A Distributed International Patient Data Registry for Hairy Cell Leukemia

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 5986-5986
Author(s):  
Leslie A. Andritsos ◽  
Michael R. Grever ◽  
Mirela Anghelina ◽  
Claire E Dearden ◽  
Monica Else ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Hairy Cell Leukemia ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Patient Data ◽  
Hairy Cell ◽  
Cell Leukemia ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Web Based ◽  
Data Registry ◽  
The Web

Abstract BACKGROUND: The study of rare diseases is limited by the uncommon nature of the conditions as well as the widely dispersed patient populations. Current rare disease registries such as the National Organization of Rare Diseases utilize centralized platforms for data collection; however because of their broad nature, these do not always capture unique, disease specific elements. Hairy Cell Leukemia (HCL) is a rare leukemia globally with approximately 900 new cases diagnosed in the US each year. The HCL Foundation undertook creation of a Patient Data Registry that collects data from multiple HCL Centers of Excellence (COE) around the globe to better understand the complications, treatment outcomes, disease subtypes, comorbid conditions, epidemiology, and quality of life of patients with HCL. METHODS: Investigators at The Ohio State University Department of Biomedical Informatics and Division of Hematology in collaboration with the HCL Foundation developed a Patient Data Registry (PDR) for the longitudinal capture of high quality research data. This system differs from other registries in that it uses a federated( rather than centralized) architecture, wherein data is queried and integrated in an on-demand manner from local registry databases at each participating site. Further, the data collected for use in the registry combines both automated exports from existing electronic health records (EHRs) as well as additional data entered via a set of web-based forms. All manually entered data comes from source documents, and data provenance spanning electronic and manually entered data is maintained via multiple technical measures. Patients may be enrolled at HCL COE, or, if they do not have access to a COE they may enroll via a web-based portal (www.hairycellleukemia.org). At this time due to regulatory requirements the web-based portal is available to US patients only. All data are de-identified (see Figure 1: De-Identification Workflow) which reduces regulatory burden and increases opportunities for data access and re-use. End users have access to data via a project-specific query portal. RESULTS: The Patient Data Registry has been deployed at The Ohio State University, Royal Marsden Hospital, and MD Anderson Cancer Center, and is undergoing deployment at the University of Rochester. Up to 25 international HCL COE may participate. In addition, US patients are actively entering the registry via the web-based portal. To date, 227 patients have been consented to the registry with 119 of these being via the web-based entry point. CONCLUSION: We created an international and web-based patient data registry which will enable researchers to study outcomes in HCL in ways not previously possible given the rarity of the disease. This work was made possible by research funding from the Hairy Cell Leukemia Foundation. Figure De-Identification Workflow Figure. De-Identification Workflow Disclosures Andritsos: Hairy Cell Leukemia Foundation: Research Funding. Anghelina:Hairy Cell Leukemia Foundation: Research Funding. Lele:Hairy Cell Leukemia Foundation: Research Funding. Burger:Pharmacyclics: Research Funding. Delgado:Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis/GSK: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Infinity: Research Funding. Jones:AbbVie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics, LLC, an AbbVie Company: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Lozanski:Beckman Coulter: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; Stemline Therapeutics Inc.: Research Funding; Boehringer Ingelheim: Research Funding. Montserrat:Morphosys: Other: Expert Testimony; Vivia Biotech: Equity Ownership; Gilead: Consultancy, Other: Expert Testimony; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy; Janssen: Honoraria, Other: travel, accommodations, expenses. Parikh:Pharmacyclics: Honoraria, Research Funding. Park:Genentech/Roche: Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy; Juno Therapeutics: Consultancy, Research Funding. Robak:Pharmacyclics, LLC, an AbbVie Company: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Tam:janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Roche: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AbbVie: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Heckler:Hairy Cell Leukemia Foundation: Research Funding. Payne:Hairy Cell Leukemia Foundation: Research Funding.

scholarly journals Efficacy and Safety of the Bruton Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Ibrutinib in Patients with Hairy Cell Leukemia: Stage 1 Results of a Phase 2 Study

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 1215-1215 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeffrey Jones ◽  
Leslie Andritsos ◽  
Robert J. Kreitman ◽  
Farhad Ravandi ◽  
Charles Schiffer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Dose Level ◽  
Clinical Benefit ◽  
Hairy Cell Leukemia ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Hairy Cell ◽  
Cell Leukemia ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Background : Effective therapy for classical hairy cell leukemia (c-HCL) refractory to purine nucleoside analog (PNA) treatment is limited, and there are no accepted treatment standards for variant hairy cell leukemia (v-HCL). Ibrutinib, an oral small molecule inhibitor of Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK), has shown single-agent efficacy and acceptable tolerability in patients with various B-cell malignancies, including chronic lymphocytic leukemia, mantle cell lymphoma, and Waldenstrom's. While BTK is expressed in HCL cells, the clinical activity of ibrutinib in this disease has not been previously assessed. We conducted a single-arm, multi-center phase 2 study (NCI #9268) of single-agent ibrutinib to characterize the overall response rate (complete + partial response) and safety of single-agent ibrutinib treatment for HCL. Methods : Patients with c-HCL (unfit for or relapsed after PNA) and v-HCL (relapsed or treatment-naïve) were eligible. Enrolled patients required treatment, had ECOG ≤ 2, no active infection, and preserved end-organ function. Patients received continuous once daily ibrutinib in 28-day cycles. Using a Simon 2-stage design, the first 13 patients were treated at 420 mg daily, and a second cohort of 13 patients was accrued at the 840 mg dose-level. Ultimately, the pre-specified number of objective responses was reached at the 420 mg dose-level, and accrual to the second stage of the design continues at that dose. Response, including bone marrow biopsy with immunohistochemistry for minimal residual disease (MRD), was assessed after 8 and 12 cycles. Patients experiencing clinical benefit may continue ibrutinib until unacceptable toxicity or progressive disease. Results: As of 15 May 2016, 28 patients had been enrolled and were evaluable for response: 420 mg/day (n=15) and 840 mg/day (n=13). Enrolled patients (1 treatment-naïve v-HCL, 10 relapsed v-HCL, 17 relapsed c-HCL) included 22 male and 6 female patients with median age 65 years (range: 43-78). Relapsed patients received median 4 prior therapies (range: 1-11); all had prior PNA, 81% had prior rituximab, and 3 c-HCL patients had prior vemurafenib. Response data are summarized by dose and histology in the table. To date, the ORR is 46% [4 CR (all c-HCL) and 9 PR (6 c-HCL)], with objective responses more commonly observed in patients with c-HCL. Eight additional patients (29%) with stable disease have experienced clinical benefit (resolution of symptoms, improvement in peripheral blood cell counts) not meeting criteria for PR, most commonly attributable to persistent thrombocytopenia, and continue on treatment. At median follow-up of 22 months, 20 patients (71%) remain on treatment, 3 patients (1 v-HCL, 2 c-HCL) have progressed, 2 patients (c-HCL) with severe neutropenia at baseline (c-HCL) had early deaths from pneumonia, 1 (c-HCL) discontinued during cycle 8 for failure to resolve baseline neutropenia, and 2 other patients (v-HCL) have discontinued for adverse events. Estimated 24-month progression-free survival (PFS) was 79% (95% CI: 57-91%) and the median PFS has not been reached. Redistribution lymphocytosis was observed in patients with circulating disease at baseline. Soluble interleukin-2 receptor (sIL2R) level was increased at baseline in all c-HCL patients for whom data were available and correlated with response. In general, toxicity did not differ by dose level or disease histology. The most frequent (>10%) grade ≥3 adverse events (AEs) were lymphopenia (21%), neutropenia (18%), lung infection (18%), thrombocytopenia (14%), hypophosphatemia (11%), and hypertension (11%). Common grade 1/2 non-hematologic toxicities included myalgia (57%), diarrhea (54%), fatigue (50%), nausea/vomiting (46%), bruising (46%), and rash (46%); grade 1/2 atrial fibrillation (no grade ≥3) was observed in 5 patients. Grade ≥3 infection was observed in 25%, but no grade ≥3 bleeding AEs were reported. Conclusions: Ibrutinib can induce remission in both c-HCL and v-HCL patients, including heavily pre-treated patients, but complete remissions have only been observed in c-HCL to date. The drug is generally well-tolerated during long-term administration, and durable clinical benefit is observed in the majority of treated patients even when objective response criteria are not met. Table 1. Table 1. Figure 1. Figure 1. Disclosures Jones: Pharmacyclics, LLC, an AbbVie Company: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; AbbVie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Lozanski:Stemline Therapeutics Inc.: Research Funding; Beckman Coulter: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; Boehringer Ingelheim: Research Funding.

Trametinib for the Treatment of IGHV4-34, MAP2K1 Mutant Variant Hairy Cell Leukemia

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 5598-5598 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leslie A. Andritsos ◽  
Mirela Anghelina ◽  
Nicole R. Grieselhuber ◽  
Sameek Roychowdhury ◽  
Julie Reeser ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Skin Rash ◽  
Hairy Cell Leukemia ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Unrelated Donor ◽  
Hairy Cell ◽  
Cell Leukemia ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Skin Nodules ◽  
Skin Biopsies

Abstract Background: Mutations of MAP2K1, which encodes MEK1, have been identified in up to half of patients with variant Hairy Cell Leukemia (vHCL).[Waterfall et al., Nat Gen 2014, Mason et al., Leukemia & Lymphoma 2016], and have been associated with vHCL with IGHV4-34 gene usage, which This form of HCL tends to have a worse prognosis than classic HCL or wild type vHCL (Arons et al., Blood 2009), with inferior responses to chemotherapy and shorter durations of remission. Trametinib, an oral inhibitor of MEK1 and MEK2, is FDA approved for treatment of patients with BRAF p.V600E mutant melanoma. We hypothesized that this MEK inhibitor would have activity in MAP2K1 mutant vHCL. Case Report: The patient is a 52 year old man with a history of CD25+, BRAF wildtype, IGHV4-34 usage vHCL diagnosed in 2005. His previous treatments included cladribine, BL22, pentostatin/rituximab, splenectomy, single agent rituximab, ibrutinib, bendamustine/rituximab, and allogeneic transplantation from a matched unrelated donor. The patient experienced disease relapse day +350 post transplant when he developed skin nodules as well as a generalized skin rash. The skin rash appeared clinically consistent with acute GVHD. However, when biopsies of both the skin nodules and skin rash were performed he was found to have relapsed vHCL. He was consented for paired tumor and germline next generation sequencing with a 25-gene amplicon panel which revealed a somatic MAP2K1 K57N mutation that has been shown to constitutively activate MEK [Marks et al., Cancer Res 2008]. As the patient had exhausted the majority of available treatment options, he was prescribed trametinib 2 mg po daily (commercial supply, according to approved melanoma dosing). Within a week of therapy initiation his skin nodules were markedly diminished in size and his generalized rash had resolved. He did develop a new acneiform rash over his face consistent with drug toxicity. This was managed with topical agents with improvement and did not require a dose reduction. Disease restaging following cycle 2 of therapy showed near complete resolution of skin nodules, with disappearance of visible skin rash. Repeat bone marrow biopsy showed unchanged hairy cell index. Skin biopsies were repeated and phospho-ERK (T202/Y204) staining of skin biopsies pre- and post-trametinib were performed (Figure 1). This showed diminished lymphocyte involvement on H&E staining with a decrease in p-ERK expression on immunostaining, indicative of decreased signaling downstream of MEK and consistent with on target trametinib effects. As of this writing, the patient has remained on trametinib for 12 weeks with no recurrence of leukemia cutis rash. Discussion: MEK inhibition with the oral MEKi trametinib is a well tolerated therapy with clinical activity in MAP2K1 mutant vHCL. Additional studies of this agent are warranted. Optimal dose and duration of therapy will need to be explored in prospective clinical trials. Figure 1 Skin biopsies pre- and post-trametinib. (A)(C) H&E staining shows diminished lymphocyte involvement. (B)(D) PhosphoERK immunostaining shows decrease of phosphoERK expression. Bar = 500 μm Figure 1. Skin biopsies pre- and post-trametinib. (A)(C) H&E staining shows diminished lymphocyte involvement. (B)(D) PhosphoERK immunostaining shows decrease of phosphoERK expression. Bar = 500 μm Disclosures Andritsos: Hairy Cell Leukemia Foundation: Research Funding. Anghelina:Hairy Cell Leukemia Foundation: Research Funding. Lozanski:Boehringer Ingelheim: Research Funding; Beckman Coulter: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; Stemline Therapeutics Inc.: Research Funding. Jones:Pharmacyclics, LLC, an AbbVie Company: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; AbbVie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding.

scholarly journals First Line Chemo-Free Therapy with the BRAF Inhibitor Vemurafenib Combined with Obinutuzumab Is Effective in Patients with Hcl

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 3998-3998
Author(s):  
Jae H. Park ◽  
Madhulika Shukla ◽  
Jose M Salcedo ◽  
Shreya Vemuri ◽  
Julie C Kinoshita ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Hairy Cell Leukemia ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Braf Inhibitor ◽  
Digital Pcr ◽  
Hairy Cell ◽  
Cell Leukemia ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Dose Reductions

Background: We have previously reported initial high response rates of the BRAF inhibitor, vemurafenib, in patients (pts) with relapsed or refractory hairy cell leukemia (HCL) (Tiacci and Park et al. NEJM 2015). However, complete response (CR) rates were low at 35-40% with detectable minimal residual disease (MRD) in most patients, and a longer follow up revealed a relapse rate of 50% (Park JH et al. Blood 2018, 132;392). Based on the recent data suggesting improved CR rate in combination with rituximab in relapsed HCL (Tiacci et al. Blood 2016, 128:1214), we initiated a phase II clinical trial to investigate the efficacy of vemurafenib and obinutuzumab in patients with newly diagnosed HCL (NCT03410875). Methods: Adult pts with previously untreated HCL who met the treatment initiation criteria (i.e. ANC <1.0k/ul, Hgb <10.0g/dL or PLT <100k/ul) are eligible for the study. Patients received vemurafenib 960mg bid from months 1-4 and obinutuzumab from months 2-4, for a total treatment duration of 4 months. Obinutuzumab was administered at 1000mg IV on days 1, 8, and 15 of month 2, and day 1 of month 3 and 4. Vemurafenib dose reductions were allowed for drug-related adverse events (AEs). Response was assessed at the end of month 4 with bone marrow (BM) biopsy and CT scans. The primary objective was to determine the efficacy of vemurafenib and obinutuzumab combination as assessed by CR rates, and the secondary objectives include assessment of safety, duration of response, MRD negativity, and BRAF allele burden by digital PCR. The study adopted a Simon's minimax 2-stage design and required ≥7 CR in the first 9 pts in the first stage to continue accrual for a total of 28 pts. We report the result of the first 9 pts in the first stage of the study. Results: A total of 11 pts have been enrolled to the study to date. The median age of the patients is 49 years old (range, 35-79). The median pretreatment ANC, Hgb and PLT is 0.7k/ul (range, 0.0-2.6), 11.5g/dL (range, 7.0-15.0), and 83k/ul (range, 21-153), respectively. Nine of 11 pts had a baseline splenomegaly. Nine pts completed all treatments to date, and 2 pts remain on active therapy. Among the 9 pts who completed the treatment, all pts achieved a response with normalization of cytopenia, including 7 pts with MRD negative CR and 2 pts with PR at the end of month four. Two pts with PR at month 4 converted to MRD+ and MRD negative CR by month 7 and 10, respectively, with no further treatment, with the best overall CR rate of 100% (9/9 pts) (Figure). All MRD negative CR had undetectable BRAFV600E by highly sensitive digital PCR. After 1 month of vemurafenib and before the first dose of obinutuzumab, 7 of 9 pts had ANC recovery to >1.0K/ul and 8 of 9 pts had Hgb >10 g/dL and PLT 100k/uL. With a median follow-up of 9.7 months (range, 4.6-15.4), all pts remain in remission with no relapse. The most common vemurafenib-related AEs were rash (73%; Gr2-9%, Gr3-64%), arthralgia (64%; Gr1-27%, Gr2-27%, Gr3-18%), alopecia (45%, all Gr1), dry skin (27%, all Gr1), and fatigue (27%, Gr1). Two pts experienced obinutuzumab infusion reaction but were able to complete all intended doses of obinutuzumab. No case of cutaneous squamous cell carcinomas has been observed. No pt discontinued the therapy due to toxicity but 8 pts had vemurafenib dose reductions due to rash (n=5) and arthralgia (n=2). Conclusion: Vemurafenib and obinutuzumab combination therapy induced a high CR rate of 100% and high rates of MRD negativity (89%) in patients with HCL in the frontline setting and appears to be a promising chemo-free targeted therapeutic approach for HCL. A majority of the pts achieved a normalization of cytopenia within 4 weeks of starting therapy. A longer follow-up is needed to assess durability of remission and degree of immunosuppression compared to cladribine-treated cohorts. Figure Disclosures Park: Kite Pharma: Consultancy; Incyte: Consultancy; GSK: Consultancy; Autolus: Consultancy; AstraZeneca: Consultancy; Allogene: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy. Winer:Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Pfizer: Consultancy. Tallman:Cellerant: Research Funding; Abbvie: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Abbvie: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; KAHR: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BioLineRx: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Nohla: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Rigel: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Oncolyze: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Orsenix: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; ADC Therapeutics: Research Funding; Biosight: Research Funding; Daiichi-Sankyo: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; UpToDate: Patents & Royalties; Tetraphase: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Delta Fly Pharma: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Cellerant: Research Funding. OffLabel Disclosure: Vemurafenib and obinutuzumab for treatment of hairy cell leukemia

Vemurafenib As First Treatment of Hairy Cell Leukemia

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 5482-5482
Author(s):  
Gregory Cheng ◽  
Gym Cheng ◽  
Natalie Pui Ha Chan ◽  
Chris Wong ◽  
Raymond S Wong
Keyword(s):  
Complete Remission ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Hairy Cell Leukemia ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Lymphoid Cells ◽  
Hairy Cell ◽  
Cell Leukemia ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Braf V600 Mutation

Abstract 44 years old lady presented with fever and pancytopenia in March 2014.CXR showed bilateral pneumonia. Hb 7.5xg/dl, plt 42x x109/l, wbc 1.2 x19neutrophils22%, lymphocytes75%.Circulating lymphocytes with hairy cytoplasmicprojections and indented nuclei were noted. Flow cytometry showed these abnormal lymphoid cells were CD19+ve, CD5-ve, CD 23-ve, FMC7+ve, CD25+ve, CD11c+ve and CD103+ve.Bone marrow biopsy revealed a hypercellular marrow with dense infiltration of lymphoid cells of the same immunophenotype. Braf V600 mutation was detected. Cladribine or pentostatin was out of stock and import of these drugs would take at least 2 months. In view of the severe pancytopenia and on -going infection, various treatment options were discussed with, the patient .Patient decided to start on vemurafenib 960mg twice daily while awaiting cladribine. After 8weeks of treatment, the peripheral blood counts were normalized. Hb 12.2g/dl, plt 153x x109/l, wbc 3.1x109/l, neutrophils 53%,lymphocytes 40%. Braf V600 mutation was no longer detected. Vemurafenib was well tolerated and the patient received treatment mainly as outpatient. Vemurafenib was discontinued after 8 weeks and the patient then received a 5-day course of cladribine. She remained in complete remission Discussion Vemurafenib had shown to be safe and effected in hairy cell leukemia patients who were refractory to or who relapsed after purine analogs.1,2 Still to be determined are the correct vemurafenib dosing strategy, the best timing , duration and scheduling of vemurafenib. Due to unusual circumstances, our patient received 8 weeks of vemurafenib as first line therapy. The patient achieved a complete remission with minimal residual disease. Follow data is needed to see how long the patient remains in remission 1. N Engl J Med 2014; 370:286-288 2. 19th Congress of the European Hematology Association (EHA): Abstract S696. Disclosures Off Label Use: Vemurafenib as first treatment of Hairy Cell Leukemia. Wong:johnson &johnson: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; GlaxoSmithKline: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Biogen-Idec: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Bayer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Pfizer, MSD, Roche, BMS, Baxter, Amgen, Alexion: Research Funding.

scholarly journals Long-Term Treatment of Hairy Cell Leukemia Patients with Interferon: Clinical and Molecular Aspects

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 37-37
Author(s):  
Giovanni Manfredi Assanto ◽  
Costantino Riemma ◽  
Francesco Malaspina ◽  
Salvatore Perrone ◽  
Maria Lucia De Luca ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Elderly Patients ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Hairy Cell Leukemia ◽  
Univariate Analysis ◽  
Hematologic Toxicity ◽  
Hairy Cell ◽  
Cell Leukemia ◽  
Front Line ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Group A

Introduction. Hairy cell leukemia (HCL) is a rare clonal B-cell chronic lymphoproliferative disorder. Current treatments for HCL include purine analogs (PA), which are used successfully as front-line therapy in young and fit patients. The therapeutic armamentarium has been recently extended by the introduction of rituximab, BRAF oral inhibitors and other novel agents. Interferon alpha (IFNα) has been the first agent capable of inducing a response in HCL patients and of changing the natural course of the disease. It has been extensively used up to the introduction of PA. Nowadays, IFNα front-line is limited to pregnant women (or desiring a pregnancy), to patients with severe neutropenia or frail, or to relapsed/refractory patients. We hereby report the experience of 74 patients treated continuously with IFNα at our Center in Rome. Methods. A retrospective analysis was performed on patients with HCL or with variant HCL treated between 1990 and 2020 with IFNα until progression or toxicity. The initial dosage was 3 MUI subcutaneously three times weekly (3d/week). In responding patients, after 12 months the dose was progressively tapered to reach a very low maintenance dose, ranging from 0.1 MUI 3d/week to 0.9 3d/week. After 12 months of treatment, the degree of response was based on peripheral blood count evaluation, bone marrow biopsy and IFNα front-line; C) patients resistant to PAs who received IFNα as second or further line of treatment. Results. After 12 months of treatment, 70 patients (95%) achieved either a PR or a CR in 52 (70%) and 18 (24%) cases, respectively. Four (5.4%) patients were considered as non-responders. After a median follow-up of 92 months (range 7-236), 55 patients (75%) still maintained their response while receiving maintenance IFNα. The estimated 5-year and 10-year PFS were 89% and 77%, respectively (Fig. 1). The median PFS for these patients has not been reached at 10 years. Patients in CR at 12 months of treatment showed a significantly superior PFS rate (p 0.001). The 10-year PFS was 94% for patients in CR compared to 73% for patients who obtained a PR during abdominal ultrasound. The mutational status of BRAF V600E by PCR analysis was assessed in a subset of patients during treatment. Three groups of patients were identified: A) patients &gt;65 years who received IFNα front-line; B) patients &lt;65 years with comorbidities or women desiring a pregnancy who received IFNα therapy. Univariate analysis showed a different PFS for groups A, B and C, the 5-year PFS being 95%, 68% and 96%, respectively (p 0.005) (Fig. 1). In group A, a CR was achieved by 28% of cases and a PR by 62%, in group B the rates were 16% and 80%, and in group C 28% and 68%, respectively. Group C received a median number of 2 prior lines of treatment; 89% received PAs. Patients with previous PA-based treatment obtained a PR in 55% of cases and a CR in 32%. No significant differences were observed in terms of PFS in the 10 patients with a variant HCL (p 0.5); 1/10 achieved a CR. The impact of Hb, WBC count, spleen size and platelet count were assessed in univariate analysis. A significant difference in the entire case series was observed in patients with a WBC &gt;3500/mmc at the start of treatment: the estimated median PFS was 236 vs 108 months (p 0.004). Twenty-two patients in response during IFNα maintenance were tested for MRD basing on BRAF status: 32% were negative during treatment (7 out of 22). All patients with negative MRD were in CR. G1-2 extra-hematologic toxicity, occurred as flu-like syndrome and fatigue, was observed in 25 patients (76% in group A), 13/25 patients discontinued IFNα for toxicity; 1 case of alopecia was reported. No patient required discontinuation due to G3-4 hematologic toxicity. Four deaths occurred, 2 due to secondary neoplasms and 2 in very elderly patients. Conclusions. IFNα still retains a role in selected HCL patients. In young patients with comorbidities front-line IFNα remains a possible option, although not as effective as PAs. In elderly patients, the continuous administration allows remarkable results with acceptable toxicity. Also in patients resistant to PAs, INFα is capable of inducing durable responses in a considerable part of patients. The data on MRD demonstrate the possibility of achieving a molecular response. Although the role of IFNα is further limited by the advent of new agents, when administered in a continuous schedule it still represents a valid therapeutic option in specific subsets of HCL patients. Figure Disclosures Martelli: sandoz: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; roche: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; gilead: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; janssen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Foà:Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Incyte: Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Speakers Bureau; Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Tiacci:Roche: Research Funding; Abbvie: Other: Travel and meeting expenses. Pulsoni:Pfizer: Consultancy; Merk: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy; Gilead: Speakers Bureau; Sandoz: Consultancy; roche: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Bristol Myers Squibb: Speakers Bureau.

scholarly journals The Treatment of Hairy Cell Leukemia with a Focus on Long Lasting Responders to Cladribine: A Thirty-Year Experience from the Institute of Hematology of Bologna

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 4005-4005
Author(s):  
Alessandro Broccoli ◽  
Carolina Terragna ◽  
Vittorio Stefoni ◽  
Cinzia Pellegrini ◽  
Beatrice Casadei ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Peripheral Blood ◽  
Hairy Cell Leukemia ◽  
Braf V600e Mutation ◽  
Braf V600e ◽  
Hairy Cell ◽  
Cell Leukemia ◽  
First Line ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Purine Analogs

The treatment of hairy cell leukemia (HCL) has deeply changed over years. Purine analogs, namely cladribine (2CdA) now represent the treatment of choice. The BRAF V600E mutation is now regarded as the pathogenic event. One hundred and eighty-four patients were followed between 1986 and 2018 and treated according to era-specific guidelines. This is the largest monocentric series reported. Responses were classified by combining Consensus Resolution criteria and marrow immunohistochemistry. Patients were grouped according to the number of treatment lines they received (table). Ten patients treated with frontline 2CdA and in complete response (CR) for at least 5 years were tested for the presence of the BRAF V600E mutation in peripheral blood by droplet digital PCR as a molecular marker for active disease. Patients treated first line responded in 86% of cases, with 44% CR. Response rates remained high throughout the first 4 lines (84%, 81%, 79% for the second line onward, with CR in 38%, 37%, 15% of cases respectively), although decreasing progressively with the number of treatments received. One hundred and twenty-two patients received 2CdA as first line treatment, with a response rate of 86% and a CR rate of 54%. Among the 66 CR patients, 45 (68%) have never received further therapy: 11 patients are in continuous CR between 5 and 10 years after treatment, 14 between 10 and 20 years and 3 patients at more than 20 years. Median time-to-next treatment (TTNT) for patients after receiving 2CdA was 8.2 years: partial responders had a significantly shorter median TTNT than CR patients (5.3 years versus median not reached at 25.8 years, p=0.0001) (figure). Seven patients in CR for more than 5 years after front line 2CdA were BRAF V6500E negative in peripheral blood. One of these displayed disease recurrence and required further treatment roughly 2 years later. Three patients were positive for the BRAF V600E mutation at 6.5, 8.4 and 13.7 years after treatment and developed an overt disease relapse between 4 months and 2 years. Patients with HCL require subsequent lines of therapy in more than 50% of cases. Purine analogs allow significant response rates when applied first line and upon retreatment. Some patients may enjoy long lasting responses after one course of 2CdA and display no evidence of BRAF V600E mutation in peripheral blood. A PCR-based evaluation of the allelic burden in peripheral blood may provide information regarding disease activity over time. Figure Disclosures Cavo: Celgene, Janssen, Amgen, BMS, Abbvie, Takeda: Honoraria; Janssen, Celgene: Other: Travel Accommodations; Janssen, Celgene: Speakers Bureau; Janssen, Celgene, Amgen, Abbvie: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Zinzani:TG Therapeutics: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Kyowa Kirin: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Immune Design: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Sandoz: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Servier: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Verastem: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; MSD: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Eusapharma: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Sanofi: Consultancy; Celltrion: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Gilead: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Janssen-Cilag: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Portola: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau.

scholarly journals Primary Plasma Cell Leukemia Outcomes Remain Dismal Despite Novel Agents and Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 266-266
Author(s):  
Sagar Patel ◽  
Saulius K. Girnius ◽  
Binod Dhakal ◽  
Lohith Gowda ◽  
Raphael Fraser ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Plasma Cell ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation ◽  
Disease Status ◽  
Cell Leukemia ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Primary Plasma Cell Leukemia ◽  
Equity Ownership

Background Primary plasma cell leukemia (pPCL) is a rare plasma cell neoplasm with a high mortality rate. There have been improvements in multiple myeloma (MM) outcomes with novel induction agents and use of hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) with maintenance, but similar progress has not been reported for pPCL. We examined the outcomes of pPCL patients receiving novel agents with autologous (autoHCT) or allogeneic (alloHCT) approaches as reported to the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR) in the modern era. Methods From 2008 to 2015, 348 pPCL pts underwent HCT (N = 277 - autoHCT and 71 - alloHCT) with 45% and 48% having research level data available, respectively. Cumulative incidences of non-relapse mortality (NRM) and relapse/progression (REL), and probability of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were calculated. Cox multivariate regression was used to model survival after autoHCT only. Median follow-up in autoHCT and alloHCT was 48 and 60 months, respectively. Results AutoHCT Cohort Median age was 60 years and 93% received HCT within 12 months of diagnosis with 76% after a single line of induction (Table 1). 35% had high risk cytogenetics. 23% received bortezomib, doxorubicin, cisplatin, cyclophosphamide, and etoposide (VDPACE). Moreover, 40% received bortezomib (BTZ) and immunomodulatory drug (IMIID)-based triplets. Disease status at HCT was VGPR or better in 47%. 27% received maintenance therapy. At 4 years post-HCT, NRM was 7% (4-11%), REL 76% (69-82%), PFS 17% (13-23%), and OS 28% (22-35%) (Figures 1A, 2A, 2B). Disease status ≥VGPR at HCT and Karnofsky Performance Score &gt;90 significantly predicted superior OS in multivariate analysis. AlloHCT Cohort Median age was 53 years and 89% received HCT within 12 months of diagnosis (Table 1). 61% received a single alloHCT, while 39% used auto-alloHCT tandem approach. 42% had high-risk cytogenetics. 61% received total body irradiation with 44% receiving myeloablative conditioning. Use of VDPACE was higher at 41% in this cohort. VGPR status at HCT was similar (48%), while maintenance was used less often (12%). Grade II-IV acute GVHD occurred in 30% and chronic GVHD in 45%. At four years post-HCT, NRM was 12% (5-21%), REL 69% (56-81%), PFS 19% (10-31%), and OS 31% (19-44%) (Figures 1A, 1B, 2A, 2B). There were no differences in outcomes based on type of HCT. A comparison of post-HCT outcomes of CIBMTR pPCL patients from 1995 to 2006 showed that PFS and OS outcomes are inferior despite lower NRM in this modern cohort (Mahindra et al. Leukemia. 2012). In addition, analysis of SEER (1995-2009) and CIBMTR databases showed that use of HCT increased from 12% (7-21%) in 1995 to 46% (34-64%) in 2009. Conclusion More newly diagnosed pPCL patients are receiving modern induction regimens translating into a higher proportion receiving HCT, but without significant further benefit post-HCT. Post-HCT relapse remains the biggest challenge and further survival in pPCL will likely need a combination of targeted and cell therapy approaches. This study provides a benchmark for future HCT studies for pPCL. Disclosures Girnius: Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Genentech: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Dhakal:Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sanofi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria. Shah:University of California, San Francisco: Employment; Indapta Therapeutics: Equity Ownership; Genentech, Seattle Genetics, Oncopeptides, Karoypharm, Surface Oncology, Precision biosciences GSK, Nektar, Amgen, Indapta Therapeutics, Sanofi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene, Janssen, Bluebird Bio, Sutro Biopharma: Research Funding; Poseida: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Nkarta: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Kite: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Teneobio: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Qazilbash:Amgen: Consultancy, Other: Advisory Board; Bioclinical: Consultancy; Autolus: Consultancy; Genzyme: Other: Speaker. Kumar:Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding. D'Souza:EDO-Mundapharma, Merck, Prothena, Sanofi, TeneoBio: Research Funding; Prothena: Consultancy; Pfizer, Imbrium, Akcea: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Hari:BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Kite: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Research Funding; Spectrum: Consultancy, Research Funding; Sanofi: Honoraria, Research Funding; Cell Vault: Equity Ownership; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria.

Analysis of Serial Patient Samples Reveals a Variety of Clonal Dynamics In Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 1923-1923
Author(s):  
Jonathan J Keats ◽  
Esteban Braggio ◽  
Scott Van Wier ◽  
Patrick Blackburn ◽  
Angela Baker ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Cell Leukemia ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Tumor Mass ◽  
Time Points ◽  
Tumor Genome ◽  
Time Point

Abstract Abstract 1923 Our understanding of the genetic abnormalities associated with the development of multiple myeloma has increased significantly in the last decade. However, very little is known about how, or if, myeloma tumor genomes change with time and if therapeutic interventions influence these events. To address these issues we studied a cohort of 29 patients for whom at least two serial samples (1-65 months, median 19 months) were available for analysis. Each serial pair was analyzed by both array-based comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) and microarray gene expression profiling (GEP) to identify DNA copy number abnormalities (CNA) at a 25kb resolution and gene expression differences present in the bulk of the tumor mass. Though this does not address the intra-clonal heterogeneity that may exist at a given time point, it does answer if the bulk of the tumor mass is changing with time. This study has unearthed several surprising and clinically relevant findings. First, myeloma tumor genomes are not as unstable as previous cytogenetic analyses suggest. In 40% of patients we observed no detectable CNA changes (1-37 months, median 12 months). In 24% of patients we observed the exclusive acquisition of new CNA (1-12, median 3.5) (3-22 months, median 18 months). In 36% of patients we observed both the loss (1-20, median 3) and gain (1-33, median 21) of CNA (5-43 months, median 20 months). Because time was not a significant influence on the detection of stable or unstable genomes we compared CNA changes with TC class and found patients with the high-risk 4p16 and maf IgH translocations were over-represented in the latter subset of patients. These observations raise the question of what happens between multiple rounds of therapy and if different regimens influence these phenotypes differently. For two patients with no CNA changes between the first two time points there was an additional sample that extended the follow-up by 52 and 12 months. Again no CNA changes were seen between diagnosis and these final samples taken 63 and 50 months later. For one patient with CNA changes (5 shared, 29 lost, and 32 gained) we have a detailed time course of 5 samples from diagnosis through to end-stage plasma cell leukemia. This patient received continuous lenalidomide-dexamethasone (Rd) for 20 months and progessed with a clone containing a BIRC2/3 deletion, which activates the NFKB pathway. The patient received single agent PR-171 and a bortezomib containing regimen and unexpectedly, the tumor genome observed in the third sample was almost identical (32 shared, 2 lost, and 4 gained CNA) to the first time point, including two copies of BIRC2/3. Subsequently, the patient received melphalan-prednisone-bortezomib (MPV) and the tumor genome observed in the fourth and fifth samples, which were identical, were similar to that seen in the second sample (24 shared, 13 lost, and 39 gained CNA). To understand these observations better we performed FISH to ascertain if the observed clones were detectable earlier, albeit at a low frequency. These experiments proved that the two dominant subclones observed at time points 1 and 3 versus 2, 4, 5 were mutually exclusive at the single cell level. Moreover, both of these clones were detectable at diagnosis with 12% of the tumor mass being the second subclone that eventually evolved into plasma cell leukemia. Interestingly, we assayed 5 of the 39 unique CNA observed in the final two samples and only one, the 17p13 deletion, was detectable earlier. This suggests the MPV regimen effectively eliminated a clone that was previously sensitive to Rd and selected for a dramatically evolved subclone that was previously sensitive to two different proteasome inhibitors. Although it is clear that the high-risk patients are enriched in the subset with the most changes, it is not clear if the specific drugs used (Melphalan vs IMID vs proteasome inhibitor) or intervention strategy (Cycled vs continuous/maintenance) and perhaps the response achieved (PR vs CR) influences these events. These observations do highlight two important clinical concepts that need to be considered in the future. First, the meaning of a partial response needs further investigation as this may reflect effective elimination of one subclone but not another. Second, because some patients are not changing or can revert back to a previous subclone we need to consider re-chanllenging patients with previously effective regimens when patients progress. Disclosures: Fonseca: Genzyme: Consultancy; Medtronic: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; AMGEN: Consultancy; Otsuka: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Intellikine: Consultancy; Cylene: Research Funding; Onyx: Research Funding; FISH probes prognostication in myeloma: Patents & Royalties. Stewart:Millennium: Consultancy; Celgene: Honoraria. Bergsagel:Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Genentech: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Millennium: Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Speakers Bureau.

Low Molecular Weight Heparin for Prevention of Placenta-Mediated Pregnancy Complications: An Individual Patient Data Meta-Analysis

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 890-890
Author(s):  
Marc Rodger ◽  
Johanna IP de Vries ◽  
Evelyne Rey ◽  
Jean-Christophe JCG Gris ◽  
Ida Martinelli ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Low Molecular Weight Heparin ◽  
Individual Patient Data ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Risk Difference ◽  
Patient Data ◽  
Low Molecular Weight ◽  
Single Center ◽  
Advisory Committees

Abstract Introduction Placenta-mediated pregnancy complications (PMPC) include pre-eclampsia, late pregnancy loss, placental abruption, and the small-for-gestational age (SGA) newborn. They are leading causes of maternal, fetal, and neonatal morbidity and mortality. Affected women are at an elevated risk of recurrence in subsequent pregnancies. We completed a pooled summary-based (i.e. study level) meta-analysis that strongly suggests that low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) reduces the risk of recurrent PMPCs. However, our study-level meta-analysis was limited by high clinical and statistical heterogeneity likely due to the inclusion of women with heterogeneous prior PMPCs and trial designs (e.g. single vs multi-center trials). To address these limitations, the trialists agreed to conduct an individual patient data meta-analysis to identify sources of heterogeneity including exploring which patients benefit from LMWH and which outcomes are prevented. Methods We conducted a systematic review to identify randomised controlled trials that were eligible to contribute individual patient data to a meta-analysis to evaluate the effectiveness of LMWH for reducing the risk of PMPC in women with prior PMPCs. The primary outcome was a composite of early-onset or severe pre-eclampsia, birth of an SGA newborn < 5th percentile, late pregnancy loss (> 20 weeks), or placental abruption leading to delivery. Individual patient data from eligible women were re-coded in a prescribed format and combined in a common dataset for analysis. All studies were assessed for risk of bias. Results Data from 1049 women in nine trials were analysed; Participants were mostly Caucasian (88%) with a mean age of 31.518 had thrombophilia. 525 women were randomised to LMWH and 524 to no LMWH. In our primary outcome analysis, LMWH did not significantly reduce the risk of recurrent PMPCs (LMWH 60/459 (13.1%) vs. no LMWH 92/449 (20.5%) p=0.1). Significant heterogeneity was noted between single center and multi-center trials. In multi-center trials, LMWH reduced HELLP (p=0.03) but none of the other secondary outcomes, whereas in single center trials LMWH reduced all of the secondary outcomes. In sub-group analysis, in multi-center trials LMWH reduced the primary outcome in women with prior abruption (p<0.01) but none of the other sub-groups, whereas in single center trials LMWH was beneficial in all the sub-groups (prior pre-eclampsia, prior severe pre-eclampsia, prior early onset pre-eclampsia, prior SGA <10th, prior SGA < 5th and prior abruption). Conclusions In this individual patient data meta-analysis, LMWH does not appear to reduce the risk of recurrent PMPC in women with prior PMPC. Promising results suggest that women with prior abruption may benefit from LMWH but this should be replicated in future multi-center trials. PROSPERO registration:CRD42013006249 Table. Primary Analysis All Studies Multi-Center Studies Single Center Studies Composite outcome Risk difference (95% CI) N=908 -0.07 (-0.16, 0.01)p = 0.10 N=524 -0.01 (-0.11, 0.09) p = 0.89 N=384 -0.17 (-0.21, -0.13) p < .0001 Secondary Outcome Analyses Severe or Early Preeclampsia Risk difference (95% CI) N=946 -0.04 (-0.10, 0.02) p = 0.20 N=562 0.01 (-0.06, 0.07) p = 0.81 N=384 -0.11 (-0.16, -0.07) p <.0001 HELLP Risk difference (95% CI) N=813 -0.02 (-0.04, -0.004) p = 0.01 N=429 -0.01 (-0.02, -0.001) p = 0.03 N=384 -0.04 (-0.07, -0.01) p = 0.02 SGA <10 Risk difference (95% CI) N=913 -0.08 (-0.14, -0.02) p = 0.01 N=529 -0.03 (-0.10, 0.03) p = 0.32 N=384 -0.14 (-0.18, -0.10) p <0.0001 Abruption leading to delivery Risk difference (95% CI) N=945 -0.01 (-0.02, 0.003) p = 0.14 N=561 -0.01 (-0.03, 0.01) p = 0.53 N=384 -0.016 (-0.027, -0.005) p = 0.005 Subgroup Analyses Prior preeclampsia Risk difference (95% CI) N=583 -0.12 (-0.19, -0.04) p = 0.002 N=288 -0.06 (-0.19, 0.06) p = 0.34 N=295 -0.17 (-0.24, -0.11) p <.0001 Prior severe or early onset Preeclampsia Risk difference (95% CI) N=487 -0.10 (-0.19, -0.02) p = 0.02 N=236 -0.04 (-0.19, 0.12) p = 0.65 N=251 -0.17 (-0.23, -0.11) p <.0001 Any prior late loss (2 >12 weeks or 1 >16 weeks) Risk difference (95% CI) N=245 0.001 (-0.11, 0.12) p = 0.98 N=0 Prior SGA < 10 Risk difference (95% CI) N=305 -0.12 (-0.25, 0.01) p = 0.08 N=203 -0.03 (-0.17, 0.10) p = 0.64 N=102 -0.29 (-0.38, -0.20) p <.0001 Prior abruption Risk difference (95% CI) N=281 -0.16 (-0.22, -0.11) p <.0001 N=95 -0.13 (-0.22, -0.04) p = 0.01 N=186 -0.18 (-0.22, -0.14) p <.0001 Disclosures Rodger: Biomerieux: Honoraria, Research Funding. Off Label Use: Low Molecular Weight Heparin to prevent pregnancy complications. de Vries:Pfizer: Research Funding. Rey:Leo Pharma: Other: Travel Grant. Gris:Sanofi: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Stago: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Leo Pharma: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; LFB: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Baxter: Research Funding; BI: Speakers Bureau; Bayer: Speakers Bureau; BMS: Speakers Bureau. Schleussner:Bayer: Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Merck: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Middeldorp:GSK/Aspen: Research Funding; Bayer: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; BI: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Daiichi-Sankyo: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Bates:Eli Lilly Canada: Other: I hold the Eli Lilly Canada/May Cohen Chair in Women's Health. Eli Lilly Canada provides unrestricted funding for partial salary support through this Chair. Eli Lilly Canada does not manufacture/distribute drugs relevant to the topic to be discussed..

scholarly journals Wide Variation in Use and Interpretation of Gene Mutation Profiling Panels Among Health Care Providers of Patients with Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS): Results of a Large Web-Based Survey

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 1825-1825 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexander B Pine ◽  
Nora B Chokr ◽  
Maximilian Stahl ◽  
David P. Steensma ◽  
Mikkael A. Sekeres ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Stratification ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Gene Mutation ◽  
Health Care Providers ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Specific Gene ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Web Based ◽  
Mutation Profiling

Abstract Background. Gene mutation profiling is increasingly employed for diagnosis, risk stratification, and clinical management in patients with MDS. However, current World Health Organization MDS classification is still based on histologic findings (with the exception of SF3B1 for MDS-RS), and guidelines generally suggest that clinical decisions be guided by clinico-pathologic risk stratification tools such as Revised International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS-R). We sought to study beliefs and patterns of practice with respect to gene mutation profiling among health care providers who manage patients with MDS. Methods. A link to a 23-question web-based survey was emailed to members of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG)-ACRIN Cancer Research Group, Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology (Alliance), and the Southwest Oncology Group (SWOG), and the Cancer Trials Support Unit (CTSU) on 5/1/2018 with 6 subsequent weekly reminders. The Qualtrics survey platform was used to record anonymous responses. We used descriptive statistics to analyze the data. No incentive was provided for responses. Results. Of 371 received responses, 262 were received from providers who did not manage MDS patients or lacked analyzable data and therefore were excluded. Of 109 eligible responses, 108 responders were from institutions representing 31 US states (one respondent was from South America). Median age of respondents was 48 years (range, 33-75); 43 (39%) were women. A third of responders (32%) worked at a university hospital, while 25%, 17%, and 5% worked at a community hospital, private practice, or other settings, respectively. While 37% of participants worked at institutions with guidelines for clinical care of MDS patients, 28% reported that their institutional guidelines recommended MDS-specific gene mutation profiling. Such testing was performed at institutions of 13% participants; institutions of 26% of responders tested a general AML panel that included MDS-specific genes. The total number of respondents whose institutions sent out either an MDS-specific gene panel or a general AML gene panel with MDS-specific genes was similar, 25% and 12%, respectively (Fig. 1). Of those who routinely perform molecular testing, 94% do so at diagnosis, 56% at relapse, 33% during preparation for stem cell transplant, 31% after the failure of hypomethylating agents (HMA), 24% during screening for a clinical trial, and 15% at initial treatment (Fig. 2). MDS gene mutation profiling was felt to be most helpful in diagnosis (rarely 11%; sometimes 49%; often 30%; always 9%), risk stratification (sometimes 31%; often 51%; always 15%), and prognosis (sometimes 31%; often 51%; always 14%); its role was more limited in response assessment (never 12%; rarely 25%; sometimes 44%; often 14%) and to predict responses to HMAs (never 5%; rarely 28%; sometimes 52%, often 14%) (Fig. 3). Various types of evidence were used to stratify MDS risk and prognosis: genetic mutations were used by nearly everyone (95%); 70% relied on morphologic findings, while gene expression/transcriptome profiling was used by 40%. Eighty-four percent of responders reported relying on conventional prognostic models like IPSS-R to identify high-risk patients for whom they would consider intensive treatment options. For this purpose, 62% would also rely on mutation profiling, and 32% would also consider higher frequency of gene mutations. While mutations in the p53 pathway were felt to be helpful in terms of risk stratification and treatment decisions by 70% of responders, 43%, 39%, 31%, 26% 23%, 20%, and 3% considered mutations in spliceosome, DNA methylation, transcription factors, histone modification, signaling, RAS pathway, and cohesin genes, respectively, to be useful as well. Approximately 31% of responders were not certain as to which mutations would affect risk stratification and management choices and said they needed to review literature. The respondents also cited multiple limitations to wider clinical use of MDS gene mutation profiling (Fig. 4). Conclusions. Our survey demonstrates widespread use of gene mutation profiling in the management of patients with MDS, but also reveals substantial variability in beliefs, practices, testing logistics, and interpretation of molecular profiling. Our findings emphasize the need for high-quality data to develop consensus evidence-based guidelines for gene profiling of MDS patients. Disclosures Sekeres: Opsona: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Opsona: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Bejar:AbbVie/Genentech: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Foundation Medicine: Consultancy; Astex/Otsuka: Consultancy, Honoraria; Modus Outcomes: Consultancy; Takeda: Research Funding; Genoptix: Consultancy. Gore:Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding. Zeidan:Ariad: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Gilead: Consultancy; Incyte: Employment; Celgene: Consultancy; Abbvie: Consultancy; Agios: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document