scholarly journals Long-Term Outcomes of Subjects with Epstein-Barr Virus-Driven Post-Transplant Lymphoproliferative Disorder (EBV+PTLD) Following Solid Organ (SOT) or Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplants (HCT) Treated with Tabelecleucel on an Expanded Access Program

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 4071-4071 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susan Prockop ◽  
Ran Reshef ◽  
Donald E. Tsai ◽  
Nancy Bunin ◽  
Rolla Abu-Arja ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Cell ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Ventilatory Support ◽  
Solid Organ ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Cell Transplants ◽  
Equity Ownership ◽  
Epstein Barr

Background: Patients (pts) undergoing solid organ (SOT) or allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplants (HCT) are at risk for developing Epstein-Barr (EBV) virus-driven post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD). Pts with EBV+PTLD not responding to rituximab ± chemotherapy after SOT or HCT have poor outcomes. Many SOT and HCT recipients are also not good candidates for aggressive chemotherapy regimens. There is an unmet need for effective and well tolerated therapies in this patient population. Tabelecleucel (tab-cel®) is an investigational, off-the-shelf, allogeneic, EBV-specific, T-cell immunotherapy generated from healthy donors, which functions through native, endogenous T-cell receptors (TCRs) and HLA restrictions. Tabelecleucel is selected for an individual patient from an existing library, based on HLA restriction and matching. Here, we report long-term study results from US centers using tabelecleucel for subjects with EBV+PTLD following HCT or SOT. Methods: Subjects with EBV+PTLD after HCT (n=14) or SOT (n=12) were treated with tabelecleucel on Atara's expanded access program (EAP; ATA129-EBV-201, NCT02822495, ongoing). Subjects received tabelecleucel matched by ≥ 2/10 HLA alleles, including ≥1 HLA allele through which tabelecleucel exerts cytotoxicity (HLA restriction). Key inclusion criteria were: presence of biopsy-proven EBV+PTLD, adequate organ function (ANC ≥ 500/µL +/- cytokine support; platelets ≥ 20,000/µL +/- transfusion support if no ≥ grade 2 bleed in prior 6 months; ALT, AST, T. Bili < 3X ULN; Creatinine < 3X ULN) and performance status (ECOG ≤ 4 or Lansky ≥ 20), and lack of approved alternative therapies. Non-PTLD-related vasopressor or ventilatory support, pregnancy, concomitant need for T-cell inhibiting medications were exclusionary. Tabelecleucel was given at 1.6-2 x 106 cells/kg/dose on days 1, 8, and 15 of every 5-week cycle with imaging-based response assessment at ~d28 of each cycle. Subjects were treated to maximal response with up to 4 tabelecleucel products (cell lines) with different HLA restrictions, occurrence of an adverse event leading to tabelecleucel discontinuation, or withdrawal of consent. The results presented herein reflect a data snapshot from 3th June 2019. Results: All subjects had received prior rituximab and 7/12 SOT subjects received prior chemotherapy. Intermediate/high risk PTLD-prognostic index (PTLD-IPI; Choquet et al, Ann Hematol 2007) was noted in 79% and 42% of HCT and SOT subjects, respectively. The results are presented in table 1. While the median follow-up time in HCT subjects is short, 3 subjects were followed for over 12 months including 2 who were followed for more than 24 months. In subjects responding to tabelecleucel, 1-year OS was 85.7% in HCT and 100% in SOT, and no deaths were attributable to PTLD progression. In a subset of study subjects (HCT: n=11; SOT: n=11) with adequate ECOG, no CNS disease, and no PTLD-related ventilatory support, who would have likely been eligible for Atara's ongoing phase-3 trials, the ORR was 55% (HCT) and 82% (SOT), with a 2-yr OS of 79% (HCT) and 81% (SOT). The safety profile of tabelecleucel was consistent with previously published data. At the data snapshot for this abstract, no tabelecleucel-related adverse events led to treatment discontinuation or death. In addition, no cytokine release syndrome, organ rejection or tumor flare adverse events were reported in the PTLD subjects treated with tabelecleucel on this EAP. Conclusions: The data demonstrate a high response rate for tabelecleucel in PTLD in both HCT and SOT after initial treatment failure. Longer term follow-up shows a favorable 2-year OS in this predominantly high-risk population for whom there are no approved alternative therapies. Similar outcomes were observed in the subset of subjects potentially eligible for ongoing phase 3 studies of tabelecleucel in relapsed/refractory EBV+PTLD following SOT (NCT03394365) or HCT (NCT03392142). Tabelecleucel appears to be an effective and well-tolerated option in the subset of subjects with EBV+PTLD treated on this EAP. Disclosures Prockop: Atara Biotherapeutics: Other: Support for industry sponsored trails ; Mesoblast: Other: Support for industry sponsored trails . Reshef:Atara: Consultancy, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy; Shire: Research Funding; Incyte: Consultancy, Research Funding; Magenta: Consultancy; Kite, a Gilead Company: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding. Tsai:Eli Lilly and Company: Employment. Bunin:PRA Health Sciences: Other: Immediate family member employed. Mahadeo:PI for ATARA EBV CTL Trials: Other: Other ; Recipient of unrestricted medical education grant from Jazz: Research Funding. Van Besien:Miltenyi Biotec: Research Funding. Dwivedy Nasta:Debiopharm: Research Funding; Millenium/takeda: Research Funding; Merck: Consultancy, Other: data safety monitorin; 47 (Forty Seven): Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding; Rafael: Research Funding; Aileron: Research Funding; ATARA: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria. Hiremath:Atara Biotherapeutics: Employment, Equity Ownership. Yue:Atara Biotherapeutics: Employment, Equity Ownership. Sun:Atara Biotherapeutics: Employment, Equity Ownership. Navarro:GE: Equity Ownership; Pfizer: Equity Ownership; Atara Biotherapeutics: Employment, Equity Ownership, Patents & Royalties; Bluebird Bio: Equity Ownership.

scholarly journals Mature Follow up from a Phase 2 Study of PI3K-Delta Inhibitor Idelalisib in Patients with Double (Rituximab and Alkylating agent)-Refractory Indolent B-Cell Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma (iNHL)

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 1708-1708 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ajay K. Gopal ◽  
Brad S. Kahl ◽  
Sven de Vos ◽  
Nina D. Wagner-Johnston ◽  
Stephen J. Schuster ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
B Cell ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Non Hodgkin Lymphoma ◽  
Duration Of Response ◽  
Equity Ownership ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Systemic Therapies

Abstract Introduction: Rituximab-alkylator combinations are the standard therapies for patients (pts) with iNHL, however, refractory disease nearly uniformly develops. Once iNHL becomes “double-refractory” to both rituximab + alkylating agents, there are limited options to induce durable remissions. PI3K-delta signaling is critical for activation, proliferation and survival of B cells, and is hyperactive in many B-cell malignancies. Idelalisib, a selective oral inhibitor of PI3Kd, demonstrated considerable clinical activity in double-refractory iNHL (Gopal NEJM 2014). FDA granted accelerated approval for Idelalisib (Zydelig®) in patients who have received at least two prior systemic therapies with relapsed FL or SLL. Based on these encouraging initial results, we now describe long-term follow up, safety, and remission durations of this double-refractory iNHL population treated with idelalisib. Methods: Eligible iNHL pts included those with measurable disease refractory to both rituximab and an alkylating agent. Refractory was defined as lack of response to, or progression of lymphoma within 6 months of completion of index therapy, confirmed by imaging. Idelalisib 150 mg PO BID was administered continuously until disease progression or intolerance. Responses were evaluated by an independent review committee, using standard criteria (Cheson, 2007, and Owen 2013). The new data cutoff date for this analysis was June 2014, 20 months after the last patient enrolled. Results: Enrolled pts (N = 125) had a median age of 64 years and included follicular lymphoma (FL) n=72 (58%), small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL) n=28 (22%), marginal zone lymphoma (MZL) n=15 (12%) and lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma (LPL)/Waldenstrom's macroglobulinemia (WM) n=10 (8%). The median number of prior therapies was 4 [range 2-12], including bendamustine/rituximab (BR) (n=60) and rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisone (R-CHOP) (n=56) and autologous transplant (n=14). 81 pts (65%) had prior bendamustine, of which 61/81 (75%) were refractory. 112 pts (90%) were refractory to their last regimen, and 99 pts (79%) were refractory to ≥2 regimens. 38 pts (30%) had elevated LDH, and 33 pts (26%) had bulky disease >7 cm. The median time to progression from last prior therapy was 3.9 months. With a median exposure of 11.1 months (range 0.7 to 35.4), the overall response rate (ORR) is 56% (95% CI = 46.8-64.9) with 70 responders, comprising 12 CRs (9.6%), 58 PRs (46.4%). The median time to response was 1.9 months (time of first evaluation) and time to CR was 4.5 months. There were 43 pts with stable disease (SD) (34.4%). 90% of pts experienced some decrease in tumor burden. ORR for iNHL subtypes is: FL (54%), SLL (61%), MZL (47%), and LPL/WM (70%). CR rate for iNHL subtypes is: FL (14%), SLL (4%), MZL (7%), and LPL/WM (0%). Among responders, median DOR is 13.9 (0.03-31.3) months. DOR for iNHL subtypes in months (Figure 1) is: FL 11.8, SLL 13.9, MZL 18.4, and LPL/WM (not yet reached). Median PFS for all pts is 11.0 months, in comparison to a median PFS of the last prior regimen of 3.9 months (p<.0001). The median PFS for individual subtypes in months was: FL 11.0, SLL11.1, MZL 6.6, and LPL/WM 22.2. The median overall survival of all patients was 30.8 months. The adverse events include (total%/≥ grade 3%) diarrhea/colitis (50/18), fatigue (30/2), nausea (31/2), cough (32/0), pyrexia (30/2), dyspnea (18/5), rash (14/2), pneumonia (14/11), and pneumonitis (4/3). Based on central laboratory measurements, Grade ≥3 ALT/AST elevations occurred in 18 pts (14%). Drug was temporarily held in these pts, and 11/15 pts (73%) were re-treated without recurrence of ALT/AST elevation. Overall, 30 pts (24%) have discontinued therapy due to adverse events. Conclusions: The prolonged administration of idelalisib was well tolerated, had an acceptable safety profile, and was highly effective in inducing and maintaining remissions in double-refractory iNHL population with an ORR of 56%, PFS of 11 months, and DOR of 13.9 months. The response rate and long term duration of responses in the small number of subjects with LPL/WM is very promising, and will be evaluated in larger trials of this disease. The observed disease control compared to prior regimens suggests the potential for prolonged clinical benefit in this challenging patient population with unmet medical need. Figure 1: Duration of Response by Disease Group. Figure 1:. Duration of Response by Disease Group. Disclosures Gopal: Gilead Sciences: Research Funding. Off Label Use: Zydelig is a kinase inhibitor indicated for the treatment of patients with: 1) Relapsed chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), in combination with rituximab, in patients for whom rituximab alone would be considered appropriate therapy due to other co-morbidities; 2) Relapsed follicular B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (FL) in patients who have received at least two prior systemic therapies; and 3) Relapsed small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL) in patients who have received at least two prior systemic therapies.. Kahl:Gilead Sciences: Research Funding. de Vos:Gilead Sciences: Research Funding. Wagner-Johnston:Gilead Sciences: Research Funding. Schuster:Gilead Sciences: Research Funding. Jurczak:Gilead Sciences: Research Funding. Flinn:Gilead Sciences: Research Funding. Flowers:Gilead Sciences: Research Funding. Martin:Gilead Sciences: Research Funding. Viardot:Gilead Sciences: Research Funding. Blum:Gilead Sciences: Research Funding. Goy:Gilead Sciences: Research Funding. Davies:Gilead Sciences: Research Funding. Zinzani:Gilead Sciences: Research Funding. Dreyling:Gilead Sciences: Research Funding. Holes:Gilead Sciences: Employment, Equity Ownership. Sorensen:Gilead Sciences: Employment, Equity Ownership. Godfrey:Gilead Sciences: Employment, Equity Ownership. Salles:Gilead Sciences: Research Funding.

scholarly journals Prognostic Molecular Stratification in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma - Results of the Pomalidomide Mukseven (NCT02406222) Biomarker Trial

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 4327-4327
Author(s):  
James Croft ◽  
Andrew Hall ◽  
Amy L Sherborne ◽  
Katrina Walker ◽  
Sidra Ellis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Flow Cytometry ◽  
T Cell ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Real World ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Unmet Need ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Equity Ownership

Background Treatment of relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) remains challenging as durable remissions are achieved in patient sub-groups only. Identifying patients that are likely to benefit prior to or early after starting relapse treatments remains an unmet need. MUKseven is a trial specifically designed to investigate and validate biomarkers for treatment optimization in a 'real-world' RRMM population. Design In the randomized multi-center phase 2 MUKseven trial, RRMM patients (≥2 prior lines of therapy, exposed to proteasome inhibitor and lenalidomide) were randomized 1:1 to cyclophosphamide (500 mg po d1, 8, 15), pomalidomide (4 mg days 1-21) and dexamethasone (40 mg; if ≥75 years 20 mg; d1, 8, 15, 21) (CPomD) or PomD and treated until progression. All patients were asked to undergo bone marrow (BM) and peripheral blood (PB) bio-sampling at baseline, cycle 1 day 14 (C1D14, on-treatment) and relapse. For biomarker discovery and validation, IGH translocations were profiled by qRT-PCR, copy number aberrations by digital MLPA (probemix D006; MRC Holland), GEP by U133plus2.0 array (Affymetrix), PD protein markers by IHC and PB T-cell subsets by flow cytometry for all patients with sufficient material. Primary endpoint was PFS, secondary endpoints included response, OS, safety/toxicity and biomarker validation. Original planned sample size was 250 patients but due to a change in UK standard of care during recruitment with pomalidomide becoming available, a decision was made to stop recruitment early. Results In total, 102 RRMM patients were randomized 1:1 between March 2016 and February 2018. Trial entry criteria were designed to include a real-world RRMM population, permitting transfusions and growth factor support. Median age at randomization was 69 years (range 42-88), 28% of patients had received ≥5 prior lines of therapy (median: 3). Median follow-up for this analysis was 13.4 months (95% CI: 12.0-17.5). 16 patients remained on trial at time of analysis (median number of cycles: 19.5; range 8-28). More patients achieved ≥PR with CPomD compared to PomD: 70.6% (95% CI: 56.2-82.5%) vs. 47.1% (CI: 32.9-61.5%) (P=0.006). Median PFS was 6.9 months (CI: 5.7-10.4) for CPomD vs. 4.6 months (CI: 3.5-7.4) for PomD, which was not significantly different as per pre-defined criteria. Follow-up for OS is ongoing and will be presented at the conference. High-risk genetic aberrations were found at following frequencies: t(4;14): 6%, t(14;16)/t(14;20): 2%, gain(1q): 45%, del(17p): 13%. Non-high risk lesions were present as follows: t(11;14): 22%, hyperdiploidy: 44%. Complete information on all high-risk genetic markers was available for 71/102 patients, of whom 12.7% had double-hit high-risk (≥2 adverse lesions), 46.5% single-hit high-risk (1 adverse lesion) and 40.8% no risk markers, as per our recent meta-analysis in NDMM (Shah V, et al., Leukemia 2018). Median PFS was significantly shorter for double-hit: 3.4 months (CI: 1.0-4.9) vs. single-hit: 5.8 months (CI: 3.7-9.0) or no hit: 14.1 months (CI: 6.9-17.3) (P=0.005) (Figure 1A). GEP was available for 48 patients and the EMC92 high-risk signature, present in 19% of tumors, was associated with significantly shorter PFS: 3.4 months (CI: 2.0-5.7) vs. 7.4 (CI: 3.9-15.1) for EMC92 standard risk (P=0.037). Pharmacodynamic (PD) profiling of cereblon and CRL4CRBN ubiquitination targets (including Aiolos, ZFP91) in BM clots collected at baseline and C1D14 is currently ongoing. Preliminary results for the first 10 patients demonstrate differential change of nuclear Aiolos (Figure 1C), with a major decrease in Aiolos H-scores in 7/10 patients from baseline to C1D14 and reconstitution at relapse. T-cell PB sub-sets were profiled at baseline and C1D14 by flow cytometry. Specific sub-sets increased with therapy from baseline to C1D14, e.g. activated (HLA-DR+) CD4+ T-cells, as reported at last ASH. CD4+ T-cell % at baseline was associated with shorter PFS in these analyses in a multi-variable Cox regression model (P=0.005). PD and T-cell biomarker results will be updated and integrated with molecular tumor characteristics and outcome. Discussion Our results demonstrate that molecular markers validated for NDMM predict treatment outcomes in RRMM, opening the potential for stratified delivery of novel treatment approaches for patients with a particularly high unmet need. Additional immunologic and PD biomarkers are currently being explored. Disclosures Croft: Celgene: Other: Travel expenses. Hall:Celgene, Amgen, Janssen, Karyopharm: Other: Research funding to Institution. Walker:Janssen, Celgene: Other: Research funding to Institution. Pawlyn:Amgen, Janssen, Celgene, Takeda: Other: Travel expenses; Amgen, Celgene, Janssen, Oncopeptides: Honoraria; Amgen, Celgene, Takeda: Consultancy. Flanagan:Amgen, Celgene, Janssen, Karyopharm: Other: Research funding to Institution. Garg:Janssen, Takeda, Novartis: Other: Travel expenses; Novartis, Janssen: Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria. Couto:Celgene Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership, Patents & Royalties. Wang:Celgene Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Boyd:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria. Pierceall:Celgene: Employment. Thakurta:Celgene: Employment, Equity Ownership. Cook:Celgene, Janssen-Cilag, Takeda: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen, Takeda, Sanofi, Karyopharm, Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squib, GlycoMimetics, Seattle Genetics, Sanofi: Honoraria. Brown:Amgen, Celgene, Janssen, Karyopharm: Other: Research funding to Institution. Kaiser:Takeda, Janssen, Celgene, Amgen: Honoraria, Other: Travel Expenses; Celgene, Janssen: Research Funding; Abbvie, Celgene, Takeda, Janssen, Amgen, Abbvie, Karyopharm: Consultancy.

scholarly journals Ponatinib Efficacy and Safety in Patients with the T315I Mutation: Long-Term Follow-up of Phase 1 and Phase 2 (PACE) Trials

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 4552-4552 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael J. Mauro ◽  
Jorge E. Cortes ◽  
Andreas Hochhaus ◽  
Michele Baccarani ◽  
Timothy P. Hughes ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Research Funding ◽  
Progressive Disease ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Long Term Follow Up ◽  
T315i Mutation ◽  
Equity Ownership

Abstract Background: Resistance to tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in patients (pts) with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) and Philadelphia chromosome-positive (Ph+) acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is frequently caused by mutations in the BCR-ABL kinase domain. Ponatinib is the only approved oral TKI that inhibits the T315I mutant, which is uniformly resistant to other TKIs. Here we report long-term follow-up of the efficacy and safety of ponatinib in pts with the T315I mutation at baseline from the Phase 1 (Ph1) and PACE trials. Methods: The Ph1 trial (NCT01207440) evaluated safety and anti-leukemic activity of ponatinib (2-60 mg qd) in pts with CML or Ph+ ALL (N=81); the PACE trial (NCT00660920) evaluated efficacy and safety of ponatinib (45 mg qd) in CML and Ph+ ALL pts (N=449) resistant/intolerant to dasatinib or nilotinib or with the T315I mutation. Data reported are for pts with the T315I mutation at baseline, detected by Sanger sequencing at a central lab. Results: The Ph1 and PACE trials included 19 (29%) and 128 (29%) pts with the T315I mutation, respectively. Median age and median time since diagnosis were 47 and 2.7 years for Ph1, and 53 and 3.6 years for PACE.Pts were heavily pretreated: 89% in Ph1 and 84% in PACE had received ≥2 prior TKIs. As of Jan 6, 2014, median follow-up was 42 (1-59) months in Ph1, and 20 (0.1-40) months in PACE; 58% Ph1 (92% CP-CML) and 33% PACE (52% CP-CML) pts remained on study. Most-common reasons for discontinuation: administrative decision (16%) and progressive disease (16%) for Ph1, and progressive disease (31%) and adverse events (AEs; 13%) for PACE. Of the pooled chronic phase (CP)-CML pts, 75%, 72%, and 61% achieved MCyR, CCyR, and MMR, respectively, with deeper responses (MR4, MR4.5) observed in over a third of the pts (Table). MaHR was achieved in 58%, 27% and 38% of pooled AP-CML, BP-CML and Ph+ ALL pts, respectively. For Ph 1 CP-CML pts, 3-year CCyR duration estimates were 80%. For PACE CP-CML pts, 2-year MCyR/CCyR duration, PFS and OS estimates were 93%/79%, 72% and 82%, respectively. Only 1 CP-CML pt in PACE lost MCyR and 1 transformed to AP-CML. For AP-CML, BP-CML, and Ph+ ALL, estimated OS/PFS at 2 years was 69%/54%, 14%/10%, and 10%/N/A, respectively. The most frequent treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) observed in Ph1 CP-CML pts were dry skin (83%), rash (83%), arthralgia (75%), fatigue (75%), headache (67%), abdominal pain (58%), hypertension (58%), hypertriglyceridemia (58%), myalgia (58%), and nausea (58%). None of the 19 serious TEAEs that occurred in Ph1 CP-CML pts occurred in >1 pt. The most common (≥25%) TEAEs in PACE CP-CML pts were rash (48%), dry skin (42%), headache (41%), abdominal pain (39%), nausea (36%), constipation (33%), fatigue (33%), thrombocytopenia (28%), myalgia (28%), hypertension (27%), arthralgia (25%), and upper respiratory tract infection (25%). Most common (≥5 %) serious TEAEs in PACE CP-CML pts were acute myocardial infarction (8%), pancreatitis (8%), atrial fibrillation (6%), coronary artery disease (6%), congestive cardiac failure (5%), pneumonia (5%), cerebral infarction (5%), pyrexia (5%), increased lipase (5%), and dyspnea (5%). Arterial thrombotic events occurred in 1 (8%) Ph1, and 20 (31%) PACE pts. Venous thromboembolic events occurred in 1 (8%) Ph1, and 3 (5%) PACE pts. Despite the higher median dose intensity for T315I CP-CML pts (38 vs 30.8 mg/day overall CP-CML) in PACE, the safety profiles were similar. For CP-CML pts in PACE, responses achieved by 12 months were generally maintained after dose reduction primarily to manage AEs: 100% maintained MCyR; 100% maintained CCyR, and 79% maintained MMR. Conclusions: In Ph+ leukemia pts with the T315I mutation, where effective treatment options are limited, ponatinib continued to exhibit deep and durable responses with up to 6 years follow-up. Dose reductions to manage AEs did not impact maintenance of cytogenetic responses. The response rates and safety profile of T315I pts were comparable to, if not better than, those observed in the overall population of refractory CML and Ph+ ALL pts in ponatinib clinical trials. Table. Responses at Any Time in Ponatinib Treated Pts with T315I Mutation Phase 1 PACE Phase 1 and PACE Pooled n (%) n (%) n (%) CP-CML N=12 N=64 N=76 MCyR 11 (92) 46 (72) 57 (75) CCyR 10 (83) 45 (70) 55 (72) MMR 9 (75) 37 (58) 46 (61) MR4 7 (58) 25 (39) 32 (42) MR4.5 4 (33) 21 (33) 25 (33) AP-CML N=1 N=18 N=19 MaHR 0 11 (61) 11 (58) BP-CML N=2 N=24 N=26 MaHR 0 7 (29) 7 (27) Ph+ ALL N=4 N=22 N=26 MaHR 2 (50) 8 (36) 10 (38) Disclosures Mauro: ARIAD Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Consultancy. Cortes:ARIAD, BMS, Novartis, Pfizer, Teva: Consultancy, Research Funding. Hochhaus:ARIAD Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding. Baccarani:ARIAD, Novartis, BMS: Consultancy; ARIAD, Novartis, BMS, Pfizer, Teva: Honoraria; ARIAD, Novartis, BMS, Pfizer, Teva: Speakers Bureau. Hughes:Novartis, BMS, ARIAD: Honoraria, Research Funding. Guilhot:ARIAD Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Honoraria. Deininger:BMS, Novartis, Celgene, Genzyme, Gilead: Research Funding; BMS, ARIAD, Novartis, Incyte, Pfizer: Advisory Board, Advisory Board Other; BMS, ARIAD, Novartis, Incyte, Pfizer: Consultancy. Kantarjian:ARIAD Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Pfizer, Amgen: Research Funding. Shah:ARIAD Pharmaceuticals, Inc., BMS: Research Funding. Flinn:ARIAD Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding. Lustgarten:ARIAD Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Rivera:ARIAD Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Haluska:ARIAD Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Clackson:ARIAD Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Talpaz:ARIAD Pharmaceuticals, Inc., BMS, Sanofi, Incyte, Pfizer: Research Funding.

T Cells Engineered With a Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR) Targeting CD19 (CTL019) Produce Significant In Vivo Proliferation, Complete Responses and Long-Term Persistence Without Gvhd In Children and Adults With Relapsed, Refractory ALL

Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 67-67 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephan A Grupp ◽  
Noelle V. Frey ◽  
Richard Aplenc ◽  
David M Barrett ◽  
Anne Chew ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gene Therapy ◽  
T Cells ◽  
T Cell ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Equity Ownership ◽  
Cell And Gene Therapy ◽  
Active Disease

Abstract Background CARs combine a single chain variable fragment (scFv) of an antibody with intracellular signaling domains into a single chimeric protein. We previously reported on CTL019 cells expressing a CAR with intracellular activation plus costimulatory domains. Infusion of these cells results in 100 to 100,000x in vivo proliferation, durable anti-tumor activity, and prolonged persistence in pts with B cell tumors, including 1 sustained CR in a patient with ALL (Grupp, et al. NEJM 2013). We now report on outcomes and longer follow up from our pilot studies treating 20 pts (16 children and 4 adults) with relapsed, refractory ALL. Methods T cells were lentivirally transduced with a CAR composed of anti-CD19 scFv/4-1BB/CD3ζ, activated/expanded ex-vivo with anti-CD3/anti-CD28 beads, and then infused into pts with relapsed or refractory CD19+ ALL. 17/20 pts received lymphodepleting chemotherapy the week prior to CTL019 infusion. The targeted T cell dose range was 107 to 108 cells/kg with a transduction efficiency (TE) of 11-45%. On the adult protocol, the target dose was 5 x 109 total cells split over 3 days with a TE of 6-31%. 11 pts had relapsed ALL after a prior allogeneic SCT. T cells were collected from the pt, regardless of prior SCT status, and not from allo donors. All pts s/p allo SCT had to be 6 mos s/p SCT with no GVHD or GVHD treatment. Results 16 children median age 9.5 y (5-22y) and 4 adults median age 50y (26-60y) with CD19+ ALL were treated. One child had T cell ALL aberrantly expressing CD19. 14/16 pediatric pts had active disease or +MRD after chemotherapy on the day prior to CTL019 cell infusion, while 2 were MRD(-). 3 of 4 adults had active disease prior to lymphodepleting chemotherapy, while 1 was in morphologic CR. Lymphodepleting chemotherapy varied with most receiving a Cytoxan-containing regimen the week prior to CTL019. A median of 3.7x106 CTL019 cells/kg (0.7-18x106/kg) were infused over 1-3 days. There were no infusional toxicities >grade 2, although 5 pts developed fevers within 24 hrs of infusion and did not receive planned subsequent infusions of CTL019 cells. 14 patients (82%) achieved a CR, including the patient with CD19+ T ALL, 3 did not respond, and 3 are pending evaluation. 11/17 evaluable pts have ongoing BM CR with median follow up 2.6 mo (1.2-15 mo). Three patients with a CR at 1 month have subsequently relapsed, 1 with CD19(-) disease. Median follow-up as of August 1, 2013 was 2.6 mo (1-15 mo) for all pts. All responding pts developed some degree of delayed cytokine release syndrome (CRS), concurrent with peak T cell expansion, manifested by fever, with variable degrees of myalgias, nausea, anorexia. Some experienced transient hypotension and hypoxia. Detailed cytokine analysis showed marked increases from baseline values of IL6 and IFNγ (both up to 1000x), and IL2R, with mild or no significant elevation in systemic levels of TNFα or IL2. Treatment for CRS was required for hemodynamic or respiratory instability in 7/20 patients and was rapidly reversed in all cases with the IL6-receptor antagonist tocilizumab (7 pts), together with corticosteroids in 4 pts. Although T cells collected from the 11 pts who had relapsed after allo SCT were generally 100% of donor origin, no GVHD has been seen. Persistence of CTL019 cells detected by flow cytometry and/or QPCR in pts with ongoing responses continued for 1-15 months after infusion, resulting in complete B cell aplasia during the period of CTL019 persistence. Pts have been treated with IVIg without any unusual infectious complications. One child who entered a CR subsequently developed MDS with a new trisomy 8 in ALL remission and has gone to SCT, and 1 child developed a single leukemia cutis lesion at 6 mo, still BM MRD(-). Conclusions CTL019 cells are T cells genetically engineered to express an anti-CD19 scFv coupled to CD3ζ signaling and 4-1BB costimulatory domains. These cells can undergo robust in-vivo expansion and can persist for 15 mo or longer in pts with relapsed ALL. CTL019 therapy is associated with a significant CRS that responds rapidly to IL-6-targeted anti-cytokine treatment. This approach has promise as a salvage therapy for patients who relapse after allo-SCT, and collection of tolerized cells from the recipient appears to have a low risk of GVHD. CTL019 cells can induce potent and durable responses for patients with relapsed/refractory ALL. Multicenter trials are being developed to test this therapy for ALL in the phase 2 setting. Disclosures: Grupp: Novartis: Research Funding. Chew:Novartis: Patents & Royalties. Levine:Novartis: cell and gene therapy IP, cell and gene therapy IP Patents & Royalties. Litchman:Novartis Phamaceuticals: Employment, Equity Ownership. Rheingold:Novartis: Research Funding. Shen:Novartis Pharmaceuticals: Employment, Equity Ownership. Wood:Novartis Pharmaceuticals: Employment, Equity Ownership. June:Novartis: Patents & Royalties, Research Funding.

scholarly journals Four-Year Survival and Durability Results of Brentuximab Vedotin in Combination with CHP in the Frontline Treatment of Patients with CD30-Expressing Peripheral T-Cell Lymphomas

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 2993-2993 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michelle A Fanale ◽  
Steven M Horwitz ◽  
Andres Forero-Torres ◽  
Nancy L Bartlett ◽  
Ranjana H Advani ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Cell ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Equity Ownership ◽  
Alk Positive

Abstract Background Peripheral T-cell lymphomas (PTCLs) encompass ~10-15% of aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphomas. Cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (CHOP), or variations thereof, are the most commonly used treatment regimens with complete remission (CR) rates ranging from 39-55% (Reimer 2009, d'Amore 2012). With the exception of low international prognostic index (IPI)-anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-positive ALCL, with 4-year progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) ranging from 25-35% and 30-40%, respectively (Ellin 2014). We previously reported the results of this phase 1 trial that evaluated brentuximab vedotin (BV) administered in sequence with CHOP, or in combination with CHP (CHOP without vincristine) in treatment-naive patients (pts) with CD30-expressing PTCL (NCT01309789). The combination therapy (BV+CHP) showed safety and activity at standard doses, with an objective response rate (ORR) of 100% and complete response (CR) rate of 88% (Fanale 2014). The most common adverse events (AEs) experienced by pts were nausea and peripheral sensory neuropathy (69% each). Four-year durability data and updated results on peripheral neuropathy (PN) resolution from the BV+CHP combination treatment arm are presented herein. Methods Adults with CD30-expressing PTCL, including systemic ALCL (anaplastic large cell lymphoma, ALK-negative, or ALK-positive with IPI score ≥2) were eligible for this study. CD30 expression for non-ALCL pts was defined as ≥1% CD30 expression in malignant cells. Pts on the combination treatment arm received 1.8 mg/kg BV and standard-dose CHP q3wk for up to 6 cycles. Pts who achieved at least a partial response (PR) following treatment could receive continued BV 1.8 mg/kg q3wk as single-agent for up to 10 additional cycles. Antitumor response was assessed by the investigator according to the Revised Response Criteria for Malignant Lymphoma (Cheson 2007). Results Twenty-six previously untreated pts received BV+CHP. Disease diagnoses included systemic ALCL (n=19; including ALK-negative, n=16 and ALK-positive, n=3), PTCL-NOS (n=2), angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma (AITL, n=2), adult T-cell leukemia/lymphoma (ATLL, n=2), and enteropathy-associated T-cell lymphoma (EATL, n=1). Twenty-one of the 26 pts who achieved remission with combination treatment continued on to receive single-agent BV. Overall, the 26 pts received a median of 13 cycles (range, 3 to 16) of BV. After a median observation period of 52 months (range 4.6 to 58.3) from first dose, 18 pts remain on study. The estimated 4-year PFS and OS rates are 52% (95% CI: 31, 69) and 80% (95% CI: 59, 91), respectively. The median PFS has not been reached (95% CI: 12.3, -). To date, 15 of 19 ALCL (3/3 ALK-positive, 12/16 ALK-negative), and 6 of 7 non-ALCL pts were alive at last follow-up. Five pts (19%) received subsequent treatment with single-agent BV in long-term follow-up and 3 pts received stem cell transplants (1 autologous, 2 allogeneic) for relapsed disease. There were no pts who underwent a consolidative stem cell transplant. Of the 26 pts treated with combination therapy, 19 (73%) experienced PN. Of these pts, 95% (18 of 19) experienced complete resolution (8 pts), or some resolution or improvement (defined as a decrease by at least 1 grade from worst grade, 10 pts). Of the pts who experienced improvement, 1 pt each improved from Grade 3 to a lowest Grade 2 and from Grade 3 to a lowest Grade 1, and 5 pts improved from Grade 2 to a lowest Grade 1. The median time to resolution of PN symptoms was 5.7 months. Eleven pts had ongoing neuropathy at last follow-up, of which, 9 pts had Grade 1 severity and 2 pts had Grade 2. Conclusions These 4-year durability results demonstrate that among pts with PTCL, initial therapy with BV in combination with CHP can induce long-term remissions with a tolerable safety profile. A phase 3 randomized trial comparing BV+CHP with CHOP for the frontline treatment of CD30-expressing PTCL is ongoing (NCT01777152). Progression-free Survival Figure Figure. Disclosures Horwitz: Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Takeda Pharmaceuticals International Co.: Consultancy, Research Funding; Infinity: Research Funding; Huya: Consultancy; FortySeven: Consultancy; Kyowa Hakka Kirin: Consultancy, Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Spectrum: Consultancy, Research Funding. Forero-Torres:Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Genentech/Roche: Research Funding; Juno: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Abbvie: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding. Bartlett:Gilead: Consultancy. Pro:Takeda: Honoraria; Seattle Genetics: Honoraria; Celegene: Honoraria. Chen:Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Millenium: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Genentech: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Merck: Consultancy, Research Funding. Davies:Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel, accommodation, expenses, Research Funding; Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel to scientific conferences, Research Funding; GSK: Research Funding; Mundipharma: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; Bayer: Research Funding; Karyopharma: Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding. Illidge:Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Takeda Pharmaceuticals International Co.: Consultancy, Honoraria. Uttarwar:Seattle Genetics: Employment, Equity Ownership. Huebner:Takeda Pharmaceuticals International Co.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Ren:Seattle Genetics: Employment, Equity Ownership.

Long-Term Outcome of Ruxolitinib Treatment in Patients with Myelofibrosis: Durable Reductions in Spleen Volume, Improvements in Quality of Life, and Overall Survival Advantage in COMFORT-I

Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 800-800 ◽  
Author(s):  
Srdan Verstovsek ◽  
Ruben A. Mesa ◽  
Jason Gotlib ◽  
Richard S. Levy ◽  
Vikas Gupta ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Survival Advantage ◽  
Primary Analysis ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Equity Ownership ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Abstract 800 Background: Ruxolitinib (RUX), an oral JAK1/JAK2 inhibitor, reduced spleen volume (SV), improved myelofibrosis (MF)-associated symptoms and quality of life (QoL), and appeared to exhibit a survival advantage over placebo (PBO) in patients (pts) with MF regardless of JAK2V617F mutation status in the phase III COMFORT-I study. We describe long-term efficacy and safety of RUX from COMFORT-I, with 1 year of additional follow up beyond previously published data. Methods: Eligible pts (N=309) were randomized (1:1) to RUX or PBO. The primary analysis occurred when all pts completed 24 weeks (wks) and when half the pts completed 36 wks of treatment. All pts receiving PBO were eligible for crossover to RUX after the primary analysis; crossover before wk 24 was permitted if pts met protocol-defined criteria for worsening splenomegaly. The proportion of pts with ≥35% SV reduction at 24 wks (primary endpoint) and durability of SV response were assessed. Although symptom burden (measured daily using the modified MF Symptom Assessment Form v2.0) was only measured up to wk 24, QoL continued to be evaluated beyond wk 24 (every 24 wks) using the EORTC QoL Questionnaire-Core 30 (QLQ-C30). Overall survival (OS) was assessed according to original randomized treatment. Results: In this updated analysis, median follow-up of pts randomized to RUX was 102 wks. All pts receiving PBO completed crossover or discontinued within 3 months of the primary analysis. Of 134 pts randomized to RUX who remained on treatment after the primary data analysis, 100 continue on study. Mean SV reduction in pts randomized to RUX was 31.6% at wk 24 and has remained stable with additional follow up through wk 96 (Table). In pts who achieved a ≥35% SV reduction, response was durable, with a median response duration of 108 wks. RUX treatment was also associated with durable improvements in the Global Health Status/QoL (Table) and the 5 functional domains of the EORTC QLQ-C30. Twenty-seven (27) pts randomized to RUX and 41 pts randomized to PBO died, representing a continued OS benefit in favor of RUX (HR=0.58; 95% CI: 0.36, 0.95; P = 0.028; Fig 1) similar in magnitude to that previously reported. OS favored RUX across subgroups including starting dose as well as baseline risk status and hemoglobin (Hgb). Of 34 pts randomized to RUX who discontinued after the primary analysis, 4 discontinued for an adverse event (AE). In pts who continued on RUX, anemia and thrombocytopenia remained the most frequently reported AEs. New onset of grade 3 or 4 anemia and thrombocytopenia was reported in only 12 and 5 pts, respectively. One pt discontinued for anemia. Overall, among all pts randomized to RUX, Grade 3 and 4 anemia regardless of baseline Hgb was reported in 37.4% and 14.8% of pts, respectively. Similarly, Grade 3 and 4 thrombocytopenia was reported in 11.0% and 5.2% of pts, respectively. These rates were similar to those reported in the primary analysis. By wk 36, the proportion of pts receiving red blood cell transfusions decreased to the level seen with PBO and remained stable thereafter (Fig 2). Rates of nonhematologic AEs adjusted for increased follow-up duration remain similar to those seen at the time of the primary data analysis. No additional cases of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in pts randomized to RUX were reported. Two pts originally randomized to PBO developed AML, 21 and 178 days after crossover to RUX. There continued to be no reports of a withdrawal syndrome after RUX discontinuation. Conclusions: RUX provides durable reductions in SV and improvements in QoL. Although all pts randomized to PBO crossed over to RUX shortly after the primary analysis, with 1 year of additional follow up, RUX continues to be associated with a survival advantage over PBO. RUX continues to be well tolerated; the AE profile with long-term treatment is consistent with that previously reported. The proportion of pts receiving transfusions decreased over time to rates similar to PBO, and there were no reports of a specific withdrawal syndrome or cytokine rebound phenomenon after RUX discontinuation. Disclosures: Verstovsek: Incyte Corporation: Research Funding. Mesa:Incyte: Research Funding; Lilly: Research Funding; Sanofi: Research Funding; NS Pharma: Research Funding; YM Bioscience: Research Funding. Gotlib:Incyte: Consultancy, travel to congress Other. Levy:Incyte: Employment, Equity Ownership. Gupta:Incyte: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; YM Biosciences: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Sanofiå]Aventis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Catalano:Incyte: Consultancy. Deininger:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy; Ariad: Consultancy. Miller:Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau, development of educational presentations Other; Incyte: development of educational presentations, development of educational presentations Other. Talpaz:Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; B.M.S.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Ariad: Research Funding; Sanofi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Teva: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Winton:Incyte: Consultancy, Honoraria. Arcasoy:Incyte: Research Funding. Lyons:Incyte: Consultancy, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Telik: Research Funding. Paquette:Incyte: Consultancy. Vaddi:Incyte: Employment, Equity Ownership. Erickson-Viitanen:Incyte: Employment, Equity Ownership. Sun:Incyte Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Sandor:Incyte Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Kantarjian:Incyte: grant support Other.

Three-Year Survival Results From An Ongoing Phase 2 Study Of Brentuximab Vedotin In Patients With Relapsed Or Refractory Systemic Anaplastic Large Cell Lymphoma

Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 1809-1809 ◽  
Author(s):  
Barbara Pro ◽  
Ranjana H. Advani ◽  
Pauline Brice ◽  
Nancy L. Bartlett ◽  
Joseph D. Rosenblatt ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Cell ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Brentuximab Vedotin ◽  
Observation Time ◽  
Board Membership ◽  
Equity Ownership

Abstract Background Systemic anaplastic large cell lymphoma (sALCL) is a CD30-positive aggressive subtype of mature T-cell lymphoma. Approximately 40–65% of patients (pts) with sALCL develop recurrent disease after frontline treatment. Outcomes are poor for pts with relapsed T cell lymphomas, including sALCL, with a median overall survival (OS) of 7.0 mos (Mak et al, 2013). Few effective therapies are available to address this unmet need. Brentuximab vedotin (ADCETRIS®) is an antibody-drug conjugate comprising a CD30-directed antibody attached to the microtubule-disrupting agent monomethyl auristatin E (MMAE) via a protease-cleavable linker. A phase 2 study evaluated the efficacy and safety of brentuximab vedotin in 58 pts with relapsed or refractory sALCL (ClinicalTrials.gov #NCT00866047). Long-term follow-up data from this ongoing trial are presented. Methods Pts received 1.8 mg/kg brentuximab vedotin every 3 weeks as a 30-minute outpatient IV infusion for up to 16 cycles. The primary endpoint was the objective response rate (ORR) per independent review according to the Revised Response Criteria for Malignant Lymphoma (Cheson 2007). Results In this heavily pre-treated pt population with poor prognosis, 62% had primary refractory disease (defined as no complete remission [CR] or relapse within 3 mos of frontline therapy), 26% had failed a prior autologous stem cell transplant (SCT), and 72% had ALK-negative disease. As previously reported, the ORR with brentuximab vedotin was 86% (50 of 58 pts) and the CR rate was 59% (34 of 58 pts). At the time of this analysis (datacut June 2013), all pts had discontinued treatment and the median observation time from first dose was 33.4 mos (range, 0.8-45.6). The median duration of objective response for all pts was 13.2 mos (95% CI: 5.7, 26.3) and the median duration of response for pts who obtained a CR was 26.3 mos (95% CI: 13.2, -). Of the 34 pts who achieved a CR, 16 (47%) remained in remission at the time of this analysis. Thirty-seven of 58 pts (64%) were alive at the time of last follow up. The median progression-free survival (PFS) for all pts was 14.6 mos and the median OS has not yet been reached. The estimated 3-year survival rate was 63% (95% CI: 51%, 76%). Median OS for pts who obtained a CR has not yet been reached while median OS for pts who did not obtain a CR was 7.7 mos (95% CI: 4.5, 13.7). Median OS for pts with PET-negative disease at Cycle 4 has not yet been reached while median OS for pts with PET-positive disease at Cycle 4 was 14.6 mos. After discontinuing treatment in the study, 17 pts (29%) received a hematopoietic SCT (9 allogeneic, 8 autologous). The median PFS has not yet been met for the group of pts who achieved a CR and received a subsequent SCT (95% CI: 14.6, -), while the median PFS for the group who achieved a CR and did not receive post-treatment SCT was 18.4 mos (95% CI: 8.4, 33.7). As previously reported, adverse events (AEs) in ≥20% of pts were peripheral sensory neuropathy (41%), nausea (40%), fatigue (38%), pyrexia (34%), diarrhea (29%), rash (24%), constipation (22%), and neutropenia (21%). The majority of AEs were Grade 1 or 2 in severity. Conclusions After a median observation time of 33.4 mos from first dose of brentuximab vedotin, 64% of pts with relapsed or refractory sALCL were alive at the time of last follow up and the median OS has not yet been reached. Pts who achieved a CR with brentuximab vedotin experienced longer OS than pts who did not achieve a CR and early PET-negative status appeared to be important for long-term survival. These long-term follow-up results further underscore the durability of clinical benefit obtained with brentuximab vedotin. A randomized phase 3 study is being conducted to evaluate brentuximab vedotin in combination with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and prednisone for frontline treatment of CD30-positive mature T-cell lymphomas, including sALCL (ClinicalTrials.gov #NCT01777152). Disclosures: Pro: Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Advisory/Scientific board membership and travel expenses Other, Consultancy, Research Funding. Advani:Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Advisory/Scientific Board Membership Other, Research Funding. Brice:Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Honoraria, Research Funding. Bartlett:Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Advisory/Scientific Board Membership and Travel Expenses Other, Research Funding. Rosenblatt:Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Research Funding. Illidge:Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Consultancy, Research Funding. Matous:Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Ramchandren:Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Fanale:Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Advisory/Scientific Board Membership and Travel Expenses Other, Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Connors:F Hoffmann-La Roche: Research Funding; Roche Canada: Research Funding. Yang:Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Huebner:Takeda: Equity Ownership; Takeda Cambridge US: Employment. Kennedy:Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Shustov:Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Advisory/Scientific Board Membership Other, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau.

Four-Year Survival Data from an Ongoing Pivotal Phase 2 Study of Brentuximab Vedotin in Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Systemic Anaplastic Large Cell Lymphoma

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 3095-3095 ◽  
Author(s):  
Barbara Pro ◽  
Ranjana Advani ◽  
Pauline Brice ◽  
Nancy L. Bartlett ◽  
Joseph D. Rosenblatt ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Cell ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Sensory Neuropathy ◽  
Large Cell ◽  
Brentuximab Vedotin ◽  
Observation Time ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Equity Ownership

Abstract Background: Systemic anaplastic large cell lymphoma (sALCL) is a CD30-positive aggressive subtype of mature T-cell lymphoma. Approximately 50% of patients (pts) with sALCL develop recurrent disease after frontline treatment (Savage, 2008). Outcomes have historically been poor for pts with relapsed T-cell lymphomas, including sALCL, with a median overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) of 5.5 months (mos) and 3.1 mos, respectively (Mak, 2013). A phase 2 study evaluated the efficacy and safety of brentuximab vedotin, a CD30-directed antibody-drug conjugate, in pts with relapsed or refractory sALCL (ClinicalTrials.gov #NCT00866047). Four-year follow-up data from this ongoing trial are presented. Methods: Pts received 1.8 mg/kg brentuximab vedotin every 3 weeks as a 30-minute outpatient IV infusion for up to 16 cycles. Response was assessed according to the Revised Response Criteria for Malignant Lymphoma (Cheson 2007). Assessments of response and durability of response per an independent review facility (IRF) have been previously reported. Following a protocol amendment that removed the requirement for routine CT scanning during the follow-up period, response is now being assessed per the investigator. Survival and disease status are being assessed every 3 mos for 2 years, every 6 mos during years 3 to 5, and annually thereafter. CT scans are required if progression is suspected clinically. Results: The enrolled population of 58 pts was heavily pretreated with poor prognosis. As previously reported, 72% of patients had ALK-negative disease, 62% had primary refractory disease (defined as no complete remission [CR] or relapse within 3 months of frontline therapy), and 26% had failed a prior autologous stem cell transplant (SCT). Pts had received a median of 2 prior systemic chemotherapy regimens (range, 1 to 6). Per investigator, the objective response rate (ORR) with brentuximab vedotin was 83% (48 pts) and the CR rate was 62% (36 pts), which were similar to the previously reported ORR (86%) and CR (59%) rates per IRF. At the time of this analysis (data cut June 2014), all pts had discontinued treatment and the median observation time from first dose was 46.3 mos (range, 0.8 to 57.7). Sixty-two percent (36 of 58) of pts were alive at last follow-up and the estimated 4-year survival rate by Kaplan-Meier analysis was 64% (95% CI: 51%, 76%). Median OS by best clinical response was CR (n=36): median not reached; partial remission (n=12): 11.6 mos; stable disease (n=4): 6.9 mos; and progressive disease (n=2): 4.2 mos. Median PFS was 20.0 mos (95% CI: 9.4, – [range, 0.8 to 54.9+]) for all pts and was not reached in pts with CR. Median PFS for pts with ALK-positive (25.5 mos) and ALK-negative (20.0 mos) disease were similar. Median PFS for pts with PET-negative disease at Cycle 4 (n=28) was not reached, whereas median PFS for pts with PET-positive disease at Cycle 4 (n=20) was 6.7 mos. After discontinuing treatment, 18 pts received a hematopoietic SCT (9 allogeneic, 9 autologous). The median PFS for the pts who achieved a CR and did not receive a post-treatment SCT (n=21) was 37.7 mos (95% CI: 14.1, - [range, 2.8 to 51.1+]) and the median PFS was not reached for the pts who achieved a CR and received a subsequent SCT (n=15) (95% CI: 9.5, - [range, 8.0 to 54.4+]). Of the 36 pts who achieved CR per the investigator, 17 (47%) remain in follow-up free of progression: 10 pts received a consolidative SCT following treatment with brentuximab vedotin and 7 pts received no further therapy after completing brentuximab vedotin treatment. As previously reported, adverse events (AEs) in ≥20% of pts were peripheral sensory neuropathy, nausea, fatigue, pyrexia, diarrhea, rash, constipation, and neutropenia. AEs ≥ Grade 3 that occurred in ≥5% of pts were neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, peripheral sensory neuropathy, anemia, recurrent ALCL, and fatigue. Conclusions: After a median observation time of approximately 4 years from first dose of brentuximab vedotin, the 4-year survival rate was 64%. Forty-seven percent of patients with CR remain in follow-up with no evidence of progression, suggesting that brentuximab vedotin treatment may be curative for some patients. A randomized phase 3 study is being conducted to evaluate brentuximab vedotin in combination with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and prednisone for frontline treatment of CD30-positive mature T-cell lymphomas, including sALCL (ClinicalTrials.gov #NCT01777152). Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Pro: Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Consultancy, Research Funding, Travel expenses Other. Advani:Takeda Pharmaceuticals International Co.: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Janssen Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Other, Research Funding. Brice:Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Research Funding; Takeda Pharmaceuticals International Co.: Honoraria, Research Funding; Roche: Honoraria. Bartlett:Genentech: Research Funding; ImaginAb: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; MedImmune: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; Takeda Pharmaceuticals International Co.: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Other, Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Research Funding. Rosenblatt:Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Research Funding; University of Miami: Employment. Illidge:Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Consultancy, Research Funding; Takeda Pharmaceuticals International Co.: Consultancy, Honoraria. Matous:Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Onyx: Speakers Bureau; Takeda Pharmaceuticals International Co.: Speakers Bureau. Ramchandern:Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Fanale:Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other, Research Funding. Connors:Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding. Wang:Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Huebner:Takeda Pharmaceuticals International Co.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Kennedy:Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Shustov:Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Research Funding.

Ahead Study: A 3 Year Follow-up of 522 Severe and Moderate Hemophilia a Patients

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 3786-3786
Author(s):  
Johannes Oldenburg ◽  
Dimitrios Tsakiris ◽  
Cedric R. Hermans ◽  
RI Liesner ◽  
Kate Khair ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Hemophilia A ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Prophylaxis Group ◽  
Equity Ownership

Abstract Introduction: Long-term, real-world data on natural history of hemophilia A patients, safety and treatment outcome are still insufficient, particularly as far as the impact of bleeding on patient lives is concerned, as most of clinical trials and PASS studies are limited in study population size and length of follow-up, often no longer than 12 months. Methods: The AHEAD study is a non-interventional, prospective long-term cohort study including severe and moderate hemophilia A patients treated with ADVATE. Study endpoints include long-term joint health outcomes, annualized (joint) bleeding rates (ABR/AJBR), factor consumption, quality of life and safety data. Globally, AHEAD aims to evaluate data on approximately 1,000 patients, with a maximum follow-up period of up to 8 years. This interim data report includes 3 years of follow-up after study start. Results: The interim data report includes 522 patients from 21 countries (German study arm is not included in this analysis), for overall 1160 patient years. Of these, 334 completed year 1, 238 year 2 and 136 year 3 study visits. Median age at screening was 17 years (min-max: 0 - 78) and 57% of patients had severe HA (FVIII<1%); 78% were on prophylaxis, 21% were on demand (OD) and 1% on ITI treatment. The median ABRs in year 1, 2 and 3 were 1.2/1.2/1.9 respectively in patients on prophylaxis and 8.4/10.0/7.2, respectively in patients on OD. Median AJBRs were 0.9/0.9/1.0 in the prophylaxis group and 6.4/5.5/5.9 for patients on OD in the first three years of observation. Very similar data were reported taking only severe hemophilia A patients on prophylaxis into account (ABR: 1.9/1.7/2.5 and AJBR: 1.0/1.0/1.1) Overall, 56% of patients on prophylaxis and 32% of patients OD had an AJBR <1 in the first year, 54% and 33% in the second year and 52% and 22% in the third year. In the OD group about half of the patients had an AJBR ≥ 6, in the 3 years of follow up, while only 10% of patients in the prophylaxis group. Median annualized total dose in the prophylaxis group was consistently approximately 245,000IU while the FVIII consumption in the OD group was ranging from 26,000 to 47,000. Effectiveness of prophylaxis assessed by investigators was excellent/good in 93-96% of cases in the three years of observation. Functionality assessment using the hemophilia activity level (HAL) questionnaire showed a median summary score of 77.3-86.7 for patients on prophylaxis and 67.9-71.3 in patients OD over the 3 year follow up period. Differences of health related quality of life (HRQoL) as assessed by the SF-12 were found in the domain physical functioning (median score of 75-100 vs. 50-75 in patients on prophylaxis and OD, respectively) and role physical (median scores of 75 vs. 62.5-75 in patients on prophylaxis and OD, respectively). There were 7 treatment-related adverse events (AEs): 6 serious AEs (5 transient low titer inhibitors and 1 transient high titer inhibitor). The remaining non serious treatment-related adverse event was a mild allergic cutaneous reaction with rhinitis. All patients continued to receive ADVATE. Conclusion: Interim read-out of 3 year follow-up of patients enrolled in the AHEAD study show a clinically meaningful difference in ABR/AJBR, HAL, HRQoL of patients on prophylaxis or OD treatment. This study represents the largest cohort of hemophilia patients with the longest follow-up period. Disclosures Tsakiris: Baxalta, now part of Shire: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Bayer Switzerland GmbH: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Hermans:Baxalta, now part of Shire: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Investigator Clinical Studies. Liesner:Baxalta, now part of Shire: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Bayer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Octapharma: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Sobi: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; BPL: Research Funding; Cangene: Research Funding; CSL Behring: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Khair:Pfizer: Research Funding; NovoNordisk: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Baxalta, now part of Shire: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Study Investigator, Research Funding; Octapharma: Consultancy, Equity Ownership, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Study Investigator, Patents & Royalties, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Sobi/Biogen: Research Funding. Mazzucconi:Baxalta, now part of Shire: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Bayer: Speakers Bureau; NovoNordisk: Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Speakers Bureau; Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Speakers Bureau; Shire: Speakers Bureau. Steinitz-Trost:Baxalta, now part of Shire: Employment. Spotts:Shire: Employment. Reininger:Baxalta, now part of Shire: Employment, Equity Ownership. Gringeri:Shire: Employment, Equity Ownership.

scholarly journals An Allogeneic GM-CSF-Based Vaccine in Combination with Lenalidomide Induces Durable Remissions and Sustained Immunological Responses in Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 1895-1895
Author(s):  
Luca Biavati ◽  
Anna Ferguson ◽  
Carol Ann Huff ◽  
Lakshmi Rudraraju ◽  
Rachel Gittelman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Cell ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Disease Burden ◽  
Vaccine Dose ◽  
Cell Receptor ◽  
Gm Csf ◽  
Depth Of Response ◽  
Equity Ownership

Introduction: Novel therapies have significantly increased the complete response (CR) rates in multiple myeloma (MM) with corresponding improvement in progression free survival (PFS). However, the emergence of treatment resistant sub-clones leads to disease relapse in a significant number of patients. Despite continuous improvements, cancer vaccination strategies have not been effective in preventing disease progression. Possible reasons include suboptimal timing of administration, antigen selection, disease burden at the time of vaccination and lack of the appropriate adjuvant. Here, we present the results of a phase I/II trial evaluating an allogeneic MM cellular vaccine administered in the context of a minimal disease burden in combination with lenalidomide (Len) to prevent MM progression. Methods: The vaccine consists of two MM cell lines (U266 and H929) coupled to a GM-CSF producing leukemia cell line (K562, GVAX® platform). After irradiation, the vaccine was cryopreserved until further use. Patients achieving a near CR (nCR), defined as absent M-spike and positive urine/serum immunofixation, were observed for at least 4 months to monitor response stability before enrollment. Vaccination was administered at 1, 2, 3 and 6 months together with the PrevnarÒvaccine in patients continuing on Len maintenance. Bone marrow (BM) and peripheral blood (PB) samples were utilized for immune monitoring, T-cell receptor (TCR) sequencing, and B-cell receptor (BCR) sequencing for minimal residual disease (MRD) determination using the immunoSEQ®Assay (Adaptive Biotechnologies, Seattle, WA)at enrollment, 3 months, 1 year and long-term follow-up timepoints. Results: Of the 30 patients that were initially observed, 15 patients maintained a stable nCR for at least 4 months and were vaccinated at the established timepoints. Patients who either progressed or improved their clinical response transitioning to a CR were not considered eligible. TCR immunoSEQ analysis revealed both the appearance and expansion of new T-cell clones without overall changes in repertoire clonality, suggesting active response to vaccination in both BM and PB compartments. Persistence of expanded clones was detected by immunoSEQ up to 1 year after the first vaccine dose in all patients. Phenotypic analyses and antigen-stimulation assays on BM T cells demonstrated maintenance of MM-specific T-cell reactivity at all examined timepoints. Polyfunctional MM-specific T-cell responses were detected in follow-up samples up to 8 years after the first vaccine dose and surprisingly showed persistence of MM-specific T-cell immunity when compared to the 1-year time point. Although negative MRD status and depth of response directly correlated with disease remission, some patients developed a low, but persistent MRD and M-spike (<0.5 g/dL) without actually meeting criteria for disease recurrence. These findings suggest that while vaccination can further reduce the disease burden in some patients, the development of persistent immune equilibrium with vaccination is important for disease control. Strikingly, with a median follow-up time of 4.73 (range 2.9-7.25) years, the vaccine group (n=15) did not reach the median PFS (mPFS) with an overall PFS at 6 years of 75%, which is significantly higher than the mPFS of patients not enrolled due to achievement of CR (n=5, mPFS = 2.1 years, p<0.01). Conclusions: These data demonstrate that an allogeneic MM vaccine effectively stimulates antitumor immunity in the setting of low disease burden with Len. Moreover, polyfunctional antitumor immune responses were persistent up to 8 years post vaccination. It is likely that the diversity of antigens in the vaccine supported polyclonal MM-specific immune responses, thus establishing long-term MM control. Although depth of response to treatment is a critical factor in maintaining MM remission, the long-term persistence of functional MM-specific T-cell clones highlights the importance of an active immune response to prevent MM relapse. Overall, these findings suggest that allogeneic MM vaccination could be an integrative therapy to support persistent antitumor immunity and increase PFS, especially in patients who responded to treatment without achieving an MRD-negative status. Disclosures Huff: Member of Safety Monitoring Board for Johnson and Johnson: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Karyopharm, Sanofi, MiDiagnostics: Consultancy. Rudraraju:WindMIL Therapeutics: Employment, Equity Ownership. Gittelman:Adaptive Biotechnologies: Employment, Other: Financial Interest. Johnson:Adaptive Biotechnologies: Employment, Other: Financial Interest. Ali:Celgene: Research Funding; Poseida: Research Funding. Noonan:WindMIL Therapeutics: Employment, Equity Ownership, Patents & Royalties; Aduro: Patents & Royalties: intellectual property on allogeneic MM GVAX. Borrello:BMS: Consultancy; Aduro: Patents & Royalties: intellectual property on allogeneic MM GVAX; WindMIL Therapeutics: Equity Ownership, Patents & Royalties, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document