scholarly journals Real-World Utilization of Midostaurin Among Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 5135-5135
Author(s):  
Ajeet Gajra ◽  
Andrew J Klink ◽  
Jonathan K. Kish ◽  
Dhruv Chopra ◽  
Bruce Feinberg
Keyword(s):  
Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Second Line ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
First Line ◽  
Flt3 Mutation ◽  
Line Therapy ◽  
Acute Myeloid

Introduction: Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) is a biologically heterogeneous disease with poor outcomes despite aggressive induction chemotherapy (IC). Cytogenetics and mutational profile are used to inform subgroups of patients who are at high risk of relapse. Mutations in the fms-related tyrosine kinase 3 gene (FLT3) are detected in 30% of adults with newly diagnosed AML. The predominant (75%) FLT3 mutation, is an internal tandem duplication mutation (FLT3-ITD), which confers poor prognosis due to a high relapse rate. The addition of the multitargeted kinase inhibitor midostaurin to standard IC significantly prolonged overall survival (hazard ratio for death 0.77, p=0.016) among patients with AML and a FLT3 mutation. Midostaurin was approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in April 2017 for the treatment of adult patients with newly diagnosed FLT3+ AML, as detected by an FDA-approved test, in combination with standard cytarabine and daunorubicin IC and cytarabine consolidation. The recommended dose of midostaurin in AML is 50 mg twice daily with food on days 8 to 21 of each cycle of induction and consolidation chemotherapy followed by 50 mg with food as a single agent for up to 12 months. The objective of this study was to evaluate the utilization of midostaurin in AML in the real-world setting in the first year after its US approval and marketing. Methods: Patients with at least 1 claim for midostaurin (index date) between April 1, 2017 and October 31, 2018 and who had at least 1 claim with a diagnosis of AML in the 6-month pre-index period were identified from Symphony Health's Integrated Dataverse (IDV), a large US claims database containing linked longitudinal prescription, medical, and hospital claims. The IDV contains claims for 280 million active unique patients representing over 73% of specialty prescriptions, 58% of medical claims, and 30% of hospital claims volume in the US. Patients included in the study cohort had a 6-month pre-index period with no claims with a diagnosis of AML, were at least 18 years old at initiation of midostaurin, and no evidence of participation in a clinical trial. Patient characteristics and treatment patterns were summarized using descriptive statistics. Median and 95% confidence interval (CI) for duration of midostaurin were calculated using Kaplan-Meier estimates. Results: There were 708 patients with AML treated with midostaurin who met all study selection criteria. Median age at midostaurin initiation was 60 years (range 20-80), and 49% of patients were male. The majority (61%) had commercial insurance, and patients resided in all 4 US regions (43% West, 22% South, 18% Northeast, 16% Midwest). Midostaurin was given as first line therapy in 583 (82%) patients, as second line in 95 (13%) patients, and as third line or later in 30 (4%) patients (see Table). Among the 95 patients who received midostaurin as second line therapy, hydroxyurea monotherapy (n=24, 25%) and sorafenib monotherapy (n=23, 24%) were most common first line therapies. With a median follow-up of 5.9 months from initiation of midostaurin, the median duration of midostaurin treatment was 2.3 months (95% CI 1.9-2.6). Over half (51%) had an average daily dose of 100mg on their first fill, 25% had 50mg, 9% had 67mg, 5% had 25mg, and 10% had other doses. Conclusions: In this retrospective claims-based study, there is evidence of early uptake of midostaurin use in AML. However, majority of patients receive midostaurin as a single agent contrary to the approved schedule of initiating midostaurin concurrently with IC and with consolidation cytarabine. The median duration of midostaurin treatment was short at 2.3 months given that the recommendation is to continue it for 12 months after IC. Almost half the patients are started at a dose that is lower than the recommended dose, which may impact efficacy. Potential limitations of this dataset include a relatively short period of follow-up, retrospective design and low uptake post-marketing as some patients may have completed IC or missing data from midostaurin administered in the hospital. Barriers to the appropriate use of midostaurin in AML, if any, will need further exploration. Universal and timely testing for the FLT3 mutation is the essential first step to allow for including midostaurin as a part of IC for the appropriate utilization of this agent in FLT3 + AML. Disclosures Gajra: Cardinal Health: Employment. Klink:Cardinal Health: Employment. Kish:Cardinal Health: Employment. Chopra:Cardinal Health: Employment. Feinberg:Cardinal Health: Employment.

scholarly journals FLT3 mutated acute myeloid leukemia: 2021 treatment algorithm

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
Naval Daver ◽  
Sangeetha Venugopal ◽  
Farhad Ravandi
Keyword(s):  
Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Prognostic Significance ◽  
Treatment Algorithm ◽  
Molecular Testing ◽  
Prognostic Impact ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Acute Myeloid

AbstractApproximately 30% of patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML) harbor mutations in the fms-like tyrosine kinase 3 (FLT3) gene. While the adverse prognostic impact of FLT3-ITDmut in AML has been clearly proven, the prognostic significance of FLT3-TKDmut remains speculative. Current guidelines recommend rapid molecular testing for FLT3mut at diagnosis and earlier incorporation of targeted agents to achieve deeper remissions and early consideration for allogeneic stem cell transplant (ASCT). Mounting evidence suggests that FLT3mut can emerge at any timepoint in the disease spectrum emphasizing the need for repetitive mutational testing not only at diagnosis but also at each relapse. The approval of multi-kinase FLT3 inhibitor (FLT3i) midostaurin with induction therapy for newly diagnosed FLT3mut AML, and a more specific, potent FLT3i, gilteritinib as monotherapy for relapsed/refractory (R/R) FLT3mut AML have improved outcomes in patients with FLT3mut AML. Nevertheless, the short duration of remission with single-agent FLT3i’s in R/R FLT3mut AML in the absence of ASCT, limited options in patients refractory to gilteritinib therapy, and diverse primary and secondary mechanisms of resistance to different FLT3i’s remain ongoing challenges that compel the development and rapid implementation of multi-agent combinatorial or sequential therapies for FLT3mut AML.

scholarly journals Not BCL2 mutation but dominant mutation conversation contributed to acquired venetoclax resistance in acute myeloid leukemia

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiang Zhang ◽  
Jiejing Qian ◽  
Huafeng Wang ◽  
Yungui Wang ◽  
Yi Zhang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Underlying Mechanism ◽  
Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽  
First Line ◽  
Dominant Mutation ◽  
First Line Therapy ◽  
Line Therapy ◽  
Acute Myeloid

AbstractVenetoclax (VEN) plus azacitidine has become the first-line therapy for elderly patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML), and has a complete remission (CR) plus CR with incomplete recovery of hemogram rate of ≥70%. However, the 3-year survival rate of these patients is < 40% due to relapse caused by acquired VEN resistance, and this remains the greatest obstacle for the maintenance of long-term remission in VEN-sensitive patients. The underlying mechanism of acquired VEN resistance in AML remains largely unknown. Therefore, in the current study, nine AML patients with acquired VEN resistance were retrospectively analyzed. Our results showed that the known VEN resistance-associated BCL2 mutation was not present in our cohort, indicating that, in contrast to chronic lymphocytic leukemia, this BCL2 mutation is dispensable for acquired VEN resistance in AML. Instead, we found that reconstructed existing mutations, especially dominant mutation conversion (e.g., expanded FLT3-ITD), rather than newly emerged mutations (e.g., TP53 mutation), mainly contributed to VEN resistance in AML. According to our results, the combination of precise mutational monitoring and advanced interventions with targeted therapy or chemotherapy are potential strategies to prevent and even overcome acquired VEN resistance in AML.

scholarly journals Decitabine as a First-Line Treatment for Older Adults Newly Diagnosed with Acute Myeloid Leukemia

2017 ◽  
Vol 58 (1) ◽  
pp. 35 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hyunsung Park ◽  
Haerim Chung ◽  
Jungyeon Lee ◽  
Jieun Jang ◽  
Yundeok Kim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Older Adults ◽  
Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
First Line ◽  
First Line Treatment ◽  
Acute Myeloid

scholarly journals Single-agent and combination biologics in acute myeloid leukemia

Hematology ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 (1) ◽  
pp. 548-556 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guillaume Richard-Carpentier ◽  
Courtney D. DiNardo
Keyword(s):  
Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Older Patients ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Gemtuzumab Ozogamicin ◽  
Targeted Agents ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Rational Drug ◽  
Genomic Characterization ◽  
Acute Myeloid

Abstract Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a heterogeneous malignancy characterized by recurrent genetic, epigenetic, and metabolic abnormalities. As a result of our increasing knowledge of the underlying biology of AML leading to rational drug development, several new targeted agents have been recently added to our therapeutic arsenal. The BCL2 inhibitor venetoclax in combination with low-dose cytarabine (LDAC) or hypomethylating agents (HMAs) is safe and effective in older patients with newly diagnosed AML ineligible for intensive chemotherapy. Glasdegib, a hedgehog pathway inhibitor, may be used in combination with LDAC for the same indication and improves survival compared with LDAC alone. In newly diagnosed, fit, older patients with therapy-related AML or AML with myelodysplasia-related changes, the liposome-encapsulated combination of daunorubicin and cytarabine (CPX-351) has shown superiority over the 7 + 3 regimen. The presence of an IDH1 or IDH2 mutation can be effectively targeted by ivosidenib or enasidenib, respectively. Gemtuzumab ozogamicin improves event-free survival in CD33+ patients with favorable or intermediate-risk cytogenetics. With new targeted agents available, comprehensive genomic characterization of AML at diagnosis and relapse is increasingly necessary to select optimal treatment. Herein, we review the new single-agent and combination biologics (omitting FLT3 inhibitors, which are discussed separately) and provide recommendations on how to best use and manage patients on these regimens in clinical practice.

Efficacy and safety of aspacytarabine (BST-236) as a single-agent, first-line therapy for patients with acute myeloid leukemia unfit for standard chemotherapy.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 7007-7007
Author(s):  
Jessica K. Altman ◽  
Jamie Koprivnikar ◽  
James K. McCloskey ◽  
Vamsi Kota ◽  
Olga Frankfurt ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
De Novo ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
First Line ◽  
Standard Chemotherapy ◽  
First Line Therapy ◽  
Line Therapy ◽  
De Novo Aml

7007 Background: Aspacytarabine (BST-236) is a prodrug of cytarabine, the backbone of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) standard of care chemotherapy, associated with toxicity which precludes its administration in older patients and patients with comorbidities. Aspacytarabine is inactive in its intact prodrug form until cytarabine is gradually released at pharmacokinetics which decrease the systemic exposure to peak toxic cytarabine levels, resulting in reduced systemic toxicity and relative sparing of normal tissues, enabling therapy with high cytarabine doses to patients otherwise unfit to receive it. Methods: A phase 2b open-label, single-arm study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of aspacytarabine as a first-line single-agent therapy in newly-diagnosed AML patients unfit for standard chemotherapy (NCT03435848). Aspacytarabine is administrated at 4.5 g/m2/d (containing 3 g/m2/d cytarabine) in 1-2 induction and 1-3 consolidation courses, each consisting of 6 daily 1-hour infusions. Patients with secondary AML, prior hypomethylating agent (HMA) therapy, and therapy-related AML, are eligible. Results: To date, in the ongoing study, 46 newly-diagnosed AML patients unfit for standard chemotherapy (median age 75 years) were treated with aspacytarabine and completed 1-4 courses of 4.5 g/m2/d aspacytarabine, including 26 patients (63%) with de novo AML and 17 (37%) with secondary AML. Six patients (13%) were previously treated with HMA (median 12 courses). The baseline median bone marrow blasts was 52%, and 54% and 29% of patients had adverse or intermediate European LeukemiaNet (ELN) score, respectively. Twenty (43%) patients had ECOG 2. Aspacytarabine is safe and well-tolerated in repeated-course administration. Grade > 2 drug-related adverse events include mainly hematological events and infections. The 30-day mortality rate is 11%. Of 43 patients evaluable for efficacy analysis to date, 15 patients (35%) reached a complete remission (CR) following 1 (13 patients) or 2 (2 patients) induction courses, all with complete hematological recovery (median 27.5 days, range 22-39 days). The CR rates in de novo AML patients and patients with adverse ELN score are 46% and 33%, respectively. Of the 11 patients evaluable to date for minimal residual disease (MRD) flow cytometry test, 8 are MRD negative (73%). While aspacytarabine treatment consists of a limited number of courses, median duration of response and median overall survival for responders are not reached at 12 and 24 months, respectively (end of follow up). Updated results will be presented at the meeting. Conclusions: The cumulative clinical data suggest that aspacytarabine, a time-limited single-agent treatment, is safe and efficacious as a first-line therapy for patients who are unfit for intensive chemotherapy, which may establish it as a new tolerable AML chemotherapy backbone. Clinical trial information: NCT03435848.

Efficacy of Mitoxantrone and Etoposide in Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia Refractory to Initial Standard Induction Therapy.

Blood ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 110 (11) ◽  
pp. 4385-4385 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rajesh Sehgal ◽  
Wassim McHayleh ◽  
James Natale ◽  
Anastasios Raptis ◽  
Mounzer Agha ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Induction Therapy ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Infectious Complications ◽  
High Dose ◽  
First Line ◽  
First Line Therapy ◽  
Line Therapy ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Acute Myeloid

Abstract The most effective reinduction regimen for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients who do not achieve complete remission (CR) after one cycle of cytarabine combined with an anthracycline is not well established. In an effort to search for new synergistic and non-cross resistant antileukemic regimens different chemotherapeutic combinations have been investigated in refractory AML patients. Multiple regimens including high dose cytarabine, anthracyclines, fludarabine and etoposide have been used with CR rates up to 40%. Mitoxantrone and etoposide have activity in AML as induction agents but their role in reinduction in patients not responding to first line therapy has not been fully established. In the current retrospective study we evaluated the efficacy and toxicity of mitoxantrone and etoposide in AML patients treated at our institution who did not respond to first induction therapy with cytarabine and an anthracycline. A total of fifty seven AML patients were treated with mitoxantrone and etoposide (mean age 55 years, range 18–75 years). Twenty four patients were treated with mitoxantrone 10 mg/m2/d and etoposide 100 mg/m2/d both administered intravenously, days 1 to 5 (regimen 5+5) and thirty three patients were treated with mitoxantrone 10 mg/m2/d administered intravenously days 1 to 3 and etoposide 100 mg/m2/d administered intravenously, days 1 to 5 (regimen 3+5). Twenty six of fifty seven patients (46%) achieved CR. CR was achieved in 38% of patients (9/24) treated with the 5+5 regimen and 52% of patients (17/33) treated with the 3+5 regimen. Mean blast percentage before treatment with mitoxantrone and etoposide was 25% in patients who achieved CR vs 40% in patients who did not achieve CR (p < 0.03). Grade 3/4 hepatic toxicities were seen in 5% (3/57) of patients and there were no grade 3 or 4 renal toxicities. The median duration of neutropenia in patients achieving CR was 29 days after reinduction. 10% (6/57) of the patients died from infectious complications. Cytogenetic analyses were performed prior to first-line therapy in all patients. Patients with favorable cytogenetics treated with etoposide and mitoxantorne had 100% CR (3/3), patients with standard cytogenetics had 58% CR (19/33) and patients with unfavorable cytogenetics had 19% CR (4/21). Overall CR was achieved in 61% (22/36) of patients with favorable and standard cytogenetics. Our data suggest that the combination of etoposide and mitoxantorne is an active and well tolerated regimen, especially in patients with favorable and standard cytogenetics, and warrants further studies in prospective trials.

WT1 Monitoring of Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) in Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 3695-3695 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michele Malagola ◽  
Crisitina Skert ◽  
Enrico Morello ◽  
Francesca Antoniazzi ◽  
Erika Borlenghi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
End Of Treatment ◽  
Minimal Residual ◽  
Acute Myeloid

Abstract Background: Although a complete remission (CR) can be achieved in 70-80% of newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients, relapses occur in up to the 50% of cases. Thus, minimal residual disease (MRD) monitoring is a major issue for early detection of patients at high-risk of treatment failure and relapse. Aim: to dynamically evaluate WT1 pan-leukemic molecular marker of MRD in patients with AML. Matherial and methods: 107 newly diagnosed AML patients consecutively treated between 2010 and 2013 were monitored with quantitative WT-1 from bone marrow (BM) and peripheral blood (PB) at baseline, after induction, after the first consolidation course, before allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT), at the 3rd and the 6th month after transplantation Results: At diagnosis, 104/107 (97%) had increased PB and BM WT1 levels assessed according to the ELN assay. Eighty-eight out of 107 patients (82%) achieved a complete remission (CR) after induction, 30/88 (34%) relapsed during follow up and 24/107 (22%) were addressed to allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT). By univariate analysis, PB-WT > 50x10^4/ABL and BM-WT1 > 250x10^4/ABL after induction (PB: p=0.02; BM: p=0.04), after consolidation (PB: p=0.003), at the end of treatment (PB and BM: p=0.001), at 3rd month of follow up (PB and BM: p=0.005) and at 6th month of follow up (PB: p=0.005) were associated with a reduced overall survival (OS). By multivariate analysis, a BM-WT1 > 250 x 10^4/ABL at the end of treatment was significantly associated with a reduced OS. In order to adapt the cut-off of WT1 in our series of patients, we considered WT1 levels as continuous variables and categorized them at approximately the 25th, 50th, and 75th percentile. A cut-off of PB-WT1 > 25x10^4/ABL and BM-WT1 > 125x10^4/ABL at the end of the treatment program was identified as correlated with reduced leukemia-free survival (LFS) and OS (p=0.001). Similarly, and restricting the analysis on the 24 patients allo-transplanted in CR, 8/11 (73%) with pre-transplant PB-WT1 ≥ 5 and 4/13 (31%) with PB-WT1 < 5 relapsed, respectively (p=0.04). The incidence of relapse was higher in AML patients with PB-WT1 ≥ 5 measured at 3rd (56% vs 38%; p=0.43) and 6th month (71% vs 20%; p=0.03) after allo-SCT. Interestingly, 5/5 (100%) patients with pre-transplant PB-WT1 ≥ 5 who never reduced this level at 3rd or 6th month after allo-SCT experienced a disease recurrence. Conclusions: our data, although retrospectively collected, show that WT1 monitoring may be useful to predict the relapse in AML patients. Acknowledgments: This work was supported in part by Banca di Credito Cooperativo di Pompiano e Franciacorta and Lions Club Bassa Bresciana Association. Disclosures Russo: Celgene: Research Funding; Gilead: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy.

scholarly journals Hypomethylating Agent and Venetoclax Combination Yields Comparable Outcomes to CPX-351 in Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 3895-3895
Author(s):  
Hannah Asghari ◽  
Dasom Lee ◽  
Yehuda E. Deutsch ◽  
Onyee Chan ◽  
Najla Al Ali ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Complete Remission ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Risk Group ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Acute Myeloid

Background The therapeutic landscape for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) has become complex with recent drug approvals. CPX-351 has become standard-of-care for patients (pts) with therapy-related AML and AML with myelodysplasia-related changes. Moreover, earlier phase studies combining hypomethylating agents (HMA) and Venetoclax (HMA+Ven) in the frontline setting for elderly patients have demonstrated high response rates and improved survival. Given the overlapping indications, yet lack of comparative outcome data between these therapeutic regimens, treatment decisions have become challenging in the frontline setting. Therefore, we compared the outcomes of newly diagnosed AML pts receiving HMA+Ven vs. CPX-351. Methods We retrospectively annotated 119 pts that received frontline treatment with HMA+Ven and CPX-351 at Moffitt Cancer Center and Memorial Healthcare System between 2013 and 2019. Pts were divided in two cohorts: HMA+Ven (Cohort A) or CPX-351(Cohort B). Via comprehensive chart review of each patient that received HMA+Ven, we further classified a subgroup of pts meeting criteria to receive CPX-351 as CPX-351eligible. Clinical and molecular data were abstracted for each patient in accordance with IRB requirements. Overall response rate (ORR) was the combined total of complete remission (CR), complete remission with incomplete count recovery (CRi), and morphologic leukemia free state (MLFS). Fisher's Exact method was used to determine significance. Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed to estimate median overall survival (mOS) with log-rank test to determine significance. All p-values are two-sided. Results Out of 119 total pts, 41 pts received HMA+Ven (Cohort A) and 78 pts received CPX-351 (Cohort B) with baseline characteristics outlined in Table 1. Among 111 response evaluable pts, ORR was 64.1% in Cohort A, including 28.2% with CR and 28.2% with CRi (Table 2). ORR was 50.0% in Cohort B, comprised of CR in 29.2% and CRi in 18.1%. There was no difference in ORR between Cohort A and Cohort B (64.1% vs. 50%, p 0.17). A significantly greater fraction of pts in Cohort B underwent allogeneic stem cell transplant (allo-SCT) (24.4% vs. 2.4%, p=0.004). ORR was higher in pts with European LeukemiaNet (ELN)-defined favorable/intermediate (fav/int) risk compared to adverse risk group in Cohort A (100% vs. 58.3%, p=0.03), however there was no difference in Cohort B (52.6% vs. 49.1%, p=1.0). ORR was similar among adverse risk groups in both cohorts (58.3% in Cohort A vs. 49.1% in Cohort B, p=0.47). Among responders, median time to best response was significantly longer in Cohort A (61.0 days vs. 40.5 days, p<0.0001). Median duration of response was not reached (NR) in both cohorts. Impact of somatic mutations on ORR is represented in Figure 3. Median follow-up was 6.5 months (mo) in Cohort A and 13.0mo in Cohort B. Median OS was similar in both cohorts (A vs. B, 13.8mo vs. 11.1mo, p=0.82) (Figure 1). Among responders, mOS was NR in Cohort A and 18.2mo in Cohort B (p=0.88) (Figure 2). Compared to Cohort B, mOS was superior for pts with fav/int risk disease in Cohort A (14.2mo (B) vs. NR (A), p=0.045) and not different for adverse risk group (11.1mo (B) vs. 7.3mo (A), p=0.2). Prior HMA exposure was 26.8% in Cohort A and 29.5% in Cohort B for an antecedent hematologic malignancy, however it did not impact mOS (p=0.86) or ORR (p=0.7). Early mortality rates for Cohort A and B were similar at day 30 (2.4% vs. 0%) and day 60 (4.9% vs. 3.8%). Rate of relapse was similar between cohorts A and B (16.0% vs. 30.6%, p=0.24). We then compared the outcomes of pts in Cohort B to CPX-351eligible arm from Cohort A (n=14). ORR and mOS were similar in Cohort B and CPX-351 eligible arm (ORR: 50% vs. 50%, p=1.0; mOS 11.1mo vs. 13.8mo, p=0.43). Only 1 patient (7.1%) of the CPX-351eligible arm underwent allo-SCT. Conclusion Our study demonstrates that HMA+Ven results in comparable response rates and survival outcomes to patients receiving CPX-351 when used as an initial remission therapy for patients with newly diagnosed AML, however the median follow up for patients receiving HMA+Ven was short. Survival did not appear to be impacted by a significantly greater proportion of patients proceeding to allo-SCT in the CPX-351 arm. Overall, HMA+Ven may represent a reasonable frontline remission therapeutic choice in patients with AML and a randomized trial would seem justified. Disclosures Kuykendall: Abbvie: Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy; Incyte: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Honoraria. List:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Lancet:Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Agios, Biopath, Biosight, Boehringer Inglheim, Celator, Celgene, Janssen, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Karyopharm, Novartis: Consultancy; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy, Other: fees for non-CME/CE services . Sallman:Celyad: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Komrokji:celgene: Consultancy; Agios: Consultancy; pfizer: Consultancy; DSI: Consultancy; JAZZ: Speakers Bureau; JAZZ: Consultancy; Novartis: Speakers Bureau; Incyte: Consultancy. Sweet:Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Stemline: Consultancy; Agios: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol Myers Squibb: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Incyte: Research Funding; Astellas: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Consultancy; Celgene: Speakers Bureau; Jazz: Speakers Bureau. Talati:Agios: Honoraria; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Honoraria; Daiichi-Sankyo: Honoraria; Astellas: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Honoraria.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document