Assessing Efficacy and Safety of Daunorubicin and Cytarabine Liposomal in Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Background. Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is the most common acute leukemia in adults. The median age of diagnosis is 67 years old, and it has unfavorable outcomes in older patients. Approximately one-third of patients are diagnosed after the age of 75. Thus, as the population continues to increase in age, the incidence of AML will continue to expand (NCCN guidelines: AML. Version 3.2019). The long term disease free survival (DFS) rates for patients > 60 years of age is 5-15% whereas younger patients < 60 years of age have a better DFS rate of up to 40% (Dohner H, et al. N Engl J Med. 2015). Recent advancements have been made in patients with AML, including the approval of daunorubicin and cytarabine liposomal (Vyxeos®) for the treatment of adults with 2 poor risk types of AML: newly diagnosed therapy related AML (t-AML) or AML with myelodysplasia-related changes (AML-MRC). Given the financial constraints of this new medication, our objective was to determine the safety and efficacy of daunorubicin and cytarabine liposomal in our adult patients with t-AML and AML-MRC at a single academic medical center. Methods. This was a single center, retrospective, chart review at Wake Forest Baptist Health (WFBH) Comprehensive Cancer Center from August 1, 2017 to November 1, 2018. Patients were selected via report generation if they had received at least one dose of daunorubicin and cytarabine liposomal during the study period. The initial induction dose of daunorubicin and cytarabine liposomal was 44 mg/m2 of daunorubicin and 100 mg/m2 cytarabine administered on days 1, 3, and 5 for up to 2 cycles to achieve remission. If a second induction was necessary, the same induction doses were given on days 1 and 3 only. The consolidation dose was 29 mg/m2 of daunorubicin and 65 mg/m2 of cytarabine on days 1 and 3 for up to 2 cycles. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Secondary endpoints included event free survival (EFS), 30-day and 60-day mortality, complete remission (CR) and morphologic complete remission with incomplete blood count recovery (CRi), adverse drug reactions, and financial impact to the health system. Descriptive statistics were utilized for demographic data. Time to event data was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method. SPSS IBM and Microsoft Excel Software were utilized for data analysis. Results. A total of 37 AML patients were identified as receiving daunorubicin and cytarabine liposomal from August 2017 to November 2018. Of those 37 patients, 27 had AML-MRC and 10 had t-AML. The average patient was a 70 year old Caucasian male with an ECOG performance status of 1 and a Charlson Comorbidity Index of 6 (Table 1). The median OS was 10 months and EFS was 7 months. The 30-day mortality rate was 16% and 60-day mortality rate was 19%. Eighteen patients (49%) achieved a CR and 2 patients (5%) achieved a CRi. A subgroup analysis was conducted for prior hypomethylating agent (HMA) use, age > 75 years old, < 60 years old, molecular mutations including FLT3-ITD and TP53 mutations, and t-AML. Poorer outcomes were noted in patients > age 75, prior HMA use, and the t-AML subgroups. Table 3 highlights the OS, 60-day mortality rate, transplant received and CR+CRi for each subgroup. The median time to platelet and absolute neutrophil count (ANC) recovery was 32 and 33 days, respectively. Eight patients (21.6%) proceeded to transplant post administration of daunorubicin and cytarabine liposomal. All patients experienced at least one adverse event with hematologic being the most commonly observed toxicity (Table 4). Most patients received induction therapy with daunorubicin and cytarabine liposomal in the inpatient setting whereas consolidation was predominantly administered in an outpatient encounter. Conclusions. Daunorubicin and cytarabine liposomal was considered an effective treatment option for patients with t-AML and AML-MRC with a CR+CRi rate of 54%. Younger patients (< 60 years old) exhibited the greatest benefit with an OS of 12 months and 60 day mortality rate of 0%. However, poorer outcomes were demonstrated in elderly patients (> 75 years old), patients with FLT3-ITD positive mutations, and patients with previous HMA use, with an OS less than 2 months in each subgroup and mortality rates ranging up to 60%. Thus, additional studies are necessary to determine the role of daunorubicin and cytarabine liposomal in these higher risk patient subgroups > age 75, FLT3-ITD positive patients, and patients with previous HMA use. Disclosures Manuel: Novartis: Speakers Bureau; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Speakers Bureau. Pardee:Rafael Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Research Funding; Karyopharm: Research Funding; Spherix Intellectual Property: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics/Janssen: Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Speakers Bureau; CBM Bipharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Powell:Janssen: Research Funding; Rafael Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Increased Idarubicin Dosage during Consolidation Therapy for Adult Acute Myeloid Leukemia Improves Leukemia-Free Survival

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v128.22.338.338 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 128 (22) ◽

pp. 338-338

Author(s):

Bradstock Kenneth ◽

Emma Link ◽

Juliana Di Iulio ◽

Jeff Szer ◽

Paula Marlton ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽

Complete Remission ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Induction Therapy ◽

Myeloid Leukemia ◽

Research Funding ◽

Consolidation Therapy ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Free Survival ◽

Acute Myeloid

Abstract Background: Anthracylines are one of the major classes of drugs active against acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Increased doses of daunorubicin during induction therapy for AML have been shown to improve remission rates and survival. The ALLG used idarubicin in induction therapy at a dose of 9 mg/m2 x 3 days (total dose 27 mg/m2) in combination with high-dose cytarabine and etoposide (Blood 2005, 105:481), but showed that a total idarubicin dose of 36 mg/m2 was too toxic in this context (Leukemia 2001, 15:1331). In order to further improve outcomes in adult AML by anthracycline dose escalation, we conducted a phase 3 trial comparing standard to an increased idarubicin dose during consolidation therapy. Methods: Patients achieving complete remission after 1 or 2 cycles of intensive induction therapy (idarubicin 9 mg/m2 daily x3, cytarabine 3 g/m2 twice daily on days 1,3,5 and 7, and etoposide 75 mg/m2 daily x7; ICE protocol) were randomized to receive 2 cycles of consolidation therapy with cytarabine 100 mg/m2 per day for 5 days, etoposide 75 mg/m2 for 5 days, and idarubicin 9mg/m2 daily for either 2 or 3 days (standard and intensive arms respectively). No further protocol therapy was given. The primary endpoint was leukemia-free survival from randomization to consolidation therapy (LFS) with overall survival (OS) as secondary endpoint. Results: A total of 422 patients with AML (excluding cases with CBF rearrangements or APL) aged 16 to 60 years were enrolled between 2003-10, with 345 (82%) achieving complete remission, and 293 being randomized to standard (n=146) or intensive (n=147) consolidation arms. The median age was 45 years in both arms (range 16- 60), and both groups were balanced for intermediate versus unfavorable karyotypes and for frequency of mutations involving FLT3-ITD and NPM1 genes. Of the randomized patients, 120 in the standard arm (82%) and 95 in the intensive arm (65%) received the second consolidation cycle (p<0.001). The median total dose of idarubicin received in the 2 consolidation courses was 36 mg/m2 (range 17-45), or 99% (47-125%) of the protocol dose in the standard arm, versus 53 mg/m2 (18-73), or 98% (33-136%) of the protocol dose in the intensive arm. The durations of grades 3-4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia were significantly longer in the intensive arm, but there were no differences in grade 3 or 4 non-hematological toxicities. There were no non-relapse deaths during consolidation on the standard arm and 2 in the intensive (0% vs 1%; p =0.50). Subsequently, 41 patients in the standard arm and 37 in the intensive arm underwent elective allogeneic BMT during first remission. On intention to-treat analysis uncensored for transplant and with a median follow-up time of 5.3 years (range 0.6 - 9.9), there was improvement in LFS in the intensive arm compared with the standard arm (3 year LFS 47% (95% CI 40-56%) versus 35% (28-44%); HR 0.74 (95% CI 0.55-0.99); p=0.045) (Figure 1). The 3 year OS for the intensive arm was 61% (95% CI 54-70%) and 50% (95% CI 43-59%) for the standard arm; HR 0.75 (95% CI 0.54-1.05); p=0.092). Although adverse cytogenetics, presence of FLT3-ITD mutation, and absence of NPM1 mutation were all associated with poorer outcomes, there was no evidence of a benefit of intensive consolidation being confined to specific cytogenetic or gene mutation sub-groups. Conclusion: We conclude that in adult patients in complete remission after intensive induction chemotherapy an increased dose of idarubicin delivered during consolidation therapy results in improved LFS, without increased non-hematologic toxicity. Figure 1. Figure 1. Disclosures Szer: Ra Pharma: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Alnylam: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Marlton:Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AbbVie: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Wei:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria; CTI: Consultancy, Honoraria; Abbvie: Honoraria, Research Funding; Servier: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Cartwright:ROCHE: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Roberts:Servier: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; AbbVie: Research Funding. Mills:Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Meeting attendance sponsorship. Gill:Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Seymour:Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Genentech: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel support, Speakers Bureau; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel support, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Download Full-text

Clinical Outcomes Following Treatment with Gilteritinib or Quizartinib in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory FLT3-ITD+ Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2020-136118 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 42-43

Author(s):

Alexander E. Perl ◽

Qiaoyang Lu ◽

Alan Fan ◽

Nahla Hasabou ◽

Erhan Berrak ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽

Complete Remission ◽

Myeloid Leukemia ◽

Research Funding ◽

Phase 3 ◽

Hematopoietic Stem ◽

Travel Costs ◽

Baseline Characteristics ◽

Acute Myeloid

Background: Gilteritinib is approved for patients (pts) with relapsed/refractory (R/R) FLT3-mutated acute myeloid leukemia (AML), based on findings from the phase 3 ADMIRAL trial (Perl AE, et al. N Engl J Med. 2019). A phase 3 trial, QuANTUM-R, demonstrated the benefit of quizartinib in pts with R/R AML with FLT3 internal tandem duplication (FLT3-ITD) mutations (Cortes JE, et al. Lancet Oncol. 2019). Although eligibility criteria across both studies were similar, QuANTUM-R was more stringent as to prior therapy intensity and remission duration, which potentially enriched for higher-risk pts. We sought to describe outcomes from ADMIRAL among pts who otherwise met eligibility for QuANTUM-R. Methods: In this post-hoc analysis, a subset of pts from ADMIRAL were matched with R/R FLT3-ITD+ AML pts from QuANTUM-R on the basis of baseline characteristics and prior treatment criteria. Matched pts were either refractory to initial anthracycline-based chemotherapy or had relapsed ≤6 mos after achieving composite complete remission (CRc) with an anthracycline-based regimen. Results: Overall, 218 pts with R/R FLT3-ITD+ AML in the ADMIRAL trial (gilteritinib, n=140; salvage chemotherapy [SC], n=78) were matched with the QuANTUM-R intention-to treat (ITT) population (N=367; quizartinib, n=245; SC, n=122). Proportions of pts preselected for high-intensity SC were 66% (n=143/218) in the matched ADMIRAL ITT population and 77% (n=281/367) in the QuANTUM-R ITT populations. Demographic and baseline characteristics of the matched ADMIRAL ITT population and QuANTUM-R ITT population were similar. Median durations of exposure to gilteritinib and quizartinib were 3.8 mos and 3.2 mos, respectively, and median number of treatment cycles received were five and four, respectively. Rates of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) were similar in pts treated with gilteritinib (35%; n=49/140) or quizartinib (32%; n=78/245), as were the proportions of pts who resumed gilteritinib (23%; n=32/140) or quizartinib (20%; n=48/245) therapy post-HSCT. Median overall survival (OS) in pts treated with gilteritinib or quizartinib was longer than that observed with SC. After a median follow-up of 17.4 mos, median OS was 10.2 mos with gilteritinib versus 5.6 mos with SC (hazard ratio [HR]=0.573 [95% CI: 0.403, 0.814]; one-sided nominal P=0.0008). After a median follow-up of 23.5 mos, median OS with quizartinib was 6.2 mos versus 4.7 mos with SC (HR=0.76 [95% CI: 0.58-0.98]; one-sided P=0.02). After censoring for HSCT, median OS was 9.3 mos with gilteritinib versus 5.5 mos with SC (HR=0.525 [95% CI: 0.356-0.775]; nominal one-sided P=0.0005), and 5.7 mos versus 4.6 mos with quizartinib versus SC, respectively (HR=0.79 [95% CI: 0.59, 1.05]; one-sided P=0.05). In both QuANTUM-R and matched ADMIRAL populations, the survival benefits of quizartinib and gilteritinib compared with SC were maintained across multiple subgroups, including high FLT3-ITD allelic ratio subsets. Compared with SC, high CRc rates were observed in pts treated with either gilteritinib (57%; n=80/140) or quizartinib (48%; n=118/245). The complete remission (CR) rate with gilteritinib was 23% (n=32/140), whereas the CR rate with quizartinib was 4% (n=10/245) (Table). Median time to achieve CRc was 1.8 mos with gilteritinib and 1.1 mos with quizartinib, median duration of CRc was 5.5 mos with gilteritinib and 2.8 mos with quizartinib. The safety profiles of gilteritinib and quizartinib were generally similar, though aspartate or alanine aminotransferase elevations (any grade) were more frequent with gilteritinib (41-44%) than quizartinib (≤13%), whereas neutropenia (14% vs 34%, respectively), fatigue (24% vs 39%, respectively), and prolonged QT intervals (9% vs 27%, respectively) were more frequent with quizartinib. Conclusions: In pts with R/R FLT3-ITD+ AML and similar baseline characteristics, both gilteritinib and quizartinib were generally well tolerated and associated with improved survival and treatment response compared with SC. Responses to gilteritinib and quizartinib, as measured by CRc, were similar; blood count recovery varied between the two FLT3 inhibitors. Although cross-study comparisons have substantial limitations, the findings suggest that while remission is achieved faster with quizartinib, response may be more durable and survival potentially longer with gilteritinib. Disclosures Perl: Syndax: Consultancy, Honoraria; Leukemia & Lymphoma Society, Beat AML: Consultancy; Novartis: Honoraria, Other, Research Funding; Agios: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other; Jazz: Honoraria, Other; FORMA Therapeutics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Writing/editorial support, travel costs for meetings, Research Funding; FUJIFILM Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc: Research Funding; New Link Genetics: Honoraria, Other; Arog Pharmaceuticals Inc: Other: uncompensated consulting, travel costs for meetings; Actinium Pharmaceuticals Inc: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Biomed Valley Discoveries: Research Funding; Astellas: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: writing/editorial support, travel costs for meeting presentations related to study, Research Funding; Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; AbbVie Inc: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other, Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria, Other: Travel costs for meeting; Loxo Oncology Inc, a wholly owned subsidiary of Eli Lilly & Company: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other. Lu:Astellas: Current Employment. Fan:Astellas Pharma: Current Employment. Hasabou:Astellas Pharma: Current Employment. Berrak:Astellas: Current Employment. Tiu:Eli Lilly & Company: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company, Ended employment in the past 24 months; Astellas Pharma Global Development: Current Employment.

Download Full-text

Childhood acute myeloid leukemia: outcome in a single center using chemotherapy and consolidation with busulfan/cyclophosphamide for bone marrow transplantation.

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.1994.12.10.2138 ◽

1994 ◽

Vol 12 (10) ◽

pp. 2138-2145 ◽

Cited By ~ 17

Author(s):

P J Shaw ◽

M E Bergin ◽

M A Burgess ◽

L Dalla Pozza ◽

S J Kellie ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Bone Marrow ◽

Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽

Bone Marrow Transplantation ◽

Survival Rate ◽

Complete Remission ◽

Relapse Rate ◽

Marrow Transplantation ◽

Myeloid Leukemia ◽

Free Survival ◽

Acute Myeloid

PURPOSE To report the impact of bone marrow transplantation (BMT) with busulfan/cyclophosphamide (BuCy) as end consolidation in a cohort of consecutively diagnosed children with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). PATIENTS AND METHODS Between May 1987 and November 1992, 43 patients were diagnosed with AML. Tissue typing at diagnosis determined whether patients would proceed to autologous or allogeneic BMT as end consolidation after six cycles of chemotherapy. Conditioning for BMT was with BuCy, followed by allogeneic or unpurged autologous marrow infusion. RESULTS Of 37 patients who received chemotherapy, 35 achieved remission (95%) after one to six courses of treatment and 34 (92%) were transplanted. Five relapsed before BMT, four were subsequently transplanted in second complete remission (CR2) (n = 3) or untreated first relapse (n = 1), and one failed to respond to further therapy. All other patients proceeded to BMT in first complete remission (CR1). Eleven patients received allografts: one relapsed and one died of graft-versus-host disease (GvHD), for a leukemia-free survival rate of 90% at a median of 41 months after BMT (range, 3 to 60). For 23 autografts, there were two toxic deaths and eight relapses, with a leukemia-free survival rate of 61% at a median of 11 months after BMT (range, 0 to 66). The high relapse rate following autologous BMT led us to escalate the dose of Bu from 16 mg/kg to 600 mg/m2 using a single daily dose of Bu. CONCLUSION With modern supportive therapy, most newly diagnosed children with AML will enter remission and are eligible for intensification therapy. BuCy is well tolerated in children, which allowed us to escalate the dose of Bu in recent patients. Further follow-up is needed to determine whether this has an impact on the relapse rate following autologous BMT.

Download Full-text

High Expression of Myocyte Enhancer Factor 2C (MEF2C) Is Associated with Adverse Risk Features and Poor Outcome in Pediatric Acute Myeloid Leukemia: A Report from the Children's Oncology Group

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v126.23.2570.2570 ◽

2015 ◽

Vol 126 (23) ◽

pp. 2570-2570

Author(s):

George S. Laszlo ◽

Todd A. Alonzo ◽

Chelsea J. Gudgeon ◽

Kimberly H. Harrington ◽

Alex Kentsis ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Bone Marrow ◽

Overall Survival ◽

Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽

Myeloid Leukemia ◽

Research Funding ◽

Event Free Survival ◽

Free Survival ◽

Expression Levels ◽

Acute Myeloid ◽

Enhancer Factor

Abstract Background: Myocyte enhancer factor 2C (MEF2C) was initially identified as essential transcription factor for cardiac muscle development. However, subsequent studies have indicated that MEF2C plays a much broader biological role, including in the normal hematopoietic system. Recent studies have now identified MEF2C as cooperating oncogene in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and suggested a contribution to the aggressive nature of at least some subtypes of AML. These findings raised the possibility that MEF2C could serve as marker of poor-risk disease and, therefore, have prognostic significance in AML. To test this hypothesis, we retrospectively quantified MEF2C expression in participants of the AAML0531 trial and correlated expression levels with disease characteristics and clinical outcome. Patients and Methods: AAML0531 (NCT00372593) was a multicenter phase 3 study that determined the addition of gemtuzumab ozogamicin to intensive chemotherapy among 1,022 eligible patients aged <30 yearswith newly diagnosed de novo non-APL AML, excluding those with bone marrow failure syndromes, juvenile myelomonocytic leukemia, or Down syndrome (if ≤3 years of age) between 2006 and 2010. Cryopreserved pretreatment ("diagnostic") specimens from patients enrolled on AAML0531 who consented to the biology studies and had bone marrow samples were available were included in this study. Total RNA from unsorted specimens was extracted, quantified, and subjected to quantitative reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) using TaqMan primers to determine expression of MEF2C and, for normalization, the housekeeping gene, β-glucuronidase (GUSB). Patient samples were run in duplicate, and the ΔΔCT method quantified as 2(-ΔΔCT) was used to determine the expression levels of MEF2C relative to GUSB. Results: In all 751 available patient specimens, MEF2C mRNA was detectable and varied >3,000-fold relative to GUSB (0.0091-29.1272 [median: 0.7978]). Patients with the highest relative MEF2C expression (4th quartile) less likely achieved a complete remission after one course of chemotherapy than the other patients (67% vs. 78%, P=0.005). They also had an inferior overall survival (P=0.014; at 5 years: 55±8% vs. 67±4%), inferior event-free survival (P<0.001; at 5 years: 38±7% vs. 54±4%), and higher relapse risk than patients within the lower 3 quartiles of MEF2C expression (P<0.001; at 5 years: 53±9% vs. 35±5%). Of note, exploratory multiple cutpoint analyses for overall and event-free survival indicated that the most statistically significant results were centered around the Q4 cutpoint region, supporting our approach of comparing patients with the highest quartile of relative MEF2C expression with those having lower relative MEF2C expression. Importantly, MEF2C expression was strongly associated with cytogenetic and molecular abnormalities. Specifically, patients with high MEF2C expression less likely had CBF translocations (inv(16): P=0.007, and t(8;21): P<0.001) or normal karyotype AML (P<0.001); conversely, they were more likely to have leukemia with monosomy 7 (P<0.001) and abnormalities involving 11q23 (P<0.001). Furthermore, patients with high MEF2C less likely had a FLT3/ITD (P =0.018) or a mutation in either NPM1 (P=0.010) or CEBPA (P =0.002). Consistently, patients with high MEF2C expression less likely had low-risk disease (16% vs. 46%, P<0.001) and more likely had standard-risk disease (68% vs. 42%, P <0.001) than those with lower MEF2C expression. Indeed, after adjustment for disease risk, age, FAB category, and treatment arm, high MEF2C expression was no longer statistically significantly associated with inferior overall survival (hazard ratio [HR]=0.99 [95% confidence interval: 0.72-1.36], P=0.929), inferior event-free survival (HR: 1.14 [0.86-1.49], P=0.365), or higher relapse risk (HR: 1.32 [0.91-1.92], P=0.137), suggesting that MEF2C cooperates with additional pathogenic abnormalities. Conclusion: High MEF2C expression identifies a subset of AML patients with adverse-risk disease features and poor outcome. These findings provide the rationale for therapeutic targeting of MEF2C transcriptional activation in AML. Disclosures Walter: AstraZeneca, Inc.: Consultancy; Covagen AG: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Research Funding; Amgen, Inc.: Research Funding; Pfizer, Inc.: Consultancy; Amphivena Therapeutics, Inc.: Consultancy, Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Hypomethylating Agent and Venetoclax Combination Yields Comparable Outcomes to CPX-351 in Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-130379 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 3895-3895

Author(s):

Hannah Asghari ◽

Dasom Lee ◽

Yehuda E. Deutsch ◽

Onyee Chan ◽

Najla Al Ali ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽

Complete Remission ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Myeloid Leukemia ◽

Research Funding ◽

Risk Group ◽

Newly Diagnosed ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Acute Myeloid

Background The therapeutic landscape for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) has become complex with recent drug approvals. CPX-351 has become standard-of-care for patients (pts) with therapy-related AML and AML with myelodysplasia-related changes. Moreover, earlier phase studies combining hypomethylating agents (HMA) and Venetoclax (HMA+Ven) in the frontline setting for elderly patients have demonstrated high response rates and improved survival. Given the overlapping indications, yet lack of comparative outcome data between these therapeutic regimens, treatment decisions have become challenging in the frontline setting. Therefore, we compared the outcomes of newly diagnosed AML pts receiving HMA+Ven vs. CPX-351. Methods We retrospectively annotated 119 pts that received frontline treatment with HMA+Ven and CPX-351 at Moffitt Cancer Center and Memorial Healthcare System between 2013 and 2019. Pts were divided in two cohorts: HMA+Ven (Cohort A) or CPX-351(Cohort B). Via comprehensive chart review of each patient that received HMA+Ven, we further classified a subgroup of pts meeting criteria to receive CPX-351 as CPX-351eligible. Clinical and molecular data were abstracted for each patient in accordance with IRB requirements. Overall response rate (ORR) was the combined total of complete remission (CR), complete remission with incomplete count recovery (CRi), and morphologic leukemia free state (MLFS). Fisher's Exact method was used to determine significance. Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed to estimate median overall survival (mOS) with log-rank test to determine significance. All p-values are two-sided. Results Out of 119 total pts, 41 pts received HMA+Ven (Cohort A) and 78 pts received CPX-351 (Cohort B) with baseline characteristics outlined in Table 1. Among 111 response evaluable pts, ORR was 64.1% in Cohort A, including 28.2% with CR and 28.2% with CRi (Table 2). ORR was 50.0% in Cohort B, comprised of CR in 29.2% and CRi in 18.1%. There was no difference in ORR between Cohort A and Cohort B (64.1% vs. 50%, p 0.17). A significantly greater fraction of pts in Cohort B underwent allogeneic stem cell transplant (allo-SCT) (24.4% vs. 2.4%, p=0.004). ORR was higher in pts with European LeukemiaNet (ELN)-defined favorable/intermediate (fav/int) risk compared to adverse risk group in Cohort A (100% vs. 58.3%, p=0.03), however there was no difference in Cohort B (52.6% vs. 49.1%, p=1.0). ORR was similar among adverse risk groups in both cohorts (58.3% in Cohort A vs. 49.1% in Cohort B, p=0.47). Among responders, median time to best response was significantly longer in Cohort A (61.0 days vs. 40.5 days, p<0.0001). Median duration of response was not reached (NR) in both cohorts. Impact of somatic mutations on ORR is represented in Figure 3. Median follow-up was 6.5 months (mo) in Cohort A and 13.0mo in Cohort B. Median OS was similar in both cohorts (A vs. B, 13.8mo vs. 11.1mo, p=0.82) (Figure 1). Among responders, mOS was NR in Cohort A and 18.2mo in Cohort B (p=0.88) (Figure 2). Compared to Cohort B, mOS was superior for pts with fav/int risk disease in Cohort A (14.2mo (B) vs. NR (A), p=0.045) and not different for adverse risk group (11.1mo (B) vs. 7.3mo (A), p=0.2). Prior HMA exposure was 26.8% in Cohort A and 29.5% in Cohort B for an antecedent hematologic malignancy, however it did not impact mOS (p=0.86) or ORR (p=0.7). Early mortality rates for Cohort A and B were similar at day 30 (2.4% vs. 0%) and day 60 (4.9% vs. 3.8%). Rate of relapse was similar between cohorts A and B (16.0% vs. 30.6%, p=0.24). We then compared the outcomes of pts in Cohort B to CPX-351eligible arm from Cohort A (n=14). ORR and mOS were similar in Cohort B and CPX-351 eligible arm (ORR: 50% vs. 50%, p=1.0; mOS 11.1mo vs. 13.8mo, p=0.43). Only 1 patient (7.1%) of the CPX-351eligible arm underwent allo-SCT. Conclusion Our study demonstrates that HMA+Ven results in comparable response rates and survival outcomes to patients receiving CPX-351 when used as an initial remission therapy for patients with newly diagnosed AML, however the median follow up for patients receiving HMA+Ven was short. Survival did not appear to be impacted by a significantly greater proportion of patients proceeding to allo-SCT in the CPX-351 arm. Overall, HMA+Ven may represent a reasonable frontline remission therapeutic choice in patients with AML and a randomized trial would seem justified. Disclosures Kuykendall: Abbvie: Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy; Incyte: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Honoraria. List:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Lancet:Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Agios, Biopath, Biosight, Boehringer Inglheim, Celator, Celgene, Janssen, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Karyopharm, Novartis: Consultancy; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy, Other: fees for non-CME/CE services . Sallman:Celyad: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Komrokji:celgene: Consultancy; Agios: Consultancy; pfizer: Consultancy; DSI: Consultancy; JAZZ: Speakers Bureau; JAZZ: Consultancy; Novartis: Speakers Bureau; Incyte: Consultancy. Sweet:Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Stemline: Consultancy; Agios: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol Myers Squibb: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Incyte: Research Funding; Astellas: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Consultancy; Celgene: Speakers Bureau; Jazz: Speakers Bureau. Talati:Agios: Honoraria; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Honoraria; Daiichi-Sankyo: Honoraria; Astellas: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Honoraria.

Download Full-text

The 17-Gene Leukemic Stemess Score Can Predict Treatment Outcomes Following Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-128281 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 3299-3299

Author(s):

Dennis Dong Hwan Kim ◽

Taehyung Kim ◽

Tracy Murphy ◽

Steven M Chan ◽

Mark D. Minden ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽

Stem Cell ◽

Myeloid Leukemia ◽

Research Funding ◽

Chronic Gvhd ◽

Hematopoietic Stem ◽

Free Survival ◽

Allogeneic Hct ◽

Gvhd Prophylaxis ◽

Acute Myeloid

Introduction: A 17-gene stemness score (LSC17 score) had been reported to determine the risk of therapy resistance in acute myeloid leukemia (Nature 2016), and this was replicated successfully in 5 independent cohorts (n=908). When the patients were stratified according to the median value of the LSC17 score, allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT) did not affect overall survival (OS) from initial diagnosis for either high- or low-score patients (p=0.2 for high and p=0.06 for low LSC17 score groups). In the present study, we aimed to further perform a subgroup analysis confined to the patients receiving allogeneic HCT and determine whether the LSC17 score at leukemia diagnosis was associated with treatment outcomes including OS, leukemia-free survival (LFS), non-relapse mortality (NRM), relapse incidence (RI), and acute/chronic GVHD following allogeneic HCT. Methods and patients: Out of 452 patients with available LSC17 scores, 123 patients were included into the final analysis who received allogeneic HCT using matched (n=104, 84.6%) or mismatched/haploidentical donors (n=19, 15.4%). 80 patients were from the previous study (Nature 2016), while 43 patients were a prospectively accrued cohort during 2016-2018. Patients and transplant characteristics were: male/female (n=61/62); median age, 51 (17-73); CR status prior to HCT, CR1 (n=93, 75.6%), CR2 (n=30, 24.4%); Conditioning regimen, reduced intensity/myeloablative conditioning (n=59, 48.0% vs n=64, 52.0%); GVHD prophylaxis using post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy; n=45, 36.6%) or T cell depletion (n=62, 50.4%); Cytogenetic risk, favorable (n=10, 8.1%), intermediate (n=70, 56.9%), adverse (n=26, 21.1%), inconclusive or not done (n=17, 13.8%). The LSC17 score for each patient was measured in a diagnostic sample using a NanoString assay and compared to the high/low threshold of a reference AML cohort (Ng et al, Nature 2016 and unpublished data). Transplant outcomes were compared according to the LSC17 risk group for OS, LFS, NRM and RI. Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted for OS and LFS using Cox's proportional hazard model or for NRM and RI using Fine-Gray model, respectively. The following variables were included in the model: the LSC17 score group (high vs low LSC17 score), chronic GVHD, CR status (CR2 vs CR1), Cytogenetic risk (adverse vs favorable/intermediate/inconclusive), GVHD prophylaxis (PTCy vs others, T-cell depletion vs others), Age (above 60 vs others), donor type (mismatched/haploidentical vs matched donors). Results: With a median follow-up duration of 22 months among survivors after HCT, 23 patients experienced relapse (n=23, 18.7%) while 63 deaths (51.2%) were noted. Out of 123 patients, 58 (47.1%) had a low LSC17 score and 65 (52.9%) had a high LSC17 score. There was no difference in the distribution of LSC17 scores between the group who received HCT (n=123; 0.479±0.026) vs not (n=229; 0.456±0.019; p=0.491). LFS survival was significantly better in the low LSC17 score group (51.5 vs 32.4% for 2-year LFS rate, p=0.0219), and there was a trend to higher OS rate in the low LSC17 group (48.1%) compared to the high LSC17 group at 2 years (34.2%, p=0.09). Furthermore, patients with a low LSC17 score had a significantly lower RI (14.9% vs 27.3% for 2-year relapse incidence, p=0.028). There is no difference of NRM between the groups (37.2% vs 38.2% at 2 years, p=0.647). Multivariate analysis confirmed that the high LSC17 score group was associated with worse LFS (HR 1.874 [1.080-3.249], p=0.025). However, it was not confirmed with respect to OS or relapse incidence. As expected, it was not associated with NRM. Conclusion: A low 17-gene stemness score is associated with better leukemia-free survival and lower relapse incidence after allogeneic HCT, and is suggested to be associated with OS. The high LSC17 score group may be considered for novel therapeutic strategies to reduce the risk of relapse after allogeneic HCT. Figure Disclosures Chan: Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; AbbVie Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Agios: Honoraria. Minden:Trillium Therapetuics: Other: licensing agreement. Michelis:CSL Behring: Other: Financial Support. Mattsson:Gilead: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Therakos: Honoraria. Wang:Pfizer AG Switzerland: Honoraria, Other: Travel and accommodation; Pfizer International: Honoraria, Other: Travel and accommodation; Trilium therapeutics: Other: licensing agreement, Research Funding; NanoString: Other: Travel and accommodation.

Download Full-text

Extramedullary Disease at Diagnosis of Acute Myeloid Leukemia Does Not Influence Outcome of Patients Undergoing Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplant in First Complete Remission

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v126.23.2020.2020 ◽

2015 ◽

Vol 126 (23) ◽

pp. 2020-2020

Author(s):

Fotios V. Michelis ◽

Hans A. Messner ◽

Naheed Alam ◽

Vikas Gupta ◽

Dennis Dong Hwan Kim ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽

Complete Remission ◽

Cumulative Incidence ◽

Myeloid Leukemia ◽

Research Funding ◽

Univariate Analysis ◽

Multivariable Analysis ◽

Hematopoietic Cell ◽

First Complete Remission ◽

Acute Myeloid

Abstract Occurrence of extramedullary (EM) disease at diagnosis of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) has been associated with increased risk of relapse and worse outcomes post-chemotherapy. There is minimal data in the literature concerning the association with outcomes following allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). The purpose of this single-centre study was to retrospectively investigate the impact of EM disease at diagnosis on the outcome of 303 patients with AML in first complete remission (CR1) that underwent HCT during the time period 2000-2013. Median age at HCT was 51 years (range 18-71), 151 (50%) patients were female. Myeloablative conditioning (MAC) was used in 202 (67%) patients, reduced-intensity (RIC) in 101 (33%) patients. Donors were related for 194 (64%) patients, unrelated for 109 (36%) patients. Grafts were peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) in 253 (83%) patients and bone marrow in 50 (17%) patients. Median follow-up of patients alive was 63 months (range 12-168). Cytogenetics at diagnosis were available for 263 (87%) of patients, of which 16 (5%) were favorable, 185 (61%) were intermediate and 62 (20%) were unfavorable risk (MRC classification). Primary induction failure prior to achievement of CR was seen in 67 (22%) patients. In vivo T-cell depletion was performed in 71 (23%) patients. A total of 124 patients (41%) underwent HCT during the years 2000-2006 and 179 patients (59%) during the years 2007-2013. EM disease at diagnosis was seen in 39 patients (13%), of whom 11 patients had CSF disease, 7 patients had gingival infiltration and 5 patients had leukemia cutis. Univariate analysis for overall survival (OS) demonstrated that EM disease at diagnosis had no influence (HR=0.96 for EM, 95%CI=0.60-1.51, p=0.85, Figure 1). Multivariable analysis for OS including the previously described variables verified this observation. EM disease did not influence cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR) on univariate analysis (HR=0.94 for EM, 95%CI=0.45-1.96, p=0.86, Figure 2), and this also was confirmed on multivariable analysis. Moreover, EM disease did not influence cumulative incidence of non-relapse mortality on both univariate (HR=0.94 for EM, 95%CI=0.53-1.66, p=0.83) and multivariable analysis. In conclusion, EM disease at diagnosis of AML in patients achieving CR1, does not seem to influence outcomes post allogeneic HCT. This is significant in the consideration of allogeneic HCT for the treatment of this unfavorable subtype of AML. We are unable to comment on whether a similar percentage of patients with EM disease versus without EM disease, achieve CR1. Figure 1. Figure 1. Figure 2. Figure 2. Disclosures Kim: Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Myelodysplasia-Related Changes Have Adverse Prognostic Significance in Children with Acute Myeloid Leukemia; A Report From the Japanese Pediatric Leukemia/Lymphoma Study Group (JPLSG).

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v120.21.2583.2583 ◽

2012 ◽

Vol 120 (21) ◽

pp. 2583-2583

Author(s):

Akitoshi Kinoshita ◽

Hayato Miyachi ◽

Hiromichi Matsushita ◽

Miharu Yabe ◽

Tomohiko Taki ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽

Complete Remission ◽

Myeloid Leukemia ◽

Who Classification ◽

Prognostic Significance ◽

Morphological Features ◽

Review System ◽

Free Survival ◽

Multilineage Dysplasia ◽

Acute Myeloid

Abstract Abstract 2583 Background: The 2008 WHO classification expanded the category of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with multilineage dysplasia of the 2001 WHO classification into AML with myelodysplasia-related changes (AML-MRC). Although AML with multilineage dysplasia (AML-MLD) is diagnosed based on morphological features alone, AML-MRC includes AML with a previous history of myelodysplastic syndrome or myeloproliferative neoplasms and AML with a myelodysplasia-related cytogenetic abnormality as well as AML-MLD. Since this category of AML has been believed to be rare in children, its clinical impact on children remains unknown. We developed a comprehensive and prospective central review system in a clinical trial for pediatric AML, in which unexpected high incidence of AML-MRC was found. Thus, we evaluated the clinical characteristics and prognostic significance of AML-MRC in children. Patients & Methods: JPLSG AML-05, registered at http://www.umin.ac.jp/ctr/as UMIN000000511, is a nation-wide multi-institutional study for children (age <18 years) with de novo AML from 11/1/2006 to 12/31/2010 (acute promyelocytic leukemia and myeloid leukemia associated with Down syndrome excluded). On the trial, morphology was prospectively diagnosed by a central review system. A diagnosis of AML-MLD was made by the presence of dysplasia in 50% or more of the cells in 2 or more lineages. Cytogenetic tests were carried out in regional laboratories, but reports were reviewed centrally. Mutations of FLT3 were examined for all patients. Results: Among 447 eligible patients recruited, a total of 93 patients (20.8%) were diagnosed as AML-MRC; 34 from morphological features, 65 from myelodysplasia-related cytogenetic abnormalities and six from the both. The cases with AML-MRC included 48 boys and 45 girls with a median age of 3 years (range; 0–17 years). Ten patients with AML-MRC had FLT3-internal tandem duplication (ITD). Three-year probability of event-free survival (3y-pEFS) and 3-year probability of overall survival (3y-pOS) at the 93 patients was 37.1% (95%CI, 26.9 – 47.3%) and 56.8% (95%CI, 45.2 – 66.8%), respectively. The median follow-up of alive patients as of May 2012 was 3.4 years (range;1.3–5.3 years). Comparison of the clinical outcome of AML-MRC with AML, not otherwise specified (AML-NOS)(n=111), showed that AML-MRC had a lower complete remission rate after two induction courses(67.7% vs 85.6%, p<0.01), and worse 3y-pEFS (37.1% vs 53.8%, p= 0.02), but that 3y-pOS (56.8% vs 68.9%, p= 0.05) and 3 year probability of relapse-free survival after achieving complete remission (46.9.% vs 62.8%, p= 0.06) were similar. Although no differences were seen in sex and WBC count at diagnosis between AML-MRC and AML-NOS, the median age or the incidence of FLT3-ITD positivity of AML-MRC was lower than that of AML-NOS. In Cox regression analysis, adjusted hazard ratio (HR) of patients diagnosed with AML-MRC for EFS was significantly worse compared to those diagnosed with AML-NOS after controlling for these baseline patients and disease characteristics (HR 1.7,p<0.01). Conclusions: Our study suggests that AML-MRC is not rare in children. AML-MRC had adverse prognostic significance in children partly due to the low induction rate. Induction chemotherapy awaits further improvement for children with AML-MRC. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Download Full-text

Homoharringtonine-Based Induction Regimens for Patients with De Novo Acute Myeloid Leukemia: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Phase 3 Trial

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v120.21.45.45 ◽

2012 ◽

Vol 120 (21) ◽

pp. 45-45 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Jie Jin ◽

Jianxiang Wang ◽

Feifei Chen ◽

Depei Wu ◽

Jiong Hu ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽

Complete Remission ◽

Induction Therapy ◽

Myeloid Leukemia ◽

De Novo ◽

Phase 3 ◽

Free Survival ◽

Cytogenetic Profile ◽

To Receive ◽

Acute Myeloid

Abstract Abstract 45 Background Homoharringtonine-based induction regimens have been widely used in China for patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML), which have shown to improve the rate of complete remission (CR) and long-term survival. We aimed to further evaluate its efficacy and safety in treatment of de novo AML. Methods This phase 3 study was done in 17 institutions in China. Patients between the age of 14 and 59 with untreated AML were randomly assigned to receive HAA (homoharringtonine 2 mg/m2/day, days 1–7; cytarabine 100 mg/m2/day, days 1–7, aclarubicin 20 mg/day, days 1–7), HAD (homoharringtonine 2 mg/m2/day, days 1–7; cytarabine 100 mg/m2/day, days 1–7; daunorubicin 40 mg/m2/day, days 1–3) or DA (daunorubicin 40–45 mg/m2/day, days 1–3; cytarabine 100 mg/m2/day, days 1–7) regimen as induction therapy. Patients who achieved partial remission or had a decrease of blast ¡Ý60% could receive a same second induction course. All patients who had a complete remission were offered the same consolidation chemotherapy according to the cytogenetic-risk. The primary endpoints were CR and event-free survival (EFS). The trial is registered in Chinese Clinical Trial Register, number ChiCTR-TRC-06000054. Results 620 patients were randomly assigned to receive HAA (n=207), HAD (n=206) and DA (n=207) regimens. HAA or HAD regimen, as compared with DA regimen, resulted in a higher rate of CR in the first course of induction therapy (67.5% vs. 54.0%, P=0.005; 64.9% vs. 54.0%, P=0.026, respectively). The overall CR rate remained significantly higher in the HAA arm as compared with DA arm (75.0% vs. 61.9%, P=0.005). HAA or HAD regimen has similar rates of adverse events as compared with DA regimen, but was associated with significantly increased risk of induction death (5.8% vs. 1.0%, P=0.007; 6.6% vs. 1.0%, P=0.003, respectively). The EFS was greatly improved in the HAA arm (3-year EFS 35.4±3.5% vs.23.1±3.1%, P=0.002), while not significantly in the HAD arm (3-year EFS 32.7±3.5% vs.23.1±3.1%, P=0.078) as compared with the DA arm. Overall survival (OS) and relapse-free survival (RFS) did not differ significantly in the HAA or HAD arm as compared with DA arm, but an OS and RFS advantage of the HAA arm over the DA arm was observed in patients with favorable or intermediate cytogenetic profile (OS: P=0.014; RFS: P=0.022, respectively). Patients in the HAD arm with NPM1 but not FLT3ITD mutations, as compared with the patients in the DA arm, had an improved EFS (P=0.038). In intermediate cytogenetic profile, patients with mutant CEBPA had prolonged RFS in the HAA arm as compared with the DA arm (P=0.045). Conclusions Homoharringtonine-based induction regimens are associated with a higher rate of CR and improved survival as compared with DA regimen in AML. The toxicity is mild with the exception of a higher rate of induction death. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Download Full-text

CBFA2T3-GLIS2 Fusion Is Prevalent in Younger Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia and Associated with High-Risk of Relapse and Poor Outcome: A Children’s Oncology Group Report

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v124.21.13.13 ◽

2014 ◽

Vol 124 (21) ◽

pp. 13-13 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Heather L Schuback ◽

Todd A. Alonzo ◽

Robert B. Gerbing ◽

Kristen L. Miller ◽

Samir Kahwash ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽

Myeloid Leukemia ◽

De Novo ◽

Disease Free Survival ◽

Clinical Implications ◽

Free Survival ◽

Younger Patients ◽

De Novo Aml ◽

Disease Free ◽

Acute Myeloid

Abstract The cryptic CBA2T3-GLIS2 fusion generated by the inv(16)(p13.3q24.3) was initially identified in megakaryocytic leukemia and later implicated in other acute myeloid leukemia (AML) subtypes. Presence of this fusion may lead to altered expression of the potentially targetable sonic hedgehog and bone morphogenic protein pathways. We determined the prevalence of CBA2T3-GLIS2 in children treated on COG AAML03P1 and AAML0531 protocols, which collectively enrolled 1361 eligible children, adolescents, and young adults with de novo AML, and correlated the presence of this fusion with patient demographics, laboratory features, and clinical outcomes. We also determined the prevalence and clinical implications of CBA2T3-GLIS2 in 71 children with FAB M7 AML treated on 4 consecutive COG AML trials. Of the 1042 diagnostic samples available and tested for CBFA2T3-GLIS2, 45 (4.3%) were positive for the fusion. Fusion-positive patients were significantly younger than fusion-negative patients (2.1 vs. 10.3 years; P<0.001). CBFA2T3-GLIS2 was most prevalent in the youngest patients (10.6% for 0 to <2 year olds and 8.6% for 2 to <5 year olds) [Figure A]. In contrast, no fusion transcripts were identified in 299 unselected adult patients. All FAB subtypes were represented in fusion-positive patients. Overall, FAB M5 and M7 were equally prevalent in fusion-positive patients, and each subtype accounted for 20% of cases [Figure B]. There was a preponderance of MLL rearrangements (N=7) in fusion-positive patients, and 3 more patients had either t(8;21) or inv(16), and 25.6% (N=11) without karyotypic alterations (CN-AML). None of the fusion-positive patients had the t(7;12) or 12p abnormality. There were few common AML-associated mutations: 1 patient had FLT3ITD and 1 had the WT1 mutation (no NPM1 or biallelic CEBPA mutations were identified). Figure 1 Figure 1. Rates of morphologic complete remission (CR) at the end of induction course 1 were similar for fusion-positive and -negative patients (68.9% vs. 77.7%; P=0.17). However, fusion-positive patients were more likely to have minimal residual disease (MRD) by flow cytometry at this time point (50% vs. 28.9%; P=0.006) with a correspondingly higher relapse rate (RR) from remission of 58% vs. 35% (p=0.005). Disease-free survival for those with and without fusion was 42% vs. 58% (p=0.060) In a subset analysis of 193 patients with CN-AML, the prevalence of CBFA2T3-GLIS2 was 4.7%. Fusion-positive patients were younger than fusion-negative patients (1.6 vs. 13.1 years; P<0.001) and more likely to have MRD at the end of induction (85.7% vs. 40.8%; P=0.043). CN-AML fusion-positive patients had significantly worse 5-year OS (36% vs. 67% P=0.025) and EFS (18% vs. 51%, P=0.017) than fusion-negative patients. All fusion-positive patients in CR had a higher 5-year RR than fusion-negative patients (88% vs. 33%; P<0.001), with a corresponding disease-free survival (DFS) of 13% vs. 59% (P<0.001). Implications of CBFA2T3-GLIS2 were evaluated in 71 cases of children with FAB M7 AML where the fusion was identified in 12 patients (17%). Fusion-positive FAB M7 patients had significantly lower CR rate than fusion-negative patients (33.3% vs. 77.6%, P=0.005) and all were MRD positive at the end of induction (100% vs. 30%, P=0.001). All FAB M7 fusion-positive patients relapsed (100% vs. 36%, P=0.007), with a DFS of 0% vs. 60% (p=0.013). As CBFA2T3-GLIS2 was most common in younger patients, we compared clinical implications in children <2 years of age. Although CR rates in fusion-positive and -negative patients were similar (68.2% vs. 74.9%; P=0.50), fusion-positive patients were more likely than fusion-negative patients to have MRD at the end of course 1 (63.2% vs. 24.8%, P=0.006). Five-year RR rates in fusion-positive and -negative patients were 71% vs. 39% (P=0.012), with corresponding DFS of 29% vs. 56% (P=0.030). This study provides a comprehensive evaluation of incidence and prognostic implications of the CBFA2T3-GLIS2 fusion in pediatric de novo AML. Along with MLL rearrangements, 12p abnormalities, and the recently described NUP98-JARID1A fusion, this cryptic inversion 16, as defined by presence of the CBFA2T3-GLIS2 fusion, represents a distinct, recurrent chromosomal abnormality associated with poor prognosis in infant AML and is a potential therapeutic target. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Download Full-text