scholarly journals Trial in Progress: A Prospective Phase I/II Trial to Jointly Optimize the Administration Schedule(s) and Dose(s) of Melphalan for Injection (Evomela) As a Preparative Regimen for Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 37-38
Author(s):  
Qaiser Bashir ◽  
Peter F Thall ◽  
Dawen Sui ◽  
Cristina Knape ◽  
Jitesh Kawedia ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Propylene Glycol ◽  
Cell Transplantation ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Room Temperature ◽  
Advisory Board ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Preparative Regimen

Background: High-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (auto HCT) is considered to be the standard of care treatment for transplant-eligible patients with multiple myeloma (MM). The most commonly used conditioning regimen in this setting is high-dose melphalan by intravenous administration. Conventional melphalan formulations, when administered at high doses, can put patients at risk of potential propylene glycol-associated toxicities. Melphalan for injection (Evomela) is propylene glycol free (PGF), can be dissolved directly using saline, and as a PGF reformulation of Alkeran, incorporating Captisol brand of beta-cyclodextrin sulfobutyl ethers sodium salts, overcomes previous formulation limitations. In 2016 Evomela was the first product approved by the US FDA for high-dose conditioning treatment prior to HCT in MM patients and it is also indicated for the palliative treatment of patients with MM for whom oral therapy is not appropriate. Reconstituted Evomela solution can be stored in the vial for up to 1 hour at room temperature or up to 24 hours at 2-8 °C with no significant degradation. After storage in the vial, it remains stable for an additional 3 to 29 hours after, preparation of admixture solution in infusion bags at concentrations of 0.25 to 5.0 mg/mL, respectively. As well, Evomela solution in saline, at concentration of 5.0 mg/mL melphalan, was bacteriostatic through 72 hours when stored at 2-8 °C. This stability allows for less frequent handling by pharmacy and nursing staff, resulting in a concomitant decrease in exposure risks, increased convenience and administration flexibility, suggestive of an improved ease of handling and administration, when compared to Alkeran. Further, Evomela may actually be less toxic due to the absence of propylene glycol. Although increased melphalan doses have previously demonstrated signals of improved response, the most commonly used dose of melphalan is 200 mg/m2, primarily due to concerns of toxicity. Emerging data regarding higher stability and potentially less toxicity of PGF melphalan (Evomela) supports dose escalation evaluation in order to improve the outcomes. Previous trial data have shown that continuous infusion or frequent fractionated-dose delivery increases the antitumour activity of several drugs. Due to the instability of currently available Alkeran at the room temperature, infusional studies have not been feasible. This limitation is overcome by Evomela, being that the compound is stable for several hours at the room temperature, thus allowing evaluation of infusional schedules in addition to the traditional 30-60 minute bolus doses. Here, we describe a trial designed to assess whether the above noted characteristics of Evomela allow for the escalation of dose and prolongation of infusion time, in order to increase the efficacy of melphalan in patients undergoing auto-HCT. Study Design/Methods: This is a two-stage phase I-II trial to optimize the dose and schedule of Evomela given as a single agent preparative regimen for auto-HCT. Up to 60 participants may be included if they are 18-70 years of age, with non-relapsed MM, have a Karnofsky performance score ≥70%, who have received at least two cycles of initial systemic therapy, and are within 2 to 12 months of the first dose. Patients will be randomized 1:1 to two different infusion schedules (30-60 minute infusion or 8-9 hour infusion) using Evomela (2mg/ml) at two dose cohorts (200mg/ml2 or 225mg/m2). Because 2 mg/mL Evomela is stable for 10 hours, patients receiving the 8-9 hour infusion will receive the total dose in one single infusion bag. The primary objectives are to determine the optimal dose and schedule of Evomela before auto-HCT for MM and collect pharmacokinetic data and compare the exposure-response evaluations between the two infusion schedules. Secondary outcomes will include incidence of treatment-related mortality, rate of minimal residual disease negative complete response at 90 days post auto-HCT, progression-free survival and overall survival after auto-HCT in newly diagnosed myeloma patients treated on different schedules and doses of Evomela. The active study follow-up period will be up to one-year post auto-HCT. Figure Disclosures Bashir: Acrotech: Research Funding; StemLine: Research Funding; Takeda: Other: Advisory Board, Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; KITE: Other: Advisory Board; Amgen: Other: Advisory Board; Purdue: Other: Advisory Board. Qazilbash:Amgen: Research Funding; Bioclinica: Consultancy; Angiocrine: Research Funding; Bioline: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding.

High Dose Intravenous Busulfan and Melphalan Followed By Bortezomib (BuMelVel) As Conditioning With Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation (ASCT) For Patients With Multiple Myeloma (MM)

Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 3376-3376
Author(s):  
Danielle Sterrenberg ◽  
Patrick J Stiff ◽  
Mala Parthasarathy ◽  
Aileen Go ◽  
Scott E. Smith ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Stem Cell Transplantation ◽  
Cell Transplantation ◽  
Induction Therapy ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Fixed Dose ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Target Area ◽  
Preparative Regimen

Abstract Background Progression free and overall survival (PFS/OS) for Multiple Myeloma (MM) have improved over the past 20 years largely as a result of ASCT as well as novel conventional dose therapeutic agents. However, since the 1990s improvements in PFS and OS due to ASCT have improved minimally due to continued reliance on single agent melphalan (MEL). In order to improve PFS and OS, better transplant regimens should be investigated. The combination of Busulfan (BU) and MEL delivers better PFS compared to MEL alone (Lahuerta, et al) with similar toxicity rates to MEL alone. Furthermore, in vitro and in vivo studies indicate synergy between MEL and proteasome inhibitors such as Botezomib (BTZ). Superior response rates and PFS were seen when BTZ is combined with MEL when compared with historical controls using MEL in a recent IFM study. (Roussel et al. Blood 2010). We hypothesize that IV BU and MEL followed by BTZ (BuMelVel) could be an effective preparative regimen with acceptable toxicity for patients with MM. Methods Between July 2009 and June 2013 57 patients with Multiple Myeloma who had already undergone induction therapy and were eligible for ASCT were enrolled. Patients received IV BU administered as a daily intravenous infusion for a total of 4 days with the first 2 days (day -6, -5) at fixed dose of 130 mg/m2 over 3 hours and the subsequent 2 doses (day -4, -3) adjusted to achieve a target area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) total of 20,000 mM* min. Pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis performed after the first dose of IV Bu was used to determine Bu AUC and individualized Bu PK-directed dosing for later doses (d-4 and -3). MEL was administered at 140 mg/ m2 IV over 15-30 minutes on D-2. BTZ 1.6 mg/m2 was administered IV push on D-1. Palifermin was given for mucoprotection at a dose of 6.25 mg IV for two consecutive days before the first busulfan dose (days -8 and -7). A third dose of 6.25 mg was give on day 0 after stem cell transplantation. Results Of the 57 patients enrolled 56 are evaluable for toxicity and 54 for response at D +100. Median age is 61 (31 - 72). 49 % of patients had received ≥ 2 induction regimens (range 1-4) and 69% were DS stage III. 38% of patients had achieved at least a VGPR after induction with 9% of those achieving a CR. After transplantation, 70% of patients had at least a VGPR including 37% CR or sCR. All but 4 patients had a PR or better to induction therapy (three had stable and one progressive disease). The most common grade ≥ 3 toxicities were neutropenic fever (n = 42) and mucositis (n=21). No VOD or treatment related deaths at D+100 were observed and all patients engrafted. Median time to engraftment was 10 days (range 10-12) and median hospital stay was 20 days ( 15-31). Median PFS at 2 years was 78%. Conclusion BuMelVel is an effective novel preparative regimen with ≥ VGPR and CR/sCR of 70% and 37% respectively which compare favorably to responses previously reported with MEL 200 alone (43% and 11%, respectively) by Roussel et al. At the time of reporting, 12 patients had relapsed; 2 and 3-year PFS rates were 78% and 60% respectively. The regimen of BuMelVel is well tolerated and may lead to improvements in PFS and OS in patients with multiple myeloma. Disclosures: Rodriguez: Otsuka: Research Funding; Millennium: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau.

scholarly journals Utilization of Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation in Older Patients with Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 5701-5701
Author(s):  
Justin King ◽  
Mark A. Fiala ◽  
Scott R. Goldsmith ◽  
Keith E. Stockerl-Goldstein ◽  
Mark A. Schroeder ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Older Patients ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Small Sample ◽  
Poor Performance Status ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Equity Ownership

Historically, high-dose therapy in combination with autologous stem cell transplants (ASCT) for multiple myeloma (MM) was reserved for younger patients. In more recent years, the use of ASCT has expanded in the older population. However, there is still limited data on the utilization and efficacy of ASCT in older patients, particularly those over the age of 75. To further evaluate this issue, we retrospectively analyzed all patients with newly diagnosed MM between the ages of 75-78, the institutional cutoff for ASCT eligibility, that were referred to the stem cell transplant unit at our institution for consultation from the years 2012-2018. Baseline characteristics, anti-myeloma treatments, and patient outcomes were abstracted through chart review. Seventy-five patients were referred to our institution. 71% were male, 29% female. 39% patients were considered ineligible for ASCT by the consulting transplant physician. Most patients were considered transplant ineligible due to comorbidities or poor performance status. Of the 46 patients eligible for ASCT, 52% underwent the procedure during their first-line therapy. The majority of those patients received reduced intensity melphalan (140 mg/m2) while 2 patients received conventional dosing (200 mg/m2). The other 22 patients eligible for ASCT declined or elected to defer the procedure and to be treated with conventional therapy. The characteristics of these three groups were similar and are detailed in Table 1. After a median follow-up of 30 months, 25% of the patients had expired. Estimated median overall survival (OS) was 71.3 months (unable to quantitate 95% CI) for all patients. Compared to transplant eligible patients, regardless of transplant receipt, those who were transplant ineligible had a 186% increase risk for death (HR 2.86; 95% CI 1.12-7.35; p = 0.029). There was also a notable trend for longer OS in those who underwent ASCT compared to those who were eligible but declined the procedure, but it was not statistically significant (HR 0.36; 95% CI 0.10-1.28; p = 0.114). At a transplant center, two-thirds of patients referred for newly diagnosed MM between the ages 75-78 were considered eligible for ASCT and one-third underwent the procedure. Outcomes were better for patients eligible for ASCT, regardless of whether they underwent the procedure. There was also a trend for better OS in patients who underwent the procedure compared to those who declined. While small sample sizes and the retrospective nature of the study limit our ability to draw conclusions, it appears that ASCT has an OS benefit among patients age 75-78. Disclosures Fiala: Incyte: Research Funding. Stockerl-Goldstein:AbbVie: Equity Ownership; Abbott: Equity Ownership. Vij:Genentech: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Research Funding; Sanofi: Honoraria; Karyopharm: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding. Wildes:Janssen: Research Funding; Carevive: Consultancy.

scholarly journals VTE Rates and Safety Analysis of Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Patients Receiving Carfilzomib-Lenalidomide-Dexamethasone (KRD) with or without Rivaroxaban Prophylaxis

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 1835-1835 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katrina M Piedra ◽  
Hani Hassoun ◽  
Larry W. Buie ◽  
Sean M. Devlin ◽  
Jessica Flynn ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Venous Thromboembolism ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Cancer Trial ◽  
Oncology Research ◽  
Increased Risk

Introduction Immunomodulatory agents (IMiD's) are associated with an increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE), particularly when combined with high dose steroids. Studies evaluating the use of lenalidomide-bortezomib-dexamethasone (RVD) and carfilzomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone (KRD) in the frontline setting for multiple myeloma (MM) have reported a 6% and 24% incidence of thrombosis, respectively, despite primary thrombotic prophylaxis with aspirin (ASA) (Richardson, et al. Blood. 2010; Korde, et al. JAMA Oncol 2015). Recent data, including the Hokusai VTE Cancer Trial, have suggested that safety and efficacy of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are preserved in the setting of treatment of solid malignancy-associated thrombosis (Raskob, et al. N Engl J Med. 2018; Mantha, et al. J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2017). Despite this data, there is limited experience and use of DOACs in prevention of thromboses in the setting of hematologic malignancies, specifically MM. After careful review of literature, since early 2018, we changed our clinical practice and routinely placed newly diagnosed MM (NDMM) patients receiving KRD at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) on concomitant rivaroxaban 10 mg once daily, regardless of VTE risk stratification. In the following abstract, we present VTE rates and safety data for newly diagnosed MM patients receiving RVD with ASA vs. KRD with ASA vs. KRD with rivaroxaban prophylaxis. Methods This was an IRB-approved, single-center, retrospective chart review study. All untreated patients with newly diagnosed MM, receiving at least one cycle of RVD or KRD between January 2015 and October 2018 were included. The period of observation included the time between the first day of therapy until 90 days after completion of induction therapy. Patients were identified by querying the pharmacy database for carfilzomib or bortezomib administration and outpatient medication review of thromboprophylaxis with rivaroxaban or ASA. VTE diagnoses were confirmed by ICD-10 codes and appropriate imaging studies (computed tomography and ultrasound). Descriptive statistics were performed. Results During the observation period, 241 patients were identified to have received RVD or KRD in the frontline (99 RVD with ASA; 97 KRD with ASA; 45 KRD with rivaroxaban). Baseline characteristics were well distributed among the three arms, with a median age of 60 (30-94) in the RVD ASA arm, 62 (33-77) in the KRD ASA arm, and 60 (24-79) in the KRD rivaroxaban arm. Patients had International Staging System (ISS) stage 3 disease in 13% (N=13), 9.3% (N=9), and 11% (N=5) of the RVD ASA, KRD ASA, and KRD rivaroxaban arms, respectively. Median weekly doses of dexamethasone were higher in both KRD arms, 40 mg (20-40) vs. 20 mg (10-40) in the RVD ASA arm. The average initial doses of lenalidomide were 22 mg in the RVD ASA arm compared to 25 mg in both the KRD ASA and KRD rivaroxaban arms. After querying the pharmacy database, no patients were identified to have a history or concomitant use of erythropoietin stimulating agent (ESA) use. Treatment-related VTE's occurred in 4 patients (4.0%) in the RVD ASA arm, 16 patients (16.5%) in the KRD ASA arm, and in 1 patient (2.2%) in the KRD rivaroxaban arm. Average time to VTE was 6.15 months (Range 5.42, 9.73) after treatment initiation in the RVD ASA group, while it was 2.61 months (Range 0.43, 5.06) in the KRD ASA group and 1.35 months in the KRD rivaroxaban group. Minor, grade 1 bleeding events per the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) were identified in 1 (1.1%) patient in the RVD ASA arm, 5 (5.2%) patients in the KRD ASA arm, and 1 (2.2%) patient in the KRD rivaroxaban arm. Conclusion More efficacious MM combination therapies have been found to increase the risk of VTE when using ASA prophylaxis, indicating better thromboprophylaxis is needed. We found patients receiving ASA prophylaxis with KRD were more likely to experience a VTE and these events occurred earlier compared to patients receiving ASA prophylaxis with RVD. Importantly, the rate of VTE was reduced to the same level as ASA prophylaxis with RVD when low-dose rivaroxaban 10 mg daily was used with KRD, and without necessarily increasing bleeding risk. Our retrospective data support the development of prospective clinical trials further investigating DOAC use in thromboprophylaxis for NDMM patients receiving carfilzomib-based treatments. Figure Disclosures Hassoun: Novartis: Consultancy; Janssen: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding. Lesokhin:BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Research Funding; GenMab: Consultancy, Honoraria; Serametrix Inc.: Patents & Royalties; Genentech: Research Funding; Juno: Consultancy, Honoraria. Mailankody:Juno: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Takeda Oncology: Research Funding; CME activity by Physician Education Resource: Honoraria. Smith:Celgene: Consultancy, Patents & Royalties, Research Funding; Fate Therapeutics and Precision Biosciences: Consultancy. Landgren:Theradex: Other: IDMC; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Karyopharm: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Merck: Other: IDMC; Sanofi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Adaptive: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. OffLabel Disclosure: Off-label use of rivaroxaban for outpatient prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism (VTE) will be explicitly disclosed to the audience.

Arsenic Trioxide with Ascorbic Acid and High-Dose Melphalan for Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation for Multiple Myeloma.

Blood ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 108 (11) ◽  
pp. 3090-3090 ◽  
Author(s):  
Muzaffar H. Qazilbash ◽  
Rima M. Saliba ◽  
Marilyn S. Davis ◽  
Floralyn L. Mendoza ◽  
Chitra Hosing ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Ascorbic Acid ◽  
Arsenic Trioxide ◽  
Cell Transplantation ◽  
Hematopoietic Progenitor Cell ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Preparative Regimen ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Backround: Arsenic trioxide (ATO) has been shown to be synergistic with melphalan both in vitro and in vivo. We conducted a phase I/II trial to determine the safety and efficacy of a combination of arsenic trioxide, melphalan and ascorbic acid (AA) as preparative regimen in patients undergoing high-dose therapy (HDT) and autologous hematopoietic progenitor cell transplantation for multiple myeloma (MM). We also assessed the impact ATO levels on melphalan pharmacokinetics (PK), engraftment and toxicity. Methods: Forty-eight patients with secretory myeloma (23 females, 25 males; median age: 54, range: 3570) were treated between 4/04 and 8/05. All patient received melphalan 100 mg/m2 IV on days -4 and -3 and AA 1000 mg/day IV on days -9 to -3. Patients were randomized to 3 arms; no ATO (arm 1), ATO 0.15 mg/kg IV on days -9 to -3 (arm 2) and ATO 0.25 mg/kg IV on days -9 to -3 (arm 3). Twelve patients had disease progression or relapse after a prior autograft. Median CD34 cells dose infused was 4.5 x 106/kg (range 2.3–10.9). Results: Patients in all 3 arms were evenly matched. With a median F/U of 14.0 months (range 6–25) post autograft, no dose-limiting toxicity or non-relapse mortality was seen. Toxicity was limited to grade I or II nausea, vomiting and diarrhea. Median ATO levels on day 0 in arms 1, 2 and 3 were 0.2, 26.3 and 46.2 ng/ml, respectively. Melphalan PK was not altered by ATO pretreatment. Median time to neutrophil engraftment (ANC >500/ dl) was 9 days. There were no engraftment failures or delays in the ATO arms. CR rate for the entire group was 23%, and total response rate (CR + PR) was 75%. 1-year Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 75% and 95%, respectively. There was no significant difference in CR, RR, PFS or OS between the 3 arms (p = 0.9, 0.9, 0.4 and 0.6, respectively). A prior autologous transplant (p = 0.02) and abnormal cytogenetics at transplant (p = 0.04) were associated with a significantly shorter remission. Conclusions: ATO + melphalan + ascorbic acid is a safe, effective and well tolerated preparative regimen for patients with multiple myeloma undergoing an autotransplant. A longer follow up is needed to assess the impact of ATO on progression-free and overall survival.

Sequential VAD (Vincristine, Adriamycin, Dexamethasone) and VTD (VELCADE®, Thalidomide, Dexamethasone) Induction Followed by High-Dose Therapy with Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation and Maintenance Treatment with VELCADE for Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma: Interim Results of Phase II Trial.

Blood ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 110 (11) ◽  
pp. 952-952 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sung-Soo Yoon ◽  
Hye Jin Kim ◽  
Dong Soon Lee ◽  
Hyeon Seok Eom ◽  
Jun Ho Jang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Stem Cell Transplantation ◽  
Cell Transplantation ◽  
Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation ◽  
Maintenance Treatment ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Hematologic Toxicity ◽  
Newly Diagnosed

Abstract Introduction Effective reduction of myeloma before autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) prolongs survival in multiple myeloma patients. Recently, incorporation of novel agents resulted in improved response rate and reduced side effect in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. Method: Patients are planned to receive 2 cycles of VAD (vincristine 0.4mg D1-4, adriamycin 9mg/m2 D1-4, dexamethasone 40mg D1-4, 9–12 every 3 weeks), and VTD (bortezomib 1.3mg/m2 D1, 4, 8, 11, thalidomide 100mg daily, dexamethasone 40mg D1-4, 9–12 every 3 weeks). High dose melphalan (200mg/m2) is used as a conditioning regimen for ASCT. Bortezomib (1.3mg/m2) as a maintenance treatment is administered weekly x 4 times every 6 weeks for 4 cycles after ASCT. Response was assessed by EBMT criteria, with additional category of nCR. Adverse events were graded by the NCI-CTCAE, Version 3.0. Result: At this interim analysis, 60 patients have been entered into the ongoing trial, and efficacy could be assessed in 53 patients. After 2 cycles of VAD, response rate was 70%. After VTD, two patients showed further improvement with additional CR, and an overall response was 97% with 14% CR. Especially, patients with poor prognostic cytogenetics (n=6) all responded after VTD. So far, autologous stem cells were successfully collected in all 28 patients with a median CD34+ count of 7.8 x 106/kg (range, 2.17–44.7 x 106/kg). In 24 patients who underwent autologous stem cell transplantation, five patients gained additional CR. There was no progression in patients completed bortezomib maintenance (n=9, CR 77%). The median follow-up duration was 6 months, median time to response was 1.4 months, and median overall survival was not reached. Grade 3,4 hematologic toxicity was more frequently observed after VAD than VTD (anemia 15.8%, 4.6%, neutropenia 7.9%, 3.5%), and incidence of grade 2,3 peripheral neuropathy was low (VAD 3.5%, VTD 7%). Conclusion: Sequential VAD and VTD induction therapy in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma was highly effective, even in patients with poor prognostic cytogenetics, and did not prejudice stem cell collection. VTD could have contributed to increased RR and minimized side effects. An updated results will be presented at the ASH meeting. *Protocol Number: KMM51-NCT00378755.

A Phase I Study of Vorinostat, Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone In Patients with Relapsed or Relapsed and Refractory Multiple Myeloma: Excellent Tolerability and Promising Activity In a Heavily Pretreated Population

Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 1951-1951 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul Richardson ◽  
Donna Weber ◽  
Constantine S. Mitsiades ◽  
Meletios A. Dimopoulos ◽  
Jean-Luc Harousseau ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Phase I Study ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Advisory Board ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Equity Ownership ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Abstract 1951 Background: Although novel treatment combinations for multiple myeloma (MM) have improved outcomes, the disease remains incurable and new drug combinations are urgently needed. Vorinostat is an oral histone deacetylase inhibitor approved in the United States for treatment of patients (pts) with advanced cutaneous T-cell lymphoma who failed prior therapies. Vorinostat alters gene expression and protein activity, promoting MM cell death through multiple pathways, and has been shown in preclinical studies to synergistically enhance the anti-MM activity of bortezomib and immunomodulatory drugs, including lenalidomide, with or without dexamethasone. Aims: The primary objective of this Phase I study was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of vorinostat plus lenalidomide and dexamethasone in pts with relapsed or relapsed and refractory MM. Secondary objectives included overall safety, tolerability, response rate, duration of response, and time to progression (TTP). Methods: Pts in this Phase I multicenter open-label study were sequentially enrolled into 1 of 5 escalating doses of the combination regimen using a standard 3 + 3 design for ≤8 cycles. Pts who tolerated treatment and experienced clinical benefit were eligible for enrollment in an extension phase. Toxicity was evaluated using the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria (version 3.0). Response was assessed using the modified European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation criteria and International Myeloma Working Group Uniform Criteria. Safety and efficacy data were analyzed using summary statistics, except for TTP, which was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Results: As of July 15, 2010, 31 pts were treated and evaluable for toxicity; 4 pts remain on study. Most pts had received prior thalidomide (n=22; 71%), bortezomib (n=20; 65%), or lenalidomide (n=14; 45%), with a median of 4 prior therapies (range, 1–10). The patient population contained both high-risk and low-risk pts, based on cytogenetic and/or fluorescence in situ hybridization analyses. Most adverse events (AEs) were mild or moderate in severity. The most common grade ≥3 treatment-related AEs, experienced by 19 (61%) pts, were neutropenia (26%), thrombocytopenia (16%), diarrhea (13%), anemia (10%), and fatigue (10%); 8 pts discontinued due to toxicity. One dose-limiting toxicity (grade 3 diarrhea lasting >48 h) was observed at the maximum assessed dose (level 5), but MTD was not reached (Table) and there were no treatment-related deaths. Among 30 pts evaluable for response, the median TTP was 32 weeks (5 mo), and 4 pts remain on study as of the data cutoff date; 26 of 30 pts (87%) have achieved at least stable disease (SD). Best single responses included 2 complete responses, 3 very good partial responses (VGPR), 11 partial responses (PR), and 5 minimal responses (MR), with 5 pts achieving SD and 4 developing progressive disease, resulting in an overall response rate (ORR; PR or better) of 53%. Of 13 evaluable pts who had previously received lenalidomide, a best single response of SD or better was observed in 9 (69%; 2 VGPR, 3 PR, 1 MR, 3 SD), resulting in a 38% ORR. Notably, SD or better (2 PR, 1 MR, 3 SD) was observed in 60% of 10 evaluable pts who were relapsed, refractory, or intolerant to previous lenalidomide-containing regimens. Conclusions: Preliminary data from this Phase I study suggest that vorinostat plus lenalidomide and dexamethasone is a convenient and generally well-tolerated regimen with promising activity for relapsed or relapsed and refractory MM. The MTD for this combination was not reached. Importantly, responses were observed in pts who had received prior lenalidomide, bortezomib, and thalidomide. Further evaluation of this regimen is planned in future trials. Disclosures: Richardson: Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Millenium: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Johnson & Johnson: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Off Label Use: Vorinostat, Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone for treatment in Multiple Myeloma. Weber:Novartis-unpaid consultant: Consultancy; Merck- unpaid consultant: Consultancy; Celgene- none for at least 2 years: Honoraria; Millenium-none for 2 years: Honoraria; Celgene, Millenium, Merck: Research Funding. Mitsiades:Millennium: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria; Merck & Co.: Consultancy, Honoraria; Kosan Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Honoraria; Pharmion: Consultancy, Honoraria; Centrocor: Consultancy, Honoraria; PharmaMar: Patents & Royalties; OSI Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Amgen Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; AVEO Pharma: Research Funding; EMD Serono: Research Funding; Sunesis: Research Funding; Gloucester Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Genzyme: Research Funding. Dimopoulos:MSD: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Harousseau:Janssen-Cilag: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Houp:Merck Research Laboratories: Employment. Graef:Merck Research Laboratories: Employment. Gause:Merck Research Laboratories: Employment. Byrne:Celgene Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Anderson:Millennium Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Onyx: Consultancy; Merck: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; Acetylon: Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Siegel:Celgene and Millennium: Advisory Board, Speakers Bureau; Merck: Advisory Board.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document