Prognostic Impact of Beta 2 Microglobulin in Patients with Immunoglobulin Light-Chain Amyloidosis Undergoing Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

Background: Risk stratification for Immunoglobulin light chain amyloidosis (AL) has been refined with advances in the understanding of disease biology. Although nonspecific, beta 2 microglobulin (β2M) levels correlate with disease burden and are considered a prognostic marker in several hematologic malignancies. Recently, we and others have shown the association of β2M levels with survival in AL. In this study, we evaluated the role of β2M as a predictor of outcome for high-dose chemotherapy and autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (auto-HCT) in patients with AL. Methods: We identified 175 consecutive patients with AL who received auto-HCT between 2009 and 2019 at our institution. A β2M≥3.5 mg/L, regardless of renal function status was used as a cutoff value. Hematologic and organ responses were evaluated according to the Consensus Guidelines for AL. Revised Mayo staging system was utilized for Cardiac staging. Results: The median age at auto-HCT was 60 years (range, 27 to 77). Of 175 patients, 153 (87%) had a β2M value available, of whom 57 (37%) had a β2M ≥ 3.5 mg/L. There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics between the 2 groups, except for the higher level of LDH, worse renal function, and more patients with renal involvement in the β2M ≥ 3.5 group, and more patients with lambda light chain type in the β2M <3.5 group (Table 1). The median follow-up from auto-HCT was 38 months (range; 1 to 124). One-year non-relapse mortality (NRM) was 2%. The 1-year NRM was 5% (n=3) and 1% (n=1) in patients with β2M≥3.5, and β2M<3.5, respectively (p=0.115). Hematologic CR after auto-HCT was seen in 21 (37%), and 38 (40%) patients with β2M≥3.5 and β2M<3.5, respectively (p=0.864). Organ response (OR) after auto-HCT was seen in 36 (73%), and 65 (71%) patients with β2M≥3.5 and β2M<3.5, respectively (p=1.00). The 3-year progression-free survival (PFS) was 66%, and 74% in patients with β2M≥3.5, and β2M<3.5 (p=0.17) (Figure 1A).The 3-year overall survival (OS) was 73%, ad 89% in patients with β2M≥3.5, and β2M<3.5 (p=0.009) (Figure 1B). On Cox-regression multivariate analysis, cardiac involvement with AL (p=0.043), and β2M≥3.5 (p=0.029) were associated with a shorter OS. Conclusion: In this single-center retrospective analysis, we showed that high serum β2M is associated with shorter OS. β2M may be incorporated as a prognostic marker for AL if these findings are confirmed in larger studies. Disclosures Bashir: Acrotech: Research Funding; StemLine: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Takeda: Other: Advisory Board, Research Funding; KITE: Other: Advisory Board; Amgen: Other: Advisory Board; Purdue: Other: Advisory Board. Hosing:NKARTA Inc.: Consultancy. Popat:Bayer: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding. Kebriaei:Novartis: Other: Served on advisory board; Jazz: Consultancy; Ziopharm: Other: Research Support; Kite: Other: Served on advisory board; Pfizer: Other: Served on advisory board; Amgen: Other: Research Support. Shpall:Takeda: Other: Licensing Agreement; Magenta: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Adaptimmune: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Zelluna: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Manasanch:Sanofi: Research Funding; Adaptive Biotechnologies: Honoraria; GSK: Honoraria; Sanofi: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria; Quest Diagnostics: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; JW Pharma: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding. Lee:Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Daiichi Sankyo: Research Funding; Regeneron: Research Funding; Genentech: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; Sanofi: Consultancy; GlaxoSmithKline: Consultancy, Research Funding; Genentech: Consultancy. Kaufman:Janssen: Research Funding; Karyopharm: Honoraria; Bristol Myers Squibb: Research Funding. Patel:Cellectis: Research Funding; Nektar: Consultancy, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; Precision Biosciences: Research Funding; Oncopeptides: Consultancy; Poseida: Research Funding. Thomas:BMS: Research Funding; Ascentage: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; X4 Pharma: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; Xencor: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Other: Advisory Boards. Orlowski:STATinMED Research: Consultancy; Founder of Asylia Therapeutics, Inc., with associated patents and an equity interest, though this technology does not bear on the current submission.: Current equity holder in private company, Patents & Royalties; Sanofi-Aventis, Servier, Takeda Pharmaceuticals North America, Inc.: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen, Inc., AstraZeneca, BMS, Celgene, EcoR1 Capital LLC, Forma Therapeutics, Genzyme, GSK Biologicals, Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Janssen Biotech, Juno Therapeutics, Kite Pharma, Legend Biotech USA, Molecular Partners, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.,: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Laboratory research funding from BioTheryX, and clinical research funding from CARsgen Therapeutics, Celgene, Exelixis, Janssen Biotech, Sanofi-Aventis, Takeda Pharmaceuticals North America, Inc.: Research Funding. Champlin:Genzyme: Speakers Bureau; Johnson and Johnson: Consultancy; Actinium: Consultancy; Cytonus: Consultancy; Omeros: Consultancy; DKMS America: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Patents & Royalties. Qazilbash:Angiocrine: Research Funding; Bioline: Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding; Bioclinica: Consultancy; Janssen: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Outcome of Patients with Immunoglobulin Light-Chain Amyloidosis with t(11;14) Undergoing Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2020-141307 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 18-19

Author(s):

Aimaz Afrough ◽

Leonard C Alsfeld ◽

Samer A. Srour ◽

Qaiser Bashir ◽

Neeraj Saini ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Stem Cell ◽

Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Advisory Board ◽

Single Center ◽

Research Support ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Hematopoietic Stem ◽

Free Survival

Background- In patients with light chain amyloidosis (AL), t(11;14) detected by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) is the most common cytogenetic aberration. Several studies have shown that t(11;14) is associated with inferior outcomes in newly diagnosed AL patients [1, 2]. In contrast, at least one study in patients with t(11;14) who underwent high-dose therapy and autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (auto-HCT) showed improved complete response (CR) rate and prolonged hematologic event-free survival[3]. In this single-center, retrospective analysis, we evaluated the outcome of patients with AL and t(11;14) who underwent auto-HCT at our institution. Method- We identified 122 consecutive patients with AL with cardiac or renal involvement who received an auto-HCT between 2011 and 2019. Baseline FISH data were available for 92 patients, 15 (16 %) of whom had t(11;14). Seventy-seven (84%) patients without t(11;14) were included as control . Hematologic and organ responses were evaluated according to the Consensus Guidelines for AL [4]. Revised Mayo staging system was utilized for Cardiac staging [5]. Result- The median age at auto-HCT was 60 years (range, 27 to 77). There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics between the two groups (Table 1). The median follow-up from auto-HCT was 28 months (range, 1 to 100). Overall, 40%, and 42% of patients with or without t(11;14), respectively (p=0.573), received post-auto-HCT maintenance therapy. One-year non-relapse mortality (NRM) was 2%. The 1-year NRM was 0 and 2.6% (n=2) in patients with or without t(11;14) (p=0.366). Hematologic CR after auto-HCT was seen in 7 (47%) and 33 (42%) patients with or without t(11;14), respectively (p=0.78). Organ response (OR) after auto-HCT was seen in 10 (71%) and 50 (67%) patients with or without t(11;14), respectively (p=0.586). The 2-year hematologic disease-free survival (Heme DFS) was 93% and 87% with or without t(11;14), respectively (p=0.422). The 2-year progression-free survival (PFS) was 92%, and 87% in patients with or without t(11;14) (p=0.6) (Figure 1A).The 2-year overall survival was 100%, ad 87% in patients with or without t(11;14) (p=0.2) (Figure 1B). Cardiac involvement with AL was associated with a shorter OS (p=0.012). Conclusion- In this single-center retrospective analysis, we showed that auto-HCT is safe and feasible in selected patients with AL and t(11;14), and these patients have comparable outcomes to patients without t(11;14). Disclosures Bashir: Celgene: Research Funding; StemLine: Research Funding; Acrotech: Research Funding; Takeda: Other: Advisory Board, Research Funding; KITE: Other: Advisory Board; Purdue: Other: Advisory Board; Amgen: Other: Advisory Board. Hosing:NKARTA Inc.: Consultancy. Popat:Bayer: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding. Kebriaei:Amgen: Other: Research Support; Pfizer: Other: Served on advisory board; Kite: Other: Served on advisory board; Novartis: Other: Served on advisory board; Ziopharm: Other: Research Support; Jazz: Consultancy. Shpall:Takeda: Other: Licensing Agreement; Magenta: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Adaptimmune: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Zelluna: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Manasanch:Adaptive Biotechnologies: Honoraria; Sanofi: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; JW Pharma: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Quest Diagnostics: Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria; Sanofi: Honoraria; GSK: Honoraria. Lee:Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; Genentech: Consultancy; GlaxoSmithKline: Consultancy, Research Funding; Sanofi: Consultancy; Daiichi Sankyo: Research Funding; Regeneron: Research Funding; Genentech: Consultancy. Kaufman:Janssen: Research Funding; Karyopharm: Honoraria; Bristol Myers Squibb: Research Funding. Patel:Oncopeptides: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Cellectis: Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Nektar: Consultancy, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; Precision Biosciences: Research Funding; Poseida: Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding. Thomas:Ascentage: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; X4 Pharma: Research Funding; Xencor: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Other: Advisory Boards; Genentech: Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding. Orlowski:STATinMED Research: Consultancy; Founder of Asylia Therapeutics, Inc., with associated patents and an equity interest, though this technology does not bear on the current submission.: Current equity holder in private company, Patents & Royalties; Sanofi-Aventis, Servier, Takeda Pharmaceuticals North America, Inc.: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen, Inc., AstraZeneca, BMS, Celgene, EcoR1 Capital LLC, Forma Therapeutics, Genzyme, GSK Biologicals, Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Janssen Biotech, Juno Therapeutics, Kite Pharma, Legend Biotech USA, Molecular Partners, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.,: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Laboratory research funding from BioTheryX, and clinical research funding from CARsgen Therapeutics, Celgene, Exelixis, Janssen Biotech, Sanofi-Aventis, Takeda Pharmaceuticals North America, Inc.: Research Funding. Champlin:Actinium: Consultancy; Omeros: Consultancy; Takeda: Patents & Royalties; Cytonus: Consultancy; DKMS America: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Genzyme: Speakers Bureau; Johnson and Johnson: Consultancy. Qazilbash:Janssen: Research Funding; Bioline: Research Funding; Angiocrine: Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding; Bioclinica: Consultancy.

Download Full-text

The Abundance of Certain Bacteria in the Intestinal Flora Is Associated with Relapse after Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v126.23.744.744 ◽

2015 ◽

Vol 126 (23) ◽

pp. 744-744 ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

Jonathan Peled ◽

Eric R. Littman ◽

Lilan Ling ◽

Satyajit Kosuri ◽

Molly Maloy ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Overall Survival ◽

Stem Cell ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Intestinal Flora ◽

Advisory Board ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Hematopoietic Stem ◽

Streptococcus Anginosus ◽

Conditioning Intensity

Abstract The major causes of mortality after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) are relapse, graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), and infection. We have previously reported that changes in the intestinal flora can affect GVHD, bacteremia, and overall survival. As intestinal bacteria are potent modulators of systemic immune responses, and since GVHD is correlated with graft-versus-tumor activity, we hypothesized that components of the intestinal flora could be associated with relapse after allo-HSCT. We applied a biomarker-discovery approach and performed a retrospective observational analysis of 160 adults who received an unmodified (T-cell-replete) allograft. Patients were prospectively enrolled in a fecal biospecimen-collection protocol. For this analysis, we selected patients who had at least one specimen during the first 3 weeks following allo-HSCT. The primary diseases in this cohort were AML (37%), Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma (33%), ALL (8%), MDS (7%), CLL (6%), Hodgkin's Lymphoma (6%), CML (2%), and myeloproliferative neoplasm (2%). The mean age of the patients was 52 years (range 21-75). They were conditioned with ablative (17%), reduced-intensity (64%), and nonmyeloablative (19%) regimens. They received grafts from cord blood (46%), unrelated adults (33%), or related adults (22%). Among adult grafts, 92% were from peripheral blood and 8% were from bone marrow. A census of the bacterial species in each stool sample was generated by 16S rRNA deep-sequencing as previously described (Jenq et al., BiolBone Marrow Transplant 2015). The area under the curve of bacterial abundance over time was used as a measure of each patient's cumulative exposure to each bacterial taxon. Bacterial taxa of each patient present at a frequency >1% were evaluated for association with the outcome of relapse or progression of disease within the first year after allo-HSCT using linear discriminant analysis of effect size (LEfSe), a common approach in microbiota studies (Segata et al., Genome Biology, 2011). Among the taxons most significantly associated with freedom from relapse were members of the human oral flora including Streptococcus anginosus. After stratifying the patients by median abundance, we found that those with higher abundance of this bacterium had less relapse after transplantation (Left figure, p = 0.0014). We also identified bacteria associated with increased risk of relapse, such as Enterococcus faecium (Right figure, p = 0.0103). We evaluated these bacteria as biomarkers in multivariate Cox models adjusted for three factors that were associated with relapse in this cohort: Refined Disease Risk Index (RDRI, Armand et al., Blood 2014), conditioning intensity, and graft source (cord blood vs. adult donor). Streptococcus anginosus predicted relapse in a multivariate model adjusted for all three factors (HR 0.39, 95% CI 0.16-0.96, p = 0.041). Enterococcus faecium predicted relapse in a model adjusted for RDRI and conditioning intensity but failed to do so in a model additionally adjusted for graft source. In this analysis there was no formal adjustment for multiple comparisons; these data are now being validated in an additional cohort of patients whose samples are being sequenced. Finally, although we have previously reported that low bacterial diversity is associated with decreased overall survival after allo-HSCT (Taur et al., Blood 2014), we did not find an association between bacterial diversity and relapse as assessed by reciprocal Simpson diversity index (p > 0.1). Thus, the results of this retrospective analysis have identified an association between relapse after allo-HSCT and the abundance of two bacteria in the intestinal flora. These might serve as potential novel diagnostics or therapeutic targets to prevent relapse and improve overall survival after allo-HSCT. Figure 1. Figure 1. Disclosures Peled: Merck: Research Funding. Giralt:SANOFI: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; TAKEDA: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; AMGEN: Consultancy, Research Funding; JAZZ: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; CELGENE: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Perales:Merck: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Astellas: Honoraria; NMDP: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. van den Brink:Boehringer Ingelheim: Consultancy, Other: Advisory board attendee; Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Tobira Therapeutics: Other: Advisory board attendee; Regeneron: Honoraria; Merck: Honoraria.

Download Full-text

High-Dose Chemotherapy (HDC) with Autologous Stem-Cell Transplant (ASCT) with Consolidative Radiation Therapy (RT) for Relapsed or Refractory (R/R) Primary Mediastinal B-Cell Lymphoma (PMBCL): 20-Year Experience at MD Anderson Cancer Center (MDACC)

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2020-134471 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 32-33

Author(s):

Neeraj Saini ◽

Junsheng Ma ◽

Melissa Timmons ◽

Amin M. Alousi ◽

Paolo Anderlini ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

B Cell Lymphoma ◽

Advisory Board ◽

Older Age ◽

Long Term Results ◽

Cell Transplant ◽

Research Support ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Grant Support

Background Most PMBCL pts are cured with frontline chemoimmunotherapy ± RT. Data are scant regarding the role of HDC/ASCT for R/R PMBCL, and the benefit of RT administered peri-HDC/ASCT. Our institutional approach has focused on developing potentially more active HDC regimens, and on consideration of post-ASCT consolidation RT, especially for pts who had not achieved a CR at the time of HDC. Methods We retrospectively analyzed all patients (pts) with R/R PMBCL treated with HDC/ASCT at MDACC between 01/01/2000-12/31/2019. All pts underwent similar standard pre-SCT evaluation and met eligibility criteria as per our institutional guidelines. Response assessment differed over time and included CT and gallium scan (N=9) and PET/CT (N=49). Cox proportional hazards regression models evaluated the associations of the specific HDC regimen and clinical covariates of interest with EFS and OS. Results 58 pts received HDC/ASCT with BEAM-rituximab (N=36) or rituximab/gemcitabine/busulfan/melphalan ± vorinostat (R-GemBuMel) (n=22) (Table 1). The R-GemBuMel group included more pts pretreated with >2 lines of therapy than the R-BEAM group (55% vs. 28%, p=0.025), had fewer pts in CR (41% vs. 69%, P=0.01) and more pts in PD/SD at ASCT (32% vs. 3%, P=0.01). Prior RT at a median 44 (36-48) Gy was administered to 29 pts (20 R-BEAM, 9 R-GemBuMel, P=0.27). Nineteen pts (89% not in CR at SCT) who had not previously received full doses of RT received post-SCT RT (6 after BEAM, 13 after R-GemBuMel, P<0.001) at median 40 Gy (36-48). There were 2 treatment-related deaths in the R-BEAM arm, none in the R-GemBuMel arm. At median follow-up of 69.1 months (interquartile range, 36.5-85.2), the EFS rates were 57.6% (overall), 67.6% (R-GemBuMel) and 52.7% (R-BEAM) (Figure 1a). Their respective OS rates were 69.3%, 81.1% and 63.9% (Figure 1b). On multivariable Cox regression analyses, R-GemBuMel (vs. R-BEAM) (HR=0.29, p=0.05), and 1 organ involved (vs. >1) (HR 0.28, p=0.009) were associated with improved EFS, whereas older age (HR= 1.08 per year above median, p=0.005), refractory disease (SD/PD) at SCT (vs. CR/PR) (HR 5.44, p=0.01) correlated with worse EFS. Likewise, R-GemBuMel (HR= 0.16, p=0.03) and 1 organ involved (HR=0.17, p=0.004) significantly resulted in improved OS, whereas older age (HR= 1.11, p=0.002), and refractory (SD/PD) disease at SCT (HR= 21.27, p=0.001) correlated with worse OS. Neither sex nor disease status (primary refractory vs. relapse) nor No. prior lines (2 vs. >2) nor pre-SCT RT nor post-SCT RT correlated significantly with EFS or OS. Conclusions HDC/ASCT for R/R PMBCL pts, with post-SCT RT for pts with active disease at SCT, results in favorable long-term results. R-GemBuMel ± vorinostat seems to improve EFS and OS compared to R-BEAM. Disclosures Alousi: Incyte: Honoraria, Research Funding; Therakos: Research Funding; Alexion: Honoraria. Hosing:NKARTA Inc.: Consultancy. Kebriaei:Amgen: Other: Research Support; Ziopharm: Other: Research Support; Kite: Other: Served on advisory board; Pfizer: Other: Served on advisory board; Jazz: Consultancy; Novartis: Other: Served on advisory board. Popat:Bayer: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding. Qazilbash:Angiocrine: Research Funding; Bioline: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Bioclinica: Consultancy; Amgen: Research Funding. Shpall:Zelluna: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Adaptimmune: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Magenta: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Other: Licensing Agreement. Champlin:Takeda: Patents & Royalties; Genzyme: Speakers Bureau; Cytonus: Consultancy; Omeros: Consultancy; Actinium: Consultancy; Johnson and Johnson: Consultancy; DKMS America: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Nieto:Affimed: Consultancy, Other: Grant Support; Novartis: Other: Grant Support; Astra Zeneca: Other: Grant Support; Secura Bio: Other: Grant Support.

Download Full-text

DNMT3A and TET2 mutant Clonal Hematopoiesis May Drive a Proinflammatory State and Predict Enhanced Response to Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2021-150347 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 4295-4295

Author(s):

Abhay Singh Singh ◽

Nuria Mencia-Trinchant ◽

Elizabeth A. Griffiths ◽

Mahesh Swaminathan ◽

Matthew Gravina ◽

...

Keyword(s):

T Cell ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽

Advisory Board ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Hematopoietic Stem ◽

Clonal Hematopoiesis ◽

Serial Sample ◽

Serial Samples

Abstract Background. DNA methylation is a key epigenetic process involved in development, aging, and cancer. Mutations in DNMT3A and TET2 in the hematopoietic stem cell compartment lead to increased self-renewal. In addition to mutations in ASXL1, collectively, these DTA mutations are recognized as an aging phenomenon, known as the most common Clonal hematopoiesis of Indeterminate Potential (CHIP) mutations and alone are not predictive of increased risk for hematopoietic malignancy. Recently, DNMT3A mutations in donor hematopoietic cells were suggested to be associated with enhanced T-cell activity in allografted patients. Additionally, role of DNMT3A mutations in creating a proinflammatory state in cardiovascular disease setting and associated elevation of T-cell markers in the myocardium have been recently explored (Sano S et al. Circ Res. 2018). Since an inflamed tumor microenvironment is associated with improved immune checkpoint inhibitors (CPI) activity, we sought to determine the impact of CHIP (a proinflammatory state) on response to CPI and CPI's effects on clonal dynamics. Additionally, while classical chemotherapy (CTX) can create selective external pressure providing survival advantage to mutant stem cells, the selective pressure of T-cell activating therapies on hematopoietic stem cells is unclear. Methods. To study the relationship between CHIP and CPI, we used paired peripheral-blood samples taken before and after treatment with CPI therapy in patients (pts) with melanoma (MEL; n= 32) and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC; n=109). Serial samples (or post CPI samples) were evaluable in 5 MEL pts and 6 NSCLC pts. Error-corrected sequencing of a targeted panel of genes recurrently mutated in clonal hematopoiesis (CH) was performed on peripheral blood genomic DNA. Statistical comparisons between baseline and serial sample VAFs were performed using two-sided fisher's exact test, with a p < 0.05 considered significant. Results. In both the MEL and NSCLC cohort, baseline samples were collected before extensive therapy exposure. 90% (29/32) of the MEL cohort had no CTX or targeted therapy prior to the baseline sample; 28% (9/32) had prior radiotherapy (RT). 10% (11/109) of the NSCLC cohort samples had prior CTX, but only 2 of these were treated for more than 1 month before sample collection. CH was frequent in these minimally pre-treated patient samples; 28.1% (9/32) and 37.6% (41/109) of the baseline MEL and NSCLC samples, respectively. As expected, DTA mutations were the most common events in these cohorts. Samples with CH were from patients of older age, but had normal hematological parameters with exception of increased RDW (p=0.022). Primary tumor responses in this cohort were defined as durable (receipt of ≥12 CPI cycles) or not durable (<12 cycles). DNMT3Amut patients (VAF ≥1%, n=5) had more durable responses, i.e. higher median number of CPI cycles (21 cycles, range:10-40) compared to non-DNMT3Amut pts (7 cycles, range:1-13; p= NS). Additionally, pts with larger DNMT3Amut clones (figure 1- MEL cohort) tended to receive higher numbers of CPI cycles. In the serial sample analysis, we observed that mutations in DNMT3A and TET2 increased in size with longer CPI exposures (Figure 2, MEL cohort); pts 2, 3 and 5 received 13, 15 and 18 CPI cycles respectively, while pt 4 with the most notable clonal expansion in DNMT3A received 40 CPI cycles. All serial samples in MEL cohort showed a statistically significant change in VAF from baseline. In the serial sample analysis of NSCLC pts, we observed that those with ≥ 3 months of CPI exposure demonstrated decreases in clone size for non-DTA gene mutations such as SRCAP, STK11 and TPM1 (Table 1), but increases or stability in DNMT3A and TET2 mutations (Table 1). However, this VAF increase in DNMT3A and TET2 mutations in NSCLC cohort was not statistically significant. Conclusions. In this small cohort of pts with MEL and NSCLC, the presence of DNMT3A/TET2 CH was associated with longer checkpoint inhibitor exposure and increased allelic frequency over time. These findings need further validation in larger cohorts and delineation of the relationship between DTA mutations such as DNMT3A and enhanced immune activity. Acknowledgement: Data and samples for this study were provided by the Data Bank and BioRepository (DBBR), which is funded by the National Cancer Institute (P30 CA016056) and is a Roswell Park Cancer Institute Cancer Center Support Grant shared resource. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Griffiths: Taiho Oncology: Consultancy, Honoraria; Alexion Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria; Boston Biomedical: Consultancy; Astex Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene/Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Apellis Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; Takeda Oncology: Consultancy, Honoraria; Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria. Hassane: Tempus Labs, Inc: Current Employment. Guzman: SeqRx: Consultancy; BridgeMedicines: Consultancy; Cellectis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Daiichi Sankyo: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Wang: Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Advisory Board; Genentech: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Kite Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Advisory Board; Kura Oncology: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Advisory board, steering committee, Speakers Bureau; AbbVie: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; GlaxoSmithKline: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Advisory Board; BMS/Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Astellas: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Advisory Board; Mana Therapeutics: Consultancy, Honoraria; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Advisory Board, Speakers Bureau; Stemline Therapeutics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Advisory board, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Advisory board; DAVA Oncology: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Rafael Pharmaceuticals: Other: Data safety monitoring committee; Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Advisory board; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Advisory board; PTC Therapeutics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Advisory board; Genentech: Consultancy; MacroGenics: Consultancy.

Download Full-text

Sars-Cov-2 Infection and Systemic Light Chain Amyloidosis: The International Society of Amyloidosis' Survey

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2020-141569 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 11-11

Author(s):

Paolo Milani ◽

Vaishali Sanchorawala ◽

Ramon Lecumberri ◽

Sunil Saith ◽

Mathew S. Maurer ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Mechanical Ventilation ◽

Data Collection ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

International Society ◽

Light Chain ◽

Research Funding ◽

Advisory Board ◽

Al Amyloidosis ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Heart Involvement

Introduction: The COVID-19 pandemic, caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus, has become a global health crisis since it was first reported in December 2019. In a subset of infected subjects, pneumonia, multi-organ failure, and eventually death can occur. Frail patients and those with comorbidities are believed to be at increased risk of severe manifestations of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Patients with light chain (AL) amyloidosis have a hematologic malignancy that causes multi-organ dysfunction and can be at higher risk of complications and death. The International Society of Amyloidosis (ISA) has issued a guidance (Kastritis et al. BJH 2020, https://cms.cws.net/content/isaamyloidosis.org/files/ISA%20recommendations%20Covid-19%20v_%203_3.pdf) for patients with amyloidosis during the pandemic and called for an international data collection in April 2020. Aim of this study is to report the preliminary data of the ongoing international survey regarding systemic AL amyloidosis and COVID-19. Methods: The survey was proposed by the ISA Board and approved by the coordinating institution's Ethics Committee. All members of the ISA were invited to participate by email and a link for participation is online on ISA website. RedCap software was used for the data collection. Results: Twelve Institutions requested the access to the data collection system from 7 countries. At the data lock of July 26, 2020, 29 patients with systemic amyloidoses were collected from 7 different Institutions. Systemic AL amyloidosis patients reported so far were 19: 12 from the Pavia Amyloidosis Research and Treatment Center (Italy), 3 from the Boston Medical Center (USA), and 1 patient each from the Columbia University Hospital (New York, USA), Hospital Clinic (Barcelona, Spain), Clinica Universitaria de Navarra (Navarra, Spain) and Amyloidosis Centrum (Heidelberg, Germany). Eleven (58%) had heart involvement, 8 (42%) had kidney and two or more organs were involved in 9 patients (47%). The most frequent comorbidities reported were history of hypertension in 7 (37%) and cardiovascular diseases in 3 (16%). Four (21%) patients were newly diagnosed and treatment-naïve at the time SARS-CoV-2 infection was documented. The remaining 15 patients had received a median number of 2 previous lines of therapy (range 1-3). Nine (47%) patients were on active chemotherapy at the time of COVID-19 infection. Five were receiving daratumumab combinations, and the 4 remaining patients were on cyclophosphamide, bortezomib and dexamethasone, oral melphalan and dexamethasone, lenalidomide and ixazomib. Relevant concomitant medications were anti-hypertensive drugs in 26% of cases and diuretics in 21%. One patient was on dialysis. COVID-19-related symptoms were fever 11 (58%), cough 8 (42%), anosmia and ageusia. Pneumonia was documented in 10 (53%) patients, 5 of whom had acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) (26%). Four of them were treated with non-mechanical ventilation and one accessed intensive care support. Three of the 5 patients with severe COVID-19 had heart involvement, 2/5 had concomitant heart and kidney involved and 3 was infected while on active chemotherapy. Azytromicin was used in 6 (26%) cases, which was in combination with hydroxycloroquine in 4 of them. Three patients received steroids as treatment for SARS-CoV-2 infection, while anticoagulant therapy was used only in two cases. Lopinavir, tocilizumab and sarilumab were used in one patient each. Four patients (21%) died in the whole cohort. Three had ARDS and one patient died few weeks after the recovery of COVID-19 infection. All deceased patients had heart involvement, 2 were on active therapy (daratumumab plus bortezomib and ixazomib plus dexamethasone). Two patients with kidney involvement at diagnosis, one with ARDS and one with a radiological documented pneumonia treated with non-mechanical ventilation recovered from COVID-19 but developed subsequent worsening of renal function, requiring dialysis in one case. Conclusions: The fatality rate and the proportion of patients with severe COVID-19 in this series is in the higher range of reports from the general population. Severe SARS-CoV-2 infection can result in renal failure in patients with renal AL amyloidosis. Disclosures Milani: Janssen: Other: Speaker honoraria; Pfizer: Other: Speaker honoraria; Celgene: Other: Travel support. Sanchorawala:Oncopeptide: Research Funding; Abbvie: Other: advisory board; Proclara: Other: advisory board; Caleum: Other: advisory board; Regeneron: Other: advisory board; Prothena: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; UpToDate: Patents & Royalties; Caelum: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding. Cibeira:Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Educational lectures; Akcea Therapeutics: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Honoraria, Other: Educational lectures; Amgen: Honoraria, Other: Educational lectures. Schönland:Janssen, Prothena, Takeda: Honoraria, Other: travel support to meetings, Research Funding. Palladini:Celgene: Other: Travel support; Jannsen Cilag: Honoraria, Other.

Download Full-text

Myeloablative Fractionated Busulfan with Fludarabine in Older Patients: Long Term Outcomes of Prospective Phase II Clinical Trial

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2020-139325 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 10-11

Author(s):

Rohtesh S. Mehta ◽

Roland Bassett ◽

Julianne Chen ◽

Benigno C. Valdez ◽

Jitesh Kawedia ◽

...

Keyword(s):

High Risk ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Older Patients ◽

Research Funding ◽

Advisory Board ◽

Long Term Outcomes ◽

Research Support ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Gvhd Prophylaxis

Background: We started a randomized phase II trial [NCT01572662] that compared the safety of two myeloablative fractionated ("timed-sequential") busulfan with fludarabine (Bu-Flu) conditioning regimens: one with a lower dose of busulfan (area under the curve [AUC] of 16 000 μmol.min; 16K arm) and one with a higher dose (AUC of 20 000 μmol.min; 20K arm). After 49 patients were treated on the 16K group and 48 patients on the 20K group, the randomization was stopped as the higher dose arm was found to be as safe as the lower dose arm. The outcomes of those patients were previously reported, with the primary endpoint of interest being day 100 non-relapse mortality (NRM). The trial then continued enrolment as a single-arm study with increased accrual onto the higher dose arm. The current paper reports long-term outcomes of a total of 150 patients treated on the higher dose arm with an extended median follow-up of over 3.5 years. Methods: Patients with hematological malignancies up to 75 years of age were included. Bu dosing was determined on the basis of pharmacokinetic (PK) analyses conducted after day -13 and day -6 dose to achieve target AUC 20 000 ± 12% μmol.min (20K arm). On days −13 and −12, patients received 80 mg/m2 Bu IV daily as outpatient. Then, Flu 40 mg/m2 and Bu IV once daily were given as inpatient from day −6 though −3. Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis consisted of tacrolimus from day −2 and methotrexate on days 1, 3, 6, and 11. Results: The median age was 61 years (interquartile range, 55-67); most were males (91; 61%) had an unrelated donor (n=93, 62%) and received peripheral blood graft (n=110, 73.3%). The most common diagnoses were acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and myelodysplastic syndrome (n = 88, 58.7%). Among AML, 41% (n=24) were in CR, 44% (n=26) had primary induction failure and 15% (n=9) had relapsed disease without attaining CR before HCT. Over half had HCT-Specific Comorbidity Index (HCT-CI) >3 (n=79, 52.7%). Estimated relapse, NRM, and overall survival (OS) were 40% (95% confidence interval (CI), 32.1%-47.9%), 22% (95% CI, 15.3%-28.7%), and 49.1% (95% CI, 41.7%-57.8%) at 3 years [Table]. The highest relapse rate at 3 years was noted in patients with myeloma (70.6%), followed by MDS (51.7%), and lymphoma (46.2%), while it was the lowest in myelofibrosis (13.6%). Among AML patients not in CR, the rate of relapse was not higher than those who were in CR (37.1% and 41.7%, respectively at 3 years). NRM at 3 years ranged from 7.7% (lymphoma) to 37.1% (AML, not in CR). Lymphoma patients had the lowest NRM (7.7%) and the best OS (69.2%) at 3 years, while AML patients not in CR had the highest NRM (37.1%) and the lowest OS (31.4%) [Figure]. Patients with HCT-CI 0-2 had lower NRM (14.1%; 95% CI, 5.9%-22.3%) and better OS (57.2%; 95% CI, 46.7%-70.1%) than those with HCT-CI > 3 (NRM: 29.1%; 95% CI, 19%-39.2% & OS: 41.7%; 95% CI, 32.2%-54.2%). Day 100 cumulative incidence of grade II-V acute GVHD was 38% (95% CI, 30.2%-45.8%), grade III-IV was 11.3% (95% CI, 6.2%- 16.4%). At 3 years, cumulative incidence of extensive chronic GVHD was 27% (95% CI, 20%-34%), bronchiolitis obliterans was 4.7% (95% CI, 1.3%-8.1%), and secondary malignancies was 8.7% (95% CI, 4.1%-13.2%). Conclusion: The fractionated myeloablative Bu-Flu conditioning regimen is well tolerated and leads to acceptable risk of NRM, relapse and long term survival in older patients, those with high risk disease and high comorbidities. Acknowledging the high risk study population, the long term outcomes, although acceptable, provide a framework to further improve upon. Modifications of this fractionated Bu-Flu regimen to further enhance its efficacy (with the addition of other chemotherapy agents) while reducing the toxicity and risk of NRM (with an inclusion of novel GVHD prophylaxis regimens) are currently being investigated. Disclosures Mehta: Incyte: Research Funding; Kadmon: Research Funding; CSL Behring: Research Funding. Alousi:Therakos: Research Funding; Alexion: Honoraria; Incyte: Honoraria, Research Funding. Bashir:Celgene: Research Funding; Amgen: Other: Advisory Board; KITE: Other: Advisory Board; Purdue: Other: Advisory Board; Takeda: Other: Advisory Board, Research Funding; Acrotech: Research Funding; StemLine: Research Funding. Hosing:NKARTA Inc.: Consultancy. Kebriaei:Novartis: Other: Served on advisory board; Amgen: Other: Research Support; Jazz: Consultancy; Kite: Other: Served on advisory board; Ziopharm: Other: Research Support; Pfizer: Other: Served on advisory board. Oran:Celgene: Consultancy; Arog Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; ASTEX: Research Funding. Qazilbash:Angiocrine: Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding; Bioclinica: Consultancy; Bioline: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding. Shpall:Takeda: Other: Licensing Agreement; Magenta: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Adaptimmune: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Zelluna: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Champlin:Takeda: Patents & Royalties; Johnson and Johnson: Consultancy; Actinium: Consultancy; Cytonus: Consultancy; Omeros: Consultancy; Genzyme: Speakers Bureau; DKMS America: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Popat:Bayer: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Phase 2 Trial of Ixazomib, Cyclophosphamide and Dexamethasone for Treatment of Previously Untreated Light Chain Amyloidosis

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2020-138814 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 52-53

Author(s):

Eli Muchtar ◽

Morie A Gertz ◽

Betsy Laplant ◽

Francis K. Buadi ◽

Nelson Leung ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Clinical Trials ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Light Chain ◽

Research Funding ◽

Advisory Board ◽

Organ Involvement ◽

Al Amyloidosis ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Hematologic Response ◽

Phase 2 Trial

Background: Bortezomib, a proteasome inhibitor, has shown efficacy in the treatment of newly diagnosed and relapsed light chain (AL) amyloidosis, and the combination of bortezomib, cyclophosphamide and dexamethasone is a commonly used regimen in AL. Ixazomib is the first oral proteasome inhibitor to be approved, and the combination of ixazomib with cyclophosphamide and dexamethasone is an all oral effective regimen for the treatment of multiple myeloma. This phase 2 trial was designed to evaluate the efficacy of this regimen in patients with AL, who have not received any therapy. Patients and methods: Newly diagnosed patients with biopsy proven AL amyloidosis, with organ involvement requiring therapy, were enrolled if they had measurable disease (Serum immunoglobulin free light chain ≥5 mg/dL AND abnormal serum free light chain ratio) and adequate organ function. Patients with severe organ involvement were excluded (Alkaline phosphatase >750 U/L, creatinine clearance <30 mL/min or NT-ProBNP ≥ 7500 ng/dL). Treatment consisted of ixazomib 4 mg days 1, 8, 15; cyclophosphamide 500 mg PO weekly and dexamethasone 40 mg, weekly for twelve 28-day cycles, followed by ixazomib maintenance (days 1, 8, 15) at the last tolerated dose till progression. The primary objective was to determine the hematologic response rate of ixazomib, used in combination with cyclophosphamide and dexamethasone in patients with previously untreated AL. A one-stage binomial design was utilized to test the null hypothesis that the hematologic response rate is at most 30% against the alternative hypothesis that it is at least 50%, with 85% power and 9% type I error. Results: Thirty-five patients were enrolled, median age was 67 (range 38-78) years; 69% were male. Organ involvement included cardiac in 23 (65.7%), renal in 19 (54.3%), and nervous system involvement in 5 (14.3%). At data cutoff 8 patients still remain on study with a median follow up of 4.4 months for those who are alive. Across the trial a median of 4 cycles (range 0-23) of treatment have been completed; the most common reason for going off study was institution of alternate therapy in 17 patients (63%). The overall hematologic response was 57% (20/35) and included amyloid CR in 5 (14%), VGPR in 9 (26%) and a PR in 6 (17%) patients. Confirmed organ responses have been observed in 5 patients so far, 2 each for cardiac and renal and 1 hepatic. The median PFS and OS have not been reached; 4 patients had hematological progression; 6 patients (17%) have died. Across 193 cycles of treatment administered, dose modification was required in 5, 3, and 10 patients, respectively, for ixazomib, cyclophosphamide and dexamethasone. A grade 3 or higher adverse event (AE), at least possibly attributed to the study drugs, was observed in 41% of patients. The figure shows the maximum grade of adverse events for individual patients seen in more than one patient across the study. Conclusions: The all-oral regimen of ixazomib, cyclophosphamide, and dexamethasone is active in patients with previously untreated AL amyloidosis with hematologic responses observed in 57% of patients, including complete responses. Organ response has been observed but will likely need longer follow up for accurate assessment, given the delay in organ responses in this disease. Further evaluation of this combination is warranted. Disclosures Gertz: Alnylam: Consultancy; Ionis/Akcea: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; Medscape: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Physicians Education Resource: Consultancy; Data Safety Monitoring board from Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Consultancy; Johnson and Johnson: Speakers Bureau; DAVA oncology: Speakers Bureau; Advisory Board for Pharmacyclics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Advisory Board for Proclara: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; i3Health: Consultancy; Springer Publishing: Patents & Royalties; Amyloidosis Foundation: Research Funding; International Waldenstrom Foundation: Research Funding; NCI SPORE MM: Research Funding; Prothena: Consultancy; Sanofi: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Spectrum: Consultancy, Research Funding; Annexon: Consultancy; Appellis: Consultancy. Kapoor:Celgene: Honoraria; GlaxoSmithKline: Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding; Sanofi: Consultancy, Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Cellectar: Consultancy. Larsen:Janssen Oncology: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Dingli:Apellis: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Sanofi-Genzyme: Consultancy; Rigel: Consultancy; Bristol Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Karyopharm Therapeutics: Research Funding; Alexion: Consultancy; Millenium: Consultancy. Dispenzieri:Janssen: Research Funding; Intellia: Research Funding; Alnylam: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding. Kumar:Adaptive Biotechnologies: Consultancy; Carsgen: Other, Research Funding; AbbVie: Other: Research funding for clinical trials to the institution, Consulting/Advisory Board participation with no personal payments; Janssen Oncology: Other: Research funding for clinical trials to the institution, Consulting/Advisory Board participation with no personal payments; Genecentrix: Consultancy; Dr. Reddy's Laboratories: Honoraria; Tenebio: Other, Research Funding; Takeda: Other: Research funding for clinical trials to the institution, Consulting/Advisory Board participation with no personal payments; BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding; Sanofi: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Kite Pharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; Karyopharm: Consultancy; Oncopeptides: Consultancy, Other: Independent Review Committee; IRC member; Merck: Consultancy, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Other: Research funding for clinical trials to the institution, Consulting/Advisory Board participation with no personal payments, Research Funding; Genentech/Roche: Other: Research funding for clinical trials to the institution, Consulting/Advisory Board participation with no personal payments; Celgene/BMS: Other: Research funding for clinical trials to the institution, Consulting/Advisory Board participation with no personal payments; Cellectar: Other; MedImmune: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

MASS-FIX for the Diagnosis of Plasma Cell Disorders: A Single Institution Experience of 4118 Patients

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2020-138829 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 48-49

Author(s):

Patrick Mellors ◽

Surendra Dasari ◽

Mindy Kohlhagen ◽

Bonnie Kaye Arendt ◽

Morie A. Gertz ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Clinical Trials ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Light Chain ◽

Mayo Clinic ◽

Research Funding ◽

Advisory Board ◽

Single Institution ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Monoclonal Protein ◽

Monoclonal Proteins

Introduction: Since 2018, immunoenrichment-based matrix assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF-MS), termed MASS-FIX, has replaced immunofixation for the detection and isotyping of serum monoclonal proteins at Mayo Clinic. MASS-FIX has advantages including increased sensitivity, specificity, and the ability to distinguish therapeutic monoclonal antibodies. Herein, we report the laboratory characteristics and distribution of diagnoses of patients tested clinically at Mayo Clinic. Methods: MASS-FIX was performed on patient samples as previously described (Kohlhagen et. al. Clin Chem Lab 2020). Demographics and laboratory data, including quantitative M-spike, serum free light chains (FLC), and quantitative immunoglobulins at the time of MASS-FIX were recorded. For patients with multiple samples during the study period, only the initial MASS-FIX was evaluated. We identified 9195 unique patients with MASS-FIX performed between 7/24/2018 and 3/6/2020. Seven-thousand nine hundred and forty-six patients provided consent for study enrollment, and 7689 had data available on index diagnosis. Given considerable variability in the interpretation of diagnostic criteria for light chain (LC) MGUS, patients with this diagnosis (1360, 18%) were excluded. Patients were considered to have negative results (2211 in total) on MASS-FIX if: 1) no monoclonal protein was identified (1081, 49%); 2) the interpretation was "cannot rule out monoclonal protein" (945, 43%); 3) multiple, nonspecific spectral peaks were identified consistent with immune reconstitution (29, 1%); or 4) the only monoclonal protein identified was consistent with a therapeutic monoclonal antibody (156, 7%). Results: The final cohort consisted of 4118 patients with a positive MASS-FIX and 2211 patients with a negative MASS-FIX, all in the setting of underlying PCDs. Figure 1 illustrates the numbers and percentages of patients who are MASS-FIX positive versus MASS-FIX negative by diagnosis. MGUS and multiple myeloma (MM) were the most common diagnoses overall, and both were more common in the MASS-FIX positive cohort. More than 90% of patients with Waldenstrom's macroglobulinemia (WM), smoldering WM, smoldering MM, and cold agglutinin disease were positive by MASS-FIX. For MASS-FIX positive patients, IgG isotype was identified in 2575 patients (63%), IgA in 703 (17%) and IgM in 710 (17%). Bence Jones proteinemia was identified in 283 patients (7%) with lambda restriction being the most common (57%). 3625 patients (88%) had a monoclonal pattern, 228 patients (6%) had a bi-clonal pattern, and 7 (<1%) had a tri-clonal pattern. The majority of patients (58%) were kappa LC restricted by MASS-FIX, 222 (5%) had N-glycosylated LC, and 2 patients (<1%) had a heavy chain with no light chain. Conclusions: This single institution experience illustrates the practicality of MASS-FIX in detecting and following monoclonal proteins for a wide range of PCDs in a tertiary center. In this cohort, the percentage of patients who were MASS-FIX positive varied by diagnosis, reflecting cross sectional sampling of patients throughout their disease course. Disclosures Gertz: Research to Practice: Other; Springer Publishing: Patents & Royalties; Aurora Bio: Other; Johnson and Johnson: Speakers Bureau; Sanofi: Other; Amgen: Other: personal fee; Appellis: Other: personal fee; Annexon: Other: personal fee; Spectrum: Other: personal fee, Research Funding; Janssen: Other: personal fee; Prothena: Other: personal fee; Alnylam: Other: personal fee; Ionis/Akcea: Other: personal fee; Proclara: Other; DAVA oncology: Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Other; Teva: Speakers Bureau; Abbvie: Other; Physicians Education Resource: Other: personal fee; Medscape: Other: personal fee, Speakers Bureau. Kumar:AbbVie: Other: Research funding for clinical trials to the institution, Consulting/Advisory Board participation with no personal payments; Dr. Reddy's Laboratories: Honoraria; Takeda: Other: Research funding for clinical trials to the institution, Consulting/Advisory Board participation with no personal payments; Carsgen: Other, Research Funding; Karyopharm: Consultancy; Merck: Consultancy, Research Funding; Oncopeptides: Consultancy, Other: Independent Review Committee; IRC member; Kite Pharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding; Janssen Oncology: Other: Research funding for clinical trials to the institution, Consulting/Advisory Board participation with no personal payments; Amgen: Consultancy, Other: Research funding for clinical trials to the institution, Consulting/Advisory Board participation with no personal payments, Research Funding; Genecentrix: Consultancy; Adaptive Biotechnologies: Consultancy; Novartis: Research Funding; MedImmune: Research Funding; Sanofi: Research Funding; Tenebio: Other, Research Funding; Cellectar: Other; Genentech/Roche: Other: Research funding for clinical trials to the institution, Consulting/Advisory Board participation with no personal payments; Celgene/BMS: Other: Research funding for clinical trials to the institution, Consulting/Advisory Board participation with no personal payments. Kapoor:Sanofi: Consultancy, Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria, Research Funding; GlaxoSmithKline: Research Funding; Cellectar: Consultancy; Janssen: Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria. Dingli:Karyopharm Therapeutics: Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Rigel: Consultancy; Alexion: Consultancy; Sanofi-Genzyme: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Apellis: Consultancy; Millenium: Consultancy. Lin:Merck: Research Funding; Legend BioTech: Consultancy; Juno: Consultancy; Bluebird Bio: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Kite, a Gilead Company: Consultancy, Research Funding; Gamida Cells: Consultancy; Takeda: Research Funding; Sorrento: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Vineti: Consultancy. Murray:The Binding Site: Patents & Royalties: Patent Use of Mass Spec to identify monoclonal proteins licensed to The Binding Site. Dispenzieri:Alnylam, Intellia, Janssen, Takeda, Pfizer, Prothena, Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding.

Download Full-text

PBSC Mobilization for Auto-HSCT in Myeloma: Growth Factors Vs Growth Factors + Chemotherapy

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2020-143108 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 6-7

Author(s):

Jeremy L. Ramdial ◽

Junsheng Ma ◽

Denai R. Milton ◽

Ruby Delgado ◽

Qaiser Bashir ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Growth Factors ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Transfusion Requirement ◽

Advisory Board ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Hematopoietic Stem ◽

Cell Dose ◽

Grant Support ◽

Duration Of Hospitalization

Background: Peripheral blood hematopoietic stem cell mobilization for autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (auto-HSCT) in multiple myeloma (MM) can be achieved with either growth factors (GF) alone (filgrastim +/- plerixafor), or with chemotherapy (GF + chemo). When utilized, the chemotherapy regimens include single-agent cyclophosphamide (Cy), or combination regimens, including cyclophosphamide, vincristine or bortezomib, doxorubicin, dexamethasone (CVAD/CBAD) at our center. The optimal mobilization strategy, however, has yet to be established. Methods: In this single center retrospective analysis, we identified 1,006 patients who received auto-HCT for MM between 2009 and 2015. This time-period was chosen to include patients who received auto-HCT after the availability of plerixafor. Patients were divided into 4 groups: G (filgrastim alone), G+P (filgrastim + plerixafor), Cy, and CVAD/CBAD. Plerixafor was mainly used "just-in-time", and not as planned therapy in accordance with our Departmental guidelines. Primary endpoints were CD34+ cell dose/kg collected, days to collect the target CD34+ cell dose, time to neutrophil engraftment (first of three consecutive days of peripheral blood neutrophil count of >500 x 106/L), packed red blood cell (PBRC) and platelet transfusion requirement, duration of hospitalization, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Results: Patient characteristics are summarized in Table 1. There were 654 patients mobilized with G, 203 with G + P, 80 with Cy, and 69 with CVAD/CBAD. Patients mobilized with CVAD/CBAD were younger compared to the other three groups, were less likely to have achieved VGPR to induction, and more likely to have received a more intense preparative regimen (Table 1). Patients who received G alone, G+P, Cy, and CVAD/CBAD collected a median of 4.1 (0.7-12.2), 4.0 (1.8-11.1), 5.2 (2.2-19.2), and 5.6 (2.5-26.6) x106 CD34+ cells/kg [p<0.001]. Median number of days to collect the target CD34+ cell dose of approximately 6x106 were, 3 (1-10), 5 (1-10), 2 (1-8), and 1 (1-8) for G, G+P, Cy and CVAD/CBAD groups, respectively [p<0.001]. Median time to neutrophil engraftment was 11 days in all four groups, with the range being 8-15, 8-14, 8-13 and 9-13 for G, G+P, Cy and CVAD/CBAD respectively [p=0.021]. Median PRBC units transfused after auto-HCT were 1 (0-13), 1 (0-8), 2 (0-7), and 2 (0-9) for patients in G, G+P, Cy, and CVAD/CBAD groups, respectively [p<0.001]. Median platelets units transfused after auto-HCT were 2 in all four groups. Median duration of hospitalization for auto-HCT was 17 (3-73), 18 (5-84), 18 (4-39), and 19 (5-34) days in G, G+P, Cy and CVAD/CBAD groups, respectively [p=0.003]. The 5-year [95% CI] PFS rates were 36.6% [32.9-40.7%], 38.5% [31.5-47%], 28.9% [20.0-41.5%], and 30.9% [21.5-44.3%] for G, G+P, Cy, and CVAD/CBAD groups, respectively. The 5-year [95% CI] OS rates were 71.3% [67.7-75.1%], 73.9% [67.3-81.2%], 67.6% [57.3-79.7%], and 61.7% [51.1-74.5%] for G, G+P, Cy, and CVAD/CBAD groups, respectively. On multivariable analysis, after adjusting for covariates including age, ISS stage, cytogenetic risk, and response to induction, there was no significant impact of mobilization approach on PFS or OS. Conclusion: Approximately 85% of MM patients underwent PBSC mobilization with GF only (G or G+P). GF + chemo (Cy, CVAD/CBAD) was primarily used in patients with suboptimal response to induction, and allowed successful PBSC collection in this high-risk group. GF + chemo-based mobilization was associated with a higher CD34+ cell dose collection, without improving the time to neutrophil or platelet engraftment, PRBC or platelet transfusion requirement, or the duration of hospitalization. Disclosures Bashir: Purdue: Other: Advisory Board; StemLine: Research Funding; Acrotech: Research Funding; Takeda: Other: Advisory Board, Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Amgen: Other: Advisory Board; KITE: Other: Advisory Board. Nieto:Secura Bio: Other: Grant Support; Astra Zeneca: Other: Grant Support; Novartis: Other: Grant Support; Affimed: Consultancy, Other: Grant Support. Hosing:NKARTA Inc.: Consultancy. Popat:Bayer: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding. Lee:Sanofi: Consultancy; GlaxoSmithKline: Consultancy, Research Funding; Genentech: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Genentech: Consultancy; Regeneron: Research Funding; Daiichi Sankyo: Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding. Patel:Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding; Oncopeptides: Consultancy; Poseida: Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Cellectis: Research Funding; Precision Biosciences: Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; Nektar: Consultancy, Research Funding. Manasanch:Merck: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Quest Diagnostics: Research Funding; Adaptive Biotechnologies: Honoraria; GSK: Honoraria; Sanofi: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria; JW Pharma: Research Funding; Sanofi: Research Funding. Thomas:BMS: Research Funding; Ascentage: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; X4 Pharma: Research Funding; Xencor: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Other: Advisory Boards; Genentech: Research Funding. Kaufman:Karyopharm: Honoraria; Bristol Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding. Orlowski:Amgen, Inc., AstraZeneca, BMS, Celgene, EcoR1 Capital LLC, Forma Therapeutics, Genzyme, GSK Biologicals, Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Janssen Biotech, Juno Therapeutics, Kite Pharma, Legend Biotech USA, Molecular Partners, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.,: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Laboratory research funding from BioTheryX, and clinical research funding from CARsgen Therapeutics, Celgene, Exelixis, Janssen Biotech, Sanofi-Aventis, Takeda Pharmaceuticals North America, Inc.: Research Funding; Founder of Asylia Therapeutics, Inc., with associated patents and an equity interest, though this technology does not bear on the current submission.: Current equity holder in private company, Patents & Royalties; Sanofi-Aventis, Servier, Takeda Pharmaceuticals North America, Inc.: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; STATinMED Research: Consultancy. Champlin:Actinium: Consultancy; Johnson and Johnson: Consultancy; Omeros: Consultancy; Cytonus: Consultancy; DKMS America: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Genzyme: Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Patents & Royalties. Qazilbash:Bioclinica: Consultancy; Amgen: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Angiocrine: Research Funding; Bioline: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Incidence and Outcomes of Toxoplasma Reactivation in Patients with Hematologic Diseases after Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2021-151474 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 1779-1779

Author(s):

Taha Al-Juhaishi ◽

Alexandre Elias Malek ◽

Denái R. Milton ◽

Jeremy L. Ramdial ◽

May Daher ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Stem Cell ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Antimicrobial Prophylaxis ◽

Advisory Board ◽

License Agreement ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Hematopoietic Stem ◽

Scientific Advisory Board ◽

Scientific Advisory

Abstract Introduction: Toxoplasmosis is a rare complication of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (AlloHSCT) usually through reactivation in a previously seropositive recipient, and is associated with mortality as high as 60% (Paccoud et al. BMT 2020). Seroprevalence in the population varies ranging from 5% or lower in North America to over 50% in France. Risk factors for reactivation include immune suppression, seronegative donors, cord blood grafts, and lack of adequate antimicrobial prophylaxis (Robin et al. BBMT 2019). We sought to evaluate the outcomes of patients with toxoplasma reactivation after undergoing AlloHSCT in the modern era. Methods: This study was a retrospective single center analysis of all patients who underwent AlloHSCT between January 2012 and June 2021 at our center. Primary objectives were to assess the incidence of toxoplasma reactivation and the effects of reactivation on survival. Patients were identified in the department database and relevant demographic and clinical data were extracted. Results of toxoplasma testing [IgG serology and polymerase chain reaction (PCR)] were collected and verified by manual chart review. Patients with negative toxoplasma serology and/or missing serology or PCR data were excluded from analysis. Reactivation was defined as positive PCR in a seropositive patient. Toxoplasma reactivation associations were assessed by logistic regression models. Overall Survival (OS) was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and differences compared using the log-rank test. Cox proportional hazards models were used for survival associations. Cumulative incidence of non-relapse mortality (NRM) was determined using competing risks method. This study was approved by the institutional board review (IRB) committee at our center. Results: A total of 370 patients who received AlloHSCT and had a positive toxoplasma IgG were identified. Fifty-two patients had missing toxoplasma PCR and 4 did not meet eligibility criteria and were excluded. Twenty-two (7%) out of the remaining 314 seropositive patients experienced toxoplasma reactivation as confirmed by positive PCR. Median age in the reactivation group was 55 years, and patients were mostly white males with myeloid neoplasms who underwent AlloHSCT in first complete remission using nonmyeloablative conditioning and a matched unrelated donor (table 1). No significant differences in baseline characteristics were seen between the seropositive only and the reactivation groups, except for antimicrobial prophylaxis use (P <0.001). Fifty-nine percent of patients (13 out of 22) in the reactivation group were on toxoplasma prophylaxis compared to 93% (273 out of 292) in the seropositive patients without reactivation. Sixteen out of the 22 (73%) patients with reactivation developed clinical symptoms while 6 (27%) had asymptomatic reactivation. Antimicrobial prophylaxis only with either pentamidine, atovaquone, trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole but not dapsone, was associated with lower risk of developing reactivation (table 2). With a median follow up of 15.4 months (0.3-98.9), the median OS was 9.6 months in patients with reactivation versus 58.5 months in seropositive patients without reactivation [HR, 2.06; (95% CI, 1.21 to 3.52); P=0.008] (figure 1). NRM was also higher in the reactivation group [HR, 2.61; (95% CI, 1.34 to 5.11); P=0.005] (figure 2). Specifically, day 100, 1-year and 2-year NRM were higher in the reactivation group versus (vs) seropositive patients (36% vs 10%, 41% vs 18%, and 47% vs 20% respectively). Toxoplasma reactivation was associated with worse OS and increased NRM in univariable analysis however this did not reach statistical significance in multivariable analysis. Conclusion: Toxoplasma reactivation in seropositive AlloSCT patients remains low at our center at around 7%. Toxoplasma reactivation is associated with worse outcomes after AlloHSCT and reactivation could be mitigated by improved compliance with antimicrobial prophylaxis. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Mehta: Kadmon: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; CSLBehring: Research Funding; Syndax: Research Funding. Shah: Amgen: Consultancy; Bluebird Bio: Research Funding; BMS/Celgene: Research Funding; CareDx: Consultancy; CSL Behring: Consultancy; GSK: Consultancy; Indapta Therapeutics: Consultancy; Janssen: Research Funding; Karyopharm: Consultancy; Kite: Consultancy; Nektar: Research Funding; Oncopeptides: Consultancy; Poseida: Research Funding; Precision Biosciences: Research Funding; Sanofi: Consultancy; Sutro Biopharma: Research Funding; Teneobio: Research Funding. Hosing: Nkarta Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Rezvani: Pharmacyclics: Other: Educational grant, Research Funding; Affimed: Other: License agreement and research agreement; education grant, Patents & Royalties, Research Funding; Takeda: Other: License agreement and research agreement, Patents & Royalties; GSK: Other: Scientific Advisory Board ; Caribou: Other: Scientific Advisory Board; GemoAb: Other: Scientific Advisory Board ; AvengeBio: Other: Scientific Advisory Board ; Virogin: Other: Scientific Advisory Board ; Navan Technologies: Other: Scientific Advisory Board; Bayer: Other: Scientific Advisory Board . Qazilbash: Janssen: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Other: Advisory Board; Angiocrine: Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding; Oncopeptides: Other: Advisory Board; Biolline: Research Funding; NexImmune: Research Funding. Popat: Bayer: Research Funding; Abbvie: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding. Shpall: Takeda: Patents & Royalties; Navan: Consultancy; Novartis: Honoraria; Magenta: Honoraria; Affimed: Patents & Royalties; Novartis: Consultancy; Magenta: Consultancy; Adaptimmune: Consultancy; Axio: Consultancy; Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria. Ahmed: Seagen: Research Funding; Xencor: Research Funding; Tessa Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding.

Download Full-text