scholarly journals Sequential Use of Carfilzomib and Pomalidomide in Relapsed Multiple Myeloma: A Multi-Institutional Report from the Canadian Myeloma Research Group (CMRG) Database

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 5-7
Author(s):  
Arleigh McCurdy ◽  
Christopher P. Venner ◽  
Martha L Louzada ◽  
Richard LeBlanc ◽  
Michael Sebag ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Observational Study ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Real World ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Treatment Initiation ◽  
Median Line ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Two Agents ◽  
The Impact

Introduction: The treatment of multiple myeloma (MM) has dramatically improved due to the availability of immunotherapies such as daratumumab (Dara). However, in Canada, myeloma treatments now account for up to 20% of some provincial drug budgets. As Dara may be effective for a prolonged period and is quickly moving into first-line therapy, the Canadian body which provides guidelines to the provincial ministries of health recommended in 2019 against open sequencing of drugs in relapsed MM. Specifically, patients who receive Dara are now only eligible for public funding for either carfilzomib (CAR) or pomalidomide (POM)--but not both-- for relapsed MM. Given the known heterogeneity of myeloma, data gaps regarding the optimal sequencing of the available agents and uncertainly regarding the impact of this new restriction on patient outcomes, we utilized our Canadian national myeloma database to assess the sequencing of these two agents. The goal of our study was to understand the efficacy of these two commonly used treatments in the relapsed setting: 1) POM- after CAR-based therapy and 2) CAR- after POM-based therapy. Methods: We performed a retrospective observational study using the Canadian Myeloma Research Group Database (CMRG-DB), analyzed up to 30/06/2020. The CMRG-DB (formerly Myeloma Canada Research Network Database/MCRN-DB) is a prospectively maintained disease-specific database with over 7000 patients enrolled from 14 academic sites across Canada and includes legacy data collected from 2007. All patients with MM who were treated for relapsed disease with approved regimens using POM after CAR, or CAR after POM were included. Our primary outcomes were overall response rates (ORR) in each respective cohort. Secondary outcomes were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and a landmark OS analysis from treatment initiation with the first of the two agents. Survival was estimated using Kaplan-Meier methods and compared between groups using log rank test. Results: A total of 121 patients were included: 49 treated with POM after CAR, and 72 with CAR after POM. In the POM after CAR group, the median line of treatment was 4th for POM and 3rd for CAR. In the CAR after POM group, the median line of treatment was 4th for POM and 5th for CAR. In 79/121 patients (65%), the two therapies were directly sequential, 40/49 (82%) for the POM after CAR group, and 38/72 (54%) in the CAR after POM group. Baseline characteristics and treatment details are shown in Table 1. The ORR was 51% for patients treated with POM after CAR, and 49% for patients treated with CAR after POM. The median PFS for POM after CAR was 4.93 months (95% CI, 2.76-7.07), and for CAR after POM was 5.36 months (95% CI, 3.75-6.94). The median OS for patients treated POM after CAR was 11.01 months (95% CI, 4.50-19.13), and for patients treated with CAR after POM the median OS was 10.98 months (95% CI, 8.98-19.17) (Figure 1). In a landmark analysis using the time of the treatment initiation with the first of the two agents, the median OS of patients treated with CAR after POM was 37.61 months (95% CI 26.66-46.52) and 25.32 months (95% CI 14.56-41.19) for patients treated with POM after CAR (p=0.1270) (Figure 2). Conclusion: In this real-world observational study we demonstrated that both CAR- and POM-based therapies were effective treatment options for patients with advanced relapsed MM as each produced responses in approximately 50% of patients with a median PFS of about 5 months and median OS of 11 months. These results are comparable to those noted in prospective clinical trials leading to the approval of these agents in this setting. Further, a landmark analysis showed that using both agents sequentially late in the disease course provided reasonable OS outcomes, regardless of the order in which they are sequenced. Finally, as the cost of MM therapy increases, the use of real-world data can help determine the impact of funding decisions on the outcome of patients treated in a publicly funded universal health care system such the one in Canada. Disclosures McCurdy: GSK: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; Sanofi: Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria. Venner:Janssen, BMS/Celgene, Sanofi, Takeda, Amgen: Honoraria; Celgene, Amgen: Research Funding. Louzada:Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria. LeBlanc:Celgene: Research Funding; Celgene Canada; Janssen Inc.; Amgen Canada; Takeda Canada: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Sebag:Takeda: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria. Song:Celgene: Research Funding; Celgene, Janssen, Amgen, Takeda: Honoraria. Jimenez-Zepeda:Janssen, Celgene, Amgen, Takeda: Honoraria. Kotb:Takeda: Honoraria; Merck: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; Sanofi: Research Funding; Karyopharm: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company; Amgen: Honoraria. Mian:Sanofi: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria. White:Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria. Stakiw:Roche: Research Funding; Lundbeck: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding. Reece:Janssen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Amgen, Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen, Bristol-Myers Squibb: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Merck: Honoraria, Research Funding; Otsuka: Research Funding.

scholarly journals The Grndad Registry: Contemporary Natural History Data and an Analysis of Real-World Patterns of Use and Limitations of Disease Modifying Therapy in Adults with SCD

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 34-36
Author(s):  
Alexandra Boye-Doe ◽  
Elizabeth Brown ◽  
Charu Puri-Sharma ◽  
Anjulika Chawla ◽  
Joshua J Field ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Real World ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Clinical Characteristics ◽  
Reticulocyte Count ◽  
Principal Investigator ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Disease Modifying Therapy ◽  
Disease Modifying ◽  
The Impact

Incremental improvement in care for children with sickle cell disease (SCD), arising from government-funded research over the last 4 decades, resulted in a dramatically reduced childhood mortality. However, the impact of iterative research and disease modifying therapy (DMT) on adults with SCD has not been as strong. Until now, there has been no coordinated, longitudinal, generalizable, natural history study of SCD that allowed for an assessment of the contemporary adult population. Here, we describe demographics at enrollment and cross-sectional clinical characteristics of 570 adults with SCD (SCA, homozygous HbSS or HbSb0 N=387, 68%, and compound heterozygous SCD variant, HbSC or HbSb+ N=183, 32%, Table I) on whom we have evaluable data. These data are from the multi-site REDCap-based prospective Globin Research Network for Data and Discovery (GRNDaD) registry, comprising 11 centers with over 1100 consented adults and children. The objective of this work was to evaluate the cohort at year of entry, including the use and clinical associations with DMT, and to explore indicators of disease progression as patients age. 16% of adults with SCA and 9.6% with variant disease stroke; 60.9% of adults with SCA and 41% with variant disease had a history of acute chest syndrome. Albuminuria was prevalent in both SCA (39.5%) and variant disease (19.4%). 185 adults (185/387, 47.8%) with SCA, previously referred for symptoms in clinic, had recorded tricuspid regurgitant jet velocity measurements, with a significantly abnormal result (>2.7 m/s), in 92 (92/185, 49.7%). At enrollment, 45% of adults with SCA (175/387) and 14% of adults with variant disease (25/183) were on hydroxyurea (HU); 20.4% of adults with SCA were on chronic transfusions (79/387) compared with 7% of adults with variant disease (13/183). One third of all adults with SCA were not on or were not consistently on DMT, and had laboratory evidence for increased hemolysis (Table 1). Adults with SCA who were on HU had a higher MCV and higher HbF than other treatment states (Table 1). However, only 34% (60/175) of adults with SCA on HU were at maximally tolerated dose (MTD), per guideline-based recommendations, i.e. ANC ≤4.0 x109/L. On HU, those in the lowest quartile for ANC (<3.2 x109/L) were older (mean age 35.9 years (95% Confidence Limit (CL) 32.5-39.3) vs. 31.2 (95% CL 28.2 to 34.4) years, P=0.04), had a lower mean reticulocyte count (119 x109/L (95% CL 76-162) vs. 203 (95% CL 129-278), P=0.05), and a higher mean MCV (104.4 fL (95% CL 100.2-108.7) vs. 92.5 (95% CL 87.2-97.8), P=0.0007), compared to those in the highest quartile for ANC (>5.7 x109/L, N=34), but did not otherwise differ (including mean HbF, which was not measured in a standardized way). In older adults with SCD (Table 2), fewer people with SCA than with variant disease were >54 years old, (26/387 HbSS, 7%, vs. 34/183, 19%, respectively). The older adult with SCA had a depressed reticulocyte count and a trend towards a higher creatinine. 45% of adults with SCA were on HU, and only a minority were at MTD, highlighting the challenges to optimal long-term therapy in chronic illness. Those patients not stably on DMT had laboratory evidence for worse anemia and hemolysis, without an evident increase in hospital admissions, perhaps due to a hyper hemolytic phenotype. Despite a more intensive regimen, SCA patients on transfusions had a higher Hgb but did not have hemolysis labs that differed from SCA patients on HU. Further, there was no difference in hospitalizations amongst treatments for SCA, although a decrease in hospitalizations was detectable in variant disease (Table 1). Successful use of DMTs in SCA was challenging even in academic centers, and there was evidence for ongoing hemolysis in treated and untreated patients. These real world data provide useful information about adults (>17 years) with SCD. These data highlight opportunities to improve adherence to therapy (patient-centered) and to prescribing guidelines (provider-centered), and to consider less-burdensome alternatives. Importantly, we found that a large proportion of people with SCA were not on DMT, and with HU often not at MTD. In future, the GRNDaD registry will enable prospective longitudinal real-world analyses of the impact of DMTs and/or newer therapies on clinical outcomes, will enhance quality improvement, and will allow us to more fully explore clinical characteristics, of SCA and variant disease, in the aging adult. Disclosures Puri-Sharma: Bluebird Bio: Current Employment. Chawla:Bluebird Bio: Current Employment. Field:Shires: Research Funding; Ironwood: Research Funding. Neumayr:Emmaus: Consultancy; Bayer: Consultancy; CTD Holdings: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; ApoPharma: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Micelle: Other: Site principal investigator; GBT: Other: Site principal investigator; PCORI: Other: site principal investigator; Novartis: Other: co-investigator; Bluebird Bio: Other: co-investigator; Sangamo Therapeutics: Other; Silarus: Other; Celgene: Other; La Jolla Pharmaceuticals: Other; Forma: Other; Imara: Other; National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute: Other; Health Resources and Services Administration: Other; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: Other; Seattle Children's Research: Other. Desai:Pfizer, Inc.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; GBT, Inc.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Ironwood Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Rockpointe Continuing Medical Education Company: Consultancy. Lanzkron:GBT: Research Funding; HRSA: Research Funding; Ironwood: Research Funding; NHLBI: Research Funding; PCORI: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; Pharmacy Times Continuing Education: Honoraria; Prolong: Research Funding. Little:Hemex Health, Inc.: Patents & Royalties: Microfluidic electropheresis (patent, no royalties); BioChip Labs: Patents & Royalties: SCD Biochip (patent, no royalties); GBT: Research Funding; GBT: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bluebird Bio: Research Funding; NHLBI: Research Funding.

scholarly journals Real-World Outcomes for Standard-of-Care Treatments in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 4075-4075
Author(s):  
Michel Delforge ◽  
Marie-Christiane Vekemans ◽  
Sébastien Anguille ◽  
Julien Depaus ◽  
Nathalie Meuleman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Real World ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Retrospective Chart Review ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Real World Data ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Treatment Regimens

Abstract Background: With the advent of immunomodulatory agents (IMiDs), proteasome inhibitors (PIs) and, more recently, anti-CD38 monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), prognosis of patients with multiple myeloma (MM) has improved considerably. Unfortunately, even with these 3 major MM drug classes, most patients ultimately relapse and require further therapy. There remains an incomplete understanding of how patients who have received extensive therapy and with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) are treated in routine clinical practice, as no standard-of-care exists for these patients, and what the outcomes are in this real-world setting. Objective: This study aims to evaluate the outcomes of patients with triple-class (IMiD, PI and anti-CD38 mAb) and triple-line exposed RRMM using real-world data from patients in Belgium. Methods: A multicenter, observational study, involving 7 non-academic and academic Belgian centers, was conducted based on a retrospective chart review of adult RRMM patients who started subsequent treatment from March 2017 through May 2021 after having received ≥3 lines of therapy including at least an IMiD, a PI, and anti-CD38-directed therapy (tri-exposed). Data were captured in an electronic case report form (Castor EDC). Patients with an ECOG performance status of ≥2, who received prior CAR-T treatment or prior BCMA-targeted therapy, or with a known active or prior history of CNS involvement (or with clinical signs thereof), were excluded. All treatment lines initiated after becoming eligible were used in the analysis. Specifically, all treatment lines for patients meeting the eligibility criteria more than once in their entire follow-up were included as separate observations, with date of treatment initiation as specific baseline for each treatment line. Cox proportional hazards models were fitted to explore the prognostic value with Overall Survival (OS), Progression Free Survival (PFS), and Time to Next Therapy (TTNT). Results: A total of 112 patients with 237 eligible treatment lines were included in the analysis; median follow-up was 16.6 months. In 45% of the initiated treatment lines, patients were refractory to 4 or 5 therapies, 62% had received ≥5 prior lines, 22% had extramedullary disease and in 48% of observations the time to progression in prior line was shorter than 4 months. After patients became tri-exposed, more than 50 unique treatment regimens were initiated, with the following being the most common: carfilzomib + dexamethasone (14%), pomalidomide + dexamethasone + chemotherapy (8%), and ixazomib + lenalidomide + dexamethasone (6%). Additionally, 4% of included observations were exposed to anti-BCMA agents. Overall, the following treatment classes were the most frequently started: PI only (19%), PI + IMiD combinations (17%), and regimens including anti-CD38 antibodies (15%). Median OS was 9.79 months [95% CI: 7.79; 12.22], median PFS was 3.42 months [95% CI: 2.79; 4.27], median TTNT was 3.61 months [95% CI: 3.09; 4.57]. Higher refractory status (p<0.001), being male (p=0.001), older age (p<0.001), shorter duration of prior lines (p<0.001), shorter time to progression in prior line (p=0.025), and higher LDH levels (p<0.002) were prognostic for worse outcomes for both OS (Figure 1) and PFS. Conclusions: This retrospective chart review of patients with tri-exposed RRMM in Belgium shows that real-world outcomes in terms of OS, PFS and TTNT are poor for these patients, with a median OS of <10 months. A wide variety of treatment regimens used in clinical practice confirm the absence of a clear standard-of-care in this patient population. The literature also confirms that these poor outcomes observed in Belgium, for this subset of MM patients, are similar in other countries. These real-world data highlight the high unmet medical need in this patient population and critical need for new and effective treatment options. MD and MCV contributed equally to this work. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Delforge: Amgen, Celgene, Janssen, Sanofi: Honoraria, Research Funding. Vekemans: Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS-Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen Pharmaceutica: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Sanofi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Depaus: Takeda: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy. Meuleman: iTeos Therapeutics: Consultancy. Strens: Realidad bvba: Consultancy. Van Hoorenbeeck: Janssen: Current Employment. Moorkens: Janssen-Cilag: Current Employment. Diels: Janssen: Current Employment. Ghilotti: Janssen-Cilag SpA, Cologno Monzese, Italy: Current Employment. Dalhuisen: Janssen: Current Employment. Vandervennet: Janssen: Current Employment.

scholarly journals Prospective Study Reveals Increased Platelet Function Associated with Multiple Myeloma and Its Treatment

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 21-21
Author(s):  
Dalia Khan ◽  
Joanne Mitchell ◽  
Rekha Rana ◽  
Neline Kriek ◽  
Amanda Unsworth ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Platelet Function ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Platelet Reactivity ◽  
Immunoblot Analysis ◽  
Healthy Controls ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Fibrinogen Binding ◽  
The Impact

Background: Multiple Myeloma (MM) is a rare incurable bone marrow cancer characterised by a malignant proliferation of plasma cells. MM is usually preceded by a premalignant and benign Monoclonal Gammopathy of Undetermined Significance (MGUS). The incidence of arterial and venous thrombosis in MM is substantially higher than in the normal population, however the cause of this increased thrombosis risk and the impact of MM on platelet function is unclear. Treatments for both newly diagnosed and relapsed/refractory patients with MM include Immunomodulatory drugs (IMiDs) such as thalidomide/lenalidomide-based combinations. These treatments improve considerably patient outcomes, however iMiD treatment also increases the risk of thrombotic complications in these patients. Aims: In this prospective study we explored the impact of MM and its treatment on platelet function. Methods: High throughput functional analysis was performed using platelets from normal healthy controls (n=31) and patients with MGUS (n=18), smouldering multiple myeloma (SMM, n= 20), and MM (26). The MM group was further divided into 3 treatment cohorts; (1) no treatment, (2) treatment with proteasome inhibitor (PI) and dexamethasone (Dex), and (3) treatment with PI, Dex, immunomodulatory drug (iMiD) and direct oral anticoagulant. Platelet aggregation and activation (fibrinogen binding and P-selectin exposure) were measured in response to a concentration range of agonists including ADP, the thrombin receptor agonist TRAP-6, collagen, collagen-related peptide (CRP), a thromboxane receptor agonist U46619 and epinephrine. Cereblon protein was detected in platelet protein extracts by immunoblot analysis. Results: Consistent with previous reports, modestly increased VWF and factor VIII levels were detected in MM patients, but no additional differences in coagulation parameters were detected in patient groups compared to normal healthy controls (other than expected due to anticoagulant usage). Platelet aggregation in response to each agonist was increased significantly in the MM patient group compared to the normal healthy controls, suggesting that platelet reactivity is elevated in MM patients through a common mechanism that is shared by different activation pathways or the involvement of multiple mechanisms. P-selectin exposure on platelets from MM patients was not significantly different from normal healthy donors, indicating that enhanced platelet reactivity in MM is specifically through modulation of integrin αIIbβ3 activation, fibrinogen binding and therefore enhanced aggregation. The effects of treatment on platelet function in patients on iMiD vs. non iMiD treatment were assessed. In the iMiD treatment group, patient platelets aggregated in response to lower concentrations of ADP, collagen, epinephrine and CRP in samples taken post-treatment compared to those taken before and during treatment. This demonstrates an increased sensitivity to platelet activation in these patients induced by treatment. Immunoblot analysis revealed that platelets contain cereblon, a therapeutic target of lenalidomide. The potential direct effects of iMiDs on platelets in vitro was therefore explored. Lenalidomide treatment (10mM) increased the ability of platelets to aggregate in response to low concentrations of each agonist tested when compared to normal controls. Conclusions: Platelet reactivity is increased in multiple myeloma and increased further upon iMiD treatment. The presence of the key therapeutic target for iMiDs in platelets and the ability of lenalidomide to modulate platelet function directly, reveals new avenues for investigation to determine the underlying mechanism of action. Disclosures Laffan: CSL: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; Sobi: Consultancy; Roche: Consultancy; LFB: Consultancy; Shire: Consultancy; Octapharma: Consultancy; Bayer: Speakers Bureau; Roche-Chugai: Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Speakers Bureau; Leo-Pharma: Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Speakers Bureau. Shapiro:Bayer: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; NovoNordisk: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Sobi: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Chugai/Roche: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Shire/Takeda: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Thakurta:Oxford University: Other: visiting professor; Bristol Myers Squibb: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Ramasamy:Takeda: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria; Sanofi: Honoraria; Oncopeptides: Honoraria; Takeda: Speakers Bureau; Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; GSK: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Oncopeptides: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sanofi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Honoraria; Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol Myers squibb: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Gibbins:Bristol Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Arena Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding.

Protective Effects of Daratumumab on Carfilzomib-Related Cardiac Dysfunction in Patients with Relapsed Multiple Myeloma: Results from an Observational Study

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 17-17
Author(s):  
Evangelos Terpos ◽  
Kimon Stamatelopoulos ◽  
Nikolaos Makris ◽  
Ageliki Laina ◽  
Maria Gavriatopoulou ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Observational Study ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Longitudinal Strain ◽  
Systolic Function ◽  
Cardiac Ultrasound ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Grade 3

Introduction: Carfilzomib is a second-generation irreversible proteasome inhibitor that has been shown to improve overall survival in patients with relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). Carfilzomib may exert cardiovascular adverse events (CVAEs), although related mechanisms, prognostic markers and precipitating factors have not been fully characterized. In the prospective randomized phase 3 CANDOR study, comparing daratumumab in combination with carfilzomib and dexamethasone (DaraKd) versus Kd alone, a lower rate of cardiac failure events was observed in the DaraKd arm. The aim of this study was to assess whether treatment with daratumumab may ameliorate carfilzomib-related cardiovascular toxicity. Patients and Methods: This is an ongoing, prospective, observational study on the effects of Kd with or without daratumumab on cardiac function of patients with RRMM. All patients attended an initial visit, which included recording of medical history and cardiotoxicity risk factors (age ≥65 years, obesity, smoking, hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, diabetes mellitus, previous anthracycline use, previous chest or mediastinum radiotherapy and current myocardial disease). At baseline, cardiac ultrasound was performed and images were acquired for standard echocardiographic analysis and for speckle tracking offline analysis. As in ENDEAVOR study, carfilzomib was administered at 20 mg/m2 on days 1 (C1D1) and 2 (C1D2) of cycle 1 and at 56 mg/m2 thereafter, with dexamethasone 40 mg on days 1, 8 & 15 of 28-day cycles (Kd regimen). In the DaraKd regimen, daratumumab was administered at a weekly dose of 16 mg/kg, iv, for cycles 1-2, every 2 weeks for cycles 3-6 and every 4 weeks thereafter, while Kd was given at the dose described previously. A follow-up cardiac ultrasound study, as described above, was performed on the last day of cycle 6 (C6D16) or earlier if carfilzomib interruption was indicated. Patients were followed for a median of 10 months for carfilzomib-related CVAEs [hypertension (HTN), heart failure (HF) and acute coronary syndrome (ACS)]. Results: In this preliminary report, we evaluated 25 patients with relapsed or refractory MM who received either DaraKd or Kd in the everyday clinical practice; 11 patients received DaraKd and 14 received Kd. Patients' mean (±SD) age was 67.8±7.6 years and 60% were men. The two treatment groups did not significantly differ in baseline characteristics including age, gender and prevalence of hypertension, hyperlipidemia, smoking, diabetes mellitus and cardiovascular disease (p>0.1 for all). In the DaraKd group, we did not observe any significant change of markers of left and right ventricular systolic function; however, these markers deteriorated in the Kd group. Specifically, in the Kd group, among left ventricular (LV) systolic function markers, average LV ejection fraction (LVEF) decreased from 59.6±4.8 to 56.6±5.4% (p=0.026) and LV global longitudinal strain (GLS) from -22.5±2.9 to -19.4±3.1 (p=0.007). Similarly, among right ventricular (RV) function markers, tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE) decreased from 23.8±3.6 to 20.4±2.8 mm (p=0.020) and RV free wall longitudinal strain from -31.9±3.4 to -28.2±4.3 (p=0.012). A significant group interaction (p<0.05 for all) was observed for changes in all these 4 markers. No difference between groups was observed in changes of markers of LV diastolic or left atrial function. In regard to CVAEs, more events occurred in the Kd group (in 5 out of 11 patients, 45%, including 2 HF and 3 HTN grade 3 events) as compared to the DaraKd group (4 out of 14 patients, 28.6%, including 2 ACS, 1 HF and 2 HTN grade 3 events; one patient had two events, ACS and HTN, both of grade 3). Conclusion: The combination of daratumumab with Kd is associated with preserved post-treatment cardiac systolic function as compared to the Kd regimen in patients with RRMM, who had received 1-3 prior lines of therapy. This was associated with a lower CVAE rate, even in this small group of patients. The clinical significance and the mechanisms mediating this possible protective cardiovascular action of daratumumab merits further investigation, given the high activity of DaraKd in patients with relapsed or refractory MM. Disclosures Terpos: Amgen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Genesis pharma SA: Honoraria, Other: travel expenses , Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria, Other: travel expenses , Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria; Sanofi: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria. Stamatelopoulos:Amgen: Honoraria, Research Funding. Gavriatopoulou:Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Genesis Pharma: Consultancy, Honoraria; Karyopharm: Consultancy, Honoraria; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria. Dimopoulos:Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Personal fees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Personal fees; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Personal fees, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Personal fees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Personal fees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Kastritis:Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Genesis Pharma: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding.

Impact of Renal Impairment (RI) on Outcomes after Treatment (Tx) with Lenalidomide and Low-Dose Dexamethasone (Rd) in Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma (NDMM) Patients (Pts): First Trial Results

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 2112-2112
Author(s):  
Meletios A. Dimopoulos ◽  
Matthew C Cheung ◽  
Murielle Roussel ◽  
Ting Liu ◽  
Barbara Gamberi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Renal Function ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Normal Renal Function ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Failure Time ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Risk Of Death ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background: Approximately 20–40% of pts with NDMM present with RI, which is associated with a negative impact on survival (Rajkumar, 2005). In the pivotal phase 3 FIRST trial (median follow-up 37 months [mos]), continuous Rd improved progression-free survival (PFS) vs. melphalan-prednisone-thalidomide (MPT) in elderly NDMM pts by 28% (25.5 vs. 20.7 mos; HR = 0.72; P < 0.01) (Facon, Blood 2013). Although 121 pts receiving continuous Rd are still on Tx, the interim overall survival (OS) analysis showed a 22% reduction in the risk of death in favor of continuous Rd vs. MPT (HR = 0.78; P = 0.02). The present analysis was conducted to determine the impact of RI on PFS, OS, and time to 2nd antimyeloma Tx (AMT) as clinical study outcomes. Methods: Pts were randomized to 3 Tx arms: continuous Rd until progression (n = 535); Rd for 18 cycles (72 weeks) (Rd18; n = 541); or MPT for 12 cycles (72 weeks) (n = 547). Enrolled NDMM pts were categorized according to their renal function: 24% had normal renal function (creatinine clearance [CrCl] ≥ 80 mL/min), 44% presented with mild RI (≥ 50 and < 80 mL/min), 23% had moderate RI (≥ 30 and < 50 mL/min), and 9% had severe RI (< 30 mL/min). Pts requiring dialysis were excluded. Lenalidomide starting dose was 25 mg QD for pts with normal renal function or mild RI, 10 mg QD for moderate RI, and 15 mg QOD for severe RI. Melphalan dose was reduced by 50% in pts with moderate or severe RI. The primary endpoint was PFS (continuous Rd vs. MPT); secondary endpoints were OS, overall response rate, time to response, duration of response, time to Tx failure, time to 2nd AMT, health-related quality of life, safety, and improvement in renal function from baseline. Improvement in RI was defined as shifts from baseline to most extreme post-baseline value of the calculated CrCl as a measure of renal function during the active Tx (N = 1484). Results: A PFS benefit favored continuous Rd vs. MPT irrespective of the degree of renal function (Table 1): there was a benefit in pts with normal renal function (HR = 0.72 (0.51–1.02); P = 0.06), and better in pts with mild RI (HR = 0.79 (0.62–1.00); P = 0.05) and moderate RI (HR = 0.62 (0.45–0.85); P < 0.01). A PFS benefit was also seen with continuous Rd vs. Rd18 (a secondary comparison) in pts with mild RI and moderate RI (P < 0.01 for both). An interim OS benefit with continuous Rd vs. MPT was observed in most renal subgroups. Similar results were observed between Rd18 and MPT in terms of PFS or interim OS in any of the renal subgroups. Continuous Rd, compared with Rd18 or MPT, extended time to 2nd AMT in most renal groups except severe RI (CrCl < 30mL/min) (Table 2). Improvement in RI was observed more frequently in pts treated with continuous Rd than those with Rd18 or MPT: improvement of mild RI, 48%, 43%, and 48%, respectively; of moderate RI, 67% 61%, and 62%; and of severe RI, 64%, 59%, and 56%. Overall, < 5% of pts in any Tx group experienced a worsening in renal function status during Tx (continuous Rd 2.2%; Rd18 2.8%; MPT 2.7%). The most common grade 3–4 adverse events (AEs) for these Txs were anemia, neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, deep-vein thrombosis/pulmonary embolism (DVT/PE), and peripheral sensory neuropathy (Table 3). Tx discontinuation due to AEs increased in pts with moderate and severe RI, regardless of the type of Tx (Table 3). Conclusions: PFS, OS (at interim analysis), and time to 2nd AMT outcomes generally improved continuous Rd vs. Rd18 or MPT in transplant-ineligible NDMM pts with normal renal function, and in those with mild or moderate RI. The small number of pts in the severe RI group precluded a meaningful conclusion. Continuous Rd was generally well tolerated and renal function improved in the majority of pts during Tx with continuous Rd vs. Rd18 or MPT. Disclosures Dimopoulos: Celgene Corporation: Consultancy, Honoraria. Off Label Use: Lenalidomide used in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients. Roussel:Celgene: Consultancy, Lecture fees Other, Research Funding. van der Jagt:Celgene Corporation: Research Funding. Jaccard:Celgene Corporation: Honoraria, Research Funding. Tosikyan:Celgene: Consultancy. Karlin:Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sandoz: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Bensinger:Celgene Corporation: Consultancy, Research Funding. Schots:Celgene: Research Funding. Chen:Celgene Corporation: Employment. Marek:Celgene Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Ervin-Haynes:Celgene Corporation: Employment. Facon:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau.

scholarly journals Subcutaneous Versus Intravenous Bortezomib in Two Different Induction Therapies for Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma – Subgroup Analysis from the GMMG-MM5 Trial

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 3475-3475 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maximilian Merz ◽  
Hans Salwender ◽  
Mathias Hänel ◽  
Uta Bertsch ◽  
Christina Kunz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Induction Therapy ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Group Iv ◽  
Route Of Administration ◽  
Prolonged Treatment ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background: In patients with relapsed multiple myeloma (MM), Moreau and colleagues (Lancet Oncol, 2011) demonstrated that subcutaneous (SC) administration of bortezomib (BTZ) significantly reduced rates of adverse events (AE) compared to the intravenous (IV) formulation without loss of efficacy. Prospective data on SC BTZ in newly diagnosed MM are limited. We investigated the impact of SC versus IV BTZ in two different induction therapies for patients with newly diagnosed MM treated within the multicenter, prospective randomized MM5 trial of the German Myeloma Multicenter Group (GMMG). Methods: From 06/2010 until 11/2013, 604 patients were randomly assigned to receive 3 cycles of PAd (BTZ 1.3 mg/m2, days 1, 4, 8 and 11; Doxorubicin 9 mg/m2 IV, days 1-4; Dexamethasone 20 mg/d, orally, days 1-4, 9-12 and 17-20) or 3 cycles VCD (BTZ 1.3 mg/m2, days 1, 4, 8 and 11; Cyclophosphamide 900 mg/m2IV; day 1, Dexamethasone 40 mg/d, orally, days 1-2, 4-5, 8-9 and 11-12) for induction therapy. In the MM5 trial, induction therapy is followed by stem cell mobilization and harvest, high-dose therapy and Lenalidomide-based consolidation/maintenance therapy. Primary end points of the ongoing study are response to treatment after induction therapy and progression-free survival. Due to improved AE profile of SC compared to IV BTZ reported by Moreau, the administration of BTZ was changed from IV to SC in 02/2012. Therefore, we were able to perform an explorative analysis of 598 patients who received at least one dose of trial medication (PAd: n=150 IV / 140 SC; VCD: n=154 IV / 140 SC). 14 patients were excluded from the analysis because administration of BTZ was changed after start of induction therapy. We analyzed whether the route of administration influenced the applied cumulative BTZ dose, toxicity and efficacy of PAd and VCD. Results: The cumulative applied BTZ dose was significantly higher in patients treated with SC BTZ (PAd: 28.9 mg; VCD: 28.8 mg) compared to IV-treated patients (PAd: 27.6 mg; VCD: 27.9 mg; p = 0.007). Analysis of reported AEs associated to induction therapy revealed a significantly higher rate in patients treated with IV BTZ (65.1%) compared to SC-treated patients (55.7%, p = 0.02). AE > °II were reported more frequently in the IV group (IV: 52.0%; SC: 43.9%, p = 0.004). In detail, abnormal laboratory findings including leucopenia and thrombocytopenia (IV: 23.0%; SC: 16.4%, p = 0.05), metabolism and nutrition disorders (IV: 12.5%; SC: 5.4%, p = 0.004) and gastrointestinal disorders (IV: 9.9%; SC: 3.9%, p = 0.006) occurred more often in IV-treated patients. Analysis of peripheral neuropathy (PN) ≥ °II revealed no significant differences between IV and SC BTZ during the first two cycles of induction therapy (cycle 1: IV: 1.6%; SC: 2.5%; cycle 2: IV: 2.3%; SC: 3.6%) but PN occurred more often in IV-treated patients during the third cycle of induction therapy compared to the SC group (IV: 7.6%; SC: 1.8%, p = 0.001). Overall response rates (partial response or better) were not influenced by the route of administration in patients treated with PAd (IV: 72.7%; SC: 70.7%; p = 0.79) or VCD (IV: 77.9%; SC: 82.1%; p = 0.39). Analysis of the VCD arm showed that rates of VGPR or better were significantly higher in patients treated with IV BTZ compared to SC-treated patients (IV: 41.6%; SC: 28.6%, p = 0.02). Rates of VGPR or better were also higher for IV-treated patients in the PAd arm but did not reach statistical significance (IV: 36.7%; SC: 31.4%, p=0.39). Patient characteristics including baseline creatinine levels > 2 mg/dl, obesity or age at inclusion > 65 years did not influence efficacy of IV or SC BTZ in both arms. Conclusion: Last year we reported on the favorable toxicity profile and equal efficacy of VCD compared to PAd. With the current analysis we demonstrate that toxicity is further reduced with SC BTZ compared to IV. We therefore recommend VCD as induction therapy. However, we show for the first time a possible loss of efficacy in SC-treated patients. Therefore it remains unclear whether the reduced toxicity justifies the general application of SC BTZ in newly diagnosed, transplant-eligible patients or whether a prolonged treatment (4 x VCD SC) may reduce toxicity while achieving similar efficacy. Further studies are warranted since our results are partially in contrast with the previously presented data in relapsed MM and the ongoing MM5 trial was initially not designed to prospectively investigate the effect of SC or IV BTZ. Disclosures Salwender: Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Binding site: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Scheid:Celgene: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria. Mai:Janssen: Travel support Other. Hose:Novartis: Research Funding. Schmidt-Wolf:Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria. Weisel:Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Onyx: Consultancy, Honoraria; BMS: Consultancy; Noxxon: Consultancy. Duerig:Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria. Goldschmidt:Janssen-Cilag: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Polyphor: Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Chugai: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Onyx: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Millenium: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau.

scholarly journals The Impact of Fractures on Survival in Multiple Myeloma: Results from a Population-Based Study

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 4490-4490
Author(s):  
Sigrun Thorsteinsdottir ◽  
Ingigerdur S Sverrisdottir ◽  
Gauti Gislason ◽  
Ola Landgren ◽  
Ingemar Turesson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Population Based Study ◽  
Risk Of Death ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Introduction Multiple myeloma (MM) causes lytic bone lesions, osteopenia, and fractures, which increase the morbidity of MM patients. Results from small previous studies have indicated that fractures in MM have a negative effect on survival. Aims The aim of the study was to evaluate the impact of fractures on survival in MM patients diagnosed in Sweden in the years 1990-2013. Furthermore, to analyze the effect of bone fractures at MM diagnosis on subsequent survival. Methods Patients diagnosed with MM in 1990-2013 were identified from the Swedish Cancer Registry. Information on date of birth, diagnosis, and death were collected from the Registry of Total Population. Information on all fractures were retrieved from the Swedish Patient Registry. Cox regression model was used with fractures as time-dependent variables. The effect of fractures on survival was assessed for any fracture or a subtype of fracture (a specific bone fracture or ICD-coded pathologic fracture). Either first fracture or the first subtype of fracture was used in the analysis. The effect of a fracture at MM diagnosis (within 30 days before or 30 days after MM diagnosis) on survival was also estimated using a Cox regression model. All models were adjusted for age, sex, time of diagnosis, and previous fractures. Results A total of 14,008 patients were diagnosed with MM in the study period. A total of 4,141 (29.6%) patients developed a fracture including fractures that occurred within a year before MM diagnosis and thereafter. Hereof 2,893 (20.7%) patients developed a fracture after MM diagnosis. The risk of death was significantly increased for patients that developed a fracture after the time of MM diagnosis with a hazard ratio (HR) of 2.00 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.91-2.10) for all fractures combined. The risk of death was significantly increased for patients that developed all subtypes of fractures after MM diagnosis except ankle fractures. The risk of death was significantly increased for patients that developed pathologic fractures (HR=2.17; 95% CI 2.03-2.32), vertebral fractures (HR=1.73; 95% CI 1.61-1.87), hip fractures (HR=1.99; 95% CI 1.82-2.18), femoral fractures (HR=2.62; 95% CI 2.32-2.98), humerus fractures (HR=2.57; 95% CI 2.32-2.86), forearm fractures (HR=1.24; 95% CI 1.05-1.46), and rib fractures (HR=1.52; 95% CI 1.31-1.77), but not for ankle fractures (HR 1.07; 95% CI 0.79-1.44). A total of 942 (6.7%) of all MM patients were diagnosed with a fracture within 30 days before or 30 days after MM diagnosis. The patients with a fracture at diagnosis were at a significantly increased risk of death compared to those without (HR 1.31; 95% CI 1.21-1.41; Figure) Conclusions Our large population-based study, including over 14,000 patients diagnosed with MM in Sweden in the years 1990-2013, showed that MM patients that developed a fracture after the time of diagnosis were at twofold increased risk of dying compared to MM patients without a fracture. Furthermore, MM patients with a fracture at diagnosis had a 30% higher risk of dying compared to patients without a fracture. Our results indicate that fractures in MM reflect a more advanced disease at diagnosis and stress the importance of managing MM bone disease in all MM patients. Figure. Figure. Disclosures Landgren: Takeda: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Merck: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Karyopharm: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding.

scholarly journals A Novel Approach to Risk Stratification in Multiple Myeloma Using ISS Stage and FISH

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 1800-1800 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shaji K. Kumar ◽  
Patricia Greipp ◽  
Morie A Gertz ◽  
Angela Dispenzieri ◽  
Linda B Baughn ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Assessment ◽  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Final Model ◽  
Survival Table ◽  
The Impact ◽  
1Q Gain

Background: A variety of risk factors have been described in multiple myeloma and current risk assessment incorporates ISS stage with specific FISH results and serum LDH (R-ISS). However, this model does not include all the current abnormalities described as prognostic for survival in multiple myeloma. Importantly, the impact of many of these high-risk abnormalities are not uniform. We examined if we can better integrate FISH results into a risk assessment tool to better predict the outcomes of newly diagnosed MM. Patients and methods: We studied a cohort of 1316 patients with FISH done within 6 months of diagnosis of MM, in whom results for commonly observed abnormalities were available. We specifically examined the individual impact of common translocations involving chromosome 14, MYC rearrangements, chromosome 1q gain (single or multiple duplication) and del13q/monosomy 13. A risk assessment system was developed, weighting each abnormality according to their Risk Ratio and integrating ISS stage and serum LDH into the final model construction. Overall survival was calculated from diagnosis, with those alive at last follow up being censored. Results: We first examined the impact of each of the above FISH abnormalities: 1) high risk translocations [t(4;14), t(14;16), or t(14,20)], 2) trisomies, 3) t(11;14), 4) MYCrearrangements, 5) del13q/monosomy 13, and 6) 1q gain . Each of the abnormalities, except for t(11;14), was prognostic for survival (Table 1 with the risk ratios). For 1q gain, the median OS was NR, 105 mos and 79 mos respectively for no abnormality, duplication of 1 copy and duplication of multiple copies, (p<0.001). On multivariate analysis, t(11;14) and trisomies were no longer prognostic for overall survival (Table 1). The cumulative impact of abnormalities demonstrated worsening survival in the presence of increasing numbers of abnormalities (Figure 1). Including ISS stage 3 and LDH > ULN as additional variables for prognostication indicated both were individually prognostic for OS. In a multivariate analysis, including these two and FISH abnormalities, 1q gain and LDH were not independently prognostic. The final model consisted of HR translocations, MYCrearrangements, del17p/monosomy 17, del13q/monosomy 13, and ISS stage 3. Each of these variables was weighted using their risk ratio and a composite score was developed using 998 patients for whom all variables were available (range: 0-7.9; median 1.8). Three patient groups were characterized: group 1 (0; 32%), group 2 (1-4; 58%) and group 3 (>4; 10%) with a median OS of 53 mos, 106 mos, and NR, respectively, p <0.001 (Figure 2). Conclusion: Using the most relevant FISH and laboratory factors, in a large cohort of patients, we refined the current system to develop a risk stratification system that predicts survival in patients with newly diagnosed MM treated with contemporary treatment regimens. This needs validation in future studies. Disclosures Kumar: Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding. Gertz:International Waldenstrom Foundation: Research Funding; Annexon: Consultancy; Medscape: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Amyloidosis Foundation: Research Funding; Abbvie: Other: personal fees for Data Safety Monitoring board; i3Health: Other: Development of educational programs and materials; Springer Publishing: Patents & Royalties; Physicians Education Resource: Consultancy; Pharmacyclics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Proclara: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Ionis/Akcea: Consultancy; Alnylam: Consultancy; Prothena Biosciences Inc: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Spectrum: Consultancy, Research Funding; Appellis: Consultancy; Research to Practice: Consultancy; Teva: Speakers Bureau; Johnson and Johnson: Speakers Bureau; DAVA oncology: Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Consultancy. Dispenzieri:Akcea: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Intellia: Consultancy; Pfizer: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Alnylam: Research Funding. Lacy:Celgene: Research Funding. Dingli:alexion: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Millenium: Consultancy; Rigel: Consultancy; Karyopharm: Research Funding. Kapoor:Celgene: Honoraria; Janssen: Research Funding; Sanofi: Consultancy, Research Funding; Glaxo Smith Kline: Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding; Cellectar: Consultancy. Leung:Prothena: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Research Funding; Omeros: Research Funding; Aduro: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Bergsagel:Celgene: Consultancy; Ionis Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Janssen Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy.

scholarly journals Real-World Outcomes for Transplant-Ineligible Patients with Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Treated with Lenalidomide, Bortezomib, and Dexamethasone, or Bortezomib and Dexamethasone: An Enhanced Electronic Health Records Database Analysis

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 2243-2243
Author(s):  
Ajai Chari ◽  
Brian Ung ◽  
Marc Tian ◽  
Amit Agarwal ◽  
Kejal Parikh
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Real World ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Second Line ◽  
Second Line Therapy ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Line Therapy ◽  
Equity Ownership

Abstract Background: For transplant-ineligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM), the only category 1 regimens recommended by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) are lenalidomide and dexamethasone (Rd)-based, including triplet therapy with lenalidomide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone (RVd) (NCCN Myeloma v4.2018). Other doublet regimens, such as bortezomib and dexamethasone (Vd), are still a first-line option for patients with NDMM, especially for those who are elderly and/or frail. However, the latter population is either excluded or markedly underrepresented in clinical trials. Using an electronic health records (EHRs) database, we compared outcomes when either RVd or Vd were used in the treatment of transplant-ineligible patients with NDMM in a real-world practice setting, after adjusting for baseline demographic and clinical differences between the two cohorts. Methods: A retrospective observational study of patients with NDMM was conducted using EHRs from a nationally representative database (Flatiron Health). The Flatiron Network database is an enhanced oncology EHR database of patients treated at 265 clinics throughout the USA. Patients diagnosed with multiple myeloma, ICD-9 (203.0x) or ICD-10 (C90.xx), between January 2011 and May 2018 who were treated with RVd or Vd and did not undergo stem cell transplantation were included in the analysis. The primary comparison was time to next therapy (TTNT) in the overall population and in a subset of frail patients, as determined by a composite score based on age, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) score, and Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI). Data regarding overall and progression-free survival (PFS) were limited as patient data prior to adoption of the Flatiron Network database were incomplete. Treatment-free interval (TFI) for patients who initiated a second-line therapy was defined as time from start of first-line to start of second-line therapy minus the duration of therapy (DOT). The Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazard methods were used to calculate TTNT after adjusting for differences in patient baseline demographic and clinical characteristics. Results: Of the 8,470 transplant-ineligible patients with NDMM in the database, 2,369 were treated with either RVd (n = 1,309) or Vd (n = 1,060) and met the criteria for inclusion in this analysis. Patients treated with Vd were more likely to be older (median age 75 vs 70 years; P < 0.0001), frail (76.3% vs 65.4%; P = 0.0002), have creatinine clearance < 30 mL/min (23.9% vs 10.7%, P < 0.0001), have a higher ECOG PS score (P = 0.0031), and have International Staging System stage III disease (45.1% vs 28.8%; P < 0.0001). There were no significant differences in baseline neutropenia, anemia, or thrombocytopenia, or in median CCI. The proportion of patients with high-risk cytogenetics was lower in the Vd group (19.7% vs 26.0%; P < 0.0001). The mean DOT was longer for RVd (11.4 ± standard deviation [SD] 13.3 months) than for Vd (7.7 ± SD 9.7 months). However, the median adjusted TTNT was significantly longer with RVd than Vd (40.9 vs 14.8 months; hazard ratio [HR] 0.43; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.33-0.55; P < 0.0001). The proportion of patients initiating a new treatment was lower in the RVd group (24.8% vs 40.6%; P < 0.0001). Among those who initiated a second-line therapy, the mean TFI for RVd compared with Vd was 42.6 versus 39.3 days, respectively (P = 0.2214). Among the 735 frail patients (416 RVd and 319 Vd), the median TTNT was significantly longer with RVd (32.6 vs 17.1 months; HR 0.40; 95% CI 0.29-0.54; P < 0.0001; Figure). Similar to the overall population, there were no significant differences in TFI (54.9 vs 29.6 days, P = 0.2598) and a significantly higher proportion of Vd patients initiated a new treatment (22.1% vs 36.4%; P < 0.001). Conclusions: In this real-world practice setting where PFS cannot be measured directly, triplet therapy with RVd significantly prolonged TTNT compared with Vd by 26.1 months in the overall patient population, and by 15.5 months in frail transplant-ineligible patients with NDMM. Disclosures Chari: Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Adaptive Biotechnology: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; The Binding Site: Consultancy; Array Biopharma: Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy. Ung:Celgene Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Tian:Celgene Corporation: Employment. Agarwal:Celgene Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Parikh:Celgene Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership.

scholarly journals Real-World Outcomes with Bortezomib-Containing Regimens and Lenalidomide Plus Dexamethasone for the Treatment of Transplant Ineligible MM Patients: A Multi-Institutional Report from the National Myeloma Canada Research Network (MCRN) Database

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 2008-2008 ◽  
Author(s):  
Victor Jimenez-Zepeda ◽  
Donna E Reece ◽  
McCurdy R Arleigh ◽  
Esther Masih-Khan ◽  
Eshetu G Atenafu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Real World ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Small Sample ◽  
Research Network ◽  
National Database ◽  
Categorical Variables ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Entire Cohort

Abstract Introduction: Bortezomib-containing regimens (BCRs) have been the standard frontline approach for the treatment of transplant ineligible multiple myeloma (TIMM) patients in Canada for many years. Based on recent randomized clinical trial results lenalidomide and dexamethasone (Ld) has become another provincially funded option in Canada in the same therapeutic space. We aimed to compare the effect of BCRs and Ld for the treatment of TIMM using the newly-formed Myeloma Canada Research Network Multiple Myeloma Database (MCRN-MM-DB) project. This web-based centralized platform can track and characterize real-world outcomes of patients treated at major Canadian institutions and includes both legacy data dating back to 2007 (from 4 centres) as well as ongoing prospective data collection (from 11 centres) analyzed up to 01/07/18. Patients and Methods: The primary objective was to assess the ORR, PFS and OS for TIMM patients treated with CyBorD/CyBorP, Ld, VMP or VD/VP, each given as reported previously but with dose-adjustments at the discretion of the treating physician to maintain patients on therapy. The two-sided Fisher exact test was used to test for differences between categorical variables. Survival curves were constructed according to the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the log rank test; a p value of <0.05 was considered significant. Results: 842 TIMM patients were evaluated. Clinical characteristics are shown in Table 1. Median OS and PFS for the entire cohort were 54.1 and 20.4 months, respectively. ORR and ≥VGPR better rates were 83% and 52% for the entire cohort. A ≥VGPR rate of 53%, 46%, 56% and 51% were observed for patients treated with CyBorD/P, VMP, Ld and VD/VP, respectively (p=0.3). The median PFS was longer for Ld patients (25 months) compared to CyBorD/CyBorP, VMP and Vd/VP (19.3, 20.5 and 13.7 months, respectively), (p=0.03, Fig 1a); there was no significant difference in PFS between the 2 different alkylating-agent containing regimens when combined with bortezomib + steroids (CyBorD/P vs VMP, p =0.9). Median OS was 51, 59.5, 29.4 and 66.5 months for those patients treated with CyBorD/CyBorP, VMP, VD/VP and Ld, respectively (p=0.07, Fig 1b). When the OS and PFS for CyBorD/P (typically given for a fixed duration of 9 cycles) were compared with Ld in a subset analysis, the p-values were 0.08 and 0.008, respectively. Conclusions: 1) OS was not significantly different in patients treated with either a bortezomib-containing triplet that includes an alkylator + steroid or continuous Ld. 2) The BCR triplets and Ld were more efficacious than the bortezomib + steroid doublet (VD/VP) for both OS and PFS although, the small sample size and adverse factors, such as frailty and comorbidities, may have influenced the findings. 3) The results in the real-world setting, i.e., a median PFS in the range of 1.5-2 years and median OS of 4.5-5.5 years, confirm triplet-based BCRs and Ld as current valid standards of care for frontline therapy in TIMM. 5) This study confirms the utility of a large comprehensive national database to benchmark current results for comparison with newer regimens as they are introduced into the Canadian therapeutic landscape. Disclosures Arleigh: Celgene: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria. Sebag:Janssen Inc.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen Canada: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda Canada: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene Canada: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Leblanc:Celgene Canada: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen Inc.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen Canada: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda Canada: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Louzada:Janssen: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; amgen: Honoraria; pfizer: Honoraria. Venner:Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document