scholarly journals Impact of Center Experience with Donor Type and Treatment Platform on Outcomes: A Secondary Analysis BMT CTN 1101

Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 3956-3956
Author(s):  
Claudio G. Brunstein ◽  
Paul V O'Donnell ◽  
Brent R. Logan ◽  
Luciano J. Costa ◽  
Corey Cutler ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cord Blood ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Secondary Analysis ◽  
Marrow Transplant ◽  
Advisory Board ◽  
Blood And Marrow Transplant ◽  
Transplant Center ◽  
Scientific Advisory ◽  
Donor Type ◽  
Overall Mortality

Abstract BACKGROUND: Our group recently reported on the results of Blood and Marrow Transplant (BMT) Clinical Trials Network (CTN) 1101 a randomized comparison between double umbilical cord blood (dUCB) and haploidentical bone marrow (haplo) with post-transplant cyclophosphamide (ptCy) in the nonmyeloablative setting that showed similar progression free survival (PFS) between the two treatment groups, but lower non-relapse mortality (NRM) and better of overall survival (OS) in the haplo arm. In this secondary analysis we sought to investigate if transplant center experience with haplo and or cord blood HCT had an impact on outcomes. PATIENTS AND METHODS: All patient randomized in BMT CTN 1101 were included. In order to determine the transplant center experience with either haplo or dUCB we queried the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR) for number of transplants with each platform in the year prior to initiation of the study. Centers were then grouped as dUCB center (> 10 dUCB, n=117, 10 centers), Haplo center (>10 haplo and ≤10 dUCB, n=110, 2 centers), and ≤10 haplo and ≤10 dUCB HCTs (other center, n=140, 21 centers). Further analysis considered the alternative cut-off for haplo (> 5 vs ≤ 5) experience, and considered the outcomes based on the donor experience vs. others (e.g. dUCB > 10 vs. ≤ 10; haplo > 5 vs. ≤ 5). RESULTS: The effect of center experience on HCT outcomes shown in Figure, below . After adjusting for age, Karnofsky performance score and, disease risk index we found that there was no difference in outcomes between haplo and dUCB for centers that were experienced with dUCB or had limited to no experience with either dUCB or haplo. In contrast, in centers that were primarily experienced with haplo had better outcomes with this donor type, as compared to dUCB. The higher risk of treatment failure (relapse or death) and overall mortality in dUCB in haplo experienced centers was driven by significantly higher risk of relapse. We then considered the transplant experience with each of the donor types separately. In transplant centers that had performed > 10 dUCB, there were similar outcomes for recipients of both dUCB and haplo. Similarly, centers that had ≤ 5 haplo HCTs had no difference in outcomes between donor types suggesting an overlap with centers that had performed > 10 dUCB HCTs. Overall mortality was higher among dUCB recipients in centers that had performed ≤ 10 dUCB. Notably, the hazard ratio of non-relapse mortality favored haplo in all four donor experience type of transplant center, albeit not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: Except for dUCB recipients in centers with < 10 dUCB/year had worse overall mortality, primarily driven by relapse, the transplant center experience in the year prior to the initiation of BMT CTN 1101 had limited impact on the outcomes of this randomized clinical trial. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Brunstein: NANT: Research Funding; FATE: Research Funding; GamidaCell: Research Funding; BlueRock: Research Funding; AlloVir: Consultancy. Costa: Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Karyopharm: Consultancy, Honoraria. Cutler: Deciphera: Consultancy; Cimeio: Consultancy; Editas: Consultancy; Kadmon: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; Mallinckrodt: Consultancy; CareDx: Consultancy; Incyte: Consultancy; Omeros: Consultancy; Syndax: Consultancy; Mesoblast: Consultancy; Jazz: Consultancy. Horowitz: Sobi: Research Funding; Regeneron: Research Funding; Orca Biosystems: Research Funding; Tscan: Research Funding; Xenikos: Research Funding; Miltenyi Biotech: Research Funding; Stemcyte: Research Funding; Medac: Research Funding; Vor Biopharma: Research Funding; Kite/Gilead: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Kiadis: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Mesoblast: Research Funding; GlaxoSmithKline: Research Funding; Sanofi: Research Funding; Pfizer, Inc: Research Funding; Omeros: Research Funding; Magenta: Consultancy, Research Funding; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Vertex: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Shire: Research Funding; Gamida Cell: Research Funding; Daiicho Sankyo: Research Funding; CSL Behring: Research Funding; Chimerix: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; bluebird bio: Research Funding; Astellas: Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding; Allovir: Consultancy; Actinium: Research Funding. Horwitz: Gamida Cell: Research Funding. McGuirk: Novartis: Research Funding; Magenta Therapeutics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; EcoR1 Capital: Consultancy; Pluristem Therapeutics: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Bellicum Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Astelllas Pharma: Research Funding; Gamida Cell: Research Funding; Fresenius Biotech: Research Funding; Allovir: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Juno Therapeutics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Kite/ Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: travel accommodations, expense, Kite a Gilead company, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Rezvani: US Department of Justice: Consultancy; Kaleido: Other: One-time scientific advisory board; Nohla Therapeutics: Other: One-time scientific advisory board; Pharmacyclics-Abbvie: Research Funding. Rybka: Spark Therapeutics: Consultancy; Merck: Consultancy. Vasu: Kiadis, Inc.: Research Funding; Boehringer Ingelheim: Other: Travel support; Seattle Genetics: Other: travel support; Omeros, Inc.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Allogeneic Transplantation for Philadelphia Chromosome-Positive Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia with Post-Transplantation Cyclophosphamide: Assessing the Importance of Conditioning Regimen, Donor Choice, and Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Use

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 44-45
Author(s):  
Jonathan Webster ◽  
Leo Luznik ◽  
Hua-Ling Tsai ◽  
Philip H. Imus ◽  
Amy E. DeZern ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Conditioning Regimen ◽  
Advisory Board ◽  
Categorical Variables ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Post Transplant ◽  
Scientific Advisory Board ◽  
Scientific Advisory ◽  
Donor Type

Background: Contemporary trials in adult Ph+ ALL patients with TKIs continue to show improved outcomes with allogeneic blood or marrow transplantation (alloBMT) in first remission (CR1) (Chalandon. Blood. 2015 AND Ravandi. Blood Adv. 2016). These studies have relied on myeloablative conditioning (MAC) and largely required an HLA-matched donor. Post-transplant survival in Ph+ ALL has been shown to be similar between patients transplanted with reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) and MAC, but the incidence of relapse after RIC is higher (Bachanova. Leukemia. 2014). Post-transplant TKI maintenance reduces the incidence of relapse (Brissot. Haematologica. 2015), but this strategy has not specifically been investigated after RIC. Additionally, HLA-haploidentical donor transplants using post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) as a component of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis have comparable outcomes to HLA-matched transplants (McCurdy. Haematologica. 2017). We analyzed outcomes among patients who universally received PTCy and attempted post-transplant TKI prophylaxis to determine the importance of remission status (CR1 vs. later), conditioning regimen, donor type, and TKI choice. Methods: The bone marrow transplant database at Johns Hopkins was queried for adult patients with de novo Ph+ ALL who received alloBMT using PTCy between January 2008 and August 2018. Characteristics of patients were summarized and compared using the student's T test for continuous variables and Fisher's exact test for categorical variables. Estimators of OS and RFS were reported using the Kaplan-Meier method. Differences in time-to-event outcomes were estimated using Cox proportional hazards model. Results: A total of 81 transplants for Ph+ ALL were performed: 69 (85%) in CR1 and 12 (15%) in second or greater remission (CR2+). The demographics are presented in Table 1 and separated by conditioning regimen [MAC vs. nonmyeloablative (NMAC)] for transplants in CR1. The cumulative incidences of grade 2-4 and grade 3-4 aGVHD at 1 year were 33% (95% CI, 23% to 44%) and 9% (95% CI, 3% to 15%), respectively. The incidence of moderate or severe cGVHD at 2 years was 8% (95% CI, 2% to 13%). Nearly all patients (91.4%) initiated a post-transplant TKI at a median of 56 days. Overall, 44.4% of patients were able to take a TKI on ≥85% of nonrelapse days from day 31-395 post-transplant. AlloBMT in CR1 (compared to CR2+) improved RFS (HR=0.25, p=0.0002) and pre-transplant minimal residual disease (MRD) by flow cytometry (MFC) was associated with decreased RFS (HR=2.57, p=0.039). The presence of pre-transplant MRD by PCR did not confer an increased risk of relapse (HR 1.12, p=0.84). Among the 69 patients transplanted in CR1, the 5-year OS was 77.6% (95% CI, 64.8% to 86.2%) and RFS was 67% (95% CI, 52.4-76.5%). As shown in Figure 1, the use of NMAC versus MAC (HR 0.37, p=0.02) and dasatinib versus imatinib at diagnosis (HR 0.21, p=0.007) led to improved relapse-free survival (RFS) in univariate analyses. Neither donor type (with the majority being haploidentical) nor recipient age ≥60 affected RFS. Post-transplant TKI prophylaxis was discontinued prior to relapse in 20 patients among whom 12 remain in an MRD-negative remission, 4 died of non-relapse causes, 3 relapsed, and 1 developed recurrent MRD controlled by a TKI. The median duration of post-transplant TKI prophylaxis prior to discontinuation was 46.5 months in those who remain in treatment-free remission versus 15.6 months in those who relapsed (p=0.01). Eighteen relapses occurred on maintenance therapy, and 90% of tested cases were positive for a kinase domain mutation conferring resistance to the TKI in use at relapse. No significant difference in the median time to TKI initiation post-transplant was noted between those who relapsed on maintenance and those who did not (70 days vs. 55 days, p=0.6). All patients in ongoing remission were MRD-negative by PCR at their most recent evaluation. Conclusions: AlloBMT with PTCy in Ph+ ALL was most effective when performed in CR1 with negative MFC for MRD. The initiation of post-transplant TKI prophylaxis was nearly universal. Among patients transplanted in CR1, the best results were achieved in patients treated with dasatinib at diagnosis (5-year RFS 83%) and NMAC (5-year RFS 73.1%). Thus post-transplant TKI prophylaxis appeared to overcome any relapse control advantage for MAC, yielding better outcomes with NMAC. Disclosures Webster: Amgen: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy. Luznik:WindMil Therapeutics: Patents & Royalties: Patent holder; Genentech: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; AbbVie: Consultancy. DeZern:Abbvie: Consultancy; Astex: Research Funding; MEI: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria. Pratz:Jazz Pharmaceutical: Consultancy; Millennium: Research Funding; Daiichi Sankyo: Research Funding; Agios: Other: Scientific Advisory Board, Research Funding; Celgene: Other: Scientific Advisory Board; Boston BioMedical: Consultancy; Astellas: Other: Scientific Advisory Board, Research Funding; AbbVie: Other: Scientific Advisory Board, Research Funding. Levis:Astellas: Honoraria, Research Funding; Menarini: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; FujiFilm: Honoraria, Research Funding; Daiichi-Sankyo: Honoraria. Gojo:Amgen: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amphivena: Research Funding. Bolanos-Meade:Incyte: Other: DSMB Fees. Dalton:Eli Lilly: Research Funding; AbbVie: Research Funding. Jain:Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bristol Myer Squibb: Other: for advisory board participation; CareDx: Other: Advisory Board. Ali:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Borrello:Celgene: Research Funding; Aduro: Patents & Royalties; WindMIL Therapeutics: Other: Founder , Research Funding. Wagner-Johnston:ADC Therapeutics, Regeneron, CALIB-R, Verastem: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Smith:Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Agios: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Jazz: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

scholarly journals Secreted Factors Determine Resistance to Idelalisib in Marginal Zone Lymphoma Models of Resistance

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 2569-2569
Author(s):  
Alberto J Arribas ◽  
Sara Napoli ◽  
Eugenio Gaudio ◽  
Luciano Cascione ◽  
Alessandra Di Veroli ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
B Cell ◽  
Cell Lines ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Advisory Board ◽  
Institutional Research ◽  
Rna Seq ◽  
Scientific Advisory Board ◽  
Scientific Advisory ◽  
Erbb Signaling ◽  
Travel Grant

Background . PI3Kδ is expressed in B-cells and has a central role in the B-cell receptor signaling in B-cell derived malignancies. Idelalisib was the first-in-class PI3Kδ inhibitors and several second-generation compounds are undergoing clinical investigation as single agents and in combinations. To identify modalities to overcome the resistance that develops to this class of agents, we have developed two idelalisib-resistant models derived from splenic marginal zone lymphoma (SMZL) cell lines. Materials and Methods. Cells were kept under idelalisib (IC90) until acquisition of resistance (RES) or with no drug (parental, PAR). Stable resistance was confirmed by MTT assay after 2-weeks of drug-free culture. Multi-drug resistance phenotype was ruled out. Cells underwent transcriptome and miRNA profiling by RNA-Seq, whole exome sequencing (WES), lipidomics profiling, pharmacological screening (348 compounds), and FACS analysis. Cytokines and growth factor secretion was performed by ELISA. Results. Two RES models were obtained from VL51 and Karpas1718 with 7-10 fold times higher IC50s than PAR counterparts. In both models, conditioned media from RES cells transferred the resistance in the PAR cells. While WES did not identify somatic mutations associated with resistance, RNA-Seq and lipidomics analyses showed that the two cell lines had developed resistance activating different modalities. The VL51 RES model showed an enrichment in BCR-TLR-NFkB (TLR4, CD19, SYK), IL6-STAT3 (IL6, CD44), chemokines (CXCL10, CXCR4, CXCR3) and PDGFR (PDGFRA, PRKCE) signatures, paired with increased p-AKT and p-BTK levels, decreased cardiolipins and sphingomyelins levels, and increased levels of specific triacylglycerols and glycerophosphocholines. In particular, there was an over-expression of surface expression of PDGFRA and secretion of IL6 in the medium. Silencing of both IL6and PDGFRA by siRNAs reverted the resistance, while the silencing of the individual genes had only a partial effect. These data were paired with the acquired sensitivity to the PDGFR inhibitor masitinib, identified in the pharmacologic screening. In the Karpas1718 model, we observed an increased p-AKT activity with an enrichment for B-cell activation signatures (RAG1, RAG2, TCL1A), proliferation (E2F2, MKI67), ERBB signaling (HBEGF, NRG2, ERRB4), increased levels of some triacylglycerols and repressed levels for specific glycerophosphocholines. HBEGF secretion was confirmed by ELISA. The addition of recombinant HBEGF to the medium induced resistance in the PAR cells. Combination with the pan ERBB inhibitor lapatinib was beneficial in the K1718 RES. Recombinant HBEGF also induced resistance to the BTK inhibitor ibrutinib in the PAR cells and in the mantle cell lymphoma SP-53 cell line. Specific members of the let-7 family of miRNAs were repressed in the RES lines derived from both cell lines, indicating the involvement of miRNA deregulation in the mechanism of resistance. Indeed, let-7 members are known to directly target IL6-STAT3 and cytokine signaling cascade, as well PI3K-AKT network. In solid tumors, let-7 members are also expressed at low levels in tumors with constitutive active ERBB signaling, in accordance with the activation of ERBB pathway and p-AKT we observed in our Karpas1718model. Experiments with a LIN28B inhibitor are now on-going. Finally, we validated the findings across a panel of 34 B-cell lymphoma cell lines, in which IL6, PDGFRA, HBEGF and LIN28 expression levels were negatively correlated with idelalisib sensitivity, while the latter was positively correlated with let-7 levels (P <0.05). Conclusions. We developed two distinct models derived from MZL of secondary resistance to the PI3Kδ inhibitor idelalisib. We identified treatments that might overcome resistance to idelalisib and are worth of further investigations. The two models, driven by different biologic processes, will allow the evaluation of further alternative therapeutic approaches. Disclosures Stathis: PharmaMar: Other: Renumeration; ADC Therapeutics: Other: Institutional research funding; Abbvie: Other: Renumeration; Bayer: Other: Institutional research funding; Novartis: Other: Institutional research funding; MEI-Pharma: Other: Institutional research funding; Roche: Other: Institutional research funding; Pfizer: Other: Institutional research funding; Merck: Other: Institutional research funding. Stuessi:Gilead: Speakers Bureau. Zucca:Gilead: Honoraria, Other: travel grant. Rossi:Gilead: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Abbvie: Honoraria, Other: Scientific advisory board; Janseen: Honoraria, Other: Scientific advisory board; Roche: Honoraria, Other: Scientific advisory board; Astra Zeneca: Honoraria, Other: Scientific advisory board. Bertoni:Nordic Nanovector ASA: Research Funding; Acerta: Research Funding; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Other: travel grants; ADC Therapeutics: Research Funding; Bayer AG: Research Funding; Cellestia: Research Funding; CTI Life Sciences: Research Funding; EMD Serono: Research Funding; Helsinn: Consultancy, Research Funding; ImmunoGen: Research Funding; Menarini Ricerche: Consultancy, Research Funding; NEOMED Therapeutics 1: Research Funding; Oncology Therapeutic Development: Research Funding; PIQUR Therapeutics AG: Other: travel grant, Research Funding; HTG: Other: Expert Statements ; Amgen: Other: travel grants; Astra Zeneca: Other: travel grants.

scholarly journals Conventional Immunochemotherapy (R-CHOEP) Vs High-Dose Immunochemotherapy (R-MegaCHOEP) in Younger Patients with High-Risk Aggressive B-Cell Lymphoma: 10-Year Long-Term Follow-up of a German Lymphoma Alliance (GLA) Study

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 1589-1589
Author(s):  
Fabian Frontzek ◽  
Marita Ziepert ◽  
Maike Nickelsen ◽  
Bettina Altmann ◽  
Bertram Glass ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Advisory Board ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Scientific Advisory Board ◽  
Scientific Advisory

Introduction: The R-MegaCHOEP trial showed that dose-escalation of conventional chemotherapy necessitating autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) does not confer a survival benefit for younger patients (pts) with high-risk aggressive B-cell lymphoma in the Rituximab era (Schmitz et al., Lancet Oncology 2012; 13, 1250-1259). To describe efficacy and toxicity over time and document the long-term risks of relapse and secondary malignancy we present the 10-year follow-up of this study. Methods: In the randomized, prospective phase 3 trial R-MegaCHOEP younger pts aged 18-60 years with newly diagnosed, high-risk (aaIPI 2-3) aggressive B-cell lymphoma were assigned to 8 cycles of CHOEP (cyclophosphamide, doxorubcine, vincristine, etoposide, prednisone) or 4 cycles of dose-escalated high-dose therapy (HDT) necessitating repetitive ASCT both combined with Rituximab. Both arms were stratified according to aaIPI, bulky disease, and center. Primary endpoint was event-free survival (EFS). All analyses were calculated for the intention-to-treat population. This follow-up report includes molecular data based on immunohistochemistry (IHC) and fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) for MYC (IHC: 31/92 positive [40-100%], FISH: 14/103 positive), BCL2 (IHC: 65/89 positive [50-100%], FISH: 23/111 positive) and BCL6 (IHC: 52/86 positive [30-100%], FISH: 34/110 positive) and data on cell of origin (COO) classification according to the Lymph2CX assay (GCB: 53/88; ABC: 24/88; unclassified: 11/88). Results: 130 pts had been assigned to R-CHOEP and 132 to R-MegaCHOEP. DLBCL was the most common lymphoma subtype (~80%). 73% of pts scored an aaIPI of 2 and 27% an aaIPI of 3. 60% of pts had an initial lymphoma bulk and in 40% more than 1 extranodal site was involved. After a median observation time of 111 months, EFS at 10 years was 57% (95% CI 47-67%) in the R-CHOEP vs. 51% in the R-MegaCHOEP arm (42-61%) (hazard ratio 1.3, 95% CI 0.9-1.8, p=0.228), overall survival (OS) after 10 years was 72% (63-81%) vs. 66% (57-76%) respectively (p=0.249). With regard to molecular characterization, we were unable to detect a significant benefit for HDT/ASCT in any subgroup analyzed. In total, 16% of pts (30 pts) relapsed after having achieved a complete remission (CR). 23% of all relapses (7 pts) showed an indolent histology (follicular lymphoma grade 1-3a) and 6 of these pts survived long-term. In contrast, of 23 pts (77%) relapsing with aggressive DLBCL or unknown histology 18 pts died due to lymphoma or related therapy. The majority of relapses occurred during the first 3 years after randomization (median time: 22 months) while after 5 years we detected relapses only in 5 pts (3% of all 190 pts prior CR). 11% of pts were initially progressive (28 pts) among whom 71% (20 pts) died rapidly due to lymphoma. Interestingly, the remaining 29% (8 pts) showed a long-term survival after salvage therapy (+/- ASCT); only 1 pt received allogeneic transplantation. The frequency of secondary malignancies was very similar in both treatment arms (9% vs. 8%) despite the very high dose of etoposide (total 4g/m2)in the R-MegaCHOEP arm. We observed 2 cases of AML and 1 case of MDS per arm. In total 70 pts (28%) have died: 30 pts due to lymphoma (12%), 22 pts therapy-related (11 pts due to salvage therapy) (9%), 8 pts of secondary neoplasia (3%), 5 pts due to concomitant disease (2%) and 5 pts for unknown reasons. Conclusions: This 10-year long-term follow-up of the R-MegaCHOEP trial confirms the very encouraging outcome of young high-risk pts following conventional chemotherapy with R-CHOEP. High-dose therapy did not improve outcome in any subgroup analysis including molecular high-risk groups. Relapse rate was generally low. Pts with aggressive relapse showed a very poor long-term outcome while pts with indolent histology at relapse survived long-term. Secondary malignancies occurred; however, they were rare with no excess leukemias/MDS following treatment with very high doses of etoposide and other cytotoxic agents. Supported by Deutsche Krebshilfe. Figure Disclosures Nickelsen: Roche Pharma AG: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel Grants; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel Grant; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Hänel:Amgen: Honoraria; Celgene: Other: advisory board; Novartis: Honoraria; Takeda: Other: advisory board; Roche: Honoraria. Truemper:Nordic Nanovector: Consultancy; Roche: Research Funding; Mundipharma: Research Funding; Janssen Oncology: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Research Funding. Held:Roche: Consultancy, Other: Travel support, Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding; Acrotech: Research Funding; MSD: Consultancy; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Other: Travel support, Research Funding. Dreyling:Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: scientific advisory board, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Bayer: Consultancy, Other: scientific advisory board, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Other: scientific advisory board, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Mundipharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; Gilead: Consultancy, Other: scientific advisory board, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Other: scientific advisory board; Sandoz: Other: scientific advisory board; Janssen: Consultancy, Other: scientific advisory board, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Acerta: Other: scientific advisory board. Viardot:Kite/Gilead: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Honoraria; F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Rosenwald:MorphoSys: Consultancy. Lenz:Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Agios: Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Bayer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Employment, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Consultancy. Schmitz:Novartis: Honoraria; Gilead: Honoraria; Celgene: Equity Ownership; Riemser: Consultancy, Honoraria.

scholarly journals Identification of Two CAR T-Cell Populations Associated with Complete Response or Progressive Disease in Adult Lymphoma Patients Treated with Axi-Cel

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 779-779 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zinaida Good ◽  
Jay Y. Spiegel ◽  
Bita Sahaf ◽  
Meena B. Malipatlolla ◽  
Matthew J. Frank ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Cells ◽  
T Cell ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Advisory Board ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Car T Cells ◽  
Scientific Advisory Board ◽  
Car T ◽  
Scientific Advisory

Axicabtagene ciloleucel (Axi-cel) is an autologous anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy approved for the treatment of relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (r/r DLBCL). Long-term analysis of the ZUMA-1 phase 1-2 clinical trial showed that ~40% of Axi-cel patients remained progression-free at 2 years (Locke et al., Lancet Oncology 2019). Those patients who achieved a complete response (CR) at 6 months generally remained progression-free long-term. The biological basis for achieving a durable CR in patients receiving Axi-cel remains poorly understood. Here, we sought to identify CAR T-cell intrinsic features associated with CR at 6 months in DLBCL patients receiving commercial Axi-cel at our institution. Using mass cytometry, we assessed expression of 33 surface or intracellular proteins relevant to T-cell function on blood collected before CAR T cell infusion, on day 7 (peak expansion), and on day 21 (late expansion) post-infusion. To identify cell features that distinguish patients with durable CR (n = 11) from those who developed progressive disease (PD, n = 14) by 6 months following Axi-cel infusion, we performed differential abundance analysis of multiparametric protein expression on CAR T cells. This unsupervised analysis identified populations on day 7 associated with persistent CR or PD at 6 months. Using 10-fold cross-validation, we next fitted a least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (lasso) model that identified two clusters of CD4+ CAR T cells on day 7 as potentially predictive of clinical outcome. The first cluster identified by our model was associated with CR at 6 months and had high expression of CD45RO, CD57, PD1, and T-bet transcription factor. Analysis of protein co-expression in this cluster enabled us to define a simple gating scheme based on high expression of CD57 and T-bet, which captured a population of CD4+ CAR T cells on day 7 with greater expansion in patients experiencing a durable CR (mean±s.e.m. CR: 26.13%±2.59%, PD: 10.99%±2.53%, P = 0.0014). In contrast, the second cluster was associated with PD at 6 months and had high expression of CD25, TIGIT, and Helios transcription factor with no CD57. A CD57-negative Helios-positive gate captured a population of CD4+ CAR T cells was enriched on day 7 in patients who experienced progression (CR: 9.75%±2.70%, PD: 20.93%±3.70%, P = 0.016). Co-expression of CD4, CD25, and Helios on these CAR T cells highlights their similarity to regulatory T cells, which could provide a basis for their detrimental effects. In this exploratory analysis of 25 patients treated with Axi-cel, we identified two populations of CD4+ CAR T cells on day 7 that were highly associated with clinical outcome at 6 months. Ongoing analyses are underway to fully characterize this dataset, to explore the biological activity of the populations identified, and to assess the presence of other populations that may be associated with CAR-T expansion or neurotoxicity. This work demonstrates how multidimensional correlative studies can enhance our understanding of CAR T-cell biology and uncover populations associated with clinical outcome in CAR T cell therapies. This work was supported by the Parker Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy. Figure Disclosures Muffly: Pfizer: Consultancy; Adaptive: Research Funding; KITE: Consultancy. Miklos:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Kite-Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; AlloGene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Precision Bioscience: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Miltenyi Biotech: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Becton Dickinson: Research Funding; Adaptive Biotechnologies: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Juno: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Mackall:Vor: Other: Scientific Advisory Board; Roche: Other: Scientific Advisory Board; Adaptimmune LLC: Other: Scientific Advisory Board; Glaxo-Smith-Kline: Other: Scientific Advisory Board; Allogene: Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Apricity Health: Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Unum Therapeutics: Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Obsidian: Research Funding; Lyell: Consultancy, Equity Ownership, Other: Founder, Research Funding; Nektar: Other: Scientific Advisory Board; PACT: Other: Scientific Advisory Board; Bryologyx: Other: Scientific Advisory Board.

scholarly journals Interaction of Mantle Cell Lymphoma with the Microenvironment Induces Phospho Akt-Mediated Resistance Against BTK Inhibition and Can be Overcome By Co-Treatment with a Specific Akt Inhibitor (MK-2206)

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 2802-2802
Author(s):  
Elisabeth Silkenstedt ◽  
Claudia Schwandner ◽  
Johanna Deuss ◽  
Natalie Mack ◽  
Yvonne Zimmermann ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Western Blot ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Direct Interaction ◽  
Cell Interaction ◽  
Advisory Board ◽  
Akt Inhibitor ◽  
Scientific Advisory Board ◽  
Mantle Cell ◽  
Scientific Advisory ◽  
Btk Inhibitor

Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is a distinct lymphoma subtype representing 6-8% of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL). Although with current standard therapy high initial response rates can be achieved, early relapses and rapid disease progression determine the clinical course of most MCL patients. Recently, Bruton´s tyrosine Kinase (BTK) inhibitors have been introduced with highly promising clinical activity. Nevertheless, interindividual responsiveness is heterogenous and primary and secondary resistance has been reported. However, molecular mechanisms driving resistance to BTK inhibition are not well understood yet. Among other factors, interactions between the tumor and its microenvironment have been proposed to play an important role in response to targeted therapy. In this study, we investigated the influence of tumor cell interaction with its microenvironment on sensitivity to the BTK inhibitor CC292 in vitro. MCL cell lines JeKo-1, Z-138 and Granta-519 were treated with 5 µM of CC292 alone or in co-culture with human bone marrow stromal cells (HS-5) and cell death induction and proliferation were assessed. Expression of proteins involved in BCR signaling and other tumor-promoting pathways was analyzed by Western Blot. Co-cultured MCL cells settled within the stromal cell layer were separated using MACS Feeder removal microbeads prior to Western Blot analysis. In all cell lines, direct interaction with the microenvironment markedly reduced sensitivity towards CC292 treatment (by 22% (JeKo-1), 33% (Granta) and 64 % (Z-138)). Importantly, cell-cell contact was shown to play a crucial role for mediating resistance to CC292 as only those MCL cells settled within the stromal cell layer proved to be significantly less vulnerable to the inhibitor compared to MCL cells co-cultured with HS-5 but separated by a transwell insert. Western Blot analysis showed a reduction of protein levels of phBTK upon treatment with CC292 in both, mono- and co-cultured cells. Interestingly, direct interaction of MCL cells with the microenvironment strongly induced protein expression of phAkt. Accordingly, phosphorylation (inactivation) of the pro-apoptotic FoxO1, a downstream-target of phAkt, was increased and its translocation to the nucleus was decreased in those cells. We could show that the effect of microenvironment interaction on sensitivity towards CC292 is mediated by Akt as knockdown of Akt using siRNA restored sensitivity to the drug. Furthermore, co-treatment of MCL cells with CC292 and the specific Akt inhibitor MK-2206 hampered upregluation of phAkt in co-cultivated cells and prevented Akt-mediated sequestration of FoxO1 in the cytoplasm, resulting in translocation of FoxO1 to the nucleus. Thus, combination with MK-2206 could significantly overcome microenvironment-mediated protection from growth inhibition and apoptosis induction upon CC292 treatment. Moreover, combination of the BTK inhibitor CC292 and the Akt inhibitor MK-2206 proved to act synergistically in MCL cells in all dose combinations tested (Combination index 0,73-0,93 in Z-138; 0,47-0,78 in JeKo-1). Taken together, cell-cell-interaction of MCL cells with their microenvironment protected them from CC292-induced cell death. This effect was mediated by increased phAkt expression resulting in inhibition of pro-apoptotic signaling and could effectively be overcome by combination with the specific Akt inhibitor MK-2206. Furthermore, CC292 and MK-2206 acted synergistically in MCL cells. Our results indicate that co-targeting the PI3K/Akt-pathway might be a promising strategy to overcome resistance to BTK inhibition mediated by interaction with the microenvironment. Disclosures Dreyling: Sandoz: Other: Scientific advisory board; Roche: Other: Scientific advisory board, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Other: Scientific advisory board; Mundipharma: Other: Scientific advisory board, Research Funding; Janssen: Other: Scientific advisory board, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Gilead: Other: Scientific advisory board, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Other: Scientific advisory board, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Bayer: Other: Scientific advisory board, Speakers Bureau; Acerta: Other: Scientific advisory board.

scholarly journals BMT CTN 1803: Haploidentical Natural Killer Cells (CSTD002) to Prevent Post-Transplant Relapse in AML and MDS (NK-REALM)

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 1955-1955
Author(s):  
Sumithira Vasu ◽  
Nelli Bejanyan ◽  
Steven Devine ◽  
Elizabeth Krakow ◽  
Elizabeth Krakow ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Nk Cells ◽  
Cumulative Incidence ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Nk Cell ◽  
Ex Vivo ◽  
Marrow Transplant ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Blood And Marrow Transplant ◽  
Relapse Rates

Background and Rationale: Relapse remains the leading cause of treatment failure for patients with high-risk acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) undergoing allogeneic blood or marrow transplantation (BMT). Although relapse rates vary based on patient population, age, and conditioning intensity, relapse is experienced in at least 30-50% after conventional BMT in high-risk AML/MDS. Initial safety and post-BMT relapse risk reduction results are reported by investigators at MD Anderson Cancer Center in a phase I study of ex vivo-expanded, donor-derived, haploidentical natural killer (NK)-cell infusion in conjunction with haploBMT. Of 13 patients with high-risk myeloid malignancies treated with NK cells, no infusion reactions or dose-limiting toxicities occurred and only 1 patient, treated at the lowest dose of 1×105 cells/kg, relapsed (Ciurea, Blood 2017). This experience supports investigation of CSTD002, a product derived from haploidentical donor NK cells and expanded ex vivo using plasma membrane (PM21) nanoparticles bearing membrane-bound IL-21 and 4-1BBL. This study represents a public-private partnership between the sponsor (Kiadis Pharma) and the Blood and Marrow Transplant Clinical Trials Network (BMT CTN), leveraging existing National Institutes of Health-supported clinical trials infrastructure to conduct a complex cellular immunotherapy trial. We used contemporary, unpublished data from the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research registry to determine baseline relapse rates that informed the statistical design. Doses of NK cells expanded by a novel method and exceeding those previously achieved in most published studies will be given in the peri-transplant period to test the hypothesis that haploidentical NK cells can mediate an effective anti-leukemia response. Trial Design and Methods: BMT CTN 1803 is a phase II, single-arm, open-label, multicenter trial designed to investigate the safety and efficacy of CSTD002 for the treatment of patients with high-risk AML or MDS undergoing haploBMT. An initial safety run-in phase will precede enrollment into the full study of approximately 60 patients. Major inclusion criteria of patients and donors are listed in the Table. Peripheral blood will be drawn from the donor to start the NK-cell expansion approximately 5 weeks before the planned haploBMT. Patients will receive intravenous (IV) melphalan 140 mg/m2 (100 mg/m2 for patients ≥60 years old) on Day -7; fludarabine 40 mg/m2 IV on Days -7, -6, -5, and -4; and 2 Gy of total body irradiation on Day -3. Donor bone marrow will be harvested and given on Day 0. Three doses of CSTD002 will be administered IV on Days -2, +7, and +28, relative to the haploBMT. The recommended dose of CSTD002 for administration will be formulated at 1×108 NK cells/kg of recipient body weight. Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis is post-transplantation cyclophosphamide with tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil. The primary endpoint is cumulative incidence of relapse at 1 year post haploBMT in patients receiving at least 1 infusion of CSTD002. Secondary endpoints are safety and tolerability of CSTD002; overall survival; non-relapse mortality; relapse-free survival; GVHD-free survival; cumulative incidence of acute GVHD and chronic GVHD; hematologic recovery; donor-cell engraftment; primary and secondary graft failure; overall incidence of toxicity; and cumulative incidence of infections including cytomegalovirus re-activation and symptomatic BK virus hemorrhagic cystitis. Exploratory endpoints are systemic immunosuppression-free survival; immune reconstitution at Days 28, 100, and 365 post haploBMT; proportion of patients with detectable minimal residual disease at Days 28 and 100 post haploBMT; feasibility of administering the planned CSTD002 doses; and impact of NK-cell alloreactivity on relapse and survival. Disclosures Vasu: Boehringer Ingelheim: Other: Travel support; Seattle Genetics: Other: Clinical trial support. Bejanyan:Kiadis Pharma: Other: advisory board. Devine:Kiadis Pharma: Other: Protocol development (via institution); Magenta Therapeutics: Other: Travel support for advisory board; My employer (National Marrow Donor Program) has equity interest in Magenta; Bristol Myers: Other: Grant for monitoring support & travel support. Krakow:Bellicum Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Highpass Bio: Research Funding; Magnolia Innovations: Other: Personal fees. Logan:Eisai: Other: Personal fees; Astellas: Other: Grant; Kiadis (formerly Cytosen): Other: Grant; Novartis: Other: Personal fees; Kite: Other: Grant. Luznik:Merck: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Genentech: Research Funding; AbbVie: Consultancy; WindMiL Therapeutics: Patents & Royalties: Patent holder. Barrett:Kiadis Pharma (formerly Cytosen): Other: Personal fees; Biologics Consulting Company: Other: Personal fees. Shan:Kiadis Pharma (formerly Cytosen): Employment. Champlin:Actinium: Consultancy; Johnson and Johnson: Consultancy; Sanofi-Genzyme: Research Funding.

Evolving Infrastructural Issues in Blood and Marrow Transplant Center Development

Graft ◽  
2001 ◽  
Vol 4 (6) ◽  
pp. 418-420
Author(s):  
Hans-G. Klingemann ◽  
Marie Schumer ◽  
Patricia Friend
Keyword(s):  
Marrow Transplant ◽  
Blood And Marrow Transplant ◽  
Transplant Center

Umbilical Cord Blood (UCB) Transplantation in Children with Acute Leukemia: Impact of Conditioning Regimen on Transplant Outcomes

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 1231-1231 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mary Eapen ◽  
Joanne Kurtzberg ◽  
Mei-Jie Zhang ◽  
Adam M. Mendizabal ◽  
Ka Wah Chang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Leukemia ◽  
Cord Blood ◽  
Conflicts Of Interest ◽  
Chronic Gvhd ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Conditioning Regimen ◽  
Disease Status ◽  
Marrow Transplant ◽  
Blood And Marrow Transplant ◽  
Hematopoietic Recovery

Abstract The Blood and Marrow Transplant Clinical Trials Network (BMT CTN 0501; NCT00412360) randomized children with hematologic malignancy to one or two cord blood unit transplantation between December 2006 and February 2012. While the trial concluded that survival was similar regardless of number of units infused, results were generally better than those previously reported after single UCB transplant. The apparently improved survival in recipients of BMT CTN 0501 compared to prior studies in children transplanted with a single UCB unit prompted a comparison of trial versus non-trial treatment outcomes to determine 1) the generalizability of trial results and 2) whether survival was better for patients treated with the trial regimen. Using data reported to the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research during the trial period, 396 recipients of one UCB unit transplant met the broad eligibility criteria for BMT CTN 0501 (i.e. aged 1- 21 years, high-risk acute leukemia, performance score ≥70). Trial and non-trial patients were comparable in their HCT-CI score. Trial patients (n=100) received total body irradiation (TBI) 1320 cGy, cyclophosphamide 120 mg/kg, and fludarabine 75 mg/m2 (TCF). Non-trial patients either received the same regimen as in the trial (N=62; non-trial TCF) or an alternative regimen (N=334; non-trial non-TCF regimen). Excluded were 13 patients on BMT CTN 0501 randomized to receive a single UCB unit for malignant diseases other than acute leukemia. Patient and disease characteristics of those treated on BMT CTN 0501 and others were similar except that those who received non-trial TCF regimen were more likely to report performance scores of 80 or 70 (24% versus 11%, p=0.04) and transplanted in relapse (18% vs. 5%, p=0.02) and those that received non-TCF regimens were more likely to 1-10 years of age (76% versus 53%, p<0.0001). Sixty-three percent of non-trial non-TCF regimens included TBI (≥1000 cGy) and the predominant non-TBI regimen was busulfan and cyclophosphamide. All patients received a calcineurin inhibitor for graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis. Donor-recipient HLA-match, median infused total nucleated cells and median follow up times were similar across the groups. Three-year survival rates were similar between patients receiving TCF regimen either on (A) or off trial (B), Figure1A, p=0.83. Similarly, there were no differences in hematopoietic recovery, relapse or non-relapse mortality between trial and non-trial TCF. However, compared to TCF on trial (A), overall survival rates were significantly lower with non-TCF non-TBI (C) and TBI (D) containing regimens after adjusting for age, CMV serostatus, disease and disease status; Figure 1B, 68% versus 55% (p=0.001) and 68% versus 50% (p=0.04), respectively. Results of multivariate analysis are shown in Table 1. Compared to patients treated on trial (TCF regimen; 20% at 3-years) relapse rates were higher with non-TCF non-TBI (42%, p=0.003) but not TBI-containing regimens (25%, p=0.38) after adjusting for age, disease, disease status and CMV seropositivity. Among non-TCF patients, relapse risk was higher for non-TBI compared to TBI-containing regimens (hazard ratio [HR] 1.61, p=0.02) but not mortality risk (HR 0.93, p=0.74). Cytogenetic risk features were not associated with relapse or survival. There were no differences in hematopoietic recovery, acute and chronic GVHD. The results of BMT CTN 0501 appear generalizable to the population of trial eligible patients. The survival differences between the trial specified and other conditioning regimens support use of the TCF regimen to improve survival. It also indicates the importance of conditioning regimen for outcome and may serve as a stimulus to design trials to identify the optimal regimen for children with acute leukemia undergoing UCB transplantation. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

scholarly journals A perspective on the selection of unrelated donors and cord blood units for transplantation

Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (2) ◽  
pp. 259-265 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen R. Spellman ◽  
Mary Eapen ◽  
Brent R. Logan ◽  
Carlheinz Mueller ◽  
Pablo Rubinstein ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cord Blood ◽  
Marrow Transplant ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem ◽  
Blood And Marrow Transplant ◽  
Unrelated Donors ◽  
Matching Criteria ◽  
Graft Selection ◽  
Transplantation Outcomes ◽  
Unrelated Adult ◽  
Selection Of

Abstract Selection of a suitable graft for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation involves consideration of both donor and recipient characteristics. Of primary importance is sufficient donor-recipient HLA matching to ensure engraftment and acceptable rates of GVHD. In this Perspective, the National Marrow Donor Program and the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research provide guidelines, based on large studies correlating graft characteristics with clinical transplantation outcomes, on appropriate typing strategies and matching criteria for unrelated adult donor and cord blood graft selection.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document