scholarly journals A Phase II Trial of Anakinra for the Prevention of CAR-T Cell Mediated Neurotoxicity

Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 2814-2814
Author(s):  
Matthew J. Frigault ◽  
Kathleen M.E. Gallagher ◽  
Marc Wehrli ◽  
Betsy Valles ◽  
Keagan Casey ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Cell ◽  
Stock Options ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Leadership Role ◽  
Publicly Traded ◽  
Car T Cell ◽  
Car T ◽  
Post Infusion ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Privately Held

Abstract Introduction: Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cell therapy is limited in most cases to inpatient use due to risk of severe treatment-related toxicities. The two primary toxicities observed with CAR-T therapy, cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and neurotoxicity, are associated with increased circulating inflammatory cytokines such as IL-6 and IL-1. Targeting IL-6 with tocilizumab is effective for treating CRS but not neurotoxicity. Anakinra is an FDA-approved recombinant IL-1 receptor antagonist that competitively inhibits IL-1 receptor signaling and therefore blocks downstream production of inflammatory cytokines including IL-6. Leveraging support from Kite Pharma, we opened an investigator-initiated clinical trial (NCT04150913) with the hypothesis that anakinra could be administered prophylactically to prevent severe CRS and neurologic events (NE) in patients receiving axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel). Here we report preliminary outcomes of this study. Study Design and Methods: This is a phase II single center, open-label study for patients ≥18 years old with relapsed or refractory large cell lymphoma. Patients must have progressed after ≥2 lines of systemic therapy but could not have CNS disease or have been previously treated with CAR-T therapy. Following leukapheresis and manufacturing, patients received 3 days of lymphodepleting chemotherapy (LDC, cyclophosphamide 500mg/m 2 and fludarabine 30 mg/m 2) and 200 mg of subcutaneously administered anakinra starting 4 hours prior to axi-cel infusion and daily thereafter for a total of 7 days. CRS and NE were graded based on the Lee 2013 criteria and the CTCAE 4.03 criteria, respectively, to enable direct comparison to the pivotal Zuma-1 cohorts. The primary endpoint is the rate and severity of NE within the first 30 days of infusion; secondary endpoints include the incidence and severity of CRS and disease response. CAR-T cell expansion, serum cytokines, and circulating biomarkers of toxicity were measured at baseline, day 3, 7, 14, 21, and 28 post CAR-T cell infusion. Results: Interim analysis of the first 6 patients demonstrated a median age of 68 (range 59-72). Patients included a diverse group of histologies including double-hit lymphoma (n=2), transformed indolent NHL (n=3), and DLBCL NOS (n=1). Two patients were considered primary refractory at time of enrollment. Pre-LDC baseline characteristics included a median SPD of 2819 mm 2 (range 1063-5802), median LDH of 415 (range 147-497) which were comparable to the pivotal ZUMA-1 cohorts. Baseline ferritin, CRP, SAA and IL-15 were similar to the pivotal ZUMA-1 cohorts. While low-grade CRS was observed in 5/6 patients, no patients experienced severe CRS and median onset occurred on day +8 (range 1-8). Four patients did not experience any NE, while two patients experienced grade 3 NE on days +6 till +9 (somnolence) and +12 (global aphasia only, for one day) respectively. With a median follow-up of 4 months, the day +28 overall response rate was 100% (4 CRs, 2 PRs), with 4/6 patients having an ongoing complete response at last disease assessment. One patient was re-infused at progression and remains in a CR 3 months from re-infusion. Responses were seen despite varying CAR-T peak level with most patients demonstrating expansion in the lower quartile of the historic ZUMA-1 cohort. Median post-infusion peak of CRP, ferritin, IL-2, GM-CSF, IFNγ, IL-10, IL-6 and SAA were lower than that observed in the pivotal ZUMA-1 cohorts. All patients remain alive at time of data analysis. Conclusions: With a limited number of patients analyzed thus far, anakinra appears to provide benefit to the toxicity profile of axi-cel, presenting reduced and/or delayed CRS and NE and a decrease in post-infusion inflammatory analytes, when compared to ZUMA-1 pivotal cohorts. No severe CRS was observed in this initial analysis and 2/6 patients experienced grade 3 NE (somnolence and global aphasia) after day 6. Despite CAR-T expansion in the lower quartile of that of ZUMA-1, we observed a 100% ORR with 4 patients remaining in CR at a median follow-up of 4 months. Additional subjects will be assessed to investigate the role of prophylactic anakinra in the management of CRS and NE, which has potential for making axi-cel treatment an outpatient therapy. Disclosures Frigault: BMS: Consultancy; Editas: Consultancy; Iovance: Consultancy; Arcellx: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy; Kite: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding. Wehrli: CSL Behring: Patents & Royalties; Nestle: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company; Novartis: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Chou: Kite Pharma: Current Employment. Shen: Atara: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company, Other: Leadership role, Patents & Royalties; Gilead Sciences: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company; Kite, a Gilead Company: Current Employment, Other: Leadership role, Patents & Royalties. Filosto: Kite, a Gilead Company: Current Employment; Gilead Sciences: Other: stock or other ownership ; Tusk Therapeutics: Patents & Royalties: or other intellecular property. Bot: Kite, a Gilead Company: Current Employment; Gilead Sciences: Consultancy, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company, Other: Travel support. Maus: Agenus: Consultancy; Arcellx: Consultancy; Astellas: Consultancy; AstraZeneca: Consultancy; Atara: Consultancy; Bayer: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; Cabaletta Bio (SAB): Consultancy; CRISPR therapeutics: Consultancy; In8bio (SAB): Consultancy; Intellia: Consultancy; GSK: Consultancy; Kite Pharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; Micromedicine: Consultancy, Current holder of stock options in a privately-held company; Novartis: Consultancy; Tmunity: Consultancy; Torque: Consultancy, Current holder of stock options in a privately-held company; WindMIL: Consultancy; Adaptimmune: Consultancy; tcr2: Consultancy, Divested equity in a private or publicly-traded company in the past 24 months; century: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company; ichnos biosciences: Consultancy, Current holder of stock options in a privately-held company.

scholarly journals Effects of Prior Exposure to Tec Kinase(BTK/ITK) Inhibitors on Kte-X19 Products

Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 3849-3849
Author(s):  
Irene Scarfò ◽  
Kathleen M.E. Gallagher ◽  
Mark B. Leick ◽  
Michael C. Kann ◽  
Justin Budka ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Cells ◽  
T Cell ◽  
Stock Options ◽  
Effector Function ◽  
Prior Exposure ◽  
Publicly Traded ◽  
Car T Cells ◽  
Car T ◽  
Post Infusion ◽  
Privately Held

Abstract Introduction: Frequent and durable responses were recently reported in relapsed or refractory (R/R) mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) patients treated with KTE-X19, an autologous CD19-targeted chimeric antigen receptor-engineered T-cell (CAR-T) product (Wang et al. N Engl J Med. 2020). Most patients enrolled had received at least one line of Tec kinase inhibitor prior to KTE-X19 manufacturing, either in the form of ibrutinib, a Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK) and Inducible T cell kinase (ITK) inhibitor, or acalabrutinib, a more selective BTK inhibitor. Pharmacokinetic expansion of KTE-X19 was higher in ibrutinib-treated patients relative to acalabrutinib-treated patients. We previously showed that prolonged exposure to ibrutinib enhanced T cell effector function and proliferation in patients with CLL (Fraietta et al, Blood, 2016). To assess the impact of Tec kinase inhibitor on KTE-X19 products and downstream clinical outcomes, we examined the phenotype, transcriptional profile and cytokine production of KTE-X19 infusion products and post-infusion lymphocytes from patients with R/R MCL treated on the Zuma-2 study. Study Design and Methods: We evaluated biospecimens from MCL patients who enrolled on the Zuma-2 clinical trial (NCT02601313) and who were previously treated with ibrutinib (n=14) or acalabrutinib (n=6). Samples analyzed consisted of KTE-X19 CAR T products and peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) collected 7 days after infusion. Lymphocytes were assessed for CAR expression, T cell phenotype, transcriptional profile and cytokine production. In addition, CAR T cell phenotypes and cytokines were profiled following co-culture of KTE-X19 with CD19 + Toledo cells (DLBCL). Results: Flow cytometric analysis of KTE-X19 demonstrated similar distributions of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells and comparable frequencies of central and effector memory populations in the CAR+ T cells derived from patients with prior exposure to ibrutinib vs. acalabrutinib. T helper subset analysis trended towards enrichment of Th1/Th17 populations within the CAR+ CD4+ cells of the ibrutinib cohort. This finding was further supported by transcriptional profiling of sorted CAR+ T cells from infusion products, where Th1/Th17, Jak/STAT and activation-related genes were enriched in the cohort with prior ibrutinib exposure. In addition, the Th1 phenotype was more frequent in PBMC of ibrutinib-exposed patients (8/14) compared to acalabrutinib-exposed patients (1/4). Interestingly, a shift from a central memory-dominant product towards an effector memory phenotype was observed in peripheral CD4+ and CD8+ CAR T cells in the ibrutinib cohort, whereas acalabrutinib post-infusion CAR T cells maintained a central memory phenotype. In vitro stimulation of KTE-X19 CAR-T infusion products with tumor cells resulted in a significant enrichment of the Th1 population in patients who had received ibrutinib compared to those that received acalabrutinib (p=0.0058). Following stimulation, CAR-T cells from the acalabrutinib cohort produced higher levels of Th2 cytokines, including IL-4, IL-5, and IL-13 as well as GM-CSF compared to the ibrutinib cohort. Conclusions: Analysis of KTE-X19 infusion products and day 7 post-infusion PBMC demonstrated that CAR T cells from patients with prior ibrutinib exposure have a Th1 predominant phenotype, suggesting that ibrutinib but not acalabrutinib promotes Th1 differentiation and effector function, potentially through the inhibition of ITK. Furthermore, our data suggest that inhibition of non-BTK targets such as ITK may play a role in driving a Th17 phenotype. Prior exposure to ibrutinib may increase CAR T cell effector function to a greater extent than exposure to acalabrutinib to enhance clinical outcome in patients with MCL. Disclosures Budka: Kite Pharma: Current Employment. Sowrirajan: Kite Pharma: Current Employment. Nguyen: Kite Pharma: Current Employment. Shen: Gilead Sciences: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company; Kite, a Gilead Company: Current Employment, Other: Leadership role, Patents & Royalties; Atara: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company, Other: Leadership role, Patents & Royalties. Bot: Kite, a Gilead Company: Current Employment; Gilead Sciences: Consultancy, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company, Other: Travel support. Maus: Agenus: Consultancy; Arcellx: Consultancy; Astellas: Consultancy; AstraZeneca: Consultancy; Atara: Consultancy; Bayer: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; Cabaletta Bio (SAB): Consultancy; CRISPR therapeutics: Consultancy; In8bio (SAB): Consultancy; Intellia: Consultancy; GSK: Consultancy; Kite Pharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; Micromedicine: Consultancy, Current holder of stock options in a privately-held company; Novartis: Consultancy; Tmunity: Consultancy; Torque: Consultancy, Current holder of stock options in a privately-held company; WindMIL: Consultancy; Adaptimmune: Consultancy; tcr2: Consultancy, Divested equity in a private or publicly-traded company in the past 24 months; century: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company; ichnos biosciences: Consultancy, Current holder of stock options in a privately-held company.

scholarly journals Costs of Postinfusion Monitoring By Site of Care for Patients with Relapsed/Refractory (R/R) Large B-Cell Lymphoma (LBCL) Who Received Third-Line or Later Treatment with Lisocabtagene Maraleucel (liso-cel) in the Transcend NHL 001 and Outreach Trials

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 16-17
Author(s):  
M. Lia Palomba ◽  
Monika P. Jun ◽  
Jacob Garcia ◽  
James Lymp ◽  
November McGarvey ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Cell ◽  
Cell Therapy ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Cost Ratio ◽  
Publicly Traded ◽  
T Cell Therapy ◽  
Car T Cell ◽  
Car T Cell Therapy ◽  
Car T ◽  
Third Line

Background: Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy is generally limited to inpatient settings; yet, exploration of outpatient infusion and monitoring is ongoing. Information on health care resource utilization (HCRU) and costs associated with CAR T cell therapy administration is limited and may differ by postinfusion monitoring site. Liso-cel is an investigational, CD19-directed, defined composition, 4-1BB CAR T cell product administered at equal target doses of CD8+ and CD4+ CAR+ T cells. An interim analysis from the OUTREACH study (NCT03744676) observed lower HCRU with outpatient vs inpatient administration (Bachier et al. J Clin Oncol 2020;38:8037). The patient journey after CAR T cell therapy administration may differ for patients with outpatient vs inpatient monitoring and may result in varying costs of care. This study estimated the cost of postinfusion monitoring by site of care for patients with R/R LBCL who received third-line or later treatment with liso-cel in the TRANSCEND NHL 001 (TRANSCEND; NCT02631044) and OUTREACH clinical trials. Methods: This retrospective study analyzed HCRU reported in clinical trial databases from TRANSCEND and OUTREACH. A 2-step microcosting method was used to identify key HCRU and to estimate postinfusion costs: (1) HCRU was analyzed from the index date (day of liso-cel infusion) through the 6-month follow-up; and (2) costs were applied to each HCRU. HCRU included standard inpatient and intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay (LOS), diagnostics (laboratory work and imaging), procedures (dialysis and intubation), and medications (supportive care, prophylactic treatment, and adverse event management). Unit costs were obtained from the health care system (provider) perspective and adjusted to 2020 US dollars. Cost per standard inpatient day ($2,542) was estimated from Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project databases, and cost per ICU day ($7,556) was sourced from Dasta et al (Crit Care Med. 2005;33:1266-77). All medication costs were obtained from REDBOOK (IBM Micromedex) using wholesale acquisition costs. Diagnostic and procedure costs were obtained from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services laboratory fee schedule, physician fee schedule, or outpatient prospective payment system. A payment-to-cost ratio was applied to Medicare payment rates to estimate unit costs. Costs were adjusted to reflect the site of care where the HCRU occurred. A cost ratio was applied to adjust costs from the physician's office/community oncology clinic to the hospital outpatient department (Winfield, Muhlestein, Leavitt Partners; 2017) and from outpatient to inpatient (Meisenberg et al. Bone Marrow Transplant. 1998;21:927-32). Costs were aggregated by HCRU category, specifically medications, diagnostics, procedures, and facility costs. An average total cost by post-liso-cel infusion month was calculated for patients with ongoing status in that month (patients censored due to data cutoff were not included). Analyses were stratified by site of postinfusion monitoring (inpatients vs outpatients). Results: A total of 303 patients with R/R LBCL across the 2 trials received liso-cel and postinfusion monitoring (inpatients, n = 256; outpatients, n = 47). HCRU and LOS, including standard inpatient and ICU days, are shown in the Table. Inpatients had higher rates of inpatient stays (<100% vs 62%) and tocilizumab use (for CRS and/or NE; 20% vs 9%) than outpatients, respectively. Rates of ICU admission, corticosteroid use, vasopressor use, dialysis, and intubation were similar between groups. Median and average LOS in standard inpatient and ICU settings were higher among inpatients. Median (range) total LOS for inpatients and outpatients was 15 (0-88) and 4 (0-77) days, respectively. The estimated mean postinfusion cost of care was $89,535 for inpatients and $36,702 for outpatients. Over 6 months, most costs were incurred in the first month after infusion ($50,369 [56%] for inpatients and $19,837 [54%] for outpatients). Costs were largely driven by facility costs, namely standard inpatient and ICU stays (Figure). Conclusions: Lower overall HCRU was observed with outpatient liso-cel postinfusion monitoring, primarily due to hospitalizations, which resulted in a mean 6-month cost savings of $52,833 (59%) compared with inpatient monitoring. These results are based on national average costs and may not be generalizable to specific institutions. Disclosures Palomba: Regeneron: Research Funding; Juno Therapeutics, a Bristol-Meyers Squibb Company: Honoraria, Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; Merck: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Pharmacyclics: Honoraria. Jun:Bristol-Myers Squibb Company: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Garcia:Bristol-Myers Squibb Company: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company; Juno Therapeutics, a Bristol-Myers Squibb Company: Current Employment. Lymp:Bristol-Myers Squibb Company: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company; Juno Therapeutics, a Bristol-Myers Squibb Company: Current Employment. McGarvey:Pfizer, Inc.: Ended employment in the past 24 months; BluePath Solutions: Current Employment. Gitlin:BMS: Research Funding. Pelletier:BMS: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Nguyen:BluePath Solutions: Current Employment.

scholarly journals Qualitative Analysis of the Treatment Experience and Well-Being of Patients with Relapsed/Refractory (R/R) Large B-Cell Lymphoma (LBCL) Enrolled in 2 Trials of Lisocabtagene Maraleucel (liso-cel) during the Initial Stages of Therapy

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 22-23
Author(s):  
Tanya Siddiqi ◽  
Ulrich Jaeger ◽  
Olga Moshkovich ◽  
Jennifer Devlen ◽  
Matthew Miera ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trials ◽  
T Cell ◽  
Cell Therapy ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Publicly Traded ◽  
T Cell Therapy ◽  
Car T Cell ◽  
Car T Cell Therapy ◽  
Car T

Background: Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy is a novel treatment modality for patients with R/R LBCL. Limited information exists regarding patients' views of CAR T cell therapy. Our research aimed to better understand patients' needs by capturing their expectations/concerns, current well-being, and treatment experiences during the beginning stages of CAR T cell therapy in the clinical trial setting. Methods: Patients with R/R LBCL from 2 ongoing trials of the investigational, CD19-directed CAR T cell therapy liso-cel (TRANSCEND WORLD [NCT03484702] or PLATFORM [NCT03310619]) were invited to participate in an optional interview component. Semistructured interviews were conducted to gain insight about patients' experience with CAR T cell therapy in the clinical trials. Interviews of ≤1 hour (in-person or over the phone) were conducted in parallel with screening procedures (interview 1), after leukapheresis (interview 2), and up to 3 days after liso-cel infusion (interview 3). Interviews were audio recorded and transcribed. MAXQDA (VERBI GmbH, Berlin, Germany) qualitative analysis software was used to manage and thematically organize interview transcript data to identify key concepts related to each research objective. Previously reported results of interview 1 showed a high perception of unmet needs, lack of alternative options, and expectations for positive outcomes. The analysis presented here primarily focused on interviews 2 and 3. Denominators shown in the Results vary by question as some patients skipped questions. Results: A total of 75 interviews were analyzed, including 35, 24, and 16 patients at interviews 1, 2, and 3, respectively, across sites in the US (n = 14), Europe (n = 26), and Japan (n = 2). Among 42 patients who completed ≥1 interview, the mean age was 62 years and 69% were male. Treatment Experience: Of 24 patients who completed interview 2, 22 (92%) reported positive experiences during leukapheresis and 16 (67%) reported the procedure was as expected. Patients thought the most difficult part of leukapheresis was the length of the procedure (n = 8/21 [38%]). Of 15 patients who provided feedback on lymphodepleting chemotherapy, a majority reported that it was as expected (n = 8 [53%]) or easier than expected (n = 3 [20%]); when asked about the most difficult part, many patients (n = 7/17 [41%]) discussed side effects (eg, nausea, fatigue, and lack of appetite). Of patients who described liso-cel infusion as different than expected, differences included easier (n = 12/13 [92%]) or quicker (n = 3/12 [25%]) than expected, and 5/12 (42%) reported few/no side effects within 3 days post-infusion. Over half of patients (n = 8/14 [57%]) reported that the infusion, as a whole, was not difficult. Changes over Time: At interviews 1, 2, and 3, respectively, 47% (n = 14/30), 47% (n = 9/19), and 69% (n = 9/13) of patients reported hoping for successful treatment. Similarly, patients generally had fewer concerns later in the process, with 21 (64%) and 11 (33%) of 33 patients reporting side-effect and treatment efficacy concerns, respectively, during interview 1 vs 5 (33%) and 3 (20%) of 15 patients, respectively, during interview 3. At time of enrollment, most patients (n = 21/34 [62%]) were able to function normally or with minimal impact from their lymphoma, although most reported some symptoms like fatigue, pain, or stomach problems. At interview 1, 14 (40%) of 35 patients were employed; most patients reported no changes in their work life at interviews 2 (n = 19/20 [95%]) and 3 (n = 11/12 [92%]). From enrollment to immediately post-infusion, the physical health of most patients remained stable (n = 4/16 [25%]) or deteriorated (n = 9/16 [56%]). However, most patients (n = 14/15 [93%]) reported feeling positive at interview 3. Conclusions: This study provided the unique opportunity to gather feedback directly from patients participating in clinical trials of liso-cel therapy, specifically during the initial treatment stages. The overall impression of the treatment was positive, with most patients reporting that study procedures were easier than expected. The results of this qualitative research provide useful insight into the motivations, expectations, and experiences of patients with R/R LBCL receiving liso-cel therapy, which can inform the design of health care support systems and future clinical trials to better meet patients' needs. Disclosures Siddiqi: AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Juno: Consultancy, Research Funding; Kite, a Gilead Company: Consultancy, Research Funding; BeiGene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Oncternal: Research Funding; TG Therapeutics: Research Funding; Janssen: Speakers Bureau; Seattle Genetics: Speakers Bureau. Jaeger:F. Hoffmann-La Roche: Honoraria, Research Funding; AbbVie: Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Gilead: Honoraria, Research Funding; BMS/Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Karyopharm: Honoraria; CDR Life AG: Consultancy, Research Funding; Miltenyi: Consultancy, Honoraria. Moshkovich:Icon Plc: Current Employment. Devlen:Icon Plc: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Miera:Icon Plc: Current Employment. Williams:Icon Plc: Current Employment. Hasskarl:Bristol Myers Squibb: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Liu:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Braverman:Bristol Myers Squibb: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Salles:MorphoSys: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other; Kite: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other; Debiopharm: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Participation in educational events; Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Participation in educational events; F. Hoffman-La Roche Ltd: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other; Epizyme: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Other; Karyopharm: Consultancy; Amgen: Honoraria, Other: Participation in educational events; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Participation in educational events; Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Participation in educational events; Autolus: Consultancy; Genmab: Consultancy.

scholarly journals NOTCH and CAR Signaling Control T Cell Lineage Commitment from Pluripotent Stem Cells

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 30-30
Author(s):  
Sjoukje van der Stegen ◽  
Pieter Lindenbergh ◽  
Roseanna Petrovic ◽  
Benjamin Whitlock ◽  
Raedun Clarke ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cells ◽  
T Cells ◽  
T Cell ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Cell Lineage ◽  
Lineage Commitment ◽  
Publicly Traded ◽  
Car T Cell ◽  
Car T ◽  
Single Positive

Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR) T cells are a new treatment paradigm for relapsed/refractory hematopoietic malignancies. However, their autologous nature imposes manufacturing constraints that can delay CAR T cell availability and increase their cost. We previously established proof of principle that αβ T cell-derived induced pluripotent stem cells (TiPSCs) can provide a self-renewing source for in vitro CAR T cell production (Themeli, Nat Biotechnol, 2013). The use of cloned TiPSC further enhances the feasibility of verifying genome integrity of the genetically engineered stem cells and should in principle yield highly homogenous cell products. Using αβ T cell-derived TiPSCs transduced with a well-defined CD19-specific CAR (1928z; Park, NEJM, 2018), we previously demonstrated that TiPSCs can be differentiated into CAR T cells. These T cells retained their endogenous T cell receptor (TCR) and also displayed characteristics of innate lymphoid cells. We have now examined how the timing of CAR expression as well as the CAR signaling strength influence T cell lineage commitment, enabling better control towards αβ T cell lineage commitment. αβ T cell lineage development depends in part on a precisely orchestrated interactions between NOTCH and (pre)TCR signaling, the timing and strength of which are crucial for αβ lineage commitment. Because TiPSCs harbor rearranged TCRα and TCRβ genes, mature TCR expression occurs earlier than if it required VDJ recombination, skewing differentiation towards acquiring innate features including CD4-CD8- double-negative or CD8αα single-positive phenotypes. We show that providing strong NOTCH stimulation counteracts the effects of early antigen receptor expression, facilitating CD4+CD8αβ+ double positive (DP) formation. We hypothesized that CAR signaling in the absence of ligand binding (tonic signaling) may mimic a TCR signal, the strength and timing of which could re-direct lineage commitment. We therefore investigated CARs providing different levels of signaling strength and the impact of delaying the onset of CAR expression. Tonic CAR signaling was measured in peripheral blood T cells expressing 1928z or 1928z-1XX, a construct in which the second and third ITAM in the CD3ζ domain have been mutated to be non-functional (Feucht, Nat Med, 2019), following either retroviral transduction (SFG vector) orTRAC-targeted cDNA integration, placing CAR expression under the transcriptional control of the TCRα promoter (Eyquem, Nature, 2017). CAR signaling in the absence of antigen exposure, measured by phosphorylation of ITAM3, ERK1/2 and ZAP70, was reduced by bothTRAC-targeting and reduction of functional ITAMs, with additive effects when combined inTRAC-1928z-1XX. Three of these engineering strategies (virally expressed 1928z,TRAC-1928z andTRAC-1928z-1XX) were evaluated in the context of TiPSC-derived T cell differentiation. Virally expressed 1928z (resulting in constitutive CAR expression throughout differentiation) resulted in the predominant generation of innate-like CD8αα T cells, associated with the absence of early T cell lineage markers such as CD5, CD2 and CD1a. Delayed expression of 1928z throughTRACtargeting resulted in increased CD5, CD2 and CD1a, but did not yield any more CD4+CD8αβ+ DP cells. In TiPSC expressingTRAClocus-encoded 1928z-1XX, a greater DP population emerged, from which CD8αβ single-positive T cells could be induced. Phenotypic analyses of clonal TRAC-1928z-1XX TiPSC lines further establish the interplay between CAR and NOTCH1 in determining αβ lineage commitment. Together these data show that early TCR and CAR expression skew T cell lineage commitment towards an innate-like T cell fate, which can be overcome by controlling the strength and timing of NOTCH, TCR and CAR signaling. These studies pave the way for the predetermined generation of a variety of CAR T cell types endowed with different functional attributes. Disclosures Whitlock: Fate Therapeutics Inc.:Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company.Clarke:Fate Therapeutics Inc.:Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company.Valamehr:Fate Therapeutics, Inc:Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company.Riviere:Juno Therapeutics:Other: Ownership interest, Research Funding;Takeda:Research Funding;Fate Therapeutics Inc.:Consultancy, Other: Ownership interest , Research Funding;FloDesign Sonics:Consultancy, Other: Ownership interest;Atara:Research Funding.Sadelain:Atara:Patents & Royalties, Research Funding;Fate Therapeutics:Patents & Royalties, Research Funding;Mnemo:Patents & Royalties;Takeda:Patents & Royalties, Research Funding;Minerva:Other: Biotechnologies , Patents & Royalties.

scholarly journals Targeting the Membrane-Proximal C2-Set Domain of CD33 for Improved CD33-Directed CAR T Cell Therapy

Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 2776-2776
Author(s):  
Salvatore Fiorenza ◽  
George S. Laszlo ◽  
Tinh-Doan Phi ◽  
Margaret C. Lunn ◽  
Delaney R. Kirchmeier ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Cells ◽  
T Cell ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Set Domain ◽  
Car T Cells ◽  
Car T Cell ◽  
Car T ◽  
Privately Held

Abstract Background: There is increasing interest in targeting CD33 in malignant and non-malignant disorders, but available drugs are ineffective in many patients. As one limitation, therapeutic CD33 antibodies typically recognize the membrane-distal V-set domain. Likewise, currently tested CD33-directed chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells likewise target the V-set domain and have thus far shown limited clinical activity. We have recently demonstrated that binding closer to the cell membrane enhances the effector functions of CD33 antibodies. We therefore raised antibodies against the membrane-proximal C2-set domain of CD33 and identified antibodies that bound CD33 regardless of the presence/absence of the V-set domain ("CD33 PAN antibodies"). Here, we tested their properties as targeting moiety in CD33 PAN CAR T cell constructs, using a clinically validated lentiviral backbone. Methods: To generate CAR T cells, negatively selected CD8 + T cells were transduced with an epHIV7 lentivirus encoding the scFv from a CD33 PAN antibody (clone 1H7 or 9G2) linked to either a short (IgG 4 hinge only), intermediate (hinge plus IgG 4 CH3 domain), or long (hinge plus IgG 4 CH3 domain plus IgG 4 CH2 domain) spacer, the CD28-transmembrane domain, CD3zeta and 4-1BB intracellular signaling domains, and non-functional truncated CD19 (tCD19) as transduction marker. Similar constructs using scFvs from 2 different V-set domain-targeting CD33 antibodies, including hP67.6 (My96; used in gemtuzumab ozogamicin), were generated for comparison. CAR-T cells were sorted, expanded in IL-7 and IL-15, and used in vitro or in vivo against human AML cell lines endogenously expressing CD33 and cell lines engineered to lack CD33 (via CRISPR/Cas9) with/or without forced expression of different CD33 variants. Results: CD33 V-set-directed CAR T cells exerted significantly more cytolytic activity against AML cells expressing an artificial CD33 variant lacking the C2-set domain (CD33 ΔE3-4) than cells expressing full-length CD33 at similar or higher levels, consistent with the notion that CD33 CAR T cell efficacy is enhanced when targeting an epitope that is located closer to the cell membrane. CD33 PAN CAR T cells were highly potent against human AML cells in a strictly CD33-dependent fashion, with constructs containing the short and intermediate-length spacer demonstrating robust cytokine secretion, cell proliferation, and in vitro cytolytic activity, as determined by 51Cr release cytotoxicity assays. When compared to optimized CD33 V-set CAR T cells, optimized CD33 PAN CAR T cells were significantly more potent in cytotoxicity, proliferation, and cytokine production without appreciably increased acquisition of exhaustion markers. In vivo, CD33 PAN CAR T cells extended survival in immunodeficient NOD.SCID. IL2rg -/- (NSG) mice bearing significant leukemic burdens from various cell line-derived xenografts (HL-60, KG1α and MOLM14) with efficient tumor clearance demonstrated in a dose-dependent fashion. Conclusion: Targeting the membrane proximal domain of CD33 enhances the anti-leukemic potency of CAR T cells. Our data provide the rationale for the further development of CD33 PAN CAR T cells toward clinical testing. Disclosures Fiorenza: Link Immunotherapeutics: Consultancy; Bristol Myers Squibb: Research Funding. Godwin: Pfizer: Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Turtle: Allogene: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; Arsenal Bio: Consultancy; Asher bio: Consultancy; Astrazeneca: Consultancy, Research Funding; Caribou Biosciences: Consultancy, Current holder of individual stocks in a privately-held company; Century Therapeutics: Consultancy, Other; Eureka therapeutics: Current holder of individual stocks in a privately-held company, Other; Juno therapeutics/BMS: Patents & Royalties, Research Funding; Myeloid Therapeutics: Current holder of individual stocks in a privately-held company, Other; Nektar therapeutics: Consultancy, Research Funding; PACT Pharma: Consultancy; Precision Biosciences: Current holder of individual stocks in a privately-held company, Other; T-CURX: Other; TCR2 Therapeutics: Research Funding. Walter: Kite: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Genentech: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; Astellas: Consultancy; Agios: Consultancy; Amphivena: Consultancy, Other: ownership interests; Selvita: Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Jazz: Research Funding; Macrogenics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Immunogen: Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Aptevo: Consultancy, Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding.

scholarly journals Fever Characteristics Associated with Toxicity and Outcome after Anti-CD19 CAR T-Cell Therapy for Aggressive Lymphoma

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 1612-1612 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hamza Hashmi ◽  
Alicia Darwin ◽  
Christina A Bachmeier ◽  
Julio Chavez ◽  
Bijal Shah ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Cell ◽  
Cell Therapy ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
T Cell Therapy ◽  
Car T Cell ◽  
Car T Cell Therapy ◽  
Car T ◽  
Grade 3

Background: Fever is a cardinal symptom of cytokine release syndrome (CRS) after CAR T-cell therapy with 84% of patients experiencing fever on the ZUMA-1 trial of axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel). Knowledge of the patterns of fever and associated symptoms may inform the clinical management of these patients. Methods: We performed a single center retrospective study in 78 patients receiving axi-cel for large B cell lymphoma (LBCL) as of 12/31/2018. We evaluated all the patients who developed fever during lymphodepleting chemotherapy with fludarabine (Flu) and cyclophosphamide (Cy), after CAR T-cell infusion, and after administration of tocilizumab (toci); and analyzed the association of fever with toxicity rates (grade 3+ CRS and neurotoxicity) and efficacy [overall response rates (ORR) and complete response (CR) rate 6 months post CAR T-cell infusion]. Fever was defined per the Lee criteria [equal to or greater than 38 °C], CRS used the modified Lee criteria and neurotoxicity used the CARTOX grading system. Results: Fever occurred in 71/78 (91%) of patients. Rates of grade 3+ CRS and neurotoxicity were 9% (7/78) and 26% (20/78) respectively. The CR rate at 6 months was 41% (32/78). Toxicities and outcomes in patients with the described fever characteristics are shown in the Table. During lymphodepletion with Flu/Cy, fever was observed in 11% (9/78) of patients. Fever occurred within 24 hours of axi-cel infusion in 47% (37/78) and within 72 hours of axi-cel infusion in 71% (55/78) of the patients. In total, 41% (32/78) of patients were treated with anti-IL6R therapy (tocilizumab; toci) for CAR T toxicity. After the first dose of toci, fever recurred in 69% of patients (22/32), of which 34% (11/32) experienced fever recurrence within 24 hours of toci infusion. Conclusions: This is the first study to our knowledge that describes in detail the characteristics of fever after CAR T-cell therapy with axi-cel. Fever was common and occurred in 71% of the patients within 72 hours of axi-cel infusion. When toci was used, fever recurred in a majority of patients (69%) and in 1/3 of patients the fever recurred within 24 hours of toci infusion. These descriptive data may be used by clinicians to inform their expectations of fever occurring after treatment with axi-cel and/or toci. Table Disclosures Bachmeier: Kite/Gilead: Speakers Bureau. Chavez:Genentech: Speakers Bureau; Kite Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Speakers Bureau. Shah:AstraZeneca: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Spectrum/Astrotech: Honoraria; Adaptive Biotechnologies: Honoraria; Pharmacyclics: Honoraria; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Kite/Gilead: Honoraria; Celgene/Juno: Honoraria. Pinilla Ibarz:Novartis: Consultancy; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy; Sanofi: Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Bayer: Speakers Bureau; TG Therapeutics: Consultancy; Teva: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Abbvie: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Nishihori:Novartis: Research Funding; Karyopharm: Research Funding. Lazaryan:Kadmon: Consultancy. Davila:Bellicum: Consultancy; Anixa: Consultancy; GlaxoSmithKline: Consultancy; Precision Biosciences: Consultancy; Novartis: Research Funding; Adaptive: Consultancy; Celgene: Research Funding; Atara: Research Funding. Locke:Cellular BioMedicine Group Inc.: Consultancy; Kite: Other: Scientific Advisor; Novartis: Other: Scientific Advisor. Jain:Kite/Gilead: Consultancy.

scholarly journals Easix Predicts Severe Cytokine Release Syndrome (CRS) and Immune Effector Cell-Associated Neuro-Toxicity Syndrome (ICANS) in Patients Receiving CD19-Directed Chimeric Antigen Receptor T (CAR-T) Cell Therapy

Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 3861-3861
Author(s):  
Felix Korell ◽  
Olaf Penack ◽  
Michael Schmitt ◽  
Carsten Müller-Tidow ◽  
Lars Bullinger ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Cells ◽  
T Cell ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Validation Cohort ◽  
T Cell Therapy ◽  
Training Cohort ◽  
Car T Cells ◽  
Car T Cell ◽  
Car T ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Background: Endothelial dysfunction underlies the two main complications of chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cell therapy, i.e. cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS). The purpose of this retrospective analysis was to evaluate and validate the Endothelial Activation and Stress Index (EASIX)) as predictor for CRS and ICANS in patients receiving CD19-directed CAR-T cells. Methods: In this retrospective study, the training cohort recruited 107 patients treated with CAR-T cells at the University Hospital Heidelberg (n=83) and Charité University Medicine Berlin (n=24) from Oct 1, 2018, to March 31, 2021. Patients from the validation cohort (n=93) received CAR-T cells within the ZUMA-1 trial (ClinicalTrials.gov number: NCT02348216). The training cohort included 37 and 34 patients with relapsed / refractory (r/r) large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL) treated with Axi-cel and Tisa-cel, respectively, 1 patient with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) treated with Tisa-cel, 2 patients with mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) treated with KTE-X19 on an early access program; and 5 patients with LBCL, 5 patients with MCL, 5 patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia, 4 patients with follicular lymphoma, and 14 patients with ALL treated with the 3 rd generation CAR-T HD-CAR-1. Median age was 57 (20-81) years, 72% were male. The 93 patients of the validation cohort all had r/r LBCL and received Axi-Cel. EASIX and serum levels of endothelial stress markers (angiopoietin-2, suppressor of tumorigenicity-2, soluble thrombomodulin and interleukin-8) were measured before start of lymphodepletion (EASIX-pre), and on days 0, 3, and 7 after CAR-T infusion. Primary endpoints were severe CRS and/or ICANS (grades 3-4). Results: Of the 107 patients of the training cohort, 61 patients (58%) developed CRS grades 1-4 and 24 patients (22%) developed ICANS grades 1-4. Higher grade CRS (grade ≥ 3) was seen in 6 patients (6%) with a median onset of 4 (0-14) days, while grade ≥ 3 ICANS occurred in 11 patients (11%; median onset 8 (4-17) days). EASIX values increased continuously from lymphodepletion to day 7 after CAR-T cell application (EASIX-pre 2.0 (0.5-76.6, interquartile range (IQR) 1.2/4.1); EASIX-d0 2.0 (0.3-91.5, IQR 1.2/4.2); EASIX-d3 2.4 (0.3-69.1, IQR 1.3/4.9) and EASIX-d7 2.7 (0.4-94.0, IQR 1.4/7.5)). In the validation cohort, Grade ≥ 3 CRS was observed in 10 patients (11%) and grade ≥ 3 ICANS in 28 patients (30%). Similar to the training cohort, EASIX values rose from lymphodepletion to day 3 after CAR-T cell application (EASIX-pre 1.8 (0.3-106.1, IQR 1.0/4.7); EASIX-d0 2.0 (0.3-120.4, IQR 1.1/4.1) and EASIX-d3 2.7 (0.3-57.9, IQR 1.7/6.2). In both cohorts, all EASIX values (pre, d0, d3, d7) were significantly higher in patients who developed either grade 3-4 CRS, ICANS or both (see Figure 1 for the training cohort). EASIX predicted grade 3-4 CRS and ICANS before lymphodepleting therapy (-pre), on day 0 and on day 3 in both cohorts: AUC EASIX-pre, training cohort 0.73 (0.62-0.85, p=0.002), validation cohort 0.76 (0.66-0.87, p<0.001). An optimized cut-off for EASIX-pre (1.86) identified in the training cohort associated with an odds ratio (OR) of 5.07 (1.82-14.10), p=0.002 in the validation cohort in multivariable binary logistic regression analysis including age, gender, diagnosis and disease stage. Serum endothelial stress markers did not predict the two complications when assessed before CAR-T infusion, but diagnostic markers were strongly associated with CRS and ICANS grade 3-4 on day+7. Conclusions: EASIX-pre is a validated predictor of severe complications after CAR-T therapy and may help to tailor safety monitoring measures according to the individual patient's needs. Data on patients from the ZUMA-1 trial were provided by Kite/Gilead. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Penack: Astellas: Honoraria; Gilead: Honoraria; Jazz: Honoraria; MSD: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Neovii: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria; Therakos: Honoraria; Takeda: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Priothera: Consultancy; Shionogi: Consultancy; Omeros: Consultancy. Schmitt: MSD: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Apogenix: Research Funding; Hexal: Other: Travel grants, Research Funding; TolerogenixX: Current holder of individual stocks in a privately-held company; Kite Gilead: Other: Travel grants; Bluebird Bio: Other: Travel grants; Novartis: Other: Travel grants, Research Funding. Müller-Tidow: Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; Bioline: Research Funding. Bullinger: Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Astellas: Honoraria; Menarini: Consultancy; Sanofi: Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Seattle Genetics: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria; Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bayer: Research Funding; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy, Honoraria; Gilead: Consultancy; Hexal: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Dreger: Gilead Sciences: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; AbbVie: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Consultancy; Bluebird Bio: Consultancy; AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Riemser: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau.

scholarly journals Lisocabtagene Maraleucel (liso-cel) for Treatment of Second-Line Transplant Noneligible (TNE) Relapsed/Refractory (R/R) Aggressive Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma (NHL): Initial Results from the PILOT Study

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 2882-2882 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alison R. Sehgal ◽  
John Godwin ◽  
John Pribble ◽  
Lei Wang ◽  
Jerill Thorpe ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Cell ◽  
B Cell ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Car T Cell ◽  
Car T ◽  
Equity Ownership ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Large B Cell

Background: Patients (pts) with R/R aggressive large B cell NHL who fail first-line therapy with immunochemotherapy and are ineligible for high-dose chemotherapy and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) have a poor prognosis. Available treatment options include platinum/gemcitabine-based or bendamustine-based regimens in combination with rituximab, with or without radiotherapy, or clinical trials. However, long-term outcomes remain poor due to lack of a curative option. Liso-cel is an investigational, anti-CD19, defined composition, 4-1BB CAR T cell product administered at target doses of CD4+ and CD8+ CAR T cells. In the ongoing TRANSCEND NHL 001 study of liso-cel as third- or later-line treatment for pts with R/R large B cell NHL, preliminary data showed high overall response rates with a low incidence of grade ≥3 cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and neurological events (NEs) (Abramson et al, ASCO 2018). The open-label, phase 2 PILOT study is assessing the safety and efficacy of liso-cel as second-line therapy in TNE pts (NCT03483103). PILOT is the first study evaluating CAR T cell therapy focusing on this pt population. Methods: Eligible pts had R/R large B cell NHL (diffuse large B cell lymphoma [DLBCL], not otherwise specified [NOS], de novo or transformed indolent NHL, high-grade lymphoma with MYC and BCL2 and/or BCL6 [double/triple-hit lymphoma], or follicular lymphoma (FL) grade 3B) and had received only 1 prior line of immunochemotherapy containing an anthracycline and a CD20-targeted agent (eg, R-CHOP). Pts had to be deemed ineligible for high-dose chemotherapy followed by HSCT by meeting at least 1 of the following TNE criteria while still fulfilling the criteria for CAR T cell therapy: age ≥70 years, ECOG PS of 2, and/or impaired pulmonary (DLCO ≤60% but SaO2 ≥92% on room air and CTCAE ≤1 dyspnea), cardiac (LVEF ≥40% and <50%), renal (creatinine clearance >30 and <60 mL/min), or hepatic function (AST/ALT >2 and ≤5 ×ULN). Liso-cel was administered at a target dose of 100×106 CAR+ T cells after lymphodepletion (LD) with fludarabine/cyclophosphamide for 3 days. Pts could be treated as outpatients at the investigator's discretion. Results: At data cutoff, 10 pts had been leukapheresed, and 9 pts had LD followed by liso-cel infusion; 1 pt is awaiting liso-cel treatment. Liso-cel was manufactured successfully in all pts. Five pts were infused and monitored as outpatients. Median age was 71 (range, 64-79) years; 5 pts were male. Histology included DLBCL NOS (n=7) and transformed FL (n=2); 2 pts had triple-hit, one of whom had transformed from FL. Five pts had relapsed from, and 4 pts had disease refractory to, prior therapy. Median SPD and LDH were 26.6 cm2 and 201 U/L, respectively. Four pts had high tumor burden with SPD ≥50 cm2 (n=4) and/or LDH ≥500 U/L (n=1). The median Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation Comorbidity Index (HCT-CI) score was 3 (range, 0-3). Six pts had 1 or more treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) grade ≥3, which were primarily cytopenias. Three pts had prolonged grade ≥3 cytopenias at Day 29. Two pts had infections of any grade; no pts had grade ≥3 infections. No pts had CRS or NEs, and no pts received tocilizumab, corticosteroids, or vasopressors. There were no cases of macrophage activation syndrome, tumor lysis syndrome, infusion reactions, or grade 5 TEAEs. Among the 5 pts treated and monitored as outpatients, none were admitted to hospital for adverse events within the first 29 days post liso-cel infusion. All 9 pts achieved an objective response. Four pts achieved complete response; all are ongoing. Five pts achieved partial response (PR), with 2 PRs ongoing. Results were similar in inpatient vs outpatient pts. Median follow-up was 3.5 months. Median (range) time to peak CAR T cell expansion was 10 (7-21) days. Conclusions: These preliminary safety and efficacy data from the ongoing phase 2 PILOT study suggest that liso-cel can be successfully administered, including in the outpatient setting, as second-line therapy in pts with R/R aggressive B cell NHL who were ineligible for high-dose chemotherapy and HSCT by prespecified criteria. Updated safety and efficacy data with longer follow-up will be presented. Disclosures Sehgal: Kite/Gilead: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Juno/Celgene: Research Funding. Pribble:Celgene/Juno: Employment. Wang:Celgene Corporation: Employment. Thorpe:Juno Therapeutics, a Celgene Company: Employment, Equity Ownership. Hildebrandt:Axim Biotechnologies: Equity Ownership; Abbvie: Equity Ownership; GW Pharmaceuticals: Equity Ownership; Endocyte: Equity Ownership; Clovis Oncology: Equity Ownership; Kite Pharma: Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other; CVS Health: Equity Ownership; Celgene: Equity Ownership; Axim Biotechnologies: Equity Ownership; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Sangamo: Equity Ownership; Cellectis: Equity Ownership; Bluebird Bio: Equity Ownership; Bristol-Myers-Squibb: Equity Ownership; crispr therapeutics: Equity Ownership; IDEXX laboratories: Equity Ownership; Johnson & Johnson: Equity Ownership; Pfizer: Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel; Procter & Gamble: Equity Ownership; Vertex: Equity Ownership; Scotts-Miracle: Equity Ownership; Takeda: Research Funding; Bayer: Equity Ownership; Astellas: Other: Travel; Kite Pharma: Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel; Novartis: Equity Ownership; Aetna: Equity Ownership; Juno Therapeutics: Equity Ownership; Cardinal Health: Equity Ownership; Novartis: Equity Ownership; Insys Therapeutics: Equity Ownership; Incyte: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel, Research Funding; Immunomedics: Equity Ownership.

scholarly journals Neurotoxicity of Axicabtagene Ciloleucel and Long-Term Outcomes - in a Minority Rich, Ethnically Diverse Real World Cohort

Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 4842-4842
Author(s):  
Ryann Quinn ◽  
Astha Thakkar ◽  
Sumaira Zareef ◽  
Richard Elkind ◽  
Karen Wright ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Cell ◽  
Cell Therapy ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
T Cell Therapy ◽  
Car T Cell ◽  
Car T Cell Therapy ◽  
Car T ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Introduction Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy has revolutionized the treatment of B- cell malignancies leading to durable responses in patients with relapsed/refractory disease. 1,2 One of the most severe toxicities associated with this treatment is immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS), which was seen in 65-75% of patients treated with axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel) in initial clinical trials. ICANS can range from mild headache to coma, and can occur with or without cytokine release syndrome (CRS). Due to the recent development of CAR T-cell therapy, the long-term effects of ICANS are unknown. This study sought to determine the long-term outcomes in patients with neurotoxicity from axi-cel. Methods We conducted a retrospective chart review of patients who received CAR T-cell therapy with axi-cel between June 2018 and June 2021. Neurotoxicity was graded according to the American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy (ASTCT) ICANS grading system. 3 The primary outcome was percentage of patients who had neurotoxicity defined as ICANS grade ≥ 1 as well as the percentage of patients with neurotoxicity lasting ≥ 1 month. We captured descriptive data such as age, sex, ethnicity, comorbidities, IPI score, stage, baseline neurologic dysfunction, performance status, and number of prior treatments. Secondary outcomes included progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Results Thirty-four patients received axi-cel between June 2018 and June 2021 at our institution. Median age of patients was 65. Twenty patients (59%) were male and 14 (41%) were female. The majority of patients received axi-cel for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (97%). Study population was predominantly hispanic (35%), white (32%), African american (29%) and asian (3%). (Sixteen patients (47%) developed neurotoxicity of any grade, with 7 patients (21%) ≥ grade 3. Of note, 4 patients (12%) died during admission for CAR T-cell therapy and 3/4 deaths were in patients with ICANS ≥ grade 3. Median follow up time was 8 months. Of the 12 patients with neurotoxicity who survived initial admission for CAR-T, 9 (75%) patients recovered from neurotoxicity and mental status was at baseline at discharge without recurrence during follow up. Three (25%) of patients had prolonged neurotoxicity lasting &gt; 1 month. Long-term neurotoxicity included confusion, disorientation, and mild cognitive impairment in the three patients. One patient recovered 15 months after CAR T-cell infusion. 2 patients had prolonged neurotoxicity resulting in deterioration of functional status and death in 1 patient, and 1 patient transitioning to hospice and being lost to follow up. Conclusions Neurotoxicity from axicabtagene ciloleucel is a common adverse event, with half of patients in our cohort having neurotoxicity of some degree, and 20% ≥ grade 3. Twenty-five percent of patients that developed neurotoxicity had long-term effects lasting &gt; 1 month, which resulted in deterioration of functional status in 2 patients. Long-term neurotoxicity included disorientation, confusion, and memory impairment. Our study is limited by a small sample size. Larger studies with longer follow-up times are needed to further characterize the long-term outcomes of neurotoxicity associated with CAR T-cell therapy. Neurotoxicity can be confounded by other causes of neurological dysfunction in these patients such as hospital delirium, chemotherapy toxicity, encephalopathy from infection, and subtle baseline neurologic dysfunction that may not be apparent at presentation. Next steps include prospective evaluation of patients with formal neurology evaluation prior to CAR T-cell therapy and periodically after treatment, in order to objectively monitor late neurologic effects of CAR T-cell therapy. 1. Fl, L. et al. Long-term safety and activity of axicabtagene ciloleucel in refractory large B-cell lymphoma (ZUMA-1): a single-arm, multicentre, phase 1-2 trial. Lancet Oncol. 20, (2019). 2. Jacobson, C. Primary Analysis of Zuma-5: A Phase 2 Study of Axicabtagene Ciloleucel (Axi-Cel) in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory (R/R) Indolent Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma (iNHL). in (ASH, 2020). 3. Dw, L. et al. ASTCT Consensus Grading for Cytokine Release Syndrome and Neurologic Toxicity Associated with Immune Effector Cells. Biol. Blood Marrow Transplant. J. Am. Soc. Blood Marrow Transplant. 25, (2019). Disclosures Gritsman: iOnctura: Research Funding. Shastri: Onclive: Honoraria; Guidepoint: Consultancy; GLC: Consultancy; Kymera Therapeutics: Research Funding. Verma: Celgene: Consultancy; BMS: Research Funding; Stelexis: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company; Curis: Research Funding; Eli Lilly: Research Funding; Medpacto: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy; Acceleron: Consultancy; Stelexis: Consultancy, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company; Incyte: Research Funding; GSK: Research Funding; Throws Exception: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company.

scholarly journals Preliminary Safety and Efficacy of PBCAR0191, an Allogeneic 'Off-the-Shelf' CD19-Directed CAR-T for Patients with Relapsed/Refractory (R/R) CD19+ B-ALL

Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 650-650
Author(s):  
Nitin Jain ◽  
Hagop Kantarjian ◽  
Scott R. Solomon ◽  
Fiona He ◽  
Craig S. Sauter ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Cells ◽  
Dose Level ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
Publicly Traded ◽  
Car T Cells ◽  
Car T ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Privately Held

Abstract Introduction: CD19-directed autologous CAR-T products induce high response rates in adults with R/R B-ALL, yet many patients relapse within the first year. Additionally, cell manufacturing timelines, and poor t-cell fitness may imperil efficacy, especially among those with proliferative disease. This makes access to a donor-derived, readily available CAR-T product of great interest in this patient population, particularly when consolidation with allogeneic stem cell transplant (allo-SCT) is possible. We report preliminary safety, efficacy, and correlative data for the R/R B-ALL patients dosed with at least 3 x 10 6 CAR-T cells/kg of PBCAR0191, an allogeneic 'off-the-shelf' CD19-directed CAR-T. Methods: Subjects were 18 years or older with CD19+ R/R B-ALL after at least 2 prior lines of therapy. Patients were required to have adequate organ function and no active GvHD, CNS disease, active infections, or other active medical issues. Prior allo-SCT and/or autologous CAR-T therapy were allowed. Subjects received either standard (sLD; 30mg/m2/day and 500mg/m2/day x 3 days fludarabine and cyclophosphamide, respectively) or enhanced (eLD; 30mg/m2/day x 4 days flu and 1000mg/m2/day x 3 days cy) lymphodepletion preceding PBCAR0191 infusion. Correlative laboratory samples were taken for CAR-T expansion, persistence, molecular response to treatment and safety assessments. Results: As of August 2, 2021, 15 subjects with R/R CD19+ B-ALL have been dosed with dose Dose level 3/4a (3 X 10 6 CAR-T cells/kg or equivalent, n=11) or a Dose level 4b (flat dose of 5 X 10 8 CAR-T cells, n=4). Demographics, baseline disease, and prior treatment data are presented in the table. Most of the Adverse events (AE) reported to date were mild, with no cases of GvHD, no Grade ≥3 CRS and 1 case of Grade 3 ICANS which resolved within 48 hours. 67% of subjects treated (10/15) experienced PBCAR0191 related AEs, with 60% (9/15) of subjects experiencing serious AEs (one related to PBCAR0191, ICANS Grade 3). The complete response (CR) or CRi (incomplete marrow recovery) rate at Day ≥28 is 33% (2/6) in DL3/4a and sLD, 80% (4/5) in DL3/4a with eLD and 75% (3/4) in DL4b with sLD. Importantly, 4/15 (27%) responding subjects underwent allo-SCT, with one additional subject not able to receive transplant due to eligibility yet maintaining an MRD- CR for &gt;250 days, and one refusing to proceed with transplant. Product accessibility was evident compared to autologous CAR-T products, with median time from screening completion to PBCAR0191 infusion of 7 days (median of 1 day until start of LD) and all eligible subjects receiving PBCAR0191 infusion. Conclusion: PBCAR0191 has demonstrated a manageable safety profile and high complete response rate at day 28 or later, providing an adequate window for potential bridge to allo-SCT. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Jain: Adaptive Biotechnologies: Honoraria, Research Funding; Precision Biosciences: Honoraria, Research Funding; Cellectis: Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria; Genentech: Honoraria, Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Honoraria, Research Funding; Beigene: Honoraria; TG Therapeutics: Honoraria; Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Research Funding; Aprea Therapeutics: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; AbbVie: Honoraria, Research Funding; Fate Therapeutics: Research Funding; Servier: Honoraria, Research Funding; ADC Therapeutics: Honoraria, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding. Kantarjian: KAHR Medical Ltd: Honoraria; Ascentage: Research Funding; Immunogen: Research Funding; Jazz: Research Funding; Aptitude Health: Honoraria; Ipsen Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria; Precision Biosciences: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; Astra Zeneca: Honoraria; AbbVie: Honoraria, Research Funding; NOVA Research: Honoraria; BMS: Research Funding; Daiichi-Sankyo: Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Astellas Health: Honoraria; Taiho Pharmaceutical Canada: Honoraria. Sauter: Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; GSK: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Gamida Cell: Consultancy; Kite/Gilead: Consultancy; Precision Biosciences: Consultancy; Genmab: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Spectrum Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Juno Therapeutics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Sanofi-Genzyme: Consultancy, Research Funding. Heery: Precision BioSciences: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company, Ended employment in the past 24 months; Arcellx: Current Employment, Current holder of stock options in a privately-held company. List: Halia Therapeutics: Consultancy, Current holder of individual stocks in a privately-held company; CTI Biosciences: Consultancy; Precision BioSciences: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company; Aileron Therapeutics: Consultancy. Johnson: Precision BioSciences, Inc: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Lou: Precision BioSciences: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Vainorius: Precision BioSciences: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company; Abbvie: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company; United Therapeautics: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Olszewski: Genentech, Inc.: Research Funding; TG Therapeutics: Research Funding; PrecisionBio: Research Funding; Celldex Therapeutics: Research Funding; Acrotech Pharma: Research Funding; Genmab: Research Funding. Stein: Amgen: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Speakers Bureau; Stemline: Speakers Bureau. Shah: Adaptive Biotechnologies: Consultancy; Bristol-Myers Squibb/Celgene: Consultancy, Other: Expenses; Novartis: Consultancy, Other: Expenses; Pfizer: Consultancy, Other: Expenses; Amgen: Consultancy; Precision Biosciences: Consultancy; Kite, a Gilead Company: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Expenses, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics/Janssen: Honoraria, Other: Expenses; Acrotech/Spectrum: Honoraria; BeiGene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Incyte: Research Funding; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Servier Genetics: Other. OffLabel Disclosure: PBCAR0191 is not FDA approved

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document