scholarly journals Clofarabine-Based Chemotherapy for KMT2Ar Infantile Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 3406-3406
Author(s):  
Tanja Andrea Gruber ◽  
Deqing Pei ◽  
John Kim Choi ◽  
Cheng Cheng ◽  
Elaine Coustan-Smith ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Stock Options ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Childhood All ◽  
Risk Patients ◽  
Severe Infections ◽  
Privately Held

Abstract Rearrangements in KMT2A (KMT2Ar) are associated with pediatric, adult and therapy-induced acute leukemias. Infants with KMT2Ar acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) have a poor prognosis, with an event-free-survival (EFS) of 33.6-36.9%. In the context of the remarkable improvements in the treatment of childhood ALL, the dismal outcome of infantile KMT2Ar ALL and the lack of any significant progress for more than two decades are striking . The St. Jude Total Therapy 16 study (the most recently reported study of a program for childhood ALL that begun in 1962) yielded a 5-year EFS of 88.2% overall. Total 16 enrolled all subtypes of newly diagnosed pediatric ALL patients including infants, with intensity of treatment adapted to presenting clinical and genomic features, and early treatment response as determined by minimal/measurable residual disease (MRD). KMT2Ar infants were treated on an intensified high-risk arm and received clofarabine in combination with cyclophosphamide and etoposide (CCE) at two points during treatment: Induction days 22-25 and Reinduction I. Infants who lacked KMT2Ar and KMT2Ar patients who were one year of age or older received the same risk-directed treatment plan given to all other patients enrolled on study. A total of 28 patients with KMT2Ar were enrolled on Total 16; the 19 patients > 1 year of age received standard-risk therapy, and the 9 patients < 1 year of age received high-risk therapy on the infant arm with CCE. The probabilities of 5-year EFS and overall survival in KMT2Ar patients > 1 year of age and those < 1 year of age were 73.3% vs. 44.4% (p=0.071) and 84.2% vs. 55.6% (p=0.060), respectively. Six of the nine infants were MRD-positive on Induction day 15 prior to CCE (MRD-positive range, 0.012% to 13.7%; median, 2.13%) with MRD negative status (<0.01%) achieved post CCE in six of the eight patients with data (MRD was 0.011% and 0.07% in the remaining two patients). The trend towards superior outcomes in older KMT2Ar patients was not due to a lower incidence of relapse, as the 5-year cumulative incidence of relapse was 26.7% in patients > 1 year of age and 12.5% for those < 1 year of age (p=0.454). Five infants remain alive (four in CR1, one in CR2), while four expired in CR1. Three deaths were secondary to infection, including a multi-drug resistant soft tissue bacterial infection during Induction days 1-21, a respiratory syncytial virus pneumonia during Reinduction II, and a chronic parainfluenza 3 infection during Continuation weeks 70-101 that led to chronic pneumonitis and interstitial fibrosis. The fourth patient developed grade 5 pulmonary hypertension following induction, a complication potentially compounded by their presenting WBC count of 905 x 10 9/L and pulmonary leukostasis. A comparison of 3-year cumulative risk of selected major toxic effects of treatment revealed that high-risk infants had a lower incidence of asparaginase allergic reactions, osteonecrosis, hyperglycemia, and pancreatitis; in contrast, the incidence of fever and neutropenia, hepatic toxicity and seizures, was similar in high-risk patients regardless of age. Infants had a higher risk of thrombosis (46.7% vs. 23.1%, p<0.001) and of severe infection (70% vs. 19.7%, p<0.001). To further study the contribution of clofarabine to severe infections, we looked at the incidence in high-risk patients > 1 year of age that received one or more clofarabine-containing Reintensification chemotherapy cycles prior to hematopoietic stem cell transplant in first remission (CR1). This revealed a higher frequency of infections in infants, suggesting a greater susceptibility to this complication independent from clofarabine exposure (mean number of episodes, 2.39 vs. 1, p<0.001, Poisson regression modeling). In conclusion, treatment of infants with KMT2Ar ALL with chemotherapy including high-intensity clofarabine leads to a lower cumulative incidence of relapse but a higher risk of treatment-related mortality. Severe infections were a major cause of morbidity and mortality. Disclosures Gruber: Kura Oncology: Consultancy. Coustan-Smith: Juno Therapeutics: Patents & Royalties; Nkarta Therapeutics: Current holder of individual stocks in a privately-held company; Medisix Therapeutics: Current holder of individual stocks in a privately-held company. Campana: Nkarta Therapeutics: Current holder of stock options in a privately-held company; Medisix Therapeutics: Current holder of stock options in a privately-held company; Juno: Other: patent licensing payments; Juno Therapeutics (a Bristol-Myers Squibb company),: Other: patents on methods for minimal residual disease detection.. Evans: St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Emeritus Member (began Jan 2021): Ended employment in the past 24 months; BioSkryb, Inc.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Scientific Advisory Board, Chair: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Pui: Adaptive Biotechnologies: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Other: Data Monitoring Committee.

scholarly journals Diagnostic Tumor Mirna Profiling Predicts Molecular Relapse in Mantle Cell Lymphoma Patients Prospectively Followed for Minimal Residual Disease. Results from the Nordic MCL2-3 Trials

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 2994-2994
Author(s):  
Simon Husby ◽  
Lone Bredo Pedersen ◽  
Ulrik Ralfkiær ◽  
Christian Garde ◽  
Sara Ek ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Mantle Cell ◽  
Risk Patients ◽  
Minimal Residual

Abstract Background Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is a subtype of non-Hodgkin`s lymphoma (NHL) with a variable but often aggressive clinical course. The majority of MCL patients ≤65 years will experience clinical relapse during a 10-year period (Geisler et al. Br J Haematol 2012). Risk-stratification is therefore of great importance in order to identify patients who are eligible for novel or alternative treatment regimens. Minimal residual disease (MRD) monitoring can predict clinical progression in MCL and guide pre-emptive treatment with rituximab as single agent. It has thus far not been possible to predict post-treatment molecular relapse (MRD-positivity). Although some recent studies have shown that aberrant miRNA expression delineate pathogenic molecular pathways and predict survival in MCL patients, miRNA profiling has not been performed in the context of MRD and molecular relapse. Aims We assessed MCL miRNA expression, in a large, prospective, uniformly treated patient cohort followed with molecular markers for MRD to determine if miRNAs could predict molecular relapse. Methods Diagnostic MCL tumor samples from 114 patients in the Nordic MCL2 and MCL3 clinical trials were retrieved. All patients had confirmed CyclinD1 overexpression and 96 patients had Ki-67 expression measurement for use in the MIPI-B predictive score. All patients received almost identical induction treatment with six alternating cycles of maxi-CHOP and high-dose Ara-C in combination with rituximab. Patients in remission were consolidated with high dose chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation. All patients had a molecular marker (PCR detectable t(11;14) or clonal IgH rearrangement) for MRD. The median follow-up was 6.4 years for the MCL2 cohort and 3.7 years for the MCL3 cohort. 19 miRNAs, previously found to have prognostic significance in MCL (Husby et al EHA 2014), were measured by qRT-PCR and analyzed in concordance with MRD-data. The main endpoint was first event of molecular relapse (MRD-positive sample). Results Of the 114 patients in the study, 71 (62%) patients became MRD-positive in the follow-up period. Of the 19 examined miRNAs, 10 miRNAs showed unique qPCR melting curves and were analyzed with respect to MRD. Four miRNAs (miR-92a, miR-3687, miR-486-5p and miR-185-5p) were significantly up-regulated in patients who had molecular relapse (t-test; respectively p = 0.010, p = 0.019, p = 0.048, p = 0.043). However miR-18b, previously identified as prognostic marker regarding survival, was not significantly overexpressed. We hereafter investigated if a newly derived prognostic score, the MIPI-B-miR, which incorporates miR-18b with the MIPI-B, could predict molecular relapse. The MIPI-B-miR high-risk patients had significantly shorter time to first molecular relapse than MIPI-B high-risk patients (Figure 1). Functional studies of these aberrantly expressed miRs are ongoing. Conclusion Patients with molecular relapse had significantly increased levels of miR-92a, miR-3687, miR-486-5p and miR-185-5p, and MIPI-B-miR improved MRD prediction compared to MIPI-B. Aberrant miRNA profiles may be able to predict molecular relapse, and may already at diagnosis identify patients eligible to anti-CD20 antibody maintenance or alternative regimens. However validation in other cohorts is needed. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Kolstad: Nordic Nanovector: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Räty:GlaxoSmithKline Ltd: Honoraria; Roche Ltd: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Mundipharma: Honoraria.

scholarly journals Evaluation of Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) By Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) Is Highly Predictive of Progression Free Survival in the IFM/DFCI 2009 Trial

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 191-191 ◽  
Author(s):  
Herve Avet-Loiseau ◽  
Jill Corre ◽  
Valerie Lauwers-Cances ◽  
Marie-Lorraine Chretien ◽  
Nelly Robillard ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Marrow ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Young Patients ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
High Risk Patients ◽  
Risk Patients

Abstract Evaluation of MRD in multiple myeloma (MM) is becoming an important trial endpoint, especially in young patients. With current intensive approaches, the complete remission (CR) rates are up to 70%, making conventional evaluations of response quite useless. More sensitive tools are mandatory. Two techniques may help investigators to reach this goal, flow cytometry (FCM) and NGS. We applied both techniques to the IFM part of the IFM/DFCI 2009 trial. Briefly, this trial enrolled 700 patients under 66 years of age who were randomized to receive either 8 cycles of VRD (Velcade®-Revlimid®-Dexamethasone) (arm A), or 3 VRD cycles, high-dose melphalan, followed by two consolidation VRD cycles (arm B). All patients received a lenalidomide maintenance for 12 months. A bone marrow MRD evaluation was planned before and after maintenance for all patients achieving at least very good partial response (VGPR). A one-mL bone marrow aspirate was sent overnight to one of the central labs. The primary purpose was to assess MRD by FCM. When extra cells were available, they were frozen as a dry pellet for NGS analyses, using the LymphoSight® platform (Sequenta/Adaptive Inc.). A total of 246 patients have been evaluated by NGS before maintenance and 178 after maintenance. Patients were classified in 3 categories: negative (< 10-6), low-positive (between 10-4 and 10-6), and positive (> 10-4). At pre-maintenance, 87 patients were negative, 80 were low-positive, and 79 were positive. At post-maintenance, these numbers were respectively 86, 52, and 40. Using a cutoff at 10-6, patients below 10-6 at pre-maintenance presented a 3-year PFS at 83%, vs 53% for patients > 10-6. At post-maintenance, these % were 90% and 59% respectively. When restricted to patients in CR, the 3-year PFS was 87% and 63% at pre-maintenance, and 92% and 64% at post-maintenance (Figure). Finally, we compared the two MRD techniques. Using a 7-color FCM strategy, the sensitivity level was 10-4. Amongst the 163 patients negative with the FCM approach, 84 (51 %) patients were positive using NGS and among 72 patients positive with FCM, 67 (93%) were also positive using NGS. In the subgroup of patients with negative MRD using FCM, the 3 year PFS was 86% for NGS negative patients vs 66 % for NGS positive at pre-maintenance and 91% vs 65% at post maintenance. Looking at high-risk patients, 26 patients with t(4;14), and 16 with del(17p) were evaluated. Half of the t(4;14) patients achieved MRD negativity, versus only 1/16 patients with del(17p). Interestingly, 9/13 patients with t(4;14) who achieved MRD negativity, and 0/1 patients with del(17p) did not relapse, showing the importance of achieving deep response in these high-risk patients. In conclusion, this study clearly demonstrates that a sensitive technique like NGS is able to predict PFS in patients treated with modern approaches. Figure 1. Figure 1. Disclosures Avet-Loiseau: Takeda: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding. Hulin:celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; jansen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Arnulf:Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Garderet:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy. Karlin:Sandoz: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria. MACRO:millenium: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; jansen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Richardson:Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene Corporation: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Millennium Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gentium S.p.A.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Faham:Adaptive Biotechnologies: Employment, Equity Ownership. Facon:Onyx: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Millenium: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pierre Fabre: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Moreau:Novartis: Honoraria, Other: Adboard; Takeda: Other: Adboard; Celgene: Honoraria, Other: Adboard; Janssen: Honoraria, Other: Adboard; Takeda: Honoraria, Other: Adboard; Amgen: Other: Adboard; Amgen: Other: Adboard; Novartis: Other: Adboard. Attal:celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; jansen: Honoraria.

scholarly journals A Phase II Single Arm Study of Nivolumab As Maintenance Therapy after Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation in Patients with Hodgkin Lymphoma at Risk of Relapse or Progression

Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 2455-2455
Author(s):  
Carlos Bachier ◽  
Henning Schade ◽  
Behyar Zoghi ◽  
Aravind Ramakrishnan ◽  
Nirav N. Shah
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cell ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Maintenance Therapy ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Hodgkin Lymphoma ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Refractory Disease ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Extranodal Disease

Abstract Introduction: Autologous stem cell transplants (ASCT) are standard of care for patients with primary refractory or recurrent Hodgkin lymphoma (HL). While transplant results in cure for some patients, others relapse and succumb from their disease. Studies have found high expression of programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) in HL cells. The anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibody, nivolumab, has been safe and efficacious in the treatment of relapsed, refractory HL (Ansell et al. 2015). We evaluated the safety and efficacy of nivolumab maintenance therapy post-ASCT in high risk for relapse Hodgkin disease. Methods: Patients with HL with high risk of residual disease following ASCT ( high risk defined as refractory disease, relapse &lt;12 months, or relapse ≥12 months with extranodal disease after frontline therapy) received nivolumab (240 mg IV every 2 weeks) starting 45-180 days post-transplant for a maximum of 6 months of treatment. Patients were followed for AEs through 100 days after the last dose of drug. PET-CT response assessments were performed 1-3 month, 6 month, and 12 month post-ASCT. The primary objective was to evaluate the safety and tolerability of nivolumab as maintenance therapy early after ASCT. The secondary objective was to evaluate progression-free survival (PFS) at 12 months post-transplant. Results: To date, 37 patients were enrolled; median age 36 years; 25 patients (68%) male. The median number of prior systemic regimens was 2 (range 2-4). 25 patients (68%) had relapsed disease, and 12 patients (32%) had primary refractory disease. 18 patients (49%) had extranodal disease at relapse, 6 patients (16%) had B-symptoms at relapse, and 11 patients (30%) had residual disease after salvage, including 10 patients (27%) of whom had 2-3 prior salvage therapies. 22 patients (60%) had received prior brentuximab, and 3 patients (8%) had received prior nivolumab or pembrolizumab. 36 patients received ASCT and 1 patient received tandem ASCT. At the time of data cutoff, 28 patients (76%) had discontinued nivolumab treatment, 22 patients (60%) because they had completed the 6-month treatment course, 4 patients (11%) due to an adverse event (AE) (1 patient each with pain, pneumonitis, rhabdomyolysis, or hypothyroidism), and 2 patients (5%) due to disease progression. The median duration of treatment was 22.1 weeks. 17 patients (46%) experienced a treatment-related AE (TRAE), of which 5 patients (14%) experienced a ≥Grade 3 TRAE. The most common (≥5%) TRAEs were diarrhea, fatigue, bone pain, neutrophil count decreased, pruritus, rash, and vomiting. 2 patients experienced a treatment-related serious AE (pneumonitis, rhabdomyolysis). There were no treatment-related deaths. With a median follow up of 9.2 months, the median PFS and overall survival (OS) have not been reached. The 6 month PFS is 92.1% and the 12-month OS is 100%. There were no differences in OS when stratified based on prior treatment. Conclusions: The use of nivolumab maintenance early after ASCT is safe and tolerable in this high risk patient population. Early efficacy data is promising, but data need to mature to determine the 12 month PFS. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Bachier: CRISPR: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Autolus: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Nkarta: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Mana: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Shah: Umoja: Consultancy; Incyte: Consultancy; Legend: Consultancy; Kite: Consultancy; Miltenyi Biotec: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Lily: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Epizyme: Consultancy.

scholarly journals Bleeding Complications in Patients with Cancer and COVID 19- Analysis from the COVID 19and Cancer Consortium (CCC19) Registry

Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 4997-4997
Author(s):  
Surbhi Shah ◽  
Shuchi Gulati ◽  
Ang Li ◽  
Julie Fu ◽  
Vaibhav Kumar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Stock Options ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Tumor Board ◽  
Bleeding Complications ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Icu Admission ◽  
Patients With Cancer ◽  
Privately Held

Abstract Background : Patients (pts) with COVID-19 are reported to have increased risk of venous thromboembolism yet bleeding has been an under recognized complication. Rates of bleeding remain unexamined in all patients especially in pts with cancer and COVID-19. Aim: To estimate the incidence of bleeding complication in patients with cancer and COVID 19 Methods: The CCC19 international registry (NCT04354701) aims to investigate complications of COVID-19 in pts with cancer. Our aim was to investigate the frequency of bleeding in hospitalized adult pts with cancer andCOVID-19, enrolled between March 16, 2020 and Feb 8, 2021. The incidence of bleeding complications was captured as defined by CCC19 and included both major and non major bleeding . Associated baseline clinic-pathologic prognostic factors and outcomes such as need for mechanical ventilation, intensive care unit (ICU) admission and mortality rates were assessed Results :3849 pts met analysis inclusion criteria. Bleeding was reported in 276 (7%) pts with median age of 70years; incidence was 6.6 % in females and 7.6 % in males, 6.5% in non-Hispanic white pts, 8.2 % in non-Hispanic Black pts, and 7.8 % in Hispanic pts. 74% had solid cancer and 29% had hematologic malignancies, 33% had received anti-cancer therapy in preceding 30 days, and 8% had surgery within 4weeks. In pts taking antiplatelet or anticoagulant medications at baseline, 7.2% developed bleeding. Need for mechanical ventilation, ICU admission, 30-day mortality, and total mortality were significantly higher in those with bleeding complications compared to those without, p&lt;0.05 Conclusion : We describe the incidence of bleeding in a large cohort of pts with cancer and COVID-19. Bleeding events were observed in those with adverse outcomes including mechanical ventilation, ICU admission, and high mortality; the overall mortality of 43% in patients with bleeding complications is especially notable. This important complication may reflect underlying COVID-19 pathophysiology as well as iatrogenic causes. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Kumar: Diagnostica Stago: Honoraria. Zon: AMAGMA AND RLZ: Consultancy, Current holder of individual stocks in a privately-held company. Byeff: Pfizer, BMS, Takeda,Teva, Merck, United health: Consultancy, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company, Current holder of stock options in a privately-held company. Nagaraj: Novartis: Research Funding. Hwang: astrazaneca,Merck,bayer, Genentech: Consultancy, Research Funding. McKay: Myovant: Consultancy; Bayer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Exelixis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Calithera: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Tempus: Research Funding; Merck: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Tempus: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sanofi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Dendreon: Consultancy; Caris: Other: Serves as a molecular tumor board ; Vividion: Consultancy; Sorrento Therapeutics: Consultancy; Bayer: Research Funding. Warner: Westat, Hemonc.org: Consultancy, Current holder of stock options in a privately-held company. Connors: Pfizer: Honoraria; CSL Behring: Research Funding; Alnylam: Consultancy; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria; takeda: Honoraria; Abbott: Consultancy. Rosovsky: Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding; Inari: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Dova: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

scholarly journals Personalized therapy in pediatric high-risk B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia

2020 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
pp. 204062072092757 ◽  
Author(s):  
Seth E. Karol ◽  
Ching-Hon Pui
Keyword(s):  
Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
Pediatric Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
Risk Patients ◽  
Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
Disease Stratification ◽  
Cure Rates ◽  
Minimal Residual

Although cure rates for pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) have now risen to more than 90%, subsets of patients with high-risk features continue to experience high rates of treatment failure and relapse. Recent work in minimal residual disease stratification and leukemia genomics have increased the ability to identify and classify these high-risk patients. In this review, we discuss this work to identify and classify patients with high-risk ALL. Novel therapeutics, which may have the potential to improve outcomes for these patients, are also discussed.

ABVD Versus Escalated Beacopp in Advanced Stage Hodgkin's Lymphoma: Results from a Retrospective, Multicenter European Study

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 1565-1565 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patrizia Mondello ◽  
Irene Dogliotti ◽  
Jan-Paul Bohn ◽  
Federica Cavallo ◽  
Simone Ferrero ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Advanced Stage ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
High Risk Patients ◽  
Risk Patients

Purpose: Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL) is a highly curable disease even in advanced-stage, with &gt;90% of long-term survivors. Currently, the standard of care is ABVD (doxorubicin, etoposide, vinblastine and dacarbazine), as it is less toxic and as effective as other more intensive chemotherapy regimens. Alternatively, BEACOPP (bleomycin, etoposide, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, procarbazine and prednisone) has been proposed as front-line intensified regimen with a better initial disease control and prolonged time to relapse when compared to ABVD. However, this advantage is associated with higher rates of severe hematologic toxicity, treatment-related deaths, secondary neoplasms and infertility. To date, the debate regarding which regimen should be preferred as first line for advanced-stage HL is still ongoing. To shed some light on this open question we compared efficacy and safety of both regimens in clinical practice. Patients and Methods: From October 2009 to October 2018, patients with HL stage III-IV treated with either ABVD or BEACOPP escalated (BEACOPPesc) were retrospectively assessed in 7 European cancer centers. Results: A total of 372 consecutive patients were included in the study. One-hundred and ten patients were treated with BEACOPPesc and 262 with ABVD. The baseline characteristics of the two groups did not differ significantly, except for a higher rate of high-risk patients in the BEACOPPesc group in contrast to the ABVD one (47% vs 18%; p= 0.003). Complete response rate (CR) assessed by PET imaging at the end of the second cycle was 67% and 78% for the ABVD and BEACOPPesc group (p= 0.003), respectively. Thirteen patients of the ABVD group achieved stable disease (SD) and 6 had a progression disease (PD). On the other hand, 4 of the patients in the BEACOPPesc group progressed, another 2 interrupted therapy because life-threatening toxicity. At the end of the therapy, CR was 76% in the ABVD group and 85% in the BEACOPPesc group (p= 0.01). A total of 20% patients in the ABVD group and 14% patients in the BEACOPPesc group received consolidation radiotherapy on the mediastinal mass at the dose of 30Gy. After radiotherapy, the number of patients with CR increased to 79% and 87% in the two groups (p= 0.041), respectively. Thirty-nine patients (35%) in the BEACOPPesc group required dose reduction of chemotherapy due to toxicity compared to 12 patients (5%; p= &lt;0.001) in the ABVD group. Overall, the rate of severe toxicities was higher in the BEACOPPesc group in comparison with the ABVD cohort. In particular, there was a significant increased frequency of acute grade 3-4 hematologic adverse events (neutropenia 61% vs 24%; anemia 29% vs 4%; thrombocytopenia 29% vs 3%), febrile neutropenia (29% vs 3%), severe infections (18% vs 3%). Myeloid growth factors were administered to 85% and 59% of patients in the BEACOPPesc group compared to the ABVD group. Blood transfusions were required in 51% and 6% of patients in the BEACOPPesc group compared to the ABVD cohort. Progression during or shortly after treatment occurred in 5 patients in the BEACOPPesc group (4%) and in 16 patients in the ABVD group (6%; p= 0.62). Among the 96 patients who achieved a CR after BEACOPPesc and radiotherapy, 8 relapsed (8%), compared to 29 of 208 patients in the ABVD group (14%; p= 0.04). At a median follow-up period of 5 years, no statistical difference in progression free survival (PFS; p=0.11) and event-free survival (EFS; p=0.22) was observed between the BEACOPPesc and ABVD cohorts. Similarly, overall survival (OS) did not differ between the two groups (p=0.14). The baseline international prognostic score (IPS &lt;3 vs ≥ 3) significantly influenced the EFS with an advantage for the high-risk group treated with BEACOPPesc (Figure 1A; p=0.03), but not the PFS (Figure 1B; p=0.06) and OS (Figure 1C; p=0.14). During the follow-up period, in the BEACOPPesc group one patient developed myelodysplasia and one acute leukemia. Second solid tumors developed in one patient in the ABVD group (lung cancer) and one in BEACOPPesc group (breast cancer). Conclusion: We confirm that the ABVD regimen is an effective and less toxic therapeutic option for advanced-stage HL. Although BEACOPP results in better initial tumor control especially in high-risk patients, the long-term outcome remains similar between the two regimens. Disclosures Ferrero: EUSA Pharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Servier: Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Gilead: Speakers Bureau. Martinelli:BMS: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; ARIAD: Consultancy; Roche: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy. Willenbacher:European Commission: Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Myelom- und Lymphomselbsthilfe Österreich: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Gilead Science: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; IQVIA: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Merck: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; oncotyrol: Employment, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Fujimoto: Consultancy, Honoraria; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sanofi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Tirol Program: Research Funding; Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria; Sandoz: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Single Immunophenotypical Evaluation of Minimal Residual Disease before Autotransplantation of Non-Cryopreserved Bone Marrow Is Insufficient for Prediction of Outcome in High Risk Adult Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia.

Blood ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 104 (11) ◽  
pp. 4439-4439
Author(s):  
Beata M. Stella-Holowiecka ◽  
Krystyna Jagoda ◽  
Aleksandra M. Holowiecka-Goral ◽  
Tomasz Czerw ◽  
Sebastian Giebel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Marrow ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Minimal Residual Disease ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
Conditioning Regimen ◽  
Long Term Results ◽  
Color Flow ◽  
Childhood All ◽  
Minimal Residual

Abstract For high-risk adult ALL patients alloHCT is a preferable option. However, a significant proportion of those not having a suitable donor may be successfully treated with autotransplantation (autoHCT). Based on our experience this treatment ensures low transplant related mortality below 3% and a reasonable overall survival and disease free survival of 60% and 45% respectively. The status of the disease before transplantation is an important factor for long term results. In childhood ALL most studies suggest that the level of minimal residual disease (MRD) after induction evaluated immunophenotypically or with bio-molecular methods is predictive for outcome after different treatments including chemotherapy, alloHCT and autoHCT. The results in adult ALL are more controversial. Patients selection. Among 1205 haematopoetic cell transplantations performed in our institution 224 (147 autologous, 77 allogeneic) were performed in 205 adults with ALL. For this study we selected an uniform group of 81 patients fulfilling following criteria’s: Ph (-) ALL, status CR1, evaluable MRD, strictly defined autoBMT procedure performed until the end of 2003. Methods. MRD was tested before autoBMT (median interval 10 days) using 2 ore 3-color flow-cytometry, as appropriate. The atypical immunophenotypes were evaluated using the “quadrans” analysis in all cases and since 2002 also the “empty spaces” technique. The sensitivity equals at least 0.0001. For all autoHSCT bone marrow was used as a source of stem cells. The CAV conditioning regimen consisted of cyclophosphamide 60mg/kg on d. -3, -2, cytarabine 2 g/m2 d. -3, -2, -1, etoposide 800 mg/m2 d. -3, -2. Bone marrow was not cryo-preserved after collection but stored in 40 C and re-transplanted after 72h. Results. In 41 patients; age med. 26 y (15–53), F/M=12/29, the MRD level was &lt;0,001: the MRD (−) group. In 40 patients; age med. 29 y (16–53), F/M=18/22, the MRD was detected at the level =/&gt; 0,001; MRD+ group. The ALL-immunophenotypes of MRD−/MRD+ groups were as follows; proB 4/7, preB 2/6, Common 18/19, B 0/1, preT 5/2, T 12/1). The interval from DGN to BMT was similar in both groups. The probability of LFS and OS at 10y calculated with median follow up time of 5y equaled; in the MRD(−) group 47% and 62% and in the MRD+ one 48% and 57% respectively (p=ns). The main reason of failure in both groups was a relapse which occurred after a median time of 277 days in the MRD(−) group and 134 days in MRD+ one (p=0.19). Conclusion and comment. Based on this observation we conclude that a single evaluation stratifying patients before autoBMT according to MRD level below or above 0.001 is not predictive for DFS and OS, because it informs only about the current amount of the disease but not about its opportunistic nature. In this respect a repeatedly confirmed MRD positivity should be more significant. Taking into consideration that the main reason of failures were relapses, this finding suggests also that in patients with chemotherapy-responsive ALL confirmed by stabile CR, the myeloablative CAV regimen is sufficiently strong to eliminate the residual disease at the level ranging 0.01–0.001. It may be speculated only that the 72h lasting incubation of bone marrow product before re-transplantation has also some kind of purging effect for leukemic blasts.

Final Analysis of a Randomized Comparison of ABVD Chemotherapy with a Strategy That Includes Radiation Therapy (RT) in Patients with Limited-Stage Hodgkin Lymphoma (HL): NCIC CTG/ECOG HD.6

Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 590-590 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ralph M. Meyer ◽  
Mary Gospodarowicz ◽  
Joseph M. Connors ◽  
Robert G Pearcey ◽  
Woodrow A Wells ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Disease Progression ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Final Analysis ◽  
Primary Analysis ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Limited Stage ◽  
Risk Patients ◽  
Single Modality

Abstract Abstract 590FN2 Background: The NCIC CTG / ECOG HD.6 trial is based on the hypothesis that for patients with limited-stage HL, treatment with single-modality ABVD provides comparable disease control, is associated with a reduced incidence of deaths due to late treatment effects and thus might improve long-term survival in comparison with treatment that includes extended-field RT. In this randomized controlled phase III trial, our primary objective was to compare the 12-yr overall survivals (OS) of limited-stage HL patients treated with ABVD alone with those receiving therapy that includes RT. Secondary outcomes include freedom from disease progression (FFDP), in which those dying prior to disease progression are censored, and event-free survival (EFS), in which the first of disease progression or death is considered an event. In 2005, we published 5-yr outcomes (median follow-up 4.2 yrs [Meyer, J Clin Oncol]). We now report results of the final analysis. Methods: Eligible patients had non-bulky clinical stage I-IIA HL; patients with subdiaphragmatic disease were eligible if disease was confined to the iliac, inguinal and/or femoral regions. Prior to randomization, patients were stratified into low and high-risk categories; low-risk patients had all of lymphocyte predominant or nodular sclerosis histology, age < 40 yrs, ESR < 50, and involvement of 3 or fewer disease-site regions; all others were high-risk. Patients randomized to therapy that includes RT received single-modality subtotal nodal irradiation (STNI) if low-risk and combined-modality ABVD (2 cycles) plus STNI if high-risk. All patients randomized to the experimental arm received single-modality ABVD (4 cycles); those not demonstrating a complete remission with restaging after 2 cycles received 6 cycles. Between March 1994 and April 2002, 405 patients were entered; 399 were eligible and included in the primary analysis (modified intent–to-treat [ITT]). The clinical cut-off date for follow-up was 2010/DEC/31 and the database was locked on 2011/JUL/15. All P-values are 2-sided. Results: The median duration of follow-up is 11.3 yrs. The OS was superior in patients randomized to ABVD (P=.04; HR=0.5; 12-yr estimates 94% vs. 87%). In comparison with patients randomized to therapy that includes RT, FFDP trended to being inferior in patients randomized to ABVD (P=.07; HR=1.82; 12-yr estimates 88% vs. 92%); no differences in EFS were detected (P=.5; HR=0.87; 12-yr estimates 86% vs. 80%). Sensitivity analyses included a true ITT evaluating all randomized patients and adding data obtained between the clinical cut-off and data-lock dates; results were robust and yielded similar findings. Causes of death in ABVD vs. RT-arm patients (N = 12 vs. 24) included HL or early treatment complication (6 vs. 4), second cancers (4 vs. 9), and other (2 vs. 11). Analysis of high-risk patients allocated to ABVD (N=137) vs. ABVD+STNI (N=139) showed similar respective results to the primary analysis: in comparison with those randomized to RT, OS was superior in the ABVD arm (12-yr estimates 92% vs. 81%; HR=.47; P=.04), FFDP was inferior (12-yr estimates 87% vs. 94%; HR=3.03; P=.01) and no differences in EFS were detected (12-yr estimates 84% vs. 78%; HR=.87; P=.6). Late-effects trended to being less frequent in ABVD patients, including second cancers (6.1% vs. 10.8%) and cardiac events (9.7% vs. 14.8%). Conclusions: We conclude that in patients with limited-stage HL, ABVD improves OS as compared with treatment that includes STNI, including combined modality therapy, because it is associated with fewer deaths from causes other than HL. The HD.6 trial hypothesis was thus confirmed. With respect to modern RT approaches, the implications of our results are: i) at 12 years, 88% of patients are disease-free and more than 90% are alive when initially treated with ABVD alone; ii) limitations exist in using FFDP as a proxy measure for OS when late treatment effects may occur; and, iii) when treatment strategies have competing risks, long-term follow-up provides crucial insights into the interpretations of best therapy. Disclosures: Connors: Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Research Funding. Horning:Genentech: Employment, Equity Ownership. Crump:Millennium Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Ortho Johnson & Johnson: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Roche: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Minimal Residual Disease At 3 Months, Combined to the Presence of IKZF1 Deletion in B-Lineage or Absence of NOTCH1 pathway Mutation in T-Lineage, Recapitulates the Disease Risk Assessment in Adults with Philadelphia Chromosome-Negative Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia - A GRAALL Study

Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 572-572 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kheira Beldjord ◽  
Elizabeth Macintyre ◽  
Véronique Lhéritier ◽  
Marie-Laure Boulland ◽  
Thibaut Leguay ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Minimal Residual Disease ◽  
Disease Risk ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
Philadelphia Chromosome ◽  
Cns Involvement ◽  
Risk Patients ◽  
Minimal Residual

Abstract Abstract 572 Aim. In recent series of adults with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), the GRAALL (ASH 2009, abstract 577) and other cooperative groups have confirmed the strong prognostic value of Ig/TCR minimal residual disease (MRD) on patient outcome. Despite this, age, WBC, CNS involvement, recurrent chromosomal translocations, and early response to steroids and chemotherapy remain frequently used to tailor post-remission therapy and envision allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT) in most adult ALL trials. We updated our MRD study, now with 262 patients who all achieved complete remission (CR) after the first induction and were assessed for MRD after induction (MRD1, at 6 weeks) and consolidation (MRD2, at 12 weeks). One hundred and fifty-eight patients had Philadelphia chromosome (Ph)-negative B-cell precursor ALL (BCP-ALL), while 104 had T-cell ALL (T-ALL). Since 107 of the BCP-ALL (68%) were studied for IKZF1 deletion and 90 of the T-ALL patients (87%) for NOTCH1/FBXW7 mutations, we were able to reassess the MRD significance according to these newly described oncogenic markers. These two covariates (i.e. MRD and IKZF1/NOTCH1/FBXW7 genetics) allowed us to redefine a much simpler yet more powerful stratification of disease risk in both BCP- ALL and T-ALL subsets. Methods. All 262 patients studied (median age, 31.5 years) were treated in the GRAALL-2003 and GRAALL-2005 trials. Although they were younger and had more frequently circulating blasts, other characteristics and outcome did not differ from patients treated in the same trials but not assessed for MRD. Ig/TCR MRD levels were determined according to Euro-MRD guidelines (Leukemia 2007;21:604). IKZF1 deletions were assessed by multiplex multi-fluorescent PCR. NOTCH1/FBXW7 mutations were assessed as previously described (Blood 2009;113:3918). Multivariate backward stepwise selection Cox models were used for the cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR), disease-free (DFS) and overall survival (OS) endpoints, after censoring transplanted patients at SCT. Models were always adjusted on age (35-year cutoff), WBC (30 and 100 G/L cutoff for BCP- and T-ALL, respectively), CNS involvement, and trial. Additional BCP-specific covariates included CD20 expression, t(4;11) and t(1;19) translocations, and IKZF1 deletion. Additional T-specific covariates included cortical immunophenotype according to the EGIL classification, TLX1 overexpression, and NOTCH1/FBXW7 mutation. Finally, allogeneic SCT was re-evaluated in the newly defined risk subsets, as a time-dependent covariate. Results. An initial multivariate analysis revealed that among blood response after 1 week of steroid, bone marrow response after 2 weeks of therapy, and molecular response at both MRD1 and MRD2 time-points, the MRD2 level was the main and sole independent predictor of relapse (P=0.003). In BCP-ALL patients, persistent MRD2 and IKZF1 deletion were the only two independent factors identified, the presence of at least one factor defining 51% high-risk patients with 52% versus 15% CIR (HR, 3.8; P= 0.008), 41% versus 81% DFS (HR, 3.6; P= 0.005), and 54% versus 80% OS (HR, 3.9; P= 0.015) at 4 years. Allogeneic SCT in first CR significantly decreased relapse incidence and prolonged DFS in these new high-risk BCP-ALL patients (HR, 0.23 and 0.40; P= 0.016 and 0.05, respectively). In T-ALL patients, persistent MRD2 and lack of NOTCH1/FBXW7 mutation were the only two independent factors identified, the presence of at least one factor defining 49% high-risk patients with 64% versus 12% CIR (HR, 6.4; P= 0.002), 36% versus 88% DFS (HR, 6.4; P= 0.002), and 41% versus 95% OS (HR, 7.3; P= 0.015) at 4 years. SCT had no significant effect on relapse incidence and DFS in these new high-risk T-ALL patients. Conclusion. In adult patients with Ph-negative ALL treated with the pediatric-inspired GRAALL regimen, IKZF1 deletion in BCP-ALL, NOTCH1/FBXW7 mutation in T-ALL, and MRD at 3 months in both subsets replace all classical risk factors, leading to a new simplified prognostic scoring system based only on IKZF1 and NOTCH1/FBXW7 genetics and MRD clearance. This new risk score identifies approximately half of the patients as good-risk, with a relapse incidence as low as 10–15%. It will be validated and used prospectively in the next generation of GRAALL trials, to stratify both new drug evaluation and SCT in first CR. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Early Versus Deferred Treatment With Combined Fludarabine, Cyclophosphamide and Rituximab (FCR) Improves Event-Free Survival In Patients With High-Risk Binet Stage A Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia – First Results Of a Randomized German-French Cooperative Phase III Trial

Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 524-524 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carmen D Schweighofer ◽  
Florence Cymbalista ◽  
Carolin Müller ◽  
Raymonde Busch ◽  
Raphael Porcher ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Event Free Survival ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Phase Iii Trial ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Risk Patients ◽  
Binet Stage

Abstract Introduction Patients with asymptomatic early Rai or Binet stage chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) do not benefit from mono-chemotherapy. Therefore, clinical observation without treatment (watch&wait; W&W) has been the gold standard for the management of these patients. Chemoimmunotherapy with FCR improves the outcome of patients with advanced CLL, but its efficacy in early stage disease has not been investigated. Several clinical and biological variables identify those patients who have a high risk of an aggressive disease course and who might benefit from early interventions. Consequently, this trial was conducted to test the value of FCR treatment in patients with early stage, high-risk CLL. Methods This report represents the endpoint and safety analysis of a randomized German-French cooperative phase III trial comparing the efficacy of early versus deferred FCR therapy in treatment-naïve Binet stage A CLL patients with a high risk of disease progression. Risk assessment was performed using 4 prognostic markers: Lymphocyte doubling time <12 months, serum thymidine kinase >10 U/L, an unmutated immunoglobulin heavy chain variable region gene (IGHV) status, and presence of unfavorable cytogenetics (del11q, del17p, trisomy 12) by fluorescence-in-situ hybridization. Presence of at least 2 versus less than 2 of these factors defined “high-risk” versus “low-risk” CLL. High-risk CLL patients were further randomized to receive either 6 cycles FCR (HR-FCR) or to be followed by a W&W strategy (HR-W&W). Patients with low-risk CLL were observed only (LR-W&W). Results Between 2005 and 2010, a total of 824 patients was enrolled, 423 patients in 69 centers of the German CLL Study Group and 401 patients in 25 centers of the French Cooperative Group on CLL. The diagnosis of CLL needed to be established no longer than 12 months prior to enrollment and patients were required to present with previously untreated stage Binet A CLL at the time of inclusion. Overall, 800 patients (97.1%) were stratified, 201 of them categorized as high-risk CLL (25.1%). There was no significant difference between high-risk patients from the two study groups regarding common baseline characteristics (e.g., age, sex, comorbidity, immunophenotype) and the distribution of risk factors used for stratification. 100 out of 201 high-risk patients were randomized to receive FCR therapy (HR-FCR), while 101 patients were allocated to the HR-W&W arm. 18 out of 100 patients (18%) withdrew consent for FCR therapy before treatment was started. 71 (86.6%) of 82 treated patients completed ≥4 cycles. The most common of 228 CTC grade III/IV adverse events reported within 12 months after treatment initiation were hematotoxicity (73.2% of patients) and infections (19.5% of patients). Three patients (3.7%) developed fatal CTC grade V infections (2 septic bacteremias, 1 of them with pulmonary aspergillosis; 1 encephalitis). Out of 79 patients available for response assessment until month 12 after treatment start, 76 showed a complete or partial remission (ORR 96.2%), 2 patients had stable disease (2.5%) and 1 patient had progressed (1.3%). After a median follow up of 46 months (range 0-88 months), HR-FCR patients demonstrated a significantly improved event-free survival (EFS) compared to HR-W&W patients (median EFS not reached versus 24.5 months, respectively, P<0.0001, Fig. 1). Overall survival was not significantly different between HR-FCR and HR-W&W with 181 high-risk patients (90%) being alive at last follow up. Both, HR-FCR and HR-W&W patients exhibited a significant shorter event-free and overall survival than LR-W&W patients, demonstrating an efficient prognostic segregation of patients by the risk assessment used for this trial (analysis based on the German LR-W&W cohort only, complete German-French LR-W&W data will be presented at the meeting). Conclusion This is the first randomized phase III trial investigating the efficacy of FCR chemoimmunotherapy in early stage CLL. So far, the study has revealed two major results: 1. A combination of clinical and biological factors can be used to identify early stage CLL patients who experience a rapid disease progression with unfavorable outcome, 2. FCR chemoimmunotherapy substantially improves event-free survival in early stage high-risk CLL. Disclosures: Langerbeins: Roche: travel grants Other. Cazin:roche: meeting invitation Other, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; GSK: meeting invitation, meeting invitation Other, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees. Fischer:Mundipharma: Travel grants, Travel grants Other; Roche: Travel grants Other. Stilgenbauer:Roche: Consultancy, Research Funding, Travel grants Other; Mundipharma: Consultancy, Research Funding. Leblond:Roche : Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Mundipharma: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Hallek:F. Hoffmann-La Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document