scholarly journals Trial in Progress: Phase I Open-Label Study of Metformin and Nelfinavir in Combination with Bortezomib in Patients with Relapsed and/or Refractory Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 2735-2735
Author(s):  
Wilson I Gonsalves ◽  
Shaji Kumar ◽  
Gabriela Perez ◽  
Stephanie Saathoff ◽  
Diana M Wilson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Dose Level ◽  
Type Ii Diabetes ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Maximum Dose ◽  
Unmet Need ◽  
Predictive Biomarkers ◽  
Type Ii ◽  
Advisory Committees

Abstract Background: GLUT4 inhibition is an attractive therapeutic option in multiple myeloma (MM) given the dependence of MM cells on glucose transport. Furthermore, combining a GLUT4 inhibitor with an oxidative phosphorylation inhibitor in MM cells to counter the possibility of therapeutic resistance to GLUT4 inhibition has demonstrated synergistic promise (Dalva-Aydemir et al, Clin Can Res 2015). Using a GLUT4 inhibitor such as the HIV protease inhibitor nelfinavir is an attractive choice since it not only inhibits the transport function of GLUT4, but it also lowers the cytotoxicity resistance of MM cells against proteasome inhibitors such as bortezomib (Driessen et al, Blood 2018). Thus, in summary the FDA-approved oral HIV-PI nelfinavir, long used for the treatment of HIV disease, can bind to glucose transporters (GLUT4) on MM cells and reversibly inhibit glucose uptake, thus disrupting the Warburg effect. Nelfinavir can also enhance the activity of PIs such as bortezomib overcome its resistance in MM cells. Metformin, an oral FDA-approved drug for the treatment of Type II Diabetes has the ability to disrupt the electron transport chain of defective mitochondria within MM cells, thus blocking the ability of such mitochondria to generate energy and anabolic substrates as compensatory mechanisms required for proliferation in the setting of GLUT4 inhibition. Thus, this study will look at the safety and tolerability of repurposing the existing FDA-approved drugs for Type II diabetes and HIV in combination with bortezomib for the treatment of relapsed and/or refractory myeloma. Methods: This study is a phase 1 clinical trial of metformin and nelfinavir in combination with bortezomib for patients with relapsed and/or refractory myeloma. Part A of this trial is a 3+3 dose escalation design with 3 dose levels planned. Part B is a dose expansion cohort at the Maximal Tolerated Dose (MTD) determined in Part A. Up to a maximum of 36 patients will be enrolled and treated for a maximum of six 21-day cycles. Bortezomib is administered in its usual weekly subcutaneous dosing schedule of days 1, 8 and 15 of a 21-day cycle at a dose level of 1.3 mg/m2. Metformin will be administered for 14 days of a 21-day cycle and started at a dose level of 500 mg twice daily and will be investigated to a maximum dose of 1000 mg twice daily. Nelfinavir will also be administered for 14 days of a 21-day cycle and started at a dose level of 1250 mg twice daily and will be investigated to a maximum dose of 2500 mg twice daily. Key inclusion criteria include having relapsed/refractory myeloma with at least 2 prior lines of therapy and prior exposure to PIs, immunomodulators and Anti-CD38 monoclonal antibodies, adequate hematologic reserve, kidney function and liver function. This trial especially allows patients with non-secretory disease yet measurable by bone marrow assessments or cross-sectional imaging of plasmacytomas to be enrolled which constitutes an unmet need in the real-world MM population. Finally, this allows patients to be treated with a dexamethasone-free regimen. The primary objective of this trial is to determine the MTD of metformin and nelfinavir in combination with bortezomib. The secondary objective is to evaluate the safety and tolerability as well as the overall response rate (ORR) associated with this combination. Potential predictive biomarkers as well as resistance mechanisms using genomic RNA, immunohistochemistry and metabolomics-based assessment platforms will be evaluated in this study. Recruitment is ongoing with no safety concerns. This trial is registered on clinicaltrials.gov: NCT03829020. This investigator-initiated trial was funded by the generous gift of the Helen Diller Family Foundation. Disclosures Kumar: Astra-Zeneca: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Bluebird Bio: Consultancy; Abbvie: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Oncopeptides: Consultancy; Antengene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Research Funding; Carsgen: Research Funding; Roche-Genentech: Consultancy, Research Funding; Beigene: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; KITE: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Tenebio: Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Adaptive: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Sanofi: Research Funding. Ailawadhi: Karyopharm: Consultancy; AbbVie: Consultancy; Genentech: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy; GSK: Consultancy, Research Funding; Xencor: Research Funding; Cellectar: Research Funding; Medimmune: Research Funding; Ascentage: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding; BeiGene, Ltd.: Consultancy; Sanofi: Consultancy; Oncopeptides: Consultancy.

A Phase I Study of Bendamustine Combined with Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone in Patients with Refractory or Relapsed Multiple Myeloma.

Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 1856-1856 ◽  
Author(s):  
Suzanne Lentzsch ◽  
Amy O’Sullivan ◽  
Silvana Lalo ◽  
Carrie Kruppa ◽  
Diane Gardner ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Partial Response ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Dose Level ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Advisory Board ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Equity Ownership ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Abstract 1856 Poster Board I-882 Background: Lenalidomide is an analog of thalidomide that has shown significant clinical activity in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (MM), both as a single agent and in combination with dexamethasone. Bendamustine is a bifunctional alkylating agent that is approved for the treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia and indolent non-Hodgkin's lymphoma that has progressed during or relapsed within 6 months following a rituximab-containing regimen. Bendamustine combined with lenalidomide may be an effective treatment option for MM patients, particularly those with preexisting or bortezomib-induced neuropathy. Our primary objective was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and safety profile of bendamustine and lenalidomide when administered with dexamethasone for patients with relapsed or refractory MM. Methods: Patients aged ≥18 years with confirmed, measurable stage 2 or 3 MM that was refractory to or progressed after 1 or more prior therapies, including lenalidomide, received bendamustine by intravenous infusion on days 1 and 2, oral lenalidomide on days 1–21, and oral dexamethasone on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 of each 28-day cycle. Treatment was continued until a plateau of best response, as determined by the IBMTR/ABMTR, was reached. Study drug doses were escalated through 4 levels (Table), with 3–6 patients enrolled at each level depending on the rate of dose-limiting toxicity (DLT). After determining the MTD, up to an additional 12 patients will be enrolled in an MTD expansion arm to better evaluate toxicity and clinical activity. Secondary endpoints included preliminary efficacy, as evidenced by objective response, time to disease progression, and overall survival. Results: To date, 11 patients have been enrolled, with a median age of 63 years (range, 38–75 years). The MTD of bendamustine and lenalidomide has not been identified at this point; currently, patients are enrolling on dose level 3 with 100 mg/m2 bendamustine and 10 mg lenalidomide. Thus far, DLT included 1 grade 4 neutropenia at dose level 2. Nine of 11 patients are currently eligible for response assessment. A partial response was observed in 67% of patients, including 1 very good partial response and 5 partial responses (PR). Two patients experienced stable disease and 1 exhibited progressive disease. Grade 3/4 adverse events included grade 3 neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, anemia, hyperglycemia, and prolonged QTC, and 1 grade 4 neutropenia. Conclusions: Bendamustine, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone form a well-tolerated and highly active regimen even in heavily pretreated MM patients, with a PR rate of 67%. Additional updates on response and MTD will be available at the time of presentation. Disclosures: Lentzsch: Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Cephalon: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Off Label Use: Bendamustine is not FDA approved for the treatment of multiple myeloma in the USA. Burt:Millennium: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria. Mapara:Resolvyx: Consultancy, Research Funding; Genzyme: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gentium: Equity Ownership; Celgene: Spouse is consultant , has received research funding, and participates on advisory board; Cephalon: Spouse has received funding for clinical trial and participates on advisory board. Redner:Biogen: Equity Ownership; Wyeth: Equity Ownership; Glaxo-Smith-Kline: Equity Ownership; Pfizer: Equity Ownership; Genzyme: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Roodman:Amgen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy; Acceleron: Consultancy. Zonder:Amgen: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; Cephalon: Consultancy; Millennium: Consultancy, Speaking (CME only); no promotional talks.

A Multicenter, Open Label Study of Oral Lenalidomide and Prednisone (RP) Followed by Oral Lenalidomide Melphalan and Prednisone (MPR) and Oral Lenalidomide Maintenance In Newly Diagnosed Elderly Multiple Myeloma Patients

Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 1940-1940 ◽  
Author(s):  
Antonio Palumbo ◽  
Patrizia Falco ◽  
Giulia Benevolo ◽  
Davide Rossi ◽  
Angelo Michele Carella ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Partial Response ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Dose Level ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Autologous Transplantation ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Level 2

Abstract Abstract 1940 The combination of Melphalan-Prednisone-Lenalidomide (MPR) has shown promising results in elderly newly diagnosed myeloma patients. In the transplant setting, low-dose chemotherapy (induction) precedes high-dose chemotherapy (autologous transplantation consolidation). This approach reduces tumor mass, with few side effects, before achieving the maximum cyto-reduction with autologous transplantation. The same approach has been designed for the elderly patients. Accordingly induction with lenalidomide plus corticosteroids precedes consolidation with MPR. A two-stage phase II clinical trial was planned to evaluate the safety and efficacy of Lenalidomide-Prednisone (RP) as induction, followed by Melphalan-Prednisone-Lenalidomide (MPR) as consolidation and Lenalidomide as maintenance in elderly myeloma patients. Unfit patients with newly diagnosed symptomatic myeloma older than 65 years were enrolled. No exclusion criteria were included in the protocol, to avoid the selection of fit elderly subjects only. Patients with low blood count, abnormal performance status, hepatic, renal, cardiac or pulmonary functions were enrolled. Patients received 4 RP courses (Lenalidomide 25 mg/day for 21 days every 4 weeks, plus Prednisone 50 mg three times/week for 4 weeks) followed by 6 MPR cycles (Melphalan 2 mg and Prednisone 50 mg three times/week, for 4 weeks plus Lenalidomide 10–15 mg/day for 21 days every 4 weeks) and maintenance with Lenalidomide alone (10 mg/day for 21 days every 4 weeks). Two different dose-levels of Lenalidomide were tested in combination with MP: 15 mg (dose-level 1) and 10 mg (dose-level 2). Each cohort included 12 patients, with additional 22 patients enrolled at dose-level 2. Patients were evaluated for efficacy and toxicity after completion of at least 2 MPR cycles. Forty-six patients (median age 75, range 65–88) were enrolled. Thirty-six patients were evaluable after a median of 7 cycles and a median follow-up of 8.5 months. During RP induction, the most frequent grade 3–4 hematological adverse events were neutropenia (19%), anemia (11 %), thrombocytopenia (6%). During MPR consolidation, grade 3–4 adverse events were neutropenia (45%), and thrombocytopenia (3%). Neutropenia was increased by the addition of melphalan, but both thrombocytopenia and anemia were reduced. Non-hematological toxicities were more frequent during RP cycles and reduced during MPR cycles (cutaneous rash and infections). After RP induction, at least partial response (PR) rate was 67%, at least very good partial response (VGPR) was 17%. After 2 MPR cycles, PR rate increase to 72%, including 22% of patients who achieved at least a VGPR. Conclusions. Induction with RP followed by consolidation with MPR showed a manageable safety profile and reduced the risk of anemia, thrombocytopenia and non-hematological toxicity in unfit elderly myeloma patients. These data will be updated at the meeting. Disclosures: Palumbo: Celgene Srl: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janseen-Cilag: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Off Label Use: Lenalidomide in combination with melphalan for multiple myeloma patients at diagnosis. Guglielmelli:Celgene: Honoraria; Janseen-Cilag: Honoraria. Gay:Celgene: Honoraria. Cavallo:Celgene: Honoraria. Boccadoro:Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janseen-Cilag: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding.

A Phase 1 Study Of ARRY-520 With Bortezomib (BTZ) and Dexamethasone (dex) In Relapsed Or Refractory Multiple Myeloma (RRMM)

Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 1938-1938 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ajai Chari ◽  
Myo Htut ◽  
Jeffrey Zonder ◽  
Joseph W. Fay ◽  
Andrzej J Jakubowiak ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Dose Level ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Initial Dose ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Phase 1 Study ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Ksp Inhibitor

Abstract Background ARRY-520 is a novel KSP inhibitor with encouraging activity in patients (pts) with RRMM. In preclinical models, the activity of ARRY-520 is synergistic with BTZ, providing a rationale to combine these drugs in the clinic. Methods ARRAY-520-111 is a Phase 1 study to identify the maximum tolerated dose of ARRY-520, BTZ and dex. Eligible pts have RRMM with ≥ 2 prior lines of therapy, including a proteasome inhibitor (PI) and an immunomodulatory agent. ARRY-520 is administered intravenously (IV) on Days 1, 2, 15 and 16 (Schedule 1) or on Days 1 and 15 (Schedule 2); BTZ is administered IV or subcutaneously (SC) on Days 1, 8 and 15; and 40 mg oral dex, if applicable, is taken on Days 1, 8 and 15 in a 28-day cycle. Results A total of 41 pts have been treated to date at various dose levels of ARRY-520 and BTZ. Patients had a median of 5 prior regimens (range 2-10). All pts received a prior PI, 39 pts received prior BTZ, and 25 pts received at least 2 prior PI- including regimens (range 1-6). In Schedule 1, the initial dose level of ARRY-520 (1.0 mg/m2/day) with BTZ (1.3 mg/m2/day) and dex was not tolerated, with dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) in 2/3 pts (pneumonia and pseudomonal sepsis). After a protocol amendment, dose escalation resumed at reduced doses of ARRY-520 (0.5 mg/m2/day) and BTZ (1.0 mg/m2/day) without dex. The addition of prophylactic filgrastim (G-CSF) enabled escalation to full dose ARRY-520 and BTZ (1.5 and 1.3 mg/m2/day, respectively). Only 1 DLT of pneumonia was observed during the further dose escalation, at 1.0 mg/m2/day ARRY-520 and 1.0 mg/m2/day BTZ. Dex has been added to the combination at 1.25 mg/m2/day ARRY-520 and 1.3 mg/m2/day BTZ and this dose level has been well tolerated. Enrollment is ongoing in the final planned dose level. In Schedule 2, the initial dose level of ARRY-520 (2.25 mg/m2/day) with BTZ (1.3 mg/m2/day) and dex was well tolerated and enrollment is ongoing at 3.0 mg/m2/day ARRY-520 and 1.3 mg/m2/day BTZ + dex, the maximum planned dose of both drugs. The most commonly reported adverse events (AEs) (in ≥ 15% of pts) include anemia, diarrhea, pyrexia, upper respiratory tract infection, thrombocytopenia, cough, neutropenia, constipation, headache, fatigue, hyperuricemia, nausea, vomiting, and dizziness. All Grade 3 – 4 non-hematologic AEs have an incidence of < 10%. Based on the laboratory data, Grade 4 neutropenia was observed in 15% of patients, Grade 4 thrombocytopenia was observed in 10%. Apart from the one pt described above with the DLT of pseudomonal sepsis, no other febrile neutropenic events were reported. Neuropathy (Grade 2) was observed in 1 pt. Monopolar spindles have been observed in a post-dose biopsy for a pt treated at 1.0 mg/m2/day ARRY-520 + 1.3 mg/m2/day BTZ, indicating that pharmacodynamic activity of ARRY-520 is maintained in the presence of full dose BTZ. Preliminary signs of efficacy have been observed in this ongoing dose-escalation study. To date, among the subset of 13 evaluable pts who received doses at ≥ 1.25 mg/m2/day ARRY-520 + 1.3 mg/m2/day BTZ, 4 (31%) partial responses (PR) and 1 minimal response (MR) have been observed. By contrast, in the 27 patients receiving lower doses of ARRY-520 and BTZ, only 1 MR has been reported. An additional 29 pts experienced stable disease (SD) on ARRY-520 + weekly BTZ without the use of steroids (dex), including 17 pts with disease refractory to BTZ. Conclusions ARRY-520 + BTZ with prophylactic G-CSF appears well tolerated with manageable non-hematologic AEs in this heavily pretreated pt population and has demonstrated preliminary evidence of activity, including PRs and SD in pts with disease refractory to BTZ. These data support further exploration of this novel KSP inhibitor in combination with BTZ in expansion cohorts. The authors would like to acknowledge the dedicated research staff and physicians at the participating centers of the Multiple Myeloma Research Consortium for their contribution to this study. Disclosures: Chari: Onyx Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Millenium Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees. Off Label Use: ARRY-520 is an investigational drug being combined with bortezomib in multiple myeloma. Zonder:Celgene Corporation: Consultancy; Onyx: Consultancy; Skyline Diagnostics: Consultancy. Jakubowiak:Millenuim: Consultancy, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen Cilag: Consultancy, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Onyx: Consultancy, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Hilder:Array BioPharma: Employment. Ptaszynski:Array BioPharma: Employment. Rush:Array BioPharma: Employment. Kaufman:Millenium: Consultancy; Merck: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Onyx: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy.

Phase 1 MMRC Trial of Selinexor, Carfilzomib (CFZ), and Dexamethasone (DEX) in Relapsed and Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma (RRMM)

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 4223-4223 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrzej Jakubowiak ◽  
Jagoda Jasielec ◽  
Cara A. Rosenbaum ◽  
Jeffrey A Zonder ◽  
Craig E. Cole ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Dose Level ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Myeloma Cell ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Treatment Regimens ◽  
Equity Ownership ◽  
Line Of Therapy

Abstract Background There is an increasing number of multiple myeloma patients (pts) refractory to currently available drugs, including the proteasome inhibitors bortezomib and Carfilzomib (CFZ), necessitating development of novel effective therapeutics. Pre-clinical evaluation of selinexor, a novel orally available selective inhibitor of nuclear export (SINE), in human myeloma cell lines (HMCL), primary plasma cells derived from myeloma patients, and HMCL tumor-bearing mice demonstrated synergistic myeloma cell death with CFZ (Rosebeck et al. ASH 2013) and the ability to overcome resistance to CFZ (Rosebeck et al. ASH 2014). Aims The primary objective is to assess the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of selinexor and CFZ in combination with DEX in RRMM pts and to provide preliminary evaluation of efficacy of this novel triplet regimen. Methods Pts with RRMM, including CFZ-refractory pts, who have failed at least two prior treatment regimens of myeloma therapy, were eligible for enrollment. Dose escalation follows the 3+3 design with pts receiving 30 mg/m2 - 40 mg/m2 selinexor PO on days 1, 3, 8, 10, 15, 17; 20 mg/m2 - 56 mg/m2 CFZ given IV on days 1, 2, 8, 9, 15, 16, and DEX PO 20/10mg (cycles 1-4/cycles 5+) in 28-day cycles. At least 12 and up to 48 pts are planned for evaluation. Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLT) are measured for the Cycle 1 as well as Day 1 of Cycle 2. Dose modifications are allowed to manage toxicities. Response was assessed by IMWG criteria plus near complete response (nCR). Results As of July 1st, 2015 the study has enrolled 8 pts, 5 pts were treated at dose level 1 (30 mg/m2 selinexor, 20/27 mg/m2 CFZ, 20/10 mg DEX) and 3 patients were treated at dose level 2a (30 mg/m2 selinexor, 20/36 mg/m2 CFZ, 20/10 mg DEX). Pts had median age of 65.5 (range 55-73) and a median of 5 prior treatment regimens (range 2-5). Six pts were refractory to CFZ combinations at their last line of therapy, including 4 to CFZ, pomalidomide (POM), and DEX. Of the 2 remaining pts, 1 was refractory to high dose CFZ with DEX in prior line of therapy and both were refractory to last line of therapy. Six pts were DLT-evaluable and two pts required replacement for DLT evaluation (1 pt had DEX reduced in cycle 1 not due to DLT; 1 pt did not receive all scheduled cycle 1 doses due to progressive disease). There have been no DLTs and MTD is not yet established. Adverse events (AEs) were reversible and managed with concomitant therapy. G3/4 hematologic AEs include thrombocytopenia (75%), neutropenia (50%), leukopenia (37.5%), lymphopenia (25%), and anemia (25%). The most common G3/4 non-hematologic AEs included fatigue (25%) and upper respiratory tract infection (25%). The most common G1/2 AEs are fatigue (75%), dyspnea (62.5%), nausea (62.5%), anemia (50%), leukopenia (50%), and thrombocytopenia (50%). Response rates for all enrolled pts are 87.5% ≥MR, 75% ≥PR, 12.5% ≥VGPR. Responses occurred rapidly; after 1 cycle: 75% ≥MR, 63% ≥PR, 12.5% VGPR. As of the cut off date, 4 pts have progressed (after 1, 2, 4, and 4 months) and 4 pts remain on treatment (10+, 1+, 1+, and 1+ months); 1 pt did not respond and died due to progression of disease. Conclusions Although still very early, the combination of selinexor, CFZ, and DEX demonstrates encouraging activity with 75% PR or better and no unexpected toxicities in highly refractory MM pts, including those previously refractory to CFZ. Responses in pts refractory to very active CFZ combinations in the last line of therapy suggest that this regimen has the ability to overcome CFZ resistance. Disclosures Jakubowiak: Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; SkylineDx: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; SkylineDx: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Karyopharm: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Sanofi-Aventis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: institutional funding for support of clinical trial conduct, Speakers Bureau; Millennium: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Onyx: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Karyopharm: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Onyx: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Millennium: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Sanofi-Aventis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Off Label Use: The combination of Carfilzomib and Selinexor is being used for the treatment of Multiple Myeloma. Rosenbaum:Celgene: Speakers Bureau. Zonder:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: research support; Prothena: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Seattle Genetics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Chari:Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Array BioPharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; Onyx: Consultancy, Research Funding; Millenium/Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding. Rashal:Karyopharm Therapeutics Inc: Employment. Youssoufian:Karyopharm Therapeutics Inc: Employment. Henry:Karyopharm: Employment, Equity Ownership. Shacham:Karyopharm: Employment, Equity Ownership. Kauffman:Karyopharm: Employment, Equity Ownership.

Final Results of Phase 1 MMRC Trial of Selinexor, Carfilzomib, and Dexamethasone in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma (RRMM)

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 973-973 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrzej Jakubowiak ◽  
Jagoda Jasielec ◽  
Cara A. Rosenbaum ◽  
Craig E. Cole ◽  
Ajai Chari ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Dose Level ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Treatment Regimens ◽  
Line Of Therapy

Abstract Background There are an increasing number of multiple myeloma (MM) patients (pts) refractory to currently available drugs, including the proteasome inhibitors bortezomib and carfilzomib (CFZ), necessitating development of novel therapeutics. Pre-clinical evaluation of selinexor (SEL), an orally available Selective Inhibitor of Nuclear Export (SINE) compound, demonstrated synergistic myeloma cell death with CFZ and mechanistic rationale for overcoming resistance to CFZ (Rosebeck et al., 2016), providing support for this phase 1 trial. Aims The primary objectives were to assess the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of a SEL, CFZ and dexamethasone (DEX) combination and to obtain preliminary efficacy data for this novel regimen in RRMM pts. Methods Pts with RRMM who progressed after at least two prior treatment regimens of myeloma therapy were eligible for enrollment. Dose escalation followed the 3+3 design with pts receiving 30 mg/m2 - 40 mg/m2 SEL PO on days (D) 1, 3, 8, 10, 15, 17; 20 mg/m2 - 56 mg/m2 CFZ IV on D 1, 2, 8, 9, 15, 16, and DEX PO (20mg cycles 1-4/ 10mg cycles 5+) in 28-day cycles (C) in up to 5 dose levels. An expansion cohort has enrolled additional pts to a total of 12 CFZ-refractory pts treated at the recommended Phase 2 dose (RP2D). Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLTs) were evaluated through C2D1. Responses were assessed by IMWG criteria plus near complete response (nCR). Results As of July 1st, 2016, the study has completed dose escalation and enrolled a total of 18 pts; 5 at dose level 1 (30 mg/m2 SEL, 20/27 mg/m2 CFZ, 20/10 mg DEX), 3 at dose level 2a (30 mg/m2 SEL, 20/36 mg/m2 CFZ, 20/10 mg DEX), and a total of 10 (7 in dose escalation, 3 in cohort expansion) at dose level 2b (60mg flat dose SEL, 20/27 mg/m2 CFZ and 20/10 DEX). Pts age ranged between 55 to 74 years with a median of 63.5 years; and had a median of 4 prior treatment regimens (range 2-10). Sixteen pts were evaluable for response, all refractory to their last line of therapy. All 16 response evaluable pts were refractory to CFZ, of which 11 were refractory to CFZ combinations as their last line of therapy, including 8 to a KPd combination of CFZ, pomalidomide, and DEX. Fifteen pts were evaluable for DLT and 3 of 18 pts required replacement for DLT evaluation (1 had DEX reduced not due to DLT; 2 did not receive all scheduled C1 doses). In the dose escalation phase, there was one DLT of cardiac amyloidosis (CA) in a pt with history of prior congestive heart failure and CA at baseline. While the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) has not been reached, the RP2D was identified at dose level 2b based on tolerability. Grade 3/4 adverse events (AEs) included: thrombocytopenia (67%), neutropenia (33%), anemia (17%), fatigue (17%), and infections (11%). The most common all grade AEs included: gastrointestinal disorders (78%), thrombocytopenia (73%), fatigue (72%), anemia (47%), dyspnea (33%), and elevated liver and pancreatic enzymes (28%). There were 2 (11%) serious AEs, 1 upper respiratory infection and 1 lower gastrointestinal bleeding. All adverse events were manageable with concomitant medications. Response rates for all evaluable pts were 75% ≥MR (12 of 16), 63% ≥PR, and 25% ≥VGPR. Response rates in CFZ-refractory pts at last line of treatment were 73%, 64%, and 18% respectively. Responses occurred rapidly; after C1 with 75% ≥MR. As of the data cutoff date, 15 pts progressed (between 1 and 14 months on study) and 3 pts remained on treatment (1 - 4 months). Conclusions The combination of SEL, CFZ, and DEX demonstrates encouraging activity and safety in heavily pretreated, mostly CFZ-refractory myeloma. In addition, with 64% PR or better for pts progressing on CFZ, these results provide early clinical evidence that selinexor has the ability to overcome CFZ resistance, warranting further investigation of this regimen in RRMM. Disclosures Jakubowiak: Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Karyopharm: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; SkylineDx: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen Inc.: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Rosenbaum:Celgene: Speakers Bureau. Chari:Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Amgen Inc.: Honoraria, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Array Biopharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding. Zonder:Pharmacyclics: Other: DSMC membership; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; Prothena: Consultancy, Honoraria.

Combined Vorinostat, Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone Therapy in Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma: A Phase I Study.

Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 305-305
Author(s):  
David Siegel ◽  
Donna M Weber ◽  
Constantine S. Mitsiades ◽  
Meletios A. Dimopoulos ◽  
Jean-Luc Harousseau ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Dose Level ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Equity Ownership ◽  
Best Responses

Abstract Abstract 305 Background: Multiple myeloma (MM), the second most common hematologic malignancy, remains incurable despite recent therapeutic advances. Treatment of patients with relapsed and refractory MM is extremely challenging and represents a specific unmet medical need. However, novel treatment combinations have the potential to improve patient outcomes. Vorinostat, an oral inhibitor of Class I and II histone deacetylase enzymes, enhances the anti-MM activity of other pro-apoptotic agents, providing potential synergy in combination with lenalidomide and dexamethasone. This Phase I, multicenter, open-label, non-randomized, dose-escalation study evaluated vorinostat plus lenalidomide and dexamethasone in patients with relapsed or refractory MM. Aims: The primary objective was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD); secondary objectives included overall safety and tolerability, and evaluation of clinical activity. Methods: Patients aged ≥18 years with relapsed or refractory MM were enrolled sequentially into 1 of 5 escalating dosing levels (Table) using a standard 3+3 design for ≤8 cycles. Patients who were tolerating, and receiving clinical benefit from, the regimen were allowed to continue into the extension phase of the study. In the absence of dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) in the first cycle, dose escalation continued until the MTD was established. In the event that the MTD was not established, dose level 5 would become the maximum administered dose (MAD) and an additional 8 patients would be enrolled in an expansion cohort to confirm safety. Response to treatment was assessed using modified European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) criteria with the overall response rate (ORR) defined as minimal or greater, and all adverse events (AEs) recorded. Results: Of 28 patients assessed for safety to date, all have experienced ≥1 AE, with 24 (87.5%) patients experiencing a total of 65 drug-related AEs overall, the majority of which were mild or moderate in severity. The most common drug-related AEs were diarrhea (n=12, 42.9%), fatigue (n=10, 37.5%), neutropenia (n=10, 37.5%), and thrombocytopenia (n=10, 37.5%). A total of 21 serious AEs, 8 of which were identified by the investigator as being related to study treatment, were reported in 13 (46.4%) patients. Three patients discontinued due to AEs. DLT evaluation is complete and there were no DLTs that prohibited dose escalation. One DLT, Grade 3 diarrhea lasting <48 hours, was observed at dose level 5. As per the protocol, this dose level was expanded to 6 patients in total and no further DLTs were observed. Therefore, the MTD has not yet been reached and dose level 5 is the MAD. Of 25 patients evaluable for efficacy, 21 (84%) experienced clinical benefit while on treatment. Best responses to vorinostat combined with lenalidomide and dexamethasone, defined by modified EBMT criteria, include: 1 complete response (CR), 1 near CR, 2 very good partial responses (VGPR), 8 partial responses (PR), 4 minimal responses (MR), 5 stable disease (SD), and 4 progressive disease (PD), for an ORR of 64%. Twelve of the 13 patients who have received prior lenalidomide therapy were evaluable for response; best responses in these patients included VGPR (n=1), PR (n=3), MR (n=1), SD (n=3); while 4 of these patients progressed. Of the 13 patients who remain on the study, 9 out of 11 (82%) evaluable patients have responded. To date, 10 out of 28 patients have discontinued due to PD. Summary/conclusions: These preliminary data suggest that vorinostat combined with lenalidomide and dexamethasone may represent a convenient oral combination therapy that is active and generally well tolerated in the treatment of relapsed/refractory MM. In addition, these results indicate that this combination may exhibit activity in patients who have received prior lenalidomide therapy. The study continues to further characterize the tolerability profile and efficacy of this combination. Disclosures: Siegel: Celegne: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Millennium: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Off Label Use: Vorinostat is a histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitor that was approved in the FDA in October 2006 for the treatment of cutaneous manifestations in patients with cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL) who have progressive, persistent, or recurrent disease on or following two systemic therapies. Weber:Milleninum: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Merck: Research Funding, unpaid advisory board. Mitsiades:Millennium: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria; Merck: Consultancy, Honoraria; Kosan Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Honoraria; Pharmion: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; AVEO Pharma: Research Funding; EMD Serono: Research Funding; Sunesis Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Pharma Mar: licensing royalties. Dimopoulos:MSD: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria. Harousseau:Janssen Cilag: Ad Board, Honoraria; Celgene: Ad Board, Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria. Rizvi:Merck: Employment, Equity Ownership. Howe:Merck: Employment, Equity Ownership. Reiser:Merck: Employment, Equity Ownership. Byrne:Celgene Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Anderson:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Millennium: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Richardson:Millennium: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Keryx: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gentium: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Merck: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Selinexor Shows Synergy in Combination with Pomalidomide and Low Dose Dexamethasone in Patients with Relapsed / Refractory Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 3330-3330 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christine Chen ◽  
Rami Kotb ◽  
Michael Sebag ◽  
Richard LeBlanc ◽  
Heather J. Sutherland ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Dose Level ◽  
Nuclear Export ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Low Dose ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Equity Ownership

Abstract Introduction - The nuclear export protein exportin 1, (XPO1) is overexpressed in a wide variety of cancers including multiple myeloma (MM). Selinexor is a first-in-class Selective Inhibitor of Nuclear Export (SINE) compound that binds and inactivates XPO1. Selinexor forces nuclear retention and reactivation of tumor suppressor proteins (TSPs; NF-kB, p53 and FOXO) and reduction of many proto-oncogenes, including MDM2, MYC and Cyclin D. In murine MM models, the combination of selinexor with IMIDs shows synergistic anti-MM activity with good tolerability. Methods - This phase 1b/2 dose escalation study (NCT02343042) using the standard 3+3 design, is designed to determine the tolerability, maximum tolerated dose (MTD), recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) and preliminary efficacy of selinexor in combination with pomalidomide and dexamethasone (SdP). Patients (pts) with relapsed/refractory MM who received ≥ 2 prior therapies including lenalidomide and a proteasome inhibitor (PI) were enrolled. Selinexor is dose escalated once-weekly (QW, starting at 80 mg) or twice-weekly (BIW, starting at 60 mg), pomalidomide 4 mg PO daily, days 1 -21 and dexamethasone (dex) 40 mg PO weekly in a 28 day cycle. Results - As of 25-Jul-2016, 11 pts (7 male / 4 female) have been enrolled. The median age is 58 years (range, 43 - 76), with a median of 5 (range, 2 - 9) prior treatment regimens. Eight pts had MM refractory to lenalidomide and 7 pts to bortezomib; including 5 pts with MM refractory to both. For the once-weekly selinexor cohort, the 80 mg dose level has been cleared and the 100 mg dose level is on going. For the twice-weekly cohort, the 60 mg dose level has been cleared and 80 mg dose level is on going. Common related grade 1/2 adverse events (AEs) include: nausea 7pts (64%), altered taste 5pts (45%), anorexia 3pts (27%), and diarrhea 3pts (27%). Grade 3/4 AEs include: neutropenia 8pts (73%), thrombocytopenia 4pts (36%), and leukopenia 3pts (27%). There was no febrile neutropenia or bleeding reported to date. No dose limiting toxicities have been observed and MTD has not been reached. Ten pts were evaluable for response including, 1 complete response (CR), 5 partial responses (PR), 3 minor responses (MR), and 1 stable disease (SD). The overall response rate (ORR) is 60% with a clinical benefit rate of 90% (ORR + MR). Responses are rapid in onset, with at least MR achieved by cycle 2 day 1. In lenalidomide and bortezomib refractory patients the ORR was 50%. One pt was deemed not evaluable due to non-compliance with study procedures. Eight pts are still on study, (range <1 - 7+ months) including 4 pts maintaining their response for > 3 months. Conclusions - The all oral combination of selinexor, pomalidomide and low dose dex (SdP) has significant clinical activity (ORR 60%) in pts with heavily pretreated MM. Responses are rapid in onset even with the lower dose cohorts tested thus far, CR can be achieved. No additive toxicities over monotherapy of either pomalidomide or selinexor have been observed. This novel treatment regimen therefore holds promise in addressing the urgent need to induce meaningful and durable responses in patients with IMiD and PI relapsed/refractory MM. Disclosures Chen: Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding. Sebag:Celgene: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria. Sutherland:Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria. White:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Venner:Takeda: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; J+J: Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria. Kouroukis:Karyopharm: Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding. McCurdy:Celgene: Honoraria. Lalancette:BMS: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria. Bensinger:Sanofi: Consultancy, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding; Acetylon: Research Funding; Bayer: Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria, Research Funding. Lentzsch:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; BMS: Consultancy. Kauffman:Karyopharm Therapeutics Inc: Employment, Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Shacham:Karyopharm Therapeutics: Employment, Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Jeha:Karyopharm: Employment. Picklesimer:Karyopharm: Employment. Saint-Martin:Karyopharm: Employment. Choe-Juliak:Karyopharm Therapeutics: Employment. Bahlis:BMS: Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel Expenses, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel Expenses, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Onyx: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria.

Evolving Unmet Need in Patients Refractory to Lenalidomide: Overview of the Clinical Trials in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 22-23
Author(s):  
Maria-Victoria Mateos ◽  
Rohan Medhekar ◽  
Istvan Majer ◽  
Mehmet Turgut
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Literature Review ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Unmet Need ◽  
Publicly Traded ◽  
First Line ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Line Of Therapy

Introduction: The majority of newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) patients are currently treated with lenalidomide-based regimens as their first line of therapy. This trend is likely to continue in the coming years. Typically, lenalidomide is administered until disease progression and has significantly contributed to better outcomes in these patients. However, most patients relapse, and prognosis worsens with each relapse. The choice of optimal treatment for patients who relapse while receiving lenalidomide as first line of therapy is unclear. Moreau et al (Blood Cancer J. 9, 38 [2019]) concluded that there is limited data on approved combinations for treating these patients and are restricted by the low number of lenalidomide-refractory patients enrolled in the pivotal trials. Results from the ongoing clinical trials of the combination of carfilzomib and anti-CD38 antibodies were not available at the time of the Moreau et al publication. The aim of this targeted literature review was to include this new data and to summarize currently available evidence on progression-free survival (PFS) for the treatment of RRMM patients who progressed on lenalidomide-based regimens. Methods: A targeted literature review was conducted to identify registrational clinical trials in patients with RRMM reporting PFS outcomes. PubMed, congress proceedings, and product labels were searched between Jan 2014 to July 2020. In addition to PFS, demographic, disease characteristics and treatment history were extracted for the trial populations to contextualize potential variations in study outcomes. The regimens studied in these trials were classified as lenalidomide-based, proteasome inhibitor (PI)-based and pomalidomide-based. Number of prior lines of therapy, prior exposure and refractoriness to lenalidomide and bortezomib were reported. Results: Twelve registrational trials were identified based on the search criteria (Table 1). Most pivotal trials assessing lenalidomide-based regimens (POLLUX, ELOQUENT-II, TOURMALINE-MM1) except the ASPIRE trial excluded patients who were refractory to lenalidomide. Trials evaluating PI-based regimens (e.g., CANDOR) or pomalidomide-based regimens (e.g., OPTIMISMM) included these patients, with more recent studies enrolling a larger proportion. Percentage of lenalidomide-exposed (and lenalidomide refractory) ranged from 40% (32%) in CANDOR to 98% (90%) in ELOQUENT III. These studies also enrolled a larger proportion of patients who were bortezomib-exposed, although most of these patients were at first relapse, with the exception of ELOQUENT III and ICARIA where most patients were at third relapse. Among lenalidomide-refractory patients, the median-PFS (mPFS) observed for the pomalidomide-based regimens ranged from 9.5 to 10.1 months and that observed for PI-based regimens ranged from 4.9 to 25.7 months. PFS in the lenalidomide-refractory subgroup was considerably shorter than in the ITT population. The mPFS for patients receiving carfilzomib/daratumumab/dexamethasone (KDd; CANDOR) and isatuximab/carfilzomib/dexamethasone (IsaKd; IKEMA) was not reached at median follow-up of 16.9 and 20.7 months respectively. While the mPFS for (KDd) for lenalidomide-refractory patients in CANDOR trial was not yet reached at median follow up of 16.9 months; the mPFS of 25.7 months for KDd in the MMY-1001 trial appears to be the longest among the assessed regimens. Conclusion: Patients refractory to lenalidomide have shorter PFS and represent a population with high unmet need. This targeted literature review suggests that the PI-based KDd regimen provides longer PFS compared to other lenalidomide-sparing regimens in lenalidomide-refractory populations. Heterogeneity across trial populations may limit the comparability of these treatments. Disclosures Mateos: Regeneron: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sanofi: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Oncopeptides: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Seattle Genetics: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen-Cilag: Consultancy, Honoraria; Adaptive Biotechnologies: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Abbvie/Genentech: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; PharmaMar-Zeltia: Consultancy; GlaxoSmithKline: Consultancy. Medhekar:Amgen Inc.: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Majer:Amgen (Europe) GmbH: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company.

scholarly journals VTE Rates and Safety Analysis of Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Patients Receiving Carfilzomib-Lenalidomide-Dexamethasone (KRD) with or without Rivaroxaban Prophylaxis

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 1835-1835 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katrina M Piedra ◽  
Hani Hassoun ◽  
Larry W. Buie ◽  
Sean M. Devlin ◽  
Jessica Flynn ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Venous Thromboembolism ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Cancer Trial ◽  
Oncology Research ◽  
Increased Risk

Introduction Immunomodulatory agents (IMiD's) are associated with an increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE), particularly when combined with high dose steroids. Studies evaluating the use of lenalidomide-bortezomib-dexamethasone (RVD) and carfilzomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone (KRD) in the frontline setting for multiple myeloma (MM) have reported a 6% and 24% incidence of thrombosis, respectively, despite primary thrombotic prophylaxis with aspirin (ASA) (Richardson, et al. Blood. 2010; Korde, et al. JAMA Oncol 2015). Recent data, including the Hokusai VTE Cancer Trial, have suggested that safety and efficacy of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are preserved in the setting of treatment of solid malignancy-associated thrombosis (Raskob, et al. N Engl J Med. 2018; Mantha, et al. J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2017). Despite this data, there is limited experience and use of DOACs in prevention of thromboses in the setting of hematologic malignancies, specifically MM. After careful review of literature, since early 2018, we changed our clinical practice and routinely placed newly diagnosed MM (NDMM) patients receiving KRD at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) on concomitant rivaroxaban 10 mg once daily, regardless of VTE risk stratification. In the following abstract, we present VTE rates and safety data for newly diagnosed MM patients receiving RVD with ASA vs. KRD with ASA vs. KRD with rivaroxaban prophylaxis. Methods This was an IRB-approved, single-center, retrospective chart review study. All untreated patients with newly diagnosed MM, receiving at least one cycle of RVD or KRD between January 2015 and October 2018 were included. The period of observation included the time between the first day of therapy until 90 days after completion of induction therapy. Patients were identified by querying the pharmacy database for carfilzomib or bortezomib administration and outpatient medication review of thromboprophylaxis with rivaroxaban or ASA. VTE diagnoses were confirmed by ICD-10 codes and appropriate imaging studies (computed tomography and ultrasound). Descriptive statistics were performed. Results During the observation period, 241 patients were identified to have received RVD or KRD in the frontline (99 RVD with ASA; 97 KRD with ASA; 45 KRD with rivaroxaban). Baseline characteristics were well distributed among the three arms, with a median age of 60 (30-94) in the RVD ASA arm, 62 (33-77) in the KRD ASA arm, and 60 (24-79) in the KRD rivaroxaban arm. Patients had International Staging System (ISS) stage 3 disease in 13% (N=13), 9.3% (N=9), and 11% (N=5) of the RVD ASA, KRD ASA, and KRD rivaroxaban arms, respectively. Median weekly doses of dexamethasone were higher in both KRD arms, 40 mg (20-40) vs. 20 mg (10-40) in the RVD ASA arm. The average initial doses of lenalidomide were 22 mg in the RVD ASA arm compared to 25 mg in both the KRD ASA and KRD rivaroxaban arms. After querying the pharmacy database, no patients were identified to have a history or concomitant use of erythropoietin stimulating agent (ESA) use. Treatment-related VTE's occurred in 4 patients (4.0%) in the RVD ASA arm, 16 patients (16.5%) in the KRD ASA arm, and in 1 patient (2.2%) in the KRD rivaroxaban arm. Average time to VTE was 6.15 months (Range 5.42, 9.73) after treatment initiation in the RVD ASA group, while it was 2.61 months (Range 0.43, 5.06) in the KRD ASA group and 1.35 months in the KRD rivaroxaban group. Minor, grade 1 bleeding events per the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) were identified in 1 (1.1%) patient in the RVD ASA arm, 5 (5.2%) patients in the KRD ASA arm, and 1 (2.2%) patient in the KRD rivaroxaban arm. Conclusion More efficacious MM combination therapies have been found to increase the risk of VTE when using ASA prophylaxis, indicating better thromboprophylaxis is needed. We found patients receiving ASA prophylaxis with KRD were more likely to experience a VTE and these events occurred earlier compared to patients receiving ASA prophylaxis with RVD. Importantly, the rate of VTE was reduced to the same level as ASA prophylaxis with RVD when low-dose rivaroxaban 10 mg daily was used with KRD, and without necessarily increasing bleeding risk. Our retrospective data support the development of prospective clinical trials further investigating DOAC use in thromboprophylaxis for NDMM patients receiving carfilzomib-based treatments. Figure Disclosures Hassoun: Novartis: Consultancy; Janssen: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding. Lesokhin:BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Research Funding; GenMab: Consultancy, Honoraria; Serametrix Inc.: Patents & Royalties; Genentech: Research Funding; Juno: Consultancy, Honoraria. Mailankody:Juno: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Takeda Oncology: Research Funding; CME activity by Physician Education Resource: Honoraria. Smith:Celgene: Consultancy, Patents & Royalties, Research Funding; Fate Therapeutics and Precision Biosciences: Consultancy. Landgren:Theradex: Other: IDMC; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Karyopharm: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Merck: Other: IDMC; Sanofi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Adaptive: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. OffLabel Disclosure: Off-label use of rivaroxaban for outpatient prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism (VTE) will be explicitly disclosed to the audience.

scholarly journals Beta-Blockers Improved Survival Outcomes in Patients with Multiple Myeloma: A Retrospective Evaluation

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 3306-3306
Author(s):  
Yi L. Hwa ◽  
Qian Shi ◽  
Shaji Kumar ◽  
Martha Q. Lacy ◽  
Morie A. Gertz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Mayo Clinic ◽  
Cumulative Incidence ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Beta Blockers ◽  
Multivariable Analysis ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Risk Of Death ◽  
Cardiac Medication

Abstract Introduction: A recent study revealed an antiproliferative and apoptotic effect of propranolol on multiple myeloma (MM) cells. Our previous small matched case-control study showed longer survival in patients with propranolol and other beta-blockers (BB) intake than those without. This larger scale study was conducted to confirm the positive association of BB and MM survival. Methods: We identified 1971 newly diagnosed pts seen at Mayo Clinic between 1995 and 2010. Cardiac medication usage after diagnosis of MM was extracted from patient records and categorized based on BB intake. Cause of death was collected with death due to MM as the primary interest event and death due to cardiac disease or other reasons as competing risk events. The primary outcomes were MM disease-specific survival (DSS) and overall survival (OS). Cumulative incidence functions and Kaplan-Meier method were used to estimate the 5-year cumulative incidence rate (CIR) of MM death and OS rate, respectively. DSS and OS were compared by Gray's test and log-rank test, respectively. Multivarable Cox proportional hazard models were used to estimate the adjusted cause-specific HR (HRCSadj.) and hazard ratio (HRadj.) for DSS and OS, respectively, adjusting for demographics, disease characteristics, diagnosis year, and various chemotherapies. Results: 930 (47.2%) of MM patients had no intake of any cardiac medications; 260 (13.2%) had BB only; 343 (17.4%) used both BB / non-BB cardiac medications; and 438 patients (22.2%) had non-BB cardiac drugs. Five-year CIR of MM death and OS rate were shown in table. Superior MM DSS was observed for BB only users, compared to patients without any cardiac drugs (HRCSadj., .53, 95% confidence interval [CI], .42-.67, padj.<.0001) and non-BB cardiac drugs users (HRCSadj., .49, 95% CI, .38-.63, padj.<.0001). Patients received both BB and other cardiac drugs also showed superior MM DSS than non-cardiac drugs users (HRCSadj.., .54, 95% CI, .44-.67, padj.<.0001) and non-BB cardiac drug users. (HRCSadj., .50, 95% CI, .40-.62, padj.<.0001). MM DSS does not differ between BB users with and without other cardiac drugs (padj.=0.90). Multivariable analysis showed the same pattern for OS. None of the MM therapies impacted the differences in DSS and OS among BB intake groups (interaction padj.>.60). Conclusion: MM patients with BB intake showed reduced risk of death due to MM and overall mortality compared to patients who used non-BB cardiac or never used cardiac drugs. The result warrants further investigation for anti-cancer effect of BB in MM. Disclosures Shi: Mayo Clinic: Employment. Kumar:Onyx: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Array BioPharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; Sanofi: Consultancy, Research Funding; Skyline: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AbbVie: Research Funding; Glycomimetics: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Noxxon Pharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; Millennium: Consultancy, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy; Kesios: Consultancy. Gertz:NCI Frederick: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Med Learning Group: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Research to Practice: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Alnylam Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Prothena Therapeutics: Research Funding; Ionis: Research Funding; Annexon Biosciences: Research Funding; GSK: Honoraria; Sandoz Inc: Honoraria. Kapoor:Celgene: Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding. Dispenzieri:pfizer: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Alnylam: Research Funding; Jannsen: Research Funding; GSK: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Prothena: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document