scholarly journals A Phase II Study Evaluating Safety and Efficacy of Polatuzumab Vedotin in Combination with Rituximab, Cyclophosphamide, Doxorubicin, and Prednisone in Patients with Previously Untreated Double and Triple Hit Lymphoma

Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 3561-3561
Author(s):  
Dipenkumar Modi ◽  
Seongho Kim ◽  
Silva Pregja ◽  
Christiane Houde ◽  
Kathy A. Reichel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Intrathecal Methotrexate ◽  
Tolerability Profile ◽  
High Risk Population ◽  
Antibody Drug Conjugate ◽  
Advisory Committees

Abstract Background: Double hit lymphoma (DHL) accounts for approximately 10-14% of diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) and is characterized by the presence of rearrangements affecting MYC and either BCL2 and/or BCL6 by FISH. The complete response (CR) rate with standard R-CHOP is very poor at 20%, with dismal long-term progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Aggressive chemotherapy regimens including R-EPOCH, R-HyperCVAD/MA, and R-CODOX-M/IVAC have been evaluated in retrospective studies and have demonstrated better PFS compared to R-CHOP. However, no OS benefit is noted. Moreover, these regimens are associated with significant toxicity and cannot be used in a substantial proportion of patients due to advanced age and comorbidities, and have not been evaluated in prospectively studies. Therefore, new therapeutic modalities, which are better tolerated, are indeed needed to improve outcomes in this high-risk population. Polatuzumab vedotin (PoV) is a CD79b-directed antibody-drug conjugate delivering monomethyl auristatin E (MMAE). PoV either as a single agent or with bendamustine and rituximab (BR) demonstrated encouraging activity in relapsed refractory DLBCL with an overall response rate (ORR) of approximately 50%. Given the promising activity, PoV has been combined with rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, prednisone (R-CHP) in a phase 1b/2 trial, and has shown a favorable safety and tolerability profile. Study design and Methods: This is a phase II, multicenter, open label study of PoV 1.8 mg/kg in combination with standard doses of R-CHP in patients with untreated double or triple hit lymphoma. One cycle of R-CHOP prior to enrollment is allowed. Key eligibility criteria include patients aged > 18 years with previously untreated double or triple hit lymphoma, ECOG PS 0 to 2, measurable FDG-avid disease. Key exclusion criteria are DLBCL NOS subtype, primary mediastinal or Burkitt's lymphoma, and CNS involvement. A total of 49 patients will be enrolled. All patients will receive PoV with R-CHP every 3 weeks for a total of 6 cycles with intrathecal methotrexate for CNS prophylaxis. The primary endpoint is CR rate. Key secondary endpoints are PFS, OS, ORR, duration of response, and safety and tolerability of the combination. Disease response will be assessed by the Lugano response criteria. The study is currently enrolling. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04479267. Disclosures Modi: Genentech: Research Funding; Seagen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; MorphoSys: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Pregja: Janssen: Consultancy; Regeneron: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; Intellia: Consultancy; Caelum: Consultancy; Alnylam: Consultancy; Eidos: Consultancy; BMS: Research Funding. Ramchandren: pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Trillium: Research Funding; curis: Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy; MERCK: Consultancy, Research Funding; seattle genetics: Consultancy, Research Funding.

scholarly journals Engine: Phase III Randomized Study of Enzastaurin/R-CHOP Versus Placebo/R-CHOP in Frontline High Risk Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma Patients with Novel Genomic Biomarker DGM1

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 5330-5330 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jun Zhu ◽  
Grzegorz Nowakowski ◽  
Qingyuan Zhang ◽  
Joshua Brody ◽  
Xiuhua Sun ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Randomized Study ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Response Assessment ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Advisory Committees

Background: Progress in genome technology allows analysis of previously completed trials to identify subgroups potentially benefiting from therapy. Enzastaurin is a potent inhibitor of protein kinase C beta (PKC-β) and suppresses the phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K)/AKT pathway. The safety and efficacy of Enzastaurin has been tested in more than 60 clinical trials including 2 major studies in DLBCL: (1) PRELUDE (A phase III maintenance trial of Enzastaurin vs Placebo, N=758) (Crump, 2016), and (2) S028 (A randomized phase II study of Enzastaurin/R-CHOP vs R-CHOP in frontline intermediate/high-risk DLBCL, N=101) (Hainsworth, 2016). DNA samples extracted from blood of patients from PRELUDE were retrospectively genotyped using whole genome SNP arrays. From the genome wide screening a novel genetic biomarker, DGM1, was identified showing high correlation with response to Enzastaurin treatment (Luo, ASH 2018). Importantly, these findings were replicated in the phase II S028 study. In the S028 study the hazard ratio (HR) for OS in high-risk (IPI ≥ 3) DGM1 positive (+) patients who received Enzastaurin/R-CHOP was 0.28 (0.1-0.81) when compared to subjects who received R-CHOP, a benefit favoring Enzastaurin (p=0.018). These data suggest that addition of Enzastaurin to R-CHOP may significantly improve outcome in frontline high-risk DGM1 (+) DLBCL. The ENGINE study was initiated to validate this finding in a prospective study. Study Design and Methods: Adult patients must have untreated CD20+ DLBCL, IPI ≥ 3. Patients are randomized 1:1 to Enzastaurin/R-CHOP or Placebo/R-CHOP for 6 cycles during combination phase. Each subject's treatment assignment will be unblinded after response assessment at the end of the combination phase. Subjects randomized to the investigational arm who have a complete or partial response will have the option to continue in the single agent phase to receive Enzastaurin for up to 2 additional years. The study intends to enroll approximately 235 patients with primary endpoint of OS in DGM1 (+) patients. The study is ongoing with 57 sites open in the US and China. As of 20 July 2019, 128 patients have been randomized. Clinical trial information: NCT03263026. Disclosures Nowakowski: Genentech, Inc.: Research Funding; Curis: Research Funding; Bayer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Research Funding; Selvita: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; NanoString: Research Funding; MorphoSys: Consultancy, Research Funding. Brody:Acerta Pharma: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Celldex Therapeutics: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; Oncovir, Inc.: Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; Kite Pharma: Research Funding. Lue:Kymera Therapeutics: Honoraria; Astex Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria. Luo:Denovo Biopharma LLC: Employment, Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Patents & Royalties. Zhang:Denovo Biopharma LLC: Employment. Han:Denovo Biopharma LLC: Employment. Jivani:TRACON Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Other: Stock; Denovo Biopharma LLC: Employment. Liu:Denovo Biopharma LLC: Employment. Li:Denovo Biopharma LLC: Employment. Sun:Novartis: Other: Stock; Denovo Biopharma LLC: Employment.

Combination of Ofatumumab and Lenalidomide in Patients with Relapsed Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL): Results of a Phase II Trial

Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 720-720 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alessandra Ferrajoli ◽  
Lorenzo Falchi ◽  
Susan O'Brien ◽  
William Wierda ◽  
Stefan Faderl ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Tumor Lysis Syndrome ◽  
Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽  
Prior Treatment ◽  
Combination Regimen ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Purine Analogs

Abstract Abstract 720 Based on the demonstrated activity of ofatumumab and lenalidomide as monotherapy in patients (pts) with CLL and on the activity of rituximab in combination with lenalidomide in pts with relapsed CLL, we conducted a phase II study to investigate efficacy and tolerability of a combination regimen of ofatumumab and lenalidomide in patients with relapsed CLL who had received prior treatment with purine analogs. Thirty-six pts entered this study between January 2010 and January 2011. All pts had an indication for therapy. Other inclusion criteria required prior treatment with purine analogs, an ECOG PS score of 0–2 and adequate organ function (creatinine clearance > 30ml/min, total bilirubin < to 2 mg/dl, ALT < 2 X ULN). Pts with any neutrophil count were eligible. Pts were excluded for platelets < 30,000 mm3, positivity for HIV, active hepatitis B or C or recent history of tuberculosis. Treatment consisted of ofatumumab IV given weekly for 4 weeks (300 mg week 1; 1,000 mg weeks 2 and thereafter), monthly during months 2–6 and every other month during months 7–24, and lenalidomide 10 mg PO/day started on day 9 and continued for 24 months. Allopurinol 300 mg PO daily was given during the first two weeks of cycle 1. No pts received antibiotic or DVT prophylaxis. The use of growth factors was allowed according to ASCO guidelines. Responses were assessed (2008 IWG criteria) at months 3 and 6 and every 6 months thereafter. Thirty-four pts are evaluable (one pt withdrew consent prior to treatment with lenalidomide, and one was excluded because of concomitant MDS at study entry). Median age was 64 yrs (34–82). Twenty-two pts (65%) had Rai stage III-IV disease. Median β-2M level was 4.1 mg/dL (1.7–16). Twenty-two pts (65%) had unmutated IgHV and 23 pts (68%) expressed ZAP-70. Nine pts (26%) had del(17p), and 4 pts (12%) had del(11q). Median number of prior treatments was 2 (1–8). All pts had been previously treated with FCR and 13 pts (38%) were fludarabine-refractory. Three pts (9%) had relapse following SCT.Twenty-three pts achieved a response, for an overall response (OR) rate of 68%. Eight pts (24%) achieved a complete response (CR), including 3 MRD-negative CR, and 15 pts (44%) achieved a partial response (PR). Median duration of response is 22 months (4–30), with a median follow up of 24 months. Among the 9 pts with del17p, 5 (55%) achieved a PR. The average daily dose of lenalidomide was 10 mg in 9 pts (26%), 7.5 mg in 4 pts (12%), 5 mg in13 pts (38%) and 5 mg in 8 pts (23%). Seventy-six % of the pts are alive. No pt deaths occurred while on therapy. Eight deaths occurred after discontinuation of therapy: progression of CLL despite subsequent therapy (5 pts), complications of HSCT (1 pt), CLL/lung cancer (1 pt) and causes unrelated to CLL(1 pt). Seven pts are still on therapy and 10 pts have an ongoing response. Six pts discontinued therapy despite an ongoing response due to transition to HSCT (3 pts), toxicity (2 pts) and physician choice (1 pts), and 7 pts discontinued therapy because of loss of response [after 12 (1 pt), 16 (2 pts), 19 (2 pts), 22 (1 pt) and 29 (1 pt) months].The most common grade 3–4 treatment-related hematological adverse events consisted of neutropenia in 16 pts (47%), thrombocytopenia in 3 pts (9%) and anemia in 2 pts (6%). One pt (3%) experienced G4 pulmonary embolism while on ESAs. One pt (3%) had G3 infusion reaction to ofatumumab. Fourteen G3 infectious episodes occurred: pneumonia (4), fever/bacteremia (5), parotitis (1), cellulitis (2), HZV (1) and CNS toxoplasmosis (1). No G3-4 tumor lysis syndrome or tumor flare reaction (TFR) was observed. G1-2 TFR was observed in 8 pts (24%), In conclusion, the combination of ofatumumab and lenalidomide induced responses in 68% of pts with relapsed CLL, including pts with del17p, all of whom had received prior chemoimmunotherapy. This treatment was well tolerated and neutropenia was the most common toxicity. The severity of TFR with this combination was less than with single agent lenalidomide, possibly due to attenuation by the addition of treatment with ofatumumab. Several studies are currently investigating the combination of anti-CD20 mAb and lenalidomide used both as initial and salvage therapy of CLL. Disclosures: Ferrajoli: Celgene Corporation: Honoraria, Research Funding; GlaxoSmithKline: Research Funding. O'Brien:GlaxoSmithKline: Consultancy; Celgene Corporation: Consultancy. Wierda:Celgene Corporation: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; GlaxoSmithKline: Research Funding. Keating:Celgene Corporation: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

scholarly journals Safety and Efficacy of Combined Ruxolitinib and Thalidomide in Patients with Myelofibrosis: Initial Results of a Phase II Study

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 354-354 ◽  
Author(s):  
Raajit K. Rampal ◽  
Srdan Verstovsek ◽  
Sean M Devlin ◽  
Eytan M. Stein ◽  
Tapan M. Kadia ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Platelet Count ◽  
Combination Therapy ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Response Assessment ◽  
Platelet Response ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Background: Among the most frequent and challenging hematologic manifestations of myelofibrosis (MF) are anemia and thrombocytopenia, the presence of which portends an adverse outcome. Few effective modalities to address these cytopenias exist, particularly thrombocytopenia. Further, although the FDA-approved JAK1/2 inhibitor Ruxolitinib (RUX) has demonstrated significant clinical efficacy in MF patients, RUX frequently results in anemia and thrombocytopenia. Thrombocytopenia in particular often results in dose attenuation of RUX. Thalidomide (THAL) is a first-in-class immunomodulatory agent. Studies of THAL in MF patients, alone and with prednisone, have demonstrated improvements in anemia and thrombocytopenia. We therefore sought to examine whether combination of RUX and THAL could result in improvement in both disease-related and therapy-related cytopenias, as well as improve overall disease response in patients with MF. Here we report initial analysis of this study (NCT03069326). Methods: We conducted a multicenter two stage phase II trial designed to assess the effect of RUX and THAL combination in subjects with primary, post-polycythemia vera, or post-essential thrombocythemia myelofibrosis. Patients taking RUX at the time of enrollment must have had less than PR per IWG-MRT/ELN 2013 criteria, or be refractory, to RUX single-agent therapy. Patients must have been taking RUX for a minimum of 3 months, and must have been on a stable dose of RUX for a minimum of 4 weeks immediately prior to enrollment. Treatment-naïve patients received single-agent RUX for 3 months (run-in phase) per label, and went on to combination therapy if they achieved less then a PR per IWG-MRT/ELN criteria. Each cycle of therapy was 28 days. Response assessment was evaluated according to the IWG-MRT/ELN 2013 criteria. Platelet response criteria in patients with baseline thrombocytopenia (less than lower limit of normal) included: Major response (≥75% increase in platelet count), Intermediate Response (≥50% increase) and Minor Response (≥25% increase). Adverse events were assessed using the NCI CTCAE v. 4.0. The primary endpoint was the proportion of treated subjects that achieved a response by IWG-MRT criteria and by platelet response criteria. Results: A total of 25 patients are planned to be accrued. At the time of this writing, a total of 18 patients have been accrued. The median age was 70.5 years (47-85). 8 patients had received prior therapies other than RUX, including imetelstat, momelotinib, danazol, pomalidomide, darbepoetin alpha and sotatercept. 7 patients enrolled to the run-in phase. 14 patients received red blood cell transfusions prior to study enrollment. Evaluation of platelet count in patients with baseline thrombocytopenia demonstrated a significant increase in platelet count at cycle 3 of therapy compared to baseline (Figure 1A and B; P<0.05). An increase in Hgb was observed over successive cycles of combination therapy (Figure 1C and D). 5 of 18 accrued patients completed ≥6 cycles of combined therapy at the time of abstract submission and were thus evaluable for response assessment. The overall response rate in these patients was 80% (4/5 patients). Clinical Improvement (Anemia response and Symptom response) occurred in 3 patients (both responses observed in all 3 patients). Major platelet response was observed in 4 of 5 patients with baseline thrombocytopenia. 1 patient met criteria for spleen response (Table 1). Grade 3/4 non-hematologic adverse events regardless of attribution included; limb edema, diverticulitis, hypertension, syncope. 1 patient experienced a thromboembolic event. 1 patient experienced a grade 3 hematologic AE (neutropenia). Conclusions: The combination of THAL and RUX has demonstrated a promising efficacy signal in this initial analysis of an ongoing phase II study, and appears to be well tolerated. Platelet count increases were observed in all patients who entered study with baseline thrombocytopenia, a response which appears to be maintained in the majority of patients observed 6 months after starting combination therapy. As well, anemia responses were observed in 3 of 5 evaluable patients. Collectively, these data indicate a potential role for this regimen in patients with anemia and/or thrombocytopenia, who otherwise have limited treatment options. Updated data on duration of response and overall response of all accrued patients will be presented. Disclosures Rampal: Constellation: Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria; Incyte: Honoraria, Research Funding; Jazz: Consultancy, Honoraria; Stemline: Research Funding. Verstovsek:Italfarmaco: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Incyte: Consultancy; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Stein:Celgene: Consultancy; Bayer: Consultancy; Agios: Consultancy; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy. Kadia:Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy; Celgene: Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy; Abbvie: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; Jazz: Consultancy, Research Funding; Abbvie: Consultancy; Jazz: Consultancy, Research Funding. Mauro:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy. Pemmaraju:SagerStrong Foundation: Research Funding; daiichi sankyo: Research Funding; novartis: Research Funding; abbvie: Research Funding; cellectis: Research Funding; samus: Research Funding; Affymetrix: Research Funding; stemline: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; plexxikon: Research Funding. Bose:Blueprint Medicines Corporation: Research Funding; Astellas Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Incyte Corporation: Honoraria, Research Funding; Constellation Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Celgene Corporation: Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer, Inc.: Research Funding; CTI BioPharma: Research Funding.

scholarly journals Safety and Antitumor Activity Study Evaluating Loncastuximab Tesirine and Rituximab Versus Immunochemotherapy in Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 9-10
Author(s):  
Yuliya Linhares ◽  
Mitul D Gandhi ◽  
Michael Chung ◽  
Jennifer Adeleye ◽  
David Ungar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Advisory Board ◽  
Publicly Traded ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Large B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Large B Cell

Introduction: Patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) who fail immunochemotherapy (IC) and are unsuitable for autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) and those who relapse shortly after ASCT have extremely poor prognosis and need additional treatment options. Loncastuximab tesirine (Lonca) is an antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) composed of a humanized anti-CD19 antibody conjugated to a pyrrolobenzodiazepine dimer toxin. In a Phase 2 study (NCT03589469), Lonca demonstrated single-agent antitumor activity with manageable toxicity in patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) DLBCL. Rituximab is a CD20-targeting monoclonal antibody used in front-line IC for DLBCL and in salvage regimens, such as rituximab/gemcitabine/oxaliplatin (R-GemOx). The addition of rituximab to a CD19-targeting pyrrolobenzodiazepine ADC appears to prolong tumor control in preclinical studies, providing the rationale for evaluating Lonca combined with rituximab (Lonca-R) as a treatment for R/R DLBCL. Study Design and Methods: This is a Phase 3, randomized, open-label, 2-part, 2-arm, multicenter study of Lonca-R versus standard IC in patients with R/R DLBCL (NCT04384484). Part 1 is a nonrandomized safety run-in with Lonca-R. The toxicity of Lonca-R will be compared with previous single-agent Lonca safety data after 20 patients have completed Cycle 1 in Part 1. Provided no significant increase in toxicity is observed, Part 2 will be initiated. Part 2 is a randomized study of Lonca-R versus R-GemOx (Figure 1). Key inclusion and exclusion criteria are reported in Table 1. The primary objective of Part 2 is to evaluate the efficacy of Lonca-R versus R-GemOx, using progression-free survival (PFS) as the primary endpoint. PFS will be defined as the time between randomization and first documentation of recurrence, disease progression or death (central review) and the primary analysis will compare PFS between treatment arms using stratified log-rank testing. Secondary objectives include evaluation of safety, pharmacokinetics, and immunogenicity of the combination, in addition to the impact of treatment on symptoms, patient-reported outcomes and patients' overall health. In Part 1 and in the Lonca-R arm of Part 2, patients will receive intravenous (iv) Lonca at 150 µg/kg on day 1 of each 21-day cycle for 2 cycles, then at 75 µg/kg on day 1 for up to 6 additional cycles. Rituximab 375 mg/m2 iv will be administered subsequent to Lonca infusion on day 1 of each cycle. Patients treated with Lonca-R will also be given dexamethasone 4 mg (oral, twice a day), where not contraindicated, on the day before, the day of, and the day after Lonca-R infusion. In the R-GemOx arm, patients will receive rituximab 375 mg/m2, gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2, and oxaliplatin 100 mg/m2 iv on day 1 of each 14-day cycle up to a total of 8 cycles. Patients will receive premedication and supportive care according to the respective prescribing information for rituximab, gemcitabine, and oxaliplatin. The trial is planned to open in Q3/Q4 2020, and target enrollment is 350 patients. Funding: This study is sponsored by ADC Therapeutics SA; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04384484. Disclosures Linhares: Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; ADC Therapeutics, Verastem Oncology, Bristol Myers-Squibb (Juno), AstraZeneca: Research Funding; Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida: Current Employment. Gandhi:TG Therapeutics (Advisory board), GlaxoSmithKline (Advisory board): Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Adeleye:ADC Therapeutics: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Ungar:ADC Therapeutics: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Hamadani:ADC Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sanofi Genzyme, AstraZeneca: Speakers Bureau; Janssen R&D; Incyte Corporation; ADC Therapeutics; Celgene Corporation; Pharmacyclics, Omeros, AbGenomics, Verastem, TeneoBio: Consultancy; Takeda Pharmaceutical Company; Spectrum Pharmaceuticals; Astellas Pharma: Research Funding. OffLabel Disclosure: Rituximab is licensed for treatment of NHL but is being used in combination with an unlicensed drug (loncastuximab tesirine) in this study

scholarly journals A Phase I/II Study of NMS-03592088, a FLT3, KIT and CSF1R Inhibitor, in Patients with Relapsed or Refractory AML or CMML

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 3855-3855
Author(s):  
Marina Ciomei ◽  
Lucia Zanetta ◽  
Federico Lussana ◽  
Erika Ravelli ◽  
Francesco Fiorentini ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Dose Titration ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Secondary Resistance ◽  
Support Research ◽  
Refractory Aml

Background: NMS-03592088 is a novel, potent inhibitor of the FLT3, CSF1R and KIT receptor tyrosine kinases (KD < 1 nM for all three targets). The compound demonstrated high preclinical efficacy following oral administration in all tested target-dependent tumor models, including those harboring kinase domain secondary resistance mutations, such us the FLT3 residue 691 gatekeeper mutation and the KIT residue 670 and exon 17 mutations. In a FLT3-ITD model of disseminated AML, efficacy observed following single agent treatment with NMS-03592088 was further significantly increased when administered in combination with cytarabine, with excellent tolerability. In preclinical studies conducted in non-human primates, a dose-related increase of circulating CSF1 levels was observed in association with the administration of NMS-03592088, consistent with in vivo inhibition of CSF1R by the compound, thus providing the opportunity for the use of CSF1 levels as a potential pharmacodynamic biomarker of CSF1R modulation in the clinical setting. All three targets of NMS-03592088 are relevant in different settings of hematologic malignancies and solid tumors. In particular, FLT3 mutations occur in approximately 30% of acute myeloid leukemia patients (AML), and are associated with a poor prognosis; KIT mutations are reported in patients with the core-binding factor (CBF) subtype of AML and the CSF1 and/or CSF1R genes are frequently expressed in AML blasts. Recent experimental evidence suggests a potential therapeutic rationale for CSF1R blockade in AML, possibly due to interference with microenvironmental support [Edwards DK et al, Blood, 2019, 133: 588]. Furthermore, chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) blasts express high levels of CSF1R and NMS-03592088 was able to effectively inhibit their proliferation, concomitant with the suppression of intracellular CSF1R dependent signalling. A clinical trial exploring safety, tolerability and efficacy of NMS-03592088 in patients with AML and CMML is therefore warranted. Trial design: This first-in-human study (EudraCT Number: 2018-002793-47) is designed as an open-label multicenter Phase I/II trial including patients with relapsed or refractory AML or CMML who have exhausted standard treatment options, or for whom standard therapy is considered unsuitable. The study is designed to characterize the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and to explore the preliminary anticancer activity of NMS-03592088 administered orally as single agent once daily for 21 consecutive days, followed by a 7-day break within a 28 day cycle. The study includes an initial conventional phase I part with an accelerated dose titration design in subsequent cohorts of 3+3 patients aimed at defining the maximal tolerated dose (MTD) and the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D), followed by a limited dose expansion to confirm the RP2D. Once the RP2D is confirmed, a single-stage exploratory Phase II part will start comprising two parallel cohorts, one cohort will consist of AML FLT3 mutated patients and one of patients with CMML. Patients previously treated with FLT3 inhibitors are allowed to participate. The primary endpoint of the Phase II portion of the study is Overall Response Rate. Efficacy will be assessed according to standard criteria [Döhner H et al, Blood 2017, 129: 424; Savona MR et al., Blood, 2015, 125: 1857]. Exploratory endpoints are included to evaluate the potential effects of treatment with NMS-03592088 on circulating levels of CSF1 in plasma, the potential correlation of cellular CSF1R expression levels with clinical outcome in both AML and CMML, and the mutational status of a panel of leukemia-related genes, not limited to FLT3. The Phase I part started in Italy in March, 2019 and is currently ongoing. Disclosures Ciomei: NMS: Employment. Zanetta:Clioss: Employment. Fiorentini:Accelera: Employment. Bosotti:NMS: Employment. Ardini:NMS: Employment. Lombardi Borgia:NMS: Employment. Pulci:Accelera: Employment. Gatto:Clioss: Employment. Di Sanzo:Clioss: Employment. Colajori:Clioss: Consultancy. Davite:Clioss: Employment. Galvani:NMS: Employment. Gan:NMS: Employment. Rossi:Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sanofi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Jazz: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Astellas: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Honoraria; Mundipharma: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria; Sandoz: Honoraria; Daiichi-Sankyo: Consultancy; Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Rambaldi:Jazz: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau, travel support; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: travel support, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: travel support, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: travel support, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: travel support, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Italfarmaco: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: travel support, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: travel support, Speakers Bureau; Omeros: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Isacchi:NMS: Employment.

Pooled Safety Analysis From Phase (Ph) 1 and 2 Studies of Carfilzomib (CFZ) In Patients with Relapsed and/or Refractory Multiple Myeloma (MM)

Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 1954-1954 ◽  
Author(s):  
Seema B. Singhal ◽  
David Samuel diCapua Siegel ◽  
Thomas Martin ◽  
Ravi Vij ◽  
Michael Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Study Drug ◽  
Underlying Disease ◽  
Tolerability Profile ◽  
Treatment Schedule ◽  
Advisory Committees

Abstract Abstract 1954 Background: Carfilzomib (CFZ) is a novel, highly selective epoxyketone proteasome inhibitor that produces potent and sustained proteasome inhibition both in vitro and in vivo. CFZ appears to lack many of the off-target activities frequently associated with bortezomib (BTZ). This lack of off-target activity may account for observed differences in tolerability seen with CFZ including lack of significant neuropathy and minimal neutropenia and diarrhea. To date, single agent CFZ has been evaluated in Ph 1 and 2 studies in >600 patients, and the vast majority of patients treated had relapsed and/or refractory (R/R) MM. In these settings, CFZ has demonstrated durable single-agent activity and was well-tolerated in patients with advanced stage disease with co-morbidities including baseline neuropathy or renal insufficiency. Here we present the results of parallel safety analyses of patients from four Ph 1 and 2 studies with CFZ. Materials and Methods: The present safety analyses were based on data accumulated from patients enrolled in the following trials: PX-171-003 A0 (R/R MM), PX-171-003 A1 (R/R MM), PX-171-004 (relapsed MM), and PX-171-005 (R/R MM with varying degrees of renal function). In all studies, the treatment schedule was based on a 28-day cycle, dosing CFZ QDx2 each week for 3 weeks (Days 1, 2, 8, 9, 15, 16) with 12 days of rest. Doses of CFZ ranged from 15–20 mg/m2 in cycle 1 (005 [15 mg/m2], 003 A0 and A1, 004 [20 mg/m2]). In three studies CFZ was escalated to 27 mg/m2 after the first cycle, as tolerated (003- A1, 004-BTZ naïve subset and 005). In PX-171-005, low-dose dexamethasone was added in the majority of patients. Results: CFZ was well-tolerated by patients across the 4 studies analyzed. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) included fatigue, anemia, nausea, dyspnea, and thrombocytopenia. Detailed descriptions of the incidence of treatment-related AEs (all Grades (G) in ≥25% of pts; ≥G3 in ≥5% of pts) across studies are presented in the table. Peripheral neuropathy (PN) occurred infrequently across all 4 studies (N= 517), with only 20 patients (3.9%) experiencing PN of any G and only 2 patients (0.4%) with G3 PN. Febrile neutropenia was likewise uncommon, occurring in only 3 patients (0.6%). Serious treatment emergent AEs (SAEs) occurring in ≥1% of patients and considered possibly/probably related to study drug across all 4 studies included: pneumonia (3.5%), congestive cardiac failure (2.5%), acute renal failure (1.7%), pyrexia (1.2%), and dyspnea (1%). Conclusions: Despite a substantial disease burden present in the patient populations described here, CFZ was well-tolerated by patients with MM across all studies examined. The excellent safety/tolerability profile of CFZ has permitted prolonged administration (in some cases over 24 mos of continuous therapy including extension study) with minimal dose modifications or discontinuations due to toxicity. The low levels of neuropathy seen with CFZ make this agent a potentially important treatment option for patients with pre-existing neuropathy from either underlying disease or prior neuropathic anti-myeloma therapy. Disclosures: Singhal: Celgene: Speakers Bureau; Takeda/Millenium: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Onyx: Research Funding. Siegel:Millenium: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria. Martin:Celgene: Honoraria; Onyx: Consultancy. Vij:Onyx: Honoraria. Wang:Celgene: Research Funding; Onyx: Research Funding; Millenium: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding. Jakubowiak:Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Centocor Ortho Biotec: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Exelixis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees. Lonial:Millennium: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding; Onyx: Consultancy, Research Funding. Kukreti:Celgene: Honoraria; Roche: Honoraria; Ortho Biotech: Honoraria. Zonder:Millenium: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Cephalon: Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria. Wong:Onyx Pharmaceuticals: Employment. McCulloch:Onyx Pharmaceuticals: Employment. Kauffman:Onyx Pharmaceuticals: Employment. Niesvizky:Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Millenium: Consultancy, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Onyx: Consultancy, Research Funding. Stewart:Millennium: Consultancy; Celgene: Honoraria. Jagannath:Millenium, OrthoBiotec, Celgene, Merck, Onyx: Honoraria; Imedex, Medicom World Wide, Optum Health Education, PER Group: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau.

scholarly journals Phase II Study of Midostaurin + Chemotherapy in Pediatric Patients with Untreated, Newly Diagnosed, FLT3-Mutated Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 3835-3835
Author(s):  
Dirk Reinhardt ◽  
Christian Michel Zwaan ◽  
Albert Hoenekopp ◽  
Julie Niolat ◽  
Sophie Ifrah ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Pediatric Patients ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Consolidation Therapy ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Advisory Boards ◽  
High Dose Cytarabine

Background: In pediatric patients with AML, the presence of FLT3-internal tandem duplication (ITD) mutation is indicative of high-risk disease and confers a worse prognosis and a greater chance of relapse. Midostaurin is a multikinase inhibitor with potent activity against both mutated and non-mutated FLT3. In adult patients with FLT3-mutated AML, midostaurin in combination with chemotherapy has demonstrated good safety/tolerability and significantly improved overall survival (OS) and event-free survival (EFS) compared with placebo + chemotherapy. We present here the design of an ongoing phase II study (NCT03591510) evaluating midostaurin combined with standard chemotherapy and as a single-agent post-consolidation therapy in newly diagnosed pediatric patients with FLT3-mutated AML, other than acute promyelocytic leukemia. Study Design and Methods: This open-label, single-arm study is composed of 2 parts. For Part 1, the primary objective is to determine the recommended phase II dose (RP2D) of midostaurin in combination with chemotherapy, as determined by the occurrence of dose-limiting toxicities. For Part 2, in which patients will receive the RP2D of midostaurin, the primary objective is to evaluate the efficacy of midostaurin + chemotherapy as measured by the EFS rate at 24 mo (for regulatory purposes outside the US) or to assess the safety/tolerability of midostaurin + chemotherapy (for regulatory purposes within the US). Secondary objectives include safety/tolerability (outside US) and EFS at 24 mo (within US), other efficacy parameters (including OS, complete remission [CR], CR with incomplete blood count recovery [CRi], cumulative incidence of relapse, and minimal residual disease-negative status), and characterization of the pharmacokinetics of midostaurin. Eligible patients are aged 3 mo to < 18 yr with expected survival of > 12 wk, have a Lansky or Karnofsky performance status of ≥ 60, and have previously untreated de novo AML with FLT3 mutation: ITD and/or mutation in the tyrosine kinase domain, with mutant/wild-type signal ratio cutoff of ≥ 0.05. Exclusion criteria include any concurrent malignancy, Philadelphia chromosome or BCR-ABL1-positive AML, AML associated with Down syndrome, secondary AML, symptomatic leukemic central nervous system involvement, bone marrow failure syndrome, or prior treatment with a FLT3 inhibitor. Patients are to receive 5 treatment blocks: 2 of standard induction (Blocks 1-2) and 3 of consolidation (Blocks 3-5) chemotherapy, each with sequential twice-daily (BID) oral midostaurin. In Part 1 of the study, midostaurin will be given at a starting dose of 30 mg/m2 BID; dose escalation and determination of RP2D will be facilitated by a Bayesian hierarchical logistic regression model guided by escalation with overdose control principle. In Part 2, midostaurin will be administered at the RP2D. Induction therapy will be the local standard chemotherapy regimen with midostaurin starting after 24 hr from identification of FLT3 abnormalities and continuing for 14 d for Block 1, and FLADx (fludarabine + high-dose cytarabine on D1-5, daunorubicin on D2, 4, 6) with sequential midostaurin on D8-21 for Block 2. Patients demonstrating CR or modified CRi will proceed to consolidation with the following chemotherapy regimens, each with sequential midostaurin on D8-21: HAM (high-dose cytarabine on D1-3, mitoxantrone on D3, 4) for Block 3, HA3E (high-dose cytarabine on D1-3, etoposide on D1-5) for Block 4, and HiDAC (high-dose cytarabine on D1-3) for Block 5. Patients must be in continued remission (CR or modified CRi) to receive each block of consolidation therapy. Patients who complete Block 5 and remain in remission will proceed to 12 × 28-d cycles of post-consolidation therapy with single-agent midostaurin. Patients may undergo allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation at any time at the investigator's discretion. Overall, the aim is to recruit a minimum of 52 patients, including at least 49 at the RP2D dose. This study is currently enrolling patients at 13 centers in 7 countries (as of July 26, 2019), and a total of 37 centers in 14 countries are planned. Disclosures Reinhardt: Novartis: Other: Participation in Advisory Boards; Jazz: Other: Participation in Advisory Boards, Research Funding; CSL Behring: Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding. Zwaan:BMS: Research Funding; Servier: Consultancy; Sanofi: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy; Pfizer: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Other: Travel support; Roche: Consultancy; Incyte: Consultancy. Hoenekopp:Novartis Pharma AG Basel: Employment, Equity Ownership. Niolat:Novartis Pharma: Employment. Ifrah:Novartis: Employment. Noel-Baron:Novartis: Employment, Equity Ownership. Locatelli:Miltenyi: Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Bellicum: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; BluebirdBio: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. OffLabel Disclosure: Midostaurin is a kinase inhibitor approved in combination with chemotherapy for the treatment of FLT3-mutated AML in adults; the study reported here is in pediatric patients with FLT3-mutated AML.

scholarly journals Brentuximab Vedotin (BV) and Lenalidomide (Len) in Relapsed and Refractory (r/r) Cutaneous (CTCL) and Peripheral (PTCL) T-Cell Lymphomas; A Planned Interim Analysis of Phase II Trial

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 2853-2853
Author(s):  
Basem M. William ◽  
Ying Huang ◽  
Amy Johnson ◽  
Jonathan E Brammer ◽  
John C. Reneau ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Cell ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Large Cell ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Brentuximab Vedotin ◽  
Advisory Committees

Background: Patients with r/r tumor stage CTCL and/or PTCL have a poor prognosis. BV is currently FDA approved for CD30 positive CTCL and anaplastic large cell lymphoma (ALCL) with single agent activity in additional PTCL subtypes. Len also has single agent activity in patients with r/r CTCL/PTCL. The safety of the combination was established in a phase I trial in patients with r/r diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Methods: We conducted a single-institution phase II trial to determine the safety and efficacy of BV+Len combination in patients with r/r CTCL/PTCL. Simon's 2-stage optimal design was followed to test the null hypothesis of overall response rate (ORR) ≤0.3 versus the alternative hypothesis of ORR≥0.5. Patients with ≥ 1 line of systemic therapy or 2 lines of skin directed therapy, at least stage IB (for CTCL), and no prior progression on BV were eligible regardless of CD30 staining. All patients were treated with BV 1.2 mg/kg IV and Len 20 mg PO daily q3 weeks for a maximum 16 cycles. After 7 patients were treated, we reduced Len to 10 mg given safety/tolerability concerns. Responses are assessed by the International Society for Cutaneous Lymphomas and the cutaneous lymphoma task force of the European Organization of Research and Treatment of Cancer (ISCL/EORTC) Global response criteria (for CTCL) and Cheson year criteria (for PTCL). The effect of treatment on quality of life is assessed by Skindex-16. Results: As of July 1, 2019, 17 subjects were treated; 10 (59%) with mycosis fungoides (MF), 2 (12%) with Sezary syndrome (SS), 2 (12%) with CD30+ lymphoproliferative disorder, and 3 (18%) with PTCL. Median age was 60 (49-90) years and 76% were males. CD30 was completely negative (<1%) in 3 (18%) of patients and median CD30 staining (by immunohistochemistry) was 7.5% (range 1-75%). Of 12 patients with MF/SS, 5 (42%) had evidence of large cell transformation at accrual. Of 14 patients with CTCL, median baseline mSWAT was 54.5 (range 4.4-190). Median number of prior therapies was 5 (range 1-9). Grade 3 adverse events (AEs) were reported in 11/17 patients; including neutropenia (4), thrombocytopenia (1), bronchitis (1), dyspnea (1), abdominal pain (2), vertigo (1), , DRESS (Drug Rash with Eosinophilia and Systemic Symptoms) syndrome (1), urinary tract infection (1), and tumor flare (2). Median number of cycles received was 4 (range 1-17). Best response in 14 evaluable patients were 2 (14%) complete response, 3 (21%) partial response, and 8 (57%) stable disease with ORR of 33% (95% confidence interval:12-62%). Of 17 patients, 5 (29%) remain on treatment, and 12 (71%) discontinued treatment because of disease progression (7; 58%), AEs (4; 33%), or patient preference (1; 2%). Median duration of response was 3.2 (range 2.5-13) months. Of note, 7/14 patients (50%) patients with CTCL had >50% reduction in their Skindex-16 scores after a median of 2 cycles (range 1-3). Conclusions: BV + Len is combination is safe and efficacious in a heavily pre-treated patients with T-cell lymphomas. Len doses higher than 10 mg daily are poorly tolerated and associated with excess tumor flare. Recruitment of both CTCL and PTCL patients for this trial is ongoing. Disclosures William: Guidepoint Global: Consultancy; Kyowa Kirin, Inc.: Consultancy; Defined Health: Consultancy; Techspert: Consultancy; Celgene Corporation: Consultancy. Brammer:Verastem, Inc: Research Funding; Viracta Therapeutics, Inc.: Research Funding; Bioniz Therapeutics, Inc.: Research Funding. Grantier:Pharmacyclics LLC and Janssen Oncology: Other: Advisory Board. Hoffman:Pharmacyclics LLC and Janssen Oncology: Other: Advisory Board. Baiocchi:Prelude: Consultancy. Epperla:Pharmacyclics: Honoraria; Verastem Oncology: Speakers Bureau. Christian:Triphase: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Immunomedics: Research Funding; Acerta: Research Funding; Genentech: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Cephalon: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Millennium Pharmaceuticals Inc: Research Funding. Maddocks:BMS: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Teva: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. OffLabel Disclosure: Brentuximab vedotin is being used off-label for CD30 negative peripheral and cutaneous T-cell lymphoma. Lenalidomide is being used off-label for both conditions (within a phase II clinical trial)

A Phase 2/3 Multicenter, Randomized Study Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of Lenalidomide Versus Investigator’s Choice in Relapsed/Refractory DLBCL

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 628-628 ◽  
Author(s):  
Myron S. Czuczman ◽  
Andrew Davies ◽  
Kim M Linton ◽  
Nina Wagner-Johnston ◽  
Randy D. Gascoyne ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
B Cell ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
P Value ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Large B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Heavily Pretreated ◽  
Stage 1

Abstract Introduction: Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is an aggressive non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (NHL) comprising 3 molecular subtypes: germinal center B-cell (GCB), activated B-cell (ABC) and class III. ABC patients (pts) have a poor prognosis. The immunomodulatory drug lenalidomide (Len) produces durable responses in pts with aggressive NHL (Witzig 2011), with preferential activity reported in non-GCB DLBCL (Hernandez-Ilizaliturri 2011). Methods: This randomized, multicenter, open-label, phase 2/3 study was conducted to determine the efficacy and safety of single-agent Len vs single-agent investigator’s choice (IC) in relapsed/refractory DLBCL pts who received ≥2 prior therapies, or were ineligible for stem cell transplantation or further combination chemotherapy. DLBCL subtype (GCB vs non-GCB) was determined by a central pathology lab using immunohistochemistry (IHC) per the Hans method (Hans 2004). Pts were stratified by subtype, then randomized 1:1 to receive Len (25 mg/day, 21 days of 28-day cycle) or IC (gemcitabine, rituximab, etoposide, or oxaliplatin) until progressive disease (PD), unacceptable toxicity, or voluntary withdrawal. In the event of radiologically confirmed PD, pts in the IC arm were allowed to cross over to Len. The primary endpoint for Stage 1 was overall response rate (ORR), as determined by an Independent Response Assessment Committee. Progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and subtype analysis using gene expression profiling (GEP) were exploratory endpoints. Concordance of GEP and IHC was evaluated from 3 separate laboratories. Results: IHC subtyping agreement rate among the 3 laboratories ranged from 87.5%-97.9%, and sensitivity of IHC to detect ABC or GCB subtypes vs GEP ranged from 92.3%-100.0%. By IHC, 102 DLBCL pts (GCB, n=48; non-GCB, n=54) were treated with ≥1 dose of Len or IC (modified intent-to-treat population) in Stage 1. In this heavily pretreated population, >90.0% of pts received ≥2 prior systemic chemotherapies; 25 pts in Len and 32 pts in IC received ≥3 prior systemic chemotherapy regimens. Median age was 65 y in the IC arm vs 69 y in the Len arm. Twenty-nine pts crossed over from IC to Len after confirmed PD. All pts, regardless of subtype or therapy group, experienced ≥1 treatment-emergent adverse event, with neutropenia, anemia, and thrombocytopenia being the most common. Efficacy data are presented in the Table. Pts with GCB or non-GCB DLBCL (per IHC) treated with Len had similar ORR, but the data suggested greater improvements in PFS and OS with Len vs IC in the non-GCB pts. In an exploratory analysis of pts subtyped by GEP, ABC pts treated with Len vs IC-treated showed greater improvements in ORR, PFS, and OS compared with GCB pts. Prespecified criterion to advance to Stage 2 was a 2-sided 15% significance level in ORR in favor of Len based on IHC-defined subtype. The data did not fulfill this requirement, and Stage 2 was not opened. Conclusion: Len monotherapy showed clinical activity in heavily pretreated pts with DLBCL. The data suggest improved ORR, PFS, and OS with Len vs IC in the non-GCB population as defined by IHC, and the difference appears to be more pronounced in the ABC population as defined by GEP. Subtyping by GEP is warranted in further studies of Len in DLBCL. Abstract 628. Table 1.Table. Efficacy DataBy IHCBy GEPOverallGCBNon-GCBGCBABCLen(n=51)IC(n=51)Len(n=23)IC(n=25)Len(n=28)IC(n=26)Len(n=14)IC(n=16)Len(n=11)IC(n=16)ORR, % (95% CI)27.5 (15.9-41.7)11.8 (4.4-23.9) 26.1 (10.2-48.4)12.0 (2.5-31.2)28.6 (13.2-48.7)11.5 (2.4-30.2)21.4 (4.7-50.8)12.5 (1.6-38.3)45.5 (16.7-76.6)18.8 (4.0-45.6)P Value .079 .279 .179 .642 .206PFS, med wk (95% CI)13.6 (8.6-17.7)7.9 (6.3-9.0) 10.1 (8.3-22.3)29.0 (6.3-20.6)15.1 (8.3-24.1)7.1 (5.3-8.4)13.2 (8.3-24.9)7.1 (6.0-20.6)82.0 (7.3-NA)6.2 (4.3-10.1)P Value .041 .550 .021 .506 .105HR (95% CI) 0.64 (0.41-0.99) 0.82 (0.43-1.57) 0.50 (0.27-0.92) 0.77 (0.35-1.68) 0.44 (0.15-1.23)OS, med wk (95% CI)31.0 (16.6-41.3)24.6 (12.7-33.9) 30.0 (14.9-44.4)24.9 (13.7-58.3)32.3 (15.9-48.1)20.4 (10.3-33.9)30.0 (18.0-34.6)20.1 (13.7-36.9)108.4 (9.6-108.4)18.6 (6.6-48.0)P Value .673 .526 .253 .767 .144HR (95% CI) 0.91 (0.59-1.41) 1.23 (0.65-2.34) 0.70 (0.38-1.30) 1.12 (0.52-2.42) 0.47 (0.17-1.33) Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; HR, hazard ratio; med, median; NA, not applicable/not available. Disclosures Czuczman: Celgene: Consultancy. Off Label Use: This abstract describes a clinical trial of lenalidomide, which is an orally-available immunomodulatory agent under investigation for treating patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.. Davies:GlaxoSmithKlein: Research Funding; Hoffman La Roche: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding. Wagner-Johnston:Celgene: Research Funding. Gascoyne:Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding. Salles:Pfizer: Honoraria; Gilead: Honoraria; Jansen: Honoraria; Hoffman La Roche: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Mundipharma: Honoraria. Witzig:Celgene Corporation: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Zinzani:Mundipharma: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria; Gilead: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Honoraria; Millennium Takeda: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Teva: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Wright:Celgene: Research Funding. Staudt:Celgene Corporation: Research Funding. Repici:Celgene: Employment. Song:Celgene: Employment. Manzke:Celgene: Employment.

scholarly journals A Phase II Study of Dasatinib and Dexamethasone As Primary Therapy Followed By Transplantation for Adults with Newly Diagnosed Ph/BCR-ABL1-Positive Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (Ph+ ALL): Final Results of Alliance/CALGB Study 10701

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 309-309 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew J. Wieduwilt ◽  
Jun Yin ◽  
Meir Wetzler ◽  
Geoffrey L. Uy ◽  
Bayard L. Powell ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Intrathecal Methotrexate ◽  
Primary Therapy ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Cns Prophylaxis ◽  
T315i Mutation

Abstract Dasatinib with corticosteroid yields high complete remission (CR) rates in Ph+ ALL with minimal induction death. Optimal post-remission therapy is not known. We report a prospective study evaluating dasatinib/dexamethasone induction then consolidation with reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT), autologous HCT (autoHCT), or chemotherapy alone (chemo), followed by dasatinib-based maintenance. Methods: We conducted a phase II, 3-arm, non-randomized trial (NCT01256398, Support: U10CA180821, U10CA180882, U10CA180861, U24CA196171) at 17 US centers with primary objectives to determine 3-year overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) of adults ≥18 years (yrs) old with untreated Ph+ ALL treated with dasatinib/dexamethasone induction, CNS prophylaxis with systemic and intrathecal methotrexate, consolidation with alloHCT, autoHCT, or chemo, then dasatinib maintenance. Induction (Course I) used dasatinib 140 mg orally daily and dexamethasone 10 mg/m2/day orally or IV days 1-7. If ≤20% lymphoblasts in marrow at Day 15, Course II continued dasatinib with 7 days of dexamethasone. If >20% lymphoblasts, patients (pts) also received vincristine and daunorubicin. Pts not in CR/CRi received a second induction (Course III) with dasatinib, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, daunorubicin, and dexamethasone. CNS prophylaxis (Course IV) used dasatinib, IV vincristine and IV, oral, and intrathecal methotrexate. Course V consisted of HCT or chemo. Pts 18-70 yrs old underwent RIC alloHCT if they had a HLA-matched donor; otherwise they underwent autoHCT. AlloHCT conditioning used fludarabine 30 mg/m2/day IV day -7 through -3, alemtuzumab 20 mg/day IV day -7 through -3, and melphalan 140 mg/m2 IV once on day -2. GVHD prophylaxis with tacrolimus began day -2. Pts undergoing autoHCT received etoposide 10 mg/kg/day (age >65, 5 mg/kg/day) CIV for 4 days and cytarabine 2 g/m2 (age >65, 1 g/m2) IV every 12 hours for 8 doses then G-CSF for mobilization. AutoHCT conditioning was melphalan 100 mg/m2/day IV on days -2 and -1. Pts >70 yrs old or unable to undergo HCT received etoposide/cytarabine alone. Dasatinib maintenance (Course VI) began day 30 of Course V and continued for 12 months and until 2 consecutive negative BCR-ABL1 RT-PCR assays 3 months apart or relapse. BCR-ABL1 isoform and ABL1 kinase domain (KD) mutation determination were done locally. Results: From 12/15/2010 to 11/14/2014, 64 eligible pts enrolled. Median age was 60 yrs (22-87); median WBC 23.2 x 103/μl (0.3-454). The dominant BCR-ABL1 isoform was p190 in 59%, p210 in 17%, and not reported in 23%. The CR rate was 97% with no induction deaths. Fifty-five pts completed CNS prophylaxis (Course IV). Twenty pts underwent protocol-specified alloHCT, 7 autoHCT, and 9 chemo. Nine pts underwent off-study alloHCT and 5 skipped Course V. Dasatinib maintenance was tolerable with 72%, 80%, and 80% receiving >50% of planned maintenance doses in alloHCT, autoHCT, and chemo arms, respectively. With a median follow up of 48 months (37-78) for survivors, 3-yr OS and DFS were 55% (median OS 45 months) and 43% (median DFS 30 months), respectively. For pts undergoing consolidation with protocol-specified alloHCT, autoHCT, or chemo, 3-yr OS was 75%, 71%, and 55% respectively with median OS not reached (NR) for all groups. DFS at 3-yrs was 55%, 43%, and 46% respectively. Median DFS for alloHCT was 42 months vs 15 months for autoHCT and 34 months for chemo (Log-Rank P=0.4). Outcomes were similar with inclusion of off-study alloHCT and chemo patients skipping Course V. Relative to p190 BCR-ABL1 isoform, p210 was associated with shorter median OS (NR vs 16 months, P=0.04) and median DFS (35 months vs 10 months, P<0.0001). Three-year DFS was 9% with p210. Relapse occurred in 23 pts with 5 CNS relapses reported, one isolated. Relapse occurred in 25% of alloHCT, 43% of autoHCT, and 37% of chemo pts. T315I mutation in ABL1 KD was detected in 6 of 8 marrow relapses (75%). One isolated CNS relapse had no ABL1 KD mutations. Conclusions: Dasatinib and dexamethasone followed by alloHCT, autoHCT, or chemo yield similar 3-yr survival comparable to approaches using intensive induction chemotherapy. Pts with the p210 BCR-ABL1 isoform had dismal outcomes and may benefit from alternate approaches. T315I mutation was the major cause of relapse and should be addressed in future studies. Disclosures Wieduwilt: Amgen: Research Funding; Reata Pharmaceuticals: Equity Ownership; Daiichi Sankyo: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Leadiant: Research Funding; Shire: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding. Uy:GlycoMimetics: Consultancy; Curis: Consultancy. Powell:Rafael Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Kolitz:Magellan Health: Consultancy, Honoraria. Liedtke:Caelum: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Amgen/Onyx: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; celgene: Research Funding; Genentech/Roche: Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Prothena: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; BlueBirdBio: Research Funding. Stock:Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy. Devine:Kiadis Pharma: Consultancy. Larson:BristolMyers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding; Ariad/Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document