ARC-12: Phase 1/1b Study to Evaluate Safety and Tolerability of AB308 + Zimberelimab (AB122) in Advanced Malignancies

Abstract Background: PD-(L)1 pathway inhibitors have demonstrated durable clinical benefit in both solid tumors and hematologic malignancies; however, as less than 1/3 of patients respond to anti-PD-(L)1 monotherapy, combination therapies may be needed for improved response rates and survival. T cell Immunoglobulin and ITIM domain (TIGIT) is expressed on activated T cell and natural killer (NK) cell subsets; TIGIT-CD155 binding suppresses T and NK cell function and inhibits the antitumor immune response. AB308, an Fc-enabled anti-TIGIT humanized IgG1 monoclonal antibody (mAb), has reversed TIGIT-CD155-mediated T cell inhibition in preclinical models. ARC-12 will assess whether TIGIT pathway blockade by AB308 can augment zimberelimab (zim; anti-PD-1 mAb) activity in patients with solid and hematologic malignancies. Study Design and Methods: ARC-12 is a phase 1/1b, first-in-human, open-label, dose-escalation study of AB308 + zim in patients with advanced solid tumors or hematologic malignancies. Dose expansion cohorts include relapsed/refractory (R/R) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) and multiple myeloma (MM). For the dose-escalation, eligible adults have solid tumors for which no standard-of-care therapy exists or have pathologically-confirmed R/R non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) and have not received or are ineligible for allogeneic stem cell transplant or adoptive cell transfer; ≤5 lines of prior systemic therapy; ≥1 measurable lesion per RECIST (solid tumors) or Lugano Classification (NHL) criteria; and ECOG performance score of 0-1. As shown in the figure, patients will receive AB308 + zim intravenously (IV) once every 3 weeks (Q3W; Part A) or once every 4 weeks (Q4W; Part B). In Part A, the first 6 patients of Cohort 1 will follow 3+3+6 rules, allowing for AB308 dose adjustment if dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) warrant; all other dose-escalation cohorts will use 3+3 rules. After the Cohort 2 DLT period has been cleared, Part B enrollment will begin in parallel with Part A to determine the recommended dose for expansion (RDE) for AB308 + zim for both the Q3W (Part A) and Q4W (Part B) schedules. Each part can independently proceed to dose-expansion once the RDE is determined for that dose schedule. In the dose-expansion, patients will be enrolled into disease-specific cohorts for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), melanoma, gastrointestinal cancer, cervical cancer, and hematologic malignancies (DLBCL or MM). AB308 + zim may be dosed on either a Q3W or Q4W schedule; all patients in each expansion cohort will receive the same dose schedule. For both the dose-escalation and dose-expansion, the primary endpoints assess safety and tolerability of AB308 + zim; secondary endpoints include pharmacokinetics (PK), immunogenicity, and objective response rate for AB308 + zim. Additional secondary endpoints in the dose-expansion are disease control rate and duration of response. Safety and efficacy data will be analyzed using summary statistics and Kaplan Meier estimates as appropriate; PK parameters will be estimated using noncompartmental methods. ARC-12 is actively recruiting at sites in the United States (NCT04772989). Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Ailawadhi: Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy; Sanofi: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Ascentage: Research Funding; Genentech: Consultancy; AbbVie: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding; Xencor: Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Medimmune: Research Funding; Cellectar: Research Funding; Karyopharm: Consultancy; Beigene: Consultancy; GSK: Consultancy, Research Funding. Foster: Arcus Biosciences, Inc.: Current Employment. Ryba: Arcus Biosciences, Inc.: Current Employment. Scharville: Arcus Biosciences, Inc.: Current Employment. El-Baghdady: Arcus Biosciences, Inc.: Current Employment. OffLabel Disclosure: AB308 and zimberelimab (AB122) are in clinical development and are not approved in the United States for the use under discussion.

Download Full-text

Clinical Safety and Activity in a Phase 1 Trial of IPI-145, a Potent Inhibitor of Phosphoinositide-3-Kinase-δ,γ, in Patients with Advanced Hematologic Malignancies

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v120.21.3663.3663 ◽

2012 ◽

Vol 120 (21) ◽

pp. 3663-3663 ◽

Cited By ~ 7

Author(s):

Ian W. Flinn ◽

Steven M. Horwitz ◽

Manish Patel ◽

Anas Younes ◽

James R. Porter ◽

...

Keyword(s):

T Cell ◽

Dose Escalation ◽

Research Funding ◽

Cell Lymphoma ◽

Phase 1 ◽

Hematologic Malignancies ◽

Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽

Grade 3 ◽

Expansion Cohort ◽

Dose Levels

Abstract Abstract 3663 Introduction: Phosphoinositide-3-kinases (PI3Ks) play pivotal roles in cell signaling and regulate a variety of cellular functions relevant to oncogenesis. Impaired development and function of B and T lymphocytes has been demonstrated in PI3K-δ and PI3K-γ isoform knockout mice, supporting the development of PI3K-δ,γ specific inhibitors for B- and T-cell lymphoid malignancies. IPI-145 is a potent PI3K-δ,γ inhibitor in clinical development for patients (pts) with hematologic malignancies. The activity of IPI-145 via PI3K-δ and PI3K-γ isoform inhibition has been characterized in biochemical and cellular assays and demonstrated in preclinical models of B- and T-cell mediated disease. Early results of the Phase 1 study in pts with advanced hematologic malignancies are reported here. Methods and Patients: This Phase 1 dose-escalation study is designed to evaluate the safety, pharmacokinetics (PK) and activity of orally administered IPI-145 in pts with advanced hematologic malignancies, including T-cell lymphomas/leukemias. Sequential cohorts of pts are enrolled at progressively higher dose levels with expansion cohorts of pts with select hematologic malignancies. IPI-145 is administered orally 2 times per day (BID) continuously in 28-day cycles. Tumor response is evaluated based on disease-specific standard criteria. Results: As of 16 July 2012, the study had enrolled 20 pts; 5 pts with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL)/small lymphocytic leukemia (SLL), 4 with indolent non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (iNHL), 3 with aggressive B-cell NHL [including diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) n=2 and Richter's transformation n=1], 3 with multiple myeloma (MM), 2 with Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL), 2 with T-cell lymphoma [anaplastic large-cell lymphoma (ALCL) n=2] and 1 with mantle cell lymphoma (MCL). Of these pts, 11 are male and 9 female, with a median [range] age of 63 years [30–81], with 36% <6 month from most recent prior systemic therapy. The median [range] number of prior therapies was 3 [1–8]. IPI-145 doses administered include 8 mg BID (n=1), 15 mg BID (n=6), 25 mg BID (n=7), 35 mg BID (n=3), and 50 mg BID (n=3). The median [range] number of treatment cycles was 2 [1–8], with 12 (60%) pts continuing on treatment. Adverse events (AEs) have occurred in 13 (65%) pts, including 7 (35%) pts with AEs Grade ≥3. Treatment-related AEs occurred in 11 pts (55%) with Grade ≥3 occurring in 5 pts (25%). Grade 4 neutropenia was the one dose limiting toxicity observed to date (15 mg dose cohort). New Grade ≥3 hematological laboratory abnormalities included neutropenia [n= 6 (30%)] and thrombocytopenia [n= 1 (5%)]. Grade 3 ALT/AST elevations occurred in 1 (5%) MM pt with onset 6 weeks after IPI-145 initiation. Preliminary PK show dose-proportional increases in plasma Cmax and AUC over the dose range studied. Further, the PK and initial pharmacodynamic (PD) data from the first 3 cohorts (8–25 mg BID) predict continuous suppression of the PI3K-δ pathway with increasing inhibition of the PI3K-γ pathway with a 25 mg BID dose or greater. In the evaluable pts (n=11), responses were observed at the 8, 15, and 25 mg BID dose levels including 2/3 CLL/SLL pts (0 CR/2 PR/1 SD), 1/2 iNHL pts (1 CR/0 PR/1 SD), and 1/1 in MCL (1 PR). No responses have been observed to date in evaluable pts with MM (0/3) or aggressive NHL (0/2). All pts with at least SD after 2 cycles (n=6) remain on treatment including the first pt dosed. Based on the PK/PD and the preliminary activity observed in pts with CLL, iNHL and MCL, an expansion cohort is enrolling pts in these select hematologic diseases dosed at 25 mg BID to further evaluate the safety and preliminary activity of IPI-145. Dose escalation continues with a focus on pts with T-cell malignancies and DLBCL where increasing suppression of the PI3K-γ isoform may improve the efficacy profile. Additional expansion cohorts in T-cell lymphoma, DLBCL, myeloproliferative neoplasms and the acute leukemias will better define disease specific activity. Conclusions: IPI-145, an oral, potent PI3K-δ,γ inhibitor, appears to be well tolerated and has shown initial clinical activity in pts with iNHL, MCL, and CLL. A dose of 25 mg BID effectively inhibits PI3K-δ, providing a rationale for expansion in CLL/iNHL/MCL. Additional safety and efficacy data from the ongoing dose escalation evaluation in T-cell/aggressive NHL and the CLL/iNHL/MCL expansion cohort will be presented. Disclosures: Flinn: Infinity Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding. Horwitz:Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Allos: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy; Genzyme: Consultancy; Kyowa Hakko Kirin Pharma: Consultancy; Johnson & Johnson: Consultancy; Infinity Pharmaceuticals, Inc. : Research Funding. Patel:Infinity Pharmaceuticals, Inc. : Research Funding. Younes:Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria; Seattle Genetics: Honoraria, Research Funding; Sanofi-Aventis: Honoraria, Research Funding; MIllenium: Honoraria; Incyte: Honoraria; Genentech: Research Funding; Infinity Pharmaceuticals, Inc. : Research Funding; Gilead: Research Funding. Porter:Infinity Pharmaceuticals, Inc. : Employment. Sweeney:Infinity Pharmaceuticals, Inc. : Employment. Allen:Infinity Pharmaceuticals, Inc. : Employment. Kelly:Infinity Pharmaceuticals, Inc. : Employment. Kahl:Infinity Pharmaceuticals, Inc. : Research Funding.

Download Full-text

AG-636 for the Treatment of Adults with Advanced Lymphoma: Initiation of a Phase 1 Clinical Study

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-123420 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 1286-1286

Author(s):

Scott F. Huntington ◽

Avyakta Kallam ◽

Frank G. Basile ◽

Danielle Ulanet ◽

Huansheng Xu ◽

...

Keyword(s):

T Cell ◽

Dose Escalation ◽

Research Funding ◽

Phase 1 ◽

Hematologic Malignancies ◽

Employment Equity ◽

Expansion Phase ◽

Bayer Corporation ◽

Equity Ownership

Background: Dihydroorotate dehydrogenase (DHODH) is a mitochondrial enzyme involved in the de novo synthesis of pyrimidines, key building blocks for RNA and DNA biosynthesis. Inhibitors of DHODH are currently in clinical use for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (leflunomide) and multiple sclerosis (teriflunomide). Brequinar, a more specific and potent DHODH inhibitor, was evaluated in several phase 1 trials in patients with advanced solid tumors in the 1990s and demonstrated little evidence of antitumor activity; however, patients with hematologic malignancies were not evaluated in those studies. More recent preclinical studies show that cell lines and in vivo models derived from hematologic malignancies are highly sensitive to inhibition of DHODH. AG-636, a novel small molecule DHODH inhibitor, demonstrated strong in vitro and in vivo anti-tumor activity across diverse models of lymphoma and acute leukemia, supporting the evaluation of AG-636 as a treatment for patients with lymphoma and other hematologic malignancies. A phase 1, multicenter, open-label study investigating AG-636 for the treatment of patients with advanced lymphoma began enrollment on May 24, 2019 (NCT03834584). Methods: The primary objective of this study is to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of AG-636 and to characterize its dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) when given to patients with advanced lymphoma. The study includes a dose escalation phase followed by an expansion phase. Approximately 54 adults (42 in the dose escalation phase and 12 in the expansion phase) with advanced lymphoma refractory to standard treatment, will be enrolled at up to 6 centers in the United States. Broad inclusion criteria enable patients with Hodgkin, Diffuse Large B-Cell (DLBCL), Follicular, Peripheral T-Cell, Cutaneous T-Cell, Mantle Cell, and less common subtypes of lymphoma as defined in 2017 by the World Health Organization to enroll. There are no limits on the number of prior lines of therapy and patients may have received prior stem cell transplant or chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy. Patients with active central nervous system disease are excluded. Patients must have an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status ≤2, an absolute neutrophil count ≥1.0×109/L, a platelet count ≥75×109/L, a serum total bilirubin level ≤1.5×upper limit of normal (ULN), alanine aminotransferase and aspartate aminotransferase levels ≤3.0×ULN, and a creatinine clearance ≥30 mL/min (Cockcroft-Gault formula). AG-636 is given as an oral capsule once daily for 2-5 days each week, with 1 cycle of therapy defined as 4 consecutive weeks of treatment. During the dose escalation phase of the study, successive cohorts of patients will be treated with increasing doses of AG-636 to estimate the MTD. The study employs a 2-parameter adaptive Bayesian logistic regression model using escalation with overdose control to guide dose escalation and to estimate the MTD. The MTD is the highest dose that is unlikely (<25% posterior probability) to cause DLTs in ≥ 33% of participants in their first cycle of treatment. Secondary objectives include the safety and tolerability of AG-636, its pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics (via measurement of plasma dihydroorotate concentrations), and characterization of any anti-lymphoma activity that may be associated with AG-636 treatment. The dose-expansion phase of the study will treat approximately 12 additional patients at the MTD in order to better characterize the safety, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of the dose that may be suggested for future studies. Further expansion may be undertaken if AG-636 shows high activity in specific subtypes of lymphoma, either in the clinic or in preclinical models. The experience in this study with the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and safety of AG-636 will inform the optimal starting dose and regimen for evaluation in subsequent studies. Disclosures Huntington: Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Honoraria; DTRM Biopharm: Research Funding; Genentech: Consultancy; Bayer: Consultancy, Honoraria; AbbVie: Consultancy. Basile:Agios Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Ulanet:Agios: Employment, Equity Ownership. Xu:Agios Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Yin:Agios Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Mobilia:Agios Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Cooper:Agios: Employment, Equity Ownership. Shah:AstraZeneca: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Spectrum/Astrotech: Honoraria; Celgene/Juno: Honoraria; Kite/Gilead: Honoraria; Incyte: Research Funding; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Honoraria; Adaptive Biotechnologies: Honoraria. Leonard:Merck: Consultancy; Miltenyi: Consultancy; Sandoz: Consultancy; ADC Therapeutics: Consultancy; Akcea Therapeutics: Consultancy; Karyopharm Therapeutics: Consultancy; Gilead: Consultancy; Akcea Therapeutics: Consultancy; Miltenyi: Consultancy; Sutro Biopharma: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Bayer Corporation: Consultancy; Bayer Corporation: Consultancy; Genentech, Inc./F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Epizyme, Inc: Consultancy; Genentech, Inc./F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Consultancy; MorphoSys: Consultancy; Karyopharm Therapeutics: Consultancy; Sutro Biopharma: Consultancy; BeiGene: Consultancy; Nordic Nanovector: Consultancy; ADC Therapeutics: Consultancy; MorphoSys: Consultancy; Sandoz: Consultancy; Gilead: Consultancy; BeiGene: Consultancy; Nordic Nanovector: Consultancy; Epizyme, Inc: Consultancy; AstraZeneca: Consultancy; Merck: Consultancy; AstraZeneca: Consultancy. von Keudell:Bayer: Consultancy; Genentech: Consultancy; Genentech: Consultancy; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy; Bayer: Consultancy. Gopal:Seattle Genetics, Pfizer, Janssen, Gilead, Sanofi, Spectrum, Amgen, Aptevo, BRIM bio, Acerta, I-Mab-pharma, Takeda, Compliment, Asana Bio, and Incyte.: Consultancy; Teva, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Merck, Takeda, Seattle Genetics, Pfizer, Janssen, Takeda, and Effector: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics, Pfizer, Janssen, Gilead, Sanofi, Spectrum, Amgen, Aptevo, BRIM bio, Acerta, I-Mab-pharma, Takeda, Compliment, Asana Bio, and Incyte: Honoraria.

Download Full-text

Final Results of Phase 1/1b Study of Tenalisib, Dual PI3K δ/γ Inhibitor in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory T-Cell Lymphoma

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-123954 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 2831-2831 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Swaminathan P. Iyer ◽

Brad M. Haverkos ◽

Jasmine Zain ◽

Radhakrishnan Ramchandren ◽

Mary Jo Lechowicz ◽

...

Keyword(s):

T Cell ◽

Adverse Events ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Dose Escalation ◽

Safety Profile ◽

Research Funding ◽

Cell Lymphoma ◽

Phase 1 ◽

Clinical Activity ◽

Advisory Committees

Introduction: Tenalisib (RP6530) is a novel, highly specific, dual PI3K δ/γ inhibitor with nano-molar inhibitory potency at the enzyme and cellular level. PI3K plays a critical role in T-cell development and activation and several studies have validated the PI3K-AKT pathway as a potential therapeutic target in T cell lymphomas. Preliminary results of the ongoing Phase 1/1b T-cell lymphoma (TCL) study demonstrated an acceptable safety profile with encouraging clinical activity in relapsed/refractory TCL (Oki, ASCO 2018 and Iyer, ASH 2018). We now present the final results of the study (NCT02567656). Methods: This study comprised of four-dose escalation cohorts, followed by two dose expansion cohorts at MTD enrolling 20 patients each in PTCL and CTCL cohorts. Patients had histologically confirmed TCL, ECOG PS ≤2, and had received ≥1 prior therapy. Patients received Tenalisib [200 mg BID-800 mg BID (fasting), 800 mg (fed only)] orally until progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary objectives were to determine the MTD and pharmacokinetic profile. The secondary objective was to evaluate overall response rate (ORR) and duration of response. Responses were evaluated for PTCL and CTCL based on IWG criteria (Cheson 2007) and mSWAT respectively. Adverse events were graded according to CTCAE v4.03. Results: Fifty-eight patients were enrolled in study, 19 in dose escalation and 39 in dose expansion (28 PTCL and 30 CTCL). Median number of prior therapies was 4 (range, 1-15). Safety assessment of 58 patients receiving at least one dose of Tenalisib demonstrated an acceptable safety profile. Treatment related Grade≥3 AEs were elevated ALT/AST (21%), rash (5%), and hypophosphatemia (3%). These events were reversible and managed by withholding study drug. Additionally, in few patients (N=9), steroids were used to manage elevated ALT/AST. There were six treatment related serious adverse events, none of these led to fatal outcome. At end of the study, four (3 CTCL; 1 PTCL) patients who completed minimum 8 cycles of therapy were rolled over to a compassionate use study (NCT03711604) and were followed up. Efficacy assessments demonstrated an ORR of 46% (3 CR and 13 PR) and clinical benefit rate (CR+PR+SD) of 77%. Subset efficacy analysis showed an ORR in PTCL of 47% (3 CR; 4 PR) and in CTCL of 45% (9 PR). The median time to initial response was 1.8 months and was similar in both sub-types. The overall median DOR was 4.91 months (range 0.9-26.6); in PTCL patients the DOR was 6.53 months, (range: 0.97-21.0) and 3.8 months (range: 1.67-25.67) in CTCL patients. In 3 PTCL patients who achieved CR, the median DOR was 19.5 months (range 7.5-21). Conclusion: Tenalisib demonstrated promising clinical activity and an improved safety profile in patients with relapsed/ refractory TCL. Currently, a phase I/II combination study to further evaluate safety and efficacy with romidepsin is ongoing in this target population. Disclosures Iyer: Arog: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Research Funding; Genentech/Roche: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding. Zain:Spectrum: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy. Korman:Genentech: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Glaxo: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Immune Pharma: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Kyowa: Research Funding; Leo: Research Funding; Menlo: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Research Funding; Principia: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Prothena: Research Funding; Regeneron: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Rhizen: Research Funding; Sun: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Syntimmune: Research Funding; UCB: Research Funding; Valeant: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Eli Lilly: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Dermira: Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; AbbVie: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Routhu:Rhizen Pharmaceuticals S.A.: Employment. Barde:Rhizen Pharmaceuticals S.A.: Employment. Nair:Rhizen Pharmaceuticals S.A.: Employment. Huen:Galderma Inc: Research Funding; Glaxo Smith Kline Inc: Research Funding; Rhizen Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Innate Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Phase 1 study of MK-4166, an anti-human glucocorticoid-induced tumor necrosis factor receptor (GITR) antibody, as monotherapy or with pembrolizumab (pembro) in patients (pts) with advanced solid tumors.

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2019.37.15_suppl.9509 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽

pp. 9509-9509 ◽

Cited By ~ 12

Author(s):

Kyriakos P. Papadopoulos ◽

Karen A. Autio ◽

Talia Golan ◽

Konstantin Dobrenkov ◽

Elliot Chartash ◽

...

Keyword(s):

T Cell ◽

Solid Tumors ◽

Dose Escalation ◽

Drug Disposition ◽

Phase 1 ◽

Objective Response ◽

Study Drug ◽

Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽

Fixed Dose ◽

Phase 1 Study

9509 Background: Ligation of GITR on immune cells decreases Treg-mediated suppression and enhances T cell proliferation. MK-4166 is a humanized IgG1 agonist monoclonal antibody targeting GITR. Data from the first-in-human phase 1 study (NCT02132754) of MK-4166 as monotherapy (mono) or in combination with pembro (combo) are presented. Methods: MK-4166 was tested alone (0.0015 mg IV-900 mg Q3W ×4 doses) or with pembro (fixed dose 200 mg IV Q3W up to 35 doses) in the absence of toxicity or progression. Study included a dose escalation/confirmation cohort (metastatic solid tumors) and an expansion cohort (treatment-naive and pretreated melanoma). A T cellinflamed gene expression profile (GEP) was assessed using RNA from baseline tumor samples. End points primary: safety/tolerability, maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of MK-4166; secondary: pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD); exploratory: objective response rate (ORR) per irRECIST1.1. Results: Of 113 pts, 48 received mono and 65 combo; 20 were in the melanoma expansion. Common AEs ( > 20%) were fatigue, infusion-related reaction, nausea, abdominal pain, and pruritus; 43 pts had grade ≥3 AEs (38.1%); 6 (5.3%) were treatment-related. One dose-limiting toxicity (bladder perforation in a urothelial pt with a neobladder) possibly related to study drug was observed with mono. MTD was not reached. No treatment-related deaths were observed. MK-4166 PK/PD showed target-mediated drug disposition concomitant with decreased GITR availability on T cells in blood with increasing doses. Four objective responses (4/45; ORR, 9%) were seen with combo in dose escalation. For ICI-naive melanoma pts (n = 13) in expansion, ORR was 69% (95% CI, 38-91), including 4 CRs and 5 PRs. No response was observed in 7 pts previously treated with ICI. High ORRs were observed in noninflamed and inflamed ICI-naive melanoma pts. Conclusions: MK-4166 at a dose up to 900 mg as monotherapy and in combination with pembro was well tolerated, with dose-related evidence of target engagement. Responses were observed with MK-4166 900 mg plus pembro, particularly in pts with melanoma naive to ICIs. Clinical trial information: NCT02132754.

Download Full-text

A Phase 1 Study of ACTR087 in Combination with Rituximab, in Subjects with Relapsed or Refractory CD20-Positive B-Cell Lymphoma

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-123810 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 244-244

Author(s):

Javier Munoz ◽

Samantha Jaglowski ◽

Matthew S. McKinney ◽

Iris Isufi ◽

Patrick J. Stiff ◽

...

Keyword(s):

T Cells ◽

T Cell ◽

Antitumor Activity ◽

Dose Escalation ◽

Research Funding ◽

Phase 1 ◽

Human Study ◽

Advisory Board ◽

Phase 1 Study ◽

Dose Levels

Background: The Antibody-Coupled T-cell Receptor (ACTR) platform is an autologous engineered T-cell therapy that combines the cell-killing ability of T cells and the tumor-targeting ability of co-administered antibodies to exert potent antitumor immune responses. ACTR087 comprises the extracellular domain of CD16 linked to a CD3ζ-signaling domain and a 4-1BB co-stimulatory domain. Here we present the clinical experience from Study ATTCK-20-2 (NCT02776813), a multicenter, phase 1 study of ACTR087 in combination with rituximab in subjects with relapsed or refractory (R/R) CD20+ NHL. Methods: The main objectives of this first-in-human study were to evaluate the safety and antitumor activity of ACTR087+rituximab. Other objectives included evaluating ACTR T-cell persistence and other correlative biomarkers. Subjects must have had CD20+ NHL that was R/R after prior treatments, which must have included anti-CD20 antibody-containing chemotherapy. Subjects received lymphodepleting chemotherapy (cyclophosphamide and fludarabine) for 3 days, followed by rituximab and a single dose of ACTR087. Additional doses of rituximab were administered q3w until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or Investigator decision. The study included a dose escalation phase (increasing doses of ACTR087) and an expansion phase (ACTR087 at the preliminary recommended phase 2 dose [RP2D]); all subjects received rituximab at a fixed dose of 375 mg/m2 q3w. Results: Two dose levels (DL) of ACTR087 were evaluated during dose escalation (n=17). The MTD was exceeded at DL2, with severe cases of cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and neurotoxicity. Statistical analysis of the relationship between non-hematologic toxicity and ACTR+ T-cell doses was retrospectively performed (two-parameter Bayesian logistic regression model) to estimate an RP2D of 35×106 ACTR+ T cells. Nine subjects enrolled in an expansion cohort and received ACTR087 at this RP2D in combination with rituximab. Among all subjects treated (n=26), the majority (69%) were diagnosed with DLBCL. Subjects had received a median of 3 (range 1-9) prior lines of therapy, with 77% having received ≥3 prior lines. ACTR087 showed dose-dependent expansion with peak levels generally observed 7 to 14 days post administration. In subjects with ongoing clinical response (CR), ACTR remained detectable through the last timepoint evaluated. Across all cohorts, Grade ≥3 TEAEs reported in >3 subjects regardless of causality were limited to hematologic events. Potential T cell-mediated toxicities were observed, including 4 serious cases of CRS (Gr 4 in 2 subjects, both with fatal sepsis) and 2 serious cases of neurotoxicity (1 Gr 5, 1 Gr 4 in a subject with fatal septic shock). Elevated baseline inflammatory markers (eg, ferritin, CRP) were observed in patients who developed Gr ≥3 CRS and neurotoxicity post ACTR087. Of note, severe CRS presented without fever and events occurred >7 days post ACTR087. Clinical activity was reported with an ORR of 50% in all dose levels tested, including durable complete responses, with one subject in CR for 869+ days (Table 1). Conclusions: ACTR087+rituximab demonstrated antitumor activity, with observed safety events that are expected with other autologous T-cell products. The time to onset and clinical presentation of severe CRS and neurotoxicity events in this study informed the safety monitoring and adverse reaction management guidance across clinical studies of ACTR T-cell products. Data from this first-in-human study of ACTR087+rituximab confirm the proof of concept and will be used to guide further development for the ACTR platform. Updated clinical data, as well as expanded biomarker correlations to efficacy and safety, will be presented. Disclosures Munoz: Pharmacyclics /Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Consultancy; Fosunkite: Speakers Bureau; AstraZeneca: Speakers Bureau; Kyowa: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Celgene/Juno: Consultancy, Research Funding; Genentech: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Kite/Gilead: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy; Alexion: Consultancy; Portola: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Bayer: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Merck: Consultancy. Jaglowski:Kite: Consultancy, Other: advisory board, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Other: advisory board, Research Funding; Unum Therapeutics Inc.: Research Funding; Juno: Consultancy, Other: advisory board. Isufi:Celgene: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Astra Zeneca: Consultancy. Stiff:Gamida-Cell: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Cellectar: Research Funding; Unum: Research Funding; Gilead/Kite Pharma: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding. Sachs:Unum Therapeutics Inc.: Employment. Ranger:Unum Therapeutics Inc.: Employment. Harris:Unum Therapeutics Inc.: Employment. Payumo:Unum Therapeutics Inc.: Employment. Akard:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Speakers Bureau; Gilead: Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Speakers Bureau.

Download Full-text

Phase I dose escalation of KD033, a PDL1-IL15 bispecific molecule, in advanced solid tumors.

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2021.39.15_suppl.2568 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽

pp. 2568-2568

Author(s):

Jason J. Luke ◽

Anthony J. Olszanski ◽

Igor Puzanov ◽

Dan Lu ◽

Adrian Hackett ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Clinical Trial ◽

Solid Tumors ◽

Dose Escalation ◽

Cell Activation ◽

Nk Cell ◽

Phase 1 ◽

Locally Advanced ◽

Advanced Solid Tumors ◽

Efficacy Evaluation ◽

Open Label

2568 Background: IL-2 and IL-15 signal through the shared IL-2/15 βγ receptor, but unlike IL-2, IL-15 does not expand regulatory T cells (Tregs), does not mediate activation-induced cell death and may have an improved therapeutic index. KD033 is a fusion antibody combining a fully human, high affinity anti-human Programmed Death Ligand 1 (PD-L1) IgG1 antibody with the human IL-15 receptor alpha (IL15Rα) sushi domain and human IL-15 (IL-15). KD033 (or its mouse cross reactive surrogate molecule, srKD033) has been extensively characterized in multiple in vitro and in vivo nonclinical studies. The fusion of anti-PD-L1 antibody to IL-15 significantly increases the maximal-tolerated dose (MTD) of srKD033 in mice compared to free IL-15. In addition, srKD033 has exhibited increased efficacy in rejecting tumors in mice as compared to the combination of its individual components, anti-PD-L1 antibody and IL-15. Methods: This is a phase 1, open-label, multiple ascending dose, multi-center clinical trial being conducted in patients with metastatic or locally advanced solid tumors (NCT04242147). The primary objective is to determine the safety and tolerability and the MTD of KD033. Secondary objectives include characterization of PK and immunogenicity, evaluation of CD8 T and NK cell activation and assessment of best overall response and duration of response. KD033 is administered by IV infusion over 30 minutes every 14 days. Accelerated intra-patient dose escalation across the initial three dose levels, followed by 3+3 escalation thereafter, is investigating dose ranges from 3 µg/kg to 600 µg/kg. Efficacy evaluation is planned in an expansion cohort of patients with PD-1/L1 refractory tumors. Results: A total of 7 patients have received treatment. Three patients were dosed in Cohort 1 and four patients were dosed in Cohort 2. Through two dose escalation cohorts (3 µg/kg – 25 µg/kg), no dose-limiting toxicities have been reported. Grade 1-2 treatment-related toxicities, when observed, resolved within 24 hours with supportive management. 6 patients are evaluable for treatment response with one patient (adenoid cystic carcinoma) in the first cohort having stable disease for more than 6 months. Conclusions: KD033 has been well tolerated early in dose escalation with on-mechanism pharmacodynamics consistent with IL-15 agonism. Clinical trial information: NCT04242147.

Download Full-text

Multicenter Phase I Dose-Escalation Study of Lenalidomide in Patients with Relapsed Adult T-Cell Leukemia-Lymphoma (ATL) or Peripheral T-Cell Lymphoma (PTCL).

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v120.21.2737.2737 ◽

2012 ◽

Vol 120 (21) ◽

pp. 2737-2737 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Naokuni Uike ◽

Michinora Ogura ◽

Yoshitaka Imaizumi ◽

Norio Asou ◽

Atae Utsunomiya ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Clinical Trials ◽

T Cell ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Dose Escalation ◽

Research Funding ◽

Phase 1 ◽

Phase 2 ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Phase 2 Study ◽

Grade 3

Abstract Abstract 2737 Introduction: ATL is prevalent in Japan and has the worst prognosis among T-cell malignancies. PTCL also has a poor prognosis with currently available chemotherapeutic regimens, and both would benefit from better treatment modality. Lenalidomide is an immunomodulatory agent with direct tumoricidal and antiproliferative activity, and is approved for multiple myeloma (MM) in combination with dexamethasone after at least 1 prior therapy and for transfusion-dependent anemia due to low- or intermediate-1-risk myelodysplastic syndromes associated with 5q deletion. We conducted a phase 1 study of lenalidomide in patients with relapsed ATL or PTCL to establish the recommended dose and schedule for a subsequent phase 2 study. Patients and Methods: This multicenter, phase 1, dose-escalation study assessed the safety, maximum tolerated dose (MTD), pharmacokinetics, and efficacy in patients with relapsed advanced ATL or PTCL. Dose-escalation was conducted according to the standard 3+3 design. Up to one PTCL patient was allowed to be included in each cohort of 3 patients. Patients in Cohort 1 received oral lenalidomide 25 mg daily on Days 1–21 of a 28-day cycle. Patients in Cohorts 2 and 3 received 25 and 35 mg/day, respectively, on each day of the 28-day cycle. Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was defined as febrile neutropenia lasting 5 or more days; thrombocytopenia (platelets <10,000/uL or bleeding requiring platelet transfusion); ALT/AST elevation of Grade 4 or that of Grade 3 lasting 7 or more days; and/or clinically unacceptable Grade 3 or higher other non-hematological adverse events (AEs). Treatment was continued until the development of unacceptable toxicity or progressive disease (PD). Response was assessed by internationally accepted standard criteria for ATL and PTCL. Results: From July 2010–June 2012, 13 Japanese patients (9 ATL and 4 PTCL; age 32–74 years [median, 64]; 1–11 prior therapies [median, 1]) were enrolled: 3 in Cohort 1, 6 in Cohort 2, and 4 in Cohort 3. The 3 patients in Cohort 1 received lenalidomide for 21, 103, and 637 days, respectively, until PD with no instances of DLT. In Cohort 2, 1 patient experienced DLT (thrombocytopenia, platelets <10,000/uL) and 4 patients received lenalidomide for 37, 56, 138, and 387 days, respectively, until PD in 3 patients and unrelated death in one. The sixth patient is still receiving lenalidomide for 28+ days without a DLT. In Cohort 3, 2 patients had DLTs (thrombocytopenia, platelets <10,000/uL in one patient and Grade 3 prolongation of QTc interval in one patient on concomitant fluconazole with preexisting cardiac disease and grade 1 QTc prolongation at baseline), 1 patient received lenalidomide for 71 days before withdrawal of consent, and 1 patient is still receiving lenalidomide for 323+ days without a DLT. Based on these results, 25 mg daily per 28-day cycle was regarded as the MTD. Other Grade 3/4 non-DLT AEs occurring in 2 or more patients included neutropenia (n=8), lymphocytopenia (n=7), thrombocytopenia (n=3), skin rash (n=3), hyperbilirubinemia (n=2), and increased ALT/AST (n=2). Among the 9 ATL patients, 3 achieved partial responses (PR) with hematological complete response in 2 patients, including the disappearance of skin lesions in 1 patient. These responses occurred between 54 and 57 days, and lasted for 92, 279+ and 505 days. Among the 4 PTCL patients, 1 achieved a PR at day 106 with >75% reduction in lymph nodes, which lasted for 282 days. PK profiles of patients in the study were generally consistent with that observed in Japanese MM patients. Plasma exposure of lenalidomide increased with increasing dose with a mean Cmax on Day 1 for 25 mg and 35 mg of 493 ng/mL and 628 ng/mL, respectively, and a mean AUC24 of 2774 ng/mL and 3062 ng/mL, respectively. There was no evidence of accumulation following multiple dosing for 8 days. Conclusions: This phase 1 study identified lenalidomide 25 mg daily per 28-day cycle as the dose and schedule for a subsequent phase 2 study in patients with ATL or PTCL. Based on the preliminary evidence of antitumor activity in ATL and PTCL patients, a phase 2 study in patients with relapsed ATL in Japan is planned. Disclosures: Off Label Use: Lenalidomide (CC-5013) is an investigational agent in Japan; this abstract assesses its use in adult ATL patients. Tobinai:Merck: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Mundipharma: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Zenyaku: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Genzyme: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Eisai: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Symbio: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Eli Lilly: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Kyowa-Kirin: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Biomedics: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Solasia Pharma: Clinical trials, Clinical trials Other, Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Johnson & Johnson: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; GSK: Research Funding; Chugai/Roche: Research Funding; Takeda: Clinical trials, Clinical trials Other, Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Phase I Dose-Escalation Study of Cpi-613, in Combination with Bendamustine, in Relapsed or Refractory T-Cell Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v128.22.4163.4163 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 128 (22) ◽

pp. 4163-4163 ◽

Cited By ~ 4

Author(s):

Zanetta S. Lamar ◽

Scott Isom ◽

Rakhee Vaidya ◽

Anne W Beaven ◽

Zachariah A. McIver

Keyword(s):

T Cell ◽

Dose Escalation ◽

Response Rate ◽

Cell Lymphoma ◽

Phase 1 ◽

Single Agent ◽

Hematologic Malignancies ◽

T Cell Lymphoma ◽

Non Hodgkin Lymphoma ◽

Grade 3

Abstract Background:T cell lymphomas account for 10-15% of lymphoid malignancies and display significant heterogeneity. T cell lymphomas have a worse prognosis than most B cell lymphomas. For relapsed or refractory disease, there is not a standard treatment and median progression free and overall survival rates have been reported as 3.7 and 6.5 months, respectively. Therefore, optimal treatment for relapsed/refractory T cell Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma (NHL) is an unmet clinical need. CPI-613 is a lipoate derivative that has shown activity in hematologic malignancies. CPI-613 selectively targets the pyruvate dehydrogenase complex (PDC) and α-ketoglutarate dehydrogenase complex (KGDHC) in tumor cells. CPI-613 leads to the inhibition of the catalytic and regulatory functions of the PDC and the KGDHC causing alterations of mitochondrial enzyme complex activities and altering redox status, leading to apoptosis, necrosis and autophagy of tumor cells. The anti-tumor activity of CPI-613 is evident in various cancer cell lines, xenograft animal tumor models and clinical trials against a diverse group of cancers. Patients tolerate CPI-613 as a single agent at doses up to 3,000 mg/m2, according to Phase 1 trials in patients with solid tumors and hematologic malignancies. Bendamustine has shown single agent activity in the relapsed lymphoma setting with response rates of approximately 50% for T cell NHL. Here, we are conducting a Phase I study in which the primary objective was to evaluate the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of CPI-613 while administered in combination with Bendamustine. The secondary objective was to determine response rate to treatment. Methods: This study is a phase 1, open label, modified 3+3 dose escalation clinical trial evaluating CPI-613 and Bendamustine combination therapy. CPI-613 was given at escalating doses starting at 2,000mg/m2 over 2 hrs on days 1-4, and on days 8, 11, 15 and 18. Bendamustine was infused at 90 mg/m2 on days 4 and 5 of each treatment cycle. Each treatment cycle was 4 weeks and repeated up to six cycles. Demographics, patient characteristics and dose levels are shown in the table below. There was no intra-patient dose escalation. Results: As of July 27, 2016, eight subjects have received at least one dose of study drug. Eight patients are evaluable for safety and five patients are evaluable for response. The most common grade 3 or higher toxicities were lymphopenia and neutropenia and occurred in 4 subjects. One patient dosed at 2750 mg/m2 had a dose limiting toxicity of grade 3 acute kidney injury and grade 4 lactic acidosis. The protocol was later amended to discontinue dose escalation at doses of 2750 mg/m2 or higher and to expand the 2500mg/m2 cohort. The overall response rate was 80%. Three patients with peripheral T cell lymphoma, NOS, obtained a complete response and 1 patient with mycosis fungoides had a partial response. One patient with T cell acute lymphomoblastic lymphoma had progressive disease. The median time to response is 1.8 months. Enrollment is ongoing and updated trial results will be presented. Conclusions: This first reported study of CPI-613 administration in combination with Bendamustine in subjects with relapsed or refractory T cell lymphoma showed a good safety profile and an excellent overall response rate of 80% with CRs in all three patients with peripheral T cell lymphoma, NOS. Although numbers are small, continued investigation is warranted as these response rates in a poor risk population of patients with relapsed/refractory T cell lymphoma are very exciting. Clinical trial: NCT02168907 Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Download Full-text

Preliminary Clinical Results from a Phase 1 Study of ACTR707 in Combination with Rituximab in Subjects with Relapsed or Refractory CD20+ non-Hodgkin Lymphoma

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-125995 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 1587-1587

Author(s):

Ian W. Flinn ◽

Jason R. Westin ◽

Jonathon B. Cohen ◽

Luke P. Akard ◽

Samantha Jaglowski ◽

...

Keyword(s):

T Cells ◽

T Cell ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Dose Escalation ◽

Research Funding ◽

Phase 1 ◽

Advisory Board ◽

Phase 1 Study ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Clinical Responses

Background: The Antibody-Coupled T-cell Receptor (ACTR) platform is an autologous engineered T-cell therapy that combines the cell-killing ability of T cells and the tumor-targeting ability of co-administered antibodies to exert potent antitumor immune responses. ACTR707 comprises the extracellular domain of CD16 linked to a CD3ζ signaling domain and a CD28 co-stimulatory domain. ACTR707 is in clinical development in combination with rituximab (NCT03189836) or trastuzumab (NCT03680560). Here we present clinical findings from the dose escalation phase of Study ATTCK-20-03, an ongoing, multicenter, phase 1 study of ACTR707+rituximab in subjects with relapsed or refractory (R/R) CD20+ NHL. Methods: The primary objectives of this first-in-human study are to evaluate the safety of the combination of ACTR707 and rituximab and to determine a recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D). Other objectives include evaluating antitumor activity and ACTR T-cell persistence. Subjects must have CD20+ NHL that is R/R after prior treatments, which must include anti-CD20 antibody-containing chemotherapy. Subjects receive lymphodepleting chemotherapy (cyclophosphamide and fludarabine) for 3 days, followed by rituximab and a single dose of ACTR707. Additional doses of rituximab are administered q3w until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or Investigator decision. The study includes a dose escalation phase (increasing doses of ACTR707 with fixed dose of rituximab at 375 mg/m2 q3w) and an expansion phase at the RP2D. Results: Six subjects received ACTR707 at Dose Level 1 (DL1; 23-38×106 ACTR+ T cells), 3 subjects at DL2 (30-50×106 ACTR+ T cells), and 5 subjects at DL3 (45-55×106 ACTR+ T cells). The majority of the subjects were diagnosed with DLBCL (93%) and had refractory disease (71%), defined as progressive disease as the best response to any prior treatment or relapse <1 year post autologous stem cell transplant. In DL1 through DL3, as of 27 May 2019, there were no dose-limiting toxicities, AEs of cytokine release syndrome (CRS), serious or severe neurologic AEs, or AEs leading to deaths on treatment. TEAEs reported in >2 subjects, regardless of causality or grade, included neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, anemia, febrile neutropenia, pyrexia, cough, constipation, diarrhea, nausea, and vomiting. SAEs considered possibly related to ACTR707 were febrile neutropenia (n=2) and cytopenia (n=1). ACTR707 expansion generally reached peak levels within 1 to 2 weeks after administration. All subjects with complete response (CR) up to 1 year had detectable ACTR at the last timepoint evaluated. Higher ACTR707 CD8:CD4 T-cell ratios were associated with clinical responses. Clinical activity was reported across DL1 through DL3, with an overall response rate of 64% including durable complete responses (CRs), with one subject in CR for 387+ days (Table 1). Conclusions: Data available from DL1 through DL3 of ACTR707+rituximab suggest that clinical responses can be achieved without severe T cell-mediated toxicities (eg, CRS and neurotoxicity) that have been reported with other autologous T-cell products. Dose escalation continues at a target dose of 80×106 ACTR+ T cells; enrollment in DL4 (n=6) was recently completed. Updated data, including identified correlates of clinical outcomes, will be presented for DL1 through DL4. Disclosures Flinn: TG Therapeutics, Trillum Therapeutics, Abbvie, ArQule, BeiGene, Curis, FORMA Therapeutics, Forty Seven, Merck, Pfizer, Takeda, Teva, Verastem, Gilead Sciences, Astra Zeneca (AZ), Juno Therapeutics, UnumTherapeutics, MorphoSys, AG: Research Funding; AbbVie, Seattle Genetics, TG Therapeutics, Verastem: Consultancy; TG Therapeutics, Trillum Therapeutics, Abbvie, ArQule, BeiGene, Curis, FORMA Therapeutics, Forty Seven, Merck, Pfizer, Takeda, Teva, Verastem, Gilead Sciences, Astra Zeneca (AZ), Juno Therapeutics, UnumTherapeutics, MorphoSys, AG: Research Funding; Acerta Pharma, Agios, Calithera Biosciences, Celgene, Constellation Pharmaceuticals, Genentech, Gilead Sciences, Incyte, Infinity Pharmaceuticals, Janssen, Karyopharm Therapeutics, Kite Pharma, Novartis, Pharmacyclics, Portola Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Research Funding. Westin:Genentech: Other: Advisory Board, Research Funding; Janssen: Other: Advisory Board, Research Funding; Kite: Other: Advisory Board, Research Funding; Unum: Research Funding; Curis: Other: Advisory Board, Research Funding; Juno: Other: Advisory Board; MorphoSys: Other: Advisory Board; 47 Inc: Research Funding; Celgene: Other: Advisory Board, Research Funding; Novartis: Other: Advisory Board, Research Funding. Cohen:Genentech, Inc.: Consultancy, Research Funding; Takeda Pharmaceuticals North America, Inc.: Research Funding; Gilead/Kite: Consultancy; LAM Therapeutics: Research Funding; UNUM: Research Funding; Hutchison: Research Funding; Astra Zeneca: Research Funding; Lymphoma Research Foundation: Research Funding; ASH: Research Funding; Bristol-Meyers Squibb Company: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Consultancy, Research Funding; Janssen Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy. Akard:Celgene: Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Speakers Bureau; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Speakers Bureau; Gilead: Speakers Bureau. Jaglowski:Juno: Consultancy, Other: advisory board; Kite: Consultancy, Other: advisory board, Research Funding; Unum Therapeutics Inc.: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Other: advisory board, Research Funding. Sachs:Unum Therapeutics Inc.: Employment. Ranger:Unum Therapeutics Inc.: Employment. Harris:Unum Therapeutics Inc.: Employment. Payumo:Unum Therapeutics Inc.: Employment. Bachanova:Celgene: Research Funding; Gamida Cell: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; GT Biopharma: Research Funding; Kite: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Incyte: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Phase 1 Study of CD19 Targeted 4-1BBL Costimulatory Agonist to Enhance T Cell (Glofitamab Combination) or NK Cell Effector Function (Obinutuzumab Combination) in Relapsed/Refractory B Cell Lymphoma

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2020-136571 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 16-17 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Martin Hutchings ◽

Fritz C. Offner ◽

Francesc Bosch ◽

Giuseppe Gritti ◽

Carmelo Carlo-Stella ◽

...

Keyword(s):

T Cells ◽

T Cell ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Dose Escalation ◽

Research Funding ◽

Bispecific Antibody ◽

Nk Cell ◽

Publicly Traded ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Anti Tumor Activity

Background: Up to 50% of patients suffering from Non-Hodgkin`s lymphoma (NHL) become refractory to or relapse after treatment (M. Crump, Blood 2017). With this, the lack of curative outcomes for patients with both indolent and aggressive NHL subtypes remains an unmet medical need. The CD20 CD3 T cell bispecific antibody glofitamab induces specific T-cell activation and has demonstrated significant single agent activity in r/r NHL patients (NP30179 study, M. Dickinson, EHA 2020, Abstract S241). RO7227166, a CD19 targeted 4-1BBL (CD137) costimulatory agonist has shown synergistic anti-tumor activity when combined with glofitamab in preclinical models (fig 1). RO7227166 is a bispecific antibody-like fusion protein composed of a split trimeric 4-1BB ligand, a tumor antigen-targeting moiety recognizing CD19, and a silent Fc part preventing Fc-mediated toxicity. 4-1BB is an inducible co-stimulatory molecule expressed by activated T-cells or NK cells. Through CD19-binding, the 4-1BB ligand moiety can deliver co-stimulatory signals to activated T- and NK-cell subsets in the tumor. The expected mode of action (MoA) for this molecule is to deliver a costimulatory signal 2 to enhance the effector function of tumor-infiltrating T cells or NK cells upon their activation (signal 1) by a T-cell bispecific antibody (e.g. glofitamab, RO7082859) or a tumor-targeted ADCC antibody (e.g. obinutuzumab). By delivering direct T-cell-target cell engagement followed by costimulatory activation the aim is to offer a highly active off-the-shelf immunotherapy combination. Methods: RO7227166 is being developed in combination with glofitamab and obinutuzumab in a phase I, open-label, dose-escalation study BP41072 (NCT04077723). The study is designed to evaluate the combination maximum tolerated dose (MTD), safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetic (PK), and/or pharmacodynamic (PD) profile of escalating doses of RO7227166, and to evaluate preliminary anti-tumor activity in participants with r/r NHL. The dose escalation stage is divided into Part I (combination with obinutuzumab) and Part II (combination with glofitamab) followed by an expansion stage (Part III). During Part I patients receive 1000mg obinutuzumab intravenously (IV) at a q3w schedule in combination with CD19 4-1BBL IV. During part II glofitamab is given in a q3w schedule with RO7227166 introduced at C2D8 and administered concomitantly from C3D1 onwards. A fixed dose of obinutuzumab (Gpt; pre-treatment) is administered seven days prior to the first administration of RO7227166 and seven days prior to the first administration of glofitamab (M. Bacac, Clin Cancer Res 2018; M. Dickinson, EHA 2020, Abstract S241). Patients will initially be recruited into part I of the study only using single-participant cohorts, where a rule-based dose-escalation is implemented, with dosing initiated at 5 μg (flat dose). As doses of RO7227166 increase, multiple participant cohorts will be recruited and dose-escalation will be guided by the mCRM-EWOC design for overdose control. Commencement of Part II including decision on the RO7227166 starting dose will be guided by safety and PK data from Part I. Patients with r/r NHL meeting standard organ function criteria and with adequate blood counts will be eligible. The maximum duration of the study for each participant will be up to 24 months in Part I (excluding survival follow-up) and up to 18 months in Part II and Part III. Tumor biopsies and peripheral blood biomarker analyses will be used to demonstrate MoA and proof of concept of an off the shelf flexible combination option providing signals 1 and 2. Disclosures Hutchings: Takeda: Honoraria; Takeda: Research Funding; Genmab: Honoraria; Roche: Honoraria; Genmab: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Sankyo: Research Funding; Roche: Consultancy; Genmab: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy; Roche: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Daiichi: Research Funding; Sanofi: Research Funding. Bosch:Hoffmann-La Roche: Research Funding. Gritti:Italfarmaco: Consultancy; F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Honoraria; Jannsen: Other: Travel Support; Autolus: Consultancy; IQVIA: Consultancy; Kite: Consultancy; Takeda: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria. Carlo-Stella:Bristol-Myers Squibb, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Janssen Oncology, AstraZeneca: Honoraria; Servier, Novartis, Genenta Science srl, ADC Therapeutics, F. Hoffmann-La Roche, Karyopharm, Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; ADC Therapeutics and Rhizen Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Boehringer Ingelheim and Sanofi: Consultancy. Townsend:Roche, Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria. Morschhauser:Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Servier: Consultancy; Janssen: Honoraria; Epizyme: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; F. Hoffmann-La Roche: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Genentech, Inc.: Consultancy. Cartron:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; F. Hoffmann-La Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria; Sanofi: Honoraria; Abbvie: Honoraria; Jansen: Honoraria; Gilead: Honoraria. Ghesquieres:CELGENE: Consultancy, Other: TRAVEL, ACCOMMODATIONS, EXPENSES; Roche: Consultancy, Other: TRAVEL, ACCOMMODATIONS, EXPENSES; Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: TRAVEL, ACCOMMODATIONS, EXPENSES; Janssen: Honoraria. de Guibert:Gilead Sciences: Consultancy, Honoraria; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria. Herter:Roche Glycart AG: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company, Patents & Royalties. Korfi:Roche Diagnostics GmbH: Consultancy. Craine:Roche: Current Employment. Mycroft:Roche: Current Employment. Whayman:Roche: Current Employment. Mueller:Roche: Current Employment. Dimier:Roche: Current Employment. Moore:Roche: Current Employment. Belli:Roche Pharma: Current Employment. Kornacker:Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd.: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Lechner:Roche Diagnostics GmbH: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Dickinson:Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Merck Sharp & Dohme: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau.

Download Full-text