scholarly journals Monogenically driven therapies: the new first line

Blood ◽  
2022 ◽  
Vol 139 (2) ◽  
pp. 162-163
Author(s):  
Lisa R. Forbes Satter
Keyword(s):  
2004 ◽  
Vol 171 (4S) ◽  
pp. 440-440
Author(s):  
Fernando J. Bianco ◽  
Mark B. Fisher ◽  
Michael L. Cher ◽  
Richard Everson ◽  
Wael A. Sakr ◽  
...  

2004 ◽  
Vol 171 (4S) ◽  
pp. 503-503
Author(s):  
Richard Vanlangendock ◽  
Ramakrishna Venkatesh ◽  
Jamil Rehman ◽  
Chandra P. Sundaram ◽  
Jaime Landman

2009 ◽  
Vol 40 (9) ◽  
pp. 32
Author(s):  
MITCHEL L. ZOLER
Keyword(s):  

2018 ◽  
Vol 23 (3) ◽  
pp. 233-249 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eric Bonetto ◽  
Fabien Girandola ◽  
Grégory Lo Monaco

Abstract. This contribution consists of a critical review of the literature about the articulation of two traditionally separated theoretical fields: social representations and commitment. Besides consulting various works and communications, a bibliographic search was carried out (between February and December, 2016) on various databases using the keywords “commitment” and “social representation,” in the singular and in the plural, in French and in English. Articles published in English or in French, that explicitly made reference to both terms, were included. The relations between commitment and social representations are approached according to two approaches or complementary lines. The first line follows the role of commitment in the representational dynamics: how can commitment transform the representations? This articulation gathers most of the work on the topic. The second line envisages the social representations as determinants of commitment procedures: how can these representations influence the effects of commitment procedures? This literature review will identify unexploited tracks, as well as research perspectives for both areas of research.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document