Disruption of STAT3 Signaling in Antigen Presenting Cells Represents a Novel Strategy To Overcome Tumor-Induced Antigen-Specific CD4+ T-Cell Tolerance.

Blood ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 104 (11) ◽  
pp. 109-109
Author(s):  
Fengdong Cheng ◽  
Hongwei Wang ◽  
Alex G. Cuenca ◽  
Pedro Horna ◽  
Lldefonso Suarez ◽  
...  

Abstract Tumor antigen-specific T-cell tolerance imposes a significant barrier to the development of effective therapeutic cancer vaccines. Bone marrow-derived antigen presenting cells (APCs) are critical in the induction of this unresponsive state. Recently, we have identified STAT3 signaling in APCs as an important regulatory pathway that determines the functional outcome of antigen-specific CD4+ T-cells in response to cognate antigen. Indeed, while disruption of this signaling pathway in APCs led to effective T cell priming, enhanced STAT3 activity resulted in the induction of T cell unresponsiveness1. Given the above results, we explored in this study whether disruption of STAT3 signaling in APCs may preserve the responsiveness of antigen-specific CD4+ T-cells during the growth of a tumor that induces antigen specific T-cell tolerance. First, mice with a genetic disruption of Stat3 in macrophages, neutrophils and a sub-population of myeloid DCs (LysMcre/Stat3flox/− mice) or control C57BL/6 mice were given subcutaneously 1x106 B16 melanoma tumor cells engineered to express Ovalbumin as a model tumor antigen (B16-OVA). Four days later, naive CD4+ T-cells (1x106) specific for a MHC class II-restricted epitope of Ovalbumin (OT-II cells) were adoptively transferred intravenously into tumor bearing mice as well as into tumor-free controls. Two weeks later animals were sacrificed and antigen-specific CD4+ T-cell responses to in vitro re-stimulation with OVA-peptide were evaluated. As expected, antigen-specific T cells re-isolated from tumor-bearing C57BL/6 mice were fully tolerant (lack of HA-specific proliferation and cytokine production). In sharp contrast, anti-OVA CD4+ T-cells isolated from tumor bearing LysMcre/Stat3flox/− mice remained fully functional as determined by their capacity to proliferate and produce IL-2 and IFN-gamma in response to cognate OVA-peptide. The demonstration that tumor-induced antigen-specific CD4+ T-cell tolerance occurs in mice with an intact STAT3 signaling in APCs, but not in mice with genetic disruption of this signaling pathway, led us next to evaluate the efficacy of pharmacologic inhibitors of STAT3 in preventing and or overcoming tumor-induced T-cell tolerance. In vivo treatment of tumor bearing mice with Tyrphostin AG490 (0.5 mg/ i.p. /twice a day x 5 days), a well-known inhibitor of STAT3 signaling, also resulted in preservation of the responsiveness of tumor-antigen specific CD4+ T-cells. Furthermore, in vitro treatment of APCs with this compound led to effective priming of naive antigen-specific T cells and breaking of antigen-specific T-cell anergy. More recently, we have evaluated the efficacy of a novel STAT3 inhibitor, compound 295558, which efficiently inhibits the DNA-binding activity of STAT3. Treatment of DCs or macrophages with this specific inhibitor led to the generation of inflammatory APCs capable of restoring the responsiveness of tolerized CD4+ T-cells isolated from tumor bearing mice. Taken together, our findings establish a critical role for STAT3 signaling in the induction of tolerance to tumor antigens in vivo. Inhibition of this signaling pathway in APCs provides a novel molecular target to overcome the remarkable barrier that tolerance to tumor antigens imposes to cancer vaccination strategies.

Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 693-693
Author(s):  
Krystalyn E Hudson ◽  
Jeanne Hendrickson ◽  
Chantel M Cadwell ◽  
Neal N Iwakoshi ◽  
James C. Zimring

Abstract Abstract 693 Introduction: Breakdown of humoral tolerance to red blood cell (RBC) antigens can result in autoimmune hemolytic anemia (AIHA), a severe and potentially fatal disease. The pathogenesis of AIHA is poorly understood. To investigate the baseline biology of tolerance to self-antigens expressed on RBCs, we utilized a murine transgenic mouse with RBC-specific expression of a model antigen consisting of a triple fusion protein of hen egg lysozyme (HEL), ovalbumin (Ova), and human blood group molecule Duffy; HEL-OVA-Duffy (HOD mouse). Methods: Wild-type C57BL/6 (B6) mice or HOD mice (on a B6 background) were immunized with HEL/CFA or OVA/CFA to test immune responses to antigens contained within HOD. Some animals were immunized with peptides as opposed to whole protein. Anti-HOD antibodies were quantified by indirect immunofluorescence using HOD RBCs as targets. Anti-HEL IgG was quantified by ELISA and anti-HEL secreting B cells were enumerated by ELISPOT. CD4+ T cell responses were assessed by tetramer staining and tetramer pull-down assays using I-Ab-OVA-329-337/326-334. T cell tolerance was specifically broken by adoptive transfer of OT-II CD4+ T cells into HOD mice (OT-II T cells recognize OVA323-339 presented by I-Ab). Effects of HOD antigen expression on B cell development were evaluated by crossing the HOD mouse with an anti-HEL BCR knockin mouse (SwHEL mouse) that is capable of normal class switching. Results: Immunization of B6 mice with OVA/CFA induced high titer antibodies reactive with HOD RBCs; in contrast, no anti-HOD was detected in HOD mice immunized with OVA/CFA. Similarly, no anti-HEL was detected in HOD mice immunized with HEL/CFA, whereas wild-type B6 mice had high anti-HEL titers (p<0.05). These data demonstrate overall humoral tolerance to the HOD antigen. Using pull-down assays, OVA-tetramer reactive T cells were detected in both B6 and HOD mice, with similar endogenous frequencies (mean numbers are 40 and 53 T cells, respectively; at least 6 mice analyzed), suggesting that central tolerance did not eliminate HOD reactive T cells. However, upon immunization with OVA peptide, B6 but not HOD mice had a detectable expansion of OVA-tetramer reactive CD4+ T cells, indicating that peripheral tolerance was preventing HOD autoreactive CD4+ T cells from participating in an immune response. To assess B cell tolerance to the HOD antigen, T cell tolerance was circumvented through adoptive transfer or OTII splenocytes (specific for the OVA323-339 peptide) into HOD mice. Anti-HEL autoantibodies were detected in HOD mice but not control B6 mice (p<0.001). Antibody production correlated with a 10–20 fold increase of anti-HEL antibody secreting cells, as determined by ELISPOT. Autoantibody production in HOD mice was not due to passenger B cells from the OTII donor, an artifact of excess CD4+ T cell number, or bystander activation as no autoantibodies were observed upon adoptive transfer with OTIIs on a Rag knockout background, irrelevant CD4+ T cells from SMARTA mice, or activated CD4+ T cells from TCR75 mice. To test the effects of HOD antigen expression on development of autoreactive B cells, HOD mice were crossed with SwHEL BCR transgenic mice (that express anti-HEL) and the F1 mice were analyzed. HEL-reactive B cells were visualized using multimeric HEL conjugated to allophycocyanin. In HOD-SwHEL+ mice, approximately 46±14% of immature bone marrow B cells were reactive with HEL, compared to 15±12% in HOD+SwHEL+ mice (p=0.043, 3 independent experiments, 5 mice total). Conclusions: These data demonstrate that tolerance to an RBC specific antigen is complete in the CD4+ T cell, but not the B cell compartment. CD4+ T cell tolerance appears to be more an effect of peripheral tolerance than central deletion, as OVA-tetramer reactive CD4+ T cells were visible in HOD mice but did not activate upon immunization with their cognate antigen. In contrast, while the HODxSwHEL F1 mice demonstrate that some B cell tolerance to HOD occurs, the induction of autoantibodies by introducing CD4+ autoreactive T cells (OT-II) demonstrates that B cell tolerance to the HOD antigen is incomplete in HOD mice. Together, these data suggest that a breakdown in T cell tolerance is all that is required for the pathogenesis of AIHA. As the T cell tolerance appears not to be deletional, it is predicted that environmental factors leading to a breakdown in peripheral tolerance of CD4+ T cells would be sufficient to induce AIHA. Disclosures: Zimring: Immucor Inc,: Research Funding.


Blood ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 103 (11) ◽  
pp. 4336-4343 ◽  
Author(s):  
Josef Kurtz ◽  
Juanita Shaffer ◽  
Ariadne Lie ◽  
Natalie Anosova ◽  
Gilles Benichou ◽  
...  

Abstract Anti-CD154 (CD40L) monoclonal antibody (mAb) plus bone marrow transplantation (BMT) in mice receiving CD8 cell-depleting mAb leads to long-term mixed hematopoietic chimerism and systemic donor-specific tolerance through peripheral and central deletional mechanisms. However, CD4+ T-cell tolerance is demonstrable in vitro and in vivo rapidly following BMT, before deletion of donor-reactive CD4 cells is complete, suggesting the involvement of other mechanisms. We examined these mechanisms in more detail. Spot enzyme-linked immunosorbent (ELISPOT) analysis revealed specific tolerization (within 4 to 15 days) of both T helper 1 (Th1) and Th2 cytokine responses to the donor, with no evidence for cytokine deviation. Tolerant lymphocytes did not significantly down-regulate rejection by naive donor-reactive T cells in adoptive transfer experiments. No evidence for linked suppression was obtained when skin expressing donor alloantigens in association with third-party alloantigens was grafted. T-cell receptor (TCR) transgenic mixing studies revealed that specific peripheral deletion of alloreactive CD4 T cells occurs over the first 4 weeks following BMT with anti-CD154. In contrast to models involving anti-CD154 without BMT, BMT with anti-CD154 leads to the rapid induction of anergy, followed by deletion of pre-existing donor-reactive peripheral CD4+ T cells; the rapid deletion of these cells obviates the need for a regulatory cell population to suppress CD4 cell-mediated alloreactivity. (Blood. 2004;103:4336-4343)


Blood ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 104 (11) ◽  
pp. 3175-3175
Author(s):  
Sanju Jalla ◽  
Erin McCadden ◽  
Jie Wang ◽  
Ephraim J. Fuchs ◽  
Katharine A. Whartenby

Abstract Since CD4+ T cell help has been proposed to be required for maintaining the activity of tumor-specific CD8+ T cells, tolerance in tumor-specific CD4+ T cells may seriously impair the efficacy of therapeutic tumor vaccines. To overcome this problem, we devised a strategy to “engineer” CD4+ T cell help by treating tumor-bearing animals with nonmyeloablative conditioning and transplantation of autologous hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) that have been genetically modified, via lentiviral transduction, to express an antigen containing “foreign” CD4+ T cell epitopes. After hematopoietic reconstitution, animals received the combination of an autologous tumor cell vaccine and an infusion of primed CD4+ T cells specific for the expressed epitopes. Using influenza hemagglutinin (HA) as the model antigen, we first confirmed that transplantation of HA-transduced HSCs led to efficient expression of HA by antigen-presenting cells, as demonstrated by the clonal expansion of adoptively transferred, HA-specific CD4+ transgenic T cells in mice receiving HA-transduced HSCs but not in mice receiving nerve growth factor receptor (NGFR) gene-transduced HSCs. Next, BALB/c mice harboring 13 day old, metastatic 4T1 mammary cancer were treated with removal of the primary, nonmyeloablative conditioning and transplantation of HA-transduced syngeneic HSCs, and following hematopoietic reconstitution, with concomitant autologous tumor cell vaccination and adoptive transfer of in vitro activated, HA-specific transgenic CD4+ T cells. This therapy was successful in curing the majority of tumor bearing mice, and was superior to the same therapy given to mice transplanted with NGFR-transduced stem cells. Finally, we found that the anti-tumor effect of vaccination plus exogenous T cell help was abolished by the adoptive transfer of either CD4+ or CD8+ T cells from tumor-bearing mice, suggesting that tumor-bearing mice contain both potential effectors and suppressors of anti-tumor immunity, the latter of which are abolished by the non-myeloablative conditioning. These results highlight the importance of CD4+ T cell help in the induction of therapeutic anti-tumor immunity.


Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 1896-1896
Author(s):  
Holbrook E Kohrt ◽  
Antonia MS Mueller ◽  
Jeanette B Baker ◽  
Matthew J Goldstein ◽  
Evan Newell ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 1896 The curative potential of MHC-matched allogeneic bone marrow transplantation (BMT) is in part due to immunologic graft-versus-tumor (GvT) reactions mediated by donor T cells that recognize host minor histocompatibility antigens. Immunization with leukemia-associated antigens, such as Wilm's Tumor 1 (WT1) peptides, induces a T cell population that is tumor antigen specific. We determined whether BMT combined with immunotherapy using WT1 peptide vaccination of donors induced more potent anti-tumor activity when combined with allotransplantation. WT1 peptide vaccinations of healthy syngeneic or allogeneic donor mice with a 9-mer WT1 peptide (amino acids 126–134, the WT1 9-mer which has the highest binding affinity for H-2Db) and Incomplete Freund's Adjuvant induced CD8+ T cells that were specifically reactive to WT1-expressing FBL3 leukemia cells. We found that compared to vaccination with IFA alone, four weekly WT1 vaccinations induced an increased percentage of WT1-tetramer+CD8 T-cells (0.15% vs. 1%) in the peripheral blood 28 days following the first vaccination (Figure A *p<.001). CD8 T-cells producing IFN-γ+ after co-culture with tumor cells were similarly increased (0.11% vs. 13.6%) at this timepoint (Figure B *p<.001). They were CD44hi suggesting a memory phenotype, specifically reactive to WT1-expressing tumor (FBL3 and not H11), and increased in a vaccination dose-dependent fashion (Figure A and B). Four weekly WT1 vaccinations prevented tumor growth in donors following intravenous leukemia challenge. In contrast, in tumor-bearing mice, WT1 vaccinations failed to induce WT1-tetramer+ or IFN-γ+ CD8 T-cells and were ineffective as a therapeutic vaccine based on intensity of bioluminescence from luciferase-labeled FBL3 leukemia and mortality. BMT from WT1 vaccinated MHC-matched donors including LP/J and C3H.SW, but not C57BL/6 syngeneic donors, into C57BL/6 recipient tumor-bearing mice was effective as a therapeutic maneuver and resulted in eradication of luciferase-labeled FBL3 leukemia and survival of 70–90% of mice. Interestingly, the transfer of total CD8+ T cells from immunized donors was more effective than the transfer of WT1-tetramer+CD8+ T cells, likely as a result of alloreactive and tumor-antigen reactive T cells contained with the donor total CD8+ T cells. Total and tetramer+CD8+ T cells required CD4+ T cell help for maximal anti-tumor activity, which was equivalent in efficacy from immunized or unimmunized CD4+ T cell donors. Total CD4+ T cells, alone, from immunized donors provided no anti-tumor activity. The infused donor LP/J or C3H.SW CD8+ T cells collected from cured C57BL/6 recipients, were highly reactive against WT1-expressing FBL3 leukemia cells (14% IFN-γ+) compared to non-WT1-expressing H11 leukemia cells (5% IFN-γ+). The circulating, WT1-tetramer+CD8+ T cell population expanded in cured recipients, peaking at 3.5% on day 50 and contracting through day 100 post-BMT to 0.56%. These findings show that peptide vaccination of donor mice with a tumor antigen dramatically enhances GvT activity and is synergistic with allogeneic BMT. This novel and broadly applicable approach, using leukemia-associated antigen immunization to enhance GvT by creating an “educated” donor T cell graft for allogeneic transplantation of patients with acute myeloid leukemia and myelodysplastic syndrome, is currently being translated to a Phase 1 clinical trial at our institution. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 568-568
Author(s):  
Krystalyn E. Hudson ◽  
James C. Zimring

Introduction: Loss of humoral tolerance to red blood cell (RBC) antigens may lead to the generation of pathogenic autoantibodies and result in autoimmune hemolytic anemia (AIHA), a severe and potentially fatal disease. Failure of tolerance to RBC antigens occurs with considerable frequency (1-3 cases/1,000 adults) and prevalence of AIHA is as high as 30% in persons with compromised B and/or T cell tolerance mechanisms. However, RBC-specific tolerance mechanisms are poorly understood. To elucidate the immune tolerances to RBC autoantigens, we utilized HOD mice. The HOD mouse expresses an RBC-specific transgene consisting of hen egg lysozyme (HEL), ovalbumin (OVA), and Duffy. Using the HOD model, we previously demonstrated B cell tolerance to RBC-specific HOD antigen is incomplete; however, T cell tolerance is stringent. HOD mice have similar detectable frequencies of HOD-specific CD4+ T cells compared to B6 mice. Although present, autoreactive HOD-specific CD4+ T cells are non-functional. Circumventing T cell tolerance by adoptive transfer, HOD mice make high titer anti-HOD autoantibodies in vivo. Thus, despite the presence of autoreactive B cells, no HOD-reactive antibodies are detectable unless CD4+ T cells are given, indicating T cell tolerance is a stopgap to autoimmunity. Methods: Leukocytes from C57BL/6 (B6) and HOD mice were harvested and OVA-specific CD4+ T cell responses were assessed by tetramer-pulldown assays with pooled tetramers I-Ab-OVA 329-337/326-334. Isolated cells were stained for surface and intracellular markers and analyzed via flow cytometry. For in vivo analysis, mice were treated with 300ug anti-CD25 (clone PC-61) depleting antibody or isotype control; a subset of antibody-treated mice was immunized with OVA/CFA. Antibodies bound to HOD RBCs were determined by direct antibody test. Anti-HOD antibodies were quantified by indirect immunofluorescence using HOD RBCs as targets. Results: Tetramer pull-down assays revealed similar numbers of OVA-reactive CD4+ T cells from HOD and B6 mice (mean 56 and 40, respectively, p = 0.3). However, cell surface and intracellular marker staining demonstrated that HOD mice had higher numbers of OVA-tetramer reactive CD4+ T cells that express regulatory markers CD25 and FoxP3, and exhaustion marker PD1 as compared to control B6 mice. Inhibitory CTLA4 expression was not detectable on OVA-reactive CD4+ T cells from HOD or B6 mice. To test whether regulatory T cells were required for RBC-specific immune tolerance, HOD and B6 mice were treated with CD25 depleting antibody or isotype control antibody. Anti-CD25 antibody treated mice had a significant reduction of CD25+ cells 4 days post treatment (p < 0.001, 2 independent experiments). Similarly, there was a significant reduction in FoxP3+CD25+CD4+ T cells (Tregs) in anti-CD25 treated mice (p < 0.001), compared to isotype. Mice received weekly injections of anti-CD25 or isotype antibody to maintain depletion for one month. A subset of mice received an OVA/CFA immunization. Sustained CD25+ depletion did not result in anti-HOD autoantibody generation. Further, there was no change in the endogenous frequency of OVA-reactive CD4+ T cells between HOD and B6 mice, regardless of antibody treatment. Similarly, HOD mice treated with depletion (or isotype) antibody and immunized with OVA/CFA did not make detectable anti-HOD autoantibodies. Consistent with lack of detectable autoantibodies, no expansion of OVA-tetramer reactive CD4+ T cells was observed in HOD mice. In contrast, B6 mice (treated with anti-CD25 or isotype antibody) had a detectable expansion of OVA-specific CD4+ T cells as a result of immunization. Conclusions: The data demonstrate a phenotypic difference between the OVA-reactive CD4+ T cells from HOD and B6 mice, with an increase in number of Tregs detectable in HOD mice. Administration of anti-CD25 antibody significantly reduced the number of overall CD25+ cells and Tregs. Prolonged depletion of these cellular subsets did not elicit autoantibodies in HOD mice. Further, immunization of CD25 depleted mice with a strong immune stimulus (OVA/CFA, known to expand OVA-reactive T cells in B6 mice), did not induce anti-HOD autoantibodies nor did it expand OVA-specific autoreactive CD4+ T cells in HOD mice. Together, these data demonstrate that CD25+ cells are not required for the maintenance of RBC-specific T cell tolerance and suggest a role for other regulatory mechanisms. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


2002 ◽  
Vol 195 (11) ◽  
pp. 1407-1418 ◽  
Author(s):  
Claes Öhlén ◽  
Michael Kalos ◽  
Laurence E. Cheng ◽  
Aaron C. Shur ◽  
Doley J. Hong ◽  
...  

CD8+ T cell tolerance to self-proteins prevents autoimmunity but represents an obstacle to generating T cell responses to tumor-associated antigens. We have made a T cell receptor (TCR) transgenic mouse specific for a tumor antigen and crossed TCR-TG mice to transgenic mice expressing the tumor antigen in hepatocytes (gag-TG). TCRxgag mice showed no signs of autoimmunity despite persistence of high avidity transgenic CD8+ T cells in the periphery. Peripheral CD8+ T cells expressed phenotypic markers consistent with antigen encounter in vivo and had upregulated the antiapoptotic molecule Bcl-2. TCRxgag cells failed to proliferate in response to antigen but demonstrated cytolytic activity and the ability to produce interferon γ. This split tolerance was accompanied by inhibition of Ca2+ flux, ERK1/2, and Jun kinasephosphorylation, and a block in both interleukin 2 production and response to exogenous interleukin 2. The data suggest that proliferation and expression of specific effector functions characteristic of reactive cells are not necessarily linked in CD8+ T cell tolerance.


2006 ◽  
Vol 176 (6) ◽  
pp. 3410-3416 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daron Forman ◽  
Eun-Suk Kang ◽  
Chaorui Tian ◽  
Jesus Paez-Cortez ◽  
John Iacomini

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document