Follow-Up Results of a Prospective, Multicenter, Open-Label Study of Oral Fludarabine Phosphate in Patients with Previously Untreated B-CLL.

Abstract The IV formulation of fludarabine phosphate is an effective treatment in patients with B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia (B-CLL), yielding overall response rates of 60% to 80%. An oral formulation of fludarabine phosphate has been developed. In a previously published multicenter, open-label, phase II clinical trial, 81 previously untreated B-CLL patients received 10-mg tablets of fludarabine phosphate (Fludara® oral) 40 mg/m2/day for 5 days, repeated every 4 weeks. The primary endpoint of the trial was response rate, and secondary endpoints included safety and quality of life assessments. Of 81 patients (mean age, 61.2 years; range, 30–75 years) with previously untreated B-CLL, 81.5% were classified as Binet stage B or C. The overall response rate (complete response [CR] + partial response [PR]) using National Cancer Institute (NCI) criteria was 80.2% (12.3% CR and 67.9% PR) and the median time to progression was 841 days (range, 28–1,146 days) (Rossi JF, et al. J Clin Oncol2004;22:1260–1267). The most frequently reported grade 3/4 adverse event was myelosuppression: WHO grade 3/4 hematologic toxicities included granulocytopenia (32.1%), anemia (9.9%), and thrombocytopenia (4.9%). This analysis reports on the long-term follow-up of this cohort during the period from November 2001 to November 2004. Of the 74 patients eligible for the survival analysis, 61 were also assessed for duration of response using NCI criteria: 9 CR (14.8%) and 52 PR (82.2%). During the 3-year follow-up period, 22 (29.7%) patients did not progress. For those who progressed, median time to progression was 29.7 months, and median duration of response was 22.9 months. In 41 (80.4%) of these patients, an increase in circulating lymphocytes was reported as evidence of disease progression. In 23 patients (45.1%), an increase in the sum of the products of at least 2 lymph nodes and/or appearance of new palpable nodes was reported as evidence of disease progression. During the indicated follow-up period, 37 patients (50%) received subsequent treatment. Twelve patients (16.2%) died during the follow-up period: 7 patients (58.3%) due to disease progression, 3 patients (25.0%) due to adverse events, and 2 patients (16.7%) due to other causes. Results from this study suggest that oral fludarabine phosphate is clinically effective and well tolerated by patients with previously untreated B-CLL. Moreover, these data demonstrate that oral fludarabine phosphate achieves response rates and duration of response comparable to those achieved with first-line fludarabine phosphate IV therapy.

Download Full-text

A Phase I/II Trial of Bortezomib, Low Dose Intravenous Melphalan and Dexamethasone for Patients with Relapsed Multiple Myeloma.

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v108.11.3542.3542 ◽

2006 ◽

Vol 108 (11) ◽

pp. 3542-3542 ◽

Cited By ~ 6

Author(s):

Rakesh Popat ◽

Catherine Williams ◽

Mark Cook ◽

Charles Craddock ◽

Supratik Basu ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Phase I ◽

Median Time ◽

Low Dose ◽

Overall Response Rate ◽

Response Rate ◽

Chemotherapeutic Agents ◽

Time To Progression ◽

Overall Response ◽

Grade 3

Abstract Background: Bortezomib is an effective treatment for patients with relapsed multiple myeloma with an overall response rate (MR+PR+CR) of 46% and time to progression of 6.2 months (APEX study). We and others have previously demonstrated potent in-vitro synergy with chemotherapeutic agents such as melphalan and it is likely that this will translate into improved responses in the clinical setting. Methods: This was a multi-centre, non-randomised Phase I/II clinical trial for patients with relapsed multiple myeloma. Bortezomib 1.3mg/m2 was given on Days 1,4,8 and 11 of a 28 day cycle, and intravenous melphalan on Day 2 for a maximum of 8 cycles. In the Phase I component melphalan was given at 2.5, 5,7.5 and 10mg/m2 in a dose escalation scheme and the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of 7.5mg/m2 was taken forward to an expanded Phase II component. Dexamethasone 20mg on the day of and the day after each dose of bortezomib was permitted for progressive or stable disease after 2 or 4 cycles respectively. Responses were classified by EBMT criteria. Results: To date 39 patients have been enrolled (median age 61years [range 40–77]) with a median of 3 lines of prior therapy [range 1–5] of which 26 (67%) have had one previous autologous stem cell procedure and 4 (10%) have had two. 23 (59%) have had prior exposure to thalidomide and 4 (10%) to bortezomib. 36 have now completed at least 1 cycle and are therefore evaluable for response. The overall response rate (CR+PR+MR) across all treatment levels was 75% rising to 81% (CR 11%; nCR 3%; VGPR 8%; PR 39%; MR 19%) with the addition of dexamethasone in 13 cases for suboptimal response. Rapid responses were seen with the median time to response being 1 month [range 1–6]. The median time to progression is 10.1 months and the median overall survival has not yet been reached at a median follow-up of 7.4 months. Of the patients that have had disease progression 7 (35%) had responses of longer duration than their previous therapy. The MTD was defined by unacceptable delays in administering treatment due to myelosuppresion. The toxicities have been acceptable with 13 SAEs reported of which 8 were hospitalisation due to infection. The most common grade 3–4 adverse events were: thrombocytopenia (53%), infections (25%), neutropenia (17%) and neuropathy (17%). Three grade 3 cardiac events were seen (myocardial infarction, atrial fibrillation and cardiac failure) and GCSF was administered to 13 patients as treatment and prophylaxis of grade 4 neutropenia. 13 patients were withdrawn from the study due to toxicity of which 7 were for neuropathy and 3 for delayed haematological recovery. Of note, 11 patients (28%) had pre-existing grade 1 neuropathy prior to starting therapy. Summary: The combination of bortezomib, low dose intravenous melphalan and dexamethasone appears to be highly effective in patients with relapsed multiple myeloma where a response rate of 81% is seen with 14% achieving nCR/CR. The toxicity profile associated is predictable, manageable and predominantly haematological. Recruitment is ongoing to a total of 53 patients.

Download Full-text

Bortezomib, Low Dose Intravenous Melphalan and Dexamethasone for Patients with Relapsed Multiple Myeloma: Final Results of a Phase I/II Clinical Trial.

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v110.11.2713.2713 ◽

2007 ◽

Vol 110 (11) ◽

pp. 2713-2713

Author(s):

Rakesh Popat ◽

Catherine Williams ◽

Mark Cook ◽

Charles Craddock ◽

Supratik Basu ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Clinical Trial ◽

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Phase I ◽

Median Time ◽

Low Dose ◽

Overall Response Rate ◽

Response Rate ◽

Time To Progression ◽

Overall Response ◽

Grade 3

Abstract Background: Bortezomib is an effective treatment for patients with relapsed multiple myeloma with an overall response rate (≥PR) of 43% and time to progression of 6.2 months (APEX study). We and others have previously demonstrated potent in-vitro synergy with chemotherapeutic agents such as melphalan and it is likely that this will translate into improved responses in the clinical setting. Methods: This was a multi-centre, non-randomised Phase I/II clinical trial for patients with relapsed multiple myeloma. Bortezomib 1.3mg/m2 was given on Days 1,4,8 and 11 of a 28 day cycle, and intravenous melphalan on Day 2 for a maximum of 8 cycles. In the Phase I component melphalan was given at 2.5, 5,7.5 and 10mg/m2 in a dose escalation scheme and the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of 7.5mg/m2 was taken forward to an expanded Phase II component. Dexamethasone 20mg on the day of and the day after each dose of bortezomib was permitted for progressive or stable disease after 2 or 4 cycles respectively. Responses were defined by EBMT criteria. Results: 53 patients were enrolled (median age 61years [range 40–77]) with a median of 3 lines of prior therapy [range 1–5] of which 26 (67%) have had one previous autologous stem cell procedure and 4 (10%) have had two. 23 (59%) have had prior exposure to thalidomide and 4 (10%) to bortezomib. The overall response rate (≥PR) across all treatment levels (n=52) was 65% rising to 69% (CR 19%; nCR 4%; VGPR 6%; PR 40%; MR 15%) with the addition of dexamethasone in 27 cases for suboptimal response. Of the 32 patients treated at the MTD the overall response rate (≥PR) was 78% (CR 28%; nCR 6%; VGPR 6%; PR 38%; MR 9%). Rapid responses were seen with the median time to response being 1 month [range 1–6]. The median time to progression was 10 months and the median overall survival has not yet been reached at a median follow-up of 17 months. Of the patients that have had disease progression 7 (35%) had responses of longer duration than their previous therapy. The MTD was defined by unacceptable delays in administering treatment due to myelosuppresion. The toxicities have been acceptable with 13 SAEs reported of which 8 were hospitalisation due to infection. The most common grade 3–4 adverse events were: thrombocytopenia (53%), infections (25%), neutropenia (17%) and neuropathy (17%). Three grade 3 cardiac events were seen (myocardial infarction, atrial fibrillation and cardiac failure) and GCSF was administered to 13 patients as treatment and prophylaxis of grade 4 neutropenia. 19 patients were withdrawn from the study due to toxicity of which 7 were for neuropathy and 3 for delayed haematological recovery. Of note, 11 patients (28%) had pre-existing grade 1 neuropathy prior to starting therapy. Summary: The combination of bortezomib, low dose intravenous melphalan and dexamethasone appears to be highly effective in patients with relapsed multiple myeloma with a response rate (≥PR) at the MTD of 78% including 34% nCR/CR. The toxicity profile is predominantly haematological.

Download Full-text

A trial of gemcitabine (gems) in combination with cisplatin for treatment of recurrent/metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC)

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2006.24.18_suppl.15505 ◽

2006 ◽

Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽

pp. 15505-15505

Author(s):

M. Yang ◽

H. Wang ◽

W. Wang ◽

T. Chiou ◽

P. Chen

Keyword(s):

Stable Disease ◽

Overall Response Rate ◽

Response Rate ◽

Performance Status ◽

Response Assessment ◽

Patient Treatment ◽

Open Label ◽

Overall Response ◽

Grade 3

15505 Aims: To determine the efficacy of gemcitabine in combination with cisplatin, and to assess the safety profile of the regimen as the first-line treatment in patients with recurrent/metastatic HNSCC. Methods: An open-label, non-comparative, multi-center phase II study for patients with histologically proven recurrent/metastatic HNSCC without prior treatment for their recurrent/metastatic disease. In this trial, 1250 mg/m2 gemcitabine was administered alone on day 1 and day 8 and 80 mg/m2 cisplatin would follow gemcitabine on day 8, to be repeated in cycles of 21 days until disease progression, intolerable toxicity, or consent withdrawal. Results: Between 04/2004 and 09/2005, 34 patients were enrolled in this study. 33 patients have completed the study treatment. Characteristics of the 33 patients: male- 33; median age- 51 years (range 38–65); 30 pts had a performance status (PS) of 0 or 1 and 3 had a PS of 2 (ECOG scale); histology: recurrent/metastatic HNSCC in all cases. Of the 33 patients, 25 were evaluable for response assessment. Partial response was observed in 8, stable disease in 10, and progressive disease in 7 patients. Overall response rate was 32% (95% Confidence interval 12%–52%). Grade 3/4 hematological toxicities included neutropenia in 12 pts, leukopenia in 11 pts, thrombocytopenia in 2 pts and anemia in 8 pts. Grade 3/4 nausea or vomiting was observed in 2 pts. Other toxicity was mild in the treatment. Patient treatment and follow-up are still ongoing. Conclusion: This study, with an overall response rate of 32% and a rate of stable disease of 40%, has shown a good activity with mild and acceptable toxicities of gemcitabine/cisplatin regimen in patients with recurrent/metastatic HNSCC. Survival and response analyses will be presented at the meeting. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Download Full-text

Phase II Trial of Lenalidomide - Dexamethasone - Rituximab in Relapsed or Refractory Indolent B-Cell or Mantle Cell Lymphomas Resistant to Rituximab.

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v114.22.1700.1700 ◽

2009 ◽

Vol 114 (22) ◽

pp. 1700-1700

Author(s):

Tahamtan Ahmadi ◽

Elise A. Chong ◽

Amanda Gordon ◽

Nicole A. Aqui ◽

Lisa H. Downs ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Follicular Lymphoma ◽

B Cell ◽

Disease Progression ◽

Phase Ii ◽

Overall Response Rate ◽

Response Rate ◽

Overall Response ◽

Mantle Cell ◽

Grade 3

Abstract Abstract 1700 Poster Board I-726 Introduction Lenalidomide is an immunomodulatory drug with effects on the innate immune system that may enhance antibody-dependent cell mediated cytotoxicity as well as the development of specific anti-tumor immune responses. These immunologic effects may synergize with the action of rituximab. To test the efficacy of lenalidomide combined with rituximab, we are conducting a single center, open label phase II clinical trial in patients (pts) with indolent B-cell or mantle cell lymphomas previously resistant to rituximab. Patients and Methods Eligible pts must have relapsed/refractory indolent B-cell or mantle cell lymphoma with measurable disease that has failed to respond to or has progressed within six months of a standard course of rituximab monotherapy (375 mg/m2 weekly for at least four weeks) or a prior rituximab-containing chemotherapy regimen. Thus, all pts enrolled are considered rituximab-resistant. In Part I (lenalidomide + dexamethasone), pts receive two 28-day treatment cycles of lenalidomide 10 mg every day and dexamethasone 8 mg once weekly. After assessment of response to Part I, all pts receive a single course of rituximab 375 mg/m2, consisting of four weekly doses during cycle 3 (Part II: lenalidomide + dexamethasone + rituximab). Treatment with lenalidomide + dexamethasone continue during and subsequent to rituximab; stable and responding pts continue on lenalidomide + dexamethasone until disease progression or development of clinically unacceptable toxicity. Response assessment after Part II is performed three months after the first dose of rituximab. Results To date, 22 pts have started therapy; diagnoses included: follicular (n = 17), mantle cell (n = 2), small lymphocytic (n = 2), and marginal zone (n = 1) lymphomas; median age was 59 years (range: 35 - 72); male: female ratio was 5:6; median number of prior therapies was 3 (range: 1 - 7); LDH was increased in 23%. For 21 pts with at least one follow-up visit, there were 2 deaths and 2 episodes of disease progression. One death due to myocarditis occurred during Part I treatment; one death due to lymphoma occurred in a patient removed from study due to grade 3 rash, which subsequently resolved. Both episodes of disease progression occurred in pts with follicular lymphoma, one of whom had been removed from study during Part 1 because of thrombocytopenia attributed to myelodysplasia. For all patients, at a median follow-up of 5.0 months (range: 0.3 - 12.3), progression-free survival (PFS) is 81% (95% CI: 51-94). For 10 pts with response assessments after Parts I and II, overall response rate (ORR) after Part I was 30% (3 CR; 6 SD; 1 PD) and ORR after Part II was 70% (5 CR; 2 PR; 2 SD; 1 PD). At a median follow-up of 7.8 months (range: 5.0 - 11.9), PFS is 89% (95% CI: 43-98) for these 10 pts. For pts who completed Parts I and II, grade 3 or 4 non-hematologic toxicities included hypokalemia (2/10 pts), hypophosphatemia (1/10 pts), and hypocalcemia (1/10 pts); grade 1 tumor flare occurred in one pt with follicular lymphoma. Conclusions Based on these preliminary data in rituximab-resistant patients with indolent B-cell or mantle cell lymphomas, the combination of continuous daily lenalidomide, low-dose weekly dexamethasone, and a single four week course of rituximab during cycle 3, achieves a high overall response rate with relatively durable responses. Additional follow-up and correlative studies will be presented. Disclosures Off Label Use: Lenalidomide is used in this trial for treatment of lymphoma.. Downs:Genentech: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria. Nasta:Genentech: Speakers Bureau. Schuster:Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding.

Download Full-text

804 A phase II study of the anti-programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) antibody penpulimab in patients with metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) who had progressed after two or more lines of chemotherapy

Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer ◽

10.1136/jitc-2020-sitc2020.0804 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 8 (Suppl 3) ◽

pp. A853-A853

Author(s):

Xiaozhong Chen ◽

Wei Wang ◽

Qingfeng Zou ◽

Jingao Li ◽

Chaosu Hu ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Disease Progression ◽

Receptor Occupancy ◽

Complete Response ◽

Hepatic Function ◽

Open Label ◽

Barr Virus ◽

Duration Of Response ◽

Epstein Barr ◽

Grade 3 ◽

Anti Tumor Activity

BackgroundNPC is rare but has a distinct geographic distribution, with a predominance in Southeast Asia. Favorable results with PD-1 inhibitors in NPC provide a strong rationale to investigate penpulimab in this disease. Penpulimab was engineered to eliminate FcγR binding and ADCC/ADCP completely,where ADCC/ADCP effects can induce T-cell apoptosis and clearance and then compromise anti-tumor activity. Penpulimab demonstrated a slower PD-1 antigen binding off-rate than marketed PD-1 antibodies, which result in better cellular activity and higher receptor occupancy. Penpulimab also showed numerous contacts with N58 glycosylation on the BC loop of PD-1 which could be an advantage to facilitate interaction of PD-1 antibody and may contribute to slower binding off-rate. These structural differentiations offer more robust biological effect and enhance anti-tumor activity of penpulimab.MethodsAK105-202 (NCT03866967) is a multicenter, single-arm, open-label study of penpulimab in metastatic NPC patients (pts) with disease progression after ≥2 prior lines of therapy including platinum-containing chemotherapy. All patients received penpulimab 200 mg q2w until progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was ORR based on RECIST v1.1 as assessed by an independent review committee (IRC). Key secondary endpoints included DCR, PFS, duration of response (DoR). Archived tissues were retrieved for the analysis of PD-L1 (Shuwen SAB-028). PD-L1 expression of tumor proportion score (TPS)≥50% was regarded as positive. Plasma Epstein-Barr virus DNA were obtained for biomarker correlative analysis.ResultsAs of 18 September 2020, the median follow-up was 7.9 months (range 0.9 to 16.9). The anti-tumor activity of penpulimab in the 111 pts with disease progression after ≥2 prior lines of therapy evaluable for efficacy (defined as pts who had an opportunity to be followed for at least 16 weeks and had measurable disease at baseline per RECIST v1.1) is shown in the table 1.Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs, including unlikely related) occurred in 79.2% of pts (≥G3 in 14.6% [19/130], treatment discontinuation in 3.1% [4/130]). Treatment-related SAEs occurred in 10.0% [13/130]. Most frequent TRAEs (≥10%) were fever (24.5%), hypothyroidism (24.6%), anemia (23.1%), ALT increased (17.0%) and WBC decreased (10.8%). Grade ≥3 TRAEs (≥2%) were hepatic function abnormal (2.3%) and anemia (2.3%).Abstract 804 Table 1a. Including 1 complete response and 29 partial response. At data cutoff, 90% of responders remained ongoing.b.43 pts were PD-L1 positive (TPS≥50%) and 66 pts were PD-L1 negative (TPS<50%).c. Including 1 ongoing response awaiting confirmation classified under SD.ConclusionsPenpulimab demonstrated encouraging anti-tumor activity and favorable safety profile in pts with disease progression after ≥2 prior lines of therapy. A higher proportion of objective responses was observed in NPC pts with PD-L1–positive tumors receiving penpulimab than those with PD-L1–negative tumors.

Download Full-text

Melflufen and Dexamethasone in Heavily Pretreated Relapsed and Refractory Multiple Myeloma

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.20.02259 ◽

2020 ◽

pp. JCO.20.02259

Author(s):

Paul G. Richardson ◽

Albert Oriol ◽

Alessandra Larocca ◽

Joan Bladé ◽

Michele Cavo ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Overall Survival ◽

Overall Response Rate ◽

Response Rate ◽

Progression Free Survival ◽

Free Survival ◽

Duration Of Response ◽

Heavily Pretreated ◽

Grade 3

PURPOSE Melphalan flufenamide (melflufen) is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate that targets aminopeptidases and rapidly and selectively releases alkylating agents into tumor cells. The phase II HORIZON trial evaluated the efficacy of melflufen plus dexamethasone in relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM), a population with an important unmet medical need. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with RRMM refractory to pomalidomide and/or an anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody received melflufen 40 mg intravenously on day 1 of each 28-day cycle plus once weekly oral dexamethasone at a dose of 40 mg (20 mg in patients older than 75 years). The primary end point was overall response rate (partial response or better) assessed by the investigator and confirmed by independent review. Secondary end points included duration of response, progression-free survival, overall survival, and safety. The primary analysis is complete with long-term follow-up ongoing. RESULTS Of 157 patients (median age 65 years; median five prior lines of therapy) enrolled and treated, 119 patients (76%) had triple-class–refractory disease, 55 (35%) had extramedullary disease, and 92 (59%) were refractory to previous alkylator therapy. The overall response rate was 29% in the all-treated population, with 26% in the triple-class–refractory population. In the all-treated population, median duration of response was 5.5 months, median progression-free survival was 4.2 months, and median overall survival was 11.6 months at a median follow-up of 14 months. Grade ≥ 3 treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 96% of patients, most commonly neutropenia (79%), thrombocytopenia (76%), and anemia (43%). Pneumonia (10%) was the most common grade 3/4 nonhematologic event. Thrombocytopenia and bleeding (both grade 3/4 but fully reversible) occurred concomitantly in four patients. GI events, reported in 97 patients (62%), were predominantly grade 1/2 (93%); none were grade 4. CONCLUSION Melflufen plus dexamethasone showed clinically meaningful efficacy and a manageable safety profile in patients with heavily pretreated RRMM, including those with triple-class–refractory and extramedullary disease.

Download Full-text

Durable Responses with Bortezomib in Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Mantle Cell Lymphoma (MCL): Updated Time-to-Event Analyses of the Multicenter PINNACLE Study.

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v110.11.125.125 ◽

2007 ◽

Vol 110 (11) ◽

pp. 125-125 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Andre Goy ◽

Steven Bernstein ◽

Brad Kahl ◽

Benjamin Djulbegovic ◽

Michael Robertson ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Peripheral Neuropathy ◽

Median Time ◽

International Workshop ◽

Single Agent ◽

Stage Iv ◽

Time To Event ◽

Prior Therapy ◽

Duration Of Response ◽

Grade 3

Abstract Background: We previously reported substantial activity with single-agent bortezomib (VELCADE®; Vc) in patients (pts) with relapsed or refractory MCL in the PINNACLE study (JCO2006;24:4867–74), which resulted in approval of Vc for MCL pts following ≥1 prior therapy. All pts have now completed treatment. Here we report updated time-to-event data in all pts, and by response category, with extended follow-up. Methods: 155 pts (median age 65 yrs; 55%/41%/4% with 1/2/≥3 prior therapies; 77% Stage IV MCL; 55% positive bone marrow) received Vc 1.3 mg/m2 on days 1, 4, 8, and 11 of 21-day cycles; of these, 141 were response-evaluable. Response and progression were determined by modified International Workshop Response Criteria using independent radiology review. Results: After a median follow-up of 26.4 mo, 55 pts (35%) remained in follow-up; 93 (60%) had died, 2 (1%) had withdrawn consent, and 5 (3%) were lost to follow-up. Pts received a median of 4 treatment cycles (range 1–21; 8 in responding pts). Median time to first response was 1.3 months. Median duration of response (DOR) was 9.2 mo in all responders and has not been reached in pts achieving CR/CRu. Median time to progression (TTP), time to next therapy (TTNT; first Vc dose to start of next therapy), and overall survival (OS) are shown in the table for all pts and by response. Survival rate at 12-mo was 69% overall and 91% in responding pts. In pts refractory to their last therapy (no response or response with TTP <6 mo; n=58), median DOR was 5.9 mo, median TTP was 3.9 mo, median TTNT was 4.6 mo, and median survival was 17.3 mo. Safety profile was similar to previously reported; most common grade ≥3 AEs were peripheral neuropathy (13%), fatigue (12%), and thrombocytopenia (11%). The most common AE resulting in Vc discontinuation was peripheral neuropathy (10%). Twelve (8%) pts died on-study, including 5 (3%) considered related to Vc. Conclusions: Vc provides durable responses plus prolonged time off-therapy and survival in responding pts, suggesting substantial clinical benefit in relapsed/refractory MCL. Median TTP, TTNT, and OS (months) in all pts and by response All pts (N=155) Responders (N=45) CR/CRu (N=11) PR (N=34) SD (N=52) PD (N=34) NE, not estimable TTP 6.7 12.4 NE 9.1 6.9 1.2 TTNT 7.4 14.3 23.9 13.3 7.0 2.3 OS 23.5 35.4 36.0 35.1 27.8 13.7

Download Full-text

Phase II Pilot Study of Rituximab + CHOP in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Waldenström’s Macroglobulinemia, an Eastren Cooperative Oncology Group Trial (Study E1A02).

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v110.11.3616.3616 ◽

2007 ◽

Vol 110 (11) ◽

pp. 3616-3616 ◽

Cited By ~ 7

Author(s):

Rafat Abonour ◽

Lijun A. Zhang ◽

Vincent Rajkumar ◽

Gordan Srkalovic ◽

Philip R. Greipp ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Median Time ◽

Phase Ii ◽

Response Rate ◽

Objective Response ◽

Visual Disturbance ◽

Low Grade ◽

Minor Response ◽

Duration Of Response ◽

Grade 3 ◽

A Minor

Abstract Waldenström’s Macroglobulinemia (WM) is a low-grade lymphoplasmacytic disorder associated with an IgM monoclonal protein that may present with anemia, lymphadenopathy, and hepatosplenomegaly. Since combination chemotherapy and Rituximab are both active in this disease, it is possible the response rate can be enhanced by using a combined modality of Rituximab and CHOP. This approach has been used in indolent lymphoma with remarkable results and limited toxicity. Objective: To determine the response rate in previously untreated patients with Waldenström’s Macroglobulinemia receiving rituximab and CHOP. Methods: This was a phase II study of standard R-CHOP in symptomatic WM patients. The study was activated on June 15, 2004 and closed on April 26, 2007 due to poor accrual. The median age of the sixteen patients enrolled was 60 (44–79 years), β2M 3 ug/ml (2.1–7.6), median hemoglobulin was 9 g/dl (7.7–10.9), Viscosity 3.4(1.6–10), and IgM 6389 (3229–13300 mg/dl). The most common symptoms were Fatigue (13/16), visual disturbance (7/16) and parasthesias or painful/numb feet (6/16). Only one patient had bulky adenopathy (6.3%). Results: Of 16 patients treated, 5 patients have no response data available (it will be presented at the meeting). Objective response was 91% (90% CI: 63.5% ∼ 99.5%) and 1 patient had a minor response with an overall response rate of 100%. Median time to response was 1.6 months from registration and median time to maximum response was 2.1 months. Median duration of response has not been reached. The median follow up time of the 16 patients was 18.3 months with a range of 3.6–24.8 months. Among the 16 treated patients, there were 8 (50%, 90% exact binomial CI: 27.9%∼72.1%) grade 4 neutropenia. 8 patients experienced grade 3 lymphopenia (50%, 90% exact binomial CI: 27.9%∼72.1%). Only 2 grade 3 febrile neutropenia were noted. As of August 4, 2007, none of the 16 patients has died. R-CHOP is a promising regimen in the treatment of patients with Waldenström’s Macroglobulinemia. To succeed in completing clinical trials in this rare disease better international collaboration and involvement in advocacy groups are required.

Download Full-text

The Role of Serum Immunoglobulin Free Light Chain In Response and Progression In Waldenstrom Macroglobulinemia

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v116.21.3095.3095 ◽

2010 ◽

Vol 116 (21) ◽

pp. 3095-3095

Author(s):

Xavier Leleu ◽

Wanling Xie ◽

Meghan Rourke ◽

Ranjit Banwait ◽

Renee Leduc ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Median Time ◽

Research Funding ◽

Response Rate ◽

Early Response ◽

Response To Therapy ◽

Time To Progression ◽

Therapy Initiation ◽

M Spike

Abstract Abstract 3095 Introduction: Waldenstrom macroglobulinemia (WM) is a low grade B cell lymphoma characterized by the secretion of IgM protein in the serum. The IgM level lacks sensitivity due to its prolonged half-life. The serum free light chain (sFLC) assay has shown significant clinical application in plasma cell dyscrasias, specifically in multiple myeloma, and is used to monitor response to therapy. In this study, we sought to examine the role of sFLC in the response and progression of patients with WM. Methods: This study was performed using serum collected from a homogeneous cohort of patients diagnosed with WM and uniformly treated on a phase 2 trial using the combination of bortezomib with rituximab, previously untreated (N=26) or relapsed and or refractory to prior therapy (N=37). Patients eligible for this analysis must have measurable sFLC levels at baseline. A total of 48 patients were included. FLC response is defined as achievement of normal iFLC value or 50% decrease from baseline in the iFLC level during therapy and follow-up. Concordance between FLC and IgM response rate was evaluated using Kappa statistics. Correlation was evaluated using Spearman correlation coefficient. Time to progression was estimated using Kaplan-Meier methodology. We also did landmark analysis to compare overall response rate and time to progression by FLC or IgM response status at 2 months after therapy initiation; Fisher Exact test or Log-rank test were used. Results: The median iFLC value was 103.50mg/L (range 22.5–3540), the median kappa over lambda ratio was 13.45 (0.01-665), and the median serum IgM value by nephlometry was 3995 mg/dL (537-10,800). Overall, as per M spike response criteria, 29 (60%, 90% CI: 48%, 72%) patients responded, e.g. had partial response or better, and 19 patients failed to obtain response. Using serum IgM protein measurement by nephlometry during therapy and follow up post-therapy, 35 (73%, 90% CI: 60%, 83%) patients responded with a PR or better (>50% decrease), with 3 (6%) having normalization of their serum IgM. In comparison, iFLC response during treatment and follow up occurred in 38 (79%, 90% CI: 67%, 88%): with 2(4%) having normalization of value, 21(44%) having 50% reduction and 15(31%) having both. The time to iFLC response and IgM response among patients who achieved response by both criteria was calculated (N=33). The median time to iFLC response was 2.1 months (range 0.9–28.7months), while the median time to IgM response was 3.0 months (0.9-14.7) (p=0.07). The median time to progression per the protocol was 18.9 months (95% CI:10.5-NR). The Kappa concordance between iFLC 25% increase and M spike progression was 0.63 (95% CI: 0.41–0.84). This showed a better concordance compared to using the iFLC >50% definition (kappa=0.58, 95% CI: 0.35, 0.81), indicating that progression using iFLC>25% would be a better definition for patients with WM. The median time to progression by iFLC>25% increase was 13.7 months (95% CI:10.9-19.4) and the median time to IgM >25% increase was 14.6 months (95% CI: 9.5–19.1), showing a more rapid detection of progression by iFLC compared to M spike and IgM measurements. We next examined whether attaining a response using iFLC can be a predictor of overall response to therapy. Seventeen patients (35%) achieved an iFLC response at 2 months after therapy initiation. Patients with early iFLC response were more likely to have intermediate/high ISS-WM stage, elevated B2M or low Hemoglobin<11.5 gm/dL (p<0.05). Early iFLC response was related to overall IgM response during therapy and follow up (p=0.02). In multivariable models when adjusting for ISS stage, B2M or Hgb, there was no significant association between FLC early response and TTP either by protocol, FLC or IgM criteria. However, there was trend that early response was related to prolonged TTP especially when adjusting for hgb risk factors (HRs ranges from 0.63∼0.80, p>0.3 for various TTP endpoints. Conclusion: iFLC may be a useful marker of tumor measurement that correlates well with IgM and M spike measurements. The time to iFLC response was shorter by 1 month compared to IgM or M spike measurement. The median time to progression by iFLC was shorter by 1 month compared to IgM. There was a trend that early response was related to prolonged TTP when adjusting for other risk factors. Disclosures: Leleu: Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen Cilag: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Chugai: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; LeoPharma: Consultancy, Honoraria.

Download Full-text

A Multi-Center, Open-Label Phase II Study of Lenalidomide Plus Low-Dose Dexamethasone in Chinese Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma - the MM-021 Trial

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v120.21.1864.1864 ◽

2012 ◽

Vol 120 (21) ◽

pp. 1864-1864

Author(s):

Jian Hou ◽

Jie Jin ◽

Zhen Cai ◽

Fangping Chen ◽

Li Yu ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Disease Progression ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Overall Response Rate ◽

Response Rate ◽

Chinese Patients ◽

Open Label ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Overall Response ◽

Best Response

Abstract Abstract 1864 Background: Previous studies (i.e. ECOG E4A03) have shown that lenalidomide plus low-dose dexamethasone (Rd) has a better safety profile compared with lenalidomide plus high-dose dexamethasone (RD) in newly diagnosed MM patients. It is hypothesized that Rd may also provide benefits in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). The MM-021 trial is the largest study in Chinese patients with RRMM aimed to assess the efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics (PK) of Rd in patients who had progressed or were refractory to previous treatment. Methods: This was a phase II, multi-center, single arm, open-label study, RRMM patients received lenalidomide (25 mg/day on days 1–21) and dexamethasone (40 mg on days 1, 8, 15 and 22) in 28-day treatment cycles until disease progression. Thromboembolic prophylaxis with aspirin or other anti-thrombotic medication was required. The primary endpoint was the best overall response rate (partial response [PR] or better) based on the investigator's assessment. Secondary endpoints included duration of response, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), safety, and PK parameters. Results: As of April 23, 2012 (median follow-up of 10.8 months), 199 patients have completed at least 1 cycle, 134 patients have completed at least 6 cycles, and 187 patients were evaluable for efficacy. Median age was 59 years (range 35–81) and 63% were male. The majority of patients (86%) had Durie-Salmon stage III disease and 57% had received ≥4 prior anti-myeloma regimens including bortezomib (64%), thalidomide (69%), or both bortezomib and thalidomide (45%). After median treatment duration of 8 months (range 1–18) or 8 cycles (range 1–19), best overall response rate (≥PR) was 54% (100 patients); including 8% (14 patients) with a best response of complete response (CR). Overall disease control (≥stable disease [SD] or better) was 95%, including 42% (78 patients) with best response of SD. Nine patients (5%) had best response of disease progression. Best overall response rates were consistent across subgroups when analyzed according to baseline renal function (creatinine clearance ≥60 mL/min: 68 patients [54%], 330 to <60 mL/min: 26 patients [52%], <30 mL/min: 6 patients [50%]) and number of prior therapies (64% if ≤2 prior regimens, 50% if >2 prior regimens). Responses were also consistent regardless of prior therapy received; 50%, 52%, and 47% for patients who previously received bortezomib, thalidomide, or both, respectively. Of the 5% (10 patients) presenting with IgD at baseline, 7 patients achieved ≥PR. Median time to first response was 2 months (range 1–12) and median duration of response was 7 months (range 0–16). The median PFS was 8 months (95% CI: 6–9) and the OS rate was 86% at 6 months and 73% at 1 year. Among the 199 patients evaluable for safety, the most common grade 3–4 adverse events (AEs) were anemia (25%), neutropenia (24%), thrombocytopenia (15%), and pneumonia (13%). Only 1 patient experienced febrile neutropenia. AEs led to dose reduction/interruption of lenalidomide in 40% of patients, 41% for dexamethasone; and 6.5% discontinued treatment due to one or more AEs. No patient discontinued due to anemia or neutropenia. Sixty-one patients (31%) died on study and the most common cause of death was disease progression (15 patients, 8%). Conclusions: Based on a median follow-up of nearly 11 months, the Rd regimen achieved a substantial best overall response rate (54%) in heavily pretreated RRMM Chinese patients. Response rates were consistent across subgroups including patients with renal impairment. The combination of Rd regimen was generally well tolerated. Disclosures: Hou: Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Xian: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Jensen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Mei:Celgene Corporation: Employment. Zhang:Celgene Corporation: Employment. Wortman-Vayn:Celgene Corporation: Employment.

Download Full-text