Combined Modality Treatment of Two or Four Cycles of ABVD Followed by Involved Field Radiotherapy in the Treatment of Patients with Early Stage Hodgkin’s Lymphoma: Update Interim Analysis of the Randomised HD10 Study of the German Hodgkin Study Group (GHSG).

Blood ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 106 (11) ◽  
pp. 2673-2673 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andreas Engert ◽  
Annette Pluetschow ◽  
Hans T. Eich ◽  
Richard Herrmann ◽  
Bernd Doerken ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Interim Analysis ◽  
Hodgkin’S Lymphoma ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Hodgkin's Lymphoma ◽  
Combined Modality Treatment ◽  
Involved Field ◽  
Radiotherapy Dose ◽  
Involved Field Radiotherapy

Abstract Combined modality treatment is regarded as standard by most study groups for patients with early-stage Hodgkin’s lymphoma (HL). However, the optimal chemotherapy, the number of cycles needed and the optimal radiotherapy dose is still unclear. The GHSG thus conducted a randomised study for patients with early stage favourable Hodgkin’s lymphoma (HD10) in which these questions were addressed. A total of 1370 patients were randomised from 5/1998 to 1/2003 between two or four cycles of ABVD and independently to 20Gy or 30Gy involved field (IF) radiotherapy. For the second interim analysis at a median follow up of 28 months, 847 patients were available. Patients were equally balanced for age, gender, stage, histology, performance status and risk factors. Compared with two cycles, there was more toxicity in patients receiving four cycles of ABVD for leucopenia, hair loss and infection. Concerning radiotherapy dose, there was more toxicity associated with 30Gy for dysphagia, mucositis and leucopenia. The rate of complete remissions ranged between 98% and 99% with no significant differences among treatment arms. Freedom from treatment failure (FFTF) and overall survival showed no differences between the four treatment arms. The curves for overall survival and FFTF were nearly superimposable for all four arms. This analysis suggests that 2 chemotherapy cycles with involved field radiotherapy may be sufficient for patients with early favourable HL, but a reliable assessment must await the final analysis including all randomised patients and with adequate follow-up. The results of the third interim analysis (10/2005) including 1110 patients with a median follow up of more than 3 years will be presented.

Evaluation of Early Stage Hodgkin’s Lymphoma Treatment: Two Decades of Progress.

Blood ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 104 (11) ◽  
pp. 4581-4581
Author(s):  
Eyad F. Alsaeed ◽  
Rajiv Samant ◽  
Gallant Victor ◽  
Lother Huebsch ◽  
Wayne Kendal
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Treatment Modality ◽  
Hodgkin’S Lymphoma ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Hodgkin's Lymphoma ◽  
Combined Modality Treatment ◽  
Combined Modality ◽  
Involved Field ◽  
Disease Free

Abstract Introduction The treatment of early stage Hodgkin’s lymphoma is controversial. Radiotherapy alone, chemotherapy alone or a combination of radiotherapy and chemotherapy are all considered effective options. Purpose The purpose of this study is to review the treatment approaches and outcomes used for early stage Hodgkin’s lymphoma over the past two decades at ORCC Methods Retrospective chart review of all patients with stage IA /IIA treated from 1984–2002 was performed. Patients were separated into three groups according to initial treatment modality: radiation alone (Rads), chemotherapy alone (Chemo), or combined modality (Combined). Disease-free survival and overall survival were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier analysis. Result Between May 1984 and January 2003, 172 patients with newly diagnosed Hodgkin’s lymphoma (28% stage 1A, 72% stage 2A) were seen at our centre. Treatment was as follows: 49% Rads, 13% Chemo and 38% Combined. The median age was 33.7 years (range: 17 – 82 years) and the median follow-up of 73 months (range: 3 – 204 months). The 5-year disease free and overall survival rates for the entire group were 90% and 96 % respectively. The 5-year disease-free and overall survival by treatment modality was: Rads 87% and 93 %; Chemo 80 % and 100 %; Combined 97 % and 98%. In the Combined group, there was no difference in outcome between patients receiving involved-field radiation and those receiving extended-field radiotherapy. The relapse rate in a patient who received abbreviated chemotherapy and greater than four cycles was 4.3% (1 out of 23) and 2.4% (1 out of 41) respectively. The incidence of acute Grade 3 and 4 toxicities were 9 % and 0.5% respectively. Conclusions Our data confirms the excellent prognosis of early stage Hodgkin’s lymphoma with all the approaches used at our centre. At present, we favour combined modality treatment with involved-field radiotherapy and our results support its continued use.

scholarly journals Hodgkin's Lymphoma in Children and Adolescents: A Saint Petersburg Hodgkin's Lymphoma Group Study

2011 ◽  
Vol 2011 ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Svetlana A. Kulyova ◽  
Boris A. Kolygin
Keyword(s):  
Hodgkin’S Lymphoma ◽  
Risk Group ◽  
Hodgkin's Lymphoma ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Intermediate Group ◽  
Involved Field ◽  
Prognostic Risk Factors ◽  
Involved Field Radiotherapy ◽  
New Strategies

Purpose. Prospective analysis of the efficacy of the original protocol SPbHL-05 was performed.Patients and Methods. Sixty patients with Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL) aged less than 18 years old were treated in accordance with SPbHL-05 from January 2000, to July 2009. In induction chemotherapy we used VBVP and ABVD schedules followed by involved-field radiotherapy. Fourteen patients (23,3%) with 0–2 adverse factors (the favourable group) received two cycles of chemotherapy (VBVP), 25 children (41,7%) with 3-4 unfavorable signs (the intermediate group) received two cycles of VBVP alternating with two cycles of ABVD, 21 patient (35%) who had 5 or more adverse prognostic factors (the unfavourable group) received three cycles of VBVP alternating with three cycles of ABVD.Results. With a median follow-up of 68 months, overall survival (OS) at 5 years is 91.3%, event-free survival (EFS) is 82.8%. OS in the favourable and intermediate risk group were 100%, EFS were 92,9% and 90,7%, respectively, OS and EFS in unfavourable risk group—77,1% and 55,6%, respectively.Conclusion. The identification of prognostic risk factors and using medicines with less prominent side effects would be of major importance in the development of new strategies of treatment for childhood HL.

Intensified Chemotherapy and Dose-Reduced Involved-Field Radiotherapy in Patients With Early Unfavorable Hodgkin's Lymphoma: Final Analysis of the German Hodgkin Study Group HD11 Trial

2010 ◽  
Vol 28 (27) ◽  
pp. 4199-4206 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hans Theodor Eich ◽  
Volker Diehl ◽  
Helen Görgen ◽  
Thomas Pabst ◽  
Jana Markova ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hodgkin’S Lymphoma ◽  
Intensive Therapy ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Final Analysis ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Hodgkin's Lymphoma ◽  
Combined Modality Treatment ◽  
Intensified Chemotherapy ◽  
Involved Field ◽  
Involved Field Radiotherapy

PurposeCombined-modality treatment consisting of four to six cycles of chemotherapy followed by involved-field radiotherapy (IFRT) is the standard of care for patients with early unfavorable Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL). It is unclear whether treatment results can be improved with more intensive chemotherapy and which radiation dose needs to be applied.Patients and MethodsPatients age 16 to 75 years with newly diagnosed early unfavorable HL were randomly assigned in a 2 × 2 factorial design to one of the following treatment arms: four cycles of doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine (ABVD) + 30 Gy of IFRT; four cycles of ABVD + 20 Gy of IFRT; four cycles of bleomycin, etoposide, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, procarbazine, and prednisone (BEACOPPbaseline) + 30 Gy of IFRT; or four cycles of BEACOPPbaseline+ 20 Gy of IFRT.ResultsWith a total of 1,395 patients included, the freedom from treatment failure (FFTF) at 5 years was 85.0%, overall survival was 94.5%, and progression-free survival was 86.0%. BEACOPPbaselinewas more effective than ABVD when followed by 20 Gy of IFRT (5-year FFTF difference, 5.7%; 95% CI, 0.1% to 11.3%). However, there was no difference between BEACOPPbaselineand ABVD when followed by 30 Gy of IFRT (5-year FFTF difference, 1.6%; 95% CI, −3.6% to 6.9%). Similar results were observed for the radiotherapy question; after four cycles of BEACOPPbaseline, 20 Gy was not inferior to 30 Gy (5-year FFTF difference, −0.8%; 95% CI, −5.8% to 4.2%), whereas inferiority of 20 Gy cannot be excluded after four cycles of ABVD (5-year FFTF difference, −4.7%; 95% CI, −10.3% to 0.8%). Treatment-related toxicity occurred more often in the arms with more intensive therapy.ConclusionModerate dose escalation using BEACOPPbaselinedid not significantly improve outcome in early unfavorable HL. Four cycles of ABVD should be followed by 30 Gy of IFRT.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document