scholarly journals Combined modality treatment improves tumor control and overall survival in patients with early stage Hodgkin's lymphoma: a systematic review

Haematologica ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 95 (3) ◽  
pp. 494-500 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Herbst ◽  
F. A. Rehan ◽  
C. Brillant ◽  
J. Bohlius ◽  
N. Skoetz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Hodgkin’S Lymphoma ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Hodgkin's Lymphoma ◽  
Tumor Control ◽  
Combined Modality Treatment ◽  
Combined Modality

Evaluation of Early Stage Hodgkin’s Lymphoma Treatment: Two Decades of Progress.

Blood ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 104 (11) ◽  
pp. 4581-4581
Author(s):  
Eyad F. Alsaeed ◽  
Rajiv Samant ◽  
Gallant Victor ◽  
Lother Huebsch ◽  
Wayne Kendal
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Treatment Modality ◽  
Hodgkin’S Lymphoma ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Hodgkin's Lymphoma ◽  
Combined Modality Treatment ◽  
Combined Modality ◽  
Involved Field ◽  
Disease Free

Abstract Introduction The treatment of early stage Hodgkin’s lymphoma is controversial. Radiotherapy alone, chemotherapy alone or a combination of radiotherapy and chemotherapy are all considered effective options. Purpose The purpose of this study is to review the treatment approaches and outcomes used for early stage Hodgkin’s lymphoma over the past two decades at ORCC Methods Retrospective chart review of all patients with stage IA /IIA treated from 1984–2002 was performed. Patients were separated into three groups according to initial treatment modality: radiation alone (Rads), chemotherapy alone (Chemo), or combined modality (Combined). Disease-free survival and overall survival were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier analysis. Result Between May 1984 and January 2003, 172 patients with newly diagnosed Hodgkin’s lymphoma (28% stage 1A, 72% stage 2A) were seen at our centre. Treatment was as follows: 49% Rads, 13% Chemo and 38% Combined. The median age was 33.7 years (range: 17 – 82 years) and the median follow-up of 73 months (range: 3 – 204 months). The 5-year disease free and overall survival rates for the entire group were 90% and 96 % respectively. The 5-year disease-free and overall survival by treatment modality was: Rads 87% and 93 %; Chemo 80 % and 100 %; Combined 97 % and 98%. In the Combined group, there was no difference in outcome between patients receiving involved-field radiation and those receiving extended-field radiotherapy. The relapse rate in a patient who received abbreviated chemotherapy and greater than four cycles was 4.3% (1 out of 23) and 2.4% (1 out of 41) respectively. The incidence of acute Grade 3 and 4 toxicities were 9 % and 0.5% respectively. Conclusions Our data confirms the excellent prognosis of early stage Hodgkin’s lymphoma with all the approaches used at our centre. At present, we favour combined modality treatment with involved-field radiotherapy and our results support its continued use.

Randomized Comparison of ABVD Chemotherapy With a Strategy That Includes Radiation Therapy in Patients With Limited-Stage Hodgkin’s Lymphoma: National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group and the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group

2005 ◽  
Vol 23 (21) ◽  
pp. 4634-4642 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ralph M. Meyer ◽  
Mary K. Gospodarowicz ◽  
Joseph M. Connors ◽  
Robert G. Pearcey ◽  
Andrea Bezjak ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Radiation Therapy ◽  
Disease Progression ◽  
Acute Treatment ◽  
Hodgkin’S Lymphoma ◽  
Hodgkin's Lymphoma ◽  
Combined Modality Treatment ◽  
Limited Stage ◽  
Combined Modality ◽  
Freedom From Disease

Purpose We report results of a randomized trial comparing ABVD (doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine) chemotherapy alone with treatment that includes radiation therapy in patients with limited-stage Hodgkin's lymphoma. Patients and Methods Patients with nonbulky clinical stage I to IIA Hodgkin's lymphoma were stratified into favorable and unfavorable risk cohorts. Patients allocated to radiation-containing therapy received subtotal nodal radiation if favorable risk or combined-modality therapy if unfavorable risk. Patients allocated to ABVD received four to six treatment cycles. Results We evaluated 399 patients. Median follow-up is 4.2 years. In comparison with ABVD alone, 5-year freedom from disease progression is superior in patients allocated to radiation therapy (P = .006; 93% v 87%); no differences in event-free survival (P = .06; 88% v 86%) or overall survival (P = .4; 94% v 96%) were detected. In a subset analyses comparing patients stratified into the unfavorable cohort, freedom from disease progression was superior in patients allocated to combined-modality treatment (P = .004; 95% v 88%); no difference in overall survival was detected (P = .3; 92% v 95%). Of 15 deaths observed, nine were attributed to causes other than Hodgkin's lymphoma or acute treatment-related toxicity. Conclusion In patients with limited-stage Hodgkin's lymphoma, no difference in overall survival was detected between patients randomly assigned to receive treatment that includes radiation therapy or ABVD alone. Although 5-year freedom from disease progression was superior in patients receiving radiation therapy, this advantage is offset by deaths due to causes other than progressive Hodgkin's lymphoma or acute treatment-related toxicity.

Combined Modality Treatment of Two or Four Cycles of ABVD Followed by Involved Field Radiotherapy in the Treatment of Patients with Early Stage Hodgkin’s Lymphoma: Update Interim Analysis of the Randomised HD10 Study of the German Hodgkin Study Group (GHSG).

Blood ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 106 (11) ◽  
pp. 2673-2673 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andreas Engert ◽  
Annette Pluetschow ◽  
Hans T. Eich ◽  
Richard Herrmann ◽  
Bernd Doerken ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Interim Analysis ◽  
Hodgkin’S Lymphoma ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Hodgkin's Lymphoma ◽  
Combined Modality Treatment ◽  
Involved Field ◽  
Radiotherapy Dose ◽  
Involved Field Radiotherapy

Abstract Combined modality treatment is regarded as standard by most study groups for patients with early-stage Hodgkin’s lymphoma (HL). However, the optimal chemotherapy, the number of cycles needed and the optimal radiotherapy dose is still unclear. The GHSG thus conducted a randomised study for patients with early stage favourable Hodgkin’s lymphoma (HD10) in which these questions were addressed. A total of 1370 patients were randomised from 5/1998 to 1/2003 between two or four cycles of ABVD and independently to 20Gy or 30Gy involved field (IF) radiotherapy. For the second interim analysis at a median follow up of 28 months, 847 patients were available. Patients were equally balanced for age, gender, stage, histology, performance status and risk factors. Compared with two cycles, there was more toxicity in patients receiving four cycles of ABVD for leucopenia, hair loss and infection. Concerning radiotherapy dose, there was more toxicity associated with 30Gy for dysphagia, mucositis and leucopenia. The rate of complete remissions ranged between 98% and 99% with no significant differences among treatment arms. Freedom from treatment failure (FFTF) and overall survival showed no differences between the four treatment arms. The curves for overall survival and FFTF were nearly superimposable for all four arms. This analysis suggests that 2 chemotherapy cycles with involved field radiotherapy may be sufficient for patients with early favourable HL, but a reliable assessment must await the final analysis including all randomised patients and with adequate follow-up. The results of the third interim analysis (10/2005) including 1110 patients with a median follow up of more than 3 years will be presented.

Prognostic and predictive factors in early stages of classic Hodgkin’s lymphoma

2022 ◽  
pp. 7-15
Author(s):  
T. I. Bogatyreva ◽  
A. O. Afanasov ◽  
A. Yu. Terekhova ◽  
N. A. Falaleeva
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Multivariate Analysis ◽  
Hodgkin’S Lymphoma ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Hodgkin's Lymphoma ◽  
Cure Rate ◽  
First Line ◽  
Bulky Disease ◽  
Cox Regression Analysis ◽  
Early Stages

Rationale. In the early stages of classical Hodgkin’s lymphoma (cHL), the cure rate reaches 85–95 %, but the long-term effects of therapy can worsen overall survival. Current trials for early stages of Hodgkin’s lymphoma with favorable prognosis address the task of maintaining cure rates while reducing sequelae. For early unfavorable stages, the challenge is to improve cure rate without increasing toxicity.Purpose. To assess the potential significance of individual risk factors for optimal choice of the first line chemotherapy in early-stage Hodgkin lymphoma.Materials and methods. This single-center retrospective study included 290 patients with early stage cHL who had received ABVD – based (n = 249; 86 %) or BEACOPP‑21 – based (n = 41; 14 %) combined modality therapy from 2000 to 2017. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were assessed in Cox regression analysis including 12 clinical parameters.Main results. At a median follow up of 60 months for the entire group, OS was 95 % and PFS was 89 %. In a multivariate analysis PFS, at 5 years, was significantly inferior in patients with mediastinal bulk, baseline lymphocytopenia (≤ 0.6 × 109/L, р = 0.002; < 1.0 × 109/L, р = 0.000) and male gender; OS was inferior only in patients with an absolute lymphocytopenia (AL). In patients with AL, PFS after ABVD-based regimen was, respectively, 12 % in the high-risk group with mediastinal bulk and 56 % without it. PFS of patients without AL when treated with ABVD did not differ compared to BEACOPP‑21 within the same prognostic group: 95.2 % vs. 92.3 % for non-bulky and 86.4 % vs. 84.2 % for bulky disease. In the absence of AL, mediastinal bulk remained the main and only risk factor in multivariate analysis.Conclusions. The ABVD regimen is highly effective in the first line of chemotherapy for cHL, except for cases with baseline lymphocytopenia, in which the early usage of the BEACOPP regimen in the escalated or 14-day variants might be justified. In patients with mediastinal bulk, standard chemotherapy is not effective enough even in the absence of AL; therefore, if an intermediate PET/CT scan is available, it seems more appropriate to use a milder ABVD regimen on the first line and leave intensive therapy for patients with proven refractory disease. Prospects for improving the efficiency are opened with the new N-AVD and A-AVD schemes, the benefits of which should be evaluated, first of all, in patients with AL and mediastinal bulk.

A Systematic Review Evaluating the Addition of Radiation Therapy to Chemotherapy for Localized Aggressive Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma: What Is the Role for Radiotherapy?.

Blood ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 104 (11) ◽  
pp. 3155-3155
Author(s):  
Daniel B. Fried ◽  
David E. Morris ◽  
Thomas C. Shea ◽  
Robert Z. Orlowski ◽  
Hendrik W. Van Deventer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Radiation Therapy ◽  
Hodgkin’S Lymphoma ◽  
Randomized Trials ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Hodgkin's Lymphoma ◽  
Non Hodgkin’S Lymphoma ◽  
Non Hodgkin's Lymphoma

Abstract Purpose/Objective: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of chemotherapy alone compared to chemotherapy plus radiation in the management of adult early stage aggressive non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (NHL). Overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) at 5 years were evaluated. Materials/Methods: Randomized trials published after 1990 comparing chemotherapy alone to chemotherapy plus radiation therapy in the management of adult aggressive NHL were identified through searches of MEDLINE and CANCERLIT databases. In addition, a search of ASTRO, ASCO, and ASH Proceedings from 1999 to the present was performed to identify updates of published articles and abstracts. Studies that were limited to GI sites only were excluded. Only studies employing CHOP or CHOP-like regimens and radiation therapy to a minimum dose of 30 Gy were deemed acceptable. Chemotherapy alone regimens had to consist of a minimum of 4 cycles of therapy. All trials reported OS and DFS at 5 years. A meta-analysis was performed using STATA statistical software, including tests for homogeneity and publication bias. Trials were analyzed by risk ratio (RR) method. Results: Five randomized trials (n = 1933, range for individual studies 215 to 647) were identified that met all inclusion criteria. The 5-yr OS and DFS RRs for the addition of radiation therapy to chemotherapy are presented in Figures 1 and 2, respectively. Three studies suggested an OS and DFS benefit with the addition of radiation to chemotherapy and two suggested an improved OS and DFS among patients treated with chemotherapy alone. Only two of the studies reported patterns of relapse (Aviles et al and Horning et al). These studies showed improved local control with combined modality therapy (16 – 23% vs. 4 – 5%). Risk ratios for OS ranged from 0.90 to 1.56. DFS estimates range from 0.89 to 1.82. A meta-analysis was conducted to estimate the overall treatment effects for this group of studies for both OS and DFS. Due to the high degree of heterogeneity among these trials (p-value for heterogeneity &lt;0.001 for both OS and DFS), summarizing these results with a pooled estimate of effect would be inappropriate. Heterogeneity was decreased only marginally with the exclusion of any individual study from the pooled estimate. Conclusions: It remains unclear whether early stage aggressive NHL patients benefit from the addition of radiation to CHOP-based chemotherapy. However, at this time we are not able to delineate those patients who will benefit from radiotherapy from those who will not. Currently CHOP-based chemotherapy plus radiation remains a standard of care in the US for early stage aggressive NHL. However, controversy remains regarding the role of radiation in light of conflicting results. Our ability to draw firm conclusions based on this review is limited due to the study heterogeneity. Differences among study populations may largely account for this heterogeneity.

Dose-Intensification in Early Unfavorable Hodgkin's Lymphoma: Final Analysis of the German Hodgkin Study Group HD14 Trial

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (9) ◽  
pp. 907-913 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bastian von Tresckow ◽  
Annette Plütschow ◽  
Michael Fuchs ◽  
Beate Klimm ◽  
Jana Markova ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hodgkin’S Lymphoma ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Final Analysis ◽  
Hodgkin's Lymphoma ◽  
Tumor Control ◽  
Combined Modality Treatment ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Intensified Chemotherapy ◽  
Involved Field

Purpose In patients with early unfavorable Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL), combined modality treatment with four cycles of ABVD (adriamycin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine) and 30 Gy involved-field radiotherapy (IFRT) results in long-term tumor control of approximately 80%. We aimed to improve these results using more intensive chemotherapy. Patients and Methods Patients with newly diagnosed early unfavorable HL were randomly assigned to either four cycles of ABVD or an intensified treatment consisting of two cycles of escalated BEACOPP (bleomycin, etoposide, adriamycin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, procarbazine, and prednisone) followed by two cycles of ABVD (2 + 2). Chemotherapy was followed by 30 Gy IFRT in both arms. The primary end point was freedom from treatment failure (FFTF); secondary end points included progression-free survival (PFS) and treatment-related toxicity. Results With a total of 1,528 qualified patients included, the 2 + 2 regimen demonstrated superior FFTF compared with four cycles of ABVD (P < .001; hazard ratio, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.30 to 0.66), with a difference of 7.2% at 5 years (95% CI, 3.8 to 10.5). The difference in 5-year PFS was 6.2% (95% CI, 3.0% to 9.5%). There was more acute toxicity associated with 2 + 2 than with ABVD, but there were no overall differences in treatment-related mortality or secondary malignancies. Conclusion Intensified chemotherapy with two cycles of BEACOPP escalated followed by two cycles of ABVD followed by IFRT significantly improves tumor control in patients with early unfavorable HL.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document