scholarly journals Hodgkin's Lymphoma in Children and Adolescents: A Saint Petersburg Hodgkin's Lymphoma Group Study

2011 ◽  
Vol 2011 ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Svetlana A. Kulyova ◽  
Boris A. Kolygin
Keyword(s):  
Hodgkin’S Lymphoma ◽  
Risk Group ◽  
Hodgkin's Lymphoma ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Intermediate Group ◽  
Involved Field ◽  
Prognostic Risk Factors ◽  
Involved Field Radiotherapy ◽  
New Strategies

Purpose. Prospective analysis of the efficacy of the original protocol SPbHL-05 was performed.Patients and Methods. Sixty patients with Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL) aged less than 18 years old were treated in accordance with SPbHL-05 from January 2000, to July 2009. In induction chemotherapy we used VBVP and ABVD schedules followed by involved-field radiotherapy. Fourteen patients (23,3%) with 0–2 adverse factors (the favourable group) received two cycles of chemotherapy (VBVP), 25 children (41,7%) with 3-4 unfavorable signs (the intermediate group) received two cycles of VBVP alternating with two cycles of ABVD, 21 patient (35%) who had 5 or more adverse prognostic factors (the unfavourable group) received three cycles of VBVP alternating with three cycles of ABVD.Results. With a median follow-up of 68 months, overall survival (OS) at 5 years is 91.3%, event-free survival (EFS) is 82.8%. OS in the favourable and intermediate risk group were 100%, EFS were 92,9% and 90,7%, respectively, OS and EFS in unfavourable risk group—77,1% and 55,6%, respectively.Conclusion. The identification of prognostic risk factors and using medicines with less prominent side effects would be of major importance in the development of new strategies of treatment for childhood HL.

Combined Modality Treatment of Two or Four Cycles of ABVD Followed by Involved Field Radiotherapy in the Treatment of Patients with Early Stage Hodgkin’s Lymphoma: Update Interim Analysis of the Randomised HD10 Study of the German Hodgkin Study Group (GHSG).

Blood ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 106 (11) ◽  
pp. 2673-2673 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andreas Engert ◽  
Annette Pluetschow ◽  
Hans T. Eich ◽  
Richard Herrmann ◽  
Bernd Doerken ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Interim Analysis ◽  
Hodgkin’S Lymphoma ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Hodgkin's Lymphoma ◽  
Combined Modality Treatment ◽  
Involved Field ◽  
Radiotherapy Dose ◽  
Involved Field Radiotherapy

Abstract Combined modality treatment is regarded as standard by most study groups for patients with early-stage Hodgkin’s lymphoma (HL). However, the optimal chemotherapy, the number of cycles needed and the optimal radiotherapy dose is still unclear. The GHSG thus conducted a randomised study for patients with early stage favourable Hodgkin’s lymphoma (HD10) in which these questions were addressed. A total of 1370 patients were randomised from 5/1998 to 1/2003 between two or four cycles of ABVD and independently to 20Gy or 30Gy involved field (IF) radiotherapy. For the second interim analysis at a median follow up of 28 months, 847 patients were available. Patients were equally balanced for age, gender, stage, histology, performance status and risk factors. Compared with two cycles, there was more toxicity in patients receiving four cycles of ABVD for leucopenia, hair loss and infection. Concerning radiotherapy dose, there was more toxicity associated with 30Gy for dysphagia, mucositis and leucopenia. The rate of complete remissions ranged between 98% and 99% with no significant differences among treatment arms. Freedom from treatment failure (FFTF) and overall survival showed no differences between the four treatment arms. The curves for overall survival and FFTF were nearly superimposable for all four arms. This analysis suggests that 2 chemotherapy cycles with involved field radiotherapy may be sufficient for patients with early favourable HL, but a reliable assessment must await the final analysis including all randomised patients and with adequate follow-up. The results of the third interim analysis (10/2005) including 1110 patients with a median follow up of more than 3 years will be presented.

Prerequisites to improvement of predictive model of childhood Hodgkin’s lymphoma

2015 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. 13-18
Author(s):  
Svetlana Aleksandrovna Kulyova ◽  
Andrei Petrovich Karitsky ◽  
Svetlana Viacheslavovna Ivanova
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Hodgkin’S Lymphoma ◽  
Roc Analysis ◽  
Risk Group ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Late Results ◽  
Tumor Burden ◽  
Hodgkin's Lymphoma ◽  
Event Free Survival ◽  
Free Survival

Background. Calculation of relative tumor burden in Hodgkin’s lymphoma patients is the simplest and significant parameter which can be used in daily clinical practice as a risk factor. The aim of study was the assessment of influence of relative tumor burden on the late results of a disease. Material and methods. This research included data on 126 patients with Hodgkin’s lymphoma aged from 0 till 18 years (middle age of 11 years), treated risk-adapted treatment according to the DAL-HD and SPBLH-05. Boys was 70, girls - 56 (a ratio 1,25 : 1). Fifty-eight patients (46 %) are stratified in favorable risk group, 50 (39,7 %) - in intermediate risk group, and 50 (39,7 %) are included in unfavorable risk group. Results. Overall survival at 5 years was 93 % (range 91-95 %), event-free survival - 88 % (85-91 %). The average relative tumor burden was 129,4 cm3/m2 (7-609,7 cm3/m2). When carrying out ROC-analysis value of 122,7 cm3/m2 (р ˂ 0,0001) appeared the critical parameter, which worsen the prognosis of a disease. Overall survival in a patients cohort with this volume was 69,6 %, with the volume less than 122,7 cm3/m2 overall survival was 97,2 % (р = 0,00002). Conclusions. The relative tumor burden is the parameter which is significantly reducing survival rates in children with Hodgkin’s lymphoma. Opinion on interrelation of clinical and laboratory parameters with “sarkoma’s saturation” or tumor volume as end result of immunological frustration, it is represented the most perspective direction of studying of Hodgkin’s lymphoma.

Involved-field radiotherapy for patients in partial remission after chemotherapy for advanced Hodgkin’s lymphoma

2007 ◽  
Vol 67 (1) ◽  
pp. 19-30 ◽  
Author(s):  
Berthe M.P. Aleman ◽  
John M.M. Raemaekers ◽  
Radka Tomiŝiĉ ◽  
Margreet H.A. Baaijens ◽  
Roberto Bortolus ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Partial Remission ◽  
Hodgkin’S Lymphoma ◽  
Hodgkin's Lymphoma ◽  
Involved Field ◽  
Advanced Hodgkin’S Lymphoma ◽  
Involved Field Radiotherapy

Long-Term Follow-Up Analysis of HD9601 Trial Comparing ABVD Versus Stanford V Versus MOPP/EBV/CAD in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Advanced-Stage Hodgkin's Lymphoma: A Study From the Intergruppo Italiano Linfomi

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (32) ◽  
pp. 4227-4233 ◽  
Author(s):  
Teodoro Chisesi ◽  
Monica Bellei ◽  
Stefano Luminari ◽  
Antonella Montanini ◽  
Luigi Marcheselli ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hodgkin’S Lymphoma ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Hodgkin's Lymphoma ◽  
Advanced Stage ◽  
Term Outcome ◽  
Long Term Outcome ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Significant Difference

Purpose The Intergruppo Italiano Linfomi HD9601 trial compared doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine (ABVD) versus doxorubicin, vinblastine, mechloretamine, vincristine, bleomycin, etoposide, and prednisone (Stanford V [StV]) versus the combination of mechlorethamine, vincristine, procarbazine, prednisone (MOPP) with epidoxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine (EBV), lomustine, doxorubicin, and vindesine (CAD) (MOPP/EBV/CAD [MEC]) for the initial treatment of advanced-stage Hodgkin's lymphoma to select which regimen would best support a reduced radiotherapy program (limited to two or fewer sites of either previous bulky or partially remitting disease). Superiority of ABVD and MEC to StV was demonstrated. We report analysis of long-term outcome and toxicity. Patients and Methods Patients with stage IIB, III, or IV were randomly assigned among six cycles of ABVD, three cycles of StV, and six cycles of MEC; radiotherapy was administered in 76, 71, and 50 patients in the three arms, respectively. Results Currently, the median follow-up is 86 months; in the prolonged observation period, eight additional failures, including two relapses, both in the StV arm, and six additional deaths in complete response were recorded. The 10-year overall survival rates were 87%, 80%, and 78% for ABVD, MEC, and StV, respectively (P = .4). The 10-year failure-free survival was 75%, 74%, and 49% in the ABVD, MEC, and StV arms, respectively (P < .001). The 10-year disease-free survival of patients treated or not with radiotherapy (RT) showed no difference for ABVD or MEC (85% v 80% and 93% v 68%), and a statistically significant difference for StV (76% v 33%; P = .004). No significant long-term toxicity was recorded. Conclusion The long-term analysis confirmed ABVD and MEC superiority to StV. The use of RT after StV was established as mandatory. ABVD is still to be considered as the standard treatment with a good balance between efficacy and toxicity.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document