Expanded Access Program (EAP) for Lenalidomide (Revlimid®) Plus Dexamethasone in over 1400 Subjects with Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma.

Blood ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 108 (11) ◽  
pp. 3556-3556 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christine Chen ◽  
Donna E. Reece ◽  
David Siegel ◽  
Ruben Niesvizky ◽  
Ralph Vincent Boccia ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Lenalidomide (Revlimid®) in combination with dexamethasone was approved in the US on June 29, 2006 for the treatment of subjects with multiple myeloma who had received at least one prior therapy. On February 28, 2005 based upon a positive interim analysis of two pivotal placebo-controlled Phase III studies, an independent Data Safety Monitoring Board recommended the studies be unblinded and all subjects in both studies be given access to lenalidomide. In April 2005, the FDA in association with myeloma patient advocacy groups requested Celgene establish an expanded access program to make lenalidomide plus dexamethasone available to subjects with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma while the treatment was awaiting approval. Aim: To provide lenalidomide to multiple myeloma subjects with a high likelihood of benefit and to obtain additional safety data. Methods: Subjects with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma that received at least 1 prior therapy were eligible. Subjects received 25 mg lenalidomide plus high-dose dexamethasone in 4-week cycles until disease progression was documented, study drug was discontinued, or lenalidomide became commercially available for this indication. Results: Between September 8, 2005 and July 25, 2006, approximately 1400 subjects in the US and Canada were enrolled into the study. A data snapshot taken March 17, 2006 demonstrated that 746 subjects had been enrolled, median age was 63 years, 60% were male, and 66.5% had Stage III disease. Median time on study was 7.1 weeks (0.1–24.4) and median daily dose was 20.5 mg. At least one Grade 3 or 4 adverse event was reported in 261 (35%) of the 746 subjects. Most commonly reported Grade 3–4 events were neutropenia (7.9% of subjects), thrombocytopenia (6.0%), fatigue (3.6%), anemia (3.5%), pneumonia (3.1%) and hyperglycemia (2.0%). These most commonly reported Grade 3–4 adverse events were the same as those found in the previous pivotal studies, however, their frequencies of occurrence were lower in the current study probably due to ongoing data collection and differences in study maturity. Likewise, the most commonly reported adverse events (all grades) were the same as those reported in the two previous pivotal studies. Conclusion: Preliminary data from this expanded access program in over 1400 subjects with multiple myeloma are consistent with results from two earlier Phase III pivotal studies. The EAP of lenalidomide plus dexamethasone in multiple myeloma represents a model of how government, advocacy groups, healthcare providers and industry can work together to quickly provide treatment to subjects in need while a clearly active treatment regimen is awaiting approval.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e20039-e20039 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ronnie Shapira-Frommer ◽  
Frank Stephen ◽  
Eytan Ben-Ami ◽  
Tamar Hamburger ◽  
Gal Markel ◽  
...  

e20039 Background: As the first agent to show survival advantage in metastatic melanoma, Ipilimumab (Yervoy, BMS) is being gradually introduced into health services worldwide. It's unique immune mediated side effects requires the incorporation of follow-up guidelines to prevent toxic sequella. We report on safety and efficacy results of refractory melanoma patients (pts) treated on an international expanded access program of Ipilimumab. Methods: Between 4/2010 and 12/2011 183 pts were treated. Pts received Ipilimumab 3 mg/kg q3w for 4 doses. Pts with evidence of clinical benefit at week 12 (CR, PR or SD), were eligible for re-induction upon progression. Results: All pts were pretreated for metastatic disease (median:1 line,range 1-5). 140 pts(77%) had M1c disease, 63 pts(34%) had brain metastasis and 84 (46%) had LDH above ULN, reflecting poor prognostic characteristics of this cohort. Patients received 3.6 doses of Ipilimumab on average. 11% received less than 4 cycles due to toxicity. Grade 3/4 immune-related adverse events were noted in 19.6% with the most common all grades toxicity being diarrhea (17.5%), pruritus (14%) rash (13%) and fatigue (8.7%). Grade 5 toxicity was noted in 4 patients (2%). Five pts were treated with anti TNF antibodies (Infliximab) for steroid resistant toxicity. Objective responses were noted in 16 pts (8.7%;4 CR, 12 PR), 26 pts(14.2%) had stable disease, overall yielding clinical benefit in 23%. Patients with stage IIIc, M1a and M1b were more likely to benefit (52% Vs 23% of the group, p<0.001) as well as patients previously treated by immunotherapy (p=0.026). Median OS was 9.2 months with 1 year survival of 42%. 34 pts (18.6%) are alive beyond 20 months, the majority of them received no further treatment. Factors favoring survival included stage IIIc, M1a and M1b, LDH below ULN and lymphocyte count at week 6 above 1000/ml (p values: <0.001,<0.001, 0.03 respectively). None of the 14 ocular melanoma pts exhibited clinical benefit. Conclusions: Our cohort reflects rapid adoption of this new modality. Ipilimumab had significant clinical benefit, comparable with previous reports, in a heterogenous group of patients, including those with poor prognostic factors.


2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4532-4532
Author(s):  
Joaquim Bellmunt ◽  
Sumanta K. Pal ◽  
Hanzhe Zheng ◽  
Darren Tayama ◽  
Dannis Chang ◽  
...  

4532 Background: A majority of mUC pts progress on standard platinum-based chemo regimens. Atezo (anti–PD-L1) was approved in the US for mUC in the post-platinum setting. Here we report the preliminary safety results from an expanded access program conducted to grant access to atezo, prior to commercial availability, to a broader range of mUC pts than are typically eligible for Phase I-III studies. Methods: From Nov 2015-Aug 2016, this study (NCT02589717) enrolled mUC pts who progressed during or following platinum. Atezo was given 1200 mg IV q3w, and pts could be treated post RECIST v1.1 PD until lack of clinical benefit (per investigator). Safety and clinical activity were key endpoints. PD-L1 expression on immune cells (IC) was assessed with the VENTANA SP142 IHC assay on the first 73 pts prior to protocol amendment omitting this requirement. This study was ended early following FDA approval of atezo. Results: 218 pts were enrolled at 36 sites in the US, with 214 treated pts comprising the safety/efficacy population (Table). Median treatment duration was 9 wks (range 3-26), corresponding to a median of 3 doses of atezo (range 1-8). Overall, 89% of pts had an AE. Treatment-related AEs (TRAEs) occurred in 46% (any Gr) and 7% (Gr3-4) of pts; 2 treatment-related Gr 5 AEs were seen (ileus; acute respiratory failure). TRAEs ≥ 5% were fatigue, decreased appetite and anemia. TRAEs leading to dose interruption or discontinuation occurred in 11% and 6% of pts, respectively. Investigator-assessed RECIST v1.1 ORR was 15% (95% CI: 9, 23), and disease control rate (ORR + SD) was 49% (95% CI: 40, 59). Additional clinical data will be reported. Conclusions: In this expanded access study, atezo was administered to > 200 mUC pts. Overall, atezo was safe and tolerable, supporting its use in a wider platinum-based population. Clinical trial information: NCT02589717. [Table: see text]


2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (25) ◽  
pp. 3892-3901 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert Z. Orlowski ◽  
Arnon Nagler ◽  
Pieter Sonneveld ◽  
Joan Bladé ◽  
Roman Hajek ◽  
...  

PurposeThis phase III international study compared the efficacy and safety of a combination of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) plus bortezomib with bortezomib monotherapy in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma.Patients and MethodsSix hundred forty-six patients were randomly assigned to receive either intravenous bortezomib 1.3 mg/m2on days 1, 4, 8, and 11 of an every 21-days cycle, or the same bortezomib regimen with PLD 30 mg/m2on day 4.ResultsMedian time to progression was increased from 6.5 months for bortezomib to 9.3 months with the PLD + bortezomib combination (P = .000004; hazard ratio, 1.82 [monotherapy v combination therapy]; 95% CI, 1.41 to 2.35). The 15-month survival rate for PLD + bortezomib was 76% compared with 65% for bortezomib alone (P = .03). The complete plus partial response rate was 41% for bortezomib and 44% for PLD + bortezomib, a difference that was not statistically significant. Median duration of response was increased from 7.0 to 10.2 months (P = .0008) with PLD + bortezomib. Grade 3/4 adverse events were more frequent in the combination group (80% v 64%), with safety profiles consistent with the known toxicities of the two agents. An increased incidence in the combination group was seen of grade 3/4 neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, asthenia, fatigue, diarrhea, and hand-foot syndrome.ConclusionPLD with bortezomib is superior to bortezomib monotherapy for the treatment of patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. The combination therapy is associated with a higher incidence of grade 3/4 myelosuppression, constitutional symptoms, and GI and dermatologic toxicities.


2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 8594-8594
Author(s):  
E. A. Stadtmauer ◽  
D. M. Weber ◽  
R. Nieszvizky ◽  
A. Belch ◽  
H. M. Prince ◽  
...  

8594 Background: The benefit of initiating lenalidomide plus dexamethasone at first relapsed was evaluated in this subset analysis from phase III studies in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (MM). Methods: Patients from the randomized, multicenter clinical trials MM-009 and MM-010 who had received at least 1 prior treatment and were not resistant to dexamethasone were treated with lenalidomide (25 mg daily for 21 days of every 28 day cycle) plus dexamethasone (40 mg on days 1–4, 9–12, and 17–20 every 28 days for 4 months, then 40 mg on days 1–4 every cycle thereafter until disease progression or intolerance), or dexamethasone (same dose and schedule) plus placebo. Baseline characteristics such as age, sex, ECOG score, and baseline β2-microglobulin levels between the 2 patient groups were similar, however, median time from diagnosis and prior therapy were statistically different. Results: Multivariate analysis showed that more prior therapies is associated with shorter time-to-progression (TTP). Patients who received 1 prior therapy demonstrated a significant improvement in outcomes such as TTP, progression-free survival (PFS), overall response rate (ORR), complete response/very good partial response rate (CR/VGPR), median duration of treatment and overall survival (OS) after first relapse compared with those who received ≥ 2 prior therapies ( Table ). Toxicity, rate of dose reduction, or treatment discontinuation in the cohort with 1 prior therapy did not increase, despite longer treatment. Conclusions: When used at first relapse compared with salvage therapy, lenalidomide plus dexamethasone treatment resulted in significantly prolonged TTP, PFS, and OS, and an improved quality of response. Lenalidomide plus dexamethasone should be considered at an early stage of therapy for patients with MM. [Table: see text] [Table: see text]


Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 3775-3775
Author(s):  
Adrian Alegre ◽  
Gonzalo Benzo Callejo ◽  
Rafael Alonso Fernández ◽  
Joaquin Martínez-López ◽  
Ana Jimenez-Ubieto ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Heavily pretreated relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (RR MM) constitutes a specific and unmet medical need. Median survival ranges from as little as 6 to 9 months, and responses to treatment are characteristically short (Richardson et al. 2007). Belantamab Mafodotin (BM), a novel anti-BCMA antibody conjugated to microtubule-disrupting agent monomethyl auristatin F, showed single-agent activity in the phase 1 DREAMM-1 and phase 2 DREAMM-2 studies in heavily pre-treated patients with RRMM (Lonial et al, 2019 & 2021). We aim to assess efficacy and safety of BM treatment administered via the expanded access compassionate care program for triple class MMRR patients in the region of Madrid (Spain). Methods: An observational, retrospective and multicenter study has been performed including all patients who received at least one dose of BM under the expanded access program in the region of Madrid (Spain) from Nov 2019 to Jun 2021. Hematology centers provided data from the medical records and entered them in a case report form distributed to the sites. Primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR). Secondary endpoints were progression free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and the incidence of treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs), with a major focus on ocular and hematologic toxicity. Results: A total of 33 patients (pts), from 14 different centers, were included from February 2020 till May 2021. Median age was 70 (46-79) years. 55% of the pts were women. Median time from diagnosis was 71 (10-858) months. 30.3% were high-risk cytogenetic features. Median of prior therapy lines was 5 (3-8) and at least 88% of the pts were triple class refractory. The median number of BM doses per patient was 3 (1-16) and the median follow-up was 11 months (95%CI 6.34-15.66). ORR was 42.2%, and 18.2% achieved ≥VGPR. Median PFS was 3 months (95%CI 0.92-5.08). Median PFS for patients who achieved ≥PR was 11 months (HR 0,26; 95% CI 0,10-0,68). No significant differences were found in PFS according to age, cytogenetic risk and prior therapy lines. OS was 424 days (95% CI 107-740). The incidence of non-hematological TEAEs was 57.6% and the most common of which was ocular toxicity (45.5%). The incidence of ≥G3 non-hematological TEAEs was 30.3%. 51.5% of the pts were diagnosed of keratopathy and 21.2% was ≥G3. 30.3% of the pts showed a reduced visual acuity, but this event was resolved in 92.9% of the pts. The most common symptoms were blurry vision (30.3%, n=10) and dry eye (24.2%, n=8). The incidence of ≥G3 hematological TEAEs was 18.2% and thrombocytopenia was the most frequent (21.2%). Dose reductions of BM were required in 30.3% of the pts and delayed in 36.4% due to TEAEs. Main causes for treatment discontinuation (81%, n=27) were disease progression (54.5%, n=18), toxicity (15.2%, n=5), death (6.1%, n=3) and due to patient's decision (3%, n=1). Conclusion: Compassionate use of BM in heavily pretreated RR MM pts showed a relevant anti-myeloma activity with a manageable safety profile.These results are similar to those observed in the DREAMM-1 and DREAMM-2 clinical trials. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document