The Addition of Rituximab to CHOP Chemotherapy Improves Response Rate, Failure-Free Survival and Overall Survival for Follicular Grade 3 Lymphoma Compared to CHOP Alone

Blood ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 110 (11) ◽  
pp. 1289-1289 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael J. Overman ◽  
Lei Feng ◽  
Barbara Pro ◽  
Peter McLaughlin ◽  
Mark Hess ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
International Prognostic Index ◽  
High Risk Patient ◽  
Prognostic Index ◽  
Cancer Center ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Historical Comparison ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Background: FL3 is a subcategory of follicular lymphomas that is challenging in that it behaves aggressively like large cell lymphomas. If treated with CHOP, however it has a clinical course of relapse and treatment failure similar to grade 1–2 follicular lymphoma. We looked at the outcome of FL3 patients treated with RCHOP, combining rituximab with CHOP. There are no large study reports of this regimen’s results in FL3 to our knowledge. Patients and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the records of 45 patients with follicular grade 3 lymphoma who were treated with rituximab and the combination of cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (CHOP) at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (UTMDACC). Response rate (RR), failure-free survival (FFS), and overall survival (OS) were estimated and a historical comparison to 111 CHOP only treated patients was made. Results: The International Prognostic Index (IPI) distribution was: 47% Low, 36% Low-Intermediate, 13% High-intermediate, and 4% High-risk. The complete response rate was 96%. Forty-four out of 45 patients are still alive. Median follow-up is 3.5 years. The 3-year FFS rate according to IPI was 80% (95% CI: 64% to 100%) in low risk, 81% in low-intermediate (95% CI 64% to 100%), and was 50% (95% CI: 25% to 100%) in high-intermediate/high-risk patient group. The addition of rituximab to CHOP improved both 5-year FFS, 71% (95% CI: 58% to 87%) compared to 44% of CHOP alone (95% CI: 36% to 55%) with p-value of 0.019 and 5-year OS, 98% (95% CI: 93% to 100%) compared to 75% (95% CI: 67% to 84) with p-valule of 0.0034. The addition of rituximab to CHOP improve the FFS compared to CHOP alone when subgroups of IPI were analyzed and compared (p=.002) Conclusion: The addition of rituximab to CHOP provided a high response rate and excellent early survival. Poor risk patients continue to demonstrate a high rate of failure despite the use of rituximab.

R-FND Followed by Radioimmunotherapy for High-Risk Follicular Lymphoma

Blood ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 112 (11) ◽  
pp. 3056-3056 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter McLaughlin ◽  
Sattva Neelapu ◽  
Michelle Fanale ◽  
Maria Rodriguez ◽  
Ana Ayala ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Follicular Lymphoma ◽  
International Prognostic Index ◽  
Prognostic Index ◽  
Ibritumomab Tiuxetan ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Anti Cd20 ◽  
Better Than

Abstract Follicular lymphoma (FL) patients, (pts) with high-risk features using the FL International Prognostic Index (FLIPI) have an expected 5-year survival of only about 50% with conventional therapy. With the incorporation of anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody (mAb) therapy, results are improving (e.g., Buske, Blood2006; 108: 1504). Starting in 2003, we have treated high-risk (FLIPI ≥3) FL pts with R-FND (rituximab, fludarabine, mitoxantrone, dexamethasone) for 4 cycles, followed by radioimmunotherapy (RIT) with ibritumomab tiuxetan, and subsequent rituximab maintenance. Results for the first 35 pts are: complete (CR) and partial (PR) remission 83% and 14%; 3-year overall (OS) and failure-free survival (FFS) 89% and 74% (median follow-up 24 mo.). RIT converted 5 PR pts to CR. Toxicity was mainly hematologic. Five pts did not receive RIT, one because of neutropenia after R-FND. Following RIT, platelet and neutrophil nadirs were 28 and 0.3, occurring at 4–7 weeks. 16 pts required transfusions, and 27 received growth factors. 13 pts had infections, only 2 of which were grade 3. Recovery occurred by 3 weeks in most, with prolonged cytopenias in 6. There has been 1 case of myelodysplasia. In conclusion, the additional complexity of this RIT intensification strategy is warranted in this high-risk FL population, resulting in OS and FFS outcomes that are better than non-mAb therapies, and at least as good as published chemotherapy-rituximab combination therapy.

scholarly journals Ofatumumab monotherapy in rituximab-refractory follicular lymphoma: results from a multicenter study

Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 119 (16) ◽  
pp. 3698-3704 ◽  
Author(s):  
Myron S. Czuczman ◽  
Luis Fayad ◽  
Vincent Delwail ◽  
Guillaume Cartron ◽  
Eric Jacobsen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Follicular Lymphoma ◽  
Overall Response Rate ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
International Prognostic Index ◽  
Prognostic Index ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Overall Response ◽  
Median Progression Free Survival ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract New treatments are required for rituximab-refractory follicular lymphoma (FL). In the present study, patients with rituximab-refractory FL received 8 weekly infusions of ofatumumab (CD20 mAb; dose 1, 300 mg and doses 2-8, 500 or 1000 mg; N = 116). The median age of these patients was 61 years, 47% had high-risk Follicular Lymphoma International Prognostic Index scores, 65% were chemotherapy-refractory, and the median number of prior therapies was 4. The overall response rate was 13% and 10% for the 500-mg and 1000-mg arms, respectively. Among 27 patients refractory to rituximab monotherapy, the overall response rate was 22%. The median progression-free survival was 5.8 months. Forty-six percent of patients demonstrated tumor reduction 3 months after therapy initiation, and the median progression-free survival for these patients was 9.1 months. The most common adverse events included infections, rash, urticaria, fatigue, and pruritus. Three patients experienced grade 3 infusion-related reactions, none of which were considered serious events. Grade 3-4 neutropenia, leukopenia, anemia, and thrombocytopenia occurred in a subset of patients. Ofatumumab was well tolerated and modestly active in this heavily pretreated, rituximab-refractory population and is therefore now being studied in less refractory FL and in combination with other agents in various B-cell neoplasms. The present study was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as NCT00394836.

scholarly journals Melflufen and Dexamethasone in Heavily Pretreated Relapsed and Refractory Multiple Myeloma

2020 ◽  
pp. JCO.20.02259
Author(s):  
Paul G. Richardson ◽  
Albert Oriol ◽  
Alessandra Larocca ◽  
Joan Bladé ◽  
Michele Cavo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Overall Response Rate ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Duration Of Response ◽  
Heavily Pretreated ◽  
Grade 3

PURPOSE Melphalan flufenamide (melflufen) is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate that targets aminopeptidases and rapidly and selectively releases alkylating agents into tumor cells. The phase II HORIZON trial evaluated the efficacy of melflufen plus dexamethasone in relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM), a population with an important unmet medical need. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with RRMM refractory to pomalidomide and/or an anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody received melflufen 40 mg intravenously on day 1 of each 28-day cycle plus once weekly oral dexamethasone at a dose of 40 mg (20 mg in patients older than 75 years). The primary end point was overall response rate (partial response or better) assessed by the investigator and confirmed by independent review. Secondary end points included duration of response, progression-free survival, overall survival, and safety. The primary analysis is complete with long-term follow-up ongoing. RESULTS Of 157 patients (median age 65 years; median five prior lines of therapy) enrolled and treated, 119 patients (76%) had triple-class–refractory disease, 55 (35%) had extramedullary disease, and 92 (59%) were refractory to previous alkylator therapy. The overall response rate was 29% in the all-treated population, with 26% in the triple-class–refractory population. In the all-treated population, median duration of response was 5.5 months, median progression-free survival was 4.2 months, and median overall survival was 11.6 months at a median follow-up of 14 months. Grade ≥ 3 treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 96% of patients, most commonly neutropenia (79%), thrombocytopenia (76%), and anemia (43%). Pneumonia (10%) was the most common grade 3/4 nonhematologic event. Thrombocytopenia and bleeding (both grade 3/4 but fully reversible) occurred concomitantly in four patients. GI events, reported in 97 patients (62%), were predominantly grade 1/2 (93%); none were grade 4. CONCLUSION Melflufen plus dexamethasone showed clinically meaningful efficacy and a manageable safety profile in patients with heavily pretreated RRMM, including those with triple-class–refractory and extramedullary disease.

Prognostic Model for Stratification of Radioresistant Nasopharynx Carcinoma to Curative Salvage Radiotherapy

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (9) ◽  
pp. 891-899 ◽  
Author(s):  
You Quan Li ◽  
Yun Ming Tian ◽  
Sze Huey Tan ◽  
Ming Zhu Liu ◽  
Grace Kusumawidjaja ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Prognostic Index ◽  
Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy ◽  
Training Data ◽  
Cancer Center ◽  
Weight Discrimination ◽  
Data Set ◽  
Training Cohort ◽  
Risk Patients ◽  
Grade 3

Purpose To investigate for a prognostic index (PI) to personalize recommendations for salvage intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) in patients with locally recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma (lrNPC). Methods Patients with lrNPC from two academic institutions (Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center [SYSUCC-A; n = 251 (training cohort)] and National Cancer Centre Singapore [NCCS; n = 114] and SYSUCC-B [n = 193 (validation cohorts)]) underwent salvage treatment with IMRT from 2001 to 2015. Primary and secondary clinical end points were overall survival (OS) and grade 5 toxicity-free rate (G5-TFR), respectively. Covariate inclusion to the PIs was qualified by a multivariable two-sided P < .05. Discrimination and calibration of the PIs were assessed. Results The primary PI comprised covariates that were adversely associated with OS in the training cohort (gross tumor volumerecurrence hazard ratio [HR], 1.01/mL increase [ P < .001], agerecurrence HR, 1.02/year increase [ P = .008]; repeat IMRT equivalent dose in 2-Gy fractions [EQD2] ≥ 68 Gy HR, 1.42 [ P = .03]; prior radiotherapy-induced grade ≥ 3 toxicities HR, 1.90 [ P = .001]; recurrent tumor [rT]-category 3 to 4 HR, 1.96 [ P = .005]), in ascending order of weight. Discrimination of the PI for OS was comparable between training and both validation cohorts (Harrell’s C = 0.71 [SYSUCC-A], 0.72 [NCCS], and 0.69 [SYSUCC-B]); discretization by using a fixed PI score cutoff of 252 determined from the training data set yielded low- and high-risk subgroups with disparate OS in the validation cohorts (NCCS HR, 3.09 [95% CI, 1.95 to 4.89]; SYSUCC-B HR, 3.80 [95% CI, 2.55 to 5.66]). Our five-factor PI predicted OS and G5-TFR (predicted v observed 36-month OS and G5-TFR, 22% v 15% and 38% v 44% for high-risk NCCS and 26% v 31% and 45% v 46% for high-risk SYSUCC-B). Conclusion We present a validated PI for robust clinical stratification of radioresistant NPC. Low-risk patients represent ideal candidates for curative repeat IMRT, whereas novel clinical trials are needed in the unfavorable high-risk subgroup.

Efficacy and Toxicity of Rituximab and Brief Duration, High Intensity Chemotherapy with Filgrastim Support for Burkitt or Burkitt – Like Leukemia/Lymphoma: Cancer and Leukemia Group B (Calgb) Study 10002

Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 858-858 ◽  
Author(s):  
David A. Rizzieri ◽  
Jeffrey L Johnson ◽  
John C. Byrd ◽  
Gerard Lozanski ◽  
Bayard L. Powell ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
High Intensity ◽  
International Prognostic Index ◽  
Tumor Lysis Syndrome ◽  
Prognostic Index ◽  
Adult Patients ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Risk Patients ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Abstract 858 Prior studies have shown that combination chemotherapy using high doses of antimetabolites and alkylating agents over a short duration is effective treatment for Burkitt leukemia and lymphoma. Adults able to tolerate this therapy have had > 50% long term survival, although those with higher risk by the International Prognostic Index (IPI) have had inferior outcomes. Between 5/2002 and 9/2009, we enrolled 105 adults (19-79 yrs old) with untreated Burkitt leukemia/lymphoma onto a phase II study of a high intensity chemo-immunotherapy regimen to assess the benefit of adding rituximab plus growth factor support to the intensive chemotherapy regimen developed in CALGB 9251 and evaluated patterns of relapse when prophylactic cranial irradiation was not given. All subjects were HIV negative and had serum creatinine and bilirubin ≤1.5 × upper limit. Complete data are available on 105 patients for toxicity and 103 patients for efficacy. Methods: Treatment began with cyclophosphamide (CY) 200 mg/m2 × 5 days and prednisone 60 mg/m2 × 7 days. Cycle 2 was started on Day 8 after entry. Cycles 2, 4, and 6 consisted of ifosfamide 800 mg/m2 on days 1–5, methotrexate (MTX) 1.5 g/m2 infused over day 1 with leucovorin rescue, vincristine (VCR) 2 mg day 1, Ara-C 1 gm/m2 days 4 and 5, VP-16 80 mg/m2 days 4 and 5, and dexamethasone 10 mg/m2 on days 1–5. Cycles 3, 5, and 7 included the same doses of MTX, VCR, and dexamethasone, with CY 200 mg/m2 IV on days 1–5 and doxorubicin 25 mg/m2 days 4 and 5. Cycles were delivered every 21 days if blood counts had recovered. Filgrastim was given at 5μg/kg/day SC beginning day 7 of each cycle and continuing until the absolute neutrophil count recovered to > 5000/μL. Rituximab was initiated during cycle 2 on day 8 at 50 mg/m2 and on days 10 and 12 at 375 mg/m2. During cycles 3 through 7, rituximab was infused only on day 8 of each course at 375 mg/m2. Central nervous system (CNS) prophylaxis consisted of triple intrathecal therapy on day 1 of cycles 2–7 (6 total doses). Results: 27% of patients were ≥60 years old; 70% were male; 46% had intermediate or high risk disease by the IPI (Table). Overall, 75 of 105 subjects completed all 7 planned courses of therapy. 82% attained a complete response (CR), and 87% of these remain in CR at last follow up. 7% had a partial response. With median follow up of survivors of 3.2 years, 2 year event free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) were 77% and 79%, respectively, with a trend favoring those <60 years old (87% and 87%, respectively). There were clear differences in outcome based on IPI score with 2 year EFS and OS for low risk patients of 90% and 92% versus 55% and 55% for high risk patients, respectively (Figure). This protocol did not use prophylactic CNS radiation, and 4 pts had documented CNS relapses; 2 had intermediate and 1 high IPI disease; the 4th was unknown. Relapse after 2 years was rare. 7 subjects (6.8%) died from treatment related causes (1 CNS bleed, 4 infections, 2 respiratory failure). Nearly all subjects experienced the anticipated severe hematologic toxicities. The most common grade 3 and 4 non-hematologic toxicities included stomatitis/upper GI toxicity (∼ 66%), nausea/vomiting (20%), fatigue (26%), rash or erythema multiforme (10%), diarrhea (10%), pulmonary or CNS bleeding (11%), clinically documented infections (72%), neurologic disturbances (8%), and dyspnea (10%). 8 pts (8%) had tumor lysis syndrome (all grade 3). Conclusion: This regimen provides a high rate of durable remissions in adult patients with a manageable side effect profile. Chemoimmunotherapy should be the standard for adult patients with Burkitt leukemia/lymphoma. Disclosures: Off Label Use: Rituximab for use in Burkitt's. Cheson:Genentech: Consultancy.

An Enhanced International Prognostic Index (IPI) for Patients with Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma (DLBCL) in the Rituximab Era Using the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) Database.

Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 2656-2656
Author(s):  
Zheng Zhou ◽  
Alfred W. Rademaker ◽  
Leo I. Gordon ◽  
Ann S. LaCasce ◽  
Ann Vanderplas ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Marrow ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
High Risk ◽  
International Prognostic Index ◽  
Model Development ◽  
Prognostic Index ◽  
Risk Groups ◽  
Ratio Test ◽  
Validation Sample ◽  
Gi Tract

Abstract Abstract 2656 Introduction: The International Prognostic Index (IPI) was first developed in 1993 to risk stratify patients with aggressive Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) for outcome prediction (Shipp, NEJM, 1993). Since the addition of rituximab to conventional CHOP chemotherapy for the treatment of DLBCL, there have been many efforts to validate the IPI as well as to improve upon the model's capacity to distinguish subgroups with discrete clinical outcomes, especially high-risk patients. Previous studies have focused on adding clinical or biologic prognostic factor(s) to the original model or regrouping the original IPI score (R-IPI; Sehn, Blood, 2007). We, therefore, built anew a modern IPI based solely on clinical factors available in the real world NCCN clinical database. Methods: Using the nationwide population-based NHL lymphoma database from NCCN, patients with newly diagnosed DLBCL enrolled between June 2000 and Dec. 2010 at 7 NCCN cancer centers were included with at least 1 year and up to 5 years of follow-up. Clinical characteristics including age, Ann Arbor stage, ECOG performance status, disease in extranodal sites (including positivity in bone marrow, CNS, liver/GI tract, lung, other sites and spleen), LDH, presence of bulky disease (>10 cm) as well as B symptoms were studied as potential predictors for model development using COX proportional hazards regression. IPI scores were assigned proportionally based on parameter estimates of the statistically significant predictors in the final COX model. Model selection and its comparison to the original IPI model were made based on Akaike Criteria (AIC) and the likelihood ratio test. Categorization of age and LDH was decided by testing the linearity assumption and Martingale residuals. Kaplan-Meier curves were plotted for stratified risk groups per the new and original IPI. Finally, both IPI models were compared using the initial randomly selected 15% validation sample. Results: There were 1,650 DLBCL patients with complete clinical information included for model development. The new IPI model consisted of similar component predictors but used a maximum of 8 scoring points by further categorizing age group into >40–60 (score of 1), >60–75 (score of 2) and >75 yrs (score of 3), and normalized LDH between >1–3 times (score of 1) and 33 times (score of 2) upper limit of normal. These categorizations minimized the Martingale residuals. Age effect was linear and 20-year increments fit the model best, whereas the effect of normalized LDH was not linear and reached plateau at a ratio of 3. Lymphomatous involvement either of bone marrow, CNS, Liver/GI tract or lung appeared as a stronger predictor (p<0.001) than number of extranodal sites (p=0.91). Four risk groups (Low, Low-intermediate, High-intermediate and High) were identified using the current IPI (Table 1) with enhanced discrimination power when compared with the original IPI and better global model fitting statistics, i.e. smaller AIC and significant likelihood ratio test (p<0.001). It was possible to identify a high risk group (score 3 6) with 5-year overall survival of 33% (95% CI: 22%–45%). Better model prediction was also shown in the validation sample. Conclusions: We were able to develop an enhanced IPI model for clinical prediction among previously untreated DLBCL cases by using patient level data from the NCCN NHL database. The NCCN-IPI demonstrates better risk stratification and identifies a poor risk subgroup with <50% 5-year overall survival in the current real-world clinical setting as compared to the original IPI model developed for aggressive lymphoma prior to the rituximab era. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Follicular Lymphoma International Prognostic Index 2: A New Prognostic Index for Follicular Lymphoma Developed by the International Follicular Lymphoma Prognostic Factor Project

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (27) ◽  
pp. 4555-4562 ◽  
Author(s):  
Massimo Federico ◽  
Monica Bellei ◽  
Luigi Marcheselli ◽  
Stefano Luminari ◽  
Armando Lopez-Guillermo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Follicular Lymphoma ◽  
Bone Marrow Involvement ◽  
International Prognostic Index ◽  
Prognostic Index ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Study Population ◽  
Index 2

Purpose The aim of the F2 study was to verify whether a prospective collection of data would enable the development of a more accurate prognostic index for follicular lymphoma (FL) by using parameters which could not be retrospectively studied before, and by choosing progression-free survival (PFS) as principal end point. Patients and Methods Between January 2003 and May 2005, 1,093 patients with a newly diagnosed FL were registered and 942 individuals receiving antilymphoma therapy were selected as the study population. The variables we used for score definition were selected by means of bootstrap resampling procedures on 832 patients with complete data. Procedures to select the model that would minimize errors were also performed. Results After a median follow-up of 38 months, 261 events for PFS evaluation were recorded. β2-microglobulin higher than the upper limit of normal, longest diameter of the largest involved node longer than 6 cm, bone marrow involvement, hemoglobin level lower than 12 g/dL, and age older than 60 years were factors independently predictive for PFS. Using these variables, a prognostic model was devised to identify three groups at different levels of risk. The 3-year PFS rate was 91%, 69%, and 51% for patients at low, intermediate, and high risk, respectively (log-rank = 64.6; P < .00001). The 3-year survival rate was 99%, 96%, and 84% for patients at low, intermediate, and high risk, respectively (P < .0001). Conclusion Follicular Lymphoma International Prognostic Index 2 is a simple prognostic index based on easily available clinical data and may represent a promising new tool for the identification of patients with FL at different risk in the era of immunochemotherapy.

Weekly Topotecan for Recurrent Ovarian, Fallopian Tube and Primary Peritoneal Carcinoma: Tolerability and Efficacy Study—The Israeli Experience

2013 ◽  
Vol 23 (3) ◽  
pp. 475-480 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tamar Safra ◽  
Tara Berman ◽  
Adelya Yachnin ◽  
Ilan Bruchim ◽  
Mihai Meirovitz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Partial Response ◽  
Clinical Benefit ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Platinum Sensitive ◽  
Tubal Cancer ◽  
Grade 3

ObjectivesThe purpose of this study was to assess the clinical activity and toxicity of weekly topotecan in a large cohort of epithelial ovarian (EOC), primary peritoneal (PPC), and tubal cancer patients.MethodsRecords of patients with recurrent EOC, PPC, and tubal cancer who were treated with weekly topotecan (4.0 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, and 15 on a 28-day cycle) after failure of more than 1 prior regimen were retrospectively reviewed in 8 centers in Israel.ResultsTwo hundred four patients were evaluated for efficacy and toxicity. Median age was 62 years (range, 27–89 years); 121 (59.3%) were platinum sensitive. Patients were exposed to a median of 2 previous lines (range, 1–9), and 48.5% received only 1 prior chemotherapy regimen. Median follow-up was 15.5 months (range, 2.5–112 months). Overall response rate was 26.5%, of which 11 patients (5.4%) had complete response, and 43 patients (21.1%) had partial response. Clinical benefit rate (complete response + partial response + stable disease) was 65.7%. Median progression-free survival was 4.0 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 3.5–4.5 months). There was no significant difference between platinum-sensitive and platinum-resistant patients regarding response rate or progression-free survival. Median overall survival from disease diagnosis was 45.0 months (95% CI, 40.04–49.6 months) and 16.0 months (95% CI, 12.3–19.7 months) from initiation of topotecan therapy. Overall survival was significantly different between patients with platinum-sensitive and platinum-resistant disease (19.9 vs 10.8 months, respectively, P = 0.003; 95% CI, 8.1–16.3 months). Multivariate analysis showed that only platinum sensitivity and topotecan line were associated with overall survival. Weekly topotecan was well tolerated—with only 16.7% of patients experiencing grade 3 to 4 hematologic toxicities. There were no other grade 4 toxicities, and only 6.9% grade 3 toxicities.ConclusionsIn this large cohort of recurrent EOC, PPC, and tubal cancer, weekly topotecan was well tolerated with good clinical benefit rate, comparable to previous studies.

Bortezomib-Melphalan-Prednisone-Thalidomide Followed by Maintenance With Bortezomib-Thalidomide Compared With Bortezomib-Melphalan-Prednisone for Initial Treatment of Multiple Myeloma: Updated Follow-Up and Improved Survival

2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (7) ◽  
pp. 634-640 ◽  
Author(s):  
Antonio Palumbo ◽  
Sara Bringhen ◽  
Alessandra Larocca ◽  
Davide Rossi ◽  
Francesco Di Raimondo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Complete Response Rate ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
To Receive

Purpose Bortezomib-melphalan-prednisone (VMP) has improved overall survival in multiple myeloma. This randomized trial compared VMP plus thalidomide (VMPT) induction followed by bortezomib-thalidomide maintenance (VMPT-VT) with VMP in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. Patients and Methods We randomly assigned 511 patients who were not eligible for transplantation to receive VMPT-VT (nine 5-week cycles of VMPT followed by 2 years of VT maintenance) or VMP (nine 5-week cycles without maintenance). Results In the initial analysis with a median follow-up of 23 months, VMPT-VT improved complete response rate from 24% to 38% and 3-year progression-free-survival (PFS) from 41% to 56% compared with VMP. In this analysis, median follow-up was 54 months. The median PFS was significantly longer with VMPT-VT (35.3 months) than with VMP (24.8 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.58; P < .001). The time to next therapy was 46.6 months in the VMPT-VT group and 27.8 months in the VMP group (HR, 0.52; P < .001). The 5-year overall survival (OS) was greater with VMPT-VT (61%) than with VMP (51%; HR, 0.70; P = .01). Survival from relapse was identical in both groups (HR, 0.92; P = .63). In the VMPT-VT group, the most frequent grade 3 to 4 adverse events included neutropenia (38%), thrombocytopenia (22%), peripheral neuropathy (11%), and cardiologic events (11%). All of these, except for thrombocytopenia, were significantly more frequent in the VMPT-VT patients. Conclusion Bortezomib and thalidomide significantly improved OS in multiple myeloma patients not eligible for transplantation.

scholarly journals Association between neutropenia and survival to nab-paclitaxel and gemcitabine in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Giandomenico Roviello ◽  
Monica Ramello ◽  
Martina Catalano ◽  
Alberto D’Angelo ◽  
Raffaele Conca ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Common Side Effect ◽  
First Line ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Toxicity Criteria

Abstract Neutropenia is a common side effect associated with nab-paclitaxel gemcitabine (Nab-Gem) therapy. We retrospectively investigated the association between neutropenia induced by first-line Nab-Gem and survival in metastatic pancreatic carcinoma patients. Metastatic pancreatic patients treated with first-line Nab-Gem were included in this retrospective analysis. Neutropenia was categorized using the National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria scale. Outcome measures were overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) and response rate. 115 patients were analyzed. Median PFS was 7 months (95% CI 5–8) for patients with grade ≥ 3 neutropenia and 6 months (95% CI 5–6) for patients with grade < 3 neutropenia [p = 0.08; hazard ratio (HR 0.68)]. Median OS was 13 months (95% CI 10–18) for patients with grade ≥ 3 neutropenia and 10 months (95% CI 8–13) for patients with grade < 3 neutropenia (p = 0.04; HR 0.44). In multivariate analysis, the occurrence of grade ≥ 3 neutropenia showed a statistically significant association with OS (HR 0.62; 95% CI 0.09–0.86; p = 0.05). Nab-Gem-induced neutropenia is associated with longer survival in metastatic pancreatic cancer patients.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document