The Cost of Managing Pleural Effusion Associated with Dasatinib in CML Patients Post Imatinib Failure.

Blood ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 110 (11) ◽  
pp. 4586-4586
Author(s):  
Jennifer Stephens ◽  
Kim Carpiuc ◽  
Marc Botteman ◽  
WeiWei Feng ◽  
Richard C. Woodman

Abstract Background: Recent follow-up data from dasatinib at a large cancer center suggests that pleural effusion events occur in up to 35% of patients, emerging as late as 24 months into therapy, and require additional medical resource use beyond the typical routine care. This study aims to apply economic costs to the medical resource utilization involved with treating pleural effusions associated with dasatinib. Methods: The costs of managing pleural effusions were estimated by applying standard cost data to medical resource utilization reported for 48 patients with dasatinib-related pleural effusions at one large cancer center (Quintas-Cardama et al, ASH 2006). Relevant CPT codes and median fees for outpatient procedures and office visits were retrieved from the 2006 Ingenix National Fee Analyzer. Cost of inpatient management of pleural effusions with chest tubes or other procedures were obtained from the medical literature (Putnam et al, 2000). Clinical expert input was used to supplement the literature related to assumptions of frequency of office visits and chest X-rays. Based on the above, the following key assumptions were made: 100% of patients incurred two additional physician visits, two chest x-rays, and a course of diuretics; 30% received steroids; 24% had recurrent effusions; 19% required 3 thoracentesis outpatient procedures; 5% were managed as inpatients with chest tube; and 4% required Denver shunts as inpatients. All costs were inflated to 2006 US prices. Results: Fifty-eight percent of pleural effusions reported at the cancer center involved ≤25% of one lung volume and were managed medically including diuretics and steroids. Costs for this medically managed group were $619 per episode, including physician office visits, chest X-rays and medications. Forty-two percent of pleural effusions were more significant, involving 26% to >75% of one lung volume, with half of those patients requiring invasive procedures. The cost of invasive procedures for inpatient management of pleural effusions was $10,130 for a chest tube and $14,475 with a pleural catheter. The cost of invasive outpatient management of pleural effusions ranged from $680 for ultrasound thoracentesis to $4,387 for pleural catheter. The average projected cost of treating a pleural effusion adverse event (including all severity levels) ranged from $1,694 to $3,882, depending on whether outpatient thoracentesis occurred or placement of outpatient pleural catheter was utilized. Important cost drivers included management of recurrent effusions. Conclusion: This economic analysis based on actually observed treatment patterns suggests that the management of pleural effusions with dasatinib is costly and requires intensive resource utilization. Development of pleural effusions with dasatinib poses a significant challenge to physicians, as they cannot be predicted, the time of onset is variable, and management may require repeat invasive procedures and possible complications. This economic analysis is likely conservative in that it did not include the cost of platelet transfusions that may be needed to perform thoracentesis, or the potential complications of hypokalemia and QTcF prolongation with the use of diuretics. Effective tyrosine kinase inhibitors with lower rates of pleural effusions may represent a clinically and economically valuable alternative for imatinib-resistant or -intolerant CML patients.

1998 ◽  
Vol 32 (7-8) ◽  
pp. 739-742 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert L Thompson ◽  
Jonathan C Yau ◽  
Ronald F Donnelly ◽  
Debra J Gowan ◽  
Frederick RK Matzinger

OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy of using an iodized talc slurry as a sclerosing agent instilled into the pleural space via a 12-French pigtail catheter for controlling malignant pleural effusions. DESIGN: A prospective study in which patients were followed until their death. SETTING: A university-affiliated tertiary-care teaching hospital. PATIENTS: Medical oncology patients admitted with symptomatic malignant pleural effusions were considered for iodized talc pleurodesis. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The control of pleural effusion. Treatment failure was defined as any reaccumulation of fluid in the pleural space. RESULTS: Fifteen patients were treated for a total of 17 instillations. The median follow-up on all patients until death was 6 months (range 1–20). The most frequent adverse effect in the study group was pleuritic chest pain (60%). The probability of control of effusion, as determined by the method of Kaplan–Meier, was 81% (SEM 9.7%). The cost of preparing 5 g of iodized talc was $4.32 (US). CONCLUSIONS: Iodized talc slurry instilled through a small-bore pigtail catheter is a safe, economical, and effective treatment for malignant pleural effusion.


Author(s):  
Davide Chiumello ◽  
Silvia Coppola

The main goal of management of pleural effusion is to provide symptomatic relief removing fluid from the pleural space. The options depend on type, stage, and underlying disease. The first diagnostic instrument is the chest radiography, while ultrasound can be very useful to guide thoracentesis. Pleural effusion can be a transudate or an exudate. Generally, a transudate is uncomplicated effusion treated by medical therapy, while an exudative effusion is considered complicated effusion and should be managed by drainage. Refractory non-malignant effusions can be transudative (congestive heart failure, cirrhosis, nephrosis) or exudative (pancreatitis, connective tissue disease, endocrine dysfunction), and the management options include repeated therapeutic thoracentesis, in-dwelling pleural catheter for intermittent external drainage, pleuroperitoneal shunts for internal drainage, or surgical pleurectomy. Parapneumonic pleural effusions can be classified as complicated when there is persistent bacterial invasion of the pleural space, uncomplicated and empyema with specific indications for pleural fluid drainage. Malignancy is the most common cause of exudative pleural effusions in patients aged >60 years and the decision to treat depends upon the presence of symptoms and the underlying tumour type. Options include in-dwelling pleural catheter drainage, pleurodesis, pleurectomy, and pleuroperitoneal shunt. Haemothorax needs to be differentiated from a haemorrhagic pleural effusion and, when suspected, the essential management is intercostal drainage. It achieves two objectives to drain the pleural space allowing expansion of the lung and to allow assessment of rates of blood loss to evaluate the need for emergency or urgent thoracotomy.


Author(s):  
Francesco Blasi ◽  
Paolo Tarsia

The main goal of management of pleural effusion is to provide symptomatic relief removing fluid from pleural space and the options depend on type, stage and underlying disease. The first diagnostic instrument is the chest radiography while ultrasound can be very useful to guide thoracentesis. Pleural effusion can be a transudate or an exudate. Generally a transudate is uncomplicated effusion treated by medical therapy, while an exudative effusion is considered complicated effusion and should be managed by drainage. Refractory non-malignant effusions can be transudative (congestive heart failure, cirrhosis, nephrosis) or exudative (pancreatitis, connective tissue disease, endocrine dysfunction), and the management options include repeated therapeutic thoracentesis, indwelling pleural catheter for intermittent external drainage, pleuroperitoneal shunts for internal drainage, or surgical pleurectomy. Parapneumonic pleural effusions can be divided in complicated when there is persistent bacterial invasion of the pleural space, uncomplicated and empyema with specific indications for pleural fluid drainage. Malignancy is the most common cause of exudative pleural effusions in patients aged >60 years and the decision to treat depends upon the presence of symptoms and the underlying tumour type. Options include indwelling pleural catheter drainage, pleurodesis, pleurectomy and pleuroperitoneal shunt. Hemothorax needs to be differentiated from a haemorrhagic pleural effusion and when is suspected the essential management is the intercostal drainage. It achieves two objectives to drain the pleural space allowing expansion of the lung and to allow assessment of rates of blood loss to evaluate the need for emergency or urgent thoracotomy.


2016 ◽  
Vol 82 (10) ◽  
pp. 995-999 ◽  
Author(s):  
Douglas Z. Liou ◽  
Derek Serna-Gallegos ◽  
Joshua L. Chan ◽  
Jerald Borgella ◽  
Shah Akhmerov ◽  
...  

Malignant pleural effusions (MPE) are commonly managed with either pleural catheter (PC) or talc pleurodesis (TP). The aim of this study was to compare survival in MPE patients treated with either PC or TP. A retrospective review of our cancer center database was performed. Patients with metastatic cancer and MPE were analyzed. Demographic and clinical data were tabulated and compared. A total of 238 patients with MPE treated by either PC or TP were included. Of these, 79 patients comprised the PC group and 159 the TP group. PC had a higher incidence of advanced disease (stage III or IV) at initial diagnosis compared with TP (70.9% vs 57.2%, P = 0.05). TP had a longer postprocedure length of stay compared with PC (7.1 vs 5.0 days, P = 0.02); however, overall length of stay was similar (9.7 vs 11.1 days, P = 0.34). Read-missions were significantly lower in TP (11.9% vs 22.8%, P = 0.04). Mean survival was higher in TP compared with PC (18.7 vs 4.1 months, P < 0.001). Patients with metastatic cancer and MPE treated with TP had significantly higher survival compared with PC. This is likely related to a greater disease burden in PC, as 70 per cent of patients in this group had stage III or IV disease on initial presentation.


2013 ◽  
Vol 20 (2) ◽  
pp. 106-110 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nadim Srour ◽  
Kayvan Amjadi ◽  
Alan John Forster ◽  
Shawn David Aaron

BACKGROUND: Management of malignant pleural effusion typically involves insertion of an indwelling pleural catheter (IPC) or chemical pleurodesis with agents such as talc.OBJECTIVES: To compare these management strategies with regard to success of pleural effusion management.METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was designed comparing patients with malignant and paramalignant pleural effusions and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status <4 managed with IPC insertion or talc pleurodesis (TP) through tube thoracostomy during non-contemporary three-year periods at a single centre.RESULTS: The IPC and TP groups comprised 193 and 167 patients, respectively. The pleural effusion control rate at six months was higher in the IPC group (52.7% versus 34.4% in the TP group; P<0.01), but the rate of freedom from catheter at 90 days and pleural effusion at 180 days was not significantly different (IPC 25.8% versus TP 34.4% [P=0.17]). Median effusion-free survival from the date of catheter insertion was significantly longer in the IPC group (101 days versus 58 days in the TP group; log-rank P=0.025). Both procedures were safe.DISCUSSION: While the results suggest better pleural effusion control and longer effusion-free survival with IPC insertion compared with TP, the present study had several limitations. Other recent studies have not shown one strategy to be clearly superior to the other.CONCLUSION: Both IPC insertion and TP remain acceptable options for the management of malignant pleural effusions.


2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. e233213 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ambreen Iqbal Muhammad ◽  
Joseph Gavin ◽  
Alex Wilkinson

The use of indwelling pleural catheters (IPC) is well established in the treatment of malignant pleural effusions. They allow symptom management with intermittent drainage without requiring overnight admission to hospital. However, little is known about their effectiveness in the treatment of pleural infections. Here, we present a case where an IPC is used in the therapeutic management of tuberculous empyema. The IPC enabled outpatient treatment, allowed the patient to return to work and reduced the cost of treatment and the risk of hospital-acquired complications.


2017 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 50 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Hassan ◽  
S.J. Seung ◽  
M. C. Cheung ◽  
G. Fraser ◽  
B. Kuriakose ◽  
...  

Purpose The purpose of the present study was to collect medical resource utilization data and costs in Ontario for the management of patients with relapsed or refractory chronic lymphocytic lymphoma (cll) who have undergone at least 1 treatment course and have been stratified by Rai staging.Methods This retrospective longitudinal cohort study, conducted by chart review, analyzed anonymized patient records from two cancer centres in Ontario. Comprehensive records of 86 patients meeting the inclusion criteria were used to obtain resource utilization, which, multiplied by unit costs, were used to determine overall and mean costs. Descriptive statistics are presented for patient demographics, medical resource utilization, and costing data.Results The total cost for the cohort was $2.2 million over a mean follow-up period of 4.7 years. The mean total cost per patient (regardless of follow-up) was $25,736. In terms of Rai staging, overall mean costs were highest for stage iv patients. Almost 50% of the total cost was attributable to cll treatments, among which fludarabine-based treatments had the highest utilization.Conclusions For this Canadian cll cohort, medical resource utilization and costs were determined to be $2.2 million, with cll treatments accounting for about half the cost. Costs generally increased with Rai stage.


2016 ◽  
pp. 66-71
Author(s):  
Van Mao Nguyen ◽  
Huyen Quynh Trang Pham

Background: The cytology and the support of clinical symptoms, biochemistry for diagnosis of the cases of effusions are very important. Objectives: - To describe some of clinical symptoms and biochemistry of effusions. - To compare the results between cytology and biochemistry by the causes of pleural, peritoneal fluids. Material & Method: A cross-sectional study to describe all of 47 patients with pleural, peritoneal effusions examinated by cytology in the Hospital of Hue University of Medicine and Pharmacy from April 2013 to January 2014. Results: In 47 cases with effusions, pleural effusion accounting for 55.32%, following peritoneal effusions 29.79% and 14.89% with both of them. The most common symptoms in patients with pleural effusions were diminished or absent tactile fremitus, dull percussion, diminished or absent breath sounds (100%), in patients with peritoneal effusions was ascites (95.24%). 100% cases with pleural effusions, 50% cases with peritoneal effusions and 80% cases with pleural and peritoneal effusions were exudates. The percentage of malignant cells in patients with pleural effusions was 26.92%, in peritoneal effusions was 28.57%, in pleural and peritoneal effusions was 42.86%. The percentage of detecting the malignant cells in patients with suspected cancer in the first test was 57.14%, in the second was 9.53% and 33.33% undetectable. Most of cases which had malignant cells and inflammatory were exudates, all of the cases which had a few cells were transudates. Besides, 7.5% cases which had high neutrophil leukocytes were transudates. Conclusion: Cytology should be carry out adding to the clinical examinations and biochemistry tests to have an exact diagnosis, especially for the malignant ones. For the case with suspected cancer, we should repeat cytology test one more time to increase the ability to detect malignant cells. Key words: Effusion, pleural effusion, peritoneal effusion, cytology, biochemistry


2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (4) ◽  
pp. 184-190
Author(s):  
Muhammad Irfan ◽  
Abdul Rasheed Qureshi ◽  
Zeeshan Ashraf ◽  
Muhammad Amjad Ramzan ◽  
Tehmina Naeem ◽  
...  

ABSTRACT Background: Conventionally Pleural effusions are suspected by history of pleuritis, evaluated by physical signs and multiple view radiography. Trans-thoracic pleural aspiration is done and aspirated pleural fluid is considered the gold-standard for pleural effusion. Chest sonography has the advantage of having high diagnostic efficacy over radiography for the detection of pleural effusion. Furthermore, ultrasonography is free from radiation hazards, inexpensive, readily available  and feasible for use in ICU, pregnant and pediatric patients. This study aims to explore the diagnostic accuracy of trans-thoracic ultrasonography for pleural fluid detection, which is free of such disadvantages. The objective is to determine the diagnostic efficacy of trans-thoracic ultrasound for detecting pleural effusion and also to assess its suitability for being a non-invasive gold-standard.   Subject and Methods: This retrospective study of 4597 cases was conducted at pulmonology  OPD-Gulab Devi Teaching Hospital, Lahore from November 2016 to July 2018. Adult patients with clinical features suggesting pleural effusions were included while those where no suspicion of pleural effusion, patients < 14 years and pregnant ladies were excluded. Patients were subjected to chest x-ray PA and Lateral views and chest ultrasonography was done by a senior qualified radiologist in OPD. Ultrasound-guided pleural aspiration was done in OPD & fluid was sent for analysis. At least 10ml aspirated fluid was considered as diagnostic for pleural effusion. Patient files containing history, physical examination, x-ray reports, ultrasound reports, pleural aspiration notes and informed consent were retrieved, reviewed and findings were recorded in the preformed proforma. Results were tabulated and conclusion was drawn by statistical analysis. Results: Out of 4597 cases, 4498 pleural effusion were manifested on CXR and only 2547(56.62%) pleural effusions were proved by ultrasound while 2050 (45.57%) cases were reported as no Pleural effusion. Chest sonography demonstrated sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV and diagnostic accuracy 100 % each. Conclusions: Trans-thoracic ultrasonography revealed an excellent efficacy that is why it can be considered as non-invasive gold standard for the detection of pleural effusion.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document