A Biologic Combination of Lenalidomide and Rituximab for Front-Line Therapy of Indolent B-Cell Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma.

Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 1714-1714 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nathan Fowler ◽  
Peter McLaughlin ◽  
Fredrick B. Hagemeister ◽  
Larry Kwak ◽  
Michelle Fanale ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 1714 Poster Board I-740 Background Despite advances in therapy and a better understanding of the natural history of indolent non-Hodgkins lymphomas (NHL), the optimal treatment for newly diagnosed patients (pts) has not been determined. While several chemotherapy regimens have response rates approaching 90%, toxicity is common with standard genotoxic combinations, particularly with retreatment at relapse. Lenalidomide is approved for the treatment of relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma and myelodysplastic syndromes with del(5q) mutation. In pts with indolent relapsed or refractory NHL, treatment with lenalidomide resulted in durations of response lasting > 16.5 months (Witzig et al JCO in press). Rituximab has been shown to have clinical activity in indolent NHL, both as a single agent and in combination with chemotherapy. The aim of this phase II, single arm study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of lenalidomide and rituximab in pts with untreated, stage III or IV, indolent NHL. Methods Previously untreated pts with indolent NHL and with measurable disease (>1.5 cm), were eligible for enrollment. For each 28-day cycle, pts received lenalidomide 20mg orally once daily on days 1-21 and rituximab 375mg/m2 intravenously on day 1, for up to 6 cycles of therapy. Response was assessed after 3 cycles and at the end of therapy using the International Working Group Response Criteria (Cheson et al 1999). Results At the time of this report, the planned accrual of 30 pts is complete. Response and adverse events are reported for the first 20 patients, which included 19 pts eligible for response assessment and 1 patient, who discontinued from study prior to response evaluation, secondary to leukocytoclastic vasculitis, which occurred during cycle 1. The median age was 55 yrs (range: 38-77) and 55% were male. The 20 currently evaluable patients include10 pts with follicular lymphoma, 8 pts with marginal zone lymphoma and 2 pts with small lymphocytic lymphoma. Of 19 pts eligible for response assessment, 18 completed 6 cycles of therapy and 1 pt, who was previously treated for Hodgkin's lymphoma, withdrew consent following cycle 3. The overall response rate was 84%, which included complete responses in 15 pts (79%; 58% CR/21% CRu) and 1 patient who achieved a partial response. An additional 3 pts (16%) remain with stable disease. By completion of 6 cycles of therapy, all 10 pts with follicular lymphoma achieved a complete response to therapy. No pt experienced progression of disease. The following grade 3/4 adverse events were reported; rash (6 pts), neutropenia (4 pts), myalgia (3 pts), neuropathy (1 pt), infection (1 pt), and fatigue (1 pt). Rashes, of all grades, occurred in 10 pts, which were mostly erythematous and transient, nonrecurring events. Response and toxicity assessment for the remaining 10 pts is ongoing and will be reported. Conclusion The biologic regimen of lenalidomide and rituximab as front line therapy produces excellent overall and complete response rates in pts with indolent B cell NHL. The combination was well tolerated with a manageable toxicity profile. Disclosures Fowler: Genentech: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; BiogenIdec: Honoraria. Off Label Use: lenalidomide and rituximab for indolent B cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. McLaughlin:Genentech: Consultancy, Honoraria. Hagemeister:Genentech: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; BiogenIdec: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy. Kwak:Celgene: Research Funding. Samaniego:Celgene: Consultancy.

2008 ◽  
Vol 26 (30) ◽  
pp. 4952-4957 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter H. Wiernik ◽  
Izidore S. Lossos ◽  
Joseph M. Tuscano ◽  
Glen Justice ◽  
Julie M. Vose ◽  
...  

PurposeThe major cause of death in aggressive lymphoma is relapse or nonresponse to initial therapy. Lenalidomide has activity in a variety of hematologic malignancies, including non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL). We report the results of a phase II, single-arm, multicenter trial evaluating the safety and efficacy of lenalidomide oral monotherapy in patients with relapsed or refractory aggressive NHL.Patients and MethodsPatients were treated with oral lenalidomide 25 mg once daily on days 1 to 21, every 28 days, for 52 weeks, until disease progression or intolerance. The primary end point was response; secondary end points included duration of response, progression-free survival (PFS), and safety.ResultsForty-nine patients with a median age of 65 years received lenalidomide in this study. The most common histology was diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (53%), and patients had received a median of four prior treatment regimens for NHL. An objective response rate of 35% was observed in 49 treated patients, including a 12% rate of complete response/unconfirmed complete response. Responses were observed in each aggressive histologic subtype tested (diffuse large B-cell, follicular center grade 3, mantle cell, and transformed lymphomas). Of patients with stable disease or partial response at first assessment, 25% improved with continued treatment. Estimated median duration of response was 6.2 months, and median PFS was 4.0 months. The most common grade 4 adverse events were neutropenia (8.2%) and thrombocytopenia (8.2%); the most common grade 3 adverse events were neutropenia (24.5%), leukopenia (14.3%), and thrombocytopenia (12.2%).ConclusionOral lenalidomide monotherapy is active in relapsed or refractory aggressive NHL, with manageable side effects.


2010 ◽  
Vol 28 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 8036-8036 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. H. Fowler ◽  
P. McLaughlin ◽  
F. B. Hagemeister ◽  
L. W. Kwak ◽  
M. A. Fanale ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 03 (01) ◽  
pp. 017-022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Prasad Apsangikar ◽  
Sunil Chaudhry ◽  
Manoj Naik ◽  
Parvez Kozgi

Abstract Introduction: Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) is the sixth most common hematological malignancy in adults, with B-cell lymphomas accounting for 85% of all NHLs. Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is the most common subtype of NHL and follicular lymphoma (FL) is the second most common form of B-cell NHL. Materials and Methods: The primary objective of this study is to assess the efficacy of Rituxirel™ arm with reference arm, whereas the secondary objective is to evaluate safety of Rituxirel™ arm with the reference arm in patients diagnosed with NHL. Results: The first patient was enrolled on April 30, 2012 and the efficacy and safety analysis was performed at 24 weeks. The objective response rate (ORR) was observed to be 87.87% in Rituxirel™ arm. 45.45% patients showed complete response and 42.42% patients showed partial response in Rituxirel™ arm. The ORR was observed to be 86.66% in the reference arm. 33.33% patients showed complete response and 53.33% patients showed partial response in reference arm in the Rituxirel™ arm, the most commonly reported treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) related to blood and lymphatic system disorders were 52.94%, whereas in the reference arm, the reported TEAEs related to blood and lymphatic system disorders were 70%. Conclusion: Based on the results from the efficacy and safety analysis at week 24, Rituxirel™ arm was found to be as effective and safe as the reference arm. Rituxirel™ arm can be a prudent option to the reference arm, in patients undergoing treatment for DLBCL or FL.


Blood ◽  
1990 ◽  
Vol 76 (7) ◽  
pp. 1293-1298 ◽  
Author(s):  
NJ Chao ◽  
SA Rosenberg ◽  
SJ Horning

Abstract Eighty-three patients with intermediate- or high-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma were treated with CEPP(B) (cyclophosphamide, etoposide [VP- 16], procarbazine, and prednisone with or without bleomycin) chemotherapy at Stanford University Medical Center (Stanford, CA) from January 1982 through June 1989. Sixty-nine received CEPP(B) as second- line or subsequent therapy after relapse from previous combination chemotherapy, and 14 patients received CEPP(B) as first-line therapy. Of 75 patients evaluable for response, 30 patients (40%) achieved a complete response (CR) and 24 patients (32%) achieved a partial response (PR), providing an overall response rate of 72%. Complete responses were recorded on 21 of 61 (34%) patients with recurrent disease and 9 of the 14 patients who received CEPP(B) as first line therapy (64%). Myelosuppression was the major side effect of treatment, resulting in eight neutropenic-febrile episodes from a total of 253 courses. A single fatal toxic event occurred on a patient who developed adult respiratory distress syndrome. Overall, CEPP(B) was well- tolerated and proved to be effective palliative therapy for patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma after relapse. As such, CEPP(B) may be considered for cytoreduction before ablative therapy and bone marrow transplantation. CEPP(B) may also be considered for initial therapy in selected patients who cannot tolerate doxorubicin-containing regimens.


Blood ◽  
1993 ◽  
Vol 81 (8) ◽  
pp. 2003-2006 ◽  
Author(s):  
T Philip ◽  
O Hartmann ◽  
R Pinkerton ◽  
JM Zucker ◽  
JC Gentet ◽  
...  

Abstract The very high cure rate in advanced B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma in children using intensive multiagent therapy has been previously reported by the French Societe Francaise d'Oncologie Pediatrique lymphoma Malin B type (LMB) group. To address the issue of salvageability in an unselected group of patients who had all received the same front-line therapy, the outcome of relapses following the LMB 84 (216 patients) protocol have been reviewed. Fourteen percent of patients achieving complete remission (CR) relapsed, ie, 27 of 195. Relapse sites comprised the central nervous system (CNS) alone (6 cases), lung or mediastinum (2 cases), abdomen (8 cases), head and neck (2 cases), or multifocal (9 cases). There were three early deaths due to disease. Twenty-four patients received rescue chemotherapy regimens and 15 were treated with high-dose chemotherapy and bone marrow rescue (1 allogeneic). Of these, 9 were in second CR, 4 in second partial remission, and 2 treated during progressive disease. One died in CR from treatment-related toxicity. Ten relapsed postbone marrow transplant and 4 are alive disease free and probably cured. Two of the long-term survivors had some delay during initial chemotherapy due to toxicity and two were isolated CNS relapses. Twelve of 27 patients did not proceed to megatherapy (12 of 12 died).


Blood ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 104 (11) ◽  
pp. 4624-4624
Author(s):  
Ti Shen ◽  
Zhongzhen Guan ◽  
Zhixiang Shen ◽  
Yuankai She ◽  
Jun Zhu

Abstract Purpose: Rituximab is a chimeric anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody that was the first antibody approved by the FDA in the United States of America and SDA in China for the treatment of B-cell non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma (NHL). It has shown significant efficacy and good tolerability in refractory and relapsed NHL. We have conducted a multicenter phase IV trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of rituximab combined with standard CHOP chemotherapy in patients with newly diagnosed B-NHL. Methods: Patients with newly diagnosed, histologically proven CD20-positive NHL were eligible for the study. All patients received 4–6 infusions of rituximab (375mg/m2 per dose) in combination with CHOP chemotherapy, either concurrently (rituximab administered on the first day of each 21-day CHOP cycle) or sequentially (4–6 once-weekly infusions of rituximab followed by six 21-day cycles of CHOP). Each CHOP cycle consisted of cyclophosphamide 750 mg/m2, doxorubicin 50mg/m2, and vincristine 1.4mg/m2 (maximum 2.0mg/dose) given intravenously on day 1, and prednisone 100mg/day orally on days 1-5. Tumor responses were assessed at the end of treatment. Results: A total of 347 patients were recruited between February 2002 and December 2003. Of these 235 (68%) were male and 94 (27%) aged >60. The main lymphoma subtypes were diffuse large B-cell 196 (56%), follicular 41(12%), small lymphocytic/chronic lymphocytic leukemia 13(4%) and MALT 11(3%). Ann Arbor staging was as follows: stage I, 52 (15%); stage II, 80 (23%); stage III, 90(26%); stage IV, 105(30%); twenty patients (6%) could not be assessed. Of the 347 patients enrolled, 314 were evaluable for response. An objective response was observed in 94% of evaluable patients with a complete response (CR) in 56%, stable disease in 3.8% and progressive disease in 2.5%. The complete response rate was 63% for patients receiving 6 cycles of rituximab and 54% for those receiving four cycles of rituximab. No difference in response rate was observed between the sequential and concurrent groups. The most common adverse events were leucopenia in 122 patients (35%), nausea and vomiting 66 (19%), fever 39 (11%), rash 15 (4%) and asthma 4 (1%). Conclusion: The combination of rituximab and CHOP chemotherapy is an effective and well-tolerated treatment for patients with newly-diagnosed CD20-positive NHL. The safety and efficacy achieved in this study suggests that more than four doses of rituximab may be required for optimal efficacy.


Blood ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 112 (11) ◽  
pp. 1574-1574 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter R Moosmann ◽  
Marc Heizmann ◽  
Nina Kotrubczik ◽  
Mario Bargetzi ◽  
Martin Wernli

Abstract Besides its established role in the treatment of patients with multiple myeloma, the proteasome inhibitor bortezomib is active in patients with a variety of indolent non-Hodgkin’s lymphomas, notably mantle cell lymphoma and follicular lymphoma. Bendamustine was originally designed as a bifunctional anticancer compound combining an alkylating and an antimetabolite function. It has strong efficacy in non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma and multiple myeloma, and apparently low cross-resistance with other alkylating agents. This open label, single-center phase 1/2 study evaluated a weekly combination of bortezomib and bendamustine in patients with relapsed or refractory indolent non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. The primary endpoint was to define the maximal tolerated dose (MTD). Secondary endpoints were tolerability and response. On days 1, 8, 15, and 22 of a 35-day cycle, patients received intravenous bolus bortezomib 1.6 mg/m2 for a maximum of 3 cycles. Bendamustine was administered as 30-min. intravenous infusion on days 1, 8, and 15. Dose escalation was started at a dose of 60 mg/m2 bendamustine. Response was assessed at the end of study treatment. Four patients entering the first dose level showed no dose-limiting toxicity (DLT). Thereupon, bendamustine dosage was increased to 80 mg/m2. In 3 out of 5 patients, DLT was observed. Dose-limiting adverse events were grade 3 diarrhea with dehydration, fatigue, and grade 4 thrombocytopenia, respectively. Adverse events with an overall incidence of ≥20% were diarrhea, nausea, vomiting, thrombocytopenia, and fatigue. There were no infectious or dose-limiting neurological adverse events. The 9 patients (7 females) in the phase 1 part of this trial, 5 with relapsed, 4 with refractory stage III (n=2) or stage IV (n=7) disease, received a median of 2 treatment cycles (range 2–3). Median age was 71 yrs (range 55–85). Detailed histological diagnoses were mantle cell lymphoma (n=4), follicular lymphoma (n=4), and Waldenstroem’s macroglobulinemia (n=1). All patients were pretreated (median 3 lines of treatment, range 2–8). Prior treatments comprised rituximab (n=7), anthracyclines (n=4), ibritumomab tiuxetan (n=2), bortezomib (n=2), and autologous stem cell transplantation (n=1). The reasons for not completing the planned 3 treatment cycles were DLT (n=2), and disease progression (n=3). As best response, partial remission was achieved in 6 patients, while disease progressed in 3 patients. Among the different types of lymphoma, partial remissions were observed in all 4 mantle cell lymphoma patients, 1 out of 4 follicular lymphoma patients, and in the Waldenstroem’s macroglobulinemia patient. The trial’s phase 2 part is currently ongoing. In conclusion, weekly bortezomib and bendamustine (1.6 mg/m2 d1, 8, 15, & 22 and 60 mg/m2 d1, 8, & 15 q5w, respectively) was found to have acceptable toxicity. Moreover, this study demonstrates initial evidence of efficacy of the combination in heavily pretreated patients with indolent non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma, particularly mantle cell lymphoma.


2004 ◽  
Vol 22 (23) ◽  
pp. 4711-4716 ◽  
Author(s):  
Myron S. Czuczman ◽  
Robin Weaver ◽  
Baha Alkuzweny ◽  
Judy Berlfein ◽  
Antonio J. Grillo-López

Purpose Long-term follow-up with updated time to disease progression (TTP) and duration of response (DR) data are presented from a multicenter, phase II trial of rituximab/cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP) combination therapy in 40 patients with CD20+, B-cell, non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL). Revised response rates based on International Workshop Response Criteria are also provided. Patients and Methods Enrollment began in April 1994 and consisted of patients with histologically confirmed, low-grade, B-cell lymphoma who had received no prior chemotherapy or who had no more than four prior standard therapies. Patients received six cycles of CHOP and six infusions of rituximab. Results Eight (21%) of the 38 treated patients were classified as International Working Formulation (IWF) A, 16 (42%) were IWF B, 13 (34%) were IWF C, and one (3%) was IWF D. Nine (24%) of 38 patients had received prior chemotherapy. Nine (24%) of 38 were considered poor risk according to the Follicular Lymphoma International Prognostic Index. Overall response rate was 100%; 87% of patients achieved a complete response or unconfirmed complete response. The median TTP and DR were 82.3 months and 83.5 months, respectively. Seven of eight patients who were bcl-2 positive at baseline converted to negative, and three of the seven patients have sustained the molecular remission. Conclusion Although a cure has not been found yet for follicular NHL, the R-CHOP combination provides a lengthy response duration in patients with relapsed or newly diagnosed indolent NHL.


2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e19519-e19519
Author(s):  
Nikita Mehra ◽  
Prasanth Ganesan ◽  
Jayachandran P K ◽  
Anjana Joel ◽  
Parathan Karunakaran ◽  
...  

e19519 Background: Gemcitabine, vinorelbine and liposomal doxorubicin (GVD) is an effective regimen in relapsed/refractory Hodgkin’s lymphoma (RRHL). Conventional second-line chemotherapy is still required as the cost of immunotherapy and antibody-drug conjugates are prohibitive to Indian patients. We report the results of a phase II, open-label, single-arm, single centre interventional study in RRHL where dexamethasone replaced liposomal doxorubicin. Methods: Adult patients (≥18 years) with RRHL at first or second relapse were included. GVDex was delivered as outpatient once in 3 weeks (Gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 IV over 30 min on D1,8; Vinblastine 25 mg/m2 IV fast infusion on D1,8; Dexamethasone 40 mg PO D1-4) for two cycles followed by interim PET CT assessment by Cheson’s criteria and Deauville scoring. The primary endpoint was the objective response rate (ORR = complete response + partial response). The sample size was calculated using Fleming’s 2-stage model (α error: 0.05 and power: 0.8). Twenty patients were required in the first stage. If there were ≥16 responses, the null hypothesis would be rejected and the study stopped. Results: Between May 2016, and December 2020, 26 patients with RRHL were screened, and 20 were enrolled: primary resistant HL-8 patients (40%) and relapsed HL- 12 patients (60%). The median age was 35 years (range:20-52). Six patients (30%) presented with limited stage and 14 patients (70%) with advanced stage HL at relapse. GVdex was delivered as a first salvage regimen in 18 patients (90%) and second in 2 patients. After 2 cycles of GVDex, 16 (80%) had responded [partial response: 12 (60%); complete response: 4 (20%)]. Median number of cycles of GVDex: 3 (range: 1-4). Five patients (25%) required dose reductions due to chemotherapy-related toxicities. The median duration of objective response was 13.4 months. Eleven patients (55%) underwent high-dose chemotherapy supported by autologous stem cell rescue. After a median follow-up of 25 months (95% CI: 5.9-44.5), the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 24.7 months, and the median overall survival (OS) has not been reached. The estimated 2-year PFS was 44%, and the 2-year OS was 79%. The most common treatment-related adverse events were anemia (100%), neutropenia (70%, 14/20) and fatigue (70%, 14/20). Grade 3 or 4 treatment-related AEs occurred in 14 patients (70%). Grade ≥3 neutropenia occurred in 9 patients (45%) and febrile neutropenia in 3 patients (15%). Serious adverse events were reported in 3 patients (15%). One patient developed Ficat and Arlet classification stage III avascular necrosis of the femoral head. One patient died due to suspected COVID-19 pneumonia (non-neutropenic fever) before cycle 2 of chemotherapy. Conclusions: GVDex it is an effective salvage regimen with acceptable toxicity in patients with RRHL. Clinical trial information: CTRI/2017/04/008361.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document