Real-Life Analysis of Dasatinib in Chronic Phase CML Patients Aged > 60 Years Resistant/Intolerant to Imatinib.

Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 2211-2211
Author(s):  
Roberto Latagliata ◽  
Massimo Breccia ◽  
Fabio Stagno ◽  
Luigiana Luciano ◽  
Antonella Gozzini ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Research Funding ◽  
Haematological Toxicity ◽  
Real Life ◽  
Elderly Subjects ◽  
Molecular Response ◽  
Imatinib Treatment ◽  
Secondary Resistance ◽  
Pericardial Effusions ◽  
Median Period ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Abstract 2211 Poster Board II-188 Dasatinib is a 2nd generation tyrosine-kinase inhibitor active in CML patients resistant or intolerant to Imatinib; at present there is no data on its toxicity and efficacy in unselected elderly patients. To highlight this issue, 97 patients treated with Dasatinib when aged > 60 years were retrospectively evaluated from 16 Italian Centers on a “real-life” basis, including all patients treated at each Center independently from enrolment or not in controlled clinical trials.There were 52 males and 45 females, median age at Dasatinib start was 69.5 years (IR 65.0 – 73.3), Sokal Risk at diagnosis was low in 26 patients, intermediate in 37, high in 15 and not valuable in 19. Forthy-five patients (46.4%) were primarily resistant, 11 (11.4%) were intolerant and 41 (42.2%) had secondary resistance to Imatinib; all patients were in CP when Dasatinib was started. Median time from diagnosis to Dasatinib treatment was 85.0 months (IR 44.8 – 120.0); 53/97 patients (54.6%) had been pretreated with IFN ± Ara-C before Imatinib, all patients received Imatinib at standard dose (400 mg/day) followed in 50/97 (51.5%) by increased dose (600 – 800 mg/day) with an overall median period of Imatinib treatment of 48.6 months (IR 26.9 – 67.0). In addition, 28/97 patients (28.8%) received other 2nd line treatment (10 Nilotinib, 14 HU +/- other drugs, 3 Imatinib + HU or IFN and 1 allogeneic transplant) before Dasatinib. Starting dose of Dasatinib was 140 mg/day in 47 patients, 100 mg/day in 44 patients and ≥ 50 mg/day in 6 patients, respectively. After a median period of treatment of 15.6 months (IR 7.6 – 23.0) all patients were evaluable for toxicity; on the whole, grade 3 – 4 hematological and extra-hematological toxicities were reported in 36/97 (37.1%) and 27/97 (27.8%) patients, respectively. A grade 3 – 4 hematological toxicity occurred in 25/47 (53.1%) patients receiving 140 mg as compared to 10/44 (22.7%) patients receiving 100 mg (p<0.01); a grade 3 – 4 extra-haematological toxicity occurred in 16 (34.0%) patients receiving 140 mg as compared to 10/44 (22.7%) patients receiving 100 mg (p=0.09). Pleuro-pericardial effusions of all WHO grades occurred in 30/97 patients (30.9%): according to starting dosage, pleuro-pericardial effusions occurred in 19/47 patients (40.4%) treated with 140 mg and in 11/44 patients (25.0%) treated with 100 mg. Overall, 11/97 patients (7 treated with 140 mg, 3 with 100 mg and 1 with < 100 mg) permanently discontinued Dasatinib due to toxicity; a dose reduction was needed in 56/97 patients [43/47 (91.5%) treated with 140 mg and 12/44 (27.3%) with 100 mg (p<0.001)]. As to response, 91 patients were considered evaluable (≥ 3 months of treatment) and 6 were considered as too early; 11 patients (12.0%) did not have any response (including 6 patients with early Dasatinib discontinuation for toxicity and 1 patient died from unrelated 2nd neoplasia), 26 (28.6%) achieved Hematological Response only, 54 (59.4%) achieved Cytogenetic Response (CyR) (Major CyR in 10, Complete CyR in 44). Among 44 patients in Complete CyR, 29 (31.8% of all 91 evaluable patients) also achieved Molecular Response (MolR) (Major MolR in 14, Complete MolR in 15). According to starting dosage, CyR was achieved in 26/47 patients (55.3%) treated with 140 mg compared with 27/39 patients (69.2%) treated with 100 mg. The mean Overall Survival and Event-Free Survival of the whole cohort of patients were 44.6 months (CI95% 41.2 - 47.9) and 24.8 months (CI95% 20.4 – 29.2), respectively. Present analysis shows that Dasatinib could have a major role in the treatment of unselected patients aged > 60 years resistant/intolerant to Imatinib; in particular, when employed at the current recommended dose of 100 mg/day, it is very effective and has a favourable safety profile also in heavily pretreated elderly subjects. Disclosures: Vitolo: Roche: . Pane:Novartis: Research Funding; Ministero dell'Università/PRIN: Research Funding; Regione Campania: Research Funding; Ministero della Salute/Progetto integrato Oncologia: Research Funding.

Dasatinib in the Treatment of CML Patients Aged > 60 Years Resistant/Intolerant to Imatinib

Blood ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 112 (11) ◽  
pp. 4253-4253
Author(s):  
Roberto Latagliata ◽  
Massimo Breccia ◽  
Fabio Stagno ◽  
Silvia De Matteis ◽  
Mario Annunziata ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Elderly Patients ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Standard Dose ◽  
Chronic Phase ◽  
Elderly Subjects ◽  
Molecular Response ◽  
Imatinib Treatment ◽  
Starting Dose ◽  
Median Period ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Dasatinib is a 2nd generation tyrosine-kinase inhibitor active in CML patients resistant or intolerant to Imatinib; at present there is no data on its toxicity and efficacy in elderly patients. To highlight this issue, 37 patients treated with Dasatinib when aged &gt; 60 years were retrospectively evaluated. There were 21 males and 16 females, median age at Dasatinb was 69.3 years (IR 64.9–73.0), Sokal Risk at diagnosis was low in 13 patients, intermediate in 14, high in 5 and not valuable in 5. Twenty-two patients (59.4%) were primary resistant, 4 (10.8%) intolerant and 11 (29.8%) secondary resistant to Imatinib; all but 2 patients were in CP when Dasatinib was started. Median time from diagnosis to Dasatinib treatment was 99.2 months (IR 56.8–124.5); 25/37 patients (67.5%) have been pretreated with IFN ± Ara-C before Imatinib, all patients received Imatinib at standard dose (400 mg/day) followed in 20/37 (54%) by Imatinib at increased dose (600–800 mg/day) with an overall median period of Imatinib treatment of 52.8 months (IR 26.2–60.9). In addition, 7/37 patients (18.9%) received other 2nd line treatment (3 with Nilotinib, 2 with Imatinib + HU and 2 with other drugs) before Dasatinib. Starting dose of Dasatinib was 140 mg/day in 18 patients and 100 mg/day in 19 patients, respectively. After a median period of treatment of 9.4 months (IR 3.0–19.1) all patients were evaluable for toxicity; among 18 patients receiving 140 mg, grade 3–4 haematological and extra-haematological toxicities were reported in 14 (77.7%) and 6 (33.3%) patients, respectively; among 19 patients receiving 100 mg, grade 3–4 haematological and extra-haematological toxicities were reported in 4 (21.0%) and 1 (5.2%) patients, respectively. Pleuro-pericardial effusions occurred in 3 patients, all treated with 140 mg as starting dose. Overall, 3/37 patients (all treated with 140 mg) discontinued permanently Dasatinib due to early toxicity; a dose reduction was needed in 17/37 patients [16/18 (88.8%) treated with 140 mg and 1/19 (5.2%) with 100 mg]. As to response, 28 patients were considered evaluable (≥ 6 months of treatment) and 9 considered as too early; five patients (17.9%) did not have any response (including 3 patients with early Dasatinib discontinuation for toxicity) and 23 (82.1%) achieved Complete Haematological Response (CHR). Furthermore, 11/28 patients (39.2%) achieved a Cytogenetic Response (CyR) (Major CyR in 4 and Complete CyR in 7) and 4/28 patients (14.2%) achieved a molecular response. In conclusion, Dasatinib, when employed at the current recommended starting dose of 100 mg/day; seems effective and very well tolerated also in heavily pretreated elderly subjects; these results are encouraging also for a future use of this drug in early chronic phase elderly patients.

Nilotinib-Associated Molecular Responses Achieved in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in Chronic Phase (CML-CP) Patients with a Suboptimal Molecular Response to Imatinib.

Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 2206-2206
Author(s):  
Allen S. Yang ◽  
Anand Jillella ◽  
Carole B. Miller ◽  
Luke P. Akard ◽  
Daniel J. DeAngelo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Research Funding ◽  
Molecular Response ◽  
Imatinib Treatment ◽  
Molecular Responses ◽  
Transcript Levels ◽  
Log Reduction ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Group 1

Abstract Abstract 2206 Poster Board II-183 Background Nilotinib is a potent, highly selective Bcr-Abl kinase inhibitor approved for adult patients with Ph+ CML in chronic and accelerated phase who are resistant or intolerant to imatinib. The achievement of a major molecular response (MMR), defined as a 3 log reduction of the Bcr-Abl transcript level from the baseline mean, is a favorable prognostic factor for the disease at any time point. This multi-center, open-label study was designed to assess the impact of nilotinib on Bcr-Abl molecular response dynamics in patients who have achieved complete cytogenetic response but have demonstrated a suboptimal molecular response to imatinib. Methods This study evaluates the change in Bcr-Abl kinetics in 2 groups of CML-CP patients (n=160) who achieve CCyR but have a suboptimal molecular response to imatinib defined either as: (Group 1) treated > 1 year with imatinib, but Bcr-Abl transcript levels did not reach ≤ 0.1% on the international scale (IS) (MMR); or (Group 2) > 1 log increase in Bcr-Abl transcript levels regardless of the imatinib treatment duration. At study entry, patients are treated with nilotinib 300 mg b.i.d. The primary endpoint is to measure the change on a logarithmic scale of Bcr-Abl transcript levels from a standardized baseline value by RQ-PCR after 12 months on treatment with nilotinib. Since there is a paucity of efficacy data published for suboptimal responders to imatinib, this preliminary analysis was performed on a small cohort of patients enrolled as of the data cut-off date of July 21, 2009. Results 11 CML-CP suboptimal molecular responding patients have been treated with a median of 2.6 months on nilotinib. One patient entered the study as a Group 2 patient and ten entered into Group 1. 1 patient was deemed ineligible due to lack of evidence of CCyR at baseline. The remaining 10 entered the trial with a baseline CCyR. Prior to enrollment, patients were treated with at least 400mg QD imatinib; the mean dose of prior imatinib treatment was 463 mg/day (range 377 – 573 mg/day). The median duration of prior imatinib treatment was 39.5 months (range 14.0-106.4 mo). 1 patient was previously treated with interferon. 8 patients have been treated for >3 months. Out of these 8 patients, 2 have been treated for > 6 months and 1 patient has been treated for > 9 months. Aside from these 8 patients, another 3 did not yet reach end of Month 3 at the time of analysis. Six out of 8 evaluable patients (75%) achieved MMR; 4 patients after three months on nilotinib, 1 patient after 4.5 months on nilotinib (measured at end of study), and 1 patient after 9 months on nilotinib. Overall, patients achieved a median log reduction of PCR transcript levels of 3.1 (range 2.1-4.5) from the standardized baseline (based on the IS) at the end of Month 3. 4 out of 11 patients were dose reduced for nilotinib related adverse events (AEs). No grade 4 AEs were reported. 1 patient experienced a grade 3 headache and two cases of grade 3 elevated ALT were reported. Brief dose interruptions were sufficient to manage most AEs. The median dose intensity was 600 (range 400-600 mg/day). No patients discontinued from the study due to an AE as of the data cut-off date. No patients who experienced QTcF changes had differences >34 msec from baseline. No QTcF prolongation >500 msec was observed. Conclusions Nilotinib treatment results in high rates of molecular response in CML-CP patients with suboptimal molecular responses to imatinib. 75% of the evaluable patients who switched to nilotinib achieved MMR at the time of analysis, and all evaluable patients achieved a median > 3 log reduction of PCR transcripts from the standardized baseline within 3 months of starting therapy. No patients were discontinued due to AEs. Outcomes for additional patients enrolled and longer term follow-up will become available. Disclosures: Yang: Bristol Myers Squibb: Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Esai: Speakers Bureau; Therepi: Equity Ownership. Off Label Use: Nilotinib for suboptimal responders to imatinib therapy. Miller:Novartis Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Akard:Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding. DeAngelo:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Speakers Bureau; Enzon Pharmaceuticals: Speakers Bureau; Novartis Pharmaceuticals: Speakers Bureau. Goldberg:Novartis Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Williams:Novartis Pharmaceuticals: Employment. Radich:Novartis Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding.

Occurrence, Management, and Outcomes In Patients with Pleural Effusion During Dasatinib Treatment for Chronic-Phase Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CML-CP) In the First-Line Setting: Analysis of the DASISION Trial

Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 2282-2282 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kimmo Porkka ◽  
Michele Baccarani ◽  
Andreas Hochhaus ◽  
Hagop Kantarjian ◽  
Satu Mustjoki ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pleural Effusion ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Chronic Phase ◽  
Risk Scores ◽  
Molecular Response ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Once Daily ◽  
Management Interventions ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Abstract 2282 Background: The Phase 3 DASISION trial comparing dasatinib 100 mg once daily with imatinib 400 mg once daily as initial treatment in patients (pts) with newly diagnosed CML-CP has demonstrated superior efficacy and favorable safety of dasatinib after a minimum of 12 months of follow-up (Kantarjian, H, et al. N Engl J Med 2010;362:2260). While fluid retention was more frequent with imatinib than with dasatinib, pleural effusion was seen only with dasatinib. Here, we provide a detailed analysis of pts experiencing pleural effusion, a clinically relevant adverse drug reaction. Methods: 519 pts with newly diagnosed, treatment-naive CML-CP (median disease duration of 1 month) were randomly assigned to either dasatinib 100 mg once daily (259 pts) or imatinib 400 mg one daily (260 pts). Key endpoints included complete cytogenetic response (CCyR), major molecular response (MMR) and safety. All pts were assessed by chest x-ray at baseline and at 6 months after randomization, or more frequently, if indicated clinically. Pts with pleural effusion at baseline were excluded. Pleural effusion was graded according to CTCAE version 3 (grade 1, asymptomatic; grade 2, symptomatic, up to 2 therapeutic thoracenteses; grade 3, symptomatic requiring supplemental oxygen, < 2 therapeutic thoracenteses; grade 4, life-threatening, hemodynamic instability). Results: After a minimum follow-up of 12 months with median treatment duration of 14.3 months (range, 0.3–25.8), 26 (10%, median age, 60 years) of the 258 dasatinib-treated pts (median age, 46 years) experienced pleural effusion. Of the pts with pleural effusion, 6 (23%) had low, 17 (65%) had intermediate and 3 (12%) had high Hasford risk scores. There were no grade 3 or 4 pleural effusion events. All events were grade 1(2%) or grade 2 (8%). Most events (n = 22, 85%) occurred more than 8 weeks after the start of study drug. In pts who had a pleural effusion, the median time to the event was 28 weeks (range, 4–88). Lymphocytosis (defined as peripheral blood lymphocyte count > 3.6 × 109/L) was noted in 11 (42%) of the 26 pts with pleural effusion, as compared to 46 (20%) of 232 pts with no pleural effusion. Pleural effusion was managed by dose modification and/or medical intervention. Therapy was interrupted in 19 pts, and the dose of dasatinib was reduced in 8 pts (4 pts, to 80 mg; 1 pt, to 70 mg; 3 pts, to 50 mg). Twelve pts received diuretics, 7 received corticosteroids, and only 1 pt underwent therapeutic thoracentesis. Only 3 pts (1.2%) discontinued therapy due to pleural effusion (grade 2). Eleven pts who continued dasatinib had resolution of their pleural effusion. Five pts had recurrent effusions. Of the 26 pts with pleural effusion, 24 (92%) achieved a CCyR and 17 (65%) achieved a MMR by 12 months of treatment; the corresponding CCyR and MMR rates in the total pt population were 83% and 46%, respectively Seven of the 8 pts with pleural effusion who reduced their dose achieved CCyR and MMR. Conclusion: In pts with newly diagnosed CML-CP treated with dasatinib as initial therapy, pleural effusion was mild to moderate in severity, and was manageable with dose interruption and/reduction and/or a short course of diuretics and/or corticosteroids. The occurrence of pleural effusion and management interventions did not negatively affect the achievement of CCyR or MMR. These findings are in line with data reported previously for second-line dasatinib in CML pts resistant or intolerant to imatinib (Porkka, K, et al. Cancer 2010;116:377). Furthermore, pleural effusion and peripheral lymphocytosis may be indicative of immune-mediated antitumor activity of dasatinib. Disclosures: Porkka: BMS, Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Baccarani: Novartis, Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Hochhaus: Brostol-Myers Squibb, Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding. Kantarjian: BMS, Pfizer and Novartis: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy. Mustjoki: BMS, Novartis: Honoraria. Bradley-Garelik: Bristol-Myers Squibb: Employment, Equity Ownership. Zhu: Bristol-Myers Squibb: Employment. Cortes: Brostol-Myers Squibb, Novartis and Wyeth: Consultancy, Honoraria.

Molecular Response After 3 Months of 1st Line Imatinib Therapy Is Predictive for Treatment Failure and Disease Progression In Patients with Chronic Phase Chronic Myeloid Leukemia - a Follow-up Analysis of the German CML Study IV

Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 360-360 ◽  
Author(s):  
Benjamin Hanfstein ◽  
Martin C. Müller ◽  
Philipp Erben ◽  
Susanne Schnittger ◽  
Susanne Saussele ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Treatment Failure ◽  
Disease Progression ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Standard Dose ◽  
Imatinib Therapy ◽  
Molecular Response ◽  
Imatinib Treatment ◽  
Early Assessment ◽  
Risk Of Treatment

Abstract Abstract 360 Introduction: The lack of a sufficient response to first line imatinib treatment has been observed in a substantial proportion of CML patients and has been associated with an inferior survival. Therefore, response criteria have been defined to identify patients with treatment failure. A change of drug therapy to 2nd generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors or allogeneic stem cell transplantation is recommended for this group of patients (European LeukemiaNet, ELN, Baccarani et al., JCO 2009). We sought to evaluate the predictive value of early molecular response landmarks for treatment failure and disease progression to identify patients at risk and to provide a guidance for the interpretation of BCR-ABL levels. Patients and methods: 949 patients included into the randomized German CML Study IV and treated with an imatinib based therapy consisting of standard dose imatinib (400 mg/d), high dose imatinib (800 mg/d) and combinations of standard dose imatinib with low dose cytarabine or interferon alpha were evaluable for molecular and cytogenetic analysis. BCR-ABL (IS) was determined by quantitative RT-PCR. The type of BCR-ABL transcript (b2a2, n=424; b3a2, n=464; b2a2 and b3a2, n=148) was defined by multiplex PCR. Patients with atypical BCR-ABL transcripts were excluded from the analysis. Cytogenetic response (CyR) was determined by G-banding metaphase analyses. Treatment failure has been defined according to ELN criteria as a lack of major CyR after 12 months and a lack of complete CyR after 18 months of imatinib treatment, respectively. CyR data were available for 479 pts between 12 and 18 months with a subset of 289 pts evaluable for 3 month molecular response (CyR data after 18 months, n=532; 3 month molecular subset, n=289). Disease progression comprises the incidence of accelerated phase, blast phase and death. Median follow-up for disease progression was 35 months (range 2–85). Fisher's exact test has been performed to evaluate the prognostic significance of 3 month BCR-ABL landmarks for 12 month and 18 month treatment failure. A landmark analysis has been performed for disease progression (logrank test). Results: In 20 of 289 evaluable pts treatment failure has been observed after 12 months, and in 29 of 289 pts after 18 months. 24 of 570 evaluable pts showed a disease progression after a median of 18 months (range 5–71). A stratification into three groups at 3 months reveals a significant difference concerning treatment failure between pts with BCR-ABL levels between 1% and 10% and those with BCR-ABL levels >10%. With regard to disease progression there is a statistical trend. Comparing two groups the 10% BCR-ABL cut-off is highly significant for both, treatment failure and disease progression. Missing the 10% BCR-ABL landmark after 3 months of imatinib treatment defines a poor risk group with a 20.7% risk of treatment failure after 18 months and a 8.1% risk of disease progression (Table). Conclusion: Early assessment of molecular response after 3 months of imatinib therapy allows the identification of a patient cohort with an increased risk of treatment failure and disease progression. Disclosure: Müller: Novartis Corporation: Honoraria, Research Funding. Schnittger:MLL Munich Leukemia Laboratory: Employment, Equity Ownership. Hochhaus:Novartis Corporation: Honoraria, Research Funding.

Time-Related Interpretation of Molecular Response Levels According to Long Term Overall and Progression-Free Survival of CML Patients on First-Line Imatinib Treatment

Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 1681-1681
Author(s):  
Martin C. Müller ◽  
Benjamin Hanfstein ◽  
Michael Lauseker ◽  
Philipp Erben ◽  
Ulrike Proetel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Disease Progression ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Published Data ◽  
Molecular Response ◽  
Imatinib Treatment ◽  
Prognostic Impact ◽  
Treatment Change ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Time Points

Abstract Abstract 1681 Introduction: The prognostic impact of different levels of molecular remission (BCR-ABL transcript expression according to International Scale, IS) at various time points on survival under imatinib treatment is still unclear. Whereas recently published data from the IRIS trial described relevant milestones at 6, 12, and 18 months for event-free and progression-free survival (PFS; Hughes et al., Blood 2010), little is known about an association of molecular response with overall survival (OS). The aim of this evaluation of the German CML Study IV was to elucidate the risk of disease progression and death as a function of the depth of molecular response in order to provide guidance in the interpretation of BCR-ABL levels in the clinical setting. Methods: 1,340 patients (median age 52 years, range 16–88, 60% male) were recruited into the randomized German CML Study IV and treated with an imatinib-based therapy as follows: imatinib 400 mg/d, n=381; imatinib 800 mg/d, n=399; imatinib 400 mg/d + interferon alpha, n=402; imatinib 400 mg/d + low-dose cytarabine, n=158. A total of 1,262 patients with typical b2a2 and b3a2 BCR-ABL transcripts were evaluable. Molecular responses were assessed in 811, 764, 671, and 619 patients at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months, respectively. Disease progression was defined as accelerated phase or blastic phase, or death from any reason. Landmark analyses and log-rank tests for OS and PFS were performed according to the achievement of different BCR-ABL response levels at different time points. Results: Patients were grouped according to the degree of molecular response (<0.1%, 0.1%-1%, 1%-10%, >10% BCR-ABL IS) at each of the 4 time points and evaluated for 5-year OS and PFS. Estimated 5-year OS for the different molecular response categories was: 97% vs 96% vs 90% vs 88% (6 months, p=0.009); 96% vs 95% vs 89% vs 69% (12 months, p<0.001); 98% vs 97% vs 92% vs 66% (18 months, p<0.001); 97% vs 96% vs 96% vs 68% (24 months, p<0.001). Applying the 4 response categories revealed estimated 5-year PFS of 97% vs 96% vs 91% vs 86% (p=0.004) at 6 months, 97% vs 92% vs 89% vs 72% (p<0.001) at 12 months, 99% vs 95% vs 90% vs 77% (p<0.001) at 18 months, and 97% vs 97% vs 93% vs 65% (p<0.001) at 24 months (s. Table). Conclusions: Faster and deeper response to imatinib-based treatment revealed to be associated with improved overall and progression-free survival. Inferior OS and PFS can be deducted from the synopsis of BCR-ABL expression and treatment duration, e.g. >1% BCR-ABL IS at 6 months or 12 months might be, and >10% BCR-ABL IS should be a trigger for a treatment change. Thereby this analysis might provide decision guidance for alteration or continuation of primary imatinib treatment. Disclosures: Schnittger: Münchner Leukämie Labor: Equity Ownership. German CML Study Group:EU: Research Funding; BMBF: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Deutsche Krebshilfe: Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding; Essex: Research Funding.

ENESTxtnd: Impact Of Nilotinib Dose Re-Escalation In Patients (pts) With Newly Diagnosed Chronic Myeloid Leukemia In Chronic Phase (CML-CP)

Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 4009-4009
Author(s):  
Jeff H. Lipton ◽  
Luis Meillon ◽  
Vernon Louw ◽  
Carolina Pavlovsky ◽  
Lee-Yung Shih ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Dose Intensity ◽  
Molecular Response ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Equity Ownership ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Study Dose ◽  
Dose Reductions

Abstract Background Frontline nilotinib 300 mg twice daily (BID) provides superior efficacy vs imatinib in pts with CML-CP, with good tolerability. Evaluating Nilotinib Efficacy and Safety in Clinical Trials—Extending Molecular Reponses (ENESTxtnd) is evaluating the kinetics of molecular response to frontline nilotinib 300 mg BID in pts with newly diagnosed CML-CP, as assessed in national and local laboratories, and is also the first study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of nilotinib dose optimization (including dose re-escalation in pts who require dose reductions due to adverse events [AEs] and dose increase in pts with less than optimal response). Here, we present results of a preplanned, interim analysis (IA) based on the first 20% of pts who completed 12 mo of treatment or discontinued early. Methods ENESTxtnd (NCT01254188) is an open-label, multicenter, phase 3b clinical trial of nilotinib 300 mg BID in adults with CML-CP newly diagnosed within 6 mo of study entry. The primary endpoint is rate of MMR by 12 mo. Molecular responses were monitored by real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RQ-PCR) at local laboratories at baseline, at 1, 2, and 3 mo, and every 3 mo thereafter. Bone marrow cytogenetic analyses were performed locally at baseline, 6 mo, and end of study. Dose reductions were allowed for grade ≥ 2 nonhematologic AEs and grade 3/4 hematologic AEs. Pts with dose reductions could attempt to re-escalate (successful re-escalation defined as ≥ 4 wk on nilotinib 300 mg BID with no dose adjustments for any AE) and remain on study. Dose increase to nilotinib 400 mg BID was allowed in cases of BCR-ABL > 10% on the International Scale (BCR-ABLIS) at 3 mo or later, no major molecular response (MMR; BCR-ABLIS ≤ 0.1%) at 12 mo, loss of MMR, or treatment failure. Results This IA includes 85 pts treated in 12 countries (Argentina, Australia, Brazil, Canada, Israel, Lebanon, Mexico, Malaysia, Saudi Arabia, Thailand, Taiwan, and South Africa). Median age was 49 y (range, 19-85 y), and 58% of pts were male. Median time since diagnosis was 35 days (range, 2-157 days). Prior to study entry, 64 pts (75%) received hydroxyurea, and 3 pts (4%) received imatinib (all for ≤ 2 wk). At the data cutoff, 68 pts (80%) had treatment ongoing, and the remaining 17 had discontinued due to AEs/laboratory abnormalities (n = 8; nonhematologic AEs [n = 5], biochemical abnormalities [n = 2], and hematologic abnormalities [n = 1]), loss to follow-up (n = 2), administrative problems (n = 2), intolerance to the protocol-proposed dose (n = 2), suboptimal response (n = 1), withdrawal of consent (n = 1), or protocol deviation (n = 1). Median time on treatment was 13.8 mo (range, 1 day-18 mo). Median actual dose intensity of nilotinib was 597 mg/day (range, 165-756 mg/day), and 85% of pts had an actual dose intensity of > 400 mg/day to ≤ 600 mg/day. Of 30 pts with dose reductions due to AEs, 19 (63%) successfully re-escalated to nilotinib 300 mg BID. Nine pts (11%) dose escalated to nilotinib 400 mg BID due to lack of efficacy. The primary endpoint of MMR by 12 mo was achieved by 57 pts (67%; 99.89% CI, 49%-82%). Complete cytogenetic response by 6 mo was achieved by 48 pts (56%). Median BCR-ABLIS decreased over time, with a median value of 0.05% (range, 0.00%-41.36%) at 12 mo (Figure). Most pts (91%) achieved early molecular response (BCR-ABLIS ≤ 10% at 3 mo). Of the 8 pts (9%) with BCR-ABLIS > 10% at 3 mo (4 of whom were then dose escalated), 3 achieved MMR by 12 mo (1 of whom had been dose escalated). By the data cutoff, no pt had progressed to accelerated phase/blast crisis (AP/BC), and there had been no deaths on study. Nilotinib was well tolerated, with a safety profile similar to that seen in other frontline studies. Drug-related nonhematologic AEs (≥ 10% of pts) were rash (31%), constipation (13%), and headache (13%). Newly occurring or worsening grade 3/4 hematologic or biochemical abnormalities (≥ 10% of pts) were neutropenia (17%), thrombocytopenia (17%), increased lipase (13%), and increased bilirubin (12%). Conclusions These results demonstrate that dose-optimized nilotinib affords high rates of molecular response in pts with newly diagnosed CML-CP. Further, they support the feasibility of nilotinib dose re-escalation in pts who require temporary dose reductions due to AEs, with 63% of dose-reduced pts able to successfully re-escalate to nilotinib 300 mg BID and safely continue therapy. Disclosures: Lipton: Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Ariad: Equity Ownership, Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Meillon:Bayer: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria. Louw:Novartis: Congress attendance support Other, Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Bristol Myers Squibb: Congress attendance support, Congress attendance support Other, Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding. Pavlovsky:Novartis: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Bristol Myers Squibb: Speakers Bureau. Jin:Novartis: Employment. Acharya:Novartis Healthcare Pvt. Ltd.: Employment. Woodman:Novartis: Employment, Equity Ownership. Hughes:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Ariad: Consultancy, Honoraria; CSL: Research Funding. Turkina:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria.

scholarly journals Correlation Between Treatment Outcomes, Baseline Characteristics and Molecular Responses in the Majic Study Which Compared Ruxolitinib to Best Available Therapy in Essential Thrombocythemia

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 1929-1929
Author(s):  
Claire N. Harrison ◽  
Adam Mead ◽  
Sonia Fox ◽  
Anesh Panchal ◽  
Christina Yap ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Essential Thrombocythemia ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Advisory Board ◽  
Symptom Improvement ◽  
Separate Analysis ◽  
Molecular Response ◽  
Molecular Responses ◽  
Early Satiety ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract MAJIC is a phase II trial of Ruxolitinib (RUX) vs Best Available Therapy (BAT) in essential thrombocythemia (ET) patients with resistance/intolerance to Hydroxycarbamide (HC) per European LeukemiaNet (ELN) criteria. Primary outcome was rate of complete hematological response (CHR) within 1 year (ELN criteria); secondary outcomes included partial HR, safety, thrombosis, hemorrhage, progression free survival (including transformation), molecular response (MR), symptom & quality of life (QOL) assessment. We present new data concerning molecular, symptom & clinical responses. Patients were stratified by JAK2V617F status, patient-reported symptoms & QOL determined using EQ5D, MDASI & MPN Symptom Assessment Form (MPN10), & compared using linear mixed models of post-baseline scores through month 12 adjusting for baseline; response was defined as ≥50% reduction in MPN10 total symptom score (TSS). JAK2/CALR/MPL allele burdens were assessed at baseline & 4 monthly. 110 patients were eligible for the modified ITT analysis, 58 (52%) & 52 (48%) in RUX & BAT arms respectively, comprising 44 males, 66 females, mean age 64.2ys, & resistant (24.5%), intolerant (51.8%) or both (22.7%) to HC. CHR was achieved in 27 (46.6%) of RUX patients vs 23 (44.2%) BAT patients (χ2 test p= 0.81). PHR occurred in 26 (44.8%) & 27 (51.9%) of RUX & BAT treated respectively. Grade 3 or 4 anemia occurred in 19% & 0% for RUX arm vs 0% (both grades) for BAT arm, grade 3 or 4 thrombocytopenia in 5.2% & 1.7% of RUX vs 0% (both grades) of BAT patients respectively. Grade 3 or 4 infections occurred in 10.3% of RUX patients vs 3.6% BAT arm. 9 RUX treated patients had 10 thrombotic events & 1 RUX patient a hemorrhage; vs 5 thrombotic & 5 hemorrhagic events in BAT patients (adjusted following central review). Transformations to post-ET MF occurred in 8 RUX vs 3 BAT treated patients, 1 RUX patient developed AML. 2 non-treatment related deaths occurred in each arm. Mean MPN-10 TSS & individual symptoms of early satiety & itching during the first 12 months were all significantly lower for RUX vs BAT (all p<0.05). Patients who achieved CHR had significantly better TSS, fatigue, inactivity, concentration problems, & MDASI symptom interference (all p<0.05) at baseline vs those without; however, scores during treatment did not appear to differ between CHR & non CHR groups after adjusting for these baseline differences. Allele burden during study & MRs (per ELN-IWG criteria Barosi Blood 2013) are shown in Table 1. Assays for JAK2 V617F were performed independently in 3 centres using qPCR (Guy's), TSCA NGS (Oxford) & amplicon-based NGS (Salisbury) & revealed Mean (range): JAK2 (Guy's): 33.2 (0.1-94.6), N=52; JAK2 (Oxford): 38.0 (0.5-92.2), N=52; JAK2 (Sal): 38.3 (0-90.0), N=50 (limited to JAK2 positive only). With Interclass Correlation Coefficient as follows ICC (Guy's v Oxford): 0.92 (95% CI 0.86-0.95) ICC (Guy's v Sal): 0.92 (95% CI 0.86-0.95) ICC (Oxford v Sal): 0.997 (95% CI 0.994-0.998). Notably MRs (n=5) only occurred with RUX treatment. There was no pattern of MR or progression with C/PHR or transformation, but 1 patient who transformed to PET MF had a complete MR. In a separate analysis baseline symptoms & QOL were not associated with JAK2, CALR, nor MPL status. Within RUX, baseline symptoms & QOL did not predict MR; however, fatigue, early satiety & abdominal discomfort (all p<0.05, Table 1) were significantly lower among those with MR vs not during treatment with a descriptively higher symptom response rate (2/4 [50%] vs 9/30 [30%]). Three non pre-specified multivariate analyses were performed to assess baseline factors influencing CHR (modelled for: treatment received, HC resistance or intolerance, white cell count, platelets, Hb & JAK2/CALR status); occurrence of ≥ grade 3 anemia or thrombocytopenia (modelled for: Hb (≥ 100g/dl) JAK2/CALR status); & transformation to PET-MF (modelled for: treatment, Hb ≤100g/dl). Only baseline Hb ≤100g/dl was significant for grade 3+ anemia (OR [95% CI]=0.17 [0.04, 0.72]), & PET-MF only occurred in patients with baseline WBC <10x109/L. This updated analysis shows that HC resistant/intolerant ET is clinically & molecularly diverse. We confirm that these patients are at high risk of thrombosis & transformation as suggested in prior retrospective studies. Molecular responses were limited to RUX & for the first time we demonstrate such responses may correlate with symptom improvement but not always with progression events. Disclosures Harrison: Shire: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Gilead: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Incyte Corporation: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Baxaltra: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: travel, accommodations, expenses, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Mead:Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Aliman:Novartis: Other: Institutional funding and grant for international conference. . Chen:Novartis: Other: Advisory Board. Coppell:Novartis: Other: Travel, accommodation and conference attendance. Knapper:ONO pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Other: Travel and expenses for international conferences. Ali:Novartis: Honoraria, Other: Conference sponsorship, advisory board meetings. Hamblin:Novartis: Other: Advisory Board. Dueck:Bayer: Honoraria. Cross:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Mesa:Celgene: Research Funding; Promedior: Research Funding; CTI: Research Funding; Gilead: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Galena: Consultancy; Ariad: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy. McMullin:Novartis: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau.

High Dose Imatinib Induction Therapy (800 mg/day, 6 Months) In Pre-Treated Chronic Phase CML Patients Improves Cytogenetic and Molecular Responses but Does Not Improve Overall and Progression Free Survival – Final Results of the CELSG Phase III CML11 “ISTAHIT” Trial

Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 2271-2271
Author(s):  
Andreas L Petzer ◽  
Dominic Fong ◽  
Thomas Lion ◽  
Irina Dyagil ◽  
Zvenyslava Masliak ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Induction Therapy ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
De Novo ◽  
Chronic Phase ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Molecular Response ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Abstract 2271 Introduction: Imatinib 400 mg/day represents the current standard treatment for de novo as well as pre-treated CML patients in chronic phase (CP). Recent randomized phase III trials revealed conflicting results concerning the potential higher efficacy of dose-increased imatinib in de novo treated CP-CML. Methods: We here present the final analyses including response data, OS, EFS and PFS of the multicenter, randomised, 2-arm phase III CELSG “ISTAHIT” trial evaluating imatinib high dose (HD) induction (800 mg/day, 6 months) followed by 400 mg/day as maintenance (experimental arm B) compared to continuous imatinib standard dose (400mg/day; arm A) in pre-treated CP CML patients. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT0032726. Results: From a total of 243 patients screened for inclusion, 16 patients were not eligible (mainly due to non sufficient numbers of metaphases obtainable from the bone marrow before the start of the study). Of the remaining 227 patients, 113 patients were randomized into arm A and 114 patients into the experimental arm B. Subsequent data are presented as per protocol. No significant differences between treatment groups were observed regarding sex (55.5% female, 44.5% male), age (median: 46.3 years, range 18 –76), Sokal scores at diagnosis (30% low, 41% intermediate, 16% Sokal high risk, 13% unknown) and different pre-treatments, which included hydroxyurea (96%), interferon (72%), busulfan (17%) and “others” (26%; mainly Ara-C). The median observation time was 673 days. Cytogenetic responses were generally higher in the experimental arm B and revealed statistically significant differences in major cytogenetic responses (MCyR) at 3 and 6 months (month 3: 25.8% arm A, 48.3% arm B, p=0.002; month 6: 41.9% arm A, 58.8% arm B, p=0.029) as well as in complete cytogenetic responses (CCyR) not only during imatinib HD therapy (month 3: 7.5% arm A, 29.9% arm B, p<0.001; month 6: 20.4% arm A, 47.4% arm B, p<0.001) but also thereafter (month 12: 31.8% arm A, 52.9% arm B, p=0.006). The primary endpoint of the study, the achievement of an improved MCyR at 12 month was, however, not significantly different (56.8% arm A, 64.4% arm B). In line with improved cytogenetic responses, major molecular response (MMRIS) rates were also significantly better at 3, 6 and even at 24 months in the HD arm B (month 3: 3.7% arm A, 15.9% arm B, p=0.003; month 6: 9.4% arm A, 34.6% arm B, p<0.001; month 24: 26.5% arm A, 42.5% arm B, p=0.034). Surprisingly, however, this impressing improvement in cytogenetic and molecular remissions in patients achieving high dose imatinib as induction therapy did not translate into a better OS and PFS, both of which were comparable in the two treatment arms (OS: p=0.25; EFS: p=0.37). Moreover, the EFS was even significantly worsened in the experimental arm B (p=0.014). Grade 3/4 non-haematological toxicities during the first 6 months of therapy were comparable, whereas grade 3/4 haematological toxicities were significantly more common in the imatinib HD arm B. Conclusions: Although high dose imatinib induction induces more rapid and higher cytogenetic and molecular remission rates in pre-treated CP CML patients, OS as well as PFS were not improved and EFS was even worsened in the high dose induction arm B. Therefore we conclude that imatinib 400mg/day remains the standard of care for pre-treated CP-CML patients. Disclosures: Petzer: Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Off Label Use: Imatinib 800mg is not licensed as the initial therapy of chronic phase CML. Lion: Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding. Bogdanovic: Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Griskevicius: Novartis: Research Funding. Kwakkelstein: Celgene: Employment. Rancati: Novartis: Consultancy, Employment, Equity Ownership, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Gastl: Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Wolf: Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Results of a Phase II Trial of Dasatinib As Frontline Therapy for Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CML) In Chronic Phase (CP)

Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 1700-1700 ◽  
Author(s):  
Naveen Pemmaraju ◽  
Hagop M. Kantarjian ◽  
Rajyalakshmi Luthra ◽  
Susan O'Brien ◽  
Elias Jabbour ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pleural Effusion ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Phase Ii Trial ◽  
Cytogenetic Response ◽  
Hematologic Toxicity ◽  
Molecular Response ◽  
Significant Activity ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Abstract 1700 Background: Dasatinib is approximately 300 times more potent than imatinib (IM) in vitro and has significant activity in patients (pts) with CML-CP resistant to or intolerant of IM. In 2005 we initiated a phase II trial to study the efficacy and safety of dasatinib in pts with previously untreated CML-CP. Objective: To determine the outcome of pts with CML-CP treated with front-line dasatinib. The primary endpoint was attainment of major molecular response (MMR) at 12 months (mos). Methods: Pts with previously untreated CML-CP within 6 mos from diagnosis were eligible and received dasatinib 100 mg/day, randomized to either 50 mg twice daily (BID) or 100 mg once daily (QD). After 66 pts were accrued, the BID arm was closed and all subsequent pts were treated with 100 mg QD. No prior therapy was allowed except for IM for no more than 1 month, or hydroxyurea. Results: From November 2005 to June 2011, 99 pts have been enrolled (66 on the QD schedule, 33 BID). For the purposes of this analysis, we considered all pts with clonal evolution at baseline (n=6) as accelerated phase and excluded them from the present analysis, therefore leaving 93 pts (62QD, 31 BID) for review. Median age was 48 years (yrs) (range 18–82); 56% were male. Median baseline counts: WBC 22.95 K/uL, PB blasts 0%, BM blasts 3%, BM basophils 2%, and platelets 315; 21 pts (23%) had brief prior exposure to IM. Sokal score by distribution: Low (81%), Intermediate (14%), High (5%). Median follow-up is 29 mos (3–67). Of the 80 evaluable pts who were not in CHR at the start of therapy, 79 (98%) achieved CHR. Of 87 evaluable pts (ie, followed for at least 3 mos), 83 (95%) achieved complete cytogenetic response (CCyR). MMR has been achieved in 75 pts (86%), including 54 pts (67%) with complete molecular response (CMR; ≤0.0032% IS). At 6 mos, 79 (94%) pts had achieved a CCyR and 56 (68%) an MMR; corresponding figures at 12 mos are 95% and 73%, respectively. Grade 3–4 non-hematologic toxicity included fatigue (9%), pain and dyspnea (6% each), memory impairment (5%), headache and sensory neuropathy (4% each), nausea, cardiac arrhythmia, and neurologic (3% each) and diarrhea, visual, and pleural effusion (2% each). Grade 3–4 hematologic toxicity (transient) included thrombocytopenia 13%, neutropenia 24%, and anemia 9%. Fifty-two (56%) of 93 pts required transient treatment interruptions and 36 (39%) have required dose reductions. The actual median daily dose for all pts was 100 mg (20–140). Thirteen pts lost CCyR: (including 3 because of non-compliance and 2 transient losses, regained spontaneously). The 24-mo probability of event-free survival (EFS) is 93%.There have been no transformations or deaths on study. Twelve (13%) pts have discontinued therapy: 3 pt's choice, 1 lost to follow up, 4 toxicity (2 pleural effusion, 1 congestive heart failure, 1 headaches), and 4 for loss of major cytogenetic response (MCyR). Three pts have had mutation assessment upon discontinuation and no mutations were identified. Conclusion: Rapid CCyR occurs in nearly all pts with previously untreated CML-CP treated with frontline dasatinib therapy with a favorable toxicity profile. None of the patients have transformed to AP/BP confirming the efficacy of dasatinib as initial therapy for CML-CP. Disclosures: Kantarjian: Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding. Jabbour:Pfizer: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria. Ravandi:BMS: Honoraria, Research Funding. Cortes:Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding.

Lenalidomide and Rituximab for Untreated Indolent Lymphoma: Final Results of a Phase II Study

Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 901-901 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nathan H Fowler ◽  
Sattva S. Neelapu ◽  
Fredrick B Hagemeister ◽  
Peter McLaughlin ◽  
Larry W. Kwak ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Follicular Lymphoma ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Data Monitoring Committee ◽  
Study Entry ◽  
Molecular Response ◽  
Advanced Stage ◽  
Indolent Lymphoma ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Abstract 901 Background: The optimal management of patients (pts) with untreated, advanced stage indolent non-Hodgkins lymphoma (NHL) is evolving. Although several traditional chemo-immunotherapy regimens achieve high overall response (OR) rates, toxicity is common and nearly all patients relapse. Lenalidomide has single-agent activity in relapsed indolent NHL, and rituximab is effective alone and in combination with chemotherapy in untreated pts. Preclinical studies suggest that lenalidomide may augment immune effector cell function and ADCC in the presence of rituximab. The aim of this phase II, single arm study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of lenalidomide and rituximab in pts with untreated, advanced stage, indolent NHL. Methods: Pts with advanced stage untreated indolent NHL and measurable disease (>1.5cm) were eligible for study entry. Pts received 20 mg/day of lenalidomide on days 1–21 and rituximab 375 mg/m2 on day 1 of each 28 day cycle for 6 cycles. Patients with evidence of tumor response could continue up to 12 cycles. To reduce the incidence of tumor flare, pts with small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL) started at 10mg, with monthly dose escalation. Pts were evaluable for response if they had at least 1 response assessment. Prophylactic growth factors were not used. Response was assessed every 3 cycles using the 1999 International Working Group Response Criteria. Results: The study enrolled 110 pts; all have completed treatment or are off-study, and 103 pts are evaluable for response. Histologies included: SLL n=30, follicular lymphoma (FL) n=50, and marginal zone lymphoma (MZL) n=30. The median age was 58 (34-84) years, and 53% were male. Of the 46 evaluable pts with FL,78% had a FLIPI score of ≥ 2, and 52% met GELF criteria for high tumor burden. The best response for the 103 evaluable pts is listed in Table 1. Among the FL pts, responses were high regardless of FLIPI score, tumor bulk, or GELF criteria at study entry. At the completion of therapy nearly all FL pts demonstrated molecular response with the absence of detectable BCL-2 by PCR. Forty five evaluable pts with FL had a positive PET scan prior to therapy and 42 (93%) attained a complete metabolic response following treatment. At a median follow up of 22 months, the estimated 2 year progression free survival (PFS) is 83% for all pts and 89% in pts with FL. Among all pts, grade ≥3 neutropenia occurred in 40% (13% of total cycles) and thrombocytopenia occurred in 4% of pts. The most common grade ≥ 3 non-hematologic toxicities included rash (8 pts), muscle pain (7 pts), fatigue (3 pts), thrombosis (3 pts). Two episodes of neutropenic fever occurred. Six pts stopped treatment due to adverse events. Conclusion: The combination of lenalidomide and rituximab is active and tolerable in pts with untreated indolent lymphoma. High complete response rates with durable remissions were observed in patients with follicular lymphoma. Randomized studies comparing this regimen versus traditional combination chemotherapy regimens are underway. Disclosures: Fowler: Celgene: Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding. Off Label Use: lenalidomide. Neelapu:Celgene: Research Funding. McLaughlin:Celgene: Data Monitoring Committee for another study Other. Fanale:Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding. Wang:Pharmacyclic: Research Funding. Lacerte:Celgene: Honoraria. Samaniego:Celgene: Research Funding.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document