Significance of Minimal Residual Disease in Patients with Chronic Myeloid Leukemia After Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation.

Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 3269-3269
Author(s):  
Iwona Solarska ◽  
Barbara Nasilowska-Adamska ◽  
Maria Bieniaszewska ◽  
Jan Maciej Zaucha ◽  
Piotr Rzepecki ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cell ◽  
Chronic Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Chronic Phase ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Low Level ◽  
High Level ◽  
Minimal Residual

Abstract Abstract 3269 Poster Board III-1 Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (alloHSCT) is a potentially curative treatment for patients (pts) with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). AlloHSCT is associated with long-term disease-free survival in 40% to 80% pts transplanted in early chronic phase of disease. The probability of relapse for pts transplanted in first chronic phase is 10% to 20% at 5 years, and is even higher (30% – 60%) for pts who received transplant in advanced phases of CML. The significance of minimal residual disease (MRD) in this clinical setting is uncertain. We enrolled 63 consecutive pts with CML who had received an alloHSCT between 1995 and 2007 and had BCR-ABL transcript quantity measured by RQ-PCR method on at least 2 occasions during follow-up in the period starting 6 months after alloHSCT. The reverse transcription was preformed using SuperScriptIII and random hexamers. Quantification of BCR-ABL was performed by RQ-PCR assay according to ‘Europe Against Cancer' protocol. BCR-ABL expression was normalized with endogenous control ABL gene and expressed as a ratio BCR-ABL/ABL. According to the amount of BCR-ABL transcript detected in blood or bone marrow after alloHSCT pts were allocated into 3 categories, including pts with no-detectable or stable very low-level of BCR-ABL transcripts (ratio BCR-ABL/ABL below 0.005%), pts with fluctuating-low level of BCR-ABL transcripts (0.005 – 0.01%) and pts with high-level of BCR-ABL transcripts (0.01 – 0.1%). We didn't find any relationships between different BCR-ABL levels after alloHSCT and clinical parameters at the time of CML diagnosis or transplantation, including Sokal, Hasford and Gratwohl scores. Median time from alloHSCT to molecular relapse (MR) was 38 months (range, 8.5 – 88.5 months). The 3-year progression rate into cytogenetic or hematological relapse of CML since MR was 70%. This progression occurred at a median time of 1.4 months (range, 0 – 3.2 months). We found strong correlation between the levels of BCR-ABL transcripts after alloHSCT and a risk of relapse. The incidence of MR was 0%, 26%, 71% for the low-level, fluctuating-low level and high-level of BCR-ABL transcript (p<.0001), respectively. Similarly the risk of cytogenetic and hematological relapse was 0%, 21%, 43% for these pts (p=.001), respectively. Five-year leukemia-free survival was 100%, 83.9% and 66.7% for the pts with low-level, fluctuating-low level and high-level BCR-ABL transcript (p=.003), respectively. There was no apparent relationship between the level of BCR-ABL transcript and overall survival. We conclude that pts with fluctuating-low and/or high levels of BCR-ABL transcripts are at higher risk of disease progression. Sequential RQ-PCR monitoring coupled with pre-emptive therapy can provide a valid strategy to reduce rates of relapse and development of a more individualized approach to management of pts with CML in major molecular response after alloHSCT. Disclosures: Warzocha: BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy; Roche: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria.

scholarly journals Preemptive Immunotherapy for Minimal Residual Disease in Patients With t(8;21) Acute Myeloid Leukemia After Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

2022 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shuang Fan ◽  
Meng-Zhu Shen ◽  
Xiao-Hui Zhang ◽  
Lan-Ping Xu ◽  
Yu Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Intermediate Level ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem ◽  
Low Level ◽  
Log Reduction ◽  
High Level ◽  
Minimal Residual ◽  
Acute Myeloid

In patients with t(8;21) acute myeloid leukemia (AML), recurrent minimal residual disease (MRD) measured by RUNX1-RUNX1T1 transcript levels can predict relapse after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). This study aimed to compare the efficacy of preemptive interferon (IFN)-α therapy and donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI) in patients with t(8;21) AML following allo-HSCT. We also evaluated the appropriate method for patients with different levels of RUNX1-RUNX1T1 transcripts. In this retrospective study, consecutive patients who had high-risk t(8;21) AML and received allo-HSCT were enrolled. The inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) age ≤65 years; (2) regained MRD positive following allo-HSCT. MRD positive was defined as the loss of a ≥4.5-log reduction and/or &lt;4.5-log reduction in the RUNX1-RUNX1T1 transcripts, and high-level, intermediate-level, and low-level MRDs were, respectively, defined as &lt;2.5-log, 2.5−3.5-log, and 3.5−4.5-log reductions in the transcripts compared with the pretreatment baseline level. Patients with positive RUNX1-RUNX1T1 could receive preemptive IFN-α therapy or DLI, which was primarily based on donor availability and the intentions of physicians and patients. The patients received recombinant human IFN-α-2b therapy by subcutaneous injection twice a week every 4 weeks. IFN-α therapy was scheduled for six cycles or until the RUNX1-RUNX1T1 transcripts were negative for at least two consecutive tests. The rates of MRD turning negative for patients with low-level, intermediate-level, and high-level RUNX1-RUNX1T1 receiving IFN-α were 87.5%, 58.1%, and 22.2%, respectively; meanwhile, for patients with intermediate-level and high-level RUNX1-RUNX1T1 receiving DLI, the rates were 50.0% and 14.3%, respectively. For patients with low-level and intermediate-level RUNX1-RUNX1T1, the probability of overall survival at 2 years was higher in the IFN-α group than in the DLI group (87.6% vs. 55.6%; p = 0.003). For patients with high levels of RUNX1-RUNX1T1, the probability of overall survival was comparable between the IFN-α and DLI groups (53.3% vs. 83.3%; p = 0.780). Therefore, patients with low-level and intermediate-level RUNX1-RUNX1T1 could benefit more from preemptive IFN-α therapy compared with DLI. Clinical outcomes were comparable between preemptive IFN-α therapy and DLI in patients with high-level RUNX1-RUNX1T1; however, they should be further improved.

scholarly journals Estimating leukemia-free survival after allografting for chronic myeloid leukemia: a new method that takes into account patients who relapse and are restored to complete remission

Blood ◽  
2000 ◽  
Vol 96 (1) ◽  
pp. 86-90 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charles Craddock ◽  
Richard M. Szydlo ◽  
John P. Klein ◽  
Francesco Dazzi ◽  
Eduardo Olavarria ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cell ◽  
Chronic Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Complete Remission ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Chronic Phase ◽  
New Method ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Unrelated Donors

Abstract A significant number of patients who relapse after allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT) for chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) will achieve sustained remissions after treatment with interferon-, second transplants, or donor lymphocyte infusions (DLI) from the original stem cell donor. Because leukemia-free survival (LFS) is at present defined as survival without evidence of relapse at any time posttransplant, patients who relapse but are then restored to complete remission are treated as failures when estimating LFS. We have established a new category of LFS, termed current LFS (CLFS), which we define as survival without evidence of leukemia at the time of most recent assessment. To gauge the contribution of treatment for relapse to the efficacy of allogeneic SCT in the management of CML in chronic phase, we compared conventional LFS and CLFS in 189 consecutive patients who underwent SCT over a 7-year period with a minimum follow-up of 3 years. Patients with sibling donors (n = 111) received cyclosporine and methotrexate as prophylaxis for graft versus host disease; patients with unrelated donors (n = 78) also received Campath-1G or 1H as intravenous T-cell depletion. The 5-year LFS defined conventionally was 36% (CI: 29% to 43%) versus a 5-year CLFS of 49% (CI: 36% to 62%). This new method of defining LFS confirms the view that appropriate “salvage” therapy, principally DLI, makes a major contribution to the capacity of allogeneic SCT to produce long-term LFS in patients who receive SCT for CML and emphasizes the importance of redefining LFS to take account of successful treatment of relapse.

scholarly journals Complete Hematologic and Molecular Response in Adult Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Philadelphia Chromosome–Positive B-Precursor Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Following Treatment With Blinatumomab: Results From a Phase II, Single-Arm, Multicenter Study

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (16) ◽  
pp. 1795-1802 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giovanni Martinelli ◽  
Nicolas Boissel ◽  
Patrice Chevallier ◽  
Oliver Ottmann ◽  
Nicola Gökbuget ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
Philadelphia Chromosome ◽  
Relapse Free Survival ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Disease Response ◽  
Minimal Residual

Purpose Few therapeutic options are available for patients with Philadelphia chromosome–positive (Ph+) B-precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) who progress after failure of tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) −based therapy. Here, we evaluated the efficacy and tolerability of blinatumomab in patients with relapsed or refractory Ph+ ALL. Patients and Methods This open-label phase II study enrolled adults with Ph+ ALL who had relapsed after or were refractory to at least one second-generation or later TKI or were intolerant to second-generation or later TKIs and intolerant or refractory to imatinib. Blinatumomab was administered in 28-day cycles by continuous intravenous infusion. The primary end point was complete remission (CR) or CR with partial hematologic recovery (CRh) during the first two cycles. Major secondary end points included minimal residual disease response, rate of allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation, relapse-free survival, overall survival, and adverse events (AEs). Results Of 45 patients, 16 (36%; 95% CI, 22% to 51%) achieved CR/CRh during the first two cycles, including four of 10 patients with the T315I mutation; 88% of CR/CRh responders achieved a complete minimal residual disease response. Seven responders (44%) proceeded to allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation, including 55% (six of 11) of transplantation-naïve responders. Median relapse-free survival and overall survival were 6.7 and 7.1 months, respectively. The most frequent AEs were pyrexia (58%), febrile neutropenia (40%), and headache (31%). Three patients had cytokine release syndrome (all grade 1 or 2), and three patients had grade 3 neurologic events, one of which (aphasia) required temporary treatment interruption. There were no grade 4 or 5 neurologic events. Conclusion Single-agent blinatumomab showed antileukemia activity in high-risk patients with Ph+ ALL who had relapsed or were refractory to TKIs. AEs were consistent with previous experience in Ph– ALL.

Long-term follow-up of allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation with reduced-intensity conditioning for patients with chronic myeloid leukemia

Blood ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 110 (9) ◽  
pp. 3456-3462 ◽  
Author(s):  
Partow Kebriaei ◽  
Michelle A. Detry ◽  
Sergio Giralt ◽  
Antonio Carrasco-Yalan ◽  
Athanasios Anagnostopoulos ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cell ◽  
Chronic Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Chronic Phase ◽  
Reduced Intensity Conditioning ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem ◽  
Reduced Intensity

Abstract Allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (HSCT) remains an effective strategy for inducing durable remission in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). Reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) regimens extend HSCT to older patients and those with comorbidities who would otherwise not be suitable candidates for HSCT. The long-term efficacy of this approach is not established. We evaluated outcomes of 64 CML patients with advanced-phase disease (80% beyond first chronic phase), not eligible for myeloablative preparative regimens due to older age or comorbid conditions, who were treated with fludarabine-based RIC regimens. Donor type was matched related (n =30), 1 antigen-mismatched related (n =4), or matched unrelated (n =30). With median follow-up of 7 years, overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were 33% and 20%, respectively, at 5 years. Incidence of treatment-related mortality (TRM) was 33%, 39%, and 48% at 100 days, and 2 and 5 years after HSCT, respectively. In multivariate analysis, only disease stage at time of HSCT was significantly predictive for both OS and PFS. RIC HSCT provides adequate disease control in chronic-phase CML patients, but alternative treatment strategies need to be explored in patients with advanced disease. TRM rates are acceptable in this high-risk population but increase over time.

Treosulfan, Fludarabine, and Antithymocyte Globulin - A Low Toxicity Conditioning Regimen for Unrelated Donor - Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia.

Blood ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 108 (11) ◽  
pp. 2948-2948
Author(s):  
Jerzy Holowiecki ◽  
Sebastian Giebel ◽  
Jerzy Wojnar ◽  
Miroslaw Markiewicz ◽  
Aleksandra Holowiecka-Goral ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cell ◽  
Chronic Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Acute Gvhd ◽  
Kinase Inhibitors ◽  
Chronic Phase ◽  
Unrelated Donor ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Unrelated donor - hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (URD-HSCT) is the treatment of proved long-term efficacy for chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) patients not having an HLA-identical sibling. However, high procedure-related toxicity observed after oral busulfan- or TBI-based conditioning limits its applicability and deteriorates outcome [Radich, Blood2003, 102, 31–5]. This is of increasing importance in the presence of challanging options offered by tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Between 2003–2006 we introduced a new preparetive regimen consisting of Treosulfan (a soluble alkylyting agent) 14 g/m2/d on days -6, -5, -4, Fludarabine 30 mg/m2/d on days -6, -5, -4, -3, -2, and, anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) at a total dose of 6 mg/kg. Thirty patients (age 32, range 16–48 years) with CML in the 1st chronic phase (n=29) or in 2nd chronic phase (n=1) were included in the study. Median interval from diagnosis to alloHSCT equaled 1.0 (0.5–12.0) years. 63% of patients had previously been treated with Imatinib. The donors were selected based on high resolution typing for both HLA class I and II. 43% of donors were mismatched for a single HLA-C (n=9), HLA-DQB1 (n=3) or HLA-B locus (n=1). Bone marrow was used a source of stem cells in 19 patients, peripheral blood - in 11 cases. GVHD prophylaxis consisted of Cyclosporin A and short-course Methotrexate. All patients engrafted with the median time to neutrophil recovery >0.5 G/L and PLT >50 G/L of 19 (10–30) days and 18 (12–29) days, respectively. Complete donor chimerism was achieved until day +100 in all but one patient. Grade 3–4 neutropenic infections occurred in 13% of patients. Grade 3–4 mucositis as well as hepatic toxicity including VOD were not observed. The incidence of grade II acute GVHD was 23%, whereas grade III-IV acute GVHD was not observed. The incidence of extensive chronic GVHD was 10%. At 3 years the probability of the overall survival and hematological relapse-free survival equaled 82% (+/−7%). The cumulative incidence of non-relapse moratlity was 18% (+/−7%) (fungal infection n=3, bacterial infection n=1, EBV-LPD n=1). Four patients required donor lymphocyte infusion or additional interferon or imatinib treatment because of incomplete donor chimerism or molecular/cytogenetic relapse after initial response. We conclude that treosulfan + fludarabine + ATG conditioning is associated with low organ toxicity, low incidence of severe GVHD and NRM. The regimen is feasible option for CML patients referred for URD-HSCT in tyrosine kinase inhibitors era.

HLA-Haploidentical Related Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation and Mesenchymal Stem Cell Transplantation in Patients with Hematologic Malignancies.

Blood ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 108 (11) ◽  
pp. 5408-5408
Author(s):  
Xiaoyan Zhang ◽  
Jianyong Li ◽  
Kejiang Cao ◽  
Hanxin Wu ◽  
Hua Lu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Marrow ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Chronic Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Stem Cell Transplantation ◽  
Cell Transplantation ◽  
Clinical Features ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Chronic Phase ◽  
Hematologic Malignancies ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem

Abstract Background: Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is the only way to cure many hematologic malignancies. HLA-haploidentical related HSCT was performed in case of lack of HLA-matched donors. From the results of in-vitro and animal studies, Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) transplanted simultaneously with hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) may support hematopoietic regeneration and have the immunomodulatory effect. MSCs together with HSCs transplantation from the same HLA-haploidentical donor were used in patients with hematologic malignancies. Patients and Methods: Three patients were chronic myeloid leukemia (blast crisis), chronic myeloid leukemia (chronic phase) and refractory T-cell lymphoblastic lymphoma (leukemia phase) respectively. Complete demographic and clinical details of these 3 patients are shown in Table 1. Bone marrow mononuclear cells obtained from their HLA-haploidentical related donors were cultured and expanded in vitro about 2 months before transplantation. Immunophenotype of the harvested cells were detected in order to identify them. After conditioned by cytosine arabinoside/cyclophosphamide/total body irradiation regimen, patients were co-transplanted with HSCs and ex-vivo expanded MSCs. Cyclosporine, methotrexate, antithymocyte globulin, mycophenolate mofetil and anti-CD25 monoclonal antibody were used together for prophylaxis of GVHD. Clinical features after transplantation in these patients were observed. Results: About 2×106 MSCs per kilogram of recipients’ weight were successfully expanded from bone marrow samples. These cells were CD73, CD90, CD105 positive and CD34, CD45, CD38, CD10, CD20, CD33, HLA-DR negative by flow cytometric analysis. No adverse response was observed during and after infusion of MSCs. Hematopoietic reconstruction was successful in all the patients. And they had full donor-type chimerism 1 month after transplantation. N1 received donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI) to prevent the relapse. N2 relapsed and received the therapy of STI571 combined with DLI. She had a complete remission at last. No graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) was observed in N1 and N2 until they received DLI. N1 died of infection 11 months after transplantation. N2 and N3 now have been followed up for 41 and 31 months respectively. Clinical features of patients after transplantation are shown in Table 2. Conclusions: Bone marrow derived MSCs can be tolerant well in HLA-haploidentical HSCT. Its exact effect in human HLA-haploidentical allogeneic HSCT needs to be studied further. Tab.1 Patient Demographic and Clinical Data Patient Diagnosis Age Sex Course of disease before transplantation Donor Mismatched HLA loci Abbr: LPL - lymphoblastic lymphoma; CML - chronic myeloid leukemia; BC - blast crisis; CP - chronic phase; yr - year; mo - month N1 T-LPL 22 F 7 yr mother 3 N2 CML-BC 32 F 6mo sibling brother 3 N3 CML-CP 22 M 5mo father 3 Tab.2 Clinical features of patients after transplantation Patient Hematopoietic reconstruction Donor-type chimerism Time of relapse time of DLI acute GVHD chronic GVHD survival Abbr: DLI - donor lymphocyte infusion; d - day; mo - month N1 15 d 100% no 5 mo IV (after DLI) extensive die in 11 mo N2 16 d 100% 6mo 6 mo IV (after DLI) no >41 mo N3 15 d 100% no no I limited >31 mo

Minimal Residual Disease Status at Day +100 Post Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation Is a Powerful Predictor for Post-Transplant Outcome In Patients with High Risk Acute Leukemia

Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 3550-3550
Author(s):  
XiaoWen Tang ◽  
Xingwei Sun ◽  
Shengli Xue ◽  
Xiaolan Shi ◽  
Mingqing Zhu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Post Transplant ◽  
Low Level ◽  
High Level Group ◽  
Risk Patients ◽  
High Level ◽  
Level Group

Abstract Abstract 3550 Background and Objectives Relapse after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) is still a major cause for the failure in treatment. It has been shown that there was a closely relationship between the level of minimal residual disease (MRD) and relapse in acute leukemia (AL) patients; However, the application of multiparameter flow cytometry (MFC) for MRD assessment in high risk patients with AL who undergoing allo-HSCT is little concerned. We retrospectively analysed the serial results of MRD of 52 high risk patients with AL to evaluates the prognostic value of MRD pre and post transplantation. Methods 52 patients with a median age of 29 (13–55) years have been enrolled on this study in our hospital from January 2003 to September 2008.Diagnoses included AML (n=27) and ALL (n=25). The patients had been analyzed retrospectively the level of MRD pre-(day-30)and post-HSCT(day+30 and +100)using three color FCM with CD45/SSC gating and a comprehensive panel of monoclonal antibodies, at least one leukemia associated aberrant immunophenotype (LAIP) at diagnosis. According to the cutoff value 0.1%, two groups were defined based on the level of patient's MRD level< (low level group) or >= (high level group) 0.1%. Results The median follow up were 23 (range 1–60) months. 1.MRD level declines significantly (P=0.03) post transplant. 2. There were significantly difference between low level and high level group at day -30 before transplant with 3 years event free survival(EFS) and relapse free survival (RFS)(77.4% and 88.4% vs. 22.3% and 25.7%, p=0.007and p=0.001 respectively). 3. Concerning about MRD at day +100 after transplant, outcome was significantly better among patients with low level MRD group versus high group including 3 years OS,EFS and RFS(84.2%, 79.5% and 89.5% versus 22.9%, 9.5% and 11.2%).4. The median time from high level MRD detected first time to clinical relapse was 2.5 (range from 1 to 33) months in relapsed patients. 5. The patients with cGVHD had better 3 years OS and EFS than that without cGVHD(86.3% vs 12.1%, p<0.001 and 65.3% vs.14.8%, p< 0.001 respectively). 6. Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that MRD on day +100 as well as chronic GVHD were independent parameters predictive for OS and EFS. Conclusions MRD monitoring pre- and post-transplant is an important tool to predict the outcome of transplantation for patients with high risk AL. The MRD check point at day +100 should be considered crucial for subsequent therapeutic decisions after allogeneic transplantation. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document