Pretransplant Factors That Influence Intravenous Busulfan Kinetics in Adult Patients.

Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 3350-3350
Author(s):  
Ali McBride ◽  
Karen Fancher ◽  
Jongphil Kim ◽  
Donn Davis ◽  
Michelle Conwell ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 3350 Poster Board III-238 We performed a retrospective review of intravenous busulfan (Bu) pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters and pretransplant characteristics on patient receiving Bu and fludarabine (40mg/m2/day x 4) (BuFlu) prior to allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) in order to determine the predictive value of pretransplant characteristics on Bu area under the concentration time curve (AUC). Included in this analysis are 265 pts transplanted between 7/04 and 12/08 who received 130 or 145mg/m2/day for 2 doses then had doses 3 and 4 adjusted based on first dose PK parameters (from 5 plasma concentrations) to achieve a target AUC of 5300 micromole*min/L. Pretransplant variables collected included: gender, age, ethnicity, height, actual body weight (ABW), body surface area (BSA), body mass index (BMI), underlying diseases states (hypertension, diabetes mellitus, coronary artery disease and liver disease), transplant diagnoses, prior chemotherapy, aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), total bilirubin (TB), serum creatinine (SCr), measured creatinine clearance (CrCl) and concomitant medications administered up to 24 hours prior to first Bu dose. Median first dose AUC was 5252 micromole*min/L (2633-21400 micromole*min/L). Univariable and multivariable analyses were utilized to identify prognostic factors that may affect AUC levels based on first dose kinetics. In univariable analyses, BMI and CrCl were negatively correlated with Bu AUC while AST and SCr were positively correlated. In addition, the use of azole antifungals, metronidazole proton pump inhibitors, doxycycline, and choice of antiseizure prophylactic medication also had a significant effect on Bu AUC. Multivariable analysis demonstrated BMI and CrCl were negatively associated with AUC (p=0.008 and 0.005, respectively) while AST was positively associated (p=0.035). The use of fluconazole, metronidazole and doxycyline was associated with higher AUCs (p=0.011, 0.021, and 0.004, respectively) while concurrent use of voriconazole was associated with lower AUC (p=0.011). Based on these data, pts with large BMI, increased CrCl, or on concomitant voriconazole may require larger doses of busulfan to achieve a target AUC whereas pts with an elevated AST or taking fluconazole, metronidazole and doxycyline may require less. In order to validate these findings, we are developing a population based dosing model that will require testing in a prospective pt sample. Disclosures: Field: PDL BioPharma: Research Funding. Perkins:PDL BioPharma: Research Funding. Off Label Use: IV busulfan and fludarabine for pretransplant conditioning.

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 3201-3201
Author(s):  
Fotios V. Michelis ◽  
Hans A. Messner ◽  
Naheed Alam ◽  
Vikas Gupta ◽  
Dennis Dong Hwan Kim ◽  
...  

Abstract The Hematopoietic Cell Transplant Co-morbidity Index (HCT-CI, Sorror et al 2005) was developed as a prognostic tool for overall survival (OS) and non-relapse mortality (NRM) in allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) patients. The prognostic significance of the score for patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) undergoing HCT has been demonstrated, however reports are conflicting. The purpose of this single-center study was to retrospectively investigate the prognostic impact of the individual component co-morbidities of the HCT-CI on the outcome of 418 patients that underwent HCT for AML at our center between 2000 and 2013. Patients underwent HCT in first (CR1, n=303) and second (CR2, n=115) complete remission. Median age at HCT was 50 years (range 18-71), 212 (51%) patients were female. Myeloablative conditioning (MAC) was used in 283 (68%) patients, reduced-intensity (RIC) in 135 (32%) patients. Donors were related for 236 (56%) patients, unrelated for 182 (44%) patients. Grafts were peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) in 339 (81%) patients and bone marrow in 79 (19%) patients. Median follow-up of patients alive was 62 months (range 12-168). Cytogenetics at diagnosis were available for 84% of patients, of which 31 (7%) were favorable, 246 (59%) were intermediate and 74 (18%) were unfavorable risk (MRC classification). HCT-CI scores were grouped as 0 (n=109, 26%), 1-2 (n=157, 38%) and ≥3 (n=152, 36%). A total of 171 patients (41%) underwent HCT during the years 2000-2006 and 247 patients (59%) during the years 2007-2013. The observed frequency of the co-morbidities composing the HCT-CI is summarized in Table 1. Univariate analysis for OS demonstrated the following significant variables: Age (HR=1.02, 95%CI=1.01-1.03, p=0.0002), CR status (HR=1.42 for CR2, 95%CI=1.08-1.87, P=0.01), donor type (HR=0.73 for related, 95%CI=0.57-0.94, p=0.02), HCT-CI group (overall p-value=0.004). For OS, univariate analysis of the impact of individual co-morbidities was performed for the components of the HCT-CI score that were observed in ≥5% of the patients (Table 1). All variables with a p-value ≤0.2 were introduced into the multivariable analysis (not including the HCT-CI itself), and these included cardiac disorder (CAD, CHF, MI or EF≤50%) (HR=1.65, 95%CI=1.17-2.32, p=0.004), prior solid tumor (HR=1.56, 95%CI=1.06-2.30, p=0.02) and diabetes (HR=1.40, 95%CI=0.89-2.19, p=0.14). In the multivariable analysis for OS, none of the aforementioned co-morbidities demonstrated independent prognostic relevance. For NRM, univariate analysis demonstrated cardiac disorder (HR=1.89, 95%CI=1.27-2.81, p=0.002), diabetes (HR=1.94, 95%CI=1.20-3.12, p=0.007) and moderate pulmonary (FEV1 and/or DLCO 66-80% or dyspnea on slight activity) (HR=1.31, 95%CI=0.93-1.84, p=0.12) to meet the significance criteria for inclusion in the multivariable analysis, which finally demonstrated diabetes (HR=2.17, 95%CI=1.31-3.60, p=0.003) and cardiac disorder (HR=1.78, 95%CI=1.15-2.76, p=0.01) to be independent predictors of NRM post-transplant. In conclusion, among the pre-transplant co-morbidities included in the HCT-CI, diabetes and cardiac dysfunction are independent prognostic indicators for NRM but not for OS. Pulmonary dysfunction does not seem to negatively influence outcomes in this cohort of patients. Disclosures Kim: Novartis Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding.


Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 5-6
Author(s):  
Issam S. Hamadeh ◽  
Michael R. Grunwald ◽  
Allison Martin ◽  
Jai N. Patel ◽  
Alexandra Shillingburg ◽  
...  

Introduction: Letermovir is a terminase complex inhibitor that was recently approved for prevention of cytomegalovirus (CMV) reactivation after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT). Its favorable side effect profile makes it an attractive alternative to other anti-CMV agents. Nevertheless, its use may present other challenges secondary to enzyme induction, leading to clinically significant drug-drug interactions. Voriconazole is widely used for prophylaxis against invasive fungal infections in the setting of HCT. By virtue of its hepatic metabolism mediated by CYP2C19, the package insert recommends close monitoring of voriconazole trough concentration when given concomitantly with letermovir. The objective of this study was to characterize the extent of interaction between voriconazole and letermovir in allogeneic HCT recipients. The study was approved by the institutional review board. Methods: Patient selection and data collection: An institutional database was queried to identify patients who underwent allogeneic HCT and received antifungal prophylaxis with voriconazole from November 2018 through July 2020. Per the institutional standard operating procedure (SOP), patients initially received intravenous micafungin 50 mg daily which was switched to voriconazole when oral drug administration became feasible. The voriconazole prophylactic dose was guided by CYP2C19 phenotype. Rapid metabolizers (harboring the gain of function variantCYP2C19*17) received 300 mg twice daily whereas others received 200 mg twice daily. Further dose adjustment was warranted if trough concentration, measured at least 5 days after starting voriconazole, did not fall within target range of 1 to 5.5 mg/L. Patients at risk for CMV reactivation who underwent HCT after SOP revision (November 2019) received prophylaxis with letermovir 480 mg daily on day +6 post HCT. After a retrospective review of electronic medical records, HCT recipients were divided into two cohorts;cohort 1included patients who received letermovir prophylaxis whereascohort 2comprised those who did not. Data extracted from medical records included: demographics, hematological disorder, voriconazole dose and trough concentration, and date of letermovir initiation. Statistical analysis: The Student's t-test was used to compare mean voriconazole trough plasma concentration between cohorts 1 and 2. The chi-squared/Fisher's exact test was used to compare rate of subtherapeutic voriconazole trough concentration. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to determine the association between letermovir use and subtherapeutic voriconazole concentration after adjusting for age, gender, race, weight and voriconazole dose. All statistical analyses were performed in SAS (version 9.4) Results: 64 patients were identified (23 in cohort 1 and 41 in cohort 2). Baseline characteristics were comparable except for age (62.0±8.7 years in cohort 1 vs. 58.0±12.2 years, p=0.01); 39% of patients in cohort 1 and 30% in cohort 2 received voriconazole 300 mg twice daily upfront for prophylaxis due to the rapid CYP2C19 metabolizer phenotype whereas the rest received voriconazole 200 mg twice daily (p=0.6). There was no significant difference in mean voriconazole trough plasma concentration (p=0.5) or frequency of subtherapeutic trough (p=0.16) between cohorts 1 and 2 (Figure 1). Multivariate logistic regression analysis indicated that letermovir prophylaxis had no impact on subtherapeutic voriconazole concentration (OR: 0.4, 95% CI: 0.1-1.4, p=0.1). In the subgroup of patients who received voriconazole at 300 mg twice daily, the rate of subtherapeutic concentration did not differ significantly between cohorts 1 and 2 (p=1.0), whereas a non-significant trend in rate of subtherapeutic voriconazole concentration was noted in subgroup of patients who received the 200 mg dose (p=0.1,Figure 2) Conclusions: Our single center experience suggests there may not be a significant interaction between voriconazole and letermovir. Notably, patients receiving the 300 mg dose upfront may not require an additional dose increase to achieve a voriconazole trough within the recommended range despite the concomitant use of letermovir. Our group is collaborating with other centers to corroborate these findings, particularly in patients receiving the standard voriconazole prophylactic dose of 200 mg. Disclosures Grunwald: Forma Therapeutics:Research Funding;Agios:Consultancy;Abbvie:Consultancy;Trovagene:Consultancy;Daiichi Sankyo:Consultancy;Astellas:Consultancy;Daiichi Sankyo:Consultancy;Trovagene:Consultancy;Trovagene:Consultancy;Premier:Consultancy;Astellas:Consultancy;Astellas:Consultancy;Genentech/Roche:Research Funding;Premier:Consultancy;Genentech/Roche:Research Funding;Genentech/Roche:Research Funding;Premier:Consultancy;Janssen:Research Funding;Merck:Consultancy;Forma Therapeutics:Research Funding;Incyte:Consultancy, Research Funding;Celgene:Consultancy;Incyte:Consultancy, Research Funding;Incyte:Consultancy, Research Funding;Pfizer:Consultancy;Celgene:Consultancy;Celgene:Consultancy;Cardinal Health:Consultancy;Merck:Research Funding;Daiichi Sankyo:Consultancy;Agios:Consultancy;Abbvie:Consultancy;Merck:Consultancy;Amgen:Consultancy;Merck:Consultancy;Amgen:Consultancy;Abbvie:Consultancy;Pfizer:Consultancy;Amgen:Consultancy;Pfizer:Consultancy;Agios:Consultancy;Cardinal Health:Consultancy;Forma Therapeutics:Research Funding;Cardinal Health:Consultancy;Janssen:Research Funding.Ai:Incyte:Speakers Bureau;Celgene:Speakers Bureau.Knight:Foundation for Financial Planning:Research Funding.Chojecki:Incyte:Research Funding;Novartis:Other: Investigator Meeting Attendance.Avalos:Juno:Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;Best Practice-Br Med J:Patents & Royalties: receives royalties from a coauthored article on evaluation of neutropenia.Copelan:Amgen:Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.


Author(s):  
Roy F Chemaly ◽  
Lynn El Haddad ◽  
Drew J Winston ◽  
Scott D Rowley ◽  
Kathleen M Mulane ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection remains an important cause of morbidity and mortality in allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (allo-HCT) recipients. CMV cell-mediated immunity (CMV-CMI) as determined by a peptide-based enzyme-linked immunospot (ELISPOT) CMV assay may identify patients at risk for clinically significant CMV infection (CS-CMVi). Methods The CS-CMVi was defined as CMV viremia and/or disease necessitating antiviral therapy. CMV-CMI was characterized as high when the intermediate-early 1 (IE-1) antigen spot counts (SPCs) were >100 (cutoff 1) or when the IE-1 and phosphoprotein 65 antigen SPCs were both >100 SPCs per 250 000 cells (cutoff 2), and a low CMV-CMI when SPCs were below these thresholds. In this prospective multicenter study, we evaluated CMV-CMI every 2 weeks from the pretransplant period until 6 months posttransplantation in 241 allo-HCT recipients with positive CMV serostatus. The primary endpoint was CS-CMVi occurring within 2 weeks of the last measurement of CMV-CMI. Results CS-CMVi occurred in 70 allo-HCT recipients (29%). CMV-CMI was low in patients who experienced CS-CMVi (94%), whereas those who had a high CMV-CMI were less likely to have CS-CMVi (P < .0001). Patients with CS-CMVi had higher all-cause mortality (P = .007), especially those with low CMV-CMI (P = .035). On multivariable analysis, CMV-CMI, sex, race, antithymocyte globulin, and steroid use were independent predictors of CS-CMVi, and the time from transplant to engraftment was the only predictor of mortality. Conclusions Measurement of CMV-CMI using a novel ELISPOT assay would be useful clinically to monitor allo-HCT recipients and distinguish between those at risk of developing CS-CMVi and requiring antiviral prophylaxis or therapy and those who are protected.


Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 1950-1950 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brian T Hess ◽  
Feng Gao ◽  
John F. DiPersio ◽  
Peter Westervelt ◽  
Ravi Vij ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: The use of post-transplantation cyclophosphamide (PTCy) as a single agent for graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis in HLA matched transplant patients has had varied results. Two recent studies at Johns Hopkins University noted favorable incidences of both GVHD and non-relapse mortality (NRM) in both matched related and unrelated donor allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (allo-HCT) recipients (Kanakry CG, et al, JCO, 2013 and Kanakry CG et al, Blood, 2014). In contrast to this data, a phase II study at MD Anderson reported higher rates of grade II-IV acute GVHD and NRM, with worse overall survival in patients receiving PTCy as the sole GVHD prophylaxis compared to their matched cohort receiving a calcineurin-inhibitor (CNI) and methotrexate (MTX) as immunosuppression (Alousi AM et al, BBMT, 2015). Another study in Australia had to be stopped for safety reasons due to high GVHD and NRM when using PTCy as sole GVHD prophylaxis (Bradstock KF, BBMT, 2015). There is no published data on the use of MMF plus tacrolimus in combination with PTCy in HLA matched allo-HCT recipients. We hypothesized that addition of MMF and Tacrolimus to PTCy in HLA matched allo-HCT recipients will lead to significantly improved transplant outcomes. To answer this question we retrospectively analyzed data from patients who received this regimen at a single institution. Methods. We performed a retrospective analysis of 31 HLA matched allo-HCT patients who received PTCy at 50 mg/m2 on days +3 and +4 in addition to MMF and tacrolimus immunosuppression from December 2012 till June 2015 at Washington University School of Medicine in Saint Louis. All of these patients received G-CSF mobilized peripheral blood grafts. Patients included AML (n=13), ALL (n=5), MDS (n=5), CML (n=2), aplastic anemia (n=2) and NHL (n=1), myelofibrosis (n=1). Twelve of the patients underwent a matched related donor (MRD) transplant and 19 underwent a matched unrelated donor (MUD) transplant. Two of the MUD transplants had a HLA match grade of 8 of 10 and the other 17 were a 10 out of 10 match. Twenty-eight of the patients received a graft collected via peripheral blood stem cell mobilization and the other three had a donor graft collected via bone marrow harvest. Cumulative incidence of aGVHD was estimated using Gray's sub-distribution method to account for death without aGVHD as a competing event, and the cumulative incidences of non-relapse mortality (NRM) and relapse were estimated treating each other as competing event, while OS was estimated using Kaplan-Meier limit method. Results: This regimen was associated with acceptable GVHD in our patients. Incidence of grade II-IV acute GVHD was 28% (21.3% for MRD; 31.5% for MUD) at day 100 and 28% at 1 year. Incidence of Grade III-IV acute GVHD was 13.5% at both 100 days and 1 year. Limited chronic GVHD was 25.9% and extensive GVHD was 14.8% at 1 year. Similarly we found acceptable NRM and relapse in these patients, NRM was 10.2% and 19.7% at 100 days and 1 year respectively and cumulative incidence of relapse at 100 days and 1 year were 17.8% and 29.0% respectively. Overall survival at 1 year for all patients was 52%. Summary: Here we report favorable results from a regimen combining MMF and Tacrolimus on PTCy platform in HLA matched MRD and MUD transplant recipients. Relatively low GVHD and NRM results are particularly encouraging in view of almost exclusive use of G-CSF mobilized T cell replete grafts with much higher T cell content. Though limited by the relatively small number of patients, our results suggest combining MMF plus Tacrolimus with PTCy platform in HLA matched allogeneic transplant patients is safe and associated with acceptable transplant outcomes. Disclosures Vij: Onyx: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Millennium: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy; Sanofi: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Merck: Consultancy. Uy:Novartis: Research Funding. Abboud:Teva Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Gerson Lehman Group: Consultancy; Merck: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Schroeder:Celgene: Other: Azacitidine provided for this trial by Celgene; Incyte: Consultancy. Jacoby:Sunesis: Research Funding; Novo Nordisk: Consultancy.


Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 605-605
Author(s):  
Lisa J. McReynolds ◽  
Maryam Rafati ◽  
Youjin Wang ◽  
Bari Ballew ◽  
Valencia Owens ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: It is important to identify inherited bone marrow failure syndromes (IBMFS) in patients with aplastic anemia in order to provide appropriate therapy. IBMFS are diagnosed through genetic or other diagnostic testing but can also go unrecognized, particularly in adults who may lack classic IBMFS features. This is particularly critical in light of increasing identification of individuals with variants of uncertain significance (VUS) and those with single pathogenic variants in an autosomal recessive (AR) gene or X-linked recessive (XLR) gene in females (SPVR) ("carriers") during evaluation. In this study of patients diagnosed with acquired severe aplastic anemia (SAA), we evaluated putatively causal variants in IBMFS genes to determine the frequency of patients with an unrecognized IBMFS or SPVR and assessed their association with outcomes after hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT). Methods: We used pre-HCT blood samples and clinical data from the Transplant Outcomes in Aplastic Anemia study (TOAA; a collaboration between the National Cancer Institute and the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research). Germline whole exome sequencing was performed on 732 patients with acquired SAA who received HCT between 1991-2015. A total of 104 IBMFS genes, (51 autosomal dominant (AD), 46 AR, 3 both AR and AD, 4 XLR) were evaluated for both single nucleotide (SNV) and copy number variants (CNV). All variants were curated using ACMG/AMP criteria, and a subset were validated by Sanger sequencing. Variants classified as VUS according to ACMG/AMP criteria and with a damaging score prediction in 3 of 5 in silico meta-predictors were categorized as deleterious VUS. Patients were divided into 3 groups based on known inheritance patterns of identified genes into those with 1) unrecognized IBMFS 2) SPVR or 3) neither (presumed acquired SAA). For telomere biology genes with AD/AR inheritance, we used telomeres <10 th percentile for age (by qPCR) to distinguish IBMFS from SPVR. For statistical analysis, we used the Kaplan-Meier estimator to calculate the probability of overall survival. The log-rank test was used to compare the survival distribution across patient categories. Cox proportional hazard models were used for multivariable analysis. Results: We identified 309 variants of them 156 were pathogenic or likely pathogenic (P/LP) (112 (71.8%) loss of function SNVs, and 10 CNVs), and 153 were deleterious VUS. Patients with deleterious VUS did not have different survival compared with those with no variants, and these were not considered for designating unrecognized IBMFS and SPVR cases Our analysis showed that 6.7% (N=49/732) of patients had variants consistent with an unrecognized IBMFS; 22 were AR (21 compound heterozygous, 1 homozygous), 26 AD and 1 XLR. Approximately half of those patients (22/49, 45%) had P/LP variants in hematopoiesis genes, and 31% in telomere biology genes (Figure 1A). We identified 79 patients with an SPVR, most in SBDS and FANCM. Patients with an unrecognized IBMFS had worse overall survival when compared with patients with presumed acquired SAA (log-rank p=0.0098) (Figure 1B). Multivariable analysis confirmed this association (HR=2.11, 95% confidence interval (CI)=1.38-3.22, p=0.001). The observed survival difference was not mitigated by lower conditioning regimen intensity (HR=2.1, p=0.01 in myeloablative condition (MAC), and HR=2.3, p=0.016, in reduced intensity regimens (RIC)). Patients with an SPVR had no post-HCT survival difference than presumed acquired SAA regardless of conditioning regimen (overall HR=0.96, p=0.85; MAC HR=1.4, p=0.27; RIC HR=0.3, p=0.1). Conclusions: A sizable subset of patients (6.7%) with reported immune mediated acquired SAA had unrecognized inherited disorder and 33% were adults at HCT. Unrecognized IBMFS was associated with statistically significant poorer survival after HCT. In contrast, post-HCT survival in patients with an SPVR ("carriers") was not different than those with acquired SAA. This work underscores the importance of identifying SAA patients with clinically meaningful underlying inherited disorders to enable the use therapeutic approaches to minimize regimen toxicity and late complications. It further highlights that identification of a single pathogenic variant in an autosomal recessive gene or X-linked gene in females and VUS are associated with post-HCT survival similar to acquired SAA. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Paczesny: Medical University of South Carolina: Patents & Royalties: inventor on the ST2 bispecific antibody patent application. Lee: Kadmon: Research Funding; National Marrow Donor Program: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Research Funding; JANSSEN: Other; AstraZeneca: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; Novartis: Other: clinical trials, Research Funding; Syndax: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding.


Blood ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 104 (10) ◽  
pp. 3386-3392 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karen L. Syrjala ◽  
Sureyya Dikmen ◽  
Shelby L. Langer ◽  
Sari Roth-Roemer ◽  
Janet R. Abrams

Abstract Research indicates that myeloablative hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) impairs neurocognitive function. However, prospective studies on long-term effects are lacking. This longitudinal study examined neurocognitive changes over the first year in 142 adult recipients of allogeneic HC transplants who received neuropsychologic testing before transplantation and again after 80 days and 1 year. Age-, sex-, and education-adjusted population-based standardized scores were used for normative comparisons. Performance on all tests declined from before transplantation to 80 days (P < .05) and improved by 1 year (P < .05), returning to pretransplantation levels on all tests except for grip strength and motor dexterity. Although verbal fluency and memory recovered by 1 year, both were below norms at all 3 testing times (P < .01). Logistic regressions indicated that patients without chemotherapy, other than hydroxyurea, previous to HCT and patients not receiving chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) medication at 1 year had lower risk of impaired function (P < .05). In conclusion, HCT was associated with significant generalized decline in neurocognitive performance at 80 days, with subsequent recovery to pretransplantation levels by 1 year for most survivors, except on motor tasks. Results indicate that long-term cognitive decrements, as distinct from motor disabilities, infrequently derive directly from HCT. (Blood. 2004;104:3386-3392)


Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 4773-4773
Author(s):  
Mudit Dutta ◽  
Rahul Mhaskar ◽  
Hany Elmariah ◽  
Taiga Nishihori ◽  
Bijal Shah ◽  
...  

Introduction: Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (allo-HCT) is a curative treatment option for patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). Both total body irradiation(TBI)-based and chemotherapy only (non-TBI) transplant conditioning regimens have been utilized. But the optimal conditioning regimen for all-HCT in ALL remains unclear. We performed a systematic review to assess the totality of evidence pertaining to the efficacy of TBI-based vs- non-TBI conditioning regimens. Methods: We searched PubMed and Embase databases for all studies comparing TBI-based vs. non-TBI conditioning regimens in patients who received allo-HCT for ALL. Two authors independently reviewed all references for inclusion and extracted data related to overall survival (OS), progression free survival (PFS), non-relapse mortality (NRM), relapse, acute- and chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) whenever available. We restricted inclusion criteria to studies published only as peer-reviewed manuscripts which included ALL only patients (both T-ALL and B-ALL) who received a myeloablative conditioning; pediatric only studies were excluded. We also assessed outcomes in subgroups of patients 16 years of age and older which were majority of the included studies. Results: Seven studies were included in the final analysis that met our inclusion criteria. The quality assessment rating for each study was good based on its study type. The results for all patients in these observational studies revealed that TBI-based regimen was significantly favorable (all p<.05) to non-TBI conditioning regimen with regards to OS (HR=0.74, 95% CI [0.62, 0.88], 6 studies, 4300 patients), PFS (HR=0.72, 95% CI [0.61, 0.85], 6 studies, 4300 patients), and relapse (RR=0.73, 95% CI [0.61, 0.86], 5 studies, 4664 patients). The TBI-based regimen did not increase (all p>.05) the risks of NRM (RR=1.09, 95% CI [0.75, 1.58], 6 studies, 4251 patients), grade II-IV acute GVHD (RR=1.11, 95% CI [0.90, 1.36], 5 studies, 4725 patients) or grade III-IV acute GVHD (RR=1.20, 95% CI [0.89, 1.63], 2 studies, 3248 patients). However, TBI-based regimen increased the risk of chronic GVHD (RR=1.12, 95% CI [1.02, 1.23], 5 studies, 4219 patients). Subgroup comparison of patients 16 years of age and older (range 16-70) showed similar results as shown in Table 1a-d. Conclusion: This meta-analysis represents evidence supporting the use of TBI-based conditioning regimens for allo-HCT in patients with ALL as it offers significantly lower risk of relapse and better survival yet acceptable NRM as compared to non-TBI regimens. Disclosures Nishihori: Karyopharm: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding. Shah:Celgene/Juno: Honoraria; Kite/Gilead: Honoraria; Incyte: Research Funding; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Honoraria; Adaptive Biotechnologies: Honoraria; Spectrum/Astrotech: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; AstraZeneca: Honoraria. Bejanyan:Kiadis Pharma: Other: advisory board.


Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 996-996 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tami D John ◽  
Madeleine Lu ◽  
Celeste K. Kanne ◽  
Minke A.E. Rab ◽  
Richard van Wijk ◽  
...  

Introduction: Mixed donor chimerism (MDC) occurs in nearly 35% of patients with sickle cell disease (SCD) post allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (alloHCT). Donor myeloid engraftment of &gt;20% is considered necessary to support disease resolution. However, in a disease known for its clinical variability, we hypothesize that patients (pts) with a severe pre-HCT phenotype may have abnormal RBC rheology at a level of chimerism and %HbS believed to be consistent with a cure. RBC rheology is markedly abnormal in SCD; these abnormalities are associated with SCD related clinical complications. Even fully oxygenated, sickle RBC are less deformable than those of HbAA or HbAS individuals; upon deoxygenation, deformability further declines. Sickle RBC morphology reflects the tendency to polymerize, with characteristic sickle forms. Sickle RBC are more adherent to the endothelial cell lining of the vasculature than HbAA or HbAS RBCs. The goal of any cell-based therapy of curative intent should be normalize the red cell rheology. To determine if the rheology of blood from SCD pts post-HCT with varying degrees of donor chimerism fall into the HbSS range of values, we propose to functionally assess the peripheral blood from a series of 6 post alloHCT SCD patients using a battery of rheological tests measuring deformability, sickling, adherence, percent dense cells (%DRBC), and RBC morphology. Methods: Peripheral blood samples (EDTA) from 6 SCD pts post alloHCT with a matched sibling donor were collected and immediately analyzed using oxygenscan (Lorrca), artificial microvascular network (AMVN), microfluidic image acquisition, and an ADVIA hematology analyzer. The Lorrca with oxygenscan measures RBC deformability (elongation index EI), under a range of pO2 (150-0 mmHg). EImax is the deformability of the oxygenated sickle RBC; EImin is the deformability of deoxygenated RBCs. The point of sickling (PoS) is the pO2 at which RBC deformability rapidly declines. RBC adhesiveness is measured by the difference in rate of perfusion of RBC through the AVMN coated with adhesive proteins (adherent AVMN) and a non-adherent, uncoated AVMN. %DRBC was measured by an ADVIA hematology analyzer. Microscopic RBC images were acquired and classified to determine the fraction of sickled RBCs in well-oxygenated samples. Additional clinical data including Hb profile, donor chimerism, and symptoms were obtained via chart review. Reference ranges were generated as described above using n=45 HbSS samples ages 2-21, on hydroxyurea, chronic transfusion, or untreated; n=14 HbAS, and n=43 HbAA. Results: In Figure 1, we show the measurements obtained by the Lorrca with oxygenscan on 5 pts post-alloHCT with a range of donor chimerism, as well as typical values for HbAA, HbAS, and HbSS patients. Patient 1 and 3 exhibit normal rheology; both were transplanted with a HbAA donor, with high chimerism and no detectable HbS. Patient 2 has 40% whole blood chimerism, well above the 20% threshold described with myeloid chimerism, and a HbS less than 50%, yet their plot resembles that of an untransplanted HbSS pt; the donor to Patient 2 exhibits the expected HbAA deformability. Patients 5 and 6 exhibit rheology in the HbAS range; they have intermediate chimerism from a HbAS donor. Clinical details and biomarker panel values for all 6 pts analyzed are in Table 1, as well as ranges of values for HbSS and HbAS subjects generated in the Sheehan and Shevkoplyas labs. Patient 2 is the only subject with values in the HbSS range, and the only subject with SCD symptoms. Conclusions: Our rheological tests identified a pt with values consistent with a HbSS pt of moderate severity or treated with hydroxyurea despite variable donor chimerism above the 20% threshold and HbS &lt;50% thought to be sufficient for cure. The pt reported pain events beginning two years prior, indicating a clinical correlation supporting the validity of the rheological tests we propose to use to distinguish cure from persistent SCD. Current post-HCT evaluation depends on chimerism and hemoglobin profiles, and would not detect the significant functional abnormalities visible by Lorrca with oxygenscan biomarkers that indicate that Patient 2 is at risk for SCD related complications. Our results suggest that this functional analysis may help with management of post alloHCT SCD pts, and may be even more essential to assessing new gene-based therapy approaches to curing patients with SCD. Disclosures Rab: RR Mechatronics: Research Funding. van Wijk:Agios Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Research Funding; RR Mechatronics: Research Funding. Shevkoplyas:SSS: Research Funding; New Health Sciences: Consultancy.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document