Sequential Approach with Bortezomib as Induction Before Autologous Transplantation, Followed by Lenalidomide as Consolidation-Maintenance in Untreated Multiple Myeloma Patients.

Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 3419-3419 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francesca Gay ◽  
Patrizia Falco ◽  
Claudia Crippa ◽  
Anna Marina Liberati ◽  
Francesca Patriarca ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Advisory Committee ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Autologous Transplantation ◽  
Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Sequential Approach ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Abstract 3419 Poster Board III-307 Background Bortezomib induction before autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) has shown its efficacy in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM) patients, both in association with dexamethasone alone (Harousseau JL, et al. Blood 110, 2007, abstr 450) and in combination with doxorubicin and dexamethasone (Popat R, et al. Br J Haematol 141:512-516, 2008). Lenalidomide, a less toxic and more potent thalidomide-derivative, lacks the neurotoxic effects of the parent drug and represents an optimal agent to include in maintenance regimens. Aims These observations provided the rationale for investigating a sequential approach including bortezomib as induction and lenalidomide as consolidation-maintenance in MM patients undergoing ASCT. Methods A hundred and two newly diagnosed patients aged 65–75 years were enrolled in 17 Italian centers. Induction (PAD) included four 21-day cycles of bortezomib (1.3 mg/m2 days 1,4,8,11), pegylated-liposomal-doxorubicin (30 mg/m2 day 4), and dexamethasone (40 mg/day: cycle 1, days 1–4, 8–11, 15–18; cycles 2–4, days 1–4). Autologous transplantation was tandem melphalan 100 mg/m2 (MEL100) followed by stem-cell support. After ASCT, patients received consolidation with four 28-day cycles of lenalidomide (25 mg/day days 1–21 every 28 days) plus prednisone (50 mg every other day) (LP), followed by maintenance (L) with lenalidomide alone (10 mg/day days 1–21 every 28 days) until relapse. Primary endpoints were safety (incidence of grade 3–4 adverse events [AEs]) and efficacy (response rate). Secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Time-to-event estimates analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Results Very good partial response (VGPR) or better was 58% after PAD induction and increased to 82% after MEL100 and to 86% during LP-L. Complete response (CR) rate was 13% after PAD induction, increased to 38% after MEL100 and to 66% during LP-L. After a median follow-up of 2 years, the 2-year PFS was 69%, the 2-year time-to-progression was 75% and the 2-year OS was 86%. During PAD induction, main grade 3–4 AEs were thrombocytopenia (17%), neutropenia (10%), peripheral neuropathy (16%), and pneumonia (10%); treatment-related mortality was 3%. During consolidation-maintenance grade 3–4 AEs included neutropenia (16%), thrombocytopenia (6%), pneumonia (5%), and cutaneous rash (4%). Consolidation-maintenance treatment was well tolerated: only 4% of patients required Granulocyte-colony stimulating factor support and no patient required platelet transfusion; dermatological toxicity was easily manageable with dose-reduction and supportive therapy; no treatment-related deaths were reported. Updated results will be presented at the meeting. Conclusion This is the first phase II study in newly diagnosed MM patients to date, where a sequential approach including bortezomib as induction, and lenalidomide as post ASCT consolidation-maintenance was explored. Treatment was correlated with an increase in response rate and in the depth of response (CR rate) and was generally well tolerated. These data suggest that this is a safe and effective regimen for newly diagnosed MM patients. Randomized trials are needed to confirm these results. Disclosures Patriarca: Celgene: Honoraria; Janssen Cilag: Honoraria. Bringhen:Celgene: Honoraria; Janssen Cilag: Honoraria. Boccadoro:Janssen Cilag : Consultant, advisory committee, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultant, advisory committee, Research Funding; Pharmion: Consultant, advisory committee, Research Funding. Palumbo:Celgene: Honoraria; Janssen Cilag: Honoraria.

The Combination of the Proteasome Inhibitor Bortezomib with Doxorubicin and Dexamethasone (PAD Regimen) as Front-Line Therapy In Newly Diagnosed, High-Risk Multiple Myeloma: Results of a Phase II Prospective Multicenter Study

Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 3052-3052 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ioannis Baltathakis ◽  
Evangelos Terpos ◽  
Sosana Delimpasi ◽  
Konstantinos Liapis ◽  
Fotios Panitsas ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Peripheral Neuropathy ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Front Line ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Cell Harvest

Abstract Abstract 3052 The combination of bortezomib, doxorubicin, and dexamethasone (PAD) has shown efficacy in both relapsed/refractory and untreated, symptomatic multiple myeloma (MM). The activity of this regimen is largely attributed to the recognized synergy between bortezomib and doxorubicin. Bortezomib is capable of reversing resistance to chemotherapy in MM with adverse prognostic features (high-risk myeloma), which has an unfavorable outcome with conventional chemotherapy followed by high-dose therapy and autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). In addition, disease status prior to ASCT has prognostic significance for survival, underscoring the need for highly efficient remission induction strategies. In a prospectively designed phase II trial, we focused on the efficacy and safety of the PAD combination as front-line treatment for high-risk myeloma. The study recruited patients aged ≤70 years with newly diagnosed, symptomatic MM with high-risk features (defined by at least one of the following criteria: ISS stage II/III according to serum albumin and beta2-microglobulin, and/or detection of 13q deletion by FISH or conventional karyotyping). Between 2005 and 2008, 40 patients were enrolled in the protocol. The median age of patients was 59 years (range: 41–70 years), and 27 (67.5%) were male. Each 21-day cycle of PAD included bortezomib 1.3 mg/m2 on days 1, 4, 8, and 11 plus doxorubicin 9 mg/m2 on days 1–4, and dexamethasone 40 mg on days 1–4 and 8–11. According to protocol, patients received 4 induction cycles of PAD before proceeding to stem cell harvest and ASCT. Acyclovir and ciprofloxacin prophylaxis were routinely used. Patients were evaluated for toxicity at each cycle and for response after the end of the fourth cycle. The primary study endpoint was the response rate at the end of induction (assessed by the International Myeloma Working Group uniform response criteria, 2006). Secondary endpoints were toxicity, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), ability to mobilize stem cells, and response after ASCT. ISS stage was I in 2 patients (5%), II in 18 (45%), and III in 20 (50%). Nine out of 40 patients (22.5%) presented with renal failure (creatinine >2mg/dl) due to myeloma at diagnosis. Deletion 13q was detected in 19 patients. Bone disease was present in 30 patients (75%) at diagnosis, and 19 (47.5%) had ≥3 lytic lesions on plain skeleton radiograms. Median patient follow-up time was 28.3 months (range, 1.4–49.3). All patients completed the 4 cycles of PAD, with the exception of one who died during the 2nd cycle. The overall response rate assessed after the 4th cycle of PAD was 95%. Complete remission (CR) was achieved in 12/39 (31%), very good partial remission (VGPR) in 15/39 (38.5%), and PR in 10/39 (25.5%). Thirty-one patients were considered eligible for ASCT, and an adequate stem cell harvest was achieved in all. Following ASCT, CR rate reached 52% (16/31) with a CR+VGPR rate of 84% (26/31). PFS was 67% at 2.1 years, and calculated OS was 81.4% at 4 years (Figures 1 and 2). Factors associated with shorter OS were beta2-microglobulin ≥5.5 mg/L (p=0.03), and ISS stage III (p=0.03). By assessment of the glomerular filtration rate (GFR), a significant improvement in renal function was demonstrated after induction with PAD (median GFR pre- and post-induction: 59.7 versus 82.1 ml/min, respectively; p<0.001). Improvement in kidney function was observed irrespective of the type of response. There was only one treatment-related death secondary to infection. Toxicities were manageable in general, and included grade 3–4 neutropenia in 8/40 patients (20%), grade 3–4 thrombocytopenia in 4/40 (10%), and grade 3 peripheral neuropathy in 4/40 (10%). No grade 4 peripheral neuropathy was encountered. We conclude that the PAD regimen is very effective, and produces high-quality responses in a substantial proportion of patients with newly diagnosed, high-risk MM (CR+VGPR: 69.5%). PAD is well tolerated and does not compromise stem cell mobilization and harvest. Upfront treatment with 4 cycles of PAD followed by ASCT resulted in notable PFS and OS rates in this patient group with adverse-prognosis MM. PAD was shown to be particularly beneficial in patients with renal impairment at diagnosis due to myeloma. Disclosures: Baltathakis: Janssen-Cilag: Research Funding. Terpos:Janssen-Cilag: Honoraria. Delimpasi:Janssen-Cilag: Research Funding. Dimopoulos:Janssen-Cilag: Honoraria. Harhalakis:Janssen-Cilag: Research Funding.

A Phase II Study of PS-341 for Patients with High Risk, Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma: A Trial of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (E2A02).

Blood ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 106 (11) ◽  
pp. 2546-2546 ◽  
Author(s):  
Angela Dispenzieri ◽  
Emily Blood ◽  
David Vesole ◽  
Rafael Fonseca ◽  
Natalie Callander ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Peripheral Neuropathy ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Partial Response ◽  
Progressive Disease ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Cell Labeling ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Background: Multiple myeloma (MM) is an incurable disease with a anticipated overall survival (OS) ranging from months to decades. Modest improvements in OS have been made with high-dose chemotherapy with peripheral blood stem cell transplant (PBSCT), but to date prognostic factors have a greater impact on OS than do individual therapies. Patients with adverse risk factors such as elevated beta-2 microglobulin (B2M), plasma cell labeling index, deletions of the long arm of chromosome 13 by metaphase cytogenetics (del 13q) require innovative new treatment strategies. Bortezomib has significant activity in patients with both newly diagnosed and relapsed/refractory MM, but its specific role in patients with adverse features has not yet been defined. Methods: Patients with newly diagnosed “high-risk” myeloma (B2M ≥ 5.5., PCLI ≥ 1, or del 13q) and adequate organ and functional status were eligible. Patients were treated with bortezomib 1.3 mg/m2 day 1, 4, 8, and 11 every 21 days for 8 cycles as induction. After induction, patients were scheduled to receive bortezomib 1.3 mg/m2 every other week indefinitely. Elective peripheral stem cell mobilization (growth factor alone) was allowed after 4 cycles of bortezomib. Patients relapsing on maintenance schedule were to have the full induction schedule resumed. Responses were by the EBMT criteria but a very good partial response category was included. The primary end-point was the response rate in these high-risk patients (90% power to detect a response rate of 50% or higher). The study decision rule requires that 16 or more responses, among 39 eligible patients, are seen in order to declare this treatment effective. Results: Between March 15, 2004 and March 10, 2005, 44 patients enrolled on study. Among the 43 eligible patients, median age was 63; 51% were male. All patients had high risk disease: del 13q (6/41); plasma cell labeling index ≥1% (16/34); and B2M≥5.5 (34/43). Preliminary response data are available for 18 of the 44 cases enrolled, of which 7 had partial response, 1 had minimal response, 1 had no response, 2 had progressive disease, and 5 were unevaluable. Among those patients completing induction therapy and with response information, the median number of cycles of therapy administered is 5, range (0,8). The most common non-hematologic adverse events (AEs) of grade 3 or higher included hyponatremia (9 patients) and diarrhea (6 patients). Mild sensory peripheral neuropathy was common: grade 1, 16 patients; grade 2, 2 patients. Only 1 patient had grade 3 peripheral neuropathy. One patient died after receiving 2 doses bortezomib due to heart block and asystole. Two patients had a grade 4, 25 patients had grade 3, and 13 had grade 1 or 2 as the worst grade non-hematologic adverse event. Based on data received by August 1, 2005, 18 patients have gone off study: AEs (2); death (1); progressive disease (9); and other reasons (6). Updated results on the full study population along with FISH data for IgH translocations and deletions of 13q and 17p will be presented at the meeting. Conclusions: Preliminary results suggest that upfront bortezomib has activity in patients with high-risk MM, but further follow-up is required.

Frontline Therapy with Bortezomib, Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone (VRD) Induction Followed by Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation, VRD Consolidation and Lenalidomide Maintenance In Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Patients: Primary Results of the IFM 2008 Phase II Study

Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 624-624 ◽  
Author(s):  
Murielle Roussel ◽  
Hervé Avet-Loiseau ◽  
Philippe Moreau ◽  
Anne Huynh ◽  
Lotfi Benboubker ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cell ◽  
Stem Cell Transplantation ◽  
Cell Transplantation ◽  
Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Stem Cell Collection

Abstract Abstract 624 Background: Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation (ASCT) is a standard of care for eligible MM patients (pts). Introduction of new drugs in this setting have markedly increased survival rates within the last 10 years. Efforts to further improve response and survival in those pts are still needed, mainly by increasing the depth of tumor reduction and the duration of response through more effective induction, consolidation and maintenance therapies. Therefore, the IFM (Intergroupe Francophone du Myélome) decided to evaluate the Bortezomib (Bor), Lenalidomide (Len) and Dexamethasone (Dex) regimen as induction and consolidation therapy followed by Len maintenance in the transplant setting for newly diagnosed pts. Methods: This open-label phase II study was conducted at 10 IFM transplant centers, with enrollment between September and December 2009. Pts under 65 with symptomatic de novo MM were enrolled to receive three 21-day induction cycles of VRD= Bor 1.3 mg/m2 (days 1, 4, 8, 11), Len 25 mg (days 1–14), and oral Dex 40 mg (days 1, 8 and 14). Stem cell collection was planned for all pts after high dose cyclophosphamide (3g/m2). All pts then proceeded to intensification prepared with melphalan 200 mg/m2 followed by ASCT. Two months after hematological recovery, pts could receive two 21-day consolidation cycles of VRD (same schedule) followed by 1 year of maintenance with Len at 10–15 mg/day. All patients received, unless contraindicated, aspirin prophylaxis or alternative anticoagulation for prevention of deep-vein thrombosis (DVT), anti-viral therapy (valacyclovir) for herpes zoster prevention. Pts with ≥ grade 2 peripheral neuropathy (PNY) were excluded. The primary endpoint was the best response achieved 1 month after consolidation. The secondary endpoints were the response rate after 3 cycles of VRD, after ASCT and after consolidation; the safety profile of the program, the feasibility and quality of stem cell collection and dthe uration of response (DOR), PFS, OS. Response was assessed according to International Uniform Response Criteria including stringent Complete Response (sCR). Flow cytometric analysis of bone marrow plasma cells was performed before and after ASCT, and after consolidation. Toxicities were graded using the CTCAEv4. Patients: Thirty-one pts with symptomatic MM were enrolled. Baseline characteristics of the pts were: median age = 58 (range 33–65); 55% were women; 55%/32%/13% had IgG/IgA/light chain MM; ISS= 1 in 52%, 2 in 32% and 3 in 16% of pts; chromosome 13q deletion in 41% over 27 assessable pts; chromosome 17p del in 18% and t(4;14) translocation in 11%. Results: All pts but one remain on study program at data cut-off (01/08/10). The one pt had discontinued treatment at time of ASCT due to mobilization failure. Therefore, 31 pts are evaluable for response rates after induction therapy, 30 after ASCT and 13 after consolidation. All results are summarized in table 1. In Intent To Treat analysis, the overall response rate (ORR) after ASCT was 94%, including 32% VGPR, 13% CR and 23% sCR. Nine serious AEs were reported. There was no treatment-related mortality. The most common toxicities were: sensory PNY (45%), including 29% grade 1 and 16% grade 2; neuropathic pain (13%); GI tract symptoms (42%) including diarrhea (16%) and constipation (10%); fatigue (10%) and erythrodermia (9%). There was no grade 3/4 PNY. Grade 3/4 hematological toxicities included neutropenia (26%), and thrombocytopenia (6%). No DVT or pulmonary embolism was reported.Six of 31 pts (19%) have had difficulty with mobilization but only 1 pt did not undergo ASCT. Stem cell collection with plerixafor was successful in 4 pts. Median stem cell collection was 7.7 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg. Conclusions: VRD induction followed by ASCT and VRD consolidation produce high quality responses and is well tolerated in newly diagnosed MM pts under 65. Updated efficacy and safety data will be presented at the meeting. Disclosures: Roussel: Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding, orator; Celgene: Consultancy, Orator, Research Funding. Off Label Use: bortezomib, lenalidomide as induction and consolidation therapies in frontline MM pts. Leleu:Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Janssen Cilag: Consultancy, Research Funding; Leo Pharma: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; Chugai: Research Funding; Roche: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding. Facon:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Attal:celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; johnson and johnson: Consultancy, Research Funding.

Results From the Phase II Dose Expansion of Cyclophosphamide, Carfilzomib, Thalidomide and Dexamethasone (CYCLONE) in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 445-445 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph R. Mikhael ◽  
Craig B. Reeder ◽  
Edward N. Libby ◽  
Luciano J. Costa ◽  
P. Leif Bergsagel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Initial Phase ◽  
Stem Cell Transplant ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Phase Ii Trial ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Abstract 445 Background: Carfilzomib is a proteasome inhibitor that irreversibly binds its target and has a favorable toxicity profile that has shown significant activity in relapsed multiple myeloma (MM), leading to recent FDA accelerated approval. To achieve rapid and deep response in patients eligible for stem cell transplant, we combined carfilzomib with the regimen of cyclophosphamide-thalidomide-dexamethasone (CTD). We recently reported the results of the Phase I component of the trial (in which no MTD was reached) followed by the initial Phase II trial; however, with increasing evidence for the safe and effective use of higher doses of carfilzomib, we now report results from dose escalation extension of the Phase II trial. Methods: Newly diagnosed myeloma patients intended for stem cell transplant were eligible. All patients were treated on a 28 day cycle with Carfilzomib IV Days 1,2,8,9,15,16 (see Table 1 below for dosing per cohort) along with Cyclophosphamide 300 mg/m2 PO Days 1,8,15, Thalidomide 100 mg PO Days 1–28 and Dexamethasone 40 mg PO Days 1,8,15,22. We initially conducted a Phase I run in trial of 6 patients with no DLT observed before expanding to the Phase II portion of the study. The initial phase II regimen is shown below – as no DLTs were observed, we have now fully accrued to the Phase II dose level +1. Treatment was for 4 cycles with expected SCT post induction. The primary endpoint of the trial is the proportion of patients who have ≥very good partial response (VGPR) to treatment. All patients received herpes zoster prophylaxis and ASA daily. Results: A total of 38 patients have been accrued to the trial, 6 in the initial Phase 1, 21 in the initial Phase II, and the remaining at dose escalated cohorts. We are reporting the 27 patients who have completed therapy and will update with the dose escalated cohorts. Median age was 65 (range 27–74) and 52% were female. ISS Stage was advanced (II-III) in 56%. Best overall response rate during 4 cycles of CYCLONE at dose level 0 is 96%: CR 29%, VGPR 46%, PR 21% (1 pt achieved MR). Adverse events of grade 3 or higher at least possibly related to CYCLONE occurred in 12 (44%). Most commonly reported non hematological toxicities (all grades) included fatigue (67%), constipation (56%), lethargy (41%) somnolence (37%), malaise (30%) depressed level of consciousness (22%); however, grade 3/4 toxicities occurring in >5% were uncommon: thromboembolic event 11%) and muscle weakness (7%). Two cases of pneumonia required hospitalization. Eight patients (30%) developed grade 1 sensory neuropathy; no higher grade or painful neuropathy was evident. There were no cardiac events seen in greater than 5% of patients. Grade 3/4 hematological toxicities included neutropenia (15%) and lymphopenia (7%). All patients advancing to SCT successfully collected stem cells. One patient died on study from pneumonia. Conclusion: The 4 drug CYCLONE regimen is highly efficaceous with a response rate after only 4 cycles of 96% (75% ≥VGPR, 29% CR) at the current dosing level of carfilzomib IV 20/27 mg/m2 in newly diagnosed myeloma. Toxicities are manageable, with only grade 1 neuropathy and minimal cardiac or pulmonary toxicity. Increasing the dose of carfilzomib is feasible and updated results of dose escalated cohorts will be reported at 20/36 and 20/45 mg/m2. Disclosures: Bergsagel: onyx: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Stewart:Millennium Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Onyx: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy.

A Multicenter, Open Label Study of Oral Lenalidomide and Prednisone (RP) Followed by Oral Lenalidomide Melphalan and Prednisone (MPR) and Oral Lenalidomide Maintenance In Newly Diagnosed Elderly Multiple Myeloma Patients

Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 1940-1940 ◽  
Author(s):  
Antonio Palumbo ◽  
Patrizia Falco ◽  
Giulia Benevolo ◽  
Davide Rossi ◽  
Angelo Michele Carella ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Partial Response ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Dose Level ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Autologous Transplantation ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Level 2

Abstract Abstract 1940 The combination of Melphalan-Prednisone-Lenalidomide (MPR) has shown promising results in elderly newly diagnosed myeloma patients. In the transplant setting, low-dose chemotherapy (induction) precedes high-dose chemotherapy (autologous transplantation consolidation). This approach reduces tumor mass, with few side effects, before achieving the maximum cyto-reduction with autologous transplantation. The same approach has been designed for the elderly patients. Accordingly induction with lenalidomide plus corticosteroids precedes consolidation with MPR. A two-stage phase II clinical trial was planned to evaluate the safety and efficacy of Lenalidomide-Prednisone (RP) as induction, followed by Melphalan-Prednisone-Lenalidomide (MPR) as consolidation and Lenalidomide as maintenance in elderly myeloma patients. Unfit patients with newly diagnosed symptomatic myeloma older than 65 years were enrolled. No exclusion criteria were included in the protocol, to avoid the selection of fit elderly subjects only. Patients with low blood count, abnormal performance status, hepatic, renal, cardiac or pulmonary functions were enrolled. Patients received 4 RP courses (Lenalidomide 25 mg/day for 21 days every 4 weeks, plus Prednisone 50 mg three times/week for 4 weeks) followed by 6 MPR cycles (Melphalan 2 mg and Prednisone 50 mg three times/week, for 4 weeks plus Lenalidomide 10–15 mg/day for 21 days every 4 weeks) and maintenance with Lenalidomide alone (10 mg/day for 21 days every 4 weeks). Two different dose-levels of Lenalidomide were tested in combination with MP: 15 mg (dose-level 1) and 10 mg (dose-level 2). Each cohort included 12 patients, with additional 22 patients enrolled at dose-level 2. Patients were evaluated for efficacy and toxicity after completion of at least 2 MPR cycles. Forty-six patients (median age 75, range 65–88) were enrolled. Thirty-six patients were evaluable after a median of 7 cycles and a median follow-up of 8.5 months. During RP induction, the most frequent grade 3–4 hematological adverse events were neutropenia (19%), anemia (11 %), thrombocytopenia (6%). During MPR consolidation, grade 3–4 adverse events were neutropenia (45%), and thrombocytopenia (3%). Neutropenia was increased by the addition of melphalan, but both thrombocytopenia and anemia were reduced. Non-hematological toxicities were more frequent during RP cycles and reduced during MPR cycles (cutaneous rash and infections). After RP induction, at least partial response (PR) rate was 67%, at least very good partial response (VGPR) was 17%. After 2 MPR cycles, PR rate increase to 72%, including 22% of patients who achieved at least a VGPR. Conclusions. Induction with RP followed by consolidation with MPR showed a manageable safety profile and reduced the risk of anemia, thrombocytopenia and non-hematological toxicity in unfit elderly myeloma patients. These data will be updated at the meeting. Disclosures: Palumbo: Celgene Srl: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janseen-Cilag: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Off Label Use: Lenalidomide in combination with melphalan for multiple myeloma patients at diagnosis. Guglielmelli:Celgene: Honoraria; Janseen-Cilag: Honoraria. Gay:Celgene: Honoraria. Cavallo:Celgene: Honoraria. Boccadoro:Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janseen-Cilag: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding.

Bortezomib-Based Therapy without Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation for Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Patients with t(4;14): A Canadian National Trial,

Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 3982-3982
Author(s):  
Donna E. Reece ◽  
Giovanni Piza Rodriguez ◽  
David Szwajcer ◽  
Leonard A Minuk ◽  
Mariela Pantoja ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Bone Marrow ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Maintenance Therapy ◽  
Disease Progression ◽  
Induction Therapy ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Newly Diagnosed

Abstract Abstract 3982 Newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM) patients (pts) with t(4;14) identified by FISH who undergo a single ASCT after older induction regimens have a median progression-free survival (PFS) of only 8–9 months (mos) and median overall survival (OS) of 18 mos (Chang H, et al. Bone Marrow Transplan t 2005; 36: 793; Gertz M, et al. Blood 2005; 106: 2837). Given the efficacy of bortezomib in t(4;14) disease, we designed a phase II study based on this agent in which ASCT was not performed as part of first-line therapy. Pts received induction therapy with four 21-day cycles of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin 30 mg/m2on day 4, bortezomib 1.3 mg/m2on days 1, 4, 8, 11 and dexamethasone 40 mg on days 1–4, 8–11, 15–18 of cycle 1 and on days 1–4 and 11–14 of cycles 2–4 (DBD), followed by post-induction therapy with eight 28-day cycles of oral cyclophosphamide 300 mg/m2on days 1, 8, 15, 22, bortezomib 1.5 mg/m2 on days 1,8,15 and prednisone 100 mg q 2 days (CyBor-P). Maintenance therapy with dexamethasone 40 mg/weekly was then administered until disease progression. Although elective stem cell collection was recommended after induction therapy, routine ASCT was not performed in the absence of disease progression. Between February 2008-May 2011, 383 newly diagnosed MM pts were screened for t(4;14) in 8 Canadian centers, and 43 (11.2%) were found to be positive by FISH. Five did not meet the CRAB criteria for symptomatic MM, 7 were ineligible, 3 declined participation and 28 were entered onto study. One of these was later determined to have a variant abnormality of chromosome 4, but not t(4;14), and underwent ASCT after induction therapy; this pt is included in the safety analysis only. The median age was 60 years (range 42–69) and 63% were male. The median percent of nuclei positive for t(4;14) by FISH in the initial bone marrow (unpurified) was 26% (range 2–62), serum β2-microglobulin 239 nmol/L (range 43–1695) and albumin 36 g/L (range 28–48); ten pts had ISS stage 1,10 had stage 2 and 7 had stage 3 MM. Immunoglobulin subtype included IgGκ in 7, IgAκ in 6, IgAλ in 6, IgGλ in 5 and IgMλ in 1. Using modified uniform criteria, the best response in 23 evaluable pts includes: sCR in 6 (26%), CR in 4 (17%), VGPR in 9 (39%), PR in 2 (9%) and SD in 2 (9%). Median F/U is 13.5 mos (range 1.2–35); 6 have progressed at median of 3 mos on study (range 1–11). Four pts have died (due to progression in 3 and complex medical problems/consent withdrawal in 1 in VGPR). SAEs were reported in 7 pts; only 6 pts (21%) developed grade 2 peripheral neuropathy, which necessitated dose reductions of bortezomib in 4. The actuarial 2-yr PFS is 47.7% (95%CI 25.9–87.9%), median PFS is 23. 2 months and 2-yr OS is 76.8% (95%CI 58.3–100%); the median OS has not yet been reached. We conclude: 1) the incidence of t(4;14) by FISH in newly-diagnosed MM pts is 11.2%; which appears to be lower than the 15% anticipated 2) 11.6% of these are asymptomatic; 3) this bortezomib-based regimen is well-tolerated; 4) the overall response rate (sCR + CR + VGPR + PR) is 91% with 82% achieving ≥ VGPR and 43% ≥ CR; 5) the PFS and OS with this approach compare favorably with those seen with older studies of single or double ASCT, and even with some recently reported trials using more modern induction regimens before ASCT, in pts with t(4;14); and 6) the use of more effective maintenance therapy, including agents targeting the aberrations associated with t(4;14), would be of interest in future trials. Disclosures: Reece: Millennium: Research Funding; Otsuka: Honoraria, Research Funding; Merck: Honoraria, Research Funding; Johnson&Johnson: Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Bristol, Meyers, Squibb: Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria. Off Label Use: Bortezomib regimens other than VMP (boretzomib, melphalan and prednisone)for initial therapy of myeloma. Piza Rodriguez:Celgene: Unrestricted educational grant; Otsuka: Honoraria. Belch:Ortho/Janssen: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria. White:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Ortho/Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding. Chen:Celgene: Research Funding. Kukreti:Celgene: Honoraria.

An open-label, single arm, phase IIa study of bortezomib, lenalidomide, dexamethasone, and elotuzumab in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 8002-8002 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jacob Laubach ◽  
Ajay K. Nooka ◽  
Craig Cole ◽  
Elizabeth O'Donnell ◽  
Ravi Vij ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Respiratory Failure ◽  
Partial Response ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Grade 3

8002 Background: Elotuzumab (elo) is approved for use in combination with lenalidomide (len) and dexamethasone (dex) for relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (MM). This phase 2a study evaluated the efficacy and safety of elo in combination with len, subcutaneous bortezomib (bortez), and dex. Methods: The primary objective of this study was to determine the response rate of newly diagnosed, transplant-eligible MM patients (pts) after four cycles of therapy with elo plus len, bortez, and dex. Pts were newly diagnosed with MM by the revised IMWG criteria. Elo was administered days 1, 8, and 15 of the first two 28 day cycles and days 1 and 11 in cycles 3 and 4. Following cycle 4, pts underwent stem cell mobilization and could then proceed with either autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) or defer transplant and receive four more cycles of induction therapy with elo plus len, bortez, and dex. Following either ASCT or 8 cycles of induction chemotherapy, pts transitioned to risk-adapted maintenance with elo, len, and dex plus every other week bortez (pts with high-risk cytogenetics, ISS stage II or III) or elo, len, dex (all others). Responses were assessed by the modified Uniform Response Criteria and toxicities graded based on NCI-CTCAE V4. Results: 41 patients with a median age of 60 were enrolled and this analysis encompasses response data from 29 patients. The overall response rate (ORR) after four cycles was 100%, with 24% achieving a complete response (CR), 47% achieving a very good partial response (VGPR), and 29% a partial response (PR). The rate of VGPR or better was 71%. The median number of CD34+ stem cells collected was 10.3 x 10^6. The most frequent grade 3 or higher toxicities included thrombocytopenia (15%) and hypophosphatemia (12%). The rate of grade 3 or higher peripheral neuropathy was 2%. Two pts died while on study, one due to complications of septicemia and the other due to respiratory failure. Conclusions: The combination of elo plus len, bortez, and dex was effective in newly diagnosed, ASCT-eligible patients. The rate of high-grade toxicities was low, although there were two grade 5 events (septicemia and respiratory failure). Clinical trial information: NCT02375555.

scholarly journals Effect of Age on Efficacy and Safety Outcomes in Patients (Pts) with Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma (NDMM) Receiving Lenalidomide and Low-Dose Dexamethasone (Rd): The First Trial

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 81-81 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cyrille Hulin ◽  
Thierry Facon ◽  
Chaim Shustik ◽  
Andrew Belch ◽  
Maria Teresa Petrucci ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Primary Endpoint ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Age Groups ◽  
P Value ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Risk Of Death ◽  
Duration Of Response ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Background: In the pivotal FIRST trial, a randomized, international, multicenter phase 3 study, continuous Rd compared with melphalan-prednisone-thalidomide (MPT) improved progression-free survival (PFS) which was the primary endpoint (HR = 0.72; P < 0.01). The interim overall survival (OS) analysis showed a 22% reduction in risk of death with continuous Rd vs. MPT (HR = 0.78; P = 0.02) (Facon, Blood 2013). This analysis evaluates outcomes based on age, which was a stratification parameter, and compared pts aged ≤ 75 yrs and > 75 yrs. Methods: Pts with NDMM were randomized to continuous Rd until progressive disease (PD) (N = 535); 18 cycles (72 weeks [wks]) of Rd (Rd18; N = 541); or 12 cycles (72 wks) of MPT (N = 547). Starting doses were reduced in pts aged > 75 yrs: dexamethasone (20 vs. 40 mg), melphalan (0.20 vs. 0.25 mg/kg), and thalidomide (100 vs 200 mg). The primary endpoint was PFS (continuous Rd vs. MPT) and the secondary endpoint were OS, overall response rate, time to response, duration of response, time to Tx failure, time to 2nd AMT, health-related quality of life, safety. Results: The proportion of pts aged > 75 yrs was > 34% across treatment (Tx) arms. In pts ≤ 75 yrs, 37% had ISS stage III vs. 51% in > 75 yrs. ECOG score ≥ 1 was observed in 74% and 69% of pts aged > 75 and ≤ 75 yrs, respectively. Severe renal impairment (CrCl < 30 mL/min) was observed in 14% of pts > 75 vs. 7% in ≤ 75 yrs. PFS and OS outcomes favored continuous Rd over MPT in both age groups. With a median follow-up of 37 months (mos), PFS was 27.4 mos in continuous Rd pts vs. 21.8 mos in MPT pts aged ≤ 75 yrs (HR = 0.68; P < 0.001); a trend for improved PFS was also seen for pts aged > 75 yrs (HR = 0.81; P = 0.11) (Table 1). PFS for continuous Rd vs. Rd18 pts was also increased in both age groups (HR = 0.68; P < 0.001 and HR = 0.75; P = 0.03, respectively). Response rates were consistently higher with continuous Rd vs. MPT in pts aged ≤ 75 yrs (77% vs. 66%; P < 0.001) and > 75 yrs (71% vs. 55%; P < 0.001). Duration of response with continuous Rd was longer vs. MPT in pts aged ≤ 75 yrs (40 vs. 22 mos) and pts > 75 yrs (31 vs. 24 mos). The interim analysis of OS showed an improved trend for continuous Rd vs. MPT in pts aged ≤ 75 yrs (HR = 0.77; P = 0.06) and > 75 yrs (HR = 0.80; P= 0.16). Grade 3–4 adverse events (AEs) in ≥ 10% of pts were similar across age subgroups (Table 2). Tx discontinuation due to AEs was comparable across the Tx groups and independent of age. Conclusions:Regardless of age (≤ 75 vs. > 75 yrs), continuous Rd was effective, increased PFS and interim OS, and was generally well tolerated vs. MPT in NDMM pts. Duration of response was improved with continuous Rd vs. MPT and Rd18, irrespective of age, and with a more profound benefit observed in younger pts. Continuous Rd represents a new clinical option and standard of care for these pts in the first-line setting. Abstract 81. Table 1 PFS, OS and Response Aged ≤ 75 yrs Aged > 75 yrs All pts ITT population Continuous Rd (n = 349) Rd18 (n = 348) MPT (n = 359) Continuous Rd (n = 186) Rd18 (n = 193) MPT (n = 188) Continuous Rd (n = 535) Rd18 (n = 541) MPT (n = 547) Median PFS, mos 27.4 21.3 21.8 21.2 19.4 19.2 25.5 20.7 21.2 PFS HR (95% CI); P-value Continuous Rd vs. Rd18 0.68 (0.55–0.83); P < 0.01 0.75 (0.58–0.98); P = 0.03 0.70 (0.60–0.82); P < 0.01 Continuous Rd vs. MPT 0.68 (0.56–0.83); P < 0.01 0.81 (0.62–1.05); P = 0.11 0.72 (0.61–0.85); P < 0.01 4-yr OS, % 66 61 58 47 47 39 59 56 51 OS HR (95% CI); P-value Continuous Rd vs. Rd18 0.88 (0.67–1.16); P = 0.36 0.94 (0.69–1.29); P = 0.70 0.90 (0.73–1.10); P = 0.31 Continuous Rd vs. MPT 0.77 (0.59–1.01); P = 0.06 0.80 (0.59–1.09); P = 0.16 0.78 (0.64–0.96); P = 0.02 Response rate (≥ PR), % 77 77 66 71 66 55 75 73 62 Duration of response (≥ PR), mos 40 23 22 31 20 24 35 22 22 CI, confidence interval; ITT, intent to treat; PR, partial response. Table 2 Grade 3–4 AEs Observed in ≥ 10% of Pts Aged ≤ 75 yrs Aged > 75 yrs Safety population, % Continuous Rd (n = 347) Rd18 (n = 348) MPT (n = 357) Continuous Rd (n = 185) Rd18 (n = 192) MPT (n = 184) Neutropenia 28 25 47 28 29 40 Thrombocytopenia 8 9 13 9 7 7 Anemia 18 12 20 19 23 17 Leukopenia 5 6 11 4 5 8 Infections 29 21 16 29 23 20 DVT and/or PE 10 6 8 7 8 4 Peripheral sensory neuropathy 1 1 10 1 0 8 Tx discontinuation due to AEs 28 18 28 32 25 30 DVT, deep-vein thrombosis; PE, pulmonary embolism. Disclosures Hulin: Celgene: Honoraria. Off Label Use: Lenalidomide used in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients. Facon:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Belch:Janssen, Celgene, Onyx: Honoraria. Petrucci:Celgene, Janssen-Cilag, Sanofi, Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria. Dührsen:Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding. Song:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Houck:Celgene: Employment. Chen:Celgene: Employment. Ervin-Haynes:Celgene: Employment.

Bortezomib-Based Therapy, without Stem Cell Transplantation, for Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Patients with t(4;14).

Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 3861-3861
Author(s):  
Donna E. Reece ◽  
Giovanni Piza Rodriguez ◽  
Andrew Belch ◽  
David Szwajcer ◽  
Mariela Pantoja ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Induction Therapy ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Liposomal Doxorubicin ◽  
Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Skin Toxicity ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Post Induction

Abstract Abstract 3861 Poster Board III-797 Previous studies have reported that multiple myeloma (MM) patients (pts) with t(4;14) identified by FISH who are treated with a single ASCT as part of first-line therapy have worse outcomes than those lacking this adverse cytogenetic marker; two trials have described a median progression-free survival (PFS) of only 8-9 months and median overall survival (OS) of 18 mos in this setting (Chang H, et al. Bone Marrow Transplant 2005; 36: 793; Gertz M, et al. Blood 2005; 106: 2837). Since the novel agent bortezomib appears to have efficacy in patients with t(4;14), we designed a phase II protocol in which pts receive induction with pegylated liposomal doxorubicin, bortezomib and dexamethasone (DBD) x 4 cycles, followed by post-induction therapy with oral cyclophosphamide 300 mg/m2 days 1,8 15, 22 with bortezomib 1.5 mg/m2 days 1,8,15 and prednisone 100 mg q 2 days of a 28-day cycle (CyBor-P) x 8 additional cycles. Maintenance therapy with dexamethasone (dex) 40 mg/month was then administered until progression. Although elective stem cell collection was recommended after induction, routine ASCT was not performed in the absence of disease progression. Between February 2008-August 2009, 153 newly diagnosed MM pts were screened for t(4;14) in 7 Canadian centers, and 14 (9%) were found to be positive by FISH. Four did not meet the critieria for symptomatic MM, 2 had received ≥ 2 mos of prior therapy while 8 were entered onto study. One of these was later determined to have a variant abnormality of chromosome 4 but not t(4;14) and underwent ASCT after induction; this pt is included in the safety analysis only. The median age was 56 (49-69) and 43% were male. The median percent nuclei positive for t(4;14) was 30% (10-41%), serum β2-microglobulin 394 nmol/L (190-1695) and albumin 34 g/L (28-39); one pt had ISS stage 1,3 had stage 2 and 3 had stage 3 MM. Immunoglobulin subtype included IgGκ in 2 and IgAκ in 2 and IgAλ in 3. All pts have completed DBD induction, with the best response in the 7 evaluable pts consisting of PR in 2 and VGPR in 5; one in PR progressed quickly after induction and has achieved nCR after D-PACE followed by ASCT and lenalidomide maintenance. Four are receiving post-induction therapy with CyBor-P currently, with VGPR in 3 and PR in 1. No SAEs or grade3/4 neutropenia or thrombocytopenia has occurred; other toxicities were mild, with grade 2 skin toxicity noted in 37.5% and grade 2 neurotoxicity observed in 7.4%. All pts are alive at a median follow-up (F/U) of 8 mos (2-11), and 6 (86%) are free of progression. We conclude: 1) the incidence of t(4;14) in newly diagnosed MM pts appears to be lower than the 15% anticipated; 2) 28% of newly diagnosed pts with this entity have asymptomatic MM; 3) preliminarily, DBD induction has resulted in ≥ PR in all pts although 1 progressed quickly; 4) this bortezomib-based regimen is very well-tolerated; 5) longer F/U is required to determine the PFS and OS with this approach. Disclosures: Reece: Ortho Biotech: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Off Label Use: Use of bortezomib as part of initial therapy with pegylated liposomal doxorubicin and dexamethasone. Piza Rodriguez:Ortho Biotech: Honoraria. Belch:Ortho Biotech: Honoraria, Research Funding. Shustik:Ortho Biotech: Honoraria. Bahlis:Ortho Biotech: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria. White:Ortho Biotech: Honoraria, Research Funding. Chen:Ortho Biotech: Honoraria. Kukreti:Celgene: Honoraria. Stewart:Genzyme, Celgene, Millenium, Proteolix: Honoraria; Takeda, Millenium: Research Funding; Takeda-Millenium, Celgene, Novartis, Amgen: Consultancy. Trudel:Ortho Biotech: Honoraria, Research Funding.

Maintenance Therapy With Lenalidomide Significantly Improved Survival Of Yong Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Patients

Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 2089-2089 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francesca Gay ◽  
Federica Cavallo ◽  
Tommaso Caravita ◽  
Maide Cavalli ◽  
Arnon Nagler ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Maintenance Therapy ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Background High-dose chemotherapy (HDT) with autologous stem cell transplant improves outcome of multiple myeloma (MM) patients in comparison to conventional chemotherapy. The incorporation of new drugs into induction, consolidation and maintenance therapy is changing the treatment paradigm and is questioning the role of HDT in newly diagnosed MM (NDMM) patients <65 years. Previous finding have been presented (Boccadoro, ASCO 2013) and this analysis provides a longer follow-up. Aims To compare in a prospective randomized trial melphalan-prednisone-lenalidomide (MPR) with tandem melphalan (200 mg/m2) (MEL200) both followed by maintenance with lenalidomide or no maintenance in NDMM patients. Methods A 2x2 factorial randomized trial was designed. The induction treatment consisted of four 28-day cycles of lenalidomide (25 mg d 1-21) and low-dose dexamethasone (40 mg d 1,8,15,22) (Rd). As consolidation, patients were randomized to MPR (N=202) [six 28-day cycles of melphalan (0.18 mg/k g d 1-4), prednisone (2 mg/kg d 1-4) and lenalidomide (10 mg d 1-21)] or MEL200 (N=200)[tandem melphalan 200 mg/m2 with stem-cell support]. Patients were further randomized, within each group, to receive lenalidomide maintenance (10 mg, days 1-21, N=198) or no maintenance (N=204). Primary study endpoint was progression free survival (PFS). The secondary study endpoints included response rates, safety and overall survival (OS). Data were analyzed in the intent-to-treat (ITT) population. Results From November 2007 to July 2009, 402 patients with NDMM <65 years of age were enrolled. All patients were stratified according to International Staging System (ISS) and age. Patient characteristics were well balanced in all groups. In the MPR group, the Very Good Partial Response (VGPR) rate was 50% with 13% of Complete Response (CR) while the VGPR rate was 52% including 19% of CR in the MEL200 group. In the MPR group the CR rate improved from 13% after consolidation to 17% after maintenance. In the MEL200 group the CR rate improved from 19% after consolidation to 25% after maintenance. After a median follow-up of 48 months, the median PFS was 24.2 months in MPR group and 38.6 months in MEL200 group ( P< 0.0001). A multivariate analysis confirms the PFS benefit associated with MEL200 across all subgroups of patients defined by stratification factors and baseline characteristics. The 5-year OS rate was similar between MPR (62%) and MEL200 (71%; P= 0.27). In a landmark analysis, lenalidomide maintenance significantly extended PFS from the start of maintenance (median 42,7 months) compared with no maintenance (median 17.5 months; P<.0001). The 4-year OS rate from the start of maintenance was higher in patients who received lenalidomide maintenance (80%) compared with patients who did not (62%; P= 0,01). No significant interaction was detected between MPR/MEL200 (P=0.704) and maintenance/observation (P=0.984) effects. During consolidation, the incidence of grade 3-4 adverse events (AEs) between MPR and MEL200 were as follow: neutropenia (50% vs. 90%), thrombocytopenia (8% vs. 89%), infections (1% vs. 15%) and gastrointestinal (0% vs. 18%), with complications being higher with MEL200. During the maintenance phase, grade 3-4 hematologic AEs were reported in 17% of patients receiving lenalidomide (16% neutropenia). For individual group comparisons during maintenance, grade 3-4 hematologic AEs were observed in 20% of patients receiving MPR plus lenalidomide maintenance compared with 15% receiving MEL200 plus lenalidomide maintenance. Second primary malignancies were observed in 11 patients (3%), and were mainly solid tumors. Four solid tumors were observed in the MEL200 group and one in the MPR group in the maintenance arm, while three solid tumors were observed in the MEL200 group and three in the MPR group in no maintenance arm. Conclusion The administration of MPR was significantly inferior to MEL200 in terms of PFS. Toxicities were significantly higher in MEL200 group, but manageable. OS is similar between MPR and MEL200. Lenalidomide maintenance significantly reduced the risk of progression and of death independently from the previous treatment. Disclosures: Gay: Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees. Cavallo:Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees. Caravita:Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding. Boccadoro:Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Palumbo:Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Honoraria; Millenium: Consultancy, Honoraria; Onyx: Consultancy, Honoraria.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document