Clofarabine (CLO) Has Single Agent Activity in Relapsed and Refractory Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma (NHL) Including Rituximab (R)-Refractory Patients (pts).

Abstract Abstract 921 Background: CLO is a second generation nucleoside analogue with known activity in acute leukemia and myelodysplasia. As there is no standard therapy for refractory and transplant-ineligible relapsed NHL, and given the activity that purine analogues have in lymphoid malignancies, we sought to investigate the activity of CLO in this pt population regardless of histology. Methods: Eligible pts had measurable disease by CT and/or PET, ECOG performance status ≤ 2, and adequate renal, cardiac, liver, and bone marrow function (unless cytopenias were disease-related). CLO was given in the outpatient setting intravenously over 1-hour days 1-5 every 28 days for 6 cycles maximum. All pts received anti-viral and anti-pneumocystis jiroveci prophylaxis. First, we initiated a phase I portion using a standard 3×3 study design. CLO was given at 4 mg/m2 in cohort 1 with subsequent cohorts to be escalated by 2 mg/m2 each. Once the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was determined, the phase II portion of this study was initiated at the MTD. All pts were followed until disease progression. Results: Thirty-three pts (18 females, 15 males) have been enrolled (7 in the phase I portion and 26 in the phase II), of which 29 are evaluable for response and/or toxicity (2 just started therapy, 1 taken off due to persistent cytopenias, and 1 withdrew consent). Median age was 69 years (range 27-88), median number of prior therapies was 3 (range 1-8), with 21% failing prior stem cell transplantation and 74% being R-refractory. Median time from original diagnosis to first CLO treatment was 36 months (range 6-216). Histologies included 12 diffuse large cell, 5 follicular, 5 small lymphocytic, 4 anaplastic large T-cell, and 1 each for Richter, mantle cell, marginal zone, peripheral T-cell, transformed, non-specific T-cell, and mixed histology. Median number of CLO cycles was 4 (range 1-6). Thrombocytopenia was the dose-limiting toxicity at 6 mg/m2 in 2/6 pts. The MTD recommended for phase II was 4 mg/m2. With a median follow up of 8 months (range 1-33), 7 pts (24%) showed complete response (CR) and 8 (27%) had partial response (PR) for an overall response rate of 51%. Four pts (13%) demonstrated stable disease and 10 (34%) showed progression. Median duration of response was 7 months (range 2-33+) with 6 pts continuing in remission including a patient who is undergoing stem cell transplantation. Median time to progression (TTP) was 3.5 months with median overall survival of 8 months. sEVEN pts (24%) remain progression-free. Of patients who were followed for more than 12 months, 60% were alive at 1-year. Five of the CR pts were of low-grade histology while only 2 had large cell lymphoma. All pts required growth factor support. Toxicity was mainly hematologic with 63% experiencing grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia, 60% grade 3/4 neutropenia, and 39% grade3/4 anemia, and 63%. Grade 3 and/or 4 non-hematologic toxicity included 2 (6%) with tumor lysis syndrome, 2 (6%) infectious episodes (pneumonia and bilateral cellulitis), 2 (6%) renal insufficiency, 2 (6%) fatigue, 1 (3%) seizure activity, 1 (3%) pleural effusion, and 1 hypokalemia (3%). No treatment-related mortality. Conclusions: CLO is active in heavily pre-treated B-cell NHL including R-refractory pts. Activity appears more pronounced in low-grade histology. The drug is well-tolerated and can be administered as an outpatient. Reversible myelosuppression is the major toxicity. Future studies in front-line in combination with R are warranted. Disclosures: Nabhan: Bayer: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Genzyme: Research Funding; Genentech: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Venugopal:Genzyme: Honoraria, Research Funding; Genentech: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau.

Download Full-text

Phase I/II Clinical Trial of Temsirolimus and Lenalidomide in Patients with Relapsed and Refractory Lymphomas

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2020-134750 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 43-44

Author(s):

Ajay Major ◽

Justin Kline ◽

Theodore G. Karrison ◽

Paul A S Fishkin ◽

Amy S Kimball ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Stem Cell ◽

Stem Cell Transplantation ◽

Phase I ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Phase Ii ◽

Research Funding ◽

Phase Ii Study ◽

The Other ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Grade 3

Background Targeting the PI3K/Akt/mTOR axis in relapsed lymphomas is of interest based on constitutive activation in many lymphoma subtypes, and has had varying degrees of success. We previously showed that the first generation mTOR inhibitor, temsirolimus (TEM), has activity across histologies with an acceptable toxicity profile (Smith, et al., JCO 2010). Lenalidomide (LEN) is currently approved for use in indolent non-Hodgkin lymphomas, and has several potential synergistic and overlapping targets with PI3K/mTOR/Akt inhibition. We designed this phase I/II clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of the combination of TEM and LEN in relapsed/refractory lymphomas. Methods The phase I dose-finding study utilized a standard "3+3" design and was open to all patients with mature B-cell malignancies. TEM was 25 mg IV weekly for all dose levels. LEN was dosed orally on D1-D21 every 28 days at three dose levels: 15 mg, 20 mg, and 25 mg. The phase II study accrued patients in a two-stage "minimax" design with stratification into three histologically-defined cohorts: diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), follicular lymphoma (FL), and other lymphomas. Primary endpoints of the phase II study were rates of complete (CR) and overall response (ORR), and secondary endpoints were duration of response (DOR), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Results In the phase I study, 18 patients were enrolled and available for toxicity assessment. Patients were treated to intolerance, progression, or discontinuation at physician discretion. Of these, 15 patients were evaluable for dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) assessment. At dose level 3, there were 2 DLTs: grade 3 diarrhea and grade 3 HSV mucositis. Dose level 2 was thus established as the recommended phase II dose: TEM 25 mg weekly and LEN 20 mg on D1-D21 every 28 days. Of the 18 patients, there were 5 partial responses, 4 stable disease, 3 progressive disease, 4 on active treatment, and 2 not adequately assessed. The phase II study enrolled an additional 93 patients (Table 1): 39 DLBCL, 15 FL, and 39 other lymphomas which included 20 relapsed/refractory Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) patients. The median number of prior treatments was 4 (range, 1-14), and 31 patients (33%) had relapsed following prior autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). The median number of cycles delivered was 4 (range, 1-21). The FL cohort closed prematurely due to slow accrual. The ORR were 25.6% (12.8% CR) and 64.1% (17.9% CR) for DLBCL and other lymphoma cohorts, respectively (Table 2). The ORR for HL patients in the other lymphoma cohort, the majority of whom had relapsed after brentuximab vedotin (BV) and autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT), was 80% (35% CR). Eight HL patients (40%) proceeded to allogeneic transplantation after TEM and LEN therapy. The high response rate in the other lymphoma cohort was sufficient to reject the null hypothesis of a 30% response rate under the minimax design. Median PFS was 7.0 mo (90% CI 3.5-8.0) and 7.0 mo (90% CI 4.6-9.9) for DLBCL and other lymphoma cohorts, respectively (Table 2). Median OS was 9.1 mo (90% CI 6.0-16.0) and 25.5 mo (90% CI 10.8-60.6) for DLBCL and other lymphoma cohorts, respectively (Table 2). Median DOR was 13.8 mo (90% CI 4.1-19.0) and 5.5 mo (90% CI 2.6-23.7) for DLBCL and other lymphoma cohorts, respectively (Table 2). Median PFS, OS and DOR for HL patients in the other lymphoma cohort were 9.2 mo (90% CI 4.6-25.5), 39.6 mo (90% CI 17.4-NR), and 8.1 mo (90% CI 5.1-38.3), respectively. Kaplan-Meier curves are displayed in Figure 1. Grade ≥3 non-hematologic adverse events (AE) related to treatment were uncommon, with no cases of pneumonitis and one grade 3 thromboembolism. Grade ≥3 hematologic AEs were common and reversible. Three Grade 5 AEs occurred (colonic perforation, myocardial infarction and sepsis). Conclusions Combination therapy with TEM and LEN demonstrated encouraging activity in heavily-pretreated and relapsed/refractory lymphomas. Survival in the other lymphoma cohort was primarily driven by favorable activity in relapsed/refractory HL. TEM and LEN may be a suitable option for treatment of HL after BV and ASCT, including as a bridge to allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Further study of PI3K/Akt/mTOR inhibition in combination with lenalidomide is warranted, particularly in relapsed HL. Disclosures Kline: Seattle Genetics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Karyopharm: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Verastem: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Kite/Gilead: Speakers Bureau. Kimball:Amgen: Current Employment; Amgen: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Petrich:Daiichi-Sankyo: Current Employment; AbbVie: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Smith:Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy; Genentech/Roche: Consultancy, Other: Support of parent study and funding of editorial support, Research Funding; TG Therapeutics: Consultancy, Research Funding; FortySeven: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Karyopharm: Consultancy, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy; Acerta: Research Funding. OffLabel Disclosure: Temsirolimus is FDA-approved for renal cell carcinoma.

Download Full-text

A Phase II Open-Label, Multi-Center Study of Anti-CCR4 Monoclonal Antibody Mogamulizumab (KW-0761) in Patients with Previously Treated Peripheral T-Cell Lymphoma(PTCL)

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v124.21.1763.1763 ◽

2014 ◽

Vol 124 (21) ◽

pp. 1763-1763 ◽

Cited By ~ 4

Author(s):

Pier Luigi Zinzani ◽

Bertrand Coiffier ◽

John Radford ◽

Dolores Caballero ◽

Paul Fields ◽

...

Keyword(s):

T Cell ◽

Phase Ii ◽

Research Funding ◽

Phase Ii Trial ◽

Median Number ◽

Advisory Board ◽

Japanese Study ◽

Duration Of Response ◽

Previously Treated ◽

Grade 3

Abstract Background CC chemokine receptor 4 (CCR4) is the receptor for macrophage-derived chemokine (MDC/CCL22) and thymus activation-regulated chemokine (TARC/CCL17). CCR4 is expressed on tumour cells in approximately 30-65% of patients with PTCL (Ogura, 2014). PTCL-NOS patients who are CCR4 positive have been reported to have a poorer prognosis compared to CCR4 negative patients (Ishida T CCR 2004). Mogamulizumab (KW-0761) is a defucosylated, humanized, IgG1 Mab with enhanced antibody dependent cellular cytotoxicity, that binds to CCR4. Mogamulizumab was evaluated in both phase 1 and 2 trials in Japanese patients. A phase II trial in PTCL and cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL) patients (Ogura, 2014) reported an overall response rate (ORR) of 35% in patients who relapsed after last systemic therapy (ORR was 34% in PTCL), leading to its approval in Japan in patients with previously treated CTCL and PTCL, in addition to its first indication, previously treated adult T-cell leukemia-lymphoma. Here we report the preliminary results of a European phase II trial of mogamulizumab in patients with relapsed/refractory PTCL. Methods A multi-center phase II study of mogamulizumab monotherapy was conducted to determine efficacy, safety and immunogenicity in patients with CCR4+ PTCL. The primary endpoint was ORR and secondary endpoints included duration of response, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). At least 34 evaluable patients were needed to detect a significant improvement over 15% assuming 80% power and a 0.0240 alpha significance level (assumes 35% ORR for alternative). Patients received mogamulizumab once weekly for 4 weeks and subsequently once every 2 weeks until progressive disease (PD) or unacceptable toxicity at a dose of 1.0 mg/kg. Responses were assessed every 8 weeks according to IWG criteria (Cheson et al 2007). Results Based on a preliminary analysis of the data, a total of 38 patients received at least one administration of mogamulizumab and were evaluable for safety analysis; (Male/female 23/15 ;Median age 58.5 years (range 19-87)). Three patients are still ongoing in the study (1 complete response (CR) and 2 stable disease (SD)). ECOG performance status at baseline was 0 (32%); 1 (29%); 2 (39%) and 92% of patients had stage III (32%) or IV (61%) disease. The median number of prior treatments was 2 (range 1-8). Only 17 patients (49%) responded to the last treatment administered prior to study entry. The median number of mogamulizumab administrations was 6 (range 1-32). The majority of adverse events (AEs) were CTCAE grade 1-2. Skin rash related to drug was observed in 32% of patients (12/38) and related AEs > grade 3 occurred in 32% (12) of patients. Infusion related reactions occurred in 3 patients (2 were CTCAE grade 2 and 1 was grade 3). Thirty-five patients were evaluable for efficacy. The ORR rate was 11% and the stable disease rate was 34% with a SD or better rate of 46%. The response by histological subtype is specified in the table below. The median duration of response (including SD) is 2.9 months. The median PFS is 2.1 months. Two patients (ALCL-ALK-neg and PTCL-NOS) proceeded to allogeneic SCT. Although the ORR in this study was less than seen in the Japanese study, the PFS was comparable. There were differences in patient population/study conduct between the Japanese study and this study, respectively, which included: inclusion of only relapsed patients (100% vs 49%), ECOG PS 2 (0% vs 39%) and response assessments (after 4 and 8 weeks versus 8 weekly from week 8). Conclusions Based on preliminary data, mogamulizumab demonstrates a SD or better rate of 46% and an ORR of 11% with an acceptable safety profile in this phase II study of heavily pre-treated relapsed/refractory PTCL patients. TableBest Overall Response by Histological subtypeNo of subjectsCR/PR n (%)SDn (%)>SD n (%)PTCL-NOS152* (13%)6 (40%)8 (53%)AITL122 (17%)3 (25%)5 (42%)TMF301 (33%)1 (33%)ALCL-ALK neg402 (50%)2 (50%)ALCL-ALK pos1000Efficacy Evaluable Subjects354 (11%)12 (34%)16 (46%) *One patient had CR by CT scan but did not have bone marrow done for confirmation of CR Disclosures Zinzani: Sandoz: Consultancy; Celgene International Sàrl: Advisory Board, Advisory Board Other, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; MundiPharma International Ltd: Advisory Board, Advisory Board Other, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer Inc: Advisory Board Other, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited: Advisory Board Other, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Advisory Board Other, Honoraria; GlaxoSmithKline: Advisory Board, Advisory Board Other, Honoraria; Gilead: Advisory Board, Advisory Board Other; Bayer AG: Advisory Board Other, Consultancy. d'Amore:CTI Life Sciences: Speakers Bureau; Mundipharma: Speakers Bureau; Takeda/Seattle Genetics : Speakers Bureau; Sanofi-Aventis: Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding; Kyowa-Kirin: Advisory Board Other. Haioun:Roche: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria. Morschhauser:Genentech: Honoraria; Bayer: Honoraria; Spectrum: Honoraria; Mundipharma: Honoraria; Gilead: Honoraria.

Download Full-text

Oral HDAC Inhibitor HBI8000 in Japanese Patients with Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma (NHL): Phase I Safety and Efficacy Results

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v128.22.1827.1827 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 128 (22) ◽

pp. 1827-1827 ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

Makoto Onizuka ◽

Kiyoshi Ando ◽

Makoto Yoshimitsu ◽

Takashi Ishida ◽

S Yoshida ◽

...

Keyword(s):

T Cell ◽

Phase I ◽

Phase Ii ◽

Research Funding ◽

Phase I Trial ◽

Cell Lymphoma ◽

Japanese Patients ◽

Dose Cohort ◽

Grade 3 ◽

Anti Tumor Activity

Abstract Background: HBI-8000 is an orally bioavailable member of the benzamide class of histone deacetylase inhibitors (HDACi), that inhibits cancer-associated HDAC enzymes (Class I and IIb). HBI-8000 has anti-tumor activity through various mechanisms of action, including epigenetic reprogramming and immunomodulation. It was recently approved by the Chinese FDA under the name chidamide (Epidaza) for relapsed or refractory (R/R) peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL) with a recommended dose of 30 mg twice weekly (BIW). HBI-8000 is also being manufactured in the USA for clinical development outside of China. The preliminary results of a phase I trial of HBI-8000 to confirm the safety and maximum tolerated dose (MTD) in Japanese patients (pts) with advanced NHL are presented (NCT02697552). Methods: This is a multicenter, prospective phase I trial in Japan. Inclusion criteria: patients are eligible if they have histologically or cytologically proven NHL and no other standard therapy is available. The primary endpoint is the MTD based on the frequency of dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) observed within 28 days of the first dose. Secondary endpoints include pharmacokinetic (PK) profile and anti-tumor activity. At the time of this abstract submission, the trial is still ongoing. Results: Thirteen out of 14 pts were eligible for the 1st cycle DLT assessment (6 pts in the 30 mg, 7 pts in the 40 mg cohort). Median age was 68 years, gender well balanced, and the majority of pts had ≥ 2 prior treatment regimens. Five pts had the diagnosis of adult T-cell leukemia-lymphoma (ATL), 2 pts presented with PTCL, 3 with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBLC), 2 with follicular lymphoma (FL), 1 with cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL), and 1 with marginal zone lymphoma. Overall, the treatment was well tolerated, and adverse drug reactions (ADRs) were predominantly hematologic, consistent with the previous experiences. There were 7 pts in the 40 mg dose cohort because one of the first 3 pts had to be replaced for incomplete dosing due to grade 3 hypertriglyceridemia which was not regarded as DLT by the Data Monitoring Safety Committee (DMC/SMC). In the 40 mg cohort, 2 pts were considered as DLTs by definition in the protocol: grade 4 neutropenia and grade 3 alanine transaminase (ALT) increase. Both pts were asymptomatic. The grade 4 neutropenia promptly resolved with the administration of G-CSF and the grade 3 ALT elevation resolved with dose interruption. The 30 mg dose cohort completed with no DLT after the 1st cycle in 6 pts. The following hematologic grade 3/4 toxicities were noted in the 40 mg dose cohort (N=7): leukopenia (2 pts, 29%), neutropenia (3 pts, 43%), and thrombocytopenia (3 pts, 43%). Non-hematologic ADRs included fatigue, nausea, diarrhea, decreased appetite, erythema and pyrexia. The preliminary pharmacokinetic (PK) results from the 3 patients in the 30 mg cohort, and 7 patients in the 40 mg dose cohort show inter-patient variability as expected of an oral agent. Mean half-life (t ½ ) was between16.5 and 20 hours (h) with a Tmax between 2.5 and 3.5h and consistent with previous findings. Mean Cmax and AUC increased with dose (30 mg: 210 ng/mL; 3660 h*ng/mL and 40 mg: 590 ng/mL; 7200 h*ng/mL). The patient with neutropenia as DLT presented with the highest exposure. Cardiovascular assessments including serial ECGs and troponin assessments did not reveal clinically relevant findings. Best overall response was noted in 40 mg BIW cohort (N=7): 1 CR (10%), 5 PR (30%), 1 SD (20%). Four of the partial responders were ATL patients. In the 30 mg BIW dose cohort, 4/6 patients had stable disease after the 1st cycle. Summary: In this phase l trial evaluating the safety of twice weekly 30 mg and 40 mg doses, HBI-8000 was well tolerated with expected toxicities that could be managed with dose interruptions/reductions. Tumor response results in pts who completed at least one cycle of treatment indicate some clinical benefit especially in pts who started with the 40 mg dose level. The DMC/SMC has provided an opinion that the 2 observed DLTs with HBI-8000 in the phase I trial were clinically manageable and that 40 mg BIW would be recommended as the dosage for subsequent phase II studies. Registration enabling phase II trials to evaluate efficacy and safety in R/R ATL pts (Japan) and R/R PTCL pts (Japan and Korea) are being initiated. Disclosures Ando: SymBio Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding. Yoshimitsu:HUYA Bioscience International: Research Funding. Ishida:Kyowa Hakko Kirin, Co., Ltd.: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene KK: Research Funding; Bayer Pharma AG: Research Funding. Hidaka:Chugai-pharm: Research Funding. Nagashima:HUYA Bioscience International: Employment. Miyazato:HUYA Bioscience International: Employment. Schupp:HUYA Bioscience International: Employment. Rolland:HUYA Bioscience International: Employment. Gillings:HUYA Bioscience International: Employment. Lee:HUYA Bioscience International: Employment. Tobinai:Eisai: Honoraria, Research Funding; GlaxoSmithKline: Research Funding; HUYA Bioscience: Honoraria; Janssen Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Research Funding; Kyowa Hakko Kirin: Research Funding; Mundipharma: Honoraria, Research Funding; Ono Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Servier: Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria, Research Funding; Zenyaku Kogyo: Honoraria; Chugai Pharma: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Abbvie: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Brentuximab Vedotin (BV) and Lenalidomide (Len) in Relapsed and Refractory (r/r) Cutaneous (CTCL) and Peripheral (PTCL) T-Cell Lymphomas; A Planned Interim Analysis of Phase II Trial

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-123801 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 2853-2853

Author(s):

Basem M. William ◽

Ying Huang ◽

Amy Johnson ◽

Jonathan E Brammer ◽

John C. Reneau ◽

...

Keyword(s):

T Cell ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Phase Ii ◽

Research Funding ◽

Cell Lymphoma ◽

Single Agent ◽

Large Cell ◽

Median Number ◽

Brentuximab Vedotin ◽

Advisory Committees

Background: Patients with r/r tumor stage CTCL and/or PTCL have a poor prognosis. BV is currently FDA approved for CD30 positive CTCL and anaplastic large cell lymphoma (ALCL) with single agent activity in additional PTCL subtypes. Len also has single agent activity in patients with r/r CTCL/PTCL. The safety of the combination was established in a phase I trial in patients with r/r diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Methods: We conducted a single-institution phase II trial to determine the safety and efficacy of BV+Len combination in patients with r/r CTCL/PTCL. Simon's 2-stage optimal design was followed to test the null hypothesis of overall response rate (ORR) ≤0.3 versus the alternative hypothesis of ORR≥0.5. Patients with ≥ 1 line of systemic therapy or 2 lines of skin directed therapy, at least stage IB (for CTCL), and no prior progression on BV were eligible regardless of CD30 staining. All patients were treated with BV 1.2 mg/kg IV and Len 20 mg PO daily q3 weeks for a maximum 16 cycles. After 7 patients were treated, we reduced Len to 10 mg given safety/tolerability concerns. Responses are assessed by the International Society for Cutaneous Lymphomas and the cutaneous lymphoma task force of the European Organization of Research and Treatment of Cancer (ISCL/EORTC) Global response criteria (for CTCL) and Cheson year criteria (for PTCL). The effect of treatment on quality of life is assessed by Skindex-16. Results: As of July 1, 2019, 17 subjects were treated; 10 (59%) with mycosis fungoides (MF), 2 (12%) with Sezary syndrome (SS), 2 (12%) with CD30+ lymphoproliferative disorder, and 3 (18%) with PTCL. Median age was 60 (49-90) years and 76% were males. CD30 was completely negative (<1%) in 3 (18%) of patients and median CD30 staining (by immunohistochemistry) was 7.5% (range 1-75%). Of 12 patients with MF/SS, 5 (42%) had evidence of large cell transformation at accrual. Of 14 patients with CTCL, median baseline mSWAT was 54.5 (range 4.4-190). Median number of prior therapies was 5 (range 1-9). Grade 3 adverse events (AEs) were reported in 11/17 patients; including neutropenia (4), thrombocytopenia (1), bronchitis (1), dyspnea (1), abdominal pain (2), vertigo (1), , DRESS (Drug Rash with Eosinophilia and Systemic Symptoms) syndrome (1), urinary tract infection (1), and tumor flare (2). Median number of cycles received was 4 (range 1-17). Best response in 14 evaluable patients were 2 (14%) complete response, 3 (21%) partial response, and 8 (57%) stable disease with ORR of 33% (95% confidence interval:12-62%). Of 17 patients, 5 (29%) remain on treatment, and 12 (71%) discontinued treatment because of disease progression (7; 58%), AEs (4; 33%), or patient preference (1; 2%). Median duration of response was 3.2 (range 2.5-13) months. Of note, 7/14 patients (50%) patients with CTCL had >50% reduction in their Skindex-16 scores after a median of 2 cycles (range 1-3). Conclusions: BV + Len is combination is safe and efficacious in a heavily pre-treated patients with T-cell lymphomas. Len doses higher than 10 mg daily are poorly tolerated and associated with excess tumor flare. Recruitment of both CTCL and PTCL patients for this trial is ongoing. Disclosures William: Guidepoint Global: Consultancy; Kyowa Kirin, Inc.: Consultancy; Defined Health: Consultancy; Techspert: Consultancy; Celgene Corporation: Consultancy. Brammer:Verastem, Inc: Research Funding; Viracta Therapeutics, Inc.: Research Funding; Bioniz Therapeutics, Inc.: Research Funding. Grantier:Pharmacyclics LLC and Janssen Oncology: Other: Advisory Board. Hoffman:Pharmacyclics LLC and Janssen Oncology: Other: Advisory Board. Baiocchi:Prelude: Consultancy. Epperla:Pharmacyclics: Honoraria; Verastem Oncology: Speakers Bureau. Christian:Triphase: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Immunomedics: Research Funding; Acerta: Research Funding; Genentech: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Cephalon: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Millennium Pharmaceuticals Inc: Research Funding. Maddocks:BMS: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Teva: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. OffLabel Disclosure: Brentuximab vedotin is being used off-label for CD30 negative peripheral and cutaneous T-cell lymphoma. Lenalidomide is being used off-label for both conditions (within a phase II clinical trial)

Download Full-text

Phase I/II Study of Lenalidomide and High Dose Melphalan As Preparative Regimen in Autologous Transplant in Myeloma: Report of Phase II Efficacy and Safety Data

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v126.23.3193.3193 ◽

2015 ◽

Vol 126 (23) ◽

pp. 3193-3193 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Attaya Suvannasankha ◽

Sherif Farag ◽

Rebecca Silbermann ◽

Mary Cangany ◽

Anita Rush-Taylor ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Stem Cell ◽

Phase I ◽

Phase Ii ◽

Research Funding ◽

High Dose ◽

Disease Response ◽

Preparative Regimen ◽

Grade 3 ◽

High Dose Melphalan

Abstract Background: High-dose melphalan and autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantat (auto-HCT) is a standard consolidation therapy for eligible multiple myeloma (MM) patients due to superior survival outcome as compared to chemotherapy alone. However, patients remain at continuous risk of disease relapse following auto-HCT. Lenalidomide is active in newly diagnosed and relapsed MM and has synergistic activity with melphalan, but has not previously been incorporated into preparative regimen for auto-HCT. While high dose lenalidomide induces myelosuppression, the anti-tumor activity of lenalidomide is dose-dependent. Methods: We conducted a single center, phase I/II study of lenalidomide and melphalan in patients with MM undergoing auto-HCT. The phase I portion included MM patients at all disease stages, including patients undergoing auto-SCT as salvage therapy. The phase II portion enrolled patients undergoing a first auto-SCT after achieving at least stable disease following their induction regimen. Phase I objectives included determination of side effect profile and recommended phase II dose (RP2D). Phase II objectives were disease response at day +100 and toxicity. Treatment: All patients received a standard melphalan dose of 200 mg/m2 (100 mg/m2 IV days -1 and -2). Phase I lenalidomide dose was escalated from 50 mg, 75mg, 100 mg, and 150 mg and administered orally daily from days -7 to +2. Phase I data were previously reported (Blood (ASH Annual Meeting Abstracts), Nov 2012; 120: 3146). Thirteen patients were treated and no MTD was reached. The RP2D lenalidomide dose (150 mg orally daily days -7 to +2) was further explored in the phase II portion of this study. Post-transplant lenalidomide maintenance therapy was started between days +100 and +120 in all responders. We now report the planned interim analysis of the efficacy and safety profile of the phase II study. Results: From 5/1/12 to 7/9/15, forty seven subjects were enrolled to the phase II portion of the study. Study accrual is complete. We report below on the 37 patients with at least 100 days follow-up (median duration of follow-up of 12 months). 36 patients were assessable for response. Responses are as followed: stringent CR 8 (22%), CR 3 (8%), VGPR 20 (54%), PR 3 (8%), progressive disease 2 (5%). Among responders, 34 were able to start maintenance lenalidomide on days +100 to +110 (two withdrew from the study to pursue tandem stem cell transplant). To date, 21 patients remain on the treatment. Of 13 who discontinued the therapy; 4 was due to progression, 4 due to physician/patient preference, 2 due to toxicities and 3 from other reasons. Median progression free survival has not been reached. Toxicities were considered treatment related if they occur after the initiation of study drugs. DLTs are defined as any AEs occurring from days -7 to -2 that cause delay or prevent subjects from proceeding to auto-SCTs, grade 3 or more non-hematologic toxicities that do not resolve to a grade 2 or less by day 30 after auto-SCT, or engraftment failure. No DLTs were observed. The median time for ANC and platelet engraftment was 12 and 15 days and no delayed engraftment was observed. Toxicities and posttransplant hematopoietic recovery rates were similar to historical data observed with single agent high dose melphalan. Lenalidomide related toxicities occurred more commonly during the maintenance phase. Common toxicities occurring in more than 10% of patients were diarrhea (24%), peripheral neuropathy (21%) and fatigue (10%). Grade 3-4 toxicities occurred in 16% percent of patients: fatigue (5%), neutropenia (5%) neuropathy (3%), and thrombocytopenia (3%). Conclusion The use of high dose lenalidomide in combination with high-dose melphalan as a preparative regiment for auto-SCT is well tolerated. High VGPR or better disease response rates, compared to historical control, suggest that the preparative combination regimen may improve the depth of response. Stem cell rescue likely overcome lenalidomide induced myelosuppression. The study is now closed to accrual. Updated data on primary endpoints from all subjects will be reported at the meeting. Disclosures Suvannasankha: Celgene: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Onyx: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Farag:Bristol Myers: Speakers Bureau; Millennium: Speakers Bureau; Teva: Research Funding; Celgene: Speakers Bureau. Silbermann:Amgen: Consultancy; Celgene: Research Funding. Abonour:Celgene: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau.

Download Full-text

Phase II Study of Melphalan, Prednisone and Lenalidomide Combination for Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Patients Who Are Not Candidates for Stem Cell Transplantation

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v112.11.2769.2769 ◽

2008 ◽

Vol 112 (11) ◽

pp. 2769-2769

Author(s):

Vivek Roy ◽

A. Keith Stewart ◽

P. Leif Bergsagel ◽

Angela Dispenzieri ◽

Kristina Laumann ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Stem Cell ◽

Stem Cell Transplantation ◽

Phase I ◽

Cell Transplantation ◽

Phase Ii ◽

Response Rate ◽

Phase Ii Study ◽

Grade 3 ◽

Ecog Ps

Abstract Melphalan (M), Prednisone (P) and Lenalidomide (R) are active in the treatment of multiple myeloma (MM). We evaluated the toxicity and efficacy of MPR in a phase I/II trial. Results of phase I part were previously reported (Blood2006, 108(11) abst 3558). M 5 mg/m2 on days (d) 1–4, 60 mg/m2 d 1–4 and R 10 mg d 1–21 of a 28 day cycle was determined as MTD for the phase II study. Methods: Patients with previously untreated MM who were not candidates for stem cell transplantation, age ≥18 yr, ECOG PS 0–3, evaluable or measurable disease, ANC >1500, platelets > 100,000 and creatinine ≤ 3.0 mg/dL were eligible. All patients received aspirin 325 mg/d as DVT prophylaxis. Routine antibacterial prophylaxis was not used. G/GM-CSF was used at the discretion of the treating physician for neutropenia. Response rate (RR), confirmed on two consecutive determinations was the primary end-point. The study had 90% power to detect a RR of at least 45%. Results: Twenty-six patients were accrued between July ’06 and Feb ’08. The median age was 74 y (64 – 87y), 17 (65%) were men. Six, 13, 6, 1 (23%, 50%, 23%, and 4%) patients had ECOG PS 0, 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Three (12%), 11 (42%) and 10 (38%) patients were ISS stage 1, 2 and 3. A total of 106 cycles were administered; median 4.5 (1–13). Seventy-seven % patients experienced at least 1 grade 3 or 4 toxicity. Neutropenia (42%/8%) and thrombocytopenia (20%/8%) were the most common grade 3/4 adverse events followed by anemia (16%/0%), fatigue (8%/4%), rash (11%/0%), and hyperglycemia (4%/0%). There were 20 treatment delays in 9 patients, and 18 dose reductions (9 in R, 11 in M and 1 P) occurred in 7 patients, most commonly because of neutropenia or thrombocytopenia. Eleven patients (42%) required G-CSF treatment. Eleven patients are currently receiving treatment; 15 have gone off study (4 completed per protocol, 3 refused, 3 adverse effects, 3 unrelated illnesses, 2 other). Median follow up of survivors is 8 m (0 – 22m). Eighteen (69 %; 95%CI 48–86) patients had a PR or better according to International Myeloma Working Group Uniform Response criteria; 3 (12 %) CR, 5 (19 %) VGPR and 10 (38%) PR. Median number of cycles before achieving a response was 2 (1 – 11). Median Progression Free and Overall Survival is 16.7m (95% CI 11.2–23.0), and 23 m (95% CI: 22 – 23), respectively. Conclusions: MPR combination is feasible with a manageable toxicity profile and has significant activity in the treatment of patients with MM who are not candidates for stem cell transplant, with an overall response rate of 69%, and a CR plus VGPR rate of 31%. Grade 3 or 4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia was the most common toxicity, seen in up to 50% of patients in this cohort of predominantly elderly patients. Dose reduction in R and/or M was required in 27% patients. No patient developed neuropathy or thromboembolic complications.

Download Full-text

Phase I Study of a Neutralizing Monoclonal Anti-CTLA4 Antibody (MDX-010) in Patients with Relapse of Malignancy after Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation.

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v106.11.2017.2017 ◽

2005 ◽

Vol 106 (11) ◽

pp. 2017-2017 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Asad Bashey ◽

Bridget Medina ◽

Sue Corringham ◽

Mildred Pasek ◽

Ewa Carrier ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Stem Cell ◽

T Cell ◽

Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation ◽

Stem Cell Transplantation ◽

Phase I ◽

T Cell Activation ◽

Cell Activation ◽

Hematopoietic Stem ◽

Anti Cancer ◽

Grade 3

Abstract Relapse of malignancy is an important cause of treatment failure after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HCT). Malignant cells may evade adoptive immunotherapy post allo-HCT by mechanisms including lack of co-stimulation and direct or indirect inhibition of T-cell activation. CTLA-4 is a homologue of CD28 which functions as a negative regulator of T-cell activation. Blockade of CTLA-4 using neutralizing antibodies has demonstrated potent anti-cancer effects in animal models. Phase I/II clinical trials of CTLA-4 blockade in advanced tumors have demonstrated durable tumor regressions as well as immune breakthrough phenomena. Although CTLA-4 blockade may augment graft-versus-malignancy following allo-HCT, GVHD and other immune complications may also be increased. We report the results of a phase I dose-escalation trial of a neutralizing human monoclonal anti-CTLA-4 antibody (MDX-010) in patients with relapse of malignancy following allo-HCT. Eligibility criteria included allo-HCT ≥90 days previously, > 50% donor T-cell chimerism, no prior grade 3/4 GVHD, no prophylaxis/therapy for GVHD for ≥ 6 weeks. Patients received a single dose of MDX-010 over 90 min. DLI at a dose of 5 x 10e6 CD3 cells/kg was allowed 8 weeks following MDX-010 if no GVHD occurred and progression of malignancy (PD) was present. Twelve patients (8M, 4F; median age 45; CML=2, CLL=1, AML=1, Hodgkins disease [HD] =3 Myeloma [MM]=3, Renal Ca =1, Breast Ca=1) have been treated (4 at dose-level 0.1 mg/kg, 3 at 0.33 mg/kg, 4 at 0.66 mg/kg and 1 at 1.0 mg/kg). Median time between BMT and MDX-010 infusion was 10.3 months (4–79). Four patients received additional DLI. MDX-010 was well tolerated in this setting. No infusional toxicity was seen. No patient has developed clinically significant GVHD following MDX-010 alone. One patient developed grade II acute GVHD of the skin 12 weeks following DLI. Two possible immune breakthrough events were documented: grade 3 polyarthropathy 14 weeks following MDX-010, but also 6 weeks post DLI, which resolved with corticosteroid therapy, (AML, dose 0.1mg/kg, RhF+ pre-MDX-010); grade 1 chemical hyperthyroidism with thyroid-stimulating antibody 6 weeks post MDX-010 (CLL, 0.66 mg/kg). Three patients have demonstrated possible anti-cancer responses following MDX-010 alone (partial remission of AML refractory to prior therapies at 0.1 mg/kg dose, molecular remission of CML maintained off imatinib at 0.1 mg/kg dose, stabilization of previously progressive MM (0.33mg/kg) and one patient developed regression of malignancy (HD) following additional DLI (0.66mg/kg). With a median follow-up of 195d (lead f/u 570d) from MDX-010 infusion three patients have died (PD), 8 are alive and 1 is in CR and 1 is in PR. Pharmacokinetic and correlative science data will be presented. This study shows tolerability with possible anti-tumor effects at the dose levels

Download Full-text

Alemtuzumab can be Incorporated Into Front-Line Therapy of Adult Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL): Final Phase I Results of a Cancer and Leukemia Group B Study (CALGB 10102).

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v114.22.838.838 ◽

2009 ◽

Vol 114 (22) ◽

pp. 838-838 ◽

Cited By ~ 30

Author(s):

Wendy Stock ◽

Ben Sanford ◽

Gerard Lozanski ◽

Ravi Vij ◽

John C. Byrd ◽

...

Keyword(s):

T Cell ◽

Phase I ◽

B Cell ◽

Phase Ii ◽

Dose Escalation ◽

Research Funding ◽

Front Line ◽

Line Therapy ◽

Grade 3

Abstract Abstract 838 Eradication of minimal residual disease (MRD) during the first months of ALL treatment is associated with improved disease-free survival (DFS). We hypothesized that alemtuzumab, a humanized anti-CD52 monoclonal antibody, might be an effective, novel agent for eradication of MRD. In CALGB 10102, we tested dose escalation of alemtuzumab in sequential cohorts of CD52+ cases to a target dose of 30 mg administered SC 3 times/week for 4 weeks (12 doses) during post-remission therapy. Dose limiting toxicity (DLT) was defined as the inability to proceed with protocol treatment within 6 weeks after the last dose of alemtuzumab. Eligible patients (pts) had ≥10% lymphoblast CD52 expression at diagnosis determined in a CALGB reference laboratory. Antimicrobial prophylaxis for cytomegalovirus (CMV) and Pneumocystis carinii was mandated. The 10102 therapy consisted of 6 monthly chemotherapy modules followed by maintenance therapy for a total of 2 years (Stock et al. ASH 2005, abstr 145); 299 untreated ALL pts were eligible and enrolled from 2003–2007. We previously reported (Lozanski et al. ASH 2007, abstr 2386) that 70% were CD52+ and eligible to receive Alemtuzumab (70% of B-cell ALL; 53% of T-cell ALL; 100% of Ph+ cases). Results: Twenty-four pts in remission (CR1) received Alemtuzumab as their fourth treatment module during the Phase I portion of the study. The median age was 37 years (18-77 years); 18 (80%) had B-cell ALL; 5 (19%) had T-cell ALL. 17/24 cases had evaluable cytogenetics after central review: 5 had favorable, 8 intermediate-risk, 2 poor-risk cytogenetics (neither were Ph+), and 2 were not classifiable (miscellaneous abnormalities). Non-hematologic toxicities were mild. SC alemtuzumab was well tolerated. Grade 3-4 myelosuppression was reported during 4 weeks of alemtuzumab treatment in 4 pts; 2 pts had Grade 3-4 lymphopenia. 4 pts had DLT: subsequent treatment was delayed in 2 due to transient CMV viremia; 1 developed Staph aureus empyema; and 1 had prolonged myelosuppression but did not receive G-CSF support as recommended by the protocol. 3 pts relapsed with ALL immediately following completion of the alemtuzumab module. Serial assessment of MRD using quantitative clone-specific PCR was possible in 11/24 cases. There was a median 1-log decrease in MRD during alemtuzumab therapy in the 20 and 30 mg cohorts. However, there was a 2-log rise during alemtuzumab therapy in one pt who relapsed 6 weeks later. Pharmacokinetic analysis revealed rising alemtuzumab serum levels during treatment in all dose cohorts, and levels were still detectable in some pts 10 weeks after completing alemtuzumab. During subsequent post-remission therapy, 8 pts developed CMV viremia, 2 had Herpes simplex infections, and 3 had Herpes zoster reactivation. There was not a significant correlation between serum alemtuzumab level and change in MRD or risk of viral infection. The median follow-up time for the 14 surviving pts is 51 months (49-54 months). Median DFS is 53 months (95% CI, 39 – not reached); median overall survival is 55 months (95% CI, 42- not reached). Conclusions: CD52 is expressed in the majority of adult ALL cases. Addition of alemtuzumab to front-line therapy is feasible and provides reduction in MRD, but is associated with viral infections. Dose escalation of alemtuzmab was not associated with DLT. Based on these results, the 30 mg dose of alemtuzumab was explored in an additional 70 patients in the Phase II portion of the study. The encouraging DFS results reported here require confirmation from longer follow-up of the larger Phase II cohort of patients. Disclosures: Stock: Genzyme: Research Funding. Off Label Use: The testing of alemtuzumab for treatment of ALL in adults. Lozanski:Genzyme: Research Funding. Vij:CELGENE: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Powell:Antisoma: Research Funding. Sher:invivoscribe: Employment. Richards:Genzyme: Employment. Sung:genzyme: Employment.

Download Full-text

Romiplostim in Patients Undergoing Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation: Results of a Phase I/II Multicenter Trial

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v128.22.65.65 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 128 (22) ◽

pp. 65-65 ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

Régis Peffault de Latour ◽

Sylvie Chevret ◽

Annalisa Ruggeri ◽

Felipe Suarez ◽

Laetitia Souchet ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Bone Marrow ◽

Septic Shock ◽

Stem Cell ◽

Adverse Events ◽

Stem Cell Transplantation ◽

Phase I ◽

Median Time ◽

Research Funding ◽

Allogeneic Hsct ◽

Grade 3

Abstract Background: Delayed platelet (plt) recovery and secondary thrombocytopenia occur in 5-25% of patients (pts) after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) and is of adverse prognostic significance. Plt transfusion to prevent bleeding remains a mainstay of therapy and role of thrombopoietic agents is not known. In this phase I/II multicenter open trial, we investigated the safety and efficacy of romiplostim (Nplate; Amgen, thousand Oaks, CA) for (pts) with transfusion-dependent thrombocytopenia after allogeneic HSCT (NCT01980030). Patients and methods: Adult pts undergoing standard of care allogeneic HSCT for any disease except myelodysplastic syndrome were eligible for this study 45 days or more after transplantation if they had plt count ² 20 x 109/L sustained for 7 days (² 50 x 109/L with a history of bleeding) or if they were plt transfusion dependent. Pts were excluded if they had abnormal liver function tests, serum creatinine ³ 176.8 μmol/L or had prior venous thrombosis. Pts were given weekly romiplostim for 12 weeks with intra-pt weekly dose escalation from 1µg/Kg to a maximum dose of 10 µg/Kg (with a dose reduction schema in case of plt overshoot). The study was composed of a 12-week treatment period. The primarysafety endpoint was the incidence of any grade 3 or 4 adverse events after HSCT, excluding those expected from the HSCT, as well as clinically significant bleeding events. The primary efficacy endpoint was time to reach a plt count above 50 x 109/L free of plt transfusion. Secondary endpoints were the durable plt response defined as a plt count above 50 x 109/L during 8 consecutive weeks independent of plts transfusions, the 1-year cumulative incidence (CumI) after HSCT of Graft versus host disease (GvHD), relapse and non-relapse mortality rates. All pts had a bone marrow biopsy before treatment and at one year. This study was approved by the research review board of the Hospital Saint-Louis (Paris, France). Statistical analysis was based on a modified intent-to-treat basis, excluding pts who did not fulfill the inclusion criteria. CumI were estimated using nonparametric methods, where deaths prior to the event of interest defined competing risks. Results: 25 pts were included in 4 different HSCT French units between April 2013 and November 2015. The analysis was restricted to 24 pts (one pt with plt count > 20x109/L after inclusion). All but one pt have malignant disease (13/24 acute leukemia). Donor type was related for 12 pts. Stem cell source was peripheral blood in 15 pts and bone marrow in 9 pts, myeloablative conditioning regimen was used in 17 pts. Median time between HSCT and romiplostim initiation was 85 days (interquartile range, IQR 63 - 117). Nineteen pts completed the 12 investigational injections of romiplostim, while five did not due to 3 deaths (1 post transplantation EBV-related lymphoproliferative disorder, 1 relapse and 1 septic shock), 1 boost of donor stem cells and one pt with plt count above 50 Giga/L after 8 injections. A total of 21 adverse events (grade 3, n=10; grade 4 n=11) considered possibly related to romiplostim were reported in 6 pts. Hematological complications appeared in 4 pts (2 neutropenia, 1 anemia and 1 pancytopenia) and liver dysfunction was present in 2 pts (mild cytolysis). Overall, romiplostim was well tolerated with a 6 months adverse events CI of 25.2% (95%IC 7.3 - 43.2). No bleeding event as well as no thrombotic complications appeared. None of the pts developed fibrosis 1 year post treatment (2 pts not yet at 1 year). After romiplostim initiation, 20 pts received a plt transfusion. The median time to reach a plt count above 50 x 109/L free of plt transfusion was 36 days (Figure 1), with required doses of 4 mg/Kg (IQR, 3-6). Fifteen pts obtained a durable plt response. A total of 17 and 12 pts experienced aGVHD and cGVHD, respectively, with 100 days CumI of aGVHD of 67% (95%CI, 47-87) and 1-year CumI of cGvHD of 55% (95%CI, 32-78), respectively. Six pts died during the study (1 PTLD, 1 relapse, 1 septic shock, 1 lung aspergillosis and 2 acute distress respiratory syndrome of unknown origin). CumI of non-relapse mortality was thus of 21% (95%CI, 7-42%). Conclusion: Romiplostim can be safely administered and improves plt count in pts with thrombocytopenia after allogeneic HSCT. The required dose to reach plt count above 50 x 109/L is 4 mg/Kg with a median time of 36 days. Research support was provided in part by Amgen. Disclosures Peffault de Latour: Alexion: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

MRD-Response Driven Phase I/II Study for Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Patients Using Higher Doses of Twice-Weekly Carfilzomib (45 and 56 mg/m2) in Combination with Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2018-99-117120 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 1983-1983 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Neha Korde ◽

Donna Mastey ◽

Sham Mailankody ◽

Hani Hassoun ◽

Alexander M. Lesokhin ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Phase I ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Phase Ii ◽

Research Funding ◽

Standard Dose ◽

Median Number ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Grade 3 ◽

Higher Doses ◽

Best Responses

Abstract Introduction Newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) patients who achieve and maintain minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity demonstrate clinical benefit with prolonged progression-free survival and overall survival. Based on available data showing MRD negativity with standard dose KRD (36 mg/m2) approximating 40% (Korde JamaOnc 2015), we designed a MRD response-adapted treatment study for NDMM, where the number of treatment cycles is determined based on MRD status, instead of the traditional paradigm of fixed number of cycles followed by autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (AHCT). We integrated a flow-based MRD driven platform in this phase I/II study evaluating higher doses of twice-weekly carfilzomib (Car) (45 and 56 mg/m2) in combination with lenalidomide (Len) and dexamethasone (Dex). Methods Eligible NDMM patients were given escalating doses of Car (45 and 56 mg/m2), Len, and Dex in a single arm, phase I standard 3+3 schema design, based on dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) occurring in cycle 1. Treatment consisted of 28-day cycles with Car 20/45 mg/m2 or 20/56 mg/m2 - days 1, 2, 8, 9 15 and 16; Len 25 mg - days 1-21; and Dex 40 mg weekly cycles 1-4, 20 mg after cycle 4. AHCT eligible patients underwent stem cell collection after 6 cycles, and then continue with protocol therapy. Patients achieving MRD negative status (serum, urine, and bone marrow with 10-color flow) received 2 additional cycles from the time of conversion and then stop therapy. Patients with less than an MRD negative response after any cycle continued therapy until treatment completion (max 12 cycles), disease progression, or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint of the phase II study was to determine the MRD negative rate at the MTD dose, using a Simon's optimal two-stage design. Herein, we have updated results on phase I and phase II portions of the study with a median follow-up of 20.7 months (1.4-31.1). For available data, we present MFC and NGS MRD platforms. Results Twenty-nine patients have enrolled onto study between October 2016 - June 2018, with 18 in phase 1 and stage I of phase II and 11 in stage II of phase II, thus completing target accrual. There were 16 males, 13 females, median age 61 (43-75) years. Baseline characteristics included 18(62%) ISS-I, 9(31%) ISS-II, and 2(7%) ISS-III, and 7(24%) patients high risk FISH (t(4,14), t(14,16), p53 deletion). There were no DLTs within the first cycle that met protocol criteria (0/3 patients in 20/45 mg/m2 cohort and 0/6 patients in 20/56 mg/m2). The MTD chosen was 20/56 mg/m2, and an additional 20 patients were enrolled. Three patients came off study (56 mg/m2 cohort): one due to MI (during C2); one due to intolerable rash (during C2); and one due to personal preference (during C2). Among all 29 patients, grade 3/4 non-hematologic toxicities included 6(21%) rash, 5(17%) electrolyte disturbances, 4(14%) infections, 3(10%) GI, 2(7%) cardiopulmonary, 2(7%) VTE, 2(7%) mood, 2(7%) cataract, and 1(3%) hyperglycemia, and grade 3/4 hematologic toxicities included 12(41%) lymphopenia, 2(7%) leukopenia, 1(3%) neutropenia, and 1(3%) thrombocytopenia. Ten patients had 13 SAEs. For the 15 patients completing protocol therapy, a median number of 11 (7-12) cycles were delivered, and best responses include 9(60%) sCR/CR MRD neg and 6(40%) obtaining VGPR. Among patients reaching sCR/CR MRD neg status, the median time to reach was 8 (5-9) cycles. Among the eleven patients currently remaining on study, 7 have received at least 1 cycle of therapy (response eligible) and best responses thus far, included 1(14%) sCR/CR MRD pending, 4(57%) VGPR, and 2(29%) PR with a median number of 4 (1-8) cycles delivered. Table comparison of MRD platforms shown in sCR/CR patients. Among patients that remain on study, median 20.7 months, no patients have progressed and all remain alive. One patient that came off study due to personal preference during cycle 2 achieved a PR, and has progressed since. Conclusion In this phase I/II clinical trial assessing higher doses of twice-weekly Car dosing in combination with Len and Dex, we established MTD 56 mg/m2 and demonstrated a MRD platform using multi-parametric flow cytometry can be successfully used to tailor individualized treatment plans. Higher doses of twice weekly Car (45 and 56 mg/m2) in combination with Len and Dex, resulted in rapid and deep responses with approximately 60% MRD negative rate, and a safety profile similar to KRD standard dose (Car 36 mg/m2). Table. Table. Disclosures Korde: Amgen: Research Funding. Mailankody:Janssen: Research Funding; Physician Education Resource: Honoraria; Takeda: Research Funding; Juno: Research Funding. Hassoun:Oncopeptides AB: Research Funding. Lesokhin:Janssen: Research Funding; Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria; Genentech: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Serametrix, inc.: Patents & Royalties: Royalties; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria. Smith:Celgene: Consultancy, Patents & Royalties: CAR T cell therapies for MM, Research Funding. Arcila:Invivoscribe, Inc.: Consultancy, Honoraria. Ho:Invivoscribe, Inc.: Honoraria. Landgren:Janssen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Merck: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Karyopharm: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy.

Download Full-text