Phenomenon of Pain In Thalassemia: A Prospective Analysis by the Thalassemia Clinical Research Network (TCRN)

Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 256-256
Author(s):  
Dru Haines ◽  
Susan Carson ◽  
Sage Green ◽  
Marie Martin ◽  
Thomas D. Coates ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 256 Background: Pain is not a symptom generally associated with thalassemia. However, healthcare providers have anecdotally noted increasing patient reports of chronic pain over the last decade creating an impetus for the TCRN to conduct this prospective, observational assessment of pain in patients with thalassemia over the age of 12. Study goals include assessment of pain prevalence, severity and sites and whether these factors are impacted by age, gender or diagnosis. Methods: Pain was assessed quarterly using the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI). Two hundred fifty-one thalassemia patients ranging in age from 12 to 71 (average age of 28.75) receiving care at one of 12 thalassemia centers across the US and Canada participated in the study. Fifty-four percent of participants were female. Diagnoses included: Beta Thalassemia (80%), E Beta thalassemia (11%), Hemoglobin H and H Constant Spring (6%) and other thalassemia conditions (3%). Eighty percent of participants were chronically transfused, 6% intermittently transfused and 14% had never been transfused. This report reviews baseline findings. Results: At study entry, 64% of the 251 participants reported experiencing pain over the last four weeks, of whom 21% reported pain on a daily basis. In comparison, 26% of the American public, 20 years and older, reported pain over a one month period according to National Center for Health Statistics data, 2006. Ordinal regression analysis of participant ratings of worst, least, and average pain over the last seven days demonstrated significant (p<0.001) correlation of increased age with increased pain across all categories irrespective of diagnosis, transfusion status or gender. Similarly, ordinal regression analysis revealed that pain increased with participant age and significantly correlated (p<0.001) with a negative impact of pain on patient's affect and activity as measured by the BPI interference scales. Eighty-two percent of those reporting pain indicated lower back as a site of pain. In logistic regression models, lower back (p=0.046), arm (p=0.047) and hip (p=0.009) pain significantly increased with age. The number of bodily pain sites (p=0.033) also increased with age which was determined using linear regression. Among patients reporting pain in the last seven days, 77% reported having pain for one year or longer and 26% reported pain for 5 or more years. Participants reporting pain in the last 7 days identified the following reasons for their pain: thalassemia (60%), low hemoglobin (55%), bone pain (37%) and muscle spasm (30%). Participants indicated multiple methods of managing pain including: blood transfusion (54%), rest (51%) massage (46%) and heat (39%). Medications were the most frequently cited pain intervention (72 % of participants) with the most common mediations taken being NSAIDs (71%), followed by acetaminophen (48%), short acting narcotics (24%) and long acting narcotics (11%). Twenty-five percent of participants reported they received no pain relief from medications or non-pharmaceutical treatments, and only 4% reported they received complete pain relief with treatment. Half the population reported they gained about 50% relief from pain with treatments. Conclusions: These data show that pain is a significant issue for patients with thalassemia and as patient's age pain increases. Pain assessment should be conducted on a regular basis for all patients with thalassemia since neither transfusion status nor diagnosis are a reliable indicator of pain status. The study also indicates that chronic pain (pain lasting greater than one year) is an issue for thalassemia patients and underscores the need for further study of pain in this population. Analysis of pain follow up data collected at 3 month intervals post baseline is being conducted to assess whether severity levels vary over time. Disclosures: Coates: Novartis: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Neufeld:Novartis, Inc: Research Funding; Ferrokin, Inc: Research Funding.

2017 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 225-232
Author(s):  
Janatin Hastuti ◽  
Neni Trilusiana Rahmawati ◽  
Rusyad Adi Suriyanto

Background: Weight status perception associates with objective weight status and is important in the management of weight control. To date, perception of weight status among Indonesian youths has not been reported.Objectives: This study aimed to examine the association between body mass index and weight status perception in a sample of college students in Yogyakarta Province.Materials and Methods: A sample of 209 boys and 269 girls of college students in Yogyakarta Province were measured for their stature and body weight. Body mass index was calculated (BMI). Data of demographic, exercise, and diet were collected. Weight status perception was based on participant responses to a question regarding how they classified their own body size as underweight, normal, overweight, or obese. Ordinal regression analysis was performed to evaluate factors associated with weight status misperception among boys and girls.Results: Overall, 43.5% of boys and 37.5% of girls misclassified their own weight status by actual BMI. Of particular note, 75.9% of obese boys and 78.6% of obese girls underestimated their weight status as overweight or normal weight. Whereas, 9.1% and 23.4% of normal weight boys and girls respectively, overestimated their weight status. Ordinal regression analysis revealed that, weight status misperception from others was significantly contributed (p<0.01) to misperception of weight status among boys and girls with OR of 10.31 and 8.13 respectively. Diet practicing was significantly correlated with weight status misperception in boys (p<0.05) with an OR of 19.57.Conclusions: Weight status misperception was prevalent among normal weight and obese students. Obese students of both gender and normal weight boys tended to underestimate their weight status, whereas normal weight girls were likely to overestimate their weight status.Bangladesh Journal of Medical Science Vol.16(2) 2017 p.225-232


2018 ◽  
Vol 100-B (6) ◽  
pp. 740-748 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. D. Clement ◽  
M. Bardgett ◽  
D. Weir ◽  
J. Holland ◽  
C. Gerrand ◽  
...  

AimsThe primary aim of this study was to assess the rate of patient satisfaction one year after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) according to the focus of the question asked. The secondary aims were to identify independent predictors of patient satisfaction according to the focus of the question.Patients and MethodsA retrospective cohort of 2521 patients undergoing a primary unilateral TKA were identified from an established regional arthroplasty database. Patient demographics, comorbidities, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) and 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-12) scores were collected preoperatively and one year postoperatively. Patient satisfaction was assessed using four questions, which focused on overall outcome, activity, work, and pain. Logistic regression analysis was used to identify independent preoperative predictors of increased stiffness when adjusting for confounding variables.ResultsUsing patient satisfaction with the overall outcome (n = 2265, 89.8%) as the standard, there was no difference in the rate of satisfaction for pain relief (n = 2277, odds ratio (OR) 0.95, 95% confident intervals (CI) 0.79 to 1.14, p = 0.60), but patients were more likely to be dissatisfied with activities (79.3%, n = 2000/2521, OR 2.22, 95% CI 1.96 to 2.70, p < 0.001) and work (85.8%, n = 2163/2521, OR 1.47, 95% CI 1.23 to 1.75, p < 0.001). Logistic regression analysis identified different predictors of satisfaction for each of the focused satisfaction questions. Overall satisfaction was influenced by diabetes (p = 0.03), depression (p = 0.004), back pain (p < 0.001), and SF-12 physical (p = 0.008) and mental (p = 0.01) components. Satisfaction with activities was influenced by depression (p = 0.001), back pain (p < 0.001), WOMAC stiffness score (p = 0.03), and SF-12 physical (p < 0.001) and mental (p < 0.001) components. Satisfaction with work was influenced by depression (p = 0.007), back pain (p < 0.001), WOMAC function (p = 0.04) and stiffness (p = 0.05) scores, and SF-12 physical (p < 0.001) and mental (p < 0.001) components. Satisfaction with pain relief was influenced by diabetes (p < 0.001), back pain (p < 0.001), and SF-12 mental component (p = 0.04).ConclusionThe focus of the satisfaction question significantly influences the rate and the predictors of patient satisfaction after TKA. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2018;100-B:740–8.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document