Rituximab Plus Chlorambucil In Patients with CD20-Positive B-Cell Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL): Final Response Analysis of An Open-Label Phase II Study

Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 697-697 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Hillmen ◽  
John G. Gribben ◽  
George A. Follows ◽  
Donald Milligan ◽  
Hazem A. Sayala ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽  
Intensive Chemotherapy ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Off Label

Abstract Abstract 697 Introduction: Despite the increasing use of combination therapy with rituximab, fludarabine and cyclophosphamide (R-FC) for chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), a significant proportion of patients (pts) are not suitable or eligible for such intensive chemotherapy due to co-morbidity and/or age. In those pts considered unfit for R-FC, chlorambucil (Chl) remains a widely used first-line therapy. However, overall responses rates with Chl are relatively modest with very few complete remissions and therefore more effective treatment options are required for this patient group. In this multi-centre Phase II study we evaluate the feasibility of adding R to Chl and assess response rate compared to single agent Chl. Methods: One hundred previously untreated CLL pts requiring therapy according to iwCLL criteria received R (day 1; 375 mg/m2 i.v. cycle 1, 500 mg/m2 cycles 2–6) plus Chl (days 1–7; 10mg/m2/day p.o.) every 28 days for 6 cycles. A further 6 cycles of Chl alone was permitted in pts with continuing clinical response at 6 cycles. Efficacy data were compared to matched historic data from the UK LRF CLL4 trial, which treated pts between 1999 and 2004 with Chl-monotherapy at the same dose as used in this study. Each patient of this study was matched to 2 pts treated with Chl in the LRF CLL4 study according to Binet Stage (B or C), VH Mutation (mutated or unmutated), 11q FISH (deleted or not) and age. It should be noted that the CLL4 data was from 1999–2005, while the Chl-R responses were from 2008. Over this time, any improvements in patient response may be due to better care, improved knowledge, different concomitant medications, etc, rather than treatment used. In addition the median age of patients in LRF CLL4 was significantly lower than those treated with Chl-R (66.5 compared with 70 yrs). Results: A total of 100 pts from 12 centres, who had completed the treatment were included in this analysis; median age was 70 years (range 43–86) and 65% were male. To date, 88 pts remain alive and 12 pts have died. Ninety-two pts (92%) had reported an AE by the end of treatment. The most common AEs were: nausea (47 pts), neutropenia (39 pts), lymphopenia (38 pts), fatigue (26 pts), pyrexia (26 pts), leukopenia (21 pts), diarrhoea (20 pts), vomiting (19 pts), anaemia (18 pts) and thrombocytopenia (18 pts). Most AEs reported were Grade 1–2; Grade 3–4 neutropenia occurred in 39% of pts. Infusion-related reactions occurred in 7 pts. Overall, 37% of pts reported a total of 53 serious AEs (SAEs). The most common SAEs were febrile neutropenia (5 pts) and neutropenic sepsis (4 pts). Overall response rate (ORR) on an intent-to-treat analysis was 82% (95% CI, 73.1–89.0), with 9 pts achieving a complete response (CR), 58 pts showing partial response (PR), 15 pts showing nodular PR (nPR) and 11 pts with stable disease (SD). Median PFS to date is 23.5 months. ORR in this study was 16% higher than in the matched subset of Chl pts from the CLL4 study (95% CI, 6.0–26.0%), suggesting improved responses for Chl-R compared with Chl-alone. Conclusions: With a median age of 70 years, the population in this study was noticeably older than that of pts in CLL4 and other large trials in CLL. This study represents a more typical CLL patient population, as often seen in the clinic. These data confirm that in previously untreated CLL pts who are unable to tolerate a more intensive chemotherapy regimen, the combination of R and Chl is an efficacious therapy with an acceptable tolerability profile resulting in a better ORR than Chl monotherapy. Further evaluation of R-Chl in a randomized Phase III study is warranted. Disclosures: Hillmen: F.Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Genzyme: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Glaxo Smith Kline: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Off Label Use: Rituximab is used broadly in this indication at some specific lines of therapy/chemotherapy combinations may be off label in some countries. Dearden:Roche Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Genzyme: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Kennedy:Roche Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Pettitt:Glaxo Smith Kline: Research Funding. Rawstron:Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BD Bioscience: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Patents & Royalties; Genzyme: Honoraria. Pocock:F.Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

scholarly journals Evaluating the Efficacy, Safety, and Dose Dependent Activities of Entospletinib in Patients with Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia

Blood ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 130 (Suppl_1) ◽  
pp. 832-832
Author(s):  
Jeffrey P. Sharman ◽  
Kathryn S. Kolibaba ◽  
Jose Azar ◽  
Rama Balaraman ◽  
Roger M. Lyons ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Median Duration ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Study Drug ◽  
Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Initial Report

Abstract Introduction: Despite recent therapeutic advances for the treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), a need remains for novel treatment strategies. Entospletinib (ENTO) is an orally bioavailable, selective inhibitor of spleen tyrosine kinase (Syk). Syk is a mediator of B-cell receptor signaling in normal and transformed B cells. Following our initial report of clinical activity of ENTO in CLL, a new formulation of spray-dried dispersion (SDD) of ENTO was made to optimize pharmacokinetic aspects of the medication such as lesser drug-drug interactions. We present results based on a data cutoff of June 8, 2017. Methods: Eligible patients with relapsed and refractory (R/R) CLL were randomized at 1:1:1 ratio to 3 treatment groups receiving 100 mg, 200 mg, and 400 mg of the SDD form of ENTO, twice daily (BID) in a phase 2 trial (NCT01799889). Tumor response was assessed based on the modified International Workshop on Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia criteria, with imaging (CT/MRI) planned at weeks 8, 16, 24, and then every 12 weeks. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) at week 24. All efficacy data were assessed by an Independent Review Committee. Results: A cohort of 61 patients with R/R CLL was enrolled, and 60 received ≥1 dose of ENTO (100 mg: n=19; 200 mg: n=22; 400 mg: n=19). Two patients (3.3%, 1 each in the 100 mg and 200 mg groups) discontinued prior to initial tumor assessment. One patient at 400 mg was not included in the response evaluation due to pending scan review. Demographics of the 100 mg, 200 mg, and 400 mg ENTO groups were men (47%, 68%, and 63%, respectively) with median ages of 71, 75, and 65 years, respectively. Most had previously received rituximab (68% to 95% across groups), and median prior therapies were 1-2 (across groups). The median duration of ENTO exposure was highest in the 400 mg group (67 weeks) compared to the 100 mg and 200 mg groups (36 and 28 weeks, respectively). The PFS rates at week 24 were as follows: 100 mg: 66% (95% CI: 36% to 85%); 200 mg: 83% (95% CI: 54% to 94%), and 400 mg: 82% (95%CI: 55% to 94%). The median PFS for each group was: 100 mg: 16.6 mo (95% CI: 5.4 mo, not reached (NR)); 200 mg: 16.8 mo (95% CI: 8.1 mo, NR), and 400 mg: 16.4 mo (95% CI: 5.6 mo, NR). The objective response rate (ORR) was 28% (90% CI: 12% to 50%), 43% (90% CI: 25% to 63%), and 61% (90% CI: 39% to 80%) for 100 mg, 200 mg, and 400 mg groups, respectively. One patient in the 400 mg group achieved a complete response. Figure 1 shows individual patients' changes in tumor size. Highest lymph node response rate of 67% (90% CI: 45% to 84%) was observed in the 400 mg group compared to 33% (90% CI: 16% to 55%) and 38% (90% CI: 21% to 58%) for the 100 mg and 200 mg groups, respectively. The most common treatment-related adverse events (TEAEs; any grade/≥grade 3, independent of causality) and common lab abnormalities are summarized in Table 1. There were 10 TEAEs in 9 patients that led to study drug discontinuation. Two deaths were reported for the 400 mg group, but neither was related to study drug. Overall safety and efficacy results for the ENTO SDD formulation were comparable with those reported for CLL patients enrolled in the original cohort taking the 800 mg mono-mesylate formulation BID. As of this data cutoff point, 32% (n=6) of the 100 mg ENTO group, 32% (n=7) of the 200 mg ENTO group, and 53% (n=10) of the 400 mg ENTO group were continuing ENTO treatment. Discontinuations were primarily for disease progression (21% to 27%) or AEs (5% to 21%). Conclusions: ENTO in SDD formulation was well tolerated among the 3 different doses tested. There is no evidence of increased clinically significant toxicity associated with ENTO administered at 400 mg. Moreover, there were increases in ORR, PFS rate at 24 weeks, and median duration of exposure in 400 mg compared to the 200 mg and 100 mg groups. Median PFS was comparable between the 3 different dose groups evaluated. These results support the rationale for 400 mg BID of ENTO SDD to be the starting dose for future phase 2 trials in CLL. Further development of ENTO in CLL will focus on its role in combination therapies. Disclosures Sharman: Novartis: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; Gilead Sciences, Inc.: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Kolibaba: Novartis: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; TG Therapeutics: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Gilead Sciences, Inc: Consultancy, Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; Cell Therapeutics: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Acerta: Research Funding. Balaraman: Eli Lilly: Honoraria; Abbvie: Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Research Funding. Smith: Kite Pharma: Research Funding; Gilead: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Genentech: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Morphosys: Consultancy. Abella-Dominicis: Gilead Sciences, Inc: Employment. Ye: Gilead Sciences, Inc: Employment, Equity Ownership. Shi: Gilead Sciences, Inc: Employment. Forero-Torres: 47 Pharmaceutical: Research Funding; GSK: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Incyte: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; Genentech/Roche: Research Funding; Juno: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Affimed: Research Funding.

Final Results of the Phase I/II Study of Chemosensitization Using the CXCR4 Inhibitor Plerixafor in Combination with Bortezomib in Patients with Relapsed or Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 4256-4256 ◽  
Author(s):  
Irene M. Ghobrial ◽  
Kenneth H. Shain ◽  
Jacob Laubach ◽  
Patrick Henrick ◽  
James Vredenburg ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Plasma Cells ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Recommended Dose ◽  
Advisory Committees

Abstract PURPOSE: This study aimed to determine activity and safety of the CXCR4 inhibitor plerixafor in combination with bortezomib and dexamethasone in patients with relapsed or refractory Multiple Myeloma (MM). This was based on our preclinical studies showing that plerixafor (Mozobil, Sanofi Corporation) induces de-adhesion of MM cells and sensitization to bortezomib in preclinical animal models. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Theprimary endpoint of the phase I study was the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and for the phase II study, the safety and response rate of the combination. Eligibility criteria included patients with relapsed or relapsed/refractory MM with 1-5 prior lines of therapy including bortezomib (unless patients were refractory to bortezomib). The phase I included 8 cohorts with different doses and two treatment schedules. In cohorts 1-5, patients received plerixafor at the recommended dose sq on days 1-6 of each cycle and bortezomib at the recommended dose twice a week on days 3, 6, 10, and 13 every 21 days. In cohort 5b-6, plerixafor was given at the recommended dose sq on days 1, 3, 6, 10, and 13 and bortezomib was given at the recommended dose twice a week on days 3, 6, 10, and 13 every 21 days. For the phase II portion patients received plerixafor at the MTD established in phase I of trial, 320 mcg/kg sq on days 1, 2, 3, 6, 10, and 13. Bortezomib was given 1.3 mg/m2 IV or sq twice a week on days 3, 6, 10, 13, every 21 days. Dexamethasone was given at 40mg on days of Bortezomib. RESULTS: A total of 58 patients were enrolled on this study from June 2009 to March 2015, with 25 on the phase I and 33 on the phase II study. In the phase I study, the median age was 60 years (range, 43-85), the median number of prior therapies was 2 (range, 1-4), with all but 3 patients receiving prior bortezomib. The median number of cycles on therapy was 4 (1-12). Dose limiting toxicities including insomnia, restlessness, and psychosis were observed in two patients at dose level 6 (plerixafor 0.40 mg/kg and bortezomib 1.3 mg/m2). Therefore, 3 additional patients were enrolled at dose level 5b (plerixafor 0.32 mg/kg and bortezomib 1.3 mg/m2). There were no grade 4 toxicities. Grade 3 toxicities included lymphopenia (40%), hypophosphatemia (20%), anemia (10%), hyponatremia (10%), hypercalcemia (10%), and bone fracture due to myeloma bone disease (10%). Twenty-three patients were evaluable for response, including 1 (4%) complete response (CR), 1 (4%) very good partial response (VGPR), 1 partial remission (PR) and 2 (9%) MR, and 15 (65%) having stable disease with only 3 (13%) progressive disease (PD). In the phase II study, the median age was 63 (46-83). The median number of prior therapies was 2 (1-5), with 22 (66%) who have received prior bortezomib. The median number of cycles on therapy is 5 (1-24). The response rate included 5 VGPR (16%), 11 PR (35%) with an overall response rate of 51% and another 11 (35%) stable disease. Grade 3/4 toxicities included thrombocytopenia (68%), lymphopenia (6%), hypophosphatemia (2%), anemia (4%), infections (4%), hyponatremia (2%), hypercalcemia (2%) and neurological toxicity (2%). We also examined in vivo mobilization of plasma cells, CD34+ hematopoietic stem cells and other accessory bone marrow cells. Analysis of these samples showed rapid mobilization of plasma cells at 2 hours post-plerixafor with a rapid return to normal levels at 4 and 24 hours post plerixafor. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of plerixafor and bortezomib is generally well tolerated with minimal neuropathy or other toxicities seen to date. The responses observed are strongly encouraging with 51% ORR in this relapsed and refractory population. This study was supported by R01CA133799-01, and by Sanofi and Takeda Corporations. Disclosures Off Label Use: Plerixafor in myeloma. Azab:Verastem: Research Funding; Selexys: Research Funding; Karyopharm: Research Funding; Cell Works: Research Funding; Targeted Therapeutics LLC: Other: Founder and owner . Schlossman:Millennium: Consultancy. Richardson:Celgene Corporation: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gentium S.p.A.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Millennium Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Final Results of Phase I/II Trial of the Oral mTOR Inhibitor Everolimus (RAD001) in Combination with Bortezomib and Rituximab (RVR) in Relapsed or Refractory Waldenstrom Macroglobulinemia

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 3081-3081 ◽  
Author(s):  
Irene M. Ghobrial ◽  
Robert Allyn Redd ◽  
Jeffrey Matous ◽  
Philippe Armand ◽  
Erica N Boswell ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Maintenance Therapy ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Overall Response Rate ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Advisory Board ◽  
Advisory Committees

Abstract Background: Waldenstrom Macroglobulinemia is a distinct lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma. Several clinical trials have shown high rates of response in patients with relapsed WM using bortezomib and rituximab combinations. In addition, the TORC1 inhibitor everolimus has previously shown a high response rate of 70% in this patient population. In this trial, we aimed to examine the safety and activity of the combination of everolimus with bortezomib and rituximab (RVR) and to determine whether a deep response can be achieved with a triple combination of targeted therapeutic agents in WM. Methods: The phase I portion of the study evaluated the maximum tolerated dose of everolimus, rituximab combination or RVR combination, while the phase II portion evaluated the depth of responses to the RVR combination. Patients were eligible for this trial if they had relapsed or refractory WM. There was no limit on the number of prior therapies. Patients were required to be ≥18 years old and have measurable and symptomatic disease. For the phase I, patients were assigned to a dose level in the order of study entry. In the dose-escalation scheme, everolimus was given at 5 or 10 mg PO with rituximab, or with bortezomib at 1.3 or 1.6 mg/m2 and rituximab. Rituximab was given at a fixed dose of 375 mg/m2 IV. In the phase II, patients received everolimus 10 mg flat dose PO daily, Bortezomib IV 1.6mg/m2 weekly on days 1, 8, 15 q 28 days and rituximab IV 375 mg/ m2 weekly on days 1, 8, 15 22 q 28 days on cycles 1 and 4 only. Treatment was daily and 4 weeks (28 days) was considered one cycle. Patients received a total of 6 cycles followed by maintenance therapy with everolimus 10 mg PO daily until progression. Dexamethasone was not permitted. Patients were assessed every cycle while on combination therapy, and every 3 months while on maintenance therapy. Patients with stable disease (SD) or responding disease could continue therapy until progression. Results: From April 2010 to July 2013, a total of 46 patients were enrolled on this trial; of these, 23 patients were in the phase I study and 23 patients in the phase II study. The median number of prior treatments was 2 (range 1-9) Prior therapies received included bortezomib-based therapy (26, 56%) and rituximab (45, 98%). Median treatment duration was 10 months (range, 3 weeks to 41 months) for all patients. There were no DLTs observed and no deaths occurred on this study. The most common toxicities in all patients on study were fatigue (29 patients, 63%); anemia and leukopenia (each in 24 patients, 52%); neutropenia (22, 48%); diarrhea (20, 43%); and neuropathy, pneumonitis/pulmonary infiltrates (each in 19 patients, 41%). The overall response rate (ORR) which includes patients with minor response (MR) or better in the phase II study (N=23) was 91% (95% CI, 72-99%) with 1 CR, 1 VGPR, 16 PR, and 3 MR. When all 36 patients on the phase I and phase II studies who received full dose of RVR were combined, the ORR was 89% (95% CI 74 – 97%), with 2 CR, 3 VGPR, 21 PR, and 6 MR. Conclusions: The RVR regimen is safe and well tolerated. RVR led to an overall response rate of 89% with PR or better achieved in 72% making this a highly effective regimen even in patients previously treated with bortezomib and/or rituximab. This study represents one of the first combination efforts of novel agents targeting the PI3K signaling pathway with a proteasome inhibitor. Disclosures Ghobrial: Sanofi: Research Funding; Noxxon: Research Funding; BMS: Advisory board, Advisory board Other, Research Funding; Onyx: Advisory board Other; Millennium: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Off Label Use: Bortezomib and everolimus are not approved for WM. Laubach:Novartis: Research Funding; Onyx Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding. Anderson:Celgene: Consultancy; Sanofi-Aventis: Consultancy; Onyx: Consultancy; Acetylon: Scientific Founder, Scientific Founder Other; Oncoprep: Scientific Founder Other; Gilead Sciences: Consultancy.

scholarly journals Impact of Idelalisib Treatment Interruption with or without Dose Reduction on Outcomes in Relapsed / Refractory Indolent Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma and Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 5468-5468
Author(s):  
Shuo Ma ◽  
Rebecca J Chan ◽  
Lin Gu ◽  
Guan Xing ◽  
Nishan Rajakumaraswamy ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Dose Reduction ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Treatment Interruption ◽  
Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽  
Hodgkin's Lymphoma ◽  
Advisory Committees

Introduction: Idelalisib (IDELA) is the first-in-class PI3Kδ inhibitor and is approved as a monotherapy for relapsed or refractory (R/R) follicular lymphoma and in combination with rituximab for R/R chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). We previously evaluated IDELA treatment interruption as a mechanism to mitigate treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and found that limited interruption with clinically appropriate re-challenging resulted in superior clinical outcomes. These findings did not comprehensively address the potential confound of interruptions inherently being associated with longer duration of therapy (DoT). Furthermore, the compound effect of IDELA dose reduction together with treatment interruption on IDELA efficacy was not assessed. Objectives: 1) To evaluate whether the benefit of IDELA interruption is retained in patients on therapy >180 days, a duration previously found to be associated with longer overall survival among patients who discontinued IDELA due to an AE; and 2) To compare clinical outcomes of patients who reduced IDELA dosing in addition to interrupting IDELA with those of patients who interrupted IDELA without additional dose reduction. Methods: Using data from Gilead-sponsored trials of patients with R/R indolent non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (iNHL) treated with IDELA monotherapy (N=125, Gopal et al., N. Engl. J. Med., 2014) or with R/R CLL treated with IDELA + anti-CD20 (N=110, Furman et al., N. Engl. J. Med., 2014; and N=173, Jones et al., Lancet Haematol., 2017), DoT, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were compared between patients on IDELA therapy >180 days with vs. without interruption and between patients who experienced Interruption and Dose Reduction (IDR) vs. patients who experienced Interruption but NoDose Reduction (INoDR) at any point during IDELA treatment. Interruption was defined as missing at least one IDELA treatment day due to an AE and dose reduction could have occurred before or after the first interruption. PFS and OS were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and were compared using a log-rank test. Results: Sixty-nine of 125 patients with R/R iNHL (55.2%) and 222 of 283 patients with R/R CLL (78.4%) remained on IDELA therapy >180 days with 29 (42.0%) and 103 (46.4%) of them, respectively, experiencing interruption on or after day 180 (Table 1). The proportions of patients with interruption before day 180 were similar within each of these populations. Among patients on therapy >180 days, those with treatment interruption on or after 180 days had a longer median (m) DOT than patients without interruption (Table 1). Both PFS and OS were longer in CLL patients who interrupted compared to those who did not interrupt (mPFS=28.9 mos. vs. 17.3 mos. and mOS=not reached [NR] vs. 40.4 mos. for with interruption vs. without interruption, respectively, Table 1 and Figure 1). In patients with iNHL, no difference was observed in PFS or OS between patients who interrupted vs. those who did not (Table 1). Of patients who experienced at least one AE-induced interruption at any point during IDELA therapy (n=63 iNHL and n=157 CLL), 47 iNHL patients (74.6%) and 84 CLL patients (53.5%) also had dose reduction. Two iNHL patients (1.6%) and 5 CLL patients (1.8%) had IDELA dose reduction but no interruption. Both iNHL and CLL patients with IDR experienced a similar PFS compared to patients with INoDR (mPFS=16.5 mos. vs. 14.2 mos. for iNHL and 21.8 mos. vs. 22.1 mos. for CLL with IDR vs. INoDR, respectively, Table 2). However, OS was longer in both iNHL and CLL patients with IDR compared to INoDR (mOS=61.2 mos. vs. 35.3 mos. for iNHL and NR vs. 42.4 mos. for CLL, respectively, Table 2; CLL patients shown in Figure 2). Discussion: IDELA treatment interruption is not associated with rapid clinical deterioration, as observed with some B-cell receptor signaling pathway inhibitors. No clear relationship between IDELA DoT and frequency of interruption was observed. When normalized for DoT >180 days, IDELA treatment interruption retained its clinical benefit in the CLL population. When utilized together with IDELA interruption, dose reduction did not lead to inferior clinical outcomes but instead extended OS in both iNHL and CLL populations. Adherence to treatment interruption and dose reduction guidance as outlined in the IDELA USPI may optimize IDELA tolerability and efficacy for patients with iNHL and CLL. Disclosures Ma: Janssen: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Gilead: Research Funding; Abbvie: Research Funding; Juno: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Xeme: Research Funding; Beigene: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Astra Zeneca: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Kite: Consultancy; Acerta: Research Funding; Bioverativ: Consultancy; Genentech: Consultancy. Chan:Gilead Sciences, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Gu:Gilead Sciences, Inc.: Employment. Xing:Gilead Sciences, Inc.: Employment. Rajakumaraswamy:Gilead Sciences, Inc.: Employment. Ruzicka:Gilead Sciences, Inc.: Employment. Wagner-Johnston:Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; ADC Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Jannsen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bayer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

IKZF3 Overexpression Phenocopies Gain-of-Function Mutation in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 9-9
Author(s):  
Shanye Yin ◽  
Gregory Lazarian ◽  
Elisa Ten Hacken ◽  
Tomasz Sewastianik ◽  
Satyen Gohil ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽  
Dna Binding ◽  
B Cell ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Bcr Signaling ◽  
Experimental Group

A hotspot mutation within the DNA-binding domain of IKZF3 (IKZF3-L162R) has been identified as a putative driver in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL); however, its functional effects are unknown. We recently confirmed its role as a CLL driver in a B cell-restricted conditional knock-in model. IKZF3 mutation altered mature B cell development and signaling capacity, and induced CLL-like disease in elderly mice (~40% penetrance). Moreover, we found IKZF3-L162R acts as a gain-of-function mutation, altering DNA binding specificity and target selection of IKZF3, and resulting in overexpression of multiple B-cell receptor (BCR) genes. Consistent with the murine data, RNA-sequencing analysis showed that human CLL cells with mut-IKZF3 [n=4] have an enhanced signature of BCR-signaling gene expression compared to WT-IKZF3 [n=6, all IGHV unmutated] (p<0.001), and also exhibited general upregulation of key BCR-signaling regulators. These results confirm the role of IKZF3 as a master regulator of BCR-signaling gene expression, with the mutation contributing to overexpression of these genes. While mutation in IKZF3 has a clear functional impact on a cardinal CLL-associated pathway, such as BCR signaling, we note that this driver occurs only at low frequency in patients (~3%). Because somatic mutation represents but one mechanism by which a driver can alter a cellular pathway, we examined whether aberrant expression of IKZF3 could also yield differences in BCR-signaling gene expression. We have observed expression of the IKZF3 gene to be variably dysregulated amongst CLL patients through re-analysis of transcriptomic data from two independent cohorts of human CLL (DFCI, Landau et al., 2014; ICGC, Ferreira et al., 2014). We thus examined IKZF3 expression and BCR-signaling gene expression, or the 'BCR score' (calculated as the mean expression of 75 BCR signaling-associate genes) in those cohorts (DFCI cohort, n=107; ICGC cohort, n=274). Strikingly, CLL cells with higher IKZF3 expression (defined as greater than median expression) had higher BCR scores than those with lower IKZF3 expression (<median) (p=0.0015 and p<0.0001, respectively). These findings were consistent with the notion that IKZF3 may act as a broad regulator of BCR signaling genes, and that IKZF3 overexpression, like IKZF3 mutation, may provide fitness advantage. In support of this notion, our re-analysis of a gene expression dataset of 107 CLL samples (Herold Leukemia 2011) revealed that higher IKZF3 expression associated with poorer prognosis and worse overall survival (P=0.035). We previously reported that CLL cells with IKZF3 mutation appeared to increase in cancer cell fraction (CCF) with resistance to fludarabine-based chemotherapy (Landau Nature 2015). Instances of increase in mut-IKZF3 CCF upon treatment with the BCR-signaling inhibitor ibrutinib have been reported (Ahn ASH 2019). These studies together suggest an association of IKZF3 mutation with increased cellular survival following either chemotherapy or targeted treatment. To examine whether higher expression of IKZF3 was associated with altered sensitivity to ibrutinib, we performed scRNA-seq analysis (10x Genomics) of two previously treatment-naïve patients undergoing ibrutinib therapy (paired samples, baseline vs. Day 220). We analyzed an average of 11,080 cells per patient (2000 genes/cell). Of note, following ibrutinib treatment, remaining CLL cells expressed higher levels of IKZF3 transcript compared to pretreatment baseline (both p<0.0001), whereas no such change was observed in matched T cells (n ranging between 62 to 652 per experimental group, p>0.05), suggesting that cells with high expression of IKZF3 were selected by ibrutinib treatment. Moreover, we showed that ibrutinib treatment resulted in consistent upregulation of BCR-signaling genes (e.g., CD79B, LYN, GRB2, FOS, RAC1, PRKCB and NFKBIA) (n ranging between 362 to 1374 per experimental group, all p<0.0001), which were likewise activated by mutant IKZF3. Altogether, these data imply that IKZF3 mutation or overexpression may influence upregulation of BCR-signaling genes and enhance cellular fitness even during treatment with BCR-signaling inhibitors. We highlight our observation that IKZF3 mutation appears to be phenocopied by elevated IKZF3 expression, and suggest that alterations in mRNA or protein level that mimic genetic mutations could be widespread in human cancers. Disclosures Kipps: Pharmacyclics/ AbbVie, Breast Cancer Research Foundation, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Oncternal Therapeutics, Inc., Specialized Center of Research (SCOR) - The Leukemia and Lymphoma Society (LLS), California Institute for Regenerative Medicine (CIRM): Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Genentech/Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; VelosBio: Research Funding; Oncternal Therapeutics, Inc.: Other: Cirmtuzumab was developed by Thomas J. Kipps in the Thomas J. Kipps laboratory and licensed by the University of California to Oncternal Therapeutics, Inc., which provided stock options and research funding to the Thomas J. Kipps laboratory, Research Funding; Ascerta/AstraZeneca, Celgene, Genentech/F. Hoffmann-La Roche, Gilead, Janssen, Loxo Oncology, Octernal Therapeutics, Pharmacyclics/AbbVie, TG Therapeutics, VelosBio, and Verastem: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Wu:BionTech: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding.

Increased Activity of Aldehyde Dehydrogenase, a Stem/Progenitor Cell Marker, in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia,

Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 3867-3867
Author(s):  
Raymond P. Wu ◽  
Christina C.N. Wu ◽  
Tomoko Hayashi ◽  
Laura Z. Rassenti ◽  
Thomas J. Kipps ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
B Cells ◽  
Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Progenitor Cell ◽  
Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽  
Cell Marker ◽  
Aldh Activity ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Aldefluor Assay

Abstract Abstract 3867 Introduction: Despite their mature appearance, the B cells from chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) possess immature characteristics both functionally and biochemically. CLL B cells display known biochemical markers characteristic of cells early in the blood lineage, including ROR1, Wnt16, and LEF1. In addition, CLL B cells have higher levels of Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS) and of the oxidant-induced transcription factor Nrf2 [NFE2L2], compared to normal peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC). Intracellular ROS status has been suggested to be a marker of cancer stem/progenitor cells possibly due to their high expression of oncogenes. Downstream targets of Nrf2 include the Aldehyde dehydrogenase [ALDH] enzymes, which are believed to play a crucial role in stem cell biology because they protect the cells against oxidative stress caused by accumulation of aldehydes. Here, we use ALDH activity to visualize populations of CLL B cells that may have stem/progenitor properties. Materials and Methods: Isolated PBMC from normal donors and CLL patients with aggressive and indolent disease were stained for ALDH activity with an Aldefluor assay kit (StemCell Technologies). The ALDH inhibitor, diethylaminobenzaldehyde (DEAB), was used to confirm that the fluorescent activity was due to ALDH activity. At the end of the Aldefluor assay, the cells were stained for cell surface markers, CD19, CD5, CD38 and CD34. 50,000 total events were collected for FACS analysis. Normalized Mean Fluorescence Intensity (MFI) values were calculated by dividing each MFI value to average MFI value of normal CD19+ cells for each experiment. Data analyses were performed by FlowJo software and Prizm. P-values were calculated by One-Way ANOVA analysis with Post-Bonferroni's multiple comparison test. Results: We examine the level of ALDH expression and activity in CD19+ cells of healthy donors (n = 9), CLL samples that expressed unmutated IgVH and that were ZAP-70 positive (defined as “aggressive”, n = 14) or samples that expressed mutated IgVH and were ZAP-70 negative (defined as “indolent”, n=12). CLL B cells from patients with aggressive disease had significantly higher ALDH activities compared to normal B cells (p < 0.001) and indolent CLL B cells (p < 0.05) (Figure1). Indolent CLL B cells also have higher level of ALDH activities compared to normal B cells (p < 0.01) (Figure1). Treatment with the ALDH inhibitor, DEAB, suppressed the increased fluorescence observed in CLL B cells. In addition, ALDH high CLL B cells are CD34 negative. These data show that CLL B cells express a marker known to be associated with stem/progenitor cells, but these populations are different from CD34 positive hematopoietic stem cells. In addition, our data show that a stem/progenitor cell marker is associated with the pathogenesis of CLL. Disclosures: Kipps: Igenica: Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Abbot Industries: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Genentech: Research Funding; GSK: Research Funding; Gilead Sciences: Consultancy, Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding.

Combination of Ofatumumab and Lenalidomide in Patients with Relapsed Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL): Results of a Phase II Trial

Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 720-720 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alessandra Ferrajoli ◽  
Lorenzo Falchi ◽  
Susan O'Brien ◽  
William Wierda ◽  
Stefan Faderl ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Tumor Lysis Syndrome ◽  
Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽  
Prior Treatment ◽  
Combination Regimen ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Purine Analogs

Abstract Abstract 720 Based on the demonstrated activity of ofatumumab and lenalidomide as monotherapy in patients (pts) with CLL and on the activity of rituximab in combination with lenalidomide in pts with relapsed CLL, we conducted a phase II study to investigate efficacy and tolerability of a combination regimen of ofatumumab and lenalidomide in patients with relapsed CLL who had received prior treatment with purine analogs. Thirty-six pts entered this study between January 2010 and January 2011. All pts had an indication for therapy. Other inclusion criteria required prior treatment with purine analogs, an ECOG PS score of 0–2 and adequate organ function (creatinine clearance > 30ml/min, total bilirubin < to 2 mg/dl, ALT < 2 X ULN). Pts with any neutrophil count were eligible. Pts were excluded for platelets < 30,000 mm3, positivity for HIV, active hepatitis B or C or recent history of tuberculosis. Treatment consisted of ofatumumab IV given weekly for 4 weeks (300 mg week 1; 1,000 mg weeks 2 and thereafter), monthly during months 2–6 and every other month during months 7–24, and lenalidomide 10 mg PO/day started on day 9 and continued for 24 months. Allopurinol 300 mg PO daily was given during the first two weeks of cycle 1. No pts received antibiotic or DVT prophylaxis. The use of growth factors was allowed according to ASCO guidelines. Responses were assessed (2008 IWG criteria) at months 3 and 6 and every 6 months thereafter. Thirty-four pts are evaluable (one pt withdrew consent prior to treatment with lenalidomide, and one was excluded because of concomitant MDS at study entry). Median age was 64 yrs (34–82). Twenty-two pts (65%) had Rai stage III-IV disease. Median β-2M level was 4.1 mg/dL (1.7–16). Twenty-two pts (65%) had unmutated IgHV and 23 pts (68%) expressed ZAP-70. Nine pts (26%) had del(17p), and 4 pts (12%) had del(11q). Median number of prior treatments was 2 (1–8). All pts had been previously treated with FCR and 13 pts (38%) were fludarabine-refractory. Three pts (9%) had relapse following SCT.Twenty-three pts achieved a response, for an overall response (OR) rate of 68%. Eight pts (24%) achieved a complete response (CR), including 3 MRD-negative CR, and 15 pts (44%) achieved a partial response (PR). Median duration of response is 22 months (4–30), with a median follow up of 24 months. Among the 9 pts with del17p, 5 (55%) achieved a PR. The average daily dose of lenalidomide was 10 mg in 9 pts (26%), 7.5 mg in 4 pts (12%), 5 mg in13 pts (38%) and 5 mg in 8 pts (23%). Seventy-six % of the pts are alive. No pt deaths occurred while on therapy. Eight deaths occurred after discontinuation of therapy: progression of CLL despite subsequent therapy (5 pts), complications of HSCT (1 pt), CLL/lung cancer (1 pt) and causes unrelated to CLL(1 pt). Seven pts are still on therapy and 10 pts have an ongoing response. Six pts discontinued therapy despite an ongoing response due to transition to HSCT (3 pts), toxicity (2 pts) and physician choice (1 pts), and 7 pts discontinued therapy because of loss of response [after 12 (1 pt), 16 (2 pts), 19 (2 pts), 22 (1 pt) and 29 (1 pt) months].The most common grade 3–4 treatment-related hematological adverse events consisted of neutropenia in 16 pts (47%), thrombocytopenia in 3 pts (9%) and anemia in 2 pts (6%). One pt (3%) experienced G4 pulmonary embolism while on ESAs. One pt (3%) had G3 infusion reaction to ofatumumab. Fourteen G3 infectious episodes occurred: pneumonia (4), fever/bacteremia (5), parotitis (1), cellulitis (2), HZV (1) and CNS toxoplasmosis (1). No G3-4 tumor lysis syndrome or tumor flare reaction (TFR) was observed. G1-2 TFR was observed in 8 pts (24%), In conclusion, the combination of ofatumumab and lenalidomide induced responses in 68% of pts with relapsed CLL, including pts with del17p, all of whom had received prior chemoimmunotherapy. This treatment was well tolerated and neutropenia was the most common toxicity. The severity of TFR with this combination was less than with single agent lenalidomide, possibly due to attenuation by the addition of treatment with ofatumumab. Several studies are currently investigating the combination of anti-CD20 mAb and lenalidomide used both as initial and salvage therapy of CLL. Disclosures: Ferrajoli: Celgene Corporation: Honoraria, Research Funding; GlaxoSmithKline: Research Funding. O'Brien:GlaxoSmithKline: Consultancy; Celgene Corporation: Consultancy. Wierda:Celgene Corporation: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; GlaxoSmithKline: Research Funding. Keating:Celgene Corporation: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

A Multicenter, Phase IV Observational Study Of Ofatumumab In Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL): A European Research Initiative On CLL (ERIC) Study

Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 1645-1645 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carol Moreno ◽  
Marco Montillo ◽  
Panayiotidis Panayiotis ◽  
Adrian Bloor ◽  
Jehan Dupuis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Safety Profile ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽  
Hematologic Toxicity ◽  
Phase Ii Trials ◽  
Advisory Committees

Abstract Background Ofatumumab was given a conditional approval in the EU on April 2010 for the treatment of CLL refractory to fludarabine (F-ref) and alemtuzumab (A-ref), encouraging the retrieval of further data in patients treated in a “daily life” setting and to investigate treatment safety. Aims The main objective of this study was to obtain information on the safety profile of ofatumumab given outside clinical trials in patients with previously treated CLL. The secondary endpoints were efficacy, progression-free-survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Methods This was an observational, retrospective study. Patients were eligible regardless of prior treatments or disease status and provided they had not been included in ofatumumab clinical trials. Data on patients’ characteristics at diagnosis, prior treatment, adverse events response rate, PFS and OS were recorded. Results One-hundred and twenty patients were screened of which 103 from 25 centers in 10 European countries were eventually eligible for the study. There were 71 males; median age at initiation of ofatumumab was 64 years (range, 38-84); 66% patients were in advanced clinical stage (Rai III-IV/Binet C) and 33 patients presented bulky lymphadenopathy. Number of prior lines of therapy was 4 (range, 1-13). 94% had received prior F-based therapy, 54% received A-based therapy and 51% received both. Eighty-one percent had been previously exposed to rituximab-combination regimens. Fifty-four percent were F-ref, 70% A-ref and 41% were both F- and A-refractory. Cytogenetics within 3 months prior therapy was available in 52 patients of which 34 presented abnormalities (11 patients: 17p-; 9 patients: 11q-; 2 patients: 13q-; 1 patient: trisomy 12; 11 patients: two or more abnormalities including 17p- or 11q-). Forty-two of 50 patients showed unmutated IGHV genes. The median number of cycles of ofatumumab given was 9 (range, 0-16) and the median percentage of given/planned cycles was 83.3% (range, 0-133). In most patients the treatment dose and schedule were as follows: 300 mg 1st infusion followed by 2000 mg for subsequent infusions (8 weekly followed by 4 doses monthly). One hundred and sixty-one adverse events were reported in 68 patients, with 28 (17%) of them being considered as ofatumumab-related. Infusion related-reactions occurred in 19 (28%) patients (III-IV: 6%). Neutropenia was reported in 26% (III-IV: 19%), thrombocytopenia in 15% (III-IV: 12%) and anemia in 15% (III-IV: 7%). The non-hematological adverse events, included infection 44% (III-IV: 36%), fatigue 10% (III-IV: 4%), fever 10% (III-IV: 6%), rash 10% (III-IV: 3%), cough 7% (III-IV: 1%), diarrhea 6% (grade III-IV: 0%) and nausea 1% (III-IV: 0%). Hematologic toxicity correlated with the number of prior lines of therapy. Autoimmune hemolytic anemia and Richter syndrome were reported in one patient each. Two heavily pre-treated patients (5 and 6 prior lines of therapy, respectively) developed progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy. The overall response rate (ORR) was 23% and the median PFS and OS were 5 and 12 months, respectively. The main causes of death were disease progression (61%) and infection (28%). Conclusions The safety profile of ofatumumab given outside clinical trials to patients with poor-prognosis and heavily pre-treated CLL was consistent with that observed in clinical trials. Although not unexpectedly the ORR was lower in this study, PFS and OS were in line with those reported in phase II trials. Disclosures: Montillo: Roche: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; GSK: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Mundipharma: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Bloor:GSK: Consultancy, Honoraria, Paid speaker Other. Schuh:GSK: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Mundipharma: Honoraria. Geisler:Roche: Consultancy; GSK: Consultancy. Hillmen:GlaxoSmithKline: Honoraria, Research Funding. Stilgenbauer:GSK: Honoraria, support Other. Smolej:GSK: Consultancy, Honoraria, travel grants Other. Jaeger:GSK: Honoraria, Research Funding. Leblond:Roche : Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Mundipharma: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Kimby:Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Teva: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Emergent BioSolutions: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Gilead Sciences: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Jansen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding.

Rituximab-CHOP21 Plus Lenalidomide (LR-CHOP21) Is Effective and Feasible in Elderly Untreated Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma (DLBCL): Results of Phase II REAL07 Study of the Fondazione Italiana Linfomi (FIL)

Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 903-903
Author(s):  
Annalisa Chiappella ◽  
Silvia Franceschetti ◽  
Alessia Castellino ◽  
Angelo Michele Carella ◽  
Ileana Baldi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
B Cell ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Dose Finding ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Off Label ◽  
Grade Iii

Abstract Abstract 903 Introduction. R-CHOP21 is the standard treatment for untreated elderly DLBCL, however up to 40% of patients fail. There is a need to improve the efficacy of R-CHOP21; an option may be the addition of novel drugs in first line induction therapy. Lenalidomide has a complex mechanism of action as immunemodulation, antiangiogenesis, restoration of immunesynapses and direct antitumor effects. Lenalidomide monotherapy exhibits significant activity in patients with relapsed aggressive B-cell NHL and has in vitro synergy with rituximab and cytotoxic therapy. This rationale prompted FIL to conduct a prospective multicenter dose finding phase I-II trial aimed at evaluating toxicity and activity of lenalidomide plus R-CHOP21 (LR-CHOP21) in elderly untreated DLBCL (NCT00907348). In the dose-finding phase I study, 21 patients were enrolled, and 15 mg lenalidomide from day 1 to day 14 was identified as the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) in combination with R-CHOP21 (Vitolo, Ann Oncol 2011;22(4):331a). Patients and Methods. Based on the phase I results, 15 mg of lenalidomide in combination to R-CHOP21 was tested in a phase II study. Phase II was designed according to Simon's two stage design; primary endpoint was an improvement of overall response rate (ORR) of 15% in LR-CHOP21 compared to 70% of standard R-CHOP21 and the study would be considered of interest if at least 16/23 in step 1 and 39/49 in step 2 responses occurred. Response was evaluated according to 2007 Cheson criteria. PET scan was mandatory at the end of the treatment; patients in partial remission (PR) who underwent radiotherapy were considered as failure in progression free survival (PFS) analysis. Inclusion criteria were: age 60–80 FIT at the comprehensive geriatric assessment; untreated CD20+ DLBCL; Ann Arbor stage II/III/IV; IPI at LI/IH/H risk. Treatment plan was: R-CHOP21 plus 15 mg lenalidomide from day 1 to 14 for 6 courses. Mandatory supportive care included: GCSF or PegGCSF, cotrimoxazole as Pneumocystis Jiroveci prophylaxis and low molecular weight heparin or low dose aspirin as deep venous thrombosis prophylaxis. Results. From April 2010 to May 2011, 49 patients were enrolled in the phase II study including 9 patients treated at the MTD during phase I. Clinical characteristics were: median age 69 years (range 61–80); stage III/IV 43 (88%), performance status >1 31 (63%), IPI IH/H 30 (61%). The step-1 of the trial showed an ORR of 22/23. At the end of 6 LR-CHOP21, ORR was 45/49 (92%). Complete remissions (CR) were 42 (86%) and PR 3 (6%); 3 patients (6%) did not respond and one (2%) died for violent death. At a median follow-up of 18 months, overall survival (OS) was 94% (95% CI: 82–98) and PFS was 75% (95% CI: 57–86). (Figure 1). Of the 294 planned courses of LR-CHOP21, 277 (94%) were administered, of which 221 (75%) with lenalidomide as planned, 40 (14%) with dose and/or day reduction and 16 (5%) without lenalidomide. Median dose of lenalidomide delivered in 49 patients was 1185 mg (IQR 900–1260), i.e. 94% of the planned dose (1260 mg). The most frequent cause of lenalidomide reduction or withdrawal was neutropenia. At least 90% of the planned dose of doxorubicine, cyclophosphamide and vincristine were administered, in: 91%, 95% and 83% of the R-CHOP21 courses, respectively. Median interval time between R-CHOP21 courses was 21 days (range 19–48). Hematological toxicity was mild: grade III/IV thrombocytopenia occurred in 13% of courses, anemia in 5% and neutropenia in 33%, with only 4% of febrile neutropenia. No grade IV extra-hematological toxicities were observed. Grade III non-hematological toxicities were reported in 7 patients: cardiologic, gastroenteric and renal in one patient respectively, grade III neurological toxicities, sensory and motorial neuropathy in two, thromboembolic event in one not receiving anti-thrombotic prophylaxis, and skin rash in one. No toxic deaths occurred during treatment. One patient died three months off therapy while in CR, due to aeromonas hydrophila sepsis and multi-organ failure. Conclusions. The addition of 15 mg lenalidomide on days 1–14 to R-CHOP21 is safe, feasible and effective in elderly untreated DLBCL. The primary objective of the phase II study was met, with 92% of ORR of which 86% CR and promising PFS rates. The addition of lenalidomide did not impair the administration of R-CHOP21. Based on these data, the efficacy of LR-CHOP21 needs to be investigated in a large phase III randomized trial in elderly DLBCL. Disclosures: Off Label Use: Trial partially supported by a research grant by Celgene. Lenalidomide was provided free by Celgene. The use of Lenalidomide is off-label in untreated DLBCL. Dreyling:Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Vitolo:Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Head-To-Head Comparison Of Obinutuzumab (GA101) Plus Chlorambucil (Clb) Versus Rituximab Plus Clb In Patients With Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL) and Co-Existing Medical Conditions (Comorbidities): Final Stage 2 Results Of The CLL11 Trial

Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 6-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Valentin Goede ◽  
Kirsten Fischer ◽  
Raymonde Busch ◽  
Anja Engelke ◽  
Barbara Eichhorst ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Final Stage ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Observation Time ◽  
Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽  
Type Ii ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Stage 1

Abstract Introduction CLL11 is a large randomized phase 3 trial investigating first-line chemoimmunotherapy in CLL patients with comorbidities, i.e. patients typically treated in daily practice. Here, we present: (i) The final stage 2 analysis with efficacy and safety results of the head-to-head comparison between GA101 plus Clb (GClb) and rituximab plus Clb (RClb); at the pre-planned interim analysis, the primary endpoint was met early and the results were released by the independent data monitoring board. (ii) An update on the stage I analysis (GClb vs. Clb and RClb vs. Clb comparisons) with longer observation time; the final stage 1 analysis recently showed that GClb or RClb has superior efficacy to chemotherapy with Clb alone. Methods Treatment-naïve CLL patients with a Cumulative Illness Rating Scale (CIRS) total score >6 and/or an estimated creatinine clearance (CrCl) <70 mL/min were eligible. Patients received Clb alone (0.5 mg/kg po d1, d15 q28 days, 6 cycles), GClb (100 mg iv d1, 900 mg d2, 1000 mg d8, d15 of cycle 1, 1000 mg d1 cycles 2-6), or RClb (375 mg/m2 iv d1 cycle 1, 500 mg/m2 d1 cycles 2-6). Primary endpoint was investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS). Response rates, minimal residual disease (MRD), and overall survival (OS) were key secondary efficacy endpoints. Results Final results of the stage 2 analysis: Median observation time was 19 months. The GClb and RClb treatment arms were well balanced for baseline characteristics. Median age, CIRS score, and CrCl at baseline were 73 years, 8, and 63 mL/min respectively. Key efficacy and safety results are shown in the table. The PFS benefit of GClb over RClb was supported by all pre-planned subgroup analyses (including the cytogenetic subgroups 17p-, 11q-, 12+, 13q-). The number of patients with MRD negative blood samples at end-of-treatment was more than 10-fold higher with GClb compared with RClb (63/214 [29.4%] vs. 6/243 [2.5%]). Grade 3-4 infusion-related reactions with GClb occurred at first infusion only. Updated results of the stage 1 analysis: Median observation time was 23 months. Confirming the primary stage 1 results, GClb or RClb compared with Clb alone was associated with statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvement in PFS (GClb vs. Clb: HR 0.18, CI 0.13-0.24, p<.0001, RClb vs. Clb: HR 0.44, CI 0.34-0.57, p<.0001). The updated median PFS in GClb, RClb and Clb were 26.7, 16.3 and 11.1 months, respectively. Updated OS analysis demonstrated a benefit of GClb over Clb (HR 0.41, CI 0.23-0.74, p=0.002). OS analysis for RClb over Clb showed HR 0.66, CI 0.39-1.11, p=0.113. At the data cut-off, 9%, 15%, and 20% of the patients in the GClb, RClb, and Clb arms, respectively, had died. OS medians were not reached. Conclusions GA101, a novel, glycoengineered, type II CD20 antibody, in combination with Clb (GClb regimen) demonstrated statistically significant and clinically meaningful prolongation of PFS, and higher complete response rate and MRD negativity rate compared with RClb in previously untreated CLL patients with comorbidities. Infusion-related reactions and neutropenia were more common with GClb without an increase in infections. Furthermore, GClb vs. Clb alone demonstrated a prolongation of OS. Overall, GClb is superior to RClb and a highly active treatment in this typical CLL patient population. Disclosures: Goede: Mundipharma: Honoraria; F. Hoffmann-La Roche: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Off Label Use: GA101 is a novel, glycoengineered, type II anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody that is designed to enhance direct cell death and antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity. It is being investigated in chronic lymphocytic leukemia, Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma and other hematologic indications. Fischer:Mundipharma: Travel grants, Travel grants Other; F. Hoffmann-La Roche: Travel grants Other. Engelke:F. Hoffmann-La Roche: Travel grants Other. Eichhorst:Mundipharma: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy; F. Hoffman-La Roche: Honoraria, Research Funding. Wendtner:F. Hoffmann-La Roche: Consultancy, Research Funding. Dilhuydy:F. Hoffmann-La Roche: Consultancy. Opat:F. Hoffmann-La Roche: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Alexion Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees. Owen:F. Hoffmann-La Roche: Honoraria. Kreuzer:F. Hoffmann-La Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria. Langerak:F. Hoffmann-La Roche: Research Funding. Ritgen:F. Hoffmann-La Roche: Research Funding. Stilgenbauer:F. Hoffmann-La Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Asikanius:F. Hoffmann-La Roche: Employment. Humphrey:F. Hoffmann-La Roche: Employment. Wenger:F. Hoffmann-La Roche: Employment, Ownership interests (including stock options) in a start-up company, the stock of which is not publicly traded Other. Hallek:F. Hoffmann-La Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document