Final Report of a Randomized Study of Decitabine Versus Conventional Care (CC) for Maintenance Therapy in Patients with Intermediate and High Risk Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) in First or Subsequent Complete Remission (CR)

Abstract Abstract 1530 Background: Maintenance therapy in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is not standard of care. It has been reported that continued therapy with cytotoxic agents similar to those used for induction and consolidation is associated with toxicity but can improve disease free survival (DFS). Methylation status of tumor suppressor genes in clinical remission may predict the relapse in AML, with earlier relapse in patients with methylated genes. Therefore, hypomethylating therapy may be effective in maintaining remission and prolonging survival. Methods: We have conducted a clinical trial comparing decitabine to conventional care (CC, low dose subcutaneous cytarabine, prolonged intensive therapy, or observation) in patients (pts) with AML in their first or subsequent complete remission (CR). Pts with non-favorable risk AML (including intermediate and poor risk) received induction therapy followed by appropriate consolidation. They were then stratified by age (£ 60 vs. > 60) and cytogenetics (intermediate vs. poor risk) and randomized to receive decitabine 20 mg/m2 IV daily × 5 every 4 to 8 weeks for 12 cycles, or CC. Pts in second or subsequent CR were randomized after completion of salvage therapy. Primary endpoint was considered to be no relapse at 1 year. We also monitored minimal residual disease (MRD) by multicolor flow cytometry (MFC) using custom staining panels based on the leukemic phenotypes. Aberrant myeloid blasts were identified by comparison to normal bone marrow CD34+ cells. Serial samples for DNA methylation studies were also collected and methylation analysis was performed. Results: 50 patients have been enrolled. Of those, 45 (19 M, 26 F) pts (including 35 in first CR and 10 in subsequent CR) were evaluable for the primary endpoint. Median age was 57 years (range, 24–77). 27 pts were £ 60 years and 18 > 60. Cytogenetics at diagnosis was intermediate in 34 pts, poor-risk in 10 pts, and favorable [inv(16)] in one patient in second CR. 20 evaluable pts were randomized to decitabine and have received a median of 4.5 cycles (range 1–12). 25 evaluable pts were randomized to CC. With a median duration of follow up for the entire group of 36.3 months (range 6.3–55), 11 pts on the decitabine arm and 10 pts on the CC arm have remained in remission; 9 of 20 (45%) on DAC versus 15 of 25 (60%) on CC have relapsed (p = 0.7). 45 pts including 20 receiving decitabine and 25 receiving CC have been followed for at least 1 year; 9 of 20 (45%) on decitabine versus 9 of 25 (36%) on CC are alive in CR (p=0.9). Toxicity in the decitabine treated pts was limited to 19 episodes of grade 3/4, neutropenia, 14 episodes of grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia, and 1 episode of grade 2 anemia. All were short in duration and reversed without any associated adverse events. Non-hematological grade 3 and 4 adverse events on the decitabine arm include 3 infections, 1 episode each of hypertension and fatigue. There have been no deaths on the study. MFC identified MRD (<5% blasts on smears) in 9 of 19 (47%) patients with subsequent relapse, at levels from 0.04% to 1% of total cells. In 18 pts remaining in CR, no MRD was identified. Relapse occurred from 1.5 to 10 months after the first positive MFC. There was a statistically significant higher LINE methylation at baseline between the pts who relapsed and those who remained in CR (78% vs 73%, P=0.02), whereas no differences were observed for methylation of CDH13 and Mir124a-1 genes. Conclusions: We conclude that administration of decitabine in CR at the above schedule/dose is well tolerated. The study has been terminated early by the data monitoring safety board due to the higher incidence of relapse at 1 year in the decitabine arm. Interestingly, at a median of 36.3 months, decitabine treated patients had lower relapse and higher survival rates than conventionally treated patients, although these differences were not significant. These data suggest the need for larger randomized studies of hypomethylating agents in maintenance therapy in AML. Disclosures: Off Label Use: Off label use of decitabine in maintenance therapy in AML. Issa:GSK: Consultancy; SYNDAX: Consultancy; Merck: Research Funding; Eisai: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; J&J: Honoraria. Faderl:Eisai: Research Funding. Borthakur:Eisai: Research Funding. Cortes:Eisai: Research Funding. Kantarjian:Celgene: Research Funding. Ravandi:Eisai: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Johnson & Johnson: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Induction Treatment with Alemtuzumab Combined with Polychemotherapy Containing Fludarabine, Cyclophosphamide and Mitoxantrone (FCM) Followed By Alemtuzumab Maintenance in Patients with T-Cell Prolymphocytic Leukaemia (T-PLL): First Analysis of a Prospective Multicenter Phase-II-Trial (T-PLL2) Conducted By the German CLL Study Group (GCLLSG)

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v124.21.1999.1999 ◽

2014 ◽

Vol 124 (21) ◽

pp. 1999-1999

Author(s):

Natali Pflug ◽

Georg Hopfinger ◽

Paula Cramer ◽

Alexandra Schrader ◽

Nicole Weit ◽

...

Keyword(s):

T Cell ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Maintenance Treatment ◽

Induction Treatment ◽

Off Label Use ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Off Label ◽

Travel Grant ◽

Grade 3

Abstract Introduction: T-cell prolymphocytic leukemia (T-PLL) is a very rare & aggressive disease. Therapeutic advances during recent years have been very limited. Even after initial response, the vast majority of T-PLL patients (pts) relapse quickly and the median overall survival remains below 2 years (ys). This also holds true for induction therapies with the anti-CD52 antibody Alemtuzumab (A). Furthermore, life-threatening viral infections are a severe problem in pts treated with this antibody. In a precursor trial (Hopfinger et al, Cancer 2013), we evaluated a consolidation therapy with A after polychemotherapy induction. In the T-PLL2 trial, we evaluated feasibility, safety and efficacy of the addition of A s.c. to an induction treatment with Fludarabine, Mitoxantrone & Cyclophosphamide (A-FMC), followed by an A s.c. maintenance therapy. Patients and Methods: 16 pts (12 untreated and 4 with pretreatments) with T-PLL were enrolled between 06/2010-09/2013. Pts received an induction treatment with A 10mg s.c. on day (d) 1-3 combined with 20mg/m2 Fludarabine i.v. d 1-3, 6mg/m2 Mitoxantrone i.v. d1 & 200mg/m2 Cyclophosphamide d1-3. After 2 cycles the A dose was increased to 30 mg s.c., if a stable disease (SD) or a partial remission (PR) was achieved. A-FMC treatment was administered every 28 days for up to 4 cycles, followed by a maintenance treatment with 30mg A s.c. starting 1 month (mo) after final staging. During the first 6 mo, A s.c. was administered monthly and in addition once in mo 10 and 13. For younger and fit pts, the option of allogeneic transplantation (tx) was explicitly recommended after induction therapy. Peripheral blood (PB) samples were taken at diagnosis & at the time of relapse/progression. Valganciclovir was recommended for prophylaxis. Results: 16 pts with a median age of 68 ys (range 32-78) and a median score on the cumulative illness rating scale of 3 (range 0-6) were enrolled. The diagnosis of T-PLL was established based on clinico-pathologic characteristics, with the lead finding of a monoclonal mature T-cell population in PB. All leukaemias (100%) were CD52 positive, 15/16 cases (93.75%) expressed TCL1 & the most frequent abnormalities by FISH/classical karyotyping were aberrations involving 14q32.1 in 14/14 cases (100%), gains of chromosome 8q in 10/14 cases (71%), & deletion 11q23 in 8/14 cases (57%). A median number of 4 courses (range 2-4) were administered for induction treatment. Six pts (37.5%) proceeded with maintenance treatment with a median of 4 (range 1-6) A applications. In total, 94 non-infectious CTC grade 3-4 adverse events (AE) & 28 episodes of CTC grade 1-4 infections were documented. Non-infectious grade 3/4 AEs were most frequently due to myelosuppression: neutropenia/leukopenia occurred in 14/16 pts (87.5%), anaemia in 7/16 pts (43.75%) & thrombocytopenia in 10/16 pts (62.5%). Two cases of cytomegalovirus (CMV) & 1 case of varicella zoster infection were documented. Most AEs could be successfully managed, however 2 (12.6%), possibly treatment related deaths occurred, both from fatal bleeding in thrombocytopenia. In all pts response data after induction treatment was available. The overall response rate was 68.75% (11/16pts) with complete remissions (CR) in 4 pts (25%), CR with insufficient bone marrow recovery in 1 pt (6.25%) & a PR in 6 pts (37.5%). Progressive disease (PD) was documented in 4 pts (25%), a SD in 1 pt (6.25%). The trial was terminated in May 2014. Until today, 11 deaths (68.75%) were reported & 1 pt (6.25%) was lost to follow-up. Prophylaxis with Valgancyclovir was administered in 12/16 pts (75%), 2 pts (12.5%) received prophylactic Valaciclovir & 2 pts (12.5%) received no viral prophylaxis at all. Seven pts (43.75%) received an allogeneic tx after the study treatment: 3 pts after the induction phase, 1 pt after 5 maintenance applications & 3 pts after bridging/salvage therapy. Tx outcomes were documented with 5 CRs & 2 PDs. Conclusion: A s.c. combined with FMC & A maintenance therapy is a relatively safe and feasible regimen in pts with T-PLL. However, safety seems to come at the cost of response quality. Therefore, the authors currently recommend using A i.v. as part of the initial therapy for T-PLL pts. Prophylaxis with Valganciclovir was effective in preventing CMV infection, one of the major threats to pts treated with A. Most importantly, the study emphasizes the need for new therapies and intensified clinical research for pts with T-PLL. Disclosures Off Label Use: Therapeutic off-label use of Alemtuzumab, Fludarabine, Cyclophophamide and Mitoxantron in T-PLL. Hopfinger:Genzyme: Research Funding. Weit:Beckman Coulter GmbH, Krefeld, Germany: Employment. Stilgenbauer:Genzyme : Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Eichhorst:Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Travel grant Other; Mundipharma: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Travel grant, Travel grant Other; GSK: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead: Consultancy. Hallek:Genzyme, Bayer: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Ofatumumab Based Chemoimmunotherapy (CIT) for Patients with Previously Untreated CLL,

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v118.21.3898.3898 ◽

2011 ◽

Vol 118 (21) ◽

pp. 3898-3898

Author(s):

Tait D. Shanafelt ◽

Mark C Lanasa ◽

Clive S. Zent ◽

Jose F. Leis ◽

Timothy G Call ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Flow Cytometry ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Previous Experience ◽

Stage Iii ◽

Hematologic Toxicity ◽

Off Label Use ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Off Label ◽

Grade 3

Abstract Abstract 3898 Background: Although chemoimmunotherapy (CIT) has substantially improved response rates, treatment free survival, and overall survival in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), only 4050 of patients achieve a complete remission and the majority have residual disease when evaluated using sensitive assays. There remains interest in identifying new approaches to improve the effectiveness of CIT. Ofatumumab is a humanized anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody that is approved for patients with relapsed CLL refractory to fludarabine and alemtuzumab. The single agent activity of ofatumumab in patients with refractory CLL suggests it may have greater efficacy than rituximab in patients with CLL. To explore the efficacy of ofatumumab based CIT, we initiated a clinical trial studying the effect of ofatumumab in combination with pentostatin and cyclophosphamide (PCO) for patients with previously untreated CLL. METHODS: Eligible patients were previously untreated and had CLL in need of treatment according to the NCI-WG criteria (Blood 111:5446). The treatment schema included 6 cycles of ofatumuamb (300 mg on day 1 of cycle 1;1000 mg on day 2 of cycle 1 and day 1 of cycles 26) followed by pentostatin (2 mg/m2) and cyclophosphamide (600 mg/m2) administered every 21 days. All patients underwent complete response evaluation including evaluation for MRD using sensitive flow cytometry (Leukemia 21:956) at the completion of treatment. RESULTS: 33 patients were enrolled at Mayo Clinic and Duke University between 3/2010 and 9/2010. All patients were eligible for treatment and have completed active treatment. Clinical characteristics included: 76 male, median age 63 (range: 5083); intermediate Rai risk 27; and high Rai risk 73. On prognostic testing 33 were CD38, 48 Zap-70 , 58 IGHV unmutated, and 6 had high risk FISH (del 17p13; del 11q22). 26 of 33 eligible patients (79) completed all 6 cycles of PCO induction. Seven patients went off treatment early (toxicity: n5; refusal: n1; progression: n1). Adverse events deemed at least possibly related to PCO induction included 8 (24) patients with grade 3 hematologic toxicity and 5 (15) with grade 3 non-hematologic toxicity. The overall response rate to PCO induction was 94 (31/33) with 15 (45) CR/CRi, 5 (15) CCR, 9 (27) nPR, and 2 (6) PR. 2/10 (20) patients with CR's tested for MRD were also MRD negative by 6 color flow cytometry analysis. Finally, we compared this cohort of patients treated with ofatumuamb-based CIT to our prior 108 patient cohort of patients treated with rituximab-based CIT both of which used an identical chemotherapy backbone (pentostatin and cyclophosphamide). Although the age, gender, ALC, and prognostic profile (CD38, ZAP-70, and IGHV mutation status) of treated patients were similar (all p0.3), the ofatumumab cohort included more advanced stage patients (Rai stage III/IV: 73 vs. 41 p0.002). Ofatumumab-based CIT appeared to be better tolerated than our previous experience with rituximab-based CIT (grade 3 hematologic toxicity ofatumumab-CIT 24 \batchmode \documentclass[fleqn,10pt,legalpaper]{article} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amsmath} \pagestyle{empty} \begin{document} ${\scriptstyle \raisebox{1ex}{8$}\!\left/ \!\raisebox{-1ex}{$33$}\right.}\]$ \end{document} vs. rituximab-CIT51 \batchmode \documentclass[fleqn,10pt,legalpaper]{article} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amsmath} \pagestyle{empty} \begin{document} ${\scriptstyle \raisebox{1ex}{55$}\!\left/ \!\raisebox{-1ex}{$108$}\right.}\]$ \end{document}, p0.009; grade 3 non-hematologic toxicity ofatumumab-CIT 15 \batchmode \documentclass[fleqn,10pt,legalpaper]{article} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amsmath} \pagestyle{empty} \begin{document} ${\scriptstyle \raisebox{1ex}{5$}\!\left/ \!\raisebox{-1ex}{$33$}\right.}\]$ \end{document} vs. rituximab-CIT 24 \batchmode \documentclass[fleqn,10pt,legalpaper]{article} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amsmath} \pagestyle{empty} \begin{document} ${\scriptstyle \raisebox{1ex}{26$}\!\left/ \!\raisebox{-1ex}{$108$}\right.}\]$ \end{document}, p0.34). Despite a higher proportion of Rai Stage III/IV patients in the ofatumumab cohort, the efficacy of ofatumumab-based CIT also compared favorably to our previous experience with rituximab based CIT (Table). CONCLUSION: Front-line ofatumumab-based CIT appears to be well-tolerated in patients with CLL. Compared to our historic experience with rituximab based CIT, ofatumumab-based CIT appeared to have less hematologic toxicity and improved efficacy. This trial has been expanded to provide a larger experience with ofatumumab-based CIT. Disclosures: Shanafelt: Hospira: Research Funding; Glaxo-Smith-Kine: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding. Off Label Use: Off label use of pentostatin and Ofatumumab. Lanasa:GlaxoSmithKline: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Zent:GlaxoSmithKline: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; Genzyme: Research Funding. Tun:Celgene: Research Funding. Kay:Biothera: Research Funding; Clegene: Research Funding; Cephalon: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; Glaxo Smith Kline: Research Funding; Hospira: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Supergen: Research Funding; Calistoga: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Emergent Biosolutions (Formerly Trubion): Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Download Full-text

Phase I Study of Ixazomib with Conventional Chemotherapy in the Treatment of Acute Myeloid Leukemia in Older Adults

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2020-140584 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 7-8

Author(s):

Philip C. Amrein ◽

Eyal C. Attar ◽

Geoffrey Fell ◽

Traci M. Blonquist ◽

Andrew M. Brunner ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Myeloid Leukemia ◽

Research Funding ◽

Remission Rate ◽

Conventional Chemotherapy ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Secondary Aml ◽

Grade 3 ◽

Acute Myeloid

Introduction: Outcomes for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) among older patients has remained largely unchanged for decades. Long-term survival for patients aged >60 years is poor (median survival 10.5 months). Targeting the proteasome in AML is attractive, since leukemia stem cells have demonstrated sensitivity to proteasome inhibition in preclinical models, perhaps through down regulation of nuclear NF-KB (Guzman, Blood 2001). AML cell lines are susceptible to synergistic cytotoxicity when bortezomib, a proteasome inhibitor, is combined with daunorubicin and cytarabine. We have shown that adding bortezomib to standard treatment in AML results in a high remission rate, although grade 2 sensory neurotoxicity was noted in approximately 12% of treated patients. A newer generation proteasome inhibitor, ixazomib, is less frequently associated with neurotoxicity, and, therefore, was selected for combination with conventional chemotherapy in this phase I trial. The primary objective of this study was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of ixazomib in combination with conventional induction and consolidation chemotherapy for AML. Herein are the initial results of this trial. Methods: Adults >60 years of age with newly diagnosed AML were screened for eligibility. Patients with secondary AML were eligible, including those with prior hypomethylating agent therapy for myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). We excluded those with promyelocytic leukemia. There were 2 phases in this study. In the first phase (A), the induction treatment consisted of the following: cytarabine 100 mg/m2/day by continuous IV infusion, Days 1-7; daunorubicin 60 mg/m2/day IV, Days 1, 2, 3, and ixazomib was provided orally at the cohort dose, Days 2, 5, 9, and 12. Consolidaton or transplant was at the discretion of the treating physician in phase A. In the second phase (B), induction was the same as that with the determined MTD of ixazomib. All patients were to be treated with the following consolidation: cytarabine at 2 g/m2/day, days 1-5 with ixazomib on days 2, 5, 9, and 12 at the cohort dose for consolidation. A standard 3 + 3 patient cohort dose escalation design was used to determine whether the dose of ixazomib could be safely escalated in 3 cohorts (1.5 mg/day, 2.3 mg/day, 3.0 mg/day), initially in induction (phase A) and subsequently in consolidation (phase B). The determined MTD of ixazomib in the first portion (A) of the trial was used during induction in the second portion (B), which sought to determine the MTD for ixazomib during consolidation. Secondary objectives included rate of complete remission, disease-free survival, and overall survival (OS). Results: Thirty-six patients have been enrolled on study, and 28 have completed dose levels A-1 through A-3 and B1 through B-2. Full information on cohort B-3 has not yet been obtained, hence, this report covers the experience with the initial 28 patients, cohorts A-1 through B-2. There were 12 (43%) patients among the 28 with secondary AML, either with prior hematologic malignancy or therapy-related AML. Nineteen patients (68%) were male, and the median age was 68 years (range 61-80 years). There have been no grade 5 toxicities due to study drug. Three patients died early due to leukemia, 2 of which were replaced for assessment of the MTD. Nearly all the grade 3 and 4 toxicities were hematologic (Table). There was 1 DLT (grade 4 platelet count decrease extending beyond Day 42). There has been no grade 3 or 4 neurotoxicity with ixazomib to date. Among the 28 patients in the first 5 cohorts, 22 achieved complete remissions (CR) and 2 achieved CRi, for a composite remission rate (CCR) of 86%. Among the 12 patients with secondary AML 8 achieved CR and 2 achieved CRi, for a CCR of 83%. The median OS for the 28 patients has not been reached (graph). The 18-month OS estimate was 65% [90% CI, 50-85%]. Conclusions: The highest dose level (3 mg) of ixazomib planned for induction in this trial has been reached safely. For consolidation there have been no serious safety issues in the first 2 cohorts with a dose up to 2.3 mg, apart from 1 DLT in the form of delayed platelet count recovery. The recommended phase 2 dose of ixazomib for induction is 3 mg. Accrual to cohort B-3 is ongoing. Notably, to date, no grade 3 or 4 neurotoxicity has been encountered. The remission rate in this older adult population with the addition of ixazomib to standard chemotherapy appears favorable. Figure Disclosures Amrein: Amgen: Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding. Attar:Aprea Therapeutics: Current Employment. Brunner:Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Forty-Seven Inc: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AstraZeneca: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding. Hobbs:Constellation: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria; Incyte: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Bayer: Research Funding; Jazz: Honoraria; Celgene/BMS: Honoraria. Neuberg:Celgene: Research Funding; Madrigak Pharmaceuticals: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding. Fathi:Blueprint: Consultancy; Boston Biomedical: Consultancy; BMS/Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy; Kura Oncology: Consultancy; Trillium: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Abbvie: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; Newlink Genetics: Consultancy; Forty Seven: Consultancy; Trovagene: Consultancy; Kite: Consultancy; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy; Astellas: Consultancy; Amphivena: Consultancy; PTC Therapeutics: Consultancy; Agios: Consultancy, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; Jazz: Consultancy. OffLabel Disclosure: Ixazomib is FDA approved for multiple myeloma. We are using it in this trial for acute myeloid leukemia.

Download Full-text

Randomized Phase II Trial of Pentostatin, Cyclophosphamide, and Rituximab with or without Concurrent Avastin for Previously Untreated B-Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL)

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v124.21.4673.4673 ◽

2014 ◽

Vol 124 (21) ◽

pp. 4673-4673

Author(s):

Tait D. Shanafelt ◽

Betsy R. LaPlant ◽

Timothy G Call ◽

Daniel Nikcevich ◽

Jose F. Leis ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Overall Survival ◽

Research Funding ◽

Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽

Response Evaluation ◽

Off Label Use ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Free Survival ◽

Off Label ◽

Grade 3 ◽

Label Use

Abstract BACKGROUND: Although chemoimmunotherapy (CIT) has improved response rates, treatment free survival, and overall survival in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), only 40-50% of patients achieve a complete remission and the majority have residual disease when evaluated using sensitive assays. Interactions with nurturing environments can enhance CLL B-cell resistance to apoptosis. These interactions include cytokine mediated prosurvival signals by angiogenic molecules, such as VEGF and bFGF that nurture CLL B-cells in an autocrine fashion and promote CLL cell survival partly through up regulation of anti-apoptotic proteins. These findings provide a strong rationale for testing anti-VEGF therapy in combination with a purine nucleoside analogue CIT regimen for upfront treatment. We conducted a randomized phase 2 CIT trial using pentostatin, cyclophosphamide, and rituximab with (PCR-B) or without (PCR) bevacizumab (B), an anti-VEGF monoclonal anti-body. METHODS: Eligible patients were previously untreated and had CLL in need of treatment by NCI-WG criteria (Blood 111:5446). Patients were randomized using a dynamic allocation procedure stratifying for stage (0-II vs. III-IV) and FISH (17p or 11q deletion vs. other) to receive either 6 cycles of rituximab (100 mg on day 1 of cycle 1; 375 mg/m2on day 2 of cycle 1 and day 1 of cycles 2-6) followed by pentostatin (2 mg/m2) and cyclophosphamide (600 mg/m2) (PCR) administered every 21 days. Patients in the PCR-B cohort also received bevacizumab 15mg/kg on day 1 of cycles 1-5 and days 1, 22, & 43 of cycle 6. All patients underwent complete response evaluation 3 months after day 1 of cycle 6 (or last cycle of treatment for those completing < 6 cycles). MRD was assessed using 6-color flow cytometry (Leukemia 21:956) at the completion of treatment. RESULTS: 68 patients were enrolled through the Mayo Clinic Cancer Research Consortium between 1/2009 and 1/2013. Three patients were excluded from analysis: 1 patient canceled prior to treatment, 1 was dosed incorrectly, and 1 was ineligible due to immunophenotyping inconsistent with CLL. Median age of eligible patients was 63 years (range 43-81) and 43 (66%) were men. With respect to disease stage, 3 (5%), 38 (58%), and 24 (37%) had low, intermediate and high Rai stage disease. Eleven (17%) patients had deletion 17p or 11q & 29 (45%) had unmutated IGHV. No statistically significant differences were observed in these variables by treatment arm. All 65 evaluable patients have completed active treatment, with 54 (83.1%) completing the intended 6 cycles (PCR group 27/32 [84.4%] and PCR-B 27/33 [81.8%]). Hematologic grade 3+ adverse events deemed at least possibly related to treatment were observed in 10 (31.3%) patients on PCR and 12 (36.4%) on PCR-B (p=0.79). Non-hematologic grade 3+ adverse events deemed at least possibly related to treatment were observed in 9 (28.1%) patients on PCR and 18 (54.4%) on PCR-B (p=0.04). The most common such events were hypertension (PCR: 3.1% vs. PCR-B: 21.2%), proteinuria (0% vs. 6.1%) and creatinine increase (3.1% vs. 6.1%). Across both arms, 64/65 (98.5%) patients achieved a response including 31/32 (96.9%) treated with PCR and 33/33 (100%) treated with PCR-B (p=0.49). CR/CRi was achieved in 10/32 (31.3%) patients treated with PCR & 18/33 (54.5%) treated with PCR-B (p=0.08). Of the 28 who achieved a CR/CRi, MRD analysis was completed on 26, of whom 12 (46%) were MRD negative. With respect to treatment arm, 5/32 (16%) patients on PCR and 7/33 (21%) on PCR-B achieved an MRD negative CR. Median time to retreatment for all 65 patients was 44.8 (95% CI: 34.6 – NA) months. Median overall survival has not yet been reached. With current follow-up no differences between treatment-free survival (p=0.38), progression-free survival (p=0.23), or overall survival (p=0.45) are observed by treatment arm. Plasma levels of angiogenic cytokines VEGF, bFGF, thrombospondin (TSP) and the chemokines CCL3 and CCL4 were measured prior to treatment and at the time of the post treatment response evaluation. Correlations of these cytokines with clinical outcome will be presented. CONCLUSION: The addition of bevacizumab to purine analogue-based CIT was generally well-tolerated and may increase complete remission rates in patients with CLL. No clear improvement in treatment free survival has been observed to date. Disclosures Shanafelt: Hospiria: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics/Jannsen: Research Funding; Cephalon: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; glaxoSmithKline: Research Funding; Genetech: Research Funding; Polyphenon E Int'l: Research Funding. Off Label Use: Off label use of pentostatin for treatment of CLL. Off label use of bevacizumab for treatment of CLL. . Kay:Genetech: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Hospira: Research Funding; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Download Full-text

Subcutaneous Alemtuzumab Combined with Oral Dexamethasone, Followed by Alemtuzumab Maintenance or Allo-SCT In CLL with 17p- or Refractory to Fludarabine – Interim Analysis of the CLL2O Trial of the GCLLSG and FCGCLL/MW

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v116.21.920.920 ◽

2010 ◽

Vol 116 (21) ◽

pp. 920-920 ◽

Cited By ~ 12

Author(s):

Stephan Stilgenbauer ◽

Florence Cymbalista ◽

Véronique Leblond ◽

Alain Delmer ◽

Thorsten Zenz ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Disease Progression ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Remission Rate ◽

High Dose ◽

Off Label Use ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Off Label ◽

Oral Dexamethasone ◽

Label Use

Abstract Abstract 920 CLL refractory to purine analogues (e.g. fludarabine, F) or with 17p- is associated with very poor prognosis. Alemtuzumab is active in F-refractory CLL, and has proven efficacy in patients (pts) with 17p-. However, outcome of F-refractory CLL is still poor in terms of remission rate and duration of remission. The multinational, multicenter CLL2O trial aims at achieving a higher remission rate by adding high-dose dexamethasone to alemtuzumab, and prolongation of remission duration and survival by alemtuzumab maintenance or allogeneic stem-cell transplantation (allo-SCT). Pts with CLL refractory (no PR/CR or PR/CR < 6 months) to F-based (e.g. FR, FC, FCR) or similar chemotherapy (i.e. pentostatin, cladribine, bendamustine), or exhibiting 17p- (untreated or at relapse) were eligible if they had “active disease”. Treatment was with subcutaneous alemtuzumab 30 mg weekly × 3 for 28 days, combined with oral dexamethasone 40 mg on days 1–4 and 15–18, and prophylactic pegfilgrastim 6 mg days 1 and 15. Depending on the remission status, pts were treated for up to 12 weeks. If CR was documented at 4 or 8 weeks, or at least SD was achieved at 12 weeks, consolidation was scheduled with either allo-SCT or alemtuzumab maintenance with 30mg weekly every 14 days for up to 2 years (yrs). Decision for one of the two consolidation options was at discretion of patient and physician. From January 2008 to July 2010, 80 pts were enrolled at 22 centers and 79 were eligible; F-refractory (n=31), 17p- without prior therapy (n=31), and 17p- in relapse (n=17). Median age was 65 yrs in the F-refractory (range 38–76) and 17p- 1st-line group (36-76), and 60 yrs for the 17p- relapse group (54-73) with male predominance (F-refractory 74%, 17p- 1st-line 71%, 17p- relapse 82%). In the 17p- 1st-line and relapse groups, 52% and 50% were stage Binet C and exhibit reduced performance status (ECOG 1–2), compared to 81% Binet C and 60% ECOG 1–2 for the F-refractory cohort. Pretreated pts had received a median of 2 prior lines (F-refractory 1–6; 17p- relapse 1–5), and 5 pts had received prior SCT. In the F-refractory group, 16% of pts had 11q- and 52% had 17p-. IGHV was unmutated in 64% of 17p- groups and 72% in the F-refractory group. The median levels of ß2-MG / TK were 4.35 / 35.40 in the 17p- groups and 4.12 / 22.65 in the F-refractory group. Treatment data are currently available for 50 pts who completed induction therapy; F-refractory (n=19),17p- 1st-line (n=22), 17p- relapse (n=9). Full treatment duration (12 weeks) could be achieved in 47% F-refractory, 67% 17p- relapsed and 82% 17p- 1st-line pts. In the latter cohort, early stop of therapy was mainly correlated with CR, while in the F-refractory cohort with disease progression (n=2) and infections (n=5, 4 with no documented response). Response rates (ORR / CR) were 47% / 0% in the F-refractory cohort, 78% / 0% in the 17p- relapsed, and 100% / 23% in the 17p- 1st-line cohorts (as compared to this, ORR / CR was 71.4% / 4.8% with FCR in the 17p- 1st-line group of CLL8). Adverse events during treatment were mostly grade 1/2 apart from hematotoxicity. Grade 3/4 non-CMV infection occurred in 35% of F-refractory, 12% of 17p- relapsed, and 16% of 17p- 1st-line pts. CMV reactivation was observed in 32 % of the 17p- 1st-line pts, and less for the pretreated groups (F-refractory 16%, 17p- relapsed 18%). All CMV episodes were successfully treated, and there was no CMV-related death. Among 18 pts documented to receive alemtuzumab maintenance treatment, so far 3 SAEs have been reported: ITP (n=1, twice in the same pt), and fever / diarrhea / thyroiditis (n=1). At a median follow-up of 41.9 weeks (maintenance 54.7 weeks, allo-SCT 29 weeks), there were 7 (37%) deaths in the in the F-refractory cohort, 2 due to disease progression, and 5 due to infection. For the 17p- relapsed group, 3 progressions and 3 deaths were reported, with one case in each treatment option (SCT/maintenance), and one pt in salvage therapy. In the 17p- 1st-line cohort, 4 progressions occurred, 2 pts died, both in maintenance therapy. At 12 months, estimated overall survival was 54%, 66% and 100% in the F-refractory, 17p- relapse, and 17p- 1st-line cohorts, respectively. Accrual is currently ongoing with a target enrolment of 122 pts and updated results will be presented at the meeting. Disclosures: Stilgenbauer: Amgen: Research Funding; Bayer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Boehringer-Ingelheim: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Genzyme: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; GSK: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Mundipharma: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Sanofi Aventis: Research Funding. Off Label Use: off-label use of diagnostic tests and therapeutic agents. Leblond:ROCHE: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; MUNDIPHARMA : Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; CELGENE: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Zenz:Roche: Honoraria; Boehringer: Honoraria; GSK: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria. Choquet:ROCHE : Consultancy. Hallek:Roche: Honoraria, Research Funding. Döhner:Pfizer: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

A Phase 2 Open-Label, Multicenter, Dose Optimization Clinical Study of the Safety, Tolerability, and Pharmacokinetic (PK) and Pharmacodynamic (PD) Profiles of Cfi-400945 As a Single Agent or in Combination with Azacitidine or Decitabine in Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia, Myelodysplastic Syndrome or Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia (TWT-202)

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2021-148808 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 4432-4432

Author(s):

Gautam Borthakur ◽

Brian A. Jonas ◽

Emily L Roberts-Thomson ◽

Glenn C. Michelson ◽

Mark R Bray

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Myeloid Leukemia ◽

Research Funding ◽

Phase 1 ◽

Single Agent ◽

Cancer Center ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Grade 3 ◽

Acute Myeloid ◽

Refractory Aml

Abstract Background: CFI-400945 is a potent, selective, orally administered, first-in-class inhibitor of the serine/threonine kinase, Polo-like kinase 4 (PLK4). PLK4 is a highly conserved master upstream regulator of centriole duplication and is critical for maintenance of genomic integrity. Aberrant expression of PLK4 results in a number of effects including the centrosome amplification often seen in aneuploid cancers, pointing to a potentially causative role for PLK4 in genome instability and cancer progression. A Phase 1 study has been completed evaluating CFI-400945 as a monotherapy in solid tumors, showing a tolerable safety profile and promising signs of activity. Given acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is characterized by genomic instability, CFI-400945 has been evaluated in pre-clinical and clinical studies in AML. In pre-clinical studies, CFI-400945 showed potent activity towards leukemia cell lines and primary human samples in vitro, as well as marked efficacy in two subcutaneous models of leukemia. A prior Phase 1 trial in AML was initiated at the Princess Margaret Cancer Center (PMCC), and of six patients evaluable for response, two (33%) achieved complete remission (CR) at 96 mg and 128 mg, and 3 patients (50%) had stable disease (with one patient having a 78% reduction in marrow blast count) at 64 mg (2 patients) and 96 mg [re: Murphy et al, ASH 2020]. Responses were seen in patients with adverse cytogenetics. The optimal dosing of CFI-400945 and its potential role as a combination agent are not yet clinically defined. Study Design and Methods: The study (TWT-202) has 4 parts, Part 1A (1A): a single agent dose escalation portion, Part 1B (1B): a food effect portion once the MTD of 1A is determined, and combinations with azacitidine (2A), and decitabine (2B). TWT-202 uses an updated version of investigational product which is identical in formulation to the drug used in the PMCC study, but which may result in higher exposures at a given dose. This study will therefore refine the dose through escalation cohorts. For parts 1A and 1B, patients with relapsed and/or refractory AML, MDS, or CMML after >1 prior therapy will be included. Patients with MDS or CMML must have progressed or had a lack of response after at least 4 cycles of hypomethylating agents. For parts 2A and 2B, patients should have relapsed and/or refractory AML or untreated MDS or CMML. Untreated patients who decline or are ineligible for intensive therapy may be included. The study will use a standard 3 + 3 design. The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) will be defined as the dose level where the number of dose limiting toxicities (DLTs) is <1 out of 6 at highest dose level below the maximally administered dose. Pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) markers will be assessed. Results: As of June 21, 2021, 2 patients had been enrolled into the study, one of the patients (50%) received >3 prior therapies (including venetoclax). Neither patient had had stem cell transplant at study entry. Both patients had secondary AML (one with antecedent MDS with excess blasts and the other with CMML). Both patients received 32 mg of CFI-400945 for 21 days followed by a 7-day rest. Both patients completed cycle 1 and neither experienced a DLT. Both patients experienced a single serious treatment emergent adverse event (SAE) of febrile neutropenia each, with neither event considered related to CFI-400945. There were 13 Grade 3 or greater TEAE's, including anemia, thrombocytopenia (3 events each), febrile neutropenia (2 events), agitation, angioinvasive fungal sinusitis, acute kidney injury, hypotension and neutropenia (1 event each). None of the grade 3 or greater TEAE's were considered related to CFI-400945. Neither patient responded to therapy at 32 mg and both came off treatment after one cycle due to progressive disease. PK and PD studies are pending. Conclusion: CFI-400945 has been generally well tolerated and TWT-202 continues to enroll in the Part 1A and Part 1B monotherapy cohorts. Updated safety, efficacy, PK, and PD data for the study will be presented at the time of the meeting. Disclosures Borthakur: University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center: Current Employment; ArgenX: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Protagonist: Consultancy; Astex: Research Funding; Ryvu: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; GSK: Consultancy; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Jonas: 47, AbbVie, Accelerated Medical Diagnostics, Amgen, AROG, Celgene, Daiichi Sankyo, F. Hoffmann-La Roche, Forma, Genentech/Roche, Gilead, GlycoMimetics, Hanmi, Immune-Onc, Incyte, Jazz, Loxo Oncology, Pfizer, Pharmacyclics, Sigma Tau, Treadwell: Research Funding; AbbVie: Other: Travel reimbursement; AbbVie, BMS, Genentech, GlycoMimetics, Jazz, Pfizer, Takeda, Treadwell: Consultancy. Roberts-Thomson: Treadwell Therapeutics: Current Employment. Michelson: Treadwell Therapeutics: Consultancy. Bray: Treadwell Therapeutics: Current Employment.

Download Full-text

Nilotinib Shows Safety and Efficacy in Older Patients (≥ 65 years) with Newly Diagnosed Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in Chronic Phase Comparable with That in Younger Patients with Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in Chronic Phase: Results From ENESTnd,

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v118.21.3768.3768 ◽

2011 ◽

Vol 118 (21) ◽

pp. 3768-3768 ◽

Cited By ~ 5

Author(s):

Richard A. Larson ◽

Udomsak Bunworasate ◽

Anna G. Turkina ◽

Stuart L. Goldberg ◽

Pedro Dorlhiac-Llacer ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Chronic Myeloid Leukemia ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Myeloid Leukemia ◽

Research Funding ◽

Chronic Phase ◽

Newly Diagnosed ◽

Employment Equity ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Equity Ownership ◽

Grade 3

Abstract Abstract 3768 Background: Data from the phase 3, randomized multicenter ENESTnd trial have demonstrated the superiority of nilotinib over imatinib after 24 months (mo) of follow-up, with significantly higher rates of complete cytogenetic response (CCyR) and major molecular response (MMR), and significantly lower rates of progression to accelerated phase/blast crisis (AP/BC). The current subanalysis evaluated the efficacy and safety of nilotinib 300 mg twice daily (Nil300) and nilotinib 400 mg twice daily (Nil400) in older (≥ 65 years [yrs] at study entry) patients (pts) with newly diagnosed chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) in chronic phase (CP) with a minimum follow-up of 24 mo. Methods: In ENESTnd, 846 pts stratified by Sokal risk score were randomized 1:1:1 to Nil300 (n = 282), Nil400 (n = 281), or imatinib 400 mg once daily (n = 283). Pts with impaired cardiac function or ECOG performance status > 2 were excluded. Rates of CCyR and MMR by 24 mo, progression to AP/BC on treatment, and safety were evaluated according to age group (< 65 vs ≥ 65 yrs) in the 2 nilotinib arms. Safety data are reported for any pt who received ≥ 1 dose of nilotinib (n = 279, Nil300; n = 277, Nil400). Results: 36 pts (13%) and 28 pts (10%) were ≥ 65 yrs old in the Nil300 and Nil400 arms, respectively. Of the pts aged ≥ 65 yrs, 51/64 (80%) had an ECOG performance status of 0 at baseline and 60/64 (94%) had intermediate or high Sokal risk scores. Of the older pts, 8 (22%) on Nil300 and 6 (21%) on Nil400 had type 2 diabetes at baseline. CCyR rates by 24 mo were 83% and 68% among older pts treated with Nil300 and Nil400, respectively, and 87% for pts aged < 65 yrs in each nilotinib arm. By 24 mo, MMR was achieved by 72% and 61% of older pts on Nil300 and Nil400, respectively; in pts aged < 65 yrs, the respective rates were 71% and 67%. All 5 pts who progressed to AP/BC on treatment (2 on Nil300 and 3 on Nil400) were aged < 65 yrs. The frequency of grade 3/4 hematologic adverse events (AEs) was low in older pts; no pts had grade 3/4 neutropenia and only 1 older pt reported grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia in each nilotinib arm (Table). Transient, asymptomatic lipase elevations were reported in 11% and 16% of older pts treated with Nil300 and Nil400, and 7% of younger pts in each arm. Hyperglycemia occurred in 23% and 16% of older pts on Nil300 and Nil400, respectively, and 4% of younger pts in each arm; regardless of age, no pt discontinued study due to hyperglycemia. Among the 12 older pts with grade 3/4 hyperglycemia (8 on Nil300; 4 on Nil400), 9 pts had type 2 diabetes at baseline. There were no QTcF increases of > 60 msec from baseline in older pts and 3 in nilotinib-treated pts < 65 yrs old (1 on Nil300; 2 on Nil400). QTcF prolongation of > 500 msec did not occur in any pt treated with nilotinib on study. Periodic echocardiograms were done, and there were no decreases of > 15% in left ventricular ejection fraction from baseline in any pt treated with nilotinib on study. There were 4 cases of ischemic heart disease reported in older pts (1/35 [3%] on Nil300; 3/25 [12%] on Nil400) and 7 cases in pts < 65 yrs of age (4/244 [2%] on Nil300; 3/252 [1%] on Nil400). No sudden deaths occurred on study. Discontinuation occurred in approximately 25% of older and younger pts with Nil300, of which, 6% and 9%, respectively, were due to AEs/lab abnormalities. Discontinuation from study with Nil400 was 46% in older pts and 19% in younger pts; of which, 36% and 10% were due to AEs/lab abnormalities. Conclusions: Older pts treated with nilotinib demonstrated high rates of cytogenetic and molecular responses and low rates of progression. Nilotinib was generally well tolerated by older pts. In older pts, Nil300 had numerically higher rates of CCyR and MMR and was generally better tolerated (as evidenced by fewer AEs and discontinuations) vs Nil400. These data support the use of Nil300 in older pts with newly diagnosed CML-CP. Disclosures: Larson: Novartis Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Bunworasate:Novartis Pharmaceutical: Research Funding. Turkina:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria. Goldberg:Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Novartis Pharmaceutical: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Ariad: Research Funding. Dorlhiac-Llacer:Bristol Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding. Kantarjian:Novartis: Consultancy; Novartis: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding. Saglio:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Novartis Pharmaceutical: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Consultancy. Hochhaus:Ariad: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis Pharmaceutical: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Merck: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Hoenekopp:Novartis Pharmaceutical: Employment, Equity Ownership. Blakesley:Novartis Pharmaceutical: Employment. Yu:Novartis: Employment, Equity Ownership. Gallagher:Novartis: Employment, Equity Ownership. Clark:Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis Pharmaceutical: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Hughes:Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Ariad: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Download Full-text

Relationship Between Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROs) and Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) and Efficacy in Patients with Myelofibrosis in the Phase III Persist-1 Trial of Pacritinib Vs. Best Available Therapy (BAT)

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v126.23.1609.1609 ◽

2015 ◽

Vol 126 (23) ◽

pp. 1609-1609

Author(s):

Ruben A. Mesa ◽

Claire N. Harrison ◽

Francisco Cervantes ◽

James P. Dean ◽

Lixia Wang ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Off Label Use ◽

Employment Equity ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Off Label ◽

Eortc Qlq C30 ◽

Night Sweats ◽

Equity Ownership ◽

Eortc Qlq

Abstract Introduction: Myelofibrosis (MF) is a life-threatening hematologic malignancy characterized by splenomegaly and debilitating symptoms including fatigue, abdominal pain, night sweats, bone pain, pruritus, and unintentional weight loss. The myeloproliferative neoplasm symptom assessment form (MPN-SAF) is a PRO tool designed to measure MF-related symptom burden and was developed and validated at Mayo Clinic. It was modified (MPN-SAF total symptom score [TSS] and TSS 2.0) for use in the PERSIST-1 and PERSIST-2 phase 3 trials. For PERSIST-1, when examining the 6 common symptoms in both TSS versions (tiredness, night sweats, early satiety, itchiness, bone pain, and abdominal pain), pacritinib-treated patients (pts) had significant improvements in TSS overall and in individual symptoms vs BAT; Pt Global Impression of Change (PGIC) was also significantly improved for pts receiving pacritinib. Improvements in EORTC-QLQ-C30 scales were noted in the pacritinib arm (Mesa, EHA 2015). The proportion of pts achieving spleen volume reduction (SVR) ≥35% at Week 24 was significantly greater with pacritinib vs BAT (ITT: 19.1% vs 4.7%, p=0.0003; evaluable at baseline and Week 24: 25.0% vs 5.9%; p=0.0001). This analysis examines relationships between TSS improvement and changes in splenomegaly and HRQoL outcomes. Methods: Pts who received no prior JAK inhibitor therapy were randomized 2:1 to oral pacritinib 400 mg once daily or BAT. Pts were stratified by DIPSS risk (Int-1/Int-2 vs High) and platelet count (<50,000/μL vs 50,000/μL to <100,000/μL vs ≥100,000/μL). Pts must have had a baseline total TSS ≥13 using MPN-SAF TSS 2.0. Each symptom is rated on a scale from 0 (absent) to 10 (worst imaginable) using MPN-SAF TSS and TSS 2.0. Results for the 6 symptoms common to both TSS versions are reported. Additional PROs used for assessment of HRQoL included EORTC QLQ-C30 and EQ-5D-5L. In multivariate logistic regressions, odds of TSS reduction ≥50% at Week 24 were modeled as a function of Week 24 SVR ≥35%, spleen length reduction (SLR) ≥ 50%, PGIC, improvement in each EORTC scale, and improvement in EQ-5D-5L Overall Health State (OHS) and in each dimension individually while adjusting for treatment (pacritinib vs BAT). Correlations were examined in all pts and by baseline platelet counts (<50,000/μL, <100,000/μL, and ≥100,000/μL). Results: A total of 327 pts were enrolled (PAC: 220, BAT: 107). 62% of pts had primary MF, 32% had baseline platelets <100,000/μL, and 16% had baseline platelets <50,000/μL. TSS reduction ≥50% was found to be associated with SVR ≥35% and improvement in splenomegaly (SLR ≥50%). In the total pt population, there was a significant association between TSS reduction and SVR (odds ratio [OR]=2.60, p=0.016). In all pts, there was a significant association between TSS reduction and improvements in OHS as measured by EQ-5D-5L (OR=2.30, p=0.013). TSS reductions were also marginally associated with improvements in the QLQ-C30 Global Health Scale (GHS)/QoL Scale (OR=1.92, p=0.050) and, though not statistically significant, there was a trend of improvement in perceived overall health as measured by PGIC (OR=2.16, p=0.118). TSS reductions were further examined in pts grouped by baseline platelet count. Improvement in EQ-5D-5L OHS was marginally associated with TSS reductions in pts with platelets <50,000/μL (OR=6.03, p=0.057). For pts with platelets <100,000/μL, reductions in TSS were significantly associated with reductions in splenomegaly (SLR ≥50%; OR=9.53, p=0.004), and improvements in the QLQ-C30 GHS/QoL domain (OR=4.03, p=0.022) as well as the EQ-5D-5L OHS (OR=5.49, p=0.008). A significant association between TSS reductions and SVR ≥35% was observed in pts with platelets ≥100,000/μL (OR=3.99, p=0.005). In all pts, improvements in Fatigue as measured by QLQ-C30 were significantly associated with TSS reductions (OR=2.20, p=0.019) as well as in pts with baseline platelets <50,000/μL (OR=17.88, p=0.008) and <100,000/μL (OR=10.18, p<0.001). Conclusions: In the total pt population, TSS reduction was associated with improvements in spleen response and perceived overall health. This trend was also observed in pts with low baseline platelet counts. Additionally, TSS reduction was significantly associated with improvements in fatigue, a major contributor to poor HRQoL in pts with MF. This reinforces the clinical relevance of measuring TSS using a validated instrument as an endpoint in MF trials. Disclosures Mesa: NS Pharma: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; Gilead: Research Funding; Incyte Corporation: Research Funding; CTI Biopharma: Research Funding; Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation: Consultancy; Genentech: Research Funding; Promedior: Research Funding. Off Label Use: This abstract discusses off-label use of pacritinib. Harrison:Shire: Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Gilead: Honoraria; CTI Biopharma: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Sanofi: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Cervantes:Novartis: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Sanofi-Aventis: Consultancy; CTI-Baxter: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Dean:CTI Biopharma: Employment, Equity Ownership. Wang:CTI Biopharma: Employment, Equity Ownership. Yang:Baxalta: Employment, Other: Stock. Vannucchi:Shire: Speakers Bureau; Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Baxalta: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Download Full-text

Updated Results of a Phase 1/2a, Dose Escalation Study of Pvx-410 Multi-Peptide Cancer Vaccine in Patients with Smoldering Multiple Myeloma (SMM)

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v126.23.4246.4246 ◽

2015 ◽

Vol 126 (23) ◽

pp. 4246-4246 ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

Ajay K. Nooka ◽

Michael Wang ◽

Andrew J. Yee ◽

Sheeba K. Thomas ◽

Elizabeth K. O'Donnell ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Immune Response ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Post Treatment ◽

Off Label Use ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Off Label ◽

Label Use

Methods: As reported previously, PVX-410 Multi-Peptide Vaccine (OncoPep, Inc.) is being developed for the treatment of SMM. PVX-410 consists of 4 human leukocyte antigen-A2 (HLA-A2), synthetic 9-mer peptides from unique regions of 3 multiple myeloma (MM)-associated antigens (XBP1 US184-192; XBP1 SP367-375; CD138260-268; and CS1239-247) emulsified in Montanide® ISA-720 VG (Seppic). Adults with SMM at high risk of progression to active MM and were HLA-A2-positive were eligible. The primary objective of this study was to determine the tolerability of PVX-410, initially as monotherapy. Immune response and change in M protein and free light chain ratio (FLC) were also assessed. PVX-410 alone was safe and immunogenic in the initial 12 patients treated, with all 12 having positive immune response to at least 1peptide, as determined by interferon-gamma enzyme-linked immunosorbent spot (Elispot) and tetramer assays. Given its immunomodulatory properties, it was hypothesized that co-administration of lenalidomide (len; Celgene Corporation) would enhance the T cell-mediated immune response induced by PVX-410. Accordingly, the tolerability, immunogenicity, and anti-MM activity of PVX-410+len was then investigated. Results in the PVX-410 alone cohort were previously reported. In the PVX-410+len cohort, patients received a dose of PVX-410, 0.8mg (0.2mg/peptide / 0.8mg total dose) subcutaneously plus 0.5 mL (1mg) Hiltonol® (poly-ICLC; Oncovir, Inc.) intramuscularly every 2 weeks for a total of 6 doses with 3 standard cycles of len (25 mg orally) on Days 1-21 every 28 days, without dexamethasone. Patients are followed for 12months post-treatment. Blood samples for immune response evaluation are collected at Week 0 (Baseline; pre-dose), 2, 4, and 8 during treatment and at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 post-treatment. Disease response is assessed at the same time points, except Weeks 0 and 2, using International Myeloma Working Group and modified European Group for Blood and Bone Marrow Transplant criteria. Results: Overall, 22 patients have been enrolled, with ages ranging from 39 to 82 years. Ten patients were enrolled in the PVX-410+len cohort, with 9 evaluable for response. All 10 patients received at least 1 cycle of len; 8 received all 3 cycles; 1 received 1 cycle before discontinuing due to a deviation; and 1 completed 2 cycles as of the cutoff date. One patient had 7 of 21 planned doses held due to neutropenia related to lenalidomide, but resumed the next cycle at a reduced dose (from 25 mg to 20 mg). Immunogenicity data with PVX-410+len and PVX-410 alone, as determined via intracellular cytokine staining and tetramer analysis, will be presented. With PVX-410 alone, 5 patients, 2 of 3 with the low-dose of 0.4 mg (0.1mg/peptide) and 3 of 9 at the target-dose (0.2 mg/peptide), experienced progression to active disease within 9 months post-treatment, and 7 had stable disease (SD) at the last follow up visit in the 12 month follow up period. With PVX-410+len, 5 patients have experienced partial or minimal responses and 3 have experienced SD. Durability of response is assessed through the 12-month study period; 1 patient has progressed to active myeloma during this time. PVX-410 was well-tolerated alone and with len. Most adverse events (AEs) have been ≤Grade 2 and non-serious. AEs seen more frequently with PVX-410+len versus PVX-410 alone are expected with len and include hematologic abnormalities (neutropenia, anemia, thrombocytopenia), gastrointestinal disorders (nausea, diarrhea, constipation), skin and cutaneous disorders (rash, pruritus), and myalgia. There was 1serious AE in the combination cohort (pneumonia), considered possibly related to len and unrelated to PVX-410. Conclusions: Six doses of PVX-410 were well tolerated in 22 patients with SMM. Additional AEs seen with PVX-410+len versus PVX-410 alone were expected with the addition of len to the treatment regimen. An immune response to the vaccine was seen in all patients treated with PVX-410 alone and is expected to be enhanced with PVX-410+len; these data will be presented. Based on the promising findings to date, an evaluation of PVX-410 in combination with an antibody to the programmed cell-death-1-ligand complex (PD1/PDL1) is planned to begin in 2015. Disclosures Nooka: Spectrum Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Onyx Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy. Off Label Use: Off label use of lenalidomide. Wang:Janssen: Honoraria; Pharmacyclics, Janssen, Celgene, Oncopep, Kite, Juno: Research Funding. Thomas:Novartis, Celgene, Acerta Pharmaceuticals, Idera Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding. O'Donnell:Millennium: Consultancy. Shah:Millenium: Research Funding; Onyx: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Array: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Merck: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Kaufman:Milleniumm, Celgene, Novartis, Onyx, Spectrum: Consultancy. Lonial:Onyx: Consultancy, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Millennium: Consultancy, Research Funding. Richardson:Gentium S.p.A.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Millennium Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene Corporation: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Raje:Takeda: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; Celgene Corporation: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; Onyx: Consultancy; AstraZeneca: Research Funding; Millenium: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Acetylon: Research Funding; Eli Lilly: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Safety and Efficacy of Maintenance Treatment Following Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplant in Acute Myeloid Leukemia and Myelodysplastic Syndrome - a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2020-136671 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 34-35

Author(s):

Jan Philipp Bewersdorf ◽

Martin S. Tallman ◽

Christina Cho ◽

Amer M. Zeidan ◽

Maximilian Stahl

Keyword(s):

Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽

Maintenance Therapy ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Myeloid Leukemia ◽

Research Funding ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Cell Transplant ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Flt3 Inhibitors ◽

Acute Myeloid

Background: Prognosis of patients (pts) with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) or myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) who relapse after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (allo-HCT) is extremely poor and strategies to reduce the risk of disease relapse are warranted. Hypomethylating agents (HMA) or FLT3 inhibitors have been used in several studies for relapse prevention following allo-HCT with mixed results leaving the question regarding the safety and efficacy of this strategy unanswered. Methods: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis and searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science and CENTRAL from inception to 8/2020 for studies using the following combination of free-text terms linked by Boolean operators: [Acute myeloid leukemia OR AML OR MDS OR Myelodysplastic syndrome] AND [transplant OR allogeneic stem cell transplant OR hematopoietic stem cell transplantation] AND [maintenance OR maintenance therapy OR maintenance treatment]. Titles and abstracts were reviewed and excluded if they were review or basic research articles, not on post-allo-HCT maintenance in AML or MDS, no English full-text was available, or if they were clinical trials without published results. Full-texts were reviewed and excluded if (I) duplicate publications from the same patient cohort, (II) insufficient reporting of endpoints, (III) studies not on FLT3 inhibitors or HMA, (IV) case series with <5 pts, or (V) commentaries without original independent data. Studies using FLT3 inhibitors or HMA for pre-emptive treatment of imminent relapse based on positive minimal residual disease (MRD) testing were excluded. Outcomes of interest were the rates of 2-year overall survival (OS) and relapse-free survival (RFS) as well as incidence of acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). The study protocol was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42020187298). Results: The search strategy retrieved 1388 unique citations (Figure 1). After application of additional exclusion criteria, 22 studies were included in the meta-analysis. A total of 829 pts was included with 462 and 367 receiving post-allo-HCT treatment with FLT3 inhibitors or HMA, respectively. All pts treated with FLT3 inhibitors had AML, while 231 AML and 112 MDS pts were treated with HMA, respectively. Among studies on FLT3 inhibitors, sorafenib was used in 10 studies with midostaurin and quizartinib being used in 1 study each. Azacitidine was used in 8 studies, decitabine in 3 studies and 1 study used both azacitidine and decitabine. Patient, transplant, and treatment characteristics of the included studies are shown in Table 1. Reporting of outcomes was variable among the included studies (Figure 2;Panels A-D). Among pts treated with FLT3 inhibitors, 2-year OS and RFS rates were 81.7% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 70.0 - 89.5%), and 82.9% (95% CI: 76.9 - 87.5%), respectively. Acute and chronic GVHD occurred in 10.4% (95% CI: 0.5 - 73.3%) and 38.4% (95% CI: 13.4 - 71.5%) of pts, respectively. In HMA-treated pts, 2-year OS and RFS rates were 65.6% (95% CI: 54.7 - 75.1%) and 56.2% (42.4 - 69.2%), respectively. Acute and chronic GVHD occurred in 39.9% (95% CI: 29.2 - 51.6%) and 44.4% (95% CI: 34.1 - 55.2%) of pts, respectively. Study quality was limited by retrospective design employed by 10 studies, small sample sizes in some of the analyses, and heterogenous patient populations, reporting of outcomes, and transplant characteristics which were limiting cross-study comparisons. Discussion: Maintenance therapy with FLT3 inhibitors or HMA following allo-HCT in AML and MDS pts appears to be safe and can potentially be associated with prolonged RFS and OS although its efficacy needs to be verified in randomized trials. Careful patient selection is necessary as both the rates of GVHD and the burden on pts related to extended treatment following allo-HCT can be substantial. Selecting pts based on high-risk genetic (e.g. presence of TP53 mutations) and other disease characteristics (MRD-positivity at time of allo-HCT) could be options for patient selection but require additional validation. Various clinical trials investigating the role of post allo-HCT maintenance therapy are ongoing and our data could serve as a reference when interpreting the results of those trials. Disclosures Tallman: Daiichi-Sankyo: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Abbvie: Research Funding; Jazz Pharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Research Funding; Orsenix: Research Funding; Cellerant: Research Funding; ADC Therapeutics: Research Funding; Bioline rx: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BioSight: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Rafael: Research Funding; Glycomimetics: Research Funding; Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; UpToDate: Patents & Royalties; Delta Fly Pharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Oncolyze: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Rigel: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; KAHR: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Zeidan:Incyte: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; CCITLA: Other; Astex: Research Funding; Trovagene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Aprea: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria; ADC Therapeutics: Research Funding; Cardiff Oncology: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other; Ionis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Epizyme: Consultancy, Honoraria; Otsuka: Consultancy, Honoraria; Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Agios: Consultancy, Honoraria; Boehringer-Ingelheim: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Acceleron: Consultancy, Honoraria; Astellas: Consultancy, Honoraria; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy, Honoraria; Cardinal Health: Consultancy, Honoraria; Taiho: Consultancy, Honoraria; BeyondSpring: Consultancy, Honoraria; Leukemia and Lymphoma Society: Other; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene / BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; MedImmune/Astrazeneca: Research Funding; Jazz: Consultancy, Honoraria; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding.

Download Full-text