Updated Results of a Phase 1/2a, Dose Escalation Study of Pvx-410 Multi-Peptide Cancer Vaccine in Patients with Smoldering Multiple Myeloma (SMM)

Methods: As reported previously, PVX-410 Multi-Peptide Vaccine (OncoPep, Inc.) is being developed for the treatment of SMM. PVX-410 consists of 4 human leukocyte antigen-A2 (HLA-A2), synthetic 9-mer peptides from unique regions of 3 multiple myeloma (MM)-associated antigens (XBP1 US184-192; XBP1 SP367-375; CD138260-268; and CS1239-247) emulsified in Montanide® ISA-720 VG (Seppic). Adults with SMM at high risk of progression to active MM and were HLA-A2-positive were eligible. The primary objective of this study was to determine the tolerability of PVX-410, initially as monotherapy. Immune response and change in M protein and free light chain ratio (FLC) were also assessed. PVX-410 alone was safe and immunogenic in the initial 12 patients treated, with all 12 having positive immune response to at least 1peptide, as determined by interferon-gamma enzyme-linked immunosorbent spot (Elispot) and tetramer assays. Given its immunomodulatory properties, it was hypothesized that co-administration of lenalidomide (len; Celgene Corporation) would enhance the T cell-mediated immune response induced by PVX-410. Accordingly, the tolerability, immunogenicity, and anti-MM activity of PVX-410+len was then investigated. Results in the PVX-410 alone cohort were previously reported. In the PVX-410+len cohort, patients received a dose of PVX-410, 0.8mg (0.2mg/peptide / 0.8mg total dose) subcutaneously plus 0.5 mL (1mg) Hiltonol® (poly-ICLC; Oncovir, Inc.) intramuscularly every 2 weeks for a total of 6 doses with 3 standard cycles of len (25 mg orally) on Days 1-21 every 28 days, without dexamethasone. Patients are followed for 12months post-treatment. Blood samples for immune response evaluation are collected at Week 0 (Baseline; pre-dose), 2, 4, and 8 during treatment and at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 post-treatment. Disease response is assessed at the same time points, except Weeks 0 and 2, using International Myeloma Working Group and modified European Group for Blood and Bone Marrow Transplant criteria. Results: Overall, 22 patients have been enrolled, with ages ranging from 39 to 82 years. Ten patients were enrolled in the PVX-410+len cohort, with 9 evaluable for response. All 10 patients received at least 1 cycle of len; 8 received all 3 cycles; 1 received 1 cycle before discontinuing due to a deviation; and 1 completed 2 cycles as of the cutoff date. One patient had 7 of 21 planned doses held due to neutropenia related to lenalidomide, but resumed the next cycle at a reduced dose (from 25 mg to 20 mg). Immunogenicity data with PVX-410+len and PVX-410 alone, as determined via intracellular cytokine staining and tetramer analysis, will be presented. With PVX-410 alone, 5 patients, 2 of 3 with the low-dose of 0.4 mg (0.1mg/peptide) and 3 of 9 at the target-dose (0.2 mg/peptide), experienced progression to active disease within 9 months post-treatment, and 7 had stable disease (SD) at the last follow up visit in the 12 month follow up period. With PVX-410+len, 5 patients have experienced partial or minimal responses and 3 have experienced SD. Durability of response is assessed through the 12-month study period; 1 patient has progressed to active myeloma during this time. PVX-410 was well-tolerated alone and with len. Most adverse events (AEs) have been ≤Grade 2 and non-serious. AEs seen more frequently with PVX-410+len versus PVX-410 alone are expected with len and include hematologic abnormalities (neutropenia, anemia, thrombocytopenia), gastrointestinal disorders (nausea, diarrhea, constipation), skin and cutaneous disorders (rash, pruritus), and myalgia. There was 1serious AE in the combination cohort (pneumonia), considered possibly related to len and unrelated to PVX-410. Conclusions: Six doses of PVX-410 were well tolerated in 22 patients with SMM. Additional AEs seen with PVX-410+len versus PVX-410 alone were expected with the addition of len to the treatment regimen. An immune response to the vaccine was seen in all patients treated with PVX-410 alone and is expected to be enhanced with PVX-410+len; these data will be presented. Based on the promising findings to date, an evaluation of PVX-410 in combination with an antibody to the programmed cell-death-1-ligand complex (PD1/PDL1) is planned to begin in 2015. Disclosures Nooka: Spectrum Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Onyx Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy. Off Label Use: Off label use of lenalidomide. Wang:Janssen: Honoraria; Pharmacyclics, Janssen, Celgene, Oncopep, Kite, Juno: Research Funding. Thomas:Novartis, Celgene, Acerta Pharmaceuticals, Idera Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding. O'Donnell:Millennium: Consultancy. Shah:Millenium: Research Funding; Onyx: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Array: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Merck: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Kaufman:Milleniumm, Celgene, Novartis, Onyx, Spectrum: Consultancy. Lonial:Onyx: Consultancy, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Millennium: Consultancy, Research Funding. Richardson:Gentium S.p.A.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Millennium Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene Corporation: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Raje:Takeda: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; Celgene Corporation: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; Onyx: Consultancy; AstraZeneca: Research Funding; Millenium: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Acetylon: Research Funding; Eli Lilly: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Variation In Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) by ISS Stage and ECOG Status Among Multiple Myeloma Patients.

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v116.21.3828.3828 ◽

2010 ◽

Vol 116 (21) ◽

pp. 3828-3828

Author(s):

Chris L Pashos ◽

Brian G. M. Durie ◽

Robert M. Rifkin ◽

Jatin J Shah ◽

Thomas K. Street ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Clinical Characteristics ◽

Self Care ◽

Off Label Use ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Off Label ◽

Hrqol Data ◽

Label Use

Abstract Abstract 3828 Introduction: Attention is being paid to HRQOL when monitoring hematologic disorders or the impact of treatments on those disorders. Minimal HRQOL data have been published on multiple myeloma (MM) patients (pts) in the United States (US). This analysis characterizes variation in the HRQOL of pts with active, symptomatic MM by International Staging System (ISS) stage and ECOG status. Methods: Data were collected as part of Connect MM®, a prospective observational registry initiated in September 2009 involving centers in the US. Data on pt demographics and clinical characteristics were provided by clinicians. HRQOL was reported by pts in the clinic at enrollment, within two months of diagnosis. Pts completed 3 psychometrically validated instruments: EQ-5D, Brief Pain Inventory (BPI), and Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Multiple Myeloma (FACT-MM). Standard analyses were conducted of each instrument given clinical characteristics at that time. Reported mean BPI, EQ-5D and FACT-MM scores were analyzed by ISS and ECOG status. Statistical significance of score differences among sub-cohorts was ascertained by ANOVA using SAS 9.1. Results: HRQOL data were reported by 328 pts, enrolled from 135 centers. Pts were predominantly male (60%) and white (79%) with mean age at 67.3 (standard deviation [SD] 11.6) yrs. HRQOL scores by evaluable ISS stage (n=236) and ECOG status (n=258) are presented. BPI data (on a scale of 0 [no pain] to 10 [worst pain]) indicate that average reported pain worsens by ISS and ECOG severity. Mean EQ-5D scores (on a scale of 1 [no problem] to 2 [some problems] to 3 [incapacity]) indicate that pain/discomfort, and usual activities are most compromised, and with self care increase in severity as ISS and ECOG worsen. Anxiety/depression level is associated with ECOG, but not with ISS. FACT-MM results indicate that ISS and ECOG severity is associated with greater decrement in physical and functional domains. The associations of HRQOL with ECOG status were stronger than with ISS stage. Specifically, scores on the BPI, all EQ-5D domains, and all FACT-MM domains (except the social/family domain) were statistically significantly associated with more severe ECOG status. Conclusions: Initial results from the Connect MM® Registry indicate that HRQOL worsens with worsening ISS stage and ECOG status, especially in physical and functioning domains, pain/discomfort, and ability to conduct usual activities and to provide self care. These areas should receive attention at diagnosis. Future analyses should be conducted on: (1) more newly diagnosed patients; (2) how HRQOL may be affected over time with changes in disease; and, (3) how HRQOL may be influenced by alternative therapies. Results reported here should serve as useful baseline reference. Disclosures: Pashos: Celgene Corporation: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Off Label Use: CONNECT is a disease registry and includes data on off-label use of anti-myeloma agents. Durie:Celgene & Millennium: Consultancy. Rifkin:Millennium: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Speakers Bureau; Cephalon: Speakers Bureau; Dendreon: Speakers Bureau. Shah:Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Millennium: Research Funding. Street:Celgene: Employment. Sullivan:Celgene: Employment, Equity Ownership. Khan:Celgene Corporation: Employment.

Download Full-text

A Single-Center Retrospective Cohort Analysis of Venetoclax in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-122383 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 5576-5576 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Swetha Kambhampati ◽

Derek Galligan ◽

Guy Ledergor ◽

Thomas G. Martin ◽

Jeffrey Wolf ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Response Rate ◽

Off Label Use ◽

Final Dose ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Off Label ◽

Best Response

Background Despite recent advances, treatment of relapsed refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) remains a challenge. Venetoclax, a BH3 mimetic, is an oral, specific, and potent small molecule inhibitor of BCL-2 that has been approved for treatment of 17p-deleted CLL and in combination with azacitidine or decitabine in AML patients >/= 75 years of age.Pre-clinical and clinical studies suggest that bcl-2 inhibition can induce MM cell death and may synergize with bortezomib and dexamethasone. Based on this, several prospective clinical trials of venetoclax in RRMM have been performed. However, clinical use of this targeted therapeutic for salvage therapy in RRMM has not been well described. Methods We performed a single-center, retrospective chart review of all patients with RRMM diagnosed after January 1, 2009 who were treated with off-label use of venetoclax. The goal of this study was to describe the clinical characteristics of these patients, assess the response to salvage treatment with venetoclax as determined by the International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) criteria, and assess the toxicities during salvage treatment with venetoclax in an academic practice setting. Results 43 patients were identified. Median number of lines of prior therapy was 7 (range 2-13). 12 patients had documented high risk cytogenetics, defined as the presence of a 17p deletion, t(14;16), t(14;20), t(4,14), gain (1q), or nonhyperdiploidy. Of the 36 patients with cytogenetics/FISH available, 8 had t(11;14). 34 patients were refractory to bortezomib. 40 patients had progressed after carfilzomib, 36 after pomalidomide, and 41 after anti-CD38 antibody therapy. 39 patients were treated with venetoclax in combination with a proteasome inhibitor (bortezomib (n=36); carfilzomib (n=3)). 23 patients were treated with venetoclax, proteasome inhibitor, and dexamethasone. Patients were started at 400 mg daily for 7 days then increased to the median dose of 800mg daily (11 received < 800mg/daily as a final dose and one received >800 mg/daily as final dose). Overall patients were on treatment for a median of 67 days (range 2-855). 2 patients received intermittent venetoclax therapy, defined as being off venetoclax for at least 3 months before restarting. Best response by IMWG criteria include; CR 5%( 2/43), VGPR 12% (5/43) and PR 16% (7/43) for an overall response rate of 33% (14/43). In addition, MR was seen in 5% (2/43) and stable disease in 9% (4/43). Fifty-one percent (22/43) had progressive disease (PD). Out of the 8 patients who had t(11;14), best responses were: 2 VGPR, 2 PR, 1 SD, and 3 PD for a response rate of 50% (4/8) in this subgroup. Median time to best response for all responding patients was 90 days (range 15-305) and median duration of response was 206 days (range 28-820). At time of data collection, median follow-up time from venetoclax treatment initiation was 192 days (range 8-1058). Four patients have not progressed and remain on therapy, 23 patients remain alive, and 4 patients have been lost to follow-up for over 6 months. The most common treatment related AEs were cytopenias including leukopenia in 26 /43 (60%) patients, neutropenia in 19/43 (44%) patients, and thrombocytopenia in 22/43 (51%) patients. Non-hematologic toxicities included diarrhea in 12/43 (30%) patients, nausea/vomiting in 15/43 (35%) patients, infections in 11/43 (26%) patients, and fatigue in 23/43 (53%) patients. 8/43 (19%) patients required dose reduction, 7/43 (16%) patients required temporary discontinuation of treatment, and 4/43 (9%) patients required permanent discontinuation due to treatment related AEs. 38/43 (88%) patients had any grade treatment related AEs, 27/43 (63%) patients had grade >/= 3 AEs and 2/43 (5%) patients had treatment related SAEs. One patient had a treatment related death from an infectious complication (CMV pneumonitis). Conclusions Venetoclax is an active and well-tolerated agent in relapsed multiple myeloma. Furthermore, it is easily administered in the outpatient setting. Additional areas of research with this therapy include understanding the importance of t(11:14) for response and selecting the best anti-MM partner for combination therapy. Disclosures Ledergor: Venetoclax: Other: off-label use; Immunai: Consultancy. Martin:Roche and Juno: Consultancy; Amgen, Sanofi, Seattle Genetics: Research Funding. Wolf:Takeda: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy. Wong:Celgene Corporation: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Fortis: Research Funding; Juno: Research Funding. Shah:Nkarta: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene, Janssen, Bluebird Bio, Sutro Biopharma: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Poseida: Research Funding; Genentech, Seattle Genetics, Oncopeptides, Karoypharm, Surface Oncology, Precision biosciences GSK, Nektar, Amgen, Indapta Therapeutics, Sanofi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; University of California, San Francisco: Employment; Indapta Therapeutics: Equity Ownership; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Kite: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Teneobio: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. OffLabel Disclosure: This study is looking at the safety and efficacy of venetoclax in relapsed refractory myeloma patients who are treated off-label since venetoclax is not currently approved for multiple myeloma

Download Full-text

Subcutaneous Alemtuzumab Combined with Oral Dexamethasone, Followed by Alemtuzumab Maintenance or Allo-SCT In CLL with 17p- or Refractory to Fludarabine – Interim Analysis of the CLL2O Trial of the GCLLSG and FCGCLL/MW

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v116.21.920.920 ◽

2010 ◽

Vol 116 (21) ◽

pp. 920-920 ◽

Cited By ~ 12

Author(s):

Stephan Stilgenbauer ◽

Florence Cymbalista ◽

Véronique Leblond ◽

Alain Delmer ◽

Thorsten Zenz ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Disease Progression ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Remission Rate ◽

High Dose ◽

Off Label Use ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Off Label ◽

Oral Dexamethasone ◽

Label Use

Abstract Abstract 920 CLL refractory to purine analogues (e.g. fludarabine, F) or with 17p- is associated with very poor prognosis. Alemtuzumab is active in F-refractory CLL, and has proven efficacy in patients (pts) with 17p-. However, outcome of F-refractory CLL is still poor in terms of remission rate and duration of remission. The multinational, multicenter CLL2O trial aims at achieving a higher remission rate by adding high-dose dexamethasone to alemtuzumab, and prolongation of remission duration and survival by alemtuzumab maintenance or allogeneic stem-cell transplantation (allo-SCT). Pts with CLL refractory (no PR/CR or PR/CR < 6 months) to F-based (e.g. FR, FC, FCR) or similar chemotherapy (i.e. pentostatin, cladribine, bendamustine), or exhibiting 17p- (untreated or at relapse) were eligible if they had “active disease”. Treatment was with subcutaneous alemtuzumab 30 mg weekly × 3 for 28 days, combined with oral dexamethasone 40 mg on days 1–4 and 15–18, and prophylactic pegfilgrastim 6 mg days 1 and 15. Depending on the remission status, pts were treated for up to 12 weeks. If CR was documented at 4 or 8 weeks, or at least SD was achieved at 12 weeks, consolidation was scheduled with either allo-SCT or alemtuzumab maintenance with 30mg weekly every 14 days for up to 2 years (yrs). Decision for one of the two consolidation options was at discretion of patient and physician. From January 2008 to July 2010, 80 pts were enrolled at 22 centers and 79 were eligible; F-refractory (n=31), 17p- without prior therapy (n=31), and 17p- in relapse (n=17). Median age was 65 yrs in the F-refractory (range 38–76) and 17p- 1st-line group (36-76), and 60 yrs for the 17p- relapse group (54-73) with male predominance (F-refractory 74%, 17p- 1st-line 71%, 17p- relapse 82%). In the 17p- 1st-line and relapse groups, 52% and 50% were stage Binet C and exhibit reduced performance status (ECOG 1–2), compared to 81% Binet C and 60% ECOG 1–2 for the F-refractory cohort. Pretreated pts had received a median of 2 prior lines (F-refractory 1–6; 17p- relapse 1–5), and 5 pts had received prior SCT. In the F-refractory group, 16% of pts had 11q- and 52% had 17p-. IGHV was unmutated in 64% of 17p- groups and 72% in the F-refractory group. The median levels of ß2-MG / TK were 4.35 / 35.40 in the 17p- groups and 4.12 / 22.65 in the F-refractory group. Treatment data are currently available for 50 pts who completed induction therapy; F-refractory (n=19),17p- 1st-line (n=22), 17p- relapse (n=9). Full treatment duration (12 weeks) could be achieved in 47% F-refractory, 67% 17p- relapsed and 82% 17p- 1st-line pts. In the latter cohort, early stop of therapy was mainly correlated with CR, while in the F-refractory cohort with disease progression (n=2) and infections (n=5, 4 with no documented response). Response rates (ORR / CR) were 47% / 0% in the F-refractory cohort, 78% / 0% in the 17p- relapsed, and 100% / 23% in the 17p- 1st-line cohorts (as compared to this, ORR / CR was 71.4% / 4.8% with FCR in the 17p- 1st-line group of CLL8). Adverse events during treatment were mostly grade 1/2 apart from hematotoxicity. Grade 3/4 non-CMV infection occurred in 35% of F-refractory, 12% of 17p- relapsed, and 16% of 17p- 1st-line pts. CMV reactivation was observed in 32 % of the 17p- 1st-line pts, and less for the pretreated groups (F-refractory 16%, 17p- relapsed 18%). All CMV episodes were successfully treated, and there was no CMV-related death. Among 18 pts documented to receive alemtuzumab maintenance treatment, so far 3 SAEs have been reported: ITP (n=1, twice in the same pt), and fever / diarrhea / thyroiditis (n=1). At a median follow-up of 41.9 weeks (maintenance 54.7 weeks, allo-SCT 29 weeks), there were 7 (37%) deaths in the in the F-refractory cohort, 2 due to disease progression, and 5 due to infection. For the 17p- relapsed group, 3 progressions and 3 deaths were reported, with one case in each treatment option (SCT/maintenance), and one pt in salvage therapy. In the 17p- 1st-line cohort, 4 progressions occurred, 2 pts died, both in maintenance therapy. At 12 months, estimated overall survival was 54%, 66% and 100% in the F-refractory, 17p- relapse, and 17p- 1st-line cohorts, respectively. Accrual is currently ongoing with a target enrolment of 122 pts and updated results will be presented at the meeting. Disclosures: Stilgenbauer: Amgen: Research Funding; Bayer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Boehringer-Ingelheim: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Genzyme: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; GSK: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Mundipharma: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Sanofi Aventis: Research Funding. Off Label Use: off-label use of diagnostic tests and therapeutic agents. Leblond:ROCHE: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; MUNDIPHARMA : Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; CELGENE: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Zenz:Roche: Honoraria; Boehringer: Honoraria; GSK: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria. Choquet:ROCHE : Consultancy. Hallek:Roche: Honoraria, Research Funding. Döhner:Pfizer: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Clinical Outcomes of Patients with Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Receiving Triplet Therapy in the Connect MM® Disease Registry

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v126.23.4229.4229 ◽

2015 ◽

Vol 126 (23) ◽

pp. 4229-4229

Author(s):

Jatin J. Shah ◽

Rafat Abonour ◽

Mohit Narang ◽

Jayesh Mehta ◽

Howard R. Terebelo ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Newly Diagnosed ◽

Employment Equity ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Risk Of Death ◽

Equity Ownership ◽

Triplet Regimen

Abstract Introduction: Triplet therapies are used for treatment (Tx) of both transplant-eligible and -ineligible patients (pts) with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM). Actual patterns and outcomes of Tx are not fully understood. Connect MM® is the first and largest multicenter, US-based, prospective observational cohort study designed to characterize Tx patterns and outcomes for pts with NDMM. This analysis describes demographic and disease characteristics of pts who received triplet Tx as an induction regimen and for whom transplant was or was not intended. The analysis explores the relationship of these factors with overall survival (OS) and other efficacy endpoints. Patients and Methods: Pts aged ≥ 18 y with NDMM within 60 days of diagnosis were eligible for enrollment regardless of disease severity, medical history, or comorbidities. Data including transplant intent (yes/no) was collected at baseline; follow-up data was collected quarterly thereafter. Based on the initial intent, 2 groups were identified: patients with intent to transplant who received transplant (TT) and pts with no intent to transplant who did not receive a transplant (NT). Triplet Tx was defined as the combination of ≥ 3 concurrent therapeutic agents in the first course of Tx (within 56 days of study entry). KM analysis adjusted for age was conducted for OS. Because decisions on use of transplant and triplet therapy are influenced by multiple factors, a multivariable Cox regression analysis was performed to evaluate the contribution of the triplet therapy (yes/no) to OS and was adjusted for other variables, including age, comorbidities, and ISS staging. Results: Between September 2009 and December 2011, 1493 pts were enrolled. This analysis was on 1436 pts: 650 pts with transplant intent and 786 pts without transplant intent. The data cutoff date was November 30, 2014, and the median follow-up for overall survival (OS) was 33.8 mos. Of pts with transplant intent, 451 (69%) received transplant (TT) and 199 (31%) did not. Of pts without transplant intent, 62 (8%) received transplant and 724 (92%) did not (NT). The abstract focuses on TT and NT groups only. NT pts tended to be older and have more advanced ISS staging and higher β2-microglobulin levels than TT pts (Table). The most common triplet regimen given during the first course treatment (within 56 days) was lenalidomide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone (RVd). RVd was administered to 34% of the NT pts (76/225) and 59% of the TT pts (152/257). The most common non-triplet regimen was bortezomib and dexamethasone (Vd), which was given to 31% of NT pts (156/499) and 38% of TT pts (73/194). Within the NT group, pts given triplet Tx had a lower risk of death than those who did not receive triplet Tx (P = .0013). The multivariable analysis found triplet Tx to be associated with a 36% reduced risk of death (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.64 [95% CI, 0.50-0.82]; P = .001). ISS disease stage (HR = 1.43 [95% CI, 1.21-1.69]; P < .001) and history of diabetes (HR = 1.38 [95% CI, 1.08-1.78]; P = .012) were negative prognostic factors for OS. Within the TT group, pts who received triplet Tx did not attain an OS benefit (P = .8993), and no baseline characteristics were significantly associated with OS. These results may be limited by other factors not considered that may have influenced physicians' choice of treatment, including the use of maintenance therapy and a short follow-up period of 33.8 months. Conclusions: Triplet Tx as a first regimen is associated with longer OS in pts without transplant intent who did not receive a transplant. RVd and Vd were the most common first Tx regimens, respectively. Continued follow-up of these pts and enrollment of an additional cohort will provide additional data with mature follow-up. Table 1. Table 1. Disclosures Shah: Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Array: Research Funding; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Onyx: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Millenium: Research Funding; Merck: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Abonour:Celgene: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Narang:Celgene: Speakers Bureau. Mehta:Celgene Corporation: Speakers Bureau. Terebelo:Millenium: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Pharmacylics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Gasparetto:Celgene Corporation: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Millennium: Honoraria, Other: Export Board Committee, Speakers Bureau. Toomey:Celgene: Consultancy. Hardin:Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Srinivasan:Celgene Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Larkins:Celgene Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Nagarwala:Celgene Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Rifkin:Onyx Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Cambridge, MA, USA, a wholly owned subsidiary of Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Download Full-text

Updated Outcomes of Fludarabine/Melphalan/Bortezomib (Flu/Mel/Vel) Conditioning for Upfront Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation in Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v128.22.5885.5885 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 128 (22) ◽

pp. 5885-5885

Author(s):

Taiga Nishihori ◽

Claudio Anasetti ◽

Rachid Baz ◽

Jose L Ochoa-Bayona ◽

Kenneth H. Shain ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Allogeneic Hct ◽

Genetics Research ◽

Gvhd Prophylaxis ◽

Unrelated Donors

Abstract Background: Multiple myeloma remains incurable despite impressive array of available novel agents and therapeutic strategies. Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) remains the only potentially curative option for patients with multiple myeloma but it is limited by its toxicities. We previously reported initial result of a phase 2 study of upfront allogeneic HCT in myeloma patients achieving at least very good partial response (VGPR) after initial therapy (Nishihori, et al. ASH 2013 abstract 3390) and here we report more mature results after a median follow up of 3 years. Methods: Twenty seven myeloma patients received allogeneic HCT between 01/2010 and 02/2015 at Moffitt Cancer Center (NCT 00948922). Eligible patients were age ≤ 60, achieving first ≥ VGPR or complete response (CR), and have 8/8 HLA-matched related or unrelated donors. Conditioning regimen consisted of fludarabine 30 mg/m2 for 4 days (days -6, -5, -4, and -3) and melphalan 70 mg/m2 for 2 days (days -4 and -3) followed by a single dose of bortezomib 1.3 mg/m2 on day -3 (Flu/Mel/Vel regimen). GVHD prophylaxis was initially left to the discretion of physicians but later modified to only tacrolimus/methotrexate. No maintenance therapy was prescribed after allogeneic HCT. Results: The median age at transplant was 50 (range, 25-58) years. Disease status at the time of allogeneic HCT was VGPR (n=17: 63%) and CR/stringent CR (n=10: 37%). All patients received unmanipulated peripheral blood stem cell grafts from HLA-matched related donors (n=14) or HLA-matched unrelated donors (n=13). Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis was tacrolimus plus either methotrexate (n=19: 70%), or mycophenolate mofetil (n=4), or sirolimus (n=4). All patients achieved neutrophil engraftment with a median of 15 (range, 11-19) days. Platelet engraftment was achieved with a median of 17 (range, 13 - 35) days and 2 patients did not recover platelets. The cumulative incidences of grades II-IV and grades III-IV acute GVHD at day 100 were 63.6% (95% confidence interval (CI): 43.1-81.1) and 19.6% (95%CI: 5.4-39.9), respectively. The cumulative incidence of moderate to severe chronic GVHD was 56.4% (95%CI: 36.3-75.5) at 1-year. The cumulative incidences of transplant-related mortality at day 100, 1 year and 2 years were 7.4% (95%CI: 0.8-20.0), 11.1% (95%CI: 2.7-25.4), and 11.1% (95%CI: 2.7-25.4), respectively. Progression-free survival estimates at 1, 2, and 3 years were 74.1% (95%CI: 53.2-86.7), 65.1% (95%CI: 43.3-80.2), and 65.1% (95%CI: 49.9-87.5), respectively. With a median follow up of 39 months for surviving patients, overall survival estimates at 1, 2 and 3 years were 85% (95%CI: 64.9-94.1), 75.4% (95%CI: 52.6-88.3), and 69.1% (95%CI: 53.8-93.5), respectively. Conclusions: The results of the this phase 2 trial of upfront allogeneic HCT with fludarabine/melphalan/bortezomib (Flu/Mel/Vel) conditioning are promising and provide the rationale for reasonable potentially curative option to younger and fit patients who are eligible for upfront intensive consolidation strategy. This approach may be potentially valuable for those with high-risk myeloma and a multicenter study is currently being conducted (BMT CTN protocol 1302:NCT02440464). Disclosures Nishihori: Novartis: Research Funding; Signal Genetics: Research Funding. Baz:Takeda/Millennium: Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Karyopharm: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Signal Genetics: Research Funding. Shain:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Amgen/Onyx: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Signal Genetics: Research Funding; Takeda/Millennium: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Speakers Bureau. Alsina:Signal Genetics: Consultancy; Novartis: Research Funding; Takeda/Millennium: Research Funding; Amgen/Onyx: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau.

Download Full-text

Real-World Outcomes for Standard-of-Care Treatments in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2021-146250 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 4075-4075

Author(s):

Michel Delforge ◽

Marie-Christiane Vekemans ◽

Sébastien Anguille ◽

Julien Depaus ◽

Nathalie Meuleman ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Real World ◽

Research Funding ◽

Retrospective Chart Review ◽

Standard Of Care ◽

Real World Data ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Treatment Regimens

Abstract Background: With the advent of immunomodulatory agents (IMiDs), proteasome inhibitors (PIs) and, more recently, anti-CD38 monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), prognosis of patients with multiple myeloma (MM) has improved considerably. Unfortunately, even with these 3 major MM drug classes, most patients ultimately relapse and require further therapy. There remains an incomplete understanding of how patients who have received extensive therapy and with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) are treated in routine clinical practice, as no standard-of-care exists for these patients, and what the outcomes are in this real-world setting. Objective: This study aims to evaluate the outcomes of patients with triple-class (IMiD, PI and anti-CD38 mAb) and triple-line exposed RRMM using real-world data from patients in Belgium. Methods: A multicenter, observational study, involving 7 non-academic and academic Belgian centers, was conducted based on a retrospective chart review of adult RRMM patients who started subsequent treatment from March 2017 through May 2021 after having received ≥3 lines of therapy including at least an IMiD, a PI, and anti-CD38-directed therapy (tri-exposed). Data were captured in an electronic case report form (Castor EDC). Patients with an ECOG performance status of ≥2, who received prior CAR-T treatment or prior BCMA-targeted therapy, or with a known active or prior history of CNS involvement (or with clinical signs thereof), were excluded. All treatment lines initiated after becoming eligible were used in the analysis. Specifically, all treatment lines for patients meeting the eligibility criteria more than once in their entire follow-up were included as separate observations, with date of treatment initiation as specific baseline for each treatment line. Cox proportional hazards models were fitted to explore the prognostic value with Overall Survival (OS), Progression Free Survival (PFS), and Time to Next Therapy (TTNT). Results: A total of 112 patients with 237 eligible treatment lines were included in the analysis; median follow-up was 16.6 months. In 45% of the initiated treatment lines, patients were refractory to 4 or 5 therapies, 62% had received ≥5 prior lines, 22% had extramedullary disease and in 48% of observations the time to progression in prior line was shorter than 4 months. After patients became tri-exposed, more than 50 unique treatment regimens were initiated, with the following being the most common: carfilzomib + dexamethasone (14%), pomalidomide + dexamethasone + chemotherapy (8%), and ixazomib + lenalidomide + dexamethasone (6%). Additionally, 4% of included observations were exposed to anti-BCMA agents. Overall, the following treatment classes were the most frequently started: PI only (19%), PI + IMiD combinations (17%), and regimens including anti-CD38 antibodies (15%). Median OS was 9.79 months [95% CI: 7.79; 12.22], median PFS was 3.42 months [95% CI: 2.79; 4.27], median TTNT was 3.61 months [95% CI: 3.09; 4.57]. Higher refractory status (p<0.001), being male (p=0.001), older age (p<0.001), shorter duration of prior lines (p<0.001), shorter time to progression in prior line (p=0.025), and higher LDH levels (p<0.002) were prognostic for worse outcomes for both OS (Figure 1) and PFS. Conclusions: This retrospective chart review of patients with tri-exposed RRMM in Belgium shows that real-world outcomes in terms of OS, PFS and TTNT are poor for these patients, with a median OS of <10 months. A wide variety of treatment regimens used in clinical practice confirm the absence of a clear standard-of-care in this patient population. The literature also confirms that these poor outcomes observed in Belgium, for this subset of MM patients, are similar in other countries. These real-world data highlight the high unmet medical need in this patient population and critical need for new and effective treatment options. MD and MCV contributed equally to this work. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Delforge: Amgen, Celgene, Janssen, Sanofi: Honoraria, Research Funding. Vekemans: Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS-Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen Pharmaceutica: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Sanofi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Depaus: Takeda: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy. Meuleman: iTeos Therapeutics: Consultancy. Strens: Realidad bvba: Consultancy. Van Hoorenbeeck: Janssen: Current Employment. Moorkens: Janssen-Cilag: Current Employment. Diels: Janssen: Current Employment. Ghilotti: Janssen-Cilag SpA, Cologno Monzese, Italy: Current Employment. Dalhuisen: Janssen: Current Employment. Vandervennet: Janssen: Current Employment.

Download Full-text

Tracking Daratumumab Clearance Using Mass Spectrometric Approaches: Implications on M Protein Monitoring and Reusing Daratumumab

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2021-153209 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 2707-2707

Author(s):

Nadine Abdallah ◽

David L Murray ◽

Angela Dispenzieri ◽

Prashant Kapoor ◽

Morie A. Gertz ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Plasma Cell ◽

Research Funding ◽

Univariate Analysis ◽

M Protein ◽

Urine Protein ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Plasma Cell Disorders

Abstract Background: MASS-FIX is a screening method for serum and urine monoclonal proteins in multiple myeloma and related plasma cell disorders, which uses immunoglobulin enrichment coupled with matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight mass-spectrometry (MALDI-TOF). In addition to superior sensitivity over conventional gel-based techniques, MASS-FIX can distinguish therapeutic monoclonal antibodies (MoAb) from patient's M protein. As the utilization of therapeutic MoAbs increases, it is essential to understand the persistence pattern of these therapeutic antibodies in the serum. We designed this study to evaluate the duration of daratumumab detection by MASS-FIX in the serum of treated patients. Methods: We used a prospectively maintained database at Mayo clinic to identify patients with multiple myeloma and related plasma cell disorders who were treated with a daratumumab-containing regimen anytime during their disease course and had serial MASS-FIX data available after discontinuation of daratumumab. A univariate analysis was performed to assess for factors that may impact the clearance of daratumumab. Results: We included 125 patients with plasma cell disorders who received daratumumab as first or subsequent line of treatment between March 15 th, 2016, and March 4 th, 2020. The median age was 60.2 years and 57% were male. The most common diagnoses were multiple myeloma (70%) and light chain amyloidosis (18%). Daratumumab-based treatments were initiated after a median of 28.8 (IQR: 6.4-76.3) months from initial diagnosis. The most common regimen used was daratumumab, bortezomib and dexamethasone (23%); 26% underwent transplant after daratumumab-based induction. The median duration of treatment with a daratumumab-based regimen was 208 (IQR: 99-479) days. The median follow-up from the time of daratumumab discontinuation was 457 (95% CI: 346-NR) days. By last follow up, daratumumab was not detected by MASS-FIX in 93 (74%) patients but remained detectable in 32 (26%) patients. The median time from daratumumab discontinuation to disappearance of daratumumab by MASS-FIX was 160 (IQR: 107-233) days. On univariate analysis, the presence of ≥0.5 grams of urine protein was associated with earlier disappearance of daratumumab on MASS-FIX [risk ratio (RR): 2.0, P=0.02). The median time from daratumumab discontinuation to disappearance of daratumumab on MASS-FIX was 116 (95%CI: 76-160) days in patients with urine protein ≥0.5 grams and 203 (95%CI: 162-216) days in patients with urine protein <0.5 grams (P=0.02). There was no association between the time to disappearance of daratumumab by MASS-FIX and old age ≥70 (RR: 0.9, P=0.81], male gender (RR: 0.9, P=0.60), eGFR <60 (RR: 1.0, P=0.98), daratumumab schedule (every 1/2 weeks vs >2weeks) (RR: 1.0, P=0.97), treatment duration (<200 days vs ≥200 days) ( RR: 1.0, P=0.95), or transplantation status (RR: 1.0, P=0.98). Conclusion: The therapeutic monoclonal antibody daratumumab remains detectable in the serum of treated patients by MASS-FIX for several months after discontinuation and the duration varies between individual patients. This data has implications for diagnostic and monitoring testing and may provide guidance for reuse of daratumumab in clinical trials and practice. Proteinuria is associated with earlier disappearance of daratumumab by MASS-FIX and may have implications in patients with amyloidosis and monoclonal immunoglobulin deposition disease (MIDD). Further studies are needed to identify additional factors associated with the timing of disappearance. Disclosures Murray: Mayo Clinic: Other: Has received patents for the Mass-Fix technology which has been licensed to the Binding Site with potential royalties.. Dispenzieri: Takeda: Research Funding; Alnylam: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; Oncopeptides: Consultancy; Sorrento Therapeutics: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding. Kapoor: Karyopharm: Consultancy; Cellectar: Consultancy; BeiGene: Consultancy; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy; Sanofi: Consultancy; Amgen: Research Funding; Ichnos Sciences: Research Funding; Regeneron Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Glaxo SmithKline: Research Funding; Karyopharm: Research Funding; Sanofi: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; AbbVie: Research Funding. Gertz: Akcea Therapeutics, Ambry Genetics, Amgen Inc, Celgene Corporation, Janssen Biotech Inc, Karyopharm Therapeutics, Pfizer Inc (to Institution), Sanofi Genzyme: Honoraria; Ionis Pharmaceuticals: Other: Advisory Board; Akcea Therapeutics, Alnylam Pharmaceuticals Inc, Prothena: Consultancy; Aurora Biopharma: Other: Stock option; AbbVie Inc, Celgene Corporation: Other: Data Safetly & Monitoring. Dingli: Alexion: Consultancy; Novartis: Research Funding; Apellis: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Sanofi: Consultancy; GSK: Consultancy. Kumar: Antengene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Bluebird Bio: Consultancy; Abbvie: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Roche-Genentech: Consultancy, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Beigene: Consultancy; Oncopeptides: Consultancy; Astra-Zeneca: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; KITE: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding; Carsgen: Research Funding; Tenebio: Research Funding; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Adaptive: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Sanofi: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

EARLY Results of TOTAL Therapy 7 (TT7): High Response Rates of NEWLY Diagnosed High Risk Myeloma to Daratumumab

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-131887 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 4569-4569 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Frits van Rhee ◽

Sharmilan Thanendrarajan ◽

Carolina D. Schinke ◽

Jeffery R. Sawyer ◽

Adam Rosenthal ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

High Risk ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Response Rates ◽

Newly Diagnosed ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Early Results ◽

Research Grant

Background. The TT approach has significantly improved the outcome of multiple myeloma (MM) by combining new drugs with a regimen that comprises induction, tandem autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT), consolidation and maintenance. However, a group of 15% of patients with high risk multiple myeloma (HRMM) have derived little benefit despite similar response rates to induction chemotherapy and ASCT when compared to low risk MM. The poor outcome of HRMM is explained by early relapse post ASCT resulting in a short progression free survival (PFS) with only 15-20% of patients surviving long-term. Daratumumab (Dara) is a human IgG1k anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody that has shown favorable results in early single-arm studies and more recently in phase III studies for relapsed/refractory and newly diagnosed MM. In TT7, we introduced Dara during all phases of therapy, including immune consolidation early post ASCT, to improve responses rate and PFS in HRMM. Methods. Patients had newly diagnosed HRMM as defined by high risk cytogenetic abnormalities, presence of extramedullary disease, >3 focal lesions on CT-PET, elevated LDH due to MM, or ISS II/III with cytogenetic abnormality. Dara (16mg/kgx1) was added to induction with KTD-PACE (carfilzomib, thalidomide, dexamethasone; and four-day continuous infusions of cisplatin, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, etoposide). Conditioning for tandem autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) was with fractionated melphalan (50mg/m2x4) (fMEL) based on prior observations that patients with adverse cytogenetics fare better with fMEL rather than single high dose MEL200mg/m2.In the inter tandem ASCT period immunological consolidation with Dara (16mg/kg) alone for 2 doses was followed by Dara (16mg/kg) on day 1 combined with K (36mg/m2) and D (20mg) weekly for 2 cycles. DaraKD was administered to avoid treatment free periods allowing for myeloma regrowth. The 2nd ASCT was followed by further immunological consolidation with Dara (16mg/k) for 2 doses, and maintenance therapy for 3 yrs with 3-months block of alternating Dara-KD (dara 16mg/kg day 1; K 36mg/m2 and dex 20mg weekly) and Dara-lenalidomide (R)D (dara 16mg/kg day 1; R 15mg day 1-21 q28 and D 20mg weekly). Results. TT7 enrolled 43 patients thus far. The median follow-up was 11 months (range: 1-22). The median age was 61 yrs (range 44-73). Sixteen patients were ≥65 yrs (37.2%). A mean of 29.4x106 CD34+ cells/kg (range: 4.6-86.4) were collected. 36 patients completed ASCT #1 (83.7%) and 18 (41.9%) ASCT #2, whilst 14 patients have proceeded to the maintenance phase. R-ISS II/III or metaphase cytogenetic abnormalities were present in 85.1 and 58.1% of patients, respectively. Elevated LDH or >3FL on CT-PET were noted in 30 and 41.8%. The 1-yr cumulative incidence estimates for reaching VGPR and PR were 87 and 83%, respectively. A CR or sCR was achieved in 68 and 46%. The 1-yr estimates of PFS and OS were 91.6 and 87.2%. 40 subjects are alive, whilst 5 progressed on study therapy and 3 subsequently died. 38 patients are progression free at the time of reporting. Dara was well-tolerated and no subjects discontinued therapy due to dara-related side effects. The CR and sCR rates compared favorably to the predecessor HRMM TT5 protocol where CR and sCR rates were 59 and 27%. Conclusion. The early results of TT7 point to increased response rates of HRMM to a dara-based TT regimen with especially higher rates of CR and sCR. Longer follow-up is required to determine if these early results translate into superior PFS and OS. Figure Disclosures van Rhee: Karyopharm Therapeutics: Consultancy; Kite Pharma: Consultancy; Adicet Bio: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy; Sanofi Genzyme: Consultancy; Castleman Disease Collaborative Network: Consultancy; EUSA: Consultancy. Walker:Celgene: Research Funding. Morgan:Amgen, Roche, Abbvie, Takeda, Celgene, Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Other: research grant, Research Funding. Davies:Amgen, Celgene, Janssen, Oncopeptides, Roche, Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Consultant/Advisor; Janssen, Celgene: Other: Research Grant, Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Randomized Phase II Trial of Pentostatin, Cyclophosphamide, and Rituximab with or without Concurrent Avastin for Previously Untreated B-Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL)

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v124.21.4673.4673 ◽

2014 ◽

Vol 124 (21) ◽

pp. 4673-4673

Author(s):

Tait D. Shanafelt ◽

Betsy R. LaPlant ◽

Timothy G Call ◽

Daniel Nikcevich ◽

Jose F. Leis ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Overall Survival ◽

Research Funding ◽

Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽

Response Evaluation ◽

Off Label Use ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Free Survival ◽

Off Label ◽

Grade 3 ◽

Label Use

Abstract BACKGROUND: Although chemoimmunotherapy (CIT) has improved response rates, treatment free survival, and overall survival in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), only 40-50% of patients achieve a complete remission and the majority have residual disease when evaluated using sensitive assays. Interactions with nurturing environments can enhance CLL B-cell resistance to apoptosis. These interactions include cytokine mediated prosurvival signals by angiogenic molecules, such as VEGF and bFGF that nurture CLL B-cells in an autocrine fashion and promote CLL cell survival partly through up regulation of anti-apoptotic proteins. These findings provide a strong rationale for testing anti-VEGF therapy in combination with a purine nucleoside analogue CIT regimen for upfront treatment. We conducted a randomized phase 2 CIT trial using pentostatin, cyclophosphamide, and rituximab with (PCR-B) or without (PCR) bevacizumab (B), an anti-VEGF monoclonal anti-body. METHODS: Eligible patients were previously untreated and had CLL in need of treatment by NCI-WG criteria (Blood 111:5446). Patients were randomized using a dynamic allocation procedure stratifying for stage (0-II vs. III-IV) and FISH (17p or 11q deletion vs. other) to receive either 6 cycles of rituximab (100 mg on day 1 of cycle 1; 375 mg/m2on day 2 of cycle 1 and day 1 of cycles 2-6) followed by pentostatin (2 mg/m2) and cyclophosphamide (600 mg/m2) (PCR) administered every 21 days. Patients in the PCR-B cohort also received bevacizumab 15mg/kg on day 1 of cycles 1-5 and days 1, 22, & 43 of cycle 6. All patients underwent complete response evaluation 3 months after day 1 of cycle 6 (or last cycle of treatment for those completing < 6 cycles). MRD was assessed using 6-color flow cytometry (Leukemia 21:956) at the completion of treatment. RESULTS: 68 patients were enrolled through the Mayo Clinic Cancer Research Consortium between 1/2009 and 1/2013. Three patients were excluded from analysis: 1 patient canceled prior to treatment, 1 was dosed incorrectly, and 1 was ineligible due to immunophenotyping inconsistent with CLL. Median age of eligible patients was 63 years (range 43-81) and 43 (66%) were men. With respect to disease stage, 3 (5%), 38 (58%), and 24 (37%) had low, intermediate and high Rai stage disease. Eleven (17%) patients had deletion 17p or 11q & 29 (45%) had unmutated IGHV. No statistically significant differences were observed in these variables by treatment arm. All 65 evaluable patients have completed active treatment, with 54 (83.1%) completing the intended 6 cycles (PCR group 27/32 [84.4%] and PCR-B 27/33 [81.8%]). Hematologic grade 3+ adverse events deemed at least possibly related to treatment were observed in 10 (31.3%) patients on PCR and 12 (36.4%) on PCR-B (p=0.79). Non-hematologic grade 3+ adverse events deemed at least possibly related to treatment were observed in 9 (28.1%) patients on PCR and 18 (54.4%) on PCR-B (p=0.04). The most common such events were hypertension (PCR: 3.1% vs. PCR-B: 21.2%), proteinuria (0% vs. 6.1%) and creatinine increase (3.1% vs. 6.1%). Across both arms, 64/65 (98.5%) patients achieved a response including 31/32 (96.9%) treated with PCR and 33/33 (100%) treated with PCR-B (p=0.49). CR/CRi was achieved in 10/32 (31.3%) patients treated with PCR & 18/33 (54.5%) treated with PCR-B (p=0.08). Of the 28 who achieved a CR/CRi, MRD analysis was completed on 26, of whom 12 (46%) were MRD negative. With respect to treatment arm, 5/32 (16%) patients on PCR and 7/33 (21%) on PCR-B achieved an MRD negative CR. Median time to retreatment for all 65 patients was 44.8 (95% CI: 34.6 – NA) months. Median overall survival has not yet been reached. With current follow-up no differences between treatment-free survival (p=0.38), progression-free survival (p=0.23), or overall survival (p=0.45) are observed by treatment arm. Plasma levels of angiogenic cytokines VEGF, bFGF, thrombospondin (TSP) and the chemokines CCL3 and CCL4 were measured prior to treatment and at the time of the post treatment response evaluation. Correlations of these cytokines with clinical outcome will be presented. CONCLUSION: The addition of bevacizumab to purine analogue-based CIT was generally well-tolerated and may increase complete remission rates in patients with CLL. No clear improvement in treatment free survival has been observed to date. Disclosures Shanafelt: Hospiria: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics/Jannsen: Research Funding; Cephalon: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; glaxoSmithKline: Research Funding; Genetech: Research Funding; Polyphenon E Int'l: Research Funding. Off Label Use: Off label use of pentostatin for treatment of CLL. Off label use of bevacizumab for treatment of CLL. . Kay:Genetech: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Hospira: Research Funding; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Download Full-text

Efficacy of Daratumumab, Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone Versus Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone Alone for Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma Among Patients with 1 to 3 Prior Lines of Therapy Based on Previous Treatment Exposure: Updated Analysis of Pollux

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v128.22.489.489 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 128 (22) ◽

pp. 489-489 ◽

Cited By ~ 13

Author(s):

Philippe Moreau ◽

Jonathan L. Kaufman ◽

Heather J. Sutherland ◽

Marc Lalancette ◽

Hila Magen ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Statistical Significance ◽

Previous Treatment ◽

Progression Free Survival ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Free Survival ◽

Refractory Multiple Myeloma

Abstract Introduction: Daratumumab is an anti-CD38 IgGκ monoclonal antibody that has been combined successfully with lenalidomide and dexamethasone. The combination of daratumumab with lenalidomide and dexamethasone (DRd) has been compared with lenalidomide and dexamethasone alone (Rd) in patients (pts) with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) in a randomized phase 3 study (Dimopoulos MA, et al. N Engl J Med 2016; in press). In a pre-specified interim analysis, the DRd combination demonstrated significantly longer progression-free survival (PFS) in addition to deep and durable responses compared with the Rd arm. We performed subgroup analyses to further examine these efficacy data according to prior treatment exposure. Methods: Pts who received ≥1 prior line of therapy were randomized (1:1) to Rd (lenalidomide: 25 mg PO on Days 1-21 of each 28-day cycle; dexamethasone: 40 mg PO weekly) with or without daratumumab (16 mg/kg IV qw for 8 weeks, q2w for 16 weeks, then q4w until progression). The primary endpoint was PFS. Pts who were refractory to lenalidomide were not eligible. All analyses were performed in pts who received 1 to 3 prior lines of therapy. Results: Median follow-up was 13.5 months. Pts who were lenalidomide-naive prior to the start of study treatment (DRd, n=226; Rd, n=219) demonstrated significantly longer PFS with DRd vs Rd (median: not reached [NR] vs 18.4 months; HR, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.25-0.52; P<0.0001), with estimated 12-month PFS rates of 83.0% vs 59.9%, respectively. ORR was significantly higher with DRd vs Rd (96% vs 79%), with ≥VGPR rates of 76% vs 47% and ≥CR rates of 44% vs 21%, respectively (P<0.0001 for all). In the lenalidomide-exposed subgroup (DRd, n=46; Rd, n=45), median PFS was NR in both treatment groups (HR, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.22-1.12; P=0.0826); estimated 12-month PFS rates were 84.1% vs 63.1%, respectively. ORR was higher with DRd vs Rd but did not reach statistical significance (87% vs 71%; P=0.0729); however, rates of ≥VGPR (78% vs 38%; P=0.0001) and ≥CR (44% vs 12%; P=0.0011) were significantly improved with DRd vs Rd, respectively. For bortezomib-naive pts (DRd, n=44; Rd, n=45), PFS was significantly longer with DRd vs Rd (median: NR vs 15.8 months; HR, 0.34; 95% CI, 0.13-0.86; P=0.0170), with estimated 12-month PFS rates of 85.4% vs 69.2%, respectively. ORR was significantly higher with DRd vs Rd (98% vs 82%; P=0.0158), with trends toward increased rates of ≥VGPR (74% vs 55%; P=0.0544) and ≥CR (42% vs 23%; P=0.0576). In the bortezomib-exposed pts (DRd, n=228; Rd, n=219), median PFS was NR in DRd vs 18.4 months in Rd (HR, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.24-0.50 P<0.0001); estimated 12-month PFS rates were 82.8% vs 58.7%, respectively. Significant differences in ORR (93% vs 77%), rate of ≥VGPR (77% vs 43%) and rate of ≥CR (44% vs 19%) were observed with DRd vs Rd, respectively (P<0.0001 for all). Among bortezomib-refractory patients (DRd, n=54; Rd, n=49), the PFS benefit of DRd compared with Rd was maintained (median: NR vs 10.3 mo, respectively; HR, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.25-0.85; P=0.0117; Figure). The estimated 12-month PFS rates were 70.8% vs 44.4%, respectively. Similar to bortezomib-exposed pts, ORR (92% vs 68%; P=0.0024), rate of ≥VGPR (75% vs 36%; P=0.0001), and rate of ≥CR (46% vs 13%; P=0.0003) were all significantly higher with DRd vs Rd for bortezomib-refractory pts. Updated data will be presented at the meeting. Conclusions: Among pts who received 1 to 3 prior lines of therapy, significantly longer PFS and higher ORR were observed with DRd vs Rd among pts who previously received bortezomib or were refractory to bortezomib or were lenalidomide-naive. Higher rates of deeper responses were observed in pts who previously received lenalidomide or bortezomib. Follow-up is ongoing to assess PFS in pts who received 1 to 3 prior lines of therapy and previously received lenalidomide. These results further strengthen the significant benefit of combining daratumumab with Rd for RRMM. Figure Progression-free Survival in Bortezomib-refractory Patients who Received 1 to 3 Prior Lines of Therapy Figure. Progression-free Survival in Bortezomib-refractory Patients who Received 1 to 3 Prior Lines of Therapy Disclosures Moreau: Janssen: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria. Kaufman:Pharmacyclics: Consultancy; Incyte: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding. Sutherland:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria. Lalancette:Celgene: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria. Iida:Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Research Funding. Prince:Janssen: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria. Cochrane:BMS: Other: Received sponsorship to attend international meetings; Novartis: Other: Received sponsorship to attend international meetings; Celgene: Other: Received sponsorship to attend international meetings; Takeda: Other: Received sponsorship to attend international meetings. Khokhar:Janssen: Employment. Guckert:Johnson & Johnson: Equity Ownership; Janssen: Employment. Qin:Janssen: Employment. Oriol:Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Download Full-text