Integration of Rituximab and Liposomal Doxorubicin (DOXIL®) Into CODOX-M/IVAC for HIV-Negative and HIV+ Adults with Untreated Burkitt's Lymphoma (BL): Results of a Prospective Multicenter Phase II Study

Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 2669-2669
Author(s):  
Andrew M. Evens ◽  
Kenneth R. Carson ◽  
Chadi Nabhan ◽  
Borko Jovanovic ◽  
Paul Barr ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 2669 Background: The survival of adult BL has improved with intensification of multi-agent chemotherapy, although 2-year survival rates remain <65–70%. Efforts to improve survival, as well as decrease treatment-related toxicities are needed. Further, there are no prospective clinical studies to date that have examined the addition of rituximab into the CODOX-M/IVAC regimen. Methods: Eligible patients for this investigator-initiated, 5-site phase II clinical trial included: newly diagnosed BL and B-cell lymphoma, unclassifiable, with features intermediate between diffuse large B-cell lymphoma and BL (according to WHO 2008 definition) regardless of HIV status. Eligibility for HIV+ patients included: no evidence of multi-drug resistant HIV infection or concurrent AIDS defining illness and CD4 count >350/mcL. Patients were classified as low risk (LR) if they had all of the following factors present: 1) normal LDH, 2) stage I/II disease, 3) ECOG performance status (PS) <2, and 4) no mass >10 cm. All other patients were “high risk” (HR). LR patients received 3 consecutive cycles of CODOX-M, while HR patients received 4 alternating cycles of CODOX-M and IVAC. For CODOX-M, methotrexate 3.0 gram/m2 i.v. was used. Further, liposomal doxorubicin (40 mg/m2) was utilized in lieu of doxorubicin (day 1 of all CODOX-M cycles), while intravenous rituximab (500 mg/m2) was added to days 0 and day 8 of each CODOX-M cycle and days 0 and 6 of IVAC cycles. In addition, as a corollary analysis, frequent assessment of ejection fraction (EF) was performed in all patients (baseline, s/p 2 cycles, and 4 weeks after completion of therapy). Results: Twenty-five patients (22 male and 3 female) enrolled from March 2007 through April 2011. The median age was 44 years (range, 23–70 years). Furthermore, 5 (20%) patients were >60 years. All patients had classical BL, while 1 patient had concomitant BCL-2 expression. There were 20 HR and 5 LR patients; 3 of the HR and 1 LR patient were HIV+, while the remaining patients were HIV-negative. Median PS at study entry was 1, while PS=2 in 6 (24%) patients. Further, 3 (15%) HR patients had + central nervous system disease (2 parenchymal, 1 leptomeningeal). Additionally, 7 (35%) HR patients had bulky disease >10 cm (2 (10%) with dominant mass >20cm), 8 (40%) of all patients had bone marrow involvement, and 15 (75%) had an elevated LDH. 24 of 25 patients were evaluable for toxicity and response/survival. Therapy was completed at a median of 13.5 weeks (range, 11–20) for HR patients and a median of 10 weeks for LR (range, 9–12). With respect to toxicity, myelosuppression was overall comparable (58% of patients experienced grade 4 thrombocytopenia with only 4% grade 4 anemia) to prior CODOX-M/IVAC data, while the incidence of mucositis also appeared similar to prior reports (38% grade 3, 13% grade 4). Other clinically relevant grade 3 toxicities included neutropenic fever (33%), transaminitis (33%), diarrhea (8%), elevated creatinine (8%), and seizure (4%). Notably, there was no grade 3 or 4 neuropathy. After 2 cycles of therapy, two grade 2 and two grade 3 cardiac events were noted (all depressed EF, no clinical evidence of congestive heart failure). The two grade 3 events occurred in a 70-year-old and 69-year-old man, both with HR disease, and the latter with history of myocardial infarction. Among all patients, the median change in EF at baseline vs study end was: −2% (range, −22% to +11%). In terms of outcomes, the response rate after 2 cycles of therapy was 100% with a 67% complete remission (CR) rate. At a median follow-up of 24 months, the 2-year PFS and OS rates for all patients were 86% and 86%, respectively (LR 2-year PFS and OS both 100%; and HR 2-year PFS and OS both 82%). Furthermore, the 2-year PFS and OS rates for HR, HIV-negative patients were 91% and 91%, respectively (see Figure 1), while the disease-specific survival (DSS) for this subgroup of patients was 100%. Of the 3 deaths on trial, 2 were due to progressive disease in HIV+ HR patients, while the 3rd was a 71 year-old HIV-negative HR subject who died in CR at 14 months from unknown causes. Conclusions: Altogether, the integration of rituximab and liposomal doxorubicin into CODOX-M/IVAC for adult BL was feasible and associated with similar tolerability compared with prior reports. Additionally, this regimen was associated with excellent survival rates, especially for HIV-negative BL. Disclosures: Evens: Ortho-Biotec: Research Funding. Off Label Use: Doxil in the treatment of Burkitt's lymphoma. Carson:Genentech: Speakers Bureau. Nabhan:Genentech: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Gregory:Genentech: Advisory Board. Gordon:Genentech: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau.

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 1718-1718 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anas Younes ◽  
Gilles Salles ◽  
R. Gregory Bociek ◽  
Giovanni Martinelli ◽  
Dolores Caballero ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL), which includes diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), follicular lymphoma (FL), and mantle cell lymphoma (MCL), is associated with a high unmet need in the relapsed and refractory setting. The PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway has been shown to play a key role in the pathogenesis of NHL. Overexpression of PIK3CD (encoding the PI3Kd isoform) is common in B-cell malignancies and is therefore widely viewed as a therapeutic target in NHL. PIK3CA and PIK3CB are also expressed in B-cell malignancies, with PIK3CA overexpression seen particularly at relapse, thereby justifying exploration of pan-PI3K inhibitors in the relapsed or refractory setting. Buparlisib (BKM120) is an oral pan-class I PI3K inhibitor which has demonstrated activity in patients with solid tumors as well as in in vitro and in vivo models of hematologic malignancies. Methods: The primary objective of this Phase II study (NCT01693614) was to evaluate the efficacy of buparlisib in three parallel cohorts of adult patients with relapsed or refractory DLBCL, FL, or MCL. Secondary objectives were to evaluate safety and tolerability, progression-free survival, duration of response, and overall survival. Inclusion criteria were: patients with relapsed or refractory disease who have received at least one prior line of therapy; at least one measurable nodal lesion (≥2 cm); ECOG performance status ≤2; and adequate bone marrow and organ function. Patients with DLBCL must have received, or be ineligible for, autologous or allogeneic stem cell transplant. All patients received single-agent buparlisib 100 mg orally QD continuously until progression, intolerance, or patient withdrawal. Tumor response was evaluated by investigators per standard criteria (Cheson, 2007). Results: At data cut-off (June 19, 2014), 64 patients had been enrolled; 26 DLBCL, 24 FL, and 14 MCL. Here, results are presented for the DLBCL cohort only. Updated results from the DLBCL cohort including biomarker analyses and results for the FL cohort will be presented at the meeting. The MCL cohort is currently enrolling. For the DLBCL cohort, median age (range) was 63.5 (28–81) years and 69% were male. The median (range) number of prior therapy regimens was 3 (1–12). Specific prior therapies included: rituximab (n=25, 96%) and bendamustine/carmustine (n=8, 31%); all patients had received prior anthracycline and an alkylating agent (e.g. cyclophosphamide), and 6 (23%) patients had undergone prior stem cell transplantation. The most common (≥15%) AEs (all grades) regardless of causality were hyperglycemia and nausea (39% each), depression (31%), anxiety and fatigue (23% each), vomiting and diarrhea (19% each), and abdominal pain (15%). Alanine transaminase or aspartate transaminase elevations were rare (4% each, with no Grade 3/4 AEs). The most common (>5%) Grade 3/4 AEs regardless of causality were hyperglycemia (23%), and nausea, depression, anxiety, urinary tract infection, and neutropenia (8% each). Six (23%) patients discontinued therapy due to AEs (potentially treatment-related). Seven on-treatment deaths were reported: 6 were disease-related and 1 was suspected to be treatment-related (unexplained death following a gastrointestinal [GI] bleed in a patient with massive GI lymphoma involvement). Overall response rate was 12% (95% CI = 2.4, 30.2) with 3 responses: 1 complete response (4%) and 2 partial responses (8%). Five patients had stable disease (19%). Eight patients (31%) experienced some decrease in tumor burden (Figure 1). At data cut-off, 2 patients demonstrated durable responses, as they were still on study treatment after 9.2 and 7.4 months, respectively. Figure 1 Figure 1. Conclusions: Early results from this Phase II study of the pan-PI3K inhibitor, buparlisib, demonstrate encouraging clinical activity, and a favorable safety profile in heavily pretreated patients with relapsed or refractory DLBCL. These data suggest that targeting all 4 PI3K isoforms in DLBCL is a viable strategy and worthy of further exploration in patients with NHL. Future combination studies with buparlisib will take a mechanism-based approach. Disclosures Younes: Novartis, Curis, J&J: Research Funding; Bayer, BMS, Celgene, Incyte, Janssen R&D: Honoraria; Sanofi, Seattle Genetics, Takeda Millenium: Honoraria. Mukherjee:Novartis Healthcare Pvt. Ltd. India: Employment. Williams:Novartis: Employment. Herbst:Novartis: Employment. Tavorath:Novartis: Employment. Kim:Novartis, Celgene, Takeda: Research Funding.


Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 1795-1795 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard R. Furman ◽  
Herbert Eradat ◽  
Julie C. Switzky ◽  
Suzanne R. Hayman ◽  
Craig C. Hofmeister ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 1795 Background: Waldenstrom's macroglobulinemia (WM) is an indolent B-cell lymphoma characterized by a heterogeneous population of lymphocytes, plasmacytoid lymphocytes and plasma cells with variable CD20 expression. Rituximab (R) achieves an overall response rate (ORR) of 25–50% in relapsed/refractory WM and is associated with IgM flares, manifested by a rapid rise in IgM, potentially leading to complications of hyperviscosity. Ofatumumab (OFA) is a fully human monoclonal antibody that targets an epitope encompassing both the large and small extracellular loops of CD20 and effectively induces complement-dependent cytotoxicity of B-lymphoma cells. OFA is approved for the treatment of fludarabine- and alemtuzumab-refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) and has demonstrated clinical activity in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Given the efficacy of OFA in CLL, with its decreased CD20 antigen density, similar to WM where CD20 is down-regulated with differentiation of cells into plasma cells, a Phase II, open-label, single-arm trial of OFA in patients (pts) with WM was initiated to examine the safety and efficacy of OFA in this population. We report data from a planned interim analysis, which was performed to examine IgM flare, toxicity and response data. Methods: Pts (age ≥18 years) with WM requiring therapy by 2nd International Workshop on WM criteria were eligible. Pts received OFA 300 mg week 1 and 1000 mg weeks 2–4. Premedication included acetaminophen and antihistamine (all infusions) and glucocorticoid (infusions 1 and 2). Pts who experienced grade 3–4 infusion-related adverse events (AEs) during weeks 1 and 2 also received glucocorticoid during weeks 3 and 4. The primary endpoint was ORR assessed by 3rd International Workshop on WM criteria, and toxicity was assessed according to NCI-CTCAE, v3.0. Results: Fifteen pts were enrolled between March 2009 and January 2010. Median age was 59 years (range 43–85), and 9 pts were male. Pts had a median IgM level of 3.70 g/dL (range 1.21–6.62) and median hemoglobin (hgb) of 9.8 g/dL (range 5.3–11.7). Three pts were previously untreated; 12 pts had received a median of 3 therapies (range 2–5), including 11 pts who had received R, and 7 pts who had received a purine analog. Fourteen pts completed all 4 infusions of OFA. One pt withdrew from study after infusion 3 due to a drug-related serious AE (SAE). One pt had cryoglobulinemia, which interfered with IgM assessment. Of the 14 pts with evaluable IgM levels, 3 achieved partial response (PR), and 3 achieved minor response (ORR=43%) 8 weeks to 5 months after start of OFA therapy. One of 3 previously untreated pts and 5 of 12 relapsed pts responded. Four of 11 pts who had received prior R and 2 of 4 R-naïve pts responded. Five of 9 pts with IgM <4 g/dL and 1 of 5 pts with IgM >4 g/dL responded. Four pts with a median hgb of 8.0 g/dL (range 5.3–9.2) experienced ≥2.8 g/dL increase in hgb, including 3 pts who had >5 g/dL increase; median time to reach hgb ≥11.0 was 4 weeks. Infusion-related events occurred with dose 1 (300 mg) in 12 pts and with dose 2 (1000 mg) in 7 pts; all infusion events were grade 1–2 except 2 grade 3 events (rash, serum sickness). Nine pts developed 11 infections: 7 URI, 2 UTI, 1 sinusitis, 1 oral candidiasis (all grade 2). One pt developed grade 3 febrile neutropenia. Two pts developed SAEs possibly related to OFA. One pt developed grade 3 Coombs-negative hemolytic anemia after infusion 3 resulting in study withdrawal, and 1 pt with a baseline IgM level of 6.62 g/dL developed grade 3 renal insufficiency due to a rapid rise in IgM and cast nephropathy 6 weeks after starting OFA. One additional pt, with a baseline IgM level of 4.69 g/dL, developed a rapid rise in IgM and hyperviscosity symptoms. Both pts with a rapid rise in IgM underwent plasmapheresis with resolution of symptoms. No other OFA-related hematologic toxicity was observed. Conclusions: OFA has an acceptable toxicity profile, although a rapid rise in IgM requiring plasmapheresis was observed in 2 pts with high baseline IgM levels. OFA shows clinical activity in pts with WM, including those who relapse after R therapy, with rapid improvement in hgb and slower reduction of IgM levels. Based on the acceptable safety profile in this study and the dose of OFA approved for refractory CLL, the study was amended to increase the OFA dose to 2000 mg and allow a 2nd cycle of therapy for pts who do not attain PR after cycle 1. Accrual to the amended study is ongoing. Disclosures: Furman: GlaxoSmithKline: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Genentech: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Cephalon, Inc.: Speakers Bureau; Celegene: Consultancy; Calistoga: Consultancy. Off Label Use: Ofatumumab is an investigational anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody, currently under development for the treatment of B-cell malignancies (chronic lymphocytic leukemia, diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, Waldenstroms macroglobulinemia and follicular lymphoma) as well as autoimmune diseases (rheumatoid arthritis and multiple sclerosis). Switzky:GlaxoSmithKline: Employment, Research Funding; Genmab: Employment, Research Funding. Leonard:GlaxoSmithKline: Consultancy. Liao:GSK: Employment. Shah:GlaxoSmithKline: Employment; Genmab: Research Funding. Brownell-Buttich:GlaxoSmithKline: Employment. Lisby:Genmab A/S: Employment. Lin:GlaxoSmithKline: Consultancy, Employment.


Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 59-59 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ranjana Advani ◽  
Daniel Lebovic ◽  
Mark Brunvand ◽  
Andy I. Chen ◽  
Andre Goy ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 59 Introduction: CD22 is a lineage marker expressed in most B-cell lymphomas. DCDT2980S is an ADC consisting of an anti-CD22 monoclonal antibody conjugated to monomethyl auristatin E (MMAE), a potent microtubule disrupting agent linked to the antibody via a protease-cleavable peptide linker. DCDT2980S exhibits potent anti-tumor activity in murine xenograft models of B-cell lymphoma and is being evaluated in a Phase I study to assess the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK), and biologic activity in patients (pts) with relapsed/refractory B-cell NHL. Methods: Pts receive DCDT2980S intravenously every 21 days at dose levels 0.1 to 3.2 mg/kg until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Intrapatient dose escalation based on tolerability at higher doses is permitted. Following determination of the recommended Phase II dose (RP2D) based on protocol-defined dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) occurring within 21 days of dosing, additional pts with indolent and aggressive B-cell NHL are being enrolled to further evaluate safety and efficacy based on Cheson response criteria. Here we report the RP2D and preliminary safety and efficacy results. Results: To date, 35 pts (57% male), median age 66 years (range 30–85) have been enrolled: diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL, n=18), follicular lymphoma (FL, n=11), transformed FL (n=4), and small lymphocytic lymphoma (n=2). Enrolled patients were heavily pre-treated: 26 pts had received ≥ 3 prior regimens, all pts had received prior rituximab, and 7 pts received prior high-dose therapy followed autologous or allogenic stem cell transplantation. Overall, pts received a median of 4 doses (range 1–25) of DCDT2980S in 7 dose-escalation cohorts, and 2 expansion cohorts at the RP2D. All 3 pts treated with DCDT2980S at 3.2 mg/kg developed Grade 4 neutropenia following the first dose, one of which constituted a DLT. No DLTs were reported in the 6 pts treated at 2.4 mg/kg, which is the RP2D. Across all dose levels, the most common treatment-emergent adverse events (AE) in ≥ 20% of pts were diarrhea (34%), fatigue (34%), nausea (31%), neutropenia (26%), decreased appetite (23%), vomiting (23%), and peripheral edema (20%). Treatment-emergent Grade ≥ 3 AEs were reported in 9 (27%) pts including 5 out of 9 pts who were treated at the RP2D of 2.4 mg/kg. Overall, neutropenia (24%) was the only Grade ≥ 3 AE in ≥ 10% of pts (24%) and was the only Grade ≥ 3 AE reported in > 1 pt (n=2) treated at the RP2D. Eight (26%) pts across all dose levels experienced a serious AE (SAE) of which one Grade 3 dehydration in a pt treated at 3.2 mg/kg was attributed to DCDT2980S. Treatment discontinuation due to AEs occurred in 3 pts: Grade 3 neutropenia (n=1) and Grade 3 peripheral sensory neuropathy (n=2). No deaths were reported within 30 days of the last dose of DCDT2980S. Assessment of Cycle 1 PK after the first dose of DCDT2980S indicated that the exposure of antibody-conjugated MMAE (acMMAE), total antibody, and free MMAE increased with dose. The clearance estimates of both acMMAE and total antibody were similar across doses from 1.0–3.2 mg/kg. The volume of distribution estimates for acMMAE and total antibody approximated plasma volume and did not change with dose and suggest dose-proportional increase of acMMAE and total antibody exposures for doses of 1.0–3.2 mg/kg. Early evidence of anti-tumor activity was observed. At the RP2D of 2.4 mg/kg, 2 of 3 pts with DLBCL had > 75% reduction in tumor sum of perpendicular dimensions (SPD) and negative PET scans; 1 partial response was noted in a pt with FL treated at 1.8 mg/kg. These 3 pts continue on study, each having received at least 8 cycles of study treatment. Two additional pts with DLBCL receiving 0.5 mg/kg and 3.2–2.4 mg/kg had > 50% reduction in tumor SPD and discontinued study treatment after 8 and 6 cycles, respectively, to undergo stem cell transplant. Conclusions: In this early experience, DCDT2980S is well tolerated, has a favorable safety profile and has evidence of anti-tumor activity in in a heavily pretreated pts with relapsed/refractory B-cell NHL. Updated clinical data will be presented. These results support additional clinical evaluation of DCDT2980S in B-cell malignancies. Disclosures: Advani: Genentech: Research Funding. Off Label Use: anti-CD79b Antibody-Drug Conjugate (ADC) DCDS4501A. Lebovic:Genentech: Speakers Bureau. Brunvand:Genentech: Speakers Bureau. Chen:Genentech: Research Funding. Chang:Genentech: Research Funding. Ho:Genentech: Employment. Kahn:Genentech: Employment. Lu:Genentech: Employment. Su:Genentech: Employment. Chu:Genentech: Employment.


Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 4395-4395 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bertrand Coiffier ◽  
Catherine Thieblemont ◽  
Sophie de Guibert ◽  
Jehan Dupuis ◽  
Vincent Ribrag ◽  
...  

Abstract Background SAR3419 is a humanized anti-CD19 antibody conjugated to maytansin DM4, a potent cytotoxic agent. SAR3419 targets CD19, an antigen expressed in the majority of B cell non-Hodgkin lymphomas (NHL). The recommended dose for single agent SAR3419 was previously determined to be 55 mg/m2 administered IV every week for 4 weeks, then bi-weekly. In phase I, clinical activity was shown mainly in patients with follicular lymphoma (FL) and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). (Trial funded by Sanofi). Methods Patients (pts) with a CD20+ and CD19+ DLBCL relapsing or refractory (R/R) after at least 1 standard treatment including rituximab and not candidate for or who already underwent transplantation, were eligible. Refractory disease was defined as unresponsive to or progressing within 6 months of regimen completion. Fresh (or recent formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded) biopsy was required before SAR3419 start. Pts received 375 mg/m2 of rituximab (R) IV and 55 mg/m² of SAR3419 on day 1, 8, 15, 22 (35-day cycle 1), followed by bi-weekly R and SAR3419 at the same doses for 2 additional 28-day cycles, provided there was no disease progression or other study discontinuation criteria met. The primary objective was the overall response rate (ORR) following Cheson 2007 criteria, with the first tumor assessment being done 42 days after the last study treatment administration. Secondary objectives were: safety, pharmacokinetics (PK), duration of response (DOR), progression free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and correlation of the antitumor and biological activity of the combination with tumor biomarker status. Results Fifty-three pts were enrolled, 52 treated. Median age was 66.5 years (range 38-85), 50% were male; 23%, 33% and 40% of patients had received 1, 2 or ≥3 prior chemo/immunotherapy regimens for DLBCL, respectively. Of the enrolled patients, 3.8% had received no prior regimen for DLBCL and therefore were excluded from primary analysis for efficacy. Seventy-three percent had stage III/IV disease, 59% had elevated lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), and 63% had bulky disease. Sixty percent were refractory to first regimen (primary refractory), 16% were refractory to last regimen and 24% were relapsed pts. The ORR in the per-protocol population (n=45) was 31.1% (80% confidence interval (CI): 22.0% to 41.6%). Among the 14 responders, 5 had progressed at the time of analysis, with duration of response beyond 6 months for 3 of them. The ORR was 58.3% (80% CI: 36.2% to 78.1%) for patients with relapsed DLBCL (n=12), 42.9% (80% CI: 17.0% to 72.1%) for pts refractory to last regimen (n=7) and 15.4% (80% CI: 6.9% to 28.4%) for primary refractory pts (n=26). Overall survival and PFS data are not yet mature. Biomarkers and PK data will be presented at the meeting. The most common (≥10%) all grades non-hematologic treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were asthenia (25.0%), nausea (21.2%), cough (19.2%), diarrhea (17.3%), weight decrease (17.3%), vomiting (15.4%), dyspnea (15.4%), abdominal pain (13.5%), back pain (13.5%), pyrexia (13.5%) and constipation (11.5%). Related grade 3-4 TEAEs were: 1 syncope, 1 bronchospasm, 2 neutropenia and 1 anemia. No TEAEs led to treatment discontinuation, no grade 3-4 peripheral neuropathy or grade 3-4 ocular events were observed. Two pts experienced grade 2 keratitis, both rapidly recovered with local treatment. Hematological toxicity was moderate, with grade 3-4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia in 15.7% and 9.8% pts, respectively. No complications related to neutropenia were reported. Grade 3 transaminase increase was observed in 1 patient. Conclusions The combination of SAR3419 plus R showed moderate ORR in R/R DLBCL; however the study population was of poor prognosis (60% refractory to first line therapy). In the relapsed DLBCL patients a higher ORR was observed. SAR3419 plus R presented with a favorable safety profile. Further investigations on biomarker expression are ongoing to identify a sub-group of pts who could have better benefited from this combination. Disclosures: Coiffier: Sanofi: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees. Off Label Use: Phase II of SAR3419. Ribrag:Johnson & Johnson: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Bayer: Research Funding; Takeda: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Servier: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Cartron:LFB: Honoraria; GSK: Honoraria; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Casasnovas:Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Hatteville:Sanofi: Employment. Zilocchi:Sanofi: Employment. Oprea:Sanofi: Employment. Tilly:Amgen: Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria; Takeda: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding.


Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 3103-3103
Author(s):  
Manish Patel ◽  
Paul Hamlin ◽  
Donald K Strickland ◽  
Anjali Pandey ◽  
Greg Coffey ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction: Preclinical studies of the Syk-mediated B-cell receptor pathway and Jak-mediated cytokine pathways have demonstrated a potential therapeutic advantage for the dual inhibition of both Syk and Jak kinases in the treatment of B-cell malignancies. Cerdulatinib (PRT062070) was identified from a chemistry screen as a potent and selective inhibitor of Syk, Jak1, Jak3, and Tyk2, with minimal activity against Jak2. Cerdulatinib is efficacious in rodent models of B-cell lymphoma and autoimmune disease (Coffey et al., ASH 2012) and has demonstrated anti-tumor activity in genetically diverse B-cell lymphoma cell lines that is greater than that of Syk- or Jak- selective inhibitors alone (Ma et al., ASH 2013). Methods: This Phase 1 3+3 dose escalation study is evaluating cerdulatinib, given continuously on either a once daily (QD) or twice daily (BID) schedule, for relapsed/refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) or B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). The primary objective is to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of cerdulatinib in patients with CLL or NHL. Secondary objectives are to assess the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of cerdulatinib and to make a preliminary assessment of antitumor activity. Toxicity is graded according to the National Cancer Institute - Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) v4. Clinical response is evaluated according to published criteria (Hallek et al., Blood 2008:111:5446-5456; Cheson et al., J. Clin. Oncol. 2012: 25:579-586). The level of inhibition of Syk and Jak is determined using a variety of whole blood assays measuring signaling via receptors for the B-cell antigen, IL2, IL4, IL6, and GM-CSF. Serum markers of tumor burden, including CCL3, CCL4, and other markers of inflammation, are also being measured. Results: As of 4 August 2014, twelve patients have been enrolled in once daily dose cohorts of 15 mg QD, 30 mg QD, and 45 mg QD. No dose-limiting toxicities have been reported. Grade ≥3 adverse events (AEs), regardless of causality, were: Grade 3 anemia (n=1), Grade 3 neutropenia (n=1), Grade 3 fatigue (n=1), Grade 3 hypotension (n=1), Grade 3 AST increased (n=1), Grade 3 hematochezia (n=1), and Grade 5 Pneumocystis pneumonia (PCP; n=1). The patient who experienced PCP pneumonia was a 76 year old male with CLL who had received prior therapy with bendamustine and rituximab. Cerdulatinib is well-absorbed with an average terminal elimination half-life at steady state of 14 hours. Selective inhibition of Syk and Jak in whole blood assays was observed post-treatment, with IC25-IC50 (Cmin to Cmax at steady-state) against these targets achieved at the 15 mg dose level, and IC50-IC80 (Cmin to Cmax at steady-state) achieved at the 30 mg and 45 mg doses. Reductions of >50% in serum markers of inflammation, as well as in CCL3 and CCL4, were noted at all dose levels post-treatment. Two patients treated at the 15 mg dose (1 CLL, 1 follicular lymphoma [FL]) remained on study for >230 and >200 days, respectively, with stable disease (SD) prior to disease progression. One patient treated at the 30 mg dose (diffuse large B-cell lymphoma [DLBCL], who did not respond to prior R-CHOP therapy), remained on study with SD for 140 days. One patient treated at the 30 mg dose (CLL) experienced a >60% decrease in peripheral lymphocyte count prior to coming off study for PCP pneumonia. Another patient treated at the 30 mg dose (CLL) experienced early lymphocytosis and a 33% reduction in lymph node size at the end of Cycle 2 and remains on study in Cycle 3. One patient treated at the 45 mg dose (FL) experienced a 40% decrease in lymph node size at the end of Cycle 4 and remains on study in Cycle 5. Conclusions: Cerdulatinib has been well tolerated in the initial cohorts of this Phase 1 study, with no dose-limiting toxicities and preliminary evidence of anti-tumor activity. Dose escalation continues and Phase 2 expansion cohorts are planned in CLL, DLBCL and FL. Disclosures Hamlin: Gilead, Spectrum, Seattle Genetics, Genentech: Consultancy; Spectrum, GSK, Jansen and Jansen/Pharmacyclics, Portola, Seattle Genetics: Research Funding. Strickland:SCRI Development Innovations: Employment. Pandey:Portola Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment; Portola Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Equity Ownership. Coffey:Portola Pharmaceuticals: Employment, Equity Ownership. Leeds:Portola Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment. Levy:Portola Pharmaceuticals: Employment; University of Michigan: Patents & Royalties. Curnutte:Portola Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership; Sea Lane Biotechnologies: Consultancy; 3-V Biosciences: Equity Ownership. Wagner-Johnston:Gilead: Consultancy; Gilead: Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Research Funding. Flinn:Portola Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding.


Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 4082-4082
Author(s):  
Beth A. Christian ◽  
Ying Huang ◽  
Sabarish Ayyappan ◽  
Robert A Baiocchi ◽  
Jonathan E Brammer ◽  
...  

Introduction: Venetoclax, a BCL2 inhibitor, has demonstrated efficacy both as a single agent and in combination with rituximabin several subtypes of B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). The combination of obinutuzumab and lenalidomide has demonstrated safety and preliminary efficacy in follicular lymphoma (Fowler et al., JCO 2015; 35: 7531). We conducted a phase I study of obinutuzumab, venetoclax, and lenalidomide to determine the safety, maximum tolerated dose, and preliminary efficacy of the combination. Methods: Patients with relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell (DLBCL), transformed, high grade B-cell (HGBCL), marginal zone, and follicular (FL) lymphoma who have received ≥ 1 prior therapy were eligible. Prior autologous (ASCT) but not allogeneic stem cell transplant were permitted. Prior lenalidomide or BCL2 family inhibitors, CNS involvement, and active hepatitis or HIV infection were not permitted. ANC > 1000/mm3, platelets > 75,000/mm3, creatinine clearance ≥50 ml/min, ALT/AST ≤ 3 x ULN, bilirubin ≤ 1.5 x ULN, and ECOG PS 0-2 were required. Treatment consisted of obinutuzumab 1000 mg on days 1, 8 and 15 of cycle 1 and then on day 1 of cycles 2-6 with escalating doses of lenalidomide days 1-21 and venetoclax days 1-28 of a 28 day cycle (Table 1). A 3+3 dose escalation schema was followed. The DLT period was 1 cycle and patients had to receive 80% of the doses of the oral agents and all doses of obinutuzumab to be considered evaluable for DLT. DLTs included: treatment delays > 28 days; ANC < 500 / mm3 or platelets <25, 000 / mm3 persisting > 28 days; grade 4 febrile neutropenia or infection; grade 3 infection that fails to resolve within 7 days; and grade 3 or 4 non-hematologic toxicity. Patients without significant toxicity or progression could continue treatment up to 12 cycles. Response was assessed by CT or PET/CT every 3 months for 12 months and then every 6 months until disease progression. Results: 22 patients were treated. Median age was 61 years (range 31-78 years) with 16 males. Median prior therapies was 2 (range 1-10) and included 5 patients who had relapsed after chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy and 2 patients relapsed after ASCT. Median baseline lactate dehydrogenase was 259.5 U/L (range 147-5133, ULN 190 U/L). 16 patients had aggressive B-cell lymphoma including DLBCL, HGBCL, primary mediastinal and transformed FL, 5 patients had FL and 1 patient had marginal zone lymphoma. At dose level (DL) 1, one patient experienced a DLT, grade 3 neutropenic fever lasting > 7 days. DL 1 was expanded and no additional DLTs occurred. No further DLTs occurred at DL 2-4. DL 4 was expanded and was determined to be the MTD. Four patients, 1 in each dose level, were not evaluable for DLT and were replaced including 3 who did not receiving 80% of the oral agents due to required dose reductions and 1 patient for disease progression. Related grade 3-4 toxicities were primarily hematologic including neutropenia (n=20, 90.9%), thrombocytopenia (n=5, 22.7%), and anemia (n=3, 13.6%). Grade 3-4 infections (n=6, 27%) included sepsis, febrile neutropenia, pneumonia and a urinary tract infection. Other grade 3-4 AEs occurring once each included dysgeusia, dyspnea, nausea, vomiting, and hyperhidrosis. No clinically significant tumor lysis has occurred. Patients have received a median of 3 cycles (range 1-12) of treatment. Three patients remain on therapy and 5 patients are on follow up. Dose reductions of lenalidomide occurred for 17 patients (77%) and of venetoclax for 11 patients (50%). Nine patients have achieved a response (41%), including 8 complete (CR) and 1 partial responses (PR). Responses have occurred at each DL and include 4 patients with FL (2 CR, 2 PR), 4 patients with aggressive lymphoma (4 CR) and 1 patient with MZL (CR). 14 patients are off of the study, 9 with progression, 2 for alternative therapy, and 1 each for DLT, physician preference, and a diagnosis of MDS in a patient with 3 prior lines of chemotherapy. Conclusions: Combined treatment with obinutuzumab, venetoclax, and lenalidomide administered up to 12 cycles is feasible with activity in multiple subtypes of relapsed NHL. Enrollment in expansion cohorts of FL and aggressive B-cell lymphoma is ongoing. Disclosures Christian: Celgene: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Cephalon: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Millennium Pharmaceuticals Inc: Research Funding; Genentech: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Triphase: Research Funding; Immunomedics: Research Funding; Acerta: Research Funding. Baiocchi:Prelude: Consultancy. Brammer:Verastem, Inc: Research Funding; Viracta Therapeutics, Inc.: Research Funding; Bioniz Therapeutics, Inc.: Research Funding. Epperla:Verastem Oncology: Speakers Bureau; Pharmacyclics: Honoraria. Jaglowski:Juno: Consultancy, Other: advisory board; Kite: Consultancy, Other: advisory board, Research Funding; Unum Therapeutics Inc.: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Other: advisory board, Research Funding. William:Guidepoint Global: Consultancy; Celgene Corporation: Consultancy; Kyowa Kirin, Inc.: Consultancy; Defined Health: Consultancy; Techspert: Consultancy. Awan:Gilead: Consultancy; AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Abbvie: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Sunesis: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Genentech: Consultancy. Maddocks:BMS: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Teva: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. OffLabel Disclosure: Obinutuzumab - off label use in relapsed aggressive B-cell lymphoma and indolent B-cell lymphoma Venetoclax - off label use in relapsed B-cell lymphoma


Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 5392-5392 ◽  
Author(s):  
Georg Hess ◽  
Andreas Hüttmann ◽  
Reinhard Marks ◽  
Mathias Witzens-Harig ◽  
Martin H. Dreyling ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Prognosis of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) and other aggressive lymphoma entities has improved with the advent of Rituximab, and R-CHOP-21 and variants is SOC. Nevertheless, a substantial proportion of patients fail first line treatment. Salvage therapies are often effective. However, no more than 25-50% achieve a long term remission even when consolidative high dose chemotherapy (HDT) followed by hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (SCT) is applied. In case of failure or intolerance to HDT, regimen like Gemcitabine/Oxaliplatin are applied but show limited efficacy, indicating the need for new treatments. Obinutuzumab (GA101) is a type II anti-CD20 antibody. Superiority of Obinutuzumab could be demonstrated in xenograft models of mantle cell lymphoma and DLBCL. Although desirable, cumulative dose-related, progressive cardiotoxicity eliminates anthracyclins from higher treatment lines. With Pixantrone, a drug structurally related to anthracyclines and especially anthracenediones, a re-exposition against this drug class has been shown to be feasible. In 70 heavily pre-treated patients, a best ORR of 40% (20% CR/CRu) was observed (Pettengell et al). Experiences from further antibody drug combinations lead to the assumption that the effects of Pixantrone will be augmented by a monoclonal antibody without increasing toxicity. We thus initiated a trial combining both agents for the first time. The trial has opened in Q4/2015 and recruitment is ongoing. Overall, a total of up 70 patients will be enrolled for a number of 64 evaluable patients. Primary endpoint will be the objective overall response rate, with secondary endpoints being safety, PFS and OS. Methods: this is a multicenter, national, prospective trial. Inclusion criteria: patients were eligible if they had histologically proven DLBCL, FL grade IIIb or transformed indolent lymphoma, CD20 positive disease, no curative option available, relapsed disease, measurable disease, ECOG < 3, sufficient bone marrow reserve, no severe concomitant diseases and given informed consent. There was no upper limit or prior treatment lines. Treatment consisted of Pixantrone 50mg/m² day 1, 8 and 15 of each cycle, Obinutuzumab 1000 mg flat dose day 1, 8 and 15 of cycle one and day 1 of each subsequent cycle. A total of 6 cycles was planned with interim staging after 3 cycles. Results: 24 patients (pts) have been included until now. Concerning clinical characteristics, all were caucasian, 12 were female and the other 12 male and median age was 75 years. Most of the patients suffered from DLBCL (18 pts, 82%). Median number of prior therapies was 2 (1 to 6). Until now 55 evaluable cycles of chemotherapy (median 2 cycles (0 to 6)) have been performed. At this time, the treatment seems to be well tolerated, with no unforeseen side effects. Observed toxicity was predominantly hematologic. The following hematologic adverse events of grade 3/4 were noted: leukopenia (4 pts, 17%), neutropenia (6 pts, 25%), granulocytopenia (1 pts, 4%), as well as thrombocytopenia (2 pts). Non-hematologic grade 3/4 adverse events were observed in at least two patients: hypertension (2 pts) and pelvic pain (2 pts). Response: currently, best responses were 4 PR, 1 SD, and 8 PD in 13 patients evaluable so far. Four patients died, all after progression of lymphoma. Summary: the combination of Obinutuzumab and Pixantrone seems to be feasible and safe with early signs of efficacy. Updated results of this trial in progress with a focus on safety will be presented. Disclosures Hess: Janssen: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Roche, CTI, Pfizer, Celgene: Research Funding; Roche: Honoraria. Marks:Pfizer: Honoraria. Witzens-Harig:Roche: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Dreyling:Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Viardot:Amgen: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; Roche: Honoraria; Takeda: Other: travel support; Pfizer: Honoraria. Keller:Spectrum Pharmaceutical: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria.


Blood ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 108 (11) ◽  
pp. 2483-2483 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sonali M. Smith ◽  
Barbara Pro ◽  
Scott Smith ◽  
Patrick Stiff ◽  
Eric Lester ◽  
...  

Abstract Mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) is a highly conserved serine/threonine kinase positioned at the juncture of several signal transduction pathways frequently disrupted in cancer. Downstream effectors, S6KI and 4EBP1, regulate cell cycle kinetics and cell growth via translational modulation, and this is effectively halted by rapamycin. Temsirolimus (TORISEL™, CCI-779) is a rapamycin ester derivative with cell cycle inhibitory properties. We conducted a phase II study of temsirolimus 25 mg IV over 30 minutes weekly in three cohorts of patients with relapsed/refractory NHL: Group A (diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, DLCL), Group B (follicular lymphoma, FL), Group C (small lymphocytic lymphoma/chronic lymphocytic leukemia [SLL/CLL] and other indolent B-cell lymphomas). Correlative studies in primary tumor tissue and in peripheral blood samples include phosphorylated p70S6K, total and phosphorylated 4EBP1, PTEN status, p21 status, and p27 status. Forty patients are registered, of which 21 are evaluable for response. Six patients are inevaluable and 13 too early for response evaluation; all patients were included in toxicity evaluation. There were 22 males/18 females with a median age of 59 (range, 29–83). Primary tumor samples were collected in 10 patients, with biomarker analysis pending. Histologic subtypes include 7 DLCL, 14 FL, and 13 CLL/SLL. Of 21 evaluable patients for response, there were 3 complete remissions (all FL) and 5 partial remissions (1 DLCL, 3 FL, 1 SLL), for an overall response rate of 40%. An additional 10 patients (5 FL, 6 CLL/SLL) had minor responses or stable disease; only 3 pts had progressive disease as their best response. The median follow-up is 4 months (range, 1–15 months). Grade 1–2 non-hematologic toxicities (except where noted) include increased hepatic enzymes (10 pts), skin rash (13 pts), fatigue (18 pts; grade 3 in 2 pts), hypercholesterolemia (22 pts), hyperglycemia (21 pts; grade 3 in 1 pt), hypertriglyceridemia (20 pts; grade 3 in 1 pt). Six patients were removed from study due to pneumonitis; 4 of these patients were symptomatic (cough, fevers, dyspnea) and 2 were asymptomatic but had pulmonary abnormalities on staging CT scans. Grade 3 and 4 hematologic toxicities include thrombocytopenia (5 pts), lymphopenia (5 pts), and leucopenia (2 pts). In summary, temsirolimus shows preliminary but encouraging activity across multiple B-NHL subtypes, complementing the published activity in mantle cell lymphoma. Careful attention must be paid to pulmonary toxicity. However, the early activity, including disease regression and stabilization, suggests that future combinations with cytotoxics or other biologics may be warranted, and that mTOR inhibition in NHL is a promising strategy.


Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 284-284 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arnold S. Freedman ◽  
John Kuruvilla ◽  
Sarit E. Assouline ◽  
Andreas Engert ◽  
DaeSeog Heo ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 284 Background: Lucatumumab (LUC) is a pure antagonistic CD40 monoclonal antibody to the transmembrane receptor CD40. In preclinical testing, micromolar concentrations of LUC decrease proliferation of B cells in vitro and LUC shows anti-lymphoma activity in in vivo models. LUC has been clinically evaluated in chronic lymphocytic leukemia and multiple myeloma, and now is under evaluation in pts with follicular lymphoma (FL), diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), mantle cell lymphoma (MCL), marginal zone lymphoma/mucosal associated lymphoid tissue (MZL/MALT), or Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL) who had progressed after at least two prior therapies. Methods: LUC was given IV once weekly for 4 weeks, followed by a 4 week rest period. Pts with stable disease or whose disease responded are eligible for additional cycles of LUC. Objectives were: (1) determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and dose limiting toxicity (DLT) dose (dose escalation, phase Ia), (2) assess the clinical response rate at the MTD (dose expansion, phase II), (3) exploratory: pharmacodynamics and correlative humoral biomarkers. Bayesian logistic regression modeling was used to escalate LUC. To estimate the response rate to LUC of each of the subtypes under study, a hierarchical Bayesian model has been used. Results: During phase Ia, 32 pts received LUC at dose levels of 3.0 mg/kg (15 pts), 4.0 mg/kg (12 pts), or 6.0 mg/kg (5 pts). The MTD and DLT dose were identified as 4.0 mg/kg and 6.0 mg/kg, respectively. DLTs were limited to clinically asymptomatic and reversible grade 3/4 elevations of amylase and/or lipase and grade 3/4 elevations of ALT and/or AST. As of June 14, 2010, 99 patients had received at least 1 infusion of LUC (32 from phase Ia, 67 from phase II). Of these patients, preliminary efficacy data is available for 79 patients (30 from phase Ia, 49 from phase II). A 40% response rate to LUC was observed in patients who were refractory to rituximab. Peripheral blood CD40 receptor occupancy analyses demonstrated greater than 90% occupancy of circulating B-cells at 4 mg/kg (MTD). The half-life of LUC at 4 mg/kg was calculated as 13 ± 11 days. No immunogenicity was observed in any samples. Conclusions: Preliminary results for LUC show anti-lymphoma activity on patients who failed at least two lines of therapy at an acceptable safety profile. Enrollment is continuing to further evaluate efficacy in all subtypes. The data warrants further development at least in the refractory setting of FL. Disclosures: Freedman: Novartis Pharmaceuticals, Inc: Consultancy. Kuruvilla:Hoffman LaRoche: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria; Genzyme: Honoraria; Otsuka: Honoraria. Engert:Novartis Pharmaceuticals, Inc: Honoraria, Research Funding. Corradini:Novartis Pharmaceuticals, Inc: Consultancy; Genezyme: Consultancy; Roche: Speakers Bureau; Celegene: Speakers Bureau. Fanale:Novartis Pharmaceuticals, Inc: Honoraria, Research Funding. Bendiske:Novartis Pharmaceuticals, Inc: Employment. Ewald:Novartis Pharmaceuticals, Inc: Employment. Dey:Novartis Pharmaceuticals, Inc: Employment. Baeck:Novartis Pharmaceuticals, Inc: Employment. Younes:Novartis Pharmaceuticals, Inc: Honoraria, Research Funding; Genentech: Honoraria, Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Honoraria, Research Funding; SBIO: Consultancy, Research Funding.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document