High Correlation of Pre-Apheresis Peripheral Blood CD34+ Cell Counts with Final Apheresis Product CD34+ Cell Count by Using a More Accurate Determination of Patient Blood Volume

Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 2996-2996
Author(s):  
Brandon Parker ◽  
James Hastings ◽  
Jill Folkert ◽  
Gayla Nagy ◽  
Carlos Bachier ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 2996 The final apheresis product CD34+ cell count per Kg of recipient weight is used to determine if additional apheresis procedures are necessary to collect the targeted amount of hematopoietic stem cells for autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation. Flow cytometric analysis of CD34+ cells can take several hours. A more timely technique to predict apheresis product CD34+ cell counts during apheresis may help determine if further administration of cytokines is necessary or if apheresis catheters can be removed, and overall improve the efficiency of patient (pt) care. We performed a retrospective review of all pts undergoing autologous peripheral blood stem cell mobilization with granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) alone, G-CSF and plerixafor, or with chemotherapy followed by G-CSF, from July 2010 through May 2011 who underwent peripheral blood stem cell collection with apheresis on the COBE Spectra cell separator. Linear regression models were used to formulate the calculation of pt blood volume based on the pre-apheresis CD34+ cell count per micro liter of blood, the final apheresis product CD34+ cell counts, and the amount of blood processed during the apheresis procedure. This calculated blood volume is expressed by the formula BV = 82.5(patients weight in Kg) + 793. We then prospectively evaluated the next consecutive pts who underwent stem cell mobilization and apheresis in June and July 2011. Twenty-seven apheresis collections were done on 26 pts. Fourteen pts were female, and 12 pts were male. Seventeen pts were diagnosed with myeloma, 6 pts with NHL, and 3 pts with other diseases. Twenty pts were mobilized with G-CSF (10 ug/kg daily) with apheresis to begin on day 5. Fifteen of the 20 pts required plerixafor on day 4 because of low peripheral blood CD34+ cell counts (< 10/ul). Six pts were mobilized with chemotherapy followed by G-CSF 10 ug/kg daily until peripheral CD34 cell counts recovered greater than 10/ul and then apheresis was started. Each pt had their blood volume calculated according to the formula above and the peripheral blood CD 34+ cell count was measured on the first and second day of apheresis. The peripheral blood CD 34+ cell count/ul was multiplied by 1000 and this product was multiplied by the calculated blood volume and then divided by the pts weight [(PBCD34+ cell count × 1000) × BV]/Kg to determine the predicted apheresis product CD34+ cell count, which was then compared to the actual apheresis product final CD34+ cell count. On the first day of collection the mean for the predicted product CD34+ cell count was 4.98 × 106 +/− 3.1 × 106, and the actual apheresis product CD34+ cell count was 4.61 × 106 +/− 2.90 × 106 (Pearson correlation r value of 0.913 and a p value <0.001)(see figure). Nineteen collections were evaluable on the second day of collection with the mean for the predicted product CD34 + cell count of 2.08 × 106 +/− 1.64 × 106, and the mean for the actual apheresis product CD34+ cell count of 2.29 × 106 +/− 0.768 × 106 (Pearson correlation r value of 0.620 with a p value of 0.005). There was no significant difference in the correlation between patients mobilized with G-CSF alone, G-CSF and plerixafor or after chemotherapy and G-CSF. In conclusion, a more accurate determination of patient blood volume allowed for a high degree of correlation on the first day of peripheral blood stem cell collection on the COBE Spectra machine between the predicted product CD34+ cell count and the actual apheresis product CD34+ cell count. An accurate prediction of the final apheresis product CD34+ cell count may allow for less cytokine administration, quicker removal of apheresis catheters, and more efficient disposition of patients undergoing peripheral blood stem cell collection. Disclosures: Shaughnessy: Otsuka: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Millenium: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Genzyme: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau.

Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 1925-1925
Author(s):  
Nelson J. Chao ◽  
Lisa M Bernard ◽  
George Carrum ◽  
Henry C. Fung ◽  
Daniel T Grima ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 1925 After mobilization, the timing of aphaeresis can be highly variable, often depending on rise in peripheral blood stem cell levels. Some centers that conduct autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) do not conduct aphaeresis for stem cell collection on weekends. We examined stem cell collection practices and related outcomes in centers that do and do not conduct weekend aphaeresis. Methods: A retrospective, multi-center chart review was conducted of multiple myeloma (MM) and lymphoma patients mobilized between January 1, 2006 and December 31, 2007 for ASCT. Patients were excluded if they were mobilized with plerixafor (Mozobil®) or were enrolled in a clinical trial of mobilization regimens. Data collected included demographics, disease and treatment history, mobilization regimen, blood counts, aphaeresis, remobilization, cells transplanted, time to engraftment, and resource use. Stem cell collection practices and related clinical outcomes were analyzed separately for sites that did and did not conduct weekend aphaeresis. Results: Data were collected for 292 consecutive patients in the different centers (91 patients from 4 sites that performed weekday only aphaeresis and 201 patients from 7 sites who performed aphaeresis on weekends and weekdays). Weekday only aphaeresis sites were more likely to conduct GCSF alone mobilization compared to weekend sites (42% vs. 21%, p<0.005). Approximately half the patients at each site had MM. The day of the week that aphaeresis was initiated differed dramatically between groups with 74% of chemo-mobilization patients starting aphaeresis on a Monday in the weekday only group compared to 26% in the other group. Approximately 15% of chemo-mobilization patients started aphaeresis on a weekend in the group that conducted weekend aphaeresis. No chemo-mobilization patients began aphaeresis on a Friday in the weekday only aphaeresis group compared to 11% in the other group. Sixteen of all aphaeresis procedures occurred on the weekend on the sites that conducted weekend aphaeresis. Significant differences were found between weekend and weekday only sites, with regards to total cells collected (16.01 × 106/kg vs. 9.2 × 106/kg, p<0.05) and cells collected on day one of aphaeresis (10.8 × 106/kg vs 5.5 × 106/kg, p<0.05) for chemo-mobilization patients. Use of peripheral blood stem cell counts differed markedly, with counts conducted on the first day of aphaeresis in 18% of weekday only group patients and 61% of weekend group patients. Discussion: Significant differences in the management of patients were observed between sites that conduct and don't conduct weekend aphaeresis. Weekday only aphaeresis sites used a more regimented collection schedule with most collections starting on a Monday, potentially missing the “peak” day of cell collection. Sites that conducted weekend aphaeresis used a more cell-count based approach and were more likely to monitor peripheral blood stem cell counts. Collection success appears to be superior with the cell-count based approach that includes greater use of chemo-mobilization, cell count monitoring and weekend collection. Disclosures: Chao: Genzyme: Research Funding. Bernard:Cornerstone Research: Employment, Equity Ownership. Fung:Genzyme: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Grima:Cornerstone Research Group Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Holmberg:Genzyme: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Millenium: Research Funding; Otsuka: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding. Brown:Cornerstone Research: Employment. Horwitz:Genzyme: Honoraria, Research Funding. Shaughnessy:Genzyme: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Millenium: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Otsuka: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Tricot:Otsuka: I have an ongoing clinical study supported by Otsuka.


Author(s):  
Kiran PK ◽  
Vinu Sarathy P ◽  
Srinivas BJ ◽  
Girish V Badarkhe ◽  
Rajesh Kumar KS ◽  
...  

Background: Autologous HCT in multiple myeloma is done as upfront treatment in newly diagnosed transplant eligible patients after induction chemotherapy. In addition, it is standard for relapsed, aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) and classical Hodgkin lymphoma (HL), and is curative in ~40% to 45% of patients. Over a decade, many efforts were made to find helpful parameters to predict an optimal time for initiating an efficient peripheral blood stem cell collection so that adequate stem cells are collected.  It has been well accepted that CD34+ cell count in peripheral blood before leukapheresis is the best parameter to predict CD34 cell yield. However, white blood cell count, mononuclear cell count, and other easily obtained parameters are still used to guide the clinical practice of peripheral blood stem cell mobilization and collection.  Materials and Methods: In the present study, we analyzed the correlation between peripheral blood MNC and Apheresis CD34 levels and also between peripheral blood CD34 by flow cytometry and apheresis CD34 levels. Results: We found that there was a statistically insignificant weak correlation between peripheral MNC and apheresis CD34. There was a statistically significant strong correlation between peripheral CD34 and apheresis CD34. Conclusion: The results show that peripheral blood MNC was analogous indicating that no reliable prediction can be done for CD34 cells collected in apheresis while peripheral CD34 by flow cytometry is the strongest predictor for initiating stem cell collection.


Transfusion ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 54 (4) ◽  
pp. 1081-1087 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chitra Hosing ◽  
Rima M. Saliba ◽  
Nelson Hamerschlak ◽  
Jose Mauro Kutner ◽  
Araci Massami Sakashita ◽  
...  

Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 4047-4047
Author(s):  
Timoleon Anguita ◽  
Alexandre Chiattone ◽  
Nelson Hamerschlak ◽  
Rima M Saliba ◽  
XiaoWen Tang ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 4047 Stem Cell collection via apheresis is the preferred method of collecting stem cells for hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Accurate prediction of stem cell yield is important for the planning of apheresis procedures and for the collection of adequate stem cells. Pierelli et. al. (Vox Sanguinis 2006, 91; 126) proposed a mathematical formula to estimate the CD34+ dose collected on 1st day of apheresis based on the peripheral blood (PB) CD34+ concentration pre-apheresis and the blood volume processed (BVP). Patients and Methods : We tested the predictive value of this formula in a multicenter sample of 1608 apheresis procedures performed at 5 centers (SCSP n=85, CAS n=195, HIAE n=305, China n=172, MDACC n=851). A 50% randomly selected sample of the MDACC study population was included in this analysis. Each contributing institution selected all consecutive apheresis procedures performed over a designated time frame. Baseline patient characteristics were collected including age, gender, diagnosis, mobilization regimen, complete blood counts on day of collection, and the absolute PB CD34+ counts within 24 hours of the first apheresis procedure. Subjects who did not have data on the PB CD34+ counts were not included in the analysis. Information on total BVP and CD34+ cells collected/kg was also collected. There were 694 males (59%), median age was 50 years. To facilitate comparison of results, we used the same statistical methods reported by Pierelli et. al. to assess the correlation between the actual (ay) and predicted (py) CD34+ yields, including assessment of the linear correlation between these measures and the distribution of the ay/py ratio. Results: Data on both actual and predicted yields were available for 1148 (97%) records. Overall, Pearson's correlation coefficient (r) between ay and py was 0.67, ranging from 0.67 for MDACC to 0.86 for China and CAS. Median ay/py ratio was 1.1 (0.02–433) ranging from 0.99 for HIAE to 1.5 for China and CAS. To characterize the correlation between ay and py and facilitate the clinical application of our findings, we classified the actual and predicted yields as falling below (<2), within (2–5), or above (>5) the conventionally acceptable collected CD34+ doses (x106/Kg). Positive predictive value (PPV) of py was estimated considering the distribution of ay as the “gold standard”. PPV was relatively high for py >5 [85% (95% CI 81–89%)], average for py <2 [72% (95% CI 68–76%)], and low for py between 2 and 5 [56% (95% CI 51–62%)]. This pattern was consistent across institutions. PPV ranged from 55% (SCSP) to 80% (China) for py<2; from 37% (CAS) to 68% (MDACC) for py between 2 and 5, and from 73% to 94% for py>5, exceeding 80% at all institutions except SCSP. Overall, 13% of cases predicted to have a CD34+ yield between 2 and 5, had an actual yield <2. This proportion varied across institutions ranging from 5% at SCSP to 28% at HIAE. Notably, the distribution of BVP (ml/Kg) was comparable across the 3 categories of ay defined above with a median of 204 (range 74–263). Consistent pattern was also observed within institutions. Conclusion: Our data indicate that the formula of Pierelli et.al. is associated with high PPV for predicted CD34+ doses >5, acceptable PPV for doses<2, and relatively low PPV for doses falling between 2 and 5. The data also suggests that CD34+ yields correlate with pre-apheresis CD34+ count and are independent of BVPNTotal 1182rangeSCSP 85rangeCAS 195rangeChina 172rangeHIAE 305rangeMDACC 425rangeAbsolute PB CD34+ × 106/μl (median, range)280.3–2735314.2–279251.3–1750140.3–411310.6–604312–2735Weight, Kg (median, range)729–1696738–143619–1106322–1007313–1438411–169Day 1 Blood volume processed, L (median, range)153–131148–25123–299.54.5–12.5195–131168–27Actual Day 1 CD34+ dose (x 106/Kg), (median, range)2.90.01–1092.90.2–293.80.01–1091.80.01–503.50.1–442.80.2–101<236%27%33%53%34%33%2–531%40%28%20%27%39%>533%33%38%27%39%28%Predicted Day 1 CD34+ dose (× 106/Kg), (median, range)2.40.02–2112.60.3–242.20.1–730.960.02–253.20.1–672.40.1–211<244%45%44%63%33%42%2–530%25%37%17%28%35%>527%30%19%20%38%23%Ratio CD34+ dose collected/predicted1.10.02–4331.10.2–111.50.03–6.31.50.02–4330.990.04–121.10.1–9.9Pearson's correlation coefficient0.670.830.860.860.770.67Pearson's within Predicted Day 1 dose<20.420.080.630.50.570.282–50.280.250.280.20.360.25>50.560.770.810.70.630.6 Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


2020 ◽  
Vol 43 (3) ◽  
pp. E27-32
Author(s):  
Xiaoning Wang ◽  
Ying Zhang ◽  
Ting Fan ◽  
Haibo Liu ◽  
Mengchang Wang ◽  
...  

Purpose: To evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of etoposide and cyclophosphamide for mobilization peripheral stem cells in multiple myeloma patients. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 46 patients with multiple myeloma who underwent peripheral blood stem cell collection for upfront autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in the First Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University between January 2010 and July 2019. The mobilization protocols included cyclophosphamide 2.0 g/m2 with G-CSF (CTX group) before January 2015, and two-days of 5 mg/kg.d etoposide and 1.0 g/m2.d cyclophosphamide with G-CSF (EC group) after January 2015. Results: The success rate of harvest (≥2×106 cells/kg) during the first mobilization attempt was 82.1% in the EC group and 50.0% in the CTX group, and the rate of adequate harvest (≥4×106 cells/kg) was 57.1% in the EC group and 15.8% in the CTX group. After the second mobilization, a sufficient number of CD34+/kg cells for an auto-HSCT was obtained for all patients in the EC group and the majority (68.4%) of patients in CTX group. There was no significant difference of non-hematological adverse events between two groups. The mean neutrophil engraftment time was 11.22±1.56 days and 9.89±2.81days for the CTX and EC groups, respectively (P>0.05). Platelet engraftments were significantly faster in the EC group than the CTX group (P0.05). Conclusion: The etoposide and cyclophosphamide regimen could be an effective and safe method for mobilization in patients with multiple myeloma.


2012 ◽  
Vol 47 (3) ◽  
pp. 345-350 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fei-yi Wu ◽  
Kee Khiang Heng ◽  
Rohani Binte Salleh ◽  
Teck Guan Soh ◽  
Jing Jing Lee ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document