The MD Anderson Cancer Center (MDACC) Experience with Ruxolitinib, An Oral JAK1 and JAK2 Inhibitor, in Myelofibrosis: Long-Term Follow-up Outcomes of 107 Patients From a Phase I/II Study,

Abstract Abstract 3851 Background: Myelofibrosis (MF) is a myeloproliferative neoplasm associated with splenomegaly, debilitating symptoms, cytopenias and progressive bone marrow fibrosis. Survival in MF is poor, and effective therapy is lacking. Ruxolitinib (INCB18424) is a JAK1 and JAK2 inhibitor with established clinical benefit in patients (pts) with MF (Verstovsek S. J Clin Oncol 29: [suppl; abstr 6500], 2011) by reducing spleen size and improving MF symptoms & quality of life. Objective: Aim was to identify potential correlates of overall survival (OS) of MF pts receiving ruxolitinib. This study was based on a subset analysis of an open-label single-arm phase I/II trial (INCB18424–251; NCT00509899). Methods: 158 adult pts with primary or secondary MF were enrolled in the parent trial; most received ruxolitinib at doses of 10–25 mg PO twice daily. This updated analysis focuses on 107 pts enrolled at MDACC: 63 were high, 34 intermediate (int)-2 and 10 int-1 risk, according to the International Prognosis Scoring System (IPSS), and assesses their survival and correlates thereof. For log-rank survival analysis, events were censored at the later of last dose, last visit, or last follow-up date. Results: Efficacy and safety findings of the parent trial have been published (Verstovsek S. N Engl J Med 363:1117, 2010): ruxolitinib treatment led to a rapid and sustained reduction in splenomegaly and improvements in MF symptoms; anemia and thrombocytopenia were the most common adverse events. After a median follow-up of 32 months, 58 of 107 pts (54%) were still receiving therapy. The corresponding overall survival (OS) was 69% (33 pts died, none due to therapy-related reasons: 14 while on therapy/within 30 days (d) of discontinuation (dc), and 19 off-study). Accounting for deaths occurring on the study, the 2-yr actuarial survival of int-2 and high-risk pts was 92% and 88%, respectively. However, the 2-yr survival of 13 int-2 and 21 high-risk pts who had discontinued therapy and were subsequently followed was 32% and 21%, respectively. MF transformed to acute leukemia in 9 pts: 5 while on therapy/within 30 d of dc, and 4 off-study; the transformation rate was 0.036/pt years. Pts with normal baseline cytogenetics did not have better survival than those with aberrations (Hazard ratio [HR]=1.52; p=0.24). However, pts with a baseline bone marrow fibrosis score of 2 had greater survival than those with a score of 3 (HR=2.21; p=0.031). Other evaluable baseline pt characteristics (gender, age, anemia, WBC and splenomegaly, did not affect survival. Surprisingly, high-risk pts (per either IPSS or dynamic IPSS [DIPSS]) did not have significantly worse survival than int-2 pts. Importantly, reduction in palpable spleen length while on ruxolitinib was noted to be the most robust predictor for survival: pts who had a ≥50% reduction in spleen size (n=62) had significantly prolonged survival vs. those with a <25% reduction (n=20) (Fig. 1; HR=4.94; p<0.0001). Conclusions: Most MDACC pts with advanced MF in the phase I/II ruxolitinib study are still receiving therapy, demonstrating an OS of 69% after a median of 32 months. The 2-yr survival of pts who remained on therapy was 3–4-fold greater than those who discontinued therapy. Among baseline pt characteristics, only a lower bone marrow fibrosis score correlated with better survival. Conversely, achievement of ≥50% reduction in spleen size while on ruxolitinib resulted in greater survival (vs. <25% reduction). Our data suggest that the most important factors that influence survival of MF pts receiving ruxolitinib are continuous active therapy and a degree of the spleen response, not pt pretherapy characteristics. Disclosures: Verstovsek: Incyte Corporation: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Compassionate Use Program (CUP) with Ruxolitinib in Mexican Patients with Primary Myelofibrosis (PMF), Post – Polycythemia, Vera Myelofibrosis (PPV – MF), and Post–Essential Thrombocythemia Myelofibrosis (PET – MF)

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v120.21.5067.5067 ◽

2012 ◽

Vol 120 (21) ◽

pp. 5067-5067 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Pablo Vargas ◽

Roberto Ovilla ◽

Martha Alvarado ◽

Manuel Lopez ◽

Rafael Hurtado Monroy ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Bone Marrow ◽

Platelet Count ◽

High Risk ◽

Hemoglobin Level ◽

Risk Level ◽

Costal Margin ◽

Intermediate Risk ◽

Spleen Size ◽

Bone Marrow Fibrosis ◽

Marrow Fibrosis

Abstract Abstract 5067 Introduction Myelofibrosis (MF) is a myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN) that is characterized by ineffective hematopoiesis and symptomatic burden such as cytopenias, and splenomegaly. The prevalence of MF symptoms is relatively uniform across the 3 main subtypes: primary MF (PMF), post – polycythemia vera MF (PPV MF), and post – essential thrombocythemia MF (PET MF). Available therapies (AT) in Mexico, includes hydroxyurea (HU), interferon (IFN), for ET, besides phlebotomy for PV, as well as androgens, steroids, chemotherapy, IFN, thalidomide, EPO and radiotherapy for PMF. The only potentially curative therapy is allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) but treatment-related mortality remains high. Recently ruxolitinib an oral Janus kinase–2 inhibitor (JAK-2) has been approved to treat patients with MF. The safety and efficacy of Ruxolitinib has been evaluated 528 patients from COMFORT I and COMFORT II trials. Objective To report the first clinical experience in a CUP with an oral JAK–2 Inhibitor (ruxolitinib) in 40 MF patients refractory to AT in Mexico. Patients and Methods PMF patients and PPV/PET MF eligible for the ruxolitinib CUP, were diagnosed according to the 2008 WHO criteria, irrespective of JAK2 mutation status; classified as high risk; intermediate risk level 2; or, intermediate risk level 1 with an enlarged spleen; with a peripheral blood blast count of < 10%; adequate renal and liver function, platelet count >100×109/L, all of them were treated with best available therapies in Mexico. Therapy with ruxolitinib was administered to all patients. Doses were adjusted according to the platelet counts. Clinical and demographic characteristics were assessed at baseline and during the follow-up. The analyzed characteristics were: Demographic: age, gender; Clinical: Risk group, Bone marrow fibrosis grade, spleen size, ECOG, MPN subtype, JAK mutation, CBC counts;Spleen size at baseline and at week 20 of treatment. Results The median age was 64. 2 (Interval 41 – 75). Gender distribution was 46% female and 54% male. Patients according to the International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS) were distributed in the following risk category: 10% low risk; 53. 3% intermediate – 1 risk; 26. 7 % intermediate – 2 risk; and 20% high risk. Bone marrow fibrosis grade distribution was: Grade I 46. 15%; Grade II 23. 07%; Grade III 30. 76%. Spleen length below costal margin: <10 cm, 80. 7%; 10 to <20 cm, 11. 5% and > 20 cm, 7. 7% of patients. Spleen Average size was 9. 58 cm below costal margin at the beginning of treatment. ECOG 0 was present in 15% of patients; ECOG 1, 73%; and ECOG 2, 12% of patients. The disease subtype distribution was: PMF 45%; PPV-MF 36% and PET-MF 46%. JAK mutation was positive for 19% of patients, 46% were negative, and 35% did not have mutation analysis. The findings from the baseline to week 20 were: Splenomegaly decreased from 9. 58 cm (avg) to 4. 5 cm (avg) (53. 02% of reduction); Median Hemoglobin level was 13. 2 gr/dL at baseline versus 10. 24 gr/dL (22. 42% of decrease). Median Platelet count was 437, 000/mm3 at baseline versus 341, 503/mm3 at week 20 of treatment (21. 85% of decrease). Median time of treatment is 20. 1 weeks. Hematologic adverse events presented: Hemoglobin level decrease events (CTCAE grade 2 and 3) resolved with transfusion support. Platelet count decreases (CTCAE grade 2) were transitory and resolved after two weeks of treatment interruption. Conclusion Data showed demonstrate principal characteristics of this MF cohort. Until recently, most treatments provided only palliative care with no single treatment addressing all of the complications and symptoms of the MF. Ruxolitinib showed a primary therapeutic benefit as reduction in splenomegaly and significant improvement in MF-related symptoms in this cohort of Mexican patients with myelofibrosis. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Download Full-text

INCB018424, an Oral, Selective JAK2 Inhibitor, Shows Significant Clinical Activity in a Phase I/II Study in Patients with Primary Myelofibrosis (PMF) and Post Polycythemia Vera/Essential Thrombocythemia Myelofibrosis (Post-PV/ET MF).

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v110.11.558.558 ◽

2007 ◽

Vol 110 (11) ◽

pp. 558-558 ◽

Cited By ~ 16

Author(s):

Srdan Verstovsek ◽

Hagop Kantarjian ◽

Animesh Pardanani ◽

Deborah Thomas ◽

Jorge Cortes ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Phase I ◽

Blood Cells ◽

Marked Reduction ◽

Jak2 V617f ◽

Symptomatic Improvement ◽

Spleen Size ◽

Wild Type ◽

Jak2 Inhibitor ◽

Whole Blood Cells

Abstract Background: A mutation in the Janus tyrosine kinase 2 gene (JAK2 V617F) has been recognized in Philadelphia chromosome-negative myeloproliferative disorders, including PV (∼95% of patients), ET (∼50%) and PMF (∼50%). INCB018424 is a potent and orally bioavailable selective JAK2 inhibitor with >80-fold selectivity against a broad panel of kinases, including JAK3. INCB018424 potently inhibits JAK2 V617F mediated signaling and malignant cell survival in vitro and in vivo in mice. Preclinical safety studies with INCB018424 demonstrated an excellent safety profile with no off-target toxicities. Methods: A phase I/II trial of INCB018424 given orally BID is being conducted in patients with PMF and Post-PV/ET MF. Both JAK2 V617F and JAK2 wild type patients are eligible. PK and PD data are being collected. Responses are being evaluated using the International Working Group (IWG) consensus criteria for treatment response in myelofibrosis with myeloid metaplasia, for the IWG for Myelofibrosis Research and Treatment (IWG-MRT) (Tefferi et al., Blood, 108, 1497–1503, 2006). Results: The initial dose of 25 mg PO BID resulted in a rapid and marked reduction in splenomegaly. All 3 patients in the first cohort of patients achieved a reduction in spleen size that is consistent with a clinical improvement response provided it is sustained for 8 weeks; spleen sizes of 25, 22, and 7 cm below the left costal margin have decreased to 8, 10, and 0 cm in the first month of therapy. At two months follow-up, the patient with a baseline spleen size of 22 cm is now down to 2 cm. All 3 patients also noted significant symptomatic improvement. The second cohort of 3 patients started therapy at an increased dose (50 mg PO BID) and at one week follow-up, the initial two patients (one JAK2 wild type, one JAK2 V617F) had decreases in spleen size from 22 cm to 17 cm and from 22 cm to 16 cm, respectively. No dose-limiting toxicities or other significant adverse events occurred in any patients to date. PK/PD analyses demonstrated that administration of INCB018424 resulted in plasma drug concentrations sufficient to markedly inhibit JAK2, as shown by suppression of phosphorylated STAT3 (a substrate of JAK2) in whole blood cells in all 3 patients in the first cohort. The 3 patients in the first cohort were all JAK2 V617F mutation positive: percentages of JAK2 V617F positive whole blood cells before therapy were 79%, 49% and 91%, and after one month of therapy, they were 59%, 48% and 78%, respectively. Conclusions: Initial results show marked reduction in splenomegaly and symptomatic improvement, without significant toxicity. The percentage of blood cells with JAK2 V617F mutation appears to be decreasing in patients on therapy. Updated results on current and future patients will be presented at the meeting.

Download Full-text

Comparison of Outcomes of Advanced Myelofibrosis Patients Treated with Ruxolitinib (INCB018424) to Those of a Historical Control Group: Survival Advantage of Ruxolitinib Therapy

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v118.21.793.793 ◽

2011 ◽

Vol 118 (21) ◽

pp. 793-793 ◽

Cited By ~ 5

Author(s):

Srdan Verstovsek ◽

Hagop M. Kantarjian ◽

Zeev Estrov ◽

Jorge E. Cortes ◽

Deborah A. Thomas ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multivariate Analysis ◽

High Risk ◽

Phase I ◽

Historical Control Group ◽

Historical Control ◽

Control Group ◽

Spleen Size ◽

Cell Counts ◽

Significant Factors

Abstract Abstract 793FN2 Background: Myelofibrosis (MF) is a myeloproliferative neoplasm associated with splenomegaly, debilitating symptoms, cytopenias and progressive bone marrow fibrosis that leads to early death. Patients (pts) with high-risk MF according to International Prognosis Scoring System (IPSS) have particularly poor outcome with a median survival of 2 years (yrs). No approved or effective therapy exists. Ruxolitinib is a JAK1 and JAK2 inhibitor with established clinical benefit in the treatment of pts with MF by reducing spleen size and improving quality of life. Objective: The objective of this analysis was to compare assorted outcomes of MF pts receiving ruxolitinib to those of a matched historical control group. Methods: Overall survival (OS) of 107 pts enrolled in a Phase I/II trial (INCB18424-251; NCT00509899) and followed at the MD Anderson Cancer Center (MDACC) was compared to that of 310 pts with MF identified in 3 large databases (MDACC, U. of Pavia and Hospital Niguarda cà Granda, Milano) with characteristics that would have allowed them to enroll in INCB18424-251. Thus, the pt features between the 2 groups were matched based on enrollment criteria. Among 107 ruxolitinib treated pts, 63 had high risk, 34 intermediate (int)-2 and 10 int-1 risk according to IPSS. In the control group (n=310), 165 pts had high and 145 pts int-2 risk; most pts were treated with conventional or investigational therapies during follow-up. Results: Ruxolitinib-treated pts had a median age of 66 yrs, hemoglobin (Hb) of 10.2 g/dL, WBC of 19×10^9/L, platelets of 277×10^9/L, and palpable spleen of 19 cm. Control pts had a median age of 70 yrs, Hb of 9.7 g/dL, WBC of 12×10^9/L, platelets of 265×10^9/L, and palpable spleen of 6 cm. Baseline characteristics that differed between 2 groups included: significantly more int-2 vs high-risk pts (according to both IPSS and dynamic IPSS [DIPSS]), older age and lower Hb in the controls, as contrasted to higher WBC and larger spleen in those on ruxolitinib. There were no differences between the groups with regard to male:female ratio, platelet count, and cytogenetic characteristics. With regard to OS comparison between the 2 groups, a significant difference was seen in favor of ruxolitinib (p=0.022). Indeed, 33 of 107 pts (30.8%) in the ruxolitinib group vs. 189 of 310 (60.9%) in the control group died, after a median follow-up of 32 and 22 months, respectively. The difference in OS was highly significant in the high-risk pt subgroup (p=0.006), in that 21/63 (33.3%) vs. 112/165 (67.9%) died in the ruxolitinib and control groups, respectively. In the univariate analysis, significant factors associated with longer OS were int-2 (vs. high) risk (per IPSS/ DIPSS), platelets >400×10^9/L, and age <65 years, but not gender, abnormal cytogenetics, high WBC (>25×10^9/L), anemia (Hb <10g/dL), or spleen size. In the multivariate analysis, using age and blood cell counts as continuous variables, independent significant factors for better survival were IPSS int-2 risk, younger age, higher platelets, and treatment with ruxolitinib (p=0.02; HR=0.63). Conclusions: We have identified a historical control group of pts with clinical characteristics that would have allowed them to participate in the Phase I/II study of ruxolitinib in MF. We compared their survival to 107 pts who participated in that trial, and were followed at the MDACC. The survival of pts with high-risk MF that were treated with ruxolitinib was found to be significantly longer than that of the matched control group. Further, ruxolitinib therapy was identified as an independent factor influencing better survival in the multivariate analysis. Our data suggest the potential of ruxolitinib to change the natural progression of MF pts with advanced disease. Disclosures: Verstovsek: Incyte Corporation: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Efficacy, Safety, and Confirmation of the Recommended Phase 2 Dose of Ruxolitinib Plus Panobinostat in Patients with Intermediate or High-Risk Myelofibrosis

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v124.21.711.711 ◽

2014 ◽

Vol 124 (21) ◽

pp. 711-711 ◽

Cited By ~ 6

Author(s):

Jean-Jacques Kiladjian ◽

Florian H Heidel ◽

Alessandro M. Vannucchi ◽

Vincent Ribrag ◽

Francesco Passamonti ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Bone Marrow ◽

High Risk ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Phase Iii ◽

Spleen Volume ◽

Bone Marrow Fibrosis ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Expansion Phase ◽

Marrow Fibrosis

Abstract Background: Myelofibrosis (MF) is a clonal neoplastic disease resulting in bone marrow fibrosis, splenomegaly, and debilitating constitutional symptoms. The Janus kinase (JAK) pathway is often dysregulated in MF, and agents targeting this pathway have demonstrated efficacy in this disease. Ruxolitinib (RUX), a potent JAK1/JAK2 inhibitor, demonstrated superiority in spleen volume reduction, symptom improvement, and survival compared with the control arm in the phase III COMFORT-I and COMFORT-II studies. Panobinostat (PAN), a potent pan-deacetylase inhibitor (pan-DACi), inhibits JAK signaling through disruption of the interaction of JAK2 with the protein chaperone heat shock protein 90. In phase I/II studies, PAN has shown splenomegaly reduction and improvement of bone marrow fibrosis. The combination of RUX and PAN demonstrated synergistic anti-MF activity in preclinical studies. These preliminary results led to the initiation of a phase Ib study evaluating the combination of RUX and PAN in patients (pts) with MF. The updated results from the expansion phase of this trial are presented here. Methods: Eligible pts had intermediate-1, -2, or high-risk primary MF, post-polycythemia vera MF, or post-essential thrombocythemia MF by International Prognostic Scoring System criteria, with palpable splenomegaly (≥ 5 cm below the costal margin). The primary objective was determination of the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and/or recommended phase II dose (RPIID). Secondary objectives included safety, efficacy, and pharmacokinetics. Exploratory endpoints included assessment of improvement in bone marrow fibrosis and reduction of JAK2 V617F allele burden. The treatment schedule was RUX (5-15 mg) twice daily (bid) every day and PAN (10-25 mg) once daily 3 times per week (tiw; days 2, 4, and 6) every other week (qow) in a 28-day cycle. Following dose escalation and identification of the potential RPIID, additional pts were enrolled into the expansion phase and treated at this dose. Results: As of March 14, 2014, a total of 61 pts were enrolled (38 escalation phase and 23 expansion phase). The median duration of exposure to PAN and to RUX was 24.6 weeks and 24.0 weeks, respectively, for pts treated in the expansion phase. Three DLTs were observed in the escalation phase (grade 4 thrombocytopenia [n = 2], grade 3 nausea [n = 1]). No MTD was reached. The RPIID was confirmed to be RUX 15 mg bid and PAN 25 mg tiw qow in May 2014. Among the 34 pts treated at the RPIID, grade 3/4 adverse events (AEs) regardless of causality included anemia (32%), thrombocytopenia (24%), diarrhea (12%), asthenia (9%), and fatigue (9%). AEs led to discontinuation in 6% of pts treated at the RPIID. Two pts treated at the RPIID died due to causes unrelated to study treatment (1 due to myocardial infarction and 1 due to progression of myelofibrosis). Among the pts treated at the RPIID, 79% showed a >50% decrease in palpable spleen length, with 100% decrease (non-palpable spleen) being observed in 53% of pts. Additionally, 48% of pts treated at the RPIID in the expansion phase achieved ≥35% reduction in spleen volume (Figure). These results are similar to those observed for spleen volume response at 24 weeks among pts who received single-agent RUX on the phase III COMFORT-I (41.9%) and COMFORT-II (32%) studies. Conclusions: The combination of the JAK1/JAK2 inhibitor RUX and the pan-DACi PAN was well tolerated and resulted in high rates of reductions in splenomegaly in pts with intermediate- and high-risk MF. Although a relatively larger proportion of patients experienced spleen volume reductions at week 24 as compared to the COMFORT studies, the smaller sample size, shorter follow up times and potential differences in the patient populations preclude definitive comparisons. Similar to COMFORT-I and II trials, hematological AEs, specifically anemia and thrombocytopenia, were the most common AEs observed in pts treated with the combination therapy. Pts continue to be treated in the expansion phase at the RPIID. Updated safety, efficacy, and exploratory analyses on bone marrow fibrosis, JAK V617F allele burden, and biomarkers, including cytokines, will be presented. Figure Change in Spleen Volume in Expansion Phase Figure. Change in Spleen Volume in Expansion Phase Disclosures Kiladjian: Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Shire: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AOP Orphan: Honoraria, Research Funding. Heidel:Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Vannucchi:Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Ribrag:Celgene: Consultancy; Pharmamar: Consultancy; Epizyme: Research Funding; Bayer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Servier: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Conneally:Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Kindler:Novartis: Consultancy. Acharyya:Novartis: Employment. Gopalakrishna:Novartis: Employment. Ide:Novartis: Employment, Equity Ownership. Loechner:Novartis: Employment. Mu:Novartis: Employment. Harrison:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria; CTI: Consultancy, Honoraria; Gilead: Honoraria; SBio: Consultancy; Shire: Speakers Bureau.

Download Full-text

A Phase 2 Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Simtuzumab in Adult Subjects with Primary, Post Polycythemia Vera (PV) or Post Essential Thrombocythemia (ET) Myelofibrosis

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v126.23.2810.2810 ◽

2015 ◽

Vol 126 (23) ◽

pp. 2810-2810

Author(s):

Srdan Verstovsek ◽

Michael R. Savona ◽

Ruben A. Mesa ◽

Stephen Oh ◽

Hua Dong ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Bone Marrow ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Phase 2 ◽

Fibrosis Score ◽

Bone Marrow Fibrosis ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Equity Ownership ◽

Stage 1 ◽

Marrow Fibrosis

Abstract Background: Simtuzumab (SIM) is a humanized monoclonal antibody that inhibits lysyl oxidase-like molecule 2 (LOXL2), an extracellular matrix enzyme that catalyzes the covalent cross-linking of collagen and is widely expressed across many fibrotic diseases. In pre-clinical models, inhibition of LOXL2 blocks fibroblast activation, which plays an important role in the development of organ fibrosis. In Phase 1 studies, SIM was well-tolerated in patients (pts) with advanced solid tumors, liver fibrosis, and idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). A Phase 2, open-label study to determine the efficacy of SIM alone (Stage 1) and combined with ruxolitinib (rux) (Stage 2) in pts with primary myelofibrosis (PMF) and post-ET/PV MF was initiated. Methods: Eligible pts had intermediate-1, intermediate-2, or high risk disease and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of <2. The primary endpoint was rate of clinical response as defined by a reduction in bone marrow fibrosis score following 24 weeks of treatment with SIM. Patients were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive 200 mg or 700 mg SIM by intravenous infusion every 2 weeks as monotherapy (Stage 1, n=24) or combined with rux (Stage 2, n=30). Patients received SIM for up to 24 weeks. Bone marrow biopsies and aspirates were performed approximately every 3 months. Bone marrow fibrosis scoring was performed and quantified at local investigator sites using the European Consensus on Grading Bone Marrow Fibrosis. Myelofibrosis symptoms were evaluated using the Myeloproliferative Neoplasm Symptom Assessment Form (MPN-SAF) and changes in hematologic parameters and splenomegaly were assessed. Results: Between 7/14/11 and 9/22/14, 54 pts were randomized and treated (200 mg SIM [n=12], 700 mg SIM [n=12], 200 mg SIM/rux [n=15], and 700 mg SIM/rux [n=15]). In Stage 1, 0 subjects (0%) in the SIM 200 mg group and 2 subjects (16.7%; 90% CI 3.0%, 43.8%) in the SIM 700 mg group showed a reduction in bone marrow fibrosis score from Baseline to Week 24. In Stage 2, 1 subject (6.7%; 90% CI 0.3%, 27.9%) in the SIM 200 mg/rux group and 2 subjects (13.3%, 90% CI 2.4%, 36.3%) in the SIM 700 mg/rux group showed a reduction in bone marrow fibrosis score from Baseline to Week 24. In an exploratory analysis, similar numbers of subjects showed increases in bone marrow fibrosis scores. SIM treatment was not associated with meaningful improvements in hematologic parameters or reductions in MPN-SAF score or spleen size. The most frequent adverse events were those commonly associated with MF, including constitutional symptoms and reductions in hematological parameters. Conclusions: SIM treatment alone or in combination with rux is safe but does not reliably reduce bone marrow fibrosis in pts with MF. The reason for reduction of marrow fibrosis in some patients and increase in others is unclear and may be sampling variability. Clinical studies of SIM in IPF and liver fibrosis are ongoing. Disclosures Savona: Karyopharm: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Incyte: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; TG Therapeutics: Research Funding; Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc: Research Funding; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Mesa:Incyte Corporation: Research Funding; CTI Biopharma: Research Funding; Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation: Consultancy; Pfizer: Research Funding; Promedior: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; NS Pharma: Research Funding; Gilead: Research Funding. Oh:CTI Biopharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Incyte: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Dong:Gilead Sciences: Consultancy, Equity Ownership. Thai:Gilead Sciences: Employment, Equity Ownership. Gotlib:Allakos, Inc.: Consultancy.

Download Full-text

A Phase 3, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Randomized Study Evaluating Navitoclax in Combination with Ruxolitinib in Patients with Myelofibrosis (TRANSFORM-1)

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2020-139758 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 4-4

Author(s):

Jalaja Potluri ◽

Jason Harb ◽

Abdullah A. Masud ◽

Jessica E. Hutti

Keyword(s):

Bone Marrow ◽

Platelet Count ◽

Stock Options ◽

Myeloproliferative Neoplasm ◽

Bone Marrow Fibrosis ◽

Double Blind ◽

Starting Dose ◽

Secondary Endpoints ◽

Marrow Fibrosis

Background: Myelofibrosis (MF) is a rare myeloproliferative neoplasm with poor clinical outcomes. It is characterized by bone marrow fibrosis and an array of constitutional symptoms that impair quality of life. Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) remains the only potential curative therapy for MF, but HSCT is only accessible to a minority of patients and is associated with high morbidity and high rates of transplant-related mortality. JAK inhibitors (JAKi), including the JAK1/2i ruxolitinib and JAK2i fedratinib, are approved for the treatment of primary and secondary MF based on reduction in splenomegaly and disease-related symptoms; however, they have little impact on bone marrow fibrosis and are not effective at managing all clinical manifestations of MF. Therefore, a substantial clinical need for novel therapies to improve the disease course of MF exists. Navitoclax is an oral, potent, small-molecule inhibitor of the antiapoptotic B-cell lymphoma 2 (BCL-2) family proteins BCL-XL, BCL-2, and BCL-w and has demonstrated cell-killing activity in myeloproliferative neoplasm-derived cell lines and primary specimens ex vivo. Preliminary data from a Phase 2 study (NCT03222609) of ruxolitinib-experienced patients with primary or secondary MF have shown favorable spleen responses and tolerability with navitoclax plus ruxolitinib (Harrison et al. EHA 2020. EP1081). TRANSFORM-1 aims to evaluate the combination of navitoclax and ruxolitinib vs placebo and ruxolitinib in adults with primary or secondary MF who have not previously received a JAK2i. Study Design and Methods: In this Phase 3, double-blind, placebo-controlled study (NCT04472598), patients aged ≥18 years with intermediate-2 or high-risk MF with measurable splenomegaly, evidence of MF-related symptoms, no prior treatment with JAK2i, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Score ≤2 will be eligible for enrollment. Candidates for allo-HSCT and those who have received prior treatment with a BH3-mimetic compound or BET inhibitor will be excluded. Patients will be enrolled across 130 sites in approximately 17 countries. Planned target enrollment is 230 patients. Patients will be randomized 1:1 to receive navitoclax or placebo, plus ruxolitinib. Randomization stratification factors include intermediate-2 vs high-risk MF and platelet count ≤200 × 109/L vs >200 × 109/L. Navitoclax will be administered orally at a starting dose of 200 mg (platelet count >150 × 109/L) or 100 mg escalated to 200 mg once daily if tolerated after ≥7 days (platelet count ≤150 × 109/L). Ruxolitinib will be administered orally at a starting dose of 20 mg (platelet count >200 × 109/L) or 15 mg (platelet count 100-200 × 109/L) twice daily. Treatment may continue until the end of clinical benefit, unacceptable toxicity, or discontinuation criteria have been met. Patients who discontinue without progression will enter post-treatment follow-up; after disease progression or initiation of post-treatment cancer therapy, patients will enter survival follow-up. The primary endpoint of the study is ≥35% reduction in spleen volume from baseline (SVR35) at Week 24, as measured by magnetic resonance imaging or computed tomography, per International Working Group (IWG) criteria. Secondary endpoints include ≥50% reduction in total symptom score from baseline at Week 24 (measured by Myelofibrosis Symptom Assessment Form v4.0), duration of SVR35, change in fatigue from baseline, time to deterioration of physical functioning, anemia response per IWG criteria, SVR35 per IWG, reduction in grade of bone marrow fibrosis from baseline, overall survival, leukemia-free survival, and overall response and composite response per IWG criteria. Exploratory endpoints include progression-free survival. Safety will be assessed throughout the study via adverse event (AE) monitoring, physical examinations, vital sign measurements, electrocardiogram variables, and clinical laboratory testing. AEs will be graded per National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for AEs v5.0. The primary statistical analysis will be conducted using a stratified Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test, and time-to-event secondary endpoints will be analyzed using a stratified log-rank test and Kaplan-Meier methodology. Hazard ratios will be estimated using stratified Cox proportional hazards model. Disclosures Potluri: AbbVie: Current Employment, Other: may hold stock or stock options. Harb:AbbVie: Current Employment, Other: may hold stock or stock options. Masud:AbbVie: Current Employment, Other: may hold stock or stock options . Hutti:AbbVie Inc.: Current Employment, Other: may hold stock or stock options. OffLabel Disclosure: Navitoclax is an investigational drug for the treatment of myelofibrosis

Download Full-text

Trial in Progress: Phase Ib/II Study of Bcl-2/Bcl-Xl Inhibitor Pelcitoclax (APG-1252) in Patients with Myelofibrosis (MF) That Progressed after Initial Therapy

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2020-137260 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 15-16

Author(s):

Naveen Pemmaraju ◽

Boyd Mudenda ◽

Cunlin Wang ◽

Jiao JI ◽

Ming Lu ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Bone Marrow ◽

Clinical Benefit ◽

Research Funding ◽

Publicly Traded ◽

Bone Marrow Fibrosis ◽

Dual Inhibitor ◽

Jak2 Inhibitor ◽

Grant Support ◽

Marrow Fibrosis ◽

Jak2 Inhibitors

Background: Pelcitoclax (APG-1252), a novel dual inhibitor of Bcl-2/Bcl-xL, is active as monotherapy in patients with advanced solid tumors and well tolerated up to 240 mg twice weekly (NCT03387332). Preclinical data suggest that cells with Janus-associated kinase-2 (JAK2) mutations, including those associated with bone marrow fibrosis, are dependent on Bcl-2/Bcl-xL for survival and that addition of BH3 mimetics targeting Bcl-2/Bcl-xL induces apoptosis. Furthermore, in JAK2‒mutated cell models, apoptotic synergy is demonstrated when a JAK2 inhibitor and Bcl-2/Bcl-xL inhibitor are combined, as inhibition of Bcl-xL overcomes resistance to JAK2 inhibitors. Taken together, APG-1252 could overcome resistance to JAK2 inhibitors, and the combination could augment clinical benefit in patients with suboptimal responses to JAK2 inhibitor‒based therapy. Study Objectives: The primary objective of this open-label trial is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of APG-1252, as monotherapy and when combined with ruxolitinib, in adults with histologically or cytologically confirmed MF who require therapy and are ineligible for JAK2 inhibitors (and can receive single-agent APG-1252) or have had inadequate responses to ruxolitinib-based therapy (and can receive this treatment plus APG-1252). Secondary objectives include APG-1252 pharmacokinetics, time to response, and duration of response. Exploratory objectives include changes in cytogenetics and molecular mutations, bone marrow fibrosis, and cytokines on treatment. Study Design: The study is divided into Part 1 (APG-1252 monotherapy) and Part 2 (APG-1252 plus ruxolitinib). For Part 1, the key inclusion criterion is ineligibility for JAK2 inhibitors and for Part 2, inadequate responses to prior ruxolitinib-based therapy. A standard 3+3 dose-escalation design is being implemented to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of APG-1252 monotherapy in Part 1 and APG-1252 combined with ruxolitinib in Part 2. APG-1252 will initially be administered at 160 mg intravenously by 30-minute injection once weekly in a 28-day cycle. The dose can be escalated to a maximum of 240 mg or reduced to a minimum of 80 mg, depending on tolerability. Part 2 will begin once the MTD and recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of APG-1252 monotherapy have been determined. In Part 2, ruxolitinib will be administered orally twice daily per the package insert. After the MTD for APG-1252 monotherapy has been determined, no additional patients will be enrolled in Part 1; however, up to 15 to 30 additional patients can be enrolled in Part 2, to further evaluate the safety and anticancer activity of the combination at MTD or RP2D. Patients will continue treatment until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Clinical responses are being assessed every 12 weeks according to criteria from the International Working Group‒Myeloproliferative Neoplasms Research and Treatment and European LeukemiaNet panels, while optimal clinical benefit will be evaluated at 24 weeks. Enrollment will be from September 2020 and preliminary results estimated in October 2022. For further information, contact: [email protected]. Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT04354727. Disclosures Pemmaraju: Pacylex Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Roche Diagnostics: Honoraria; LFB Biotechnologies: Honoraria; Stemline Therapeutics: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria; AbbVie: Honoraria, Research Funding; MustangBio: Honoraria; Affymetrix: Other: Grant Support, Research Funding; Cellectis: Research Funding; Daiichi Sankyo: Research Funding; Plexxikon: Research Funding; Samus Therapeutics: Research Funding; DAVA Oncology: Honoraria; Blueprint Medicines: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; Incyte Corporation: Honoraria; SagerStrong Foundation: Other: Grant Support. Mudenda:Ascentage Pharma Group Inc.: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Wang:Ascentage Pharma Group Inc.: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. JI:Ascentage Pharma (Suzhou) Co., Ltd.: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Lu:Ascentage Pharma Group: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Fu:Ascentage Pharma Group Inc.: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Liang:Ascentage Pharma Group Inc.: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. McClain:Ascentage Pharma Group Inc.: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Sheladia:Ascentage Pharma Group Inc.: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Verstovsek:Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Sierra Oncology: Consultancy, Research Funding; Blueprint Medicines Corp: Research Funding; PharmaEssentia: Research Funding; ItalPharma: Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Research Funding; Protagonist Therapeutics: Research Funding; Promedior: Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; NS Pharma: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; CTI Biopharma Corp: Research Funding; Incyte Corporation: Consultancy, Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding; Gilead: Research Funding. Yang:Ascentage Pharma (SuZhou) Co., Ltd: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company, Other: Leadership and other ownership interests. Zhai:Ascentage Pharma (SuZhou) Co., Ltd: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company, Other: Leadership and other ownership interests.

Download Full-text

Prognostic implications of the European consensus for grading of bone marrow fibrosis in chronic idiopathic myelofibrosis

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2007-09-112953 ◽

2008 ◽

Vol 111 (4) ◽

pp. 1862-1865 ◽

Cited By ~ 57

Author(s):

Claudia Vener ◽

Nicola Stefano Fracchiolla ◽

Umberto Gianelli ◽

Rossella Calori ◽

Franca Radaelli ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Bone Marrow ◽

High Risk ◽

Scoring Systems ◽

Myeloproliferative Disorders ◽

The Other ◽

Idiopathic Myelofibrosis ◽

Bone Marrow Fibrosis ◽

European Consensus ◽

Marrow Fibrosis ◽

Chronic Idiopathic Myelofibrosis

Various clinical prognostic scoring systems (PSSs) have been suggested as means of selecting high-risk chronic idiopathic myelofibrosis (CIMF) patients at diagnosis. The WHO has recently proposed strict diagnostic criteria for CIMF, and the European consensus for bone marrow fibrosis (BMF) grading recommends 4 classes. It has been suggested that BMF grading may play a prognostic role in CIMF, but it has never been compared with the other PSSs in the same patients. We tested a prognostic model for overall survival (OS) based on the WHO criteria and BMF grading in 113 consecutive patients with chronic myeloproliferative disorders (98 with CIMF and 15 with postpolycythemic myelofibrosis), and compared the findings with those of PSSs. The results showed that our model is significantly associated with different OSs and, unlike the other PSSs, clearly discriminates the OS of intermediate- and high-risk patients.

Download Full-text

The Kinetic Of Bone Marrow Fibrosis Regression Predicts Outcome In Myelofibrosis Patients After Allogeneic SCT

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v122.21.2078.2078 ◽

2013 ◽

Vol 122 (21) ◽

pp. 2078-2078

Author(s):

Nicolaus Kröger ◽

Haefaa Alchalby ◽

Tatjana Zabelina ◽

Hans-Michael Kvasnicka ◽

Juergen Thiele ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Bone Marrow ◽

Stem Cell ◽

High Risk ◽

Stem Cell Transplantation ◽

Cell Transplantation ◽

Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation ◽

Complete Regression ◽

Bone Marrow Fibrosis ◽

Fibrosis Regression ◽

Marrow Fibrosis

Abstract Introduction Bone marrow fibrosis is a hallmark of primary or post ET/PV myelofibrosis. Recent studies have shown that allogeneic stem cell transplantation induces rapid bone marrow fibrosis regression suggesting that fibrosis is more a dynamic rather than a static process. So far, no data are reported if fibrosis regression influences outcome after transplantation. Methods and patients We studied 94 patients with myelofibrosis who received allogeneic stem cell transplantation at the University Medical Center Hamburg between 2002 and 2010. In 57 patients the complete bone marrow histology prior transplantation and/or on day+30 and +100 after transplantation were available. The median age was 57 years (r: 33–73) and patients were classified as IPSS low-risk (n = 1), intermediate-1 (n = 5), intermediate-2 (n = 18), and high-risk (n = 33). Donor source was unrelated (n = 46) or related (n = 11) and of these 38 were HLA-matched while 19 were HLA-mismatched. 41 had primary and 16 post ET or post PV myelofibrosis. The median number of blasts was 1% (r: 0–17%) and gender was male (n = 32) and female (n = 25). All patients received busulfan-based dose-reduced conditioning regimen. Bone marrow fibrosis was graded according to the European consensus and WHO (MF-0 – 3), respectively, and evaluated by experienced hematopathologists. Results Before transplantation 41 patients (72%) had MF grade 3 and 16 (28%) MF grade 2. After engraftment on day+30 (± 10 days) (n = 48), 3 (6%) had complete regression (MF-0) and 7 (15%) near complete regression of bone marrow fibrosis while 17 (35%) had MF-2 and 21 (44%) had MF-3. On day+100 (± 20 days) complete regression (MF-0) was noted in 11 (25%) and near complete regression (MF-1) in 13 (29%) while 12 (27%) and 8 (18%) had still MF-2 or MF-3, respectively. Patients with complete and near complete regression (MF-0 and MF-1) on day +30 had a 5-year estimated overall survival of 100% and those with MF-2 and MF-3 of 75% (p = 0.09). Patients with complete or near complete regression on day+100 had a 5-year estimated survival of 95% in contrast to 60% for those with MF-2 or MF-3 (p = 0.04). If analyzed by regression by grade at day+100 7 (16%) had a reduction of 3 grades (e.g. MF-3 to MF-0), 12 (27%) of 2 grades, 16 (36%) of 1 grade, and 9 (21%) had no grade reduction at day+100. Reduction of 2 or 3 grades at day+100 resulted in 95% survival at 5 years while reduction of 1 or no grade had a survival of 70% however this difference did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.1). There was no difference of fibrosis regression at day+100 between high risk IPSS and low/intermediate risk patients. Furthermore, in those patients with JAK2V617F mutation and complete or near complete regression 42% still had detectable JAK2V617F mutation level in peripheral blood. In contrast, 81% had complete donor cell chimerism if bone marrow fibrosis was MF-0/MF-1 while only 31% had complete chimerism at day+100 if fibrosis was classified as MF-2 or MF-3. Conclusion This data on fibrosis regression after allogeneic stem cell transplantation suggests that a more rapid regression - independently of IPSS risk score - resulted in a favorable survival and may be used as an early predictive factor for excellent survival. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Download Full-text

Bone Marrow Fibrosis In Immune Thrombocytopenia (ITP) Patients Treated With Thrombopoietin Receptor Agonists (TRA) – a Single Center Long-Term Follow-Up

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v122.21.3527.3527 ◽

2013 ◽

Vol 122 (21) ◽

pp. 3527-3527

Author(s):

Waleed Ghanima ◽

Julia Turbiner Geyer ◽

Christina Soo Lee ◽

Attilio Orazi ◽

Leonardo Boiocchi ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Bone Marrow ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Single Center ◽

Duration Of Treatment ◽

Bone Marrow Fibrosis ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Equity Ownership ◽

Marrow Fibrosis

Abstract Introduction TRAs increase platelet counts by stimulating the TPO-receptor. A known effect of TRA treatment is increased bone marrow fibrosis (MF). This study explored extent of MF, its clinical relevance, and incidence of phenotypic or karyotypic abnormalities in TRA-treated ITP patients. Methods This single-center study was carried out at the Platelet Disorders Center of Weill Cornell Medical College (WCMC), NY, USA. Eligibility criteria were: diagnosis of ITP; treatment with a TRA (romiplostim, eltrombopag, AKR 501 (Eisai) or Shionogi agent), ≥ 1 bone marrow biopsy (BMB) performed during TRA treatment. BMBs were performed every 1–2 years as standard f/u procedure for our ITP patients on TRA. MF grade was assessed from MF-0 to MF-3 according to the European Consensus Grading System in 141 BMBs acquired prior to (n=15), during (n=117) and after (n=9) TRA-treatment from 66 patients. Fifty disease-free staging BMBs served as controls. BMBs were separately reviewed by 3 pathologists to assess the grade of MF and then reviewed concurrently as needed to reach consensus. The study was approved by the IRB of WCMC; informed written consent was obtained from patients. Results Median (Q1-Q3) age at the time of 1st BMB was 38 years (18-63); 34 males 32 females. 32 patients had > 2 on-treatment BMBs. The distribution of MF-grades is shown in the figure. The proportion of MF-0 decreased from 67% in pretreatment biopsies (BM0) to 21% in the first set of BMBs (BM1); in the 15 patients with pre- and on-treatment BMBs there was a significantly higher number of MF-0 in BM0 as compared to BM1 (10/15 vs. 3/15;p=0.016) suggesting that TRAs induce fibrosis in treated patients. In patients with multiple on-treatment BMBs (n=32), first on-treatment BMB was graded as MF-1 in 24. In the last set of biopsies (BM-Last) 8 had progressed to MF-2/3, 12 remained MF-1, and 4 became MF-0 illustrating the unpredictability of the future course of MF from the first on-treatment marrow. Nonetheless, a higher number of MF-2/3 BMB was found in BM-Last as compared to BM1 [10 (31%) vs. 3 (9%) of 32; p=0.039]. In 5 patients with MF-2/3 BMB, TRA were discontinued: on f/u 2 had less fibrosis, 1 remained the same, and 2 are awaiting f/u BMB. BMB was graded MF-0 in 54% and MF-1 in 46% of control BMB; no difference was found in the proportion of MF-0/1 and 2/3 in BM0 compared to controls, but increased MF-2/3 was seen in BM-last compared to controls (p<0.001). At BM-last in patients dichotomized by MF-0/1 vs. MF-2/3, differences in hemoglobin levels (13.6 vs. 12.4 g/dl, respectively), absolute neutrophil counts (4.8 vs. 7 x109/L), platelet counts (92 vs. 123 x109/L), and LDH levels (212 vs. 219 U/L) were not significantly different. Of the following 6 clinical factors: age, duration of disease, duration of treatment, splenectomy status, type and dose of agent; only age was significantly higher in patients with MF-2/3 as opposed to MF0/1 at time of BM-last [57 vs. 38 years; p=0.01]. There was a tendency toward longer duration of treatment in patients with MF-2/3 as compared to MF-0/1 (3.6 y vs. 2.7y; p=0.16). Flow cytometric immunophenotyping of BMB in 89 examinations did not reveal emergence of clonal abnormalities. Cytogenetic analysis in 72 BMBs did not show any clonal karyotypic abnormalities. Conclusions This large single center experience indicates that TRAs induce some degree of MF as supported by: 1) decreasing fraction of MF-0 after initiation of TRA, 2) decreasing fraction of MF-0/1 (normal grades of MF) in subsequent on-treatment BMBs, 3) increasing fraction of MF-2/3 (pathological grades) in patients with multiple on-treatment BMBs. Only older age was associated with higher grades of fibrosis. However, MF remained stable in most patients within the range found in normal individuals. Higher grades of MF (MF-2/3) observed in some patients were not clinically significant based on peripheral blood counts. Overall, since a number of patients developed MF-2 and even MF-3, this suggests a risk of progressive fibrosis in approximately 20% of patients. No neoplastic immunophenotypic or karyotypic abnormalities emerged during treatment with TRAs. Annual or bi-annual follow-up with BMB should be carefully considered in TRA-treated patients. Discontinuation of TRA should be encouraged in those who develop/progress to MF-3 and possibly even MF-2 to avoid potential further progression of MF Disclosures: Bussel: Amgen: Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; GlaxoSmithKline: Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Cangene: Research Funding; Genzyme: Research Funding; IgG of America: Research Funding; Immunomedics: Research Funding; Ligand: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Eisai: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Shionogi: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Sysmex: Research Funding; Symphogen: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Download Full-text