Mobilization and Elimination of FLT3-ITD+ Acute Myelogenous Leukemia (AML) Stem/Progenitor Cells by Plerixafor/G-CSF/Sorafenib: Results From a Phase I Trial in Relapsed/Refractory AML Patients

Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 142-142 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Andreeff ◽  
Zhihong Zeng ◽  
Mary A Kelly ◽  
Rui-yu Wang ◽  
Teresa McQueen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Flow Cytometry ◽  
Progenitor Cells ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Overall Response Rate ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Fold Increase ◽  
Myelogenous Leukemia ◽  
Color Flow ◽  
In Vivo Models ◽  
Overall Response

Abstract Abstract 142 FLT3-ITD AML are associated with poor prognosis. Our group identified Sorafenib (S) as potent inhibitor of FLT3-ITD (Zhang W, JNCI, 2008; Borthakur G., Haematologica, 2010). FLT3-ITD is also associated with overexpression of the chemokine receptor CXCR4. Utilizing preclinical in vitro and in vivo models we determined increased activity of S when combined with CXCR4 inhibitor Plerixafor (P) and G-CSF (G) (Zeng Z et.al. Blood 2009). Here we report clinical and translational data testing this concept in patients with R/R FLT3-ITD AML. Clinical trial: G (10 ug/kg) and P(240 ug/kg) were given s.c. QOD on days 1 – 13, S (400–600mg) on d 1 – 28(one cycle). G/P was held when blasts exceeded 5×104/uL. Cell populations expressing CD34, 38, 123, CXCR4 (1D9, 12G5), VLA4, CD44 and phospho-proteins were assessed at baseline and at multiple time points during treatment by flow cytometry of up to 10 parameters and by flow cytometric mass spec using CyTOF. Results: 13 patients have been treated so far; responses are as follows: 1 CR, 3 CRp, 6 PR and 4 failed (NR), for an overall response rate of 10/13 (77%); One patients achieved 2 CRp. Six/13 patients, including 3/6 responders and 3/4 NR were previously treated with and considered refractory to FLT3 inhibitors. Four patients had additional D835 mutations: 2 failed and 2 achieved PRs, none of the CR/p patients carried this mutation. Side effects included hyperleukocytosis in 3/10 pts.(who missed 1 to 5 doses of G/P), skin rash (5 pts.), hand foot syndrome (3 pts.) hypertension (7 patients), diarrhea (10 pts.), nausea (8 pts.), headache (6 pts.), muscle weakness (3 pts.) and anorexia (5 pts.). Analysis of cells mobilized in 22 treatment cycles revealed massive mobilization: a 29-fold increase in WBC, 41-fold in absolute blasts and 77-fold in granulocytes. Increases in the numbers of circulating stem/progenitor cells: CD34+: 231-fold, CD34+/38-: 90-, CD34+/38-/123+(LSC): 148-, CXCR4+: 139-, VLA-4+: 68- and CD44+: 82-fold. Increase in circulating LSC was positively correlated with baseline blasts and VLA4 levels, but not with baseline CXCR4. Serial FISH analyses confirmed the preferential mobilization of leukemic vs. non-leukemic cells and 10-color flow cytometry demonstrated altered levels of pERK and pAKT but not of pSTAT3 in mobilized cells. Surprisingly, CXCR4 levels in mobilized cells were increased. CyTOF analysis of up to 29 parameters documented mobilization of primitive LSC. Conclusions: The combination of G-CSF+Plerixafor appears superior in increasing the number of circulating leukemic blasts and stem/progenitor cells in FLT3-ITD AML, as compared to Plerixafor alone in R/R AML(blast increase 2.1-fold; Uy et al. Blood, 2012). Treatment resulted in 4/13 CR and CRp and 6/13 PRs, for an overall response rate of 77%. Mobilized stem/progenitor cells displayed altered MAPK/AKT signaling and increased CXCR4 expression. This is the first clinical study of G-CSF/Plerixafor for the “mobilization” of AML cells, aimed at removing them from their protective bone marrow microenvironment and the initial results are providing proof-of–concept and encouraging clinical responses. Disclosures: Off Label Use: Clofarabine in AML. Burger:Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Research Funding. Kantarjian:Genzyme: Research Funding.

A Phase II Trial of the Oral mTOR Inhibitor Everolimus (RAD001) in Relapsed or Refractory Waldenstrom's Macroglobulinemia.

Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 587-587
Author(s):  
Irene M Ghobrial ◽  
Morie A Gertz ◽  
Betsy LaPlant ◽  
John Camoriano ◽  
Suzanne R. Hayman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Overall Response Rate ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Waldenström’S Macroglobulinemia ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Overall Response ◽  
Waldenstrom's Macroglobulinemia ◽  
Waldenström's Macroglobulinemia

Abstract Abstract 587 Background: The phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) signal transduction pathway controls cell proliferation and survival. Everolimus is an oral agent targeting raptor mTOR (mTORC1). The trial's goal was to determine the anti-tumor activity and safety of single-agent everolimus in patients with relapsed/refractory Waldenstrom's macroglobulinemia (WM). Patients and Methods: Eligible patients had measurable disease (IgM monoclonal protein >1000 mg/dL with >10% marrow involvement or nodal masses >2 cm), a platelet count ≥75,000 × 106/L, a neutrophil count ≥1,000 × 106/L, and a creatinine and bilirubin ≤2x laboratory upper limit of normal. Patients received everolimus 10 mg PO daily and were evaluated monthly. Tumor response was assessed after cycles 2 and 6 and then every 3 cycles until progression. Results: 50 pts were treated. The median age was 63 years (range, 43-85). The overall response rate (CR+PR+MR) was 70% (95% CI: 55-82%), with a PR of 42% and 28% MR. The median duration of response and median progression-free survival (PFS) has not been reached. The estimated PFS at 6 and 12 months is 75% (95%CI: 64-89%) and 62% (95%CI: 48-80%), respectively. Grade 3 or higher related toxicities were observed in 56% of patients. The most common were hematological toxicities with cytopenias. Pulmonary toxicity occurred in 10% of patients. Dose reductions due to toxicity occurred in 52% of patients. Conclusions: Everolimus has high single-agent activity with an overall response rate of 70% and manageable toxicity in patients with relapsed WM, and offers a potential new therapeutic strategy for this patient group. Disclosures: Ghobrial: Millennium: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Gertz:celgene: Honoraria; millenium: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Richardson:Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Johnson and Johnson: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Keryx: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Treon:Millennium: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Genentech: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Witzig:Novartis: Research Funding.

Decitabine Is Effective and Safe In Patients with Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia

Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 4032-4032
Author(s):  
Elias Jabbour ◽  
Hagop M. Kantarjian ◽  
Farhad Ravandi ◽  
A. Megan Cornelison ◽  
Tapan Kadia ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Median Survival ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Overall Response Rate ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
White Blood Count ◽  
Survival Duration ◽  
Overall Response ◽  
Myelomonocytic Leukemia

Abstract Abstract 4032 Background: Chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) is a rare yet indolent disease. The median survival duration in CMML is 12 to 18 months and patients with poor prognostic features do even worse, with median survival time ranging 3 to 6 months. Activity with decitabine in CMML has been previously reported. We sought to analyze the clinical experience of 17 adults with a diagnosis of CMML treated on two decitabine studies. Methods: A subset of patients with CMML from a pivotal phase III 3-day dosing and an open-label trial of 5-day dosing were identified and reviewed to determine the overall response rate (ORR, based on IWG 2006 criteria), duration of response, time to response, and overall survival (OS). Results: A total of 17 patients with CMML were included in this review. Mean age at diagnosis was 71 years (range, 47 to 81 years) with a mean time from diagnosis of 406.4 days. The majority of CMML patients had de novo (94.1%), good risk cytogenetics (58.8%) with an IPSS classification of Intermediate-1 (64.7%). Baseline mean white blood count (WBC), hemoglobin (HGB), and platelets (plts) were 7.5 × 103/μ L, 14.6 g/dL and 81.9 × 103/μ L, respectively. A larger proportion of CMML patients at baseline were plt and RBC transfusion independent. Objective response rate (ORR) was 41% [17.6% complete response (CR) and 23.5% marrowCR (mCR)]; Hematologic improvement (HI) was observed in 11.7% and stable disease in 29.4% of patients. Median survival was 391 (95% CI 239, 678) days and 2 (11.7%) patients progressed to AML. The adverse event profile was similar to observations in previous trials with myelosuppression and infectious complications. Conclusions: This retrospective review of responses in CMML patients supports previous findings of decitabine experience in this population. In this analysis an overall response rate of 41.4% was achieved. Decitabine provided anti-CMML activity with an acceptable safety profile. Disclosures: Jabbour: Eisai Inc.: Editorial and statistical support from Eisai Inc., Honoraria. Kantarjian:Novartis: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy. Ravandi:Eisai Inc.: Research Funding; Eisai Inc.: Honoraria. Borthakur:Eisai Inc.: Research Funding. Cortes:Novartis: Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Research Funding.

A Multi-Center, Open-Label Phase II Study of Lenalidomide Plus Low-Dose Dexamethasone in Chinese Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma - the MM-021 Trial

Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 1864-1864
Author(s):  
Jian Hou ◽  
Jie Jin ◽  
Zhen Cai ◽  
Fangping Chen ◽  
Li Yu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Disease Progression ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Overall Response Rate ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Chinese Patients ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Overall Response ◽  
Best Response

Abstract Abstract 1864 Background: Previous studies (i.e. ECOG E4A03) have shown that lenalidomide plus low-dose dexamethasone (Rd) has a better safety profile compared with lenalidomide plus high-dose dexamethasone (RD) in newly diagnosed MM patients. It is hypothesized that Rd may also provide benefits in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). The MM-021 trial is the largest study in Chinese patients with RRMM aimed to assess the efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics (PK) of Rd in patients who had progressed or were refractory to previous treatment. Methods: This was a phase II, multi-center, single arm, open-label study, RRMM patients received lenalidomide (25 mg/day on days 1–21) and dexamethasone (40 mg on days 1, 8, 15 and 22) in 28-day treatment cycles until disease progression. Thromboembolic prophylaxis with aspirin or other anti-thrombotic medication was required. The primary endpoint was the best overall response rate (partial response [PR] or better) based on the investigator's assessment. Secondary endpoints included duration of response, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), safety, and PK parameters. Results: As of April 23, 2012 (median follow-up of 10.8 months), 199 patients have completed at least 1 cycle, 134 patients have completed at least 6 cycles, and 187 patients were evaluable for efficacy. Median age was 59 years (range 35–81) and 63% were male. The majority of patients (86%) had Durie-Salmon stage III disease and 57% had received ≥4 prior anti-myeloma regimens including bortezomib (64%), thalidomide (69%), or both bortezomib and thalidomide (45%). After median treatment duration of 8 months (range 1–18) or 8 cycles (range 1–19), best overall response rate (≥PR) was 54% (100 patients); including 8% (14 patients) with a best response of complete response (CR). Overall disease control (≥stable disease [SD] or better) was 95%, including 42% (78 patients) with best response of SD. Nine patients (5%) had best response of disease progression. Best overall response rates were consistent across subgroups when analyzed according to baseline renal function (creatinine clearance ≥60 mL/min: 68 patients [54%], 330 to <60 mL/min: 26 patients [52%], <30 mL/min: 6 patients [50%]) and number of prior therapies (64% if ≤2 prior regimens, 50% if >2 prior regimens). Responses were also consistent regardless of prior therapy received; 50%, 52%, and 47% for patients who previously received bortezomib, thalidomide, or both, respectively. Of the 5% (10 patients) presenting with IgD at baseline, 7 patients achieved ≥PR. Median time to first response was 2 months (range 1–12) and median duration of response was 7 months (range 0–16). The median PFS was 8 months (95% CI: 6–9) and the OS rate was 86% at 6 months and 73% at 1 year. Among the 199 patients evaluable for safety, the most common grade 3–4 adverse events (AEs) were anemia (25%), neutropenia (24%), thrombocytopenia (15%), and pneumonia (13%). Only 1 patient experienced febrile neutropenia. AEs led to dose reduction/interruption of lenalidomide in 40% of patients, 41% for dexamethasone; and 6.5% discontinued treatment due to one or more AEs. No patient discontinued due to anemia or neutropenia. Sixty-one patients (31%) died on study and the most common cause of death was disease progression (15 patients, 8%). Conclusions: Based on a median follow-up of nearly 11 months, the Rd regimen achieved a substantial best overall response rate (54%) in heavily pretreated RRMM Chinese patients. Response rates were consistent across subgroups including patients with renal impairment. The combination of Rd regimen was generally well tolerated. Disclosures: Hou: Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Xian: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Jensen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Mei:Celgene Corporation: Employment. Zhang:Celgene Corporation: Employment. Wortman-Vayn:Celgene Corporation: Employment.

Pomalidomide, Cyclophosphamide, and Dexamethasone Is Superior to Pomalidomide and Dexamethasone in Relapsed and Refractory Myeloma: Results of a Multicenter Randomized Phase II Study

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 303-303 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rachid Baz ◽  
Thomas G. Martin ◽  
Melissa Alsina ◽  
Kenneth H. Shain ◽  
Hearn J. Cho ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Overall Response Rate ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Overall Response ◽  
Best Response ◽  
Randomized Phase Ii ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Background: Pomalidomide-dexamethasone results in an overall response rate of 33% and median PFS of 4.2 months in patients with prior lenalidomide and bortezomib (Richardson et al. Blood 2014). In this randomized phase II trial, we compared pomalidomide-dexamethasone (arm B) versus the addition of oral weekly cyclophosphamide to pomalidomide-dexamethasone (arm C) in patients with lenalidomide-refractory multiple myeloma (MM). We have previously reported that the recommended phase II dose of cyclophosphamide with standard-dose pomalidomide + dexamethasone was 400 mg PO D1, 8, 15. Patients and Methods: Eligible patients had relapsed and refractory MM after at least 2 prior therapies and were lenalidomide refractory. Patients had a platelet count ≥ 50,000/mm3 and ANC ≥ 1,000/mm3 (patients with ≥50% bone marrow plasmacytosis were allowed if platelet count was ≥ 30,000/mm3and ANC could be supported with GCSF during screening and therapy). Patients were randomized (1:1) to receive pomalidomide 4 mg PO D1-21 and dexamethasone 40 mg PO D1, 8, 15, 22 (20 mg if older than 75 years) (arm B) with or without oral cyclophosphamide 400 mg PO D1, 8, 15 of a 28-day cycle (arm C). Patients randomized to arm B were allowed to cross over to arm C in the event of disease progression. Thromboprophylaxis was mandated with aspirin, warfarin, or LMWH. The primary endpoint was overall response rate using IMWG criteria. Secondary endpoints included an evaluation of PFS, OS and safety of the two arms. Results: Between 7/2012 and 3/2014, 36 patients were randomized to arm B and 34 to arm C. Patients characteristics were not different between the 2 arms (table below). The median number of prior therapies was 4 (2-12). All patients were lenalidomide refractory and none received prior pomalidomide. After a median follow up of 15 months, the overall response rate (partial response or better) was 39% and 65% (p=0.03) for arm B and C, respectively. The clinical benefit rate (minimal response or better) was 64% and 79% (p=0.2) for arm B and C, respectively. The median PFS was 4.4 months (95% CI 2.3-5.9) for arm B and 9.2 months (95% CI 4.6-16) for arm C (log rank p=0.04). As of July 2014, 28 patients had died (16 arm B, 12 arm C) with median overall survival of 10.5 versus 16.4 months (p=0.08) for arm B and C, respectively. Hematologic grade 3/4 adverse events were more frequent in arm C, although this was not statistically significant (see table). Thirteen patients crossed over and oral weekly cyclophosphamide was added to their tolerated dose of pomalidomide dexamethasone. For those patients, the best response was as follows: 2 PR, 2 MR, and 6 SD, 3 PD. Conclusions: Pomalidomide-dexamethasone in combination with oral weekly cyclophosphamide resulted in a superior response rate and PFS compared to pomalidomide-dexamethasone alone in patients with relapsed and refractory MM. The increased hematologic toxicities, as a result of the addition of oral cyclophosphamide, were manageable. Table Arm B (N=36) Arm C (N=34) P value Age, years, median (range) 63 (50-78) 64 (47-80) 0.7 Male, n (%) 23 (64) 18 (53) 0.3 Number of prior therapies, median (range) 4 (2-12) 4 (2-9) 0.5 Bortezomib refractory, n (%) 28 (78) 24 (71) 0.3 Carfilzomib refractory, n (%) 16 (44) 13 (38) 0.5 Prior high-dose therapy, n (%) 27 (75) 28 (82) 0.6 Prior alkylating agent, n (%) 32 (89) 32 (94) 1 B2-microglobulin, median (range) 3.2 (1.6-10) 3.6 (1.5-13.9) 0.5 Serum creatinine, median (range) 1 (0.5-2.3) 0.9 (0.6-2.1) 0.6 High-risk cytogenetics, n (%) 5 (24) 6 (28) 0.8 Deletion 17p, n (%) 3 (14) 4 (20) 0.8 t(4;14), n (%) 3 (14) 3 (14) 0.9 Trisomy or tetrasomy 1q, n (%) 11 (55) 6 (33) 0.4 Best response (partial response or better), n (%) 14 (39) 22 (65) 0.03 Clinical benefit rate (MR or better), n (%) 23 (64) 27 (79) 0.2 Grade 3/4 neutropenia, n (%) 12 (33) 17 (50) 0.2 Grade 3/4 febrile neutropenia, n (%) 4 (11) 6 (18) 0.5 Grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia, n (%) 2 (5) 5 (15) 0.2 Grade 3/4 anemia, n (%) 3 (8) 7 (20) 0.2 Grade 3/4 pneumonia, n (%) 4 (11) 3 (9) 1 Grade 3/4 fatigue, n (%) 2 (5) 4 (12) 0.4 Number of serious adverse events 17 20 Disclosures Baz: Celgene: Research Funding; Millenium: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Karypharm: Research Funding; Sanofi: Research Funding. Off Label Use: Pomalidomide cyclophosphamide dexamethasone in relapsed refractory myeloma. Martin:Sanofi: Research Funding; Novartis: Speakers Bureau. Alsina:Triphase: Research Funding; Millenium: Research Funding. Shain:Onyx / Amgen: Research Funding; Treshold: Research Funding. Chari:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Millenium: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Array Biopharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Jagannath:Celgene: Honoraria; Millennium: Honoraria; Sanofi: Honoraria.

Antigenic Variation of Hairy Cell Leukemia Defines a CD25 Negative Variant with a Uniform Immunophenotype and Distinct Clinicopathologic Features.

Blood ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 104 (11) ◽  
pp. 1102-1102
Author(s):  
Henry Y. Dong
Keyword(s):  
Flow Cytometry ◽  
Hairy Cell Leukemia ◽  
Standard Therapy ◽  
Overall Response Rate ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Hairy Cell ◽  
Cell Leukemia ◽  
Overall Response

Abstract Classical hairy cell leukemia (HCL) coexpressing both CD25 and CD103 is highly responsive to the treatment with cladribine and pentostatin (complete response rate, 75–95%; overall response rate, 86–100%). HCL variant in the literature is characterized by HCL-like morphology, lack of CD25 coexpression, and variable immunophenotypes indistinguishable from those of splenic marginal zone B cell lymphoma (Matutes, et al. Leukemia2001; 15:184). Importantly, HCL variant is associated with a poor response to standard therapy. It is unclear if HCL cases lacking CD25 but otherwise phenotypically identical to classical HCL belong to HCL or HCL variant, and if the standard therapy is effective in these patients. To further delineate features of HCL and its variants, we analyzed immunophenotyping data, by flow cytometry or immunohistochemistry, or by both when feasible, in 260 consecutive patients with HCL (Dong, et al. Mod Pathol2003; 16:230A). The diagnosis was established by hairy cell morphology together with coexpression of strong CD20 and CD22, bright CD11c, and CD103. Clinical data were obtained for a subset of cases in which expression of CD25 was distinctly absent. Our results were consistent with the literature in that HCL has a consistent and unique immunophenotypic profile, which allowed detection of residual HCL by flow cytometry at levels as low as 0.1% of total cells. In addition, approximately 20% and 37% of classical HCL coexpressed CD10 and BCL-1 respectively, which may significantly confuse the diagnosis in an incomplete work-up. Interestingly, there were 43 cases (20% of all CD103+ cases) that lacked CD25 but were otherwise identical to classical HCL in their uniform phenotypic profiles. Compared with classical HCL, patients with the CD25- HCL were generally older (medium age: 59yrs vs. 79yrs; p=0.001) and frequently had leukocytosis (medium WBC: 3.0x109/L vs. 24.5x109/L; p=0.014). Among 14 patients with follow up data, 7 were treated with cladribine or pentostatin. The complete response (CR) rate was 14.3% (1/7) and the overall response rate was 57.1% (4/7). Three patients had no response. One patient who had an initial partial response (PR) to pentostatin died of the disease 10 months after the diagnosis. Of others, an additional two patients achieved CR and PR upon initial treatment with fludarabine and Rituxamab respectively. Four patients were untreated and were alive with disease (follow up, 21–41 months). One patient died of the disease in 2 years and treatment for this patient was unknown. These clinical features overlapped with those of HCL variant in the literature. However, unlike the HCL variant that has significant phenotypic heterogeneity, including lack of CD11c and CD103 in a substantial number of cases, the CD25- HCL was remarkably uniform in phenotype and can be easily identified by immunophenotyping. In conclusion, these results suggest that lack of CD25 in HCL defines a clinically distinct chronic lymphoproliferative disorder, which appears to require different clinical management.

AOP2014, a Novel Peg-Proline-Interferon Alpha-2b with Improved Pharmacokinetic Properties, Is Safe and Well Tolerated and Shows Promising Efficacy in Patients with Polycythemia Vera (PV)

Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 175-175 ◽  
Author(s):  
Heinz Gisslinger ◽  
Robert Kralovics ◽  
Bettina Gisslinger ◽  
Daniel Lechner ◽  
Veronika Buxhofer-Ausch ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Overall Response Rate ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Molecular Response ◽  
Overall Response ◽  
Long Term Treatment

Abstract Abstract 175 AOP2014 is a next generation long-acting pegylated IFNa-2b, consisting predominantly of only one isoform, as opposed to other commercially available pegylated interferons. AOP2014 has a distinct pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profile which may potentially allow reduced dosing frequencies compared to other pegylated IFNs. This is being expected to result in improved tolerability, better compliance, and, finally, favorable long-term treatment outcomes. AOP2014 is a designated Orphan Drug in EU for treatment of patients with PV. The maximum tolerated dose (MTD), long term safety and efficacy of AOP2014, administered subcutaneously every 14 days, are the main objectives of the study. Patients with confirmed PV diagnosis, age equal or older 18 years, both naïve and cytoreduction pre-treated are eligible. After establishing the MTD, an extended cohort of 25 additional patients was planned to be recruited. European LeukemiaNet criteria were used for response assessment. 34 patients, treated by March 31, 2012 were included into this analysis: 25 in Phase I (dose-finding) and 9 in the Phase II (cohort extension). Median time from diagnosis was 24 months (range 0–180). 12 patients (35%) were HU pre-treated (mean past duration of HU pre-treatment 39 months, mean daily HU dose 950 mg). Median number of phlebotomies in the past 3 months prior to inclusion was 1 (range 0–8), a total of 21 patients (62%) were regularly phlebotomized at least once in three months prior to study entry. 11 patients (32%) had a history of thrombotic complications. Median Hct at baseline was 42% (range 36–51). Median WBC and platelet counts were 10.6*109/l (range 3.9–20.4) and 452*109/l (range 141–1019), respectively. 17 patients (50%) had splenomegaly at baseline. The median reported treatment duration was 41 weeks (range: 1 day – 80 weeks), 11 patients completed 1 year on treatment. Doses from 50 to 540 ug every two weeks were tested, 540 ug has been concluded as MTD as the highest tested dose, since no DLTs occurred in the study. The mean administered dose (both Phase I and II patients) was 287 ug. After 28 weeks of treatment (21 evaluable patients), 71% of patients had hematological response (7 CR, 33%; 8 PR, 38%), at week 36 (19 evaluable patients) 8 patients (42%) achieved a CR and 8 patients (42%) a PR, overall response rate (ORR, CR+PR) was 84%. At week 52 (1 year; 11 evaluable patients), 5 patients (46%) had CR and 5 (46%) PR, ORR was 91%; 8 (73%) patients presented with completely normalized blood values, all evaluable patients were phlebotomy free at this timepoint. 4 patients (of 12 evaluable for this measurement, 33%) had still enlarged spleen at week 52. At week 76, 2 evaluable patients were complete responders. At week 52, 1 patient (of 9 evaluable, 11%) developed partial molecular response, at week 68 3 patients (of 7 evaluable, 43%) had partial molecular response. One patient with allelic burden of 22% at baseline developed complete molecular response at week 36 (still ongoing). Mainly grade 1 and 2 adverse events were reported. A total of 358 adverse events occurred. 27 patients (79%) suffered from drug-related adverse events. 9 patients (26%) developed serious adverse events; 4 SAEs were considered to be treatment related. 5 patients (15%) discontinued their study participation prematurely, 3 of them due to adverse events (deterioration of underlying disease and two cases of depression). Acceptable tolerability and durable clinical benefits have been demonstrated in PV patients measured as overall response rate of above 90% with CRs of 46% at one year after treatment start. Phlebotomy independence and normalization of hematological parameters could be seen in most of the patients. The study continues to recruit and collect long term follow up information. Presented data support further development of AOP2014 in PV, a Phase III study is planned to start early 2013. Disclosures: Gisslinger: AOP Orphan Pharmaceuticals AG: Research Funding; Novartis: Speakers Bureau; Celgene Austria: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Kralovics:AOP Orphan Pharmaceuticals AG: Research Funding. Gisslinger:AOP Orphan Pharmaceuticals AG: Research Funding. Lechner:AOP Orphan Pharmaceuticals AG: Research Funding. Buxhofer-Ausch:AOP Orphan Pharmaceuticals AG: Research Funding. Strecker:AOP Orphan Pharmaceuticals AG: Research Funding. Gastl:AOP Orphan Pharmaceuticals AG: Research Funding. Willenbacher:AOP Orphan Pharmaceuticals AG: Research Funding. Greil:AOP Orphan Pharmaceuticals AG: Research Funding. Egle:AOP Orphan Pharmaceuticals AG: Research Funding. Melchardt:AOP Orphan Pharmaceuticals AG: Research Funding. Burgstaller:AOP Orphan Pharmaceuticals AG: Research Funding. Schloegl:AOP Orphan Pharmaceuticals AG: Research Funding. Tarmann:AOP Orphan Pharmaceuticals AG: Employment. Zoerer:AOP Orphan Pharmaceuticals AG: Employment. Klade:AOP Orphan Pharmaceuticals AG: Employment. Zahriychuk:AOP Orphan Pharmaceuticals AG: Employment. Thaler:AOP Orphan Pharmaceuticals AG: Research Funding.

Phase 1/1b Study of the Efficacy and Safety of the Combination of Panobinostat + Carfilzomib in Patients with Relapsed and/or Refractory Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 4081-4081 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jatin J. Shah ◽  
Sheeba K. Thomas ◽  
Donna M. Weber ◽  
Michael Wang ◽  
Raymond Alexanian ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Overall Response Rate ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Overall Response ◽  
Elevated Creatinine

Abstract Abstract 4081 Background: Carfilzomib, a novel irreversible proteasome inhibitor (PI), has demonstrated single agent activity in, and was recently FDA approved for relapsed and refractory myeloma. Panobinostat, a potent histone deacetylase inhibitor (HDACi), has been studied as a single agent and in combination with bortezomib, demonstrating promising response rates and a favorable safety profile in bortezomib-refractory patients. Our hypothesis proposed that the combination of carfilzomib and panobinostat (Car-Pan) would also be highly active, and we therefore aimed to combine these two agents for the first time. We report the initial findings from the phase I dose-escalation and expansion portions of our phase I/II trial of this novel combination regimen. Methods: The primary objectives were to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and the safety/tolerability of Car-Pan in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. Secondary objectives included determination of the overall response rate, time to progression, progression free survival, and time to next therapy. Panobinostat was administered orally on days 1, 3, 5, 8, 10, 12 of every 28-day cycle, while carfilzomib was given intravenously over 30 minutes on days 1, 2, 8, 9, 15, and 16. Dose level 1 started carfilzomib at 20 mg/m2 with 15 mg of panobinostat, and escalated from there using a standard 3+3 schema based on dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) occurring in cycle 1. An amendment was later introduced to allow carfilzomib to be given at 20 mg/m2for days 1 and 2 of cycle 1, followed by an increase to the full dose level for that cohort. Adverse events (AEs) were graded using the NCI-CTCAE v4, and responses were assessed with the modified International Uniform Response Criteria. Results: To date, 20 patients have been enrolled, 3 of whom are still in their first cycle, leaving 17 evaluable patients who are described herein, who have received a median of 4 cycles (range 1–8). The median age was 62 years (range 46–73), 11/17 (70%) were male, and the median number of prior regimens was 5 (range 2–15). Patients were very heavily pretreated, with 16/17 (94%) having undergone stem cell transplantation, 16/17 (94%) having prior bortezomib, including 8/17 (47%) who were bortezomib-refractory, and 17/17 (100%) having prior lenalidomide, including 12/17 (70%) who were lenalidomide-refractory. Cytogenetic abnormalities were common, including: 4 with del(17p), 4 with t(4;14), 2 with t(11;14), 9 with del(13), of whom 7 had additional mutations. Grade 1–4 AEs regardless of causality occurring in >20% of patients included anemia (14/17), thrombocytopenia (17/17), neutropenia (8/17), diarrhea (9/17), nausea/emesis (7/17), fatigue (10/17), elevated creatinine (8/17), and pneumonia (5/17). Grade ≥3 AEs regardless of causality included anemia (7/17), thrombocytopenia (10/17), neutropenia (6/17), diarrhea (2/17), nausea/emesis (1/17), fatigue (4/17), elevated creatinine (2/17), and pneumonia (4/17). An MTD has not been established, and dosing is ongoing in cohort 4, with Carfilzomib at 45mg/m2and 20 mg of Panobinostat. Of the 17 evaluable patients, the overall response rate was 35% (6/17) who achieved at least a partial response (PR); including 2 with very good PR (VGPR). In addition, one patient had a minor response, and 65% overall achieved stable disease or better. Conclusions: The combination of Carfilzomib + Panobinostat is well tolerated with a manageable side effect profile. Importantly, the combination achieves a promising response rate in a very heavily pre-treated, lenalidomide/bortezomib/high dose melphalan-refractory population, with an overall response (≥PR) rate of 35%. Updated safety and efficacy data for all patients will be presented at the meeting. Disclosures: Shah: Onyx: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Array BioPharma: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Off Label Use: This presentation will include information about panobinostat, which is not yet approved for use in patients with multiple myeloma. Thomas:Celgene: Research Funding; Millenium: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Immunomedics: Research Funding; Johnson & Johnson: Research Funding; Onyx: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Wang:Onyx Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Research Funding. Orlowski:Onyx: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Lenalidomide and Rituximab For The Treatment Of Patients With Relapsed Or Refractory Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia: Results Of Planned Interim Analysis

Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 5299-5299 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Y. Choi ◽  
Januario E. Castro ◽  
Sheila Hoff ◽  
Hongying Li ◽  
Laura Rassenti ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Partial Response ◽  
Interim Analysis ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Overall Response Rate ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Safety And Efficacy ◽  
Overall Response ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Based on data previously presented by our group demonstrating the safety and efficacy of lenalidomide (L) and rituximab (R) in the upfront setting, we are conducting an open-label, phase 2 trial single center trial to evaluate this combination as treatment for patients with relapsed or refractory CLL. Methods Patients started L at 5 mg per day and could escalate to 25 mg/day if tolerated. Patients received L for 21 of 35 days for cycle 1, then 21 of 28 days for cycles 2 to 7. Rituximab was started at the end of C1 at 50 mg/m2 on Day 29, 325 mg/m2 on day 31 and 33, then 375mg/m2 weekly x4 for cycle 2, and on day 1 for cycles 3-7. Patients who achieved a response but had residual disease after 7 cycles were given the option to continue single-agent L in a consolidative manner for 6 additional cycles. All patients received allopurinol 300mg daily and aspirin 81mg daily, unless contraindicated. The primary endpoint was overall response rate by iwCLL guidelines following 7 cycles. This abstract reports on the planned interim analysis of the safety and efficacy. Results By April 2013, 24 patients were enrolled and received treatment. 63% of patients were male (15/24). The median age at the start of study treatment was 67 years (range 53-83), with median 2.5 prior therapies (range 1-7). 75% (18/24) had CLL cells that expressed unmutated IgVH genes or high levels of ZAP-70. 25% (6/24) had unfavorable cytogenetics (del 17p or del 11q). 5 patients stopped therapy early due to toxicity. 2 patients stopped treatment due to grade 3 tumor flare reaction. 1 patient developed grade 4 tumor lysis requiring hemodialysis. 1 patient had grade 4 neutropenia within days of starting L. 1 patient developed a deep vein thrombosis during cycle 2 while off aspirin for transient thrombocytopenia. These patients tended to have a higher baseline absolute lymphocyte count, but this association did not meet statistical significance. Treatment was otherwise well tolerated. Neutropenia was the most common adverse event (AE), with grade 4 (by CTCAE 4) in 9 patients, and grade 3 in 6 patients out of 21 evaluable patients. There was a single instance of grade 4 thrombocytopenia, and 4 patients had grade 3 thrombocytopenia. 3 patients had grade 3 anemia. The only other grade 3 or higher AE was fatigue (5%). Of note, grade 2 superficial thrombophlebitis occurred in 3 patients. Out of the 20 patients whose primary endpoints were assessed, the overall response rate (ORR) was 70% (14/20) with 15% nodular partial response (3 patients) and 55% partial response (PR) (11 patients). 30% (6/20) were non-responders (NR). Only 1 of the 6 patients with NR had objective progressive disease (PD). The other 5 patients stopped treatment early due to toxicity and were designed as non-responders. Of the responder patients, 8 elected to receive an additional 6 months of consolidation lenalidomide. All maintained the same response without meeting objective criteria for either PD or complete response. After a median follow-up of 17 months from the start of treatment, there have been no deaths among the 24 patients. For the 20 evaluable patients, the median progression free survival (PFS) was 18.4 months and the median treatment free survival was 13.5 months.We did not find any significant association between response, toxicity, or PFS and any demographic or prognostic variable analyzed, including age, ZAP-70, IgVH mutation, cytogenetics, splenomegaly, or CLL cell immunophenotype. Conclusions The combination of lenalidomide and rituximab is an effective regimen for the treatment of patients with relapsed or refractory CLL with an ORR and PFS that rivals novel CLL therapies, especially for patients continued on lenalidomide consolidation therapy. The median PFS for all patients is in excess of 1.5 years after a median follow-up of 17 months. A subset of patients encountered adverse events requiring early treatment cessation, but only 1 patient progressed on treatment. Continued accrual will facilitate the identification of biologic or clinical factors that may predict such outcomes. Disclosures: Choi: Celgene: Research Funding. Castro:Celgene: Research Funding. Kipps:Celgene: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding.

scholarly journals Bortezomib in Combination with Dexamethasone, Cyclophosphamide, Etoposide, and Cisplatin (V-DCEP) for the Treatment of Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 2139-2139 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kelly Valla ◽  
Jonathan L. Kaufman ◽  
Charise Gleason ◽  
Lawrence H. Boise ◽  
Leonard T Heffner ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Median Time ◽  
Salvage Therapy ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Overall Response Rate ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Overall Response

Abstract Introduction Despite therapeutic advances in multiple myeloma, disease relapse is common. Combination therapy with dexamethasone, cyclophosphamide, etoposide, and cisplatin (DCEP) has been utilized as an effective salvage regimen for over a decade, and a recent study reported that DCEP provided an overall response rate of 45.1% when used as salvage therapy in patients who had previously received novel agents (Park S, et al. 2014). Aside from hematologic toxicities, DCEP is generally well-tolerated. In fact, the toxicity profile of DCEP has been compared to high dose cyclophosphamide in the setting of stem cell mobilization and is considered less toxic than the latter. Based upon the synergy noted when proteasome inhibitors are combined with genotoxic therapy, we have combined bortezomib with DCEP in a series of relapsed myeloma patients. Herein we report our experience with the addition of bortezomib to DCEP in relapsed/refractory disease. Patients and Methods We performed a retrospective evaluation of patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma treated at Emory University Hospital from October 2011 until March 2014. Patients received dexamethasone, cyclophosphamide, etoposide, and cisplatin (DCEP) at standard doses in combination with bortezomib at either a dose of 1 mg/m2 or 1.3 mg/m2 administered on Days 1 and 4 of each cycle given every 28 days. Indications for receiving V-DCEP are either cytoreduction prior to SCT (cohort 1) or as salvage therapy (cohort 2). Results Among the 51 patients (49% male and 51% female) included in analysis, the median age at the time of diagnosis is 58 years (range 30-78) and the time of treatment with V-DCEP is 62 years (range 33-79). Among patients that received V-DCEP as cytoreduction prior to SCT, median prior lines of therapy were 1 (0-8). Among the patients that received V-DCEP as salvage therapy, median number of prior lines of therapy was 3 (1-6). ISS 3 disease was seen in 70% of patients and high risk disease in 72.5% of pts (del 17p: 31%; PCL: 19%; extramedullary disease: 33%; complex CTG: 11%) and t(4;14): 6%). Median time from diagnosis to initiation of V-DCEP therapy among cohort 1 is 18 months (0-86) and among cohort 2 is 31 months (12-105) months. Median serum creatinine before C1D1 is 1.17 (0.61-6) and serum bilirubin is 0.6 (0.1-2.8). 31% of patients needed dose reductions from our standard protocol due to organ dysfunction. 47% of patients received ≥2 cycles. The median time to next cycle is 28 days (20-46) and time to next treatment after V-DCEP is 35 days (25-451) suggesting good hematologic recovery. The overall response rate (≥PR) amongst both cohorts with V-DCEP is 47.8% (40% and 51.6% overall response for cohorts 1 and 2, respectively). Figure 1 illustrates response rates. 10 patients that presented with renal insufficiency had renal response including 2 of the 5 patients on hemodialysis. While the median PFS for cohort 1, as expected has not reached, for cohort 2, it is 8 months (95% CI 5.7-10.3). At a median follow-up of 17 months, from the time of V-DCEP initiation, median OS for cohort 2 is 10 months (95% CI 5-14.9). Median overall survival for this predominantly high risk group of patients from diagnosis in cohort 1 is 78 months (95% CI 47-108) and 49 (95% CI 17-80.7) months in cohort 2, respectively. While only 1 patient with grade 2 peripheral neuropathy (PN) received V-DCEP, change from baseline existing PN was seen in 19% of patients (no grade 3/4 events). Conclusions During this era where minimizing alkylator therapy is a consideration, certain indications exist for using V-DCEP such as cytoreduction prior to SCT or as salvage therapy serving as bridge to next line of therapy. Addition of bortezomib to DCEP is deemed safe and is an effective cytoreductive regimen in the treatment of multiple myeloma. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Gleason: Celgene: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy. Heffner:Amgen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Biotest: Honoraria, Research Funding; Dana Farber CI: Honoraria, Research Funding; Genentech: Honoraria, Research Funding; Gilead: Honoraria, Research Funding; Idera: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Honoraria, Research Funding; Onyx: Honoraria, Research Funding; Spectrum: Honoraria, Research Funding; Talon Therapeutics: Honoraria, Research Funding. Lonial:Millennium: The Takeda Oncology Company: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding; Onyx Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Research Funding.

scholarly journals Short Course of Bendamustine and Rituximab Followed By 90Y-Ibritumomab Tiuxetan in Patients with Chemotherapy-Naïve Follicular Lymphoma: Results of Fol-Brite

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 1733-1733
Author(s):  
Frederick Lansigan ◽  
Bassem I Zaki ◽  
Stephanie P Yen ◽  
Eric S Winer ◽  
Helen Ryan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Partial Response ◽  
Follicular Lymphoma ◽  
Primary Endpoint ◽  
Conversion Rate ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Overall Response Rate ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Myelogenous Leukemia ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
To Receive

Abstract Background: Y90 Ibritumumab tiuxetan (90YIT) is approved for use for follicular lymphoma (FL) patients (pts) who have achieved a complete or partial response to frontline chemotherapy; however, its use after bendamustine and rituximab (BR) has never been studied. BR has proven to be a superior frontline therapy over R-CHOP in the treatment of FL and is a widely used initial treatment strategy. In this prospective, single-arm, open-label, multicenter phase II trial, we assessed the response rate and safety of a short induction course of BR for 4 cycles followed by consolidation with 90YIT for chemotherapy-naïve pts with FL. Methods: Consenting pts greater than 18 years with chemotherapy naïve FL (grade 1-2 and 3a) requiring treatment were eligible for this study. All pts had Stage II-IV disease and had adequate hematologic, liver, and renal function. Treatment consisted of an initial dose of rituximab 375mg/m2. One week later, bendamustine 90mg/m2 was administered on days 1 and 2, and rituximab 375mg/m2 was given on day 1. BR was given for 4 cycles every 28 days. Pts were restaged 4-6 weeks after the last dose of BR. Pts were considered eligible for consolidation with 90YIT if they obtained at least a partial response after induction, had a platelet count greater than 100,000/mm3, a granulocyte count greater than 1,500/mm3, and bone marrow infiltration less than 25%. 90YIT was give 6-12 weeks after completion of the last cycle of BR. The primary endpoint of this study is complete and unconfirmed complete response (CR/CRu) rate after sequential therapy with BR followed by 90YIT. Secondary endpoints are overall response rate after 4 cycles of BR, conversion rate from partial response (PR) after BR to CR/CRu after 90YIT, progression-free survival, and safety. The 1999 NHL Working Group Criteria was used to assess response. Results: Forty-two pts were enrolled in this study: 38 pts initiated study treatment, and 4 were screen failures. Median age was 58 years [range 31-74]. The study enrolled FLIPI low (18%), intermediate (47%), high (34%) risk pts; 32 of 38 (84%) were Grade 1-2 and 6 (16%) were Grade 3a. Response rates after 4 cycles of BR: Thirty-eight pts have completed 4 cycles of BR and 38 are evaluable for response. Twenty-two of 38 evaluable pts achieved a CR/CRu (58%) and 15 of 38 pts had a PR (39%) for an overall response rate (ORR) of 97%. One pt had stable disease (SD). Response rates after BR followed by 90YIT: Thirty of 38 BR-treated pts have received 90YIT and are evaluable for the primary endpoint of CR/CRu. Of the 38 BR treated pts, two in CR were unable to receive 90YIT due low platelets, one was not eligible to receive 90YIT due to achievement of SD only, one declined treatment, and four are not yet evaluable for response. Twenty-five of 30 evaluable pts are in CR/CRu (83%), 4 remain in PR (13%) after 90YIT and one progressed during 90YIT, for an ORR of 96%. Of the 14 pts who had a PR after BR, 7 (50%) converted to a CR/CRu immediately after 90YIT, with three (21%) additional conversions to CR/CRu in follow-up, the latest occurring 16 months after 90YIT. Grade 3-4 hematologic toxicities during BR included: lymphopenia (36%), neutropenia (8%), thrombocytopenia (3%), leukopenia (3%). Non-hematologic toxicities included grade 2 phlebitis (14%) and grade 3 hyperglycemia (8%), hyponatremia (3%), diarrhea (3%), infusion-related reaction (3%), headache (3%), rectal hemorrhage (3%). Grade 3-4 hematologic toxicities after 90YIT included: neutropenia (33%), leukopenia (36%), thrombocytopenia (36%), lymphopenia (14%), anemia (3%). Non-hematologic toxicities included skin infection (3%). Median neutrophil recovery was 8 weeks [range 8 to 12] and median platelet recovery was 9 weeks [range 5 to 36] after Y90IT. There have been no incidences of neutropenic fever. One pt developed chronic myelogenous leukemia, occurring 11 months after treatment with BR followed by Y90-IT. There have been no cases of myelodysplasia or acute myelogenous leukemia. Conclusions: In this nearly final analysis, the CR/CRu rate of pts completing all study therapy (BR followed by 90YIT) is 83%, the ORR is 96%, and the conversion rate from PR to CR/CRu is 71%. We conclude that sequential treatment with BR followed by Y90IT is highly effective and safe, and should be considered as a frontline treatment option for FL. Disclosures Lansigan: Teva Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Spectrum Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document