Short Course of Bendamustine and Rituximab Followed By 90Y-Ibritumomab Tiuxetan in Patients with Chemotherapy-Naïve Follicular Lymphoma: Results of Fol-Brite

Abstract Background: Y90 Ibritumumab tiuxetan (90YIT) is approved for use for follicular lymphoma (FL) patients (pts) who have achieved a complete or partial response to frontline chemotherapy; however, its use after bendamustine and rituximab (BR) has never been studied. BR has proven to be a superior frontline therapy over R-CHOP in the treatment of FL and is a widely used initial treatment strategy. In this prospective, single-arm, open-label, multicenter phase II trial, we assessed the response rate and safety of a short induction course of BR for 4 cycles followed by consolidation with 90YIT for chemotherapy-naïve pts with FL. Methods: Consenting pts greater than 18 years with chemotherapy naïve FL (grade 1-2 and 3a) requiring treatment were eligible for this study. All pts had Stage II-IV disease and had adequate hematologic, liver, and renal function. Treatment consisted of an initial dose of rituximab 375mg/m2. One week later, bendamustine 90mg/m2 was administered on days 1 and 2, and rituximab 375mg/m2 was given on day 1. BR was given for 4 cycles every 28 days. Pts were restaged 4-6 weeks after the last dose of BR. Pts were considered eligible for consolidation with 90YIT if they obtained at least a partial response after induction, had a platelet count greater than 100,000/mm3, a granulocyte count greater than 1,500/mm3, and bone marrow infiltration less than 25%. 90YIT was give 6-12 weeks after completion of the last cycle of BR. The primary endpoint of this study is complete and unconfirmed complete response (CR/CRu) rate after sequential therapy with BR followed by 90YIT. Secondary endpoints are overall response rate after 4 cycles of BR, conversion rate from partial response (PR) after BR to CR/CRu after 90YIT, progression-free survival, and safety. The 1999 NHL Working Group Criteria was used to assess response. Results: Forty-two pts were enrolled in this study: 38 pts initiated study treatment, and 4 were screen failures. Median age was 58 years [range 31-74]. The study enrolled FLIPI low (18%), intermediate (47%), high (34%) risk pts; 32 of 38 (84%) were Grade 1-2 and 6 (16%) were Grade 3a. Response rates after 4 cycles of BR: Thirty-eight pts have completed 4 cycles of BR and 38 are evaluable for response. Twenty-two of 38 evaluable pts achieved a CR/CRu (58%) and 15 of 38 pts had a PR (39%) for an overall response rate (ORR) of 97%. One pt had stable disease (SD). Response rates after BR followed by 90YIT: Thirty of 38 BR-treated pts have received 90YIT and are evaluable for the primary endpoint of CR/CRu. Of the 38 BR treated pts, two in CR were unable to receive 90YIT due low platelets, one was not eligible to receive 90YIT due to achievement of SD only, one declined treatment, and four are not yet evaluable for response. Twenty-five of 30 evaluable pts are in CR/CRu (83%), 4 remain in PR (13%) after 90YIT and one progressed during 90YIT, for an ORR of 96%. Of the 14 pts who had a PR after BR, 7 (50%) converted to a CR/CRu immediately after 90YIT, with three (21%) additional conversions to CR/CRu in follow-up, the latest occurring 16 months after 90YIT. Grade 3-4 hematologic toxicities during BR included: lymphopenia (36%), neutropenia (8%), thrombocytopenia (3%), leukopenia (3%). Non-hematologic toxicities included grade 2 phlebitis (14%) and grade 3 hyperglycemia (8%), hyponatremia (3%), diarrhea (3%), infusion-related reaction (3%), headache (3%), rectal hemorrhage (3%). Grade 3-4 hematologic toxicities after 90YIT included: neutropenia (33%), leukopenia (36%), thrombocytopenia (36%), lymphopenia (14%), anemia (3%). Non-hematologic toxicities included skin infection (3%). Median neutrophil recovery was 8 weeks [range 8 to 12] and median platelet recovery was 9 weeks [range 5 to 36] after Y90IT. There have been no incidences of neutropenic fever. One pt developed chronic myelogenous leukemia, occurring 11 months after treatment with BR followed by Y90-IT. There have been no cases of myelodysplasia or acute myelogenous leukemia. Conclusions: In this nearly final analysis, the CR/CRu rate of pts completing all study therapy (BR followed by 90YIT) is 83%, the ORR is 96%, and the conversion rate from PR to CR/CRu is 71%. We conclude that sequential treatment with BR followed by Y90IT is highly effective and safe, and should be considered as a frontline treatment option for FL. Disclosures Lansigan: Teva Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Spectrum Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Pharmacokinetics (PK), Safety and Overall Response Rate (ORR) Achieved with Subcutaneous (SC) Administration of Rituximab in Combination with Chemotherapy Were Comparable to Those Achieved with Intravenous (IV) Administration in Patients (pts) with Follicular Lymphoma (FL) in the First-Line Setting: Stage 1 Results of the Phase III SABRINA Study (BO22334)

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v120.21.1629.1629 ◽

2012 ◽

Vol 120 (21) ◽

pp. 1629-1629 ◽

Cited By ~ 3

Author(s):

Andrew Davies ◽

Francesco Merli ◽

Biljana Mihaljevik ◽

Noppadol Siritanaratkul ◽

Philippe Solal-Céligny ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Follicular Lymphoma ◽

Research Funding ◽

Overall Response Rate ◽

Geometric Mean ◽

Phase Iii ◽

Comparable Efficacy ◽

Grade 3 ◽

Line Setting ◽

Stage 1 ◽

To Receive

Abstract Abstract 1629 Rituximab and chemotherapy induction followed by maintenance rituximab is the backbone of therapy for FL. IV rituximab administration can take several hours; therefore, a SC formulation has been developed which may shorten administration times and increase convenience for pts. Achieving clinically effective rituximab serum concentrations is essential for optimal activity (Yin et al, ASCO 2010, abstract e13108). Therefore, achieving non-inferior Ctrough levels with SC compared with IV dosing is expected to provide comparable efficacy. BO22334 (NCT01200758) is a two-stage, phase III, international, randomized, controlled, open-label study of SC vs IV rituximab combined with up to 8 cycles of CHOP or 8 cycles of CVP chemotherapy followed by maintenance in pts with previously untreated FL. Pts were scheduled to receive 8 cycles of rituximab, regardless of the number of chemotherapy cycles. In the SC arm, rituximab was administered IV (375 mg/m2) for the first cycle, with following cycles administered SC (1400 mg). Stage 1 aimed to confirm that the SC rituximab dose of 1400 mg (dose based on phase I study BP22333; Salar et al, EHA 2012, abstract 0794), resulted in non-inferior Ctrough rituximab levels compared with the 375 mg/m2 IV dose when given as 3-weekly induction therapy combined with chemotherapy. The stage 1 primary endpoint was non-inferiority of the Ctrough,SC:Ctrough,IV ratio (limit for non-inferiority was Ctrough ratio > 0.8) at Cycle 7 of induction. Secondary endpoints included comparisons of SC vs IV: area under the serum concentration–time curve (AUC); end of induction ORR; CR (CR/CRu); and safety. Previously untreated pts with histologically confirmed CD20-positive grade 1, 2, or 3a FL requiring treatment (N = 127) were randomized 1:1 to SC (n = 63) or IV (n = 64) rituximab, stratified by Follicular Lymphoma International Prognostic Index score, chemotherapy, and region. Allocation to R-CHOP or R-CVP was at the investigator's discretion; 40 pts in each arm (63%) received CHOP chemotherapy and the remaining pts (37%) received CVP chemotherapy. The primary PK endpoint was met with a geometric mean of 134.6 μg/mL for the rituximab SC arm (n = 48) and 83.1 μg/mL for the rituximab IV arm (n = 54) resulting in an SC:IV ratio of 1.62 (90% confidence interval [CI]: 1.36, 1.94). The Ctrough achieved with SC rituximab was therefore concluded to be non-inferior to IV administration. The geometric mean ratio of AUCSC:AUCIV (1.378 [90% CI: 1.241, 1.530]) was also non-inferior. After a median follow-up of approximately 9 months, the overall safety profile was as would be expected for IV administration, with no new or unexpected adverse events (AEs). In the SC and IV arms AEs were experienced by 92% (n = 57) and 88% of pts (n = 57), respectively. Grade 3/4 AE were observed in 47% of pts in the SC arm and 46% in the IV arm. The only grade 3/4 AE occurring in > 10% of pts was neutropenia (26% in the SC arm, 22% in the IV arm) which was not associated with increased infection rate (grade 3/4 infections and infestations: 5% SC vs 9% IV). Total administration-related reactions (ARRs; any events occurring during/within 24 hours of drug administration that were considered treatment-related by the study investigator) were higher in the SC vs IV arm (50% vs 32%) with the majority being grade 1/2; there were no grade 4 ARRs. Individual ARRs (all grades) occurring in ≥5% of pts in the SC vs IV arms were: erythema (8% vs 3%), pruritus (6% vs 3%), chills (3% vs 6%), injection site erythema (10% vs 0%), and vomiting (3% vs 6%). Investigator-assessed ORR was 90.5% (95% CI: 80.4, 96.4) in the SC arm and 84.4% (95% CI: 73.1, 92.2) in the IV arm. Complete response (CR/CRu) rates were 46.0% (29/63 pts, 95% CI: 33.4, 59.1) for the SC arm and 29.7% (19/64 pts, 95% CI: 18.9, 42.4) for the IV arm. Stable and progressive disease rates were similar in each arm. An independent review of response assessments is planned. Data demonstrate PK non-inferiority and comparable efficacy for SC (1400 mg) compared with IV (375 mg/m2) rituximab administration, with similar ORR and CR rates in the rituximab SC and IV arms. Overall, SC and IV rituximab AE profiles were similar; ARRs were mostly of mild/moderate intensity. Stage 1 pts are continuing to receive maintenance treatment with SC or IV rituximab. Stage 2 of the study has opened recruitment of an additional 280 pts who will be randomized to receive SC (1400 mg) or IV rituximab. Disclosures: Davies: Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Off Label Use: Pharmacokinetics (PK), safety and overall response rate (ORR) achieved with subcutaneous (SC) administration of rituximab in combination with chemotherapy were comparable to those achieved with intravenous (IV) administration in patients (pts) with follicular lymphoma (FL) in the first-line setting. Siritanaratkul:Roche: Research Funding. Solal-Céligny:Roche, France: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Boehnke:F. Hoffmann-La Roche: Employment. Berge:Roche: Employment. McIntyre:Roche: Employment. Barrett:Roche: Employment. Macdonald:Roche, Canada: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding.

Download Full-text

MP0250 Combined with Bortezomib and Dexamethasone in Multiple Myeloma Patients Previoulsy Exposed to Proteasome Inhibitors and Immunomodulatory Drugs

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2018-99-112859 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 1980-1980

Author(s):

Stefan Knop ◽

Hartmut Goldschmidt ◽

Marc S Raab ◽

Monika Szarejko ◽

Artur Jurczyszyn ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Half Life ◽

Research Funding ◽

Overall Response Rate ◽

Response Rate ◽

Proteasome Inhibitors ◽

Immunomodulatory Drugs ◽

Multiple Cycles ◽

Grade 3 ◽

To Receive

Abstract Background MP0250 is a first-in-class selective tri-specific multi-DARPin® drug candidate neutralizing VEGF-Α and HGF as well as binding to human serum albumin to increase its plasma half-life. Preclinical studies have shown that MP0250 enhances sensitivity of Multiple Myeloma (MM) cells to bortezomib, inhibits tumor growth and reduces bone destruction. In this clinical phase 2 trial (NCT03136653), we are investigating the safety, tolerability and efficacy of the combination of MP0250 plus bortezomib and dexamethasone (dex) in patients (pts) with relapsed/refractory (RR) MM previously exposed to proteasome inhibitors (PI) and immunomodulatory drugs (IMiD). Aims To study the efficacy and safety of MP0250 in combination with bortezomib and dexamethasone in patients with RRMM. Trial Design This trial is recruiting adults ≥18 years of age with RRMM who have progressed after at least two prior treatment regimens including bortezomib and an IMiD. A dose-escalation phase (part 1) consisting of two cohorts will define a safe dose of the combination of MP0250 plus bortezomib + dex followed by a dose-expansion phase (part 2). Patients were enrolled to receive iv MP0250 on day 1 + subcutaneous bortezomib 1.3 mg/m² on days 1, 4, 8, 11, oral dexamethasone (dex) 20 mg on days 1-2, 4-5, 8-9, 11-12 of each 21-day cycle. Up to 40 patients will be enrolled. Patients will receive treatment until there is documented disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Methods The primary endpoint is efficacy in terms of overall response rate (ORR) per International Myeloma Working Group criteria. Secondary endpoints include safety, immunogenicity, progression free survival (PFS) and duration of response (DOR). Exploratory endpoints include overall survival, pharmacokinetics and potential biomarkers that include MM specific markers and cytokines monitoring bone homeostasis. The safety analysis set (SAF) is defined as patients who have received at least 1 dose of the combination of MP0250 plus bortezomib + dex. Results Data cut off was 21 July 2018. 8 pts have been treated in cohort 1 and 3 pts in cohort 2. Median time from initial diagnosis to first dose was 4.8 years (range, 1-10). Median number of prior therapies was 3 (range, 2-5). All 11 pts had prior exposure to IMiDs and PIs and 4 pts were considered PI refractory. Four patients received PI immediately prior to receive MP250 in combination. The most frequent drug-related grade ≥ 3 AEs: hypertension in 3 pts, thrombocytopenia in 6 pts, proteinuria in 2 pts and transient liver enzyme elevation in 1 patient. One dose-limiting toxicity has been reported in cohort 1 (grade 3 hypertension) and two in cohort 2 (grade 3 epistaxis, grade 3 proteinuria). There were no infusion-related reactions. Best response achieved in the 8 efficacy evaluable pts in cohort 1 was VGPR in 1 and PR in 4 for an overall response rate (ORR, ≥PR) of 62.5%. In cohort 2, 1 patient achieved Minimal Response (MR), 1 patient stable disease and 1 progressive disease. Three of four patients who were coming immediately from a PI based regimen achieved a response. Pharmacokinetics data in cohort 1 show sustained exposure over multiple cycles with a mean half-life of 11 days, and no indication of ADA mediated drug clearance was observed. Data from cohort 1 patients show accumulation of MP0250-HGF complexes over multiple cycles confirming the stable binding of MP0250 to HGF suggesting that all circulating HGF is neutralized. Summary Data from cohort 1 (8 mg/Kg q3w) suggest that MP0250 can be safely combined with bortezomib and dex in patients with relapsed and refractory MM. Durable responses were seen in patients who came from PI based pretreatment suggesting that MP0250 might be capable to reverse PI resistance. Disclosures Knop: Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Goldschmidt:Sanofi: Consultancy, Research Funding; ArtTempi: Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Mundipharma: Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Chugai: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; Adaptive Biotechnology: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding. Raab:BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Dürig:Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Roche: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Castellano Acosta:Molecular Partners AG: Employment. Lemaillet:Molecular Partners AG: Employment. Cortijo:Molecular Partners AG: Employment. Sudhir:Molecular Partners AG: Employment.

Download Full-text

Short Course of Bendamustine and Rituximab Followed by 90Y-Ibritumomab Tiuxetan in Patients with Chemotherapy-Naïve Follicular Lymphoma: Early Results of “Fol-Brite”

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v120.21.3657.3657 ◽

2012 ◽

Vol 120 (21) ◽

pp. 3657-3657

Author(s):

Frederick Lansigan ◽

Eric Winer ◽

Sara R Metzler ◽

Lynn Shaw ◽

Peggy Alton ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Follicular Lymphoma ◽

Primary Endpoint ◽

Research Funding ◽

Complete Response ◽

Ibritumomab Tiuxetan ◽

Stage Design ◽

Short Course ◽

Secondary Endpoints ◽

Grade 3 ◽

To Receive

Abstract Abstract 3657 Background: Bendamustine and rituximab is proving to be a superior first-line option in the treatment of follicular lymphoma. 90Y-ibritumomab tiuxetan is an effective consolidation strategy after chemotherapy induction in patients with follicular lymphoma, but has never been sequentially combined with bendamustine. In this prospective, single-arm, open-label, multicenter phase II trial (Fol-BRITE), we aim to assess the response rate and safety of a short induction course of bendamustine and rituximab (B-R) for 4 cycles followed by consolidation with 90Y-ibritumumab tiuxetan (90Y-IT) for chemotherapy-naïve patients with follicular lymphoma. Methods: Subjects greater than the age of 18 with chemotherapy-naïve follicular lymphoma (grade 1–2 and 3a) requiring treatment are eligible for this study. Treatment consists of an initial dose of rituximab 375mg/m2, and then one week later, bendamustine 90mg/m2 on days 1 and 2, and rituximab 375mg/m2 on day 1 of a 28-day cycle. B-R is given for a total of 4 cycles. Patients are eligible for consolidation with 90Y-IT if they obtain at least a partial response (PR) after induction, with a platelet count over 150,000/mm3, and granulocyte counts 1,500/mm3 and a bone marrow infiltration of <25%. The primary endpoint of this study is the determination of the complete response (CR) rate after sequential therapy with B-R followed by 90Y-IT. Secondary endpoints are overall response (OR=CR+PR) rate after a short course of B-R (4 cycles) and conversion rate from PR after B-R to CR after 90Y-IT. Secondary endpoints also include progression-free survival and safety. An optimal Simon two-stage design is incorporated to allow an early futility look for complete responses. Results: Nineteen patients have started treatment in this study to date, 13 have completed B-R and 7 have received 90Y-IT. Response rates after 4 cycles of B-R: Thirteen patients have completed 4 cycles of B-R and 13 are evaluable for response. Seven of 13 evaluable patients have had a CR (53.8%) and 5 of 13 patients have had a PR (38.5%) after 4 cycles of B-R for an OR rate of 92.3%. Response rates after B-R followed by 90Y-IT: Seven of 13 B-R-treated patients have received 90Y-IT and are evaluable for the primary endpoint of complete response. Of the 13 B-R treated patients, one patient in CR was unable to receive 90Y-IT due to thrombocytopenia, and one other patient was not eligible to receive 90Y-IT due to achievement of stable disease only. Six of the 7 evaluable patients are in CR (85.7%) and one patient remains in a PR (14.3%) after consolidation with 90Y-IT. Of the 3 subjects who attained a PR after B-R, 2 (66.7%) converted to a CR after 90Y-IT, with one late conversion 16 months after 90Y-IT. Hematologic toxicities after B-R included grade 4 neutropenia (1), grade 3–4 lymphopenia (3), and no grade 3–4 thrombocytopenia, out of 13 patients evaluable. Hematologic toxicities after 90Y-IT were acceptable, including grade 3–4 neutropenia (6), grade 3–4 lymphopenia (5), and grade 3–4 thrombocytopenia (4), out of 7 patients evaluable for toxicity. There have been no incidences of neutropenic fever. All patients have recovered their blood counts 7 to 12 weeks after Y90-IT. One out of 19 patients treated in this study has developed chronic myelogenous leukemia, occurring 11 months after treatment with Y90-IT. Conclusions: In this early pre-planned analysis of the first-stage of an optimal Simon two-stage design, we report this combination of therapy is both effective and safe. The CR rate of patients completing all study therapy is 85.7%, and well exceeds the limits required to continue this trial with an accrual goal of 39 subjects. Sequential treatment with B-R followed by Y90-IT is a promising option for the treatment of follicular lymphoma. Disclosures: Lansigan: Spectrum Pharmaceuticals: Advisory Board Other, Research Funding; Teva: Research Funding. Beaven:Celgene: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Lenalidomide and Rituximab For The Treatment Of Patients With Relapsed Or Refractory Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia: Results Of Planned Interim Analysis

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v122.21.5299.5299 ◽

2013 ◽

Vol 122 (21) ◽

pp. 5299-5299 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Michael Y. Choi ◽

Januario E. Castro ◽

Sheila Hoff ◽

Hongying Li ◽

Laura Rassenti ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Partial Response ◽

Interim Analysis ◽

Research Funding ◽

Overall Response Rate ◽

Response Rate ◽

Free Survival ◽

Safety And Efficacy ◽

Overall Response ◽

Grade 3

Abstract Based on data previously presented by our group demonstrating the safety and efficacy of lenalidomide (L) and rituximab (R) in the upfront setting, we are conducting an open-label, phase 2 trial single center trial to evaluate this combination as treatment for patients with relapsed or refractory CLL. Methods Patients started L at 5 mg per day and could escalate to 25 mg/day if tolerated. Patients received L for 21 of 35 days for cycle 1, then 21 of 28 days for cycles 2 to 7. Rituximab was started at the end of C1 at 50 mg/m2 on Day 29, 325 mg/m2 on day 31 and 33, then 375mg/m2 weekly x4 for cycle 2, and on day 1 for cycles 3-7. Patients who achieved a response but had residual disease after 7 cycles were given the option to continue single-agent L in a consolidative manner for 6 additional cycles. All patients received allopurinol 300mg daily and aspirin 81mg daily, unless contraindicated. The primary endpoint was overall response rate by iwCLL guidelines following 7 cycles. This abstract reports on the planned interim analysis of the safety and efficacy. Results By April 2013, 24 patients were enrolled and received treatment. 63% of patients were male (15/24). The median age at the start of study treatment was 67 years (range 53-83), with median 2.5 prior therapies (range 1-7). 75% (18/24) had CLL cells that expressed unmutated IgVH genes or high levels of ZAP-70. 25% (6/24) had unfavorable cytogenetics (del 17p or del 11q). 5 patients stopped therapy early due to toxicity. 2 patients stopped treatment due to grade 3 tumor flare reaction. 1 patient developed grade 4 tumor lysis requiring hemodialysis. 1 patient had grade 4 neutropenia within days of starting L. 1 patient developed a deep vein thrombosis during cycle 2 while off aspirin for transient thrombocytopenia. These patients tended to have a higher baseline absolute lymphocyte count, but this association did not meet statistical significance. Treatment was otherwise well tolerated. Neutropenia was the most common adverse event (AE), with grade 4 (by CTCAE 4) in 9 patients, and grade 3 in 6 patients out of 21 evaluable patients. There was a single instance of grade 4 thrombocytopenia, and 4 patients had grade 3 thrombocytopenia. 3 patients had grade 3 anemia. The only other grade 3 or higher AE was fatigue (5%). Of note, grade 2 superficial thrombophlebitis occurred in 3 patients. Out of the 20 patients whose primary endpoints were assessed, the overall response rate (ORR) was 70% (14/20) with 15% nodular partial response (3 patients) and 55% partial response (PR) (11 patients). 30% (6/20) were non-responders (NR). Only 1 of the 6 patients with NR had objective progressive disease (PD). The other 5 patients stopped treatment early due to toxicity and were designed as non-responders. Of the responder patients, 8 elected to receive an additional 6 months of consolidation lenalidomide. All maintained the same response without meeting objective criteria for either PD or complete response. After a median follow-up of 17 months from the start of treatment, there have been no deaths among the 24 patients. For the 20 evaluable patients, the median progression free survival (PFS) was 18.4 months and the median treatment free survival was 13.5 months.We did not find any significant association between response, toxicity, or PFS and any demographic or prognostic variable analyzed, including age, ZAP-70, IgVH mutation, cytogenetics, splenomegaly, or CLL cell immunophenotype. Conclusions The combination of lenalidomide and rituximab is an effective regimen for the treatment of patients with relapsed or refractory CLL with an ORR and PFS that rivals novel CLL therapies, especially for patients continued on lenalidomide consolidation therapy. The median PFS for all patients is in excess of 1.5 years after a median follow-up of 17 months. A subset of patients encountered adverse events requiring early treatment cessation, but only 1 patient progressed on treatment. Continued accrual will facilitate the identification of biologic or clinical factors that may predict such outcomes. Disclosures: Choi: Celgene: Research Funding. Castro:Celgene: Research Funding. Kipps:Celgene: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Short Course of Bendamustine and Rituximab Followed By 90Y-Ibritumomab Tiuxetan in Patients with Chemotherapy-Naive Follicular Lymphoma (FOL-BRITe): Final Report of Response Rates and Progression Free Survival

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v128.22.1793.1793 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 128 (22) ◽

pp. 1793-1793 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Cristiana A Costa ◽

Bassem I Zaki ◽

Stephanie P Yen ◽

Eric S Winer ◽

Helen Ryan ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Partial Response ◽

Follicular Lymphoma ◽

Myeloid Leukemia ◽

Overall Response Rate ◽

Response Rate ◽

Progression Free Survival ◽

Free Survival ◽

To Receive

Abstract Background: Y90-Ibritumomab tiuxetan (90YIT) is approved for use for follicular lymphoma (FL) patients who have achieved a complete or partial response to frontline chemotherapy; however, its use after bendamustine and rituximab (BR) has not been reported. BR has proven to be a superior frontline therapy over R-CHOP in the treatment of FL and is a widely used initial treatment strategy. This analysis focuses on the long-term outcomes and safety of untreated follicular lymphoma patients treated with a short induction course of BR for 4 cycles followed by consolidation with 90YIT. Methods: Patients greater than 18 years with chemotherapy-naïve FL (grade 1-2 and 3a) requiring treatment were eligible. All patients had Stage II-IV disease and had adequate hematologic, liver, and renal function. Treatment consisted of an initial dose of rituximab 375 mg/m2. One week later, bendamustine 90 mg/m2 was administered on days 1 and 2, and rituximab 375 mg/m2 was given on day 1. BR was given for 4 cycles every 28 days. Patients were restaged 4-6 weeks after the last dose of BR. Patients were eligible for consolidation with 90YIT if they obtained at least a partial response after induction, had a platelet count greater than 100,000/mm3, a granulocyte count greater than 1,500/mm3, and bone marrow infiltration less than 25%. 90YIT was given 6-12 weeks after completion of the last cycle of BR. The primary endpoint is complete and unconfirmed complete response (CR/CRu) rate after sequential therapy with BR followed by 90YIT. Secondary endpoints are overall response rate after 4 cycles of BR, conversion rate from partial response (PR) after BR to CR/CRu after 90YIT, progression-free survival, and safety. The 1999 NHL Working Group Criteria was used to assess response. Results: From October 2010 to May 2014, forty-four patients were enrolled in this study (NCT01234766). 39 patients initiated treatment, and 5 were screen failures. Median age was 57 years [range 31-75]. The study enrolled FLIPI low (18%), intermediate (44%), and high (38%) risk patients; 33 of 39 (85%) were Grade 1-2 and 6 (15%) were Grade 3a. Twenty-two of 39 patients achieved CR/CRu (56%) and 16 of 39 patients had a PR (41%) for an overall response rate (ORR) of 97%. One patient had stable disease (SD). Four patients were not randomized to receive 90YIT: one in CR and one in PR were unable to receive 90YIT due to thrombocytopenia, one only achieved SD after BR, and one declined treatment. Thirty of 35 evaluable patients were in CR/CRu (86%), 4 remained in PR (11%) after 90YIT and one progressed during 90YIT, for an ORR of 97%. The number of patients in PR after BR who reached CR/CRu immediately after 90YIT were 10 of 16 (63%). Three (19%) additional patients converted to CR/CRu during follow-up, the latest occurring 16 months after 90YIT. After a median follow up of 30 months, 25 patients (71%) remain in CR/CRu, 10 patients (29%) have progressed/relapsed with a 24-month PFS of 80% (95% CI 63-90) [Figure]. The median PFS was not reached. Grade 3-4 hematologic toxicities during the 90YIT period included: neutropenia (34%), leukopenia (37%), thrombocytopenia (40%), lymphopenia (15%), and anemia (6%). There were no incidences of febrile neutropenia. One patient developed JC Virus/Progressive Multifocal Leukoencephalopathy, 13 months after receiving the last dose of rituximab and 90YIT on study. One patient developed chronic myeloid leukemia 11 months after, one patient developed acute myeloid leukemia 15 months after, and one patient developed uterine cancer 52 months after all study treatment. One patient died to progression of the lymphoma, 35 months after treatment. There have been no reported cases of myelodysplasia. Conclusions: In this 2.5 year report of patients that received BR followed by 90YIT, the CR/CRu rate of patients completing all study therapy is 71% and the 24-month PFS is 80%. There is a high rate of conversion in partial responders to CR/CRu (81%), some occurring more than one year after treatment with 90YIT. The durable PFS is comparable to what is reported in the FIT trial (Morschhauser et al. JCO 2013) and the phase II Spanish intergroup study (Canales et al. ASH 2013). BR followed by 90YIT is a well-tolerated regimen for follicular lymphoma with high response rates that is a safe and highly effective as first-line therapy. Long-term safety reflects the natural history of patients with indolent lymphomas. Figure Figure. Disclosures Lansigan: Pharmacyclics: Consultancy; Teva: Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy; Spectrum: Consultancy, Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Phase I-II Trial of Oral Cyclophosphamide, Prednisone and Lenalidomide (Revlimid®) (CPR) for the Treatment of Patients with Relapsed and Refractory Multiple Myeloma.

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v114.22.1874.1874 ◽

2009 ◽

Vol 114 (22) ◽

pp. 1874-1874 ◽

Cited By ~ 4

Author(s):

Donna E. Reece ◽

Esther Masih-Khan ◽

Arooj Khan ◽

Saima Dean ◽

Peter Anglin ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Phase I ◽

Dose Level ◽

Research Funding ◽

Overall Response Rate ◽

Response Rate ◽

Oral Cyclophosphamide ◽

Refractory Multiple Myeloma ◽

Grade 3

Abstract Abstract 1874 Poster Board I-899 Lenalidomide (Revlimid®) and dexamethasone is an effective regimen in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (MM) patients (pts), with an overall response rate of 60.6% and median time to progression (TTP) of 13.4 months (Dimopoulos MA, et al, Leukemia 2009 Jul 23 [Epub ahead of print]). Oral cyclophosphamide and prednisone is an older regimen with excellent patient tolerance, and we sought to enhance the efficacy of lenalidomide by adding oral cyclophosphamide and prednisone in this phase I-II trial. The CPR regimen consisted of cyclophosphamide on days 1, 8 and 15; lenalidomide on days 1–21; and prednisone 100 mg every other day in a 28 day cycle. ASA 81 mg/day was given to all pts as DVT prophylaxis. Three dose levels were evaluated using a 3 by 3 dose escalation design. Between 11/2007–07/2009, 31 pts with relapsed/refractory MM who had not previously received lenalidomide were entered onto study. Median age was 61 (40–78) years and 61% were male. Immunoglobulin subtype was IgG in 19 pts (61%), IgA in 8 pts (26%) and light chain only in 4 pts (13%). Median number of prior regimens was 2 (1–5) and 28 pts had undergone previous ASCT, including double transplants in 6 pts. Prior therapy included thalidomide in 9 (29%) and bortezomib in 15 (48%). FISH cytogenetics were available in 13 pts; one had 13q deletion but none had t(4;14) or p53 deletion. At the time of protocol entry, median β 2-microglobulin level was 246 (92–767) nm/L, albumin 39 (34–48) g/L, creatinine 83 (50–126) μmol/L, platelet count 230 (75–337) × 109/L and ANC 2.5 (1.1–6.1) x 109/L. Protocol treatment is summarized in Table 1. Dose limiting toxicity was not observed during cycle 1 at any dose level. Grade 3–4 toxicities included thrombocytopenia in 5 pts (16%) and neutropenia in 9 pts (29%). These were managed with dose reduction and/or growth factor support. Four episodes of febrile neutropenia occurred. Other grade 3–4 non-hematologic toxicities included abdominal pain/bacteremia in 1 pt in cohort 1; hypokalemia in 1 pt in cohort 2; and DVT in 2 pts, dizziness in 2 pts and fatigue in 1 pt in cohort 3. Using the International uniform response criteria (Durie BG, et al, Leukemia 2006; 20:1467–1473), the best response was documented at a median of 6 (1–5) cycles and included the following: dose level 1 (1 CR, 2 PR); dose level 2 (1 VGPR, 2 PR); dose level 3 (5 CR, 9 VGPR, 9 PR, 1 MR and 1 stable disease). At a median follow-up (F/U) of 12 (8–21) months, 20 pts remain on study, 2 have withdrawn and 9 pts have progressed at a median of 9 (4–13) months; only 1 one has died (due to MM). We conclude: 1) the combination of full doses of the agents in CPR can be given in a 28 day cycle with minimal toxicity; 2) the overall response rate (CR + VGPR + PR) in 31 pts to date is 93%; 3) at a median F/U of 1 year, only 9 pts (29%) have progressed; 4) longer follow-up is required to assess the TTP and survival of the CPR regimen. Disclosures: Reece: Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Off Label Use: Lenalidomide in combination with drugs other than dexamethasone. Anglin:Celgene: Honoraria. Chen:Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding. Kukreti:Celgene: Honoraria. Mikhael:Celgene: Honoraria. Trudel:Celgene: Honoraria.

Download Full-text

Bortezomib Added to CVP-R Is Safe and Effective for Previously Untreated Advanced Stage Follicular Lymphoma: A Phase II Study by the NCIC Clinical Trials Group.

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v114.22.407.407 ◽

2009 ◽

Vol 114 (22) ◽

pp. 407-407

Author(s):

Laurie H. Sehn ◽

David A Macdonald ◽

Sheldon H. Rubin ◽

Guy Cantin ◽

Morel Rubinger ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Follicular Lymphoma ◽

Phase Ii ◽

Research Funding ◽

Standard Dose ◽

Phase Iii ◽

High Risk Population ◽

Low Grade ◽

Grade 3 ◽

To Receive ◽

Experienced Grade

Abstract Abstract 407 Background: Bortezomib, the first-in-class proteasome inhibitor has demonstrated promising efficacy as a single agent in heavily pretreated patients (pts) with follicular lymphoma (FL). This is the first study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the addition of bortezomib to cyclophosphamide, vincristine, prednisone and rituximab (CVP-R), one of the most commonly used regimens in untreated patients. Methods: This is a phase II multi-centre open-label trial adding bortezomib (1.3 mg/m2 day 1&8) to standard dose cyclophosphamide (750 mg/m2), vincristine (1.4 mg/m2, capped at 2 mg), prednisone (40 mg/m2 × 5) and rituximab (375 mg/m2) for up to 8 cycles in pts with newly diagnosed stage III/IV FL requiring therapy. Response was assessed following 4 and 8 cycles. The two co-primary endpoints were complete response rate (CR/CRu) and incidence of grade 3/4 neurotoxicity. Following the final response assessment, patients were permitted to receive maintenance rituximab at the discretion of the treating physician according to local practice. Results: Between March 2007 and February 2009, 95 patients were enrolled. Median age was 56.6 years (range 29.5 – 83.6 years). 48% percent were male and 63% had stage IV disease. FLIPI score at study entry: low 11%, intermediate 43%, high 46%. Safety data was availabel on all patients. Overall, the combination of bortezomib and CVP-R was extremely well tolerated. No pts have developed grade 4 neurotoxicity and only 6/95 (6.3%) have developed grade 3 neurotoxicity (five sensory neuropathy and one neuropathic pain). The incidence of grade I and II neuropathy was 65.3% and 36.8% respectively. Neurotoxicity was largely reversible. Five pts discontinued therapy prematurely (three refused further treatment, one pt was found to have Hodgkin lymphoma as well as FL and one pt was removed from study for non-compliance). 84% of planned bortezomib treatments and 85% of vincristine treatments were administered without dose reduction. Five pts experienced grade 3/4 anemia and 3 pts experienced grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia. Only 4 episodes of febrile neutropenia occurred and 2 grade 3 infections were noted. No grade 4 infections were reported. No serious adverse events were reported. One patient died due to progressive disease. At present, 78/95 patients are evaluable for response. 37/78 (47%) achieved a CR/CRu (95% CI 36.4, 58.5), and 29/78 (37%) achieved a PR with an ORR of 84.6% (95% CI 76.6, 96.6). An additional 5/78 pts had stable disease, while 7/78 progressed on therapy. Complete efficacy data as well as information on quality of life will be availabel within the next few months. Forty-one of 70 pts (58.6%) with availabel follow-up information went on to receive maintenance rituximab. Conclusions: The addition of bortezomib to standard dose CVP-R is feasible and well tolerated with minimal associated toxicity. Neurotoxicity is primarily low grade and reversible and does not limit delivery of either bortezomib or vincristine. The complete remission rate in this high risk population compares favorably to historical results of patients receiving CVP-R. Based on these encouraging results, a phase III trial of CVP-R with or without bortezomib is currently being planned. Disclosures: Sehn: Johnson and Johnson Ortho Biotec: Honoraria. Off Label Use: Velcade for is not yet approved for follicular lymphoma. Chen:Johnson and Johnson Ortho Biotec: Research Funding. Djurfeldt:Johnson and Johnson Ortho Biotec: Research Funding. Shepherd:Johnson and Johnson Ortho Biotec: Research Funding. Crump:Johnson and Johnson Ortho Biotec: Honoraria.

Download Full-text

Pomalidomide, Cyclophosphamide, and Dexamethasone Is Superior to Pomalidomide and Dexamethasone in Relapsed and Refractory Myeloma: Results of a Multicenter Randomized Phase II Study

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v124.21.303.303 ◽

2014 ◽

Vol 124 (21) ◽

pp. 303-303 ◽

Cited By ~ 6

Author(s):

Rachid Baz ◽

Thomas G. Martin ◽

Melissa Alsina ◽

Kenneth H. Shain ◽

Hearn J. Cho ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Phase Ii ◽

Research Funding ◽

Overall Response Rate ◽

Response Rate ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Overall Response ◽

Best Response ◽

Randomized Phase Ii ◽

Grade 3

Abstract Background: Pomalidomide-dexamethasone results in an overall response rate of 33% and median PFS of 4.2 months in patients with prior lenalidomide and bortezomib (Richardson et al. Blood 2014). In this randomized phase II trial, we compared pomalidomide-dexamethasone (arm B) versus the addition of oral weekly cyclophosphamide to pomalidomide-dexamethasone (arm C) in patients with lenalidomide-refractory multiple myeloma (MM). We have previously reported that the recommended phase II dose of cyclophosphamide with standard-dose pomalidomide + dexamethasone was 400 mg PO D1, 8, 15. Patients and Methods: Eligible patients had relapsed and refractory MM after at least 2 prior therapies and were lenalidomide refractory. Patients had a platelet count ≥ 50,000/mm3 and ANC ≥ 1,000/mm3 (patients with ≥50% bone marrow plasmacytosis were allowed if platelet count was ≥ 30,000/mm3and ANC could be supported with GCSF during screening and therapy). Patients were randomized (1:1) to receive pomalidomide 4 mg PO D1-21 and dexamethasone 40 mg PO D1, 8, 15, 22 (20 mg if older than 75 years) (arm B) with or without oral cyclophosphamide 400 mg PO D1, 8, 15 of a 28-day cycle (arm C). Patients randomized to arm B were allowed to cross over to arm C in the event of disease progression. Thromboprophylaxis was mandated with aspirin, warfarin, or LMWH. The primary endpoint was overall response rate using IMWG criteria. Secondary endpoints included an evaluation of PFS, OS and safety of the two arms. Results: Between 7/2012 and 3/2014, 36 patients were randomized to arm B and 34 to arm C. Patients characteristics were not different between the 2 arms (table below). The median number of prior therapies was 4 (2-12). All patients were lenalidomide refractory and none received prior pomalidomide. After a median follow up of 15 months, the overall response rate (partial response or better) was 39% and 65% (p=0.03) for arm B and C, respectively. The clinical benefit rate (minimal response or better) was 64% and 79% (p=0.2) for arm B and C, respectively. The median PFS was 4.4 months (95% CI 2.3-5.9) for arm B and 9.2 months (95% CI 4.6-16) for arm C (log rank p=0.04). As of July 2014, 28 patients had died (16 arm B, 12 arm C) with median overall survival of 10.5 versus 16.4 months (p=0.08) for arm B and C, respectively. Hematologic grade 3/4 adverse events were more frequent in arm C, although this was not statistically significant (see table). Thirteen patients crossed over and oral weekly cyclophosphamide was added to their tolerated dose of pomalidomide dexamethasone. For those patients, the best response was as follows: 2 PR, 2 MR, and 6 SD, 3 PD. Conclusions: Pomalidomide-dexamethasone in combination with oral weekly cyclophosphamide resulted in a superior response rate and PFS compared to pomalidomide-dexamethasone alone in patients with relapsed and refractory MM. The increased hematologic toxicities, as a result of the addition of oral cyclophosphamide, were manageable. Table Arm B (N=36) Arm C (N=34) P value Age, years, median (range) 63 (50-78) 64 (47-80) 0.7 Male, n (%) 23 (64) 18 (53) 0.3 Number of prior therapies, median (range) 4 (2-12) 4 (2-9) 0.5 Bortezomib refractory, n (%) 28 (78) 24 (71) 0.3 Carfilzomib refractory, n (%) 16 (44) 13 (38) 0.5 Prior high-dose therapy, n (%) 27 (75) 28 (82) 0.6 Prior alkylating agent, n (%) 32 (89) 32 (94) 1 B2-microglobulin, median (range) 3.2 (1.6-10) 3.6 (1.5-13.9) 0.5 Serum creatinine, median (range) 1 (0.5-2.3) 0.9 (0.6-2.1) 0.6 High-risk cytogenetics, n (%) 5 (24) 6 (28) 0.8 Deletion 17p, n (%) 3 (14) 4 (20) 0.8 t(4;14), n (%) 3 (14) 3 (14) 0.9 Trisomy or tetrasomy 1q, n (%) 11 (55) 6 (33) 0.4 Best response (partial response or better), n (%) 14 (39) 22 (65) 0.03 Clinical benefit rate (MR or better), n (%) 23 (64) 27 (79) 0.2 Grade 3/4 neutropenia, n (%) 12 (33) 17 (50) 0.2 Grade 3/4 febrile neutropenia, n (%) 4 (11) 6 (18) 0.5 Grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia, n (%) 2 (5) 5 (15) 0.2 Grade 3/4 anemia, n (%) 3 (8) 7 (20) 0.2 Grade 3/4 pneumonia, n (%) 4 (11) 3 (9) 1 Grade 3/4 fatigue, n (%) 2 (5) 4 (12) 0.4 Number of serious adverse events 17 20 Disclosures Baz: Celgene: Research Funding; Millenium: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Karypharm: Research Funding; Sanofi: Research Funding. Off Label Use: Pomalidomide cyclophosphamide dexamethasone in relapsed refractory myeloma. Martin:Sanofi: Research Funding; Novartis: Speakers Bureau. Alsina:Triphase: Research Funding; Millenium: Research Funding. Shain:Onyx / Amgen: Research Funding; Treshold: Research Funding. Chari:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Millenium: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Array Biopharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Jagannath:Celgene: Honoraria; Millennium: Honoraria; Sanofi: Honoraria.

Download Full-text

Phase 2 Trial of PRM-151, an Anti-Fibrotic Agent, in Patients with Myelofibrosis: Stage 1 Results

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v124.21.713.713 ◽

2014 ◽

Vol 124 (21) ◽

pp. 713-713 ◽

Cited By ~ 29

Author(s):

Srdan Verstovsek ◽

Ruben A. Mesa ◽

Lynda M Foltz ◽

Vikas Gupta ◽

John O Mascarenhas ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Bone Marrow ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Clinical Benefit ◽

Research Funding ◽

Overall Response Rate ◽

Response Rate ◽

Jak Inhibitor ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Grade 3 ◽

Stage 1

Abstract PRM-151 (PRM) is a recombinant form of Pentraxin-2, an endogenous human protein that acts at sites of tissue damage, inducing macrophage differentiation to prevent and reverse fibrosis. PRM has broad anti-fibrotic activity in multiple preclinical models of established fibrotic diseases and no dose limiting toxicities in phase 1 trials. Myelofibrosis (MF: primary (PMF), post-essential thrombocythemia (post-ET MF), and post polycythemia vera (Post PV MF)) is a myeloid malignancy characterized by progressive bone marrow (BM) fibrosis with resultant anemia, abnormal platelet and leukocyte counts, extramedullary hematopoiesis, and a well-defined symptom complex. This study investigated the potential of PRM in MF to reduce BM fibrosis and to improve key disease features including abnormal blood counts, symptoms, and splenomegaly. MF patients (pts) with Dynamic International Prognostic Scoring System (DIPSS) intermediate-1, intermediate-2, or high-risk disease and grade ≥ 2 BM fibrosis, either on no current therapy or on a stable dose of ruxolitinib (RUX) for ≥ 12 weeks and no improvement in spleen for ≥ 4 weeks, were eligible for stage 1 of this open-label adaptive trial. Assignment to one of the 4 treatment arms was per investigator and pt choice: PRM 10 mg/kg IV 1-hour infusion days 1, 3, 5, then weekly (QW) or every 4 weeks (Q4W), alone or with RUX, for 24 weeks. Primary endpoint was overall response rate by IWG-MRT (symptoms by MPN-SAF Total Symptom Score (TSS), spleen by palpation) and/or decrease in BM fibrosis by ≥ 1 grade with otherwise stable disease. BM biopsies were obtained at baseline, 3 and 6 months, and were evaluated centrally by two blinded hematopathologists. Pts with clinical benefit were allowed to continue treatment in an extension. At least one response in any arm was required for that regimen to be evaluated in Stage 2. Twenty seven pts were enrolled: 8 PRM QW, 7 PRM Q4W, 6 PRM QW + RUX, 6 PRM Q4W + RUX. Median age 67 years (52-85); 70% DIPSS Int-2 or High Risk; 52% PMF, 15% post-ET MF, 33% post-PV MF; 63% grade 3 BM fibrosis, Hemoglobin (Hgb) < 100 g/L in 56% and < 85 g/L in 26%, platelet count (PLT)< 100 x 109/L in 52% and < 25 x 109/L in 30%; 22% were JAK inhibitor-naive and 52% had received a prior JAK inhibitor (not including ongoing RUX). Twenty pts completed 24 weeks of therapy; 18 continued extension treatment. PRM-151 was well-tolerated alone and with RUX; most adverse events (AEs) were Grade 1/2 and unrelated, with 3 Grade 3 possibly related AEs and 5 possibly related serious AEs. Nine of 26 evaluable pts responded, for an overall response rate (ORR) of 35%, with 4 IWG symptom clinical improvements (CI) and 6 BM fibrosis responses (Table 1), with ≥ 1 response in each arm. One pt had a CI and BM response. Reduction in BM fibrosis was associated with normal erythroid microarchitecture, normal or decreased myeloid:erythroid ratio, and fewer paratrabecular megakaryocytes, all potential surrogates of improved bone marrow microenvironment. IWG stable disease was observed in 77% of pts, with trends of clinical benefit in Hgb, PLT, peripheral blood blasts, spleen, and symptoms (Table 2). In 14 patients (54%), all parameters were stable or improved. Conclusion: PRM-151 was well-tolerated in patients with advanced MF, with no evidence of drug-related myelosuppression and encouraging trends in both clinical and histologic aspects of the disease. Reduction in BM fibrosis, stable to improved hematologic parameters, symptom responses, and stable to reduced spleen size support further development of PRM-151 in MF. Table 1 Two additional subjects had decrease in bone marrow fibrosis but progressive disease. Number of Patients BM Fibrosis Grade at Last Study Timepoint 3 2 1 BM Fibrosis Grade at Baseline 3 8 3 1 2 1 4 2 Abstract 713. Table 2 Outcome Parameter Denominator (n) Clinical Benefit Pts with Improvement (n/%) ORR (primary endpoint) All evaluable pts (26) IWG-MRT CI AND/OR reduction in BM fibrosis by ≥ 1 grade 9 (35%) Hgb Hgb < 100 g/L (15) ≥10 g/L increase from baseline AND no transfusions or 50% reduction in transfusions if transfusion dependent 6 (40%) PLT PLT < 100 x 109/L (13) > 100 x 109/L AND increase of ≥20 x 109/L ; increase of ≥20 x 109/L if baseline < 50, AND/OR increase of ≥ 10 x 109/L with discontinuation of transfusions 8 (62%) Blasts ≥ 1% peripheral blasts (14) No peripheral blasts 3 (21%) Symptoms All evaluable pts (26) ≥ 25% reduction in TSS ≥ 12 weeks 10 (38%) Spleen Palpable spleen (19) ≥ 25% decrease ≥ 4 weeks AND any decrease ≥ 12 weeks 5 (26%) Disclosures Verstovsek: Incyte: Research Funding; Astrazeneca: Research Funding; Lilly Oncology: Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding; Geron: Research Funding; NS Pharma: Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Gilead: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Promedior: Research Funding; Cell Therapeutics: Research Funding. Mesa:Incyte, CTI, NS pharma, Gilead, Celgene: Research Funding; Promedior: Research Funding. Foltz:Janssen: Consultancy; Promedior: Research Funding; Gilead: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Gupta:Incyte Corporation: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Promedior: Research Funding. Mascarenhas:Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation: Research Funding; Incyte Corporation: Consultancy, Research Funding; Promedior: Research Funding. Ritchie:Celgene, Incyte: Speakers Bureau; Promedior: Research Funding. Hoffman:Geron: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; All Cells LLC: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Promedior: Research Funding. Pozdnyakova:Sanofi: Consultancy; Incyte: Consultancy; Promedior: Consultancy. Hasserjian:Sanofi: Consultancy; Incyte: Consultancy; Promedior: Consultancy. Trehu:Promedior: Employment, Equity Ownership. Kantarjian:ARIAD, Pfizer, Amgen: Research Funding. Gotlib:Novartis: Research Funding, Travel Reimbursement, Travel Reimbursement Other; Sanofi: Research Funding; Gilead: Research Funding; Incyte: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Travel Reimbursement Other; Promedior: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Mobilization and Elimination of FLT3-ITD+ Acute Myelogenous Leukemia (AML) Stem/Progenitor Cells by Plerixafor/G-CSF/Sorafenib: Results From a Phase I Trial in Relapsed/Refractory AML Patients

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v120.21.142.142 ◽

2012 ◽

Vol 120 (21) ◽

pp. 142-142 ◽

Cited By ~ 12

Author(s):

Michael Andreeff ◽

Zhihong Zeng ◽

Mary A Kelly ◽

Rui-yu Wang ◽

Teresa McQueen ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Flow Cytometry ◽

Progenitor Cells ◽

Research Funding ◽

Overall Response Rate ◽

Response Rate ◽

Fold Increase ◽

Myelogenous Leukemia ◽

Color Flow ◽

In Vivo Models ◽

Overall Response

Abstract Abstract 142 FLT3-ITD AML are associated with poor prognosis. Our group identified Sorafenib (S) as potent inhibitor of FLT3-ITD (Zhang W, JNCI, 2008; Borthakur G., Haematologica, 2010). FLT3-ITD is also associated with overexpression of the chemokine receptor CXCR4. Utilizing preclinical in vitro and in vivo models we determined increased activity of S when combined with CXCR4 inhibitor Plerixafor (P) and G-CSF (G) (Zeng Z et.al. Blood 2009). Here we report clinical and translational data testing this concept in patients with R/R FLT3-ITD AML. Clinical trial: G (10 ug/kg) and P(240 ug/kg) were given s.c. QOD on days 1 – 13, S (400–600mg) on d 1 – 28(one cycle). G/P was held when blasts exceeded 5×104/uL. Cell populations expressing CD34, 38, 123, CXCR4 (1D9, 12G5), VLA4, CD44 and phospho-proteins were assessed at baseline and at multiple time points during treatment by flow cytometry of up to 10 parameters and by flow cytometric mass spec using CyTOF. Results: 13 patients have been treated so far; responses are as follows: 1 CR, 3 CRp, 6 PR and 4 failed (NR), for an overall response rate of 10/13 (77%); One patients achieved 2 CRp. Six/13 patients, including 3/6 responders and 3/4 NR were previously treated with and considered refractory to FLT3 inhibitors. Four patients had additional D835 mutations: 2 failed and 2 achieved PRs, none of the CR/p patients carried this mutation. Side effects included hyperleukocytosis in 3/10 pts.(who missed 1 to 5 doses of G/P), skin rash (5 pts.), hand foot syndrome (3 pts.) hypertension (7 patients), diarrhea (10 pts.), nausea (8 pts.), headache (6 pts.), muscle weakness (3 pts.) and anorexia (5 pts.). Analysis of cells mobilized in 22 treatment cycles revealed massive mobilization: a 29-fold increase in WBC, 41-fold in absolute blasts and 77-fold in granulocytes. Increases in the numbers of circulating stem/progenitor cells: CD34+: 231-fold, CD34+/38-: 90-, CD34+/38-/123+(LSC): 148-, CXCR4+: 139-, VLA-4+: 68- and CD44+: 82-fold. Increase in circulating LSC was positively correlated with baseline blasts and VLA4 levels, but not with baseline CXCR4. Serial FISH analyses confirmed the preferential mobilization of leukemic vs. non-leukemic cells and 10-color flow cytometry demonstrated altered levels of pERK and pAKT but not of pSTAT3 in mobilized cells. Surprisingly, CXCR4 levels in mobilized cells were increased. CyTOF analysis of up to 29 parameters documented mobilization of primitive LSC. Conclusions: The combination of G-CSF+Plerixafor appears superior in increasing the number of circulating leukemic blasts and stem/progenitor cells in FLT3-ITD AML, as compared to Plerixafor alone in R/R AML(blast increase 2.1-fold; Uy et al. Blood, 2012). Treatment resulted in 4/13 CR and CRp and 6/13 PRs, for an overall response rate of 77%. Mobilized stem/progenitor cells displayed altered MAPK/AKT signaling and increased CXCR4 expression. This is the first clinical study of G-CSF/Plerixafor for the “mobilization” of AML cells, aimed at removing them from their protective bone marrow microenvironment and the initial results are providing proof-of–concept and encouraging clinical responses. Disclosures: Off Label Use: Clofarabine in AML. Burger:Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Research Funding. Kantarjian:Genzyme: Research Funding.

Download Full-text