Do Elderly Myeloma Patients Benefit From High Dose Therapy (HDT) and Autologous Stem Cell Transplant (ASCT)?: A Comparative Survival Analysis using SEER Registry

Abstract Abstract 2072 Introduction: Many randomized control trials demonstrated that HDT-ASCT is superior to conventional therapies in myeloma patients and prolongs progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) (Attal M, 1996, Childs JA, 2003). However, in treating a malignancy with a median age of diagnosis of 69 years, the majority of the patients will not be eligible for this beneficial approach if a nominal numerical age cut-off (<65 years) is followed based on the assumption that elderly patients cannot tolerate HDT-ASCT; nor will they be eligible for clinical trials involving HDT-ASCT if stringent age-restricted inclusion criteria are incorporated. Therefore, we have evaluated if the elderly patients benefit from HDT-ASCT. Methods: We used the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) 18 registry data (www.seer.cancer.gov) as our comparator (reflects 28% of the US population);to provide information on incidence, prevalence and survival from 1973–2009. The data from an institutional cohort (IC) is obtained from the records of patients that underwent HDT-ASCT from January 2000 to January 2012. We used IBM SPSS version 20 to generate the Kaplan-Meier survival curves. Results: Of the 6,571,117 malignant cases listed in SEER registry, a total of 74,826 cases (1.1%) of multiple myeloma (ICD-03 code 9732) were identified (39735 males and 35091 females). Median age of the patients is 70 years. Among these patients 48,988 patients (65%) are over the age of 65. A total of 901 myeloma patients underwent HDT-ASCT from IC during the evaluable period and 167 patients (19%) were over the age of 65. The median survival for each subset is listed in Table 1. Both male and female WCI-ASCT myeloma patientshad prolonged OS compared to the SEER myeloma patients, despite the difference in magnitude of advantage in IC-ASCT male patients vs. female patients. Both white and black patients, as well as patients undergoing HDT-ASCT across all age subgroups had a significant survival advantage. Conclusions: In each subgroup, by the decade of diagnosis, gender, race, age subsets we have consistently demonstrated a significant survival benefit for IC transplant patients ≥age 65 compared to SEER myeloma patients ≥age 65 if offered HDT-ASCT. Selection-bias prevails in the groups showing improved overall survival. Hence, a careful selection process considering physiologic age as a determinant for transplant eligibility would result in better outcomes, and not preclude the elderly from the survival benefits of HDT-ASCT. Disclosures: Kaufman: Millenium: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Onyx: Consultancy. Flowers:Celgene: Consultancy; Prescription Solutions: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy; Millennium: Research Funding, Unpaid consultancy, Unpaid consultancy Other; Genentech: Unpaid consultancy, Unpaid consultancy Other; Gilead: Research Funding; Spectrum: Research Funding; Janssen lymphoma research foundation: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Waller:Outsuka: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Outcome of Elderly Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) Post Hypomethylating Agent (HMA) Failure.

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v120.21.2627.2627 ◽

2012 ◽

Vol 120 (21) ◽

pp. 2627-2627 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Koichi Takahashi ◽

Hagop M. Kantarjian ◽

Hady Ghanem ◽

Farhad Ravandi ◽

Jorge E. Cortes ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Overall Survival ◽

Elderly Patients ◽

Salvage Therapy ◽

Research Funding ◽

Objective Response ◽

Induction Treatment ◽

High Dose ◽

Cell Transplant ◽

Investigational Agents ◽

The Impact

Abstract Abstract 2627 Background and Aims: HMA such as 5-azacitadine or decitabine have been increasingly used as induction therapy in elderly patients with AML. The prognosis of such patients who failed initial HMA and the impact of subsequent chemotherapy on outcome are unknown. Therefore the aims of the current analysis are 1) to evaluate the prognosis of elderly patients with AML post HMA failure and 2) to evaluate the efficacy of using intensive cytarabine-based salvage therapy vs. low intensity investigational therapy. Methods: We analyzed 54 patients older than 60 years old with AML who received induction treatment with HMA using either 5-azacitadine (n=17; 31%) or decitabine (n=37; 69%) under various clinical trials. Result: Median age of the group was 68 years (range; 60–84); 39% patients were female. Forty three patients (77%) had performance status (PS) ≤1 and 11 patients had PS of 2 (23%). Mean initial white blood cell count was 10.9 ± 3.2 (x103/μl), hemoglobin 9.9 ± 0.2 (g/dl), platelet count 77 ± 9 (x103/μl), and bone marrow blast count 44 ± 2.9 (%). Cytogenetic category was classified as intermediate in 30 (55%) patients and poor in 24 (45%) based on the MRC criteria. Six patients (11%) carried FLT3-ITD mutation and 1 carried FLT3 D835 mutation. Complete remission (CR) was achieved in 24 patients (44%) with median numbers of cycles required to achieve CR being 3 (range; 1–6). All patients received further salvage therapies, at the time of failure, with a median of 2.5 (range, 2–5) salvage regimens. As part of the salvage regimen, high-dose cytarabine-based regimen (HDAC) was given to 32 patients (59%). Objective response rate to HDAC was 53%, with 18 pts achieving CR. Median number of courses given was 2 (range, 1–7) with a median duration of response of 3 months. No induction death was reported. Stem cell transplant was performed in total of 9 patients (17%) as a consolidation post HDAC (n=4) or as salvage therapy (n=5). With a median follow-up of 5 months post HMA failure, 5 (9%) patients remained alive receiving therapy. The median overall survival (OS) was 5.4 months (range, 2.3–8.5). The 1-year overall survival rate was 26%. There was no difference in OS between patients who received HDAC versus those who received investigational agents (p=0.25). Conclusion: The outcome of untreated elderly patients with AML who failed HMA is poor with a median survival of 5 months. HDAC based regimen, although active with low treatment related morbidity, yielded no survival improvement compared to investigational agents. Such patients should benefit from more innovative approaches. Disclosures: Ravandi: Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Eisai: Honoraria, Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Update on the Initial Therapy of Multiple Myeloma

American Society of Clinical Oncology Educational Book ◽

10.14694/edbook_am.2013.33.e307 ◽

2013 ◽

pp. e307-e312

Author(s):

Donna Reece

Keyword(s):

Elderly Patients ◽

Progression Free Survival ◽

Response Rates ◽

The Elderly ◽

Initial Therapy ◽

Autologous Stem Cell Transplant ◽

Phase Iii ◽

Novel Agents ◽

Cell Transplant ◽

Bortezomib Treatment

Advances in myeloma biology and the identification of new anti-myeloma agents have resulted in improved management of younger, transplant-eligible, and older patients. The first novel agents—thalidomide, bortezomib, and lenalidomide—have been integrated into induction therapy before autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) as well as into first-line therapy in elderly individuals; phase III trials have established the superiority of these approaches in terms of better response rates, progression-free survival (PFS), and, in some studies, overall survival. With more experience, improvements in dosing have decreased the toxicity of these regimens. Before ASCT, four phase III studies have shown that bortezomib-based regimens confer better outcomes than older regimens. Posttransplant consolidation and maintenance strategies with novel agents provide additional benefit, particularly in terms of a longer PFS. In the elderly population, novel agents can be combined with melphalan plus prednisone (MP). MP plus thalidomide and MP plus bortezomib are commonly utilized, and the regimen of MP plus lenalidomide with lenalidomide maintenance (MPR + R) produces superior response rates and longer PFS compared with MP alone. Prolonged maintenance with bortezomib plus thalidomide also appears to extend PFS when given following combinations of MP plus bortezomib. Treatment of very elderly patients, however, remains challenging due to comorbidities and side effects. Lenalidomide plus weekly dexamethasone is also effective in elderly patients, and results of a trial comparing this regimen with MP plus thalidomide should be available soon. Finally, better methods of risk stratification and the availability of even newer drugs will allow future refinements in myeloma treatment.

Download Full-text

Phase 2 Trial of LDE225 and Lenalidomide Maintenance Post Autologous Stem Cell Transplant for Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-132035 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 1905-1905

Author(s):

Francis K. Buadi ◽

Martha Q. Lacy ◽

Angela Dispenzieri ◽

Gabriela Perez ◽

Morie A. Gertz ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Overall Survival ◽

Stem Cell ◽

Maintenance Therapy ◽

Research Funding ◽

Stem Cell Transplant ◽

Autologous Stem Cell Transplant ◽

High Dose ◽

Cell Transplant ◽

Grade 3

Background: Lenalidomide maintenance therapy post-autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is associated with improved progression-free survival (PFS) and possibly overall survival in multiple myeloma (MM). However, almost all patients do relapse as a result of residual multiple myeloma cells that remain after the high-dose chemotherapy. In the myeloma setting it has been found that the hedgehog (Hh) pathway is essential for maintaining a subset of tumor causing stem cells. LDE 225 (Sonidegib) is a potent selective oral bioavailable antagonist of Smoothened (SMO), a component of the Hh signaling pathway. In in vitro experiments, LDE225 treatment of myeloma cell lines resulted in a modest inhibition of cell proliferation at increasing doses. When LDE225 was combined with lenalidomide, a more than additive effect was observed in terms of cell proliferation, an effect that was more pronounced in the context of myeloma cell lines growing in co-culture with marrow derived stromal cells. These findings form the basis of evaluation of LDE 225 as a strategy to enhance the activity of lenalidomide in the post-transplant maintenance setting. The minimal residual state post SCT provides the most optimal situation for evaluation of a drug that is likely to work by inhibiting the tumor cells that escaped high dose therapy. Methods: Multiple myeloma patients without evidence of progression, who were 60 - 120 days after a single autologous stem cell transplant (SCT), performed within 1 year of diagnosis were eligible for the study. Maintenance therapy was started approximately 3 months after SCT. Treatment consisted of lenalidomide 10 mg days 1-21 and LDE225 400 mg days 1-28 in 28-day cycles for a total of 18 cycles. The goal of the study was to assess toxicity of this combination, complete response rate (CR) progression free survival (PFS) at 1 and 2 year and overall survival (OS). CR and PFS were estimated using an exact binomial distribution and Kaplan Meier curves respectively. Results: A total of 28 patients were accrued from Jan 2014 to Aug 2016, 1 patient canceled prior to treatment and 1 patient was deemed ineligible resulting in 26 evaluable pts for CR and PFS. The median age of all pts (n=26) was 60 years (range 43-69) and 50% were males. Seventy-three percent of patients reported one treatment regimen prior to SCT, while 27% reported 2 or more prior regimens. The other characteristics of the patient are summarized in Table 1. Twenty seven pts received at least one cycle of treatment and are evaluable for toxicities (AE). Patients were treated for a median of 12.5 (range 1-18) cycles. While 10 pts (38.5%) completed protocol treatment (18 cycles), the remaining 16 pts went off treatment due to AEs (6, 23%), disease progression (3, 11.5%), refusal of further treatment (3, 11.5%) and other reasons (4, 15.4%). A grade 3 or higher AE at least possibly attributed to either drug was seen in 63%. Grade 3+ hematologic toxicities were noted in 30%, with 7% neutropenia and 4% thrombocytopenia. Notable grade 2+ non-hematologic toxicities with more than 5% incidence were dysgeusia 22%, alopecia 11%, and anorexia 7%. Grade 3+ non-hematologic toxicities were fatigue, myalgia and arthralgia each at 7%. The CR rate in evaluable patients was 46% (5 CRs and 7 sCRs) with a 95% CI of 27% - 66%. CR rate improved from 31% to 46%. VGPR or better improved from 42% to 85%. The 24-month PFS (time from SCT to progression or death due to any cause) was 73% (95% CI: 57.9 - 92.3%) with a median time to censoring of 38 months. Conclusion: Lenalidomide in combination with LDE225 as posttransplant maintenance therapy was associated with some toxicity but manageable. The combination improved the depth of response after autologous stem cell transplant. Long-term follow-up is needed to determine overall survival. Disclosures Lacy: Celgene: Research Funding. Dispenzieri:Celgene: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy; Intellia: Consultancy; Akcea: Consultancy; Alnylam: Research Funding. Gertz:Ionis: Honoraria; Alnylam: Honoraria; Prothena: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Spectrum: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria. Kapoor:Glaxo Smith Kline: Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Cellectar: Consultancy; Takeda: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria; Sanofi: Consultancy, Research Funding. Dingli:alexion: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Millenium: Consultancy; Rigel: Consultancy; Karyopharm: Research Funding. Russell:Imanis: Equity Ownership. Kumar:Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding. OffLabel Disclosure: Sonidegib (LDE 225) is a selective oral bioavailable antagonist of Smoothened (SMO), a component of the hedgehog signaling pathway.

Download Full-text

Role of High-Dose Chemotherapy with Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation in Primary Systemic Amyloidosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v110.11.2872.2872 ◽

2007 ◽

Vol 110 (11) ◽

pp. 2872-2872

Author(s):

Madhusmita Behera ◽

Ambuj Kumar ◽

Mohamed A. Kharfan-Dabaja ◽

Benjamin Djulbegovic

Keyword(s):

Systematic Review ◽

Overall Survival ◽

Stem Cell ◽

Stem Cell Transplant ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

High Dose Chemotherapy ◽

Autologous Stem Cell Transplant ◽

High Dose ◽

Cell Transplant ◽

Conventional Chemotherapy

Abstract Background: Primary systemic amyloidosis (AL) is a rare plasma cell clonal disorder(8/million) characterized by extracellular deposits of material composed mainly of fragments of light chain immunoglobulin throughout a body. Standard chemotherapy (e.g. melphalan and prednisone) is associated with poor outcomes (typical median survival is between 12–18 months with less than 5% survive 10 years). Autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) has been increasingly advocated for treatment of AL. However, it is uncertain whether ASCT is better than standard chemotherapy. To address this uncertainty, we undertook a systematic review/meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy of high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem-cell transplant (HSCT) versus conventional chemotherapy in patients with AL. Methods: Data search of published studies included Medline [all randomized controlled trials (RCTs)], Cochrane library and hand search of references. Studies were included if they were comparison trials of HSCT versus conventional chemotherapy, regardless if they were RCTs, prospective studies with historical control, or single arm studies. The studies were eligible if patients had biopsy proven AL with at least one major organ involved. Data were extracted on benefits as well as harms (overall survival, event-free survival, response, treatment related mortality, treatment-related morbidity). Results: Out of 34 identified studies only 13 met the inclusion criteria for the current systematic review (2 RCTs, 2 prospective non-randomized trials involving historical control, and 9 single arm trials). Altogether these trials enrolled 1056 patients. Pooled data from 4 trials with controls (RCT and non-RCT) found similar overall survival for ASCT and conventional therapy arms [hazard ratio (HR) of 1.10 (95% CI 0.88, 1.36, p=0.4); p= 0.6]. Analysis of data according to trial design also did not find any difference in survival [HR for RCTs was 1.10 (95% CI 0.88, 1.37) and for non RCTs HR was 0.98 (95% CI 0.29, 3.35)]. The complete hematological response was also similar in both arms in RCTs (Odds ratio [OR]=1.38, 95%CI 0.67, 2.85; p=0.4) and non RCTs (OR=1.78, 95%CI 0.22, 14.65; p=0.32). The pooled proportion of treatment-related deaths in the single arm studies for AHCT was 0.119 (95% CI = 0.09 to 0.14)]. Conclusion: The results from the meta-analysis indicate that there is no statistically significant difference between the treatment effects from high-dose chemotherapy with ASCT and conventional chemotherapy. Hence, the efficacy of ASCT in improving overall survival and complete hematological response remains to be proven.

Download Full-text

Second Autologous Stem Cell Transplant (ASCT) as Salvage Therapy in Patients with Relapsed Multiple Myeloma.

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v114.22.1217.1217 ◽

2009 ◽

Vol 114 (22) ◽

pp. 1217-1217

Author(s):

Joseph R. Mikhael ◽

Sahar Zadeh ◽

A. Keith Stewart ◽

Christine Chen ◽

Suzanne Trudel ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Overall Survival ◽

Salvage Therapy ◽

Median Overall Survival ◽

Stem Cell Transplant ◽

Progression Free Survival ◽

Autologous Stem Cell Transplant ◽

Cell Transplant ◽

Free Survival ◽

Free Interval ◽

Ortho Biotech

Abstract Abstract 1217 Poster Board I-239 Background Single autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) is considered the standard of care after induction therapy for younger multiple myeloma (MM) patients (pts). However, it is not curative and virtually all patients will ultimately relapse. As more options are available to treat relapsed disease, the role of a second ASCT as salvage therapy is unclear. Method Retrospective review of all MM pts who received a 2nd ASCT as salvage therapy at Princess Margaret Hospital. Results Between February 1997 and July 2009, 79 MM pts received a second ASCT for relapsed MM at our institution. Median age was 60 yrs (range 39-72) at second transplant. 48 pts (61%) were male. Immunoglobulin subtype included IgG (42), IgA (21), light chain (11), nonsecretory (3), IgM(1) and IgD (1). Transplant conditioning regimen for first transplant was high dose melphalan (MEL) 140-200 mg/m2 in 67, busulphan and cyclophosphamide in 1, and combinations of MEL with etoposide (E) or TBI in the rest. 2nd ASCT conditioning consisted of MEL alone in 76, the remaining 3 had MEL with either TBI or E. The median time to relapse after the first transplant was 2.72 years (0.81-8.26), with a median interval between transplants of 3.61 years (1.63-9.59). Response to first transplant in 78 evaluable patients was 13 CR/nCR (17%), 56 PR/VGPR (72%), 9 MR/SD (12%). Nineteen pts received maintenance therapy between transplants. Two transplant-related deaths occurred following 2nd ASCT. In 73 evaluable patients, response to second transplant was 11 CR/nCR (15%), 57 PR (78%), 6 MR/SD (8%). After 2nd ASCT, with median follow up 5.92 years (71 months), median progression-free survival (PFS) was 18.5 months and median overall survival (OS) was 4.4 years. Long term progression-free status based on the progression-free interval after 1st ASCT is summarized Table 1. PFS based on progression free interval after 1st ASCT is outlined in Figure 1. Conclusions 2nd ASCT is a feasible and safe salvage therapy in relapsed MM patients. It is effective in providing a median progression free survival of 18.5 months and median overall survival of 4.4 years (52.8 months) after 2nd ASCT. This is comparable if not better than modern salvage chemotherapies. The longer the disease free interval after 1st ASCT the more effective 2nd ASCT is at extending both progression free survival and overall survival. It is reasonable, therefore, to consider a 2nd ASCT if the time to progression is greater than 2 years after first ASCT. Disclosures Chen: Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Ortho Biotech: Honoraria. Trudel:Celgene: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Ortho Biotech: Honoraria. Kukreti:Celgene: Honoraria.

Download Full-text

Tandem Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation in Chemorefractory Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v120.21.4554.4554 ◽

2012 ◽

Vol 120 (21) ◽

pp. 4554-4554

Author(s):

Catherine Garnett ◽

Chrissy Giles ◽

Osman Ahmed ◽

Maialen Lasa ◽

Holger W. Auner ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Overall Survival ◽

Stem Cell ◽

Stem Cell Transplantation ◽

Stem Cell Transplant ◽

Progression Free Survival ◽

Autologous Stem Cell Transplant ◽

Cell Transplant ◽

Free Survival

Abstract Abstract 4554 High-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is currently standard treatment for younger patients with multiple myeloma, resulting in improved survival and response rate compared to conventional chemotherapy. Disease relapse, however, remains almost inevitable and thus the role of two successive (tandem) autologous stem cell transplants has been evaluated in chemorefractory patients as a means of prolonging duration of disease response. We retrospectively analysed the results of nine patients with chemorefractory disease treated at a single UK institution who received tandem ASCT between January 1998 and February 2009. There were six men and three women. Median age at diagnosis was 56 years (range, 42–65 years). Paraprotein isotype was IgG in eight patients and IgA in one patient. Median serum paraprotein level was 41g/L (range 12–73g/L) at presentation. At time of 1st transplant six patients were in stable disease (SD) and three had evidence of progressive disease. Conditioning melphalan dose was 140mg/m2 in all but two patients who received 110mg/m2 and 200mg/m2. Median time between transplants was 3.7 months (range 2.3–6.4 months) with PR and SD being observed in 2/9 and 7/9 patients at time of 2nd transplant. None of the patients reached complete response (CR). One patient received melphalan 140mg/m2 prior to 2nd transplant. The remaining patients received melphalan 200mg/m2. Median follow up after tandem transplant was 54.3 months (range 15.6 –143.6 months). No treatment related mortality was reported. At the time of analysis, six patients were still alive and under follow up with an overall survival (OS) figure for the group of 52% at 10 years from diagnosis (Figure 1). Median progression free survival (PFS) was 20 months from 2nd transplant (range 6.7–62.6 months) (Figure 2). Tandem autologous stem cell transplant in chemorefractory patients has resulted in overall survival similar to autologous stem cell transplant in chemosensitive patients and should be considered in patients with chemorefractory disease. Figure 1: Overall survival from diagnosis in patients receiving tandem autologous stem cell transplant for multiple myeloma Figure 1:. Overall survival from diagnosis in patients receiving tandem autologous stem cell transplant for multiple myeloma Figure 2: Progression free survival following tandem transplant Figure 2:. Progression free survival following tandem transplant Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Download Full-text

Bortezomib-High Dose Melphalan Conditioning for the Treatment of MM Patients Undergoing ASCT

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v128.22.2273.2273 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 128 (22) ◽

pp. 2273-2273

Author(s):

Victor Jimenez-Zepeda ◽

Peter Duggan ◽

Paola Neri ◽

Ahsan Chaudhry ◽

Jason Tay ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Flow Cytometry ◽

Overall Survival ◽

Proteasome Inhibitor ◽

Research Funding ◽

Clinical Characteristics ◽

Conditioning Regimen ◽

Progression Free Survival ◽

High Dose ◽

Free Survival ◽

High Dose Melphalan

Abstract Introduction Recent data suggests that bortezomib, a proteasome inhibitor, in combination with high-dose melphalan (Bor-HDM) provides with a synergistic effect able to improve the level of response for MM patients undergoing auto-SCT. In the present study, patients receiving induction followed by ASCT with Bor-HDM and HDM alone were evaluated. Methods All consecutive patients undergoing ASCT from 01/2004 to 03/2016 were evaluated. All patients received induction chemotherapy before undergoing auto-SCT. Patients received conditioning with either HDM at 200 mg/m2 (or adjusted as per renal failure) or HDM with Bortezomib (Bor-HDM). Most of patients received Bortezomib conditioning at 1.3 mg/m2. As per physician discretion, the dose of 1 mg/m2 was also employed in 30% of cases. Definitions of response and progression were used according to the EBMT modified criteria. MRD negativity was assessed by flow cytometry at day-100 post-ASCT. Results Clinical characteristics are shown in Table 1. Among 301 cases, 129 were treated with Bor-HDM while 172 patients went onto receive HDM alone as part of the conditioning regimen. Induction regimens are shown in Table 1. At the time of analysis, 83% and 58% of patients in the Bor-HDM and HDM group are still alive and 34% and 69.1% of patients have already progressed, respectively. At day-100 post ASCT, ORR of 97%, with CR/VGPR rate of 84.2% was seen in the Bor-HDM group compared to 94.2% and 68.6% in the HDM group (p=0.001). MRD negativity was higher in the Bor-HDM group (33.3%) compared to HDM (12.2%) (p=0.001). Median OS was similar for Bor-HDM and HDM (p=0.864) (Fig 1a). In addition, median PFS did not differ among patients receiving HDM or Bor-HDM (37.7months vs 29.3 months, p=0.2) (Fig1b) In conclusion,Bor-HDMis a conditioning regimen able to provide higher rates ofnCR/CR, as well as MRD negativity compared to HDM alone. Further studies are warranted to explore this regimen, especially when other upfront therapies are employed. Overall Survival according to the conditioning regimen employed for patients with MM undergoing ASCT Overall Survival according to the conditioning regimen employed for patients with MM undergoing ASCT Figure 1 Progression-Free Survival according to the conditioning regimen employed for patients with MM undergoing ASCT Figure 1. Progression-Free Survival according to the conditioning regimen employed for patients with MM undergoing ASCT Disclosures Jimenez-Zepeda: Takeda: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; Celgene, Janssen, Amgen, Onyx: Honoraria. Neri:Celgene and Jannsen: Consultancy, Honoraria. Bahlis:Onyx: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel Expenses, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel Expenses, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau.

Download Full-text

Patterns of Relapse Among Myeloma Patients Post-Autologous Stem Cell Transplant

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v128.22.4524.4524 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 128 (22) ◽

pp. 4524-4524

Author(s):

Prashanth Kumar ◽

Nisha Joseph ◽

Dhwani Almaula ◽

Lawrence H Boise ◽

Jonathan L. Kaufman ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Overall Survival ◽

Stem Cell ◽

Research Funding ◽

Stem Cell Transplant ◽

Autologous Stem Cell Transplant ◽

Cell Transplant ◽

Biochemical Relapse ◽

Entire Cohort ◽

Symptomatic Relapse

Abstract Introduction: In younger patients that are transplant-eligible, autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) prolongs overall survival based on several prospective randomized control trials. Nevertheless, ASCT is not a curative approach and majority of the patient's relapse, requiring further salvage therapeutic options. However, in the face of an ongoing paradigm shift in myeloma therapeutics, there is a significant knowledge gap regarding how patients relapse following ASCT. We analyzed the patterns of relapse among myeloma patients after ASCT. Methodology: We have evaluated a total of 975 patients that underwent ASCT during the period January 2008 through June 2014 from our myeloma database. 273 patients had documented evidence of first relapse post-ASCT on the laboratory parameters, radiologic or pathologic findings based on IMWG criteria for relapse. We categorized the relapses as biochemical vs symptomatic, and described their frequencies and characteristics. Median time of follow up from diagnosis is 68 months and from ASCT is 54 months. We used IBM SPSS version 23.0 to generate the survival statistics. Results: Median time from ASCT to relapse is 20 months. A total of 182 (66.7%) patients (105M, 77F) experienced biochemical relapse, while 91 (33.3%) patients (50M, 41F) had symptomatic relapse. More IgA patients (30.8% vs 23.1%, p=0.06) relapsed as symptomatic myeloma. While characterizing relapses, we did not find any differences in symptomatic relapses by the risk group [high risk (31.3%) vs standard risk (31.9%), p=0.193, ISS stage I (29.3%) vs II (32.9%) vs III (32.8%), p=0.807] or by maintenance [yes (30.7%) vs no (38.1%), p=0.211]. Among the patients that had a symptomatic relapse, presence of new bone lesions (52%) and anemia (42%) are the most common forms of relapse seen. Only 4% presented as hypercalcemia and 1% presented as renal failure illustrating the benefits of closer follow up. Overall survival is similar among patients that relapsed as biochemical or symptomatic relapse (log rank, p=0.105). More importantly, impressive median OS of 145 months from the ASCT among this entire cohort (at median follow up 54 months, figure 1). Conclusions: Two-thirds of the patients relapse as a biochemical relapse post-ASCT. The patterns of biochemical vs symptomatic relapses were similar among patients by maintenance, by risk status and also by the ISS stage. The significant improvement in OS among the entire cohort emphasizes the power of the new therapeutic salvage strategies aimed at gaining the survival advantage even among this selected group of patients undergoing early relapses. Disclosures Kaufman: Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Incyte: Consultancy; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy. Lonial:Novartis: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Onyx: Consultancy; Onyx: Consultancy; Merck: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; Millenium: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy. Nooka:Spectrum, Novartis, Onyx pharmaceuticals: Consultancy.

Download Full-text

A Phase 2 Multi-Center, Open Label Study of Isatuximab Added to Standard Cybord Induction and Lenalidomide Maintenance Treatments in Newly Diagnosed, Transplant Eligible Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2021-153632 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 4767-4767

Author(s):

Rami Kotb ◽

Engin Gul ◽

Donna E. Reece

Keyword(s):

Stem Cell ◽

Sample Size ◽

Research Funding ◽

Response Rate ◽

Autologous Stem Cell Transplant ◽

Induction Treatment ◽

High Dose ◽

Cell Transplant ◽

Newly Diagnosed ◽

High Dose Melphalan

Abstract Background: Despite recent improvements, myeloma is still incurable. There is need to add new therapeutic tools. For young and fit patients, the current standard first-line therapy is a proteasome inhibitor (PI) containing induction, followed by stem cell collection, high dose Melphalan and autologous stem cell transplantation, followed by maintenance lenalidomide therapy in Canada. The anti-CD38 antibodies showed interesting activity in myeloma, and significant synergism with PI and IMiD based regimens. This CMRG-008 trial is designed to explore the benefit of adding Isatuximab to the current Canadian standard of care (CyBorD induction/Autologous SCT/Maintenance Len) in a single arm phase II trial. Design and Methods: Phase II study. Transplant eligible newly diagnosed myeloma patients (TE-NDMM) will receive Isatuximab added to four cycles of standard induction CyBorD chemotherapy (Cyclophosphamide 300 mg/m 2 PO, Bortezomib 1.5 mg/m 2 SC, and Dex 40 mg PO, all given on days 1, 8, 15 and 22 of 28-day cycles; Isatuximab 10 mg/kg IV days 1, 8, 15 and 22 of cycle 1; days 1 and 15 of cycles 2-4). After the completion of the induction treatment, subjects achieving at least stable disease will receive stem cell mobilization, collection of hematopoietic stem cells, high dose melphalan chemotherapy, and autologous stem cell transplantation. Maintenance treatment will start at 100 days (+/- 7 days) after the transplantation date (and to be continued until disease progression). The maintenance treatment will consist of Isatuximab administered in combination with Lenalidomide in 28-day cycles (Lenalidomide: 10 mg daily on days 1-21 of every cycle; Isatuximab: 10 mg/kg IV on days days 1, 8, 15 and 22 of cycle 1; days 1 & 15 of cycles 2-3; then day 1 of each subsequent cycle). The objectives: To evaluate the benefit of adding Isatuximab to CyBorD (induction = Isa + CyBorD) and Lenalidomide (maintenance = Isa + Lenalidomide) in transplant-eligible myeloma patients. Primary Endpoint: To determine the response rate (VGPR or better) defined by IMWG criteria at 100 days (+/- 7 days) after the autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT). Secondary Endpoints: A) To determine the response rate (VGPR or better) after induction treatment (before ASCT), and at 12 months, 24 months and 36 months. B) To evaluate additional efficacy outcomes including progression free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS), time to response and duration of response. C) To confirm the feasibility, safety and tolerability of adding Isatuximab to CyBorD and to maintenance lenalidomide in transplant-eligible newly diagnosed myeloma patients. D) To determine the feasibility of autologous stem cell collection after Isa + CyBorD induction treatment. The key inclusion criteria are having a TE-NDMM with a measurable disease; adequate performance status; and adequate organ functions. The key exclusion criteria include previous exposure to anti-CD38 therapy, intolerance to CyBorD, adverse cardiac history, pulmonary disease, central nervous system disease, congenital or acquired immune suppression, and other concurrent severe or uncontrolled medical conditions. Statistics and Sample Size: Considering that the response rate (VGPR or better) after CyBorD induction therapy, high dose chemotherapy and autologous SCT is about 70-78%; and assuming a response rate (VGPR or better) to Isa-CyBorD induction and autologous stem cell transplant at 100 +/- 7 days of 88%; a sample size of 65 evaluable subjects will allow estimating the 95% confidence interval with a precision of +/- 7.9%. For the assumed rate and sample size, the lower bound of the confidence interval will be estimated to be larger than 80%. Assuming a 10% drop out rate, a total study size of 72 patients will be considered. This study is expected to open to recruitment in the third quarter of 2021. Clinicaltrials.gov #: NCT04786028. Disclosures Kotb: Janssen: Honoraria; Merck: Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria; Akcea: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria; Sanofi: Honoraria, Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria; Karyopharm: Current holder of individual stocks in a privately-held company. Reece: BMS: Honoraria, Research Funding; GSK: Honoraria; Karyopharm: Consultancy, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Millennium: Research Funding; Sanofi: Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Optimal Therapy for Relapsed AL Amyloidosis Post Autologous Stem Cell Transplant

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-125453 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 3171-3171

Author(s):

M Hasib Sidiqi ◽

Abdullah S. S. Al Saleh ◽

Iuliana Vaxman ◽

Angela Dispenzieri ◽

Francis K. Buadi ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Progression Free Survival ◽

Autologous Stem Cell Transplant ◽

Al Amyloidosis ◽

Cell Transplant ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Free Survival ◽

Treatment Regimens ◽

2Nd Generation

Introduction: There is a paucity of randomized trials to guide therapy for relapsed AL amyloidosis with treatment regimens generally extrapolated from experience in multiple myeloma. Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of patients who relapsed after receiving autologous stem cell transplant at Mayo Clinic. Patients treated for first relapse between January 2004 and December 2018 were included. Results: Three hundred and twenty-one patients were seen for relapsed AL amyloidosis post ASCT during the study period. Baseline characteristics were typical for a cohort with AL amyloidosis and are listed in Table1. 39% received therapy prior to transplant, conditioning in the majority (75%) was melphalan 200mg/m2. The median progression free survival from transplant (PFS1) was 30.7 months. Of the 321 patients 294 received treatment for relapsed disease. We categorized treatment regimens according to commonly used combinations and drug classes to further analyze outcomes. 34 patients were excluded from this analysis as they either proceeded directly to second ASCT (n=10) or received an atypical regimen not commonly considered for AL amyloidosis (n=24). Five categories of therapy regimens were identified, thalidomide based (n=110), melphalan plus steroids (n=31), 2nd generation immunomodulatory (IMiD) drug +/- alkylator (n=76), proteasome inhibitor (PI) +/- alkylator (n=116), PI plus IMiD (n=16), or daratumumab based (n=9). Disease and treatment characteristics for patients treated with these regimens are listed in Table 2. Patients treated with thalidomide had the shortest PFS1 (17.7 months) but PFS1 was similar for those treated with melphalan plus steroids, PI+IMiD and 2nd generation IMiDs (25.5, 24.3 and 25.6 months respectively). Patients treated with a PI +/- alkylator and daratumumab based regimen had the longest PFS1 (36.7 and 41.9 months respectively). The median duration of therapy was longer in patients treated with a 2nd generation IMiD or daratumumab based regimen (10.2, 12, 6.1, 5.5, 6.2 and 5.9 months for Dara based, 2nd generation IMiD, PI+/- alkylator, PI+IMiD, melphalan plus steroids and thalidomide based respectively). Hematologic response rate was lowest in those treated with melphalan plus steroids or thalidomide based regimens (44% and 55% respectively) and highest for patients treated with a PI+/- alkylator, (Figure 1). Progression free survival from relapsed therapy (PFS2) was longest amongst patients treated with daratumumab based regimens, PI +/- alkylator and 2nd generation IMiDs (not reached, 29.9 and 26.7 months respectively), Figure 2A. Overall survival from time of relapsed therapy favored patients treated with daratumumab based regimens, 2nd generation IMiDs and PI +/- alkylator, Figure 2b). Conclusion: A second generation IMiD based regimen or PI +/- alkylator produce high response rates and prolonged progression free and overall survival for relapsed AL amyloidosis. Patients treated with daratumumab based regimens and those treated with a PI plus IMiD also appear to do well, although numbers were low in our study. Patients treated with melphalan plus steroids or thalidomide based combinations have inferior outcomes and these regimens should be avoided. Disclosures Dispenzieri: Celgene: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy; Intellia: Consultancy; Akcea: Consultancy; Alnylam: Research Funding. Lacy:Celgene: Research Funding. Dingli:Karyopharm: Research Funding; Rigel: Consultancy; Millenium: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; alexion: Consultancy. Leung:Takeda: Research Funding; Prothena: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Aduro: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Omeros: Research Funding. Kapoor:Glaxo Smith Kline: Research Funding; Sanofi: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria; Cellectar: Consultancy; Amgen: Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding. Kumar:Takeda: Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding. Gertz:Medscape: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Prothena Biosciences Inc: Consultancy; Ionis/Akcea: Consultancy; Alnylam: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Spectrum: Consultancy, Research Funding; Appellis: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; Physicians Education Resource: Consultancy; Abbvie: Other: personal fees for Data Safety Monitoring board; Research to Practice: Consultancy; Teva: Speakers Bureau; Johnson and Johnson: Speakers Bureau; DAVA oncology: Speakers Bureau; Pharmacyclics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Proclara: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; i3Health: Other: Development of educational programs and materials; Springer Publishing: Patents & Royalties; Amyloidosis Foundation: Research Funding; International Waldenstrom Foundation: Research Funding; Annexon: Consultancy. OffLabel Disclosure: Daratumumab off label use for AL amyloidosis.

Download Full-text