Abnormal Hevylite Assay Ratio As a Prognostic Marker for Survival in Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Patients Treated On Total Therapy 3

Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 3976-3976
Author(s):  
Josh Bornhorst ◽  
Adam Rosenthal ◽  
Rachael Sexton ◽  
Alan Mitchell ◽  
Linda Traylor ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Clinical Laboratory ◽  
Conflicts Of Interest ◽  
Small Subset ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Serum Samples ◽  
Pilot Studies ◽  
Baseline Serum ◽  
Total Therapy

Abstract Abstract 3976 Background: International guidelines for identifying monoclonal gammopathies now include serum protein electrophoresis (SPEP) and serum free light chain (FLC) immunoassays with derived kappa/lambda (κ/λ) ratios. Compared with the absolute FLC concentration, the use of the (κ/λ) ratio is a more sensitive marker of monoclonal FLC production because it also includes suppression of the non tumor FLC in its calculation and also has prognostic implications in multiple myeloma (MM). Following this rationale, pilot studies have indicated that novel paired immunoassays, called Hevylite (HLC) assay, enables the measurement of isotype matched immunoglobulin pairs (IgGκ/IgGλ, IgAκ/IgAλ) and offer a sensitive alternative to immunofixation. We examined the performance of HLC assay on stored samples from newly diagnosed MM patients treated on two successive Total Therapy 3 trials (TT3A & TT3B). Methods: The details of the TT3A and TT3B clinical trials have been previously published. The IgA and IgG k/λ HLC reagent kits, provided by The Binding Site, Inc, have been used to run the test on a subset of TT3A patients where the stored serum samples were still available. UAMS Clinical Laboratory tested samples for IgA k/λ and IgG k/λ HLC nephelometrically using BNII. Chi-square and Fisher's exact tests were used to compare baseline characteristics between protocols patients with and without available serum samples. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression were used to model associations between baseline covariates and HLC assay. Kaplan and Meier method was used to model progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Results: 101 baseline serum samples were available (TT3A=67, TT3B=34) for patients with IgGκ (n=45), IgGλ (n=22), IgAκ (n=17) and IgAλ (n=17) isotype MM. Patient characteristics between the patients with and without available samples were comparable except a higher proportion of IgA isotype, higher baseline serum CRP and higher baseline serum LDH in patients without available samples (Table 1). There were no differences in PFS or OS amongst the 4 heavy chain isotypes. Whether evaluating by optimal cut-point or by tertiles, there were no differences in PFS/OS for the IgAκ, IgAλ or IgGλ MM. There was an OS benefit observed for IgGκ MM subset (Figure 1) by baseline samples, even when landmarked at 3 years (Figure 2). Comparing post-therapy HLC ratio normalization in 33 paired samples (IgG k/λ =25, IgA k/λ =8), there was a trend for improved OS in patients who had normalized the ratio after autologous stem cell transplantation (Figure 3). Conclusions: These data provide early evidence of pre- and post-therapeutic prognostic utility of the HLC assay. Although our study was conducted on a small subset of TT3 patients, these data support the prospective evaluation of the HLC assay in upfront MM clinical trials. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

scholarly journals Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment in Consecutive Newly-Diagnosed Elderly Multiple Myeloma Patients in China: A Multicentered, Prospective, Non-Interventional Study

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 5493-5493
Author(s):  
Yuan Yao ◽  
Dehui Zou ◽  
Aijun Liao ◽  
Xiaoxia Chu ◽  
Wei Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Cognitive Impairment ◽  
Geriatric Assessment ◽  
Real World ◽  
Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Frail Patients

Background: Multiple Myeloma (MM) is a disease of the elderly, whose prognoses are highly heterogeneous. Hence International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) proposed geriatric assessment (GA) in 2015, including daily activity and comorbidity status, to better discriminate between fit and frail patients (Palumbo et al, 2015). However, IMWG recruited patients from clinical trials instead of real world practices. Therefore we studied GA in elderly MM patients consecutively in China, along with other perspectives which are known to be problematic in elderly population that were previously left unnoticed, such as nutrition status, risk of cognitive impairment, risk of depression, and quality of life. Aim: Our study centers on the feasibility to perform a more comprehensive geriatric assessment (cGA) in elderly MM patients, current cGA status in elderly MM patients in China, and the cGA difference between Chinese patients and patients in the IMWG study. Method: From August 2017 to April 2019, we continuously recruited 336 newly diagnosed elderly (age ≥ 65) MM patients from 21 centers in China. cGA was performed at diagnosis, after treatment cycle 1, after cycle 4, and 1 year after treatment. cGA includes physical conditions (ECOG), activities of daily living (ADL), instrumental ADL (IADL), mini-nutritional assessment (MNA-SF), geriatric depression scale (GDS), mini-mental state examination (MMSE), quality of life (SF-36) and Charlson comorbidity index (CCI). Staging was assessed at baseline (International Staging System (ISS) & Revised ISS) and hematological responses were evaluated along with each cGA timepoint. Results: We pool-analyzed data of 336 newly-diagnosed elderly MM patients. The median age was 70 (range 65-88) and 25.5% of patients were older than 75 years. 336 (100%) patients were able to complete cGA, and median assessment time was 40 minutes (range 20-70). Upon diagnosis, only 34% and 37.5% of patients had full ADL and IADL respectively. 38.5% of patients had moderate to high risk of depression (GDS ≥ 6). 13.2% of patients were malnourished (MNA-SF ≤ 7), while 46.3% of patients were at risk of malnutrition (8 ≤ MNA-SF ≤ 11). 41% of patients had at least one comorbidity (CCI ≥ 1). 45.7% of patients had moderate to intermediate risk of cognitive impairment (MMSE ≤ 26). Grouping by IMWG-GA index, our study identified 59.9% patients in frail group (vs 39% in IMWG study), 15.8% in intermediate (vs 31% in IMWG) and 24.3% in fit (vs 30% in IMWG). 69% of patients received proteasome inhibitor-containing regimens and 20.7% of patients received lenalidomide-containing regimens. Best hematological responses in fit and intermediate groups were better than responses in frail group (≥ PR rate: 88.5% in fit, 94.4% in intermediate vs 77.5% in frail). Median follow up time was 10 months. To date, 215 (64%) patients have finished the cGA after cycle 1; 164 (48.8%) patients have finished the cGA after cycle 4; 91 (27.1%) patients has finished all 4 planned cGA and improvements in cGA were observed in the majority of these patients. Conclusion: Our study showed significant CGA heterogeneity in elderly MM patients. Even in the IMWG-GA "fit" group, nutrition, depression and cognitive impairment remain problems. Frail patients took up a larger proportion in Chinese elderly MM patients compared to IMWG study. Our study strongly justifies the necessity for cGA in elderly patients with MM, more so in the real world MM patients than in the clinical trials. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

scholarly journals Safety and Efficacy of Four Drug Versus Three Drug Regimens Among Patients with Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 3-3
Author(s):  
Saad Ullah Malik ◽  
Nazma Hanif ◽  
Priyanka Kumari ◽  
Khadija Noor Sami ◽  
Chase Warner ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Randomized Clinical Trials ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Drug Regimen ◽  
P Value ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Drug Regimens ◽  
Grade 3

Introduction: During recent years there has been a boom in the availability of treatments for multiple myeloma (MM). Based on the status of disease (newly diagnosed or relapsed/refractory), several regimens have successfully improved progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in these two types of patients. Triple drug regimen is considered the current standard of care for newly diagnosed MM patients. However, with the advent of four drug regimens, some studies demonstrated a significant improvement in PFS and OS compared to standard of care where as others showed marginal to no difference. Also, it remains unclear whether the benefits of using four drug regimen outweigh the risks. Thus, the aim of our meta-analysis was to compare the efficacy and safety of four drug versus three drug regimens among newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients. Methods: We built a PICO based search strategy using keywords like "multiple myeloma", "randomized clinical trials" and ran literature search on PubMed, Embase, Wiley Cochrane Library, Web of Science and ClinicalTrials.gov ranging from the date of inception till 16th July, 2020. A pre-validated data extraction sheet was used to extract data on PFS, OS and ≥Grade 3 hematologic adverse events at the longest follow-up. We included only randomized clinical trials (RCTs) comparing four versus three drug regimen in newly diagnosed MM patients. We excluded studies other than RCTs, studies conducted on relapsed refractory MM patients or other plasma cell dyscrasias. A generic variance weighted random effects model (DerSimonian and Laird) was used to derive hazard ratio estimates along with their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for PFS and OS. Risk ratio along with its 95% CIs was estimated for Grade ≥3 hematologic adverse events. Heterogeneity was assessed with Cochrane Q -statistic and was quantified with I2 test (I2 >50% was consistent with a high degree of heterogeneity). A pre-specified sensitivity analysis was also performed for risk of adverse events. Cochrane Collaboration's tool was used to assess the quality of included RCTs and GRADE was used to rate the quality of evidence. Results: Initial search retrieved 7622 titles. After duplicate removal, 4880 articles were left. Following initial screening, 58 articles were considered for full text review. Of these only 3 studies (n=2277) met inclusion criteria. Four drug regimens included daratumumab, bortezomib, melphalan-prednisone (D-VMP), daratumumab, bortezomib, thalidomide-dexamethasone (D-VTd) and bortezomib and melphalan prednisone and thalidomide (VMPT-VT) respectively. Whereas, three drug regimens were bortezomib, melphalan-prednisone (VMP), bortezomib, thalidomide-dexamethasone (VTd) and bortezomib, melphalan and prednisone (VMP) respectively. There was a significant improvement in PFS when 4 vs 3 drug regimens were compared in patients with newly diagnosed MM (HR: 0.53, 95% CI: 0.46-0.62, p-value:<0.001, I2: 0%). Also, OS improved significantly in four drug regimen group (HR: 0.62, 95% CI: 0.51-0.76, p-value:<0.001, I2: 3.5%). There was no statistically significant difference in any grade ≥3 hematologic adverse events when 4 vs 3 drug regimens were compared (RR: 1.26, 95% CI: 0.93-1.73, p-value:0.14, I2: 93%). Sensitivity analysis after removing D-VTd regimen from any grade ≥3 hematologic adverse events revealed similar results (RR: 1.05, 95% CI: 0.97-1.13, p-value:0.23, I2: 23%) confirming the robustness of analysis. When each hematologic adverse event was looked at separately, there was no difference between 4 vs 3 drug regimen in rates of anemia (RR: 0.99, 95% CI: 0.76-1.28, p-value:0.92, I2: 0%), neutropenia (RR: 1.39, 95% CI: 1.00-1.94, p-value:0.05, I2: 85%) and thrombocytopenia (RR: 1.13, 95% CI: 0.92-1.39, p-value:0.24, I2: 33%). There was low risk of bias and strength of evidence was of moderate. Conclusion: Using four drug regimens, compared to three drug regimens, significantly improves PFS and OS among newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients without any difference in the risk of ≥3 grade hematologic adverse events. Further randomized clinical trials are required to establish four drug regimen as standard of care for patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. Disclosures Anwer: Incyte, Seattle Genetics, Acetylon Pharmaceuticals, AbbVie Pharma, Astellas Pharma, Celegene, Millennium Pharmaceuticals.: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau.

Total Therapy With Tandem Transplants for Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽  
1999 ◽  
Vol 93 (1) ◽  
pp. 55-65 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. Barlogie ◽  
S. Jagannath ◽  
K.R. Desikan ◽  
S. Mattox ◽  
D. Vesole ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Remission Induction ◽  
Comprehensive Treatment ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
High Dose Therapy ◽  
Dose Therapy ◽  
Total Therapy ◽  
Macrophage Colony ◽  
Intent To Treat

Abstract Between August 1990 and August 1995, 231 patients (median age 51, 53% Durie-Salmon stage III, median serum β-2-microglobulin 3.1 g/L, median C-reactive protein 4 g/L) with symptomatic multiple myeloma were enrolled in a program that used a series of induction regimens and two cycles of high-dose therapy (“Total Therapy”). Remission induction utilized non–cross-resistant regimens (vincristine-doxorubicin-dexamethasone [VAD], high-dose cyclophosphamide and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor with peripheral blood stem cell collection, and etoposide-dexamethasone-cytarabine-cisplatin). The first high-dose treatment comprised melphalan 200 mg/m2 and was repeated if complete (CR) or partial (PR) remission was maintained after the first transplant; in case of less than PR, total body irradiation or cyclophosphamide was added. Interferon--2b maintenance was used after the second autotransplant. Fourteen patients with HLA-compatible donors underwent an allograft as their second high-dose therapy cycle. Eighty-eight percent completed induction therapy whereas first and second transplants were performed in 84% and 71% (the majority within 8 and 15 months, respectively). Eight patients (3%) died of toxicity during induction, and 2 (1%) and 6 (4%) during the two transplants. True CR and at least a PR (PR plus CR) were obtained in 5% (34%) after VAD, 15% (65%) at the end of induction, and 26% (75%) after the first and 41% (83%) after the second transplants (intent-to-treat). Median overall (OS) and event-free (EFS) survival durations were 68 and 43 months, respectively. Actuarial 5-year OS and EFS rates were 58% and 42%, respectively. The median time to disease progression or relapse was 52 months. Among the 94 patients achieving CR, the median CR duration was 50 months. On multivariate analysis, superior EFS and OS were observed in the absence of unfavorable karyotypes (11q breakpoint abnormalities, -13 or 13-q) and with low β-2-microglobulin at diagnosis. CR duration was significantly longer with early onset of CR and favorable karyotypes. Time-dependent covariate analysis suggested that timely application of a second transplant extended both EFS and OS significantly, independent of cytogenetics and β-2-microglobulin. Total Therapy represents a comprehensive treatment approach for newly diagnosed myeloma patients, using multi-regimen induction and tandem transplantation followed by interferon maintenance. As a result, the proportion of patients attaining CR increased progressively with continuing therapy. This observation is particularly important because CR is a sine qua non for long-term disease control and, eventually, cure.

Chromosome 1q Amplification Is Associated with a History of Prior Malignancies Among Patients Newly Diagnosed with Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 2193-2193
Author(s):  
Elizabeth B Lamont ◽  
Andrew J. Yee ◽  
Stuart L. Goldberg ◽  
Andrew D Norden
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Usual Care ◽  
Real World ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
History Of ◽  
Equity Ownership ◽  
Prior Malignancy

Background: Over the past 20 years, observational data from usual care clinical oncology settings has been leveraged to inform estimates of cancer treatment-associated benefits and risks among patients not treated on clinical trials. Increasing genomic testing to inform treatment decisions in usual care settings now meaningfully augments traditional observational data, positioning it to provide insights beyond clinical care into tumor biology. We studied patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM), comparing cytogenetic test patterns according to history of prior malignancy. Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, we identified 2,380 patients from the COTA real-world database (RWD) who were newly diagnosed with MM in the years 2010-2018. The COTA RWD is a de-identified composite of both abstracted electronic health record and administrative data pertaining to patients receiving their cancer care at one of COTA's clinical oncology practice partners. Among these patients, 1769 (74%) had evidence of MM-associated cytogenetic testing with fluorescent in-situ hybridization (FISH) within the 120 days surrounding their date of diagnosis. The 1,769 patients form the analytic cohort. We compared patients' FISH results for t(4;14), deletion(17p), t(14;16), deletion(13), t(14;20), t(6;14), t(11;14), deletion (1p), and amplification(1q) according to their history of prior malignancy. Results: Within the cohort, 263 prior malignancies were identified in 241 patients (14%, 241/1,769). Two-hundred and twenty-one patients (92%) had one prior malignancy, 28 (7.9%) had two prior malignancies, and one (<1%) had four prior malignancies. The most common prior malignancies were prostate (n=50), breast (n=19), melanoma (n=14), skin (n=13), and cervix (n=6). Amplification of the long arm of chromosome one (amp(1q)) was noted in 31% of patients (75/241) with a prior malignancy vs. 24% of patients (370/1,528) without (chi2 test p=0.02). Overall 25% of patients had amp(1q). No other translocations, amplifications, deletions were associated with prior cancers. A non-parametric test for trend revealed a strong positive association between patients' malignancy count (range 0-4) and amp1q (p<0.01). MM patients with prior lymphomas and prior melanomas also had high rates of amp(1q), though these were not significantly different from patients without these prior malignancies. In a multivariable logistic regression model that adjusted for patient demographic attributes, other known potentially collinear MM poor prognostic factors (i.e., revised ISS stage, IgA sub-type, lambda light chains) and adjusted standard errors for clustering of patients within treatment settings, a history of prostate cancer remained clinically and statistically significantly positively associated with amp(1q) (OR 2.1, 95% CI: 1.9-2.2) as did history of two or more prior malignancies (OR 2.8, 95% CI: 2.3-3.3). Of note, amp(1q) was positively associated with IgA subtype (OR 1.5, 95% CI: 1.3-1.6) and the presence of lambda subtype (OR 1.3, 95%CI: 1.3-1.4). Conclusions: Using RWD, we found that newly diagnosed MM patients with histories of prostate cancer and those with two or more prior malignancies were more likely to have amp(1q), a poor prognostic marker in MM. Gains in 1q have previously been identified among patients with prostate and lymphoid cancers, but to our knowledge this is the first study to identify an association with a prior history of cancer, especially prostate cancer, and amp(1q) in MM. This relationship is worth further exploration of whether there is a common pathway associated with for example risk of prostate cancer and amp(1q) in MM. Clinical trials are less likely to answer this question as patients with prior malignancies are often excluded from enrollment. Overall, the results reported suggest that RWD is an efficient and comparatively inexpensive tool to support research in cancer biology through hypothesis generating and testing analyses of linked real-world phenotypic and genotypic data. Disclosures Lamont: COTA: Employment. Yee:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Karyopharm: Consultancy; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy; Adaptive: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria. Goldberg:Cancer Outcomes Tracking and Analysis (COTA) Inc.: Equity Ownership; COTA: Equity Ownership; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy. Norden:COTA: Employment, Equity Ownership.

Up-Front Therapy for Multiple Myeloma: A Survey of Practice Patterns in the USA.

Blood ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 106 (11) ◽  
pp. 5172-5172
Author(s):  
Kavita Natarajan ◽  
Gary H. Lyman ◽  
Oscar F. Ballester
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Stem Cell Transplantation ◽  
Cell Transplantation ◽  
Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation ◽  
Initial Therapy ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
The Usa ◽  
Choice Of Therapy

Abstract Introduction: Several treatment programs are available for the initial management of patients with multiple myeloma, with no clear documented advantage(s) of one regimen over the others in terms of time to progression (TTP) or overall survival (OS). Materials and Methods: A questionnaire was mailed to 540 randomly selected members of ASH during early 2005. Practitioners were asked their choice of therapy for newly diagnosed myeloma patients during 2004, based on 2005 NCCN guidelines, including: 1) melphalan/prednisone (MP), 2) vincristine / adriamycin / decadron (VAD), 3) high-dose decadron (HD), 4) thalidomide / decadron (Thal/Dex), 5) doxyl / vincristine / decadron (DVD); the options of a clinical trial (CT) or “other” were also included. Physicians were asked about factors influencing their choice of therapy for individual patients and their recommendations for autologous stem cell transplantation as part of the initial treatment schema. Results: Surveys were returned by 123 physicians(19.2%), of which 93 contained evaluable data. Among responders, 52% were in private practice and 47% in academic institutions and 74% respondants reporting having been in practice for more than 10 years. A large majority of physicians (74%) utilized 3 or more different regimens, only 10.7% of responders used a single regimen for all of their patients. Thal/Dex was used by 87% of responders, with 47% of them recommending this regimen in ≥ 50% of their patients. MP, HD and VAD were used by 67.7%, 49% and 44% of responders, but only 10.7%, 4% and 3% respectively, recommended them to ≥ 50% of their patients. DVD was used by 25% of physicians. Of respondants, 64.5% did not accrued patients to clinical trials and only 7.5% of physicians accrued ≥ 50% of their patients to clinical trials. No significant differences in the choice of regimen were apparent based on years of practice. Physicians in academic centers tended to use HD (p =.002) and accrue patients to CT (p=. 001) more often than those in private practice. Factors identified as important in selecting initial therapy for individual patients included: age (92%); performance status (95%); prognostic factors, such as β2-microglobulin and cytogenetics (75%); and candidacy for stem cell transplantation (93%). Respondants consider autologous stem cell transplantation as part of the initial therapy for all eligible patients (47%), only those with responsive disease (42%) and normal renal function (30%); only in selected cases (76%). Conclusions: Thal/Dex appears to be currently the most commonly recommended up-front therapy for multiple myeloma in the USA, in spite of the lack of published data documenting patient benefit in terms of TTP and OS. A sizable proportion of physicians do not recommend autologous stem cell transplantation as part of the initial therapy of newly diagnosed myeloma patients despite confirmed randomized clinical trials documenting benefit.

TIMP-1 and TIMP-2 Levels Are Directly Correlated with Neoangiogenesis and Are Prognostic Factors in Multiple Myeloma Patients.

Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 4866-4866
Author(s):  
Luciana Correa Oliveira de Oliveira ◽  
Juliana Alves Uzuelli ◽  
Ana Paula Alencar de Lima Lange ◽  
Barbara Amelia Aparecida Santana-Lemos ◽  
Marcia Sueli Baggio ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Bone Marrow ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Prognostic Factors ◽  
Bone Disease ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Conflicts Of Interest ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Abstract 4866 Background Multiple myeloma (MM) is an incurable malignant disease, characterized by increased angiogenesis in the bone marrow (BM) microenvironment and aberrant BM metabolism. Matrix metalloproteinases (MMP) are a family of zinc-dependent endopeptidases implicated in tumour progression, invasion, metastasis and angiogenesis, via proteolytic degradation of extracellular matrix. MMPs are inhibited by tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinase (TIMP). Although recent studies have implicated MMP 9 in MM bone disease, little is known about the role of the TIMPs. Objectives a) to compare levels of sRANKL, OPG, MMP-2, MMP-9, TIMP-1, TIMP-2, VEGF, bFGF, microvessel density (MVD) between newly diagnosed MM patients and healthy controls; b) to determine the association of these molecules with disease progression, bone disease and neoangiogenesis and c) to evaluate the impact of these variables on survival. Patients and Methods As of July 2009 38 newly diagnosed and untreated multiple myeloma patients were enrolled in the study. The median age was 61years-old (range 39-91) with 24 (63%) males. Patients were diagnosed and categorized according The International Myeloma Working Group criteria and ISS, respectively. Bone involvement was graded according to standard X-ray: patients with no lesions, or with one/ two bones involved or diffuse osteoporosis were classified as low score, whereas patients with lesions in more than two bones or presence of bone fracture were classified as high score. MMP-2 and MMP-9 were determined by PAGE gelatin zymography from plasma as previously described. MMP-9, TIMP-1 and TIMP-2, OPG and sRANKL concentrations were measured by ELISA. The levels of VEGF, bFGF were obtained using cytometric bead array. Ten healthy volunteers were used as controls. Bone marrow MVD measured in hotspots was evaluated in 26 out of 38 patients at diagnosis and 15 patients with Hodgkin Lymphoma stage IA and IIA (used as controls) by staining immunohistochemically for CD34. Comparisons among groups were analyzed by ANOVA and the correlation by the Spearman's correlation coefficient. Cox regression were performed for overall survival (OS) analysis. Results Patients with MM had elevated TIMP-1, TIMP-2 and OPG values compared with controls. No significant difference was found between plasma sRANKL, pro-MMP2, pro-MMP9 and MMP-9 levels. We found that plasma TIMP-1 levels correlated positively with bFGF, VEGF, MVD, beta-2 microglobulin (B2M) and OPG (r: 0.514, p=0,001, r: 0.350, p=0,031; r: 0.610, p<0.0001; r: 0.760, p<0.0001 and r: 0.701, p<0.0001, respectively) and TIMP-2 levels with bFGF, DMV, B2M and OPG (r: 0.512, p=0.002; r: 0.595, p<0.0001; r: 0.587, p<0.0001 and r: 0.552, p<0.0001, respectively). TIMP-1 and TIMP-2 levels correlated with the ISS stage (p<0.0001, p=0.006, respectively). The only variables that correlated with clinical bone disease staging were hemoglobin, B2M and albumin levels, whereas TIMP-1, TIMP-2, bFGF, VEGF and OPG correlated with DMV. On the univariate analyses, age, gender, proMMP2, TIMP-1, TIMP-2, creatinine, B2M and MVD were significantly associated with overall survival. In Cox regression model, TIMP-1, TIMP-2 and B2M levels remained to be significantly associated with OS. In conclusion, our results suggest that TIMP-1 and TIMP-2 levels are strongly associated with neoangiogenesis and are independent prognostic factors in MM. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Phase 2 Clinical Trial of Oral Lenalidomide, Cyclophosphamide, and Prednisone (RCP) for Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Patients

Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 1970-1970
Author(s):  
Attaya Suvannasankha ◽  
Sherif Farag ◽  
Robin Obryant ◽  
Lisa l Wood ◽  
Nicole Porter ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Conflicts Of Interest ◽  
Treatment Protocol ◽  
Sensory Neuropathy ◽  
Hematological Toxicity ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Hematologic Toxicity ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Post Transplant

Abstract Abstract 1970 Background: An effective and convenient regimen is appealing for Multiple Myeloma (MM) therapy. Lenalidomide and dexamethasone combination is highly effective in MM. However, at the FDA approved dose, dexamethasone related toxicity remains challenging. We report the efficacy and side effect profile of an all oral, dexamethasone-sparing combination of lenalidomide, cyclophosphamide and prednisone in newly diagnosed MM. Methods: The treatment protocol consisted of lenalidomide (Revlimid®) given orally at a dose of 25 mg daily on days 1–21 of a 28-day cycle, cyclophosphamide at a dose of 50 mg b.i.d. days 1–21 of a 28-day cycle, and prednisone 50 mg q.o.d (RCP). Responses were assessed on intent-to-treat basis based on the International Uniform Response Criteria. Treatment was planned for 6 cycles. Responding patients proceeded to observation, or transplantation, based on patient's preferred choices. All patients received, unless contraindicated, aspirin prophylaxis (81 or 325 mg daily) for prevention of deep-vein thrombosis, acyclovir for herpes zoster prevention, and bisphosphonates. Results: Forty six patients were enrolled from October 2007 to August 2010. Median follow up duration was 5.6 months. At this time, 38 of 46 patients are evaluable for confirmed responses (i.e., off-study or completed at least 4 cycles of therapy). The median age was 63 years (range, 41–76). 16 patients had ISS stage II (42%) and 8 (21%) had stage III disease. The median number of cycles was 6 (range: 1 – 6). Among the 38 evaluable patients, the overall response rate was 95%, consisting of CR: 1 (3%), VGPR: 9 (24%) and PR: 26 (68%). One patient had stable disease (1%) after the first cycle and treatment is ongoing. One patient had progression (3%). Thirty twoof 38 patients have discontinued study treatment. Reasons for treatment discontinuation are: completed study per protocol (24), disease progression (3), adverse event (2), non compliance (1), alternate treatment (1) and withdrawal of consent unrelated to toxicity (1). The most common toxicity was sensory neuropathy (24%): 8 (21%) grade I and 1 (3%) grade II. Other common toxicity included constipation (21%), pruritus (21%) and edema of limbs (18%). The most common hematologic toxicity was neutropenia (18%); 4 grade III and 2 grade IV. Infections were seen in 4 patients (2 febrile neutropenia and 2 with normal ANC). Five patients had grade 4 metabolic abnormalities (2 renal failure attributed to dehydration and tumor lysis, 2 hyperglycemia. and 1 hypokalemia). Thirteen patients had dose adjustments or interruption, most commonly due to hematological toxicity attributed to lenalidomide or cyclophosphamide. Twenty-five patients had stem cell collection. In all, sufficient numbers of stem cells (CD34+ cells ≥ 4.0 × 106 cells/kg) were collected for the transplantation use. To date, fifteen have undergone high dose chemotherapy and stem cell transplantation. Of eight patients with PR on RCP, seven achieved VGPR and one achieved CR post transplant. Of four patients with VGPR on RCP, 2 achieved CR and 2 remained in VGPR post transplant. Post-transplant response is not yet evaluable in the 3 remaining patients. Conclusions: The combination of lenalidomide, cyclophosphamide, and prednisone (RCP) has excellent activity in the setting of newly diagnosed myeloma. Overall toxicities were manageable. The study is still ongoing with the total accrual goal of up to 48 patients. The updated data for response and toxicities will be presented at the ASH Annual Meeting. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document