Safety and Efficacy of Four Drug Versus Three Drug Regimens Among Patients with Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Introduction: During recent years there has been a boom in the availability of treatments for multiple myeloma (MM). Based on the status of disease (newly diagnosed or relapsed/refractory), several regimens have successfully improved progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in these two types of patients. Triple drug regimen is considered the current standard of care for newly diagnosed MM patients. However, with the advent of four drug regimens, some studies demonstrated a significant improvement in PFS and OS compared to standard of care where as others showed marginal to no difference. Also, it remains unclear whether the benefits of using four drug regimen outweigh the risks. Thus, the aim of our meta-analysis was to compare the efficacy and safety of four drug versus three drug regimens among newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients. Methods: We built a PICO based search strategy using keywords like "multiple myeloma", "randomized clinical trials" and ran literature search on PubMed, Embase, Wiley Cochrane Library, Web of Science and ClinicalTrials.gov ranging from the date of inception till 16th July, 2020. A pre-validated data extraction sheet was used to extract data on PFS, OS and ≥Grade 3 hematologic adverse events at the longest follow-up. We included only randomized clinical trials (RCTs) comparing four versus three drug regimen in newly diagnosed MM patients. We excluded studies other than RCTs, studies conducted on relapsed refractory MM patients or other plasma cell dyscrasias. A generic variance weighted random effects model (DerSimonian and Laird) was used to derive hazard ratio estimates along with their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for PFS and OS. Risk ratio along with its 95% CIs was estimated for Grade ≥3 hematologic adverse events. Heterogeneity was assessed with Cochrane Q -statistic and was quantified with I2 test (I2 >50% was consistent with a high degree of heterogeneity). A pre-specified sensitivity analysis was also performed for risk of adverse events. Cochrane Collaboration's tool was used to assess the quality of included RCTs and GRADE was used to rate the quality of evidence. Results: Initial search retrieved 7622 titles. After duplicate removal, 4880 articles were left. Following initial screening, 58 articles were considered for full text review. Of these only 3 studies (n=2277) met inclusion criteria. Four drug regimens included daratumumab, bortezomib, melphalan-prednisone (D-VMP), daratumumab, bortezomib, thalidomide-dexamethasone (D-VTd) and bortezomib and melphalan prednisone and thalidomide (VMPT-VT) respectively. Whereas, three drug regimens were bortezomib, melphalan-prednisone (VMP), bortezomib, thalidomide-dexamethasone (VTd) and bortezomib, melphalan and prednisone (VMP) respectively. There was a significant improvement in PFS when 4 vs 3 drug regimens were compared in patients with newly diagnosed MM (HR: 0.53, 95% CI: 0.46-0.62, p-value:<0.001, I2: 0%). Also, OS improved significantly in four drug regimen group (HR: 0.62, 95% CI: 0.51-0.76, p-value:<0.001, I2: 3.5%). There was no statistically significant difference in any grade ≥3 hematologic adverse events when 4 vs 3 drug regimens were compared (RR: 1.26, 95% CI: 0.93-1.73, p-value:0.14, I2: 93%). Sensitivity analysis after removing D-VTd regimen from any grade ≥3 hematologic adverse events revealed similar results (RR: 1.05, 95% CI: 0.97-1.13, p-value:0.23, I2: 23%) confirming the robustness of analysis. When each hematologic adverse event was looked at separately, there was no difference between 4 vs 3 drug regimen in rates of anemia (RR: 0.99, 95% CI: 0.76-1.28, p-value:0.92, I2: 0%), neutropenia (RR: 1.39, 95% CI: 1.00-1.94, p-value:0.05, I2: 85%) and thrombocytopenia (RR: 1.13, 95% CI: 0.92-1.39, p-value:0.24, I2: 33%). There was low risk of bias and strength of evidence was of moderate. Conclusion: Using four drug regimens, compared to three drug regimens, significantly improves PFS and OS among newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients without any difference in the risk of ≥3 grade hematologic adverse events. Further randomized clinical trials are required to establish four drug regimen as standard of care for patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. Disclosures Anwer: Incyte, Seattle Genetics, Acetylon Pharmaceuticals, AbbVie Pharma, Astellas Pharma, Celegene, Millennium Pharmaceuticals.: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau.

Download Full-text

Melphalan, Prednisone, and Lenalidomide Treatment for Newly Diagnosed Myeloma: A Report From the GIMEMA—Italian Multiple Myeloma Network

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2007.12.3463 ◽

2007 ◽

Vol 25 (28) ◽

pp. 4459-4465 ◽

Cited By ~ 236

Author(s):

Antonio Palumbo ◽

Patrizia Falco ◽

Paolo Corradini ◽

Antonietta Falcone ◽

Francesco Di Raimondo ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Partial Response ◽

Adverse Events ◽

Survival Rates ◽

Standard Of Care ◽

Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽

Treatment Schedule ◽

Newly Diagnosed ◽

Low Incidence ◽

Grade 3

PurposeLenalidomide has shown significant antimyeloma activity in clinical studies. Oral melphalan, prednisone, and thalidomide have been regarded as the standard of care in elderly multiple myeloma patients. We assessed dosing, efficacy, and safety of melphalan, prednisone, and lenalidomide (MPR) in newly diagnosed elderly myeloma patients.Patients and MethodsOral melphalan was administered in doses ranging from 0.18 to 0.25 mg/kg on days 1 to 4, prednisone at a 2-mg/kg dose on days 1 to 4, and lenalidomide at doses ranging from 5 to 10 mg on days 1 to 21, every 28 days for nine cycles, followed by maintenance therapy with lenalidomide alone. Aspirin was given as a prophylaxis for thrombosis.ResultsFifty-four patients were enrolled and evaluated after completing the assigned treatment schedule. The maximum tolerated dose was defined as 0.18 mg/kg melphalan and 10 mg lenalidomide. With these doses, 81% of patients achieved at least a partial response, 47.6% achieved a very good partial response, and 23.8% achieved a complete immunofixation-negative response. In all patients, 1-year event-free and overall survival rates were 92% and 100%, respectively. At the maximum tolerated dose, grade 3 adverse events included neutropenia (38.1%), thrombocytopenia (14.2%), febrile neutropenia (9.5%), vasculitis (9.5%), and thromboembolism (4.8%); grade 4 adverse events were neutropenia (14.2%) and thrombocytopenia (9.5%).ConclusionOral MPR therapy is a promising first-line treatment for elderly myeloma patients. Hematologic adverse events were frequent but manageable. A low incidence of nonhematologic adverse events was noted. Aspirin appears to provide adequate antithrombosis prophylaxis.

Download Full-text

Ixazomib Based Regimens in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2020-141620 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 35-35

Author(s):

Anum Javaid ◽

Faryal Razzaq ◽

Muhammad Ashar Ali ◽

Muhammad Abu Zar ◽

Atif Sohail ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Systematic Review ◽

Clinical Trial ◽

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Clinical Trials ◽

Placebo Group ◽

Adverse Events ◽

Randomized Clinical Trials ◽

Phase Ii Trial ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Newly Diagnosed

Introduction: Multiple myeloma (MM) is an incurable malignancy, and clinical trials with newer agents have shown improved patient outcomes. Ixazomib (Ixa) is a proteasome inhibitor and induces apoptosis in cancer cells. It is commonly used with immunomodulators for the treatment of MM. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the efficacy of Ixazomib alone and in combination with other drugs for the treatment of newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM). Methods: A literature search was performed on PubMed, Cochrane, Embase, Web of Science, and clinicaltrials.gov. We used the following MeSH and Emtree terms; "ixazomib" AND "Multiple Myeloma" from inception till 06/05/2020. We screened 1,558 articles and included 3 randomized clinical trials (RCTs) (N=901) and 12 non-randomized clinical trials (NRCT) (N=632). We excluded case reports, case series, preclinical trials, review articles, observational studies, meta-analysis, and ongoing clinical trials that did not report interim efficacy outcomes. We used the R programming language (version 4.0.2) to conduct a meta-analysis. Results: In 15 clinical trials (N=1533), Ixa based regimens were used in patients with age range of 39-92 years. (Table 1) In 3 clinical trials (N=170), Ixa with Lenalidomide (Len) and dexamethasone (Dex) yielded a pooled overall response rate (ORR) of 90% (95% CI=0.82-0.94, I2=32%), a pooled complete response (CR) of 23% (95% CI=0.16-0.32, I2=24%) and a pooled ≥very good partial response and better (≥VGPR) of 39% (95% CI=0.24-0.57, I2 =76%) when used as induction therapy for NDMM patients. As consolidation therapy (N=88), pooled ORR was 91% (95% CI=0.79-0.97, I2=0), pooled CR was 36% (95% CI=0.27-0.47, I2=0) and pooled ≥VGPR was 70% (95% CI=0.53-0.84, I2=60%). (Fig 1-3) In 5 clinical trials (N=233), Ixa + cyclophosphamide (Cyc) + Dex yielded a pooled ORR, CR, and ≥VGPR of 76% (95% CI=0.70-0.81, I2 =0), 12% (95% CI=0.07-0.20, I2=44%), and 25% (95% CI=0.14-0.39, I2=78%), respectively. (Fig 1-3) The lower dose of Cyc 300mg/m2 had similar efficacy as 400mg/m2 with better safety profile in elderly patients. In a RCT (N=175) of Ixa with multiple combinations, Ixa + Dex yielded ORR 55% (95% CI=0.40-0.69), CR 14% (95% CI=0.07-0.28) and ≥VGPR 24% (95% CI=0.13-0.39). Ixa+ thalidomide (Thal) + Dex fostered ORR 82% (95% CI=0.70-0.90), CR 15% (95% CI=0.08-0.26), and VGPR 43% (95% CI=0.31-0.55). Ixa + bendamustine + Dex yielded ORR of 73% (95% CI=0.41-0.91), CR 9% (95% CI=0.01-0.44), and ≥VGPR 27% (95% CI=0.09-0.59). In one clinical trial (N=53), Ixa + melphalan (Mel) + prednisone (Pred) combination yielded pooled ORR, CR, and ≥VGPR of 66% (95% CI=0.52-0.77), 13% (95% CI=0.06-0.25), and 30% (95% CI=0.19-0.44), respectively. In a phase II trial (N=40), Ixa + daratumumab (Dara) + Len + Dex yielded an ORR, CR and ≥VGPR of 97% (95% CI=0.84-1), 15% (95% CI=0.07-0.28), and 35% (95% CI=0.22-0.51) respectively. (Fig 1-3) In a phase III RCT by Dimopholous et al. (N=656), Ixa maintenance therapy after stem cell transplant (SCT) yielded an ORR, CR, and ≥VGPR of 76%, 15%, and 54%, respectively. They observed 28% reduction in the risk of progression or death with Ixa vs. placebo, median progression free survival (mPFS) was 26.5 months (95% CI 23·7-33·8) vs 21·3 months [18·0-24·7]; hazard ratio 0·72, 95% CI 0·58-0·89; p=0·0023). Second malignancies were 3% in both ixazomib and placebo group. 27% of the patients in ixazomib group and 20% patients in placebo group experienced serious adverse events. In a clinical trial on unfit and frail patients (N=46) treated with Ixa + daratumumab (Dara) + Dex, pooled ORR and ≥VGPR were 83% (95% CI=0.69-0.91, I2=0), and 33% (95% CI=0.21-0.47, I2=0), respectively. (Fig 1-3) In the phase II trial, ORR, CR, and VGPR with ixazomib and lenalidomide were 64%, 26%, and 53%, respectively. Conclusion: Ixa in combination with Len, Dex, Cyc, Dara, Mel, Pred is effective in the treatment of NDMM patients. In early phase trials, Ixa with Dara, Len, and Dexa showed the highest overall response as induction therapy. Ixazomib maintainance therapy prolongs PFS after SCT as compared to placebo and represents an additional option for post SCT maintainace therapy in NDMM patiens. The safety profile of Ixa was acceptable with most commonly encountered adverse events were hematological including neutropenia and thrombocytopenia. Additional multicenter, double-blind, randomized clinical trials are needed to confirm these results. Disclosures Anwer: Incyte, Seattle Genetics, Acetylon Pharmaceuticals, AbbVie Pharma, Astellas Pharma, Celegene, Millennium Pharmaceuticals.: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau.

Download Full-text

Subcutaneous Administration of Bortezomib in Combination with Thalidomide and Dexamethasone for Treatment of Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Patients

BioMed Research International ◽

10.1155/2015/927105 ◽

2015 ◽

Vol 2015 ◽

pp. 1-6 ◽

Cited By ~ 8

Author(s):

Shenghao Wu ◽

Cuiping Zheng ◽

Songyan Chen ◽

Xiaoping Cai ◽

Yuejian Shi ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Overall Survival ◽

Adverse Events ◽

Subcutaneous Administration ◽

Progression Free Survival ◽

The Other ◽

Newly Diagnosed ◽

Efficacy And Safety ◽

Free Survival ◽

Grade 3

Objective. To investigate the efficacy and safety of the treatment of the newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM) patients with the therapy of subcutaneous (subQ) administration of bortezomib and dexamethasone plus thalidomide (VTD) regimen.Methods. A total of 60 newly diagnosed MM patients were analyzed. 30 patients received improved VTD regimen (improved VTD group) with the subQ injection of bortezomib and the other 30 patients received conventional VTD regimen (VTD group).The efficacy and safety of two groups were analyzed retrospectively.Results. The overall remission (OR) after eight cycles of treatment was 73.3% in the VTD group and 76.7% in the improved VTD group (P>0.05). No significant differences in time to 1-year estimate of overall survival (72% versus 75%,P=0.848) and progression-free survival (median 22 months versus 25 months;P=0.725) between two groups. The main toxicities related to therapy were leukopenia, neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, asthenia, fatigue, and renal and urinary disorders. Grade 3 and higher adverse events were significantly less common in the improved VTD group (50%) than VTD group (80%,P=0.015).Conclusions. The improved VTD regimen by changing bortezomib from intravenous administration to subcutaneous injection has noninferior efficacy to standard VTD regimen, with an improved safety profile and reduced adverse events.

Download Full-text

Bortezomib, IV cyclophosphamide, and dexamethasone (VelCD) as induction therapy in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: Results of an interim analysis of the German DSMM Xia trial

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2009.27.15_suppl.8516 ◽

2009 ◽

Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽

pp. 8516-8516 ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

S. Knop ◽

P. Liebisch ◽

H. Wandt ◽

M. Kropff ◽

W. Jung ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Interim Analysis ◽

Standard Of Care ◽

Dose Finding ◽

Optimum Dose ◽

Primary Study ◽

Induction Treatment ◽

Newly Diagnosed ◽

Study Objective ◽

Grade 3

8516 Background: Cytoreductive induction followed by HD-MEL and ASCT is considered standard of care for younger patients (pts) with multiple myeloma (MM). The success of this combined procedure partially depends on the efficacy of induction treatment. Bortezomib-containing induction regimens have already been shown to be superior to standard VAD. In order to further improve the efficacy of induction treatment we combined Vel with intravenous (IV) cyclophosphamide (C) and dexamethasone (D). Methods: This trial is an open, prospective, multicenter, uncontrolled phase II/III study with a planned recruitment of 400 pts. The first 30 pts were included in the dose finding study to determine the optimum dose of IV C in conjunction with Vel and D. The following 170 pts up to 60 years of age with untreated MM were enrolled to receive 3 cycles of induction with Vel 1.3 mg/m2 IV d1, 4, 8, 11; D 40 mg/d d1, 2, 4, 5, 8, 9, 11, 12; and C 900mg/m2 IV d1. Primary study objective is response rate (≥ PR) to VelCD according to the EBMT criteria. Results: Data from the first completed 200 pts (mean age: 52 years; 74% stage III) from 36 German centers were analyzed as ITT population. Response rates are given in Table and were documented in 82% of the subjects with 13q-, in 94% with t(4;14) and in 70% with 17p-. SAEs (n=84) occurred in 24.5% of the pts and were related to Vel, C or D in 16%, 14.5% or 9.5% respectively. The mortality rate of 1% is low, 53% of the patients experienced grade 3 + 4 AEs, infections of grade 3 and 4 were reported in 2% and grade 3 paraesthesia occurred in 2%. Conclusions: This interim analysis demonstrates that bortezomib combined with dexamethasone and intravenous cyclophosphamide (VelCD) is a highly effective induction regimen for pts ≤ 60 years with newly diagnosed MM regardless of cytogenetic risk factors. [Table: see text] [Table: see text]

Download Full-text

Pomalidomide Based Regimens for Treatment of Relapsed Multiple Myeloma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2018-99-111439 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 2022-2022

Author(s):

Adeela Mushtaq ◽

Ahmad Iftikhar ◽

Midhat Lakhani ◽

Fnu Sagar ◽

Ahmad Kamal ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Clinical Trials ◽

Adverse Events ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Random Effect Model ◽

Pooled Analysis ◽

Cochrane Library ◽

Significant Heterogeneity ◽

Grade 3 ◽

Stratified Analysis

Abstract Introduction Bortezomib, a proteasome inhibitor and lenalidomide (Len), an immunomodulatory drug are the backbone of established treatment regimens for newly diagnosed MM. Patients with dual-refractory (refractory to both bortezomib and lenalidomide) disease have a poor prognosis with overall survival estimated to be less than one year. Pomalidomide (Pom) has distinct anticancer, antiangiogenic and immunomodulatory properties and has demonstrated synergistic antiproliferative activity in combination regimens. The aim of our study is to compare different Pom based regimens to identify the most effective regimen for relapsed refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) patients. Methods A comprehensive literature search was performed on PubMed, Cochrane library, Web of Science, Embase and AdisInsight databases on 03/29/2018 which identified a total of 1374 studies. We included phase II/III clinical trials on pomalidomide based regimens that have clearly documented efficacy outcomes. All statistical analyses were performed using Comprehensive Meta-analysis (CMA) Version 3. We used the Cochrane Q statistics (p<0.05 considered significant) and I2 index to calculate the degree of heterogeneity of the studies. A random effect model was used if there was significant heterogeneity (p>0.05 or I2 >50%). Studies were classified into subgroups according to the therapeutic regimen: dual and triplet combinations. A separate stratified analysis of triplet regimens based on type of regimen was also performed. Results A total of 35 studies (n = 4623 patients) were included. The most commonly studied regimen was Pom + LoDex (Low dose dexamethasone) with a total of 16 studies on this regimen. All patients included in our study had ≥ 2 prior lines of therapy. Mean number of prior lines of therapy was 6. Most patients were lenalidomide refractory, with 10 patient cohorts of 100% refractoriness and 8 cohorts of ≥ 90% refractoriness. Pooled analysis showed an overall response rate (ORR) of 47.1% across all Pom regimens including both doublet and triplet regimens. An I2 value of 87.3 was found, indicating high heterogeneity across all Pom regimens. With Pom-LoDex, pooled ORR was found to be 35.7% and mean OS 14.37 months. With triplet regimens, pooled ORR was found to be 61.9%. In a separate stratified analysis of triplet regimens based on type of regimen, pooled ORRs with few selected regimens were as follows; Bort-Pom-LoDex (pooled ORR 83.5%, mean PFS 15.7 months [mos]), CFZ-Pom-LoDex (pooled ORR 77.1%, mean PFS 15.3 mos), Pom-LoDex-bendamustine (pooled ORR 74.2%), Pom-Dex-daratumumab (pooled ORR 64.5%), Pom-LoDex-cyclophosphamide (pooled ORR 59.4%, mean PFS 9.5 mos), Pom-LoDex-doxorubicin (pooled ORR 32%). Most frequently reported adverse event with Pom based regimens was myelosuppression. Mean incidences of grade ≥3 hematologic adverse events were neutropenia (47.6%), anemia (26.5%), and thrombocytopenia (20.8%). Mean incidences of grade ≥3 non-hematologic adverse events were infections (29.1%), pneumonia (13.8%) and fatigue (10%). Most of the studies used pomalidomide 4mg daily dosing. Lacy et al. suggested no advantage of 4mg pomalidomide over 2 mg daily dosing. Conclusion From results of pooled analysis, we can infer that triplet combinations of Pom yield almost double response rates (pooled ORR 61.9%) when compared to dual combination of Pom-LoDex (pooled ORR 35.7%). Among three drug combinations, Bort-Pom-LoDex (pooled ORR 83.5%) and CFZ-Pom-LoDex (pooled ORR 77.1%) seem to produce better outcomes. Our study provides useful insight into relative efficacy of various Pom regimens for treatment of RRMM patients. Several trials involving various MoAbs like nivolumab, daratumumab, elotuzumab, isatuximab and pembrolizumab in combination with Pom-LoDex are currently ongoing. Pomalidomide has an acceptable safety profile. Most common treatment emergent adverse events were myelotoxicity and infections that can be effectively managed with supportive care and dose modifications. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Download Full-text

Efficacy and Safety of Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors in Multiple Myeloma - a Systematic Review of Early Phase Clinical Trials

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2018-99-114019 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 5629-5629

Author(s):

Sharoon Samuel ◽

Muhammad Junaid Tariq ◽

Muhammad Usman ◽

Amna Khalid ◽

Muhammad Asad Fraz ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Systematic Review ◽

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Clinical Trials ◽

Adverse Events ◽

Phase I ◽

Hdac Inhibitors ◽

Complete Response ◽

Number Of Patients ◽

Grade 3 ◽

Early Phase Clinical Trials

Abstract Introduction Recent studies in novel therapies have created opportunities for new treatment regimens to be used in the management of multiple myeloma. Histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitors lead to epigenetic manipulation of multiple myeloma (MM) cells by reducing resistance to pro-apoptotic signals. Panobinostat is an FDA approved HDAC inhibitor for multiple myeloma. The aim of this article is to study the safety, efficacy and dose limiting toxicities of HDAC inhibitors in the early phase clinical trials in multiple myeloma. Methods We performed a comprehensive literature search for phase I & I/II trials of HDAC inhibitors during last ten years using following databases: PubMed, Embase, AdisInsight, and Clinicaltrials.gov. Studies involving HDAC inhibitors in multiple myeloma other than panobinostat irrespective of the age, sex or specific eligibility criteria were included. Results Out of 2537 studies, we included 25 trials (23 phase I, 2 phase I/II) of HDAC inhibitors in this systematic review having a total of 518 patients. Of these, 471(90.9%) patients were evaluable for response. Vorinostat (Vor) is the most studied drug used in 13 trials (n=281). Two trials had Vor-only regimen and the remaining 11 had combination regimens mostly with lenalidomide and bortezomib. Vor, in combination with lenalidomide (R), bortezomib (V) and dexamethasone (d) has showed 100% overall response rate (ORR) in 30 newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) patients, (Kaufmann et al., 2016), fifty two percent patients achieved very good partial response (VGPR) and 28% patients showed complete response (CR). Another study using Vor + R regimen after autologous stem cell transplant in 16 NDMM patients showed VGPR in 7, stringent complete response (sCR) in 4, partial response (PR) in 2 and CR in 3 patients (Sborov et al.). Grade 3 neutropenia was seen in 1 patient in this study. Richter et al, 2011 showed an ORR of 24% in 29 relapsed refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) patients with Vor only regimen. Another study (Kaufmann et al., 2012) with Vor only regimen used in 10 RRMM patients showed stable disease (SD) in 9 and minimal response (MR) in 1 patient. ORR of 65% was achieved in 31 RRMM patients receiving Vor in combination with doxorubicin & bortezomib (Vorhees et al, 2017). Thrombocytopenia & neutropenia were reported in 94% and 59% patients respectively. Ricolinostat in combination with Rd and Vd achieved an ORR of 55% and 29% respectively in two studies with 38 and 57 evaluable patients (NCT01583283, NCT01323751). Another ricolinostat regimen with pomalidomide & dexamethasone achieved ≥PR in 6/11 RRMM patients (Madan et al., 2016). Table 1 illustrates the efficacy, number of patients and regimens used in all the studies in this systematic review. Quisinostat in a 2017 study by Moreau P et al. (NCT01464112) showed an ORR of 88% in a combination regimen with Vd in RRMM patients (N=18). Drug related adverse events were seen in 13 patients, thrombocytopenia being most common in 11 patients, 2 patients had grade 3 cardiac disorders and 1 patient had a cardiac arrest. Romidepsin in a phase I/II study (Harrison et al., 2011) combined with Vd was used in 25 RRMM patients. ORR was 60% with VGPR n=7, CR n=2, PR n=6, SD n=5 and PD n=1. Grade ≥3 thrombocytopenia in 16, neutropenia in 9 and peripheral neuropathy in 2 patients was seen. Popat et al used combination of two HDAC inhibitors CHR 3996 and tosedostat in 20 RRMM patients. ORR was 10% and SD was seen in 30% patients. Grade 3/4 toxicities seen were thrombocytopenia (n=12), leukopenia (n=6) and diarrhea (n=5). A phase I study on AR-42 drug in 17 RRMM patients (Sborov et al., 2017) showed SD in 10, PD in 4, MR in 3 patients with progression free survival (PFS) of 8.2 months. Thrombocytopenia, neutropenia and lymphopenia were seen in 11, 10 and 6 patients respectively. A detail of all grade 3 and higher adverse events along with dose limiting toxicity is given in table 2. Three trials (NCT02576496, NCT01947140, NCT03051841) of Edo-S101, romidepsin and CKD-581 are currently recruiting with 84, 93 and 18 planned number of patients. Conclusion Regimens containing vorinostat have shown an ORR up to 100% in NDMM patients. HDAC inhibitors have also shown promising efficacy up to 88% ORR in RRMM population. Majority of the patients developed cytopenias as hematological adverse events. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Download Full-text

Impact of post-ASCT maintenance therapy on outcomes in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma in Connect MM

Blood Advances ◽

10.1182/bloodadvances.2018017186 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 2 (13) ◽

pp. 1608-1615 ◽

Cited By ~ 12

Author(s):

Sundar Jagannath ◽

Rafat Abonour ◽

Brian G. M. Durie ◽

Mohit Narang ◽

Howard R. Terebelo ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Clinical Trials ◽

Maintenance Therapy ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Progression Free Survival ◽

Standard Of Care ◽

Second Primary ◽

Newly Diagnosed ◽

Serious Adverse Events ◽

Using Data

Abstract Autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) followed by lenalidomide maintenance therapy is the standard of care for transplant-eligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM). Clinical trials show progression-free survival (PFS) benefits, with some studies (Cancer and Leukemia Group [CALGB] trial and meta-analysis) also showing overall survival (OS) benefits, but applicability to real-world clinical settings is unclear. Using data from Connect MM, the largest US-based observational registry of NDMM patients, we analyzed effects of maintenance therapy on long-term outcomes in 1450 treated patients enrolled from 2009 to 2011. Patients who received induction therapy and ASCT (n = 432) were analyzed from 100 days post-ASCT (data cut 7 January 2016): 267 received maintenance (80% lenalidomide-based [of whom 88% received lenalidomide monotherapy]); 165 did not. Lenalidomide maintenance improved median PFS and 3-year PFS rate vs no maintenance (50.3 vs 30.8 months [hazard ratio (HR), 0.62; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.46-0.82; P < .001] and 56% vs 42%, respectively). Improvements in median OS and 3-year OS rate were associated with lenalidomide maintenance vs no maintenance (not reached in either group [HR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.36-0.83; P = .005] and 85% vs 70%, respectively). Five hematologic serious adverse events were reported with lenalidomide maintenance (pancytopenia [n = 2], febrile neutropenia, anemia, and thrombocytopenia [n = 1 each]) and 1 with no maintenance (thrombocytopenia). Second primary malignancies occurred at rates of 1.38 and 2.19 events per patient-year in lenalidomide maintenance and no maintenance groups, respectively. Survival benefits associated with lenalidomide maintenance previously demonstrated in clinical trials were observed in this community-based Connect MM Registry.

Download Full-text

The Value of PD-L1 Expression as Predictive Biomarker in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Patients: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials

Cancers ◽

10.3390/cancers12071945 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 12 (7) ◽

pp. 1945 ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

Alberto Carretero-González ◽

David Lora ◽

Isabel Martín Sobrino ◽

Irene Sáez Sanz ◽

María T. Bourlon ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Renal Cell Carcinoma ◽

Overall Survival ◽

Clinical Trials ◽

Renal Cell ◽

Randomized Clinical Trials ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Standard Of Care ◽

Predictive Biomarker ◽

P Value ◽

Metastatic Rcc

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are soluble antibodies that have dramatically changed the outcomes including overall survival in a subset of kidney tumors, specifically in renal cell carcinoma (RCC). To date, there is no a single predictive biomarker approved to be used to select the patients that achieve benefit from ICIs targeting. It seems reasonable to analyze whether the programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression could be useful. To assess the role of PD-L1 expression as a potential predictive biomarker for benefit of ICIs in RCC patients, we performed a search of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) comparing ICIs (monotherapy or in combination with other therapies) to standard of care in metastatic RCC patients according to PRISMA guidelines. Trials must have included subgroup analyses evaluating the selected outcomes (progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS)) in different subsets of patients according to PD-L1 expression on tumor samples. Hazard ratios with confidence intervals were used as the measure of efficacy between groups. A total of 4635 patients (six studies) were included (ICIs arm: 2367 patients; standard of care arm: 2268 patients). Globally, PFS and OS results favored ICIs. Differential expression of PD-L1 on tumor samples could select a subset of patients who could benefit more in terms of PFS (those with higher levels; p-value for difference between subgroups: <0.0001) but it did not seem to impact in OS results (p-value for difference: 0.63). As different methods to assess PD-L1 positivity were used among trials, this heterogeneity could have an influence on the results. PD-L1 could represent a biomarker to test PFS in clinical trials but its value for OS is less clear. In this meta-analysis, the usefulness of PD-L1 expression as a predictive biomarker to select treatment in metastatic RCC patients was not clearly shown.

Download Full-text

How I Treat Frontline Transplant-eligible Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.2020008735 ◽

2021 ◽

Author(s):

Aurore Perrot

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Randomized Clinical Trials ◽

Human Monoclonal Antibody ◽

Autologous Transplantation ◽

Proteasome Inhibitors ◽

Standard Of Care ◽

Adaptive Strategy ◽

High Dose ◽

Newly Diagnosed ◽

High Dose Melphalan

High dose Melphalan supported by autologous transplantation is the standard of care for eligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma for more than 25 years. Several randomized clinical trials have recently reaffirmed the strong position of transplant in the era of proteasome inhibitors and immunomodulatory drugs combinations, demonstrating a significant reduction of progression or death in comparison with strategies without transplant. Immunotherapy is currently changing the paradigm of multiple myeloma management and daratumumab is the first-in-class human monoclonal antibody targeting CD38 approved in the setting of newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. Quadruplets become the new standard in the transplantation programs, but outcomes remain heterogeneous with various response depth and duration. Otherwise, the development of sensitive and specific tools for disease prognostication allows to consider adaptive strategy to a dynamic risk. I discuss in this review the different available options for the treatment of transplant-eligible multiple myeloma patients in frontline setting.

Download Full-text

Carfilzomib PLUS Melphalan and Prednisone (CMP) Is A Promising Combination Therapy For The Treatment Of Elderly Patients With NEWLY Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma: Results Of A PHASE I/II Trial In 68 CASES

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v122.21.1933.1933 ◽

2013 ◽

Vol 122 (21) ◽

pp. 1933-1933 ◽

Cited By ~ 5

Author(s):

Philippe Moreau ◽

Brigitte Kolb ◽

Cyrille Hulin ◽

Denis Caillot ◽

Lotfi Benboubker ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Elderly Patients ◽

Phase I ◽

Standard Of Care ◽

Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽

High Dose ◽

Newly Diagnosed ◽

Safety And Efficacy ◽

Frontline Treatment ◽

Grade 3

Abstract Melphalan-Prednisone + bortezomib (MPV) is one of the standard of care for the frontline treatment of patients with symptomatic multiple myeloma non eligible for high-dose therapy. In the pivotal VISTA trial for approval of MPV, the main toxicity was grade 3-4 peripheral neuropathy (PN) described in 14% of the cases. Carfilzomib (CFZ), the second-in-class proteasome inhibitor has shown promising activity and a favorable toxicity profile with low PN rates. Therefore, the option of combining CFZ with MP (CMP) is an attractive one. Therefore we designed a phase I/II study to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of CMP and to assess safety and efficacy. In the phase I portion of the trial, CFZ was started at 20mg/m2, then escalated to 27, 36, and 45mg/m2, administered IV over 30 minutes in 42-day cycles on D1/2/8/9/22/23/29/30 for 9 cycles. Melphalan 9mg/m2 and prednisone 60mg/m2 were given PO D1–4 of every 42-day cycle. MTD was based on dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) in cycle 1 defined as any grade 4 (G4) hematologic adverse event (AE), any hematologic AE preventing aministration of ≥ 2 CFZ doses except G4 thrombocytopenia without bleeding or G4 neutropenia ≤ 7days, ≥ G3 febrile neutropenia, or any ≥G3 nonhematologic AE. As of July 6, 2013, 24 pts have been enrolled in phase I: 6 for each dose level. There were 2 DLTs at 45mg/m2 (fever plus hypotension) resulting in a MTD of 36mg/m2. In Phase II, 44 additional patients received CMP at 36mg/m2 CFZ for N=68 total PhI/II patients (50 patients overall treated at the dose pf 36mg/m2). The median age of the series was 72 years, with 36% of the patients presenting with ISS3. Overall response rate was 89.5% including 56% ≥ very good partial response. With a median follow-up of 12 months, the projected 2y OS was 87%, and the median event-free survival was 22 months. CMP was well tolerated and only 1 patient developed grade 3 PN. These promising results compare favorably to those of MPV, MP+Thalidomide, MP+lenalidomide (R), and R+dex in similar pts. CFZ 36mg/m2 + MP is tolerable and effective in elderly patients with symptomatic newly diagnosed MM. Treatment is ongoing, 20% of the patients are receiving their last cycles of CMP. Final safety and efficacy data will be presented during the meeting. Disclosures: Moreau: CELGENE: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; JANSSEN: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Off Label Use: FRONTLINE TREATMENT WITH CARFIZOMIB. Hulin:CELGENE: Honoraria; JANSSEN: Honoraria. Leleu:CELGENE: Honoraria; JANSSEN: Honoraria. Roussel:CELGENE: Honoraria; JANSSEN: Honoraria. Attal:CELGENE: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; JANSSEN: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Facon:CELGENE: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; JANSSEN: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau.

Download Full-text