Response Adapted Therapy Using Single Agent Lenalidomide in Older Adults with Newly Diagnosed Standard Risk Multiple Myeloma

Abstract Abstract 4060 Introduction: Rajkumar et al. reported improved survival with lenalidomide and low dose dexamethasome as compared with lenalidomide and high dose dexamethasone (Rajkumar V, Lancet Oncol 2010). In addition, we reported promising outcomes of a retrospective cohort of newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients treated with single agent lenalidomide(Baz R Leuk Lymphoma. 2010). Accordingly, we conducted this prospective single center open label study to evaluate the efficacy of a response adapted approach using single agent lenalidomide in older adults with newly diagnosed standard risk multiple myeloma. Patients/Methods: Eligible patients had symptomatic multiple myeloma without high risk features (b2microglobulin (b2m) ≤5.5, absence of t(4;14), t(14;16), 17p deletion, aneuploidy or 13q by metaphase cytogenetics) and were not eligible or not willing to receive high-dose therapy and stem cell transplant. Patients received lenalidomide 25 mg PO D1–21 every 28 days for 2 cycles. If patients had a minimal response or better (MR, 25% reduction in serum M spike) after 2 cycles, they continued on single agent lenalidomide until progressive disease. If patients had stable disease after 2 cycles, prednisone 100 mg PO D1–5 was added to their lenalidomide. In the event of progressive disease on single agent lenalidomide or on lenalidomide/prednisone, therapy was changed to lenalidomide (at the tolerated dose) and dexamethasone 40 mg PO weekly. Thromboprophylaxis was with aspirin, warfarin or low molecular weight heparin. Responses were per IMWG response criteria. The study was approved by the institutional review board. Results: Between February 2010 and May 2012, 22 patients were screened and 19 were eligible. The median age was 75 years (range 65–83) and 12 were males. Per protocol, no patient had ISS stage 3 disease but 8 patients had ISS stage 2 and 11 stage 1 (median b2m was 3.2 mg/L (range 2.2–5.5)). 5 patients had 13q deletion by FISH alone, 4 had t(11;14), another 3 had trisomy 11, and 2 had trisomy or tetrasomy 1q. The median baseline creatinine clearance was 66.5 ml/min (range 43–109). After 2 cycles of single agent lenalidomide, 9 patients (47%) had a PR (partial response), 6 (32%) MR, 3 (16%) stable disease (SD), and 1 (5%) progressive disease. The best response to single agent lenalidomide was as follows: 3 had a stringent complete response sCR (16%), 1 (5%) a very good partial remission (VGPR), 8 PR (42%), 4 MR (21%), 2 SD (11%) and 1 PD (5%). The estimated 1 year PFS to single agent lenalidomide is 80%. Five patients required the addition of dexamethasone with the following responses: 1 VGPR, 1 PR, 1 MR, 1 SD and 1 PD; Three patients required the addition of prednisone and the response to lenalidomide prednisone was 1PR, 1 MR, 1 SD. Five patients went off study, 2 for PD and 3 withdrew consent (2 were in PR at the time and 1 in SD). The estimated 1 year PFS for the protocol therapy is estimated at 94%. Eleven patients had dose reduction in lenalidomide; 5 patients to 15mg and 6 patients to 10 mg. Grade 3/4 neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, anemia, febrile neutropenia and fatigue occurred in 58%, 5%, 10%, 5% and 5% of patients respectively. Conclusion: In this patient population, single agent lenalidomide results in an ORR (PR and better) of 63% and clinical benefit rate (MR and better) of 84% with only a quarter of patients requiring the addition of dexamethasone. A response adapted therapy using single agent lenalidomide is safe and effective in older adults with standard risk myeloma sparing dexamethasone toxicities from the majority of patients. Updated results for ongoing accrual of up to 30 evaluable patients will be presented at the meeting. Disclosures: Baz: Celgene, Millennium, Bristol Myers Squibb, Novartis: Research Funding. Off Label Use: lenalidomide for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. Alsina:Millenium: Consultancy, Research Funding. Finley-Oliver:celgene: Speakers Bureau.

Download Full-text

Response Adapted Lenalidomide Based Therapy For Newly Diagnosed (ND) Standard Risk Older Adults With Multiple Myeloma (MM): An International Collaboration

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v122.21.3201.3201 ◽

2013 ◽

Vol 122 (21) ◽

pp. 3201-3201

Author(s):

Rachid Baz ◽

Hui-Yi Lin ◽

Sung-Soo Yoon ◽

Kihyun Kim ◽

Melissa Alsina ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Progressive Disease ◽

Single Agent ◽

High Dose ◽

Newly Diagnosed ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Free Survival ◽

The Us ◽

Standard Risk

Abstract Introduction Older MM patients continue to have poor outcomes. Lenalidomide (L) and low dose dexamethasone (D) was found to result in better overall survival than L and high dose D in ND MM (Rajkumar et al. Lancet Oncol 2010). In an attempt to decrease toxicity from therapy in this vulnerable patient population, we have initiated two phase II clinical trials evaluating a response adapted therapy using single agent L with sequential addition of corticosteroids. The trials had similar design and were conducted in one site in the United States (US) and multiple sites in South Korea (SK). Methods Eligible patients had symptomatic standard risk MM (b2microglobulin (b2m)≤5.5, absence of t(4;14), t(14;16), 17p deletion, aneuploidy or 13q by metaphase cytogenetics) and were not eligible or not willing to undergo high-dose melphalan. Patients received L on D1-21 every 28 days for 2 cycles based on renal function. If patients had a minimal response (MR) or better (25% reduction in serum M spike) after 2 cycles, they continued on single agent L until progressive disease. If patients had stable disease (SD) after 2 cycles, prednisone 100 mg PO D1-5 (P) was added to their L. In the event of progressive disease on single agent L or on LP, therapy was changed to L (at the tolerated dose) with dexamethasone 40 mg PO weekly (D). Thromboprophylaxis was with aspirin, warfarin or low molecular weight heparin. Responses were per IMWG and the primary end point was the 1 year progression free survival (PFS)of LD. Results Between 2/2010 and 6/2013, 61 patients were enrolled (34 in SK and 27 in the US). The median age was 73 (range 48-85) and 58% were males. Compared to US, patients in SK had a younger age, lower weight and body surface area and a higher proportion of ISS 2. There were no differences in baseline performance status, hematologic parameters, creatinine clearance or baseline b2m. The overall response rate (≥PR) to single agent L was 48% (59% & 38% for US and SK) and the clinical benefit rate (≥MR) 64% (74% & 56% for the US and SK respectively). After a median follow up of 13.2 months, P was added for 16 patients (26%) and 7 (44%) had ≥PR. D was added for 14 patients (23%) and 10 patients (71%) had ≥PR. The 1 year dexamethasone free survival was 75% (84% & 67% in the US and SK respectively). To date, 3 patients progressed after the addition of D and the 1 year LD PFS was 90% (95% CI 78-96%). There were no statistical differences in grade 3/4 hematologic adverse events (table). Lenalidomide dose reduction was more frequent in the US (59% vs. 26%) however discontinuation from therapy for causes other than progressive disease or death was more frequent in SK (41% vs. 18%). Conclusion In This elderly patient population, response adapted (sequential) therapy results in outcomes comparable to LD in younger patients with MM with 78% of patients not requiring the addition of D. Social and ethnic causes of differential tolerance to therapy should be studied further. Disclosures: Baz: Celgene: Research Funding; Millenium: Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Karyopharm: Research Funding; Sanofi: Research Funding. Off Label Use: lenalidomide in newly diagnosed myeloma. Alsina:Celgene: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Shain:Onyx: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees. Kwak:celgene: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Utilization of Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation in Older Patients with Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-130689 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 5701-5701

Author(s):

Justin King ◽

Mark A. Fiala ◽

Scott R. Goldsmith ◽

Keith E. Stockerl-Goldstein ◽

Mark A. Schroeder ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Stem Cell ◽

Older Patients ◽

Research Funding ◽

Small Sample ◽

Poor Performance Status ◽

High Dose ◽

Cell Transplant ◽

Newly Diagnosed ◽

Equity Ownership

Historically, high-dose therapy in combination with autologous stem cell transplants (ASCT) for multiple myeloma (MM) was reserved for younger patients. In more recent years, the use of ASCT has expanded in the older population. However, there is still limited data on the utilization and efficacy of ASCT in older patients, particularly those over the age of 75. To further evaluate this issue, we retrospectively analyzed all patients with newly diagnosed MM between the ages of 75-78, the institutional cutoff for ASCT eligibility, that were referred to the stem cell transplant unit at our institution for consultation from the years 2012-2018. Baseline characteristics, anti-myeloma treatments, and patient outcomes were abstracted through chart review. Seventy-five patients were referred to our institution. 71% were male, 29% female. 39% patients were considered ineligible for ASCT by the consulting transplant physician. Most patients were considered transplant ineligible due to comorbidities or poor performance status. Of the 46 patients eligible for ASCT, 52% underwent the procedure during their first-line therapy. The majority of those patients received reduced intensity melphalan (140 mg/m2) while 2 patients received conventional dosing (200 mg/m2). The other 22 patients eligible for ASCT declined or elected to defer the procedure and to be treated with conventional therapy. The characteristics of these three groups were similar and are detailed in Table 1. After a median follow-up of 30 months, 25% of the patients had expired. Estimated median overall survival (OS) was 71.3 months (unable to quantitate 95% CI) for all patients. Compared to transplant eligible patients, regardless of transplant receipt, those who were transplant ineligible had a 186% increase risk for death (HR 2.86; 95% CI 1.12-7.35; p = 0.029). There was also a notable trend for longer OS in those who underwent ASCT compared to those who were eligible but declined the procedure, but it was not statistically significant (HR 0.36; 95% CI 0.10-1.28; p = 0.114). At a transplant center, two-thirds of patients referred for newly diagnosed MM between the ages 75-78 were considered eligible for ASCT and one-third underwent the procedure. Outcomes were better for patients eligible for ASCT, regardless of whether they underwent the procedure. There was also a trend for better OS in patients who underwent the procedure compared to those who declined. While small sample sizes and the retrospective nature of the study limit our ability to draw conclusions, it appears that ASCT has an OS benefit among patients age 75-78. Disclosures Fiala: Incyte: Research Funding. Stockerl-Goldstein:AbbVie: Equity Ownership; Abbott: Equity Ownership. Vij:Genentech: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Research Funding; Sanofi: Honoraria; Karyopharm: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding. Wildes:Janssen: Research Funding; Carevive: Consultancy.

Download Full-text

Long Term Response To Lenalidomide With and Without Continuous Therapy Among Patients With Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v122.21.3209.3209 ◽

2013 ◽

Vol 122 (21) ◽

pp. 3209-3209

Author(s):

Taxiarchis Kourelis ◽

Shaji K Kumar ◽

Geetika Srivastava ◽

Morie A Gertz ◽

Martha Q Lacy ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Disease Control ◽

Median Time ◽

Research Funding ◽

Autologous Stem Cell Transplant ◽

Cell Transplant ◽

Newly Diagnosed ◽

Best Response ◽

Standard Risk

Abstract Introduction Lenalidomide is an immunomodulatory drug that is active in newly diagnosed as well as relapsed multiple myeloma (MM). The goal of this study is to describe patients with newly diagnosed MM remaining on lenalidomide for more than 3 years (long term responders) as well as patients that after discontinuing lenalidomide were able to maintain disease control while only on observation (LenO group). Methods We retrospectively reviewed 283 patients with newly diagnosed MM that were treated with lenalidomide between January 2003 and January 2011. We excluded patients that underwent early autologous stem cell transplant (n=102) or had less than 3 years of follow-up (n=6), leaving 175 patients for the current analysis. Results Long term responders Thirty-three patients (19%) received lenalidomide for more than 3 years. When compared to patients receiving lenalidomide for less than 3 years, at baseline, long term responders were more likely to have standard risk disease (64% versus 44%, p=0.03) and less likely to have high risk disease (18% versus 4%, p=0.04). They were more likely to have achieved a deeper response (VGPR versus PR, p<0.001) and had a longer median time to best response (6 versus 4 months, p<0.001). When considering the 12 patients who received lenalidomide for more than 5 years, this group was more likely to have achieved a deeper response (CR versus PR, p<0.0001) and had a longer median time to achieving best response (9 versus 4 months, p<0.0001) than those 163 patients who remained on lenalidomide for fewer than 5 years. Observation group Thirty-three patients (19%) discontinued lenalidomide for reasons other than progression and were observed without receiving further treatment (LenO group). Prior to moving to observation, five patients had received lenalidomide for more than three years. Indications for stopping in the LenO group included: prolonged disease stability (n= 20); and toxicity (n=13). The only differences in baseline characteristics between the LenO group and patients that were not observed off any treatment was depth of response, with 61% (n=20) of LenO in VGPR or better versus 23% (n=23) in the remainder, p=0.0003. Median PFS from the time of discontinuing lenalidomide was significantly longer in those patients who took lenalidomide for more than 1 year (n=24) when compared to patients taking it for less than one year (n=9) (median PFS off therapy was 38.5 months versus, 14.9 months log rank 0.08; Wilcoxon p<0.05), figure 1a; PFS for those treated for 1-2 years (n=11) as compared to 2 years or greater (n= 13) were comparable to each other (data not shown). Among those taking lenalidomide for at least a year, PFS from time of discontinuing lenalidomide was superior in patients who had achieved a VGPR/CR (n=20) as compared to those who achieved only a PR (n=13) (Median 48.4 months versus 14.8 months, log-rank p<0.05; Wilcoxon p=0.01), figure 1b. Conclusion Approximately one out of five patients with newly diagnosed MM can achieve responses lasting more than three years while on treatment with lenalidomide. Patients with standard risk FISH and those achieving at least VGPR are more likely be long-term responders. Furthermore, long-term responders were more likely to be slow responders. We also demonstrate that suspension of lenalidomide therapy after 1 year among those patients achieving a VGPR or better can result in long-term disease control and can be considered as a therapeutic strategy. Disclosures: Kumar: Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Millennium: Consultancy, Research Funding; Onyx: Consultancy, Research Funding. Gertz:Celgene: Honoraria. Lacy:Celgene: Honoraria. Dispenzieri:Celgene: Research dollars Other.

Download Full-text

Efficacy and Safety of Carfilzomib at 56mg/m2 with Cyclophosphamide and Dexamethasone (K56Cd) in Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Patients Followed By ASCT or K56Cd Consolidation: Initial Results of the Phase 2 Cardamon Study

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-127992 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 861-861 ◽

Cited By ~ 3

Author(s):

Kwee Yong ◽

Rakesh Popat ◽

William Wilson ◽

Gavin Pang ◽

Richard Jenner ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Stem Cell ◽

Adverse Events ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Cell Transplant ◽

Newly Diagnosed ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Risk Patients ◽

Standard Risk

Introduction: Carfilzomib (20/36mg/m2) triplets with Lenalidomide-Dexamethasone (KRd), or Cyclophosphamide-Dexamethasone (KCd) are safe and effective in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma(NDMM). The higher dose of 56mg/m2 is effective as a doublet with Dexamethasone in the relapsed setting, but there is limited data on this dose in triplet combinations in the frontline setting. Aim: The CARDAMON study evaluated KCd with bi-weekly carfilzomib (56mg/m2) as induction in NDMM patients, and the benefit of ASCT versus K56Cd consolidation followed by carfilzomib maintenance. Co-primary endpoints were major response (≥VGPR rate) to 4 induction cycles of K56Cd, and 2-year PFS for ASCT versus K56Cd consolidation. Here we report interim analysis of the first primary endpoint of ≥VGPR rate to K56Cd induction. Methods: Transplant eligible ND patients received 4 x 28d cycles of K56Cd (carfilzomib:20/56mg/m2, IV d1, 2, 8, 9, 15, 16, cyclophosphamide 500mg orally d1, 8, 15 and dexamethasone 20mg d1, 2, 8, 9, 15, 16). Responding patients with a successful stem cell harvest (PBSCH) were randomised to autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) or 4 more cycles of K56Cd as consolidation, followed by 18 months carfilzomib maintenance (K56 days 1, 8, 15) for both arms. Trial recruitment completed in July 2019. Response was assessed by IMWG criteria; all patients had MRD testing by multi-parameter flow cytometry (10-5) after PBSCH. Adverse risk genetics was any one of t(4;14), t(14;16), t(14,20) or del(17p). Results: 281 pts were registered between 06/2015 and 07/2019; we report outcomes for 252 patients who either completed induction or came off study before end of induction. Median age was 58yrs(33-74), 91% ECOG 0-1, 45.2% ISS I, 24.7% adverse risk (48.5% when including 1p/1q+). Best response at end of induction or after PBSCH (n=250) was: ≥VGPR 59.2%, ORR 87.6%. ≥VGPR rate in adverse risk patients was 53.4% vs 61.9% in standard risk(SR), (p=0.25), ORR was similar: adverse risk, 87.9% vs standard risk, 88.1%. Post-PBSCH, 24.1% of patients were MRD-negative (patients who were withdrawn due to insufficient induction response or toxicity and those with an inconclusive result were grouped with the MRD-positive). Of 19 patients in sCR/CR, 9 were MRD-negative(47.4%) while 40/110 (36.4%) of VGPR patients were MRD-negative. MRD-negative rates in adverse and standard risk patients were 22.8% and 24.7% respectively. 10 patients progressed during or at end of induction, and 12 were withdrawn for toxicity. There were 4 deaths during induction, one from myocardial infarction, the other 3 from cardiac arrest, associated with bronchopneumonia and sepsis. During induction, 114 serious adverse events (SAEs) were reported in 72/252 patients, notable ones were thrombotic microangiopathy (2), grade 3 cardiac ischaemia (4), infection (16.3%, mainly lung), renal impairment (6), G3 hypertension (3), thromboembolism(2). Specific guidance for hypertension management was incorporated. 25% of patients are currently reported to have received a dose modification during induction. Full details of adverse events and dose intensity will be presented at the meeting. Conclusion: K56Cd is an effective induction regimen in NDMM patients, and has equivalent MRD negative rates in adverse and standard risk disease. The SAE profile is in keeping with published safety data with carfilzomib. Disclosures Yong: Sanofi: Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Autolus: Consultancy; Janssen: Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Popat:Celgene Corporation: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: travel, accommodations, expenses; Janssen: Honoraria, Other: travel support to meetings; AbbVie: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; GSK: Consultancy, Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria, Other: travel, accommodations, expenses. Ramasamy:Takeda: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; NAPP Pharmaceuticals Ltd.: Research Funding; Janssen-Cilag Ltd.: Research Funding; Oncopeptides and Sanofi: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Abbvie: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Chapman:Takeda: Honoraria. Benjamin:Allogene: Research Funding; Gilead: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Pfizer: Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria; Servier: Research Funding; Eusapharm: Consultancy. Owen:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel/ meeting support. OffLabel Disclosure: Carfilzomib is used with cyclophosphamide as 1st line treatment for myeloma

Download Full-text

Long-Term Follow-up of Combined Hypercvad (hCVAD) Regimen with Dasatinib (Db) in the Front Line Therapy of Patients (pts) with Philadelphia Chromosome Positive (Ph+) Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL)

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v118.21.1512.1512 ◽

2011 ◽

Vol 118 (21) ◽

pp. 1512-1512 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Hun Ju Lee ◽

Hagop M. Kantarjian ◽

Deborah A. Thomas ◽

Stefan Faderl ◽

Charles Koller ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽

Single Agent ◽

High Dose ◽

Cell Transplant ◽

Newly Diagnosed ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Platelet Recovery

Abstract Abstract 1512 Background: The introduction of tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors (TKI) has significantly improved the outcome of patients (pts) with Ph+ ALL. Dasatinib (Db) is a second generation dual SRC/ABL TKI with greater potency compared to Imatinib in inhibiting BCR/ABL. Aim: To determine the outcome of pts with Ph+ ALL treated with hCVAD + Db. Method: Between 9/06 and 7/09, pts with newly diagnosed Ph+ ALL received Db 50mg oral (PO) twice daily (BID) or 100mg PO daily for the first 14 days of each of 8 cycles of alternating hCVAD, and high dose cytarabine and methotrexate. Pts in complete remission (CR) continued to receive maintenance Db 50mg PO BID or 100mg PO daily, as well as monthly prednisone and vincristine for 2 years, followed by Db indefinitely. From 8/09 protocol was amended and pts received 100mg Db for the first 14 days of cycle #1 and then 70mg daily continuously for the next 7 cycles, as well as 2 doses of rituximab 375 mg/m2 during each of the first 4 cycles. Maintenance was with Db, vincristine and prednisone. Results: Sixty-one pts with newly diagnosed Ph+ ALL have been treated to date. Median age was 56 years (yrs) (range (r), 22–80) and 41 (67%) pts were >50 yrs. The median follow up is 26.1 months (mo) (r, 4–58). Central nervous system (CNS) involvement was noted in 9 (14%) pts at diagnosis. Sixteen (26%) pts had Ph+ alone, 38 (62%) pts had Ph+ with additional abnormalities, and 7 (12%) pts were Ph negative, and BCR/ABL positive. Median white blood cell count (WBC) at diagnosis was 13.4 × 109/L (r: 0.4–658), and 22 (36%) pts had WBC >30 × 109/L at diagnosis. BCR/ABL transcript was identified in 60 (98.3%) pts at diagnosis, including e1a2 in 46 (76%) pts, b2a2 in 10 (17%) pts, b2a2+b3a2 in 2 (3%) pts, b3a2 and e1a3 in 1 (1.6%) pt each. One pt had a variant transcript that was not detectable with the standard primers. The median number of induction and maintenance cycles received were 6 cycles (r: 1–8) and 13.5 cycles (r: 1–24), respectively. Fifty seven (94%) pts achieved CR1 and 1 (1.5%) pts achieved CR with incomplete platelet recovery with first induction cycle of chemotherapy. Three (4.5%) pts died before response assessment could be performed due to infections. Thirty-nine (64%) pts received maintenance, 3 (5%) pts are currently receiving induction and 19 (31%) pts had no maintenance [9 pts received allogeneic stem cell transplant (ASCT) prior to maintenance, 10 pts had progression of disease]. To date, twelve (19%) pts have relapsed and Abl kinase domain mutations were analyzed in 7 pts; mutations were noted in 4 pts. These included T315I in 2 pts, and F359V and V299L in 1 pt each. CNS relapse occurred in 5 pts. Salvage (S1) regimens included [hCVAD + another TKI in 7 pts, single agent TKI in 2 pts, single agent monoclonal antibody in 1 pt, methotrexate, vincristine, asparginase, dexamethasone (MOAD) in 1pt, intrathecal cytarabine/methotrexate plus CNS radiation and Db in 1 pt]. Eight pts achieved CR2, 3 pts were refractory (2 pts with T315I and 1 pt with F359V) and one is still undergoing salvage treatment. Median DFS and OS after S1 were 5.3 mo (r: 0.7–17.3) and 6.7 mo (r: 0.6–24.4), respectively. ASCT was performed in 15 (24%) pts, including 10 pts in CR1 and 5 pts in CR2. Donors were related in 8 (53%) and unrelated in 7 (47%) transplants. Sixteen pts have died 11 (68%) pts from infectious complications, 2 (13%) pts from multi-organ failure, 1 (6%) pt with graft versus host disease, and 2 (13%) pts from unknown causes. Three-year disease free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) (n=61) were 49% and 62%, respectively. Conclusion: Db plus hCVAD is an effective regimen with durable responses in pts with newly diagnosed Ph+ ALL. Disclosures: Kantarjian: BMS: Research Funding. Jabbour:Pfizer: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria. Cortes:Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Ariad: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Chemgenex: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Ravandi:Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria.

Download Full-text

VTE Rates and Safety Analysis of Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Patients Receiving Carfilzomib-Lenalidomide-Dexamethasone (KRD) with or without Rivaroxaban Prophylaxis

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-124403 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 1835-1835 ◽

Cited By ~ 4

Author(s):

Katrina M Piedra ◽

Hani Hassoun ◽

Larry W. Buie ◽

Sean M. Devlin ◽

Jessica Flynn ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Venous Thromboembolism ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

High Dose ◽

Newly Diagnosed ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Cancer Trial ◽

Oncology Research ◽

Increased Risk

Introduction Immunomodulatory agents (IMiD's) are associated with an increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE), particularly when combined with high dose steroids. Studies evaluating the use of lenalidomide-bortezomib-dexamethasone (RVD) and carfilzomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone (KRD) in the frontline setting for multiple myeloma (MM) have reported a 6% and 24% incidence of thrombosis, respectively, despite primary thrombotic prophylaxis with aspirin (ASA) (Richardson, et al. Blood. 2010; Korde, et al. JAMA Oncol 2015). Recent data, including the Hokusai VTE Cancer Trial, have suggested that safety and efficacy of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are preserved in the setting of treatment of solid malignancy-associated thrombosis (Raskob, et al. N Engl J Med. 2018; Mantha, et al. J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2017). Despite this data, there is limited experience and use of DOACs in prevention of thromboses in the setting of hematologic malignancies, specifically MM. After careful review of literature, since early 2018, we changed our clinical practice and routinely placed newly diagnosed MM (NDMM) patients receiving KRD at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) on concomitant rivaroxaban 10 mg once daily, regardless of VTE risk stratification. In the following abstract, we present VTE rates and safety data for newly diagnosed MM patients receiving RVD with ASA vs. KRD with ASA vs. KRD with rivaroxaban prophylaxis. Methods This was an IRB-approved, single-center, retrospective chart review study. All untreated patients with newly diagnosed MM, receiving at least one cycle of RVD or KRD between January 2015 and October 2018 were included. The period of observation included the time between the first day of therapy until 90 days after completion of induction therapy. Patients were identified by querying the pharmacy database for carfilzomib or bortezomib administration and outpatient medication review of thromboprophylaxis with rivaroxaban or ASA. VTE diagnoses were confirmed by ICD-10 codes and appropriate imaging studies (computed tomography and ultrasound). Descriptive statistics were performed. Results During the observation period, 241 patients were identified to have received RVD or KRD in the frontline (99 RVD with ASA; 97 KRD with ASA; 45 KRD with rivaroxaban). Baseline characteristics were well distributed among the three arms, with a median age of 60 (30-94) in the RVD ASA arm, 62 (33-77) in the KRD ASA arm, and 60 (24-79) in the KRD rivaroxaban arm. Patients had International Staging System (ISS) stage 3 disease in 13% (N=13), 9.3% (N=9), and 11% (N=5) of the RVD ASA, KRD ASA, and KRD rivaroxaban arms, respectively. Median weekly doses of dexamethasone were higher in both KRD arms, 40 mg (20-40) vs. 20 mg (10-40) in the RVD ASA arm. The average initial doses of lenalidomide were 22 mg in the RVD ASA arm compared to 25 mg in both the KRD ASA and KRD rivaroxaban arms. After querying the pharmacy database, no patients were identified to have a history or concomitant use of erythropoietin stimulating agent (ESA) use. Treatment-related VTE's occurred in 4 patients (4.0%) in the RVD ASA arm, 16 patients (16.5%) in the KRD ASA arm, and in 1 patient (2.2%) in the KRD rivaroxaban arm. Average time to VTE was 6.15 months (Range 5.42, 9.73) after treatment initiation in the RVD ASA group, while it was 2.61 months (Range 0.43, 5.06) in the KRD ASA group and 1.35 months in the KRD rivaroxaban group. Minor, grade 1 bleeding events per the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) were identified in 1 (1.1%) patient in the RVD ASA arm, 5 (5.2%) patients in the KRD ASA arm, and 1 (2.2%) patient in the KRD rivaroxaban arm. Conclusion More efficacious MM combination therapies have been found to increase the risk of VTE when using ASA prophylaxis, indicating better thromboprophylaxis is needed. We found patients receiving ASA prophylaxis with KRD were more likely to experience a VTE and these events occurred earlier compared to patients receiving ASA prophylaxis with RVD. Importantly, the rate of VTE was reduced to the same level as ASA prophylaxis with RVD when low-dose rivaroxaban 10 mg daily was used with KRD, and without necessarily increasing bleeding risk. Our retrospective data support the development of prospective clinical trials further investigating DOAC use in thromboprophylaxis for NDMM patients receiving carfilzomib-based treatments. Figure Disclosures Hassoun: Novartis: Consultancy; Janssen: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding. Lesokhin:BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Research Funding; GenMab: Consultancy, Honoraria; Serametrix Inc.: Patents & Royalties; Genentech: Research Funding; Juno: Consultancy, Honoraria. Mailankody:Juno: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Takeda Oncology: Research Funding; CME activity by Physician Education Resource: Honoraria. Smith:Celgene: Consultancy, Patents & Royalties, Research Funding; Fate Therapeutics and Precision Biosciences: Consultancy. Landgren:Theradex: Other: IDMC; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Karyopharm: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Merck: Other: IDMC; Sanofi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Adaptive: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. OffLabel Disclosure: Off-label use of rivaroxaban for outpatient prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism (VTE) will be explicitly disclosed to the audience.

Download Full-text

Bortezomib (Velcade™) + Adriamycin™ + Thalidomide + Dexamethasone (VATD) as an Effective Regimen in Patients with Refractory or Relapsed Multiple Myeloma (MM).

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v104.11.2399.2399 ◽

2004 ◽

Vol 104 (11) ◽

pp. 2399-2399 ◽

Cited By ~ 17

Author(s):

Klaus Hollmig ◽

Julie Stover ◽

Giampaolo Talamo ◽

Athanasios Fassas ◽

Choon-Kee Lee ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Bone Marrow ◽

Platelet Count ◽

Stable Disease ◽

Progressive Disease ◽

Single Agent ◽

Patient Characteristics ◽

M Protein ◽

Ambulatory Care Setting ◽

Pet Scans

Abstract Velcade™ (Vel) has shown promising activity as single agent and, more recently, in combination with other antimyeloma agents (dexamethasone, thalidomide) in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. We have now explored the efficacy and safety of adding Adriamycin™ 2.5–10.0mg/m2 continuous infusion on days 1–4 and days 9–12 to Velcade™ 1.0 or 1.3 mg/m2 administered on days 1, 4, 9 and 11; thalidomide 50 or 100 mg days 1–12; and dexamethasone 20 or 40 mg days 1–4 and 9–12 (VATD). The treatment was administered in an out-patient, ambulatory care setting to 20 patients. Of the 20 patients evaluable for toxicity, 14 are also evaluable for response. Patient characteristics are outlined in Table 1. Prior resistance to Velcade™-based treatment was demonstrated in 19 patients, with progressive disease in 13 and stable disease in 6. All patients have received systemic therapy immediately prior to the initiation of VATD, which included Vel + thal (7), VTD (5), DT-PACE (4), Revlimid (3), and dex + thal (1). Hematologic toxicities were dependent on the pre-VATD platelet count and WBC levels, as outlined in Table 2. Out of 14 evaluable patients, partial response (≤ 75% of serum M protein reduction, ≤ 75% of urinary M excretion) was obtained in 7 (50%); none had a complete response. Serum M protein decreased by a median of 57% (21–90%) and urine M decreased by a median of 93% (21–90%). Bone marrow follow-up examinations were available in 13 patients and revealed a median reduction in monoclonal plasmacytosis of 50% (range 33–94%); none had a normal bone marrow. Pre-VATD PET scans showed evidence of disease in 10 patients. Post VATD PET scans showed improvement in 5, stable disease in 1 and progressive disease in 4 patients. Our results are promising and demonstrate that administration of Adriamycin™ can be safely added to VTD, and that this addition does overcome the resistance to Velcade-based therapy even in metronomic doses. This approach is now being formally evaluated in a randomized trial comparing VTD alone versus added Adriamycin™ 2.5 mg/m2 on days 1–4 and 9–12 as a salvage protocol in patients with recurrent or progressive MM. Patient Characteristics Velcade 1.0 mg/m² Velcade 1.3 mg/m² Parameter Total Adria 2.5 mg/m² Adria 5 mg/m² Adria 10 mg/m² Adria 5 mg/m² 1: Autotransplant; 2: Thalidomide; 3: Velcade; 4: Velcade; Thalidomide, Dexamethasone N 20 7 10 1 2 % Age ≥ 65 14 14 60 100 0 % Abn Cytogen 55 43 60 100 50 % Prior Autotx1 85 86 80 100 100 % Prior Thal2 100 100 100 100 100 % Prior Vel³ 95 100 90 100 100 % Prior VTD[sup4] 45 71 20 100 50 % LDH > 190 U/l 55 57 60 100 0 Hematologic Toxicities Pre-Treatment Median WBC Nadir Platelet Count WBC < 2,000 WBC > 2,000 WBC < 2,000 WBC > 2,000 > 100k (n=6) 1 5 .65 2.07 50k-100k (n=9) 3 6 .94 1.73 < 50k (n=4) 1 3 1.98 3.44 Median Platelet Nadir > 100k 46,000 51,000 50K–100k 11,000 20,000 < 50K 36,000 47,000

Download Full-text

High Dose Chemotherapy and Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation in Multiple Myeloma: Comparison of Four Preparative Regimens.

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v106.11.5489.5489 ◽

2005 ◽

Vol 106 (11) ◽

pp. 5489-5489

Author(s):

Emilio P. Alessandrino ◽

Letizia Zenone Bragotti ◽

Anna A. Colombo ◽

Alessandra Algarotti ◽

Paolo Bernasconi ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Overall Survival ◽

Total Dose ◽

Stable Disease ◽

Partial Remission ◽

Progressive Disease ◽

High Dose ◽

Event Free Survival ◽

Free Survival ◽

Preparative Regimen

Abstract From 1996 to 2003, 113 consecutive patients with multiple myeloma were treated with four different high dose approaches rescued by autologous peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPC) after four cycles of VAD or other combinations. The median age was 53 years 31–68), 58% were male and 42% female, the median interval from diagnosis to transplant was 252 days (range 160–3116 days). Twenty-five patients received as preparative regimen Carmustine, Etoposide and Melphalan (BVM) at the total dose of 600 mg/m2, 900mg/m2 and 140–180 mg m2 respectively. Nineteen pts had as preparative regimen Thiotepa and Melphalan at the total dose of 10 mg/kg and 140–180 mg/m2 respectively, 38 pts received a double transplant with Melphalan given as a single agent at the dose of 200 mg/m2, while 31 pts received a single transplant with Melphalan 200 mg/m2. In patients with poor performance status at transplant or previous history of infection or renal impairment, the dose of melphalan was reduced by 20% respect to the standard planned dose. in the group of 25patients treated by BVM, 10 had progressive disease, 6 stable disease (SD), 7 partial remission (PR), 1 very good partial remission (VGPR). At day +90 from transplant, 17 patients were in CR or PR (68%). The actuarial probability of overall survival and event free survival at 5 years were 40% and 20%, respectively. One pt died of transplant, one developed a solid tumor 24 mos after transplant. in the group of 19 pts treated with TT and Mel (TT-Mel), 3 pts were with progressive disease, 3 with stable disease, 6 in partial remission, 3 with minimal response, 3 in VGPR, 1 in CR. At day +90, 15 pts were in CR or PR (78%). The actuarial probability of survival was 50% at 5 years, and event free survival 28%. in the group of 38 pts who received a double transplant, 7 pts were with progressive disease, 3 with stable disease, 14 in PR, 12 in VGPR or CR. At day +90 after the second transplant, 31 of 38 patients (81%) were in CR or PR. Overall survival and event free survival was respectively 48% and 20% at five years. in the group of 31 pts receiving a single transplant with Melphalan alone, 8 were with progressive disease, 1 with stable disease, 6 in VGPR, 1 in CR, 13 in PR. At day +90, 21 of 31 patients (67%) were in CR or PR. Overall survival and event free survival was respectively 45% and 22% at five years. In conclusion, double transplant seems better than one transplant with melphalan alone in terms of EFS and OS (p<0.03); the BVM combination produces high response rates, the regimen, however, is toxic with a high rate of life threatening mucositis. the addition of Carmustine and Vepeside or Thiotepa to Melphalan does not produce significant improvement of OS and EFS.

Download Full-text

Phase II Study of Combination of the Hypercvad Regimen with Dasatinib in the Front Line Therapy of Patients with Philadelphia Chromosome (Ph) Positive Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL).

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v114.22.837.837 ◽

2009 ◽

Vol 114 (22) ◽

pp. 837-837 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Farhad Ravandi ◽

Hagop M. Kantarjian ◽

Deborah A. Thomas ◽

Stefan Faderl ◽

Dan Jones ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Stem Cell ◽

Phase Ii ◽

Research Funding ◽

Stem Cell Transplant ◽

High Dose ◽

Cell Transplant ◽

Newly Diagnosed ◽

Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplant ◽

Median Response ◽

Platelet Recovery

Abstract Abstract 837 Background: Combination therapy with cytotoxic chemotherapy and tyrosine kinase inhibitors has improved the outcome for patients with Ph+ ALL with durable remissions in some patients even without an allogeneic stem cell transplant. The dual Src and Abl inhibitor dasatinib has ∼325 times more potent in vitro kinase inhibition than imatinib against BCR-ABL with significant clinical activity in patients with imatinib-resistant lymphoid blast phase CML (CML-LB) and Ph+ ALL. Aim: To determine the efficacy and safety of combining chemotherapy with dasatinib for treating patients with Ph+ ALL. Methods: In this phase II trial, patients with newly diagnosed Ph+ ALL receive dasatinib 50 mg po bid (or 100 mg daily) for the first 14 days of each of 8 cycles of alternating hyperCVAD and high dose cytarabine and methotrexate. Patients in CR continue to receive maintenance dasatinib 50 mg po bid (or 100 mg daily) and vincristine and prednisone monthly for 2 years followed by dasatinib indefinitely. Results: We have enrolled in the study 34 patients with untreated Ph+ ALL and 7 patients with 1 prior cycle of chemotherapy (before Ph+/BCR-ABL+ status was known). Patients younger than 50 years old have received a median of 6 cycles (range 2-8) and patients 50 years and older have received a median of 6 cycles (range 1-8). 20 patients are receiving maintenance in CR and two have completed the entire treatment regimen. Median age is 51 years (range 21 – 79); 22 patients were older than 50 years, Median WBC at diagnosis was 13.6 × 109/L (range, 1-276 × 109/L). 12 patients had CNS involvement at presentation. All patients are evaluable for assessment of response to induction; 39 (95%) achieved CR after first cycle or were CR at start. Two patients died before response assessment from infections. Thirty-one of 39 (79%) evaluable patients achieved cytogenetic (CG) CR after 1 cycle; 4 had a major CG response (3 had 5% and one had 15% Ph+), 2 had insufficient metaphases, and 2 are unknown (no CG exam on day 21 marrow). To date, 22 patients (56%) have achieved complete molecular remission (CMR) and another 8 (21%) have achieved a major (but not complete) molecular response (MMR) at a median of 14 weeks from initiation of treatment (range 2 – 59 weeks). Minimal residual disease assessment by flow cytometry is negative in 35 (90%) patients at a median of 3 weeks (range, 2-18 weeks). The median time to neutrophil and platelet recovery for cycle 1 is 18 and 23 days and for subsequent cycles is 15 and 20 days. Grade 3 and 4 adverse events have included bleeding (GI, GU, soft tissue and subdural hematomas)(18), pleural effusions (9), pericardial effusion (1), reversible rise in creatinine (10), deep vein thromboses (6), pulmonary emboli (3), as well as diarrhea, infections, hypophosphatemia, hypokalemia, hypocalcemia, hyperglycemia, and elevated transaminases. With a median follow up of 13 months (range 1-33), 29 patients (71%) are alive and 27 (66%) are in CR; 4 patients died in CR; 1 from an unrelated cardiac event and 3 from infections. Three patients have undergone an allogeneic stem cell transplant. The median disease free survival is 48+ weeks (range,1 to 140+) and the median overall survival is 52+ weeks (range, 3 to 143+). Eight patients have relapsed with a median response duration of 51 weeks (range 23-73) and 6 of them have died. In 5 patients morphological relapse was preceded by flow and molecular relapse. Five relapsed patients had ABL mutations (3 T315I, 1 F359V, and 1 V299L). Conclusion: Combination of chemotherapy with dasatinib is effective in achieving long term remissions in patients with newly diagnosed Ph+ ALL. Disclosures: Ravandi: Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Research Funding. Kantarjian:Bristol Myers Squibb: Research Funding. Wierda:Genzyme: Research Funding; Genentech: Consultancy, Honoraria. Cortes:Bristol Myers Squibb: Research Funding. O'Brien:Bristol Myers Squibb: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Bendamustine, Bortezomib and Dexamethasone (BBD) As First-Line Treatment of Patients with Multiple Myeloma Who Are Not Candidates for High Dose Chemotherapy: Toxicity Comparison of Two Dose Schedules

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v120.21.4047.4047 ◽

2012 ◽

Vol 120 (21) ◽

pp. 4047-4047 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Jesus G. Berdeja ◽

Michael R. Savona ◽

James Essell ◽

Patrick Murphy ◽

Luis Chu ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Herpes Zoster ◽

Research Funding ◽

High Dose Chemotherapy ◽

High Dose ◽

Newly Diagnosed ◽

Off Label Use ◽

First Line ◽

Off Label ◽

Grade 3

Abstract Abstract 4047 Background: Despite significant advances, multiple myeloma is an incurable plasma cell disorder with an eventual fatal outcome. In newly diagnosed MM, combinations of bortezomib, steroids and alkylating agents, such as melphalan and prednisone, have achieved response rates in excess of 70% and have been established as a standard of care in patients (pts) who are ineligible for high dose chemotherapy. Bendamustine is a bi-functional alkylating agent with a purine-like benzimidazole ring effective as a single agent and in various combinations for the treatment of relapsed/refractory MM (Poenisch et al, 2007, Fenk et al, 2007). In this study, the combination of bendamustine, bortezomib and dexamethasone (BBD) was evaluated as a first-line therapy for patients with MM. Methods: Patients with newly diagnosed active multiple myeloma who were not candidates for high-dose chemotherapy and met standard eligibility criteria with regards to renal, hepatic and hematologic function were enrolled. The original treatment schema (schema A) consisted of: bendamustine 80 mg/m2 IV on days 1, 4; bortezomib 1.3 mg/m2 IV on days 1, 4, 8, 11; and dexamethasone 40 mg on days 1, 2, 3, 4 with cycles repeating every 28 days. Patients had the option to continue on maintenance bortezomib. An interim analysis found this combination to be efficacious but relatively toxic. As a result the treatment schema was amended to the following (schema B): bendamustine 80 mg/m2 IV on days 1, 2; bortezomib 1.3 mg/m2 IV on days 1, 8, 15; and dexamethasone 20 mg on days 1, 2, 8, 9, 15, 16 every 28 days for a total of 8 cycles or 2 cycles beyond documented CR, whichever occurred first. Again, patients had the option to continue maintenance bortezamib. Acyclovir or equivalent viral prophylaxis was recommended on schema A and became required on schema B. Responses were assessed using the IMWG criteria. AEs were assessed using the CTCAE Version 4.0. We report the results of an interim safety assessment of the amended BBD combination and compare the results to those seen with the original regimen. Results: Treatment schema A accrued 18 patients between 5/2010 and 2/2011. Ten patients were accrued from 10/2011 and 4/2012 and treated on treatment schema B. The median ages of treatment schemas A and B were 75 and 72.5 respectively, with all other characteristics within expected distributions and no major differences between the groups. No grades 4 hematologic Adverse Events (AEs) were seen. Grade 3 hematologic AEs were similar in both arms seen in 33% of patients on treatment schema A and 40% of patients on treatment schema B. Grade 3/4 non-hematologic AEs were seen in 72% of patients on treatment schema A and 60% of patients on treatment schema B. Although the preliminary Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) were similar with 39% of patients on treatment schema A compared to 30% of patients on treatment schema B, a large proportion of patients on treatment schema A (39%) were unable to complete the study due to toxicity or related issues. The incidence and severity of neuropathy and herpes zoster infections were significantly different between the two schemas. Schema A had 72% of patients with any grade neuropathy, with 56% being grade 2 or worse while schema B had 40% of the patients with any grade neuropathy, all but one grade 1. Likewise, 44% of patients on the original treatment reported herpes zoster while there were no cases of herpes zoster reported for patients on the revised treatment schema. Thus far, the early response rates appear similar. Schema A had an ORR of 78% (56% >vgPR) while schema B had an ORR of 90% (40% >vgPR). Conclusions: The combination of bendamustine, bortezomib and dexamethasone is feasible and efficacious in an elderly patient population. Using the revised schema, we were able to lower treatment toxicity without adversely impacting initial efficacy. Updated results will be presented at the meeting. Disclosures: Off Label Use: Off-label use of Bendamustine in the treatment of Multiple Myeloma. Chu:Millennium: Research Funding; Cephalon: Research Funding.

Download Full-text