Prognostic Impact Of Serum Free Light Chain (sFLC) Assay In Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma (MM) Treated With Bortezomib

Abstract Introduction sFLC assay is an important advance in the diagnosis and monitoring of MM, however data on prognostic significance are still limited. Methods We performed a retrospective analysis aimed to investigate the role of sFLC assay as predictor of outcomes in newly diagnosed MM patients (pts) treated up-front with bortezomib based regimens. sFLC assay (Freelite; The Binding Site, Birmingham, UK) was performed by BN II nephelometer (Date Behring, Deerfield, IL, USA). sFLC-k, sFLC-l and sFLC k/l ratio were serially measured at baseline, during treatment and follow-up. sFLC k/l ratios were classified as normal (0.26-1.65) or abnormal (<0.26 or >1.65) according to the IMWG criteria. An involved sFLC level >=100 mg/L, defined by the IMWG criteria as the level to identify a sFLC evaluable disease, was categorized as high. Results We analyzed 110 pts who received first-line bortezomib-based treatments: 67% incorporated into autotransplantation and 33% combined with conventional chemoterapy. The median age was 63 years, 47 pts (43%) were female and 63 (57%) were male. Fifty-eight pts (53%) had IgG heavy chains, 25 (23%) IgA, 1 (1%) IgM and 1 (1%) IgD; 23 pts (21%) had light chain only disease, and 2 pts (2%) had nonsecretory MM. Overall, the involved light chain was kappa in 69 pts (64%), lambda in 36 (33%) and both in 2 (2%), whereas 3 pts (3%) had no detectable light chains. An abnormal sFLC k/l ratio was detected in 91 pts (83%) at baseline, whereas 76 pts (69%) had an involved sFLC >=100 mg/L. The median involved k and l concentrations were 720 and 479 mg/L, respectively. Baseline sFLC >=100 mg/L correlated with higher frequency of Bence Jones isotype (p=0.041), higher beta-2-microglobulin (b2M) (p=0.011), lower hemoglobin concentration (p=0.003) and higher frequency of del(13q) (p=0.016). No correlation was found between high baseline sFLC and other parameters including ISS stage, LDH, bone marrow infiltration, and presence of t(4;14) or del(17p). IMWG response was: 43% stringent complete response (sCR), 11% complete response (CR), 18% very good partial response (VGPR) and 15% partial response (PR). Overall, 83 pts (75%) achieved a normalization of sFLC k/l ratio during treatment. With a median follow-up of 26 months (mos), 36 pts progressed and 17 died. The median time to progression (TTP), progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 46, 46 and 75 mos, respectively. In comparison with a baseline sFLC <100 mg/L, sFLC >=100 mg/L was associated with a reduced rate of sCR/CR (71% vs 48%, p=0.028), a lower probability to normalize sFLC k/l ratio (94% vs 67%, p=0.002) and a shorter median TTP (not reached vs 36 mos, p=0.047) and PFS (not reached vs 35 mos, p=0.034), whereas the OS was similar in the two groups (65 vs 75 mos, p=0.16). By the opposite, pts who achieved a normalization of sFLC k/l ratio during treatment had an extended TTP (53 vs 20 mos, p<0.0001), PFS (53 vs 18 mos, p<0.0001) and OS (not reached vs 75 mos, p=0.0026) in comparison with those who failed this objective. Of the 36 pts who relapsed or progressed, 28 could be assessed for sFLC at relapse. Eleven pts (39%) showed a sFLC escape, defined as an increase of sFLC with no associated increase of intact M protein concentration, that preceded the conventional relapse by a median time of 4 mos. No difference was observed between pts with or without sFLC escape, in terms of time to start second line therapy (1 vs 2 mos, p=0.38) and OS post relapse (p=0.86), whereas sFLC >=100 mg/L at relapse was associated with earlier start of salvage therapy, compared with sFLC <100 mg/L (1 vs 4 mos, p=0.006). A multivariate analysis including age, treatment, b2M, albumin, ISS stage, sFLC and cytogenetic abnormalities identified non-transplant regiments (p<0.001), IIS 3 (p=0.032) and sFLC >=100 mg/L (p=0.047) as variables independently associated with a reduced probability to normalize sFLC k/l ratio. By Cox regression analysis, the normalization of sFLC k/l ratio was an independent factor predicting for extended TTP and PFS (p=0.022 and p=0.001) together with ISS 1-2 (p=0.042 and p=0.007). Conclusions High sFLC at baseline was associated with more aggressive disease characterized by a lower probability to achieve sCR/CR and shorter TTP and PFS. Moreover, high sFLC at relapse predicted for short-lasting asymptomatic phase. By opposite, the achievement of normal sFLC k/l ratio during treatment resulted a considerable prognostic indicator of longer TTP and PFS. Disclosures: Tacchetti: Janssen: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria. Zamagni:Janssen-Cilag: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria. Brioli:Celgene: Honoraria. Martinelli:Novartis: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Consultancy; Ariad: Consultancy. Cavo:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Onyx: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Millennium: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Download Full-text

Eltrombopag, Low-Dose Rituximab, and High-Dose Dexamethasone Combination for Patients with Newly Diagnosed Immune Thrombocytopenia: A Pilot "Total Therapy" Study

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v128.22.1369.1369 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 128 (22) ◽

pp. 1369-1369

Author(s):

David Gomez-Almaguer ◽

Olga Cantu-Rodriguez ◽

Cesar Homero Gutierrez-Aguirre ◽

Jose Carlos Jaime-Perez ◽

Luz C. Tarin-Arzaga ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Partial Response ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Low Dose ◽

Complete Response ◽

High Dose ◽

Newly Diagnosed ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

High Dose Dexamethasone ◽

Frontline Therapy

Abstract Introduction: Immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) is an autoimmune disorder that results from platelet destruction and production suppression. Frontline-therapy includes corticosteroids, intravenous immune globulin or anti-D immunoglobulin. Single-agent treatments have not been successful in inducing prolonged remission, as relapse will occur in approximately 50% of patients. Low-dose rituximab (100 mg) has been used for the treatment of ITP, showing an activity almost similar to the 375 mg/m2 standard dose. We and others have reported sustained response rates ranging from 58% to 76% using rituximab plus dexamethasone as a frontline therapy. Eltrombopag is a thrombopoietin nonpeptide mimetic that has been shown to raise platelet count in chronic ITP, and we have previously reported eltrombopag/dexamethasone as a feasible frontline therapy for ITP reaching 100% response rates.The lack of sustained response in many adult patients with newly diagnosed acute ITP has stimulated the search for a treatment that modifies the natural course of the disease. Objetive: We aim to evaluate efficacy, safety, and response duration of low-dose weekly rituximab (100 mg weekly, four doses) plus high-dose dexamethasone (40 mg PO, days 1-4) in combination with eltrombopag (50 mg, days 1-28) as frontline therapy in newly diagnosed primary ITP in an ambulatory setting. Methods: This is an ongoing open-label, single-arm study performed in patients with newly diagnosed ITP from the Hospital Universitario Dr. Jose Eleuterio Gonzalez in Monterrey, Mexico (Clinical trials.gov NCT02834286). Eligible patients are 16 years or older, with bleeding manifestations and/or a platelet count ²30×109/L, without previous treatment. Patients are excluded if they had active infection, pregnancy, or a malignant disease. A complete blood count is performed at baseline, on days 3, 5, 7 and then weekly for 28 days, monthly until month 6, and every 3 months thereafter. Partial and complete responses are defined as an increase in platelet counts ³30×109/L and ³100×109/L, respectively. Results: Ten consecutive patients have been enrolled from March 2015 until July 2016. Median age was 37 years (16-61). Six patients were women (60%) and four were men (40%). Median platelet account at diagnosis was 7 « 109/L (range 1.2-28). Median follow-up has been 7 months (range 1-13). All patients achieved at least a partial response (PR) at a median of 4 days (range 3-14). Complete response (CR) was achieved in 9 patients in a median of 7 days (7-22); all of them were still in CR at the end of treatment (Day 28). One patient lost response at 28 days and received a second high-dexamethasone course maintaining CR. No significant adverse effects have occurred during treatment, only 1 patient reported mild myalgia. No relapses have been documented until now.Currently, 8 patients remain in CR and 2 in PR. Conclusion:This is the first trial evaluating the response of low-dose rituximab in combination with eltrombopag and high-dose dexamethasone in newly diagnosed patients with ITP.Low-dose rituximab in combination with eltrombopag and high dose dexamethasone is a feasible frontline therapy for ITP. This drug combination showed high response rates achieved very rapidly, with a low incidence of side effectsand might represent an attractive option in patients with ITP and substantial bleeding. Table Characteristics and follow-up of patients M: Male, F: Female, CR: Complete Response, PR: Partial Response Table. Characteristics and follow-up of patients. / M: Male, F: Female, CR: Complete Response, PR: Partial Response Disclosures Gomez-Almaguer: Amgen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Bristol: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Download Full-text

Routine Use of Gemtuzumab Ozogamicin in 7+3-Based Inductions for All "Non-Adverse" Risk AML

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2020-142691 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 36-37

Author(s):

Gavin Hui ◽

Abdullah Ladha ◽

Edna Cheung ◽

Caroline Berube ◽

Steven Coutre ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Median Time ◽

Research Funding ◽

Gemtuzumab Ozogamicin ◽

Intermediate Risk ◽

Newly Diagnosed ◽

Myeloablative Conditioning ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Monosomy 7

Introduction: The addition of gemtuzumab ozogamicin (GO) to 7+3 chemotherapy for newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML) has been shown to significantly improve event-free survival (EFS) for cytogenetically favorable-risk AML, with marginal benefit for intermediate-risk AML, and no benefit for cytogenetically adverse-risk AML. Of note, with the exception of mutated FLT3-ITD, little is known about the impact of GO in ELN 2017-defined genotypically adverse-risk AML, and a recent randomized trial found no EFS benefit for 7+3+GO in patients (pts) with genotypically favorable-risk, NPM1-mutated AML. Since 2017, our institution incorporated GO into 7+3-based inductions for all "non-adverse" risk AML pts, as defined by wild-type FLT3 and no abnormalities on rapid FISH analysis for del(5q)/monosomy 5, del(7q)/monosomy 7, and del(20q). We report our experience treating all pts with "non-adverse" risk AML-as defined by this algorithm-with 7+3+GO. Methods: An institutional database was queried in order to identify all pts ≥18 years old who received 7+3-based chemotherapy for newly diagnosed AML between 2017 and 2020; pts who received the FDA-approved fractionated dose of GO were included in the analysis. Data collection included demographic variables, karyotype/FISH, targeted PCR analyses, and multigene NGS panels for AML-related mutations including, but not limited to, mutations in FLT3, NPM1, CEBPA, TP53, RUNX1, and ASXL1. Outcome data included response to induction, relapse, and death, as well as hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) rates, conditioning regimens, and post-transplant complications. Results: Between January 2017 and July 2020, 96 pts received 7+3-based induction at our institution. Of these, 29 (30%) received 7+3 in combination with GO. Median age at diagnosis was 46 years (range 23-66), with 17 (59%) males. Sixteen (55%) pts had ELN favorable-risk AML (5 [31%] by cytogenetics and 11 [69%] by genotype), 6 (21%) pts had ELN intermediate-risk AML, and 7 (24%) pts had ELN adverse-risk AML (4 [57%] by cytogenetics and 3 [43%] by genotype). Median time from diagnosis to start of induction was 4 days (range 0-43). For cytogenetically adverse-risk pts, median time from diagnostic bone marrow biopsy to receipt of adverse karyotype results was 8 days (7-14). Median time from start of induction to receipt of multigene NGS results for all pts was 15 days (3-32). Overall, 22 (76%) pts achieved remission. All genotypically adverse-risk pts (1 with mutated TP53 and 2 with mutated RUNX1) were refractory to induction, while 3 of 4 (75%) cytogenetically adverse-risk pts (1 with t(6;9), 1 with monosomy 7, and 2 with 11q23 abnormalities) achieved remission. Eight of the 29 (28%) pts proceeded to HCT, including 4 adverse-risk pts. Of the adverse-risk pts, all received myeloablative conditioning prior to HCT and 3 (75%) developed veno-occlusive disease (VOD), with 2 (50%) requiring defibrotide therapy. In favorable/intermediate-risk pts, 4 (18%) proceeded to HCT (2 intermediate-risk pts in first remission and 2 favorable-risk pts in second remission). Of these, 2 (50%) received myeloablative conditioning and 1 (25%) developed VOD. At last follow-up, 23 of 29 pts (79%) remained alive, with a median overall survival not reached (range 1-29 months) and a median EFS of 20 months (9-31). The percentage of ELN favorable-, intermediate-, and adverse-risk pts who remained event-free at last follow-up was 75%, 33%, and 43%, respectively. Discussion: This single-center, retrospective cohort describes the outcomes of pts with "non-adverse" risk AML who received induction chemotherapy with 7+3+GO according to a pre-defined algorithm. Using this algorithm, 30% of all pts receiving 7+3-based inductions received GO. Of these, nearly 25% were ultimately found to have adverse-risk AML as defined by ELN 2017 criteria, largely driven by long turn-around times for karyotyping and NGS multigene panel results. No patient with genotypically adverse-risk AML by ELN criteria responded to induction chemotherapy, and 75% of cytogenetically adverse-risk pts who proceeded to HCT developed VOD. Routine use of 7+3+GO induction outside of the context of cytogenetically favorable-risk AML remains controversial, and further study is needed to define the role of GO, particularly for pts with ELN genotypically adverse-risk AML. Table Disclosures Gotlib: Blueprint Medicines Corporation: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Chair of the Response Adjudication Committee and Research Funding, Research Funding; Deciphera: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: co-chair of the Study Steering Committee and Research Funding. Liedtke:Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Honoraria; GSK: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Adaptive: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Caelum: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Muffly:Adaptive: Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy; Servier: Research Funding. Mannis:AbbVie, Agios, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Genentech: Consultancy; Glycomimetics, Forty Seven, Inc, Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Clapd (Clarithromycin, Pomalidomide, Dexamethasone) Therapy In Relapsed Or Refractory Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v122.21.1955.1955 ◽

2013 ◽

Vol 122 (21) ◽

pp. 1955-1955 ◽

Cited By ~ 6

Author(s):

Tomer M Mark ◽

Angelique Boyer ◽

Adriana C Rossi ◽

Dennis Kwon ◽

Roger N Pearse ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Partial Response ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Complete Response ◽

Response Analysis ◽

Muscular Weakness ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Disease Response ◽

Grade 3

Abstract Background Pomalidomide is a distinct IMiD® immunomodulatory agent with activity in subjects with relapsed or refractory MM (RRMM), including those with prior lenalidomide treatment. We have previously reported that the addition of clarithromycin enhances the anti-myeloma activity of pomalidomide+dexamethasone (Pom/Dex) in the treatment of RRMM (Mark et al, ASH 2012). We now report updated results with extended follow up from a phase 2 trial of large group of patients treated with ClaPd in RRMM. Methods One hundred nineteen patients with heavily pretreated RRMM were enrolled into a single-institution study to investigate the effectiveness and tolerability of ClaPd. Eligible subjects had at least 3 prior lines of therapy, one line of which must have included lenalidomide. ClaPd is clarithromycin 500mg twice daily; pomalidomide 4mg for days 1-21, and dexamethasone 40mg on days 1,8,15,22 of a 28-day cycle. All subjects had thromboprophylaxis with 81mg aspirin daily. Disease response evaluation was performed monthly with immunoelectrophoresis and free light chain analysis; bone marrow biopsy with skeletal imaging was used to confirm MM progression or complete response (CR). Treatment was continued as tolerated by the patient until disease progression. Results One hundred fourteen patients had completed at least 1 cycle of ClaPd and were eligible for disease response analysis at data cut-off. All patients were included in the safety analysis. Patients had undergone a median of 5 (range 3-15) prior lines of therapy. The proportion of patients who were refractory to lenalidomide, refractory to bortezomib, and double (lenalidomide+bortezomib) refractory were 85%, 79%, and 68% respectively. The median number of ClaPd cycles received was 7 (range 1-34). Overall response rate (ORR, ≥PR, entire cohort/double-refractory subgroup) was 61.4/56.4% [stringent complete remission (sCR): 4.4/4%, complete response (CR): 0.9/1.3%, very good partial response (VGPR): 14.9/11.5%, partial response (PR): 41.2/38.5%, minimal response (MR): 7/9%, stable disease (SD): 21.9/21.8%, progressive disease (PD): 9.6/12.8%, ³VGPR rate of 20.2/16.7%]. Clinical benefit (³ MR) was achieved in 68.4/65.4%. Median time to PR and maximum response was 1 (range 1-7) and 2 (range 1-18) cycles, respectively. After a mean follow up time of 11.9 months, 40 patients (34%) remain free from progression, with a median progression free survival of 8.1 months (95% CI: 5.1, 9.8). Median duration of response (DOR) was 9.3 months (95% CI: 7.2,16.1). Median overall survival (OS) has not been reached with 68 patients (57%) alive at last follow-up. Median PFS, DOR, OS were not significantly different in the double-refractory subgroup at 6.3 (CI 4.7, 8.7; p = 0.21), 8.6 (CI 6.5, 16.1; p = 0.87), and 16.8 months (CI 12.4, 28.7; p = 0.11) respectively. The most common (³% grade 3 and 4 toxicities were: neutropenia (49%), thrombocytopenia (39%), anemia (27%), pneumonia (10%), fatigue 8%, and muscular weakness 7%. Febrile neutropenia was uncommon at 2%. There were 6 cases of lower extremity venous thrombosis (5%, 1 grade 1, 4 grade 2, 1 grade 3) and no instances of pulmonary embolism. Mild peripheral neuropathy was present in 32% (19% grade 1, 13% grade 2), 0% grade 3 or 4). Grade 2 congestive heart failure, due to dexamethasone, emerged in 1 subject (0.8%). Four patients (3.3%) withdrew due to treatment related toxicity (1 with Grade 3 muscular weakness, 2 due to Grade 3 fatigue, 1 grade 4 neutropenic sepsis). There was no treatment related mortality. Conclusions ClaPd is a highly effective and tolerable regimen for heavily treated RRMM that has progressed after prior treatments. Response to ClaPd is rapid and sustained at > 8 months in the majority of subjects. The presence of double refractory disease did not significantly impact clinical outcomes. The ORR and PFS compare favorably and toxicity profile is similar to other published reports of Pom/Dex. Disclosures: Mark: Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Millennium: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Onyx: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Rossi:Celgene: Speakers Bureau. Zafar:Celgene: Speakers Bureau; Millennium: Speakers Bureau; Onyx: Speakers Bureau. Pekle:Millennium: Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Speakers Bureau. Niesvizky:Millennium: The Takeda Oncology Company: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Onyx: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau.

Download Full-text

Weekly Carfilzomib, Cyclophosphamide and Dexamethasone (wCCyd) in Elderly Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Patients: Results of a Phase 2 Study

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v126.23.1828.1828 ◽

2015 ◽

Vol 126 (23) ◽

pp. 1828-1828 ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

Sara Bringhen ◽

Davide Rossi ◽

Alessandra Larocca ◽

Paolo Corradini ◽

Piero Galieni ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Partial Response ◽

Adverse Events ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Phase 1 ◽

Progression Free Survival ◽

Complete Response ◽

Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽

Phase 2 ◽

Newly Diagnosed ◽

Advisory Committees

Abstract Background Carfilzomib is a novel second generation proteasome-inhibitor with significant anti-MM activity and favorable toxicity profile. In a recent phase 1/2 study in relapsed/refractory patients (pts) a weekly schedule of carfilzomib in combination with dexamethasone showed to be effective (overall response rate of 77%) and safe (ASCO 2015). The ongoing phase 3 ARROW study is comparing once- with twice-weekly carfilzomib. In the newly diagnosed setting, no data are available on weekly carfilzomib. We designed a phase 1/2 study of weekly carfilzomib in combination with cyclophosphamide and dexamethasone (wCCyd) for newly diagnosed MM pts. Results of the dose-escalation phase 1 portion of study were previously reported (Palumbo A et al, Blood 2014), the maximum tolerated dose of weekly carfilzomib was established as 70 mg/m2. Here we report efficacy and safety results of the phase 2 portion of the study. Methods Newly diagnosed pts ineligible for autologous stem-cell transplantation due to age or co-morbidities were enrolled in the phase 2 portion of the study. Pts received IV carfilzomib at the maximum tolerated dose 70 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, 15 combined with oral cyclophosphamide at 300 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, 15 and oral dexamethasone at 40 mg on days 1, 8, 15, 22, in 28-daycycles. After the completionof 9 cycles, pts received 28-day maintenance cycles with carfilzomib at 70 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, 15 until disease progression or intolerance. The primary objectives were to determine the efficacy and safety of wCCyd. The secondary objectives included the evaluation of time to progression, progression-free survival, time to next therapy and overall survival. Response was assessed according to the modified International Uniform Response Criteria. Adverse events (AEs) were graded following NCI-CTCAE v4. Results As of July 15, 2015, 47 newly diagnosed MM pts were enrolled in the phase 2 portion of the study. Median age was 72 years, 23% of pts were older than 75 years, 30% had ISS stage III, 34% had unfavorable FISH profile [t(4;14) or t (14;16) or del17p or amp1]. Toxicityand response data were available in 40 pts, who completed atleast the first cycle; 7 pts were still receiving their first cycle of treatment. Pts received a median of 6 cycles (range 1-9). Overall, 80% of pts achieved at least a partial response, 60% at least a very good partial response, and 28% a near complete response. Responses improved over time (Table 1). During the study, 9 pts progressed or died, the progression-free survival at 1 year was 75%. Grade (G) 3-4 drug-related adverse events included neutropenia (22%, 9 pts), thrombocytopenia (7%, 3 pts), infection (10%, 4 pts), acute pulmonary edema (5%, 2 pts), creatinine increase (5%, 2 pts), fever (2.5%, 1 pt), fatigue (2.5%, 1 pt) and headache (2.5%, 1 pt). G1-2 hypertension was reported in 6 pts (15%). No peripheral neuropathy was reported. Overall, the wCCyd regimen was well tolerated, 4 pts (10%) required carfilzomib dose-reduction (G3 hematologic toxicities [2 pts], G3 headache [1 pt] and G2 fatigue [1 pt]) and 9 pts (22%) required treatment discontinuation due to adverse events (2 infections, 1 acute pulmonary edema, 1 creatinine increase, 1 fever, 1 pt condition, 1 second tumor, 1 pericardial effusion, 1 sudden death). Conclusions This is the first prospective study evaluating once-weekly carfilzomib in treatment-naïve MM. wCCyd therapy appears safe and effective in newly diagnosed MM pts. Responses became deeper with subsequent cycles and toxicities were manageable. The response rate observed with weekly carfilzomib compares favorably with similar studies with standard twice-weekly carfilzomib infusion. Updated results will be presented at the meeting. Table 1. 2nd cycle 6th cycle 9th cycle Complete Response 17% 26% 33% At least near Complete Response 29% 39% 40% At least Very Good Partial Response 66% 82% 87% At least Partial Response 86% 87% 87% Disclosures Bringhen: Janssen-Cilag, Celgene, Novartis: Honoraria; Onyx: Consultancy; Merck Sharp & Dohme: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Off Label Use: Use off-label of drugs for the dose and/or schedule and/or association. Larocca:Janssen-Cilag, Celgene: Honoraria. Offidani:Janssen-Cilag, Celgene, Sanofi, Amgen, Mundipharma: Honoraria. Gaidano:Celgene, Onyx: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Boccadoro:Sanofi: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Onyx Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen-Cilag: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Sonneveld:Janssen-Cilag, Celgene, Onyx, Karyopharm: Honoraria, Research Funding; novartis: Honoraria. Palumbo:Celgene, Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Genmab, Janssen-Cilag, Onyx Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis, Sanofi Aventis: Honoraria.

Download Full-text

Children's Oncology Group (COG) AALL0434: Successful Disease Control without Cranial Radiation in Newly Diagnosed T Lymphoblastic Lymphoma (T-LL)

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2018-99-113481 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 1000-1000 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Robert James Hayashi ◽

Stuart S. Winter ◽

Kimberly P. Dunsmore ◽

Meenakshi Devidas ◽

Brent Wood ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Bone Marrow ◽

High Risk ◽

Partial Response ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Complete Response ◽

Newly Diagnosed ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Risk Patients ◽

To Receive ◽

Standard Risk

Abstract Background: COG AALL0434 evaluated the safety and efficacy of a multi agent chemotherapy backbone containing Capizzi based methotrexate/pegaspargase in newly diagnosed T-LL patients. High-risk patients were randomized to receive the COG augmented BFM (ABFM) regimen with or without Nelarabine. This was part of a larger trial including T-Lymphoblastic Leukemia (T-ALL) patients featuring a 2 x 2 pseudo-factorial randomization at the end of induction using the COG ABFM regimen with a randomization of Capizzi MTX/pegaspargase (C-MTX) verses high dose MTX and a randomization with or without Nelarabine (Nel). Methods: AALL0434 enrolled 277 patients with T-LL (2010-2014). Patients were assigned to two risk categories based upon the degree of bone marrow involvement at diagnosis: (≥1%, High Risk, <1% Standard Risk), and the ability to achieve at least a partial response at the end of induction. Patients with prior steroid treatment were assigned to the high risk group. Both groups were treated using the ABFM C-MTX regimen. High-risk patients were randomized to receive or not receive six, 5-day courses of Nel 650 mg/m2/day. No patients received prophylactic cranial radiation and CNS3 patients were ineligible. Response criteria included, Complete Response (CR): disappearance, Complete Response unconfirmed (CRu): >75% reduction, Partial Response (PR): >50% reduction, of all measurable disease, all without new lesions. Results: At the end of induction, 98.9% of the evaluable patients achieved at least a partial response (30.7% CR, 34.7% CRu, 33.5% PR). For all T-LL patients, the 4-year event free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) were 87.0 +/- 2.1% and 90.0+/-1.8%. The 4-year Disease Free Survival (DFS) from end of induction was 90.0+/- 2.1%. There was no difference in DFS observed between the high risk and standard risk groups, (p=0.25) or by treatment regimen (p=0.31). Nel did not show an advantage for high-risk T-LL patients, with 4-year DFS 85.0 +/- 5.6% with Nel (N=60) vs 89.0 +/- 4.7% without Nel (N=58) (p=0.28). Neither stage nor tumor response at the end of four weeks of induction therapy resulted in differences in EFS (p= 0.34 and p= 0.22, respectively). Minimal detectable disease (MDD) of the bone marrow at diagnosis (<0.1%, 0.1-0.99%, >1.0%), used to establish the risk assignment for this trial, failed to demonstrate thresholds at diagnosis that resulted in differences in EFS (p=0.27). Relapse involving the CNS only occurred in 4 patients (1.4%). Overall toxicity and neurotoxicity was acceptable and not significantly different than that experienced from the ALL cohort. There was one observed second malignancy and 5 deaths not from progressive disease. Conclusion: COG AALL0434 produced excellent outcomes in one of the largest trials ever conducted for patients with newly diagnosed T-LL. The COG ABFM regimen with C-MTX provides excellent disease control regardless of stage, or the degree of disease involvement of the bone marrow at diagnosis. Nelarabine did not show an improvement in the outcome, although the trial was underpowered to address this specific question. Disclosures Teachey: Amgen: Consultancy; La Roche: Consultancy. Bollard:Torque: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Cellectis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Neximmune: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Download Full-text

Car-Bird [Carfilzomib, Clarithromycin(Biaxin(R)), Lenalidomide/(Revlimid(R)), Dexamethasone) For Newly-Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v122.21.3216.3216 ◽

2013 ◽

Vol 122 (21) ◽

pp. 3216-3216 ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

Tomer M Mark ◽

John N. Allan ◽

Geoffrey Marano ◽

Adriana C Rossi ◽

Roger N Pearse ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Partial Response ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Newly Diagnosed ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Disease Response ◽

M Spike ◽

Grade Iii

Abstract Background Carfilzomib (Cfz) synergizes with lenalidomide and dexamethasone (Len-dex) to provide impressive response rates as upfront treatment of multiple myeloma (MM) (Jakubowiak et al 2012). The addition of clarithromycin to Len-dex has shown superior time to progression compared to Len-dex alone (Gay et al 2010). We hypothesized that sequential treatment with Cfz-dex and BiRD would lead to enhanced efficacy, response duration, and tolerability. We thus tested a sequential approach of upfront carfilzomib / dexamethasone, consolidation with BiRd, and lenalidomide maintenance to evaluate overall response and safety as first line therapy for MM. Methods Twenty-four patients (pts) with symptomatic untreated MM were enrolled in a single institution study to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of Car-BiRd. Car-BiRd therapy is: Cfz IV over 30 minutes on Days 1, 2, 8, 9, 15, 16 of a 28-day cycle at a dose of 20mg/m2 on days 1, 2 of the 1st cycle only and 45mg/m2 for each successive dose thereafter and dex 40mg on D1, 8, 15, 22. Cfz-dex was continued until plateau in disease response defined as unchanged M-protein for 2 cycles. Elective autologous stem cell collection was then performed per physician and patient discretion and consolidation with BiRd initiated. Transplant ineligible pts proceeded directly to BiRd. BiRd is: Clarithromycin 500mg BID, lenalidomide 25mg daily on D1-21, and dex 40mg daily D1, 8, 15, 22 of 28-day cycle. Therapy was continued until a 2nd plateau in disease response after which lenalidomide maintenance at a dose of 10mg daily D1-21 of 28 day cycle was continued until disease progression or intolerability. Results 24 pts have currently been enrolled; 23 have completed at least 1 cycle of therapy and were evaluable for response. Sixteen pts (67%) harbored high-risk cytogenetics, as defined by the presence of one or more of the following on iFISH: del 17p, gain 1q, del 1p, t(4;14), t(14;16), or complex karyotypic abnormalities. Median study follow-up was 30.8 weeks (range 4.5-62.2). Response to the Car-BiRD regimen was: overall response rate (ORR) 87%, stringent complete response (sCR) 13%, very good partial response (VGPR) 48%, partial response (PR) 26%, stable disease (SD) 13%. Maximum response to the Cfz-dex induction was: ORR 87%, sCR 9%, VGPR 39%, PR 35%, SD 13%. Median time to PR and maximum response with Cfz-dex was 2 cycles (range 1-2) and 4 cycles (range 1-5) respectively. Median M-spike percentage decrease with Cfz-dex was 92% (range 13-100%). Twelve pts thereafter received BiRD consolidation with 5 pts (41%) further decreasing the M-spike by a median of 8% (range 1-45%). A median of 3 cycles (range 2-7) of BiRD was given until a 2nd response plateau was achieved. Seven pts subsequently received lenalidomide and all have maintained their response after a median of 5 cycles (range 1-8) of follow-up. Seven pts (30%) have come off study, 2 (8%) secondary to disease progression (1 during Car-Dex and 1 during BiRD) and 5 pts (22%) due to toxicity (2 pts due to Grade III renal failure, both attributable to Cfz, and 2 pts due to Grade III CHF during Cfz-Dex, 1 attributable to Cfz; 1 pt with Grade III Thromboembolic event during BiRD, attributable to Len-dex). Discussion This is the first prospective study evaluating the response to induction Cfz/Dex in treatment-naïve MM. Cfz/Dex therapy appears safe and effective in newly diagnosed myeloma patients. Responses deepen with subsequent IMiD(R)-based consolidation and maintenance. Toxicities due to each component of the regimen were manageable. The ORR of 87% and rate of VGPR or better of 61% in group with a high percentage of unfavorable cytogenetics compares favorably to similar studies using 1st generation proteasome inhibitor combinations, and may continue to improve with longer study follow-up. Disclosures: Mark: Onyx: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Millennium: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Off Label Use: Carfilzomib is not approved for front line use in myeloma. Rossi:Celgene: Speakers Bureau. Zafar:Onyx: Speakers Bureau; Millennium: Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Speakers Bureau. Pekle:Millennium: Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Speakers Bureau. Niesvizky:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Onyx: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Millennium: The Takeda Oncology Company: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau.

Download Full-text

Upfront Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation for Newly Diagnosed Elderly Multiple Myeloma (MM) Patients: A Prospective Multicenter Study

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v126.23.1989.1989 ◽

2015 ◽

Vol 126 (23) ◽

pp. 1989-1989

Author(s):

Laurent Garderet ◽

Cyrille Touzeau ◽

Anne-Marie Stoppa ◽

Denis Caillot ◽

Lionel Karlin ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Stem Cell ◽

Stem Cell Transplantation ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Cell Transplantation ◽

Median Time ◽

Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation ◽

Research Funding ◽

Newly Diagnosed ◽

Advisory Committees

Abstract Introduction: Previous trials have shown that autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is superior to conventional chemotherapy in terms of remission rate and PFS in younger MM patients. Concerns about toxicity and potential efficacy of ASCT in older MM patients lead most centers to limit ASCT indications to patients aged <65 years. However, at the era of novel induction regimens, and because of better patient selection and supportive care, ASCT may prove to be a valid treatment option even in older MM patients. Therefore, some investigators are questioning the widely used 65 years age limit. Patients and Methods: We prospectively analyzed the outcomes of 56 consecutive MM patients who had received ASCT between September 2012 and September 2014 in 6 institutions in France (protocol ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01671826). Patients were newly diagnosed MM. For induction therapy, all patients received a bortezomib-based induction regimen (VD, VTD, VCD, or VRD, 4 to 6 cycles) according to center's local guidelines. Mobilization was performed with G-CSF or G-CSF+cyclophosphamide and plerixafor whenever needed. High-dose chemotherapy consisted of either 140 mg/m2 or 200 mg/m2 Melphalan. A short two months consolidation phase post ASCT was allowed (lenalidomide-dexamethasone, VD, VTD, VCD or VRD). No maintenance treatment was given. Response, disease progression and relapse were defined according to the IMWG uniform response criteria. All patients signed an informed consent form according to the EBMT guidelines. Results: At time of diagnosis, median age was 67 (range, 64-74) years with 23% of patients being >70 years. There were 30 males and 26 females. The immunoglobulin subtype was IgG (n=29), IgA (n=15), light chain (n=10), other (n=2). The Salmon and Durie stage was III in 89% of cases (n=47), and the ISS score was I (n=18; 35%), II (n=19; 37%), III (n=14; 27%). Patients had high risk cytogenetics features (t(4;14) and/or del17p) in 9 cases (16%). 10% of patients had a serum creatinine level >176 micromol/L. None of the patients underwent hemodialysis. The Sorror comorbidity score was 0 (34), 1 (6), 2 (2), 3 (6), 6 (1), unknown (7). The median age at time of ASCT was 68 years, and the median time from diagnosis to ASCT was 5 months. In an intention to treat analysis, out of 56 patients, 6 patients could not proceed to ASCT because of an early infectious death (n=1), serious comorbidity (n=2), disease refractoriness to induction (n=1), and failure to collect an adequate PBSC graft (n=2). A median of 5.31x106/Kg CD34+ cells could be collected. Disease status at time of ASCT was: CR (n=12; 24%), VGPR (n=19; 38%), PR (n=17; 34%), and SD/non-responding (n=2; 4%). The conditioning regimen consisted of 140mg/m² melphalan in 18 cases (36%) and 200mg/m2 in 32 patients (64%). Moreover, 4 patients (8%) received a tandem ASCT. The median time for neutrophils and platelets engraftment was 12 days. The day-100 post ASCT non-relapse mortality was 0% and the 2-year NRM was 4.2% (95% CI:[0.3-18.3]). The overall response rate at day 100 was 96% (CR: 34%, VGPR: 47%, PR: 15%, SD/non-responsive: 4%). At 3 months post ASCT, 82% patients were able to receive the planned post ASCT consolidation treatment. After a median follow-up of 12 months, the estimated progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) rates at 2 years were 76% (95%CI: [61.6-94.1]) and 88% (95%CI: [76.7-100]), respectively. The incidences of infectious complications post ASCT, and response rates were comparable between the two melphalan dose levels (p=0.28). However, in the univariate analysis, the 200 mg/m2 melphalan conditioning group showed a better OS rate compared to the 140 mg/m2 group (1-year OS: 100% vs. 67%; p=0.012). Conclusion: These prospective multicenter results indicate that ASCT is a safe and effective treatment modality for elderly, but fit MM patients at the era of novel induction agents. Of note, patients above age 70 did not experience a worse prognosis. Thus, age per se should not be used as an exclusion criterion for ASCT. Longer follow-up data will be presented, but these results already set the frame for a randomized comparison to the non-transplant approaches in this patients' subgroup. Disclosures Garderet: Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy. Touzeau:AbbVie: Research Funding. Stoppa:Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria. Karlin:Celgene: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Sandoz: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Moreau:Celgene, Janssen, Takeda, Novartis, Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Download Full-text

Clinical Presentation and Outcomes of Patients with Light Chain Amyloidosis Who Have Non-Evaluable Free Light Chains at Diagnosis

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v128.22.3272.3272 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 128 (22) ◽

pp. 3272-3272

Author(s):

Surbhi Sidana ◽

Nidhi Tandon ◽

Angela Dispenzieri ◽

Morie A. Gertz ◽

Francis K Buadi ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Partial Response ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Light Chain ◽

Research Funding ◽

Cardiac Involvement ◽

Renal Involvement ◽

Light Chains ◽

Free Light Chains ◽

Advisory Committees

Abstract Introduction: Hematologic response criteria for light chain amyloidosis (AL) requires that difference in involved and uninvolved free light chains (dFLC) be at least 5 mg/dL (or 50 mg/L). However, many patients do not meet these criteria and are often excluded from clinical trials. These patients are challenging to follow clinically as organ response takes much longer and therefore response to treatment is difficult to evaluate in the first few cycles. This study aims to evaluate patients who had non-evaluable FLC (dFLC< 5 mg/dL) at diagnosis and compare them to those who had evaluable FLC (dFLC≥ 5 mg/dL). Methods: All patients with newly diagnosed AL seen within 90 days of diagnosis at our institution over a 10-year period (2006-2015) were identified from an institutional database. Data pertaining to demographics, diagnosis, treatment and follow-up was extracted from electronic medical records. Analysis was carried out by chi-square and Fisher's exact test for categorical variables and Kruskal-Wallis and Wilcoxon rank sum test for ordinal and continuous variables. Progression free survival (PFS) is defined as time to progression requiring treatment change or relapse requiring re-institution of treatment or death. PFS and overall survival (OS) were analyzed via the Kaplan-Meier method. Results: Of 1336 patients meeting inclusion criteria, dFLC at diagnosis was known in 1290. 85.4% (n=1101) had dFLC ≥ 5 mg/dL, while 14.6% (n=189) had non-evaluable FLC. Median age at diagnosis (65.2 vs. 63.9 years), gender distribution (males 56.1% vs.64.8%) and involved FLC (lambda: 72.2% vs. 72.9%) was similar in FLC < 5 mg/dL and FLC ≥ 5 mg/dL group. Cardiac (38.1 vs. 76.3%, p <0.0001) and liver (10.2% vs. 16.3%, p=0.03) organ involvement were less common in patients with non-evaluable FLC (table 1). NT-ProBNP was significantly lower in the group with dFLC < 5 mg/dL in patients with and without cardiac involvement, as was Mayo cardiac stage (table 1). A trend towards less gastrointestinal (GI) involvement (17.1% vs. 24%, p=0.09) was also seen with dFLC < 5 mg/dL. In contrast, a trend towards higher renal involvement was seen in patients with dFLC < 5 mg/dL (64.6% vs. 55.9%, p=0.08), though this was not statistically significant. Median 24 hour urine protein was significantly higher in all patients (with and without renal involvement) with dFLC < 5 mg/dL compared to dFLC ≥ 5 mg/dL group (table 1). Treatment details are listed in Table 1. ASCT (autologous stem cell transplant) was utilized more commonly in patients with dFLC < 5 mg/dL compared to patients with dFLC ≥ 5 mg/dL(43.2% vs. 26.1%, p <0.0001), including ASCT alone without chemotherapy (35.4% vs. 15.3%, p <0.0001).Rates of cardiac response (53.3% vs. 50.3%, p=0.88), and time to response (27.7 weeks vs. 35.6 weeks, p=0.67), were similar in both groups. Similarly, there was no difference in rates of renal and liver response and time taken to achieve a response (table 1). In patients with evaluable FLC, hematologic response was complete response (27.3%, n=245), very good partial response (21%, n=189), partial response (18%, n=160), no response (8%, n=74), progression (2%, n=15) and not known in 26.1% (n=216). In patients who had follow up data available, 30.6% (44/144) with dFLC < 5mg/dL experienced a relapse/progression with median PFS of 4.1 years (95% confidence interval (CI): 3 to 5.7), while 34.7% (304/875) with FLC ≥ 5 mg/dL experienced a relapse/progression with median PFS of 1.3 years (95% CI 1.1 to 1.5); p<0.0001. Median OS was higher in patients with dFLC < 5 mg/dL at diagnosis at 8.3 years compared to 2.4 years in patients with dFLC ≥ 5 mg/dL (p < 0.0001) as depicted in Figure 1. Conclusions: Patients with non-evaluable FLC at diagnosis have significant differences in organ involvement and survival compared to those with FLC ≥ 5 mg/dL at diagnosis. They have less cardiac and liver involvement and a trend towards less GI involvement, which may be secondary to low serum FLC burden and consequent less organ deposition. However, a trend towards higher renal involvement was seen in dFLC < 5 mg/dL group, with significantly higher urinary protein excretion. Loss of FLC in urine may result in lower serum FLC levels in this group. Survival was significantly better in patients with dFLC < 5 mg/dL, which may be explained by less cardiac involvement, lower cardiac stage and lower median FLC at diagnosis. Disclosures Dispenzieri: GSK: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Prothena: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; pfizer: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Alnylam: Research Funding; Jannsen: Research Funding. Kapoor:Amgen: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding. Kumar:Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Sanofi: Consultancy, Research Funding; Skyline: Consultancy, Honoraria; BMS: Consultancy; AbbVie: Research Funding; Noxxon: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding.

Download Full-text

A Phase 2 Study to Test the Feasibility, Safety and Efficacy of the Addition of Blinatumomab to the Interfant06 Backbone in Infants with Newly Diagnosed KMT2A-Rearranged Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia. a Collaborative Study of the Interfant Network

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2021-144843 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 361-361

Author(s):

Inge M. Van Der Sluis ◽

Paola De Lorenzo ◽

Rishi Sury Kotecha ◽

Andishe Attarbaschi ◽

Gabriele Escherich ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽

Complete Response ◽

Advisory Board ◽

Phase 2 ◽

Newly Diagnosed ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Phase 2 Study ◽

Historical Controls

Abstract Background: Infant acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is a rare disease with dismal outcome. While outcomes for older children have improved, with event-free survival (EFS) currently above 85%, newly diagnosed infants (<1 year of age) with KMT2A-rearranged ALL have an 1-year EFS of 54.8% (SE 2.3) and a 3-year EFS of 39.6% (SE 2.3) (48% and 23% for medium risk (MR) and high risk (HR) patients, respectively). Ninety percent of all relapses occur during treatment, 66% within one year of diagnosis. Survival after relapse is only 20%. Intensifying chemotherapy with the Interfant06 protocol has not improved the outcome for infant ALL over the last two decades (Pieters et al., JCO 2019), hence there is an urgent need to improve upfront treatment. We studied the safety and efficacy of blinatumomab, a bispecific T-cell engager antibody targeting CD19, in infants with newly diagnosed KMT2A-r ALL. Methods: We conducted a prospective, single-arm, international, multicenter, phase 2 study. Newly diagnosed patients <1 year of age with KMT2A-r ALL treated according to the Interfant06 protocol and with a M1/M2 marrow at the end of induction (EOI) were eligible to receive one course of blinatumomab (15ug/m 2/day, 28 day continuous infusion) after induction (Figure 1). Minimal residual disease (MRD) was measured at EOI (TP2), during blinatumomab (TP blina1 day15 and TP blina2 day29), before MARMA (TP4) and OCTADAD/hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) (TP5), and at the start of maintenance (TP6) using MLL and/or Ig/TCR polymerase chain reaction. HR KMT2A-r infant ALL was defined as age <6 months at diagnosis AND white blood cell count≥300x10 9/L and/or poor prednisone response. All other KMT2A-r patients were classified as MR. MR patients with MRD levels >0.05% before OCTADAD and all HR patients in complete remission were eligible for HSCT. (Serious) Adverse Events ((S)AEs) were collected from the start of blinatumomab until the next treatment block. Outcome data were compared to historical controls. Results: Twenty-eight patients were enrolled. Baseline characteristics are shown in Table 1. The median follow-up was 11 months (range 1.5-33 months). All patients received the full course of blinatumomab without treatment interruptions. Seven SAEs were reported during blinatumomab (3 fever, grade 1 and 4 infections, grade 3-4). None of the patients experienced neurological (S)AEs. In total, 70 AEs were reported, the most frequent grade >3 adverse events were febrile neutropenia (n= 2), anemia (n=5), and elevated GGT (n=2). MRD negative complete response occurred in 54% (n=15/28) at TP blina1, as well as at TP blina2 (after 2 and 4 weeks of blinatumomab, Table 2), which tended to be higher compared to the end of consolidation in Interfant06 (40%, p=0.16). There were 89% (25/28) of patients who were MRD negative or not quantifiable (<0.05%) at TP blina2. None of the MR patients had an indication for HSCT based on high MRD before OCTADAD, compared to 20% in Interfant06, however one patient was transplanted per investigator's discretion. All MR patients who continued chemotherapy became MRD negative during further treatment. MRD negative complete response at the end of blinatumomab was more frequently found in MR compared to HR patients (68% vs 22%, p=0.0418) and in patients with low MRD at EOI (<0.05%) compared to patients with high MRD at EOI (76% vs 18 %, p=0.0056). The 1-year EFS was 96.2% (SE 3.8). One death in first complete remission (CR1) occurred just before HSCT, which was not blinatumomab related (tracheal bleeding due to a tracheal cannula). One MR patient with high MRD at EOI had a combined CD19 positive relapse in the bone marrow and CNS at the end of maintenance, and is in continuous CR2 after HSCT. Conclusion: This is the first trial to use blinatumomab in infants with newly diagnosed KMT2A-r ALL. Blinatumomab added to the Interfant06 backbone was very well tolerated, and has promising efficacy in terms of a high rate of complete MRD response and short term EFS. Longer follow-up is awaited, but the low relapse rate after blinatumomab is remarkable, given that in historical controls relapses occur frequently and early, during therapy. Given these findings, blinatumomab will be implemented for all infants with newly diagnosed KMT2A-r ALL in the next Interfant21 protocol. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Nysom: Y-mAbs: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: teaching; EUSA Pharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bayer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: teaching. Biondi: Amgen: Honoraria; Incyte: Consultancy, Other: Advisory Board; Bluebird: Other: Advisory Board; Novartis: Honoraria; Colmmune: Honoraria. OffLabel Disclosure: Investigational use of blinatumomab

Download Full-text

RVD Induction Followed by Consolidation with ASCT in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma,

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v118.21.4134.4134 ◽

2011 ◽

Vol 118 (21) ◽

pp. 4134-4134

Author(s):

Marlise R Luskin ◽

Federico Campigotto ◽

Paul G. Richardson ◽

John Koreth ◽

Irene M. Ghobrial ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Stem Cell ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Median Time ◽

Research Funding ◽

M Protein ◽

Newly Diagnosed ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Disease Response ◽

Stem Cell Collection

Abstract Abstract 4134 Introduction: Lenalidomide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone (RVD) is an active and well tolerated induction regimen in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM). Clinical trials show this regimen to have an overall response rate (ORR) of 95–100%. Appropriately selected patients who receive RVD induction may proceed to consolidation with high-dose therapy and autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). In this retrospective study we characterize the experience of patients at our center who received RVD induction followed by ASCT. Methods: Demographic and outcome data were collected retrospectively among patients with MM who underwent ASCT between January 1, 2005 and December 31, 2010 (n=482) and received at least 2 cycles of RVD induction (n=82). Data collected include demographics, disease sub-type and International Staging System (ISS) stage, cytogenetics, treatment summary, treatment-related peripheral neuropathy and venous thromboembolism (VTE), CD34+ stem cell yield, time to hematopoietic recovery post-ASCT, disease response to induction and ASCT, and time to progression after ASCT. Response was based on M-protein or serum free light chain (FLC) response and bone marrow findings. Results: The cohort was 63% male with median age at induction of 57.5 years (range 24 to 71). By ISS stage, 51, 32, 12, and 5% had stage I, II, III, and unknown disease, respectively. Based on cytogenetic findings, 56, 33, and 12% had standard, high, and unknown-risk disease, respectively. IgG was the most common subtype (48% IgG, 24% IgA, and 26% light chain disease). Patients received a median of 5 cycles (range 2 to 16) of RVD induction. 50% of patients reported any-grade peripheral neuropathy. Two patients developed VTE. In 8 (10%) patients, bortezomib or lenalidomide was discontinued due to drug toxicity. In 5 (6%) patients, omission of lenalidomide in the final cycle prior to stem cell collection was planned. Partial response (PR) or better M-protein (or FLC) response was observed in 96% (95% CI: [88%, 99%]) with 44% complete response (CR), 26% very good partial response (VGPR), 26% PR, 4% stable disease (SD) pre-ASCT. 50% of patients who achieved a CR by M-protein response had no evidence of clonal plasma cells in their bone marrow. Sixty-three (77%) patients proceeded directly to ASCT after RVD induction with median time to ASCT 187 days (range 119 to 510). Nineteen (23%) patients received further therapy prior to ASCT: 8 patients to either deepen treatment response prior to ASCT (n=6) or for progressive disease (PD) after a transient response to RVD (n=2), while 11 were either observed (n=7) or received maintenance therapy (n=4) after induction with further therapy for PD or for cytoreduction prior to ASCT. Among patients who received additional therapy, 16% improved their response with median time to ASCT 394 days (range 155 to 975). Median CD34+ stem cell collection was 10.0 × 10^6 (range 2.0 × 10^6 to 75.4 × 10^6). More than 4 × 10^6 stem cells were collected in 95% of patients. Median time to neutrophil and platelet engraftment was 11 (range 6 to 19) and 19 (range 10 to 92) days, respectively. At 100 days post-ASCT, 33% showed improvement in disease response, 59% showed the same response, no one had PD, and 7% had unknown response due to no assessment ≤ 150 days post-ASCT. Lenalidomide maintenance was given to 71% of patients after day 100 post-ASCT. At median follow-up of 12.1 months, 12 subjects progressed and one patient died of angioimmunoblastic lymphoma on day 289 post-ASCT without myeloma progression (3 subjects had no follow-up data). No other second new primary malignancies were reported. The Kaplan-Meier estimate of progression-free survival (PFS) at 12 months post-ASCT is 85% (95% CI:[72;92]). Similar results were observed among the 63 patients who proceeded directly to ASCT. Conclusion: RVD is a well tolerated, highly active induction regimen for patients with newly diagnosed MM. The ORR of 96% and CR rate of 44% to RVD induction prior to ASCT in our study are consistent with previous results. Stem cell collection following RVD induction was successful in all patients and post-ASCT engraftment was rapid. ASCT improved disease response and these responses appear durable at median 12 month follow-up. Data from on-going phase III trials will provide insight in a prospective manner on outcomes after RVD induction followed by ASCT (either early or late) for MM patients. Disclosures: Richardson: Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Johnson & Johnson: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol Myers Squibb: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Millennium: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Koreth:Millennium Pharmaceuticals Inc: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Ghobrial:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Millennium: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Noxxon: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Munshi:Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Millennium: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Onyx: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Anderson:Onyx: Consultancy; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Millennium: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Merck: Consultancy; Acetylon: Founder.

Download Full-text