Long-Term Sustained Responses Following Ibrutinib Discontinuation after Frontline Therapy with Obinutuzumab Plus Ibrutinib in Patients with Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia

Single oral targeted therapies have emerged as a standard of care in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). However, accessibility, side effects, and financial burden associated with long term administration limit their clinical use. Mainly, it is unclear in what clinical situation discontinuation of oral therapy can be recommended. The combination of type II anti-CD20 antibody obinutuzumab-Gazyva® with ibrutinib (GI) has shown a significant progression-free survival benefit in patients (pts) with CLL, including those with high-risk genomic aberrations. We conducted a phase 1b/2, single-arm, open-label trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of GI as first-line treatment in 32 CLL pts. We report the outcome in pts that discontinued ibrutinib (either after 3 years of sustained complete response (CR) as stipulated in the clinical protocol, or due to other reasons). CLL pts enrolled in this protocol were ≥65 years old, or unfit/unwilling to receive chemotherapy. Pts received GI for six cycles, followed by daily single-agent ibrutinib. The protocol was designed to ensure that pts with a sustained CR after 36 months were allowed to discontinue ibrutinib. The median age was 66 years (IQR 59-73), and 6% of the evaluated pts had 17p deletion. All pts were able to complete the six planned cycles of obinutuzumab. The combination regimen was well-tolerated, and the most common adverse events (>5% CTCAE grade 3-4) were neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and hyperglycemia. The rate and severity of infusion-related reactions (IRR) were much lower than expected (Grade≥ 3, 3%), and pts without IRR had lower serum levels of cytokines/chemokines CCL3 (P=0.0460), IFN-γ (P=0.0457), and TNF-α (P=0.0032) after infusion. The overall response rate was 100%, with nine pts (28%) achieving a CR, and four pts (12.5%) with undetectable minimal residual disease (uMRD) in the bone marrow, defined as <10-4 CLL cells on multicolor flow cytometry. At a median follow-up of 35.5 months (IQR 24.5-42.7) after starting treatment, 91% of the enrolled pts remain in remission with a 100% overall survival. Sixteen pts have completed a long-term follow-up of 36 months. Six pts showed CR, with three of them achieving uMRD in the bone marrow. Ten of these pts were in PR, and only one had disease progression and started treatment for symptomatic stage I disease with obinutuzumab plus venetoclax. In total, thirteen pts (41%) have stopped ibrutinib, with a median time on treatment prior to discontinuation of 35 months. Five (16%) of these pts had CRs and discontinued after 36 months. Eight additional pts (25%) had PRs and discontinued ibrutinib without being eligible: three pts discontinued prior to 36 months due to toxicities, and five pts discontinued after 36 months (3 due to side effects, and 2 due to financially driven decision). One patient eligible to discontinue ibrutinib, decided to remain on treatment despite sustained CR. After a median follow up time following ibrutinib discontinuation of 8 months (IQR 3.5-17), only two out of 13 pts have progressed (10 and 17 months after Ibrutinib discontinuation). None of the pts that stopped ibrutinib after achieving a CR have shown signs of disease progression. Of note, the pharmaceutical sponsor provided ibrutinib for the first 36 months, after which pts or their insurer became financially responsible. This particular scenario could bias the discontinuation pattern compared to a real world experience. It also provided us with a perspective about diverse factors affecting the treatment choices of pts. In summary, the obinutuzumab plus ibrutinib combination therapy was well-tolerated, with a much lower IRR rate. Efficacy compares favorably with historical controls with all pts responding to therapy, no deaths associated with treatment or disease progression, and a longer than expected time-to-progression after discontinuation of ibrutinib. The rate of ibrutinib discontinuation was higher than reported in the literature, most likely influenced by the protocol design and financial decisions driven by the switch from sponsor-provided ibrutinib to insurance or self-paid medication. Our observations regarding safety, efficacy and lack of disease progression after ibrutinib discontinuation are encouraging, and warrant confirmation in long-term prospective studies. Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier NCT02315768. Funding: Pharmacyclics LLC. Disclosures Choi: AbbVie: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Amaya-Chanaga:AbbVie: Ended employment in the past 24 months, Other: Research performed while employed as an investigator of this study at UCSD.. Kipps:Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Castro:Kite Pharma: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Fate Therapeutics: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Long-Term Follow-up of a Phase 2 Study of Single Agent Lenalidomide in Previously Untreated, Symptomatic Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL)

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v120.21.718.718 ◽

2012 ◽

Vol 120 (21) ◽

pp. 718-718

Author(s):

Christine Chen ◽

Harminder Paul ◽

Trina Wang ◽

Lisa W Le ◽

Vishal Kukreti ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Lung Cancer ◽

Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽

Research Funding ◽

Single Agent ◽

Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽

Phase 2 ◽

Phase 2 Study ◽

Grade 3

Abstract Abstract 718 Introduction: In a previously reported phase 2 study of single agent lenalidomide in 25 untreated CLL patients (pts), we reported an overall response rate (ORR) of 56% (14 pts), 40% SD (10 pts) and no CR at a median follow-up of 20.7 months (Chen et al. JCO 2010;29:1175). Although an amended protocol with conservative lenalidomide dosing was used to mitigate tumor lysis and severe myelosuppression observed in the first 2 accrued pts, we continued to observe frequent toxicities of grade 3–4 neutropenia (72%) and tumor flare (TF 88%). We now report long-term efficacy and toxicity from this study at a median follow-up of 47 months (mos). Methods: Patients were eligible if previously untreated and symptomatic (cytopenias, symptomatic adenopathy/organomegaly, constitutional symptoms, lymphocyte doubling count <12 mos). The amended starting dose for lenalidomide was 2.5mg daily on days 1–21 of a 28 day cycle, with slow monthly dose escalations (2.5mg cycle 1, 5mg cycle 2, 10mg cycle 3 and if required for response, further 5mg increments to a maximum of 25mg daily were allowed). Results: Longterm toxicities: Hematologic toxicities were common: grade 3–4 neutropenia (76%), thrombocytopenia (28%), anemia (20%). With longer term use, neutropenia tended to recur (12% of all cycles) and 10 pts required GCSF support (5 routinely during each cycle). Most common non-hematologic toxicities (all grades) were TF (88%), fatigue (76%), rash (60%), muscle cramping (40%), diarrhea (40%). All non-hematologic toxicities were mild (grade 1–2), except for 1 pt each with grade 3 rash and diarrhea. Although TF was most common during cycle 1, repeat flare symptoms upon resuming lenalidomide after the 7 day rest period of each cycle were noted in 16% of all 898 cycles administered, and as late as at cycle 28. Infections were mild (most respiratory, skin) with only 2 grade 3 events (disseminated zoster, S.pneumoniae bacteremia). Other malignancies: 2 pts developed transformed large cell lymphoma 7 and 18 mos after study discontinuation, 1 pt developed squamous cell carcinoma of skin at cycle 51, and 1 pt developed recurrence of remote non-small cell lung cancer at cycle 34. Dose modifications/discontinuation: The median highest dose achieved for all 25 pts was 15 mg (range 2.5–25 mgs); 8 pts were able to escalate to the maximal 25mg dose. Ten pts (40%) required dose reductions for grade 3 cytopenias [neutropenia (2), thrombocytopenia (2), both (2)], febrile neutropenia (2), and diarrhea (2). Of all 25 pts, the median duration on therapy was 31.1 mos (range 28 days – 60.6 mos). Twelve pts (52%) currently remain on study, receiving a median of 59 cycles of therapy (range 48–66). Causes of discontinuation for 13 pts included: treatment-related toxicity (8), lack of response/progressive disease (4), and recurrence of remote lung cancer (1). Toxicities leading to discontinuation included: prolonged cytopenias (3), recurrent infections (1), atrial fibrillation (1), disseminated herpes zoster (1), persistent grade 2 diarrhea (1), and grade 3 skin rash (1). Efficacy: With extended median follow-up from 20.7 to 47 mos, the ORR improved from 56% (14 pts) to 72% (18 pts), with 3 pts in PR upgrading to CR, and 1 SD to PR. Although the median time to response was 7.7 mos, responses occurred as quickly as 1.8 mos to as late as 27.0 mos of therapy. For the 3 CR pts, prolonged therapy with an additional 14.9, 28.3 and 40.6 mos beyond the time of first response was required to achieve CR. To date, 7 pts have progressed with 3-year PFS 68.8% (95% CI:52–91%) and OS 85.3% (95% CI:71.1–100%). Correlatives: Cereblon (CRBN), recently identified as a direct protein target of lenalidomide, was evaluated by gene expression profiling and Western blot and found to be uniformly expressed in all 19 evaluable day 1 pt samples regardless of lenalidomide response. Thus, baseline CRBN expression does not appear to be a useful predictive biomarker of response in this population. The mechanism by which CRBN is linked to response is reported by Trudel et al, ASH 2012. Conclusions: Long-term followup of this study demonstrates that when using low doses of single agent lenalidomide in CLL, prolonged therapy is feasible and may be required for the achievement of durable, high quality responses. Maximal daily doses of 25mg can be reached and may also be needed for optimal response, though recurrent myelosuppression remains limiting. Disclosures: Chen: Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; GlaxoSmithKline: Research Funding; Lundbeck: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding. Off Label Use: Lenalidomide is not approved for use in chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Kukreti:Roche: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Janssen Ortho: Honoraria. Trudel:Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau.

Download Full-text

Detailed Safety Analysis of Venetoclax Combined with Rituximab in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v128.22.2033.2033 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 128 (22) ◽

pp. 2033-2033 ◽

Cited By ~ 3

Author(s):

Danielle M. Brander ◽

Michael Y. Choi ◽

Andrew W. Roberts ◽

Shuo Ma ◽

L. Leanne Lash ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Bone Marrow ◽

Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Peripheral Blood ◽

Research Funding ◽

Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Grade 3 ◽

Over Time

Abstract Background: Venetoclax (VEN) is a selective, potent, orally bioavailable BCL-2 inhibitor FDA-approved for patients with del(17p) chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) and who have received ≥1 prior therapy. Based on preclinical evidence of synergy, VEN plus rituximab is being assessed in an ongoing Phase 1b study. Methods: Patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) CLL received daily VEN with stepwise ramp-up over 3-4 weeks to reach daily doses of 200-600mg. After 1 week at the target dose, monthly rituximab was added for 6 doses. Responses and progression were assessed by iwCLL criteria with CT scan and bone marrow biopsy. Bone marrow assessments were done at screening, completion of combination therapy (month 7), and 2 months after clinical/radiologic criteria of iwCLL response were met. Minimal residual disease (MRD) was assessed in peripheral blood and marrow aspirates using ≥4 color flow cytometry (min sensitivity: 0.01%). Data cutoff was 04March2016, with analysis focusing on updated safety of cytopenias experienced on the course of treatment. Results: Forty-ninepatients enrolled (48 CLL/1 SLL). Patients had received a median of 2 prior therapies (range: 1-5) and disease in 25 (51%) was considered refractory to the most recent therapy. Median time on study was 28 (<1-42) months, with 31 patients active on study. Eighteen patients discontinued: 11 due to disease progression, 3 due to toxicity (peripheral neuropathy [1], MDS [1], and death due to TLS [1]), 3 withdrew consent, and 1 was lost to follow up. Across all doses, the most common AEs of any grade were diarrhea (57%), neutropenia (55%), upper respiratory tract infection (55%), and nausea (51%). Peripheral blood cytopenias were the most common Grade 3/4 AEs (neutropenia [53%], thrombocytopenia [16%], anemia [14%], febrile neutropenia [12%], and leukopenia [12%]). Twenty-seven (55%) patients had a history of neutropenia, of whom 6 were receiving G-CSF support prior to starting VEN. Overall, in the first month of therapy, 15 (31%) experienced an AE of neutropenia (any grade). Thereafter, the rate of new AEs of neutropenia decreased over time. While there was individual patient variability, mean ANC was stable over time. Overall, 26 (53%) patients had Grade 3/4 neutropenia. Neutropenia was generally well tolerated and managed by G-CSF support in 24 patients, in addition to ≥1 dose modification in 11 of the 24 patients. Of 8 (16%) patients who experienced grade 3 infections, 2 were while neutropenic. There were no grade 4 infections. Among the 11 (22%) patients who developed any-grade thrombocytopenia, none occurred within 2 weeks of a reported bleeding-related AE. One patient had thrombocytopenia overlapping with disease progression on therapy. Objective response rate for all patients was 86% (n=42), with 51% (n=25) who had complete response (CR/CRi; 12 achieved CR/CRi by month 7). At the completion of combination therapy (month 7), 39 patients had evaluable bone marrow assessments. Thirty (77%) had no histologic evidence of CLL in the bone marrow and 22 patients (56%) had attained bone marrow MRD-negativity. In longer follow up at any point during treatment for all 49 patients, 37 (75%) patients achieved complete marrow clearance and 28 (57%) achieved marrow MRD-negativity. Conclusions: Transient manageable neutropenia was the most common AE, with first onset usually seen within the first month of treatment and the onset of new neutropenia AEs decreased over time. No patients discontinued the study due to cytopenias. Patients were able to continue on study and high rates of response to treatment were observed. VEN given with rituximab achieved rapid and profound reductions in disease burden in peripheral blood and bone marrow. 77% of evaluable patients achieved morphologic clearance by month 7, and 57% were MRD-negative at any point on study. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Brander: TG Therapeutics: Research Funding; Gilead: Honoraria. Roberts:AbbVie: Research Funding; Servier: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; Genentech: Patents & Royalties: Employee of Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research which receives milestone payments related to venetoclax. Ma:Pharmacyclics, LLC, an AbbVie Company: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Genentech: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Research Funding; Xeme: Research Funding; AbbVie: Research Funding. Lash:AbbVie: Employment. Verdugo:AbbVie: Employment, Other: may own stock. Zhu:AbbVie Inc.: Employment, Other: may own stock. Kim:AbbVie: Employment. Seymour:Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Genentech: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; AbbVie Inc.: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau.

Download Full-text

Outcome of Second Line Treatment in Patients with Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Did Not Improve 2002-2013: A Population-Based Study from a Well-Defined Geographic Region

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v126.23.4166.4166 ◽

2015 ◽

Vol 126 (23) ◽

pp. 4166-4166

Author(s):

Anna Asklid ◽

Agnes Mattsson ◽

Einar Björgvinsson ◽

Maria Winqvist ◽

Sandra Eketorp Sylvan ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽

Research Funding ◽

Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽

Line Treatment ◽

Second Line ◽

Phase 2 ◽

Line Therapy ◽

Time Period ◽

Grade 3

Abstract Background: Treatment of relapsed or refractory (R/R) chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) remains challenging. Major progress has been achieved with new agents such as ibrutinib and idelalisib. However relapses still occur with these agents or the treatment has to be withdrawn (Byrd et al, Blood 2015). Several new drugs have been or are currently tested in pivotal, non-controlled phase 2 trials on R/R CLL patients, with the majority of patients on 2nd line therapy following chemoimmunotherapy. Thus, reliable and matching historical data are required for comparison. We have previously reported on the outcome of heavily pretreated refractory patients (Eketorp Sylvan et al, Leuk Lymphoma 2014). The aim of the this study was to specifically investigate the outcome of 2nd line treatment prior to the access of small molecule-based treatment options, in consecutive patients from a well-defined geographical region, where almost complete follow-up exists and external referrals are minimal. Methods: Patients diagnosed with CLL were identified from the Cancer Registry in Stockholm (Nov 2002- Dec 2013) and patient files were reviewed individually to identify R/R patients. Efficacy and toxicity of 2nd line and later salvage therapies were recorded as well as long term follow-up. Patients were also grouped into treated in the early (Nov 2002-2007) and late time period (2008-2013) and compared regarding outcome. A multivariate cox proportional hazards model was perform to explore risk factors for outcome. Results: Chart review of 979 patients identified 148 consecutive, non-referred patients with R/R CLL undergoing various types of 2nd line salvage therapy. Median age was 73 years and 53% had Binet stage C. Del17p testing was available in 46% of patients of which 20.6% had del17p. Most frequently initiated treatments in 2nd line were chlorambucil (27.7%), FC (23.6%) and FCR (13.5%). The overall response rate (ORR) was 48.6% (3.4% CR). Median overall-survival (OS) from start of second line therapy was 37.9 months. Shorter OS was significantly associated with ECOG higher than 0, male sex, and age > 80 years. There was no difference in OS, PFS or ORR between those treated in the first vs the second time period of this study, despite that 2nd line use of chlorambucil decreased from 39% to 23% and use of FCR or BR increased from 0% to 26% from 2002-2007 to 2008-2013. However, median duration of response was significantly longer during the later time period (20.9 vs 10.3 months, p=0.035). During treatment, 50.7% of patients were hospitalized and 32.4% of patients experienced grade III-IV infections. Other AEs ≥ grade 3 occurred in 10.1% and 7.4% had bleeding events. Grade 3/4 hematological toxicity, according to IWCLL-criteria, occurred in 0.7%/0.7% (Hb), 11.5%/8.8% (platelets) and 16.9%/36.5% (neutrophils). Toxicity was similar in both time periods. Conclusion: Our study describes the outcome of 2nd line treatment in R/R CLL in consecutive patients from a geographically well defined region with almost complete follow-up and without influence on the results from external referrals. Almost no improvement was observed in the outcome of 2nd line treatment during the 10 year period. Such real-world results may be used for comparison with data obtained in non-controlled phase 2 trials on new orphan drugs. Keywords: Chronic lymphocytic leukemia, Relapsed, Refractory, Clinical outcome Disclosures Asklid: Janssen Cilag: Research Funding. Mattsson:Janssen Cilag: Research Funding. Björgvinsson:Janssen Cilag: Research Funding. Winqvist:Janssen Cilag: Research Funding. Eketorp Sylvan:Janssen Cilag: Research Funding. Søltoft:Janssen Cilag: Employment. Repits:Janssen Cilag: Employment. Diels:Janssen: Employment. Österborg:Janssen Cilag: Research Funding. Hansson:Jansse Cilag: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

A Phase Ib/II Study of Combined Obinutuzumab (Gazyva) and High-Dose Methylprednisolone (HDMP) As Treatment for Patients with Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL)

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v128.22.2051.2051 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 128 (22) ◽

pp. 2051-2051 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Januario E. Castro ◽

Michael Y. Choi ◽

Carlos I. Amaya-Chanaga ◽

Natalie Nguyen ◽

Colin MacCarthy ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽

Research Funding ◽

Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽

Phase Iii ◽

High Dose ◽

Free Survival ◽

Phase Ib ◽

High Dose Methylprednisolone ◽

Grade 3

Abstract High-dose methylprednisolone (HDMP) and rituximab (R) is an effective non-myelosuppressive treatment regimen for patients (pts) with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Also, this combination has shown activity even in pts who have adverse leukemia-cytogenetics, such as del17p. Phase III studies have demonstrated that CLL pts treated with chlorambucil and obinutuzumab-Gazyva (G), another anti-CD20 mAb, had a superior outcome than comparable pts treated with R-chlorambucil. We hypothesized that G-HDMP is well-tolerated and effective in the treatment of pts with CLL. Accordingly, we initiated an open-label phase Ib/II clinical study. A total of 40 pts were enrolled in two cohorts of 20 pts each (previously untreated (PU) and relapsed/refractory (RR) CLL) and treated with HDMP 1 g/m2on Day 1-3 of cycles 1-4 (28 days/cycle) and G administered based on FDA dosing recommendations for 6 cycles. The pts had a median age of 67 years + 9.1 in the RR cohort and 63 years + 8.3 in the PU cohort. The median baseline absolute lymphocyte count was 30.7 + 7.3 x1,000/mm3 for pts in the RR cohort and 47.6 + 19.7 x1,000/mm3for pts in the PU cohort. Pts showed the following cytogenetic abnormalities: del(17p) in 30% RR vs. 0% PU, del(13q) in 60% RR vs. 70% PU, del(11q) in 20% RR vs. 35% PU, and trisomy 12 in 15% RR vs. 20% PU. Most AEs were grade 1-2 (RR=87%; PU=93%) without development of dose-limiting toxicities. Only two pts needed therapy discontinuation. One pt due to pulmonary embolism and the second pt due to asymptomatic gastrointestinal bleeding that required blood transfusion and resolved spontaneously. Grade 1-2 G-infusion-related reactions (IRR) were observed in 40% and 80% of pts in the RR and PU cohorts, respectively. Grade 3-4 IRR were observed in 10% of pts in the PU cohort only. We observed cytopenias (neutropenia grade 3-4: RR=55%, PU=40%; thrombocytopenia grade 3-4: RR=35%, PU=20%; and anemia grade 3-4: RR=0%, PU=0%). There were no cases of febrile neutropenia. Two pts (10%) in the RR cohort and one pt (5%) in the PU cohort developed infection grade 1-2 that was treated with oral antibiotics but did not require study treatment discontinuation. The most frequent non-hematological adverse events (AEs) were transaminitis, hyperglycemia, and electrolyte alterations (grade 1-2). There were no treatment related deaths in either cohort. The response assessment was performed in all 40 pts by iwCLL criteria. The ORR was 100% in the PU cohort and 95% in the RR cohort. 70% of the pts in the PU cohort and 85% of the pts in the RR cohort achieved a PR. CR was observed in 30% and 10% of the pts in the PU and RR cohorts, respectively. One pt (5%) in the RR cohort and four pts (20%) in the PU cohort achieved MRDneg status (<0.01% CLL in the bone marrow by multiparameter flow cytometry). Only one pt in the RR cohort achieved SD. At a median follow-up of 12.2 months, the RR cohort had a median Progression Free Survival (PFS) of 13.6 months and median Treatment Free Survival (TFS) of 14.7 months; the median Overall Survival (OS) has not been reached. In the PU cohort, the median PFS, TFS and OS have not been reached. One pt from the RR cohort and one pt from the PU cohort died during the follow-up period due to disease progression. G-HDMP was well tolerated and all 40 pts showed hematological and clinical responses during the study treatment without development of unexpected AEs. In both cohorts, most of IRR were grade 1-2 and severe IRR (grade 3-4) were much less compared with previously published data (G-chlorambucil / CLL-11 study). Compared to pts in the CLL-11 study, cytopenias appeared to be more frequent, however, the rate of infection and need for IV antibiotics or hospitalizations was lower. Of note, the eligibility criteria allowed pts with severe cytopenias and transfusion requirement to participate in our study. Response in PU pts were higher in terms of ORR, CR and CR-MRDnegativecompared with the data from the CLL-11 study and suggests a possible synergistic activity between G and HDMP. Overall, G-HDMP was well tolerated in the PU and RR CLL pts with a lower rate of IRR making this regimen more manageable in the outpatient setting. Responses were higher than previously reported in PU pts. Responses in RR pts appear to be comparable to our previous studies using R-HDMP. Our data supports G-HDMP as an alternative combination regimen for the treatment of CLL pts. Disclosures Kipps: Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics, LLC, an AbbVie Company: Consultancy, Honoraria; Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria.

Download Full-text

Five-Year Experience with Single-Agent Ibrutinib in Patients with Previously Untreated and Relapsed/Refractory Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia/Small Lymphocytic Leukemia

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v128.22.233.233 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 128 (22) ◽

pp. 233-233 ◽

Cited By ~ 53

Author(s):

Susan M. O'Brien ◽

Richard R. Furman ◽

Steven E. Coutre ◽

Ian W. Flinn ◽

Jan Burger ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Single Agent ◽

Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Equity Ownership ◽

Grade 3 ◽

Over Time

Abstract Background: Ibrutinib (ibr), a first-in-class, once-daily Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitor, is approved by the US FDA for treatment of patients (pts) with chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma (CLL/SLL) including pts with del17p. The phase 1b/2 PCYC-1102 trial showed single-agent efficacy and tolerability in treatment-naïve (TN; O'Brien, Lancet Oncol 2014) and relapsed/refractory (R/R) CLL/SLL (Byrd, N Engl J Med 2013). We report efficacy and safety results of the longest follow-up to date for ibr-treated pts. Methods: Pts received 420 or 840 mg ibr QD until disease progression (PD) or unacceptable toxicity. Overall response rate (ORR) including partial response (PR) with lymphocytosis (PR-L) was assessed using updated iwCLL criteria. Responses were assessed by risk groups: unmutated IGVH, complex karyotype (CK; ≥3 unrelated chromosomal abnormalities by stimulated cytogenetics assessed by a reference lab), and in hierarchical order for del17p, then del11q. In the long-term extension study PCYC-1103, grade ≥3 adverse events (AEs), serious AEs, and AEs requiring dose reduction or discontinuation were collected. Results: Median age of the 132 pts with CLL/SLL (31 TN, 101 R/R) was 68 y (range, 37-84) with 43% ≥70 y. Baseline CK was observed in 41/112 (37%) of pts. Among R/R pts, 34 (34%) had del17p, 35 (35%) del11q, and 79 (78%) unmutated IGVH. R/R pts had a median of 4 prior therapies (range, 1-12). Median time on study was 46 m (range, 0-67) for all-treated pts, 60 m (range, 0-67.4) for TN pts, and 39 m (range, 0-67) for R/R pts. The ORR (per investigator) was 86% (complete response [CR], 14%) for all-treated pts (TN: 84% [CR, 29%], R/R: 86% [CR, 10%]). Median progression-free survival (PFS) was not reached (NR) for TN and 52 m for R/R pts with 60 m estimated PFS rates of 92% and 43%, respectively (Figure 1). In R/R pts, median PFS was 55 m (95% confidence intervals [CI], 31-not estimable [NE]) for pts with del11q, 26 m (95% CI,18-37) for pts with del17p, and NR (95% CI, 40-NE) for pts without del17p, del11q, trisomy 12, or del13q. Median PFS was 33 m (95% CI, 22-NE) and NR for pts with and without CK, and 43 m (95% CI, 32-NE) and 63 m (95% CI, 7-NE) for pts with unmutated and mutated IGVH, respectively(Figure 2). Among R/R pts, median PFS was 63 m (95% CI, 37-NE) for pts with 1-2 prior regimens (n=27, 3 pts with 1 prior therapy) and 59 m (95% CI, 22-NE) and 39 m (95% CI, 26-NE) for pts with 3 and ≥4 prior regimens, respectively. Median duration of response was NR for TN pts and 45 m for R/R pts. Pts estimated to be alive at 60 m were: TN, 92%; all R/R, 57%; R/R del17p, 32%; R/R del 11q, 61%; R/R unmutated IGVH, 55%. Among all treated pts, onset of grade ≥3 treatment-emergent AEs was highest in the first year and decreased during subsequent years. With about 5 years of follow-up, the most frequent grade ≥3 AEs were hypertension (26%), pneumonia (22%), neutropenia (17%), and atrial fibrillation (9%). Study treatment was discontinued due to AEs in 27 pts (20%) and disease progression in 34 pts (26%). Of all treated pts, 38% remain on ibr treatment on study including 65% of TN pts and 30% of R/R pts. Conclusions: Single-agent ibrutinib continues to show durable responses in pts with TN or R/R CLL/SLL including those with del17p, del11q, or unmutated IGVH. With extended treatment, CRs were observed in 29% of TN and 10% of R/R pts, having evolved over time. Ibrutinib provided better PFS outcomes if administered earlier in therapy than in the third-line or beyond. Those without CK experienced more favorable PFS and OS than those with CK. Ibrutinib was well tolerated with the onset of AEs decreasing over time, allowing for extended dosing for 65% of TN and 30% of R/R pts who continue treatment. Disclosures O'Brien: Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Pharmacyclics, LLC, an AbbVie Company: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Furman:Pharmacyclics, LLC, an AbbVie Company: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Coutre:Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics, LLC, an AbbVie Company: Consultancy, Research Funding; AbbVie: Research Funding. Flinn:Janssen: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics LLC, an AbbVie Company: Research Funding; Gilead Sciences: Research Funding; ARIAD: Research Funding; RainTree Oncology Services: Equity Ownership. Burger:Pharmacyclics, LLC, an AbbVie Company: Research Funding; Gilead: Research Funding; Portola: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy, Other: Travel, Accommodations, Expenses; Roche: Other: Travel, Accommodations, Expenses. Sharman:Gilead: Research Funding; TG Therapeutics: Research Funding; Acerta: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding. Wierda:Abbvie: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Acerta: Research Funding; Gilead: Research Funding. Jones:Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; AbbVie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics, LLC, an AbbVie Company: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Luan:AbbVie: Equity Ownership; Pharmacyclics, LLC, an AbbVie Company: Employment, Other: Travel, Accommodations, Expenses. James:AbbVie: Equity Ownership; Pharmacyclics, LLC, an AbbVie Company: Employment. Chu:Pharmacyclics, LLC, an AbbVie Company: Employment; AbbVie: Equity Ownership.

Download Full-text

Efficacy and Safety of Ibrutinib in Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia or Small Lymphocytic Leukemia with 17p Deletion: Results from the Phase II RESONATE™-17 Trial

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v124.21.327.327 ◽

2014 ◽

Vol 124 (21) ◽

pp. 327-327 ◽

Cited By ~ 27

Author(s):

Susan O'Brien ◽

Jeffrey A. Jones ◽

Steven Coutre ◽

Anthony R. Mato ◽

Peter Hillmen ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Complete Response ◽

Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽

Efficacy And Safety ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Previously Treated ◽

Grade 3

Abstract Background: Patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) with deletion of the short arm of chromosome 17 (del 17p) follow an aggressive clinical course and demonstrate a median survival of less than 2 years in the relapsed/refractory (R/R) setting. Ibrutinib (ImbruvicaTM), a first-in-class Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitor, has been approved for previously treated patients with CLL and for patients with del 17p CLL. We report results from the primary analysis of the Phase II RESONATETM-17 (PCYC-1117-CA) study, designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of single-agent ibrutinib for treatment of patients with R/R del 17p CLL or small lymphocytic leukemia (SLL). Methods: Patients with del 17p CLL or SLL who failed at least one therapy were enrolled to receive 420 mg oral ibrutinib once daily until progression. All patients receiving at least one dose of ibrutinib were included in the analysis. The primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR) per an independent review committee (IRC). Other endpoints included duration of response (DOR), progression-free survival (PFS), and safety of ibrutinib. Results: Among 144 treated patients (137 with CLL, 7 with SLL), the median age was 64 (48% 65 years or older) and all had del 17p. Baseline characteristics included 63% of patients with Rai Stage III or IV disease, 49% with bulky lymphadenopathy of at least 5 cm, and 10% with lymphadenopathy of least 10 cm. The median baseline absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) was 32.9 x 109/L with 57% of patients with a baseline ALC at least 25.0 x 109/L. Baseline beta-2 microglobulin levels were at least 3.5 mg/L in 78% of patients (range 1.8-19.8 mg/L), and lactate dehydrogenase levels were at least 350 U/L in 24% of patients (range 127-1979 U/L). A median of 2 prior therapies (range 1-7) was reported. Investigator-assessed ORR was 82.6% including 17.4% partial response with lymphocytosis (PR-L). Complete response (CR)/complete response with incomplete bone marrow recovery (CRi) were reported in 3 patients. IRC-assessed ORR is pending. At a median follow up of 13.0 months (range 0.5-16.7 months), the median PFS (Figure 1) and DOR by investigator determination had not been reached. At 12 months, 79.3% were alive and progression-free, and 88.3% of responders were progression-free. Progressive disease was reported in 20 patients (13.9%). Richter transformation was reported in 11 of these patients (7.6%), 7 of the cases occurring within the first 24 weeks of treatment. Prolymphocytic leukemia was reported in 1 patient. The most frequently reported adverse events (AE) of any grade were diarrhea (36%; 2% Grade 3-4), fatigue (30%; 1% Grade 3-4), cough (24%; 1% Grade 3-4), and arthralgia (22%; 1% Grade 3-4). Atrial fibrillation of any grade was reported in 11 patients (7.6%; 3.5% Grade 3-4). Seven patients reported basal or squamous cell skin cancer and 1 patient had plasma cell myeloma. Most frequently reported Grade 3-4 AEs were neutropenia (14%), anemia (8%), pneumonia (8%), and hypertension (8%). Major hemorrhage was reported in 7 patients (4.9%, all Grade 2 or 3). Study treatment was discontinued in 16 patients (11.1%) due to AEs with 8 eventually having fatal events (pneumonia, sepsis, myocardial or renal infarction, health deterioration). At the time of data cut, the median treatment duration was 11.1 months, and 101 of 144 patients (70%) continued treatment with ibrutinib. Conclusions: In the largest prospective trial dedicated to the study of del 17p CLL/SLL, ibrutinib demonstrated marked efficacy in terms of ORR, DOR, and PFS, with a favorable risk-benefit profile. At a median follow up of 13 months, the median DOR had not yet been reached; 79.3% of patients remained progression-free at 12 months, consistent with efficacy observed in earlier studies (Byrd, NEJM 2013;369:32-42). The PFS in this previously treated population compares favorably to that of treatment-naïve del 17p CLL patients receiving fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and rituximab (FCR) (Hallek, Lancet 2010;376:1164-74) or alemtuzumab (Hillmen, J Clin Oncol 2007;10:5616-23) with median PFS of 11 months. The AEs are consistent with those previously reported for ibrutinib (Byrd, NEJM 2014;371:213-23). These results support ibrutinib as an effective therapy for patients with del 17p CLL/SLL. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures O'Brien: Amgen, Celgene, GSK: Consultancy; CLL Global Research Foundation: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Emergent, Genentech, Gilead, Infinity, Pharmacyclics, Spectrum: Consultancy, Research Funding; MorphoSys, Acerta, TG Therapeutics: Research Funding. Jones:Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Research Funding. Coutre:Janssen, Pharmacyclics: Honoraria, Research Funding. Mato:Pharamcyclics, Genentech, Celegene, Millennium : Speakers Bureau. Hillmen:Pharmacyclics, Janssen, Gilead, Roche: Honoraria, Research Funding. Tam:Pharmacyclics and Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Siddiqi:Janssen: Speakers Bureau. Furman:Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Brown:Sanofi, Onyx, Vertex, Novartis, Boehringer, GSK, Roche/Genentech, Emergent, Morphosys, Celgene, Janssen, Pharmacyclics, Gilead: Consultancy. Stevens-Brogan:Pharmacyclics: Employment. Li:Pharmacyclics: Employment. Fardis:Pharmacyclics: Employment. Clow:Pharmacyclics: Employment. James:Pharmacyclics: Employment. Chu:Pharmacyclics: Employment, Equity Ownership. Hallek:Janssen, Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Research Funding. Stilgenbauer:Pharmacyclics, Janssen Cilag: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding.

Download Full-text

An Open-Label, Phase Ib Study of Duvelisib (IPI-145) in Combination with Bendamustine, Rituximab or Bendamustine/Rituximab in Select Subjects with Lymphoma or Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v124.21.4422.4422 ◽

2014 ◽

Vol 124 (21) ◽

pp. 4422-4422 ◽

Cited By ~ 4

Author(s):

Ian Flinn ◽

Manish R. Patel ◽

Michael B Maris ◽

Jeffrey Matous ◽

Mohamad Cherry ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽

Febrile Neutropenia ◽

Phase I ◽

Dose Escalation ◽

Research Funding ◽

Treatment Delay ◽

Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽

Open Label ◽

Grade 3

Abstract Background: Duvelisib is a potent inhibitor of the δ and γ isoforms of phosphoinositide-3-kinase (PI3K) being developed as a potential therapeutic in hematologic malignancies including B and T cell lymphoma and chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). In a phase I study of single agent duvelisib (D), ORR of 52% was seen in pts with indolent non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (iNHL) and 47% in CLL. Bendamustine (B), rituximab (R), and their combination have demonstrated proven activity in iNHL and CLL. Combining duvelisib with either bendamustine or rituximab alone or in combination with each other may improve response rates and the durability of remission. The goal of this Phase 1b, open-label, three-arm, non-randomized, dose escalating, safety and tolerability trial is to characterize the safety, maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and preliminary efficacy profile of duvelisib given in combination with rituximab (Arm 1-DR), bendamustine plus rituximab (Arm 2-DBR) or bendamustine (Arm 3-DB) in subjects with select relapsed/refractory lymphoma or CLL. Methods: Pts had relapsed CLL or NHL, ECOG performance status (PS) ≤2, and adequate organ function. The subject population during dose escalation was limited to relapsed NHL. During the dose expansion phase, each treatment arm enrolled to population specific cohorts to continue to assess efficacy. Arm 1 (DR) received rituximab 375 mg/m2 IV weekly for 2, 28 day cycles plus duvelisib PO BID up to 12 cycles. Arm 2 (DBR)received rituximab 375 mg/m2 IV weekly for 2, 28 day cycles, bendamustine 90 mg/m2 IV on Days 1 and 2 of the first six cycles plus duvelisib PO BID up to 12 cycles. Arm 3 (DB) received bendamustine 120 mg/m2 IV on Days 1 and 2 of the first six cycles plus duvelisib PO BID up to 12 cycles. Three different dose levels of duvelisib were explored, 25, 50, and 75 mg PO BID. DLTs were defined as: febrile neutropenia, G4 neutropenia ≥7 days, G4 thrombocytopenia ≥ 7 days or G3 thrombocytopenia with bleeding, Grade 4 AST/ALT, Grade 2 hyperbilirubinemia ≥7 days, ≥ Grade 3 non-hematologic toxicity ≥7 days (excluding alopecia), Treatment delay of ≥7 days due to unresolved toxicity that prevents re-dosing, hepatocellular injury (defined as ALT>2 x ULN and (ALT/ULN)/(ALP/ULN) >5) and bilirubin >2 x ULN or jaundice ± alkaline phosphatase <2 x ULN. Patients were evaluated for response every 3 cycles according to specific criteria for their disease. Results: Between August 2013 and May 2014, 32 pts, median age 66 years (44-78) were enrolled to the study, 12 NHL pts on the dose escalation portion and 20 pts on dose expansion (13 CLL, 7 NHL). Patients had a median of 4 prior therapies (1-11). In arms 1 (DR) and 2 (DBR), no dose limiting toxicities were seen at the highest dose level of duvelisib (75 mg bid). In arm 3 (DB) in which a higher dose of bendamustine is used 1 pt developed a DLT at the 50 mg BID dose level of duvelisib (febrile neutropenia, neutropenia ≥ 7 days, thrombocytopenia ≥ 7 days, and liver toxicities which resulted in a treatment delay of ≥ 7 days). Dose escalation continues in this arm as the MTD has not reached. Patients on the dose expansion portion of the study are receiving duvelisib at 25 mg BID due to emerging data of duvelisib monotherapy showing no advantage in doses greater than 25 mg BID in these histologies. The AE profile is consistent with the toxicities of the single agents. The most common AEs > grade 3 were neutropenia (28% overall; [Arm 1 (DR), 27%]; [Arm 2 (DBR), 38%]), and rash (16% overall; [Arm 1, 14%]; [Arm 2, 25%]). Grade 3 or higher AST/ALT increases were seen in 2 out of 12 patients on Arm 1, 2 out of 8 patients on Arm 2 and no patients on Arm 3. There have been 2 deaths (cardiac arrest and pneumonia), both on Arm 1. Twenty one pts were evaluable for response with an ORR of 81% (10% CR, 71% PR, 14% SD and 5% PD). With a median follow up of 4.0 months, time to event analyses are immature. However, Kaplan-Meier estimate of PFS at 3 months is 87%. PK analysis is consistent with the monotherapy Phase I trial of duvelisib. Conclusions: Initial early analysis of duvelisib administered in combination with bendamustine and rituximab suggests these combinations to be generally well-tolerated with encouraging. Further follow-up is required to better characterize response rates and durability of remissions. Disclosures Flinn: Infinity Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding. Matous:Infinity Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Combination Trial of Duvelisib (IPI-145) with Bendamustine, Rituximab, or Bendamustine/Rituximab in Patients with Lymphoma or Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v126.23.3928.3928 ◽

2015 ◽

Vol 126 (23) ◽

pp. 3928-3928 ◽

Cited By ~ 12

Author(s):

Ian W. Flinn ◽

Mohamad Cherry ◽

Michael Maris ◽

Jeffrey V. Matous ◽

Jesus G. Berdeja ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽

Disease Progression ◽

Dose Level ◽

Dose Escalation ◽

Research Funding ◽

Single Agent ◽

Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽

Expansion Phase ◽

Time Plot

Abstract Background: Duvelisib, a potent inhibitor of the δ and γ isoforms of phosphoinositide-3-kinase (PI3K) is being developed as a potential therapeutic in hematologic malignancies including chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), as well as B and T cell lymphoma. Single agent bendamustine (B), rituximab (R), and their combination have demonstrated proven activity in iNHL and CLL. Combining duvelisib with bendamustine or rituximab alone or with both drugs may improve response rates and the durability of remission. The primary objective of this trial is to characterize the safety, maximum tolerated dose (MTD), and a preliminary efficacy profile of duvelisib given in combination with rituximab (Arm 1-DR), bendamustine plus rituximab (Arm 2-DBR) or bendamustine (Arm 3-DB) in subjects with select relapsed/refractory lymphoma or CLL. Methods: Pts with relapsed CLL or NHL, ECOG performance status (PS) ≤2, and adequate organ function were enrolled. The subject population during dose escalation was limited to relapsed NHL. During the dose expansion phase, each treatment arm enrolled to population specific cohorts to continue to assess efficacy. Arm 1 (DR) received rituximab 375 mg/m2 IV weekly for 2, 28 day cycles plus duvelisib PO BID until disease progression or intolerance. Arm 2 (DBR)received rituximab 375 mg/m2 IV weekly for 2, 28 day cycles, bendamustine 90 mg/m2 IV for NHL pts or 70 mg/m2 IV for CLL pts on Days 1 and 2 of the first six cycles plus duvelisib PO BID until disease progression or intolerance. Arm 3 (DB) received bendamustine 120 mg/m2 IV on Days 1 and 2 of the first six cycles plus duvelisib PO BID up to 12 cycles. Three different dose levels of duvelisib, 25, 50, and 75 mg PO BID were initially explored. Pts were evaluated for response every 3 cycles according to specific criteria for their disease. Results: Between August 2013 and April 2015, 48 pts, median age 67 yrs (40-83) were enrolled; 12 NHL pts in the dose escalation portion and 36 pts (18 CLL, 18 NHL) in dose expansion. Pts had a median of 2 prior therapies (1-7). In arms 1 (DR) and 2 (DBR), no dose limiting toxicities were seen at the highest dose level of duvelisib (75 mg bid). In arm 3 (DB), with a higher dose of bendamustine, 1 pt developed a DLT at the 50 mg BID dose level of duvelisib (febrile neutropenia, neutropenia ≥ 7 days, thrombocytopenia ≥ 7 days, and liver toxicities which resulted in a treatment delay of ≥ 7 days). The MTD was not reached in this study but given recent data of single agent duvelisib showing no advantage in doses >25 mg BID, pts on the expansion phase were treated with 25mg BID. The AE profile of the drug combination is consistent with toxicities of the single agents (Table 1). There have been 2 potentially treatment-related deaths (cardiac arrest in a pt with history of hypertension and diabetes, and pneumonia), both on Arm 1. 38 pts were evaluable for response with an ORR of 74% (8% CR, 66% PR, 16% SD and 10% PD). The ORR of NHL and CLL pts were 64% and 92% respectively. With a median follow up of 16.25 mos, median progression free survival is 13.7 mos overall. Median overall survival (OS) has not been reached, but 15 mo OS probability is 82%. Pharmacokinetics analysis is consistent with the monotherapy Phase I trial of duvelisib (Figure 2) and is not effected by bendamustine. Conclusions: Analysis of duvelisib administered in combination with bendamustine and rituximab shows these combinations to be generally well-tolerated with encouraging response. Further follow-up is required to better characterize both response rates and durability of remissions. Table 1. Treatment-related AEs (≥15% all pts) ARM 1 (N=28) ARM 2 (N=18) ARM 3 (N=2) Preferred Term G 1/2 G 3/4 G 1/2 G 3/4 G 1/2 G 3/4 Treated (N=48) RASH 8 (29%) 3 (11%) 3 (17%) 3 (17%) 0 17 (35%) DIARRHEA 8 (29%) 3 (11%) 2 (11%) 1 (6%) 1 (50%) 0 15 (31%) FATIGUE 9 32%) 0 4 (22%) 1 (6%) 1 (50%) 0 15 (31%) NAUSEA 5 (18%) 0 4 (22%) 0 1 (50%) 0 10 (21%) ALANINE AMINOTRANSFERASE INCREASED 5 (18%) 1 (4%) 3 (17%) 0 0 0 9 (19%) NEUTROPENIA 1 (4%) 5 (18%) 0 3 (17%) 0 0 9 (19%) ASPARTATE AMINOTRANSFERASE INCREASED 4 (14%) 1 (4%) 3 (17%) 0 0 0 8 (17%) ANAEMIA 3 (11%) 1 (4%) 2 (11%) 0 1 (50%) 0 7 (15%) PRURITUS 3 (11%) 0 3 (17%) 0 0 0 6 (13%) UPPER RESPIRATORY TRACT INFECTION 5 (18%) 0 1 (6%) 0 0 0 6 (13%) CONSTIPATION 4 (14%) 0 1 (6%) 0 0 0 5 (10%) MUCOSAL INFLAMMATION 3 (11%) 1 (4%) 1 (6%) 0 0 0 5 (10%) Figure 1. Mean IPI-145 Concentration vs Time Plot with Tx Arms Overlaid for the First 6 Hours (Linear) Figure 1. Mean IPI-145 Concentration vs Time Plot with Tx Arms Overlaid for the First 6 Hours (Linear) Disclosures Flinn: Celgene Corporation: Research Funding. Berdeja:Curis: Research Funding; Abbvie: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Array: Research Funding; Acetylon: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; Onyx: Research Funding; MEI: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Retrospective Non-Interventional Assessment of the Use of Idelalisib in Relapsed/Refractory Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Patients in Spain

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-126588 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 5473-5473 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Christelle M Ferra ◽

Manuel Perez Encinas ◽

Javier Lopez Jimenez ◽

Macarena Ortiz ◽

Santiago Osorio-Prendes ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽

Adverse Events ◽

Real World ◽

Research Funding ◽

Fungal Infections ◽

Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽

Cumulative Probability ◽

Pneumocystis Jirovecii Pneumonia ◽

Grade 3

Background Idelalisib is a PI3-kinase inhibitor specific for the delta isoform, approved (in combination with rituximab or ofatumumab) for the treatment of adult patients with Relapsed/Refractory Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (R/R CLL). Although the efficacy of idelalisib was reported in clinical trials, it is unclear how this translates into Real World. Methods A non-interventional retrospective study was conducted in Spain to describe the clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients diagnosed with R/R CLL that started treatment with idelalisib between 1 February 2015 and 31 December 2017. The Time from start of idelalisib treatment to either the start of a new anti CLL therapy or death (Time to Next Treatment or Death - TNTD) was defined as primary endpoint. Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), time to discontinuation (TTD) and safety, especially Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESI): ≥ grade 3 transaminase elevations, diarrhea /colitis, pneumonitis, neutropenia,Cytomegalovirus, bacterial, fungal and respiratory virus infections (RVI),Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PjP). Results Investigators from 21 centers included 77 patients in the study. The median age was 72.1 years (48-86) and 67.5% (n=52) were male. The main baseline characteristics were: Binet stage B-C in 32.5% (n=25), 17p deletion or TP53 mutation in 35.1% (n=27) and the median number previous lines of therapy was 4 (1-16). With a median follow up time of 14.4 months (1.2-44.4), 27 patients (35.1%) had started a new treatment and 19 (24.7%) had died. The median TNTD was 17.1 months (95% CI 14.0-22.3) in the overall population and 13.8 months (95% CI 7.9-15.2) in patients that discontinued idelalisib. The median OS has not been reached, with a cumulative probability of surviving at 1 and 2 years of 0.84 (95% CI 0.73-0.91) and 0.67 (95% CI 0.52-0.78). During follow-up 54 patients (70.1%) discontinued idelalisib: 39 (72.3%) due to toxicity and 10 (18.5%) due to disease progression. The median TTD was 13.0 months (95% CI 7.7-15.8); 5.3 months (95%CI 3.8-8.0) in patients who discontinued treatment due to serious adverse events (SAE) or AESI and 10.5 months (95% CI 0.5-16.0) in those who did so due to progressive disease. A total of 355 AEs were reported, of which 29.0% (n=103) were SAE. 181 AESIs were recorded: the most frequent were neutropenia (n=67; 22 grade >3), diarrhea/colitis (n=37; 14 grade >3) and bacterial infections (n=24; 14 grade >3). Other AESI were CMV infections (n=11), grade ≥ 3 pneumonitis (n=7), RVI (n=6), fungal infections (n=5), grade ≥ 3 transaminase elevations (n=3) and PjP (n=1). The median time from Idelalisib start to first AESI was 9.5 months (95%CI 5.5-15.3). During follow-up, 19 deaths were registered, 10 of which were caused by idelalisib-related SAEs (4 respiratory infections, 2 pneumonitis, 1 diarrhea/colitis). The time from SAE related to idelalisib that led to death, to death was 0.8 months (95% CI 0.7-1.7). Conclusions This real world study shows results of effectiveness of idelalisib consistent with the efficacy findings of the 312-0116 clinical trial. Toxicity was the most common reason for idelalisib discontinuation. Findings of adverse events were consistent with the known safety profile of idelalisib and no new drug-related adverse events were identified. This is a Gilead Sciences sponsored study. Disclosures Perez Encinas: GILEAD SCIENCES: Research Funding; CELGENE: Consultancy; JANSSEN: Consultancy. Lopez Jimenez:GILEAD SCIENCES: Honoraria, Other: Education funding. Ortiz:GILEAD SCIENCES: Research Funding. Cordoba:Pfizer: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; FUNDACION JIMENEZ DIAZ UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL: Employment; Roche: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Kyowa-Kirin: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Gilead: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Servier: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Ramirez Payer:GILEAD SCIENCES: Research Funding. González-Barca:Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celtrion: Consultancy; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria; Kiowa: Consultancy; Takeda: Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy. Martín Sánchez:GILEAD SCIENCES: Research Funding. Sanchez:Gilead Sciences: Research Funding. Baltasar Tello:JANSSEN: Consultancy, Honoraria; ABBVIE: Honoraria; ROCHE: Honoraria; GILEAD: Honoraria. Amutio:NOVARTIS: Consultancy; JANSSEN: Consultancy, Honoraria; CELGENE: Consultancy, Honoraria; ROCHE: Honoraria; GILEAD SCIENCES: Consultancy, Honoraria; TAKEDA: Consultancy; GSK: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria; JAZZ PHARMACEUTICALS: Honoraria; MUNDIPHARMA: Consultancy. Vidal Maceñido:GILEAD SCIENCES: Research Funding. Fernandez:GILEAD SCIENCES: Research Funding. Loscertales:Gilead: Honoraria; AbbVie: Honoraria; AstraZeneca: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; Roche: Honoraria. Rodríguez:GILEAD SCIENCES: Research Funding. Alaez:ROCHE: Consultancy. Ramroth:Gilead Sciences: Employment. Palla:Gilead Sciences: Employment.

Download Full-text

Safety and Efficacy of Obinutuzumab Plus Bendamustine in Previously Untreated Patients with Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia: Subgroup Analysis of the Green Study

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v126.23.493.493 ◽

2015 ◽

Vol 126 (23) ◽

pp. 493-493 ◽

Cited By ~ 9

Author(s):

Stephan Stilgenbauer ◽

Osman Ilhan ◽

Darius Woszczyk ◽

Christoph Renner ◽

Eva Mikuskova ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Bone Marrow ◽

Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽

Febrile Neutropenia ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Safety Profile ◽

Research Funding ◽

Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Safety And Efficacy ◽

Grade 3

Abstract Background The glycoengineered type II anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody obinutuzumab (GA101; GAZYVA/GAZYVARO; G) combined with chlorambucil (Clb) has superior efficacy to Clb monotherapy and to rituximab plus Clb with an acceptable safety profile in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), as shown in the CLL11 study (Goede V, et al. NEJM 2014). GREEN is an ongoing, non-randomized, multi-cohort phase IIIb study (NCT01905943) investigating the safety (primary objective) and efficacy of G alone or in combination with chemotherapy in patients with previously untreated or relapsed/refractory CLL and assessing various strategies (cohorts 1-3) for reducing the rate of infusion-related reactions (IRRs) during the first infusion of G (Bosch F, et al. Blood 2014). We report safety and efficacy data from a subgroup of previously untreated patients in cohort 1 who received G-bendamustine (G-B). Methods Subjects were aged ≥18 years withdocumented CLL (except one case of SLL), an ECOG performance status of 0-2, and adequate hematologic function. Non-fit patients were those with a CrCl of <70 mL/min, and/or a CIRS score of >6. Fit patients comprised all others. Treatment was six 28-day cycles of G-B, where G was administered IV on D1/D2 of C1 (split dose: 25mg D1/975mg D2), and 1000mg on D8 and D15 of C1 and D1 C2-6. B was administered ≥30 minutes after G on D1 and D2 of each cycle at 90mg/m2 IV, or at 70mg/m2 in non-fit patients at the investigator's discretion. Safety endpoints included incidence, type and severity of AEs. Efficacy endpoints included ORR (investigator-assessed) and minimal residual disease (MRD) measured 3 months post-treatment. ORR was strictly assessed per International Workshop Group criteria (iwCLL 2008). Patients with missing response assessment components had their responses downgraded mandatorily. MRD negativity was defined as <1x10-4 malignant B cells in peripheral blood or bone marrow aspirate, measured in a central laboratory by 4-color flow cytometry. The population comprised all patients from cohort 1 of GREEN who received at least a partial dose of both G and B, and was based on a data cut-off of 26 March 2015. Results With a planned overall sample size of 950 patients in GREEN, the G-B subgroup in cohort 1 comprised 158 patients (157 CLL, 1 SLL; 74 fit, 84 non-fit). Median age was 67.6 years, 15.8% of patients had a CIRS score of >6, and 44.9% had a CrCl of <70 mL/min; 31.6% of patients had Binet stage A disease, 38% Binet B, and 30.4% Binet C. 7.0% of patients' disease displayed 17p deletion, 16.5% 11q deletion, and 58.2% unmutated IGHV. 91.1% of patients receiving B and 93.0% of those receiving G took ≥90% of the recommended total dose. The safety profile of G-B was as expected. 50% of patients developed grade 3-5 neutropenia and 12.7% developed a grade 3-5 infection. Other common grade 3-5 AEs included thrombocytopenia (12.7%) and tumor lysis syndrome (TLS; 10.1%). The most common serious AEs were neutropenia (10.8%), pyrexia (7.6%), febrile neutropenia (7.0%), and TLS (5.1%). There were nine deaths - one due to progression, and eight due to AEs (considered related to study drug by the investigator: 1 infection, 1 sudden death, 1 acute hepatic failure, and 1 febrile neutropenia combined with TLS; considered unrelated: 2 infections and 2 secondary neoplasms). IRRs occurred in 55.7% of patients (15.2% grade 3-5, none fatal). Overall, 26 patients (16.5%) prematurely discontinued treatment due to ≥1 adverse event. The ORR was 78.5% (124/158). The rate of CR (including incomplete CR [CRi]) was 32.3% (51/158), PR 46.2% (73/158), SD 10.8% (17/158), and PD 0.6% (1/158); 10.1% (16/158) of patients had missing data. Response rates were similar in non-fit (34.5% CR/CRi, 41.7% PR, 10.7% SD, and 1.2% PD) and fit (29.7% CR/CRi, 51.4% PR, 10.8% SD, and 0% PD) patients. In an intent-to-treat analysis including all missing (not taken or evaluable) MRD results, MRD negativity was 58.9% (93/158, including 56 missing) in blood and 27.8% (44/158, including 95 missing) in bone marrow. With a median observation time of 11.2 months, PFS data were immature and the median was not reached. Conclusions Treatment with G-B in previously-untreated CLL patients is generally well tolerated and the observed toxicities are manageable and not unexpected. G-B achieves a promising rate of CRs and a high rate of MRD-negative remissions, and may offer a new treatment option for fit and non-fit patients with CLL. Disclosures Stilgenbauer: Gilead: Honoraria, Research Funding. Off Label Use: GAZYVA (obinutuzumab) is a CD20-directed cytolytic antibody and is indicated, in combination with chlorambucil, for the treatment of patients with previously untreated chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). This abstract reports on obinutuzumab alone or in combination with chemotherapy for previously untreated or relapsed/refractory CLL. Renner:Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Böttcher:Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel, accommodation, expenses, Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Beckton Dickinson: Honoraria. Tausch:Gilead: Other: Travel support. Moore:Roche: Employment. Tyson:Roche: Employment, Equity Ownership. Adamis:Roche: Employment. Leblonde:Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Gilead: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; GSK: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Mundipharma: Speakers Bureau. Bosch:Roche: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Foà:Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau.

Download Full-text