Initial Experience with 4-Factor PCC for the Reversal of Warfarin: Patterns of Use and Safety Outcomes

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 2867-2867
Author(s):  
Colleen T. Morton ◽  
David J Dries ◽  
Fatima Khan

Abstract Major bleeding among patients receiving oral anticoagulants is common and is reported to occur in up to 6.5% of patients per year. Vitamin K antagonists (VKA) remain the most frequently prescribed class of anticoagulants for conditions such as atrial fibrillation, mechanical heart valves and venous thromboembolism. The products used for the reversal of VKA-associated coagulopathy include Vitamin K, fresh frozen plasma (FFP), activated recombinant factor VII (rFVIIa), and Prothrombin Complex Concentrates (PCC). Kcentra® (CSL Behring Gmbh, Marburg, Germany) is a 4-factor PCC that contains all of the vitamin K-dependent proteins (Factors II,VII, IX, X, Protein C and S). While Kcentra® has been in use in Europe and other parts of the world for several years, it was only recently approved in the United States for warfarin reversal during acute major bleeding (April, 2013) or when there is a need for an urgent invasive procedure (December 2013). We conducted a retrospective study to evaluate the use of 4-factor PCC in a community-based tertiary care center. The efficacy and safety of PCCs has been established in large multi-center trials. However, there is limited data from outside of carefully conducted clinical trials. In particular, there is a paucity of data regarding the use of 4-factor PCC in the community setting, specifically from the United States. We developed protocols for the reversal of warfarin for life-threatening bleeding and emergent surgery. All patients get vitamin K and they receive Kcentra® if the INR is ≥ 2. If the INR is < 2 they receive plasma. The dose of Kcentra® is based on pre-treatment INR (25 u/kg for INR 2 to < 4, 35 u/kg for INR 4-6 and 50 u/kg for INR >6). We identified 33 patients from July 2013 to April 2014 that were treated with 4-factor PCC (18 males and 15 females). The mean age was 71.06 +/- 14.04 years (Range 42-94). Kcentra® was used appropriately, per our institutional protocol for VKA reversal, in 28/33 (84.35%) cases. Four of the patients, who were treated inappropriately, did not have a drug history on admission and were subsequently found to have an elevated INR due to liver dysfunction. The leading indications for PCC use were intracranial hemorrhage (49%), reversal of elevated INR prior to surgery (21%) and gastrointestinal bleeding (15%). 73% of patients had a pre-reversal INR in the range of 2-4, 12% had INR of 4-6 and15% of patients presented with an INR of >6. The indications for warfarin use included atrial fibrillation (50% patients), prosthetic valve (21.4%) and prior deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism in 18% patients. 40% patients were also receiving concomitant antiplatelet therapy. The mean administered dose of Kcentra® was 2461 +/- 825 units (Range 1375-4715). Among patient treated for reversal of VKA-related coagulopathy, the pre-treatment INR was 4.6 (range 2-17) and mean post-treatment INR was 1.32 (range 1.1-1.9). Post-treatment INR of ≤ 1.5 was attained in 24/33 (73%) patients. Post-treatment INR was not available for one patient. There was only one case of thrombosis within 72 hours of treatment (myocardial infarction). 28/33 patients (85%) were alive at 24 hours. Based on experience from our limited number of patients, we have found Kcentra® to be effective in the rapid reversal of INR in the setting of VKA associated coagulopathy. Kcentra® was successfully used for a wide variety of indications in our patient population. Arterial and venous thromboembolic complications have previously been reported in patients receiving 4-factor PCC. We found a low complication rate in our patients with only one patient developing a thrombotic phenomenon (acute coronary event) within 72 hours of administration of Kcentra®. In conclusion, based on our experience, we have found Kcentra® to be a safe and effective agent for reversal of VKA associated coagulopathy. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (6) ◽  
pp. 69
Author(s):  
Shaojie Chen ◽  
K. R. Julian Chun ◽  
Zhiyu Ling ◽  
Shaowen Liu ◽  
Lin Zhu ◽  
...  

Transcatheter left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) is non-inferior to vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) in preventing thromboembolic events in atrial fibrillation (AF). Non-vitamin K antagonists (NOACs) have an improved safety profile over VKAs; however, evidence regarding their effect on cardiovascular and neurological outcomes relative to LAAO is limited. Up-to-date randomized trials or propensity-score-matched data comparing LAAO vs. NOACs in high-risk patients with AF were pooled in our study. A total of 2849 AF patients (LAAO: 1368, NOACs: 1481, mean age: 75 ± 7.5 yrs, 63.5% male) were enrolled. The mean CHA2DS2-VASc score was 4.3 ± 1.7, and the mean HAS-BLED score was 3.4 ± 1.2. The baseline characteristics were comparable between the two groups. In the LAAO group, the success rate of device implantation was 98.8%. During a mean follow-up of 2 years, as compared with NOACs, LAAO was associated with a significant reduction of ISTH major bleeding (p = 0.0002). There were no significant differences in terms of ischemic stroke (p = 0.61), ischemic stroke/thromboembolism (p = 0.63), ISTH major and clinically relevant minor bleeding (p = 0.73), cardiovascular death (p = 0.63), and all-cause mortality (p = 0.71). There was a trend toward reduction of combined major cardiovascular and neurological endpoints in the LAAO group (OR: 0.84, 95% CI: 0.64–1.11, p = 0.12). In conclusion, for high-risk AF patients, LAAO is associated with a significant reduction of ISTH major bleeding without increased ischemic events, as compared to “contemporary NOACs”. The present data show the superior role of LAAO over NOACs among high-risk AF patients in terms of reduction of major bleeding; however, more randomized controlled trials are warranted.


2014 ◽  
Vol 121 (Suppl) ◽  
pp. 1-20 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Le Roux ◽  
Charles V. Pollack ◽  
Melissa Milan ◽  
Alisa Schaefer

Patients receiving anticoagulation therapy who present with any type of intracranial hemorrhage—including subdural hematoma, epidural hematoma, subarachnoid hemorrhage, and intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH)—require urgent correction of their coagulopathy to prevent hemorrhage expansion, limit tissue damage, and facilitate surgical intervention as necessary. The focus of this review is acute ICH, but the principles of management for anticoagulation-associated ICH (AAICH) apply to patients with all types of intracranial hemorrhage, whether acute or chronic. A number of therapies—including fresh frozen plasma (FFP), intravenous vitamin K, activated and inactivated prothrombin complex concentrates (PCCs), and recombinant activated factor VII (rFVIIa)—have been used alone or in combination to treat AAICH to reverse anticoagulation, help achieve hemodynamic stability, limit hematoma expansion, and prepare the patient for possible surgical intervention. However, there is a paucity of high-quality data to direct such therapy. The use of 3-factor PCC (activated and inactivated) and rFVIIa to treat AAICH constitutes off-label use of these therapies in the United States. However, in April 2013, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved Kcentra (a 4-factor PCC) for the urgent reversal of vitamin K antagonist (VKA) anticoagulation in adults with acute major bleeding. Plasma is the only other product approved for this use in the United States.1 Inconsistent recommendations, significant barriers (e.g., clinician-, therapy-, or logistics-based barriers), and a lack of approved treatment pathways in some institutions can be potential impediments to timely and evidence-based management of AAICH with available therapies. Patient assessment, therapy selection, whether to use a reversal or factor repletion agent alone or in combination with other agents, determination of site-of-care management, eligibility for neurosurgery, and potential hematoma evacuation are the responsibilities of the neurosurgeon, but ultimate success requires a multidisciplinary approach with consultation from the emergency department (ED) physician, pharmacist, hematologist, intensivist, neurologist, and, in some cases, the trauma surgeon.


Circulation ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 118 (suppl_18) ◽  
Author(s):  
Rangadham Nagarakanti ◽  
Michael D Ezekowitz ◽  
Kambiz Parcham-Azad ◽  
Paul A Reilly ◽  
Gerhard Nehmiz ◽  
...  

Dabigatran is an oral direct thrombin inhibitor (DTI), which has a rapid onset of action and can be given twice daily (b-i-d) without anticoagulation monitoring. To determine the long term safety and efficacy of dabigatran in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). AF patients (n=502) from 53 centers in Denmark, the Netherlands, Sweden and the United States were enrolled in the PETRO study, a 12 week comparison between dabigatran (50, 150, and 300 mg b-i-d) and warfarin (INR 2–3). 361 dabigatran patients were rolled over into a long term extension trial (PETRO-Ex). The warfarin patient arm (n=70) was discontinued. All patients were initially maintained on the same dabigatran doses as in PETRO except the 50 mg b-i-d dose group who were switched to 150 mg once daily (qd). At entry, patients were 70 years old (mean age), 19% female, median AF duration of 4.2 years, and had a median of 3 stroke risk factors. Maximum and mean follow-up times were 51 and 29 months respectively. Due to higher frequency of major bleeding events in 300 mg b-i-d group and thromboembolic events in 150 mg qd group, they were switched to dabigatran 300 mg qd or 150 mg b-i-d groups. PETRO and PETRO-Ex results: Events reported as absolute number of patients (per 100 patient-years) Thromboembolic event rates were lowest in the dabigatran 150 and 300 mg b-i-d groups. Major bleeding was most frequent in the 300 mg b-i-d group. No significant liver function abnormalities were noted in any of the dabigatran groups. The balance between stroke and bleeding risk supported dabigatran doses between 100 and 150 mg b-i-d for the ongoing phase 3 Randomized Evaluation of Longterm anticoagulation therapY (RELY) trial.


2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (3) ◽  
pp. 238-257
Author(s):  
Suresh Antony

Background:In the United States, tick-borne illnesses account for a significant number of patients that have been seen and treated by health care facilities. This in turn, has resulted in a significant morbidity and mortality and economic costs to the country.Methods:The distribution of these illnesses is geographically variable and is related to the climate as well. Many of these illnesses can be diagnosed and treated successfully, if recognized and started on appropriate antimicrobial therapy early in the disease process. Patient with illnesses such as Lyme disease, Wet Nile illness can result in chronic debilitating diseases if not recognized early and treated.Conclusion:This paper covers illnesses such as Lyme disease, West Nile illness, Rocky Mountain Spotted fever, Ehrlichia, Tularemia, typhus, mosquito borne illnesses such as enteroviruses, arboviruses as well as arthropod and rodent borne virus infections as well. It covers the epidemiology, clinical features and diagnostic tools needed to make the diagnosis and treat these patients as well.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document