scholarly journals Early T-Cell Precursor Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ETP-ALL) Is a High-Risk Subtype in Adults

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 1418-1418
Author(s):  
Nitin Jain ◽  
Audrey Lamb ◽  
Susan M. O'Brien ◽  
Farhad Ravandi ◽  
Marina Konopleva ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Early T-cell precursor (ETP) acute lymphoblastic leukemia/lymphoma (ALL) is a recently recognized high-risk T-ALL subgroup. The optimal therapeutic approaches to adult patients with ETP-ALL are poorly characterized. In this study, we compared the outcomes of adults with ETP-ALL who received treatment on frontline regimens to those of patients with other T-ALL immunophenotypic subtypes. Methods: Patients with newly-diagnosed T-ALL who received frontline chemotherapy between the years 2000 and 2014 at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (MDACC) were identified and immunophenotypically categorized into early, thymic, and mature per the European Group for the Immunologic Classification of Leukemia (EGIL)/WHO classification. Patients with ETP-ALL were identified on the basis of the following immunophenotype: CD1a(-), CD8(-), CD5(-/dim), and positivity for one or more stem cell or myeloid antigens. Patients received frontline treatment with the following chemotherapy regimens: hyper-CVAD alone (n=43), hyper-CVAD + nelarabine (n=44) or augmented BFM regimen (n=24). Results: A total of 111 patients with T-ALL with adequate immunophenotype data were identified. There was no difference in the outcomes of patients based on the EGIL/WHO subtypes (Fig 1). A total of 19 patients (17%) had ETP-ALL. The complete remission rate (CR)/CR with incomplete platelet recovery (CRp) rate in patients with ETP-ALL was significantly lower than that of non-ETP-ALL patients (73% vs. 91%; p=0.03). The median overall survival for patients with ETP-ALL was 20 months vs. not reached for the non-ETP-ALL patients (p = 0.008) (Fig 2). ETP-ALL remained a high-risk subgroup within the WHO 'Early' group (Fig 3). A subset of patients with early T-ALL had an immunophenotype that resembled that of ETP-ALL except for having ≥75% CD5 expression (ETP+CD5). The OS of patients with ETP+CD5 (n=19) was similar to that of non-ETP-ALL patients and differed from that of ETP-ALL patients (p=0.059). By univariate analysis, the following variables were significant for survival: age, WBC count (<50 vs. ≥50 x109 /L), platelet count (<100 vs. ≥100 x109 /L), LDH (<600 vs. ≥600 IU/L) and ETP-ALL (Table 1). By multivariate analysis, only age (HR: 2.862; 95%CI: 1.140-7.183; p=0.025) and ETP-ALL (HR: 2.275; 95%CI: 1.117-4.631; p=0.023) were significant. Conclusions: ETP-ALL represents a high-risk disease subtype of adult ALL. Allogeneic stem cell transplant in CR1 should be considered. Novel treatment strategies are needed to improve treatment outcomes in this T-ALL subset. Table 1. Univariate and multivariate analysis for survival Parameter Survival UVA MVA P P HR 95%CI Age ≥60 0.013 0.025 2.862 1.140-7.183 Gender 0.24 - - - Diagnosis (ALL vs. LBL) 0.13 - - - WBC < 50.0 (x 109 /L) 0.009 - - - Hemoglobin <10 (g/dL) 0.36 - - - Platelet <100 (x 109 /L) 0.036 - - - LDH <600 (IU/L) 0.045 - - - CNS involvement at Dx 0.18 - - - WHO classification (early, thymic, mature) 0.101 - - - ETP-ALL 0.008 0.023 2.275 1.117-4.631 Treatment received 0.43 - - - Figure 1. Overall survival of patients with T-ALL (N=111) categorized as Early, Thymic and Mature per EGIL/WHO Classification Figure 1. Overall survival of patients with T-ALL (N=111) categorized as Early, Thymic and Mature per EGIL/WHO Classification Figure 2. Overall survival of patients with ETP-ALL (N=19) compared to non-ETP ALL (N=92) Figure 2. Overall survival of patients with ETP-ALL (N=19) compared to non-ETP ALL (N=92) Figure 3. Overall survival of patients with WHO 'early' subcategorized as ETP vs. non-ETP, WHO 'thymic', and WHO 'mature' (N=111) Figure 3. Overall survival of patients with WHO 'early' subcategorized as ETP vs. non-ETP, WHO 'thymic', and WHO 'mature' (N=111) Disclosures Konopleva: Novartis: Research Funding; AbbVie: Research Funding; Stemline: Research Funding; Calithera: Research Funding; Threshold: Research Funding. Cortes:Astellas: Consultancy, Research Funding; BerGenBio AS: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Ariad: Consultancy, Research Funding; Teva: Research Funding; Ambit: Consultancy, Research Funding; Arog: Research Funding; Celator: Research Funding; Jenssen: Consultancy.

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 125 (16) ◽  
pp. 2486-2496 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nathalie Dhédin ◽  
Anne Huynh ◽  
Sébastien Maury ◽  
Reza Tabrizi ◽  
Kheira Beldjord ◽  
...  

Key Points SCT in first complete remission is associated with 69.5% 3-year overall survival in high-risk ALL adult patients treated with intensified pediatric-like protocol. Poor early MRD response is a powerful tool to select patients who may benefit from SCT in first complete remission.


Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 2303-2303
Author(s):  
Theis Terwey ◽  
Philipp Hemmati ◽  
Gero Massenkeil ◽  
Bernd Dörken ◽  
Renate Arnold

Abstract Abstract 2303 Poster Board II-280 Introduction: In acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) specific clinical and biological features confer high relapse risk and inferior overall survival (OS) after treatment with conventional chemotherapy alone. The differential prognostic impact of these high risk features after treatment with allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT) has not been well studied. Patients and Methods: 79 adult ALL patients in first complete remission (CR) received allogeneic HCT at our center between 1995 and 2008. All patients were high or very high risk according to German Multicenter Study Group for Adult ALL (GMALL) criteria. Median age was 36 years (range: 17-68). Patients received high-dose conditioning consisting of 12 Gy total body irradiation ± etoposide ± cyclophosphamide (n=69, 87%) or reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) consisting of fludarabine/busulfan/ATG (n=10, 13%) and HSCT from related (n=34, 43%) or unrelated (n=45, 57%) donors. Bone marrow (n=17, 22%) or peripheral blood stem cells (n=62, 78%) were given. Graft-versus-host-disease prophylaxis was CSA/MTX for high-dose conditioning or CSA/MMF for RIC. Results: Patients were classified as high risk or very high risk due to Philadelphia chromosome-positive disease (Ph+) (n=30, 38%), leukocytosis>30/nl at diagnosis in B-ALL (n=25, 23%), late response to induction therapy in B-ALL (>week 4) (n=13, 16%), early or mature T-ALL (n=13, 16%), pro-B-ALL/t(4;11) (n=8, 10%), persistence of minimal residual disease (MRD) (>week 16) (n=8, 10%) or complex aberrant karyotype (n=6, 8%). 57 patients (72%) presented with one high risk feature, whereas 20 patients (25%) and 2 patients (3%) presented with two or three features, respectively. Currently, after a median follow-up of 56 months (7-169) 49 patients (62%) remain alive. Projected OS of the whole cohort at 1, 2 and 5 years was 78%, 70% and 55% and leukemia-free survival was 77%, 66% and 55%. Cumulative incidence of non-relapse mortality (NRM) and relapse mortality (RM) at 5 years was 23% and 18%, respectively. In multivariate Cox regression analysis, a non-significant trend for inferior OS was seen for patients with early or mature T-ALL (hazard ratio (HR): 2.03 (95%CI: 0.92-4.52), p=0.082), whereas no differential effect on OS, NRM or RM was seen for any other high risk feature (Table 1). In additional analyses, inferior OS (HR 1.81 (95%CI: 1.02-3.29), p=0.043) and increased RM (HR 2.17 (95%CI 1.16-4.05), p=0.015) was observed for patients with more than one high risk feature. Conclusions: In summary, this single center study on allogeneic HCT in high risk ALL found a negative prognostic trend for early or mature T cell immunophenotype. No differential prognostic impact on OS, NRM and RM was seen for other high risk features as defined by GMALL criteria, however this conclusion is limited by the low patient number in some of the subgroups. Overall survival for the whole cohort was 55% at 5 years, with inferior OS and higher RM being observed in patients with more than one high risk feature. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 1641-1641 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elias Jabbour ◽  
Kathryn G. Roberts ◽  
Koji Sasaki ◽  
Yaqi Zhao ◽  
Chunxu Qu ◽  
...  

Background: Ino showed significant activity in phase II trials in pts with R/R ALL, that was subsequently confirmed in Phase III trial where Ino demonstrated higher response rates and superior overall survival vs standard of care chemotherapy (SOC) in adults with relapsed/refractory B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia (R/R ALL).Ph-like or BCR-ABL1-like ALL possesses a gene expression profile similar to that of BCR-ABL1 ALL but lacks the BCR-ABL1 fusion protein. It is characterized by increased expression of hematopoietic stem-cell genes, deletion of B-cell lineage genes and kinase-activating alterations. Ph-like ALL is associated with refractoriness to standard induction/consolidation chemotherapy and poor prognosis. Aim: To evaluate the outcomes of pts with R/R Ph-like ALL treated in phase II trial with Ino monotherapy. Methods: We performed an integrated analysis of whole genome sequencing (to identify sequence mutations, structural variations and DNA copy number alterations), and transcriptome sequencing (RNAseq; to quantify gene expression, determine Ph-like gene expression profile and identify fusions) on 53 patients' samples treated with Ino between June 2010 and September 2012. Results: Fifty-three evaluable pts with R/R ALL with stored baseline samples were analyzed. Pts characteristics are summarized in Table 1. Median age was 50 years. Ino was given as Salvage 1, Salvage 2, and Salvage 3 and beyond in 20 (38%), 18 (34%), and 15 (28%) pts, respectively. Figure 1 reflects the different genomic subgroups identified among 53 evaluable pts. Ph-like gene signature was found in 12 pts (22.6%). Among these 12 pts, 6 had IGH-CRLF2, 2 IGH-EPOR, 1 SNX2-ABL1, and 3 had no fusions identified. The overall response rates (ORR) were 54% [complete remission (CR) 20%, CR with partial hematologic recovery (CRh) 32%, and marrow CR (CRi) 2%]. Among pts with morphologic remission, 46% and 82% achieved minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity at CR and at any time, respectively. The ORR for pts with Ph-like ALL, Ph-positive ALL, ALL with KMT2A, and others were 58% (CR=25%; CRh=33%), 42% (CR=8%; CRh=33%), 57% (CR=14%; CRh=29%; CRi=14%), and 56% (CR=26%; CRh=30%), respectively. The respective overall MRD negativity rates were 71%, 100%, 75%, and 83% (Table 1). The median follow-up was 60 months. The median event-free (EFS) and overall survival (OS) were 3.3 and 5.4 months, respectively. There was no difference in EFS and OS between the subgroups analyzed (P=0.464; P=0.824). The median EFS and OS were 4.5 and 4.5 months for pts with Ph-like, 3.1 and 7.2 months for those with Ph-positive ALL, 2.8 and 4.4 months for those with KMT2A, and 2.2 and 4.6 months for others (Table 1). 21 (40%) pts had subsequent allogeneic stem cell transplant; 6 (50%), 3 (25%), 4 (57%), and 8 (36%) in each subgroup, respectively. The rate of VOD was 3 (6%) with no difference among different subgroups. Conclusion: The current analysis suggest that Ino therapy may overcome the impact of Ph-like phenotype in pts with ALL. Confirmation of these findings in a larger cohort and in frontline ALL patients is needed. Disclosures Jabbour: Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding; Adaptive: Consultancy, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding; AbbVie: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Cyclacel LTD: Research Funding. Sasaki:Pfizer: Consultancy; Otsuka: Honoraria. Jain:Precision Biosciences: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics, an AbbVie company: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Genentech: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; Adaptive Biotechnologies: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Cellectis: Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Servier: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; ADC Therapeutics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Verastem: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Ravandi:Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Xencor: Consultancy, Research Funding; Macrogenix: Consultancy, Research Funding; Menarini Ricerche: Research Funding; Selvita: Research Funding; Cyclacel LTD: Research Funding. Short:AstraZeneca: Consultancy; Takeda Oncology: Consultancy, Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria. Garcia-Manero:Amphivena: Consultancy, Research Funding; Helsinn: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; AbbVie: Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Astex: Consultancy, Research Funding; Onconova: Research Funding; H3 Biomedicine: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding. Konopleva:Cellectis: Research Funding; Agios: Research Funding; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Ascentage: Research Funding; Eli Lilly: Research Funding; Calithera: Research Funding; Stemline Therapeutics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Forty-Seven: Consultancy, Honoraria; Reata Pharmaceuticals: Equity Ownership, Patents & Royalties; Kisoji: Consultancy, Honoraria; Ablynx: Research Funding; Genentech: Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; F. Hoffman La-Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Astra Zeneca: Research Funding. Mullighan:Illumina: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: sponsored travel; Pfizer: Honoraria, Other: speaker, sponsored travel, Research Funding; AbbVie: Research Funding; Loxo Oncology: Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria, Other: speaker, sponsored travel. Kantarjian:Actinium: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Agios: Honoraria, Research Funding; Ariad: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Immunogen: Research Funding; AbbVie: Honoraria, Research Funding; Astex: Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; Cyclacel: Research Funding; Daiichi-Sankyo: Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria, Research Funding; Jazz Pharma: Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria.


2012 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. 416-420 ◽  
Author(s):  
Meilin Ma ◽  
Xiang Wang ◽  
Jingyan Tang ◽  
Huiliang Xue ◽  
Jing Chen ◽  
...  

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 125 (11) ◽  
pp. 1759-1767 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shannon L. Maude ◽  
Sibasish Dolai ◽  
Cristina Delgado-Martin ◽  
Tiffaney Vincent ◽  
Alissa Robbins ◽  
...  

Key Points ETP-ALL, a high-risk subtype of T-ALL, is characterized by aberrant activation of the JAK/STAT signaling pathway. The JAK1/2 inhibitor ruxolitinib demonstrates robust activity in patient-derived xenograft models of ETP-ALL.


Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 115 (17) ◽  
pp. 3437-3446 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas Klingebiel ◽  
Jacqueline Cornish ◽  
Myriam Labopin ◽  
Franco Locatelli ◽  
Philippe Darbyshire ◽  
...  

Abstract T cell–depleted haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (haploHSCT) is an option to treat children with very high-risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) lacking an HLA-identical donor. We analyzed 127 children with ALL who underwent haploHSCT in first (n = 22), second (n = 48), or third (n = 32), complete remission or in relapse (n = 25). The 5-year leukemia-free survival (LFS) was 30%, 34%, 22%, and 0%, respectively. A risk-factor analysis was performed for patients who underwent transplantation in remission (n = 102). Five-year nonrelapse mortality (NRM), relapse incidence (RI), and LFS were 37%, 36%, and 27%, respectively. A trend of improved LFS rate and decreased RI was observed for children given a graft with higher number of CD34+ cells (adjusted P = .09 and P = .07, respectively). In a multivariate analysis, haploHSCT performed in larger centers (performing ≥ 231 allotransplantations in the studied period) was associated with improved LFS rate and decreased RI (adjusted P = .01 and P = .04, respectively), adjusting for different patient-, disease-, and transplant-related factors such as number of previous autotransplantations, cytomegalovirus serology status, type of T-cell depletion, and use of total body irradiation and antithymocyte globulin. In conclusion, higher CD34+ cell dose and better patient selection may improve outcomes of children with ALL who undergo a haploHSCT. Transplant centers initiating programs on haploHSCT for children may collaborate with more experienced centers.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document