Gemcitabine in Combination with Oxaliplatin (GEMOX) As a Salvage Regimen in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Hodgkin's Lymphoma

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 1517-1517 ◽  
Author(s):  
Evren Ozdemir ◽  
Alma Aslan ◽  
Alev Turker ◽  
Ibrahim Barista ◽  
Ayse Kars
Keyword(s):  
Hodgkin’S Lymphoma ◽  
Overall Response Rate ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Hodgkin's Lymphoma ◽  
Hematological Toxicity ◽  
Hematologic Toxicity ◽  
Refractory Disease ◽  
Salvage Regimen ◽  
Overall Response

Abstract This study's objective was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of gemcitabine in combination with oxaliplatin (GEMOX) as a salvage regimen in patients with relapsed or refractory Hodgkin's lymphoma. Twenty-five patients were enrolled. All patients had received ≥ 2 prior chemotherapy regimens, had an ECOG performance status ≤ 2 and had adequate organ function. Patients received intravenous gemcitabine (1000 mg/m2) and oxaliplatin (100 mg/m2) on days 1 and 15, every 4 weeks. The median age was 29 years (range, 18-64) and 16 (68%) were male. Twenty-one (84%) had primary refractory disease (n=13) or relapsed within 12 months after initial therapy (n=8). All had previous platinum-based salvage chemotherapy (ICE, 23; DHAP, 2). Ten patients (40%) had relapsed/refractory disease following autologous stem cell transplantation (SCT). None had previous brentuximab vedotin treatment. Twenty-one (84%) patients were refractory or progressive on the last treatment. Median number of previous lines of chemotherapy was 2 (range, 2-4). Median number of GEMOX cycles administered to the patients was 3 (range, 2-6). Treatment response was evaluated with PET-CT before and 2-3 cycles after treatment, and those patients who demonstrated a response continued to receive a maximum of 6 courses of GEMOX or bridged to SCT. Of 25 patients, 2 (8%) had complete response, 9 (36%) had partial response and the remaining patients had refractory/progressive disease with an overall response rate of 44%. Seven of the 10 patients who had relapsed/refractory disease after autologous SCT achieved a response (CR, 2; PR, 5). The median time to progression for responding patients was 3 months (range, 1-40 months). One patient is disease free for 40 months. Three patients were successfully bridged to SCT (autologous, 2; allogeneic, 1). Main toxicity was hematological. Grade ≥ 3 hematologic toxicity occurred in 10 patients: thrombocytopenia (36%), neutropenia (16%) and anemia (8%). Among these, 7 had previous autologous SCT. One patient had grade 4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia. Treatment cycle postponed in 6 patients without dose reduction because of hematological toxicity. Seven patients (28%) needed G-CSF support. One patient developed febrile neutropenia. No treatment-related deaths occurred. GEMOX was shown to be an effective salvage regimen in patients with relapsed/refractory Hodgkin's lymphoma, producing an overall response rate of 44%. It is an active regimen in patients who had relapsed/refractory disease after autologous SCT. Although, the median PFS time was short, some patients can be bridged to SCT and some can get long-term PFS. Hematological toxicity was common, especially in patients with previous autologous SCT. Disclosures Off Label Use: Gemcitabine in Hodgkin's Lymphoma Oxaliplatin in Hodgkin's Lymphoma.

Single Agent Gemcitabine As a Salvage Regimen in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Hodgkin's Lymphoma after Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 5090-5090 ◽  
Author(s):  
Evren Ozdemir ◽  
Alma Aslan ◽  
Alev Turker ◽  
Ibrahim Barista ◽  
Ayse Kars
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cell ◽  
Hodgkin’S Lymphoma ◽  
Progressive Disease ◽  
Overall Response Rate ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Hodgkin's Lymphoma ◽  
Hematological Toxicity ◽  
Refractory Disease ◽  
Salvage Regimen

Abstract The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of gemcitabine as a salvage regimen in patients with relapsed or refractory Hodgkin's lymphoma after autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). Fifteen patients were enrolled. All patients had received ≥ 2 prior chemotherapy regimens, had an ECOG performance status ≤ 2, had adequate organ function and had undergone ASCT. Patients received intravenous gemcitabine (1000 mg/m2) on days 1 and 15, every 4 weeks. The median age was 26 years (range, 18-44) and 8 (53%) were female. Eight (53%) had primary refractory disease. All had previous platinum-based salvage chemotherapy (IIVP, 7; ICE, 5; DHAP, 3). All (100%) had relapsed/refractory disease following ASCT as their last treatment. Eleven (73%) had refractory/progressive disease after ASCT. None had previous brentuximab vedotin treatment. Median number of previous lines of chemotherapy was 2 (range, 2-3). Median number of gemcitabine cycles administered to the patients was 4 (range, 2-6). Treatment response was assessed with PET-CT in majority of the patients before and 2-3 cycles after gemcitabine, and those patients who demonstrated a response continued to receive a maximum of 6 courses of gemcitabine or bridged to allogeneic SCT. Of 15 patients, 1 (7%) had complete response, 5 (33%) had partial response and the remaining patients had refractory/progressive disease with an overall response rate of 40%. The median time to progression for responding patients was 3 months (range, 2-7 months). Two patients were successfully bridged to allogeneic SCT. Main toxicity was hematological. Grade ≥ 3 hematologic toxicity occurred in 8 patients: thrombocytopenia (40%), neutropenia (33%) and anemia (7%). Three patients had grade 4 thrombocytopenia and 2 had grade 4 neutropenia. Dose reduction was necessary in 3 patients and treatment cycle postponed in 2 patients because of hematological toxicity. Five patients (33%) needed G-CSF support. Two patients developed febrile neutropenia. No treatment-related deaths occurred. Gemcitabine was shown to be an active salvage regimen in patients with relapsed/refractory Hodgkin's lymphoma after ASCT, producing an overall response rate of 40%. Although, the median PFS time was short, some patients can be bridged to allogeneic SCT. Hematological toxicity was common. Disclosures Off Label Use: Gemcitabine in Hodgkin's Lymphoma.

Intravenous Busulfan Plus Melphalan Is a Highly Effective, Non-Toxic Preparative Regimen for Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation (ASCT) in Patients with Advanced Lymphoid Malignancies.

Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 3415-3415
Author(s):  
Partow Kebriaei ◽  
Timothy Madden ◽  
Reza Kazerooni ◽  
Elizabeth Shpall ◽  
Xuemei Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Disease Control ◽  
Hodgkin’S Lymphoma ◽  
Overall Response Rate ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Advanced Disease ◽  
Hodgkin's Lymphoma ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Overall Response ◽  
Lymphoid Malignancies

Abstract Abstract 3415 Poster Board III-303 High dose chemotherapy and SCT is an accepted treatment option for patients with relapsed lymphoid malignancies. Relapse remains a significant issue for patients with advanced disease. Predicting effective disease control with improved safety, we investigated the administration of intravenous (i.v.) busulfan (Bu) combined with melphalan (Mel) in patients with lymphoid malignancies undergoing ASCT. Patients and Methods Bu130 mg/m2 was infused daily for 4 days, either as a fixed dose per BSA (n=20), or to target an average daily AUC of 5,000 uMol-min ± 12% determined by a test dose of i.v. Bu at 32 mg/m2 given 48 hours prior to the high dose regimen (n=82), followed by a rest day, followed by two daily Mel doses at 70mg/m2. Stem cells were infused the following day. Dilantin was given for seizure prophylaxis. Results 102 patients (38 F/64 M) with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (n=12), Hodgkin's lymphoma (n=49) and multiple myeloma (n=41) with median age 44 years (range 19-66) have been enrolled to date. The median number of prior chemotherapy regimens was 3 (range 1-6). At time of study entry, 88% of patients were in relapse (sensitive relapse n=70, refractory relapse n=19) and 12% were in second remission. The median CD34+ cell dose infused was 5.2 × 106/kg (range 0.7-12.5). Median days to ANC ≥ 0.5 × 109/L and platelet count ≥ 20 × 109/L were 10 (range 8-44) and 9 (7-141), respectively. There was no grade IV or V toxicity. The most commonly observed toxicities were grade I or II nausea and vomiting (77%), mucositis (67%), and diarrhea (55%)., Reversible grade III liver enzyme abnormalities were observed in 4% of patients; one patient developed reversible VOD. With a median follow-up of 2.1 years (range 0.2-4.3), the cumulative incidence of treatment-related mortality (TRM) at 100 days, 1 year, and 2 years was 1.0%, 3.1%, and 4.3%, respectively. Among patients with non-Hodgkin's or Hodgkin's lymphoma, the overall response rate was 90%, with 1- and 2-year PFS rates of 63% and 58%, respectively; 1- and 2-year OS rates were 90% and 82% respectively (Figure 1). PFS was significantly better in patients with chemo-sensitive lymphoma, 61% vs. 42% at 2 years, p=.03. Among patients with multiple myeloma, the overall response rate was 58%, with 1- and 2-year PFS rates of 67% and 44%, respectively; 1- and 2-year OS rates were 90% and 82%, respectively. Survival rates were not significantly different between the chemo-sensitive and chemo-refractory multiple myeloma patients. Conclusion Intravenous busulfan-melphalan is well-tolerated, and the individualized PK-directed dosing of i.v. busulfan likely contributes to the low toxicity profile of this regimen. The high response rate and disease control in patients with advanced disease is encouraging, and should be explored in larger phase II studies. Disclosures Andersson: Otsuka Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy.

A Phase II Study of Carfilzomib, Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin, and Dexamethasone for Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 3329-3329 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark A Fiala ◽  
Jesse Keller ◽  
Jeevan Sekhar ◽  
Connie Ceriotti ◽  
Camille N. Abboud ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Research Funding ◽  
Overall Response Rate ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Hematologic Toxicity ◽  
Event Free Survival ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Overall Response ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Background: We previously reported on a phase I dose escalation trial of CDD [carfilzomib (CFZ), pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD), and dexamethasone (DEX)] (Keller, et, al, ASH 2014 Abstract 4731). The combination was well tolerated and an MTD was not reached despite administering the currently approved single-agent doses. In the maximum dose level tested, the overall response rate (ORR) was 72% (5/7) in a heavily pre-treated population. Based on the promising results of the phase I study we conducted a phase II expansion to further evaluate the efficacy of the regimen. Patient/Methods: Patients with RRMM after ≥ 1 lines of therapy, with measureable disease, and good performance status, organ function and hematological reserve were eligible. Prior CFZ or PLD/doxorubicin exposure was permitted. CFZ was given on days 1, 2, 8, 9, 15 and 16 in 28 day cycles at a dose of 56mg/m2, PLD on day 8 at a dose of 30mg/m2,DEX on days 1, 2, 8, 9, 15 and 16 at a dose of 20mg. Following 6 cycles of combination therapy, PLD was discontinued and patients were treated with maintenance CFZ and DEX (once weekly). Response was assessed per IMWG criteria. Overall response rate (ORR) was defined as partial response (PR) or better, event-free survival as the interval from start of therapy to discontinuation. Results: Twenty-three patients were enrolled from April 2014-Mar 2016. Median age was 63 years (range 27-70) and 52% were male. Ten patients were ISS stage 1, 6 were stage 2, and 7 were stage 3. By mSMART criteria, 1 patient was high risk and 5 were intermediate risk. Ten patients were IgG Kappa subtype; 4 had IgG Lambda subtype, 2 had IgA Kappa subtype, 2 had IgA Lambda subtype, 3 kappa light chain, and 2 lambda light chain. The median number of prior therapies was 2 (range 1-13); median time from diagnosis to start of protocol was 40 months (range 8-200). All had prior exposure to lenalidomide; 91% to bortezomib; 9% to PLD or doxorubicin; 9% to CFZ; 96% had undergone autologous transplantation. The overall response rate was 83% with 48% achieving a complete or very good partial response. The median number of cycles was 11; the median estimated event-free survival was 7.4 months at a median follow-up of 10.6 months. Five patients discontinued due to disease progression, 7 due to toxicity, 1 to proceed to a second transplant, and 10 remain on treatment at time of submission. Individual patient responses are summarized in Table 1. Grade 3/4 non-hematologic toxicity was uncommon but included: infections (11), hypertension (4), RPLS (1), and MI (1). Grade 3/4 hematologic toxicity included: thrombocytopenia (11), anemia (8), neutropenia (7), TTP (1), and hemolysis (1). Conclusion: CDD is well tolerated and efficacious in relapsed or refractory MM. The estimated ORR of the combination is 83% (95% CI 67%-98%) a notable increase compared to standard dose CFZ and DEX. Disclosures Abboud: Gerson and Lehman Group: Consultancy; Baxalta: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria; Novartis: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Alexion: Honoraria; Cardinal: Honoraria; Teva: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Pharmacyclics: Honoraria; Pfizer: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding. DiPersio:Incyte Corporation: Research Funding. Vij:Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Shire: Consultancy; Jazz: Consultancy; Karyopharma: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy.

scholarly journals Phase 1/2a study of 177Lu-lilotomab satetraxetan in relapsed/refractory indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (17) ◽  
pp. 4091-4101
Author(s):  
Arne Kolstad ◽  
Tim Illidge ◽  
Nils Bolstad ◽  
Signe Spetalen ◽  
Ulf Madsbu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hodgkin Lymphoma ◽  
Overall Response Rate ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Hematologic Toxicity ◽  
Overall Response ◽  
Non Hodgkin Lymphoma ◽  
Anti Cd20

Abstract For patients with indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma who fail initial anti-CD20–based immunochemotherapy or develop relapsed or refractory disease, there remains a significant unmet clinical need for new therapeutic approaches to improve outcomes and quality of life. 177Lu-lilotomab satetraxetan is a next-generation single-dose CD37-directed radioimmunotherapy (RIT) which was investigated in a phase 1/2a study in 74 patients with relapsed/refractory indolent non-Hodgkin B-cell lymphoma, including 57 patients with follicular lymphoma (FL). To improve targeting of 177Lu-lilotomab satetraxetan to tumor tissue and decrease hematologic toxicity, its administration was preceded by the anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody rituximab and the “cold” anti-CD37 antibody lilotomab. The most common adverse events (AEs) were reversible grade 3/4 neutropenia (31.6%) and thrombocytopenia (26.3%) with neutrophil and platelet count nadirs 5 to 7 weeks after RIT. The most frequent nonhematologic AE was grade 1/2 nausea (15.8%). With a single administration, the overall response rate was 61% (65% in patients with FL), including 30% complete responses. For FL with ≥2 prior therapies (n = 37), the overall response rate was 70%, including 32% complete responses. For patients with rituximab-refractory FL ≥2 prior therapies (n = 21), the overall response rate was 67%, and the complete response rate was 24%. The overall median duration of response was 13.6 months (32.0 months for patients with a complete response). 177Lu-lilotomab satetraxetan may provide a valuable alternative treatment approach in relapsed/refractory non-Hodgkin lymphoma, particularly in patients with comorbidities unsuitable for more intensive approaches. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT01796171.

SDX-105 Demonstrates a High Response Rate as a Single-Agent with Acceptable Safety in Rituximab-Refractory, Relpased Indolent or Transformed Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma (NHL).

Blood ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 104 (11) ◽  
pp. 2480-2480 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonathan Friedberg ◽  
Philip Cohen ◽  
Robert O. Kerr ◽  
K. Sue Robinson ◽  
Andres Forero-Torres ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Marrow ◽  
Dose Reduction ◽  
Overall Response Rate ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Mitotic Catastrophe ◽  
Hematologic Toxicity ◽  
Overall Response ◽  
Cell Death Pathway ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract SDX-105 (Treanda™, Bendamustine HCl) is an alkylating agent that may exert its anti-tumor activity via mitotic catastrophe, an apoptosis-independent cell-death pathway, as well as, through apoptosis. Its cytotoxic potency is unattenuated in chemotherapy-resistant lymphoma cell lines. We initiated a multi-center Phase II trial to investigate the safety and efficacy of SDX-105 in patients with rituximab-refractory, relapsed indolent or transformed B cell NHL. Patients must have pathologically-confirmed disease that has been demonstrated to be rituximab-refractory (no response or progression within 6 months) or must be intolerant of rituximab. Other requirements include measurable disease, adequate renal, hepatic and bone marrow function (ANC ≥1K/mm3, platelet ≥ 100K/mm3, except in cases of >50% NHL in bone marrow), up to 3 prior chemotherapies, and no prior allogeneic transplant. Patients receive SDX-105, 120 mg/m2 IV over 30–60 min, days 1 and 2, every 21 days. Grade 4 hematologic toxicity during a cycle results in dose reduction for subsequent cycles (to 90 mg/m2 and then to 60 mg/m2). Patients achieving stable disease or better after 6 cycles may receive up to 6 more cycles. 49 patients have been accrued to date with data available on the first 15 patients. The median age is 69 yrs (range 47–84), 47% male, median 6 yrs since diagnosis with NHL. Histologies: 10 follicular (6 Grade 1, 3 Grade 2, 1 Grade 3), 2 SLL, 1 marginal zone and 2 transformed NHL. Other features include: 93% Stage III/IV, 20% with B symptoms, 87% with extranodal disease, median 2 prior chemotherapies with 40% not responding to last chemotherapy. 4 patients have required dose reduction to 90 mg/m2 and 2 patients have withdrawn prior to completing 6 cycles due to treatment-associated toxicity. The current overall response rate (ORR) based upon best response in the intent-to-treat population is 80% (CR/CRu 20%, PR 60%). Overall 73% of patients experienced a related non-hematologic adverse event (AE), of which 20% were Grade 3 and 0% Grade 4. The most frequent AEs were nausea (40%), vomiting (27%), fatigue (33%), anorexia (20%), and constipation (20%). Alopecia was not observed. Grade 3 or 4 hematologic toxicity was seen in 53% (neutropenia), 20% (thrombocytopenia), and 13% (anemia) of patients. 4 patients experienced serious AEs, including 1 patient with baseline renal insufficiency who died on study from renal failure and pulmonary edema; other events include admissions for fever and anemia, urinary tract infection, and dehydration. Based upon these preliminary findings, SDX-105 demonstrates a high overall response rate with acceptable hematologic toxicity and modest non-hematologic toxicity in a relapsed lymphoma patient population, many of whom are refractory to rituximab-chemotherapy combinations. An additional study evaluating the combination of SDX-105 and rituximab in patients with relapsed indolent NHL who are rituximab-sensitive is also ongoing.

A Phase I/II Study of Bortezomib and Low Dose Intravenous Melphalan (BM) for Relapsed Multiple Myeloma.

Blood ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 106 (11) ◽  
pp. 2555-2555 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rakesh Popat ◽  
Heather E. Oakervee ◽  
Nicola Foot ◽  
Samir Agrawal ◽  
Patricia Smith ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Progressive Disease ◽  
Overall Response Rate ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Overall Response ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Number Of Cycles

Abstract Background: Bortezomib as a single agent has known efficacy in the treatment of relapsed multiple myeloma. The overall response rate (CR+PR+MR) was 35% in the SUMMIT study and 46% in the APEX study. In-vitro studies including our own have demonstrated potent synergy with other chemotherapeutic agents such as melphalan. It therefore follows that responses to bortezomib may be further improved by the combination of such drugs. Aims: The primary objectives of this Phase I/II study was to assess the safety, tolerability and response rates in patients with relapsed multiple myeloma; secondary objectives being time to progression (TTP) and overall surival (OS). Methods: This was a multi-centre, non-randomised trial for patients with relapsed myeloma. Patients received bortezomib 1.3mg/m2 on days 1,4,8 and 11 of each 28 day cycle with melphalan on day 2 at increasing dose levels. This was initially at 10mg/m2, but due to cytopenias subsequently at 2.5 and 5mg/m2 (levels 1a, 1 and 2) and we plan to escalate to 7.5mg/m2. Up to 8 cycles were given with dexamethasone added for stable or progressive disease after 4 or 2 cycles respectively. Responses were determined by EBMT criteria. Results: To date, 18 patients have been enrolled (12 male 6 female; median age 60 [range 44–73]; median number of prior therapies 3 [range 1–5] of which 17 have had at least one autologous stem cell procedure with high dose melphalan; 10 prior thalidomide and 2 prior bortezomib). 12 patients received melphalan at 10mg/m2 but due to unacceptable delays predominantly due to thrombocytopaenia, subsequent treatment levels commenced at 2.5mg/m2. The median number of cycles completed thus far is 4 (range 0–8) and of the 16 evaluable, the overall response rate (CR+PR+MR) across all treatment levels was 50% rising to 75% following the addition of dexamethasone as per protocol. At level 1a (melphalan 10mg/m2 ,N=12, median number of cycles completed =5) the best responses (with dexamethasone as indicated) were: 1CR, 1 VGPR, 5 PR, 2 MR; at level 1 (melphalan 2.5mg/m2, N=4) 1 PR, 2 MR (after 2 cycles only). The median time to any response was 1 cycle (range 1–3 ). Three patients have progressive disease, but the median TTP and OS have not yet been reached (median follow-up 3 months). Non-haematological toxicities have been modest with 7 SAEs reported of which only 1 was possibly drug related (myocardial infarction), and 4 episodes of Grade 3 neuropathy (2 resulting in study withdrawal). The commonest grade 3–4 haematological toxicity was thrombocytopaenia (N=10) complicated by bleeding in one patient, followed by neutropenia (N=6). Summary: The combination of bortezomib and intravenous melphalan can be given safely to patients with relapsed multiple myeloma and dose escalation is ongoing. Myelosupression was the commonest grade 3–4 adverse event. A response rate of 50% was seen, which was further improved to 75% with the addition of dexamethasone. This combination may therefore result in higher responses than single agent bortezomib in heavily pretreated patients.

A Multicenter Phase II Trial of Etoposide, Methylprednisolone, High-Dose Cytarabine, and Oxaliplatin (ESHAOx) for Patients with Refractory/Relapsed Aggressive Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma.

Blood ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 110 (11) ◽  
pp. 3446-3446
Author(s):  
Sun Jin Sym ◽  
Hye Jin Kang ◽  
Seung-Hyun Nam ◽  
Hoyoung Kim ◽  
Seok Jin Kim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hodgkin’S Lymphoma ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Hodgkin's Lymphoma ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Hematologic Toxicity ◽  
Salvage Regimen ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem ◽  
Non Hodgkin’S Lymphoma ◽  
Non Hodgkin's Lymphoma ◽  
High Dose Cytarabine

Abstract Etoposide (E), methylprednisolone (S), high-dose cytarabine (HA), and cisplatin (P) (ESHAP) combination is commonly used salvage regimen for non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (NHL). Oxaliplatin (Ox), a new platinum derivative, showed substantially different cytotoxic activity and adverse effects from both cisplatin and carboplatin. In addition, single-agent oxaliplatin was reportedly active in patients with NHL. We conducted to investigate the efficacy and toxicity of ESHAOx combination, substituting oxaliplatin for cisplatin in ESHAP combination, for relapsed/refractory aggressive NHL patients. Main eligibility criteria included aggressive NHL and failure to achieve a complete remission or recurrent disease after previous chemotherapy. ESHAOx consisted of E, 40 mg/m2 on days 1 to 4; S, 500 mg on days 1 to 5; HA, 2 g/m2 on day 5; and Ox, 130 mg/m2 on day 1, every 3 weeks. Eligible patients were scheduled to receive a maximum of 6 cycles, and high dose chemotherapy and hematopoietic stem cell rescue allowed. Responses were evaluated every 3 cycles. All patients gave written informed consent before study entry. Between May 2006 and January 2007, 27 patients were enrolled. Nineteen (70%) patients with relapsed, 8 patients with refractory, and 10 (37%) patients with IPI 3–5 were included in this study. A total of 102 cycles were administered for a median number of 4 (range 1–6 cycles) per patient. There were 8 (30%) complete responses and 9 (33%) partial responses, producing an overall response rate of 63% (95% CI, 45–81%). Most common grade 3/4 toxicity of the courses was myelosuppression with including neutropenia (55%) and thrombocytopenia (33%). Non-hematologic toxicity was very favorable. No significant renal and neurotoxicity was demonstrated. There was one treatment-related death due to neutropenic sepsis. The results of ESHAOx combination showed highly antitumor activity and favorable toxicity profile, suggesting it can be used as salvage regimen for relapsed/refractory aggressive NHL patients.

A phase II study of docetaxel and gemcitabine in the treatment of recurrent ovarian, peritoneal, and fallopian tube cancer

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 15006-15006
Author(s):  
M. S. Shahin ◽  
P. Hanjani ◽  
S. Nolte
Keyword(s):  
Fallopian Tube ◽  
Overall Response Rate ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Hematologic Toxicity ◽  
Fallopian Tube Cancer ◽  
Overall Response ◽  
Platinum Sensitive ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Grade 3

15006 Background: The aim of this trial was to investigate the efficacy and toxicity of weekly combination of docetaxel (D) and gemcitabine (G) in the management of recurrent ovarian, peritoneal, or fallopian tube cancer. Methods: D (30 mg/m2) was given as a one-hour IV infusion followed by G (650 mg/m2) as a 30 minute IV infusion on Day 1, 8 & 15 of a 28-day cycle. Results: Thirty pts were enrolled. Mean age was 67.4 (range 47–85). Twelve (40%) pts had Platinum sensitive disease, and 18 (60%) had Platinum resistant disease. One hundred eighteen cycles were evaluable for toxicity. The mean number of cycles was 4 (range 1–7). Twenty-six (22%) of the cycles were incomplete due to toxicity (day # 15 not given in 25 of the incomplete cycles). Dose delay was observed in 4 (13.3%) pts, and a one-dose level reduction was required in 11 (36.7%) pts. Hematologic toxicity included grade 3 neutropenia in 13 (11%) cycles, grade 3 thrombocytopenia in 11 (9.3%) cycles. No grade 4 neutropenia, thrombocytopenia or neutropenic fever was encountered. Bone marrow support with erythropoiten (36.6% pts), and filgrastim (13.3% pts) were utilized. Blood transfusions were given in 10 (8.5%) cycles. Elevated LFT grade 1/2 was seen in 7 (23.3%) pts and 3 (10%) pts, respectively. Nonhematologic grade 3 toxicites occurred in 4 pts (including one seizure). Mean follow-up interval was 19.6 months (mos) (range 1–36.6). To date, 14 (46.6%) pts are alive with disease, and 16 (53.4%) have died of disease. The overall response rate was 32% (1 CR and 8 PR in 28 evaluable pts). Ten pts (33.3%) had SD and 5 had ID. Median progression-free interval (PFI) was 3.8 mos (95% CI: 1.65–5.97). Overall survival was 19.6 mos (95% CI: 14.23–24.96), and no significant differences in PFI and survival between the Platinum-sensitive and resistant pts (P = 0.5, P = 0.08, respectively). Conclusions: Weekly docetaxel plus gemcitabine is an active and tolerable regimen with minimal toxicity in this older population of pts (9 ≥ 80 years of age). No significant difference in response between Platinum sensitive and resistant pts was observed. Overall response rate appears to be better than single agent regimens currently available. Elimination of the third week of treatment may not affect efficacy and will be more acceptable to pts with less toxicity. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

A Case Series Of Continuous Low Dose Lenalidomide In Patients With Relapsed Or Refractory Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma

Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 5134-5134 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ahmed Sawas ◽  
Sean Clark-Garvey ◽  
Ellen Neylon ◽  
Ameet Narwal ◽  
Kathleen Maignan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Dose Reduction ◽  
Low Dose ◽  
Overall Response Rate ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma ◽  
Time To Progression ◽  
Overall Response

Abstract Background Relapsed or refractory (rel/ref) classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) remains a clinical challenge with limited effective treatments after high dose therapy with autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). Lenalidomide (Revlimid®) is an approved anti-neoplastic therapy for multiple myeloma, mantle cell lymphoma and myelodysplastic syndrome with del(5q). It has emerged as an agent with a manageable toxicity profile and promising clinical activity in a number of B cell malignancies. Two clinical trials have evaluated lenalidomide in rel/ref patients with cHL at a dose of 25mg daily for 21 days of a 28 day cycle. One study reported an overall response rate of 14%, a median time to progression of 3.2 month, with a median number of prior therapies of 2. The second study reported an overall response rate of 19%, a cytostatic response rate (CR+PR+SD> 6 month) of 33%, with a median number of prior therapies of 4. The most common reported grade 3-4 side effects in these studies respectively were: neutropenia 28% and 47%, thrombocytopenia 28% and 27%, and anemia 21% and 27%. We report on our experience in this case series with continuous low dose (10-20mg) lenalidomide in rel/ref cHL patients. Methods Twelve rel/ref cHL patients (pts) who previously underwent (or were not candidates for) ASCT and/or clinical trials were administered a daily dose of lenalidomide. Pts received 10mg and were titrated up to 20mg, if tolerated, with continuous dosing for 30 day cycles. Treatment continued until disease progression or the development of unacceptable adverse event at the lowest administered dose (5mg) of lenalidomide. Results The median age at treatment was 33 (range 24-61) years with 5 females. Median number of prior therapies was 8 (range 3-16). Ten pts had received a prior stem cell transplant (9 ASCT, 1 allogenic, and 1 both ASCT and allogeneic). Of the 12 pts, we observed 3 PR (25%), and 9 SD (8 for more than 6 months) for an overall response rate of 25% and an overall cytostatic response rate (CR+PR+SD> 6 month) of 92%. Median number of cycles received was 6 (range 2-15); six patients remain on therapy. One patient with a PR after 2 cycles of therapy underwent allogeneic stem cell transplant. The median time to progression for the remaining 11 patients was 7.5 months (range 4-15 months). Three patients had progression of disease, all of whom were able to enroll on clinical trials. One patient discontinued therapy because of exacerbation of preexisting neuropathy and was able to transition to chemotherapy. A second patient discontinued therapy after experiencing significant fatigue. In general, the treatment was well tolerated, and the most common clinically significant adverse events were: neutropenia in 4 patients which was managed by GCSF support and dose reduction, exacerbation of neuropathy in 2 patients with one patient discontinuing therapy and dose reduction in the second, and diarrhea in one patient managed with dose reduction. Conclusions Despite a far more heavily treated patient population, continuous, low dose, single agent lenalidomide was both tolerable and effective in patients with rel/ref cHL. Continuous low dose lenalidomide is able to provide meaningful time to progression and bridge to further therapy. A clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy of continuous daily dosing of lenalidomide in rel/ref cHL is warranted. Disclosures: Off Label Use: Lenalidomide in Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma. O'Connor:Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding.

scholarly journals D.C.E.P. in Patients with Quad- or Penta-Refractory Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 2021-2021
Author(s):  
Scott Goldsmith ◽  
Mark A. Fiala ◽  
Brandon B. Wang ◽  
Mark A. Schroeder ◽  
Tanya M. Wildes ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Retrospective Study ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Overall Response Rate ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Salvage Regimen ◽  
Overall Response

Abstract Introduction: Despite the recent introduction of novel agents for multiple myeloma (MM), the disease remains incurable and invariably progresses through these new therapies. Patients with quad-refractory MM (refractory to bortezomib, carfilzomib, lenalidomide, and pomalidomide) and penta-refractory MM (refractory to an anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody as well) are left with few treatment options and poor prognoses. The chemotherapy regimen of dexamethasone, cyclophosphamide, etoposide, and cisplatin (DCEP) has demonstrated efficacy in the treatment of relapsed/refractory MM. We and others employ DCEP as a salvage regimen, however, few outcomes data exist in this heavily pretreated population. Methods: We conducted a retrospective study to identify all patients who received DCEP for quad- or penta-refractory MM at our institution between 2013 and 2018. Disease response and refractoriness were defined by IMWG criteria. The primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR) defined as PR or better. Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and duration of response (DOR). Results: We identified 31 patients who received DCEP, 8 (26%) for quad-refractory and 23 (74%) for penta-refractory MM (Table 1). Twenty-eight (90%) had at least one autologous stem cell transplant, and one had a prior allogeneic transplant. Sixteen (52%) were female, 27 (87%) were white, and median age at DCEP was 60. Median number of prior treatment regimens was 8. All patients received dexamethasone (40mg/day), cyclophosphamide (400mg/m2/day), etoposide (40mg/m2/day), and cisplatin (10mg/m2/day) on days 1-4 (Lazzarino et al. 2001). Cycles were generally 28 days in length, but doses were delayed in cases of cytopenias or other toxicities. Dose reductions occurred in cases of renal impairment or prolonged cytopenias. Twenty patients (65%) received more than one cycle (range: 1-5). The overall response rate was 35%. One patient achieved CR allowing him to proceed to a second autologous transplant. One patient achieved a VGPR, 9 (29%) a PR. Four of the 8 (50%) quad-refractory patients responded compared to 7 of the 23 (30%) of the penta-refractory patients. Eleven (35%) were primary refractory to DCEP, and two patients died after one cycle prior to response assessment. The overall median PFS was 2.7 months (95% CI 1.5-3.8) and median OS was 6.2 months (95% CI 4.4-7.8). For responders, median DOR was 4.2 months (95% CI 3.0-5.4) and median OS was 9.0 months (95% CI 7.2-10.9). Conclusion: Quad- and penta-refractory MM carry a grim prognosis. In our retrospective study, DCEP led to a notable ORR of 35% (95% CI 19%-55%) in this very heavily-treated population, and suggests that it remains a reasonable salvage therapy. Furthermore, it supports prospective study of this regimen, possibly in combination or in comparison with other agents effective in quad- or penta-refractory MM. Disclosures Schroeder: Amgen Inc.: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Vij:Jansson: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Karyopharma: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document