Frontline Hyper-CVAD with Ponatinib for Patients (pts) with Philadelphia Chromosome Positive Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: Results of a Phase II Study

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 2496-2496
Author(s):  
Koji Sasaki ◽  
Susan O'Brien ◽  
Farhad Ravandi ◽  
Deborah A Thomas ◽  
Haim G Moore ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Median Time ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
Philadelphia Chromosome ◽  
Event Free Survival ◽  
Vascular Events ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Philadelphia Chromosome Positive

Abstract Background: Addition of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) to chemotherapy improves outcome in Philadelphia chromosome positive (Ph+) acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). Ponatinib is a more potent BCR-ABL inhibitor, and covers the T315I clones. The combination of hyper-CVAD with ponatinib may contribute to better response rates and higher likelihood of eradication of minimal residual disease (MRD) than those reported with other TKIs. Methods: Pts with newly diagnosed Ph+ ALL received 8 cycles of hyper-CVAD alternating with high dose methotrexate and cytarabine every 21 days. Ponatinib was given at 45 mg/day for the first 14 days of cycle 1 then continuously for the subsequent 7 cycles. Pts in CR received maintenance with ponatinib 45 mg/day and vincristine and prednisone monthly for 2 years followed by ponatinib indefinitely. Results: From 11/2011 to 9/2013, 34 pts with untreated Ph+ ALL and 3 pts previously treated (2 pts not in CR were treated with one cycle of chemotherapy before the detection of BCR-ABL1; 1 pt in CCyR after 2 cycles of chemotherapy and dasatinib) have received a median of 6 cycles (2-8); 13 are receiving maintenance in CR; 9 underwent ASCT after a median of 4 cycles. Baseline pt characteristic and outcome are described in table 1. The overall CCyR, MMR, and CMR rates were 100%, 95%, and 78%, respectively. The median time to MMR and CMR were 3 (range, 2-14) and 11 (range, 2-96) weeks, respectively. The median time to MRD negativity was 3 weeks (range, 3-14). Median time to platelet and neutrophil recovery for cycle 1 was 22 and 18 days, respectively, and 22 and 16 days for subsequent cycles. Grade ≥ 3 toxicity included infections during induction (54%), increased liver functional tests (38%), thrombotic events (8%), myocardial infarction (14%), hypertension (16%), skin rash (22%), and pancreatitis (22%). With a median follow up of 26 months, 29 (78%) remain alive and in CR. Six pts died in CR: 1 pt died in CR from an unrelated cardiac event after being taken off therapy and placed on imatinib, 1 from MOF (C2D13), 1 from NSTEMI (C2D41; ponatinib 45 mg daily), 1 from potential MI (C4D42; ponatinib 30 mg daily), 1 from head injury sustained after a fall (C4D13), and 1 from sepsis post ASCT. Two (5%) in CMR relapsed with no identifiable T315I mutations after a median of 18 months. One of these pts achieved a second CR after blinatumomab and dasatinib therapy. To date, 13 pts are receiving maintenance therapy in CR. After the increased incidence of vascular toxicities was recognized, we offered our pts the option to switch TKIs or to reduce the dose of ponatinib to 30 mg and further decreased to 15 mg in pts in CMR. Thirteen pts remained on ponatinib at a dose of 15 mg daily in 12 and 30 mg daily in 1 (transcript levels of 0.04%). No further vascular events were observed in pts receiving lower doses of ponatinib. Nine pts elected to switch TKIs to dasatinib (n=7), nilotinib, or imatinib (1 each). One pt was lost to follow-up. Of 9 patients who underwent ASCT while in first CR (7 with MMR and 2 with CMR before transplantation), all but one are alive and disease-free after transplantation. There was no difference in OS by whether patients were censored or not at the time of ASCT. After transplantation, TKI therapy was resumed in all but one patient (1 imatinib, 4 dasatinib, 1 nilotinib, and 1 ponatinib). The 2-year event-free and overall survival rates are 81% and 80%, respectively (Figures 1). Conclusion: The combination of hyperCVAD with ponatinib is highly effective in pts with Ph+ ALL. Due to the vascular events observed, the ponatinib dose was modified to 30 mg daily during consolidation with subsequent reduction to 15 mg in pts in CMR without further episode of cardiovascular events. Table 1. Patient characteristic and outcome N(%); Median [range] N= 37 Age (yr) 51 [27-75] Age ≥50 20 (54%) Age ≥60 12 (32%) Performance status, No. (%)  0-1 31 (84)  2 6 (16)  WBC (x 109/L) 8 [1-630]  Presence of CNS disease, No. (%) 3 (8)  CD20 positivity, No. (%) 11 (30) Type of BCR-ABL1 transcript, No. (%)  p190 27 (73)  p210 10 (27) Cytogenetics abnormality, No. (%)  Diploid 5 (14)  Philadelphia-chromosome positive 32 (86) Baseline cardiovascular risk factors, No. (%)  Hypertension 18 (49)  Dyslipidemia 4 (11)  Coronary artery disease 4 (11)  Peripheral arterial disease 1 (3) Overall response, No. (%)  CR 36/36 (100)  CCyR 32/32 (100)  MMR 35/37 (95)  CMR 29/37 (78)  Flow negativity 35/36 (97)  Early death 0 Figure 1. a) Event-free survival, b) overall survival Figure 1. a) Event-free survival, b) overall survival Disclosures O'Brien: Pharmacyclics LLC, an AbbVie Company: Consultancy, Research Funding. Cortes:Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; BerGenBio AS: Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding; Teva: Research Funding; Ariad: Consultancy, Research Funding; Astellas: Consultancy, Research Funding; Ambit: Consultancy, Research Funding; Arog: Research Funding; Celator: Research Funding; Jenssen: Consultancy. Pemmaraju:Stemline: Research Funding; Incyte: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; LFB: Consultancy, Honoraria. Chahoud:American Society of Hematology (ASH): Other: 2015 HONORS Award recipient. Wierda:Glaxo-Smith-Kline Inc.: Research Funding; Celgene Corp.: Consultancy.

Phase II Study of Combination of Hypercvad with Ponatinib in Front Line Therapy of Patients (pts) with Philadelphia Chromosome (Ph) Positive Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL)

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 2289-2289 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elias Jabbour ◽  
Hagop M. Kantarjian ◽  
Deborah A. Thomas ◽  
Koji Sasaki ◽  
Farhad Ravandi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Median Time ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Philadelphia Chromosome ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Vascular Events ◽  
Platelet Recovery

Abstract Background: Combination of cytotoxic chemotherapy with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) is effective in the treatment of Ph+ ALL. Ponatinib is a more potent BCR-ABL inhibitor. It also suppresses the T315I clones, a common cause of relapse in pts with Ph+ ALL. The combinations of chemotherapy and ponatinib may be associated with better response rates and higher likelihood of eradication of minimal residual disease (MRD) than those reported with other TKIs. Methods: Pts with newly diagnosed Ph+ ALL received 8 cycles of hyper-CVAD (fractionated cyclophosphamide, vincristine [VCR], doxorubicin, dexamethasone) alternating with high dose methotrexate (MTX) and cytarabine every 21 days. Ponatinib was given at 45 mg po daily for the first 14 days of cycle 1 then continuously for the subsequent 7 cycles. Pts in CR received maintenance with ponatinib 45 mg po daily and vincristine and prednisone monthly for 2 years followed by ponatinib indefinitely. MRD monitoring was conducted. Results: To date, 34 pts with untreated Ph+ ALL and 3 pts previously treated (1 previous course) have received a median of 6 cycles (2-8); 10 pts are receiving maintenance in CR. 3 pts have completed the 2 years of maintenance and they are receiving single agent TKI. Median WBC at diagnosis was 8 x 109/L (0.9 -629 x 109/L). CD20 expression was reported positive in 11 pts (30%). 3 (8%) had concomitant CNS disease at diagnosis. All pts were in CR after cycle 1. 30/32 pts (94%) with Ph+ metaphases by CG analysis at baseline achieved CCyR after 1 cycle; 1 had mCyR only and 1 had no CG analysis at CR, both of them achieved CCyR after cycle 2. To date, 35 pts (95%) achieved MMR and 26 (70%) CMR. The median time to MMR and CMR were 3 and 10 weeks, respectively. MRD is negative in 35/36 (97%) pts, in whom a sample was sent for assessment. 9 (24%) received an allogeneic stem cell transplantation (ASCT) after a median of 4 cycles (3-10). Median time to neutrophil and platelet recovery for cycle 1 was 18 and 23 days, and 16 and 22 days for subsequent cycles, respectively. Grade ≥ 3 toxicity included infections during induction in 18 pts (49%), increased LFT’s in 12 (32%), thrombotic events in 3 (8%), myocardial infarction (MI) in 3 (8%, 2 unexplained, 1 in the context of sepsis ), skin rash in 4 (11%), and pancreatitis in 6 (16%). With a median follow up of 18 months (9-31), 31 pts are alive, 6 died in CR. 1 pt died in CR from an unrelated cardiac event after being taken off therapy and placed on imatinib, 1 from MOF (C2D13), 1 from NSTEMI (C2D41), 1 from potential MI (C4D42), 1 from head injury sustained after a fall (C4D13), and 1 from sepsis post ASCT. At the last follow-up, 8 pts (19%) are alive post ASCT; 13 pts remain on ponatinib at the dose of 15 mg daily in 14 and 30 mg daily in 1; Of the other 9 alive patients, 7 were switched to dasatinib, two were switched to imatinib and nilotinib (one each); 1 was lost of follow-up. All but one pt who switched to dasatinib remained in CR; the latter relapsed after a first remission of 10 months; she is receiving salvage therapy in combination with dasatinib. The 1-year progression-free and overall survival rates were 96% and 86%, respectively. Conclusion: The combination of hyperCVAD with ponatinib is highly effective in pts with Ph+ ALL. Due to the vascular events observed, some pts switched to alternative TKI; in the remaining, ponatinib dose was modified to 30 mg daily during consolidation with subsequent reduction to 15 mg in pts in CMR. Disclosures Kantarjian: ARIAD: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding. Kadia:GSK: Research Funding; ARIAD: Honoraria.

Phase II Study of the Frontline Hyper-CVAD in Combination with Ponatinib for Patients with Philadelphia Chromosome Positive Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 757-757 ◽  
Author(s):  
Koji Sasaki ◽  
Elias J. Jabbour ◽  
Farhad Ravandi ◽  
Naval G. Daver ◽  
Naveen Pemmaraju ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Median Time ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
Philadelphia Chromosome ◽  
Advisory Board ◽  
Molecular Response ◽  
Rt Pcr ◽  
Vascular Events

Abstract Background: The combination of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) with chemotherapy is highly effective in Philadelphia chromosome positive (Ph+) acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). Ponatinib is a more potent BCR-ABL inhibitor, and is effective against the T315I clone which commonly causes disease recurrences. The combination of hyper-CVAD with ponatinib may produce better response rates and higher likelihood of eradication of minimal residual disease (MRD) as compared to that reported with other TKIs. Methods: Patients with newly diagnosed Ph+ ALL received 8 cycles of hyper-CVAD alternating with high dose methotrexate and cytarabine every 21 days. Ponatinib was given at 45 mg po daily for the first 14 days of cycle 1 then continuously for the subsequent 7 cycles. Patients in complete response (CR) received maintenance with ponatinib 45 mg daily and vincristine and prednisone monthly for 2 years followed by ponatinib indefinitely. After an increased incidence of vascular toxicities was recognized, patients were offered the option to switch TKIs or to continue with a reduced dose of ponatinib of 30 mg with further decrease to 15 mg in patients in CMR. The evaluation of MRD status was performed by multicolor flow cytometry (FCM), and reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). The objective of this study is to evaluate response rates, CR duration, and overall survival (OS), and to assess the safety of this regimen. Rituximab and intrathecal chemotherapy were given for the first 4 courses. Results: To date, 53 patients with untreated Ph+ ALL and 4 patients previously treated (2 patients in CR; 2 patients not in CR) have received a median of 6 cycles (2-8); 11 patients are receiving maintenance in CR; 10 patients underwent allogeneic stem cell transplantation (ASCT) after a median of 4 cycles. Baseline patient characteristics and outcomes are described in table 1. The overall complete cytogenetic response (CCyR), major molecular response (MMR), and complete molecular response (CMR) rates were 100%, 96%, and 79%, respectively. The median time to MMR and CMR were 3 weeks (range, 2-14) and 11 weeks (range, 2- 96), respectively. The median time to MRD negativity by 6-color flow cytometry (FCM) was 3 weeks (range, 3-14). Median time to platelet and neutrophil recovery for cycle 1 was 22 days (range, 17-35) and 18 days (range, 13-29), respectively, and 22 days (range, 0-35) and 16 days (range, 0-28) for subsequent cycles. Grade ≥ 3 toxicity included infections during induction (47%), increased liver function tests (34%), thrombotic events (8%), myocardial infarction (6%), hypertension (15%), skin rash (15%), and pancreatitis (19%). With a median follow up of 33 months (range, 2-51), 44 81(%) patients remain alive and in CR (41 in CR1, and 3 in CR2). Six patients died in CR: 1 patient died in CR from an unrelated cardiac event 4 months after being taken off therapy and placed on imatinib, 1 from multiple organ failure due to sepsis (C2D13), 1 from non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (C2D41; ponatinib 45 mg daily), 1 from potential myocardial infarction (C4D42; ponatinib 30 mg daily), 1 from head injury after a fall (C4D13), and 1 from sepsis post allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Of 44 patients alive at the last follow-up, 20 (46%) patients remained on ponatinib (15 mg daily in 15, and 30 mg daily in 5), 12 (27%) switched to another TKI (9 to dasatinib, 2 to nilotinib, and 1 to imatinib), 8 (18%) underwent ASCT, 3 (7%) relapsed, and 1 (2%) had positive MRD by FCM and RT-PCR. No further vascular events were observed in patients receiving lower doses of ponatinib. The 3-year CR duration and OS rates are 82% and 80%, respectively (Figures 1). Of 10 patients who underwent ASCT while in first CR, 8 patients are alive in CR, 1 died of sepsis in CR, and 1 relapsed and died of disease progression. Landmark analysis at 4 months by ASCT showed no difference in 3-year CR duration (no ASCT, 79%; ASCT, 88%; p=0.48), and 3-year OS (no ASCT, 92%; ASCT, 79%; p=0.31). Conclusion: The combination of hyperCVAD with ponatinib is highly effective in patients with Ph+ ALL. Due to the vascular events observed, the ponatinib dose was modified to 30 mg daily during consolidation with subsequent reduction to 15 mg in patients in CMR without further episode of cardiovascular events. Disclosures Jabbour: ARIAD: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy. Pemmaraju:incyte: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; LFB: Consultancy, Honoraria; stemline: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; cellectis: Consultancy, Research Funding; affymetrix: Research Funding. DiNardo:Celgene: Research Funding; Agios: Other: advisory board, Research Funding; Abbvie: Research Funding; Daiichi Sankyo: Other: advisory board, Research Funding; Novartis: Other: advisory board, Research Funding. Konopleva:Cellectis: Research Funding; Calithera: Research Funding. Jain:BMS: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; ADC Therapeutics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Novimmune: Consultancy, Honoraria; Servier: Consultancy, Honoraria; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Abbvie: Research Funding; Infinity: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Genentech: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding. Wierda:Novartis: Research Funding; Abbvie: Research Funding; Acerta: Research Funding; Gilead: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding. Cortes:ARIAD: Consultancy, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Teva: Research Funding. O'Brien:Pharmacyclics, LLC, an AbbVie Company: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria.

scholarly journals Liposomal Vincristine (Marqibo) Combined with Hyper-Cmad As Frontline Therapy for Patients with Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: A Result of a Phase II Clinical Trial

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 3720-3720
Author(s):  
Koji Sasaki ◽  
Elias Jabbour ◽  
Deborah A Thomas ◽  
Maria R. Khouri ◽  
Musa Yilmaz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
Philadelphia Chromosome ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Salvage Chemotherapy ◽  
Time Interval ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Free Survival

Abstract Background: Liposomal vincristine has been approved as salvage chemotherapy for patients with relapsed/refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). Replacement of regular vincristine with liposomal vincristine might lead to improve outcome with reduced neurotoxicity in patients with newly diagnosed ALL. Methods: Patients ≥18 years with newly-diagnosed B-cell ALL were eligible for the clinical trial consisting of hyper-CMAD (cyclophosphamide 300 mg/m2 IV every 12 hours on Days 1-3; liposomal vincristine 2 mg/m2 IV on Day 1 and day 8; doxorubicin 50 mg/m2 IV on Day 4; dexamethasone 40 mg IV daily on Days 1-4 and Days 11-14) (odd cycles 1, 3, 5, 7) alternating with high-dose methotrexate 1000 mg/m2 IV on Day 1, and cytarabine 3 gm/m2 IV every 12 hours on Days 2 and 3 (even cycles 2, 4, 6, 8). Rituximab 375 mg/m2 IV on Days 1 and 8 for courses 1-4 was administered in CD-20 positive ALL. TKI (imatinib or dasatinib) were concomitantly administered in patients with Philadelphia chromosome positive (Ph+) ALL. Overall survival (OS) was defined as time interval from the start date of hyper-CMAD to the date of death. Progression-free survival (PFS) was defined as time interval from the start date of hyper-CMAD to the date of relapse or death, whichever comes first. Results: Twenty-seven patients have been treated so far. Baseline patient characteristics are described in table 1. Median age is 53 years (range 23-80). Eleven patients (41%) had CD-20 positive ALL, and 17 (63%) had Ph+ ALL. Median follow-up is 12 months (3-22) with a median of 4 cycles (1-8) administered Of 17 patients with Ph+ ALL, 15 patients were received additional dasatinib and 2 imatinib. Twenty-six (96%) achieved complete response (CR). Early death was observed in 1 patient (4%) with Ph+ ALL. Of the 26 patients evaluable for response, 22 (100%) achieved CCyR (3 patients, diploid at start; 1 patient, not performed), and 23 (88%) achieved negative MRD by multicolor flow cytometry. Of the 16 evaluable Ph-positive patients, MMR was observed in 15 (94%) and CMR in 10 (63%). Three patients in CR1 underwent allogeneic stem cell transplantation (ASCT). At the last follow-up, 23 (85%) patients are alive. Four (15%) patients died: 1 from sepsis on C1D10; 1 from unknown cause on C1D135; 1 from post-transplant complications; and 1 from disease progression at the third salvage chemotherapy. Median time to platelet and neutrophil recovery for cycle 1 was 24 and 19 days, respectively. To date, 3 patients relapsed; 1 patient with t(4;11) relapsed at C5D36; 1 Ph-positive patient relapsed post C8 with no maintenance therapy; 1 patient with positive MRD 2 months prior to morphologic relapse while on maintenance therapy C10D32. At the last follow-up, 23 (85%) patients are alive. Four (15%) patients died: 1 from sepsis on C1D10; 1 from unknown cause on C1D135; 1 from post-transplant complications; and 1 from relapse and disease progression at the third salvage chemotherapy. The 1-year PFS and OS rates were 77% and 87%, respectively. Conclusions: The combination ofliposomal vincristine withHyper-CMAD is safe and effective with high response rates in patients with newly diagnosed ALL. Table 1. Patient characteristic and outcome N (%)/ Median [range] N= 27 Age (yrs) 53 (23-80) Age ≥ 60 10 (37) Male 12 (44) PS 2-3 2 (7) WBC (x 109/L) 17.1 (1.4-372.1) CNS disease 6 (22) CD20 positivity 11 (41) Cytogenetic Abnormality, No. (%) Diploid 3 (11) Philadelphia chromosome 17 (63) Hypodiploid 2 (7) Hyperdiploid 1 (4) t(4;11) 3 (11) Misc 1 (4) Overall response, No. (%) CR 26/27 (96) Early death 1/27 (4) CCyR 22/22 (100) MRD by Flow 23/26 (88) MMR:BCR/ABL 15/16 (94) CMR:BCR/ABL 10/16 (63) Figure 1. Progression-free survival and overall survival Figure 1. Progression-free survival and overall survival Disclosures Chahoud: American Society of Hematology (ASH): Other: 2015 HONORS Award recipient. DiNardo:Novartis: Research Funding. Pemmaraju:Stemline: Research Funding; Incyte: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; LFB: Consultancy, Honoraria. Cortes:BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding; Teva: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; ARIAD Pharmaceuticals Inc.: Consultancy, Research Funding. O'Brien:Pharmacyclics LLC, an AbbVie Company: Consultancy, Research Funding.

scholarly journals Ponatinib and Chemotherapy in Young Adults with De Novo Philadelphia Chromosome-Positive Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia. Results of Ponalfil Clinical Trial after Completion of Recruitment

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 29-30
Author(s):  
Josep-Maria Ribera ◽  
Olga García ◽  
Pau Montesinos ◽  
Pilar Martinez ◽  
Jordi Esteve ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
Philadelphia Chromosome ◽  
Molecular Response ◽  
Event Free Survival ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Allogeneic Hsct ◽  
Central Artery

Background and objective. The combination of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) and chemotherapy (intensive, attenuated or minimal) has improved the prognosis of patients (pts) with Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (Ph+ALL). The combination of HyperCVAD and ponatinib has improved the molecular response and survival compared with other combinations of chemotherapy with first or second generation TKI (Jabbour E, et al, Lancet Haematol. 2018; 5:e618-e627). The Spanish PETHEMA group conducted the phase 2 PONALFIL trial, which incorporates ponatinib to the same induction and consolidation schedule of the ALL Ph08 trial (Ribera JM et al. Cancer 2019;125:2810-2817) The results of this trial after completed recruitment are herein reported. Patients and method. The PONALFIL trial (NCT02776605) combined ponatinib (30 mg/d) and induction chemotherapy (vincristine, daunorubicin and prednisone) followed by consolidation (high-dose methotrexate, ARA-C, mercaptopurine, etoposide) and allogeneic HSCT. TKI use as maintenance was only scheduled for pts with persistence or reappearance of MRD. By July 2020 the 30 scheduled pts were recruited. The response to therapy (complete morphological [CR], molecular [complete, CMR or major, MMR] after induction and before allogeneic HSCT) (assessed by centralized BCR-ABL/ABL ratio),event-free survival (EFS), overall survival [OS]) and toxicity are herein analyzed. Results. Median age was 50 (20-59) years and 14/30 pts were female. One pt showed CNS involvement at diagnosis. ECOG score at diagnosis was <2 in 86% of pts. Median of WBC count was 6.4 (0.6-359.3) x109/L, Hb 90 (63-145) g/L, platelets 38 (11-206) x109/L. The immunologic phenotype was common in 26 cases, with molecular isoform p190 in 20 patients (67%), p210 in 9 (30%) and p230 in 1 (3%). CR was attained 26/26 patients (100%) (4 are still on induction therapy), with CMR in 11/26 cases (42%), MMR in 6/26 (23%) and no molecular response in 9/26 (35%)).Two patients withdrew the trial (thrombosis of the central retina artery and severe intestinal infection, one case each). Consolidation was given to 24 patients, 2/24 are receiving consolidation and 22 patients received allogeneic HSCT (14 in CMR, 6 in MMR, 2 without molecular response). No relapses before HSCT were detected. No transplant-related mortality was observed to date, but 1 patient withdrew the trial by severe GVHD. Ponatinib was given after HSCT in 4 pts due to loss of molecular response. Three pts relapsed after HSCT, one of them after documented loss of molecular response. All pts are alive (median follow-up of 4.5 months, range 0.5-26.2.2). The EFS probability at 30 months was 91% (79%, 100%) (Figure 1). One hundred and two adverse events (AE) have been registered in 20 patients, 25 of whom were severe (SAE) and occurred in 14 patients, prompting to withdrawn of the trial in 3 (thrombosis of the central artery of the retina, severe bowel infection, grade IV aGVHD, one case each). The most frequent AE were hematologic (26%), gastrointestinal (15%), infections (10%), hepatic (8%) and cutaneous (5%). Cardiovascular events occurred in 2 patients (angor pectoris and thrombosis of central artery of the retina, one case each). Conclusions. The preliminary results of the PONALFIL trial after recruitment completed show a high short-term antileukemic efficacy with acceptable toxicity profile. Supported in part by grant 2017 SGR288 (GRC) Generalitat de Catalunya and "La Caixa" Foundation. Figure 1. Event free survival (EFS) of the whole series. Figure 1 Disclosures Ribera: Pfizer, Amgen, Ariad, Novartis: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer, Amgen: Research Funding. Martinez-Lopez:Incyte: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding; Janssen-cilag: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria. Garcia-Sanz:Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Honoraria; Gilead: Honoraria, Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria; Pharmacyclics: Honoraria; Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding.

scholarly journals Outcome of treatment in children with hypodiploid acute lymphoblastic leukemia

Blood ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 110 (4) ◽  
pp. 1112-1115 ◽  
Author(s):  
James B. Nachman ◽  
Nyla A. Heerema ◽  
Harland Sather ◽  
Bruce Camitta ◽  
Erik Forestier ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
Philadelphia Chromosome ◽  
Study Groups ◽  
Event Free Survival ◽  
Prognostic Implication ◽  
Monosomy 7 ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Modal Chromosome Number

Abstract One-hundred thirty-nine patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and hypodiploidy (fewer than 45 chromosomes) were collected from 10 different national ALL study groups and single institutions. Patients were stratified by modal chromosome number into 4 groups: 24 to 29 (N = 46); 33 to 39 (N = 26); 40 to 43 (N = 13); and 44 (N = 54) chromosomes. Nine patients were Philadelphia chromosome (Ph) positive (4 cases: 44 chromosomes; 5 cases: 40-43 chromosomes) and were not considered further. Event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) of the remaining 130 patients were 38.5% ± 4.4% and 49.8% ± 4.2% at 8 years, respectively. There were no significant differences in outcome between patients with 24 to 29, 33 to 39, or 40 to 43 chromosomes. Compared with patients with fewer than 44 chromosomes, patients with 44 chromosomes had a significantly better EFS (P = .01; 8-year estimate, 52.2% vs 30.1%) and OS (P = .017; 69% vs 37.5%). For patients with 44 chromosomes, monosomy 7, the presence of a dicentric chromosome, or both predicted a worse EFS but similar OS. Doubling of the hypodiploid clone occurred in 32 patients (24-29 chromosomes [n = 25] and 33-39 chromosomes [n = 7]) and had no prognostic implication. Children and adolescents with ALL and hypodiploidy with fewer than 44 chromosomes have a poor outcome despite contemporary therapy.

Event-Free Survival at 12 Months and Subsequent Overall Survival in Patients with Peripheral T-Cell Lymphoma

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 1501-1501
Author(s):  
Matthew J Maurer ◽  
Fredrik Ellin ◽  
James Cerhan ◽  
Stephen Ansell ◽  
Brian K Link ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
T Cell ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
T Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Event Free Survival ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
T Cell Lymphomas

Abstract Background: Peripheral T-Cell lymphomas (PTCLs) constitute approximately 10% of lymphoid malignancies and consist of several distinct entities based on pathologic and clinical characteristics. With the exception of a few subtypes (e.g., ALK-positive anaplastic large cell lymphoma (ALCL) and some primary cutaneous or leukemic forms of PTCL), a majority of PTCLs are aggressive as characterized by poor treatment response, rapid disease progression and poor overall survival. We have shown that landmark timepoints of event-free survival after diagnosis can stratify subsequent overall survival (OS) in diffuse large B-cell and follicular lymphoma. Here we evaluate this approach in newly diagnosed aggressive PTCLs treated with anthracyline-based or related chemotherapy. Methods. Newly diagnosed PTCL patients were prospectively enrolled in the University of Iowa/Mayo Clinic Lymphoma SPORE Molecular Epidemiology Resource (MER) from 2002-2012. Clinical data were abstracted from medical records using a standard protocol. For this analysis, we included patients receiving anthracycline-based or other multiagent chemotherapy for the following PTCL subtypes: ALK-negative ALCL (N=24); angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma (AITL, N=34); PTCL, not otherwise specified (NOS; N=60); enteropathy-associated T-cell lymphoma (EATL, N=8); extranodal NK/T-cell lymphoma, nasal type (ENKTL, N=11); and hepatosplenic T-cell lymphoma (HSTCL, N=1). Patients were prospectively followed, and event-free survival (EFS) was defined as time from diagnosis to progression, re-treatment, or death due to any cause. Landmark EFS timepoints were assessed at 12 (EFS12) and 24 (EFS24) months after the date of diagnosis. Subsequent OS was defined as time from a specific endpoint (diagnosis, event or EFS landmark). Replication was performed in a population-based cohort of T-cell lymphomas diagnosed from 2000-2009 from the Swedish Lymphoma Registry. Results. 138 eligible patients were enrolled in the MER from 2002-2012, the median age at diagnosis was 58 years (range, 19-88), 66% were male, 73% had Stage III-IV disease, and 33% had IPI 0-1. At a median follow-up of 47 months (range 11-120), 87 patients (63%) had an event and 70 patients (51%) had died. From diagnosis, only 60 patients were event-free at 12 months (EFS12 45%). Patients who failed to achieve EFS12 had a poor subsequent OS from event (median OS = 6.8 months, 95% CI: 5.3-14.0, figure 1). In contrast, patients who achieved EFS12 had a favorable subsequent OS (median unreached, figure 2). Of the 427 eligible patients in the Swedish registry, the median age at diagnosis was 66 years (range, 18-88), 63% were male, 68% had Stage III-IV disease, and 25% had IPI 0-1. PTCL subtypes were: ALK-negative ALCL (N=89); AITL (N=80); PTCL, NOS (N=183); EATL (N=44); ENKTL (N=24); and HSTCL (N=7). At a median follow-up of 86 months (range 40-158), 333 patients (79%) had an event and 316 patients (74%) had died. From diagnosis, 183 patients were event-free at 12 months (EFS12 44%). Similar to the MER cohort, Swedish patients failing EFS12 had poor subsequent survival (median OS = 3.7 months, 95% CI: 2.9-5.3, figure 1). Swedish patients achieving EFS12 had a favorable subsequent OS (median OS = 89 months, figure 2). Similar results were obtained when conducting landmark analysis at 24 months after diagnosis (EFS24). Conclusion. Relapse and re-treatment events within the first 12 months of diagnosis are associated with very poor OS in PTCL treated with anthracyclines or related chemotherapy, while patients achieving EFS12 have encouraging subsequent OS. Stratifying patients into prognostically distinct subsets using EFS12 may help focus biologic and biomarker studies. EFS12 has potential as an early endpoint for studies of newly diagnosed PTCL. Further investigation of determinants related to post-EFS12 survival is needed. Disclosures Maurer: Kite Pharma: Research Funding. Cerhan:Kite Pharma: Research Funding. Ansell:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Celldex: Research Funding. Link:Genentech: Consultancy, Research Funding; Kite Pharma: Research Funding. Thompson:Kite Pharma: Research Funding. Relander:Respiratorius: Patents & Royalties: valproate for DLBCL.

scholarly journals Changing the Fate of Children with Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL) in a Limited Resources Setting

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 5075-5075
Author(s):  
Yajaira Valentine Jimenez-Antolinez ◽  
Julia Esther Colunga Pedraza ◽  
José Eduardo Mares-Gil ◽  
Emma Lizeth Estrada ◽  
Jesus Mauricio Gonzalez-Diaz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
Relapse Rate ◽  
Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
Limited Resource ◽  
Outcome Evaluation ◽  
Event Free Survival ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Early Relapse

Introduction Pediatric acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL) patients have about 90% overall survival (OS) in developed countries. However, many children in low-middle income countries (LMIC) do not have access to appropriate drugs at optimal doses, a multidisciplinary medical team, laboratory resources for diagnosis and follow-up, and appropriate support therapy for morbidities and treatment-related toxicities. A 50-60% five-year OS has been reported in children with ALL in Mexico, and our center is not the exception. This low survival rate has pushed Mexican centers to develop strategies highlighting collaboration between centers with economic, research and teaching resources ("Mexico en Alianza con St. Jude MAS"), and outpatient treatment. However, each center must adapt their chemotherapy protocol to its own supplies and possibilities. We report the results of a risk adapted therapy protocol in a limited-resource treatment setting. Materials and Methods All pediatric patients with a diagnosis of ALL from January 2017 to December 2018 were classified according to risk as shown in Figure 1. Depending on risk classification, modifications to the induction, consolidation and intermediate maintenance regimens were made. The higher the risk, the higher the intensity of the regimen, as defined by the number of anthracycline doses, the presence or absence of high-dose methotrexate, and the duration of the consolidation and maintenance phases (Table 1). Demographic data is reported using distribution analysis, and the Kaplan-Meier method is used to analyze and predict overall survival, event-free survival (EFS) and relapse. Our results were compared with previous results from our institution. Results There were 35 male and 25 female patients; median age at diagnosis was 5.5. B-cell and T-cell lymphoblastic leukemia was the diagnosis in 57 (95%), and 3 (5%) patients, respectively, with a follow-up of 16 (8-30) months. Twenty-three (38%), 21 (35%), and 16 (26%) children were classified as high, intermediate and low risk ALL, respectively. After one week of corticosteroids 46 (77%) of patients had a good response. At the end of induction 53 patients had an evaluable MRD (88%), out of which 9 were positive (17%). Median follow-up was 16 (0.6-30) months. Mortality at induction was 6 (10%) patients. Very early relapse was observed in 3(5%) of patients. Estimated 2-year relapse rate was 6%, event-free survival was 84.1%, and OS was 85%. A comparison of results obtained with previous regimens (protocols 1 and 2) and the risk-adapted treatment (protocol 3) is observed in Table 2. Conclusions The implementation of a modified chemotherapy regimen based on adjusted stratification risk was associated to improved responses as reflected by MRD. A decrease in very early relapse rate to 5%, without increasing the toxicity and death during induction was observed. Periodic and prospective outcome evaluation in a limited-resource setting is fundamental to adjust and to standardize therapy. Long-term follow-up of this patient group is required to compare OS and EFS at 5 years. This is a preliminary report, but it seems that we are changing the fate of Mexican children with ALL. Disclosures Gomez-Almaguer: Amgen: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Teva: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau.

scholarly journals Dasatinib Plus Intensive Chemotherapy in Children, Adolescents, and Young Adults With Philadelphia Chromosome–Positive Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: Results of Children’s Oncology Group Trial AALL0622

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (22) ◽  
pp. 2306-2314 ◽  
Author(s):  
William B. Slayton ◽  
Kirk R. Schultz ◽  
John A. Kairalla ◽  
Meenakshi Devidas ◽  
Xinlei Mi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
Philadelphia Chromosome ◽  
Cranial Irradiation ◽  
Intensive Chemotherapy ◽  
Event Free Survival ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Risk Patients ◽  
Standard Risk ◽  
Philadelphia Chromosome Positive

Purpose Addition of imatinib to intensive chemotherapy improved survival for children and young adults with Philadelphia chromosome–positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Compared with imatinib, dasatinib has increased potency, CNS penetration, and activity against imatinib-resistant clones. Patients and Methods Children’s Oncology Group (COG) trial AALL0622 (Bristol Myers Squibb trial CA180-204) tested safety and feasibility of adding dasatinib to intensive chemotherapy starting at induction day 15 in patients with newly diagnosed Philadelphia chromosome–positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia age 1 to 30 years. Allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (HSCT) was recommended for patients at high risk based on slow response and for those with a matched family donor regardless of response after at least 11 weeks of therapy. Patients at standard risk based on rapid response received chemotherapy plus dasatinib for an additional 120 weeks. Patients with overt CNS leukemia received cranial irradiation. Results Sixty eligible patients were enrolled. Five-year overall (OS) and event-free survival rates (± standard deviations [SD]) were 86% ± 5% and 60% ± 7% overall, 87% ± 5% and 61% ± 7% for standard-risk patients (n = 48; 19% underwent HSCT), and 89% ± 13% and 67% ± 19% for high-risk patients (n = 9; 89% underwent HSCT), respectively. Five-year cumulative incidence (± SD) of CNS relapse was 15% ± 6%. Outcomes (± SDs) were similar to those in COG AALL0031, which used the same chemotherapy with continuous imatinib: 5-year OS of 81% ± 6% versus 86% ± 5% ( P = .63) and 5-year disease-free survival of 68% ± 7% versus 60% ± 7% ( P = 0.31) for AALL0031 versus AALL0622, respectively. IKZF1 deletions, present in 56% of tested patients, were associated with significantly inferior OS and event-free survival overall and in standard-risk patients. Conclusion Dasatinib was well tolerated with chemotherapy and provided outcomes similar to those with imatinib in COG AALL0031, where all patients received cranial irradiation. Our results support limiting HSCT to slow responders and suggest a potential role for transplantation in rapid responders with IKZF1 deletions.

scholarly journals Improved Early Event-Free Survival With Imatinib in Philadelphia Chromosome–Positive Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: A Children's Oncology Group Study

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (31) ◽  
pp. 5175-5181 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kirk R. Schultz ◽  
W. Paul Bowman ◽  
Alexander Aledo ◽  
William B. Slayton ◽  
Harland Sather ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
Philadelphia Chromosome ◽  
Early Event ◽  
Intensive Chemotherapy ◽  
Event Free Survival ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Improved Outcome ◽  
Philadelphia Chromosome Positive

Purpose Imatinib mesylate is a targeted agent that may be used against Philadelphia chromosome–positive (Ph+) acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), one of the highest risk pediatric ALL groups. Patients and Methods We evaluated whether imatinib (340 mg/m2/d) with an intensive chemotherapy regimen improved outcome in children ages 1 to 21 years with Ph+ ALL (N = 92) and compared toxicities to Ph− ALL patients (N = 65) given the same chemotherapy without imatinib. Exposure to imatinib was increased progressively in five patient cohorts that received imatinib from 42 (cohort 1; n = 7) to 280 continuous days (cohort 5; n = 50) before maintenance therapy. Patients with human leukocyte antigen (HLA) –identical sibling donors underwent blood and marrow transplantation (BMT) with imatinib given for 6 months following BMT. Results Continuous imatinib exposure improved outcome in cohort 5 patients with a 3-year event-free survival (EFS) of 80% ± 11% (95% CI, 64% to 90%), more than twice historical controls (35% ± 4%; P < .0001). Three-year EFS was similar for patients in cohort 5 treated with chemotherapy plus imatinib (88% ± 11%; 95% CI, 66% to 96%) or sibling donor BMT (57% ± 22%; 95% CI, 30.4% to 76.1%). There were no significant toxicities associated with adding imatinib to intensive chemotherapy. The higher imatinib dosing in cohort 5 appears to improve survival by having an impact on the outcome of children with a higher burden of minimal residual disease after induction. Conclusion Imatinib plus intensive chemotherapy improved 3-year EFS in children and adolescents with Ph+ ALL, with no appreciable increase in toxicity. BMT plus imatinib offered no advantage over BMT alone. Additional follow-up is required to determine the impact of this treatment on long-term EFS and determine whether chemotherapy plus imatinib can replace BMT.

scholarly journals A Comprehensive Cancer Center Experience with Hyper-CVAD Plus Ponatinib As Frontline Therapy for Adult Philadelphia Chromosome-Positive Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 4394-4394
Author(s):  
Tamer Othman ◽  
Benjamin Moskoff ◽  
Matthew Tenold ◽  
Tali Azenkot ◽  
Margaret Krackeler ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
Bacterial Infection ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
Blast Crisis ◽  
Philadelphia Chromosome ◽  
Mixed Phenotype ◽  
Philadelphia Chromosome Positive

Abstract Background Ponatinib, a third-generation BCR-ABL1 tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), + hyper-CVAD showed remarkable activity against Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (Ph+ ALL), and may be superior to chemotherapy + earlier generation TKIs in terms of depth of remission, event-free survival (EFS), and overall survival (OS). However, this regimen's efficacy and tolerability have yet to be externally validated. Here, we summarize our real-world experience with ponatinib + hyper-CVAD for untreated Ph+ ALL and other Ph+ acute or blast phase leukemias. Methods We retrospectively analyzed all adults treated at the University of California, Davis (UCD) from March 2012 to May 2021 with ponatinib + hyper-CVAD upfront. The primary endpoints were 3-year OS and EFS. Secondary endpoints were complete molecular response (CMR), measurable residual disease (MRD) negativity by multiparameter flow cytometry (MFC), complete cytogenetic response (CCyR) rates, and adverse events (AEs). Time to event analyses were done via the Kaplan-Meier method. Patients alive were censored at their last follow-up date. Patients undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) after 6 months of achieving complete remission (CR) were censored at the time of HCT for the landmark analysis. Patients with missing data were excluded from the response analyses. Results We identified 13 Ph+ ALL patients who received ponatinib + hyper-CVAD for initial induction. The baseline characteristics for the Ph+ ALL patients are summarized in Table 1. The median follow-up was 16 months. The median number of hyper-CVAD cycles completed was 8 (range, 1-8) with ponatinib. Two patients proceeded to HCT in CR1, one at 3.5 months after starting induction, and due to difficulty controlling the patient's concurrent multiple myeloma prior to HCT and recovery from anti-neoplastic therapy, the second was delayed to 46 months after starting induction. The 3-year OS and EFS with ponatinib + hyper-CVAD were each 92% (95% confidence interval, 78.9-100) (Figure 1). Landmark analysis completed 6 months following CR showed a 3-year OS of 100% in patients treated with ponatinib + hyper-CVAD without HCT in first CR (CR1). The CMR, CCyR, and MRD-negativity by MFC rates with ponatinib were all 92.3% (12/13). The median time to CMR, CCyR, and MRD-negativity by MFC were 51 days, 22 days, and 53 days, respectively. Notable AEs with ponatinib include neutropenic fever (92%), bacterial infection (69%), transaminitis (38%), venous thromboembolism (31%), invasive fungal infection (15%), hemorrhage (15%), cerebrovascular accident (CVA) (15%), and tumor lysis syndrome (8%). One patient died during induction with ponatinib due to a bacterial infection. Two patients switched to a different TKI due to a CVA after 4 and 24 months. Only 2 patients did not complete 8 cycles of hyper-CVAD, due to death during induction (n=1) and proceeding to HCT after 3 cycles (n=1). As for similar Ph+ leukemias, 3 chronic myeloid leukemia with lymphoid blast crisis (CML-LBC), 1 CML with mixed phenotype blast crisis (CML-MPBC), and 1 with mixed phenotype acute leukemia (MPAL) were treated with ponatinib + hyper-CVAD. The MPAL patient achieved CMR within 55 days, while the CML-MPBC and 2 CML-LBC patients achieved CMR after HCT. The third CML-LBC patient is in CR with ongoing treatment. After median follow-up of 25 months, all 5 were alive, and only the MPAL patient relapsed 28 months after starting treatment and 1 year after HCT. Conclusion To our knowledge, this is the first report externally validating the efficacy and tolerability of ponatinib + hyper-CVAD for Ph+ ALL. We also show the feasibility of using this regimen in patients with Ph+ CML-LBC, CML-MPBC and MPAL. Despite the small sample size and retrospective nature, our study supports existing data demonstrating that this regimen challenges both the designation of Ph+ ALL as a high-risk disease and the trend to transplant in CR1. Our findings support that ponatinib + hyper-CVAD should be considered a standard of care for Ph+ ALL. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Kaesberg: Incyte: Speakers Bureau. Rosenberg: Takeda, Janssen: Speakers Bureau. Abedi: BMS/Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Abbvie: Speakers Bureau; Seattle Genetics: Speakers Bureau. Tuscano: Genentech, Pharamcyclics, Abbvie, BMS, Acrotech, Seattle Genetics, Takeda: Research Funding. Jonas: AbbVie, BMS, Genentech, GlycoMimetics, Jazz, Pfizer, Takeda, Treadwell: Consultancy; 47, AbbVie, Accelerated Medical Diagnostics, Amgen, AROG, Celgene, Daiichi Sankyo, F. Hoffmann-La Roche, Forma, Genentech/Roche, Gilead, GlycoMimetics, Hanmi, Immune-Onc, Incyte, Jazz, Loxo Oncology, Pfizer, Pharmacyclics, Sigma Tau, Treadwell: Research Funding; AbbVie: Other: Travel reimbursement. OffLabel Disclosure: Ponatinib is approved for Philadelphia chromosome positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (Ph+ALL) that is resistant or intolerant to prior tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy. In this study, we described outcomes with ponatinib in combination with hyperCVAD in the frontline setting, which is off-label.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document