High Sensitivity Testing Shows Multiclonal Mutations in Patients with CLL Treated with BTK Inhibitor and Lack of Mutations in Ibrutinib-Naive Patients

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 716-716 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adam Albitar ◽  
Wanlong Ma ◽  
Ivan De Dios ◽  
Jeffrey Estrella ◽  
Mohammed Farooqui ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) that develop resistance to Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitors are typically positive for mutations in BTK or phospholipase c gamma 2 (PLCγ2). Mutations in BTK at the C481S hotspot alter the active site of the mutant BTK to the effect that Ibrutinib is reversibly bound. PLCγ2 is downstream of BTK in the B-cell signaling pathway; mutations in PLCγ2 at either of the R665W, L845F, or S707Y hotspots result in a constitutively activated PLCγ2. In order to better understand the development of these resistance mechanisms in patients with CLL, we developed a high sensitivity (HS) assay utilizing branched and locked nucleic acids (BNA and LNA, respectively). We used this high sensitivity assay in combination with Sanger sequencing and next generation sequencing (NGS) and tested cellular DNA and cell free DNA (cf-DNA) from patients with CLL. Methods: Using custom BNA or LNA oligos in a wild-type blocking polymerase chain reaction, then sequencing by Sanger and NGS methods, we achieved 100x greater sensitivity than Sanger. Sanger sequencing was capable of detecting <1 mutant allele in background of 1000 wild-type alleles (1:1000). Similar sensitivity was achieved with HS NGS. The assay is designed to cover BTK and PLCγ2 hotspots. Using this assay we tested peripheral blood samples from 44 Ibrutinib-naïve patients (Ib-) with CLL and 7 samples from CLL patients being treated with Ibrutinib (Ib+), that showed clinical evidence of disease progression. The same wild-type blocking was also used in NGS approach for confirmation. We performed wild-type blocking in a Nextera Rapid Capture Enrichment workflow for our custom 315 gene panel. Results: No BTK or PLCγ2 mutations were detected in any of the 44 ibrutinib-naïve CLL patients. In contrast, all (N=7) tested patients with progressive disease on Ibrutinib showed one or more mutation in BTK or PLCγ2 using the HS method. Without the HS testing only 4 patients (57%) showed a mutation in BTK or PLCγ2. Two patients showed multiple mutant clones. One patient with double mutations in PLCγ2 (R665W and L845F) also showed triple independent mutations in BTK at codon C481 with HS testing. These mutations give rise to two distinct mutant proteins C481R (TGC>CGC) and C481S (TGC>AGC and TGC>TCC). NGS analysis confirmed that the the three BTK mutations are in three independent clones A second patient showed initially a mutation in BTK (C481S), but subsequent sample showed a mutation in PLCg2 (R665W), in addition to the BTK mutation. All mutations detected in the peripheral blood cells were also detectable in cell-free DNA (cfDNA) using HS testing. However, without using HS testing, a BTK mutation was detected in cfDNA from a patient and this mutation was not detectable when cellular DNA was used. Conclusions: Our data suggests that ibrutinib-naïve patients with CLL do not have BTK or PLCγ2 mutations even when a highly sensitive assay is used. Emerging BTK or PLCγ2 mutant clones can be seen after therapy with the possibility of multiple clones emerging at the same time and may involve both BTK and PLCγ2 genes in the same patient. Furthermore, testing cfDNA is not only as informative as cellular DNA, but might show mutations earlier than cellular DNA. This may have clinical relevance in patients with lymphoma when only few lymphoma cells are in circulation. Figure 1. Figure 1. Disclosures Wiestner: Pharmacyclics: Research Funding.

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 1818-1818
Author(s):  
Kevin Diep ◽  
Wanlong Ma ◽  
Ferras Albitar ◽  
Ivan De Dios ◽  
Sally Agersborg ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: CALR gene is frequently mutated in patients with myeloproliferative neoplasmas (MPN). Almost all mutations are indel - some with large (>50 bp) deletion. Detecting this type of mutations with acceptable sensitivity is difficult by sequencing. Fragment length analysis (FLA) is a reliable technique in detecting this type of mutations. Furthermore, FLA allows quantifying the mutant DNA and better evaluation of tumor load. Determining tumor load can be confusing and difficult when the mutation is biallelic. Distinguishing between patients with single allele mutation from those with biallelic mutations might add another dimension in predicting clinical behavior and determining the tumor load. We explored using cell free DNA in peripheral blood plasma to test for CALR mutations and determining tumor load. Methods: Using Direct bidirectional sequencing and FLA, we detected CALR indel mutations in 71 of 522 (14%) patients suspected of having MPN and referred for testing for CALR mutation. No sample showed point mutation. DNA from cells and cell free DNA in plasma was available from 31 of the 71 cases. The mutant DNA peak was quantified and the relative percentage of mutant DNA was calculated in both cellular DNA and cell free plasma DNA. FLA and Sanger sequencing data were compared between cellular DNA and cell free plasma DNA. Any ratio >55% was considered as evidence of biallelic mutation. Results: As expected all positive samples by cellular DNA testing also showed the indel mutation in cell free plasma by FLA. However, four of the 31 (13%) positive samples by FLA failed to show the mutation on Sanger sequencing. The most likely cause for failing to detect the mutation by Sanger is low level mutation load and the lower sensitivity of Sanger sequencing. When we compared ratios of mutant peak (tumor load) between cellular DNA and cell free DNA in plasma, mutant CALR DNA was significantly higher (P=0.0002, Wilcoxon matched pairs test) in cell free DNA in plasma than in cellular DNA. More importantly, we were able to determine the presence of homozygous mutation (>55% mutant DNA) in 5 of 31 (16%) patients when cell free DNA in plasma is used. In contrast, only 1 of 31 (3%) patients showed evidence of biallelic mutation when cellular DNA is used. Most of the mutations (25 of 31, 81%) were deletions. As deletions results in smaller size amplicon on the FLA and better amplification efficiency, we set 55% as a cut-off for biallelic mutation to account for the more efficient amplification of the deleted peak. Conclusion: Cell free DNA in plasma is more reliable than cellular DNA for the detection of CALR mutations and for determining tumor load. Testing for CALR must include fragment length analysis. More importantly, biallelic CALR mutation is frequent and the clinical relevance of biallelic CALR mutation needs to be investigated. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


2020 ◽  
Vol 92 (12) ◽  
pp. 3604-3608 ◽  
Author(s):  
Norio Akuta ◽  
Fumitaka Suzuki ◽  
Mariko Kobayashi ◽  
Shunichiro Fujiyama ◽  
Yusuke Kawamura ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Rose Brannon ◽  
Gowtham Jayakumaran ◽  
Monica Diosdado ◽  
Juber Patel ◽  
Anna Razumova ◽  
...  

AbstractCirculating cell-free DNA from blood plasma of cancer patients can be used to non-invasively interrogate somatic tumor alterations. Here we develop MSK-ACCESS (Memorial Sloan Kettering - Analysis of Circulating cfDNA to Examine Somatic Status), an NGS assay for detection of very low frequency somatic alterations in 129 genes. Analytical validation demonstrated 92% sensitivity in de-novo mutation calling down to 0.5% allele frequency and 99% for a priori mutation profiling. To evaluate the performance of MSK-ACCESS, we report results from 681 prospective blood samples that underwent clinical analysis to guide patient management. Somatic alterations are detected in 73% of the samples, 56% of which have clinically actionable alterations. The utilization of matched normal sequencing allows retention of somatic alterations while removing over 10,000 germline and clonal hematopoiesis variants. Our experience illustrates the importance of analyzing matched normal samples when interpreting cfDNA results and highlights the importance of cfDNA as a genomic profiling source for cancer patients.


2018 ◽  
Vol 20 (suppl_2) ◽  
pp. i184-i184
Author(s):  
Melanie Pages ◽  
Denisse Rotem ◽  
Gregory Gydush ◽  
Sarah Reed ◽  
Justin Rhoades ◽  
...  

Diagnostics ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 234 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eun Young Lee ◽  
Eun-Ju Lee ◽  
Hana Yoon ◽  
Dong Hyeon Lee ◽  
Kwang Hyun Kim

Urinary cell-free DNA (cfDNA) is an attractive body fluid for liquid biopsy. In this study, we compared the efficiencies of four commercial kits for urinary cell-free DNA (cfDNA) isolation and of various sample storage conditions. Urinary cfDNA was isolated from 10 healthy individuals using four commercial kits: QIAamp Circulating Nucleic Acid Kit (QC; Qiagen), MagMAX™ Cell-Free DNA Isolation Kit (MM; Applied Biosystems), Urine Cell-Free Circulating DNA Purification Midi Kit (NU; Norgen Biotek), and Quick-DNA™ Urine Kit (ZQ; Zymo Research). To assess the isolation efficiency, an Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer with High Sensitivity DNA chips was used, and cfDNA yield was defined as the amount of cfDNA obtained from 1 mL of urine. MM and QC provided the highest cfDNA yield in the 50–300 bp range, and MM and NU gave the highest cfDNA yield in the 50–100 bp range. In particular, the NU kit was efficient for isolation of more fragmented cfDNA in the range of 50–100 bp with the lowest cellular genomic DNA contamination. ZQ had the best cost-efficiency for isolating the same amount of urinary cfDNA. Samples stored at −70 °C with the addition of 10 mM EDTA resulted in the highest cfDNA yield 3 months after sample collection.


2019 ◽  
Vol 13 (11) ◽  
pp. 2361-2374 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erik J. Helden ◽  
Lindsay Angus ◽  
C. Willemien Menke‐van der Houven van Oordt ◽  
Daniëlle A. M. Heideman ◽  
Eline Boon ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. ii82-ii82
Author(s):  
Mélanie Pagès ◽  
Denisse Rotem ◽  
Gregory Gydush ◽  
Sarah Reed ◽  
Justin Rhoades ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 20 (suppl_6) ◽  
pp. vi142-vi143
Author(s):  
Mélanie Pages ◽  
Denisse Rotem ◽  
Gregory Gydush ◽  
Sarah Reed ◽  
Justin Rhoades ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document