scholarly journals Progression in Patients with with Low- and Intermediate-1 Risk Del(5q) MDS Is Predicted By a Limited Subset of Mutations

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 4329-4329
Author(s):  
Christian Scharenberg ◽  
Petter S. Woll ◽  
Valentina Giai ◽  
Andrea Pellagatti ◽  
Leonie Saft ◽  
...  

Abstract A high proportion of lower-risk del(5q) MDS patients will respond to treatment with lenalidomide. The estimated duration of transfusion-independence is 2 years including some long-lasting responses, but almost 40% of patients progress to acute leukemia by 5 years after start of treatment. As the molecular mechanisms underlying disease progression in del(5q) MDS remain to be elucidated, we do not know how to predict disease progression or how to monitor patients during lenalidomide treatment. We previously reported that small TP53 mutated subclones predict for an unfavorable outcome in del(5q) patients, and that these subclones expand with disease progression. However, whether or not other somatic mutations or factors related to the bone marrow microenvironment also contribute to disease progression has not been comprehensively assessed. We studied a longitudinal cohort of 35 low- and intermediate-1-risk del(5q) patients treated with lenalidomide (n=22), or other treatments including stem cell transplantation (n=13) by flow cytometric surveillance of hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPC) subsets, targeted sequencing of mutational patterns, and changes in the bone marrow microenvironment. In our cohort, 13 of 35 patients progressed to either higher-risk MDS (n=4) or leukemia (n=9), 12 of whom were treated with lenalidomide. Progression was associated with the detection of a restricted subset of new recurrent mutations, either alone or in combination: TP53 (n=9, p=0.0004), TET2 (n=6, p=0.006), RUNX1 (n=3, p=0.044), and PTPN11 (n=1). Regardless of whether the three mutations (TP53, TET2 and RUNX1) were present in the initial sample or whether they subsequently developed, testing positive for any of them carried a high probability (13/16, 81%) for predicting progression. For 11 out of 13 patients the new mutations were detected prior to the time point of clinical progression and the median time from detection of the mutation to clinical evidence of progression was 42 months (range 0-83.9). Thus, we were able to detect the mutation in the majority of cases well before clinical signs of disease progression. Seven of the nine patients who developed leukemia carried a TP53 mutation. Based on a median sequencing depth of 370 reads, the mutation was considered present pre-treatment in one of these patients and to have developed under treatment in the other six. Using flow cytometry for surveillance of HSPC subsets in lenalidomide-treated patients, we found that neither lenalidomide treatment nor the acquisition of additional mutations led to any uniform profound changes in the hematopoietic hierarchy unless the patient showed clinical signs of progression. Microarray analysis of mesenchymal stromal cells (MSC) exhibited an expression footprint consistent with MSC with high expression of typical MSC markers and absence of hematopoietic gene signatures. However, we observed only minor differences in gene expression between pre- treatment del(5q) and healthy MSC. In conclusion, while flow cytometric analysis of HSPC populations or analysis of the microenvironment had limited predictive value in this cohort of lower-risk del(5q) MDS, all patients who progressed to either higher-risk MDS or leukemia were identified by harboring recurrent mutations in a limited number of genes, i.e., TP53, RUNX1, TET2, and PTPN11. Based on our data, we advocate for conducting a prospective study aimed at investigating in a larger number of del(5q) MDS cases pre- and post-lenalidomide treatment, whether the detection of such mutations can guide clinical decision making, such as suggesting which patients should undergo hematopoietic cell transplantation. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Leukemia ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Manja Wobus ◽  
Anna Mies ◽  
Nandini Asokan ◽  
Uta Oelschlägel ◽  
Kristin Möbus ◽  
...  

AbstractThe bone marrow microenvironment (BMME) plays a key role in the pathophysiology of myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS), clonal blood disorders affecting the differentiation, and maturation of hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPCs). In lower-risk MDS patients, ineffective late-stage erythropoiesis can be restored by luspatercept, an activin receptor type IIB ligand trap. Here, we investigated whether luspatercept can modulate the functional properties of mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) as key components of the BMME. Luspatercept treatment inhibited Smad2/3 phosphorylation in both healthy and MDS MSCs and reversed disease-associated alterations in SDF-1 secretion. Pre-treatment of MDS MSCs with luspatercept restored the subsequent clonogenic potential of co-cultured HSPCs and increased both their stromal-adherence and their expression of both CXCR4 and ß3 integrin. Luspatercept pre-treatment of MSCs also increased the subsequent homing of co-cultured HSPCs in zebrafish embryos. MSCs derived from patients who had received luspatercept treatment had an increased capacity to maintain the colony forming potential of normal but not MDS HSPCs. These data provide the first evidence that luspatercept impacts the BMME directly, leading to a selective restoration of the ineffective hematopoiesis that is a hallmark of MDS.


2020 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Courtney B. Johnson ◽  
Jizhou Zhang ◽  
Daniel Lucas

Hematopoiesis in the bone marrow (BM) is the primary source of immune cells. Hematopoiesis is regulated by a diverse cellular microenvironment that supports stepwise differentiation of multipotent stem cells and progenitors into mature blood cells. Blood cell production is not static and the bone marrow has evolved to sense and respond to infection by rapidly generating immune cells that are quickly released into the circulation to replenish those that are consumed in the periphery. Unfortunately, infection also has deleterious effects injuring hematopoietic stem cells (HSC), inefficient hematopoiesis, and remodeling and destruction of the microenvironment. Despite its central role in immunity, the role of the microenvironment in the response to infection has not been systematically investigated. Here we summarize the key experimental evidence demonstrating a critical role of the bone marrow microenvironment in orchestrating the bone marrow response to infection and discuss areas of future research.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document