Defining an Antigenic Epitope on Platelet Factor 4 Associated With Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia

Blood ◽  
1998 ◽  
Vol 92 (9) ◽  
pp. 3250-3259 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. Ziporen ◽  
Z.Q. Li ◽  
K.S. Park ◽  
P. Sabnekar ◽  
W.Y. Liu ◽  
...  

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a potentially serious complication of heparin therapy. Antibodies to platelet factor 4 (PF4)/heparin complexes have been implicated in the pathogenesis of this disorder, but the antigenic epitope(s) on the protein have not been defined. To address this issue, we studied the binding of HIT antibodies to a series of recombinant proteins containing either point mutations in PF4 or chimeras containing various domains of PF4 and the related protein, neutrophil activating peptide-2 (NAP-2). Serum samples from 50 patients with a positive 14C-serotonin release assay (14C-SRA) and a clinical diagnosis of HIT and 20 normal controls were studied. HIT antibodies reacted strongly with wild-type (WT) PF4/heparin complexes, but reacted little, if at all, with NAP-2/heparin complexes (optical density [OD]405 = 2.5 and 0.2, respectively). Alanine substitutions at three of the four lysine residues implicated in heparin binding, K62, K65, and K66, had little effect on recognition by HIT antibodies (OD405 = 2.2, 2.8, and 2.0, respectively), whereas an alanine substitution at position K61 led to reduced, but still significant binding (OD405 = 1.0). Similar studies involving chimeras between PF4 and NAP-2 localized a major antigenic site to the region between the third and fourth cysteine residues for more than half of the sera tested. This site appears to involve a series of amino acids immediately after the third cysteine residue beginning with P37. Thus our studies suggest that whereas the C-terminal lysine residues of PF4 are important for heparin binding, they do not comprise a critical antigenic site for most HIT antibodies. Rather, we propose that maintaining a region near the third cysteine residue of PF4, distal from the proposed heparin-binding domain, is required to form the epitope recognized by many HIT antibodies. © 1998 by The American Society of Hematology.

Blood ◽  
1998 ◽  
Vol 92 (9) ◽  
pp. 3250-3259 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. Ziporen ◽  
Z.Q. Li ◽  
K.S. Park ◽  
P. Sabnekar ◽  
W.Y. Liu ◽  
...  

Abstract Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a potentially serious complication of heparin therapy. Antibodies to platelet factor 4 (PF4)/heparin complexes have been implicated in the pathogenesis of this disorder, but the antigenic epitope(s) on the protein have not been defined. To address this issue, we studied the binding of HIT antibodies to a series of recombinant proteins containing either point mutations in PF4 or chimeras containing various domains of PF4 and the related protein, neutrophil activating peptide-2 (NAP-2). Serum samples from 50 patients with a positive 14C-serotonin release assay (14C-SRA) and a clinical diagnosis of HIT and 20 normal controls were studied. HIT antibodies reacted strongly with wild-type (WT) PF4/heparin complexes, but reacted little, if at all, with NAP-2/heparin complexes (optical density [OD]405 = 2.5 and 0.2, respectively). Alanine substitutions at three of the four lysine residues implicated in heparin binding, K62, K65, and K66, had little effect on recognition by HIT antibodies (OD405 = 2.2, 2.8, and 2.0, respectively), whereas an alanine substitution at position K61 led to reduced, but still significant binding (OD405 = 1.0). Similar studies involving chimeras between PF4 and NAP-2 localized a major antigenic site to the region between the third and fourth cysteine residues for more than half of the sera tested. This site appears to involve a series of amino acids immediately after the third cysteine residue beginning with P37. Thus our studies suggest that whereas the C-terminal lysine residues of PF4 are important for heparin binding, they do not comprise a critical antigenic site for most HIT antibodies. Rather, we propose that maintaining a region near the third cysteine residue of PF4, distal from the proposed heparin-binding domain, is required to form the epitope recognized by many HIT antibodies. © 1998 by The American Society of Hematology.


Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 119 (5) ◽  
pp. 1248-1255 ◽  
Author(s):  
Krystin Krauel ◽  
Christine Hackbarth ◽  
Birgitt Fürll ◽  
Andreas Greinacher

Abstract Heparin is a widely used anticoagulant. Because of its negative charge, it forms complexes with positively charged platelet factor 4 (PF4). This can induce anti-PF4/heparin IgG Abs. Resulting immune complexes activate platelets, leading to the prothrombotic adverse drug reaction heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT). HIT requires treatment with alternative anticoagulants. Approved for HIT are 2 direct thrombin inhibitors (DTI; lepirudin, argatroban) and danaparoid. They are niche products with limitations. We assessed the effects of the DTI dabigatran, the direct factor Xa-inhibitor rivaroxaban, and of 2-O, 3-O desulfated heparin (ODSH; a partially desulfated heparin with minimal anticoagulant effects) on PF4/heparin complexes and the interaction of anti-PF4/heparin Abs with platelets. Neither dabigatran nor rivaroxaban had any effect on the interaction of PF4 or anti-PF4/heparin Abs with platelets. In contrast, ODSH inhibited PF4 binding to gel-filtered platelets, displaced PF4 from a PF4-transfected cell line, displaced PF4/heparin complexes from platelet surfaces, and inhibited anti-PF4/heparin Ab binding to PF4/heparin complexes and subsequent platelet activation. Dabigatran and rivaroxaban seem to be options for alternative anticoagulation in patients with a history of HIT. ODSH prevents formation of immunogenic PF4/heparin complexes, and, when given together with heparin, may have the potential to reduce the risk for HIT during treatment with heparin.


Blood ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 110 (11) ◽  
pp. 3206-3206
Author(s):  
Jawed Fareed ◽  
Margaret Prechel ◽  
Michelle Kujawski ◽  
He Zhu ◽  
Jeanine Walenga ◽  
...  

Abstract It is now widely believed that the pathogenesis of heparin induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is largely mediated via the generation of anti-platelet factor 4-heparin antibodies (APFA) in patients who are treated with heparin and related drugs. In addition antibodies to other heparin binding proteins such as neutrophil activating peptide-2 and interleukins also contribute to this syndrome and which are not detectable by the methods based on heparin platelet factor 4 capture probes. Currently, several immunologic methods mostly utilizing sandwich ELISA techniques to measure APFA in sera of patients with HIT syndrome are available. These methods utilize different capture probes including heparin platelet factor 4 complex (ASSERACHROM® HPIA; Diagnostica Stago, France), platelet factor 4 complexed to polyvinyl sulfonate (PF4 Enhanced; GTI, USA) and heparin protamine suflate along with platelet lysates as a source of PF4 (ZYMUTEST HIA IgGAM; Hyphen Biomedical, France). These different capture probes for the APFA have different affinity for the APFAs. Moreover, these capture probes can also bind to certain other heparin binding proteins. To compare these three methods, samples (n = 100) were selected from banked sera that had been referred to Loyola University Medical Center for the quantitation of HIT antibodies and 14C Serotonin Release Assay (SRA). All of these specimens were initially positive in the GTI PF4 Enhanced ELISA for the presence of anti-heparin platelet factor 4 antibodies with a broad range of antibody titers absorbance range (0.4 – 2.5). For the head to head comparison all of these samples were assayed using the three different methods. In the GTI method the reassayed samples showed 93 out of 100 positive (93%), in the HPIA test 79 out of 100 (79%) and in the ZYMUTEST 56 out of 100 (56%) were positive. Interestingly, the correlation coefficients also showed marked variation (GTI vs ZYMUTEST r2 = 0.38; GTI vs Stago r2 = 0.49; ZYMUTEST vs Stago r2 = 0.67). The prevalence of positive samples was not consistent in the three tests used. This data clearly shows that each of the different ELISA methods exhibit different performance characteristics in binding to not only the APFA but other proteins, which may contribute to the higher false positive prevalence. Moreover, the positive/negative cutoff limits in these assays are arbitrarily set without due consideration of the antibody titer, which can also account for the observed differences. More interestingly, all of the samples positive in the SRA (n = 14) were positive in each of the three methods used with the exception of two samples, which were positive in the GTI, ASSERACHROM® HPIA and negative in the ZYMUTEST. These results clearly indicate the differences in the diagnostic efficacy of various commercially available tests and warrant clinical field trials to validate their reliability in the monitoring of APFA. Furthermore, the diagnostic reliability of these tests can be further improved by immunoglobulin subtyping and utilizing other capture probes with platelet factor 4 and related proteins, which complex with heparins.


Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 117 (4) ◽  
pp. 1370-1378 ◽  
Author(s):  
Krystin Krauel ◽  
Christian Pötschke ◽  
Claudia Weber ◽  
Wolfram Kessler ◽  
Birgitt Fürll ◽  
...  

AbstractA clinically important adverse drug reaction, heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT), is induced by antibodies specific for complexes of the chemokine platelet factor 4 (PF4) and the polyanion heparin. Even heparin-naive patients can generate anti-PF4/heparin IgG as early as day 4 of heparin treatment, suggesting preimmunization by antigens mimicking PF4/heparin complexes. These antibodies probably result from bacterial infections, as (1) PF4 bound charge-dependently to various bacteria, (2) human heparin-induced anti-PF4/heparin antibodies cross-reacted with PF4-coated Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli, and (3) mice developed anti-PF4/heparin antibodies during polymicrobial sepsis without heparin application. Thus, after binding to bacteria, the endogenous protein PF4 induces antibodies with specificity for PF4/polyanion complexes. These can target a large variety of PF4-coated bacteria and enhance bacterial phagocytosis in vitro. The same antigenic epitopes are expressed when pharmacologic heparin binds to platelets augmenting formation of PF4 complexes. Boosting of preformed B cells by PF4/heparin complexes could explain the early occurrence of IgG antibodies in HIT. We also found a continuous, rather than dichotomous, distribution of anti-PF4/heparin IgM and IgG serum concentrations in a cross-sectional population study (n = 4029), indicating frequent preimmunization to modified PF4. PF4 may have a role in bacterial defense, and HIT is probably a misdirected antibacterial host defense mechanism.


1995 ◽  
Vol 73 (01) ◽  
pp. 021-028 ◽  
Author(s):  
J Amiral ◽  
F Bridey ◽  
M Wolf ◽  
C Boyer-Neumann ◽  
E Fressinaud ◽  
...  

SummaryAs heparin-PF4 (H-PF4) complexes are the target for antibodies associated to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT), an ELISA has been developed and optimised for testing antibodies binding to H-PF4. This test was consistently negative in 50 healthy subjects (A492 <0.3) and 35 patients with other causes of thrombocytopenia (A492 <0.5). In contrast, 43 out of 44 HIT patients showed antibodies to H-PF4 (A492 = 1.70 ± 0.81) including 5 patients with a negative platelet aggregation test. In one patient with HIT, antibodies to H-PF4 were already present at day 7, whereas platelet counts dropped ≤ 100 × 109/l only at days 11–12. Surprisingly, among 41 patients under heparin for >7 days, 5 showed antibodies to H-PF4, without HIT. These findings underline the major interest of this ELISA for the early diagnosis of HIT. We also showed that LMWH as well as other sulphated polysaccharides can bind to HIT antibodies in the presence of PF4 and that their reactivity is dependent on the molecular weight and the sulphation grade. The mechanism for HIT involves platelet PF4 receptors which bind the macromolecular H-PF4 complexes formed in the presence of a well defined heparin/PF4 ratio.


Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (16) ◽  
pp. 3345-3352 ◽  
Author(s):  
Krystin Krauel ◽  
Claudia Weber ◽  
Sven Brandt ◽  
Ulrich Zähringer ◽  
Uwe Mamat ◽  
...  

AbstractThe positively charged chemokine platelet factor 4 (PF4) forms immunogenic complexes with heparin and other polyanions. Resulting antibodies can induce the adverse drug effect heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. PF4 also binds to bacteria, thereby exposing the same neoantigen(s) as with heparin. In this study, we identified the negatively charged lipopolysaccharide (LPS) as the PF4 binding structure on Gram-negative bacteria. We demonstrate by flow cytometry that mutant bacteria with progressively truncated LPS structures show increasingly enhanced PF4 binding activity. PF4 bound strongest to mutants lacking the O-antigen and core structure of LPS, but still exposing lipid A on their surfaces. Strikingly, PF4 bound more efficiently to bisphosphorylated lipid A than to monophosphorylated lipid A, suggesting that phosphate residues of lipid A mediate PF4 binding. Interactions of PF4 with Gram-negative bacteria, where only the lipid A part of LPS is exposed, induce epitopes on PF4 resembling those on PF4/heparin complexes as shown by binding of human anti-PF4/heparin antibodies. As both the lipid A on the surface of Gram-negative bacteria and the amino acids of PF4 contributing to polyanion binding are highly conserved, our results further support the hypothesis that neoepitope formation on PF4 after binding to bacteria is an ancient host defense mechanism.


1981 ◽  
Author(s):  
John C Holt ◽  
Marek Kloczewiak ◽  
Daniel A Walz ◽  
Boguslaw Rucinski ◽  
Stefan Niewiarowski

Platelet factor 4 (PF4) and low affinity platelet factor 4 (LA-PF4) are platelet-specific secreted proteins that bind to heparin. β-thromboglobulin (βTG) appears to be derived from LA-PF4 by proteolysis of four NH2-terminal residues. PF4 and LA-PF4 (βTG) show 50% sequence homology including four cysteine residues and two pairs of lysine residues near the C00H-terminus which are believed to be responsible for heparin binding. Despite these similarities, the two proteins have markedly different affinities for heparin. We have sought a structural interpretation of this difference by predicting the conformations of 0TG, LA-PF4 and PF4. First, the proportion of residues in α-helical, β-sheet and unordered conformations was estimated from circular dichroism measurements. The results for PF4 and LA-PF4 were experimentally identical, namely 16% α-helix and 20% β-sheet. These values were then applied as experimental constraints in the prediction of the secondary structure of PF4 and LA-PF4 based on their amino acid sequences. This was done by a computer program which compared local amino acid sequence (each residue and 8 residues on either side) with the conformation of similar sequences in 25 proteins of known structure. With the further constraint of the two disulfide bonds in each molecule, models were constructed representing the overall folding of the polypeptide chains. The only significant difference between the two proteins was in the COOH-terminal region of the chains. The models suggest that the lower affinity of LA-PF4 (and βTG) for heparin may result from steric hindrance by the longer and more negatively charged COOH-terminal segments of these molecules compared with PF4.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andreas Greinacher ◽  
Kathleen Selleng ◽  
Julia Mayerle ◽  
Raghavendra Palankar ◽  
Jan Wesche ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Some recipients of ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 COVID-19 Vaccine AstraZeneca develop antibody-mediated vaccine-induced thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT), associated with cerebral venous and other unusual thrombosis resembling autoimmune heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. A prothrombotic predisposition is also observed in Covid-19. We explored whether antibodies against the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein induced by Covid-19 cross-react with platelet factor 4 (PF4/CXLC4), the protein targeted in both VITT and autoimmune heparin-induced thrombocytopenia.Methods: Immunogenic epitopes of PF4 and SARS-CoV-2 spike protein were compared via prediction tools and 3D modelling software (IMED, SIM, MacMYPOL). Sera from 222 PCR-confirmed Covid-19 patients from five European centers were tested by PF4/heparin ELISA, heparin-dependent and PF4-dependent platelet activation assays. Immunogenic reactivity of purified anti-PF4 and anti-PF4/heparin antibodies from patients with VITT were tested against recombinant SARS-CoV-2 spike protein. Results: Three motifs within the spike protein sequence share a potential immunogenic epitope with PF4. Nineteen of 222 (8.6%) Covid-19 patient sera tested positive in the IgG-specific PF4/heparin ELISA, none of which showed platelet activation in the heparin-dependent activation assay, including 10 (4.5%) of the 222 Covid-19 patients who developed thromboembolic complications. Purified anti-PF4 and anti-PF4/heparin antibodies from two VITT patients did not show cross-reactivity to recombinant SARS-CoV-2 spike protein. Conclusions: The antibody responses to PF4 in SARS-CoV-2 infection and after vaccination with COVID-19 Vaccine AstraZeneca differ. Antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 spike protein do not cross-react with PF4 or PF4/heparin complexes through molecular mimicry. These findings make it very unlikely that the intended vaccine-induced immune response against SARS-CoV-2 spike protein would itself induce VITT.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document